HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-09-19 HPAB Minutes (draft)
Historic Preservation Advisory Board
April 9th, 2019 | 6:00 pm
City Hall Commission Room - 121 N. Rouse Ave., Bozeman MT
A. 06:02:43 PM (00:01:12) Call meeting to order and Roll Call
Present were:
Jennifer Dunn
Chelsea Holling
Michael Wallner
Jeanne Wilkinson
Eric Karshner
Crystal Alegria
Samantha Fox
Phillipe Gonzales (Staff Liaison)
B. Changes to the Agenda (none)
C. 06:02:58 PM (00:01:27) Minutes for Approval
3.12.19 Minutes (PDF)
o 3.12.19 Video Link
06:03:06 PM (00:01:35) MOTION to approve the meeting minutes for March 12th, 2019: Chelsea Holling
06:03:07 PM (00:01:36) MOTION SECONDED: Michael Wallner
06:03:12 PM (00:01:41) VOTE: All in Favor – Motion Carries Unanimously
D. 06:03:18 PM (00:01:47) Disclosure of Ex Parte Communication (none)
E. Public Comment (none)
F. Action Items
1. 06:03:32 PM (00:02:01) Preservation Awards Nomination Review (Discussion)
06:03:50 PM (00:02:19) Ms. Dunn clarified that it was okay to have multiple awards for the same category
and the procedure for going through them. Ms. Holling gave an overview of the projects nominated. The
board continued to discuss among themselves the best ways of structuring and tracking the discussion.
06:09:46 PM (00:08:15) Phil Gonzales began introducing the projects. The first project discussed, in the
category of “Preservation Stewardship,” was submitted on behalf of the Friends of the Bogert Pool.
Ultimately, it was agreed that more information was needed from the person who submitted the project for
consideration, and that, given that information, the board could revisit the topic at the May meeting. It was
suggested that the award category be changed to “Restoration/Rehabilitation.”
06:14:55 PM (00:13:24) The next project up for discussion, in the categories of “Continued Maintenance”
and/or “Outstanding Historic Preservation,” was the Emerson. Mr. Wallmer spoke about the fundraising
campaign to preserve the Emerson Lawn by outbidding other developers. The board then discussed whether
or not an open space such as a lawn could be considered historic. It was decided that it could, considered in
the same light as the Story Mansion or national parks, and given that developing it would fundamentally
change the historical look and feel of the Emerson. It was further concluded that “Preservation Stewardship”
would be a more appropriate award category for this project.
06:25:07 PM (00:23:36) Next up was Bozeman School District, in “Continued Maintenance,” for restoring
Willson School windows and façade. The Board agreed that this was worthy of recognition and discussed
whether the restoration was complete or if the project should be considered under a different category.
06:34:30 PM (00:32:59) In the “Restoration/Rehabilitation” category was 417 West Olive. This project was
approved before Mr. Gonzales started with the city, but he went over the amount of work done to bring it
to its current state.
06:42:06 PM (00:40:35) Mr. Wallmer summarized the nominated projects and their categories. Ms. Dunn
added that given the scale of the 417 West Olive project, it might be worth considering it for the
“Outstanding Historic Preservation” category. Board members discussed this and decided to vote on it in
that category, pending a site visit from Mr. Gonzales to be sure the home matches what was seen in the
photos.
06:46:36 PM (00:45:05) The final nomination to be presented was Jane Klockman for “Stewardship.” Ms.
Wilkinson spoke on behalf of Ms. Klockman, whom she nominated, and her accomplishments in the
preservation field. Board members discussed giving her an “Outstanding Achievement in Preservation
Stewardship ” award.
06:54:09 PM (00:52:38) Mr. Wallmer summarized the nominations and categories again to reflect the
updated discussion. The board then focused on which categories were appropriate to the Bogert Pool and
Bozeman School District and what “completion” of a project implies in categories that require that.
07:04:18 PM (01:02:47) MOTION to approve all of the historic preservation awards as discussed. (Michael
Wallmer)
07:04:28 PM (01:02:57) MOTION AMENDED to reflect on the agreement to acquire further research on the
Bogert Pool and discuss it at the May 7th meeting.
07:05:03 PM (01:03:32) MOTION SECONDED: Crystal Alegria
07:05:10 PM (01:03:39) VOTE: All in Favor – Motion Carries Unanimously
2. 07:05:26 PM (01:03:55) Preservation Awards Event (Discussion)
Ms. Wilkinson talked about her suggestion for the May 18th event’s theme, “Soul of the Community.” Board
members agreed to this theme and discussed following up with the Bozeman Chronicle, which would be doing
event coverage, about story angles or approaches to an article. Ms. Alegria requested that the awards be
framed this year to make them feel more substantial. Further ideas, including Ms. Holling’s of asking the public
to share stories about this year’s nominees, were talked over. They then discussed the food for the event and
what would be handled by the Baxter.
3. 07:15:05 PM (01:13:34) Inventory Update (Discussion)
Mr. Gonzales gave the inventory update. Last week, they had interviewed two consultants who gave proposals
for the RFP. Mr. Karshner participated in that meeting and gave his feedback. He felt that both applicants
were well-qualified and that whatever decision was made, it would be in good hands. Mr. Gonzales explained
that they’d continue to check references before making an offer and moving on to a contract, which would
then go to the City Commission for approval.
4. 07:17:25 PM (01:15:54) Wilson Project Update (Discussion)
In discussing whether anyone had been able to check out any of the project locations to see if they looked
similar to images submitted, Ms. Holling responded that she visited the Dr. Keaton residence, but that the
drawings she had were not of his house, but rather of his medical clinic, so she will need to revisit that. The
house does have an inventory form; the clinic does not. It was unknown at the time if the clinic still exists. Ms.
Dunn had the Clark apartments, but isn’t sure if what’s located there is the original structure because she
didn’t have any drawings. Following, the board talked about other assigned properties that had not yet been
checked out, and procedures for approaching the current owners.
5. 07:24:26 PM (01:22:55) NCOD Review Update (Discussion)
Mr. Gonzales went over what was approved or amended and what’s coming up next. Amended were:
o 07:25:00 PM (01:23:29) 2.2 contained four components. The first of these was amended to remove
N. 7th from the NCOD.
o 07:25:14 PM (01:23:43) 2.3 was amended to create three specific neighborhood design standard
guidelines: north of Main St., south of Main St., and a B-3 neighborhood.
o 07:25:46 PM (01:24:15) The Commission also made amendments to 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3, moving them
from a medium- to a long-term project.
o 07:26:14 PM (01:24:43) 6.2, about seeking input from neighborhood associations prior to
application review, was amended to remove “neighborhood associations” and to clarify that
developers would be required to seek input from project neighbors before submitting applications.
07:27:03 PM (01:25:32) Ms. Dunn asked Mr. Gonzales what his sense of the timeframe was for the
consultants’ work plan. He responded that he thought the consultants would submit their work plan
within the next 1-2 months. It has not yet been determined how that plan will be approved. Mr.
Gonzales then gave his thoughts about what steps would be coming next: focusing survey work where
boundaries will be moving to figure out what that will mean for N. 7th, which he believes could be
accomplished within the next six months. He, Ms. Dunn, and Ms. Fox continued to discuss future
possibilities and how the board might be involved, and the need to have a set of criteria in place first so
that there would be something to evaluate against.
G. 07:36:05 PM (01:34:34) FYI/Discussion
1. Board questions and general discussion
Ms. Dunn raised the question of how the board wanted to split up the work of writing commendations for the
awards ceremony, noting that it would be best to give the emcee some lead time with them. Board members
went around the dais to agree upon who would be responsible for which pieces of ceremony preparation.
H. 07:42:03 PM (01:40:32) Adjournment
For more information, please contact Phillipe González at pgonzalez@bozeman.net or 406-582-2940
Preservation Board meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and require assistance, please contact
our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray 582-3232 (voice), 582-3203 (TDD).