The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-25-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Direction on Preparing the Future Land Use Map for the Growth Policy - SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS BOZ E MAN MT Planning Current and Proposed BoundarY BOZ E MANm' •i+� , Planning Nj �� • ~tip 1. � y 1 1 ,) 1 �T - `-,�' Legend � y GP 201S_draR_toundary City-Limits ■�Canvnunity Plsn Brundary � --� Northwest PlanningBoundary BOZ E MAN MT Planning L G:'k1�ZF..R{}1Y�RItT1}i:L+. RT} T I '� �" ,p;:�'�iLL�I•'•�:F.1TF..K-kZL}--1�-i�•` .........,,�i: I �i _ 3�Ilrii�►ItIcll•'ST;-- � _ I° r�r� �", g J_I i_ii 9 E— r Legand F�QUS d'IZI, -i:`w f Rac Wa Brundarr RXXTF T. r GP 2019 dnfi bruncary city umis Residarmnl — Residanbal Emphasis K.49d Usa Saburban Residerria' ® Rruirna:Cv,r,rnsici:; ,md S:mvicrs. community Gnrn F �r� . —% �" r I ti \IF s'=- Community CorrmerdsI hbxed Use 13inesE Park Use -E t = ii r,1 x I Industrial / r_ I}1 R"I6N RD - :�, i cc II ;�7,G kk l If T tRTI 4E P]bl'.Inllitutom Pak%,Olimi Sims:x-nml Rrumilional I-:r•<x; Ohm Putdir Limit; GaltCculne — i P:aeent Rural ---C—.i — —_-r�"_.__— -- Northwest Planning Bounda,� ry BOZEMANmT Planning XOR � . 4{� 4•+cf.ti' � 4 Questions : y, 00 P fir. � 1'F.4' 'FAV1'FR 1 . Rae & Planning Boundary 2. Present Rural ■ .r- �11 ._� ��'��- .ter_ v�rti:��`.�L.�1.y,'��i �isJ 3. Suburban Residential 4. Business Park Mixed Use '� 44 B 36f OC•Fic�J l � -:-tit\}N �1 E_ �14 t�•:_�,� Jll — �. STUCKY-Ril —g'-1 ■�__ . •■ .,.�, -[3�, �A 7f�tll. r — R1 hC: a —r 05 s V -M .141-IVSUN - 4; NASk]. BOZ E MAN MT Public Comment Planning One public comment was received at the January 5th meeting that encouraged the Planning Board to consider conservation in the development of the future land use map. Recommendation Staff recommendations are presented in the memo. The City of Bozeman Planning Board held a public meeting on January 5, 2019 to consider the four questions. ■ The Planning Board recommendations are on pages 1 and 2 of the memo. ■ Staff has no objections to the recommendations of the Planning Board. EMT Planning THE MOST LIVABLE PLACE. Rao & Planning Boundary BOZ E MAN MT Planning Wk Alternatives: 1 ) Leave the boundary as is. 2) Remove the entire Rae service area from the planning area 3) Include the entire Rae service area within the planning area LN 4T�ZSSLT R-AY Legend dnfl bcunc�;.ry y5`�i - r Paiavil; F'Ih'L c Cs ` 131JL T.1 E K-B V I) i..r _ - Residantis.l ResidanGcl Emaha=_is Mixed L'Ea ;burban Residantia 13I.,}('I{ T Rc[lirina.Comma de: -and Suivieos camrru-T Cofe- camrru ni:y Corrmerda I hi xed Use y Bjainese Park I'd.ed Use A.. = Industria F,bl:InsG;utorr: Y.. Fxitx,01n:n parr:❑nd Ruca.^.;rlicrrsl L-rul:�; '�fj ,Nhr:r Pullin I_:milx Corr Ccuwe F sent Rural �; Rae & PlanningBoundary BOZEMANmT Planning 17 • Alternatives: ` 1 ) Leave the boundary as • • + • • • • • • • 2) Remove the entire Rae • .--4 - ! • • ft • • • • . • - N service area from the - - • • - • • . . - - • _ M - planning area �- • . r • • • • • • • STUCKY R • • • - ! • • • • 3) Include the entire Rae service area within the • O o planning area Q d Present Rural designation BOZ E MAN MT Planning --,- r _ Alternatives: _ •.� - - ~, 711. 1 ) Only show the minimum urban area - ., to match annexed land plus anticipated growth and keep using the Present :. I% Rural designation to show the remaining j area. This is continuing existing practice. 2) Show all areas as urban of some type excluding those areas with a -L,^ conservation easement or similar legal restrictions on use. �• >i _ _ ; '_ f' 3) Show most areas as some urban �iil iiu 'i ,;; --i -__' ". designation and only use Present Rural ` for those areas with substantial utility 9 i X, service location restrictions and/or substantial intent to maintain in non- 1. .- 1 : r urban character for the long term. ' t 4) Revise the description of Present Rural to show as not urban yet but that if 7r Le_end `rf-_23�9_dratt hcun��n� �' `��% annexed it defaults to an urban = Cih,L cis i ''- `"-4�bwbnnRmdznUa = i designation such as Residential. B:id:iru:r: P:aik:r&Iixttc!Usr: Suburban Residential designation BOZ E MAN MT Planning 4r Alternatives: 7 rz- 1 ) Continue to use Suburban Residential �4j !lei as it has been. 2) Depict all areas currently shown as Suburban Residential as a different urban designation such as Residential. 3 Only show the Suburban Residential on areas with an existing developed condition and substantial difficulties in extending municipal services. 77 L _ Legend GP 2919_draf bcuncan E buian Rcr-i;iwnlial- L — Pamk_Mixed U_`R!. — _ - F•c:ra:nl�uf81 ,M1-�J - I it -"[--7 Business Park Mixed Use deli nano)n OZ E MAN M T Planning - ` Alternatives: ` '` l ••-••-I ' �' 'ti 1 ) Continue to use the Business Park 41. �� ' � '�, Mixed Use land use designation _ 2) Discontinue use of Business Park Mixed Use and replace with a new designation on the individual sites on ��C future farad use map 3) Revise the description of Business —. r , ;j ' ' � 6 ••--•-• ••-•- Park Mixed Use to have a more urban character - � 4 _ o .r •. 4 / Legend f ,.y :fly L'r,i'.e ` e H.aincs,P.&rdberd User. t �� Belgrade Planning Area BOZ E MAN MT tiQi"T.»-rj�ty� Planning I� RE RD At QWWA -- r • �� I f Legend Belgrade Planning Jurisdiction Roads ,r y _ F; Belgrade Zoning Rivers High Density Density Medium Density 0610212006 �. . s \ IIIti • � �F 'r n .