Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19014 Application Materials BOZE MAN MT Al Community Development DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE F.NHIRITA / GRO%1T POLIO 11\P A\I—XIENA I.OI I OF NO:OR SO111311ISION W ATIIi(-T OF I_\NDSITOATFn IN TIIF.NF.I.OF SLS ON BM IUL P1I3 I -- CITY OF IIOZF_N\N,(:.AUATIN COI\_n,11T 1/6 r� s — PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP Project name: COS 235 Lot 1 Growth Policy Amendment Project type(s): Growth Policy Map Amendment Description: Change Land Use from BP to Residential © a ••�•�» " Montano LAC SCAIXx�� ILtJ'Ill°^' 6 Lincoln Rd. State Street address: 3747 S 19th Avenue(lot 1 Minor Sub 235) �'` university 104t I 1 Zip code: 59718 ,.I<agy Blvd. j Zoning: Current-Business Park. Proposed-RO ! Gross lot area: 20.18 sty Rd. `- Block frontage: Landscaped1 �; •i Number of buildings: none UuT __ i n Type and Number of dwellings: N/AI Non-residential building size(s): NSA rRo)Ecr LOCATION Non-residential building height(s): NSA (in stories) — Number of parking spaces: N/A - r- Affordable housing(Y/N): N/A Cash in lieu of parkland(Y/N): N/A i CITY USE ONLY Submittal date: Planner: Application file number: DRC required(Y/N): Revision Date: Development Review Application Al Page 1 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: G Force 1 Limited Liability Partnership Full address(with zip code): 1320 Manley Road Bozeman MT 59715-8779 Phone: 406 585-0604 Email: susan.gianforte@gmail.com 2. APPLICANT Name: SM Advisory Group attn: Steve Moore Full address(with zip code): 3661 Jagar Lane Bozeman MT 59718 Phone: 406 599-5169 Email: steve@smadvisorygroup.com 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Madison Engineering attn:Chris G Budeski Full address(with zip code): 895 Technology Blvd Suite 203 Bozeman MT 59718 Phone: 406 586-0262 Email: chris@mad-eng.com 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: ❑Neighborhood Conservation x❑None Urban Renewal District: ❑Downtown ❑North 7th Avenue ❑Northeast ❑North Park ®None S. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s)and the property owner(s)(if different)for all application types before the submittal will be accepted.The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s)only. As indicated by the signature(s)below,the applicant(s)and property owner(s)submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project.Further,I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative's access to the subject site during the course of the review process(Section 38.34.050, BMC). I(We)hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance—I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan—I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application Al Page 2 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS Applicant Signatur Printed Name: -Jkl yC oV-e- Owner Signature: Printed Name: 6 ,R �"a H rah z, Owner Signature: Printed Name: If signing as a corporation or LLC,please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation/1-1-C. Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures. 6. APPUCATION TYPES Check all that apply,use noted forms. FORM FORM ❑ 1. Pre-application Consultation Nora ❑ 17. Informal Review INF ❑ 2. Master Site Plan MSP 1318. Zoning Deviation/Departure None ❑ 3. Site Plan SP 1319. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR ❑ 4. Subdivision pre-application PA 1320. Conditional Use Permit CUP ❑ S. Subdivision preliminary plan PP 1321. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP ❑ 6. Subdivision final plan FP ❑22. Special Use Permit SUP ❑ 7. Subdivision exemption SE ❑23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands WR ❑ S. Condominium Review CR 1324. Zone Map Amendment(non-Annexation) ZMA ❑ 9. PUD concept plan PUDC 1325. UDC Text Amendment ZTA ❑ 10. PUD preliminary plan PUDP ®26. Growth Policy Amendment GPA ❑ 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 1327. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD 131.2. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX ❑28. Extension of Approved Plan EXT 1313. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA ❑29. Reasonable Accommodation RA 1314. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA 1330. Comprehensive Sign Plan CSP 1315. Commercial Non-residential COA CCOA ❑ 16. Historic Neighborhood NCOA 1331. Other: Conservation Overlay COA CONTACT US - Alfred M.Stiff Professional Building phone 406582.2260 20 East Olive Street 59715(FED EX and UPS Only) fax 406.582.2263 PO Box 1230 planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,MT 59771 www.bozeman.net Development Review Application Al Page 3 of 3 Revision Date:5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type,PLS GROWTH POLICY MAP AMENDMENT MINOR SUB 235 - LOT 1 APPLICATION NARRATIVE A thorough project narrative including a detailed response to the following: a. Does the proposed amendment cure a deficiency in the growth policy or result in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community? How? Response: Yes, the proposed amendment results in an improved growth policy which better responds to the needs of the general community by allowing the majority of the property to develop as residential. Additional residential development near the university would allow students, faculty and staff to live nearer to the university helping reduce the traffic on already congested city streets. b. Does the proposed amendment create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the map or between goals? Why not? If inconsistencies are identified then additional changes must be provided to remove the inconsistencies. Response: No, the proposed amendment does not create inconsistencies within the growth policy, either between the goals and the map or between goals. The proposed Land Use designation —Residential would create an opportunity for an infill residential development on a property surrounded by Residential, Residential Office and Residential Emphasis Mixed Use designated properties. This property was previously designated as Residential and was changed to Business Park when it was anticipated that Oracle was planning to expand and additional BP zoned property adjacent to their existing campus was needed. This anticipated growth appears to have not materialized. c. Is the proposed amendment consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy? How? Response: Yes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the growth policy by allowing the property to development as a high density residential neighborhood in close proximity to employment opportunities. The property is very near Montana State University, a major Bozeman employer, as well as the Genesis Business Park,which is home to Oracle as well as a numerous small businesses. d. Does the proposed amendment adversely affect the community as a whole or significant portion by: i. Significantly altering acceptable existing and future land use patterns, as defined in the text and maps of the plan? How does it not? Growth Policy Map Amendment Minor Sub 235—Lot 1 Page 1 of 2 Response: No the proposed amendment does not adversely affect the community significantly altering acceptable existing and future land use patterns. The property is surrounded by Residential, Residential Office and Residential Emphasis Mixed Use designated properties. ii. Requiring unmitigated larger and more expensive improvements to streets, water, sewer, or other public facilities or services and which, therefore,may impact development of other lands? How does it not? Response: No the proposed amendment does not require unmitigated larger and more expensive infrastructure improvements which may impact development of other lands. This property was previously designated as Residential and the installation of sewer and water mains that serve this property were sized for the residential designation. In addition, this property will access directly onto South 191h Avenue. iii. Adversely impacting existing uses because of unmitigated greater than anticipated impacts on facilities and services? How does it not? Response: No the proposed amendment will not adversely impact existing uses because of unmitigated greater than anticipated impacts on facilities and services. This property was previously designated as Residential and the installation of sewer and water mains that serve this property were sized for the residential designation. In addition,this property will access directly onto South 191h Avenue. iv. Negatively affecting the livability of the area of the health and safety of residents? How does it not? Response: No the proposed amendment will not negatively affecting the livability of the area of the health and safety of residents. The property is surrounded by Residential, Residential Office and Residential Emphasis Mixed Use designated properties. 2. If text amendment provide language to be removed from the growth policy in strikeout format on the original pages, if new text is proposed provide new text and location to be inserted into the growth policy. Response: This condition is not applicable. The application is a Growth Policy Map Amendment. 3. If map amendment, provide an exhibit of the property to be modified. Provide existing land use designation and the proposed land use designation. The exhibit should include the legal limits of the property and size in square feet and acreage. Response: An exhibit showing the property and legal limits is included in this application. Growth Policy Map Amendment Minor Sub 235—Lot 1 Page 2 of 2 i I II I I I F- 0 I o z � I m z I I • I N D C I ICf11 C 9 � � I i M F- I � v I o� `� - ���� N � m I I ' td Dom ; � ® Fq C- � ® ® Fl, It > � I � — — w — ® � � 333.42 SOUTH 370.44' —CA 00 N C zitz CD O Olt.� 00 C G:\ACAD\2018\18-127 Nexus Point\dwg\Exhibit\GPA Exhibit.dwg ��q�