HomeMy WebLinkAbout19104 Application Materials
A1
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
PROJECT IMAGE
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name:
Project type(s):
Description:
Street address:
Zip code:
Zoning:
Gross lot area:
Block frontage:
Number of buildings:
Type and Number of dwellings:
Non-residential building size(s):
(in stories)
Non-residential building height(s):
Number of parking spaces:
Afordable housing (Y/N):
Cash in lieu of parkland (Y/N):
VICINITY MAP
CITY USE ONLY
Submittal date:
Application fle number:
Planner:
DRC required (Y/N): Revision Date:
Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18
REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS
Bridger View Redevelopment GPA
Growth Policy (Map) Amendment
Amend the Community Plan Future Land Use Map for the subject property
from Community Commercial Mixed Use" + "Residential" to "Residential Mixed Use"
Approximately 920 Bridger Drive, Bozeman, Montana
59715
Existing: B1 + R4 + R2; Proposed: R3
349,569 SF / 8.025 acres
Landscaped (Story Mill Rd & W 1/2 Bridger Drive) + Mixed (E 1/2 Bridger Drive)
0
0
0
0
0
Yes
No
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
1. PROPERTY OWNER
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
2. APPLICANT
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
3. REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Full address (with zip code):
Phone:
Email:
4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation None
Urban
Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast North Park None
5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES
This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if diferent) for all application types before the
submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only.
As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms
and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development
approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special
conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may
be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject
site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true
and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge.
Certifcation of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that
I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with
municipal code provisions.
Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved
fnal plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance.
continued on next page
Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18
REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS
The Trust for Public Land (contact: Maddie Pope)
901 5th Ave, Suite 1520, Seattle, WA 98164-2013
(406) 522-7450
maddy.pope@tpl.org
HRDC (contact: Tracy Menuez)
32 South Tracy Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715
(406) 585-4890
tmenuez@thehrdc.org
Groundprint, LLC (contact: Susan Riggs, AICP)
1262 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718
(406) 579-5844
sriggs@groundprint.com
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
Applicant Signature:
Printed Name:
Owner Signature:
Printed Name:
Owner Signature:
Printed Name:
If signing as a corporation or LLC, please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation/LLC.
Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures.
6. APPLICATION TYPES
Check all that apply, use noted forms.
1. Pre-application Consultation
2. Master Site Plan
3. Site Plan
4. Subdivision pre-application
5. Subdivision preliminary plan
6. Subdivision fnal plan
7. Subdivision exemption
8. Condominium Review
9. PUD concept plan
10. PUD preliminary plan
11. PUD fnal plan
12. Annexation and Initial Zoning
13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal
14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal
. Commercial Non-residential COA
16. Historic Neighborhood
Conservation Overlay COA
17. Informal Review
18. Zoning Deviation/Departure
. Zoning or Subdivision Variance
. Conditional Use Permit
21. Special Temporary Use Permit
22. Special Use Permit
23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands
24. Zone Map Amendment (non-Annexation)
25. UDC Text Amendment
26. Growth Policy Amendment
27. Modifcation/Plan Amendment
. Extension of Approved Plan
. Reasonable Accommodation
30. Comprehensive Sign Plan
31. Other:
CONTACT US
FORM FORM
None INF
MSP None
SP 19 Z/SVAR
PA 20 CUP
PP STUP
FP SUP
SE WR
CR ZMA
PUDC ZTA
PUDP GPA
PUDFP MOD
ANNX 28 EXT
AIA 29 RA
APA CSP
15 CCOA
NCOA
Alfred M. Stif Professional Building
20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only)
PO Box 1230
Bozeman, MT 59771
phone 406.582.2260
fax 406.582.2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net
Development Review Application A1 Page 3 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18
REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS
Heather Grenier, President/CEO, HRDC
Maddy Pope, Project Manager, The Trust for Public Land
Bridger View Redevelopment
Growth Policy Map Amendment Narrative
Summary:
The Human Resource Development Council (HRDC) and The Trust for Public Land, together, propose to
amend the Bozeman Community Plan “Future Land Use Map” to allow an 8-acre property on Bridger
Drive (between Story Mill Community Park and Story Mill Road) to be designated “Residential Emphasis
Mixed Use.”
This proposal to change the land use designations stands on its own merits by meeting the required
criteria for a Growth Policy Amendment (GPA). While individual planned projects are not considered
within the criteria for a GPA, the proposed change to the underlying land use designations will enable
these non-profit entities to continue to pursue and invest in the creation of a mixed-income residential
neighborhood offering modest, efficient homes that residents can afford to purchase and a community
land trust to ensure the investment and affordability are maintained. This innovative model
neighborhood will meaningfully address Bozeman’s community housing needs, complement the
adjacent park and benefit the entire community.
The idea to reestablish a residential neighborhood on this property was conceived as a separate but
parallel component of The Trust for Public Land’s work to create the adjacent Story Mill Community Park
in partnership with the City of Bozeman. A portion of the larger site formerly housed a 92-family trailer
park that was removed in 2008 to make way for a 1,200-unit housing and commercial development
proposal that failed to move forward. The existing land use designations (as well as existing zoning
designations) are the direct result of that failed plan. The Trust for Public Land acquired the property in
2012 as part of the larger Story Mill Community Park property purchase. The 8-acre parcel was retained
to explore the feasibility of returning some affordable homes on a portion of the site – honoring the
history and complementing the new park. In 2017, the Bridger View Concept Planned Unit Development
(PUD) was informally reviewed by the City. Submittal of a Preliminary PUD is contingent upon approval
of this application and the corresponding Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) Application.
The property is currently divided by two different land use designations - the east portion (4.56 acres) is
designated “Community Commercial Mixed Use” and the west portion (3.46 acres) is designated
“Residential.” The adjacent right-of-way for Bridger Drive is designated “Industrial.” This application
proposes a designation of “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” on the entire property and half (1.35) of
the adjacent right-of-way (note that using road centerlines as boundaries is the current preferred policy
of the City).
Please note that the concurrent ZMA Application proposes a zoning designation of “R-3,” Residential
Medium Density District, to ensure the smallest scale of this land use classification is developed in the
future. This combination of Residential Emphasis Mixed Use and R-3 zoning will allow a future
neighborhood of single household dwelling units up to five attached units. With a Planned Unit
Development (PUD), there is also the possibility of some light commercial activity such as a flexible
community center with guest rooms, coffee bar or exercise classes.
The Residential Mixed-Use designation is described in the Community Plan as follows:
The graphics on the next page show the existing and proposed maps for the subject property. This is
followed by a detailed narrative addressing the required review criteria for Growth Policy Amendments.
Note that the required engineering exhibits which include more site-specific detail are also included at
the end of the application materials.
The Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use category promotes neighborhoods with supporting
services that are substantially dominated by housing. A diversity of residential housing types
should be built on the majority of any area within this category. Housing choice for a variety
of households is desired and can include attached and small detached single-household
dwellings, apartments, and live-work units. Residences should be included on the upper
floors of buildings with ground floor commercial uses. Variation in building massing, height,
and other design characteristics should contribute to a complete and interesting streetscape
and may be larger than in the Residential category.
Secondary supporting uses, such as retail, offices, and civic uses, are permitted at the ground
floor. All uses should complement existing and planned residential uses. Non-residential
uses are expected to be pedestrian oriented and emphasize the human scale with
modulation as needed in larger structures. Stand alone, large, non-residential uses are
discouraged. Non-residential spaces should provide an interesting pedestrian experience
with quality urban design for buildings, sites, and open spaces.
This category is implemented at different scales. The details of implementing standards will
vary with the scale. The category is appropriate near commercial centers and larger areas
should have access on collector and arterial streets. Multi-household higher density urban
development is expected. Any development within this category should have a well
integrated transportation and open space network which encourages pedestrian activity and
provides ready access within and to adjacent development.
Bozeman Community Plan
Application Narrative
1. A thorough project narrative is required including a detailed response to the following:
a. Does the proposed amendment cure a deficiency in the growth policy or result in an improved
growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community? How?
Yes. The proposed amendment both cures a deficiency in the growth policy and results in an improved
growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community.
The current parcel has a split designation that is the direct result of a ten+ year old expired project that
was never developed because of the economic recession and ownership issues. Since that time, the
development of the 60-acre Story Mill Community Park has and will continue to positively influence the
larger neighborhood and overall growth patterns. Note that the growth policy shows a residential land
use designation on the dedicated park parcel; however, it is anticipated that the Update to the Growth
Policy will correct this land use designation to Public Lands and Institutions. As stated in the Community
Plan, it is preferable for land use designation boundaries to follow the parcel boundaries established by
recorded plats1. This amendment proposes exactly that by designating the entire 8-acre subject
property “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use.” This is an appropriate land use designation for any future
project.
The proposed amendment also results in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs
of the general community by allowing a greater emphasis on housing in an appropriate location. The
2018 Demographic and Real Estate Market Assessment (EPS Report) discusses the need for long-term
affordable housing because most of the job growth in Bozeman is at wage levels less than $16 per hour
which further increases the demand for income restricted affordable and market rate attainable
housing. Conversely, on the retail growth side, the report states that: “retail development does not
need to be a priority for the City.”2 A “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” land use designation will
increase the supply of residential land and any future residential subdivision on this property will need
to meet code requirements for at least 10 percent of the homes to be priced at levels that that
households earning less than 80 percent Area Median Income (AMI) can afford to purchase. Housing
affordability is undeniably one of the most important issues facing Bozeman today as evidenced by the
many past and ongoing planning efforts including:
· Goal H-3 of the Community Plan states: encourage an adequate supply of affordable housing
and land for affordable housing. The rationale further explains this need: “There will always be a
portion of the population which earns less than the median income. This may be for many
reasons. This affects the ability to find market rate housing which is adequate for basic housing
needs. Lack of adequate housing effects health, social stability, and many other issues which can
have severe negative and intergeneration effects.” 3
· This community goal is emphasized even more today by the ongoing Community Plan Update.
During the initial public outreach efforts, increasing housing affordability was listed as #3 on the
1 Bozeman Community Plan, Page 3-15
2 2018 Demographic and Real Estate Market Assessment (EPS Report), Page 3 and Page 5
3 Bozeman Community Plan, Page 6-4
list of things that need to be improved in Bozeman. Similarly, when asked what Bozeman should
imagine for the year 2040, “More affordable” was also listed as #3. 4
· This ongoing growth policy update is guided by the Bozeman Strategic Plan which was adopted
in 2018 as a community-wide plan to guide policy and funding decisions in response to
considerable growth. Efforts were made to include a vision, strategies and action items based
upon input from a wide cross-section of the community. The Strategic Plan lists affordable
housing as the second most important priority, behind community outreach:
o 1.4 Business and Institutional Partnerships - Explore opportunities for partnerships with
key business groups and non-profit organizations.
o 4.5 Housing and Transportation Choices - Vigorously encourage, through a wide variety
of actions, the development of sustainable and lasting housing options for underserved
individuals and families and improve mobility options that accommodate all travel
modes.5
· The public engagement initiative “A Seat at the Table” (Bozeman Area Community Foundation
and Future West) recently collected information from over 900 Gallatin Valley residents over
dinner on October 25, 2018. Affordable housing was listed as one of the most pressing
challenges of our community.6
· The 2019 Community Housing Needs Assessment calls for an average of 770 to 905 housing
units per year which demonstrates the need to increase the supply of housing. Furthermore, the
assessment highlights this issue from an employer perspective. An employer survey fielded in
the fall of 2018 shows that 53 percent of nearly 500 employer respondents (representing 31
percent of jobs in the City) feel that housing that is affordable to the workforce is one of the
more serious problems in the City of Bozeman. Another 22 percent feel that it is the most
critical problem in the area.7
Approval of this amendment will allow more residential opportunities and potentially non-profit
partnerships for this key parcel. Overall, the amendment both cures a deficiency in the growth policy
and results in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community
by elevating housing to a higher priority on the site.
b. Does the proposed amendment create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the
goals and the map or between goals? Why not? If inconsistencies are identified, then additional
changes must be provided to remove the inconsistencies.
No, the proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies between different goals or between the
map and goals. Since the adoption of the growth policy map and goals for this larger neighborhood, The
Trust for Public Land in partnership with the City of Bozeman is building a 60-acre community park. The
proposed amendment is intended to return some residential uses to the area to both complement and
activate the edge of the new park and support some local commercial uses in the area. The larger
neighborhood will benefit from this change, and the following points address these benefits:
4 Community Plan Update, Phase 1 Summary, V2, Pages 7-8
5 Bozeman Strategic Plan, Pages 2 & 7
6 “A Seat At the Table,” Bozeman Area Community Foundation, Planning Board Presentation, 3/5/19
7 Community Housing Needs Assessment February 2019 Final Draft, Page 10 and Page 1
· It is important to reiterate that the existing split land use designations (as well as the existing
zoning) are a direct result of the “Go Build Inc.” and “Blue Sky Development” project from 2005-
2008 which planned for a very specific mix of commercial uses and 1,200 dwelling units across
106 acres. While a commercial node in this vicinity makes sense in a broader context, it is not
required to be on this parcel. The historic use of this parcel was housing and this application
proposes a return to that use.
· With approval of this amendment, the immediate neighborhood will still contain several acres
of “Community Commercial Mixed Use.” Additionally, the Trust for Public Land and the HRDC
would be supportive of expansions to the “Community Commercial Mixed Use” land use
designations to the south and southeast should those property owners choose to also apply for
a Growth Policy Map Amendment or should the ongoing Update to the Growth Policy identify
these areas as appropriate for additional commercial uses. The Community Plan Update is
specifically exploring the notion of encouraging appropriately-sized commercial nodes within
neighborhoods.8 In the Demographic and Real Estate Market Assessment, the consultants note
that other communities have reported the difficulty of creating new un-anchored retail
locations without significant housing density. 9 This growth policy amendment would allow the
creation of a residential neighborhood that would support the adjacent community commercial
node within walking distance. This emphasis on residential is even more important on the
subject parcel now since the area to the west is a dedicated park.
· The proposed land use designation of “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” allows for a variety of
different underlying zoning designations. While this application is accompanied by a Zone Map
Amendment request of R-3 zoning to implement the smallest possible scale of this land use
designation to be most compatible with the adjacent park and residential uses farther north
and east, Table C-16 (Appendix C of the Community Plan) clipped below, shows that other
mixed-use zoning designations could also correlate with the land use category.
· The land use map, combined with a windshield survey, indicates that the adjacent industrial
district across Bridger Drive currently houses a wide variety of neighborhood type uses
including retail, offices, veterinarian services, a wellness center, a gas station/convenience
shop, an alternative school, a coffee roastery/shop, a bar and a winery with restaurant
components.
· The Cannery District, a thriving walkable medium-scale commercial center, is located less than
one mile away and is now connected to the greater neighborhood by safer pedestrian and
bicycle facilities with recent improvements to North Rouse Avenue.
· The nearby Northeast Neighborhood is comprised of a mix of residential and commercial uses
and is connected to this parcel by the existing Story Mill Spur Trail as well as the new trails in
the Story Mill Park.
8 Community Plan Update, Planning Week 2 Community Event Summary, 12/17/18, V2, Page 2
9 2018 Demographic and Real Estate Market Assessment (EPS Report), Page 63
· The site is also easily accessible by trail to Downtown with a 30-minute walk or a 10-minute
bike ride.
In summary, the change of 8 acres from “Community Commercial Mixed Use” + “Residential” to
“Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” will positively impact the greater neighborhood and does not create
any inconsistencies within the growth policy goals or between goals and maps.
c. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy? How?
Yes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy. Bozeman’s
growth policy is intended to protect the health, life, safety, and welfare of the people who live, work,
and play in the community.10 Amending this land use designation will allow the subject property to
develop with a greater emphasis on residential uses to complement the adjacent park as well as the
existing and planned commercial uses in the vicinity.
Located in the northeast quadrant, the area to the east is characterized by new subdivisions with a
mixture of higher end homes, duplexes and condominiums. Bridger Drive, the major arterial linking Main
Street to Bridger Bowl, is seeing a transition from industrial to more of a mix of commercial and
industrial businesses. Montana Department of Transportation has recently completed a major upgrade
to Bridger Drive, adding a middle turning lane, bicycle lanes and sidewalks. The planned Main Street to
the “M” pathway is directly adjacent to the subject property. An easement was granted by TPL in 2017
to ensure the mature vegetation between the roadway and the pathway would be maintained as a
buffer for a future residential neighborhood.
The change of a small piece of “Community Commercial Mixed Use” and “Residential” to “Residential
Emphasis Mixed Use” will act as a catalyst in this area providing some appropriately scaled residential
development that complements and activates the park, respects the existing neighborhoods, and
supports existing and potentially new commercial uses. Additionally, the limitations of access on Bridger
Drive (which now includes a 10-foot wide pedestrian pathway with mature vegetation) and Story Mill
Road (note the linear park and trail that separates the subject site from Story Mill Road) support a more
residential emphasis for this site.
Finally, one of the twelve key components of the Community Plan vision statement is that: “The housing
stock provides quality, affordability, and choice.”11 The City can help to realize this vision with
implementation policies that include tools such as incentives, programs and partnerships with local non-
profits as suggested by the Strategic Plan: “explore opportunities for partnerships with key business
groups and non-profit organizations.” 12
d. Does the proposed amendment adversely affect the community as a whole or significant portion
by:
i. Significantly altering acceptable existing and future land use patterns, as defined in the text and
maps of the plan? How does it not?
10 Bozeman Community Plan, Page 2-1
11 Bozeman Community Plan, Page 1-2
12 Bozeman Strategic Plan, Page 2
No, the proposed amendment does not adversely affect the community by significantly altering
acceptable existing or future land use patterns. The existing land use designations are “Community
Commercial Mixed Use” + “Residential” and the proposed land use designation is “Residential Emphasis
Mixed Use.” The proposed amendment combines the existing split designations into one cohesive
designation for the entire property with a stronger emphasis on the residential component.
ii. Requiring unmitigated larger and more expensive improvements to streets, water, sewer, or
other public facilities or services and which, therefore, may impact development of other lands?
How does it not?
No, the proposed amendment will not change any required improvements to infrastructure. The site is
within the planned service area for municipal utilities. Any future development will require municipal
review for impacts and specifics for improvements and connecting to services will be outlined and
evaluated at that time. The change from “Community Commercial Mixed Use” + “Residential” to
“Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” has no substantial impacts on streets, water, sewer or any other
public facilities or services. The addition of a residential neighborhood (combined with the existing
community park) will increase the viability of commercial development on adjacent parcels by providing
a significant customer and employee base within walking distance.
iii. Adversely impacting existing uses because of unmitigated greater than anticipated impacts on
facilities and services? How does it not?
No, the proposed amendment would not adversely impact any existing uses. The addition of a
residential neighborhood will improve the park by increasing daily users and the opportunities for
informal surveillance. Similar to an “eyes on the street” approach to planning, a neighborhood in this
location will establish more “eyes on the park” and create a more active edge along the park’s western
boundary. Also, development of this parcel, in combination with the ongoing improvements to the
Story Mill Community Park will continue to incrementally improve this overall area of town and support
redevelopment projects to the south and east.
iv. Negatively affecting the livability of the area and the health and safety of residents? How does it
not?
No, designation of this site as “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” is compatible with surrounding land
uses and will not negatively affect the livability of the area or the health and safety of residents. This
designation (along with the R-3 zoning) will provide an appropriately scaled residential neighborhood to
activate the west edge of a community park and provide a customer/employee base for the existing and
potential commercial nodes near the property. This amendment will place residents adjacent to a great
community park, enhancing the livability of the area and improving resident’s health outcomes. No
negative impacts on livability or health and safety are identified.
2. If text amendment provide language to be removed from the growth policy in strikeout format on
the original pages, if new text is proposed provide new text and location to be inserted into the
growth policy.
Non-applicable – this application is for a map amendment and not a text amendment.
3. If map amendment, provide an exhibit of the property to be modified. Provide existing land use
designation and the proposed land use designation. The exhibit should include the legal limits of the
property and size in square feet and acreage.
The required exhibit has been prepared by Stahly Engineering & Associates and is being submitted as
part of this application.
N1
Noticing Materials Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 03-07-18
Required Forms: N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms:
NOTICING MATERIALS
Notice is required for certain projects in order for citizens to participate in decision making which affects
their interests and provides opportunity to receive information pertinent to an application that would
not otherwise be available to the decision maker.
SITE PLAN, MASTER SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, DEVIATION, FIRST MINOR
SUBDIVISON AND SIMILAR REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS
Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1.
Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project
site, attached to this checklist.
Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and
addresses of the adjoining property owners.
MAJOR AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS
Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1.
Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project
site and not physically contiguous (touching a boundary) to the subdivision, attached to this
checklist. Clearly label list ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS.
Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and
addresses of the adjoining property owners.
Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners physically contiguous (touching
a boundary) including recorded purchasers under contract for deed to be sent certified mail
attached to this checklist. Clearly label list CONTIGUOUS.
Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and
addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under
contract for deed.
Two sets additional mailing labels with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous
property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed attached.
NOTICE
Current property owners of record can be found at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office in
the Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman, Montana.
CERTIFICATION
I, _____________________________________________, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all condominium owners,
within 200 feet of the property located at ________________________________________________________, is a true
and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an
inaccurate list may delay review of the project.
_______________________________________
Signature
CONTACT US
Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building
20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only)
PO Box 1230
Bozeman, MT 59771
phone 406-582-2260
fax 406-582-2263
planning@bozeman.net
www.bozeman.net
X
X
X
Zach Lowe
702 Bridger Drive
SUBJECT PROPERTY:BRIDGER VIEW REDEVELOPMENT12345678910 11 121314151716BRIDGER VIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT‐ADJACENT OWNERSHIP FIGURE
3/5/2019Bridger View Redevelopment Adjacent Owners ListMap ID Legal Description Name Mailing Address City State Zip Code Geo Code Contiguous1 MDT-Hwy 86 R.O.W. Montana Department of Transportation P.O. Box 201001 Helena MT 59620-1001 YES2S31, T01 S, R06 E, ABANDONED C M ST P & P RR MENARD LINE IN PT SE4SE4 LYING E OF & ADJ TO TRACT 24 NORTHEAST ANNEX .22 & ABANDONED C M ST P & P RR MENARD LINE IN PT SE4SE4 1.22; Fm152 Pg 2244City of BozemanPO Box 1230Bozeman MT 59771-1230 06-0905-31-4-01-41-0100 YES3Tr K, C.O.S. 2547 Wake Up, Inc.PO Box 23Harrison MT 59735-0023 06-0905-31-4-01-40-0000 YES4Tr 23A, C.O.S. 2547 Wake Up, Inc.PO Box 23Harrison MT 59735-0023 06-0905-31-4-01-35-0000 YES5Parcel 5, C.O.S. 2865City of BozemanPO Box 1230Bozeman MT 59771-1230 06-0905-31-4-01-37-0000 NO6Parcel 4, C.O.S. 2865City of BozemanPO Box 1230Bozeman MT 59771-1230 06-0905-31-4-01-08-0000 YES7 Lot 3, Minor Sub 202SEOB, LLC851 Bridger Dr STE 2 Bozeman MT 59715-1806 06-0905-31-4-06-72-0000 NO8Tr C, Plat 135-492Meadowlark Rentals, LLCPO Box 4314Bozeman MT 59772-4314 06-0905-31-2-01-09-7000 NO916,393 SF Tr, C.O.S. 637Tim Matzinger476 Blue Roan Ln Belgrade MT 59714-8770 06-0905-31-2-01-35-0000 NO10Tr B, Plat Bk 135 Pg 492Patrick S Pierzina917 Bridger DrBozeman MT 59715-2211 06-0905-31-2-01-11-0000 NO11Tr A, Plat Bk 135 Pg 492Patrick S Pierzina917 Bridger DrBozeman MT 59715-2211 06-0905-31-2-01-19-0000 NO12Tr 3, Plat Bk 135 Pg 492LAMU, LLC1319 S Church Ave Bozeman MT 59715-5803 06-0905-31-2-01-12-0000 NO13Tr A, C.O.S. 1518W. T. Morvay52 Sheridan PlBozeman MT 59718-6214 06-0905-31-4-03-02-0000 NO14Tr 7B, C.O.S. 2408William J Flanigan3160 McIlhattan Rd Bozeman MT 59715-8718 06-0905-32-3-01-01-0000 NO15Tr 1, C.O.S. 1895Jeffrey R Brandner & Raymond D Rega1118 Bridger DrBozeman MT 59715-2302 06-0905-32-3-02-28-0000 NO16Tr C2-A, C.O.S. 1877B2511N, LLC & 2332N, LLCPO Box 1336Bozeman MT 59771-0013 06-0799-05-1-01-15-0000 NO17Tr G, Plat Bk 147 Pg 185Clifford Christie and Sally Franklin1015 E Griffin Dr Bozeman MT 59715-2259 06-0905-31-4-01-45-0000 NOADJOINERS (Master List - Owners within 200' of proposed Bridger View Redevelopment)Page 1Adjacent Owner List 03-05-19.xlsx