HomeMy WebLinkAbout19200 Application Materials
A1
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
PROJECT IMAGE
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name:
Project type(s):
Description:
Street address:
Zip code:
Zoning:
Gross lot area:
Block frontage:
Number of buildings:
Type and Number of dwellings:
Non-residential building size(s):
(in stories)
Non-residential building height(s):
Number of parking spaces:
Afordable housing (Y/N):
Cash in lieu of parkland (Y/N):
VICINITY MAP
CITY USE ONLY
Submittal date:
Application fle number:
Planner:
DRC required (Y/N): Revision Date:
Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18
REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
1. PROPERTY OWNER
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
2. APPLICANT
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
3. REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation None
Urban
Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast North Park None
5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES
This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if diferent) for all application types before the
submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only.
As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms
and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development
approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special
conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may
be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject
site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true
and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge.
Certifcation of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that
I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with
municipal code provisions.
Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved
fnal plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance.
continued on next page
Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18
REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS
X
MAY 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park
with a Major Change to the Lowe’s-Saccoccia PUD (Z-05128)
CONCEPTUAL PUD APPLICATION
May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Table of Contents
1. Application Forms, Checklists and Fee Calculations:
(A1, PUDC)
2. Introduction & Document Organization
3. Response to Concept Review (19-025) Comments
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials (Form PUDC)
a. Project Narrative
i. General
ii. Underlying Lowe’s & Saccoccia PUD History
iii. Project Intent & Goals
iv. Project Timeframe
v. Proposed Uses, Improvements & Buildings
vi. Phasing
b. Proposed Relaxations
c. Site Conditions
d. Conceptual Drawings & Features within 1/2 Mile Radius
e. Proposed Land Use Allocations
f. Phasing Plan
Appendices:
Appendix A: Recorded ECCR’s for Lowe’s-Saccoccia PUD Parcels
Appendix B: Draft Language for Waiver of Right to Protest SIDs
Appendix C: Lowe’s PUD Design Guidelines
Appendix D: Saccoccia PUD Design Guidelines
Appendix E: Lowe’s PUD CUP Conditions of Approval
Plans & Exhibits:
A0.1 Cover Sheet
A1.1 Concept Site Plan
A1.2 Open Space with Site Plan
Exhibit A: General Site
Exhibit B: Site Conditions within 1/2 Mile
Exhibit C: Parks, Trails & Wetlands
Exhibit D: PUD Open Space Distribution
Exhibit E: PUD Rendered Site Plan
Reference:
Map A: Lowe’s Final PUD Site Plan (2006)
Map B: Final Plat of the Saccoccia Minor Subdivision 407 (2007)
Map C: Amended Plat 407A (2008)
3 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
1. Site Plan Forms, Checklists & Fees
Attached please find the A1, and PUD-C forms for the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park
Neighborhood PUD. The calculated fees total $1,486.00 for the Concept PUD.
COMPONENT FEE QUANTITY TOTAL
PUD-C $1,486.00 1 $1,486.00
TOTAL $ 1,486.00
4 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
2. Introduction & Document Organization
The Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Neighborhood Planned Unit Development lies within the
underlying Lowe’s & Saccoccia PUD. This Concept PUD and the subsequent PUD applications
technically qualify as a major change to the underlying PUD. The justification for the major
change to the PUD per 38.430.040.3.d.(2) are as follows:
1. A change in the character of the development
2. Increase of greater than 5% of the approved number of residential buildings
3. Reduction in the approved open space
The Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Project will be changing the established character by adding
multihousehold residential on the undeveloped eastern parcel in the PUD. The project also seeks
to reduce the original open space requirement of 30% established in the underlying PUD to meet
the required Performance Points and replace the points through affordable housing. Arrowleaf
Park & Perennial Park will exceed the required PUD Performance Points through the addition of
multihousehold, workforce residential dwelling units. The project will preserve most of the
established open space, but will reduce it from 30% to approximately 25%. Section 4.a.ii. further
describes the underlying PUD , site history and relaxations established.
The proposed project includes 14 buildings across the 12.361 acre site in the B-2 zoning district.
One of the proposed buildings is a 96-unit active-senior living community, and two other buildings
include commercial uses to front and activate Tschache Lane. The remaining buildings include a
mix of multihousehold residential and rowhouse buildings. The overall design intent seeks to
create a quality neighborhood offering a mix of affordable rental options. The applicant intends to
enter into an agreement with the City of Bozeman to keep the rentals as an affordable option for
a minimum of 20 years. This neighborhood will also assist in accomplishing the goals and
objectives of the City of Bozeman’s growth policy, specifically Goal H-3: Encourage an adequate
supply of affordable housing and land for affordable housing.
Please note that the organization, layout and format of this application is intended to follow the
City of Bozeman’s PUDC Form and Checklist.
5 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
3. Response to Concept Review Comments
The applicant received Concept Review (19-025) comments back from the DRC on February 14, 2019.
In their response to the applicant’s questions, City Staff advised the applicant to pursue a major
change to the underlying PUDs rather than a Site Plan within the PUD(s). Any updates or changes
resulting from this will be reflected in the responses below.
Planning Division:
1. Applicants shall address and submit a narrative response to all Conceptual Review comments
along with the future Site Plan application.
RESPONSE: Noted
2. A Conceptual PUD is expected to be the next step for this project to gain site plan
entitlements. If phasing is proposed, please describe potential phasing with conceptual review.
Subsequent Site Plans will be required as phases come forward.
RESPONSE: These responses are part of the Concept PUD application.
3. Ensure adequate pedestrian connection from Townhome (Rowhouse) units to the street.
RESPONSE: The site design includes ample pedestrian circulation through and across the
site. Additionally, there is a trail that runs north-south along the eastern boundary of
the site for pedestrians and residents that prefer to travel away from vehicular
dominated areas.
4. Sidewalks will be required along Sidewalk to connect to the greater pedestrian system.
RESPONSE: The site includes sidewalks along the R.O.W. of Tschache Lane and Sacco
Drive, as well as between buildings connecting all structures and trails. Crosswalks are
designated at multiple spots to ensure safe pedestrian passage when crossing vehicular
areas and drives.
5. The “townhouse” building form proposed is considered a “rowhouse” when units are not on
individual lots. Please correct or clarify as needed throughout the application.
RESPONSE: Noted
6. All requirements for townhouse/rowhouse buildings in 38.360.240 apply to the rowhouse
buildings proposed.
RESPONSE: Applicant acknowledges and agrees.
6 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
7. Open space will be accounted for differently for rowhouse, apartment and commercial
buildings on the property.
RESPONSE: The applicant understands this requirement. Please see Section c.
Project Intent & Goalsand Table D-3 for open space calculations for the site.
8. East-west drive aisle must meet internal roadway standards
RESPONSE: Noted, please see Sheet A1.1 for site specifics.
9. Two-way, 24-foot drive aisle is required for perpendicular parking throughout the site. This
area does not meet the standard:
RESPONSE: Noted, all drive aisles have been updated to meet the drive aisle
requirements and include a 24’ drive aisle where required for two-way, perpendicular
applications.
Engineering Division:
1. The applicant must submitted an estimate for the peak-hour sanitary sewer demand for the
proposed project. The City is aware of a possible downstream constriction that may limit the
demand without infrastructure upgrades accruing.
RESPONSE: TD&H submi;ed the GNB sewer demand calcula=on of 167 gpm peak
flow. The City of Bozeman ran their model. Griffin Neilsen verbally stated that capacity
exists for the projected flow of 167 gpm.
2. The applicant must demonstrate the right to legally access Sacco Drive. In addition the access
onto Sacco Drive must meet the City’s access separation requirement with the property to the
west (Lowes).
RESPONSE: All owners within the Lowe’s-Sacco PUD with ownership of any portion of
the “Private Road” (Sacco Drive) grants an easement to the other Owners for pedestrian
and vehicular traffic via the ECCRs (Appendix A, Section 2.2). The separation on local
streets is 40’ as long as the access point is 150’ away from an arterial. The access point
on Sacco meets this criteria.
3. North 15th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Oak Street has been identified as a necessary
connection for developments in this area. Applicants may coordinate with Engineering as
projects in the area come forward.
RESPONSE: The applicant is aware of the issue and understands that the planned hotel
project to the east of the PUD site has these improvements as a condition and has
7 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
submitted initial engineering design for the extension project.
4. A traffic impact study is required for the proposed project.
RESPONSE: A traffic study is in progress and will be submitted with subsequent
development applications as required.
5. The property is on the edge of the two water distribution pressure zones, the applicant should
reference the City’s water facility master plans details on these pressure zone. The applicant
should ensure they utilize pressure and flow data from the zone the project will connect to.
RESPONSE: The project will be designed for the correct pressure zone
6. The applicant must contact the City Engineering Department (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of
cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights for the proposed project. CIL of water rights must be paid prior
to site plan approval.
RESPONSE: Brian Heaston has been contacted and the CIL of water rights has been
determined. This fee will be paid to acquire site plan approval.
7. The proposed project is with the North 19th and Baxter Intersection Payback District, the
owner may pay there proportional share of the payback prior to development. The applicant may
contact the engineering department (Katherine Maines) for information on the proportional
share.
RESPONSE: Katherine Maines has been contacted. Katherine noted that this property
lies in a portion of the Baxter and 19th payback that has already been paid, so nothing
further is owed.
8. A stormwater drainage/treatment grading plan and maintenance plan for a system designed to
treat the first 0.5 inch of stormwater for the remove solids, silt, oils, grease, and other pollutants
must be provided to and approved with the site plan application. The plan must demonstrate
adequate site drainage (including sufficient spot elevations), storm water detention/retention
basin details (including basin sizing and discharge calculations, and discharge structure details),
storm water discharge destination, and a storm water maintenance plan. The approved
stormwater maintenance plan must be incorporated into the Owners Association Documents
and submit a copy prior to site plan approval.
RESPONSE: It does not appear that an owners association exists for the PUD, however,
the applicant has already been in communication with all property owners within the
PUD and will work to secure sign off from all owners for the PUDP application. The site
plan will also incorporate and account for the new first 0.5” rule in the storm water
design. This will either require a treatment system or an additional pond.
8 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
9. As noted in the engineering narrative the season high groundwater elevation and ensure that
the proposed stormwater system will meet or exceed all drainage standards during the season
high.
RESPONSE: The applicant is working with civil engineering consultants to address all
stormwater issues. The current plan is to drain storm water into the exis=ng ditch that drains
into the storm water pond for the subdivision. The pond discharge pipe flow out at an eleva=on
of 4706. Past data has shown that ground water can be as close as 1-2 feet of the surface.
Buildings are planned to be slab on grade and finish floors will be raised versus cut into exis=ng
ground. It is an=cipated that ground water monitoring will be done this spring/summer.
10. Changes to the common open space lot to the north will require approval from the property
owners association.
RESPONSE: The applicant has already been in communication with all owners within the
PUD. IT is understood that they will be required to sign the PUDP application and will be
aware of all proposed changes.
11. Due to the high groundwater and increased rate of corrosion with in the clay soils all water
mains must be zinc coated. This condition may be met if the applicant can demonstrate to the
engineering department that the additional cathodic protection is not required.
RESPONSE: Noted. The applicant is working with civil engineering consultants to address
all infrastructure issues. Zinc coated water main pipes will be used as required by the
City of Bozeman
12. City standard easements must be provided for the proposed onsite water and sewer mains and
along the project frontage for public utilities. The applicant may contact the City’s engineering
department (Griffin Nielsen) to receive a copy of the standard documents.
RESPONSE: Noted and easements will be provided as required
13. If not already filed for the subject site, the applicant must provide and file with the County
Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special
Improvement Districts (SID’s) for the following:
a. Street improvements to Baxter Lane including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and
storm drainage
b. Street improvements to Oak Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and
9 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
storm drainage
c. Street improvements to North 19th Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,
and storm drainage
d. Street improvements to North 15th Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,
and storm drainage
e. Street improvements to North 11th Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk,
and storm drainage
f. Street improvements to Tschache Lane including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and
storm drainage
g. Intersection improvements to the Tschache Lane and North 15th Avenue
h. Intersection improvements to the Tschache Lane and North 19th Avenue
i. Intersection improvements to the Baxter Lane and North 15th Avenue
The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of
these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the
completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square
footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the
development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID
waiver prior to site plan approval.
RESPONSE: The applicant has drafted an SID waiver for City Staff to review, it is
included as Appendix B.
14. The applicant must submit plans and specifications for water and sewer main extensions,
streets, and storm water improvements, prepared and signed by a professional engineer (PE)
registered in the State of Montana, which must be provided to and approved by the City
Engineer. Water and sewer plans must also be approved by the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality. The applicant must also provide professional engineering services for
construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record
drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the
plans and specifications have been approved and a preconstruction conference has been
conducted. Building permits will not be issued prior to City acceptance of the site
infrastructure improvements unless all provisions set forth in Section 38.270.030.C of the
Bozeman Municipal Code are met to allow for concurrent construction.
RESPONSE: Noted. The applicant is working with civil engineering consultants to
address all infrastructure issues. All City of Bozeman and State of Montana design and
approval requirements will be satisfied.
10 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
General Comments:
1. The City of Bozeman has adopted impact fees as part of its development regulations. The
impact fee program is contained in Chapter 3.24, Bozeman Municipal Code. Future building
permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire
impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of
building permit issuance. An estimate can be supplied through our office. Contact Chris
Saunders, Planning and Policy Manger, at 406-582-2267 for further information. This requirement
is paid at building permit issuance.
RESPONSE: Noted.
2. The City of Bozeman requires a payment for cash in lieu of water rights for further
development of property where cash in lieu has not been paid. As the property has previously
been subdivided there may or may not be outstanding requirements for this location. The City
will recognize any previously provided water rights or cash-in-lieu for this property as applying
towards future development of this site. Contact Brian Heaston, Engineer at 406-582-2280 for
further information. This requirement is paid at plan review with a formal application. An
estimate of required fees and payment is required with plan application submittal.
RESPONSE: Noted
11 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
a. Project Narrative
i. General
The Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Project proposes 14 buildings across 12.361 buildable
acres. The two buildings fronting Tschache Lane located on the south portion of the site will
contain commercial and office space. While the remaining buildings will be comprised of
residential units and accessory spaces. There is an additional 2.01 acres of dedicated open
space as part of the Sacco-Lowe’s PUD located to the north of the project site. This parcel
includes a large stormwater pond that is fed by other adjacent PUD parcels.
The site will address the adjacent streets with buildings fronting Sacco Drive and Tschache
Lane while emphasizing pedestrian access and placing distributed parking behind buildings.
Two buildings along the southern edge of the site fronting Tsacache Lane will provide an active
commercial streetscape. Similarly, the estimated 96-Unit active senior living community will
define the western edge along Sacco Drive. Given the context and length of the Lowe’s Home
Improvement Building across Sacco Drive, and the existing parcel configurations, the applicant
will request a relaxation to block length requirements for this building. The senior building
will also provide a Streamline Bus transportation loading area.
Residential buildings for single residents, couples and families will be dispersed throughout
the remainder of the site. A mixture of rowhouse residences in the north, adjacent to wetlands
and common open space along with multihousehold buildings sited in the center and along the
eastern edge of the site will provide an estimated 144 dwelling units.
Wetlands do occur on and adjacent to the site. The applicant has scheduled a wetland
delineation to coincide with the appropriate growing season (May 2019) per ACOE standards.
The updated wetland delineation will be included in the PUDP application materials.
ii. Underlying Lowe’s & Saccoccia PUD History
As noted, the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Project lies within an existing PUD. The entire
12 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
PUD site is 39.99 acres, with the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park site comprising 12.31 acres on
the eastern portion of the PUD. Originally the Saccoccia Subdivision, PUD and Site plan created
only 3 lots (Reference Map A). However, the current plat includes multiple lots within the PUD.
In 2007 the Plat was updated to include a dedicated PUD Common Open Space lot of
approximately 3.3 acres in the NE portion of the site (Reference Map B). This lot includes a
common stormwater drainage area and basin. The Plat was updated again in 2008 to remove
the lot lines between Lots 3, 4 and 5; creating a singular Lot 3A, where the Arrowleaf Park &
Perennial Park Project is proposed (Exhibit F).
Existing PUD Relaxations:
The Saccoccia PUD was initiated in 2001-2002 in conjunction with a minor subdivision. The
Saccoccia PUD received approval in 2004 (P-02009) and included five relaxations as outlined
in Table 4-a below.
Shortly after the Saccoccia PUD was approved, the Lowe’s HIW PUD, consisting of a
modification to the Saccoccia PUD, was submitted and received approval in August of 2005 (Z
-05128). It included one additional relaxation, see Table 4-b.
NO. UDC REFERENCE* DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE RELAXATION
1 38.020.050 Building Height To allow the buildings heights to exceed the maximums
allowed in the M-1 and B-2 zoning districts, but not to
exceed 48 feet.
2 38.310.030 PermiKed uses To allow uses idenLfied as permiKed uses in the B-2 t and
M-1
3 38.350.030.D Water & Sanitary
Sewer System
Requirements
To allow concurrent installaLon of infrastructure
improvements and construcLon of a specific project
4 38.560 Sign Code To allow one pole sign to exceed allowable height by 12
feet and 50 sf in area, one pole sign to exceed the
allowable height by 4 feet and 16 sf in area, and one
monument sign to exceed allowable height by 6 feet and
32 sf in area
5 38.570.060.A Glare and LighLng To allow the proposed lantern style lighLng that does not
conform to the requirement that prohibits luminaries and
lenses to protrude below the edge of the light fixture.
Table 4-a: Approved RelaxaCons for Saccoccia PUD (February 2004 #P02009)
13 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
PUD Site Plan & Performance Points:
The Lowe’s PUD Modification included an updated site plan with open space designations
(See Exhibit D for this distribution over the site today). This PUD site plan identified 12.09
acres of open space of which 9.58 acres were ‘PUD Open Space’ (yellow on the exhibit).
Other components of the open space plan include Greenway, Stream and Obligated open
space. The PUD Open Space in yellow is flexible and may be allotted in other combinations
on site. The PUD set aside 30% of open space to achieve its required performance points.
The 30%, as opposed to 20% required for PUDs at the time, is due to the PUD being located
within a designated Entryway Corridor. Entryway Corridors no longer are in the code.
Of the Open space detailed on Reference Map A approximately 12.09 acres of PUD Open
Space, 0.61 Acres of Greenway and 0.27 acres of Obligated Open Space are contained in the
Common Open Space parcel (3.3 Acres total) north of the project site. The Arrowleaf Park &
Perennial Park PUD will propose to reduce some of the flexible PUD open space by
approximately 5%, leaving 25% for the entire PUD. The PUD will propose to replace the PUD
performance points achieved through this open space with Affordable Housing points, more
detail in later section.
Governing Documents:
In addition to the relaxations for the Lowe’s-Saccoccia PUDs, there are applicable design
guidelines and ‘Easements, Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions’ (ECCRs). These documents
have undergone updates as the PUD was modified. The current Guidelines were submitted in
2005 and the current ECCRs were amended and filed with the Clerk & Recorder in November
of 2005 (Docs 2207231 & 2207846). Both of these documents are included with this
application as Appendices C, D & A, respectively.
NO. UDC REFERENCE* DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE RELAXATION
1 38.020.050 Building Size Limit To allow Lowe’s HIW store to exceed 75,000 sf
maximum floor area
Table 4-b: Approved RelaxaCon for Lowe’s MOD to Saccoccia PUD (April 2005 #Z-05128)
14 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
iii. Project Intent & Goals
The intent of the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park is a vibrant, multi-household, workforce and
active senior housing community. The applicant intends to enter into an agreement with the City
of Bozeman to keep the rentals as an affordable option for a minimum of 20 years, similar to the
Larkspur project in NW Bozeman. The current goal is to serve families and individuals with
household incomes between 50-70% of the area median income. One of the proposed buildings,
fronting Sacco Drive, is a 96-unit active-senior living community, and two buildings fronting
Tschache Lane will include ground-floor commercial uses. The remaining buildings include a mix of
multi-family residential and rowhouse buildings in the northern end of the development, with the
site providing an estimated 276 dwelling units. Site improvements include sidewalk and
streetscape enhancement, landscaping, improved park/open space, and trails see attached
Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibits F & G).
PUD with Major Change:
The Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Neighborhood proposes to achieve its goals through a
Planned Unit Development with a “major change” to the underlying Lowe’s & Saccoccia PUD. As
outlined previously, the justification for the major change to the PUD per 38.430.040.3.d.(2) are
as follows:
1. A change in the character of the development
· The original PUDs were geared towards and focused on commercial development. The
Lowe’s PUD Modification did contemplate residential development and added language
in the design guidelines reflecting this (see page 1 of Appendix C). Residential uses are
allowed per the ECCRs (Appendix A). The applicant intends to request a relaxation to the
requirement for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for ground floor residential for this
parcel only (see section 2).
2. Increase of greater than 5% of the approved number of residential buildings
· While residential uses are allowed, currently the site contains no residential buildings
and none were approved under previous PUD applications.
3. Reduction in the approved open space
· The original PUD achieved its performance points through a 30% designation of Open
Space, due to the site’s location in the Entry Way Corridor at the time. The PUD Open
15 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Space is distributed throughout the parcels of the entire PUD with approximately 3.17
acres occurring on the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park parcel (Exhibit D). The
applicant proposes to reduce this by approximately 1.95 acres (61 %) to moderately
increase the buildable area on-site. The Applicant proposed to partially replace the
Open Space performance points with Affordable Housing points, resulting in
significantly more PUD points than required.
Open Space Updates:
The applicant proposes to relocate some of the flexible open space within the Arrowleaf Park &
Perennial Park Site Plan and incorporate it into the overall site design. However, some of the
‘Flexible PUD Open Space’ that is located on-site will be reduced to account for the site
improvements and site design elements necessary for the project. Originally there were 2.01
acres of flexible open space on this parcel, the applicant proposes to develop approximately
1.95 of these acres. This would be a loss of 1.95 acres for the entire PUD. The applicant also
proposes to replace the open space points achieved through affordable housing, allowing more
flexibility for other parcels within the PUD to adjust the flexible PUD space if/when needed.
Open Space Changes
TYPE Current Proposed Change
Flexible PUD Open Space 9.58 7.63 1.95
Greenway 1.83 1.83 0.0
Stream Open Space 0.68 0.68 0.0
Obligated Open Space 0.91 0.91 0.0
Trail Unchanged Unchanged N/A
TOTAL ON-SITE (PARCEL 3A) 3.17 1.22 1.95
TOTAL ACROSS THE PUD 12.09 acres 10.14 1.95
Table 4-c: Open Space Within the Lowe’s-Sacco PUD & Proposed Changes
16 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Affordable Housing
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial park will exceed the current Affordable Housing requirements
established by the City of Bozeman. This project seeks to establish long-term affordability in the
rental market for tenants. The model pursued will mean that 100% of the rental units will be
provided at affordable rental rates based on median area guidelines. The applicant-developer
will work cooperatively with the HRDC District IX, a local non-profit specializing in the
development and management of affordable housing options in SW Montana. The applicant will
achieve this by entering into a long-term contractual obligation for a period of at least 20 years,
along with a written plan. This plan will assure the ongoing affordability pricing and eligibility
monitoring, as well as annual re-certification of the community as an affordable and workforce
housing project. This plan will also ensure compliance with the City's affordability guidelines and
subsequent revisions which ultimately establish affordability and eligibility for residents.
Due to the establishment of the community as a long-term, 100% affordable housing project and
the criteria outlined above, the project is eligible to earn its PUD Performance points through
affordable housing. A project like this is eligible for three (3) points per each percent of dwelling
units to be constructed and provided as long-term options through a contractual agreement.
Therefore the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park project will be eligible to earn 300 PUD
Performance points per 38.403.090.E.2.a.7.a.ii.
Parking
The Project site design and layout, as currently proposed, provides an estimated total of 340
parking spaces. Note that with City B-2M zoning, which is substantially similar to B-2, the
proposed parking provided would essentially meet the requirements. Based on current B-2
zoning and parking minimums, and estimated 559 spaces would be required. However, the site
will be eligible for some parking reductions as a Streamline Bus Stop will be added and co-
located on-site. Additionally, the applicant is requesting parking relaxations based on the type
of housing being offered, see Section D.4 for a list of all relaxations. The applicant is seeking a
reduction of the minimums to 0.85 space per dwelling unit in the senior living facility. These
units will be one and two bedroom units and typically will have only one car or less per unit. The
applicant is also requesting to reduce the requirement to 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit in the
17 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
multihousehold workforce housing and rowhouse units. These units will tend to be families with
children and have 1-2 cars maximum per unit. The total required spaces based on the
requested relaxations and after applicable reductions is estimated to be 378 and a total of 360
are provided (340 surface and 20 on-street spaces along Sacco Drive). A table detailing the
proposed parking calculations is listed below.
iv. Project Timeframe
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park PUD Parking
UNIT NET FACTOR SPACES
Commercial Building 1:
Day Care Center 12,000 SF - 1 space/staff member +1
space/15 children 28
Senior Living: 1-Bedroom 85 - 0.85 72
Senior Living: 2-Bedroom 11 - 0.85 9
MulLhousehold: 1-Bedroom 60 - 1.75 105
MulLhousehold: 2-Bedroom 42 - 1.75 73
MulLhousehold: 3-Bedroom 18 - 1.75 31
Rowhouse Units: 3-Bedroom 24 - 1.75 42
TOTAL 419
LESS REDUCTIONS (10% for covered transit stop co-located on site) (-41 )
ADA Required (included in total) 8 ( 1 van)
TOTAL REQUIRED 378
SPACES PROVIDED 360
Offices 6,000 5,100 1/250 20
Commercial Building 2:
Medical/Dental Office 16,000 -
4 spaces for ea. full-Lme
equiv. doctor or denLst; +1
space for ea. full-Lme equiv.
employee
40
Table 4-d: Parking CalculaCons with Requested RelaxaCons
18 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
The project is intended to be completed as a phased site plan. A full breakdown of site
components and phasing is included in Section D.6. The applicant has been advised that
a Master Site Plan will also be required in addition to the Preliminary PUD. The
applicant requests that City Staff add direction on the entitlements required in
subsequent steps of this PUD with a Major Change and Site Planning process.
v. Proposed Uses, Improvements & Buildings
Buildings & Use
A total of 14 buildings will be constructed for the project: a senior living facility, seven
multihousehold buildings, three rowhouse clusters (of 8 units), two commercial
buildings and a leasing office. Table 4-e below details the distribution of dwelling units
and commercial units among the 6 building types.
The majority of the buildings and use are residential. The two commercial buildings will
be designed to provide a daycare facility and a health clinic. These buildings will front
on Tschache Lane and follow the mixed block frontage designation. Additionally, the
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Proposed Buildings
BUILDING
DWELLING
UNITS COMM.
BLDG.
FOOTPRINT (SF)
BLDG.
OVERALL SF STORIES
Senior Living 96 - 18,836 55,706 3
24-Unit
MulLhousehold
(3)
96 - 6,920 18,870 3
Commercial
Bldg. 1 - 16,000 8,000 16,000 2
Commercial
Bldg. 2 - 18,000 12,000 6,000 2
Rowhouse (3) 24 - 3,922 10,589 3
T OTAL 240 34,000 52,771 116,290
12-Unit
MulLhousehold
(4)
48 3,093 9,125 3
Table 4-e: Proposed Buildings
19 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Senior Living Apartment building will front onto Sacco Drive and also follow the mixed
block frontage designation.
Access
The site is accessed from the south off of Tschache Lane and from the Northwest via
Sacco Drive. The access point off of Sacco Drive lines up with the Lowe’s access point
across the street and is located over 150’ feet from the intersection at Baxter Lane, a
minor arterial. The access off of Tschache Lane is located 175’ feet away from the
intersection at Sacco Drive. Both streets are local streets and the required minimum
access separation is 40 feet. Additionally, this access point is over 150’ feet from the
Tschache Lane intersection with North 19th Avenue, a major arterial.
Water
The proposed water improvements for the project will consist of a new 8” diameter
water main that loops through the development, connecting to existing 12” diameter
mains in Tschache Lane and Sacco Drive. Each building will likely have a 6” diameter
domestic water service and a separate 6” diameter fire service line as determined by
the project mechanical engineer.
Four new fire hydrants are proposed for the new main to provide fire protection for the
structures in addition to the proposed fire sprinkler systems. A previous hydrant flow
test in the area resulted in static and residual pressures of 98 and 76 psi respectively.
This test is more than one year old and will have to be verified.
Sewer
The proposed sewer improvements for the project will consist of an 8” diameter gravity
collection main extending south up the main subdivision access road from Sacco Drive
to the southernmost buildings in the development adjacent to Tschache Lane. The
gravity collection system will drain to the existing 8 inch diameter sewer main in Sacco
Drive.
Recent flow monitoring on the Simmental Way interceptor indicates that adequate
downstream sewer collection capacity exists for this project. Sewer calculations will be
part of the next phase of design development.
20 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Stormwater
The proposed project site currently drains to an existing stormwater detention facility
located adjacent to the north side of lot 3. The existing detention pond serves all of the
lots in the Saccoccia Subdivison including lot 3A which comprise this development. This
pond was designed to limit the peak outflow from the site during the ten year storm
event to the pre-development flow for a post development runoff coefficient of 0.76.
The preliminary Arrowleaf and Perennial Parks estimated site post development runoff
coefficient is 0.58. This means that the post development runoff will be less than the
original subdivision design runoff and the existing pond will provide adequate storage.
Post-development runoff from rooftops, access roadways, sidewalks and driveways will
be collected and conveyed to the stormwater detention pond by a system of inlets and
underground storm drainage mains located within the utility and roadway easement.
The total area of the development discharging to the existing pond will be 9.67 acres
with an average runoff coefficient “C” equal to 0.58. The remainder of the
development not discharging to the pond is the undeveloped riparian area adjacent to
the stream ditch along the east side of the properties. This area was excluded from
Morrison Maierle’s original analysis as well.
Stormwater collection improvements for the project will consist of inlet catch basins,
and storm sewer mains. Also, the project will also incorporate and account for the new
first 0.5” rule in the storm water design. This will either require a treatment system or
an additional pond.
Wetlands
Wetlands do occur on and adjacent to the site. The applicant has scheduled a wetland
delineation to coincide with the appropriate growing season (May 2019) per ACOE
standards. The updated wetland delineation will be included in the PUDP application
materials.
Open Space/Trails
21 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
Connectivity is an important aspect of Arrowleaf Park and Perennial Park. Open space
and trails are major components of this notion of connectivity. Trails and improved
walkways are dispersed throughout the overall site to provide safe passage for
pedestrians amongst residential and commercial buildings as well as between the other
site amenities.
Water Rights
The City Engineering Department (Brian Heaston) has been contacted for an initial
analysis of cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights for the proposed project. The applicant is
aware that CIL of water rights must be paid prior to site plan approval.
Parkland
Per UDC 38.420.030 C, this project will be providing a combination of parkland dedication on-
site, cash-in-lieu of parkland and improvements-in-lieu of parkland as allowed. Below are the
calculations used to determine the amount of parkland dedication required.
Parkland Calculations:
Max required dedication = 12 Units/Acre (B-2)
Dedication per dwelling = .03 acres
(12 Units/Acre x 12.3 Acres x .03) = 4.428Acres (192,883.6 SF)
During the concept review phase, City Staff advised that the project convert the existing open
space pathway and wetland areas along the eastern portion of the site into a linear park and
count towards the Parkland Dedication, with the remaining being paid for as cash-in-lieu. The
linear park contains an established, gravel trail identified on the PROST plan and will be able to
connect to future development and trails to the south.
Net Residential Density:
D = 240/ 12.3- (0.78+0+0+0.35+0)
D= 21.4 du/acre
22 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
PUBLIC PARKLAND DEDICATION TRACKING TABLE
CURRENT PREVIOUS PHASES:
SUBDIVISION NAME:
N/A
PROJECT NAME:
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park
TOTAL
FOR SUBDIV:
THIS
PROPOSAL:
PHASE/LOT:
N/A
No previous phases
NUMBER OF RES. UNITS PER PHASE/LOT / SITE
PLAN 240 240 N/A
ACREAGE PARK LAND AND/OR CIL
REQUIRED:
$ tbd
.
4.428
=12 du x 12.3
acres x 0.03 acres/
du
N/A
VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU PROPOSED:
$________________ VS. VALUE OF CODE REQD.
BASIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS: $ ___________
N/A N/A N/A
ACREAGE PARK LAND PREVIOUSLY DEEDED TO
COB: 0 acres, 3.3 Dedicated Open Space through
PUD
N/A N/A N/A
ACREAGE PARK LAND YET TO BE
CONVEYED: TBD through PUD applicaCon N/A tbd N/A
PARK MASTER PLAN APPROVAL DATE: TBD N/A tbd N/A
Table 4-f: Parkland Tracking Table
23 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
b. Proposed Relaxations:
Below are the anticipated relaxations for the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park PUD:
NO. UDC REFERENCE* DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE RELAXATION
1 38.310.040.C PermiKed ResidenLal
Uses in commercial,
mixed use &
industrial zoning
districts
A CondiLonal Use Permit is required for ground floor
commercial in B-2 zoning districts.
Request: Eliminate need for CondiLonal Use Permit for
ground floor residenLal.
2 38.380 Affordable housing Applicant may pursue adjusLng or revising incenLves for
affordable housing
3 38.410.040.B Block Length Block length must not be designed, unless otherwise
impracLcal, to be more than 400 feet in length or less than
300 feet in length. Block lengths may be longer than 400 feet
if necessary due to topography, the presence of criLcal lands,
access control, or adjacency to exisLng parks or open space.
In no case may a block exceed 1,320 feet in length
Request: Eliminate the maximum block length of 400 feet
and allow a block length of 600 feet to accommodate the
Senior-Living facility. This building fronts Sacco Drive and is
across from the Lowe’s Warehouse & Store, which also
exceeds the 400 foot block length.
Table 4-g: Proposed RelaxaCons for Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park PUD
24 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
NO. UDC REFERENCE* DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE RELAXATION
4 38.420.020.A
38.420.060
Parkland DedicaLon
Parkland Frontage
(may not apply since
it is/will be a linear
park?)
The property fronts a 3.3 common open space lot and has a
linear trail along the eastern boundary. The project requires
4.428 acres of parkland. The applicant seeks to dedicate the
linear trail space along the eastern boundary and associated
wetlands as parkland and pay cash-in-lieu for the remainder.
The applicant also seeks to reduce the total parkland
requirement. This project would dedicate approximately 2
acres of parkland, pay cash-in-lieu for an addiLonal acre and
take a reducLon for the remainder.
Request: Reduce the parkland requirement by approximately
30%
5 38.430.090 PUD Performance
Points
Every PUD must earn at least 20 performance points. The
underlying PUD had to earn 30 due to its locaLon within the
Entry Way Corridor.
Request : Replace the original 30 PUD Performance points
achieved via open space and replace with 300 PUD
Performance points the project is eligible to achieve through
affordable housing iniLaLves.
6 38.520.060.B Open Space All mulL-household development, including mulLhousehold
porLons of mixed-use development must provide usable
open space equal to 100 sf per DU for studio and 1-BR and
150 sf for DU with 2 BR or more
Request: ReducLon in the residenLal open space based on
proximity to large common open spaces and trail.
7 38.540.050.A.1
38.540.050.A.1.b.1
38.540.050.3
Parking Minimum requirements for residenLal uses per Table
38.540.050-1 ReducLon for affordable housing, must be
calculated based on table but not to exceed 2 spaces per
unit.
Request: Reduce the required parking from 1.5—2 spaces
for 1 and 2 bedroom dwellings to 0.85 per unit for Senior
Living. Reduce the requirement for workforce housing units
from 1.5-2 per unit to 1.75 max per dwelling unit.
Table 4-g: Proposed RelaxaCons for Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park PUD (ConCnued)
25 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
c. Site Conditions:
Attached please find a vicinity map detailing general site conditions observed on site and on
adjacent properties within one-half mile of the site.
26 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
d. Concept Sketches:
Attached please find the conceptual site plan drawing including overall site layout, circulation,
open space and site features proposed on-site along with conditions observed on adjacent
properties within 1/2 mile.
27 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
e. Land Use AllocaCons :
The table below detail the land use allocations for the Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Project.
The table outlines each use in both square footage and acreage along with the percentage of
the site allocated to each use.
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park Proposed Land Use RaCos
TYPE AREA (sf) AREA (acres) % of SITE
ResidenLal: MulL-unit buildings, rowhouses, rental office
87,776 2.02 16.4
Commercial Buildings 19,400 0.45 3.7
Yards, playgrounds, pedestrian/resident on-site space 136,764 3.14 25.5
Right of Way (R.O.W.) (Sacco Drive, Tschache Lane) 15,344 0.35 2.83
Parking, on-site circulaLon 84,070 1.93 15.7
PUD Flexible Open Space 84,942 1.95 15.9
Trails & Permanent Open Space Easement 77,247 1.77 14.4
Wetlands 30,252 0.69 5.6
TOTAL 535,795 12.3 100
Table 4-h: Proposed Land Use RaCos
28 May 2019
Arrowleaf Park & Perennial Park :: CONCEPT PUD
4. Concept PUD Plan Required Materials
f. Phasing Plan:
The applicant intends to develop the entire project including all improvements, individual
buildings, and landscaping as a single project and single lot, no subdivision is planned at this time.
The project will ultimately be phased for construction and occupancy purposes, however the
approach and plan for the phased work has yet to be determined. It will be developed and
included for review in future submittals.
APPENDICES
PLS
Plans and Specifications PLS Page 1 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS INTRODUCTION In order for city staff to efficiently review your project in a timely manner, the application materials and the plan sets submitted must be clear, complete and thorough. This handout provides additional details for the application requirements outlined in the project checklists. If the requirements of this handout are met with your application it will minimize the delays that can occur when an application is unclear, incomplete or not formatted correctly. These requirements are mandatory. If the application materials do not meet these standards they will require correction, which will delay your project. GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. All plans and drawings must be accurately drawn, using a conventional scale such as 1:20 or 1:1/4, and with only one scale per sheet. Details may contain a separate scale if clearly labeled. 2. All text and annotations should be at a font size to enable it to be easily read – 10 point or more. Many plan sets require that 11” x 17” plan sizes be submitted. The text and annotations on plans that size must be readable when printed at that size. If plans are unreadable at the 11” x 17” size, they will not be accepted for review. 3. Plan sizes must meet minimum and maximum size requirements. No plans outside of the stated sizes will be accepted. 4. Plans/drawings must not contain disclaimers such as “Not to Scale” and “Do Not Scale.” (perspectives excepted) and drawings must be drawn true to the stated scale(s). 5. Plans must not contain disclaimers such as “Preliminary” and “Not for Construction.” 6. Provide all relevant measured dimensions annotated on the plans/drawings. For example label typical dimensions of parking spaces, drive accesses, drive aisles and sidewalks. 7. Consistent detailing. All existing and proposed site plan elements (e.g., sidewalks, parking spaces, fire lanes, building foot prints, etc.) must be labeled (unless a legend is provided) and dimensioned (unless a detail is provided). 8. The clearest way to present proposals is to group “existing” and “proposed” drawings side by side, using the same scale for both. 9. Each sheet and/or drawing must have a title box with the drawing name, sheet number and date clearly visible in bold. If sheets are updated or revised a new date must be applied to the sheet. For example, the civil utility plans might be labeled: C2.0 Utilities 05-01-2017. This is important as this will also be the digital file name. See naming protocol below. 10. The use of a title sheet for all general information, project team, data, calculations (parking, parkland, open spaces, and table of contents is required. The title must appear in bold letters across the top of the cover sheet. If the site plan includes a conditional use include the words “and Conditional Use.” 11. If the project is part of an existing development the name of the existing development must appear in the title. For example, “Arbys at Bozeman Gateway” or “Building K at the Cannery District.” 12. The vicinity map with zoning must be on the cover page. 13. A table of contents or plan schedule for all sheets in the plan set must be included on the title sheet with a date for each sheet. If revisions are required, the title sheet must be updated to reflect all revised sheets with a new date. 14. Fully annotated plans and drawings are more understandable, e.g. if a line is shown on the plan between two properties or other conditions such as easements, it must be annotated by adding descriptors to clarify the site condition.
Plans and Specifications PLS Page 2 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None.
15. A legend for all line types and symbols must be included on plan sets. 16. The plan sheets must not be overly congested with line types. When in doubt produce an extra sheet that separates the information. For example, produce a separate utility and easement sheet for utilities to clarify that information if the overall site plan contains too many lines and line types. 17. In general, the plan sheets are where most project information must be included. Separate cut sheets, exhibits, and summary tables on 8 1/2” by 11” will not be accepted. The only exception is for project narratives, property owners’ association documents, SID documents, easements, agreements, maintenance plans, water rights information, payback district information, contracts, deeds, weed plans, and standalone technical reports such as traffic studies, wetland reports, sewer and water reports, environmental, etc. PARKLAND TRACKING REQUIREMENTS 1. Parkland tracking on plans is required in 38.27.020BMC. This only applies to projects with residential development or residential units. 2. Documentation of compliance with the parkland dedication requirements of Section 38.27.020, UDC must be provided with the final plat, preliminary plat layout (park site plan) or individual development site plan (if previously subdivided). A parkland dedication tracking table showing the parkland requirements for the overall subdivision and the method of meeting the parkland dedication shall be included on the site plan. The table shall explicitly state how much parkland acreage, cash-in-lieu, or value of improvements-in-lieu was approved and allocated, as well as what is being proposed, for each lot of the subdivision or site development. 3. If residential development, each phase, lot or individual site plan of the development must have a copy of the parkland dedication tracking table provided below included on the site plan. Contact the Parks Department if you have questions on how to fill out the table. 4. If improvements in lieu are proposed for an existing park within the subdivision, a detailed park improvement site plan, including layout and product manufacturer cut sheets with a cost estimate for all improvements must be provided for Parks Department review. The Parks Department will provide a comparison chart indicating the value of code-required basic improvements versus proposed improvements. 5. Unless previously provided, provide the appropriate waiver of protest for future park maintenance district statement on the plat or site plan. Contact the Parks Department if you are uncertain if a waiver has been granted. 6. The parkland dedication tracking table that must be included on plans is as follows. If you have questions on how to fill out this table contact the Parks Department.
PUBLIC PARK LAND DEDICATION TRACKING TABLE CURRENT PREVIOUS PHASES
SUBDIVISION NAME: _______________________ PROJECT NAME: ___________________________
TOTAL FOR SUBDIVISION THIS PROPOSAL PHASE / LOT ___________ PARK DED AC CIL &/OR IIL
PHASE / LOT __________ PARK DED AC, CIL &/OR IIL
PHASE/LOT* __________ PARK DED AC CIL &/OR IIL
NUMBER OF RES. UNITS PER PHASE / LOT / SITE PLAN:
ACREAGE PARK LAND AND / OR CIL REQUIRED: **
VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU PROPOSED: $___________________ VS. VALUE OF CODE-REQD. BASIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS:
$___________________ (ATTACH COMPARISON CHART SPREADSHEET)
ACREAGE PARK LAND PREVIOUSLY DEEDED TO COB:
Plans and Specifications PLS Page 3 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None.
COLOR AND MATERIAL PALETTE 1. Color and material palettes are required for all new buildings and structures. A color and material palette must include all the proposed exterior building materials for all structures and site details. 2. The exterior building materials must include all siding, trim, roofing, windows, stairways, doors, balconies, railings windows, storefront, glass/glazing, walls, mechanical screening, trash enclosures, accessory equipment enclosures (generator, etc.), awnings and other architectural elements. 3. For smaller less complex projects that are using readily known building materials, a color and material palette may be presented in color on an 11” x 17” sheet that includes a color picture of the material and the specification. Each material must be keyed to the building elevations. 4. For larger, more complex projects the palette must be presented on a physical board with samples of the proposed building materials in their proposed color. Each sample must have a specification and be keyed to the building elevations. 5. Color perspectives that depict the building accurately and with the proposed building materials are encouraged to be submitted with each application. The color perspective does not satisfy the color and materials palette requirement. APPLICATION SETS 1. Application sets are independent sets of information that include one copy of all information submitted with the application. 2. Application sets that include legal documents, letters, technical reports, narratives, studies and other documentation in addition to plan sheets must include a copy of each item in each application set. All documentation of this type must have a visible and clear date of preparation on the front sheet of the document or study. 3. Three total sets of all information are required with most applications. Two of the sets must include full size plans, one set may include 11” x 17” plans. Full size plan set sizes must not exceed 24” x 36.” 4. Application sets must be bound and two hole punched at the top of the page. Three ring binders with three hole punch are not accepted. 5. If 11” x 17” plans are included, do not trifold them. Fold them in half, then fold the right half back on itself at a 45 degree angle in order to accommodate a two hole punch at the top. Plans must be accessible to be unfolded when bound in a two hole file. 6. Application sets should be organized and collated in the following general order 1) cover sheet/routing sheet 2) applications and checklists; 3) narratives/responses/photographs; 4) legal docs: CC&R’s, easements, deeds, agreements, CIL water rights, etc.; 5) plans; 6) appendices: standalone technical reports 7. Project narratives and responses must not be overwritten or provided on the application checklists. If responding to a checklist item provide a response on a separate document. 8. Plans must be grouped by discipline: Civil, Architectural, Landscape and Electrical/Lighting. 9. All plans must be stapled together and folded to a final size of 8 ½” x 11” or 8 ½” x 14”.If the plan set is large the plans must be stapled into sets by discipline and folded independently. State law requires us to keep a full size paper copy of all plans in our files. The plan sets must be folded so that they can be filed in the project archives.
ACREAGE PARK LAND YET TO BE CONVEYED:
PARK MASTER PLAN APPROVAL DATE: ______________
* INDICATE ADDITIONAL PHASES AS APPLICABLE
**SHOW ACTUAL CALCULATIONS
Plans and Specifications PLS Page 4 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None.
DIGITAL COPIES AND NAMING PROTOCOL The city requires digital copies of all planning applications in order to produce cost savings, eliminate paper waste and enhance the flow of information between the city, external agencies, neighborhoods and the applicant. The digital copy must include a copy of all documents and plan sheets submitted as part of the application. The following requirements apply to digital copies. 1. Two digital copies are required with most applications. The copies may be on CD or on a USB drive. 2. The digital copies must be separated into three categories: Documents, Plans and Appendices. 3. Naming protocol. Each individual document or plan sheet must have a proper name and date. The name should be easily understandable. Groups of plan sheets or document sets with multiple types of documents will not be accepted. Plan sheets must include the sheet number. For example a document might be labeled “A1 Development Review application 05-01-2017” or “City Parkland Deed 05-01-17.” Plan sheets are required to be listed individually. For example a plan sheet might be labeled “A300 Floor Plan level 1 and 2 05-01-2017” or “PM Photometric Plan 05-01-17.” Do not include other tab, section or other references in the digital file names. 4. No individual files will be accepted that are larger than 5 mb. Files that are larger must be broken down into smaller files. 5. Label all CD’s with the project name and date. Attach a small tag to all USB drive with the project name and date. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771
phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net
PUDC
Planned Unit Development Concept PUDC Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 01-8-19
Required Forms: A1 Recommended Forms:
PUD CONCEPT PLAN REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8½ x 11 or 8½ x 14 sets. Complete and signed development review application form A1. Plan sets that include all the required items listed in the master plan checklist below. Standard application sets required plan sizes: 2 sets that include full size 24 x 36 inch plans 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans 2-digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROM’s or USB drives. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol.
Notes: All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8½ x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. APPLICATION FEE Base fee $1,486 PUD CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A Planned United Development (PUD) Concept Plan review is the first step in the PUD entitlement process. When a subdivision is proposed in conjunction with a zoning PUD the subdivision review shall be coordinated with the zoning review and a subdivision pre-application plan application shall also be submitted. 1. Project Narrative providing a thorough description of the overall project including design intent, project goals, project timeframe, proposed uses, site improvements and buildings. If phasing is proposed include a description of each individual phase as related to the overall improvements. 2. A complete list of proposed relaxations to the BMC listed by individual section and reason for the relaxation. 3. Data regarding site conditions, land characteristics, available community facilities and utilities and other related general information about adjacent land uses and the uses of land within one-half mile of the subject parcel of land. 4. Conceptual (sketch) drawings showing the proposed location of the uses of land, major streets and other significant features on the site and within one-half mile of the site. 5. A computation table showing the site’s proposed land use allocations by location and as a percent of total site area 6. If phasing is proposed a phasing plan with phase clearly identified. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771
phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net
X
X
X
X