The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2- 18438 Mountain Vista ZMA Application Materials - combined A1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT IMAGE PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: Project type(s): Description: Street address: Zip code: Zoning: Gross lot area: Block frontage: Number of buildings: Type and Number of dwellings: Non-residential building size(s): (in stories) Non-residential building height(s): Number of parking spaces: Afordable housing (Y/N): Cash in lieu of parkland (Y/N): VICINITY MAP CITY USE ONLY Submittal date: Application fle number: Planner: DRC required (Y/N): Revision Date: Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 2. APPLICANT Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 3. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full address (with zip code): Phone: Email: 4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast North Park None 5. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if diferent) for all application types before the submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Certifcation of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved fnal plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. continued on next page Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date: 5.16.18 REQUIRED FORMS: Varies by project type, PLS ZMA Zone Map Amendment Required Materials ZMA Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 1-26-18 Required Forms: A1, N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: ZONE MAP AMENDMENT REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8½ x 11 or 8½ x 14 sets. This application is only for a proposed zone map amendment to in association with annexation. If an annexation is associated with the map amendment, see form ANNX. Complete and signed development review application form A1. Plan sets that include all items required in the zone map amendment checklist below. Standard application sets required plan sizes: 2 sets that include full size 24 x 36 inch plans 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans 2 digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROM’s or USB drive. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. Notes: All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8½ x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1 and materials. APPLICATION FEE Base fee: $1,888 Plus: $58 per acre ZONE MAP AMENDMENT CRITERIA 1. A thorough project narrative including a detailed response to the following: a. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy? How? b. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? c. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? d. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? e. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? f. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorize and non-motorized transportation systems? How? g. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? h. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? i. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? j. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? k. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? 2. If map amendment, provide an exhibit of the property to be modified. Provide existing zoning designation and the proposed land use designation. The exhibit should include the legal limits of the property and size in square feet and acreage. If adjacent to a right of way the zoning should extend to the centerline of the right of way. METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION #171283– MOONRISE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION 2-1 Metes and Bounds Legal Description DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED R-4 ZONING The Tract of Land Described in Doc. No. 2046120, and the adjacent portion of W. Babcock Street, conveyed to the City of Bozeman according to Document No. 2190840, located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, all described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the Tract of Land Described in Doc. No. 204612; thence northerly 002°07'45", assumed azimuth from north, 285.72 feet along the east line of BABCOCK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PHASE 2; thence easterly 090°50'03" azimuth, 110.00 feet, along the south line of the Tract of Land Described in Doc. No. 2537433; then northerly 002°07'42" azimuth, 149.60 feet along the eastern line of the Tract of Land Described in Doc. No. 2537433 and its northerly extension to the centerline of W. Babcock Street; thence easterly 090°49'51" azimuth, 189.98 feet along the centerline of W. Babcock Street; thence southerly 180°50'03" azimuth, 45.00 feet to the northeast corner of the Tract of Land Described in Doc. No. 2046120; thence southerly 182°02'01" azimuth, 390.13 feet along the west line of BABCOCK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PHASE 1; thence westerly 270°48'04" azimuth, 301.65 feet along the boundary of said BABCOCK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION PHASE 2B, to the Point of Beginning. Area = 114,624 square feet, 2.6314 acres or 10,648.9 square meters. Subject to existing easements. Page 1 of 2 Adjoining Property Owners: S11, T02 S, R05 E, ACRES 2.6, TRACT 24 W2W2NE4SW4 Bozeman, MT WESTLAKE RUSSELL EUGENE 3411 SUMMER CUTOFF RD BOZEMAN, MT 59715-9375 WILLOW SUB, S11, T02 S, R05 E, BLOCK 1, Lot 1, Lot 2, & BLOCK 2, Lot 2 PLAT J-232 NOT CONTIGUOUS MORGAN INVESTMENTS LLC 76 SAKO CT BOZEMAN, MT 59718-8438 TRACT 2 NW4 SEC 11 2S 5E 1.097AC COS 2276 MORGAN ANNEX TO BZN NOT CONTIGUOUS SNYDER PATRICIA ANN PO BOX 534 BOCA RATON, FL 33429-0534 WILLOW SUB, S11, T02 S, R05 E, BLOCK 2, Lot 1, PLAT J-232 NOT CONTIGUOUS TREASURE CANYON LLC 1490 HARPER PUCKETT RD BOZEMAN, MT 59718-8876 WESTGATE SUB, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot1, Lot 2, PLAT J-177 NOT CONTIGUOUS BABCOCK PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 2331 GUERNEVILLE RD SANTA ROSA, CA 95403-4122 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, ACRES 2.41, PARK AREAS IN SW4 NOT CONTIGUOUS LEIBLI THOMAS L & VIRGINIA L 10115 MISSISSIPPI BLVD NW COON RAPIDS, MN 55433-4533 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 40, ACRES 0.19, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS GILKERSON MICHAEL J & LAURA 115 VIRGINIA WAY BOZEMAN, MT 59718-1838 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 39, ACRES 0.18, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS SAVAGE DONOVAN L & JODY L 121 VIRGINIA WAY BOZEMAN, MT 59718-1838 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 38, ACRES 0.176, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS JAGER JOHN HEYWOOD & KAREN KAY 22122 LINDA DR TORRANCE, CA 90503-6257 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 37, ACRES 0.18, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS CAVANAUGH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 7129 N DRUMHELLER ST SPOKANE, WA 99208-5018 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 36, ACRES 0.19, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS SPALDING KIRK A 207 VIRGINIA WAY BOZEMAN, MT 59718-1842 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 35, ACRES 0.17, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS STIFF TONY & JENNIFER 1 ANNETTE PARK DR BOZEMAN, MT 59715-9206 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 34, ACRES 0.16, PLAT J-205 NOT CONTIGUOUS DEMAREE LARRY F & DEBRA K & ANGELA 240 KATHRYN CT BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3660 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 52, ACRES 0.2, PLAT J-314 NOT CONTIGUOUS HOMPESCH ROBIN 234 KATHRYN CT BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3660 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 51, ACRES 0.25, PLAT J-314 NOT CONTIGUOUS DRAB STEVEN F & CHRISTA J 228 KATHRYN CT BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3660 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 50, ACRES 0.25, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS LITTLE JOSEPH W 222 KATHRYN CT BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3660 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 49, ACRES 0.23, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS BENNETT JOHN D & KAREN P 216 LILLIAN WAY BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3659 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 48, ACRES 0.3, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS Page 2 of 2 CHIUCHIOLO AMY 208 DONNA AVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3662 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 47, ACRES 0.2, PLAT J-314 NOT CONTIGUOUS BECKER ANDREW E & KATIE C 202 DONNA AVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3662 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 46, ACRES 0.22, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS FRENCH JOHN BRADLEY 3325 W BABCOCK ST BOZEMAN, MT 59718-2684 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 45, ACRES 0.21, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS TOMLINSON JACOB 128 DONNA AVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718-3664 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 44, ACRES 0.18, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS MONTEE TIMOTHY S & TAMI J 44 HITCHING POST RD BOZEMAN, MT 59715-9241 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 43, ACRES 0.16, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS ADSEM DUANE E 1201 HIGHLAND BLVD APT A107 BOZEMAN, MT 59715-5906 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 42, ACRES 0.15, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS LELEVIER BERNADETTE 25450 SW NEWLAND RD WILSONVILLE, OR 97070-9776 BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 2B, S11, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 41, ACRES 0.19, PLAT J-314 CONTIGUOUS ZIMMERMAN ROBIN 3006 W BABCOCK ST BOZEMAN, MT 59718-2650 S11, T02 S, R05 E, ACRES 0.297, TR C AS DESIG ON ASSR'S PLATS W2W2NE4SW4 BEING 110' X 150' LESS RW CONTIGUOUS G:\c&h\18\180334\Zone Map Amendment\City Adjoiners -180334.doc 8,5340.3 Miles This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Feet 9940 Legend 497 Location 994 C&H Engineering and Surveying 09/10/2018 Created By: Created For: Date: Vicinity Map - Mountain Vista ZMA Street Names City Limits honesty integrity solutions 115 east oak street bozeman montana 59715 www.arch118.com November 7, 2018 City of Bozeman Department of Community Development 20 East Olive Street Bozeman, MT 59771 Re: Mountain Vista Zone Map Amendment – 2928 West Babcock Street, Bozeman, MT We believe the proposed zone change is in accordance with the City’s goals of diverse, affordable-income housing types, and infill. A slightly higher density at this site; which has good vehicular access (Babcock, collector street), immediate adjacency to recreational trail (access to Bozeman Pond) and nearby community services (Gallatin Valley Mall and other services along Main Street/Huffine); will not detrimentally affect the existing neighborhood and community fabric. The applicant intends to build apartments on the parcel that will be more affordable for those with moderate incomes. There is no current plan to subdivide this parcel due to the size and shape of the property. The proposed Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) is therefore needed. Recognizing the subjective nature of the questions below, our interpretation of the discussion at the October 22, 2018 City Commission meeting, and the understanding that support is needed for a ZMA, we offer the following for consideration. We hope the Planning Department agrees with our opinions and is supportive of this request. A thorough project narrative including a detailed response to the following: a. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy? How? i Yes. Figure 3-1 (revised 6/1/09) of the Bozeman Community Plan (BCP) identifies the future land use as Residential. Proposal is to amend from R-2 (residential moderate density) to R-4 (residential high density). Currently, the parcel is surrounded by R-3 (residential medium density), so the request for R-4 is a reasonable increase while supporting infill and greater density goals. We agree that Bozeman’s “sense of place will be strengthened through development which fills in existing gaps” (BCP page 3-3), and the intent of the project is aligned with this goal. As identified on BCP page 3-6, “Infill development….is preferred.” Further, “as our community’s population changes our housing supply must also change to accommodate it” (BCP page 6-1). This proposal specifically addresses the Housing Goal Objective 1.3, Objective 2.1, Objective 2.3, Objective 3.1, and Objective 3.3 (BCP pages 6-3 thru 6-4). It is also uniquely located to address the majority (if not all) of the desirable attributes identified in the 2007 citizen panels on BCP page 6-5. b. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? i Yes. No significant changes to existing safety or other dangers will occur due to the proposed amendment. As an infill site, the project will be subject to latest fire and community safety development requirements. Site is within 1 mile of Fire Station #2 and 1.5 mile of Station #3. It is readily accessible via Babcock Street. c. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? i Yes. No significant changes to existing public health, safety, or welfare will occur due to the proposed amendment. However, increased density adjacent to the recreation trail increases the access potential. Site is within walking/biking distance to existing recreational areas (Bozeman Pond and Kirk Park). The property is directly serviced by a collector street (Babcock Street). Future traffic from the property is anticipated to access directly to this collector street and will not be routed through local residential neighborhoods. honesty integrity solutions 115 east oak street bozeman montana 59715 www.arch118.com d. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? i Yes. No significant change to facilitation of adequate transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements will occur due to the proposed amendment. As a relatively small infill site, major improvements to existing infrastructure, schools, parks, etc are not anticipated. City of Bozeman water and sanitary sewer mains have been stubbed into the property and will be extended to service the future proposed development. Babcock Street (collector street) is readily accessible along the north end of the property. e. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? i Yes. No significant change to adequate light and air will occur due to the proposed amendment. Increased density on the site will be designed in accordance with the latest development and building codes. f. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorize and non-motorized transportation systems? How? i Yes. An increased potential density will have a minor impact on the existing motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. However, minor impacts to these existing systems is favorable compared to needing new systems in outlying greenfield areas. g. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? i Yes. The proposed R-4 designation is compatible with the adjacent R-3 zoning and a higher-density housing type in this location promotes the urban growth as identified in the BCP (see question (a.) above). h. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? i Yes. The proposed R-4 designation is compatible with the surrounding R-3 zoning. The character of the district will be in accordance with the latest development and building codes. Nearby development includes Manufactured Homes, Apartment Buildings, and Single Family Residences. The intent of the project is to enhance and supplement the character of the neighborhood. We believe a change in zoning, by itself, will not affect the character; however through context-sensitive and context-compatible improvements the neighborhood character evolves and is enhanced. i. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? i Yes. As an infill site surrounded mostly by R-3 zoning, the location is suitable for increased density. j. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? i Yes. No significant change to the values of buildings will occur due to the proposed amendment. It is anticipated nearby property values (1980’s & early 1990’s development) will increase as new development replaces an aged home and garage/shop. k. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? i We believe an R-4 zoning designation, increase density, diverse housing types, and affordable housing within the existing jurisdictional area is appropriate. Sincerely, Scott Hedglin, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP Principal, Architecture118 Montana License #2635 t