Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19219 Supplementary Documents & Reports Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Water and Sewer New water and sewer infrastructure will be installed on site to serve the development’s residents. The new infrastructure will require connecting to the existing City-owned water and sewer facilities. The proposed subdivision will connect to the existing water main at the intersection of Graf St and S. 27th and the existing sewer main in S. 27th Ave at the northeast corner of the site. Even though the modification of the Gran Cielo Subdivision Plat presented with this application (changing Lot 4, Block 14 from dedicated parkland to residential) will increase the population density of the subdivision, it will not alter any of the circumstances or conditions relating to water and sewer reviewed by staff and the commission during the original Preliminary Plat approval. This is because the water and sewer mains were designed based on acreages of R-3 and R-4 zoned land, not the precise number of dwelling units proposed. Therefore, the capacities for water and sewer mains determined in the original application remain valid because they considered the parkland as developable lots zoned R- 3 or R-4 in their calculations. Water and sewer reports are included in this section. These reports and associated calculations and figures were created for the Gran Cielo Subdivision infrastructure design review process and have already been submitted to the engineering department and approved. They are included in this section for the completeness of this Preliminary Plat application. Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Stormwater Management The modification of the Gran Cielo Subdivision Plat presented with this application (changing Lot 4, Block 14 from dedicated parkland to residential) will alter the circumstances relating to stormwater management reviewed by staff and the commission during the original Preliminary Plat approval. This is because by removing dedicated parkland and replacing it with a residential lot, the impervious area increased and necessitated a slightly larger detention pond in the NW corner of Block 14. An updated stormwater management report is included in this section which reflects the change of Lot 4, Block 14 from parkland to residential. This report and associated calculations and figures were created for the Gran Cielo Subdivision infrastructure design review and was submitted to the engineering department on April 11, 2019. It is included in this section for the completeness of this Preliminary Plat application. Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Roads, Streets, and Alleys Even though the modification of the Gran Cielo Subdivision Plat presented with this application (changing Lot 4, Block 14 from dedicated parkland to residential) will increase the population density of the subdivision, it will not alter any of the circumst ances or conditions relating to roads, streets and alleys reviewed by staff and the commission during the original Preliminary Plat approval. This is because the trip generations were calculated based on acreages of R-3 and R-4 zoned land, not the precise number of dwelling units proposed. Therefore, the original trip generations and traffic analysis outlined in the original application’s Traffic Impact Study by Marvin & Associates remain valid. However, the engineering department requested copies of the same information and traffic impact study report that was submitted in the original Gran Cielo Subdivision Preliminary Plat application from October 2017, so those are included in this section. All lots will meet the minimum lot size and as well as minimum street frontage. Access will be provided from an extension of S. 27th and Graf St. Graf St will be extended from the southeast corner of the site to the west and will dead end at the boundary of the proposed subdivision. South 27th Ave and Graf Street are planned as 90' ROW and will be extended from their intersection to the northern and western limits of the project, respectively. Both Graf St and S. 27th are classified as “Collector” streets on the 2017 Transportation Master Plan and will constructed to the collector street specifications. Typical roadway sections are provided in this section of the application. Improvements to existing roads will be limited to intersections. The Graf/S. 27th intersection will be controlled with stop signs on the S. 27th Ave northbound and southbound approaches. Stop control will also be used on each internal street access to both Graf Street and S. 27th Ave. North/South streets within the subdivision will utilize the current numbering system and will include S. 28th Ave, S. 29th Ave, S. 30th Ave and S. 31st Ave. East/West streets will include Bennett Blvd., Cielo Way, and Tierra Lane. All new streets will be constructed as local roadways and will meet the applicable standards. Alleys are proposed throughout the subdivision as seen in the Preliminary Layout Plan and will meet all applicable standards. All construction activities in the area will be required to have adequate dust control and erosion control practices based on City and MDEQ standards. Temporary erosion control will also be provided at the dead ends of streets between phases of construction. All interior local roads will be constructed by the developer and maintained through construction. Upon acceptance of road improvements, these roads will be maintained by the City of Bozeman. Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application A Traffic Impact Study has been prepared by Marvin & Associates for the subdivision and is provided in this section of the application. The development of Gran Cielo Subdivision would add 2,656 vehicle trips to the surrounding street system on the average weekday when the subdivision is fully developed. Reference Table 3 in the Traffic Impact Study for the Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary for each surrounding street. Additionally, Marvin & Associates prepared an 18 page addendum to the original Traffic Impact Study based on feedback from the original Preliminary Plat review. Both the original Traffic Impact Study dated October 24, 2017 and the addendum dated December 11, 2017 are included in this Preliminary Plat submittal for completeness. Streamline does not serve the project area and does not have plans to do so in the future. Streamline's comments on the subdivision are provided in this section. TYPICAL "LOCAL" STREET SECTIONTYPICAL ALLEY SECTIONTYPICAL "COLLECTOR" STREET SECTIONGRAF STREET & S 27TH AVETYPICAL "COLLECTOR" HALF STREET SECTIONS 27TH AVETYPICAL ACCESS ROAD SECTIONTYPICAL "COLLECTOR" HALF STREET SECTIONS 27TH AVESHEETMADISON ENGINEERING 895 TECHNOLOGY BLVD SUITE 203 BOZEMAN, MT 59718 (406) 586-0262 (406) 586-5740 FAXGRAN CIELOCIVIL DETAILSC6.03GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION CIVIL DETAILS BOZEMAN MT TYPICAL SECTIONS 1 Brianna Baker From:Lee Hazelbaker [lhazelbaker@streamlinebus.com] Sent:Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:02 AM To:brianna@mad-eng.com Subject:Canvasback Brianna, We currently do not serve this area and do not foresee plans in the near future. We will certainly keep this development on our radar and maybe someday we will expand to include this proposed subdivision. Lee Hazelbaker Streamline/Galavan Director 32 S. Tracy Bozeman, MT 59715 406 587 2434 We know you like us so make it official! Inline image 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT for GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION Bozeman, Montana Prepared for Madison Engineering Prepared by Marvin & Associates 1300 North Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 October 24, 2017 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT for GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION Bozeman, Montana Prepared for Madison Engineering Prepared by Marvin & Associates 1300 North Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 October 24, 2017 P.T.O.E. # 259 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Streets & Intersections 3 Traffic Volumes 4 Speeds 5 Capacity 6 TRIP GENERATION 7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 9 SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 9 IMPACTS 11 Traffic Volumes 11 Capacity 12 Future Access Operations 13 Future Access Capacity 16 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 17 APPENDIX A – 24 Hour Traffic Count Summaries APPENDIX B - Speed Statistics APPENDIX C – Capacity Calculations ii LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1. Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 6 Table 2. Gran Cielo Subdivision Trip Generation 7 Table 3. Existing Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 13 Table 4. Year 2032 Future Plus Site – Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 16 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1. Gran Cielo Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. Year 2017 Traffic Volumes 5 Figure 3. Full Development Site Traffic Assignment 10 Figure 4. Existing Plus Full Development Site Traffic 12 Figure 5. Full Development Future Site Traffic Assignment 14 Figure 6. Year 2027 Full Development Traffic at Graf Street Intersections 15 Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of a traffic impact study (TIS) for the Gran Cielo Subdivision development property, which is located on the south side of Bozeman, Montana. Marvin & Associates was retained by Madison Engineering to prepare the TIS in accordance with City of Bozeman subdivision development ordinances. The primary purposes of this study were to address specific traffic impacts related to the Gran Cielo Subdivision development and to provide recommendations regarding the mitigation of any identified impacts. Having reviewed the proposed land use development plan, Marvin & Associates completed an analysis of existing conditions, addressed trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment, and evaluated the resulting arterial and intersection capacity impacts, before making recommendations regarding mitigation of impacts. The study methodology and analysis procedures used in this study employed the most contemporary of analysis techniques, using nationally accepted standards in the areas of site development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made within this report are based upon those standards and the professional judgment of the author. SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The Gran Cielo Subdivision development property is bounded on its southern border by Graf Street and agricultural land on the remaining boundaries. (See Figure 1). The property consists of 39.8 acres in R-3 zoning and 8.95 acres zoned R-4. No specific plans have been developed within the overall subdivision layout, but it is estimated that approximately 743 residents would occupy the multi-family lots at full development. This TIS was prepared to evaluate the newly proposed development’s impacts on the roadway system as it currently exists and in the future. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 2 Access to the Gran Cielo Subdivision property would initially be provided from an extension of Graf Street to the west and from an extension of S 27th Avenue to the north. Two new street accesses would connect to Graf Street and four accesses would connect with S 27th Street. The City of Bozeman’s transportation plan indicates that at some future date, S. 2th would be extended from Graf Street to Garfield Street, south of the site. No specific plans were set forth for a future extension of Graf Street to the west. The transportation plan also indicates that Stucky Road will be reconstructed to provide three traffic lanes west of S 19th Avenue in the future. Potential traffic impacts associated with the initial development of Gran Cielo Subdivision property would be confined to intersections of Graf Street and Stucky Road on South 19th Avenue. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Streets & Intersections Adjacent and potentially impacted public streets within a one half mile distance of the development include South 19th Avenue and the intersections of Graf Street and Stucky Road with South 19th Avenue. South 19th Avenue is a Principal Arterial north-south oriented roadway that begins at an intersection with Cottonwood Road, approximately 6 miles south of Graf Street, and continues north approximately 4.5 miles to an interchange with Interstate 90. South 19th Avenue has variable pavement widths and varying speed zones along its length. At its intersection with Graf Street, it is approximately 62’ wide and has two southbound through lanes; two northbound through lanes; and auxiliary northbound and southbound left-turn lanes. An extension of Graf Street from S 19th Avenue to S 3rd Avenue along with traffic signal modifications were recently constructed at this intersection. North of Graf Street, South 19th Avenue transitions to a two lane road section and then transitions back to a wider section at the intersection with Stucky Road, approximately 0.5 miles south of Graf Street. The intersection of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue is similar to the Graf Street intersection except that there is only one southbound through lane on the departure side of the intersection and there is no curb and gutter on South 19th Avenue. The traffic signal at Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue is fully operational and provides two signal phases for the “T” type intersection. Graf Street and Stucky Road are both classified as Collector streets within the Urban Transportation Plan. They both provide access to residential and institutional developments west of South 19th Avenue. Both of the intersections have two approach lanes at their intersections with South 19th Avenue. Graf Street is approximately 50’ wide and accommodates a single lane of traffic in each direction with bike lanes and parking on both sides of the street. Stucky Road is Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 4 approximately 40’ wide at its intersection with South 19th Avenue and tapers back to a width of approximately 28’ west of the intersection. Traffic Volumes Hourly electronic traffic counts were taken in August 2017 on Stucky Road and two additional counts were taken on S 19th Avenue and on Graf Street in 2015. Additional counts were also taken on S 19th Avenue in 2016. The counts provided hourly variations, which were used to determine peak hour conditions and provide base volumes for average weekday projections on intersecting roadways. Summaries of the counts can be found be Appendix A of this report. The weekday peak hour traffic volumes were found to occur between 4:30 and 5:30 pm and between 7:30 and 8:30 am. Peak AM & PM turning movement counts were taken at both the Graf Street and Stucky Road intersections with South 19th Avenue in September of 2017. Average weekday traffic (AWT) volumes were calculated on street links using proportional turning movement volumes in relation to the AWT volume electronic counts. Figure 2 presents existing am & pm peak hour turning movement volumes at the potentially impacted intersections. Street segment average weekday traffic volumes are also depicted in this figure. The existing Intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graf Street was also counted, but that intersection only involves westbound left turn movements and northbound right turn movements and serves very few vehicles. No pedestrian activity was noted during the counting periods, but bike traffic was relatively substantial at the intersection of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue. There were 12 bikes turning left onto South 19th Avenue and 6 bikes turning right onto Stucky Road from South 19th Avenue during the peak pm hour period. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 5 Speeds Speed data was also collected with the electronic counters, specifically on South 19th Avenue north of Graf Street. Appendix B contains the statistical analysis of speed data for that location. It was determined from the speed statistics that the southbound traffic had an 85th percentile speed of approximately 54 miles per hour (mph) which was identical to the 85th percentile speed of 54 mph in the northbound direction. The posted speed limit of 50 mph appears to be in an acceptable range of 85th percentile speeds. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 6 Capacity Peak am and pm hour existing condition capacity calculations were completed for the potentially impacted intersections using the HCS 2010 and SigCInema software packages (see Appendix C). Table 1 summarizes the results of the capacity calculations. Measures in the table include control delay (seconds/vehicle), level of service (LOS), volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio, and 95% queue length. The calculation results showed that all approaches at each of the potentially impacted intersections currently operate at or above a LOS “C”. Since there is no intersection control at the intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graf Street, it was not possible to calculate capacity. Thus, the free flow conditions would result in LOS “A”. L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.2 19.4 19.4 20.4 5.4 17.6 5.8 16.5 LOS CB BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.31 0.07 0.18 Queue Length (95%)10 02 14 22 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)21.1 20.5 20.4 21.3 5.6 18.2 6.1 19.8 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.14 0.05 0.02 0.18 0.05 0.27 0.16 0.42 Queue Length (95%)21 02 03 45 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.6 17.8 8.9 13.9 19.3 18.2 LOS CB AB BB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.05 0.08 0.48 0.34 0.24 Queue Length (95%)51 26 82 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)22.6 19.5 12.3 12.6 30.6 18.1 LOS CB BB CB V/C Ratio 0.45 0.05 0.11 0.40 0.78 0.26 Queue Length (95%)52 16 122 Table 1. Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Intersection MOE EB WB NB SB Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour Movement Group 16.8 B 0.46 OVERALL 22.2 C 0.59 Intersection OVERALL OVERALL 16.8 B 0.30 OVERALL 17.9 B 0.32 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 7 TRIP GENERATION Table 2 presents a summary of trip generation for Gran Cielo Subdivision development plans. Within this table, trip generation rates and resulting trip projections for the average weekday, am, and pm peak hour are illustrated. Trip generation calculations for the development were based upon the specific land use information provided by the developer. The R-3 zone would accommodate 6.5 units per acre and the R-4 zone would have 10.4 units per acre. Using a density of 2.0 units per unit resulted in approximately 784 apartment residents. Trip generation rates were taken from ITE’s Trip Generation Report, 9th Edition. Table 2 indicates that initial development of Gran Cielo Subdivision property would generate approximately 2,656 average weekday trips (AWT) with 215 trips in the am hour and 292 trips during the peak pm hour. Land use developments typically produce multi-modal trips that include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit trips, in addition to other vehicular trips. When evaluating vehicular impacts, these non-vehicular and transit-related types of trips can often be considered negligible in terms of their potential impacts on site access points. Since the Gran Cielo Subdivision development is on the fringe of Bozeman the 784 Persons Rate* No. Trips Enter Exit Average Weekday T=3.47X-64.48 2656 1328 1328 Peak AM Hour T=0.26X+1.99 215 43 172 Peak PM Hour T=0.39X+2.03 292 190 102 Table 2. Gran Cielo Subdivision Trip Generation * ITE Trip Generation Report, 9th Edition Code 220 "Apartments" Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 8 area bicycle and pedestrian trip modes would probably not initially account for an appreciable number of trips. As future development in the surrounding area becomes denser, use of alternative modes will increase. However, it was assumed that none of the trips would be associated with pedestrian and bike modes. Trip generation potential can be further refined by determining the number of “new” external trips that would appear, as vehicular traffic, at development access points. It is common that, for developments which contain multiple land uses and/or complementary facilities, a portion of trips that would have origins or destinations at such facilities are captured internally. These trips are part of the total trip generation number, but do not have origins or destinations external to the development site, and as such, do not have an impact of the traffic network external to the development. These types of trips are known as “Internal Capture Trips” (ICT). In the case of Gran Cielo Subdivision Development, there are no diverse land uses that could create ICTs in the future. Therefore, no internal capture trips were applied to external trip numbers. Trips can be further categorized as primary purpose, diverted link, or passerby purpose trips. Primary purpose trips are trips for which the development is a primary destination from any particular origin. Diverted link trips are trips made to a development as a secondary destination that must be diverted from a path between the origin and primary destination. Passerby trips are also trips made to a development as a secondary destination, but without a diversion from the primary trip path (i.e., a stop on the way home from work). Passerby trips do not represent “new” trips added to the adjacent street system. Thus, site generated passerby trips must be considered as new external trips (movements) at the site approach or approaches, but do not appear as new trips on the adjacent street system. The proposed development would not be conducive to attraction of passerby traffic and it was assumed that none of the trips could be classified as passerby trips. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 9 TRIP DISTRIBUTION There are various methods available for determining the directional distribution of trips to and from site developments. For developments within a large urbanized area, the task is best accomplished through the creation of a computerized transportation model of the urban street system, which includes the proposed development changes. When the creation of a model is not feasible, realistic estimates can be made by determining the distribution of existing traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. The existing distribution can then be applied to newly generated trips, with adjustments made based upon the likely trip origins and destinations associated with the particular development land use or uses. For this development, an existing condition distribution was developed based upon area traffic patterns. Results of the distribution analysis indicated that 81% of the trips would be distributed to and from the north, 12% would be directed to and from the south, 7% would be to and from the east, and the remaining 5% would be to and from the west. SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The assignment of site traffic to the surrounding street system and site access points is dependent upon several factors. Two such factors are external directional distribution and localized operational site conditions (i.e., the subdivision layout of streets). The combined calculation of demand and least time accessibility are then used to estimate likely movement volumes at each individual access point. Turning movements at each access point were then calculated through the application of the distribution to full development vehicular trip generation totals. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 0 For the Gran Cielo Subdivision Development, the aforementioned access points consist of accesses on S 27th Avenue and Graf Street and all of the trips would be funneled thru the Graf Street and S 19th Avenue intersection. With a future extension of S 27th Avenue to Stucky Road, traffic assignments would be substantially different (see “Future Operations” section of this report). Average weekday and peak hour site generated traffic was routed onto the street system. Resulting traffic volume assignments are illustrated in Figure 3 with volumes that are associated with full development of the study subdivision. The highest site traffic volumes would occur on Graf Street. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 1 IMPACTS Traffic Volumes Traffic volume impacts for site developments can be quantified by determining the change in traffic volumes expected at various points within the surrounding network of streets. Site traffic assignments give an indication of what volume of traffic could potentially be added to the street system during the average weekday (AWT). Yet in almost all cases, it is very difficult to determine AWT on any section of street to within 10% accuracy. Thus, impact analyses on streets with relative percentage increases less than 10% are not normally considered critical. In any case, the percent change in daily traffic can only be used to identify general locations where impacts could be significant. It is the determination of volume changes during peak traffic flow periods that provides specific information on the type and location of impacts that could potentially occur. Figure 4 illustrates the relative traffic volume impacts related to development site traffic. Figure 4 also illustrates year 2017 background traffic volume plus initial site traffic at each of the potentially impacted intersections. Traffic volumes would increase on all of the potentially impacted streets, yet none of the streets east and south of the Graf Street and S 19th Avenue intersection would exceed the level of significance associated with a 10% increase. The highest percent increase attributable to initial development would be approximately 900% on a short section of Graf Street immediately east of South 27th Avenue. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 2 Capacity Table 3 presents capacity analysis results for year 2017 background traffic plus site generated traffic at the potentially impacted intersections. The addition of site development traffic to background traffic would not in itself substantially impact any of the existing intersections. In comparing Table 3 with Table 1, it can be seen that some of the movements at Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue would have a decreased LOS from “B” to “C” but the LOS on all legs of the intersection would remain the same as exists. The addition of two legs to the Graf Street and S 27th Avenue intersection would result in LOS “A” on all legs except for LOS “B” on the Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 3 southbound approach. The calculations assumed that stop control would be on S 27th Avenue, since Graf Street would have the highest volume of traffic. Future Operations Future traffic volumes were calculated using an annual growth rate of 2% per year and applied to the year 2017 through traffic volumes on S 19th Avenue. Through traffic on Graf Street west of S 19th would be dependent upon future development west of S 27th Street, which is speculative at this time. Traffic growth on Stucky Road appears to be stagnant when looking at counts taken 5 years ago. Since the majority of traffic on Stucky Road originates on Cottonwood Road, west of S 27th L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)25.3 19.9 19.4 20.4 5.4 17.6 5.8 16.7 LOS CB BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.61 0.10 0.02 0.19 0.03 0.31 0.07 0.21 Queue Length (95%)41 02 23 23 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)23.0 20.8 20.4 21.3 6.0 18.2 6.1 21.1 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.10 0.02 0.19 0.06 0.27 0.16 0.52 Queue Length (95%)32 02 14 45 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.6 17.9 9.2 16.8 20.1 18.2 LOS CB AB CB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.05 0.10 0.64 0.40 0.24 Queue Length (95%)51 39 62 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)28.0 24.2 15.0 12.2 30.2 14.7 LOS CC BB CB V/C Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.17 0.44 0.83 0.21 Queue Length (95%)62 27 142 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 Queue Length (95%)0011 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.0 11.0 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.11 Queue Length (95%)0001 18.5 18.8 A B 0.37 OVERALL OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour OVERALL B 0.43 OVERALL Table 3. Existing Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection WB NB SB Intersection Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group Movement Group OVERALL MOE EB Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour A S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour 18.0 B 0.55 Movement Group OVERALL S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour 22.8 C 0.68 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 4 Avenue, it would appear that future street system connections to the south of Graf Street would limit overall volumes increases in the future. Traffic Growth on Graf Street east of S 19th Avenue includes a number of known developments: University Districts Apartments Phases 2 and 3, University District Lot 5 commercial/residential subdivision, and the Yellowstone Theological Institute on the north side of Graf Street. Traffic projections for those developments along with traffic reassignment calculations for the Graf Street and 11th Avenue extension projects were used to develop year 2032 traffic volumes. All of the above noted assumptions were used to determine potential traffic volumes on the impacted street system. Figure 5 presents the full subdivision development traffic assignment for the Gran Cielo Subdivision development. Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 5 Figure 6 presents the combined background traffic and full development traffic volumes at the potentially impacted intersections. It can be seen that Traffic on Graf Street, immediately east of S 27th Avenue, would actually be less than the volumes shown in Figure 4. This is due to the fact that approximately 67% of the site traffic would use S 27th Avenue to access Stucky Road which would have a travel time advantage for trips to and from the north. An extension of S 27th Avenue north of Stucky Road was not considered, since timing of those improvements would probably be dependent upon future development scenarios between Stucky Road and Garfield Street. . Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 6 Future Capacity Table 4 presents a summary of calculations for year 2027 traffic conditions. Capacity calculations for the Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue intersection were based on future lane geometry and traffic signal modifications that would be developed as a condition of extending Stucky Road east of S 19th Avenue. LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)22.3 20.1 19.7 23.2 5.5 18.6 7.3 16.8 LOS CC BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.45 0.14 0.06 0.54 0.04 0.41 0.27 0.22 Queue Length (95%)32 23 14 34 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)22.1 21.0 20.4 22.4 6.1 18.9 6.9 21.2 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.30 0.14 0.03 0.35 0.07 0.34 0.27 0.53 Queue Length (95%)31 04 14 47 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)18.2 35.4 14.7 35.6 13.3 34.6 14.7 27.9 LOS BD BD BC BC V/C Ratio 0.52 0.28 0.03 0.31 0.05 0.78 0.04 0.51 Queue Length (95%)63 12 210 19 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)24.1 35.9 19.1 36.5 15.0 23.6 12.1 12.1 35.8 LOS CD BD BC BD V/C Ratio 0.59 0.24 0.02 0.32 0.13 0.43 0.21 0.86 Queue Length (95%)72 13 26 513 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 Queue Length (95%)0011 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.4 9.7 LOS AAAA V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.04 Queue Length (95%)0011 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.6 10.9 LOS ABB V/C Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.13 Queue Length (95%)111 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.013.69.9 LOS ABA V/C Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.07 Queue Length (95%)111 OVERALL OVERALL A S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour 29.2 C Movement Group 29.7 C 0.73 OVERALL 17.8 Table 4. Year 2032 Future Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection MOE EB WB OVERALL B S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Movement Group OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour A NB SB Intersection Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group OVERALL 0.47 0.46 18.6 B 0.60 OVERALL Movement Group OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour B Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour B Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 7 It was also assumed that Stucky Road would have a center continuous left turn lane at its intersection with S 27th Avenue. It can be seen that some of the movements at the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection would operate at LOS “D” in the future, but all of the approach legs would operate at LOS “C”. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Development of Gran Cielo Subdivision Development property, as detailed in this report, would add 2,656 vehicle trips to the surrounding street system on the average weekday when the subdivision is fully developed. The TIS has determined that this development will have minimal impacts to traffic operations on South 19th Avenue and at the intersections of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue if it existed today. Analysis of future traffic growth on the surrounding street system along with planned system improvements indicate that the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection would have some movements operating below the ideal LOS. However, the impacts would not be sufficient to cause any of the intersection approaches to suffer a LOS less than “C” When design of improvements to Stucky Road are begun, dual left turn lanes on the eastbound approach to the South 19th Avenue intersection should be considered. Time saved by using dual left turns would allow all movements within the intersection to operate at LOS “C” or better. The intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graff street should be controlled using stop signs on the on the S 27th Avenue northbound and southbound intersection approaches. Stop control should also be used on each of the internal street accesses to both Graf Street and S 27th Avenue. APPENDIX A Traffic Count Volumes Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 1202010.2% 2 2300110.2% 3 0010000.0% 4 1244120.3% 5 63181081.3% 6 15 4 7 15 21 17 2.7% 7 53 12 14 65 65 61 9.5% 8 51 24 16 56 60 56 8.8% 9 54 35 84 43 33 43 6.7% 10 41 29 53 32 30 34 5.3% 11 60 32 71 34 53 49 7.7% 12 63 37 27 45 36 48 7.5% 13 63 36 40 26 39 43 6.7% 14 46 24 29 28 31 35 5.5% 15 39 26 34 40 40 6.3% 16 49 41 36 34 44 45 7.0% 17 50 57 27 30 50 52 8.1% 18 48 39 25 42 32 40 6.3% 19 21 17 8 50 26 21 3.3% 20 21 10 11 8 21 17 2.7% 21 22 12 7 4 7 14 2.2% 22 510344 60.9% 23 46533 40.6% 24 06210 20.3% Total 220 693 393 557 585 380 639 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - Eastbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 1232320.3% 2 0411000.0% 3 1210000.0% 4 0140100.0% 5 2313220.3% 6 10 0 1 9 11 10 1.6% 7 37 7 263927345.3% 8 48 16 58 55 49 51 8.0% 9 41 17 52 26 40 36 5.6% 10 33 24 34 24 25 27 4.2% 11 60 25 33 41 42 48 7.5% 12 71 36 34 32 30 44 6.9% 13 52 32 37 45 49 49 7.6% 14 50 33 40 38 35 41 6.4% 15 36 25 42 37 37 5.8% 16 53 47 30 48 50 50 7.8% 17 65 56 34 63 79 67 10.5% 18 55 31 19 36 54 47 7.3% 19 37 20 21 28 35 31 4.8% 20 23 29 25 16 20 24 3.7% 21 24 23 17 12 14 20 3.1% 22 11 13 7 7 6 10 1.6% 23 69823 60.9% 24 67433 50.8% Total 280 677 392 582 616 314 641 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - Westbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Northbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 2434330.2% 2 2711110.1% 3 1220000.0% 4 1384220.2% 5 8 6 2 11 12 10 0.8% 6 25 4 8 24 32 27 2.1% 7 90 19 40 104 92 95 7.4% 8 99 40 74 111 109 106 8.3% 9 95 52 136 69 73 79 6.2% 10 74 53 87 56 55 62 4.9% 11 120 57 104 75 95 97 7.6% 12 134 73 61 77 66 92 7.2% 13 115 68 77 71 88 91 7.1% 14 96 57 69 66 66 76 6.0% 15 0 75517677 766.0% 16 102 88 66 82 94 95 7.4% 17 115 113 61 93 129 119 9.3% 18 103 70 44 78 86 86 6.7% 19 58 37 29 78 61 52 4.1% 20 44 39 36 24 41 41 3.2% 21 46 35 24 16 21 34 2.7% 22 16 23 10 11 10 16 1.3% 23 10 15 13 5 6 10 0.8% 24 613643 70.5% Total 500 1370 785 1139 1201 694 1277 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - EB & WB Volume Distribution 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Both Directions Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 7 39 26 6 8 7 0.2% 2 9 27 11 2 7 6 0.1% 3 42158040.1% 4 13 18 12 21 19 18 0.4% 5 41 20 17 59 60 53 1.2% 6 126 84 44 159 155 147 3.2% 7 366 170 102 465 482 438 9.6% 8 364 350 199 433 426 408 8.9% 9 355 411 290 260 272 296 6.5% 10 291 404 322 242 239 257 5.6% 11 319 352 283 234 280 278 6.1% 12 330 367 230 262 249 280 6.1% 13 327 237 268 211 261 266 5.8% 14 255 281 287 228 236 240 5.3% 15 285 271 243 303 263 273 6.0% 16 299 270 265 351 265 278 6.1% 17 259 318 252 301 278 285 6.2% 18 264 254 198 229 229 249 5.5% 19 313 306 156 192 163 261 5.7% 20 291 258 155 173 143 231 5.1% 21 188 139 121 56 54 127 2.8% 22 107 142 77 26 19 89 1.9% 23 38 82 40 15 18 46 1.0% 24 38 44 37 8 10 31 0.7% Total 2082 4891 4325 3750 4032 2694 4568 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - Northbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Northbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 7 32 13 5 7 6 0.2% 2 11 34 9 3 2 5 0.1% 3 21283220.1% 4 0282010.0% 5 12 5 11 12 7 10 0.3% 6 50 43 22 64 65 60 1.5% 7 127 60 74 182 157 155 3.9% 8 153 145 93 198 200 184 4.6% 9 137 150 166 161 208 169 4.2% 10 199 280 211 204 250 218 5.5% 11 284 240 275 279 249 271 6.8% 12 331 262 380 194 285 270 6.8% 13 315 333 381 277 286 293 7.4% 14 356 302 364 303 282 314 7.9% 15 391 359 332 323 383 378 9.5% 16 356 404 296 310 395 385 9.7% 17 472 458 264 336 514 481 12.1% 18 351 316 261 265 348 338 8.5% 19 118 99 244 174 290 169 4.2% 20 19 119 169 112 161 100 2.5% 21 46 129 145 82 122 99 2.5% 22 14 40 108 43 39 31 0.8% 23 31 23 51 18 31 28 0.7% 24 5 24321415 150.4% Total 1803 3955 3802 3692 4185 2000 3982 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - Southbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 14 71 39 11 15 13 0.2% 2 20 61 20 5 9 11 0.1% 3 6 331311 2 60.1% 4 13 20 20 23 19 18 0.2% 5 53 25 28 71 67 64 0.7% 6 176 127 66 223 220 206 2.4% 7 493 230 176 647 639 593 6.9% 8 517 495 292 631 626 591 6.9% 9 492 561 456 421 480 464 5.4% 10 490 684 533 446 489 475 5.6% 11 603 592 558 513 529 548 6.4% 12 661 629 610 456 534 550 6.4% 13 642 570 649 488 547 559 6.5% 14 611 583 651 531 518 553 6.5% 15 676 630 575 626 646 651 7.6% 16 655 674 561 661 660 663 7.8% 17 731 776 516 637 792 766 9.0% 18 615 570 459 494 577 587 6.9% 19 431 405 400 366 453 430 5.0% 20 310 377 324 285 304 330 3.9% 21 234 268 266 138 176 226 2.6% 22 121 182 185 69 58 120 1.4% 23 69 105 91 33 49 74 0.9% 24 43 68 69 22 25 45 0.5% Total 3885 8846 8127 7442 8217 4694 8543 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - NB & SB Volume Distribution 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Both Directions Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 25 23 29 8 9 7 12 0.2% 1 19171964690.1% 2 891155350.1% 3 413184250.1% 4 18 15 12 17 14 16 16 0.3% 5 82 44 24 85 80 81 82 1.3% 6 227 72 45 208 239 254 232 3.7% 7 635 201 131 695 727 754 703 11.3% 8 530 302 177 600 605 560 574 9.2% 9 401 367 375 388 386 385 390 6.3% 10 380 368 515 346 347 521 399 6.4% 11 470 325 492 411 496 450 457 7.3% 12 423 316 483 382 377 390 393 6.3% 13 411 325 291 324 333 356 356 5.7% 14 368 377 331 307 335 337 5.4% 15 435 431 337 283 412 424 426 6.8% 16 456 435 377 313 368 448 427 6.9% 17 442 470 403 320 385 452 437 7.0% 18 350 351 262 272 280 393 344 5.5% 19 243 265 170 230 177 220 226 3.6% 20 189 150 103 115 158 166 166 2.7% 21 174 181 108 75 95 97 137 2.2% 22 89 71 60 35 53 65 70 1.1% 23 33 42 34 14 28 18 30 0.5% Total 2411 6397 4628 4593 5746 6244 3785 6230 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - NORTHBOUND 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 30 41 39 14 17 19 20 0.3% 1 18263072890.1% 2 8151735350.1% 3 691140330.1% 4 1012974260.1% 5 38 25 17 56 31 39 41 0.7% 6 102 75 24 113 123 116 114 1.9% 7 253 113 113 260 249 264 257 4.4% 8 323 244 271 298 365 425 353 6.0% 9 298 266 253 239 286 245 267 4.6% 10 296 295 397 247 286 249 270 4.6% 11 338 348 296 328 277 327 318 5.4% 12 417 379 366 401 423 395 409 7.0% 13 440 387 358 352 369 385 387 6.6% 14 463 371 366 403 443 436 7.5% 15 516 552 376 304 482 469 505 8.6% 16 530 581 340 318 541 515 542 9.3% 17 553 534 296 406 586 637 578 9.9% 18 498 404 271 252 417 480 450 7.7% 19 344 247 195 220 296 334 305 5.2% 20 273 202 209 148 217 263 239 4.1% 21 191 282 138 86 121 162 189 3.2% 22 88 111 94 51 71 125 99 1.7% 23 58 64 67 33 33 43 50 0.8% Total 3051 6017 4592 4385 5496 5908 2480 5847 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - SOUTHBOUND 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 55 64 68 22 26 26 32 0.3% 1 37 43 49 13 6 14 18 0.1% 2 16 24 28 8 10 6 10 0.1% 3 10 22 12 12 4 5 8 0.1% 4 28 27 21 24 18 18 22 0.2% 5 120 69 41 141 111 120 123 1.0% 6 329 147 69 321 362 370 346 2.9% 7 888 314 244 955 976 1018 959 8.1% 8 853 546 448 898 970 985 927 7.8% 9 699 633 628 627 672 630 657 5.5% 10 676 663 912 593 633 770 668 5.6% 11 808 673 788 739 773 777 774 6.5% 12 840 695 849 783 800 785 802 6.7% 13 851 712 649 676 702 557 4.7% 14 831 748 697 710 778 773 6.5% 15 951 983 713 587 894 893 930 7.8% 16 986 1016 717 631 909 963 969 8.1% 17 995 1004 699 726 971 1089 1015 8.5% 18 848 755 533 524 697 873 793 6.7% 19 587 512 365 450 473 554 532 4.5% 20 462 352 312 263 375 429 405 3.4% 21 365 463 246 161 216 259 326 2.7% 22 177 182 154 86 124 190 168 1.4% 23 91 106 101 47 61 61 80 0.7% Total 5462 12414 9220 8978 11242 12152 5524 11892 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - NB & SB 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) NB & SB Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume Page 1 Stucky Road MARVIN & ASSOCIATESPO Box 80785Billings, MT 59108 Start31-Jul-17TueWedThuFriSatSunWeek AverageTimeEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWB12:00 AM * ***2668******4701:00****2356******4402:00 * ***1243******2203:00****2332******2204:00 * ***3745******4605:00****22312432******233206:00 * ***102 11293 83******98 9807:00****213214235220******22421708:00 * ***237256261248******24925209:00****142119154146******14813210:00 * ***170 134162 127******166 13011:00****249200269178******25918912:00 PM * ***201 209184239******192 22401:00****138196157185******14819002:00 * ***165 154102 134******134 14403:00****206163********20616304:00 * *270265256288********26327605:00**209253287249********24825106:00 * *162 173159 150********160 16207:00**112125103110********10811808:00 * *99 8199 110********99 9609:00**65465871********625810:00 * *28 2928 31********28 3011:00**9121415********1214Lane00954984285928331663161600000028432797Day01938569232790005640AM Peak - - - - 11:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 - - - - - - 11:00 08:00Vol. - - - - 249 256 269 248 - - - - - - 259 252PM Peak--16:0016:0017:0016:0012:0012:00------16:0016:00Vol. - - 270 265 287 288 184 239 - - - - - - 263 276 Comb.Total0 1938 5692 3279 0 0 0 5640 ADT ADT 5,650 AADT 5,650 Page 1 Stucky Road MARVIN & ASSOCIATESPO Box 80785Billings, MT 59108 Start31-Jul-17TueWedThuFriSatSunWeek AverageTimeWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEB12:00 AM * ***5257******5401:00****4352******4202:00 * ***2033******2203:00****3525******2504:00 * ***5342******4205:00****22192923******262106:00 * ***74 8846 95******60 9207:00****132216143237******13822608:00 * ***146295150288******14829209:00****75150104146******9014810:00 * ***107 127100 119******104 12311:00****157138119104******13812112:00 PM * ***146 134144141******145 13801:00****127107128114******12811002:00 * ***103 123102 78******102 10003:00****165138********16513804:00 * *266162263 158********264 16005:00**309154290196********30017506:00 * *156 140106 167********131 15407:00**841019774********908808:00 * *85 78112 61********98 7009:00**48396448********564410:00 * *30 1443 17********36 1611:00**10151212********1114Lane00988703226022811084136400000022472245Day01691454124480004492AM Peak - - - - 11:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00 08:00Vol. - - - - 157 295 150 288 - - - - - - 148 292PM Peak--17:0016:0017:0017:0012:0012:00------17:0017:00Vol. - - 309 162 290 196 144 141 - - - - - - 300 175 Comb.Total0 1691 4541 2448 0 0 0 4492 ADT ADT 4,501 AADT 4,501 APPENDIX B S 19th Avenue Speeds SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Northbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 35 35 4217 4217 19.61% 19.61% 36 to 40 40 1245 5462 5.79% 25.40% 41 to 45 45 2631 8093 12.23% 37.63% 46 to 50 50 5819 13912 27.06% 64.69% 51 to 55 55 5204 19116 24.20% 88.88% 56 to 60 60 1967 21083 9.15% 98.03% 61 to 65 65 271 21354 1.26% 99.29% 66 to 70 70 59 21413 0.27% 99.56% 71 to 75 75 43 21456 0.20% 99.76% 76 to 80 80 28 21484 0.13% 99.89% 81 to 85 85 16 21500 0.07% 99.97% 86 to 90 80 7 21507 0.03% 100.00% 0.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =21507 MEAN SPEED =48.34 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =54.20 mph PACE SPEED =46 mph TO 55 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =11023 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =51.3% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Southbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 35 35 659 659 3.56% 3.56% 36 to 40 40 2148 2807 11.61% 15.17% 41 to 45 45 5039 7846 27.23% 42.40% 46 to 50 50 5581 13427 30.16% 72.57% 51 to 55 55 3205 16632 17.32% 89.89% 56 to 60 60 1514 18146 8.18% 98.07% 61 to 65 65 259 18405 1.40% 99.47% 66 to 70 70 52 18457 0.28% 99.75% 71 to 75 75 25 18482 0.14% 99.89% 76 to 80 80 12 18494 0.06% 99.95% 81 to 85 85 7 18501 0.04% 99.99% 86 to 90 90 2 18503 0.01% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =18503 MEAN SPEED =48.95 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =53.59 mph PACE SPEED =41 mph TO 50 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =10620 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =57.4% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Southbound & Northbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 15 15 4876 4876 12.19% 12.19% 16 to 20 20 3393 8269 8.48% 20.67% 21 to 25 25 7670 15939 19.17% 39.84% 26 to 30 30 11400 27339 28.49% 68.33% 31 to 35 35 8409 35748 21.02% 89.35% 36 to 40 40 3481 39229 8.70% 98.05% 41 to 45 45 530 39759 1.32% 99.37% 46 to 50 50 111 39870 0.28% 99.65% 51 to 55 55 68 39938 0.17% 99.82% 56 to 60 60 40 39978 0.10% 99.92% 61 to 65 65 23 40001 0.06% 99.98% 66 to 70 70 9 40010 0.02% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =40010 750 MEAN SPEED =28.63 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =33.97 mph PACE SPEED =26 mph TO 35 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =19809 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =49.5% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE APPENDIX C-1 Existing Capacity Calculations HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 46 0.90 2 7 0.90 2 3 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 9 0.90 2 86 0.90 2 16 0.90 2 322 0.90 5 7 0.90 2 42 0.90 2 157 0.90 5 37 0.90 2 0 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 5 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 338 0.039 0.257 L 0.151 20.2 C 20.0 C TR 459 0.006 0.257 TR 0.024 19.4 B WB L 357 0.005 0.257 L 0.020 19.4 B 20.3 C * TR 416 0.048 0.257 TR 0.188 20.4 C NB Lper 445 0.000 0.429 17.0 B Lpro 329 0.010 0.186 L 0.023 5.4 A * TR 1175 0.107 0.343 TR 0.311 17.6 B SB Lper 347 0.000 0.429 14.5 B * Lpro 329 0.027 0.186 L 0.070 5.8 A TR 1160 0.062 0.343 TR 0.181 16.5 B Intersection: Delay = 16.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.23 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.18SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 1 / 1 7.7 0.0 TR 0 / 0 27.0 0.0 All 11.5 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 21.0 0.0 All 21.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 17.8 0.0 TR 2 / 4 13.7 0.0 All 13.8 0.0 SB L 1 / 2 12.1 0.0 TR 2 / 2 16.4 0.0 All 15.6 0.0 Intersect. 14.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 46 7 3 6 9 86 16 322 7 42 157 37 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 42 0.90 2 11 0.90 2 15 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 15 0.90 2 75 0.90 2 9 0.90 2 269 0.90 5 10 0.90 2 104 0.90 2 371 0.90 5 71 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 15 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 331 0.036 0.250 L 0.142 21.1 C 20.9 C TR 431 0.013 0.250 TR 0.053 20.5 C WB L 344 0.005 0.250 L 0.020 20.4 C 21.2 C * TR 412 0.044 0.250 TR 0.177 21.3 C NB Lper 277 0.000 0.417 17.8 B Lpro 369 0.006 0.208 L 0.015 5.6 A TR 1140 0.091 0.333 TR 0.272 18.2 B SB Lper 367 0.000 0.417 17.1 B * Lpro 369 0.066 0.208 L 0.158 6.1 A * TR 1124 0.141 0.333 TR 0.422 19.8 B Intersection: Delay = 17.9sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.32 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.25SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 1 / 2 6.9 0.0 TR 1 / 1 17.3 0.0 All 10.6 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 19.3 0.0 All 19.3 0.0 NB L 0 / 0 23.9 0.0 TR 2 / 3 13.3 0.0 All 13.4 0.0 SB L 2 / 4 12.8 0.0 TR 3 / 5 14.1 0.0 All 13.9 0.0 Intersect. 13.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 42 11 15 6 15 75 9 269 10 104 371 71 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: STUCKY & 19TH AM EXIST Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 223 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 41 0.90 2 413 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 209 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 27.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 30.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 80.0 Sec 11.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 597 0.140 0.338 L 0.415 20.6 C 20.3 C R 534 0.015 0.338 R 0.045 17.8 B NB Lper 408 0.000 0.450 13.4 B Lpro 177 0.026 0.100 L 0.079 8.9 A * T 950 0.254 0.525 T 0.483 13.9 B SB T 679 0.128 0.375 T 0.342 19.3 B 18.9 B R 590 0.092 0.375 R 0.244 18.2 B Intersection: Delay = 16.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.46 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.39SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: STUCKY & 19TH AM EXIST App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 4 / 5 7.2 0.0 R 0 / 1 25.6 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 NB L 1 / 3 10.2 0.0 T 4 / 6 16.8 0.0 All 16.3 0.0 SB T 4 / 8 14.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.5 0.0 All 15.6 0.0 Intersect. 14.7 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 223 27 41 413 209 225 1 26 24 2 8 04 3 30 24 3 30 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 234 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 29 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 34 0.90 2 351 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 511 0.90 5 242 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 28.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 34.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 85.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 583 0.147 0.329 L 0.446 22.6 C 22.3 C R 521 0.017 0.329 R 0.052 19.5 B NB Lper 163 0.000 0.471 12.6 B * Lpro 167 0.021 0.094 L 0.115 12.3 B T 980 0.215 0.541 T 0.398 12.6 B SB * T 724 0.314 0.400 T 0.785 30.6 C 27.8 C R 629 0.104 0.400 R 0.259 18.1 B Intersection: Delay = 22.2sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.59 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.48SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 5 / 5 6.7 0.0 R 1 / 2 25.2 0.0 All 10.8 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 15.5 0.0 T 4 / 6 16.3 0.0 All 16.2 0.0 SB T 9 / 12 11.9 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.4 0.0 All 12.8 0.0 Intersect. 13.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 234 29 34 351 511 242 1 27 24 2 8 04 3 34 24 3 34 24 APPENDIX C – 2 Existing Plus Site Capacity Calculations HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 185 0.90 2 18 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 12 0.90 2 86 0.90 2 21 0.90 2 322 0.90 5 7 0.90 2 42 0.90 2 157 0.90 5 72 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 15 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 337 0.157 0.257 L 0.611 25.3 C 24.3 C TR 438 0.026 0.257 TR 0.100 19.9 B WB L 347 0.005 0.257 L 0.020 19.4 B 20.3 C TR 419 0.050 0.257 TR 0.193 20.4 C NB Lper 427 0.000 0.429 16.9 B Lpro 329 0.013 0.186 L 0.030 5.4 A * TR 1175 0.107 0.343 TR 0.311 17.6 B SB Lper 347 0.000 0.429 14.9 B * Lpro 329 0.027 0.186 L 0.070 5.8 A TR 1143 0.071 0.343 TR 0.207 16.7 B Intersection: Delay = 18.5sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.37 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.29SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 3 / 4 8.5 0.0 TR 1 / 1 24.1 0.0 All 13.5 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 19.0 0.0 All 19.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 2 18.0 0.0 TR 2 / 3 13.8 0.0 All 14.0 0.0 SB L 0 / 2 20.2 0.0 TR 2 / 3 16.9 0.0 All 17.3 0.0 Intersect. 15.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 185 18 27 6 12 86 21 322 7 42 157 72 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 125 0.90 2 18 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 28 0.90 2 75 0.90 2 32 0.90 2 269 0.90 5 10 0.90 2 104 0.90 2 371 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 30 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 328 0.106 0.250 L 0.424 23.0 C 22.5 C TR 426 0.026 0.250 TR 0.103 20.8 C WB L 337 0.005 0.250 L 0.021 20.4 C 21.3 C TR 423 0.048 0.250 TR 0.191 21.3 C NB Lper 230 0.000 0.417 16.9 B Lpro 369 0.020 0.208 L 0.060 6.0 A TR 1140 0.091 0.333 TR 0.272 18.2 B SB Lper 367 0.000 0.417 18.5 B * Lpro 369 0.066 0.208 L 0.158 6.1 A * TR 1108 0.172 0.333 TR 0.517 21.1 C Intersection: Delay = 18.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.43 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.34SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 7.7 0.0 TR 1 / 2 21.4 0.0 All 12.6 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 17.0 0.0 All 17.0 0.0 NB L 1 / 1 10.5 0.0 TR 2 / 4 13.6 0.0 All 13.3 0.0 SB L 1 / 4 15.2 0.0 TR 4 / 5 14.8 0.0 All 14.8 0.0 Intersect. 14.3 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 125 18 27 6 28 75 32 269 10 104 371 225 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 223 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 29 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 50 0.90 2 543 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 242 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 27.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 30.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 80.0 Sec 11.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 597 0.140 0.338 L 0.415 20.6 C 20.3 C R 534 0.017 0.338 R 0.051 17.9 B NB Lper 376 0.000 0.450 16.1 B Lpro 177 0.032 0.100 L 0.101 9.2 A * T 950 0.333 0.525 T 0.635 16.8 B SB T 679 0.149 0.375 T 0.396 20.1 C 19.4 B R 590 0.092 0.375 R 0.244 18.2 B Intersection: Delay = 18.0sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.55 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.47SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 4 / 5 8.2 0.0 R 0 / 1 25.6 0.0 All 12.7 0.0 NB L 0 / 3 11.4 0.0 T 7 / 9 14.5 0.0 All 14.3 0.0 SB T 4 / 6 15.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.2 0.0 All 16.2 0.0 Intersect. 14.6 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 223 29 50 543 242 225 1 26 24 2 8 04 3 30 24 3 30 24 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 234 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 39 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 39 0.90 2 429 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 655 0.90 5 242 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 28.0 3.5 1.5 6.0 4.0 0.0 46.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 95.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 522 0.147 0.295 L 0.498 28.0 C 27.5 C R 467 0.024 0.295 R 0.081 24.2 C NB Lper 143 0.000 0.547 12.5 B * Lpro 112 0.024 0.063 L 0.169 15.0 B T 1067 0.264 0.589 T 0.447 12.2 B SB * T 876 0.402 0.484 T 0.831 30.2 C 27.4 C R 763 0.103 0.484 R 0.214 14.7 B Intersection: Delay = 22.8sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.68 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.57SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 5 / 6 6.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 22.3 0.0 All 10.2 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 9.8 0.0 T 6 / 7 16.2 0.0 All 15.7 0.0 SB T 11 / 14 12.3 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.2 0.0 All 13.1 0.0 Intersect. 13.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 234 39 39 429 655 242 1 27 24 2 6 04 3 46 24 3 46 24 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Existing Plus Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 69 1 5 17 26 1 1 13 103 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 6 17 123 Capacity, c (veh/h)1540 1501 929 795 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 0.8 8.9 10.4 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:31:10 PMS 27th Graf AM Exist Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Existing Plus Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 41 1 17 76 114 1 1 8 61 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 20 11 74 Capacity, c (veh/h)1333 1543 900 670 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.11 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.0 11.0 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.7 9.0 11.0 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:29:55 PMS 27th Graf PM Exist Plus.xtw APPENDIX C-3 Future Capacity Calculations HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 105 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 40 0.92 2 250 0.92 2 25 0.92 2 420 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 150 0.92 2 205 0.92 5 55 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 20 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 254 0.116 0.257 L 0.449 22.3 C 21.5 C TR 445 0.035 0.257 TR 0.135 20.1 C WB L 342 0.017 0.257 L 0.064 19.7 B 22.9 C * TR 421 0.139 0.257 TR 0.542 23.2 C NB Lper 412 0.000 0.429 17.9 B Lpro 329 0.015 0.186 L 0.036 5.5 A * TR 1170 0.140 0.343 TR 0.409 18.6 B SB Lper 286 0.000 0.429 13.2 B * Lpro 329 0.092 0.186 L 0.265 7.3 A TR 1164 0.077 0.343 TR 0.224 16.8 B Intersection: Delay = 17.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.47 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.37SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 8.5 0.0 TR 1 / 2 18.8 0.0 All 12.9 0.0 WB L 0 / 2 8.7 0.0 TR 2 / 3 19.8 0.0 All 19.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 19.2 0.0 TR 3 / 4 13.6 0.0 All 13.8 0.0 SB L 2 / 3 13.9 0.0 TR 2 / 4 15.3 0.0 All 14.9 0.0 Intersect. 15.0 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 105 30 30 20 40 250 25 420 30 150 205 55 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 85 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 45 0.92 2 120 0.92 2 35 0.92 2 350 0.92 5 10 0.92 2 170 0.92 2 480 0.92 5 130 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 30 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 60 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 309 0.074 0.250 L 0.298 22.1 C 21.7 C TR 433 0.035 0.250 TR 0.139 21.0 C WB L 333 0.008 0.250 L 0.033 20.4 C 22.2 C * TR 419 0.088 0.250 TR 0.351 22.4 C NB Lper 218 0.000 0.417 17.8 B Lpro 369 0.021 0.208 L 0.065 6.1 A TR 1141 0.114 0.333 TR 0.343 18.9 B SB Lper 320 0.000 0.417 17.8 B * Lpro 369 0.105 0.208 L 0.269 6.9 A * TR 1135 0.176 0.333 TR 0.527 21.2 C Intersection: Delay = 18.6sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.46 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.37SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 7.3 0.0 TR 1 / 1 22.3 0.0 All 12.9 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 2 / 4 17.7 0.0 All 17.7 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 21.7 0.0 TR 3 / 4 12.4 0.0 All 12.8 0.0 SB L 2 / 4 14.9 0.0 TR 4 / 7 13.3 0.0 All 13.5 0.0 Intersect. 13.6 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 85 30 30 10 45 120 35 350 10 170 480 130 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 305 0.92 2 35 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 25 0.92 2 50 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 715 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 275 0.92 5 250 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 70 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 22.0 4.0 0.0 12.0 3.5 1.5 10.0 4.0 0.0 27.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 90.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 203 0.000 0.189 21.0 C * Lpro 433 0.188 0.244 L 0.522 18.2 B TR 232 0.037 0.133 TR 0.280 35.4 D WB Lper 207 0.000 0.189 30.6 C Lpro 433 0.012 0.244 L 0.034 14.7 B * TR 224 0.042 0.133 TR 0.313 35.6 D NB Lper 217 0.000 0.367 34.0 C * Lpro 197 0.012 0.111 L 0.053 13.3 B * TR 1027 0.233 0.300 TR 0.778 34.6 C SB Lper 100 0.000 0.367 27.6 C Lpro 197 0.006 0.111 L 0.037 14.7 B TR 976 0.152 0.300 TR 0.507 27.9 C Intersection: Delay = 29.2sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.60 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.48SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 6 11.9 0.0 TR 1 / 3 15.2 0.0 All 12.2 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 13.9 0.0 TR 1 / 2 13.0 0.0 All 13.2 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 7.8 0.0 TR 8 / 10 9.5 0.0 All 9.5 0.0 SB L 0 / 1 9.3 0.0 TR 5 / 9 11.5 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 Intersect. 10.7 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 305 35 30 20 25 50 20 715 30 10 275 250 1 22 04 1 22 04 2 11 24 2 11 24 3 10 04 3 10 04 4 27 24 4 27 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 280 0.94 2 25 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 10 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 50 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 510 0.94 5 10 0.94 2 90 0.94 2 780 0.94 5 340 0.94 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 120 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 16.0 4.0 0.0 14.0 3.5 1.5 11.0 4.0 0.0 35.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 95.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 210 0.000 0.200 26.0 C * Lpro 298 0.168 0.168 L 0.587 24.1 C TR 251 0.035 0.147 TR 0.235 35.9 D WB Lper 228 0.000 0.200 34.4 C Lpro 298 0.006 0.168 L 0.021 19.1 B * TR 251 0.047 0.147 TR 0.319 36.5 D NB Lper 79 0.000 0.432 23.0 C Lpro 205 0.021 0.116 L 0.130 15.0 B TR 1267 0.158 0.368 TR 0.429 23.6 C SB Lper 261 0.000 0.432 33.8 C * Lpro 205 0.054 0.116 L 0.206 12.1 B * TR 1235 0.317 0.368 TR 0.862 35.8 D Intersection: Delay = 29.7sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.73 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.59SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 7 11.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 13.6 0.0 All 11.3 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 16.4 0.0 TR 2 / 3 9.4 0.0 All 9.6 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 7.1 0.0 TR 5 / 6 11.0 0.0 All 10.7 0.0 SB L 2 / 5 8.3 0.0 TR 9 / 13 10.3 0.0 All 10.2 0.0 Intersect. 10.4 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 280 25 35 10 35 50 35 510 10 90 780 340 1 16 04 1 16 04 2 13 24 2 13 24 3 11 04 3 11 04 4 35 24 4 35 24 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 65 1 5 16 5 1 10 10 20 5 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 6 25 31 Capacity, c (veh/h)1574 1507 845 802 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 9.4 9.7 Level of Service, LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 1.5 9.4 9.7 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:34:03 PMS 27th Graf AM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 39 1 10 71 22 1 5 5 11 10 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 12 13 26 Capacity, c (veh/h)1466 1545 811 733 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)7.5 7.3 9.5 10.1 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.8 9.5 10.1 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:36:18 PMS 27th Graf PM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)295 5 25 150 10 80 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)28 11 89 Capacity, c (veh/h)1214 557 695 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.13 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.6 10.9 Level of Service, LOS A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)1.2 11.0 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:43:26 PMS 27th Stucky AM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)200 15 95 310 10 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)103 11 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)1322 431 796 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 13.6 9.9 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh)1.9 10.5 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:45:39 PMS 27th Stucky PM Future Plus.xtw MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 1300 N. Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 80785 Billings, MT 59108-0785 Phone: 406-655-4550 FAX: 406-655-4991 Page 1 Chris Budeski, P.E. Madison Engineering 895 Technology Blvd, Suite 203 Bozeman, MT 59718 December 11, 2017 Re: Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study Addendum Subsequent to submittal of a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) dated October 24, 2017 for the proposed Gran Cielo Subdivision, the City of Bozeman Planning staff reviewed the study and requested additional information in a memo dated November 18, 2017. Item number 9 in that letter indicated that there are several development projects within the vicinity of the subdivision that were not included in future traffic projections that need to be included in the analysis. The three developments mentioned in the letter are all contained within the boundaries of the Meadow Creek Subdivision. Since there were no TIS reports prepared for the individual projects listed, it was determined that the entirety of Meadow Creek Subdivision should be included in the analysis A TIS for Meadow Creek Subdivision was completed by Robert Peccia and Associates in 2005. That study indicated that the subdivision would generate 5,382 trips on the average weekday with 414 in the peak am hour and 530 in the peak pm hour. Trip distribution and traffic assignment analysis completed with that study no longer apply to 2017 conditions because of new street links that have been created and additional development in the southern areas of Bozeman. Therefore, trip distribution percentages determined for the Gran Cielo subdivision were used to assign Meadow Creek Subdivision traffic. Attached Figure 7 was created to illustrate the additional traffic that would be attributed to Meadow Creek Subdivision on the area street system. Since a portion of Meadow Creek Subdivision has already been developed, it was necessary to subtract existing traffic from the overall trip generation totals, as noted in Figure 7. The resultant trip generation from future development of Meadow Creek Subdivision would be 3,682 average weekday trips (AWT) with 284 in the AM hour and 362 in the peak PM hour. The Meadow Creek Subdivision traffic assignment volumes shown in Figure 7 were added to traffic shown in Figure 6 of the original TIS for Gran Cielo Subdivision. Figure 6 Revised is attached and represents an estimate of year 2032 traffic volumes with full occupation of the Gran Cielo Subdivision. MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 1300 N. Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 80785 Billings, MT 59108-0785 Phone: 406-655-4550 FAX: 406-655-4991 Page 2 Capacity calculations (Revised Appendix C-3 attached) were completed for future conditions based upon the peak am and peak pm volumes, as shown in Figure 6 Revised. Table 4 Revised, below, is a summary of the capacity calculations results. In comparing Table 4 Revised to the original Table 4, it can be seen that some of the levels of service (LOS) for individual movements have changed at the two intersections on S 19th Avenue. The most appreciable difference would be at the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection during the peak pm hour, where the overall intersection LOS would drop from LOS “C” to LOS “D”. L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)29.2 19.8 19.1 22.7 6.5 20.1 8.3 19.2 LOS CB BC AC AB V/C Ratio 0.68 0.18 0.06 0.54 0.07 0.45 0.28 0.37 Queue Length (95%)41 14 25 56 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)24.4 21.1 20.4 22.6 6.9 19.2 7.1 23.7 LOS CC CC AB AC V/C Ratio 0.54 0.15 0.03 0.39 0.10 0.37 0.28 0.67 Queue Length (95%)43 03 25 69 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)19.8 36.4 15.5 36.6 13.2 33.1 15.6 25.0 LOS BD BD BC BC V/C Ratio 0.56 0.29 0.04 0.32 0.06 0.81 0.05 0.48 Queue Length (95%)62 13 210 17 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)24.6 35.9 19.1 36.5 16.9 24.7 12.1 12.7 50.5 LOS CD BD BC BD V/C Ratio 0.61 0.24 0.02 0.32 0.13 0.51 0.23 0.98 Queue Length (95%)72 13 27 518 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 9.4 10.3 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.05 Queue Length (95%)0011 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.4 7.4 10.2 11.0 LOS AABB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.06 Queue Length (95%)0111 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.7 11.0 LOS ABB V/C Ratio 0.02 0.03 0.13 Queue Length (95%)111 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.014.09.9 LOS ABA V/C Ratio 0.09 0.03 0.07 Queue Length (95%)111 S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour 28.4 C Movement Group 37.5 D 0.79 OVERALL 19.7 Table 4 Revised - Year 2032 Future Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection MOE EB WB OVERALL B S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour NB SB Intersection Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group OVERALL 0.55 0.58 20.3 C 0.67 OVERALL Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 1300 N. Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 80785 Billings, MT 59108-0785 Phone: 406-655-4550 FAX: 406-655-4991 Page 3 From this supplemental TIS analysis it appears that the addition of the Gran Cielo Subdivision, as proposed, would not substantially impact the surrounding streets or intersection operations, if it existed at the present time. However, future operations at the intersection of Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue would experience increased delays during the peak pm hour periods, if Gran Cielo is fully developed at the same time as all other area developments are in-place. It should be noted that future area street improvements have the potential to mitigate these impacts if implemented within the next 15 years. An extension of S 27th Avenue from Stucky Road to Garfield street would draw appreciable traffic demand from S 19th Avenue, which could allow acceptable operation at the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection in the year 2032. In the event that that the S 27th Avenue connection is not completed in that time period, dual left turn lanes for eastbound traffic on Stucky Road and an exclusive southbound right-turn lane on S 19th Avenue could be considered when future improvements to Stucky Road is designed. Robert R. Marvin, P.E., P.T.O.E. REVISED APPENDIX C-3 Future Capacity Calculations HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 166 0.92 2 54 0.92 2 43 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 56 0.92 2 250 0.92 2 39 0.92 2 451 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 150 0.92 2 255 0.92 5 161 0.92 2 15 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 40 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 20.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 263 0.190 0.278 L 0.684 29.2 C 26.1 C TR 490 0.050 0.278 TR 0.182 19.8 B WB L 360 0.017 0.278 L 0.061 19.1 B 22.4 C TR 459 0.149 0.278 TR 0.536 22.7 C NB Lper 311 0.000 0.417 19.1 B Lpro 320 0.024 0.181 L 0.067 6.5 A * TR 1138 0.150 0.333 TR 0.450 20.1 C SB Lper 258 0.000 0.417 16.1 B * Lpro 320 0.092 0.181 L 0.282 8.3 A TR 1101 0.124 0.333 TR 0.371 19.2 B Intersection: Delay = 19.7sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.55 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.43SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 3 / 4 6.9 0.0 TR 1 / 1 22.2 0.0 All 12.6 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 7.9 0.0 TR 3 / 4 19.5 0.0 All 18.9 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 13.4 0.0 TR 4 / 5 13.0 0.0 All 13.0 0.0 SB L 2 / 5 13.6 0.0 TR 3 / 6 14.7 0.0 All 14.5 0.0 Intersect. 14.3 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 166 54 43 20 56 250 39 451 30 150 255 161 1 19 24 1 19 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 146 0.92 2 39 0.92 2 38 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 61 0.92 2 120 0.92 2 49 0.92 2 381 0.92 5 10 0.92 2 170 0.92 2 530 0.92 5 236 0.92 2 15 5 0 0 --- --- 30 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 297 0.134 0.250 L 0.535 24.4 C 23.4 C TR 439 0.038 0.250 TR 0.153 21.1 C WB L 331 0.008 0.250 L 0.033 20.4 C 22.5 C TR 424 0.097 0.250 TR 0.387 22.6 C NB Lper 158 0.000 0.417 17.8 B Lpro 369 0.030 0.208 L 0.101 6.9 A TR 1141 0.124 0.333 TR 0.372 19.2 B SB Lper 302 0.000 0.417 20.4 C * Lpro 369 0.105 0.208 L 0.276 7.1 A * TR 1118 0.222 0.333 TR 0.667 23.7 C Intersection: Delay = 20.3sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.58 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.46SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 3 / 4 7.2 0.0 TR 1 / 3 17.4 0.0 All 11.5 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 2 / 3 17.5 0.0 All 17.5 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 16.0 0.0 TR 3 / 5 13.0 0.0 All 13.2 0.0 SB L 2 / 6 13.3 0.0 TR 6 / 9 12.2 0.0 All 12.3 0.0 Intersect. 12.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 146 39 38 10 61 120 49 381 10 170 530 236 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 321 0.92 2 35 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 25 0.92 2 50 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 865 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 319 0.92 5 256 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 70 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 22.0 4.0 0.0 12.0 3.5 1.5 7.0 4.0 0.0 32.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 92.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 197 0.000 0.185 22.4 C * Lpro 423 0.197 0.239 L 0.563 19.8 B TR 227 0.037 0.130 TR 0.286 36.4 D WB Lper 202 0.000 0.185 31.6 C Lpro 423 0.012 0.239 L 0.035 15.5 B * TR 219 0.042 0.130 TR 0.320 36.6 D NB Lper 240 0.000 0.413 32.7 C * Lpro 135 0.012 0.076 L 0.059 13.2 B * TR 1192 0.281 0.348 TR 0.807 33.1 C SB Lper 88 0.000 0.413 24.8 C Lpro 135 0.006 0.076 L 0.049 15.6 B TR 1138 0.168 0.348 TR 0.482 25.0 C Intersection: Delay = 28.4sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.67 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.53SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 6 12.4 0.0 TR 1 / 2 10.4 0.0 All 12.1 0.0 WB L 1 / 1 14.3 0.0 TR 2 / 3 10.5 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 NB L 0 / 2 6.5 0.0 TR 9 / 10 10.2 0.0 All 10.1 0.0 SB L 0 / 1 8.7 0.0 TR 5 / 7 12.2 0.0 All 12.1 0.0 Intersect. 11.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 321 35 30 20 25 50 20 865 30 10 319 256 1 22 04 1 22 04 2 11 24 2 11 24 3 7 04 3 7 04 4 32 24 4 32 24 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 290 0.94 2 25 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 10 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 50 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 602 0.94 5 10 0.94 2 90 0.94 2 936 0.94 5 357 0.94 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 150 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 16.0 4.0 0.0 14.0 3.5 1.5 11.0 4.0 0.0 35.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 95.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 210 0.010 0.200 26.4 C * Lpro 298 0.168 0.168 L 0.608 24.6 C TR 251 0.035 0.147 TR 0.235 35.9 D WB Lper 228 0.000 0.200 34.4 C Lpro 298 0.006 0.168 L 0.021 19.1 B * TR 251 0.047 0.147 TR 0.319 36.5 D NB Lper 79 0.000 0.432 24.3 C Lpro 205 0.021 0.116 L 0.130 16.9 B TR 1267 0.186 0.368 TR 0.505 24.7 C SB Lper 218 0.000 0.432 47.7 D * Lpro 205 0.054 0.116 L 0.227 12.7 B * TR 1243 0.361 0.368 TR 0.978 50.5 D Intersection: Delay = 37.5sec/veh Int. LOS=D Xc= 0.79 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.63SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue12/8/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 7 11.1 0.0 TR 1 / 2 14.7 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 17.8 0.0 TR 2 / 3 9.4 0.0 All 9.5 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 7.5 0.0 TR 5 / 7 11.4 0.0 All 11.2 0.0 SB L 3 / 5 7.2 0.0 TR 15 / 18 6.9 0.0 All 6.9 0.0 Intersect. 8.3 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 290 25 35 10 35 50 35 602 10 90 936 357 1 16 04 1 16 04 2 13 24 2 13 24 3 11 04 3 11 04 4 35 24 4 35 24 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/8/17 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 65 1 16 16 5 1 14 46 20 8 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 19 72 34 Capacity, c (veh/h)1574 1506 891 719 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.05 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 9.4 10.3 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 3.3 9.4 10.3 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.4 Generated: 12/9/2017 3:23:17 PMS 27th Graf AM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/8/17 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.88 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 39 1 45 71 22 1 8 5 11 21 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 51 16 38 Capacity, c (veh/h)1471 1548 713 639 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.06 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)7.4 7.4 10.2 11.0 Level of Service, LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 2.6 10.2 11.0 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.4 Generated: 12/9/2017 3:20:40 PMS 27th Graf PM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/8/17 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)297 6 27 157 14 80 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)30 16 89 Capacity, c (veh/h)1210 551 693 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.03 0.13 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.7 11.0 Level of Service, LOS A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)1.2 11.1 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.4 Generated: 12/9/2017 3:25:24 PMS 27th Stucky AM Future Plus.xtw HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 12/8/17 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)207 20 104 314 13 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)113 14 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)1306 415 785 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.03 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 14.0 9.9 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh)2.0 10.8 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.4 Generated: 12/9/2017 3:26:42 PMS 27th Stucky PM Future Plus.xtw Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Park and Recreation Facilities One public park area (4.24 acres) is proposed as part of this project. An updated park plan is attached to this section. The park is located in the approximate center of the subdivision and will be completed during the first phase of the work. It will contain play berms, benches, picnic tables, playground equipment, trees, neighborhood center shelters, plantings and open play space. All maintenance, weed control, garbage collection, snow removal, leaf removal, and irrigation maintenance will be coordinated and paid for by the subdivisions Home Ow ners Association (HOA). A maintenance plan is included in the Park Plan, and maintenance shall become the responsibility of the Home Owners Association. The proposed/required parkland acreage calculation summary is provided in this section. Enhanced park amenities are proposed in-lieu of approximately 3.31 acres of required parkland. A cost estimate of these "enhancements" is provided in the Master Park Plan in this section. GRAND CIELO SUBDIVISION PARKS MASTER PLAN May 10th, 2019 Prepared for: Bozeman Haus, LLC 8401 Wagon Boss Road Bozeman, MT 59715 506-599-0516 Prepared By: Land Design Inc., Billings, MT 1 | P a g e Gran Cielo Subdivision Park Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction Overall Project Description 2 Parkland Summary 3 Cash In-Lieu Summary 4 Adjacent Property Ownership and Zoning 4 Vicinity Map 5 Soil Information 6 Plat Map 7 Park Plan Gran Cielo Park 8 Pathway System 8 Trail System 8 Street Trees 8 Site Furniture 9 Playground Equipment 15 Irrigation Plan 19 Well Information 19 Park Maintenance 19 Cost Estimate 21 2 | P a g e Overall Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision is location in Gallatin County on the south edge of Bozeman, Montana. Located E1/2NE 1/4NW ¼ and the SE ¼ NW ¼ of Section 23, Township 2 South Range 5 East P.M.M. The owner is Bozeman Haus LLC, 8401 Wagon Boss Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715. The developer is Cadius Partners, LLC at 8401 Wagon Boss Road, Bozeman, Montana 59715. The Gran Cielo Park lies in the center of Phase 1. It is 184,904 square feet, or 4.24 acres. This park will contain a 5,900 sq. ft. playground, two custom park shelters, water fountain, outdoor ping pong table, corn hole area, benches, picnic tables, trees and planting and open space. The proposed/required parkland acreage summary is provided in this section. Park amenities are proposed in-lieu of approximately 3.31 acres of required parkland. A cost estimate of these enhancements is provided. 3 | P a g e Parkland Summary Gran Cielo Subdivision Parkland Summary Lot Area (SF) Single-unit Lots Multi-unit Lot Area (SF) Multi-units per Lot 12/acre Park Area (SF) Total Units Block 1 59,280 9 9 Block 2 44,173 7 7 Block 3 83,705 12 12 Block 4 60,236 10 10 Bock 5 35,748 5 5 Lot 3 19,311 5 5 Block 6 46,510 10 10 Lot 5 21,694 6 6 Lot 12 14,373 4 4 Block 7 84,273 12 12 Block 8 20,980 2 2 Block 9 184,907 Block 10 79,774 10 10 Block 11 23,160 3 3 Block 12 47,825 7 7 Lot 5 21,166 6 6 Block 13 60,028 14 14 Lot 1 14,322 4 4 Lot 9 36,391 10 10 Block 14 Lot 1 63,197 17 17 Lot 2 72,448 20 20 Lot 3 88,987 25 25 Lot 4 80,653 22 22 Block 15 Lot 1 10,541 1 1 Lot 2 8,444 1 1 Lot 3 8,454 1 1 Lot 4 8,364 1 1 Lot 5 12,540 3 3 Lot 6 27,350 8 8 Lot 7 20,110 6 6 Lot 8 21,183 6 6 Block 16 43,287 5 5 Total 724,782 110 513,725 142 184,907 252 Total Lot Area: 1,238,507 Total Units: 252 Net Residential Density: 8.9 Parkland Req’d per Unit: 0.03 Parkland Area Req’d (acres): 7.56 Park Area Provided (acres): 4.24 “In-Lieu” Req’d (acres): 3.31 4 | P a g e Cash In-Lieu Calculation Parkland Fair Market Value – (Area Removed from development via Cash In-Lieu Donation) Type Description Unit Quantity Price/Unit Total Required Parkland – Fair Market Value ($1.50/ft2) Parkland reduction via Cash In-Lieu AC 3.31 $63,540.00 $210,317.40 Central Parkland Improvements – (Cash value added to Central Park development in Lieu of Parkland) Type Description Unit Quantity Price/Unit Total Total Price Estimate for Improved Parkland Per drawings & detailed cost estimate AC 4.24 $358,722.90 $1,520,985.08 5 | P a g e Vicinity Map 6 | P a g e Adjacent Property Ownership and Zoning The Gran Cielo property has historically been used for agriculture. The property is bordered to the north by land owned by Hyalite Village Investors, LLC (zoned County) and the Milfred Rafferty Trust (zoned R4). Land to the northwest is owned by Charles Marvin (zoned County). The Barbara Ann Harrison Family Trust owns the land to the west (zoned County). South and southwest lands are owned by Diane L. Brawner L TEV RT (zoned County) to the southeast is the Meadow Creek Subdivision (zoned R3) and land to the east is owned by Marshall and Luzann Bennett (zoned county). See Plat map on page 7. Soils Information Soils in the Gran Cielo Subdivision are primarily loams, typical of relict stream terraces. Meadowcreek loam comprises the majority of the area with minor instances of Blackmore silt loam, Turner loam, and Enbar-Nythar Loam. Soils are deep, nutrient rich and slightly alkaline. Loam soils are appropriate for park development and suitable for woody plant growth, herbaceous plants and seeded or sodded grassland. 7 | P a g e Plat Map 8 | P a g e Parks Plan The overall plan for the Gran Cielo park provides a cohesive park system that includes pathways and open space for the community as well as play structures, covered seating areas, and picnic opportunities. This community/neighborhood park will provide opportunities for physical activity by encouraging outdoor play to improve human health while also provide social benefits with outdoor gathering areas to support people eating, playing and gathering together. The Gran Cielo parks shall – 1. Provide a variety of recreational activities, both passive and active in nature, ranging from picnic areas housed under shelters, informal play fields to play structures, sledding hills, table tennis, and cornhole boards. 2. Creative yet functional, attractive plantings will provide wildlife habitat, seasonal interest, shade, wind protection, visual and audio buffers to block sound into and out of the park. 3. Park improvements will include two community gathering areas featuring two shelter areas with picnic tables. Park parcel to be contoured to provide interest as a highpoint for the neighborhood and as a prominent park feature. 4. Along the pathway system a series of benches will be placed for resting opportunities as well as viewing areas to the water fountain, play structures and open space created throughout the park. Pathway System A pathway system, that hints to a nautilus shape, meanders throughout the park leading to all areas of the park. The paved concrete paths trails will be 5’ wide to meet city and ADA requirements and standards. Standard 6-foot wide sidewalks will circumvent the perimeter of the park per city standards. There will be a total of 24,145 sq. ft. of paved concrete pathways throughout the park. Trail Corridor Trail system to include Class II trails and will meet current City of Bozeman standards. The trail system located in Block 14 and will bisect east-west and north-south and totals 10,620 sq. ft. with 1,062 lineal feet of trails. Where the 30’ wide trail corridor borders the public streets, the boulevard will be established with turf grass and one street tree. Street Trees Proposed street trees per Bozeman Tree Guide and placed per code. See included drawings. 9 | P a g e Site Furniture Benches – The 6’ backed and backless benches are made from recycled materials that are high quality to withstand the Bozeman climate. The seat slats are constructed with extruded aluminum with a powder coat finish in the gray- taupe color. The steel frame will be powder coated in a black gloss. There will be 11 benches situated throughout the site. Picnic Table – Matching the bench system, the picnic tables and benches are made from the same high quality, extruded aluminum. The seat and table slats are to be painted the gray-taupe color powder coat and the steel frame will be powder coated in a black gloss. The large shelter area will house two picnic tables and the smaller shelter will house one table system. 10 | P a g e Trash Receptacle - There will be two trash receptacles placed next to the shelter areas. These matching units are made from recycled materials of the same high- quality aluminum and steel. They will be painted to match the picnic tables and benches. Bike Rack – Bike rack rings are to be positioned near the play ground for easy access for users. Frames to be made of a steel coated with a zinc epoxy then finished with a polyester powder coating. There are a total of 5 within the site. 11 | P a g e Concrete Ping Pong Table – Two of these durable concrete ping pong tables will be located next to the playground area. They are regulation size and will be surface mounted to the concrete pad with tamper resistant screws. They are virtually maintenance free with a graffiti resistant coating and top coat resists weather damage. Cornhole Boards - A set of regulation sized cornhole boards to be placed near the playground area for an additional outdoor activity. Boards are made from a high-grade concrete for durability and longevity in the Bozeman climate. 12 | P a g e Water Fountain – Located just north of the main entrance to the park is a large basalt rock water feature. Three basalt columns ranging in size from 3’4” up to 7’4” in height will be positioned in the center of the planting bed. The water feature is to be pond-less with the cavity filled with 3-4” river rock. The water level will be below the river rock so no water will be showing. This is to help keep the overall maintenance to a minimum. Access to the pump will be available nearest the connection to water and power. The picture shows is an example of the type of columns to be used. Dog Station – This dog station will be used at two entrances to the park and will be mounted on a metal plate with 4x4 wood posts on either side. This is done to match the park entrance signs. They provide signage, bag dispenser and trash receptacle. 13 | P a g e Entry Signage – Entry signs are positioned at the north and south entrances. They will be installed as shown in this image. Surrounding the sign will be plantings to help ground the sign and make it feel welcoming. The sign will be powder coated steel plate and lettering, with 6x6 steel posts powder coated to match. A timber beam and brackets will add detail and interest to the sign. Pedestrian Bridge – This custom built pedestrian bridge adds a distinct feature to the park at the intersection of the pathways; one above and one below. The bridge is built using steel supports and rails with wood decking. Large concrete footings will be set to act as a retaining wall for the lower pathway and as the support for the bridge. The bridge measures 20’ in length and 5’ wide. 14 | P a g e Small Shelter – In keeping with the modern theme, the shelters will provide the same look and feel as the site while providing practical function. The small shelter will measure 15’-8” by 14’-6” and will constructed with 8x8 steel post, wood beams and a metal roof. Large Shelter – To match the smaller shelter, the large shelter will be constructed with 8x8 steel posts, wood beams and a metal roof. The overall size will be 20’4” x 18’-8” 15 | P a g e Playground Equipment Explorer Dome - This imaginative net dome is a large multi-acting playground piece manufactured by Kompan and is intended for children ages 5-12. Multi-Activity Platform - The Multi-Activity Platform structure is manufactured by Kompan and is intended for children 6-12 years of age. 16 | P a g e Equipment Connection – The custom rope connection designed by Kompan will attach to both the Explorer Dome and Multi-Activity Platform creating a large intercepted play experience. Intended age range is 6-12 year old’s Supernova Merry Go-Round – The modern take on the merry-go- round makes the supernova one of favorites at the playground. There are many play opportunities with this structure for all abilities. It is designed for children 5-12 years old. 17 | P a g e West Elk Traverse – The West Elk Traverse is designed with physical challenges and imaginative play combined. Manufactured by ID Sculpture, this structure is intentioned for children 5-12 years of age. Sandstone Boulder – The Sandstone Boulder is designed to give kids a nature- inspired climbing adventure. Manufactured by ID Sculpture, this structure is intentioned for children 5-12 years of age. 18 | P a g e Miram Stake Rocker – Designed to give kids the feeling of staking a half-pipe or wherever their imagination takes them, the stake rocker is designed for kids 5-15 years of age. The play structure is manufactured by Kompan. Tightrope – Not your average tightrope play equipment, this features uses steel ropes that are bound together to give the users foot a platform on which to balance. As pictured the steel ropes have some give which allows for additional physical effort by the user to stay balanced. This feature is manufactured by Goric and is intended for children 5 years of age and above. Play Surfacing - The entire playground surface will be covered in a layer of CPSC compliant wood chips. Installation to be completed by an experienced playground contractor with manufacturer specific approval. 19 | P a g e Irrigation Plan The Gran Cielo Park will be irrigated to provide adequate water to all plant materials during the spring, summer and fall months. A well located onsite will provide the water for the lawn zones and drip zones. All trees within the park will be irrigated by the lawn spray zones. Turf in the park will be a blend of drought tolerant fescue and Kentucky Blue Grasses for durable, drought tolerant grass blend. Specific irrigation zones quantities, and hardware details can be found in the plan set. Irrigation shall be installed to meet all City of Bozeman Park Division design guidelines and requirements. Well Information A well drilled in a nearby park produced 42 gpm with the drill stem set at 40 feet for 1 hour with a 1 hour recovery time. Total depth of the well is 45 feet. Static water depth is 6 feet. Well log data indicates abundant water is available for park irrigation. Park Maintenance The project developer will be responsible for the maintenance and care of the parks, pathways, and open space until 75% of the lots are sold. The developer shall warrant against defects in the initial improvements for a period of two years from the date of their written acceptance by the City of Bozeman. At that time, the maintenance shall become the responsibility of the Home Owners Association having been formed under the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Gran Cielo Subdivision. The home owners shall be responsible for maintenance in perpetuity, or until such time as a park maintenance district, or some other mechanism, is created to maintain dedicated park land. The HOA Board of Directors will provide Waiver of Protest to the City of Bozeman upon its formation. At this time, it is planned for the developer to contract out the park and open space maintenance functions. Maintenance duties may include spring pruning, mowing, fertilizing, water, fall pruning and play equipment maintenance. Spring care will be as follows: As soon as the snow is gone and the grass is dry enough to walk on without compaction, remove leaves and winter debris with a broom-type rake. Power raking at 3-5 year intervals will be beneficial for heavily thatched lawns. Aerating will also alleviate compacted soil conditions and should be preformed when necessary. Pruning of trees and shrubs shall occurs in early spring before leaves emerge, except of maples and birch, which shall be pruned in late July. Pruning shall be preformed according to the ISA standards to 20 | P a g e encourage good plant health, proper shape and branch angles, and to eliminate unwanted suckers. No topping of trees will be allowed. Fall pruning to shrubs and perennials to be completed after leaves have dropped and shrubs are bare. Shrubs to be cut to shape and pruned to height as necessary. Grasses to be cut back to a mounded shape in late winter/early spring. Perennials to be cut back to ground height with exception to the artemisia which will be cut back in fall by one-third or one-half. Mowing will start in the spring as soon as the new growth starts. Most lawns should be mowed at a 2” height in the spring, early summer and fall. During the heat of the summer, raise the mower to 2.5”. Frequent mowing at 4-5 day intervals is essential to discourage weeds. Native grass areas are not intended to be mown, although they should be mowed to control weeds until grasses are established. Mowing direction to be switched each week to alleviate compaction under mower wheels and to discourage ruts in the lawn areas. Fertilizer will be applied at regular intervals a minimum of three times per year to all turf grass lawn areas. A slow release granular 16-16-16 or high nitrogen lawn fertilizer to be used at the prescribed application rate. First application to be in early spring when first mowing occurs, then repeated every 6-8 weeks throughout the growing season. Fertilizer to be applied to a dry lawn then watered in after applying. Fertilizer mixed with a broadleaf weed herbicide to be used in summer months to control weed growth. Iron added to the fertilizer is recommended for our area, during certain times of the year. Check selected lawn fertilizer application rates on the back of the bags for time of use. Enough water will be applied at each watering to soak the soil down to the depth of the root system. To conserve water, the amount of water applied will vary with the amount of natural rainfall. Recommended is 1” of water per week. The turf will be allowed to dry out between waterings. Weed control will be the responsibility of the HOA. Weed control will consist of regular herbicide applications after final grade work has been completed and before seeding or sodding is to occur. Once turf areas are established, broadleaf weeds will be managed with a broadcast application of a broadleaf weed herbicide. In landscape shrub beds a spot treatment application of Round-Up to be applied weekly or as needed to maintain week growth. Any broadcast applied herbicide will be applied on a day with no wind, to a wet lawn when temperatures are above 70 degrees, but below 90. The area will then not be watered for 2 days to follow. Before the spreading of the mulch cover or top dress, a pre-emergent herbicide to be applied at prescribed application rate as stated on bag. Example of a pre-emergent is Snapshot 2.5 TG. Snow removal to be part of the HOA’s responsibilities and to include removal of all pathways on perimeter and throughout park. Leaf removal to occur seasonal as needed and services to be provided by the HOA. Garbage collection to be the responsibility of the HOA. Gran Cielo ParkMay 10, 2019Landscape Quantities & Estimated CostsFor illustration purposes only- this is a preliminary estimateEstimate based on assumed site conditions. Actual site conditions may vary.Master Plan - Cost EstimateEarthwork & Site PrepTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Rough GradingSupplied by development SF 217,800 $0.15 $0.25 $32,670.00 $54,450.00 $43,560.00Fill MaterialSupplied by development CY 16,043 $15.00 $20.00 $240,645.00 $320,860.00 $280,752.50Top SoilSupplied by development CY 3,215 $30.00 $35.00 $96,450.00 $112,525.00$104,487.50Spread Top Soilall planted areas SF 173,644 $0.23 $0.23 $39,382.46 $39,382.46 $39,382.46Fine Gradingincludes all hardscape areas SF 217,800 $0.08 $0.08 $16,465.68 $16,465.68 $16,465.68Subtotal$425,613.14$543,683.14$484,648.14Site HardscapeTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Concrete Pavement4" standard gray concrete - all concrete inside back of curb SF 24,160 $5.35 $5.35 $129,256.00 $129,256.00 $129,256.00Architectural Guard Rail On top of wall - to match bridge LF 166 $106.06 $106.06 $17,605.30 $17,605.30 $17,605.30Curb RampsEA 16 $2,250.00 $2,250.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00Architectural Bridge20' Steel LS 1 $36,940.00 $36,940.00 $36,940.00 $36,940.00 $36,940.00Blockrock Retaining Wall2345 SFF 2-8' height TON 650$270.00$270.00$175,500.00$175,500.00$175,500.00Site BouldersGranite BouldersTON 12 $236.52$236.52$2,838.24$2,838.24$2,838.24Water FountainBasalt Columns & BasinLS 1 $23,329.08 $23,329.08$23,329.08$23,329.08$23,329.08Soft Surface PathCompacted Decorative GravelSF 280$2.12$2.12$594.00$594.00$594.00Subtotal$422,062.62$422,062.62$422,062.62Site Furnishings & ImprovementsTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Picnic TablesKnight Table Ensemble (Backless) EA 5 $4,374.00 $4,374.00 $21,870.00$21,870.00 $21,870.00BenchesKnight Bench (Backless with extruded aluminum slats) EA 6 $1,039.50 $1,039.50 $6,237.00 $6,237.00 $6,237.00BenchesKnight Bench (Back with extruded aluminum slats) EA 8 $2,688.12 $2,688.12 $21,504.96 $21,504.96 $21,504.96Park SignMonument Sign - Large EA 1 $8,154.00 $8,154.00 $8,154.00 $8,154.00 $8,154.00Park SignMonument Sign - Small EA 3 $1,494.00 $1,494.00 $4,482.00 $4,482.00 $4,482.00Bike racksDumor 293 EA 5 $496.80 $496.80 $2,484.00 $2,484.00 $2,484.00Dog StationsModern Style - Custom Mount EA 2 $1,728.00 $1,728.00 $3,456.00 $3,456.00 $3,456.00Garbage CansKnight Litter Receptacle EA 2 $1,782.00 $1,782.00 $3,564.00 $3,564.00$3,564.00Subtotal$71,751.96$71,751.96$71,751.96 Playground & Play EquipmentTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Play StructureParkour Connector EA 1 $18,060.87 $18,060.87 $18,060.87 $18,060.87 $18,060.87Play StructureEdge CustomEA 1 $52,812.04 $52,812.04$52,812.04$52,812.04$52,812.04Play StructureExplorer Dome by Kompan EA 1 $81,209.89 $81,209.89$81,209.89$81,209.89$81,209.89Play StructureSupernovaEA 1 $10,132.02 $10,132.02$10,132.02$10,132.02$10,132.02Play StructureClimbers - West elk traverseEA 1 $27,493.52 $27,493.52$27,493.52$27,493.52$27,493.52Play StructureSandstone BoulderEA 2 $9,873.70 $9,873.70$19,747.41$19,747.41$19,747.41Play StructureMiram Skate RockerEA 1 $21,803.99 $21,803.99$21,803.99$21,803.99$21,803.99Play StructureGoric TightropeEA 1 $14,090.04 $14,090.04$14,090.04$14,090.04$14,090.04Play SurfacingWood Chips CPSC compliantCY 47$40.50$40.50$1,903.50$1,903.50$1,903.50Concrete Playground Curbing12"x12"LF 414 $11.26$15.24$4,662.68$6,308.33$5,485.50Subtotal$251,915.96$253,561.61$252,738.78Recreation EquipmentTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Recreation EquipmentPing Pong Table - Concrete Outdoor LS 2 $6,130.53 $6,130.53 $12,261.07 $12,261.07 $12,261.07Recreation EquipmentBYOB all concrete bag toss game set LS 1 $1,442.88 $1,442.88 $1,442.88$1,442.88$1,442.88Subtotal$12,261.07$12,261.07$13,703.95LandscapeTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Deciduous Trees2-3" Cal EA 104 $646.13 $646.13 $67,197.60 $67,197.60 $67,197.60Shrubs: 5 galEA 49 $57.03 $57.03 $2,794.50 $2,794.50 $2,794.50Grasses: 1 galEA 140 $18.91 $18.91 $2,647.08 $2,647.08 $2,647.08Grasses: 2 galEA 25 $48.06 $48.06 $1,201.50 $1,201.50 $1,201.50Perennials: 1 galEA 26 $42.87 $42.87 $1,114.56 $1,114.56 $1,114.56Lawn SeedingHydroseeding SF 167,515 $0.13 $0.13 $21,709.94 $21,709.94 $21,709.94Plug PlantingMint 24" O.C. EA 545 $3.24 $3.24 $1,765.80 $1,765.80 $1,765.80Landscape EdgingAluminum LF 1,030 $4.39 $4.39 $4,524.66 $4,524.66 $4,524.66Mulch Ground Cover and FabricSF 3,994 $1.62 $1.62 $6,470.28 $6,470.28 $6,470.28ShippingTrees & Shrubs EA 6 $500.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00Subtotal$112,425.92$112,425.92$112,425.92IrrigationTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Irrigation System Parts & Labor SF 173,644 $0.36 $0.36 $62,639.44 $62,639.44 $62,639.44Irrigation System ConnectionAllowance for non-permitted Well EA 1 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00Subtotal$74,249.44$74,249.44$74,249.44Buildings & StructuresTypeDescriptionUnitQuantityLow-Est./UnitHigh-Est./UnitLow-RangeHigh-RangeAverage Est.Secondary Park ShelterEA 1 $15,441.30 $15,441.30 $15,441.30 $15,441.30 $15,441.30Primary Park ShelterEA 1 $19,896.30 $19,896.30 $19,896.30 $19,896.30 $19,896.30LightingAllowance in Shelters only LS 1 $1,750.68 $1,750.68 $1,750.68 $1,750.68$1,750.68Site ElectricalTie to Electrical Service on siteLS 1 $9,049.84 $9,049.84$9,049.84$9,049.84$9,049.84Structural EngineeringLS 1 $5,712.00 $5,712.00$5,712.00$5,712.00$6,168.96Subtotal$51,850.12$51,850.12$52,307.08Construction Total$1,422,130.22 $1,541,845.87 $1,483,887.89Construction Management LS 1 2.50% $37,097.20Total$1,520,985.08 Gran Cielo Detention & Boulevards May 10, 2019 Landscape Quantities & Estimated Costs For illustration purposes only- this is a preliminary estimate Estimate based on assumed site conditions. Actual site conditions may vary. Cost Estimate Detention & Boulevards Type Description Unit Quantity Low-Est./Unit High-Est./Unit Low-Range High-Range Average Est. Boulevard Turf Seeding SF 47,992 $0.13 $0.13 $6,238.96 $6,238.96 $6,238.96 Native Grass Seeding Detention basins SF 33,800 $0.13 $0.13 $4,394.00 $4,394.00 $4,394.00 Street Trees 3 - 2"-3" Trees installed and staked EA 112 $646.13 $646.13 $72,366.56 $72,366.56 $72,366.56 Shrubs: 5 gal EA 204 $57.03 $57.03 $11,634.24 $11,634.24 $11,634.24 Grasses: 1 gal EA 116 $18.91 $18.91 $2,193.29 $2,193.29 $2,193.29 Irrigation System Parts & Labor SF 81,792 $0.36 $0.36 $29,505.22 $29,505.22 $29,505.22 Irrigation System Connection Allowance for 35 GPM Well EA 1 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 $11,610.00 Subtotal $137,942.28 $137,942.28 $137,942.28 Construction Management LS 1 2.50%$3,448.56 Total $141,390.84 Gran Cielo Trail Corridors May 10, 2019 Landscape Quantities & Estimated Costs For illustration purposes only- this is a preliminary estimate Estimate based on assumed site conditions. Actual site conditions may vary. Cost Estimate Trail Corridors Type Description Unit Quantity Low-Est./Unit High-Est./Unit Low-Range High-Range Average Est. Class II Trails 10' Compacted Gravel SF 10,620 $2.12 $2.12 $22,514.40 $22,514.40 $22,514.40 Boulevard Turf Seeding Native Seed SF 1,062 $0.13 $0.13 $138.06 $138.06 $138.06 Street Trees 3 - 2"-3" Trees installed and staked EA 3 $646.13 $646.13 $1,938.39 $1,938.39 $1,938.39 Subtotal $24,590.85 $24,590.85 $24,590.85 Construction Management LS 1 2.50%$614.77 Total $25,205.62 Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application Affordable Housing The subdivision will conform to the BMC Affordable Housing Requirements. An Affordable Housing Plan Application (Form AH) and updated affordable housing calculations are provided in this section. Bozeman Affordable Housing Gran Cielo Subdivision Townhomes Detached Homes Total Total Units in Development 12 96 108 Market Rate Units 12 96 108 Lower Priced Units - 10% of Total or 0 0 0 Moderate-Priced Units - 30% of Total 0 0 0 Fractional Units (Cash-in-Lieu)1.2 9.6 10.8 Three Bedroom Units 12 96 10.8 Cash-in-Lieu for Three Bedroom units 1.2 9.6 10.8 Cash-in-Lieu Fee (per 3-bedroom)$97,889 X 10.8 =$1,057,201.20