Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-05-18 Protest - T. and V. Leibli - Mountain Vista Zone Map Amendment December 5, 2018 PAft• �a—lam—i 8 $S Thomas L. Leibli Virginia L. Leibli 10115 Mississippi Blvd.NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 City of Bozeman Department of Community Development P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Bozeman City Clerk 121 North Rouse Avenue P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Subject: Application Number 18-438 Proposed Zoning Change from R2 to R4 Regarding the property located at the legal description of. Tract 24 located in the W %2 of the W '/2 of the NE '/4 of the SW 1/4of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, 59715. Owner: Glen Haven Properties Inc. Dear City of Bozeman: Regarding description of the action protested: My wife and I are against the rezoning of the property listed on application number 18-438 from R2 to R4 with the following Legal description: Tract 24 located in the W %of the W '/2 of the NE '/4 of the SW 1/4of Section 11, Township 2 South,Range 5 East,P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, 59715 Regarding statement of owners' qualifications: Regarding ownership of property affected: My wife and I own the house and property at 109 Virginia Way,Bozeman, Montana 59715. The description of our property is taken from the Gallatin County records: Geo Code: 06-0798-I1-3-54-03-0000 Deed Book: 2195 Page: 651D Date: 2005-07-26 Property address: 109 VIRGINIA WAY,BOZEMAN MT 59715 Subdivision: (BB1)Babcock Meadows Subdivision Phase 1 Lot: 40 TRS: T02 S, R05 E, Sec. 11 Legal: BABCOCK MEADOWS SUB PH 1, S11,T02 S, R05 E,Lot 40, ACRES 0.19, PLAT J-205 Regarding ownership of property requesting the zoning change from R2 to R4: The property in question is owned by Glen Haven Properties Inc. The change of zoning is under application Number 18-438. Application Number 18-438 Zoning Change from R2 to R4 Regarding the property located at the legal description of. Tract 24 located in the W '/2 of the W '/z of the NE '/4 of the SW 1/4of Section 11,Township 2 South,Range 5 East,P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, 59715. Owner: Glen Haven Properties Inc. Page 2 of 2 December 5, 2018 Regarding how this zoning change may affect our future: We bought our 109 Virginia Way home in 2005 with the intention of making this our retirement home sometime in the future. We checked on zoning, and all of the other things that go into purchasing a home. The location is great and is close to shopping; the university;the downtown and has a reasonably good view of the mountains and sunsets. Changing the zoning from R2 to R4 puts are future plans into question. As we understand it R4 zoning applies to high density applications such as townhouses and apartments. We think going from R2 to R3 fits in better with the neighborhood in all respects and is more desirable regarding our retirement future and property value. Possible high density apartments tend to draw short term folks such as students and others. We don't think these folks have a vested interest in the future of Bozeman whereas we do. We also understand this board decision is only about a zoning change with no mention of the scope of the project. So it could be anything, but we think and assume that high density apartments are planned because of the high cost of land, etc. We think that by now the property owner has an idea of what is planned if the zoning change is truly granted. By the way I retired from the State of Minnesota,Mn/DOT,where I helped designed roads and highways. At one time our roadway design criteria showed minimum design values; maximum design values and desirable design values. Desirable design values seemed to go out the window as things such as right of way, politics and land values became the constraining criteria rather than good design practices. We don't want to see this happen to the City of Bozeman, but we already see it here and there throughout the City. I also reviewed a city's 20 year comprehensive plan for compliance. Most of the time these plans were good plans and addressed the future growth of the city, but this was not always the case. I want the City of Bozeman to succeed rather than be constrained by politics and developer's wishes that go against the future growth of the city. Sincerely, c Thomas L. Leibli ` Virginia L.Leibli Enc. 0 Cc: File