HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-22-19 Public Comment - A. Ogle - AC Hotel by MarriottFrom:Ashley Ogle
To:Danielle Garber; Agenda
Cc:ashleyogle@kenyonnoble.com
Subject:Application 19078
Date:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:14:45 PM
Bozeman City Planning –
This email is regarding the AC Hotel Site Plan, Application 19078. I am both a resident and
property owner in Downtown Bozeman. All three of my properties are a block or less from
the proposed development.
I object to this application based on the following items:
1. According to the Public Notice the number of parking spaces is 0. For a
development of this size this cannot meet current code.
2. The Summary AC Traffic Study seems incomplete. First, the report is generated
using the assumption that all peak hour trips would use the hotel valet service.
Yet, in the same breath it says an unknown percentage of trips would self-park in
the garage and in on street parking spots. So, what is the breakdown? There is
concern in the central core area regarding both limited on street parking and
Garage parking. Also, some of the data is being driven by a hotel in Billings. First,
the Billings market is not the Bozeman market. Secondly, in order to get correct
data you would have to know the occupancy of the hotel. Also the cost of the valet
service versus the cost of the parking in the Bridger Park Garage are not apparent.
This should be disclosed as it will influence where people park. In the report it also
states the route that the outbound trips from the off-site parking lot to the hotel
will utilize. That path is Willson Avenue, Beall Street, N Black Avenue, and
Mendenhall to arrive at Tracy. However, in the tables evaluating traffic volume I
do not see the Black Avenue and Mendenhall intersection listed. This has
become a busy intersection for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Due to the
potential increase in load this intersection should be evaluated for volume and a
potential traffic light.
3. The designated parking area for the hotel seems nebulous for numerous
reasons. There is a license agreement for the Medical Arts Lot on Willson. Which
according to code, section 38.540.070.A.6 is supposed to be a long-term lease.
The document also contradicts itself. An example of this would be it uses terms
like “irrevocable” and then “revoked.” As for the off-site lot, is the lot going to be
shared with Medical Arts or is the lot going to be dedicated to the AC Hotel? Has
there been an adequate usage study done on the Medical Arts Building lots to see
if it is feasible for this to be a shared lot? Have the parking calculations for the
Medical Arts Building been verified? And if so, by whom? There is a list of
employees associated with each business in that building. Those counts directly
correlate to the parking calculations for that building. The other parking option
that the applicant seems to be holding on to is the Letter of Intent issued by the
City of Bozeman for 80 spaces in the Bridger Park Garage. This has its own
challenges. In September 2019 the Bozeman Parking Commission passed
Resolution 2019-05. Resolution 2019-05 states as of August 2019 the Bozeman
Parking Commission does not accept new long term lease agreements, at the
Bridger Park Downtown Garage, for the purpose of satisfying parking
requirements in the Bozeman Unified Development Code. Therefore, a UDC
lease in the Bridger Park Downtown Garage does not seem to be a viable option.
However, there are numerous mentions of it in the Intent and Exhibits criteria that
was provided by the Applicant.
4. The loading/unloading zones on Tracy seem to pose safety and traffic issues
both at the site and throughout the neighborhood. Due to the lack of space
pedestrians entering and exiting their cars will not only create issues for
themselves but also for other motorists. You will have an increased number of
pedestrians in the street due to this configuration. As for the traffic issues, there
should be consideration for what guests will do if the loading zone is full assuming
they are not using the valet service. They will either drop people off in the middle
of the street or circle the block. A car stopping in the middle of Tracy will create a
traffic issue for those turning off Mendenhall. Again, it will also endanger the
individuals in the street and oncoming vehicular traffic. The second option guests
will have if the loading zone is full is to circle the block. This would mean going
down Tracy, turning right on Lamme, right on Black, right on Mendenhall then back
on to Tracy to see if the loading/unloading zone is available. This would cause an
increase in capacity on Lamme Street, Black Avenue and Mendenhall. The same
would be true if the parking spots were in the Bridger Park Garage. In the
Summary AC Traffic Study I do not see the intersections of Lamme Street and Tracy
Avenue, Lamme Street and Black Avenue or Black Avenue and Mendenhall
measured.
5. The development specifies a bar/lounge on the sixth floor. It has allocated part
of its 3000 square foot exemption to this area along with an area on the first floor.
However, per the code it is the first 3,000 gross square feet of a non-residential
building within the B-3 district. The exemption is not meant to cherry pick areas to
get out of parking requirements.
6. What about the neighborhood? It is already overloaded with people parking
and walking into the core. How much capacity does the core have before
saturation levels are met, if they haven’t been already.
Under these circumstance, I respectively request that Application 19078 be denied.
I appreciate your time and attention to these items.
Thank You,
Ashley Ogle
Confidentiality Notice: This information is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, distribution, or copy is prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please inform the sender immediately by replying to this message and then destroy all
copies of the original message.