HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-15-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A4. Bogert Pavilion Repair Recommendation
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Jon Henderson, Strategic Services Director Anna Rosenberry, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Bogert Pavilion Repair Recommendation
MEETING DATE: July 15, 2019 MEETING TYPE Action
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Option 2 for repair of the Bogert Pavilion as listed in the Structural Assessment Report.
BACKGROUND:
The Parks Division along with the Strategic Services Department have been working on a path
forward regarding the Bogert Pavilion partial roof collapse since the initial failure on March 17th,
2019. After securing the site, the City contracted with Morrison Maierle to perform a structural assessment of the facility. The collapse was determined to be a result of unbalanced snow load
in conjunction with rotting and delamination of the exposed western end of the failed glue
laminated beam. A final report was received on April 10th which included several options for
repair. City staff are recommending Option 2 which includes full replacement of the failed
beam (#4) along with replacement of the western half of beams #2, #8, and #9 along with adequate weather protection for the remaining beams.
At least three options are offered for consideration. Option 1 involves replacing the failed beam,
along with splicing additional rotted sections out of three other beams. Option 2 involves
replacing the failed beam, along with replacing the western half of three other beams. Option 3 involves replacing eight out of ten beams in their entirety. The first and second options rely on
the building code that was in place at the time of original construction, while the third option
brings the structure up-to-date with current building code which includes prescribed load
deficiencies in addition to wind and seismic events. Finally, an option to demolish the structure
was included in the report (Option 4). Constructing a new facility at the same location is not allowed under the current development code.
Bogert Pavilion Cost Estimates
Morrison-Maierle Martel
Option 1 $147,044 $167,673
Option 2 $182,346 $229,408
Option 3 $653,260 $524,753
Option 4 $227,062 $231,234
506
In addition, it is recommended that the repair specification include some manner of adequate
weather protection for the new and remaining glue laminated beams where they are exposed to
the weather.
The Facilities Superintendent and Parks Superintendent are in the process of developing a plan
for annual inspection and preventative maintenance for all park facilities (including a citywide
condition inventory budgeted for FY20 Q3). Routine maintenance will allow for a more
proactive approach in an effort to avoid future issues.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: Some degree of checking, cracking, and delamination was observed in all beams throughout the
facility resulting from decades of exposure. While Option 2 replaces a total of five beam ends,
nine other beam ends were found to have signs of wear that could result in future concerns (i.e., fourteen out of twenty beam ends show signs of decay). City staff believe that routine inspection
and maintenance along with the addition of adequate weather protection will be sufficient to
support future use of the facility.
Structural calculations indicate eight of the ten glue laminated beams are overstressed by over 50% under currently accepted code required loads. In addition, the current configuration of the
facility does not include lateral force (wind, seismic) resisting elements in the north/south
direction.
Park operations have experienced significant impact since the collapse. All reservations for the Pavilion have been cancelled until a repair has been completed.
FISCAL EFFECTS:
$200,000 has been allocated within the FY20 budget to offset costs associated with repair.
Initial cost estimates for Option 2 fall between $182,346 and $229,408. Additional costs associated with adequate weather protection for the remaining beam ends will be included in the
final bid documents. Option 3 would require additional budget cuts to identify necessary funds.
MMIA is working with their reinsurer to determine the proper coverage. Early indications
suggest there may be coverage for “all damage as a result of the collapse, but not the rotten beam”. They will be sending engineers to the site after which MMIA will meet with the City to
discuss the three options.
$11,899.69 has been spent to date (structural assessment + fence rental). $22,333 remains on a
contract with Morrison Maierle to produce final bid drawings prior to construction.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission.
Report Compiled on: 07/03/19 Attachments: Structural Assessment Report
Cost Estimates
507
Structural Assessment Report
Date: 04/10/19 Project: City of Bozeman
Bogert Park Pavilion: Structural
Assessment and
Recommendations
Report By: Jay Fischer, P.E.
Rebecca Scheetz, E.I.T.
Project Number: 0417.083
Reported To: Mike Gray
MGray@bozeman.net
City of Bozeman
BACKGROUND
The Bogert Park Pavilion was originally constructed in the late 1970’s with a plywood roof
supported on wood I-joists spanning between glue laminated arched main beams. The glue
laminated arched beam system was constructed and erected as two separate half arched
sections connected with a steel strap at the apex of the arch.
During our research and conversations regarding the existing pavilion, it was found and discussed
with City personnel that a fire in the summer of 2006 caused significant damage to several of the
arched glue laminated main beams. A previous assessment report that focused on the fire
damage recommended the two (2) exterior glue laminated arched beams be replaced. The report
indicated the interior arched glue laminated sections were sufficient and did not require
replacement.
In the evening hours of March 17th, the Bogert Park Pavilion experienced a partial collapse of one
of the interior arched glue laminated main beams. The partial collapse was located in the
Northwest portion of the pavilion. Following the partial collapse of the pavilion roof, a structural
assessment was requested by the City of Bozeman. The initial structural assessment report
provided to the City on 3/18/19 described the current condition of the roof system and gave
recommendations for the short-term safety of the pavilion (see Appendix A for reference).
The following assessment report serves as a follow-up to the report dated 3/18/2019. This report
verifies assumptions and identifies factors that may have contributed to the partial collapse of an
interior arched glue laminated main beam. In addition, this report provides options and
recommendations for short and long-term solutions for the occupancy of the Bogert Park Pavilion.
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES
The following are the objectives of the structural assessment and report:
1) Perform a structural analysis of the existing Bogert Park Pavilion to verify assumptions
and identify potential factors contributing to the partial collapse of the structure.
2) Provide an opinion on how to mitigate the immediate safety concerns with the partial
collapse of the existing roof and provide options for occupancy and use of the Bogert
Pavilion facilities.
508
3) From the structural analysis and assessment, provide the City of Bozeman with options
and recommendations for short-term and long-term rehabilitation of the Bogert Park
Pavilion.
SITE OBSERVATIONS
On the morning on March 18th, Morrison-
Maierle structural engineers Jay Fischer, P.E.,
and Rebecca Scheetz, E.I.T., performed a
preliminary visual structural assessment of
the partial collapse of the Bogert Park Pavilion
roof. It was observed that the fourth main
arched glue laminated beam from the north
end (Beam #4) had failed and split just above
the west end connection, where it is
connected to a concrete pier foundation. (see Figure 1).
Additionally, the western section of the failed interior
arched glue laminated beam had rotated about the apex
and caused rotation in the connection to the eastern
section. Due to this rotation, delamination was observed
in the middle laminates near the apex of the east arched
glue laminated beam section. (see Figure 3).
In the investigation of Beam #4 it was found the glue
laminated beam had deteriorated due to moisture
exposure and rotted through the cross section of the
member in several of beam’s laminations. We observed
the beam had rotted through (approximately the top three
to four laminates). The location of the rotted laminates
coincided with location of failure; (see Figures 1 and 2).
A limited portion of the arched beam was still attached to
the concrete pier foundation. We did not observe
damage or failure of the concrete pier or the connection
plates.
In addition to the main structural failure, it was observed
several of the other arched glue laminated
beams showed signs of significant
checking/cracking and/or delamination at the
exposed ends at both the east and west
support connections. Three (3) arched
beams on the west side showed signs of
significant deteriorations with laminate rotting
along with delamination. The arched glue
laminated beams observed to exhibit the
most severe rotting and/or delamination were
Beams #2, #8 and #9; (see Figures 4, 5,
and 6), and Appendix C for reference.
Figure 2: Beam Failure from Interior (GLB #4)
Figure 1: Location of Partial Collapse (GLB#4)
Figure 2 - Failed Arched Beam Interior
Figure 3: Delamination East Section at Apex
509
Figure 6: - Rotting and Delamination of Beam #8 Figure 7: Typical Pier Foundation/Connection
Additional specific locations of structural concern have been documented in the attached
structural plan view in Appendix B (updated from our report of 3/18/19 based on drawings
provided by the City).
The existing connection of the arched glue laminated beams to the concrete pier foundations
consisted of painted steel bent plates/angles on each side of the beam with three (3) painted thru-
bolts and two (2) anchor rods per plate for a total of four (4) anchor rods. (see Figure 7) for
reference. The exterior bolts and steel plates appeared to be in good condition and corrosion
was not observed on the exterior of the plates. It was not possible to determine if corrosion was
Figure 5 – Delaminating of Beam #2 Figure 4: Delaminating of Beam #2
510
present on the inside face on the steel plate. Additionally, without deconstruction of a connection,
it was not possible to determine if the thru-bolts have corroded inside the wood beam.
The concrete pier foundations were observed to be in good condition without major structural
issues observed. The concrete piers did show normal signs of wear and typical irregularities for
this age of concrete; (see Figure 7). Our structural assessment did not include the observation
of the existing concrete foundation footings. It is assumed the concrete foundation footings are
constructed below frost level on suitable bearing soil. We did not observe conditions that would
indicate settlement, differential settlement, frost heave, or conditions associated with bearing
failure of the concrete foundation footings.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS APPROACH AND RESULTS
The structural members, material properties, and dimensions are based on the information that
could be determined from the documents provided to us by the City of Bozeman. Where
assumptions were necessary, they are stated herein.
Documents provided to us by the City indicate all ten (10) glue laminated arched beams sustained
damage during the fire in the summer of 2006. The engineers involved in the restoration effort
stated that the eight (8) interior glue laminated arched beams suffered only a minor loss of section
(4%) and could be salvaged in the restored structure. The two (2) exterior glue laminated arched
beams suffered more severe damage as a result of the fire, and the structural engineers involved
advised that these beams be replaced in their entirety with grade 24F-V8 DF/DF GLB 5.125x28.5.
Our structural analysis assumes that the City accepted and implemented these
recommendations.
The primary loading condition considered in this analysis was snow loading, as this was
determined to be the critical loading scenario that triggered the partial collapse. A lateral analysis
based on wind and seismic loading was not included in the loading scenarios and therefore not
considered in the analysis.
Though this structure was likely designed in accordance with the applicable Code at the time of
the design (likely the 1973 Uniform Building Code, code required loads have evolved and
increased significantly in the 42 years since the Bogert Park Pavilion was designed and
constructed. As a result, we have chosen to evaluate facility with respect to past and present-
day code requirements. Analyses were performed with both 1973 UBC and 2012 IBC loads for
comparison purposes. Table 1 presents the snow loads prescribed by the 1973 UBC and 2012
International Building Code.
Table 1: Snow Loadings Used in Structural Analysis
Load Case Magnitude
1973 UBC Balanced Snow Loading 30 psf
1973 UBC Unbalanced Snow Loading* one side only, same magnitude as balanced
2012 IBC Balanced Snow Loading 42.5 psf
2012 IBC Unbalanced Snow Loading* one side only, magnitude varies per code
* Unbalanced snow loading is an extreme case of asymmetrical loading where one half of the is
fully loaded while the other half is completely void of snow. This most commonly occurs when a
roof surface is subjected to unequal wind or sun exposure.
511
To further our understanding of the structural systems and load paths, representative glulam
beams were modeled using a 3-D finite element modelling software. See Appendix D for
reference. Per documents provided to us by the City of Bozeman, the original grade of all glue
laminated arched beams was assumed to be 24F-V4 DF/DF. As a result of the 2006 fire, the
interior and exterior member grades were assumed to 24F-V4 DF/DF and 24F-V8 DF/DF,
respectively.
The results from snow loading based on the 1973 UBC and 2012 IBC on interior and exterior
glulam beams are presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The results are expressed as a unity
value, where a unity value of 1.00 or less indicates that the member is within its acceptable design
limit and unity value larger than 1.00 indicates that the member is overstressed.
Table 2: Structural Analysis of Existing GLB Sections with respect to 1973 UBC
Location Member Size Grade Load Case Unity Value
Interior GLB 8.75X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (balanced) 0.75
Interior GLB 8.75X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (unbalanced) 1.17
Exterior GLB 5.125X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (balanced) 0.62
Exterior GLB 5.125X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (unbalanced) 1.00
These results indicate that the exterior beams were designed to maximize their capacity and the
interior glulam beams were designed to be up to 17% overstressed under the unbalanced snow
load prescribed by the 1973 UBC requirements.
Table 3: Structural Analysis of Existing GLB Sections with respect to 2012 IBC
Location Member Size Grade Load Case Unity Value
Interior GLB 8.75X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (balanced) 0.96
Interior GLB 8.75X28.5 24F-V4 DF/DF D + S (unbalanced) 1.52
Exterior GLB 5.125X28.5 24F-V8 DF/DF D + S (balanced) 0.69
Exterior GLB 5.125X28.5 24F-V8 DF/DF D + S (unbalanced) 1.01
512
These results indicate that, when evaluated with
respect to current code requirements, the interior and
exterior glulam beams may be up to 52% and 1%
overstressed respectively when loaded with snow on
one side of the roof.
While on site, it was observed that Beams #2 and #4
were spliced at their east ends at some point, (see
Figure 8). Though not accounted for in Table 3, the
presence of a hinge at this location has the potential
to further increase stresses throughout the glue
laminated arched beams.
It is important to acknowledge that the results
presented in Table 3 do not account for loss of
structural capacity due to 40+ years of exposure and
the resulting deterioration. As mentioned, several
areas of structural concern were noted during the
initial visual assessment of the structure, with the
exposed ends of nearly every beam showing signs of checking, cracking, delamination and/or
rotting; (see Figures 4, 5 and 6 and Appendix B for reference).
Observations made during our initial site visit on 3/18/2019 showed that an unbalanced snow load
was likely the loading scenario that was present during the partial collapse of the Bogert Park
Pavilion. However, it should be noted that the stress profile of a representative interior glue
laminated arched beam reveals that the critical location of maximum stress due to an unbalanced
snow load does not correspond to the location of the physical failure. The maximum critical stress
due to an unbalanced snow load is located opposite the unbalanced snow load, and thus outside
the area where the partial collapse occurred; (see Appendix D for reference). Based on this
information, it can be deduced that the unbalanced snow load was not the only factor contributing
to the partial collapse of the facility’s roof.
Given that the structural failure occurred in an exposed area of the roof, it is our opinion that
structural deficiencies resulting from 40+ years of exposure and the resulting deterioration
contributed to the partial collapse of the pavilion. Structural calculations indicate that the collapsed
beam’s depth of 28.5 inches would need to be effectively reduced by only about 33% to result in
a collapse at the location of the failure. Figure 1 shows that the bottom ~24 inches of the collapsed
beam had rotted, which corresponds to about 84% of the beam’s depth.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the analysis results, visual observations, and assessment of the arched glue laminated
beams, we believe the partial collapse of the Bogert Park Pavilion was a result of an unbalanced
snow load in conjunction with rotting and delamination of the laminates at the exposed western
end of the failed arched beam. It is important to note we observed similar severe delamination
and rotting in Beam #2, #8 and #9 at their same respective western end connections.
We recommend the City of Bozeman continues to secure the facility and limit temporary access
to only necessary personnel. In addition, we recommend one of the following options for the short-
term immediate occupancy of the space:
Figure 8 – Splice Connection
513
Option 1) A. Remove Beam #4 from the apex to the ground on the western facing curve of
the roof. The roof system will need to be removed in the bays adjacent to Beam
#4 resulting in a large “skylight” in the pavilion’s roof. The remaining half of the
arch will need to be supported at the apex with a column-type support element
carried down to the existing slab on grade.
B. Provide three to four thru-bolts at the apex of the eastern half of beam #4 to
provide compression and shear strength of the delaminated element.
C. Provide additional struts to adequately support Beams #3 and #5 laterally.
D. Splice Beams #2, #8 and #9 to remove the rotted and delaminated sections of
each beam.
Option 2) A. Remove Beam #4 in its entirety. Similar to Option 1, the roof system will need
to be removed in the bays adjacent to Beam #4.
B. Provide additional struts to adequately support Beams #3 and #5 laterally.
C. Remove the western half of Beams #2, #8 and #9 and replace with new
sections.
When considering time and cost to deconstruct and reconstruct the collapsed portion, we believe
Option 1 is the more efficient and cost-effective option to facilitate a safe structure and allow
occupancy in a timely manner.
For the long-term use of the existing facility, code-mandated minimum repair requirements must
be considered in accordance with the International Existing Building Code (IEBC). Chapter 2 of
the 2012 International Existing Building Code (IEBC) defines Substantial Structural Damage as
follows:
“A condition where the capacity of any vertical gravity load-carrying component, or any group of
such components, that supports more than 30 percent of the total area of the structure’s floor(s)
and roof(s) has been reduced by more than 20 percent from its predamage condition…”
Even though several interior glue laminated arched beams may have suffered a reduction in
their vertical load carrying capacity, we calculated the damaged components support less than
30 percent of the total roof area. Consequently, we do not believe the damage sustained by the
Bogert Park Pavilion meets the criteria required to be classified as Substantial Structural
Damage. Based on this information, code-mandated minimum required repairs allow for the
restoration of the building to its predamaged condition based on material properties and design
strengths applicable at the time of original construction (ref. 2012 IEBC Section 606.2.1).
Based on this information, the following options are recommended for the long-term use of the
facility:
Option 1) Based on the 2012 IEBC definition of substantial structural damage indicated
above, the minimum repair required by Section 606.2.1 shall consist of the
following:
A. Replace the east and west sections of Beam #4 in their entirety to their original
configuration, size and connection detailing.
B. Replace the damaged portions of beams #2, #8 and #9. Partial replacement
would involve replacing the exposed western ends of the beams and using a
splice connection to connect the new sections to the existing glue laminated
beams.
514
Option 2) Similar to Option 1,
A. Replace the east and west sections of Beam #4 in their entirety to their original
configuration, size and connection detailing.
B. Replace the western half of beams #2, #8, and #9 from the apex to the western
concrete pier foundation.
Option 3) Complete replacement of the eight (8) interior arched glue laminated beam to
meet the requirements of the current adopted building codes.
For each option listed above, the exposed ends of all new or existing glue laminated beams should
be protected from the environmental conditions to prevent further exposure-related damages. In
addition, the connections to the pier foundation shall be constructed with galvanized steel
elements with stainless steel thru-bolts.
In closing, we further recommend the City consider the vulnerability of the 1970’s design and
construction in all long-term planning and related short-term actions. Structural calculations
indicate eight (8) of the ten (10) glue laminated beams are overstressed by over 50% under
currently accepted code required dead, live, and snow loads. In addition, the current configuration
of the Bogert Park Pavilion does not include lateral force (wind, seismic) resisting elements in the
North/South direction. As the options listed above are reviewed, the City may want to also
consider these building code requirements, prescribed loads, and load configurations in
determining the next steps for the Bogert Park Pavilion.
This concludes our analysis of snow/exposure related damage and recommendations for future
occupancy. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have.
LIMITATIONS
Our discussions and opinions expressed in the information above does not express nor imply
any warranty or guarantee of the existing conditions and is limited to the directed areas of focus
and structural elements that were observable at the time of these efforts. There is no claim,
neither stated nor implied, that all faulty conditions were or could be determined based on the
limited scope of our efforts. We are available to continue investigations that will provide more
detail on the conditions and measures necessary to address any damage or deficiencies.
Morrison-Maierle, Inc.
Jay B. Fischer, P.E.
Attachments:
Appendix A – Initial Structural Assessment provided to the City on 3/18/19 (3 pages)
Appendix B - Bogert Park Pavilion - Structural Sketch (1 page)
Appendix C – Site Photos (9 pages)
Appendix D – Structural Calculations (17 pages)
515
Appendix A – Initial Structural Assessment provided to the City on 3/18/19
516
Structural Assessment Report
Date: 03/18/19 Project: City of Bozeman
Bogert Park Pavilion: Structural Assessment
Initial Structural Analysis
Report By: Jay Fischer, P.E.
Rebecca Scheetz, E.I.T.
Project Number: 0417.083
Reported To: Mike Gray
MGray@bozeman.net
City of Bozeman
BACKGROUND
A section of the roof in Bogert Park Pavilion collapsed in the evening hours of March 17th, a
structural assessment was requested by the City of Bozeman. This report covers an initial
structural analysis of the Bogert Park Pavilion roof to assess the potential hazards associated
with its current condition and exposure.
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES
We understand the primary objectives of this structural assessment to be as follows:
1) Conduct a preliminary visual condition assessment of the roof.
2) Obtain photographs of the damage sustained to monitor the system as necessary.
3) Obtain photographs and measurements of the components of the roof system to aid in
potential future structural modeling and analysis efforts.
4) Use the information obtained to help the City of Bozeman manage and mitigate safety
concerns with this roof.
ON-SITE OBSERVATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS OF AREAS OF CONCERN
Morrison-Maierle structural engineers Jay Fischer, P.E., and Rebecca Scheetz, E.I.T., arrived on
site at approximately 9:30AM on Monday, March 18th to make a preliminary visual structural
assessment of the partial collapse of the Bogert Park Ice Rink roof.
At the time of the assessment, existing drawings of the Pavilion were not available. To aid us in
our understanding of the overall structural systems and load paths, we developed the attached
structural sketch based on preliminary measurements taken on site. The numerical designations
were established to aid in identifying and specifying areas of concern. The structural members,
material properties, and dimensions are based on information that could be visually observed.
Due snow accumulation from sliding snow off the roof, the connection of the Glue Laminated
Beams (GLB) to the foundations, as well as, the foundations could not be observed.
Existing roof framing elements of structural concern noted during the visual condition assessment
include the following:
x GLB Number 1 showed signs of checking/cracking at both its east and west ends.
x GLB Number 2 showed signed of checking/delamination and rotting of the wood members
at its west end.
517
x GLB Number 3 showed minor signs of checking/cracking at its east end.
x GLB Number 4 had completely rotted and failed at its west end under the snow load. the
center of the GLB had also been damaged (likely resulting from the failure). The east side
of GLB Number 4 also showed signs of checking/cracking
x GLB Number 5 showed minor signs of checking/cracking at its west end.
x GLB Number 6 showed signs of checking/delamination at its east end, minor checking on
the west end.
x GLB Number 7 showed signs of checking/cracking at its west end.
x GLB Number 8 showed signs of checking/delamination at both its east and west end. The
west end of GLB Number 8 also showed signs of rotting
x GLB Number 9 showed signs of checking/delamination at its west end.
x GLB Number 10 showed signed of checking/cracking at its east end.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on these preliminary observations, we recommend the following:
1) Continue to secure the facility and limit temporary access to only necessary personnel.
2) Snow removal from the western slope of the roof is a priority. Snow shall be removed in
such a manner as to not increase loads on existing structural members nor place workers
in risk of injury in the event of a partial or full collapse. No personnel on top of the roof or
in the path of falling snow.
3) After the snow is removed a shoring plan should be considered to shore the roof to prevent
further damage to the Pavilion roof until a more permanent solution is provided.
LIMITATIONS
Our discussions and opinions expressed verbally and in the summary information above does
not express nor imply any warranty or guarantee of the existing conditions and is limited to the
directed areas of focus and structural elements that were observable at the time of these
efforts. There is no claim, neither stated nor implied, that all faulty conditions were or could be
determined based on the limited scope of our efforts. We are available to continue
investigations that will provide more detail on the conditions and measures necessary to
address any damage or deficiencies.
Morrison-Maierle, Inc.
Jay Fischer, P.E.
Attachments:
Structural Sketch (1 page)
518
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
833(5*<0522)3/$1522)$66(660(172%6(59$7,21127(62%6(59$7,21127(2%6(59$7,21'(6&5,37,21 75866180%(5 )5$&785(';%27720&+25'0(0%(5,17:2/2&$7,216216287+)$&,1*0(0%(5 75866180%(5 648$5(:$6+(50,66,1*)5203$1(/32,173,1&211(&7,21216287+6,'(2)75866 75866180%(5 63/,7&+(&.,1;%27720&+25'0(0%(525,*,1$7,1*$7),5673$1(/32,17$1'(;7(1',1*72(1'2)0(0%(5 6(3(5$7,212)75866%27720&+25'%5,'*,1*&211(&7,2172(;,67,1*:$//08/7,3/(/2&$7,2161766758&785$/2%6(59$7,211766758&785$/2%6(59$7,211766758&785$/2%6(59$7,21RLSBOGERT PARK ICE RINK ROOF PLANN.T.S.24'-0"128'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"12109876543GLB 28.5 X 5.125GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 29.5 X 8.75GLB 28.5 X 5.125APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFROOF SHEATHING/MEMBRANEGLB NUMBER 4: STRUCTURAL FAILURE AT WEST ENDGLB NUMBER 4: CRACKING AT CENTER OF GLBGLB NUMBER 8: SIGNS SIGNS OF CHECKING/CRACKING/ROTTING AT WEST END1LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 1LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 2LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 3334333334(VERIFY)3(VERIFY, TYP.)244342BOGERT PARK PAVILLION ROOF PLAN1234519
Appendix B - Bogert Park Pavilion - Structural Sketch
520
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
833(5*<0522)3/$1522)$66(660(172%6(59$7,21127(62%6(59$7,21127(2%6(59$7,21'(6&5,37,21 75866180%(5 )5$&785(';%27720&+25'0(0%(5,17:2/2&$7,216216287+)$&,1*0(0%(5 75866180%(5 648$5(:$6+(50,66,1*)5203$1(/32,173,1&211(&7,21216287+6,'(2)75866 75866180%(5 63/,7&+(&.,1;%27720&+25'0(0%(525,*,1$7,1*$7),5673$1(/32,17$1'(;7(1',1*72(1'2)0(0%(5 6(3(5$7,212)75866%27720&+25'%5,'*,1*&211(&7,2172(;,67,1*:$//08/7,3/(/2&$7,2161766758&785$/2%6(59$7,211766758&785$/2%6(59$7,211766758&785$/2%6(59$7,21BOGERT PARK PAVILLION ROOF PLAN1234RLSBOGERT PARK PAVILION ROOF PLANN.T.S.24'-6"128'-0"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"24'-6"12109876543GLB 5.125 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 8.75 X 28.5GLB 5.125 X 28.5APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFROOF SHEATHING/MEMBRANEGLB NUMBER 4: STRUCTURAL FAILURE AT WEST ENDGLB NUMBER 4: CRACKING AT CENTER OF GLBGLB NUMBER 8: SIGNS SIGNS OF CHECKING/CRACKING/ROTTING AT WEST END1LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 1LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 2LOCATION OF STRUCTURALOBSERVATION 3334333334(VERIFY)3(VERIFY, TYP.)244342521
Appendix C – Site Photos
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
Appendix D – Structural Calculations
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
Bogert Park Pavilion Cost Estimate: Memo
Date: 04/30/19 Project: City of Bozeman
Bogert Park Pavilion:
Cost Estimate
Report By: Jay Fischer, P.E.
Rebecca Scheetz, E.I.T.
Project Number: 0417.083
Reported To: Mike Gray
MGray@bozeman.net
City of Bozeman
GENERAL INFORMATION
Following the Structural Assessment Report on the Bogert Park Pavilion, the City of Bozeman
has requested an estimate of the costs associated with the restoration of the pavilion for the long-
term occupancy of the space. Morrison-Maierle has previously provided three options for the long-
term occupancy of the space. The City of Bozeman has requested estimates for all three options
as well as for the full demolition of the pavilion.
COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION
The attached estimates were prepared using 2019 RSMeans CostWorks data and take current
market and industry trends into consideration. The three options previously provided by Morrison-
Maierle are summarized as follows:
Option 1:
Demo and replace the east and west sections of Beam #4 in their entirety to their original
configuration, size and connection detailing. Demo and replace all TJI joists framing into
the western half of Beam #4. Demo and replace the compromised portions of Beams #2,
#8 and #9 to their original size and connection detailing. Connect the new sections of glue
laminated beams to the existing glue laminated beams using a splice connection. Protect
the exposed ends of all glue laminated beams from the environmental conditions to
prevent further exposure-related damage.
Option 2:
Demo and replace the east and west sections of Beam #4 in their entirety to their original
configuration, size and connection detailing. Demo and replace all TJI joists framing into
the western half of Beam #4. Demo and replace the western half of Beams #2, #8 and #9
to their original size and connection detailing. Protect the exposed ends of all glue
laminated beams from the environmental conditions to prevent further exposure-related
damage.
550
Option 3:
Demo and replace Beams #2 - #9 in their entirety to meet the requirements of the current
adopted building codes. (This option will involve the demo and replacement of essentially
the entire roof assembly, including the eight interior glue laminated beams and associated
TJI joists, plywood sheathing and roofing.) Protect the exposed ends of all glue laminated
beams from the environmental conditions to prevent further exposure-related damage.
The City of Bozeman has also requested a cost estimate for the full demolition of the Bogert Park
Pavilion.
Option 4: Full Demolition
This estimate includes the approximate cost of demolishing the roof assembly, slab and
foundations.
Note that the final cost estimates include the project’s anticipated overhead and profit, and that
the estimates for options 1, 2 and 3 include the cost of the required selective demolition.
Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or concerns you may have.
Morrison-Maierle, Inc.
Jay B. Fischer, P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
Bogert Park Pavilion – Cost Estimates (4 pages)
551
Location: Bozeman, MT
04/30/2018
Estimate Parameters: Budget Estimate
Source: 2019 RSMeans CostWorks
*Final Cost Includes Overhead and Profit
MMI Crane Rental 28 days -$ -$ 500$ 500$ 1.0 $500 14,000.00$
Shoring / Bracing
MMI Full Shoring of (1) glulam beam 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 1.4 21,000.00$ 21,000.00$
MMI Temporay Jacking of glulam beam 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1.4 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$
Subtotal 28,000.00$
Division 2 - Demolition
02 41 19 25 5020 Saw Cutting 280 LF -$ 1.19$ -$ 1.19$ 1.4 1.67$ 466.48$
07 05 05 10 4420 Roofing (material unknown) 1024 SF -$ 0.23$ -$ 0.23$ 1.4 0.32$ 329.73$
06 05 05 10 6092 Sheathing (Assume 5/8" Plywood) 1024 SF -$ 0.23$ -$ 0.23$ 1.4 0.32$ 329.73$
06 05 05 10 7450 GLB 198 LF -$ 0.48$ 0.25$ 0.74$ 1.4 1.03$ 204.05$
07 05 05 10 0220 Flashing 280 SF -$ 0.83$ -$ 0.83$ 1.4 1.16$ 325.36$
06 05 05 10 4285 Damaged Joists 1127 LF -$ 0.35$ -$ 0.35$ 1.4 0.49$ 552.23$
05 05 05 10 0040
05 05 05 10 0350 Connections 9 EA. -$ 21.51$ -$ 21.51$ 1.4 30.11$ 271.03$
05 05 05 10 0350 Hangers 26 EA. -$ 6.95$ -$ 6.95$ 1.4 9.73$ 252.98$
MMI Haul Off and Disposal 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ -$ 8,000.00$ 1.4 11,200.00$ 11,200.00$
Subtotal 13,931.58$
Division 5 - Metals
MMI Splice Plate Conn.4 EA. -$ -$ -$ 2,000.00$ 1.4 2,800.00$ 11,200.00$
MMI Conn. Plate at foundation 5 EA. -$ -$ -$ 3,000.00$ 1.4 4,200.00$ 21,000.00$
05 05 05 50 5900 Galvanized 1 Ton -$ -$ -$ 580.00$ 1.4 812.00$ 812.00$
06 05 23 60 1700 Hangers (assume 16 ga. galv, 3" x 14" joists) 218 EA. 3.38$ 1.23$ -$ 4.61$ 1.4 6.45$ 1,406.97$
Subtotal 34,418.97$
Division 6 - Wood and Plastics
06 16 33 10 0200 Sheathing (Assume 5/8" Plywood) 1024 SF 0.60$ 0.30$ -$ 0.90$ 1.4 1.26$ 1,290.24$
06 17 53 20 2300 GLB (72' long by 24.5' trib) 198 LF 79.60$ 5.04$ 5.44$ 90.08$ 1.4 126.11$ 24,970.18$
06 11 10 18 3030 Joists 1127 LF 0.20$ 0.51$ -$ 0.71$ 1.4 0.99$ 1,112.35$
Subtotal 27,372.77$
Division 9 - Finishes / Roofing
07 52 16 20 3800 Roofing (Assume EPDM, 45 mils thick) 1024 SF 1.22$ 0.35$ 0.07$ 1.64$ 1.4 2.30$ 2,350.39$
07 61 16 10 1100 Weather-Proofing at exposed ends of GLB (Mastic-
coated 2 sides, .005" thick)1534 SF 2.02$ 0.59$ -$ 2.61$ 1.4 3.65$ 5,605.24$
Subtotal 7,955.62$
Subtotal of all Items 125,678.94$
Mobilization (2%)2,513.58$
Contingency (15%) 18,851.84$
Total of all Items 147,044.36$
*Multiplier includes industry trends, geographic location factor, overhead and profit
Multiplier*Adjusted Unit
Cost Total Cost
Project Name: Bogert Park Pavilion - Option 1
Bogert Park Pavilion
Source Description Quantity Unit
Material
Cost Labor Cost Equipment
Cost
Total Unit
Cost
552
Location: Bozeman, MT
04/30/2018
Estimate Parameters: Budget Estimate
Source: 2019 RSMeans CostWorks
*Final Cost Includes Overhead and Profit
MMI Crane Rental 28 days -$ -$ 500$ 500$ 1.0 $500 14,000.00$
Shoring / Bracing
MMI Full Shoring of (1) glulam beam 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 1.4 21,000.00$ 21,000.00$
MMI Temporay Jacking of glulam beam 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1.4 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$
Subtotal 28,000.00$
Division 2 - Demolition
02 41 19 25 5020 Saw Cutting 592 LF -$ 1.19$ -$ 1.19$ 1.4 1.67$ 986.27$
07 05 05 10 4420 Roofing (material unknown) 2320 SF -$ 0.23$ -$ 0.23$ 1.4 0.32$ 747.04$
06 05 05 10 6092 Sheathing (Assume 5/8" Plywood) 2320 SF -$ 0.23$ -$ 0.23$ 1.4 0.32$ 747.04$
06 05 05 10 7450 GLB 360 LF -$ 0.48$ 0.25$ 0.74$ 1.4 1.03$ 371.00$
07 05 05 10 0220 Flashing 280 SF -$ 0.83$ -$ 0.83$ 1.4 1.16$ 325.36$
06 05 05 10 4285 Damaged Joists 1127 LF -$ 0.35$ -$ 0.35$ 1.4 0.49$ 552.23$
05 05 05 10 0040
05 05 05 10 0350 Connections 9 EA. -$ 21.51$ -$ 21.51$ 1.4 30.11$ 271.03$
05 05 05 10 0350 Hangers 26 EA. -$ 6.95$ -$ 6.95$ 1.4 9.73$ 252.98$
MMI Haul Off and Disposal 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ -$ 10,000.00$ 1.4 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$
Subtotal 18,252.95$
Division 5 - Metals
MMI Splice Plate Conn.4 EA. -$ -$ -$ 2,000.00$ 1.4 2,800.00$ 11,200.00$
MMI Conn. Plate at foundation 5 EA. -$ -$ -$ 3,000.00$ 1.4 4,200.00$ 21,000.00$
05 05 05 50 5900 Galvanized 1 Ton -$ -$ -$ 580.00$ 1.4 812.00$ 812.00$
06 05 23 60 1700 Hangers (assume 16 ga. galv, 3" x 14" joists) 344 EA. 3.38$ 1.23$ -$ 4.61$ 1.4 6.45$ 2,220.18$
Subtotal 35,232.18$
Division 6 - Wood and Plastics
06 16 33 10 0200 Sheathing (Assume 5/8" Plywood) 2320 SF 0.60$ 0.30$ -$ 0.90$ 1.4 1.26$ 2,923.20$
06 17 53 20 2300 GLB (72' long by 24.5' trib) 360 LF 79.60$ 5.04$ 5.44$ 90.08$ 1.4 126.11$ 45,400.32$
06 11 10 18 3030 Joists 1127 LF 0.20$ 0.51$ -$ 0.71$ 1.4 0.99$ 1,112.35$
Subtotal 49,435.87$
Division 9 - Finishes / Roofing
07 52 16 20 3800 Roofing (Assume EPDM, 45 mils thick) 2320 SF 1.22$ 0.35$ 0.07$ 1.64$ 1.4 2.30$ 5,325.10$
07 61 16 10 1100 Weather-Proofing at exposed ends of GLB (Mastic-
coated 2 sides, .005" thick)1534 SF 2.02$ 0.59$ -$ 2.61$ 1.4 3.65$ 5,605.24$
Subtotal 10,930.33$
Subtotal of all Items 155,851.33$
Mobilization (2%) 3,117.03$
Contingency (15%) 23,377.70$
Total of all Items 182,346.05$
*Multiplier includes industry trends, geographic location factor, overhead and profit
Total Cost Total Unit
Cost
Adjusted Unit
Cost
Project Name: Bogert Park Pavilion - Option 2
Bogert Park Pavilion
Source Description Quantity Unit
Material
Cost Labor Cost Equipment
Cost Multiplier*
553
Location: Bozeman, MT
04/30/2018
Estimate Parameters: Budget Estimate
Source: 2019 RSMeans CostWorks
*Final Cost Includes Overhead and Profit
MMI Crane Rental 42 days -$ -$ 500$ 500$ 1.0 $500 21,000.00$
Shoring / Bracing
MMI Temporay Bracing of exterior glulam beams 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1.4 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$
Subtotal 7,000.00$
Division 2 - Demolition
02 41 13 13 1020 Wood Building Demolition 28224 SF -$ 0.68$ 1.03$ 1.71$ 1.4 2.40$ 67,636.17$
MMI Haul Off and Disposal 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ -$ 35,000.00$ 1.4 49,000.00$ 49,000.00$
Subtotal 116,636.17$
Division 5 - Metals
MMI Splice Plate Conn.8 EA. -$ -$ -$ 2,000.00$ 1.4 2,800.00$ 22,400.00$
MMI Conn. Plate at foundation 16 EA. -$ -$ -$ 3,000.00$ 1.4 4,200.00$ 67,200.00$
05 05 05 50 5900 Galvanized 1 Ton -$ -$ -$ 580.00$ 1.4 812.00$ 812.00$
06 05 23 60 1700 Hangers (assume 16 ga. galv, 3" x 14" joists) 900 EA. 3.38$ 1.23$ -$ 4.61$ 1.4 6.45$ 5,808.60$
Subtotal 96,220.60$
Division 6 - Wood and Plastics
06 16 33 10 0200 Sheathing (Assume 5/8" Plywood) 28224 SF 0.60$ 0.30$ -$ 0.90$ 1.4 1.26$ 35,562.24$
06 17 53 20 2300 GLB (72' long)1152 LF 79.60$ 5.04$ 5.44$ 90.08$ 1.4 126.11$ 145,281.02$
06 11 10 18 3030 Joists 11025 LF 0.20$ 0.51$ -$ 0.71$ 1.4 0.99$ 10,881.68$
Subtotal 191,724.94$
Division 9 - Finishes / Roofing
07 52 16 20 3800 Roofing (Assume EPDM, 45 mils thick) 28224 SF 1.22$ 0.35$ 0.07$ 1.64$ 1.4 2.30$ 64,782.55$
07 61 16 10 1100 Weather-Proofing at exposed ends of GLB (Mastic-
coated 2 sides, .005" thick)16688 SF 2.02$ 0.59$ -$ 2.61$ 1.4 3.65$ 60,977.95$
Subtotal 125,760.50$
Subtotal of all Items 558,342.21$
Mobilization (2%)11,166.84$
Contingency (15%) 83,751.33$
Total of all Items 653,260.38$
*Multiplier includes industry trends, geographic location factor, overhead and profit
Multiplier*Adjusted Unit
Cost Total Cost
Project Name: Bogert Park Pavilion - Option 3
Bogert Park Pavilion
Source Description Quantity Unit
Material
Cost Labor Cost Equipment
Cost
Total Unit
Cost
554
Location: Bozeman, MT
04/30/2018
Estimate Parameters: Budget Estimate
Source: 2019 RSMeans CostWorks
*Final Cost Includes Overhead and Profit
MMI Crane Rental 14 days -$ -$ 500$ 500$ 1.0 $500 7,000.00$
Division 2 - Demolition
02 41 13 13 1020 Wood Building Demolition 28224 SF -$ 0.68$ 1.03$ 1.71$ 1.4 2.40$ 67,636.17$
02 41 16 17 0280 Slab on Grade Demolition (assume 4" slab reinforced
with wire mesh) 28224 SF -$ 0.16$ 0.50$ 0.66$ 2.4 1.58$ 44,706.82$
03 05 05 10 0050 Foundation and Pier Demolition (assume 3 CY of
concrete per beam) 30 CY -$ 36.50$ 9.85$ 46.35$ 3.4 157.59$ 4,727.70$
MMI Haul Off and Disposal 1 Lump Sum -$ -$ -$ 50,000.00$ 1.4 70,000.00$ 70,000.00$
Subtotal 187,070.69$
Subtotal of all Items 194,070.69$
Mobilization (2%)3,881.41$
Contingency (15%) 29,110.60$
Total of all Items 227,062.70$
*Multiplier includes industry trends, geographic location factor, overhead and profit
Multiplier*Adjusted Unit
Cost Total Cost
Project Name: Bogert Park Pavilion - Option 4: Full Demolition
Bogert Park Pavilion
Source Description Quantity Unit
Material
Cost Labor Cost Equipment
Cost
Total Unit
Cost
555
1
Jon Henderson
From:Mike Gray
Sent:Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:32 PM
To:Jon Henderson; Mitchell Overton; Thom White
Subject:FW: Bogert Pavilion Estimates
Attachments:Bogert Pavilion - Option #1.pdf; Bogert Pavilion - Option #2.pdf; Bogert Pavilion -
Option #3.pdf; Bogert Pavilion - Option #4.pdf; Bogert Schematic Estimate Invoice.pdf
Here are the estimates that we requested from MMI to get from actual contractor to see where the numbers came
out. They were pretty close
Mike Gray
Facilities Superintendent
O: 406.582.3232 | C: 406.579.5343
mgray@bozeman.net
From: Jay B. Fischer <jfischer@m‐m.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 5:59 PM
To: Mike Gray <MGray@BOZEMAN.NET>
Subject: FW: Bogert Pavilion Estimates
Hey Mike:
Wanted to pass along to you the estimate we have received from Martel construction for Options 1-4. As
mentioned in Tyler’s email our estimate was pretty close to what they had minus the construction
fee. Additionally they priced Option #3 in a different way than we did by salvaging the roof joist and only
replacing the GLB. We replaced the total structure. There are many ways to replace the pavilion and we took
the worst case (more expensive option when looking at costs). Take a look and let me know if you have
questions. I have also include Martel’s P.O. we will get this processed, but wanted to let you know cost.
I did reach out to Bob Risk with the building department, discussed with Bob our intent to meet and discuss
and he did think we needed to meet. I have an email to confirm our questions to verify our interpretation of the
code. We discussed this is usually the process that works best for his department and time.
Thanks Mike, I will follow up again to confirm our questions. Please let us know if you have
questions. Thanks!
Jay B. Fischer, PE
Senior Structural Engineer, Morrison-Maierle
406.922.6835 direct | 406.581.6603 mobile
From: Tyler Ragen [mailto:tragen@martelconstruction.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 5:13 PM
To: Jay B. Fischer <jfischer@m‐m.net>
556
2
Cc: Tony Martel <tmartel@martelconstruction.com>
Subject: Bogert Pavilion Estimates
Jay,
Attached are estimates for the four options for repairing or demolishing the Bogert Pavilion. I reviewed the MMI
estimates after I was finished with my estimates. Our biggest variance is option #3. It looks like MMI priced bringing
down the whole structure (except the end glulams), reusing the I joists, and re‐sheathing/roofing with new. I believe it
would be less expensive to shore the I joist ends, cut them loose from the glulams, pull up the sheathing as needed, pull
out the old glulam, drop in the new glulam, fit the I joists out with new hangers, re‐sheet only the portion of sheathing
the was necessary to remove with new sheathing, and patch the roof.
Let me know if you object to this method, or have any other questions regarding our assumptions.
Thank you,
Tyler Ragen
Martel Construction
www.martelconstruction.com
Direct: (406) 922-5504 Cell: (406) 579-1533
Fax: (406) 586-8646
Email: tragen@martelconstruction.com
557
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 1Bogert Pavilion - Option #1 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, Splice Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:01 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount01-0000GENERAL REQUIREMENTS101-0110Supervision2Superintendent at 20 Hours/Wk4.00wk3,982360-650-1,248.10/wk4,9923 Supervision3,982360650/wk4,99201-0150Project Management4Project Engineer at 10 Hours/Wk4.00wk1,699----424.80/wk1,6995 Project Management1,699/wk1,69901-1650Safety Bonus6Monthly Safety Bonus1.00mo40----40.00/mo407 Safety Bonus40/wk4001-2050Temporary Telephone8Temporary Phone1.00mo----200200.00/mo2009 Temporary Telephone200/mo20001-2100Temporary Electric10Temporary Electric Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01101-2400Temporary Water Service12Temporary Water Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01301-3150Temporary Toilet14Temporary Toilet1.00mo----250250.00/mo25015 Temporary Toilet250/mo25001-3200Barricades & Enclosures16Temporary Fence - Already On-Site0.00lf**---0.00/lf01701-3410Safety Equipment/Support18Misc. Safety Supplies4.00wk-400---100.00/wk40019 Safety Equipment/Support400/mo40001-6000Mobilize20Mobilize & Demobilize 40 Ton Crane2.00trip328--*-164.04/trip32821 Mobilize328/trip32801-6050Unload Materials22Unload Materials1.00mo328----328.08/mo32823 Unload Materials328/wk32801-6100Hoisting Equipment2440 Ton Hydraulic Crane, Operator, Fuel, Rigging -Grid 4 Beam Replacement1.00wk1,886150-2,2502004,486.40/wk4,48625 Hoisting Equipment1,8861502,250200/mo4,48601-6400Construction Equipment26Forklift - Mobilize from Home Office as Needed24.00hr-151-840-41.30/hr99127Scissor Lifts - 2 Ea1.00mo---2,900-2,900.00/mo2,90028 Construction Equipment1513,740/mo3,89101-7010Layout29Layout12.00hr4926-60-46.51/hr55830 Layout492660/wk55801-7050Cleanup31Current Cleanup4.00wk1,312--80-348.08/wk1,39232 Cleanup1,31280/wk1,39201-7080Trash & Rubbish Handling33Rental Dumpster w/ County Dump Fee4.00wk-576-500-269.00/wk1,07634558
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 2Bogert Pavilion - Option #1 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, Splice Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:01 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount Trash & Rubbish Handling576500/wk1,07601-7100Final Cleanup35Final Cleanup - Broom Clean1.00est656-*--656.16/est65636 Final Cleanup656/wk656 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS10,7251,6437,280650/ls20,29802-0000EXISTING CONDITIONS3702-2200Selective Demolition38Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Aluma SystemRent2.00wk**-1,500-750.00/wk1,50039Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Setup ShoreTowers8.00ea1,968*---246.06/ea1,96840Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Post / BraceBeams / Joist Ends to Shore Towers1.00est1,3121,200---2,512.32/est2,51241Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Remove ShoreTowers & Bracing8.00ea1,312*---164.04/ea1,31242Temporary Shoring - Ends of Beams 2, 8, 9 forSplice Connection Replacement3.00ea1,4761,500---992.12/ea2,97643Temporary Shoring - I Joist Ends for PartialReplacement of Beams 2, 8, 930.00lf1,230750---66.01/lf1,98044Remove Roof Membrane & Sheathing Grid 3-5 @West & 8' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf2,083----0.51/sf2,08345Remove Wood I Joists Grid 3-5 @ West48.00ea984----20.51/ea98446Remove Structural Beams Grid 42.00ea984----492.12/ea98447Rental Dumpster for Demo1.00wk*530-500-1,030.00/wk1,03048Disconnect I Joists, Cut & Remove DamagedPortion of Beam 2, 8, 93.00ea738----246.06/ea73849Remove Roof Membrane & Sheathing at Beams2, 8, 9144.00sf738----5.13/sf73850 Selective Demolition12,8283,9802,000/sf18,808 EXISTING CONDITIONS12,8283,9802,000/sf18,80805-0000STEEL5105-5050Metal Fabrications52Splice Plates - Beam 2, 8, 9 - 1/4" x 4" x 24"6.00ea246120---61.01/ea36653Splice Plates - Beam 4 - 1/4" x 4" x 24"2.00ea8240---61.01/ea12254 Metal Fabrications328160/ton488 STEEL328160/sf48806-0000WOOD & PLASTICS5506-0900Hardware & Fasteners56Bolts - Base Plates at Beam 46.00ea-150---25.00/ea15057Bolts - Splice Plates at Beams 2, 8, 912.00ea-300---25.00/ea30058Bolts - Base Plates at Beams 2, 8, 99.00ea-225---25.00/ea22559Misc. Hardware1.00est-650---650.00/est65060Bolts - Splice Plates at Beams 44.00ea-100---25.00/ea10061Joist Hangers at Wood I Joist to GLB - Grid 4Only - Reuse Grid 3 & 548.00ea164720---18.42/ea88462Joist Hangers - Replace at Beams 2, 8, 96.00ea2190---18.42/ea11163 Hardware & Fasteners1852,235/ea2,42006-1650Wood Panel Sheathing6465559
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 3Bogert Pavilion - Option #1 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, Splice Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:01 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount06-1650Wood Panel Sheathing5/8" Plywood Roof Sheathing - Grid 3 to 5 @West & 8' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf3,4722,845---1.55/sf6,317655/8" Plywood Roof Sheathing - Patch at Beams 2,8, 9144.00sf492101---4.12/sf59366 Wood Panel Sheathing3,9642,946/sf6,91006-1740Wood I-Joists6716" TJI 560 Wood I Joists - 16" TJI 3548.00ea1,9684,080---126.01/ea6,04868TB42 Tension Bridging at Mid-Span New I Joists96.00ea492240---7.63/ea73269Web Stiffners192.00ea246115---1.88/ea36170Reconnect Existing Wood I Joists at Spliced GLBeams6.00ea246*---41.01/ea24671 Wood I-Joists2,9534,435/ea7,38806-1800GluLam Construction728-3/4" x 28-1/2" x 72' Arched Beam Sections2.00ea1,96810,800---6,384.24/ea12,76873Replace Damaged Portion of Beams 2, 8, 9 -Assumed 16' Section3.00ea1,9683,600---1,856.16/ea5,56874 GluLam Construction3,93714,400/lf18,337 WOOD & PLASTICS11,03924,016/sf35,05407-0000THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.7507-5300Membrane Roofing76Membrane Roofing - Replace at Grid 3-5 @ West,8' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf--40,640--10.00/sf40,64077Membrane Roofing - Patch at Beams 2, 8, 9144.00sf--4,320--30.00/sf4,32078 Membrane Roofing44,960/sq44,96007-6210Flashing & Sheet Metal79Flashing Cap at Exterior Portion of Grid 4 GLB20.00lf205122---16.35/lf32780Flashing Cap at Beam 2, 8, 9 Partial Replacement30.00lf308183---16.35/lf49081 Flashing & Sheet Metal513305/lf817 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.51330544,960/sf45,77709-0000FINISHES8209-9100Paint Finishes83Paint Interior Ceiling - Grid 3-54,064.00sf--7,315--1.80/sf7,31584Paint Replacement Sections of Beams 2, 8, 9 /New Plywood Sheathing144.00sf--864--6.00/sf86485 Paint Finishes8,179/sf8,179 FINISHES8,179/sf8,17921-0000FIRE SUPPRESSION8621-1100Fire Protection Piping87Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Sprinkler System1.00est--3,500--3,500.00/est3,50088 Fire Protection Piping3,500/sf3,500 FIRE SUPPRESSION3,5003,50026-0000ELECTRICAL8926-5000Lighting90Remove / Replace / Repair Lighting1.00est--4,000--4,000.00/est4,00091 Lighting4,000/sf4,000560
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 4Bogert Pavilion - Option #1 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, Splice Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:01 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount ELECTRICAL4,000/sf4,00028-0000ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY9228-0300Detection & Alarm Systems93Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Alarm System1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50094 Detection & Alarm Systems1,500/ea1,500 ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY1,5001,50032-0000SITE IMPROVEMENTS9532-9000Landscaping96Landscaping - Misc. Repair of Damaged Areas1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50097 Landscaping1,500/sf1,500 SITE IMPROVEMENTS1,5001,500Estimate TotalsDescriptionAmountTotalsLabor35,432Material30,104Subcontract63,639Equipment9,280Other650139,105139,105General Liability Insurance1,492Performance Bond1,375Builders Risk302Gross Receipts Tax1,677Construction Fee16,767Construction Contingency6,95528,568167,673Total167,673561
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 1Bogert Pavilion - Option #2 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, West Half Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:03 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount01-0000GENERAL REQUIREMENTS101-0110Supervision2Superintendent at 20 Hours/Wk5.00wk4,978450-813-1,248.10/wk6,2413 Supervision4,978450813/wk6,24101-0150Project Management4Project Engineer at 10 Hours/Wk5.00wk2,124----424.80/wk2,1245 Project Management2,124/wk2,12401-1650Safety Bonus6Monthly Safety Bonus1.25mo50----40.00/mo507 Safety Bonus50/wk5001-2050Temporary Telephone8Temporary Phone1.25mo----250200.00/mo2509 Temporary Telephone250/mo25001-2100Temporary Electric10Temporary Electric Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01101-2400Temporary Water Service12Temporary Water Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01301-3150Temporary Toilet14Temporary Toilet1.25mo----313250.00/mo31315 Temporary Toilet313/mo31301-3200Barricades & Enclosures16Temporary Fence - Already On-Site0.00lf**---0.00/lf01701-3410Safety Equipment/Support18Misc. Safety Supplies5.00wk-500---100.00/wk50019 Safety Equipment/Support500/mo50001-6000Mobilize20Mobilize & Demobilize 40 Ton Crane2.00trip328--*-164.04/trip32821 Mobilize328/trip32801-6050Unload Materials22Unload Materials1.25mo410----328.08/mo41023 Unload Materials410/wk41001-6100Hoisting Equipment2440 Ton Hydraulic Crane, Operator, Fuel, Rigging -Grid 2,4,8,9 Beam Replacement2.00wk3,773300-4,5004004,486.40/wk8,97325 Hoisting Equipment3,7733004,500400/mo8,97301-6400Construction Equipment26Forklift - Mobilize from Home Office as Needed24.00hr-151-840-41.30/hr99127Scissor Lifts - 2 Ea1.25mo---3,625-2,900.00/mo3,62528 Construction Equipment1514,465/mo4,61601-7010Layout29Layout16.00hr6568-80-46.51/hr74430 Layout656880/wk74401-7050Cleanup31Current Cleanup5.00wk1,640--100-348.08/wk1,74032 Cleanup1,640100/wk1,74001-7080Trash & Rubbish Handling33Rental Dumpster w/ County Dump Fee5.00wk-720-625-269.00/wk1,34534562
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 2Bogert Pavilion - Option #2 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, West Half Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:03 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount Trash & Rubbish Handling720625/wk1,34501-7100Final Cleanup35Final Cleanup - Broom Clean1.00est656-*--656.16/est65636 Final Cleanup656/wk656 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS14,6162,12910,583963/ls28,29002-0000EXISTING CONDITIONS3702-2200Selective Demolition38Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Aluma SystemRent - Grid 4 Beam Replace2.00wk**-1,500-750.00/wk1,50039Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Setup ShoreTowers - Grid 4 Beam Replace8.00ea1,968*---246.06/ea1,96840Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Post / BraceBeams / Joist Ends to Shore Towers1.00est1,3121,200---2,512.32/est2,51241Temporary Shoring of Beam #4 - Remove ShoreTowers & Bracing8.00ea1,312*---164.04/ea1,31242Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,8,9 - AlumaSystem Rent2.00wk**-1,500-750.00/wk1,50043Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,8,9 - Setup ShoreTowers12.00ea2,953*---246.06/ea2,95344Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,8,9 - Infill Top ofShore Towers to I Joists3.00est1,9682,400---1,456.16/est4,36845Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,8,9 - RemoveShore Towers & Bracing12.00ea1,968*---164.04/ea1,96846Remove Roof Membrane & Sheathing Grid 3-5 @West & 8' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf2,083----0.51/sf2,08347Remove Wood I Joists Grid 3-5 @ West48.00ea984----20.51/ea98448Remove Structural Beams Grid 42.00ea984----492.12/ea98449Rental Dumpster for Demo1.00wk*530-500-1,030.00/wk1,03050Disconnect I Joists, Cut & Remove West Half ofBeam 2, 8, 93.00ea1,968----656.16/ea1,96851Remove Roof Membrane & Sheathing at Beams2, 8, 91,524.00sf1,562----1.03/sf1,56252 Selective Demolition19,0664,1303,500/sf26,696 EXISTING CONDITIONS19,0664,1303,500/sf26,69605-0000STEEL5305-5050Metal Fabrications54Splice Plates - Beam 2, 8, 9 - 1/4" x 4" x 24"6.00ea246120---61.01/ea36655Splice Plates - Beam 4 - 1/4" x 4" x 24"2.00ea8240---61.01/ea12256 Metal Fabrications328160/ton488 STEEL328160/sf48806-0000WOOD & PLASTICS5706-0900Hardware & Fasteners58Bolts - Base Plates at Beam 46.00ea-150---25.00/ea15059Bolts - Splice Plates at Beams 2, 8, 912.00ea-300---25.00/ea30060Bolts - Base Plates at Beams 2, 8, 99.00ea-225---25.00/ea22561Misc. Hardware1.00est-800---800.00/est80062Bolts - Splice Plates at Beams 44.00ea-100---25.00/ea10063Joist Hangers at Wood I Joist to GLB - Grid 4Only - Reuse Grid 3 & 548.00ea164720---18.42/ea88464Joist Hangers - Replace at Beams 2, 8, 9144.00ea4922,160---18.42/ea2,65265563
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 3Bogert Pavilion - Option #2 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, West Half Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:03 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount Hardware & Fasteners6564,455/ea5,11106-1650Wood Panel Sheathing665/8" Plywood Roof Sheathing - Grid 3 to 5 @West & 8' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf3,4722,845---1.55/sf6,317675/8" Plywood Roof Sheathing - Patch at Beams 2,8, 91,524.00sf2,6041,067---2.41/sf3,67168 Wood Panel Sheathing6,0763,912/sf9,98806-1740Wood I-Joists6916" TJI 560 Wood I Joists - 16" TJI 3548.00ea1,9684,080---126.01/ea6,04870TB42 Tension Bridging at Mid-Span New I Joists96.00ea492240---7.63/ea73271Web Stiffners192.00ea246115---1.88/ea36172Reconnect Existing Wood I Joists at ReplacedArched Beams144.00ea2,362*---16.40/ea2,36273 Wood I-Joists5,0694,435/ea9,50406-1800GluLam Construction748-3/4" x 28-1/2" x 72' Arched Beam Sections2.00ea1,96810,800---6,384.24/ea12,76875Replace West Half of Beams 2, 8, 93.00ea2,95316,200---6,384.24/ea19,15376 GluLam Construction4,92127,000/lf31,921 WOOD & PLASTICS16,72339,802/sf56,52407-0000THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.7707-5300Membrane Roofing78Membrane Roofing - Replace at Grid 3-5 @ West,4' Strip on Grid 4 East4,064.00sf--40,640--10.00/sf40,64079Membrane Roofing - Patch at Beams 2, 8, 91,524.00sf--15,240--10.00/sf15,24080 Membrane Roofing55,880/sq55,88007-6210Flashing & Sheet Metal81Flashing Cap at Exterior Portion of Grid 4 GLB20.00lf205122---16.35/lf32782Flashing Cap at Beam 2, 8, 9 West HalfReplacement30.00lf308183---16.35/lf49083 Flashing & Sheet Metal513305/lf817 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.51330555,880/sf56,69709-0000FINISHES8409-9100Paint Finishes85Paint Interior Ceiling - Grid 3-54,064.00sf--7,315--1.80/sf7,31586Paint Replacement Sections of Beams 2, 8, 9 /New Plywood Sheathing1,524.00sf--3,810--2.50/sf3,81087 Paint Finishes11,125/sf11,125 FINISHES11,125/sf11,12521-0000FIRE SUPPRESSION8821-1100Fire Protection Piping89Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Sprinkler System1.00est--3,500--3,500.00/est3,50090 Fire Protection Piping3,500/sf3,500 FIRE SUPPRESSION3,5003,50026-0000ELECTRICAL9126-5000Lighting92Remove / Replace / Repair Lighting1.00est--4,000--4,000.00/est4,00093564
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 4Bogert Pavilion - Option #2 (Replace Beam 4 Complete, West Half Beam 2, 8, 9)6/11/2019 5:03 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount Lighting4,000/sf4,000 ELECTRICAL4,000/sf4,00028-0000ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY9428-0300Detection & Alarm Systems95Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Alarm System1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50096 Detection & Alarm Systems1,500/ea1,500 ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY1,5001,50032-0000SITE IMPROVEMENTS9732-9000Landscaping98Landscaping - Misc. Repair of Damaged Areas1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50099 Landscaping1,500/sf1,500 SITE IMPROVEMENTS1,5001,500Estimate TotalsDescriptionAmountTotalsLabor51,244Material46,526Subcontract77,505Equipment14,083Other963190,321190,321General Liability Insurance2,042Performance Bond1,881Builders Risk413Gross Receipts Tax2,294Construction Fee22,941Construction Contingency9,51639,087229,408Total229,408565
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 1Bogert Pavilion - Option #3 (Replace 8 Interior Beams)6/11/2019 5:04 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount01-0000GENERAL REQUIREMENTS101-0110Supervision2Superintendent at 20 Hours/Wk8.00wk7,965720-1,300-1,248.10/wk9,9853 Supervision7,9657201,300/wk9,98501-0150Project Management4Project Engineer at 10 Hours/Wk8.00wk3,398----424.80/wk3,3985 Project Management3,398/wk3,39801-1650Safety Bonus6Monthly Safety Bonus2.00mo80----40.00/mo807 Safety Bonus80/wk8001-2050Temporary Telephone8Temporary Phone2.00mo----400200.00/mo4009 Temporary Telephone400/mo40001-2100Temporary Electric10Temporary Electric Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01101-2400Temporary Water Service12Temporary Water Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01301-3150Temporary Toilet14Temporary Toilet2.00mo----500250.00/mo50015 Temporary Toilet500/mo50001-3200Barricades & Enclosures16Temporary Fence - Already On-Site0.00lf**---0.00/lf01701-3410Safety Equipment/Support18Misc. Safety Supplies8.00wk-800---100.00/wk80019 Safety Equipment/Support800/mo80001-6000Mobilize20Mobilize & Demobilize 40 Ton Crane2.00trip328--*-164.04/trip32821 Mobilize328/trip32801-6050Unload Materials22Unload Materials2.00mo656----328.08/mo65623 Unload Materials656/wk65601-6100Hoisting Equipment2440 Ton Hydraulic Crane, Operator, Fuel, Rigging -Grid 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Beam Replacement6.00wk11,318900-13,5001,2004,486.40/wk26,91825 Hoisting Equipment11,31890013,5001,200/mo26,91801-6400Construction Equipment26Forklift - Mobilize from Home Office as Needed24.00hr-151-840-41.30/hr99127Scissor Lifts - 2 Ea2.00mo---5,800-2,900.00/mo5,80028 Construction Equipment1516,640/mo6,79101-7010Layout29Layout24.00hr98412-120-46.51/hr1,11630 Layout98412120/wk1,11601-7050Cleanup31Current Cleanup8.00wk2,625--160-348.08/wk2,78532 Cleanup2,625160/wk2,78501-7080Trash & Rubbish Handling33Rental Dumpster w/ County Dump Fee8.00wk-1,152-1,000-269.00/wk2,15234566
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 2Bogert Pavilion - Option #3 (Replace 8 Interior Beams)6/11/2019 5:04 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount Trash & Rubbish Handling1,1521,000/wk2,15201-7100Final Cleanup35Final Cleanup - Broom Clean1.00est656-*--656.16/est65636 Final Cleanup656/wk656 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS28,0113,73522,7202,100/ls56,56602-0000EXISTING CONDITIONS3702-2200Selective Demolition38Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 -Aluma System Rent8.00wk**-6,000-750.00/wk6,00039Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 -Setup Shore Towers64.00ea15,748*---246.06/ea15,74840Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 -Infill Top of Shore Towers to I Joists16.00est10,49912,800---1,456.16/est23,29941Temporary Shoring of Beam #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 -Remove Shore Towers & Bracing64.00ea10,499*---164.04/ea10,49942Remove Roof Membrane & Sheathing10,160.00sf8,333----0.82/sf8,33343Remove Wood I Joists Grid 3-5 @ West48.00ea984----20.51/ea98444Rental Dumpster for Demo8.00wk*4,240-4,000-1,030.00/wk8,24045Disconnect I Joists, Cut & Remove Beams Grids2,3,4,5,6,7,8,916.00ea10,499----656.16/ea10,49946 Selective Demolition56,56117,04010,000/sf83,601 EXISTING CONDITIONS56,56117,04010,000/sf83,60105-0000STEEL4705-5050Metal Fabrications48Splice Plates - Beam 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 - 1/4" x 4" x24"16.00ea656320---61.01/ea97649 Metal Fabrications656320/ton976 STEEL656320/sf97606-0000WOOD & PLASTICS5006-0900Hardware & Fasteners51Bolts - Base Plates at Beam 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,948.00ea-1,200---25.00/ea1,20052Bolts - Splice Plates at Beams 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,932.00ea-800---25.00/ea80053Misc. Hardware1.00est-1,000---1,000.00/est1,00054Joist Hangers - Replace at Beams 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9768.00ea2,62511,520---18.42/ea14,14555 Hardware & Fasteners2,62514,520/ea17,14506-1650Wood Panel Sheathing565/8" Plywood Roof Sheathing - Patch at Beams2,3,4,5,6,7,8,910,160.00sf13,0217,112---1.98/sf20,13357 Wood Panel Sheathing13,0217,112/sf20,13306-1740Wood I-Joists5816" TJI 560 Wood I Joists - 16" TJI 35 - ReplaceDamaged at Grid 3-5 West Side48.00ea1,9684,080---126.01/ea6,04859TB42 Tension Bridging at Mid-Span New I Joists96.00ea492240---7.63/ea73260Web Stiffners192.00ea246115---1.88/ea36161Reconnect Existing Wood I Joists at ReplacedArched Beams768.00ea12,598*---16.40/ea12,59862 Wood I-Joists15,3054,435/ea19,74006-1800GluLam Construction6364567
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 3Bogert Pavilion - Option #3 (Replace 8 Interior Beams)6/11/2019 5:04 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount06-1800GluLam Construction8-3/4" x 28-1/2" x 72' Arched Beam Sections16.00ea15,74886,400---6,384.24/ea102,14864 GluLam Construction15,74886,400/lf102,148 WOOD & PLASTICS46,698112,467/sf159,16507-0000THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.6507-5300Membrane Roofing66Membrane Roofing - Patch at Beams2,3,4,5,6,7,8,910,160.00sf--101,600--10.00/sf101,60067 Membrane Roofing101,600/sq101,60007-6210Flashing & Sheet Metal68Flashing Cap at Exposed Beam Sections160.00lf1,640975---16.35/lf2,61669 Flashing & Sheet Metal1,640975/lf2,616 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROT.1,640975101,600/sf104,21609-0000FINISHES7009-9100Paint Finishes71Paint Replacement Sections of Beams 2, 8, 9 /New Plywood Sheathing10,160.00sf--20,320--2.00/sf20,32072 Paint Finishes20,320/sf20,320 FINISHES20,320/sf20,32021-0000FIRE SUPPRESSION7321-1100Fire Protection Piping74Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Sprinkler System1.00est--3,500--3,500.00/est3,50075 Fire Protection Piping3,500/sf3,500 FIRE SUPPRESSION3,5003,50026-0000ELECTRICAL7626-5000Lighting77Remove / Replace / Repair Lighting1.00est--4,000--4,000.00/est4,00078 Lighting4,000/sf4,000 ELECTRICAL4,000/sf4,00028-0000ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY7928-0300Detection & Alarm Systems80Remove / Replace / Repair Fire Alarm System1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50081 Detection & Alarm Systems1,500/ea1,500 ELECTRONIC SAFETY &SECURITY1,5001,50032-0000SITE IMPROVEMENTS8232-9000Landscaping83Landscaping - Misc. Repair of Damaged Areas1.00est--1,500--1,500.00/est1,50084 Landscaping1,500/sf1,500 SITE IMPROVEMENTS1,5001,500Estimate Totals568
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 4Bogert Pavilion - Option #3 (Replace 8 Interior Beams)6/11/2019 5:04 PMEstimate TotalsDescriptionAmountTotalsLabor133,567Material134,538Subcontract132,420Equipment32,720Other2,100435,345435,345General Liability Insurance4,670Performance Bond4,303Builders Risk945Gross Receipts Tax5,248Construction Fee52,475Construction Contingency21,76789,408524,753Total524,753569
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 1Bogert Pavilion - Option 4 (Demolish)6/11/2019 5:05 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount01-0000GENERAL REQUIREMENTS101-0110Supervision2Superintendent at 20 Hours/Wk4.00wk3,982360-650-1,248.10/wk4,9923 Supervision3,982360650/wk4,99201-0150Project Management4Project Engineer at 10 Hours/Wk4.00wk1,699----424.80/wk1,6995 Project Management1,699/wk1,69901-1650Safety Bonus6Monthly Safety Bonus1.00mo40----40.00/mo407 Safety Bonus40/wk4001-2050Temporary Telephone8Temporary Phone1.00mo----200200.00/mo2009 Temporary Telephone200/mo20001-2100Temporary Electric10Temporary Electric Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01101-2400Temporary Water Service12Temporary Water Service - By Owner0.00mo----*0.00/mo01301-3150Temporary Toilet14Temporary Toilet1.00mo----250250.00/mo25015 Temporary Toilet250/mo25001-3200Barricades & Enclosures16Temporary Fence - Already On-Site0.00lf**---0.00/lf01701-3300Traffic Control18Flagmen - Assist Trucks in Parking Lot3.00wk2,450----816.80/wk2,45019Barricades / Temp Signage - Bogert Parking Lot4.00wk1,6341,000---658.40/wk2,63420 Traffic Control4,0841,000/mo5,08401-3410Safety Equipment/Support21Misc. Safety Supplies4.00wk-400---100.00/wk40022 Safety Equipment/Support400/mo40001-6400Construction Equipment23Forklift - Mobilize from Home Office as Needed24.00hr-151-840-41.30/hr99124 Construction Equipment151840/mo99101-7050Cleanup25Current Cleanup4.00wk1,307--80-346.72/wk1,38726 Cleanup1,30780/wk1,387 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS11,1121,9111,570450/ls15,04402-0000EXISTING CONDITIONS2702-0800Hazardous Material Abatement28Hazardous Material Investigations - Assume NotRequired0.00ls--*--0.00/ls029Hazardous Material Abatement - Assume Not Required0.00ls--*--0.00/ls03002-2200Selective Demolition31Link Belt Excavator w/ Thumb Rental & Fuel3.00wk*945-5,100-2,015.00/wk6,04532Loader Rental & Fuel3.00wk*945-5,100-2,015.00/wk6,04533Demolish Wood Structure to Slab on Grade27,648.00sf6,534----0.24/sf6,53434Load, Haul, & Dispose of Wood Framing Materials- To Logan23.00load1,4096,0705,693--572.66/load13,17135Demolish Concrete Slab on Grade27,648.00sf3,921----0.14/sf3,9213637570
Martel Construction IncSpreadsheet ReportPage 2Bogert Pavilion - Option 4 (Demolish)6/11/2019 5:05 PMGroupPhaseDescriptionTakeoff QuantityLabor AmountMaterial AmountSub AmountEquip AmountOther AmountTotal Cost/UnitTotal Amount02-2200Selective DemolitionLoad, Haul, & Dispose of Slab on Grade - ToLogan48.00load1,96044,54411,880--1,216.34/load58,38437Demolish Footing Piers20.00ea6,534----326.72/ea6,53438Load, Haul, & Dispose of Footing Piers - To Logan8.00load3278,3521,980--1,332.34/load10,65939Stockpile Under-Slab Gravels - Assumed 4" BaseCourse341.00cy1,307----3.83/cy1,30740Load, Haul & Dispose of Under Slab Gravels - ToTMC Belgrade Pit24.00load980-4,620--233.34/load5,60041 Selective Demolition22,97260,85624,17310,200/sf118,201 EXISTING CONDITIONS22,97260,85624,17310,200/sf118,20121-0000FIRE SUPPRESSION4221-1100Fire Protection Piping43Fire Sprinkler Service - Cap / Abandon in Place1.00est--5,000--5,000.00/est5,00044 Fire Protection Piping5,000/sf5,000 FIRE SUPPRESSION5,0005,00026-0000ELECTRICAL4526-0510Wiring Methods46Electrical Disconnect / Make Safe for Demo1.00est--2,500--2,500.00/est2,50047 Wiring Methods2,500/sf2,500 ELECTRICAL2,500/sf2,50031-0000EARTHWORK4831-2300Excavation and Fill49Fine Grade Demo Area for Landscaping34,928.00sf1,189----0.03/sf1,18950 Excavation and Fill1,189/cy1,189 EARTHWORK1,1891,18932-0000SITE IMPROVEMENTS5132-9340Trees & Irrigation52Import Soil at Demo Area - 5" Topsoil / 1" Compost680.00cy--27,200--40.00/cy27,20053Seed Demo Area34,928.00sf--8,732--0.25/sf8,73254Turf Irrigation at Demo Area34,928.00sf--13,971--0.40/sf13,97155 Trees & Irrigation49,903/sf49,903 SITE IMPROVEMENTS49,90349,903Estimate TotalsDescriptionAmountTotalsLabor35,274Material62,767Subcontract81,576Equipment11,770Other450191,837191,837General Liability Insurance2,058Construction Fee23,123Construction Contingency9,592Bond1,896Builders Risk416Gross Receipts Tax2,31239,397231,234Total231,234571