Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16521 Neighborhood indicators Memo to PB 2-19-19 TO: PLANNING BOARD FROM: TOM ROGERS RE: GROWTH POLICY UPDATE – DISTRICT AND NEIGHBORHOOD INDICATORS OR BOUNDARIES DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2019 Tanya Andreasen will present the City’s Neighborhoods program on the evening of February 19 and generally describe the programs intent and purpose and ongoing activities. Following this summary staff will ask each of you to create a map illustrating your personal impression of Bozeman neighborhoods and districts. Staff will provide a number of data sets to inform your decisions. The Planning Board has discussed neighborhoods as a concept and planning tool to integrate and implement the community plan. In addition, the Bozeman Strategic Plan (New Interactive Strategic Plan web site) includes specific references to districts and centers. Three of the proposed seven community plan vision themes are directly related to this concept. The Board’s focus on land use and the plan align with the notion of neighborhood plans to more accurately reflect the City’s character. The Strategic Plan:  An Engaged Community  Well Planned City Proposed Vision Themes:  The shape of the city  A city of neighborhoods  A city bolstered by downtown and complementary districts This exercise is informal use only at this time. Although no formal action will result staff will continue this activity by requesting key individuals from many city departments to describe how they would define our neighborhoods and districts. The departments include Engineering, Planning, Park and Recreation, Finance, Economic Development, Parking, Neighborhoods, and selected members of the organized neighborhoods. Upon completion staff will report back to the Planning Board with these different perspectives. This memo is purposefully vague on details in an effort to initiate the conversation and allow you an opportunity to create your own metrics for determining boundaries and how the City or community member’s could use this as a tool to implementing the community plan and measuring its efficacy. The following characteristics and consideration may be employed to develop criteria on how to determine an appropriate boundary for a district or Neighborhood. This is not an exhaustive list, only a starting point.  Arterial and collector streets  Schools  Historic structures or features  Sewer/water system  Fire service areas  Character  Parks, trails, and open space  Quadrants. We used the corner of Main and 19th for our online questionnaires  Economic conditions and BID’s, TIFF Districts, etc.  Environmental constraints such as water courses, wetlands, and other natural features Questions the Board might want to consider are as follows: 1. Should the city continue exploring defining the meaning of a districts and neighborhoods? 2. Should the city consider using defined districts and neighborhoods as a tool for: a) Communication and public engagement in governance, b) Character preservation or creation, c) Economic diversification d) Determining future and use designation and zoning classification, or e) Other consideration The City hosts a wide variety of data on our Community Development Viewer. Please take a few moments before the meeting and refresh your knowledge of the available data we could consider when determining a neighborhood or district boundary. A direct link to the viewer is HERE. Additional data is hosted on the Public Works viewer. These data sets include water, sewer, drainage basins, transportation, and others. Please click HERE for the public works data viewer. An example is shown in Figure 2 below. Attachments: additional maps of other districts Figure 1 – Existing neighborhoods Figure 2 – Public works viewer example