HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-16-19 BID MinutesDowntown Business Improvement District
Board Meeting Minutes
January 16, 2019
Attending: Mike Basile, Eric Bowman, Susan Neubauer, Eric Sutherland, Jeff Krauss, Chris
Naumann
Absent: Jolee Berry, Ileana Indreland, Erik Nelson,
Public Comments: Allison Totten from Comma Q was present to hear the discussions. Marty
Matsen, Bozeman Community Development Director, was present for the NCOD discussion.
Minutes
ACTION: None taken. October and November minutes will be considered at February
meeting.
Finance Report
Chris presented the current finances noting that all expenses and revenues were on budget and
as expected. The board did not have any questions.
Executive Directors Report
None provided.
Discussion and Decision Item
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) Plan
Chris reminded board that all members had agreed to join the URD board on a letter to the City
Commission asking that the Downtown B3 district be excluded from the NCOD. As chairperson,
Eric Bowman asked that the board discuss the issue further at a future board meeting.
Marty Matsen offered more information about the NCOD process. He said the consultants,
Bendon-Adams, were scheduled to present to the City Commission on March 11, 2019. At that
meeting, the Commission will give specific direction on each policy recommendation in the draft
NCOD document prepared by Bendon-Adams. Marty said that then staff will work with the
consultants to draft a plan according to the direction given by the Commission.
Marty said there are several issues that must be resolved. For instance, the Community Plan
and Downtown Plan are adopted by ordinance and therefore are “quasi regulatory”, whereas the
NCOD was adopted by resolution which is not regulatory. Similarly, chapter 4B was adopted by
ordinance so it has more “standing” than the rest of the NCOD guidelines.
Marty offered that whether downtown remains in the NCOD, it will need to be recognized as a
unique sub-district and will need it own set of design guidelines specific to downtown’s urban,
mixed-use built environment.
Several board members said they still feel strongly that downtown should be excluded from the
NCOD to definitively eliminate the extra layer of conflicting guidelines.
Eric Bowman asked if the BID Board would consider a letter that asked the conflicting guideline
issues be resolved without being so resolute that the answer was to be excluded. Chris said the
offered to draft a unique letter for the BID to consider. The board agreed to consider a revised
letter. Chris said he would send a draft by the first week of February.
Downtown Plan Funding Request (associated documents attached below)
Chris reviewed the request from Agency Landscape + Planning for additional services and fees.
He touched on the main justifications in his memo including: timeline increasing from original 7
months to over 10 months; considerable additional time spent responding to NCOD and Comm
Plan; and significant additional time needed to interact with City of Bozeman staff and engage in
more robust public outreach. Chris reiterated that he feels the additional $25,000 of funding to
complete the Plan and processes is well warranted.
Chris added that we spent $80k in 2009 for a 45-page plan and the current draft exceeds 150
pages which we should not expect to cost only $80k as originally contracted.
The board acknowledged that the contract was for a fixed fee and timeline, but 3 additional
months of work is a significant change.
Regarding the additional funding Chris said he had secured $5,000 from the City Community
Development Department and $15,000 from the Downtown URD board. Thus, he requested the
BID board contribute $5,000.
ACTION: Eric Bowman moved to approve $5,000 in additional funding for the
Downtown Plan as requested.
Susan Neubauer seconded the motion.
All voted in favor.
**Meeting was adjourned at 1:10pm**
BOARD MEMO
January 11, 2019
TO: Downtown BID and URD Boards
FR: Chris Naumann
RE: Agency Additional Services and Fees Request
For the reasons outlined below, I am requesting that the URD and BID Boards consider
allocating additional funding to the Downtown Bozeman Improvement Plan.
The Agency team has more than exceeded my expectations as has the demands of the project.
It became apparent to me this fall that the team was investing more time and effort than
contracted to do. I met with Brie Hensold from Agency at the end of October to have an honest
conversation about the project, contract and compensation. She said that her team willingly
entered into the project knowing it would require more of their services than the $80,000
contract would cover. When further pressed, she also admitted that they had grossly
underestimated extent of the discrepancy. I asked Brie to provide me with a supplemental fee
proposal that would fairly cover the shortfall and be more commensurate of their work.
The attached Agency additional services and fee proposal breaks out the various components
totaling $25,000.
Below are the factors that drove the project well beyond the original scope and timeline. It is my
professional position that the additional fee is warranted not only for the circumstances outlined
below but also due to the exceptional job the team has done with public engagement and the
extremely high quality of their work product.
For comparison, the 2009 Downtown Plan cost $80,000. Accounting for inflation, in today’s
dollars that same investment would cost in excess of $93,000. Along those same lines, the 2009
Plan was 45 pages in length, whereas the draft 2019 Plan is 130 pages with an additional 30
pages of appendices.
The RFP for the 2019 Plan outlined a 4-month process (for $80,000). The subsequent contract
with Agency is based upon a 7-month timeline (for $80,000). With the tentative date for the City
Commission to adopt the Plan in mid-April, the project will last over 10 months.
Although acknowledged in the RFP and contract, the Agency team has spent considerably more
time than anticipated addressing issues related with the other City planning processes.
Consideration of the NCOD Guidelines, the Community Plan and Housing Needs Assessment
has required significant attention.
Another aspect that has proved more demanding than expected is the elevated level of City of
Bozeman involvement. Considering the pressures and sensitivities around Bozeman’s growth,
the City staff and administration have placed additional demands on the consulting team in the
form of meetings, communications, documentation, and schedule delays. Similarly, the
understandable expectation of a higher degree of public engagement has resulted in more
thought, time and effort than originally planned.
In conclusion, the dynamics around the growth our community is grappling with are
exponentially more complex than they were 10 years ago. Correspondingly the scope and scale
of the downtown planning process has been considerably more involved. Thankfully the Agency
team has risen to the occasion rather than limiting their efforts based on the shortcomings of the
original contract. Therefore, I respectfully request the Downtown Plan funding partners to
approve the supplemental consulting fees outlined below.
Original Expenses
$80,000 Agency Team Consulting Fee
$10,000 Administration Expenses (facilities, marketing, printing)
$90,000 Total Project Expenses
Original Funding
$50,000 Urban Renewal District for Consulting Fee
$10,000 Urban Renewal District for Administration Expenses
$20,000 Business Improvement District for Consulting Fee
$10,000 City Community Development Department for Consulting Fee
$90,000 Total Funding
Requested Additional Expenses
$25,000 Agency Fee for additional time and services
Proposed Additional Funding
$15,000 Urban Renewal District
$ 5,000 Business Improvement District
$ 5,000 City Community Development District
$25,000 Total Additional Funding
Thank you for taking the time to consider this request and review the documents prior to our
meetings on January 15 and 16, 2019.
Please contact me with any questions.
Attachments:
• 2019 DBIP PSA Additional Services Amendment
• Agency Additional Services Agreement
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This first amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for the update of the Downtown
Bozeman Improvement Plan dated June 15, 2018 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into
January 18, 2019, by and between the Downtown Bozeman Partnership, a limited liability
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Montana, with a mailing
address of 222 East Main Street #302, Bozeman, MT 59715, hereinafter referred to as
“Partnership,” and, Agency Landscape + Planning with a mailing address of 45 Lawn Street,
Cambridge, MA 02138, hereinafter referred to as “Design Professional.”
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and
sufficiency whereof being hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the
Agreement as follows:
1. Extension of Term/Effective. Section 2 of the Agreement is extended and will terminate
upon completion of the work included in the Additional Services Agreement of Exhibit A
but no later than April 31, 2019.
2. Payment. Section 4 of the Agreement is amended to include the amount specified in the
Additional Services Agreement of Exhibit A.
3. Agreement still valid. All remaining terms and provisions of the Agreement remain valid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument the day and year
first above written.
DOWNTOWN BOZEMAN PARTNERSHIP AGENCY LANDSCAPE + PLANNING
By By
Chris Naumann, Executive Director Brie Hensold, Principal
Mr. Chris Naumann Executive Director
Downtown Bozeman Partnership 222 East Main #302
Bozeman MT 59715
December 3, 2018
Subject: Additional Services Agreement
Dear Chris:
This letter is to summarize additional services provided by Agency Landscape + Planning to
Downtown Bozeman Partnership between November 1, 2018 and April 31, 2019 on the
Downtown Bozeman Master Plan. The original scope of services for the master plan, dated
June 13, 2018, included work and an established schedule through the end of October 2018.
Likewise, the needs of the project and client team have expanded to include greater integration
and coordination with other ongoing projects and teams, additional visits, and more detailed
work to examine relationships and implications between the scale of growth Downtown and in
nearby neighborhoods.
These additional services are provided on behest of the client to cover work associated with a
schedule extension. These include:
• Ongoing participation in client and subconsultant calls, and project management
correspondence due to schedule extension. This is assumed to be include regular emails as
well as weekly calls through the end of January and monthly February through April - $6,500
• Additional review cycle and associated revisions to the master plan by various
stakeholders and staff - $5,600
• Additional content development, greater level of detail, and coordination with other
ongoing planning efforts (including the Community Plan, NCOD, and Housing Needs
Assessment), city staff and consultant teams to align the DBIP Update with the complexity of
current planning processes - $10,500
• One-person, one-day trip to present the final master plan by Brie Hensold or Gina Ford
- $2,400 (labor plus expenses, which are estimated for billing at cost)
The total for these services, inclusive of labor and expenses is $25,000.
If desired, additional person-trips can be added for a per diem cost of $1,500-2,500 per person,
depending on the representative and the cost of expenses at the time.
Expenses (costs for travel, reproduction, postage, messenger, telephone, etc.) are included at
cost with no mark-up.
Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing Proposal by signing two copies and returning
the copy to Agency Landscape + Planning, LLC.
Very truly yours,
Brie Hensold
Agency Landscape + Planning, LLC