HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-15-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A3. Water and Wastwater Rate Study Final Report
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Water and Wastewater rate studies and models MEETING DATE: April 15, 2019 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
RECOMMENDATION: Listen to the presentation; take public comment, and direct staff and consulting firm regarding the adoption of the rate model for the budget and rate setting.
BACKGROUND:
In August 2017, the City put out a request for proposals for water and wastewater rate studies
and AE2S Nexus, LLC was selected and signed a professional services agreement November 6, 2017. The expenditures are funded from the Water and Wastewater funds as outlined in the budget.
AE2S presented the preliminary results of their rates studies for the water and wastewater funds
on August 20, 2018 Commission meeting. Based on the feedback from that meeting an inflationary rate for water and wastewater was adopted and staff continued to work with the consultant on the study. Staff have reviewed and revised capital plans for the funds, which were
then adopted December 3, 2018.
On January 28, 2019, AE2S and staff brought forward to the Commission key policy decisions to complete the rate design regarding the following: Single Family Residential Conservation Rates
Feedback Requested:
1. Should Tier 1 be limited to primarily essential water use (6 CCF) or include some element of minor outdoor consumption (8 CCF)? 2. Does the Commission agree that primary outdoor use tiers (2nd and 3rd Tier) be
established based on typical/peak Single Family residential watering needs?
3. Should the rate structure include an excessive outdoor water use tier (4th tier)?
4. Are there any concerns with the price step factors between tiers (see Table 1)? Direction Given: o 4 Tier structure with an excessive use reduction tier is preferred
o Further evaluation of new development outdoor use needs and the sizing of Tier 1
for “Essential Use” o Requested to example bills
440
Drought Rates and Reserves Feedback Requested:
1. Is the drought surcharge rate structure as proposed in line with Commission policy
objectives? 2. Given the potential for significant surcharges in the event of Stage 3-4 drought, does
the Commission believe drought surcharges should be capped and to what level?
3. If surcharge caps are desired, should a corresponding drought reserve be funded?
4. What does the Commission believe should be the target reserve balance?
5. How many years is appropriate to accumulate the reserve? 6. Should the reserve be accumulated through a standard volumetric rate increase or a
user class increase based on the anticipated benefit of use of the reserves during
drought?
Direction Given: o Surcharge Rate cap of 25% o Reserve Target of 1-Year Stage 3 Drought Revenue Shortfall ($2.2M) funded
over 10-years
Reserve Policies and Targets Feedback Requested: 1. Given the current approach to funding Operating and Debt Reserves, does the
Commission have a desire to better define policy to include Renewal & Replacement,
Rate Stabilization, and Drought Contingency Reserves?
2. If the Commission desires to set policy for and develop any of these additional
Reserves, are the preliminarily proposed targets appropriate for planning purposes? Direction Given:
o Reserve Funding Approach with increases for all users
Cost of Service Based User Class Corrections Feedback Requested: 1. Going forward, does the Commission desire to apply user class-specific adjustments
to the rate structures that will work to generate revenue from each class that is
commensurate with the associated cost for each class?
2. If cost of service correction is a priority, how aggressively should it be approached? Direction Given: o Proceed with 5-year volumetric rate increase strategy as proposed to correct
interclass Cost of Service
o Provide revised alternative for similar 5-year correction for Government Class
This final presentation is based on the direction given above. The budget discussions in June will include the model adopted tonight and rates will be adopted in September.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the Commission
FISCAL EFFECTS: To be determined
Report compiled on: April 5, 2019
Attached: AE2S Presentation Sample Utility Bills
441
1WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY SYSTEM COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDYApril 15, 2019Presentation to City Commission: Final Results and RecommendationsCITY OF BOZEMAN, MT442
2BOZEMAN WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY RATESAgenda for Today •Recap of Policy Direction from January 28, 2019 Commission Work Session •Single Family Residential Conservation Rates•Drought Rates and Reserves•Reserve Policies and Targets•Cost of Service Based User Class Corrections•Final Rate Modeling Results•Revenue Requirements Forecasts –Water and Wastewater Funds•Multi-Year Rate Projections•Conclusions and Study Recommendations443
3WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONHow will policy direction address challenges?•Primary Implementation Action from the City’s Integrated Water Resource Management Plan•Anticipated to send appropriate pricing signals to promote conservation and reduce consumption over time CONSERVATION BASED RATESDROUGHT RATES AND RESERVESRESERVING POLICIES AND TARGETSCOST OF SERVICE BASED RATES•Primary Recommendation from 2017 Drought Management Plan•Anticipated to send appropriate pricing signals to promote immediate water use reduction and financial stability in time of drought•Key to managing rate increases over time and ensuring appropriate system reinvestment •Will support stable funding for operations, capital, and renewal needs and mitigate unforeseen revenue shortfalls•Ensuring City’s goal of adopting reasonable and defendable rates in line with water/wastewater industry standards•Maintaining appropriate relationship between cost to serve and revenue generated from each user class444
4WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONKey Points of Discussion from January 28thCommission•Three separate tiered rate structure alternatives presented•Discussion of anticipated effectiveness of Alternatives and specifics of Tier Sizing, Tier Steps, and Number of TiersFeedback Summary:•A 4 Tier structure with an excessive use reduction tier is preferred •Further evaluation of new development outdoor use needs and the sizing of Tier 1 for “Essential Use”•Requested bill impacts analysis - how many users impacted and to what degree?CONSERVATION BASED RATES445
5Rate Alternatives Carried Forward for Consideration681919301935+44+Alternative 2Alternative 3Comparison of Tier Structures$2.55$2.40$3.57$3.24$5.18$4.54$7.76$6.81CONSERVATION BASED WATER RATE DESIGN0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90Hundred Cubic Feet (CCF)Tier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier 4446
6WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONConservation Tier Sizing Follow-up: Water Use Summary by Age GroupingPre‐19501950 to 19881988 to 2009Post‐2009Parcel Size (sq. ft.)Water Use (HCF)051015202512,00011,50011,00010,5009,5008,5007,50011,0009,0008,0007,0002017 Residential Use vs. Parcel SizeSummary:•Newer Lot Sizes are Trending Down•However, Outdoor Use is Trending Up Significantly with Newer Lots (irrigation systems impact)•Indoor Use is more Efficient for Newer Lots (efficient fixtures benefit)Avg. OutdoorAvg. SummerAvg. WinterAvg. Parcel Size447
7WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONConservation Tier Sizing Follow-up: Water Use by Age Grouping Data VariabilityKey Takeaways:•First Tier Size of 6 CCF provides sufficient amount for Indoor Use•6 CCF also will provide availability for minor outdoor uses, especially for newer development•Due to irrigation system installations, newer development will be most impacted by Tier 2‐4 rate structure changes•Top of 2ndTier at 25 CCF will provide adequate efficient outdoor water budget for most usersAge GroupingPre‐19501950 to 19881988 to 2009Post‐2009Total Count1377 1850 3605 2186% of Total15% 21% 40% 24%Average Winter5.0 5.8 5.1 3.8Upper Quartile4.4 5.2 4.9 3.6Median4.8 5.5 5.1 3.8Lower Quartile5.6 6.4 5.3 3.9Average Summer11.3 14.8 21.7 22.0Upper Quartile10.1 12.5 19.4 20.3Median11.0 13.6 21.3 22.8Lower Quartile12.5 17.5 24.4 23.0Winter Usage SummarySummer Usage SummaryWinter vs. Summer Water Usage by Age Grouping448
8WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONRecommended Conservation Rate Structure: Alternative 2Alternative 2 –Key Benefits:•Conservation: Anticipated to be effective in reducing inefficient and irresponsible outdoor use over time •Revenue Sufficiency: Expected to be very effective in yielding total rate revenue targets from Single Family user class•Essential Use Pricing: Maintains/improves affordability for low volume users and provides modest outdoor use availability in Tier 1Size CCF Price/CCFTier 10‐62.40$ Tier 26‐25 3.24$ Tier 325‐55 4.54$ Tier 455+ 6.81$ Alternative 2 Tier Definition449
9WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONRecommended Alternative: Anticipated Bill Impacts$27.16 $28.69 $38.03 $70.69 $147.68 $26.34 $27.75 $37.75 $75.61 $177.83 $‐ $20.00 $40.00 $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $140.00 $160.00 $180.00 $200.004.1 CCF: Winter Median 4.67 CCF: Winter Average 8.0 CCF: Current Tier 119.3 CCF: Summer Averagefor Irrigating Properties42.8 CCF" Summer 95thPercentileMonthly Residential Bill Comparison2019 Monthly ChargesProposed 2020 Monthly Charges450
10WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONRecommended Alternative: Anticipated Bill Impacts$29.03$46.70$30.91$54.21$29.84$76.47$26.35$80.80$28.07$47.80$29.81$56.51$28.82$82.31$25.59$87.33$0.00$10.00$20.00$30.00$40.00$50.00$60.00$70.00$80.00$90.00$100.00Winter Median: Pre‐1950 ‐ 4.8 CCFSummer Median:Pre‐1950 ‐ 11.0 CCFWinter Median: 1950to 1988 ‐ 5.5 CCFSummer Median:1950 to 1988 ‐ 13.6CCFWinter Median: 1988to 2009 ‐ 5.1 CCFSummer Median:1988 to 2009 ‐ 21.3CCFWinter Median: Post‐2009 ‐ 3.8 CCFSummer Median:Post‐2009 ‐ 22.8 CCFMonthly Residential Bill Comparison2019 Monthly ChargesProposed 2020 Monthly ChargesPre‐19501950‐19881988‐2009Post‐2009451
11WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONAlternative 2: Anticipated Bill ImpactsHandout: See Single Family Bill Examples for Different Consumption Levels under Proposed Conservation Rate Structure Alternative 2452
12WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONKey Points of Discussion from January 28thCommissionKey Points of Discussion:•Drought Surcharges and Surcharge Caps •Drought Reserves Required to Allow for Caps•Reserve Funding Timeframe Feedback Summary:•Surcharge Rate Cap: 25%•Reserve Target: 1-Year Stage 3 Drought Revenue Shortfall ($2.2M) funded over 10-years•Reserve Funding Approach:Common Increases for all User Classes -$0.08/CCF for all units of water sold DROUGHT RATES AND RESERVES453
13Required Reduction in Drought ConditionsDROUGHT SURCHARGE RATES49.7%16.3%55.0%14.0%27.6%10.0%1,018,512 615,855 69,099 220,752 603,431 28,441 (100,000) 100,000 300,000 500,000 700,000 900,000 1,100,000Single Family & LowIncome ResidentialMulti‐FamilyResidentialGovernment MSU Commercial IndustrialCCF Total Test Year Water SalesTargeted Reduction ‐ Stage 3454
14Proposed Drought Surcharge Rate Structure by StageDROUGHT SURCHARGE RATESStage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4Single Family and Low Income ResidentialTier 1 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 25.0%Tier 2 21.0% 47.0% 100.0% 200.0%Tier 3 21.1% 47.2% 100.0% 200.3%Tier 4 21.1% 47.2% 100.0% 200.3%Multi-Family Residential 11.1% 19.0% 19.0% 25.0%Government 11.1% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%MSU 11.1% 16.3% 16.3% 25.0%Commercial 11.1% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%Industrial 11.1% 11.1% 11.1% 11.1%Utilize Drought Reserve to achieve target Surcharge Cap to offset revenue shortfallSurcharges Revenue-Neutral by Class455
15WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONKey Points of Discussion from January 28thCommissionKey Points of Discussion:•Operating Reserves•Renewal and Replacement Reserves•Debt Service Reserves•Rate Stabilization ReservesFeedback Summary:•Proceed with modeling reserves as presented and provide corresponding rate increases required to achieve targets for Water and Wastewater fundsOther Reserve Policies and Targets456
16Water Utility Reserves – Policy Change ConsiderationsRESERVE FUNDING POLICIESCurrent Policy Summary:•O&M: 45 Days•Renewal and Replacement: No Current Policy•Debt Service: Per Bond Covenants•Rate Stabilization: No Current Policy•Drought Contingency Reserves: No Current Policy457
17RESERVE FUNDING POLICIESWastewater Utility Reserves – Policy Change ConsiderationsCurrent Policy Summary:•O&M: 45 Days•Renewal and Replacement: No Current Policy•Debt Service: Per Bond Covenants•Rate Stabilization: No Current Policy458
18WATER/WW UTILITY RATES – POLICY DIRECTIONKey Points of Discussion from January 28thCommissionKey Points of Discussion:•Recent historical increases have been equivalent for all User Classes•Cost of Service Analysis indicated some discrepancies exist between classes•Government Class in Water shown to have largest discrepancyFeedback Summary:•Proceed with 5-year volumetric rate increase strategy as proposed to correct interclass Cost of Service•Provide revised alternative for similar 5-year correction for Government ClassCost of Service Based Rate Increases459
192019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Total 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 5.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.0%Total 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 6.0%Total 5.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0%Total 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%Total 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Flow Charge - % IncreaseSingle Family/Low Income ResidentialMulti Family ResidentialCommercialGovernmentMSUIndustrialCOST OF SERVICE ANALYSISRecommendations – WaterSummary of Varied Increases by User Class:•One-time change to residential tiered rate structure in 2020 with no additional volumetric increases projected by 2024•Volumetric increases are projected to meet revenue requirements inclusive of contemplated reserve policy changes and Tiered rate structure change•All classes projected to be within +/-10% target by 2024Adopted 2019 Increase460
20Forecasted Revenue RequirementsWater$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000$10,000,000$12,000,000$14,000,000$16,000,0002019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Revenue Requirement ProjectionsO&MRate Funded Capital/ReservesDebt Service P&IRevenue at Existing RatesKey Assumptions:O&M Escalation:•General Inflation –3%•Labor Costs –5%•Power/Chemicals –5% Account Growth:•Residential –3.8%•Multi-Family –3.1%•Commercial –1.7% CIP: 2020-2024 CIP Project ReportMajor CIP Debt Funded: •2020 –Sourdough Improvements -$0.90 M•2021 –Lyman Tank Improvements -$10.0 M•2022 –Phase 1 PRV Improvements -$1.75 M•2023 –Hyalite Dam and Reservoir -$4.0 M•2024 –Phase 2 PRV Improvements -$6.7 M461
21Forecasted Revenue AdequacyWaterKey Assumptions:Fixed Water Service Charges: •No significant increases projectedVolumetric Charges: •Including New Residential Tier Structure •Cost of Service Corrections as presentedReserve Targets: Per Policy Recommendations $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Projected Water Fund BalancesBond Covenant Reserve AccountOperations and Maintenance Reserve AccountRenewal/Replacement Reserve AccountDrought Contingency ReserveRate Stabilization Reserve AccountOperating and Bond Reserve TargetStacked Reserve TargetBond Reserve TargetDrought Contingency Reserve Target462
22COST OF SERVICE ANALYSISRecommendations – WastewaterSUMMARY OF VARIED INCREASES BY USER CLASS:•Volumetric increases projected to meet revenue requirements inclusive of contemplated reserve policy changes •All classes projected to be within +/-10% target by 2024Adopted 2019 Increase2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Total 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 4.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%Total 4.0% 6.0% 6.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%Total 4.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0%Total 4.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 6.0%Total 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%Single FamilyFlow Charge - % IncreaseMulti FamilyCommercialGovernmentMSUIndustrial463
23Forecasted Revenue RequirementsWastewaterKey Assumptions:O&M Escalation:•General Inflation –3%•Labor Costs –5%•Power/Chemicals –5% Account Growth:•Residential –3.8%•Multi-Family –3.1%•Commercial –1.7% CIP: 2020-2024 CIP Project ReportMajor CIP Debt Funded: •NA$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000$10,000,000$12,000,0002019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Revenue Requirement ProjectionsO&MRate Funded CapitalDebt Service P&IRevenue at Existing Rates464
24Forecasted Revenue AdequacyWastewater $‐ $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,0002019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Projected Wastewater Fund BalancesBond Covenant Reserve Cash BalanceO&M Reserve Cash BalanceRenewal/Replacement Reserve Cash BalanceRate Stabilization Reserve BalanceBond Reserve TargetOperating and Bond Reserve TargetStacked Capital Reserve TargetKey Assumptions:Fixed Service Charges: •No Increases ProjectedUsage Charges: •Cost of Service Corrections as PresentedReserve Targets: •Per Policy Recommendations465
25Summary Recommendations - WaterSingle Family: begin steps toward implementation of Alternative 2 Conservation Rate Design for FY20Remainder User Classes: implement proposed Cost of Service based volumetric rate adjustments for FY20Drought Surcharge Rate Structure: implement structure as proposed including: •Surcharge Rate Cap: 25%•Reserve Target: 1-Year Stage 3 Drought Revenue Shortfall ($2.2M) funded over 10-years•Reserve Funding Approach:Common Increases for all User Classes -$0.08/CCF for all units of water sold Future Increases: monitor appropriateness of forecasted FY21-FY24 increases w/ future years rate setting considering:•Cost of Service corrections over time•Shifts in future years Revenue Requirements•Reserves and Target Balances per Revised Policy Recommendations466
26Summary Recommendations - WastewaterAll User Classes: implement proposed Cost of Service based volumetric rate adjustments for FY20Future Increases: monitor appropriateness of forecasted FY21-FY24 increases w/ future years rate setting considering:•Cost of Service corrections over time•Shifts in future years Revenue Requirements•Reserves and Target Balances per Revised Policy Recommendations467
27SHAWN GADDIEShawn.Gaddie@ae2s.com701-746-8087THANK YOU468
XXX-XXXX $73.84
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 3.00 $7.44TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 23.61
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 3.00 $9.84
TOTAL SEWER 29.84
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $73.84
$73.84
469
XXX-XXXX $79.77
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 4.10 $10.17TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 26.34
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.10 $13.45
TOTAL SEWER 33.03
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $79.77
$79.77
470
XXX-XXXX $83.08
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 4.67 $11.58TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 27.75
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $83.08
$83.08
471
XXX-XXXX $84.15
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 5.10 $12.65TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 28.82
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $84.15
$84.15
472
XXX-XXXX $86.38
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 31.05
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $86.38
$86.38
473
XXX-XXXX $91.07
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) 1.40 $4.69TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 35.74
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $91.07
$91.07
474
XXX-XXXX $96.10
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) 2.90 $9.72TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 40.77
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $96.10
$96.10
475
XXX-XXXX $130.94
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) 13.30 $44.56TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF)TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 75.61
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $130.94
$130.94
476
XXX-XXXX $183.19
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) 19.00 $63.65TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF) 7.10 $33.16TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 127.86
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $183.19
$183.19
477
XXX-XXXX $266.16
164.61 167.04 2.43
WATER SERVICE CHARGE $16.17TIER 1 (0-6 CCF) 6.00 $14.88TIER 2 (6.01-25 CCF) 19.00 $63.65TIER 3 (25.01-55 CCF) 17.80 $83.13TIER 4 (55.01+ CCF)
TOTAL WATER 177.83
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE $19.58USAGE PER CCF 4.67 $15.32
TOTAL SEWER 34.90
35 GALLON TOTE 01/31/2019 - 02/28/2019 $14.52
TOTAL GARBAGE/RECYCLING 14.52
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGES $233.16
$266.16
478