HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-21-19 Public Comment - O. Okie - HRDC Warming Center Site-1From:Chris Mehl
To:Agenda; I-Ho Pomeroy
Subject:FW: Proposed HRDC Warming House Next to Morning Star School
Date:Monday, October 21, 2019 4:15:53 PM
Attachments:image.png
Chris Mehl
Bozeman Deputy Mayor
cmehl@bozeman.net
406.581.4992
________________________________________
From: Okie Okie [montanaokie16@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 3:58 PM
To: Jeff Krauss; Terry Cunningham; Sarah Rosenberg; Cyndy Andrus; Chris Mehl; Tanya Andreasen
Subject: Proposed HRDC Warming House Next to Morning Star School
Good afternoon. In preparation for the 15 day comment period for this application, residents in the surrounding
neighborhoods are requesting your feedback. There are many concerns and questions that we need you to address.
The below questions come straight from HRDCs Application dated Oct 8th 2019 and represent the first round of
concerns and comments put forth by residents in the surrounding area.
With no opportunity for a public hearing, we are limited to email, phone and any private and public meetings we can
manage to organize within a limited timeframe. We want to stress that this issue is not about lack of compassion.
It's about location. We all understand the need for homeless shelters, but as a community, we must choose
appropriate locations. The health and safety of residents must come first. Ignoring the risks with this location
would be a disservice to our community. If approved, this Special Use Permit is "indefinite" as stated by, Ms.
Rosenberg, the associate planner reviewing the application. It is ludicrous and undemocratic that a PERMANENT
change in use for a home in a densely residential area (R1 Zoned Area), sitting directly between two very busy
schools, which would impact so many people, could be approved "administratively" by one person without
requiring a vote or comment from city commissioners or warrant a public hearing. The residents of Figgins, Alder
Creek, West Meadow, Sundance Springs, Meadow Creek and all families with children in Morning Star and
Sacajawea Schools eagerly await a reply from your office. We have heard from the HRDC and we have read the
development review application, it is time for us to hear from our elected city officials. Thank you all in advance
for your attention to this matter.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BELOW QUESTIONS ARE PULLED DIRECTLY FROM THE HRDC
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
Please reference page and paragraph
PAGE 5 - INTAKE GUIDELINES
"All participants are asked for identification when signing their participation agreement. Lack of identification does
not impact a participants eligibility to receive services"
HRDC offers low barrier shelter to the homeless. In our last meeting HRDC confirmed that they do not perform
background checks or screening to determine if residents are criminals. The shelter will process 36 people per night
at max capacity. The shelter will be open for 6 months. Seasonal usage of this facility could range from 1500 on
the low end (10 per night) to 5400 (at full capacity) Note - usage is defined as beds used per month. Many
individuals and families could stay multiple days. HRDC will not know if individuals visiting the shelter are
mentally ill, drug addicts, felons, etc. There is not a background check, because they do not refuse service. This
creates a major safety risk for the residents of Figgins and surrounding neighborhoods.
PAGE 5 - GUEST CONFIDENTIALITY
SECOND PARAGRAPH: Staff and volunteers are to maintain client confidentiality at all times. If a person enters
the warming center looking for another person, use the following verbiage, "I cannot confirm or deny if that person
is here; however, I can take a message......"
Because the shelter location is public knowledge, we are very concerned with unwanted visitors. If a HRDC
resident is fleeing a violent relationship, a drug problem, a money problem, etc. they are bringing those problems
and threats directly to our neighborhood. In addition, they are exposing our children to those threats. What happens
if an angry father (high on meth) knocks on the wrong door? What happens if an HRDC resident owes a drug
2000.00 and he comes to collect in our neighborhood? There are a thousand scenarios to consider and they all put
Figgins residents at risk. We can not examine the impacts of this shelter on an emotional, surface level. We must
considering the potential for real impacts to the residents.
PAGE 8 - GUEST LEAVING PREMISES AND RETURN
FIRST PARAGRAPH: "If a staff or volunteer witness a guest leaving the property, they will need to inform the
guest that they are not permitted to return the following night."
As residents, we are very concerned with people leaving the shelter at night. HRDC cannot control this. They do
not have the power to stop someone. Someone could leave during a smoke break and nobody would know. Again,
there is no vetting of these individuals so we have no idea what we are dealing with. If that person leaves the
shelter, they would be roaming our neighborhood which creates a safety risk to the residents of Figgins and
surrounding neighborhoods. If this person is a criminal and chooses to commit a criminal act, it would happen.
PAGE 8 - GUEST PARKING AND SHUTTLE
LAST SENTENCE: "Guests will be provided with transportation to HRDC main office at 7:00 am each morning."
HRDC will encourage guests to take the shuttle, but they can't make people do anything. If its a nice day and 15
HRDC residents decide to walk down to our neighborhood park they can't be stopped. Police can't stop them
because they haven't broken any laws.
When this happens, HRDC residents would be sharing a sidewalk with children walking to school. Their interaction
with children and residents would be unavoidable. Walking in any direction from the HRDC home, HRDC
residents would be required to cross 2 cross-walks used by children as they walk to school. This creates a major
liability and safety issue. Most of our children walk to school with friends, unsupervised by an adult. What happens
if a HRDC resident decides to use the bathroom next to the sidewalk? What happens when a 1st grader picks up a
dirty needle? What happens when a mentally ill person wants to chat with kids on the sidewalk, exposing them to
inappropriate material, language, etc?
If there is a crisis situation at the HRDC shelter, how will police re-route children on their way to school? If
someone is expecting them at school early, who will notify their parents and the school? By approving this special
permit you are creating health and safety risks for the area residents, especially children.
PAGE 8 - SMOKE BREAKS
FIRST PARAGRAPH: "Staff or volunteer monitored smoke breaks will occur for fifteen minutes at 8:00pm,
9:00pm and 10:00pm. An additional smoke break at 6:00am does not require supervision because it coincides with
the first wake up announcement."
Figgins residents with homes that border this property are very concerned with the amount of smoking and potential
for noise disturbance. With a capacity of 36 per night, dozens of people could be smoking at once during the
designated breaks. Most of Figgins residents are young families. Bed time for most is between 8pm and 9pm. If
calls are made to the police, additional neighbors would feel the impact. Homeowners bought houses in this
neighborhood specifically for the R-1 designation. They did not make the largest investment of their lives to live
next to a house that would house 36 individuals, many of whom will be smoking on the property most of the
evening and early hours of the morning. Would you like to live next door to a home with 36 people? Would you
like to smell cigarette smoke each evening for 6 months? How would you like to see the value of your home drop
because nobody wants to buy a home next to a homeless shelter? For many of us our home is our most valuable
asset.
PAGE 15 - BEHAVIOR
LAST PARAGRAPH: "The warming center reserves the right to require guests with a history of inappropriate
behavior to leave the premises. The warming center is not responsible for the health and safety of a guest once they
have been asked to leave the premises."
If refused, where will these people go? If they get upset and leave, then they would be walking through our
neighborhood. If this happened, we would have a person refused based on bad behavior walking through our
neighborhood. Is this person confrontational? Are they under the influence? Do they have weapons? Does he or
she have a history of violence? We don't know. That's the issue. This creates a safety risk.
PAGE 16 - WEAPONS
FIRST PARAGRAPH: "Any other weapons including but not limited to knives, mace, bear spray, swords, razors,
throwing stars, nun chucks, metal knuckles must be stored by a staff member in a labeled manilla envelope in a
secured and locked location: weapons must be returned to guests upon guest departure in the morning."
Again, HRDC does not have the ability to control the residents of this home. The shelter will be ran by 2 HRDC
staff who ask for weapons to be checked at the door and those weapons are returned in the morning. Will they frisk
the guest if they suspect the guest may be hiding a weapon? How will they know that they have, in fact, checked all
weapons? When we asked HRDC about weapons in our first town-hall meeting they referenced nail files, yet the
description in the application references knives, razors, metal knuckles, etc. 36 people and 2 HRDC staff members
checking weapons
PAGE 17 - SAFETY AND POLICE ISSUES
This entire section is a reminder of the type of behavior that is possible within a shelter. Violence, intoxication,
fighting, drugs, etc. HRDC volunteers have a 5 step procedure to properly communicate with police. What if a
fight spills into the street? Last year there were 80+ calls at one HRDC warming center in a 5 month period. Our
neighborhood rarely experiences any police calls. This will negatively impact our neighborhood character. This is
very concerning.
PAGE 18 - MORNING SCHEDULE
FIRST PARAGRAPH-: "5:00AM - Front door is unlocked. Coffee is made. Guests may come and go as they
please."
HRDC claims that they will transport everyone to and from the industrial drive location, yet they cannot force
anyone to get into the van. It's hard enough to get 36 willing people to do something, let alone 36 people, some of
which with mental illness, addiction issues and or a criminal background.
This final concern is a big one. Please take the time to read in detail. Think about the safety risks for our children
and our schools. Please consider the liability here. You have the power to approve or reject this application. This is
not about lack of compassion, it's about location. HRDC does great work but they chose a poor location for this
shelter. You must consider the risk associated with HRDC's proposal. In the last several years our country has been
through some terrible tragedies. Many of those tragedies were avoidable. People knew the risks and they ignored
them. They knew someone had a gun or was mentally ill. They saw the warning signs but did nothing. The
warning signs with this proposal are glaringly obvious. Bottom line, this shelter greatly increases the health and
safety risks for residents in Figgins and surrounding neighborhoods. It would be extremely irresponsible for the
City to approve this application considering those risks.
PROXIMITY TO MORNING STAR SCHOOL AND SCHOOL CROSSWALKS
The proposed HRDC shelter home is 287 Feet from the Morning Star School property. That measurement is taken
from the HRDC proposed Shelter to the Morning Star playground where morning walkers and bikers will stage
before going into the building. There is a path from the cross-walk in front of the HRDC Shelter that leads directly
to the school. The HRDC shelter property boarders the cross-walk and sidewalk that our children use to walk and
bike to school. Please see below aerial image with measurements. It's just too close. If there is a crisis situation at
the HRDC. If someone there commits a crime, then runs from the police and a foot pursuit follows into school
hours, the school would be required to go on lock-down. Think of any police interaction gone bad and by default it's
287 feet from school property where elementary children learn and play. Its only 21 feet from the cross walk they
use. That is way too close. There's a reason some sexual offenders are required to stay 300 ft from a school
property. There is a reason we have appropriate zoning restrictions in our city. Those restrictions are in place for
many reasons and the most important is the health and safety of the community. Approving a special permit to
process 36 mystery HRDC residents per night this close to young children in a densely populated family community
is unacceptable.
[image.png]
We eagerly await your response.
Sincerely,
Residents of South Bozeman