Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-25-19 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Ruh Building CUP and Site PlanPage 1 of 21 18422 and 18433 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 in the Commission Meeting Room in Bozeman City Hall, 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, MT at 6:00 p.m. Project Description: Site Plan (18423) for a 4-story, mixed-use building with 16 residential units, approximately 7,786 sf of commercial space including brewery and rooftop bar, 720 sf of rooftop terrace seating, 2291 sf rooftop residential open space and other shared circulation and mechanical spaces totaling 29,493 sf and related site improvements. A Conditional Use Permit (18433) is required for on-premise consumption of alcohol as proposed with the brewery. Project Location: 605 N. 7th Avenue. The parcels are legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, of Durston’s 2nd Subdivision located in the Southeast One-quarter of Section One (S01), Township Two South (T02S), Range Five East (R05E), P.M.M, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana. A concurrent lot aggregation application is being reviewed. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code provisions Motion: “Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for applications 18422 and 18433 and move to approve the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan applications subject to conditions and all applicable code provisions.” Report Date: March 12, 2019 Staff Contact: Addi Jadin, Associate Planner Executive Summary The property owner and applicant submitted an application to develop an existing site in the Community Business District-Mixed (B-2M) zoning district and Midtown Urban Renewal District. The site will be accessed from an improved alley off Durston Road and existing accesses off N. 7th and Durston Road will be vacated. The development proposes a mixed use building with commercial ground floor including a brewery with tasting room; 2 stories with 8 apartments each; and a rooftop with bar, outdoor serving area, and private residential open space. A Conditional Use Permit for sales of alcohol for on-premises consumption is required in conjunction with the Site Plan application. 211 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 2 of 21 Staff analysis of the criteria for granting Site Plan and CUP approval begins on page 12 of the staff report. With the passage of Resolution 4991 on February 11, 2019, the City Commission approved the use of tax increment revenues or bonds for eligible costs associated with impact fees, cash-in-lieu of park land, cash-in-lieu of water rights, service lines, Northwestern Energy, demolition, streetscape & public infrastructure, alley improvement and engineering fees. The maximum amount of the award including 15% contingency is $747,500. The proposal for cash-in-lieu of parkland was recommended for approval by the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board on Thursday, February 28, 2019. The Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the application. Based on its evaluation of the application against the criteria, the Development Review Committee (DRC) found the application adequate for continued review. Public notice commenced on March 10, 2019. The Design Review Board (DRB) reviewed the application on March 13, 2019 and recommended approval with the following amendments: 1. That the existing building on the site be professionally documented by someone who meets the Secretary of the Interior professional standards to do so and that, at a minimum, an appropriate Montana Historic Property form be prepared prior to the building’s demolition. 2. Resolve code correction regarding bicycle parking within landscaping bed. Further analysis regarding item 1 is provided in Section 5 of the staff report under CUP criterion 3.n. and a staff recommended condition of approval to implement the DRB’s recommendation is provided in Section 3. Staff analysis of the recommended code correction is provided in Section 4 of the staff report. Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues with the application. Code corrections have been provided by the DRC. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions and report findings; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions and modifications to the report findings; 3. Deny the application based on the City Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 212 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 3 of 21 4. Open and continue the review on the application with the concurrence of the applicant, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 – MAP AND DRAWING SERIES ........................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS / DEPARTURES / VARIANCES 13 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ............................................. 13 SECTION 4 – REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS ...................................................................... 14 SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS .................................................................. 14 APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY ......................................... 20 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ............................................................ 21 APPENDIX C – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .................................... 21 ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 21 213 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 4 of 21 SECTION 1 – MAP AND DRAWING SERIES Zoning Classification 214 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 5 of 21 Growth Policy Designation 215 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 6 of 21 Current Land Use 216 Page 7 of 21 Site Plan (Cropped) 217 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 8 of 21 Architectural Perspectives 218 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 9 of 21 First Floor Plan including Alcohol Service Area 219 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 10 of 21 3rd Floor/Residential Plan 220 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 11 of 21 Roof/Penthouse Plan including Alcohol Service Area 221 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building CUP and SP Page 12 of 21 Departure Images 222 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 13 of 21 SECTION 2 - REQUESTED RELAXATION / DEVIATIONS / DEPARTURES / VARIANCES One departure is requested from the Landscaped Block Frontage standards of Table 38.510.030.C. which require a 10-foot minimum buffer of landscaping between the street and off-street parking areas. The applicants propose a 4-foot privacy fence (see “Departure Images” on page 12 of the staff report) running the width of the parking lot and temporary plantings which will remain within a 20-foot public street and utility easement until street widening is conducted as identified in the 2017 Bozeman Transportation Master Plan (see L101 Landscape Plan in application materials). The departure criterion for “Parking location” in 38.510.030.C.3.c. states: 1. There must be an acceptable tradeoff in terms of the amount and quality of storefront area that is integrated with the development and the applicable parking location departure. Plus, the alternative must include design features to successfully mitigate the visual impact of additional parking areas along designated landscaped streets. Due to the quality of storefront in the building design, staff recommends approval of the departure. As designed, the building is meeting storefront requirements despite its landscaped setback because it is designed to meet the future road configuration. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 2. The property must be configured through the applicable subdivision review process to aggregate parcels prior to submittal of building permits. 3. A Montana Historic Property Form to document the existing structure must be completed and approved prior to application for demolition. 4. A copy of the Montana Department of Revenue alcohol license for the establishment must be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to alcohol service. 5. Any modification of the Montana Department of Revenue alcohol license requires review and approval of a new conditional use permit. 6. A copy of the City of Bozeman alcohol license for the establishment must be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to alcohol service. 7. The right to serve alcohol to patrons is revocable according to the provisions in Bozeman Municipal Code Sections 38.230.110.I and 38.200.030 based on 223 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 14 of 21 substantial complaints from the public or from the Police Department regarding violations of the City of Bozeman’s open alcohol container, minor in possession of alcohol, or any other applicable law regarding consumption and/or procession of alcohol. 8. Any expansion of this use or facility is not permitted unless reviewed and approved as required under the applicable regulations of the Bozeman Municipal Code. SECTION 4 – REQUIRED CODE PROVISIONS As identified by Design Review Board, there is a conflict between landscaping and bicycle parking along the west façade of the building. The bicycle parking would cause damage to plantings; therefore, the landscaping performance points claimed for foundation screening would not be achieved. The required landscaping points will not be met without the foundation landscaping. There are many different methods allowed under the regulations to meet the required landscaping standard. A revision to the plan is needed to demonstrate compliance with the landscaping standard. Such changes to approved plans are within the authority of the Staff as delegated by the City Commission in 38.200.010. Staff will work with the applicants to resolve the issue and ensure landscaping standard compliance prior to building permit issuance. SECTION 5 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis in this report is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Plan Review Criteria, Section 38.230.100, BMC. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, do not in any way create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1. Conformance to and consistency with the City’s adopted growth policy Yes. The property has a future land use designation of Community Commercial Mixed Use and is zoned B-2M, Community Commercial Mixed Use. The proposed residential units, commercial and artisan manufacturing (brewery) uses increase the intensity of commercial uses and the density of residential uses in an area of the city designated for lively, mixed us development. The change in intensity is anticipated by the growth policy in areas of the city with adequate infrastructure. The project is in conformance to 224 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 15 of 21 and consistent with the City’s adopted growth policy, the Bozeman Community Plan, including the following goals and objectives: Goal LU-1: Create a sense of place that varies throughout the City, efficiently provides public and private basic services and facilities in close proximity to where people live and work, and minimizes sprawl. This project contributes to an expanding mixed use area and allows people to live in close proximity to work, public and private basic services and minimizes sprawl. Objective LU-1.4 Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. Objective LU-2.3: Encourage redevelopment and intensification, especially with mixed uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent with the City’s adopted standards. This project provides additional density of residential and commercial use while respecting the context of the mixed use area. As indicated in the Executive Summary, this project has received support from the Midtown TIF district for its redevelopment of an underutilized site with vacant building. Objective E-4.2: Promulgate efficient land use practices. This project promulgates efficient land use practices and provides a high net residential density and FAR with office and manufacturing uses. The redesign of vehicular traffic to the site with parking off the alley consolidates two drive accesses off public streets. Goal H-1: Promote an adequate supply of safe, quality housing that is diverse in type, density, cost, and location with an emphasis on maintaining neighborhood character and stability. This project provides additional quality housing at high density in an area that already provides a transition from multi- to single-household residences. For more information on the growth policy designation please see Appendix A. 2. Conformance to this chapter, including the cessation of any current violations Yes. The project, if approved, will conform to the Bozeman Municipal Code other than the requested relaxations. There are no known documented violations of the BMC for this property. 225 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 16 of 21 3. Conformance with all other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations Yes. The proposed uses of the site are consistent with the allowed uses of the B-2M district. No specific conflicts have been identified. Additional steps will be required including but not limited to final payment for cash in lieu of water rights, subdivision exemption to realign and aggregate the underlying lots, dedication of the utility easements, construction of infrastructure, and building permits. The Building Division of the Department of Community Development will review the requirements of the International Building Code for compliance at the time of building permit application. Condition of approval 1 requires full compliance with all applicable code requirements. An appropriate City alcohol license must be obtained prior to any alcohol service. 4. Conformance with special review criteria for applicable permit type as specified in article 2 Yes. The CUP criteria are reviewed below. The project meets the criteria as presented. 5. Conformance with the zoning provisions of article 3, including permitted uses, form and intensity standards and requirements, applicable supplemental use criteria, and wireless facilities and/or affordable housing provisions if applicable Yes. The uses are permitted in the B-2M district. Form and intensity standards are met with the approval of a departure from parking lot screening requirements as described in Section 2 of the staff report. 6. Conformance with the community design provisions of article 4, including transportation facilities and access, community design and element provisions, and park and recreational requirements Yes. The project will improve transportation access with the consolidation of 2 existing driveways and required alley improvements. The required parkland is being met through the provision of cash-in-lieu and has been recommended for approval by the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board noting vicinity to parks that are also within the TIF district. The primary entrances into the building face a high visibility street corner and the 7th street façade which connect directly to the City’s sidewalk system. Perimeter street frontage sidewalks are provided on every perimeter street in conformance to standards. The applicant will be improving alley surfacing to provide a connection from 226 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 17 of 21 Durston to properties to the north. Cash in lieu of water rights is proposed and will be paid with the final site plan for site development. The applicant proposes to pay cash in lieu of parkland in conformance with standards, capped at twelve dwelling units per acre. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board recommended approval at their meeting on February 28, 2019. 7. Conformance with the project design provisions of article 5, including compatibility with, and sensitivity to, the immediate environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development; design and arrangement of the elements of the plan; landscaping; open space; lighting, signage; The development is compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods and other approved development relative to, building mass and height, landscaping, orientation of parking and building placement on the site all designed in accordance with the block frontage and design standards of article 5. The buildings complies with permanence in building materials, building quality, architectural integration, neighborhood identity, and orientation of parking and service areas. The landscaping provided will enhance the pedestrian ways within and adjacent to the site and are used to control vehicular traffic within the site. Parking is provided onsite despite the Midtown TIF district having no parking minimums. 8. Conformance with environmental and open space objectives set forth in articles 4—6, including the enhancement of the natural environment, watercourse and wetland protections and associated wildlife habitats; and if the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area, have provisions been made in the plan to avoid interfering with public access to and use of that area Yes. The approach to the stormwater system meets code standards. The site is not adjacent to a park or public open space area. 9. Conformance with the natural resource protection provisions of article 4 and article 6 Yes. No streams, floodplains, critical plant communities or wetlands exist on site. 10. Other related matters, including relevant comment from affected parties No public comment has been received as of the issuance of the staff report. 11. If the development includes multiple lots that are interdependent for circulation or other means of addressing requirement of this title, whether the lots are either: 227 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 18 of 21 a. Configured so that the sale of individual lots will not alter the approved configuration or use of the property or cause the development to become nonconforming; or b. The subject of reciprocal and perpetual easements or other agreements to which the City is a party so that the sale of individual lots will not cause one or more elements of the development to become nonconforming The property must be configured through the applicable subdivision review process to aggregate common lot boundaries prior to submittal of building permits. See conditional of approval 2. 12. Phasing of development Not applicable. The project is proposed to be constructed in one phase. Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria, Section 38.230.110, BMC. E. In addition to the review criteria of section 38.230.100, the review authority shall, in approving a conditional use permit, determine favorably as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use, and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity; The site is adequate. The proposed buildings, site design, pedestrian connectivity, open space and mix of uses are appropriate for a high visibility street corner and building of over 100-foot façade length. Landscaped areas are coordinated within the proposed development and provide interesting visual features to enhance the pedestrian experience. The replacement of vegetative parking lot screening with a fence as allowed through a departure is an appropriate response where the timing of future road improvements is unknown and where the quality of storefront provided is of value. Vehicular and bicycle parking has been provided on-site with adequate landscaping and pedestrian features. 2. That the proposed use will have no material adverse effect upon the abutting property. Persons objecting to the recommendations of review bodies carry the burden of proof; No adverse impacts to abutting properties have been identified. In fact, the development of the property required alley improvements beyond the immediate frontage of the subject parcel that will benefit existing properties in the vicinity. The addition of a multi-story, storefront building with new street trees, weather protection (awnings) and active use on the ground floor is a significant improvement for a high- visibility intersection in an area where large swaths of parking front the street. The 228 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 19 of 21 pedestrian-friendly design and larger building height at the sidewalk edge contributes to an environment where traffic speeds naturally decrease. General welfare will be promoted through the provision of apartment units in a neighborhood already serving as a transition between multi- and single-household residences to the southwest. 3. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to: a. Regulation of use; b. Special yards, spaces and buffers; c. Special fences, solid fences and walls; d. Surfacing of parking areas; e. Requiring street, service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds; f. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g. Regulation of signs; h. Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i. Regulation of noise, vibrations and odors; j. Regulation of hours for certain activities; k. Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed; l. Duration of use; m. Requiring the dedication of access rights; and n. Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the city in an orderly and efficient manner. As mentioned earlier in the staff report, the Design Review Board recommended that the existing structure be further documented considering its potential for historic significance. The DRB found that an unbiased professional observer would consider the existing structure to be eligible for the National Register. Similar buildings of this age have required further documentation outside of the NCOD. Staff agrees with the recommendation and has added condition of approval #3 in Section 3 of the staff report. The building’s historic use and design is reflective of iconic mid-century modern design and representative character of the N 7th corridor. The condition of approval would ensure the completed documentation would be archived in the City’s architecture inventory GIS map and available for future research and 229 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 20 of 21 available to the general public. Additionally, the Commission has previously considered and approved the project for an award of Tax Increment Financing due to its advancement of the goals of the Midtown Urban Renewal District and the Bozeman Community Plan as described in this report. After evaluating all the site plan criteria, staff finds that the merits of the application outweigh the historic significance of the existing structure. Therefore, after completion of documentation the removal of the building and replacement with the proposed building is appropriate and the benefits outweigh the loss of the building. Given the specifics of the site and project, the recommended condition of approval is deemed adequate by staff. F. In addition to all other conditions, the following general requirements apply to every conditional use permit granted: 1. That the right to a use and occupancy permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the conditional use permit procedure; and 2. That all of the conditions shall constitute restrictions running with the land use, shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successors or assigns, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing, and shall be recorded as such with the county clerk and recorder's office by the property owner prior to the issuance of any building permits, final plan approval or commencement of the conditional use. The necessary recording of documents will be required prior to alcohol service. APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned B-2M (Community Business - Mixed). The intent and purposes of the commercial zoning districts are to establish areas within the City that are primarily commercial in character and to set forth certain minimum standards for development within those areas. The intent of the B-2M community business district-mixed is to function as a vibrant mixed-use district that accommodates substantial growth and enhances the character of the city. This district provides for a range of commercial uses that serve both the immediate area and the broader trade area and encourages the integration of multi-household residential as a secondary use. Design standards emphasizing pedestrian oriented design are important elements of this district. Use of this zone is appropriate for arterial corridors, commercial nodes and/or areas served by transit. 230 18422 and 18423 Staff Report for the Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Page 21 of 21 Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as “Community Commercial Mixed Use” in the Bozeman Community Plan. Community Commercial Mixed Use has several elements with which this project complies due to the proposed site: • Integration with significant transportation corridors, including transit and non-automotive routes, to facilitate efficient travel opportunities; • Placed in proximity to significant streets and intersections, an equal emphasis on vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit circulation shall be provided; and • Location on one or two quadrants of intersections of arterials and/or collectors. • Residences on upper floors • Mixed use areas should be developed in an integrated, pedestrian friendly manner and should not be overly dominated by any single land use APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Noticing has been provided pursuant to Section 38.220.420, BMC in advance of the City Commission hearing. No public comment has been received for this application. If public comment is received prior to the City Commission public hearing, it will be forwarded to the City Commission members. APPENDIX C – OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner/Applicant: William and Karen Ruh, 439 Cranleigh Court, San Ramon, CA 94583 Representatives: Luke Stein, C&H Engineering & Surveying, Inc., 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Jesse Sobrepena, JDS Architects Inc., 719 West Mendenhall, Bozeman, MT 59715 Chad Rempfer, 3084 Thorpe Rd, Belgrade, MT 59714 Report By: Addi Jadin, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. 231 A1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: Project type(s): Description: Street address: Zip code: Zoning: Gross lot area: Block frontage: Number of buildings: Type and Number of dwellings: Non-residential building size(s): (in stories) Non-residential building height(s): Number of parking spaces: Affordable housing (Y/N): Cash in lieu of parkland (Y/N): VICINITY MAP CITY USE ONLY Submittal date: Application file number: Planner: DRC required (Y/N): Revision Date: Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS The Ruh Building Site Plan Application Proposed Residential/Business Building 605 N. 7th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 B2-M 0.6421 Acres or 27,972 SF Varies 1 16 Dwellings 9,917 sf Footprint 4 Stories 25 N N 232 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 2. APPLICANT Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast North Park None 5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different) for all application types before the submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS Karen & William Ruh 439 Cranleigh Court, San Ramon, California 94583 (703) 919-9608 kangruh2@gmail.com Same as Owner C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718 (406) 587-1115 lstein@chengineers.com 233 234 A1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: Project type(s): Description: Street address: Zip code: Zoning: Gross lot area: Block frontage: Number of buildings: Type and Number of dwellings: Non-residential building size(s): (in stories) Non-residential building height(s): Number of parking spaces: Affordable housing (Y/N): Cash in lieu of parkland (Y/N): VICINITY MAP CITY USE ONLY Submittal date: Application file number: Planner: DRC required (Y/N): Revision Date: Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS The Ruh Building Conditional Use Permit Proposed Residential/Business Building 605 N. 7th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 B2-M 0.6421 Acres or 27,972 SF Varies 1 16 Dwellings 9,917 sf Footprint 4 Stories 25 N N 235 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 2. APPLICANT Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast North Park None 5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different) for all application types before the submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS Karen & William Ruh 439 Cranleigh Court, San Ramon, California 94583 (703) 919-9608 kangruh2@gmail.com Same as Owner C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc. 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, Montana 59718 (406) 587-1115 lstein@chengineers.com 236 237 1 September 4, 2018 City of Bozeman Community Development 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: Ruh Building CUP Application Narrative To whom it may concern: The proposed multipurpose building will include two floors of residential apartments and one floor of commercial space along with open space on one side of building and on the rooftop area. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate the building, parking, yards (open space), fences, loading, and landscaping to properly relate to the commercial land uses in the vicinity. The proposed brewery production portion of the project totals 1,477 s.f. and is located to the west of the project facing the west parking lot. The production of the beer requires delivery of materials once or twice every month by a large box truck during business hours. The brewery serving areas are located on the ground level, south side, and rooftop. There will be no material adverse effect upon the abutting commercial properties, including sound or smell. It’s our opinion that when complete the project and site improvements will have a significant positive effect on all adjacent properties in the area. We also feel the project sets a new precedence for the North 7th area that is greatly needed. There are no special conditions of approval required to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Jesse Sobrepena, AIA JDS Architects, Inc. 238 3124561011121314151416101718252525222222222222241323232319201920211920978292626111229Ø4'-6"Ø4' - 6 "HSS239 HSS 4“ø SDR35 PVC2727240 HSS 2725241 252525252525292829HSS 242 6 0 5 N o r t h S e v e n t h192019202119201234605 North SeventhR U H B U I L D I N G252525345610111211121314151416101718243 6 0 5 N o r t h S e v e n t h605 North SeventhR U H B U I L D I N G2525252525252525252323231322222222222224244 STATUS:JOB NO.:CHECKED:DRAWN:Copyright © 2018 719 W. MENDENHALL ST.BOZEMAN MONTANA 59715PHONE: 406-556-8080FAX: 406-585-1677JESSE@JDSARCHITECTSBOZEMAN.COMJDSARCHITECTSBOZEMAN.COM605 N. 7TH AVE, BOZEMAN, MONTANA2/4/2019AuthorCheckerPRELIMINARYA4RUH BUILDINGEXTERIOR PERSPECTIVESSW VIEWREVISION SCHEDULENO: DESCRIPTION:DATE: BY:S SIDEWALKSE VIEWNE VIEW245 246 247