The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-18-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A3. Street Impact Fee Fund CIP for FY21-25 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adoption the Street Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY21-25. AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action MEETING DATE: November 18, 2019 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Street Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY21-25. BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The Public Works Department, City Manager, and other city staff met during September - October to develop the attached Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the capital needs of the Street Impact Fee Fund. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee met on November 5, 2019 and approved the Street Impact fee CIP. The Committee did ask for use to make clearer the total cost of project between the two funds. Based on this feedback we have added a table to both showing the project shares and totals. Relationship to the Strategic Plan: • All the street projects funded by the Arterial and Collector District CIP will include bike lanes and aid in our efforts towards item 4.5 a -Enhance Non-motorized Transportation. 344 Major Project Highlights Underway in the Prior Year: Improvements to Baxter Lane from Davis Lane to 19th Avenue were completed in the summer of 2019 including the addition of a signalized intersection at Baxter Lane and Davis Lane. Improvements that will serve the new high school are under construction and will be complete well in advance of the new high school opening including improvements to Oak Street, Cottonwood Road, and Durston Road and major intersections in the vicinity of the new high school. UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for FY21. Report compiled on: November 7, 2019 Attached: Street Impact Fee Fund CIP Section Requests submitted to the Impact Fee Advisory Committee 345 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP 8,860,180$ 79,976$ (718,325)$ 1,062,642$ (2,219,153)$ (315,419)$ Plus: Impact Fee Revenues Dedicated to CIP 4,790,095$ 4,981,699$ 5,180,967$ 5,388,205$ 5,603,734$ 5,827,883$ ‐$ Plus: Urban Funds: Less: Carryover FY19 Capital Projects (6,005,104)$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs (7,565,195)$ (5,780,000)$ (3,400,000)$ (8,670,000)$ (3,700,000)$ (4,276,000)$ (27,600,000)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP 79,976$ (718,325)$ 1,062,642$ (2,219,153)$ (315,419)$ 1,236,464$ Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current YearFY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25Estimated Annual Street Impact Fee Revenues 4,790,095$ 4,790,095$ 4,981,699$ 5,180,967$ 5,388,205$ 5,603,734$ Estimated Annual Increase ** 0.0% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%Total Estimated Revenues 4,790,095$ 4,981,699$ 5,180,967$ 5,388,205$ 5,603,734$ 5,827,883$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Street Capacity Expansion CIP 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP 4,790,095$ 4,981,699$ 5,180,967$ 5,388,205$ 5,603,734$ 5,827,883$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(5,780,000)$(3,400,000)$(8,670,000)$(3,700,000)$(4,276,000)$(27,600,000)FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 UNSCHEDULEDSTREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS 346 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND PROJECT SUMMARY *Share funding with Arterial & Collector District Fund Project #Project NameFY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 UnscheduledSIF001RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 ‐ SIF009KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION1,000,000 ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 1,000,000 ‐ SIF086*BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF110*MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF112HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 130,000 ‐ ‐ 850,000 ‐ SIF113*GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 2,500,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF114*FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ 3,750,000 1,250,000 ‐ ‐ SIF116*BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF117*STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) 250,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF118*BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 200,000 550,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF138*COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ ‐ 1,670,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF143BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY ‐ ‐ 550,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF144HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 SIF146KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF147*OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 750,000 ‐ SIF149*BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 1,500,000 SIF15015TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 SIF151HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,000,000 SIF152*N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,000,000 SIF153*DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,400,000 SIF154*CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 SIF155KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,000,000 SIF156*HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,000,000 SIF157COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN ‐ ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ SIF158*COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 876,000 ‐ Fiscal Year totals 5,780,000 3,400,000 8,670,000 3,700,000 4,276,000 27,600,000 347 Project # ProjectStreet Impact Fee FundingArterial & Collector FundingTotal Project FundingSIF086 *BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 SIF110 *MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 400,000 2,000,000 SIF113 *GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 3,500,000 2,000,000 5,500,000 SIF114 *FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) 5,000,000 2,500,000 7,500,000 SIF116 *BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 SIF117 *STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) 250,000 250,000 500,000 SIF118 *BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 SIF138 *COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER 1,670,000 1,670,000 3,340,000 SIF147 *OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 SIF149 *BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH 1,800,000 500,000 2,300,000 SIF152 *N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 4,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 SIF153 *DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000 350,000 1,750,000 SIF154 *CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 SIF156 *HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 SIF158 *COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 876,000 1,752,000 348 STREET IMPACT FEE FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND Street Impact Fees go towards capacity expanding road improvements. The Arterial & Collector District will be providing significant amounts of “local share” in advance of the local projects, so that critical portions of the street network can be connected (See the Arterial & Collector CIP). For non‐intersection improvements, the Arterial & Collector District will be “paid back”, in the future, if/when the local project moves forward, or upon annexation via a Payback District arrangement. The Commission’s recent changes that allow waivers for certain projects that are within the first 3 years of the Capital Improvements Plan and have all the necessary right‐of‐way and funding plans, has added pressure to include projects within the first three years, sometimes leading to a large negative balance. Given the fact that lead‐times (design/right of way) and construction timeframes on these projects usually span 24 months, we feel comfortable developing a CIP that could be in a negative position by approximately “one‐year’s‐worth” of revenues at any given point before year five. With the completion of the impact fee study we made our revenue forecast more positive than last year before the adoption of the new fess. With the average revenue being $4.4 million and we have used a growth rate of 4%. 2,934,549.0 4,016,986.0 4,080,090.0 3,978,274.0 5,523,019.0 4,513,015.0 4,422,276.8 ‐ 1,000,000.0 2,000,000.0 3,000,000.0 4,000,000.0 5,000,000.0 6,000,000.02014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 FY15‐FY19AverageStreet Impact Fees349 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY We have made some changes from last year’s plan, SIF001 Right of Way Acquisition amounts have been increased from $250,000 a year to a range of $300,000 to $500,000 due to upcoming projects that need a large amounts of right‐of‐way to be completed. SIF009 Kagy (Wilson to 19th) was slated last year for FY24 but Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is requiring $1 million in FY21 for continued design costs, with the remaining amounts of $2 million and $1 million scheduled for FY24 and FY25 for construction. Per the Commission’s request we added SIF112 Highland to Main Intersection Reimbursement, we are able to fund $130,000 in FY21 and remaining amount of $850,000 in FY25. SIF157 and SIF158 Is a project for College between 8th and 19th has been moved later in the plan due to funding and other projects. Other larger projects that will expand capacity to our road network are SIF 113 Griffin (7th to Rouse), which has been coordinated with MDT’s project in the area. SIF114 Fowler Connection (Huffine to Oak) scheduled for FY23 and FY24 that will increase capacity and extends an important north‐south corridor. Multiple projects were added to the unscheduled portion of the CIP to identify streets priorities in the 5‐10 year timeframe. All the road projects funded by the Street Impact Fee fund will include bike lanes and aid in our efforts towards the Strategic Plan 4.5 a Enhance Non‐motorized Transportation. 350 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THE ‐ EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND CAPACITY ‐ WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL RIGHT‐OF‐ ‐ WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENTS OF THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD POTENTIALLY BE ‐ AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO ‐ WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CAN NOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING ‐ AND MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO ‐ BE A VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST FOR THE STREET ‐ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 50,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2021300,000$ SIF001 (FY21)351 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THAT ‐ THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENT ‐ OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ALL OF THE OTHER STREET ‐ IMPACT FEE PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING ‐ TO WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CAN NOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING ‐ AND MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO ‐ BE A VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 100,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2022350,000$ SIF001 (FY22)352 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS THAT ‐ THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ELEMENT ‐ OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN DOING SO, ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS OFTEN A ‐ PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICAL ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ALL OF THE OTHER ‐ STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE ‐ MARKET. AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC ‐ CONDEMNATION PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO ‐ WAIT FOR VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ STREET IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 150,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2023400,000$ SIF001 (FY23)353 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS ‐ THAT THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN ‐ DOING SO, CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION ‐ MASTER PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS ‐ OFTEN A PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. ‐ ALL OF THE OTHER STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD ‐ POTENTIALLY BE AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET ‐ AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC CONDEMNATION ‐ PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO WAIT FOR ‐ VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS: STREET ‐ IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ INCREASED DUE TO PROJECTS EXPECTED 200,000 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2024450,000$ SIF001 (FY24)354 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ANNUAL ALLOCATION AVAILABLE FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY ‐ PURCHASES AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE. IN ALL CASES, ‐ THE ONLY REASON ADDITIONAL R/W IS REQUIRED IS ‐ THAT THE EXISTING ROADWAY IS BEING EXPANDED AND ‐ CAPACITY WILL BE INCREASED. PURCHASING ADDITIONAL ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY MAY BE CRITICAL TO CONNECTING ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, AND IN ‐ DOING SO, CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY TRANSPORTATION ‐ MASTER PLAN CAN BE OBTAINED. PURCHASE OF R/W IS ‐ OFTEN A PREREQUISITE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. ‐ ALL OF THE OTHER STREET IMPACT FEE PROJECTS COULD ‐ POTENTIALLY BE AFFECTED BY R/W ACQUISITION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONDEMN PROPERTY FOR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY; PAY COURT COSTS ‐ AS WELL AS APPRAISED VALUE OF PROPERTY. TIME ‐ CONSUMING FOR CITY STAFF AND A RELATIVELY ‐ EXPENSIVE PROCESS. WAIT FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY ‐ OWNERS TO DEDICATE R/W AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION/ ‐ DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES DOLLARS FOR THE PURCHASE OF NECESSARY ‐ RIGHT‐OF‐WAY AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE ON THE MARKET ‐ AVOIDS THE EXPENSIVE, ANTAGONISTIC CONDEMNATION ‐ PROCESS WHERE POSSIBLE OR HAVING TO WAIT FOR ‐ VOLUNTARY DEDICATIONS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS: STREET ‐ IMPACT FEES CANNOT BE SPENT ON OPERATING & ‐ MAINTAINING FACILITIES. THERE IS EXPECTED TO BE A ‐ VERY MINIMAL, INCREMENTAL COST TO THE STREET ‐ RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 2025500,000$ SIF001 (FY25)355 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 19TH TO WILLSON AVE TO A ‐ 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTION HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY & THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) & CONFORMANCE WITH ‐ THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED ‐ WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY & 19TH, KAGY & ‐ 11TH, AND KAGY & WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ $1 MILLION IS MOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN ‐ FY24 TO FY21 TO ADVANCE DESIGN BY MDT IN ADVANCE ‐ OF THE PROJECT. MDT HAS ALREADY INVESTED. ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20211,000,000$ SIF009 (FY21)356 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #KAGY(WILLSON TO 19TH)DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF S 19TH AVE TO WILLSON AVE ‐ TO A 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTING HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY ‐ & 19TH, KAGY & 7TH, KAGY & 11TH, AND KAGY & ‐ WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20242,000,000$ SIF009 (FY24)357 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #KAGY(WILLSON TO 19TH)DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF RECONSTRUCTING KAGY BLVD ‐ FROM THE INTERSECTION OF S 19TH AVE TO WILLSON AVE ‐ TO A 4 LANE URBAN ARTERIAL STANDARD. THIS PROJECT ‐ DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS & ‐ MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERSECTIONS. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ KAGY SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF BOZEMAN'S ‐ PERIMETER STREET SYSTEM CONNECTING HIGHLAND BLVD, ‐ WILLSON AVE, AND S 19TH. IT ALSO SERVES AS THE ‐ PRIMARY ACCESS TO MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND THE ‐ UNIVERSITY'S MAJOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES. THE LEVEL ‐ OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED WITH THIS PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT KAGY ‐ & 19TH, KAGY & 7TH, KAGY & 11TH, AND KAGY & ‐ WILLSON. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, URBAN FUNDS, INCREMENTAL CONSTRUCTION BY ‐ ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING & MAINTENANCE COSTS:INCREMENTAL ‐ INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & GENERAL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LST CIP: ‐ NONE ‐ KAGY (WILLSON TO 19TH) DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION 20251,000,000$ SIF009 (FY25)358 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ 2,000,000 CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION AT BAXTER AND COTTONWOOD. ‐ THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY STOP ‐ CONTROLLED. REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL OR ‐ ROUNDABOUT WILL GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. ‐ EAST‐WEST CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS ‐ LOCATION. NORTH‐SOUTH CONNECTIVITY IS STILL ‐ LACKING. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) ‐ AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER ‐ PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER ‐ AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE COTTONWOOD CORRIDOR ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AND BAXTER CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ IDENTIFIED IN THE 2007 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE. ‐ INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR OTHER ADEQUATE TRAFFIC CONTROL ‐ DEVICE WHEN WARRANTS ARE MET. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BAXTER & COTTONWOOD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20232,000,000$ SIF086359 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 1,600,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT MANLEY & ‐ GRIFFIN. THIS INTERSECTION IS CURRENTLY 1‐WAY ‐ STOP CONTROLLED REPLACING IT WITH A SIGNAL WILL ‐ GREATLY INCREASE ITS CAPACITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. A PAYBACK DISTRICT ‐ OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER ‐ STAKEHOLDERS. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN MOVED TO ‐ COINCIDE WITH THE GRIFFIN CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION & ‐ MDT'S GRIFFIN & 7TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ SIF1101,600,000$ 2021MANLEY & GRIFFIN (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) 360 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 130,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PER CITY COMMISSION DIRECTION, DEVELOPER TO BE ‐ REIMBURSED IN 2 FISCAL YEARS. $130K IN FY21 & ‐ $850K IN FY25. ‐ HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 850,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CITY COMMISSION DIRECTION, DEVELOPER TO BE REIMBURSED IN 2 FISCAL YEARS. $130K IN FY21 & ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NONE ‐ INCLUDED PER COMMISSION DIRECTION. ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: NONE CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ADDED PER COMMISSION DIRECTION. HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 2021130,000$ SIF112 (FY21)HIGHLAND & MAIN INTERSECTION REIMBURSEMENT 2025850,000$ SIF112 (FY25)361 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ALTERNATIVE FINANCING COULD BE PROVIDED BY ‐ CREATING AN SID OR PAYBACK DISTRICT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ‐ GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20211,000,000$ SIF113 (FY21)362 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2 2,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT W GRIFFIN CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS FROM N. ‐ 7TH TO ROUSE TO AN URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. ‐ DESIGNED IMPROVEMENTS WILL IMPROVE LOS AT THE KEY ‐ INTERSECTIONS AND WILL INCREASE CAPACITY IN THE ‐ CORRIDOR AS A WHOLE. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS ‐ AT THIS LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY WHICH IS BEING ‐ EXPANDED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ‐ (LOS) STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS AT GRIFFIN AND 7TH AND GRIFFIN AND ‐ ROUSE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (DO NOTHING). ‐ ALTERNATIVE FINANCING COULD BE PROVIDED BY ‐ CREATING AN SID OR PAYBACK DISTRICT. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY OF OUR ‐ STREET NETWORK AND IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND ‐ PEDESTRIANS. FACILITATES DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY ‐ OCCURRING IN THIS PART OF THE CITY AND NETWORK ‐ PERFORMANCE OVERALL. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ‐ GRIFFIN (7TH TO ROUSE) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20222,500,000$ SIF113 (FY22)363 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 3,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO ‐ OAK. THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER, ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS ‐ OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS ‐ PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, ‐ BABCOCK, DURSTON, AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20233,750,000$ SIF114 (FY23)364 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE THE SECTION OF FOWLER FROM HUFFINE TO ‐ OAK. THIS PROJECT ALLOWS FOR EXTENSION OF FOWLER, ‐ WHICH WILL DIRECTLY INCREASE CAPACITY, AND IT ‐ EXTENDS AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH CORRIDOR ON THE ‐ WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH ‐ IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED ‐ TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS ‐ OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS ‐ PROJECT. OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON FOWLER AT HUFFINE, ‐ BABCOCK, DURSTON, AND OAK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ COMPLETES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ON ‐ OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ FOWLER CONNECTION (HUFFINE TO OAK) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20241,250,000$ SIF114 (FY24)365 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION 1,200,000 IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE THE INTERSECTION CONTROL AT BRIDGER AND ‐ STORY MILL. ADDING ADDITIONAL PHASES AND IMPROVING ‐ GEOMETRY WILL INCREASE CAPACITY FOR DEFICIENT ‐ MOVEMENTS AT THIS INTERSECTION. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ CONFORMANCE WITH THE TRANPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐ WILL BE ATTAINED AT COMPLETION. OTHER AFFECTED ‐ PROJECTS INCLUDE STORY MILL, GRIFFIN‐BRIDGER DR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT LOS ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THIS INTERSECTION ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BRIDGER DR & STORY MILL RD (INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20211,200,000$ SIF116366 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 250,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE STORY MILL FROM GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER. THIS ‐ PROJECT DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ‐ ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND ‐ SIDEWALKS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS ‐ INTERSECTION AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ‐ UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF ‐ THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT ‐ FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE INCOMPLETE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY IS PUTTING ‐ UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE STREET ‐ NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT THE ‐ COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR ‐ SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ OTHER AFFECTED PROJECTS INCLUDE INTERSECTION ‐ IMPROVEMENTS TO STORY MILL AND BRIDGER DRIVE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR AND ‐ CONSTRUCT THE ROAD INCREMENTALLY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVES AN IMPORTANT NORTH‐SOUTH LINK IN THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION NETWORK WHICH REDUCES DEMAND ‐ ON OTHER ADJACENT CORRIDORS. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ STORY MILL (GRIFFIN TO BRIDGER) ‐ CONSTRUCTION 2021250,000$ SIF117367 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) DESIGN 200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 15TH TO 19TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE CORRIDOR ‐ AT A TIME MORE FAVORABLE TO THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 2021200,000$ SIF118 (FY21)368 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) CONSTRUCTION 550,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 15TH TO 19TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ALLOWS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE CORRIDOR ‐ AT A TIME MORE FAVORABLE TO THE CITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BABCOCK (15TH TO 19TH) 2022550,000$ SIF118 (FY22)369 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,670,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF A 5 LANE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ SID, PAYBACK DISTRICT, TOPS, INCREMENTAL ‐ CONSTRUCTION BY ADJACENT DEVELOPERS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL EXPAND THE CAPACITY AND IMPROVE ‐ THE CONNECTIVITY OF THE CITY STREET NETWORK. IT ‐ WILL IMPROVE SAFETY FOR DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS ‐ AND IMPROVE ACCESS TO THE SPORTS PARK. IT WILL ‐ FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY OCCURRING IN THIS ‐ PART OF THE CITY. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY 550,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ PURCHASE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY NECESSARY FOR THE ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF THE BAXTER & COTTONWOOD ‐ INTERSECTION IMPROVMENTS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOT CONSTRUCT INTERSECTION UNTIL ROW OBTAINED ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW AN INTERSECTION TO BUILT ‐ ADD OPERATIONAL COSTS: ‐ N/A ‐ COTTONWOOD ROAD, OAK TO BAXTER ‐ CONSTRUCTION 20231,670,000$ SIF138BAXTER & COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION ‐ RIGHT OF WAY 2023550,000$ SIF143370 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MDT HAS NOT ALLOWED AN UPGRADE TO THIS ‐ INTERSECTION IN THE PAST DUE TO THE PROXIMITY TO ‐ THE FREEWAY OFF RAMP. HOWEVER, THIS IS A CRITICAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT CITY STAFF WILL REQUEST MDT RECONSIDER ‐ ALLOWING A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION UPGRADE AT THIS ‐ LOCATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING AND ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ MSU CLOSED GRANT STREET, REROUTING TRAFFIC TO KAGY ‐ RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT DELAYS AT 11TH AND KAGY. ‐ THIS WOULD BE AN INTERIM UPGRADE UNTIL THE KAGY ‐ ROAD PROJECT IS COMPLETED IN FY24. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT UNTIL KAGY IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED IN FY24 ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ IMPROVEMENTS ADDED TO THE CIP DUE TO THE CLOSURE ‐ OF GRANT STREET. GRANT CLOSURE IS REQUIRED FOR THE ‐ RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ROMNEY GYM AFTER IT'S ‐ UNEXPECTED COLLAPSE THIS PAST WINTER. ‐ HAGGERTY/MAIN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED2,000,000$ SIF144KAGY/11TH INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS 2021100,000$ SIF146371 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EASTBOUND LANE RECONFIGURATION & SIGNAL UPGRADE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES. GENERAL MAINTENANCE. ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM ‐ BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH DESIGN 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 11TH TO 15TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ OAK & 19TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2025750,000$ SIF147 BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH 2025300,000$ SIF149 (FY25)372 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH CONSTRUCTION 1,500,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ IMPROVE BABCOCK FROM 11TH TO 15TH. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ‐ ALLOWED TO PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN ‐ PLACE. FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS ‐ DEPENDENT ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. ‐ THE INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS ‐ VICINITY IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ‐ ELEMENTS OF THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ 15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS (DESIGN & 500,000 CONSTRUCTION) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ SUPPLEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT FUNDING FOR ‐ CONSTRUCTION ‐ BABCOCK ‐ 11TH TO 15TH UNSCHEDULED1,500,000$ SIF149 (UNSCHEDULED)15TH ‐ PATRICK TO BAXTER IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED500,000$ SIF150 373 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY 7,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE HIGHLAND FROM MAINT TO KAGY. FUTURE ‐ DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO ‐ PROCEED UNTIL THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ THIS PROJECT DIRECTLY INCREASES CAPACITY BY ADDING ‐ ADDITIONAL LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & ‐ SIDEWALKS. CONNECTIVITY ALREADY EXISTS AT THIS ‐ LOCATION, IT IS CAPACITY THAT IS AFFECTED. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. CONFORMANCE ‐ WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ‐ ATTAINED AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. A ‐ PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE CREATED TO LEVERAGE ‐ OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL 4,000,000 4,000,000$ DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT N 27TH TO A CITY COLLECTOR STREET ‐ STANDARD BETWEEN BAXTER AND CATTAIL. ‐ DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,400,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECTION OF DURSTON & 27TH. ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT THE INTERSECITON OF DURSTON & 27TH ‐ ROUNDABOUT OR SIGNAL. ‐ HIGHLAND ‐ MAIN TO KAGY UNSCHEDULED7,000,000$ SIF151N 27TH ‐ BAXTER TO CATTAIL UNSCHEDULEDSIF152DURSTON & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED1,400,000$ SIF153CATTAIL & 27TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED1,200,000$ SIF154374 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND 8,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ COMPLETE KAGY FROM WILLSON TO HIGHLAND, INCLUDING ‐ THE INTERSECTION AT HIGHLAND & KAGY. THIS PROJECT ‐ INCREASES CAPACITY DIRECTLY BY ADDING ADDITIONAL ‐ LANES, DEDICATED BIKE LANES & SIDEWALKS AND BY ‐ IMPROVING INTERSECTION LOS. FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS ‐ WHICH IMPACT THIS AREA MAY NOT BE ALLOWED TO ‐ PROCEED UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN PLACE. ‐ FUNCTIONALITY OF THE NETWORK AT LARGE IS DEPENDENT ‐ ON THIS ELEMENT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE ‐ INCOMPLETE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THIS VICINITY ‐ IS PUTTING UNNECESSARY DEMAND ON THOSE ELEMENTS OF ‐ THE STREET NETWORK THAT ARE IN PLACE. THE LEVEL OF ‐ SERVICE STANDARD (BMC) AND CONFORMANCE WITH THE ‐ TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN WILL BE ATTAINED AT ‐ COMPLETION. A PAYBACK DISTRICT OR SID MAY BE ‐ CREATED TO LEVERAGE OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT TO INSTALL THE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS SECTION BY SECTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ INCREMENTAL INCREASES IN SWEEPING, PLOWING & ‐ GENERAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADES TO THE INTERSECTION OF HIGHLAND AND KAGY, ‐ MOST LIKELY A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION, TO ADDRESS ‐ LEVEL OF SERVICE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ DO NOTHING. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ CHANGES FROM LAST CIP: ‐ NEW ITEM. ‐ KAGY:WILLSON TO HIGHLAND UNSCHEDULED8,000,000$ SIF155HIGHLAND/KAGY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS UNSCHEDULED2,000,000$ SIF156375 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN 300,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REDESIGN COLLEGE, FROM 19TH TO 8TH, TO AN URBAN ‐ MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN ‐ A FAILING CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; ‐ HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME ‐ DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO ‐ MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL PROVIDE THE DESIGN FOR A CITY STANDARD STREET ‐ SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, ‐ PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE WHICH WILL IMPROVE ‐ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ‐ ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE AND MS4 PERMIT ‐ COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT COMPLETION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT FAILING CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ENHANCES SAFETY AND DRAINAGE, PRESERVES PAVEMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐DESIGN 2023300,000$ SIF157376 Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 876,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REDESIGN COLLEGE, FROM 19TH TO 8TH, TO AN URBAN ‐ MINOR ARTERIAL STANDARD. THE STREET IS ALREADY IN ‐ A FAILING CONDITION AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION; ‐ HOWEVER, EVENTUALLY THE STREET WILL BECOME ‐ DETERIORATED TO A POINT WHERE IT IS UNFEASIBLE TO ‐ MAINTAIN AND KEEP OPEN TO PUBLIC USE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL PROVIDE THE DESIGN FOR A CITY STANDARD STREET ‐ SECTION, WITH ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, ‐ PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE WHICH WILL IMPROVE ‐ PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. ALSO, NEW ASPHALT AND DRAINAGE ‐ IMPROVEMENTS WILL ELIMINATE POTHOLES AND MINIMIZE ‐ ICE BUILDUP. ADA COMPLIANCE AND MS4 PERMIT ‐ COMPLIANCE WILL BE MET AT COMPLETION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ ACCEPT THE CURRENT FAILING CONFIGURATION. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ ENHANCES SAFETY AND DRAINAGE, PRESERVES PAVEMENT. ‐ ADD OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ COLLEGE(8TH TO 19TH)‐CONSTRUCTION 2025876,000$ SIF158377 Memorandum TO: Kristin Donald, Finance Director FROM: Shawn Kohtz, City Engineer SUBJECT: Street Impact Fee Capital Improvements Request Summary for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Impact Fee Funding Requests: Multiple funding requests were made from the Street Impact Fee Program, and those requests are summarized here. All requests are attached for reference. Blackmore Bend – East Main Street and Highland Boulevard Intersection Upgrades The developer of the Blackmore Bend project requested reimbursement of additional costs for an upgrade the Highland and Main intersection. This request was previously presented to the City Commission, and the draft CIP reflects direction from Commission. Laurel Parkway C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. requested extension of 1,340-feet of Laurel Parkway to be included in the street impact fee CIP to support Norton Ranch Subdivision Phase 5. This segment of Laurel Parkway would connect to Laurel Parkway in the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision. Staff considered this request. However, this project isn’t a high priority relative to other projects identified in the CIP, so this request was not included in the draft CIP. Nelson Meadows Subdivision Morrison Maierle, as the design professional for the Nelson Meadows Subdivision, requested multiple reimbursements in support of the Nelson Meadows Subdivision:  The developer requested reimbursement for right-of-way dedications for streets and utility infrastructure. The City’s development code requires such dedications from the developer without reimbursement from City funds. Therefore, this request is invalid and cannot be reimbursed from street impact fee funds.  The developer requested reimbursement for construction of Nelson Road to a collector street standard. Staff considered this request. However, this 378 project isn’t a high priority relative to other projects identified in the CIP, so this request was not included in the draft CIP.  The developer requested reimbursement for construction of Prince Lane from the intersection of Royal Wolf Way to the Frontage Road. This is a local street. City development code requires developers to construct all local streets at the developer’s cost. Therefore, this is not a valid request for reimbursement.  Other requests were submitted with respect to this development relating to the water and sewer impact fee program. Those requests will be addressed in the corresponding fund memo. Bozeman Area Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee The Bozeman Area Pedestrian and Traffic Safety (PTS) Committee submitted six requests for street impact fee funding.  Bike/pedestrian accommodation on the Valley Center Spur: PTS requested funding to install bike and pedestrian improvements at the Valley Center Spur intersection. This road is outside City limits and therefore cannot be funded with City funds. Additionally, this request was made to Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) in conjunction with construction of the new intersection at the Valley Center Spur and Frontage Road. MDT elected not to install bike and pedestrian improvements with that intersection and the Spur upgrade project.  Construction of the fourth leg of the Valley Center Spur and Frontage Road intersection: MDT is now allowing the fourth leg of the intersection to be constructed despite substantial and multiple requests from City staff and City Management to allow completion of the fourth leg of the intersection. If MDT allowed construction of the fourth leg, the developer of the Nelson Meadows Subdivision would be required to build the fourth leg at their cost per the subdivision preliminary plat requirement. Therefore, this improvement is not included in the draft CIP.  The Frontage Road Path: A request is made to fund construction of the frontage road path between Belgrade and Bozeman. Staff considered this request. However, this project isn’t a high priority relative to other projects identified in the CIP, so this request was not included in the draft CIP.  The intersection of East Main and Highland Boulevard: funding was requested to install a pedestrian crossing at the west leg of the intersection. However, this project is complete, and the completed project meets the requirements of the Blackmore Bend site plan application and MDT requirements. Therefore, an item was not added to the draft CIP for additional funding. 379  Haggerty Street Sidewalk: A request was made to install sidewalk along Haggerty lane from Ellis Street to East Main Street. Staff considered this request. However, this project isn’t a high priority relative to other projects identified in the CIP, so this request was not included in the draft CIP. However, the City may elect to order in these sidewalks per City Code as an alternate means of installing this segment of sidewalk with the cost of these sidewalks born by adjacent property owners.  A Line item for construction of shared use paths: PTS requested a line item for construction of shared use paths of $500,000 per year for staff directed connection of paths. Staff considered this request. Shared use paths are constructed where the Transportation Master Plan or the Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan (PROST) call for a shared use path adjacent to streets projects that are scheduled in the CIP. As such, the draft CIP does not include additional funding for shared use paths beyond funding already dedicated with specific streets projects. North 15th Avenue Philip Saccoccia requested construction of North 15th Avenue from Patrick Street to Tschache Lane to support his development project west of North 15th Avenue. Staff considered this request. Staff consider this improvement to be specific to the needs of development in the vicinity of the improvement. As such, the improvement should be funded by development in the vicinity of the improvement. 380 June 5,2019East Main Investments, LLC1276 North 15th, Suite 104Bozeman MT 59715Shawn KohtzCity Engineer20 E. Olive St. 1st FloorBozeman, MT 59715RE: Blackmore Bend - East Main Street and Highland Boulevard Intersection UpgradesDearShawn,I hope this letter finds you well. I appreciated our conversation last week regarding the city's ability tocontribute an additional $130,000 in impact fee credits toward the East Main Street and HighlandBoulevard intersection upgrades. The work that you and the city management team completed toidentify the additional funds from the CIP is noted and appreciated on our side.As we discussed, I am writing to you now to ask the city to consider a couple of additional approachesthat still involve the use of impact fee credits to help reach the goal of $750,000 in total city participation.The first approach is to have the balance of the requested funds issued as impact fee credits in the nextcapital improvements planning cycle to avoid the dilemma created bydeprioritizingone of the projectsbudgeted for in the current CIP.The second alternative is to have impact fee credits issued annually over a period of five years in$150,000 increments. This suggestion is intended to spread out the investment over a period of time andthereby decreasing the impact to any one year's capital improvements budget to an amount that is moreeasily absorbed by the city.I acknowledge that both of these alternatives are outside of what the city has historically done and willrequire evaluation by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and ultimately the City Commission. Please letme know what timeline we might expect in terms of appearing before both of those bodies. Consideringthe magnitude of the monies involved and implications it represents for our project, we would be gratefulif we were granted the opportunity to meet with both bodies as soon as practically possible.Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or comments. You can contact me at (406)579-2316 or via email at dcape@jwtcompanies.com. As always, I am appreciative of your help in processingthis request and the other assistance you have provided in working through the broader Blackmore Bendproject.Sincerely,^Do(rfCape,Jr.East Main Investments, LLC381 TEngineering and Surveying Inc.1091 Stoneridge Drive • Bozeman, Montana • Phone(406)587-1115 • Fax(406)587-9768www.chengineers.com • E-Mail: info@chengineers.comOctober 23, 2019City ofBozemanChris Saunders, AICPShawn Kohtz, PE20 E. OliveBozeman,MT59718RE: Capital Improvements Plan Addition Request - Laurel Parkway (#161141)Dear Mr. Saunders and Mr. Kohtz,It is requested that the 1,340-foot extension of Laurel Parkway (CIP # FMSN-31), as proposedwith the Norton East Ranch Subdivision - Phase 5 preliminary plat, be added to the CapitalImprovements Plan to be eligible for impact fee reimbursement in 2020. Norton East RanchSubdivision, Phase 5 proposes to extend Laurel Parkway to connect to the Lakes at Valley WestSubdivision as an enhanced collector street (with landscaped median).This application includes costs for widening Laurel Parkway to a 62' wide collector standardwith a landscaped median consistent with the existing cross section for Laurel Parkway. Thesuggested local street standards are identified in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan(2007) update as 31' wide. The 31' wide local street would adequately serve Phase 5 based onthe future traffic projections. Norton Properties, LLC is requesting funding from the RoadImpact Fee Fund to cover the cost differential between the needed 31' wide road and the required62' wide collector street with a landscaped median. The amount of this request is $453,744.00.Please see the enclosed spreadsheet for the quantity takeoff for installing Laurel Parkway as a62' wide collector with landscaped median versus installing Laurel Parkway as a 31' wide localstreet.This request will fill the gaps of an important collector connection and will result in a fullyconstructed collector street from Oak Street to Fallon Street. This connection will provide animportant link between Babcock Street (collector) and Durston Road (minor arterial) and connectthe Norton Ranch Subdivision to the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision. There is currently onlyone north/south collector connection from Huffine Lane to Oak Street located west of 19Avenue (Ferguson Avenue). The next available north/south connection to Durston Road fromHuffine Lane to the west is Gooch Hill Road - a sub-standard County road.Sincerely,Matthew Hausauer, P.E.Civil/Structural Engineering and Surveying382 Norton East Ranch Subdivision, Phase 5 Improvements ([Laurel Parkway] Collector - 62" Wide]PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY TAKEOFF - PRELIMINARY10/21/19QUANTITY | UNIT | UNIT PRICE] C^ST-IITEM NO. IDESCRIPTIONWATER1-112" CL 51 DIP1,377LF$58.00$79,8661-212" GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY4EA$2,550.00$10,200TT^2"x8" CROSS1EA-$1,000.00$1,0001-412" CAP AND BLOWOFF1EA$2,350.00$2,350"1-5"FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY4EA-$4,700.00$18,800TOTAL$Tl2,216STORM SEWERY--l15" PVC A-2000 STORM WATER PIPE225LF^$38^0~$8,550"2-2CURB INLET/MANHOLE COMBO (48")6EA$4,500.00$27,0002-3POND OUTLET STRUCTURE (48")3EA$3,000.00$9,0002-4GRADE RETENTION/DETENTION PONDS3EA$3,200.00$9,600STREET IMPROVEMENTSTOTAL$54,1503-1COMPACTED SUB-GRADE CUT VOLUME (HAUL OFF)7,148CY$2.00$14,2963-2COMPACTED SUB-GRADE FILL VOLUME0CY$2.00~w-3-3-6" MINUS PIT RUN (18" THICK COMPACTED)4,765CY$18.00$85,7783-41 'A" MINUS CRUSHED BASE COURSE (6" THICK COMPACTED)1,588CY~$22.00$34,9473-5HOT PLANT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (4" THICK COMPACTED)1,999TONS^82^0~$163,907y-6"GEOTEXTILE FABRIC9,531SY~$2.00$19,0623-7CURB & GUTTER5,360LF$12.00$64,3203-8COMPACTION & TESTING OF SUBGRADE1LS$3,000.00$3,0003-9^TANDARD'CONCRETE FILLETS/INTERSECTION DOUBLE GUTTER1EA~$2,750.00$2,7503-106' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (6" THICK)16,081SF_$9.00$144,7333-11"ADA DOUBLE CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP4EA$2,500.00$10,0003-12^IGNAGE (STREET, NO PARKING, ETC.)EA$550.00$4,4003-13PAVEMENT MARKINGS1LS$5,500.00$5,500TOTAL$552,693MISCELLANEOUS4-1MOBILIZATION1LS$4,500.00$4,500"4-2EROSION CONTROL MEASURES1LS$6,500.00$6,5004-3WETLAND PERMITTING AND MITIGATION1LS$30,000.00$30,0004-4CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL1LS_$0^0~~w4-5-DEWATERING DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION1LS$3,500.00$3,5004-6BACKFILL AROUND CURBS1LS$1,500.00$1,5004-7IRRIGATE AND LANDSCAPE MEDIANS11,200SF$3.50$39,2004-8INSTALL COLLECTOR STREET LIGHTS3EA$8,044.00$24,132TOTAL$109,332PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL:$828,391383 Norton East Ranch Subdivision, Phase 5 Improvements ([Laurel Parkway] Local - 31' Wide) 10/21/19PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS QUANTITY TAKEOFF - PRELIMINARYI ITEM NO. | DESCRIPTIONQUANTITYl UNIT | UNJt PRICE |COST |WATER1-1-8" CL 51 DIP1,377LF$50.00$68,8501-28" GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY4Eh^2,400.00$9,6001-38"x8" CROSS1EA$1,000.00$1,0001-48" CAP AND BLOWOFF1EA$2,250.00$2,250STREET IMPROVEMENTSTOTAL$81,700TTCOMPACTED SUB-GRADE CUT VOLUME (HAUL OFF)3,679-CY-$3.00$11,0382-2"COMPACTED SUB-^RADE FILLVOLUME0CY$16.00$02-36" MINUS PIT RUN (12" THICK COMPACTED)1,635_CY$18.00$29,4352-41 '/z" MINUS CRUSHED BASE COURSE (6" THICK COMPACTED)818CY-$22.00~$17,9882-5HOT PLANT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE (3" THICK COMPACTED)700TONS-$82.00$57,409^TGEOTEXTILE FABRIC4,906SY$2.00$9,8122-7"CURB & GUTTER2,680_LF$12.00$32,1622-8COMPACTION & TESTING OF SUBGRADE1LS$2,800.00$2,800-2-9STANDARD CONCRETE FILLETS/INTERSECTION DOUBLE GUTTER-1EA"$27750.00$2,750J^o~5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4" THICK)^3,401"ST$7.00$93,808^ITADA DOUBLE CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP4EA$2,500.00$10,0002-12"SIGNAGE (STREET7NO PARKING, ETC.)4EA$550.00$2,200MISCELLANEOUSTOTAL$269^40T~3^~MOBILIZATION-1Ts"^47500.00$4,5003-2EROSION CONTROL MEASURES1LS$6,000.00$6,0003-3CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL1Ts~$0.00$0~3^4~DEWATERING DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION-lLS~-$37500.00$3,500~3^BACKFILL AROUND CURBS1LS$1,500.00$1,5003-6INSTALL LOCAL INTERSECTION STREET LIGHT1EA$8,044.00$8,044TOTAT$23,544PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL:$374,647384 t,1 Morrisoni Maierleengineers • surveyors planners * scicn'tistsMemoTO: Chris SaundersFROM: Matt EkstromDATE: September 16, 2019JOB NO.: 2286.009RE: Nelson Meadows Subdivision - Impact Fee CreditsCC: Kent Merselis, Susan Swimleywlr^\iSl^\//[Fr^.£uf^!n)iSEP172BH /|fi|DUrgentI For ReviewdPlease Comment QPIease ReplyJForYour UseThis memorandum continues our initial communication of April 22, 2019 wherein we discussedthe process of applying for City Impact Fee credits as a means of reimbursement for those costsincurred in providing the City with increased land contributions and over-standard improvementsabove and beyond that required by code compliance. In August our contractor, Knife River,presented us with the Change Order that summarized the cost for each over-standardimprovement items which provided us with the supporting cost information for this application.The value of the land is based upon a less-than-average summary of comparable lot sales thathave already been place in escrow.The attached information is our Impact Fee Credit Application for the Nelson MeadowsSubdivision (COB review #18458). Per your email request (see attached email from 9/6/19) wehave prepared the following information:1) LAND: The 30' dedicated Right-of-Way (ROW) on the north boundary of the property.This is preliminary plat condition of approval #36 (see attached conditions of approval).The area contained in this dedication is 1.41 acres f61.420 SF) (30' wide by 2047.78'long). See the attached highlighted section on the Plat located in Appendix A for details.The cost for this ROW is ($8.50 / SF x 61,420 SF) = $522,066.00. The $8.5 / SF is the1 going price for land in the Nelson Meadows Subdivision.2) LAND: Nelson Road was built to a Collector road standard per the COB TransportationPlan. The Nelson Meadows Subdivision traffic generation would only dictate that NelsonRoad be built to a Local road standard. The Collector road standard requires a 90' ROWcompared to 60' ROW for the Local road standard. Therefore the difference in ROW widthon the Nelson Meadows Subdivision property is 15'. The area contained in this dedicationis 0.774 acres (33.715 SF) (15' wide by 2249.13' long). See the attached highlightedPage 1385 yl•• Mor'ri?onNelson Meadows Subdivision - Impact Fee Creditssection on the Plat located in Appendix A for details. The cost for this ROW is ($8.50 / SFx 33,715 SF)= $286,581.003) LAND: The extension of Prince Lane from the intersection of Royal Wolf Way to theFrontage Road ROW. This ROW contains 0.826 acres f36.000SF) (60' wide by 600' long).See the attached highlighted section on the Plat located in Appendix A for details. Thecost for this ROW is ($8.50 / SF x 36,000 SF) = $306,000.004) STREET: As was stated above, Nelson Road was built to a Collector road standard perthe COB Transportation Plan. Located in Appendix B is the cost difference betweenbuilding a Local road vs a Collector road. This cost difference is based on Knife River's(general contractor on the Nelson Meadows project) bid dated March 15th, 2019 (bid tabsare in Appendix B). Also located in Appendix B are the road plans for Nelson Road. Thecost difference = $232,065.64 (this includes the extra road width, striping, signage, andstorm drain).5) STREET: The extension of Prince Lane from the intersection of Royal Wolf Way to theFrontage Road ROW. The cost of this road extension is included in Appendix C. Alsolocated in Appendix C are the road plans for Prince Lane. The estimated cost to constructthis portion of Prince Lane = $106,437.506) WATER: A 16" water main was requested by the COB to run through the Nelson MeadowsSubdivision. The cost difference between a 16" main and an 8" main (which is what theNelson Meadows Subdivision project would require) is located in Appendix D. Theestimated cost to oversize the water main to 16" = $339,363.00. The 16" water plan sheetsare also located in Appendix D.7) MONTANA RAIL LINK PERMITTING: In our negotiations with Montana Rail Link (MRL)to secure Utility Occupancy Permits for Nelson Meadows project, it became apparent thatthe existing 8" water main and the 1.5" sewer force main serving the MDT facility on NelsonRoad were never permitted through MRL. In order to get approvals on the Nelson Meadowpermits MRL required us submit the after the fact Utility Occupancy Permits for the MDTutilities. The cost for submitting these permits = $3,431.00 ($1200 of this total is for permitfees to MRL). The permits are attached in Appendix E.Chris, we sincerely appreciate your assistance with our application process and look forward tocompleting the application over the next few weeks. Please do not hesitate to contact us shouldyou require additional information.N:\2286\009\04 DesignV^gency Submittal\COB\Tech Memo to Chris Saunders - Impact Fee Credit 090619.docxPage 2386 )CITY OF BOZEMANDEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CREDIT REQUESTDate RecievedDay_ Month_ YearStreets | | FireWateraWastewaterApplicantStreeVP.O. BoxCity/State/ZipOwnerStreeVP.O. BoxCity/State/ZipLegal Desc.Site AddressProject TitleProject Desc.^a^^f/1 ^«4/ /^/^^'ej. ZL^-C7<?/ (^ofof ^^e.K^-ieAu^, i^TT S-^7/^~Sft/ZT'l^^C^ P^>rt^l4es Z.4C7c?/ (go/c/ ^f.SO-IC^A', f^i- S'^7tS'/1^4-iA/ ^castc^is ^uU/ih^r^ - serYrf S'e^i/.^ 27- S t^e % Sa.^ 27T I S ^'S€ . <&»/4^^ <^^AA/e./so'^ ^oo( _bif^ /l/l*<f£fUft.^ ^^Al/^/^ .^u^e/t'yifi/ti^Reason for Credit Request[""^DedicationsLocation of Credit Items A/Q/SO/V Mf^io^ ^/u ^ft't/i^^JExcess Capacity Required ImprovementsProject Unrelated Off-Site ImprovementsDescription of the basis and facts which create a qualification for Credit^e</ A^^ff ^'A^^rCP^f'A^ /l4(i^D/Prepared by:Address/^1^[\^ /4^^1(. 3^/Cz^o 7&4 ^// ^V^/, /?^^ ^/ ^77 /y / -^/^/-^^7-^Z^Tf, being first duly sworn upon oath, states that allinfoyfnation contained in this request is true, correct and complete to the best of myknowledge and all attatched materials and documents are correct and complete.Subscribed and sworn to before me this i~l~^ day of ^p^H\[a^ , 2Q_J_3_.zL^.. w. £/^^/.<5?UE°fe.^CYNTHIA M EDGMONDiNotary Public^?.^oTAR//i^.l^for the State of Montana;. SEAL .•^r^ Bozeman, Montana'%:A.-.;rtt^? My Commission Expires:^'.OF,M0^^ ' "becembel:08, 2020"Notary Public for the State of If^/r/s^^residing at ft»oz.^m6jn WT.JMy Commission Expires \^f.r^.^ ^^ Q^, SiQJ^Revised 12/2/2008387 II^1IIilAti!@K's ^£ 2E 5Nf\J^^-(N(Ua:-QiEroX:cnccBt-^Im<u01•cro0~•a-0H3(J^1°L-~a>-0.c 0-"ai 0ro ^>v^EENit^s- ^cc"3o1 S^..li3sl1-2^Itro^ wL---o 'aiC£.£:^ls.^ -5 &S S"i ^-cE *:•2 5 .0 uW t- UI01Iw ±sIc^0CN)-=tr^ItIt(U^>.<uMcdu'^-1^-ssVIy.gs^u0(UcoJ3S30^3T3s30r<s ^0^^0i-^>^0<uPlK gu2(Ds's^.s0^§3^tifl.-^!=!u•{Su>1u.-;=;suas<uH•sp^>.0^^s&D.sX)3T3!=!0=!0<+-(<u^•s^'ss"m§ ^^crc&Q^.2 S^CTyg g02H .d>?^-s0bflut4-l0•B..G%Ul3w•K&^cd%%^3s "<usQ-SCT<213^.ab! !=!^s00g>.<.23%VI's<^^0^^!^^ sU (Dw^(D^•S 'S 5s -rou^^(U0^1-s^M.2.sT3^.H!=!C30Vls sT3%!=!ffl^ §CT1gs•^-c3IIs•'sQIss•i'siI§c^-Ismrt c^-11cnII11II11c^-^^"II^ I11i^s|11I^yi^g^(UysSb^CL,<4-iiu0ucnH^Tl^<L>^•3X3Xlsl-1&<0>-1u^PLlJ3^ <203•rt0sVI^h H^^^cd Suc^-&fi>1'0(U^.scau•s^%^u2<u&fi'ssT3sT30(UaivsM.2•3<u^s^2T3y &2!U&<&3'0COfi0<L>^-a<ussari30scj0M^yf-1%0^JCJmT3^>>dd)vsbfl^13£cu^c3bO^^^3fi00u^•?!=!i- m•a(U-s^<u>1^)8<a^usg g>c^-^FS00-s^-G^^^<<Ul-1^02<SVI(D's;y^&fl^G-^^T3u^a•^0t»0c3coTCis(U<u(U%m^-sfis^0s(U^T3.-;=;COgs3(/I^73!=!^ g0od^0'sMscrID%>-12Oflaj>.^^0VS!=!-0^ §'0sFS^0.=tt:0^ojT3<&stL>S3^•sa3<u-0^(D<umssu.s=ti:soc<i-1G!=!<u^u0.2^s0c^-^<L><+^Vt^0.s^0-s-ati-^'sucd.2CO^.s0^s<u^u1-1•+=!s3^ <.cn>1a•^M>.s%^3 u Ss<u0T3^ s3yila&v00^<ucn^)J3^ -T3u.^0MT3•s<L).sMg%s)-1^'s{=!Ki(U<u&0!Ug)•ss^ °.€^< ^m<u's's>.4-100^0wIuII0!Mj11•II^ sU3IIs ^N^^ IIllo^ ^ ra388 Ii^l11°Ill§118t,Illo o^'1ilfflu^^I:tt:^^11Ii^^^^III gsI2 -2^ §?.§sf^ °< ^0^1—I^CT\1—III.STGO_^^I^t^s§IIIII011!s^ ^•21uI!=:cd^0IIII§i^1cS"?0)ll11'^ us<sII?i^1ll0]IN0ffl811^.1VIIsu>->^^>sgi=!I^T?IIm'0'-^g0(D^-05mcB^'s-^•i3^0§.£^VIrc!<uuu:^-^ s<uariu2cu0s0•Tj^^(Dca's0<u0^.s&mi^u0" -5-;=;y^^^uu>su-3u^ ^TJ>,g^g^0.-=;)-1!=^&1m^cs>.-;=;" .33u-dXiOT•s-d<u!=!s^ ^bfl'0.s!=!<u!=G0c3y0<uw^.us 's!=!•5•s!=!^ .^Ofl0.ss0.2^)^S-l=s's^ "3&,^scdC/2&.U hu-a^a^u0-sM(Uf-1sul-wu^0bfl>>g^§G^!=2<+;^0<+^^ A>.a0T3u(UVI^^sy]•s(L>•Gg^sw3u0(D^-3•s ",3rt&0§3 .S^ £<u>uT3^.s^^§•-P>,c>. 5s ^u^^^0gt;cnCOd2^%2&<aj3^^m=3<uG!=!>(L»bfl<ud.2's^' ^ .s p^-1i-1?•^'T3•^&uGeN03s3^•a<us's5t>fl0^s .s ^<u!=!•s.y^.3ri-d!=!0>^^=g!=!srbcd!-luy0g^0fc^s ^Mu(U^ ^^^V.^tlfl-ggt^vgi(Dcn(D^•s-c/lbfl!=!h•^030^<ufflg0-s0'Xtlfl^u>^"^G1^^^i^.McgOQT3<u^•^^D!=!0g!=!•fS.20u^^(Us<u^ ss^&<iu^sT3(U>rt•o(U0s'0>-6u^ott>fl^CJ(U0^6fl-as0<3t-^<u<4=!2•T3fcccojIsc3^OT=j-3&1&0)^C/3^(L>^i-1^'stis3us(L>uu(U^>>.^2^-3PL,'s>>^>-^<+-<w^0tlfl.g<u•^3^-1^•^(U<u^^0h<+-^t4-lb0cSbflu!=!s.2-d£)£y'ti't;iui=ju^cV.c:vs<ubialu§)srsir\]389 II ^"11..II III^11=§!i!'cfw ^ ^•s ^ ^ i!fflu. " "^1111> ;fl &b u^^<-B•G ^ . utill^ § I!11 i ^ill!tillN si^^c2.i)t3g ^ -53' ap^ I ^ I"Jl!jtill^,sslil.ie tili^i§lii!^1 §11^ ^6^'5^ g8'^ S§.§fe ^s1111^ " ^^tillilili^ .2-S •2 ^^'33^^°~MT32 .SItlliI&1Ie^uIp-l£mIs^As'^ g)^.ijll I 11"M 4->II-g .2l1JIIsfflOQ"Iu^1 ^rt .!s^^0&fl.3^>H^^ ^^^•1S—f•+3 cdg?^'ll'i® ^ scn<+-!0fi^ I'I ^1g ^ ^ ^ ^ g^0g)ll'1^ I'i^^§.&s6Illilu?§.&li&itVIIT3s'^.^0^s^-sg&<nit-1bp<3^-§:^i•^ 8 ^^"t.1^1.2?s' § I ;1 ^'s "^w"IllIi^'s&00Iu^1&pU§-^I-{^"sII§^•y01&1ill."g S.2s'B< sy'&fl ^lits =^^>1^^^^? <u<3^^^^.^IM^Iga ^,iiit1(U^)^^1sItIl^l^ -sCO ^^ 0i?liJ115i^ll?^ ^i's ^ ^3IllM's §g^.^1ti3^4-i0Its^&i2 §1.1cdII1^|<s§ s1pi-i&?-(uw>ilt^'^-stillcig 16<y^s gs IiII0"^&^l-g^ M's .riIII!& QgI&11^^3^)uH SU topy]<usg^-1S ^ '0P3 6 &b Sit.itgsII0u0i?^0 ^5.11s I Ijlii ^^•s g -^uo "5 5" & g.-sI^2.s'i'I?.!^VIasT3lit.2 S^I.'^A&i^Ill.ti'-S ^0^^^ ^ § & .su11Illil'•g<01—III0"?' sU Fs-i U|^'s's'2^srsus^^^ItI?I!?1gb ^aI,2§)[II2s!•^ ^ ^lsi :i§^^X)8^-^d^ik-acQ."'.^jrii(/2^III!^'^^^"?is&-2^"1v^IIHiII^8^§.! ^U tK ^3k8^IllIllIllIll^ tj &il^M^ ^ -s1.1^iiiIllbfl^j gU Q^ ca o-3§ ^IS sil IIllitsIll^•ItS 2 IIll^jl<w u^11IIsIlls g^lliS I f>.y ^I IIIt?ii.i-§<SGillmS3^ &^tl&< 0i!IIII1""IIIw^(UI£•^-'w-^ -s^ .^^ '^% "§t<1rt y•l^^''s ^ Iu 'S§><L>^Ill^r^^3Ofl^*u&II?u^ &1My -2 .^•s-o-scs-§s^e<y% -52il>>IITj T3x^-^ s 'S^ s^^0 ti0s vtilill•^ffl'sill^g^§ws•G ^-<i i ^s §^-ciIllu ^SiuI'sc311'^Iju ^=3r00illii §1^!It&IllJ^ "S '35 ^ s.&p~&1^0 ^^ ^01I!=!0-a .-KIlltilIll^'^9^^-^w '^ un^Illill-0 -J-< ^-" °i^i!~-4t^ ^illsss(=; ^ g^11.^-"i^ts1^I§ Icdu^.^^11litillit?SIllc02"tu2IIIIcnGu ."•I I ^§IP" •;Ill^ ^"^"S uit!:0'2 S^ § s^ ^Sjj^1n390 IIII5baj^IsI1IsIIII1s!=!'^UD<II^>1.IINu^1iiugII(73^ItSoIU~lu^-a"ll.s .g.§)10 "^^sm '^3i ^G .2u x's "itIIIv\IIII1-L| !=)sl8 I1<IIIs'^tIi"d<uj.2IIVI<t.IIs ^1 ^1 §"^ 2" fefl^^15^^t§ ^ri11^'iIfft1^nct? 4-<o btl"^ rtIPlts§I!=!0uf-1^II<^6§3<u(UT3•s•s!=!<u^T3^cmcdg00^^J=!-3u^(D£C ^3ariras^^<u^ ^<u -^(U>0&.&<.^a0^•^&ls:3s^gu .cdUlusT3<urt%0T3T3>,j3s>-1§M^!=!>.(^'s<ufiuu o u^ -^-sT=t -;0^roOflgu3c2.^^!=!^^3sft.22^<uu!=!0&<(^s'S S ^J^'a2-sg^&,<ut;S G>->uutff<u^u^a0!=!0<u-30&<1=bu•53^•s1-1UrlVIu.-;=;(U0!=!flcnCO>^2<u&<^ty!=!00COT3.-;=;•scd&^0u<u!=!tu um•a^tlfl•T34^<u^0gi0^0.s<uu•&vu^0MXS-sfi0§00^^-1>^>^uT3f-1•s^2.-=;Bs(D^ sc0(U3u0>cdctafiss^0u0-ste.s<L>>.^-d-s^>-.'s •?01^•scds<uT3-aa3i-1ertinra01^0ca<30<u>^0^u»-1!=:^VI<s s ^^.2i'Su<uc^2§<§^1-1c3rts ^3<L>&&u.sJS0<uC4-1cn&a^0^^0•ff bOflbfiH^<s(U -~ ^_<u^-s^ra^s^130T3!=!0-0COGOw(U^ u rta m u^ rt<s2-2c<uT3?s1 Nw•?3c3s0^ -^^&<^sCO^&<0^.g0cn<4-1<L>>-1CQ-d&-cS0^-1&<co!=!cdT3G0u=sVm(U!=!>^0(UXl^^0<u's0^%<u.2T3%•^30^uss"uw^0^H&<<u&1g20!=!0w. ^^cS-.<u0^3^'^ §t>0•f^ <4-1^cncn>^w!=!0t4-luc<u6^3uVI'S 0If!^ ^1^ o p'3's•^c0•30<4-<OJO(U00^0^0!=!<G•^(U0cn0•5S uu^s"0s3Msgs(U'- -fc!-ayi IIT3>^^0u<L)u>>'ccnw.s<u0r-?.-;=;acnyi!=!-sc^u3- s(Uc0S-lB^'s%co&=iuu.^ ^IB3^s&^s Su ^3 o-5ag^!=!-sc3cn<L)(U-I—'>J3§.s su00 "" 0 -Sx^•s^&<T3<uu!=!&4^%^=!(UT3<u^>-1s03-s^T3'0^^^^3g^^M3^cd01T3^<u30u"0e°,cAgOfli-< n30^u u^5<u(UOfl^(Dcd-y!=!u=i&s^cn<u^^^>.-K000flu —'s0u2uJ3d)^r-1^=!ucnusyis •T3cn^^33^t)fls<uu-rt^0ssT3^s!=!>^-au. 2'S Kws!=!ss&-G••3^s u&<^rt(U•3>.>u^<u^<u.s ^^?<uT3-C!<u^"0u'0^^i^>Hs^(UT3<.§-3'ss2<u.i!=!ri1-1>^s^0T3cd&<m-0"as.2t3^!=!&ac!^cd^g ^s.^ 3^0&<gM-^uGsxs>00(Uuu.^.^!-lus^gcPlu>>IIIIB^Iftl.° "1I!MIt.ill^lllliI0 tyIllc sut^ftsb6lit^11'^^itsil..Is s(U (L>li^01Igup00'^il!.p.60^ %, :§U) •'i.i'g-i^Illill^ s ^^ III g KIll^ ^1I1!y5 ^^-{iyI0§j11.1.1I-6"I<u^^II•^^^ Ili0P^ CQ•»•391 ins^KS'a^.sas&0^.g^ "5 'S0^m2QT3•S30-a CQrip^ucac3^>^^^-aws.00 g Ulit8v392 Shawn KohtzFrom:Sent:To:Subject:Philip Saccoccia Jr <philsac@gmail.com>Friday, September 13, 2019 5:48 AMShawn KohtzN 15th Avenue - Capital Improvements PlanShawn Kohtz, City EngineerCity of BozemanShawn,I am writing to request that you include completion of North 15th Avenue from Patrick Street to TschacheLane in the Bozeman Capital Improvements plan.Completion of North 15th Avenue connecting Oak Street to Tschache Lane will relieve traffic at the OakStreet - North 19th Avenue intersection and will significantly improve traffic flow across this entire areaof northwest Bozeman.As you know I paid entire construction COSt of North 15th Avenue from Oak Street to Patrick Street to allowconstruction ofBridger Peaks Village affordable housing project.Estimated cost for completion of North 15th Avenue to Tschache Lane is $650,000. A significant CapitalImprovement fund contribution to this project will be most welcome.Thank you for your consideration and assistance with this request.Best Regards,Philip Saccoccia JrSaccoccia Lands LLC1393