Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-10-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Approve the General Fund CIP for FY 2020-2024 Commission Memorandum REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director SUBJECT: Approval of the General Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action MEETING DATE: December 10, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the General Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 as presented under Plan B. BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a multi-year Capital Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The City’s General Fund portion of the CIP contains, by far, the greatest number of capital items and pays for a broad range of departmental needs. During the months of October, November, and December numerous staff meetings have taken place to develop this recommended plan. The plan includes capital items from 11 different departments in the General Fund. Strategic Plan: This plan includes numerous items that help support and accomplish the goals of the City’s adopted Strategic Plan. • The Lasher Fiche upgrade, GF337, will aid in our efforts to 1.1 b Dramatically increase transparency and create access to all city documents. This project is scheduled in FY21. 240 • The plan requests $25,000 a year for fiber optic conduit and vaults, GF275, this is an investment into broadband infrastructure taking a step towards 2.2 a Identify Commercial/Industrial Infrastructure needs. • 3.1 a Develop a Criminal Justice Facility Plan and 3.1 c Implement the Fire Station Location Plan- Last year there were four scheduled projects in the plan that had an estimated combined cost of over $57 million, representing 85% of the total scheduled costs. The largest of the projects was GF263 – Law & Justice Center, costing what was estimated at the time to be $30 Million. The third-largest project was GF306 – Fire Station 1’s replacement, estimated to cost $6.5 Million. This fall, City voters approved bonds in the amount of $36.9 Million for construction of the Bozeman Public Safety Center, a combined Justice/Fire Station Headquarters building. Because funding has been approved, we are removing these two items from the CIP. Any budget amendments or other approvals that may be necessary for the construction of the facility will be brought to the Commission as they arise. Fire Station 2 relocation remains in this plan for FY23. • FY20 includes the second payment for radio leases for the Police Department (with Gallatin County) as part of 3.1 d Update Public Safety Technology Systems. • 3.4 Active Recreation- There are many projects in the plan that encourage and promote active recreation such as the proposed aquatics/recreation center, GF056. We have several park amenities proposed with splashpads and pickleball courts in the plan. • 7.3 b System Integration and 7.4 a Develop Data Analysis Tools – The proposed Applicant tracing tool , GF 288, will integrate with our current Human Resource Information Systems and will help us track data and information regarding our applicants. • We have proposed the creation of a Parks and Trails Maintenance District that works towards 4.3 a Develop a Comprehensive Parks Maintenance Facilities Funding Program that would provide funding for Parks’ capital needs. o The proposal of the Parks and Trails Maintenance District is way for us to have a sustainable funding source for our parks to continue our efforts to 7.5 Funding and Delivery of City Services. 241 • This year we worked towards item 7.1 b Create a Culture of Innovation by changing our CIP database system for project tracking and plan development. We are now using our citywide budgeting system’s project module for all CIP items. This will make it easier to merge approved projects into the recommended budget, begin tracking projects in their initial stages, and give us increased project cost reporting. The change has resulted in a different report “look-and-feel,” and we are working to evolve and refine how the CIP reports appear. • 7.1 b Create a Culture of Innovation - we are also recommending that we continue to innovate the plan for next year by increasing the CIP threshold from its current level of $10,000 to a new minimum level of $25,000. Currently, the $10,000 threshold causes many maintenance and other operational budget items to be included in the capital plan. For the FY21 to FY25 CIP we recommend using a $25,000 threshold. This will align us with best practices and allow us to make better capital decisions by focusing on true capital items and less maintenance and operational expenses. Capital Plan Funding Options: Last year, the CIP included a plan to fund Parks capital with a separate Maintenance District beginning in FY20. Parks department scheduled capital will be moved to a separate Parks and Trails Maintenance District Fund CIP upon the successful creation of a District. You will see in the Financial Summary were we adjust the General Fund CIP Project costs by the amount of Parks capital for all the years of the plan. We do not reduce General Fund revenues in those years; we will need the current (and slightly increasing) revenues to continue to pay for General Fund capital in the future. When we began updating the CIP this year, we saw the need to develop a couple of scenarios: • Plan A follows the concept proposed last year where the City creates a Parks and Trails Maintenance District in the winter and spring of 2019 so that assessments can be collected in FY20. • Plan B allows an additional year for the Parks and Trails Maintenance District creation with assessments collected in FY21. • Plan C show the effects of not creating a Parks and Trails Maintenance District. 242 Plan A: Similar to the CIP that was approved last year, this plan includes creation of the District in FY19, so that the first year of assessments (funding) could occur in FY20. In order to deliver on Plan A, work needs to begin on District creation procedures immediately this January/February. The following would be the required timeline with significant public education efforts beginning in March: DEPARTMENT FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Unscheduled CEMETERY 45,000 118,000 - 128,000 412,000 - CITY ATTORNEY - - - 22,085 - - CITY COMMISION - - - - - 60,000 CITY CLERK - 57,000 - - - - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 93,500 55,000 139,845 330,000 80,000 5,816,000 FINANCE - 60,000 - - - 333,000 FIRE - - - 4,500,000 - - HUMAN RESOURCES - 30,000 - - - - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 177,000 256,000 142,000 221,000 140,000 - PARKS 781,000 260,000 706,000 697,000 332,000 2,895,000 POLICE 511,000 222,000 240,000 182,000 303,000 1,117,000 RECREATION 96,580 339,000 19,094,300 360,400 75,388 - TOTAL 1,729,080 1,422,000 20,347,145 6,465,485 1,367,388 10,221,000 243 January 1. Direction on Vote or Protest. 2. Potential Direction on Initial Budget Development for FY20 General Fund, assuming passage. 3. Discussion on Waivers of Right to Protest collected for the past 20 years. Mid-Feb Policy Discussion: 4. Consultant Presentation on: a. Costs of Silver Level of Service b. Staffing Recommendations c. Implementation Strategies/Phasing of District Operations/Capital plans. 5. Decision on General Fund FY20 Budget reduction/offset March 6. Preparing documentation for District Creation 7. Plan, create, and begin public education efforts District Creation with Protest Period: Public Hearing on District Creation – April 1st Resolution of Intent to Create District – April 15th Creation & Protest Notices mailed to every property owner in City - April 19th Creation & Protest Notice Publish April 21st Start of Protest Period – April 22th Customer service answering public’s questions about Creation & Protest Validation and Tabulation of Protests Received. End of Protest Period – June 24th This timeline will challenge staff capacity to have the District formed in time for FY20 assessments. In addition, the recent educational efforts of the Bozeman Public Safety Center and public engagements for community planning efforts, another city-wide effort might be a challenge for the public to absorb. 244 Plan B: If, for whatever reason, the District is not created in time for FY20 assessments, we would need to delay a year and move to Parks and Trails District to be funded in FY21 and beyond. This plan shifts the creation back one year and adjusts projects to accommodate the lessor funding in FY20. The plan delays Parks items one year and other department projects in FY20 and FY21. This is the plan we are recommending, tonight. DEPARTMENT FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Unscheduled CEMETERY 45,000 118,000 - 128,000 412,000 - CITY ATTORNEY - - - 22,085 - - CITY COMMISSION - - - - - 60,000 CITY CLERK - 57,000 - - - - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - - 50,000 50,000 25,000 - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 33,500 45,000 156,845 348,000 80,000 5,816,000 FINANCE - - 60,000 - - 333,000 FIRE - - - 4,500,000 - - HUMAN RESOURCES - 30,000 - - - - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 177,000 230,000 168,000 221,000 140,000 - PARKS 333,000 448,000 260,000 706,000 697,000 3,227,000 POLICE 458,000 275,000 240,000 182,000 303,000 1,117,000 RECREATION 37,080 339,000 19,094,300 360,400 75,388 - TOTAL 1,083,580 1,542,000 20,029,145 6,517,485 1,732,388 10,553,000 245 Plan C: In the case of non-passage or a shift in priorities, we designed a plan that removed the District funding entirely. This delayed many items in the plan, or moved them to unscheduled. DEPARTMENT FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Unscheduled CEMETERY 45,000 118,000 - 18,000 412,000 110,000 CITY ATTORNEY - - - - - 22,085 CITY COMMMISSION - - - - - 60,000 CITY CLERK - 57,000 - - - - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - - - - - - FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 93,500 40,000 154,845 80,000 80,000 6,066,000 FINANCE - - - - - 333,000 FIRE - - - 4,500,000 - 60,000 HUMAN RESOURCES - - - 30,000 - - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 177,000 256,000 142,000 195,000 140,000 26,000 PARKS 344,000 46,000 164,000 697,000 332,000 4,420,000 POLICE 511,000 222,000 240,000 182,000 303,000 1,117,000 RECREATION 96,580 194,000 19,074,300 40,100 75,388 485,300 TOTAL 1,267,080 933,000 19,775,145 5,742,100 1,342,388 12,699,385 246 Summary of Unscheduled Projects: The unscheduled amount varies slightly between Plan A and B, and changes dramatically with Plan C. The largest single unscheduled project is GF219 – Addition to City Hall, Consolidation of Services estimated at $5.5 Million. This item remains unscheduled in all versions (Plan A, B, C.) This has been discussed as a project that would be needed within the 6-10 year timeframe. Refer to the attached CIP schedule for the details of other unscheduled projects. Items of particular note that are in all three plans: Timing of voter-based initiatives are highlighted in orange in the attached Financial Summary: • Aquatics Facility & Projects – GF056 and GF137 have been on the plan and would require a voter approved levy and bond issuance in FY22. • Fire Station #2 Relocation – GF305 was also recommended in the Fire Master Plan. Similar to Station #1, it is likely we would be selling the existing site to reduce the costs of the new station. The value of the current site is not known, but could be determined at a future date. We have also not included any amounts from the Fire Equipment and Capital Replacement Fund for this project, which we could consider. This project is planned for FY23. In order to continue to make the necessary improvements and equipment purchases, we need to make increased funding available for capital projects in the General Fund. Plan A and B makes a 3-pronged recommendation, that will make more money available for projects. While Plan C does not include the second recommendation: 1 Increased borrowing: The planned voter-approved bonds, as discussed above. 2 The Park Maintenance District, if created, is funded by a separate assessment without decreasing the General Fund revenue dedicated to capital. 3 Annual General Fund Revenues available for Capital Improvements have been increased to 3% in FY20, and to 3.5% in FY21. In order to accomplish this and actually fund the capital projects listed, we will need to prioritize capital projects ahead of the growth of the other portions of the General Fund budget going forward. 247 UNRESOLVED ISSUES: The possible creation of a Park Maintenance District and the timing of the creation. ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not wish to adopt a schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda. FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for FY20. Projects and equipment purchases can only be made after being included in an Approved Budget. Report compiled on: November 30, 2018 Attached: General Fund CIP Plan A General Fund CIP Plan B General Fund CIP Plan C General Fund CIP Project Listing Per Plan B General Fund CIP Unscheduled Listing Per Plan B 248 General Fund ‐ Plan ACapital Improvement PlanFinancial Summary Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24UnscheduledProjected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP ‐$                     ‐$                          58,961$               81,457$               580,503$             474,418$               Plus:  General Fund Revenues Dedicated to CIP 1,313,217$          967,041$                 1,139,496$          1,150,891$          1,162,400$          1,174,024$           ‐$                 Plus:  GF286 ‐ Veterans Cemetery Project ‐ Reserve Used 88,000$               40,000$                   45,000$              Plus: Intercap loan GF260 and GF261 431,500$            Plus:  Bond Issue:  GF306 Fire Station 24,500,000              Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue:  GF056 Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Facility  17,490,000$       Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue: GF137 Swim Center/ GF238 Bogert    1,499,300$         Less:  Scheduled CIP Project Costs (1,832,717)$        (1,729,080)$             (1,422,000)$        (20,347,145)$      (6,465,485)$        (1,367,388)$        (10,221,933)$        Creation of Citywide Park Maint Dist. CIP projects moved to own fundCreation 781,000$                260,000$            706,000$            697,000$            332,000$             2,895,000$    Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP‐$                     58,961$                   81,457$               580,503$             474,418$             613,054$                Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Estimated Annual General Fund Revenues31,915,530$       31,915,530$           32,234,685$       32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$         Estimated Growth in General Fund Revenues 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%Total Estimated General Fund Revenues 31,915,530$       32,234,685$           32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$       33,543,543$       Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %2.6%2.6%3.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%  Plus:  Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 1.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  Total % Dedicated to CIP**4.1% 3.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP**1,313,217$         967,041$                1,139,496$         1,150,891$         1,162,400$         1,174,024$          ** 2019 had one time revenues used for capital itemsProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(1,729,080)$(1,422,000)$(20,347,145)$(6,465,485)$(1,367,388)$(10,221,933)FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 UNSCHEDULEDPLAN A ‐ GENERAL FUND  PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT249 Project #Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 GF010 CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS ‐ 18,000               ‐ 18,000               ‐  GF083 CEMETERY BACKHOE        ‐ 110,000              GF116 CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT     52,000                GF252 CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS    55,000                GF268 SW MT VETERAN'S CEMETERY 45,000               45,000               360,000              45,000               118,000             ‐ 128,000             412,000              GF337 HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM   ‐ 22,085                ‐ ‐ ‐ 22,085               ‐  GF284 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE UPGRADE       ‐ 57,000                ‐ 57,000               ‐ ‐ ‐  GF275 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS 25,000               25,000               25,000               25,000               25,000                25,000               25,000               25,000               25,000               25,000                GF103 FACILITIES ADA COMPLIANCE 10,000               10,000               10,000               10,000               10,000                GF157 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR   74,700                GF245 ENERGY PROJECTS   CITY HALL     100,000              GF272 SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 15,000               15,000               18,000                GF274 CITY HALL BOZ CREEK IMPRV 33,500                GF303 CITY HALL EXPANSION ‐ 150,000              GF323 STIFF BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT ‐ 37,145                GF324 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 35,000                GF325 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE 35,000               35,000                GF326 DEPARTMENT ATV SNOW PLOW 15,000                GF327 LEASE PAYOFF OF VEHICLE 15,000                GF328 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT  35,000                GF329 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT   35,000                93,500               55,000               139,845             330,000             80,000                GF308 FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL 60,000                ‐ 60,000               ‐ ‐ ‐  GF305 FIRE STATION 2 RELOCATION 4,500,000          ‐ ‐ ‐4,500,000         ‐  GF288 APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM     30,000                ‐ 30,000               ‐ ‐ ‐  GF062 PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) RE 50,000               65,000               75,000               80,000               65,000                GF080 CITY‐WIDE SWITCHES&ROUTRS 50,000               50,000               55,000               55,000               55,000                GF233 IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT   ‐ 26,000               26,000                GF265 SERVER REPLACEMENT GF    20,000               48,000               20,000               20,000                GF289 SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES     35,000               35,000                GF310 APC REPLACE  FOR DATA CEN 12,000               12,000               12,000                GF311 COOLING SYSTEM FOR CHALL ‐ 20,000                GF312 ISCI FLASH UPGRADE CHALL 10,000                GF313 POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE 40,000                177,000             256,000             142,000             221,000             140,000              INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY  Department Subtotal Department Subtotal CITY CLERK           Department Subtotal ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Department Subtotal FACILITIES MANAGEMENT     Department Subtotal FINANCE Department Subtotal FIRE Department Subtotal HUMAN RESOURCES           Department Subtotal PLAN A  CEMETERY Department Subtotal CITY ATTORNEY             250 Project # Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 GF031 PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT    ‐                     150,000              GF034 LARGE DECK MOWER    58,000                60,000               110,000              GF084 PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES  34,000                GF092 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      ‐                     105,000              95,000               120,000              120,000              GF108 PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS         120,000              88,000                GF115 PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 30,000                30,000                30,000                55,000                32,000                GF190 4‐WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT 16,000                GF250 SPLASH PADS         300,000              300,000              GF254 25TH STREET FROM OAK TO TSCHACHE 333,000              GF260 SPORTS PARK INFRASTRUCTURE ‐                     364,000              GF291 PICKLEBALL COURTS             90,000                GF317 SYTHETIC TURF GROOMER      11,000                GF318 WATER WHEEL                17,000                GF319 AUTOMATED  MOWER BLADE GRINDER   17,000                GF320 UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE    11,000                10,000                GF322 750 AIR COMPRESSOR       70,000                781,000              260,000              706,000              697,000              332,000              GF052 UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT 30,000                GF053 PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 171,000              118,000              180,000              122,000              124,000              GF166 COUNTY RADIO LEASE        295,000              GF292 MOBILE DATA EQUIP         30,000                30,000                30,000                30,000                30,000                GF293 NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES   15,000                15,000                30,000                GF294 PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL   59,000                62,000                GF309 REPLACMENT K9 DOG                  17,000                GF316 POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM 70,000                511,000              222,000              240,000              182,000              303,000              GF056 AQUATICS/RECREATION CENTER 106,000              17,490,000        GF137 SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY    987,300              GF140 LINDLEY PARKING LOT RESURFACING 75,388                GF209 LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE     320,300              GF238 BOGERT POOL RENOVATION    512,000              GF296 SWIM CENTER   FRONT FURNACE     37,080                GF299 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT   32,500                GF300 SMCC GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT  ‐                     110,000              GF301 STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT    60,000                GF302 PASSENGER VAN                   35,000                GF331 SMCC GYM LIGHTING UPGRADE   ‐                      11,000                GF332 SMCC DOOR REPLACEMENT   17,000                GF333 SMCC GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM  50,000                GF334 SMCC MEETING ROOM  RENOVATION   55,000                GF335 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    27,000                GF336 SMCC HVAC SYSTEM  40,100                96,580               339,000              19,094,300        360,400              75,388                1,729,080        1,422,000        20,347,145     6,465,485        1,367,388        RECREATION                Department Subtotal General Fund Totals PARKS                     Department Subtotal POLICE                    Department Subtotal 251 General Fund ‐ Plan BCapital Improvement PlanFinancial Summary Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24UnscheduledProjected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP ‐$                     ‐$                          (76,539)$              13,957$               385,003$             235,918$               Plus:  General Fund Revenues Dedicated to CIP 1,313,217$          967,041$                 1,139,496$          1,150,891$          1,162,400$          1,174,024$           ‐$                 Plus:  GF286 ‐ Veterans Cemetery Project ‐ Reserve Used 88,000$               40,000$                   45,000$              Plus: Intercap loan GF260 and GF261 431,500$            Plus:  Bond Issue:  GF306 Fire Station 24,500,000              Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue:  GF056 Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Facility  17,490,000$       Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue: GF137 Swim Center/ GF238 Bogert    1,499,300$         Less:  Scheduled CIP Project Costs (1,832,717)$        (1,083,580)$             (1,542,000)$        (20,029,145)$      (6,517,485)$        (1,732,388)$        (10,554,933)$        Creation of Citywide Park Maint Dist. CIP projects moved to own fund  Creation 448,000$            260,000$            706,000$            697,000$             3,227,000$    Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP‐$                     (76,539)$                  13,957$               385,003$             235,918$             374,554$                Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Estimated Annual General Fund Revenues31,915,530$       31,915,530$           32,234,685$       32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$         Estimated Growth in General Fund Revenues 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%Total Estimated General Fund Revenues 31,915,530$       32,234,685$           32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$       33,543,543$       Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %2.6%2.6%3.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%  Plus:  Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 1.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  Total % Dedicated to CIP**4.1% 3.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP**1,313,217$         967,041$                1,139,496$         1,150,891$         1,162,400$         1,174,024$          ** 2019 had one time revenues used for capital itemsProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(1,083,580)$(1,542,000)$(20,029,145)$(6,517,485)$(1,732,388)$(10,554,933)FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 UNSCHEDULEDPLAN B ‐ GENERAL FUND  PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT252 Project # Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Unscheduled GF010 CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS ‐                  18,000           ‐                     18,000           ‐                  GF083 CEMETERY BACKHOE         ‐                  110,000         GF116 CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT      52,000           GF252 CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS     55,000           GF268 SW MT VETERAN'S CEMETERY  45,000           45,000           360,000         45,000           118,000         ‐                     128,000         412,000         GF337 HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM    ‐                  22,085           ‐                  ‐                  ‐                     22,085           ‐                  GF284 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE UPGRADE         ‐                  57,000           ‐                  57,000           ‐                     ‐                  ‐                  GF275 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS  ‐                  ‐                  50,000               50,000           25,000           ‐                  ‐                  50,000               50,000           25,000           GF103 FACILITIES ADA COMPLIANCE ‐                  ‐                  30,000               10,000           10,000           GF157 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR    74,700               GF245 ENERGY PROJECTS   CITY HALL      100,000         GF272 SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD ‐                  15,000           15,000               18,000           GF274 CITY HALL BOZ CREEK IMPRV 33,500           GF303 CITY HALL EXPANSION ‐                  150,000         GF323 STIFF BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT ‐                  37,145               GF324 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    ‐                 Lease GF325 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    35,000           35,000           GF326 DEPARTMENT ATV SNOW PLOW 15,000           GF327 LEASE PAYOFF OF VEHICLE 15,000           GF328 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT       35,000           GF329 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT     35,000           33,500           45,000           156,845             348,000         80,000           GF308 FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL   ‐                  60,000               ‐                  ‐                  60,000               ‐                  ‐                  GF305 FIRE STATION 2 RELOCATION 4,500,000      ‐                  ‐                  ‐                     4,500,000      ‐                  GF288 APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM      30,000           ‐                  30,000           ‐                     ‐                  ‐                  GF062 PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) RE 50,000           65,000           75,000               80,000           65,000           GF080 CITY‐WIDE SWITCHES&ROUTRS 50,000           50,000           55,000               55,000           55,000           GF233 IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT    ‐                  26,000               26,000           GF265 SERVER REPLACEMENT GF     20,000           48,000           20,000           20,000           GF289 SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES  35,000           35,000           GF310 APC REPLACE  FOR DATA CEN 12,000           12,000           12,000               GF311 COOLING SYSTEM FOR CHALL  20,000           GF312 ISCI FLASH UPGRADE CHALL  10,000           GF313 POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE 40,000           177,000         230,000         168,000             221,000         140,000         Department Subtotal INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY    Department Subtotal HUMAN RESOURCES           Department Subtotal CITY CLERK           Department Subtotal ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Department Subtotal FACILITIES MANAGEMENT     Department Subtotal FINANCE                   Department Subtotal FIRE                      Department Subtotal CITY ATTORNEY             PLAN B (Highlighted changes  from Plan A) CEMETERY                  Department Subtotal 253 Project # Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Unscheduled GF031 PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT    150,000         GF034 LARGE DECK MOWER    58,000               60,000           110,000         GF084 PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES  34,000               GF092 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      105,000             95,000           120,000         120,000         GF108 PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS           120,000         88,000           GF115 PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 30,000           30,000               30,000           55,000           32,000           GF190 4‐WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT 16,000               GF250 SPLASH PADS               300,000         300,000         GF254 25TH STREET FROM OAK TO TSCHACHE 333,000         GF260 SPORTS PARK INFRASTRUCTURE 364,000         GF291 PICKLEBALL COURTS                90,000           GF317 SYTHETIC TURF GROOMER     11,000           GF318 WATER WHEEL               17,000               GF319 AUTOMATED  MOWER BLADE GRINDER   17,000           GF320 UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE    11,000           10,000           GF322 750 AIR COMPRESSOR       70,000           333,000         448,000         260,000             706,000         697,000         GF052 UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT 30,000           GF053 PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 118,000         171,000         180,000             122,000         124,000         GF166 COUNTY RADIO LEASE        295,000         GF292 MOBILE DATA EQUIP         30,000           30,000           30,000               30,000           30,000           GF293 NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES  15,000           15,000           30,000               GF294 PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL   59,000           62,000           GF309 REPLACMENT K9 DOG                17,000           GF316 POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM 70,000           458,000         275,000         240,000             182,000         303,000         GF056 AQUATICS/RECREATION CENTER 106,000         17,490,000       GF137 SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY    987,300             GF140 LINDLEY PARKING LOT RESURFACING 75,388           GF209 LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE     320,300         GF238 BOGERT POOL RENOVATION    512,000             GF296 SWIM CENTER   FRONT FURNACE     37,080           GF299 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT   ‐                 Lease GF300 SMCC GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT  ‐                  110,000         GF301 STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT    60,000           GF302 PASSENGER VAN                   35,000           GF331 SMCC GYM LIGHTING UPGRADE   ‐                  11,000           GF332 SMCC DOOR REPLACEMENT   17,000           GF333 SMCC GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM  50,000               GF334 SMCC MEETING ROOM  RENOVATION   55,000               GF335 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    ‐                 Lease GF336 SMCC HVAC SYSTEM   40,100           37,080           339,000         19,094,300       360,400         75,388           1,083,580    1,542,000    20,029,145     6,517,485    1,732,388    332,000       Department Subtotal RECREATION                Department Subtotal General Fund Totals PARKS                     Department Subtotal POLICE                    254 General Fund ‐ Plan CCapital Improvement PlanFinancial Summary Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24UnscheduledProjected Beginning Balance Dedicated to CIP ‐$                     ‐$                          (260,039)$           (8,543)$                356,503$             276,803$               Plus:  General Fund Revenues Dedicated to CIP 1,313,217$          967,041$                 1,139,496$          1,150,891$          1,162,400$          1,174,024$           ‐$                 Plus:  GF286 ‐ Veterans Cemetery Project ‐ Reserve Used 88,000$               40,000$                   45,000$              Plus: Intercap loan GF260 and GF261 431,500$            Plus:  Bond Issue:  GF306 Fire Station 24,500,000              Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue:  GF056 Indoor/Outdoor Aquatics Facility  17,490,000$       Plus: Aquatics Bond Issue: GF137 Swim Center/ GF238 Bogert    1,499,300$         Less:  Scheduled CIP Project Costs (1,832,717)$        (1,267,080)$             (933,000)$           (19,775,145)$      (5,742,100)$        (1,342,388)$        (12,699,385)$        Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP‐$                     (260,039)$                (8,543)$                356,503$             276,803$             108,439$                Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates: Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Estimated Annual General Fund Revenues31,915,530$       31,915,530$           32,234,685$       32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$         Estimated Growth in General Fund Revenues 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%Total Estimated General Fund Revenues 31,915,530$       32,234,685$           32,557,032$       32,882,602$       33,211,428$       33,543,543$       Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %2.6%2.6%3.0%3.5%3.5%3.5%  Plus:  Increase Dedicated to Capital Improvements % 1.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%  Total % Dedicated to CIP**4.1% 3.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP**1,313,217$         967,041$                1,139,496$         1,150,891$         1,162,400$         1,174,024$          ** 2019 had one time revenues used for capital itemsProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(1,267,080)$(933,000)$(19,775,145)$(5,742,100)$(1,342,388)$(12,699,385)FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 UNSCHEDULEDPLAN C ‐ GENERAL FUND  PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT255 Project # Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24  Unscheduled   GF010 CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS ‐                      18,000                ‐                      18,000                ‐                      GF083 CEMETERY BACKHOE         ‐                      ‐                      110,000             GF116 CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT     52,000                GF252 CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS     55,000                GF268 SW MT VETERAN'S CEMETERY  45,000                45,000               360,000              45,000               118,000              ‐                      18,000                412,000              GF337 HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM    ‐                      ‐                      22,085               ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      GF284 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE UPGRADE   ‐                      57,000                ‐                      57,000                ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      GF275 FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS  ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      125,000             ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      GF103 FACILITIES ADA COMPLIANCE 10,000                10,000                10,000                10,000                10,000                GF157 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR    74,700                GF245 ENERGY PROJECTS   CITY HALL         ‐                      100,000             GF272 SITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 15,000                15,000                18,000                GF274 CITY HALL BOZ CREEK IMPRV 33,500                GF303 CITY HALL EXPANSION ‐                      ‐                      150,000             GF323 STIFF BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT ‐                      37,145                GF324 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    35,000                GF325 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    35,000                35,000                GF326 DEPARTMENT ATV SNOW PLOW 15,000                GF327 LEASE PAYOFF OF VEHICLE ‐                      15,000                GF328 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT        35,000                GF329 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT      35,000                93,500                40,000               154,845              80,000                80,000                GF308 FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL  ‐                      60,000               ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      GF305 FIRE STATION 2 RELOCATION 4,500,000          ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      4,500,000          ‐                      GF288 APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM      ‐                      30,000                ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      30,000                ‐                      GF062 PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) RE 50,000                65,000                75,000                80,000                65,000                GF080 CITY‐WIDE SWITCHES&ROUTRS 50,000                50,000                55,000                55,000                55,000                GF233 IT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT    ‐                      26,000                ‐                      26,000               GF265 SERVER REPLACEMENT GF     20,000                48,000                20,000                20,000                GF289 SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES       35,000                35,000                GF310 APC REPLACE  FOR DATA CEN 12,000                12,000                12,000                GF311 COOLING SYSTEM FOR CHALL  20,000                GF312 ISCI FLASH UPGRADE CHALL  10,000                GF313 POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE  40,000                177,000             256,000             142,000              195,000              140,000              CITY ATTORNEY             PLAN C (Highlighted changes  from Plan A) CEMETERY                  Department Subtotal HUMAN RESOURCES           Department Subtotal CITY CLERK           Department Subtotal ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Department Subtotal FACILITIES MANAGEMENT     Department Subtotal FINANCE                   Department Subtotal FIRE                      Department Subtotal Department Subtotal INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY    Department Subtotal 256 Project # Project Name FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24  Unscheduled   GF031 PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT    ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      150,000             GF034 LARGE DECK MOWER    ‐                      58,000                60,000                110,000              GF084 PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES  ‐                      34,000               GF092 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      ‐                      ‐                      95,000                120,000              120,000             105,000             GF108 PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS            ‐                      88,000                120,000             GF115 PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS ‐                      30,000                ‐                      55,000                32,000                60,000               GF190 4‐WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT 16,000                GF250 SPLASH PADS             ‐                      ‐                      600,000             GF254 25TH STREET FROM OAK TO TSCHACHE 333,000              GF260 SPORTS PARK INFRASTRUCTURE ‐                      364,000              GF291 PICKLEBALL COURTS                ‐                     90,000               GF317 SYTHETIC TURF GROOMER     11,000                GF318 WATER WHEEL       ‐                      17,000               GF319 AUTOMATED  MOWER BLADE GRINDER   ‐                     17,000               GF320 UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE    11,000                10,000                GF322 750 AIR COMPRESSOR       70,000                344,000              46,000               164,000              697,000              332,000              GF052 UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT 30,000                GF053 PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 171,000             118,000             180,000              122,000              124,000              GF166 COUNTY RADIO LEASE        295,000              GF292 MOBILE DATA EQUIP         30,000                30,000                30,000                30,000                30,000                GF293 NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES     15,000                15,000                30,000                GF294 PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL   59,000                62,000                GF309 REPLACMENT K9 DOG            17,000                GF316 POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM 70,000                511,000             222,000             240,000              182,000              303,000              GF056 AQUATICS/RECREATION CENTER 106,000              17,490,000        GF137 SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY    987,300              GF140 LINDLEY PARKING LOT RESURFACING 75,388                GF209 LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE     ‐                      320,300             GF238 BOGERT POOL RENOVATION    512,000              GF296 SWIM CENTER   FRONT FURNACE     37,080                GF299 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT   32,500                GF300 SMCC GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT  ‐                      ‐                      110,000             GF301 STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT    60,000                GF302 PASSENGER VAN                   ‐                      35,000                GF331 SMCC GYM LIGHTING UPGRADE   ‐                      11,000                GF332 SMCC DOOR REPLACEMENT   17,000                GF333 SMCC GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM  50,000                GF334 SMCC MEETING ROOM  RENOVATION   ‐                      55,000               GF335 NEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    27,000                GF336 SMCC HVAC SYSTEM  40,100                96,580               194,000              19,074,300        40,100                75,388                1,267,080      933,000           19,775,145     5,742,100       1,342,388      2,271,385          Department Subtotal RECREATION                Department Subtotal General Fund Totals PARKS                     Department Subtotal POLICE                    257 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS                        18,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  ONGOING CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM.        ‐                  SCHEDULED ON A FIVE YEAR REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, WITH ‐                  THE OLDEST CEMETERY MOWER NOW BEING 5 YEARS OLD.   ‐                  PROPOSING TO GO BACK TO THE THREE REPLACEMENT      ‐                  CYCLE, DUE TO NUMEROUS BREAKDOWNS AFTER THE THREE  ‐                  YEAR MARK. THESE MOWERS ARE USED TO COMPLETE THE   ‐                  MOWING 53+ ACRES OF TURF INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE    ‐                  CEMETERY WHICH INCLUDE MOWING OF THE OPEN SPACE,   ‐                  TRAILS, AND THE WEEKLY MOWING THROUGH THE          ‐                  HEADSTONES.                                        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP OLDER MOWERS FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME,    ‐                  WHICH HAS BEEN DONE AS WE MOVED TO A 5 YEAR        ‐                  REPLACEMENT PROGRAM INSTEAD OF A 3 YEAR PROGRAM.   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LESS DOWN TIME; DECREASED REPAIR /MAINTENANCE      ‐                  COSTS; HIGH TRADE  IN VALUE; INCREASED             ‐                  PRODUCTIVITY; LESS EMISSIONS.                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, OIL CHANGES, FUEL.            ‐                  CEMETERY CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS        202118,000             GF010  (FY21)258 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS                        18,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  ONGOING CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM.        ‐                  3 YEAR REPLACEMENT PROGRAM                         ‐                  WITH THE OLDEST CEMETERY MOWER NOW BEING 3YEARS    ‐                  OLD                                                ‐                  THESE MOWERS ARE                                   ‐                  USED TO COMPLETE THE MOWING 53+ ACRES OF TURF      ‐                  INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE CEMETERY WHICH INCLUDE      ‐                  MOWING OF THE OPEN SPACE, TRAILS, AND THE WEEKLY   ‐                  MOWING THROUGH THE HEADSTONES.                     ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP OLDER MOWERS FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME,    ‐                  WHICH HAS BEEN DONE AS WE MOVED AWAY FROM 5YEAR    ‐                  REPLACEMENT PROGRAM TO A 3 YEAR PROGRAM.           ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LESS DOWN TIME; DECREASED REPAIR /MAINTENANCE      ‐                  COSTS; HIGH TRADE  IN VALUE; INCREASED             ‐                  PRODUCTIVITY; LESS EMISSIONS.                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, OIL CHANGES, FUEL.            ‐                  CEMETERY MOWERS REPLCEMENT PROGRAM                 20,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM BASED ON A 3    ‐                  ROTATION, OLDEST MOWER REPLACED IS THREE YEARS OLD ‐                  ALTERANTIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO USE OLDER MOWERS, WHICH HAS BEEN TRIED ‐                  AND HAS PROVED UNSUCESSFUL AND COST PROHIBITIVE    ‐                  OP[ERATING COSTS:                                 ‐                  LESS THAN WITH OLDER LESS EFFICENT MODELS          ‐                  CEMETERY BACKHOE                                  110,000         THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WOULD REPLACE CURRENT      ‐                  BACKHOE (2001 MODEL WITH 3295 HOURS) THIS PIECE OF ‐                  EQUIPMENT IS USED FOR BURIALS 2 TO 3 TIMES PER     ‐                  WEEK‐ THIS IS THE MAIN AND MOST IMPORTANT PIECE OF ‐                  EQUIPMENT UTILIZED IN THE CEMTERY                  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO UTILIZE EXISTING BACHOE                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREADED RELIABILITY AND STAFF SAFETY             ‐                  OPERATING COSTS: DECREASE WITH NEW MACHINERY      ‐                  CEMETERY CEMETERY MOWERS REPLCEMENT PROGRAM                202420,000             GF010 (FY24) CEMETERY CEMETERY BACKHOE                    2023110,000           GF083 CEMETERY CEMETERY MOWER REPLACEMENTS        202318,000             GF010  (FY23)259 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT                        52,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  VEHICLE REPLACMENT OF 2001 1 TON DODGE 53,000 MI   ‐                  VEHICLE USED FOR BURIALS, HAULING MATERIAL AND     ‐                  WINTER TIME SNOW PLOWING                           ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP USING AND REPAIRING THE OLDER EQUIPMENT       ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL                                            ‐                  CEMETERY COLUMBARIUM                               55,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  ADDING AN ADDITIONAL EIGHTY NICHE EACH COLUMBARIUM ‐                  THE COLUMBARIUM WOULD BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE SAME ‐                  AREA AS THE EXISTING COLUMBARIUMS. CURRENTLY, THE  ‐                  SECOND COLUMBARIUM IS FULL. THIRD COLUMBARIUM      ‐                  IS IN OPERATION AND POPULAR                        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOT ADD ANY COLUMBARIUMS TO THE CEMETERY AND    ‐                  CEASE OR PUT ON HOLD THE PROGRAM ONCE THE          ‐                  THIRD COLUMBARIUM IS FULL.                         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CONTINUATION ON A LONG STANDING CEMETERY SERVICE,  ‐                  ALONG WITH EASE AND MINIMAL MAINTENANCE.           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL IF ANY                                     ‐                  CEMETERY CEMETERY VEHICLE REPLACMENT         202452,000             GF116 CEMETERY CEMETERY COLUMBARIUMS     202155,000             GF252 260 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY               45,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  PHASE TWO OF THE SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERANS        ‐                  CEMETERY: (CONCRETE PLAZA)                         ‐                  5500 SQUARE FOOT STAMPED CONCRETE PLAZA AND PHASE  ‐                  THREE COULD BE THE INSTALLATION OF THE             ‐                  INSTALLATION OF THE FIRST COLUMBARIUM. PHASES 2    ‐                  AND 3 POTENTIALLY BE FUNDED WITH A 50% MATCH FROM  ‐                  THE VETERAN'S GROUPS FOR THE CONCRETE AND THE      ‐                  FIRST COLUMBARIUM.                                 ‐                  ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  REDUCE THE CITY'S CAPITAL INPUT AND RELY ON THE    ‐                  VARIOUS VETERAN GROUPS FOR THE FUNDING.            ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  A TRUE VETERAN'S CEMETERY WILL HELP THE VETERAN'S  ‐                  REALIZE THEIR BENEFITS UPON THEIR DEATH. CURRENTLY ‐                  THERE ARE OVER 70,000 VETERANS IN SOUTHWEST        ‐                  MONTANA, WHO UPON THEIR DEATH, WOULD HAVE TO BE    ‐                  INTERRED IN HELENA OR LAUREL TO REALIZE THE        ‐                  BENEFIT.                                           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:MINIMAL                       ‐                  FUTURE PHASING MIGHT BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING ON THE ‐                  FUNDRAISING CAPABILITIES OF THE VARIOUS VETERAN    ‐                  GROUP IN SOUTHWEST MONTANA.                        ‐                  CEMETERY SW MT VETERAN'S CEMETERY  202045,000             GF268 (FY20)261 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY               ‐                  DESCRIPTION:   PHASE 3 COLUMBARIUM.>>>>>>>        45,000            FIRST PHASE OF THE SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S     ‐                  CEMETERY WHICH INCLUDES DESIGN, EARTH WORK,        ‐                  SIDEWALKS AND RETAINING WALLS TO FORM THE          ‐                  'BACKBONE' FOR THE VETERAN GROUP TO START          ‐                  FUNDRAISING. PHASE TWO POTENTIALLY COULD BE THE    ‐                  5500 SQUARE FOOT STAMPED CONCRETE PLAZA AND PHASE  ‐                  THREE COULD BE THE INSTALLATION OF THE FIRST       ‐                  COLUMBARIUM. PHASES 2 AND 3 POTENTIALLY BE FUNDED  ‐                  WITH A 50% MATCH FROM THE VETERAN'S GROUP FOR THE  ‐                  CONCRETE AND THE FIRST COLUMBARIUM.                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  REDUCE THE CITY'S CAPITAL INPUT AND RELY ON THE    ‐                  VARIOUS VETERAN GROUPS FOR THE FUNDING.            ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  A TRUE VETERAN'S CEMETERY WILL HELP THE VETERAN'S  ‐                  REALIZE THEIR BENEFITS UPON THEIR DEATH. CURRENTLY ‐                  THERE ARE OVER 70,000 VETERANS IN SOUTHWEST        ‐                  MONTANA, WHO UPON THEIR DEATH, WOULD HAVE TO BE    ‐                  INTERRED IN HELENA OR LAUREL TO REALIZE THE        ‐                  BENEFIT.                                           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:MINIMAL                       ‐                  FUTURE PHASING MIGHT BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING ON THE ‐                  FUNDRAISING CAPABILITIES OF THE VARIOUS VETERAN    ‐                  GROUP IN SOUTHWEST MONTANA.                        ‐                  SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY‐ CONT'D       ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  CONTINUING ITEM/ASSETS ADDED TO VETERAN'S CEMETERY ‐                  COMMITTAL SHELTER                                 360,000         ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NO SHELTER FROM THE WEATHER                        ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT FOR MEMORIAL SERVICES       ‐                  OPERATIONAL COSTS: MINIMAL CUSTODIAL WORK         ‐                  CEMETERY SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY    2024360,000           GF268  (FY24)CEMETERY SOUTHWEST MONTANA VETERAN'S CEMETERY              202145,000             GF268  (FY21)262 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM                   22,085            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE REQUESTS REPLACEMENT OF ‐                  THE CURRENT LOW‐DENSITY SHELVING AND STORAGE AREA  ‐                  WITHIN THE CITY ATTORNEY S SUITE WITH A HIGH       ‐                  DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM. THE CURRENT METHOD OF ‐                  STORING ARCHIVED CRIMINAL FILES IS NOT EFFICIENT,  ‐                  SAFE NOR IS IT AN OPTIMAL USE OF SPACE.            ‐                  ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE HAS CIVIL ‐                  FILES STORED IN A STORAGE AREA ADJACENT TO THE     ‐                  ADMINISTRATION S SUITE IN CITY HALL.  ‐                  THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 2ND FLOOR OF CITY HALL ‐                  WILL MOST LIKELY NEVER BE USED FOR OFFICE SPACE.   ‐                  THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A NEED FOR HIGH DENSITY FILE  ‐                  STORAGE IN CITY HALL WHETHER IT BE FROM THE CIVIL  ‐                  FUNCTION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY S OFFICE OR OTHER    ‐                  DEPARTMENTS WITHIN CITY HALL.                      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  WE INTEND TO PURCHASE A HEAVY DUTY SCANNER ($900)  ‐                  AND HIRE A TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE TO SCAN A PORTION    ‐                  OF THE EXISTING CRIMINAL FILES INTO THE JUSTWARE   ‐                  FILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. THERE ARE CURRENTLY       ‐                  OVER 15,000 FILES, WHICH WOULD NEED SCANNING. IF A ‐                  TEMP COULD SCAN SIX FILES AN HOUR, IT WOULD TAKE   ‐                  2500 HOURS TO COMPLETE THIS TASK.  ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THE HIGH DENSITY STORAGE SYSTEM WILL MAXIMIZE      ‐                  STORAGE IN AN 11  BY 23 WINDOWLESS ROOM. ‐                   THE NEW STORAGE SYSTEM WILL ALLOW STAFF TO FILE ‐                   AND LOCATE FILES MORE  QUICKLY ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  $20,800   TEMP STAFF AND SUPPLIES  WILL BE ONE TIME EXPEN‐                  CITY ATTORNEY HIGH DENSITY FILE STORAGE SYSTEM    202322,085             GF337 263 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #LASERFICHE SOFTWARE UPGRADE                        57,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  AN UPGRADE TO LASERFICHE AVANTE, WHICH IS NEEDED   ‐                  TO BRING OUR DIGITAL RECORDS SOFTWARE TO A MORE    ‐                  RECENT VERSION, AS WELL AS INCORPORATE IN          ‐                  FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDING WORKFLOW AND FORMS, WHICH  ‐                  CAN INCREASE EFFICIENCIES ACROSS DEPARTMENTS. THE  ‐                  FOLLOWING YEARS REQUEST IS THE ESTIMATED ANNUAL    ‐                  FEE FOR THE SOFTWARE.                              ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  LASERFICHE UPGRADE COULD POTENTIALLY HAPPEN  A     ‐                  YEAR PRIOR OR LATER, DEPENDING ON WORKLOAD AND     ‐                  CITY PRIORITIES AND STAFF RESOURCES. A NUMBER      ‐                  OF DEPARTMENTS ARE ANXIOUS FOR THE INCREASED       ‐                  USE OF THE PRODUCT.                                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LASERFICHE UPGRADE IS A NEEDED IMPROVEMENT,        ‐                  AND WHILE IT WILL BE A PROCESS TO BRING            ‐                  DEPARTMENTS ON BOARD, IT WILL BOTH INCREASE        ‐                  STAFF EFFICIENCIES IN RECORD MANAGEMENT (ACROSS    ‐                  ALL DEPARTMENTS) BUT ALSO CITIZEN EASE OF ACCESS   ‐                  FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION.                            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ANNUAL SOFTWARE FEE, ESTIMATED AT $28,000          ‐                  FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS                     50,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE   ‐                  INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT.                  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDRED:                           ‐                  DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT.     ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐                  AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT      ‐                  POLICY.                                            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION                    ‐                  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTFIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS        202250,000             GF275   (FY22)CLERK LASERFICHE SOFTWARE UPGRADE   202157,000             GF284 264 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS                     50,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE   ‐                  INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT                   ‐                  ALTRNATIVES CONSIDERED:                           ‐                  DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT.     ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐                  AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT      ‐                  POLICY                                             ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION                    ‐                  FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS                     25,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  FUTURE CITY CONDUIT POLICY WILL DRIVE THE FUTURE   ‐                  INVESTMENT IN CITY OWNED CONDUIT.                  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOTHING, REDUCE OR INCREASE CIP INVESTMENT.     ‐                  ADVANTGAES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIBER CONDUIT ‐                  AND VAULTS IN FURTHERANCE OF A FUTURE CONDUIT      ‐                  POLICY.                                            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  COST OF DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.                   ‐                  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTFIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS        202350,000             GF275 (FY23)ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTFIBER OPTIC CONDUIT AND VAULTS        202425,000             GF275  (FY24)265 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE  30,000            IMPROVEMENTS                                       ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACE OR INSTALL ADA UPGRADES IN VARIOUS CITY‐   ‐                  OWNED BUILDINGS. WORK EXAMPLES INCLUDE: DOOR       ‐                  HARDWARE, HANDRAILS, PARKING SIGNAGE AND STALLS,   ‐                  BUILDING ACCESS, ETC.                              ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ONLY WHEN REMODLING                                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  IT HAS BEEN THE POLICY OF THE CITY TO MEET THE     ‐                  FULL SPIRIT OF THE LAW AS OUTLINED IN THE ADA      ‐                  REGULATIONS. BY TAKING THE INITIATIVE TO BRING ALL ‐                  OUR BUILDINGS UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS WE CAN       ‐                  PROVIDE A POSITIVE EXAMPLE TO THE COMMUNITY IN     ‐                  MEETING THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH RESTRICTED OR     ‐                  LIMITED MOBILITY.                                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO SIGNIFICANT COSTS                               ‐                  AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE  10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACE OR INSTALL ADA UPGRADES IN VARIOUS CITY‐   ‐                  OWNED BUILDINGS. WORK EXAMPLES INCLUDE: DOOR       ‐                  HARDWARE, HANDRAILS, PARKING SIGNAGE AND STALLS,   ‐                  BUILDING ACCESS, ETC.                              ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ONLY WHEN REMODLING                                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  IT HAS BEEN THE POLICY OF THE CITY TO MEET THE     ‐                  FULL SPIRIT OF THE LAW AS OUTLINED IN THE ADA      ‐                  REGULATIONS. BY TAKING THE INITIATIVE TO BRING ALL ‐                  OUR BUILDINGS UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS WE CAN       ‐                  PROVIDE A POSITIVE EXAMPLE TO THE COMMUNITY IN     ‐                  MEETING THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH RESTRICTED OR     ‐                  LIMITED MOBILITY.                                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO SIGNIFICANT COSTS                               ‐                  FACILITIES MANAGEMENTAMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE IMPROVEMENTS202230,000             GF103 (FY22)FACILITIES MANAGEMENTAMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE IMPROVEMENTS202310,000             GF103  (FY23)266 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REPLACE OR INSTALL ADA UPGRADES IN VARIOUS CITY‐   ‐                  OWNED BUILDINGS.  WORK EXAMPLES INCLUDE:           ‐                  DOOR HARDWARE, HANDRAILS, PARKING SIGNAGE AND      ‐                  STALLS, BUILDING ACCESS, ETC.                      ‐                   ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:  ONLY WHEN REMODELING   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:  IT HAS BEEN THE POLICY   ‐                  OF THE CITY TO MEET THE FULL SPIRIT OF THE LAW AS  ‐                  OUTLINED IN THE ADA REGULATIONS.  BY TAKING THE    ‐                  INITIATIVE TO BRING ALL OUR BUILDINGS INTO CURRENT ‐                  STANDARDS WE CAN PROVIDED A POSITIVE EXAMPLE       ‐                  TO THE COMMUNITY IN MEETING THE NEEDS OF           ‐                  PEOPE WITH RESTRICTED OR LIMITED MOBILITY.         ‐                  ADD OPERATING COST:  NO SIGNIFICANT COST          10,000            FACILITIES MANAGEMENTAMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLIANCE IMPROVEMENTS202410,000             GF103 (FY24)267 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR                             68,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE ELEVATOR AT THE BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL          ‐                  CENTER IS A THREE STOP OTIS ELEVATOR. THE ELEVATOR ‐                  WAS INSTALLED IN EARLY 1980 AND IS AT THE POINT    ‐                  WHERE MANY TECHNOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN    ‐                  MADE IN ELEVATOR TECHNOLOGY. A CHANGE OUT WOULD    ‐                  YIELD BOTH IMPROVED SERVICE AND SOME               ‐                  REDUCTIONS IN ENERGY COSTS. WHILE THE ELEVATOR IS  ‐                  INSPECTED ANNUALLY AND IS SAFE, IT IS USED HEAVILY ‐                  BY THE MEMBERS OF THE SENIOR CENTER. PLANNING      ‐                  AHEAD FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE ELEVATOR WILL BE  ‐                  MORE COST EFFECTIVE AND AVOID UNNECESSARY DOWN     ‐                  TIME DURING THE REPLACEMENT PROCESS. THE           ‐                  ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR HAS RECOMMENDED   ‐                  THIS BE THE FIRST ELEVATOR REPLACED BY THE CITY.   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN AND ADJUST THE ELEVATOR       ‐                  OPERATING SYSTEMS AS NEEDED. WAIT TO REPLACE THE   ‐                  ELEVATOR UNTIL IT PHYSICALLY BREAKS DOWN OR        ‐                  CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE OPERATION AND HOLD OFF ON  ‐                  THE REPLACEMENT UNTIL THE ROUTINE REPAIR AND       ‐                  MAINTENANCE COSTS EXCEED ACCEPTABLE LIMITS.        ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  IMPROVED OPERATIONS AND REDUCED MAINTENANCE FOR    ‐                  THE ELEVATOR MOST NEEDED BY A SPECIAL POPULATION.  ‐                  SMALL REDUCTION IN ANNUAL ENERGY COSTS.            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS.            ‐                  INCREASE:                                         ‐                  REPLACEMENT COST ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF       ‐                  $6,700.  TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST IS $74,700         6,700              FACILITIES MANAGEMENTSENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR    202274,700             GF157 268 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #ENERGY PROJECTS   CITY HALL                        75,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  CITY HALL IS A LEED‐SILVER CERTIFIED BUILDING AND  ‐                  IS CURRENTLY UNDERPERFORMING. A RECENT ENERGY STAR ‐                  PORTFOLIO MANAGER REVIEW FOUND THAT CITY HALL      ‐                  SCORED A 30 ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 100, INDICATING     ‐                  THAT  THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF THE BUILDING HAS   ‐                  DECLINED AS EQUIPMENT HAS AGED OR BEEN REPLACED,   ‐                  AND SPACES MODIFIED. RETRO‐COMMISSIONING           ‐                  IMPROVES EFFICIENCY OF A BUILDING S EQUIPMENT AND  ‐                  SYSTEMS; OFTEN RESOLVING PROBLEMS THAT OCCURRED    ‐                  DURING DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION, OR THOSE THAT       ‐                  DEVELOP OVER TIME. IT IS A SYSTEM‐WIDE EVALUATION  ‐                  OF OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE ENERGY PERFORMANCE     ‐                  AND OCCUPANT COMFORT.  CITY HALL WAS FIRST         ‐                  COMMISSIONED IN 2008 FOLLOWING THE REMODEL.        ‐                  MANY ISSUES WERE ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME, BUT       ‐                  CERTAIN PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE HEATING HOT WATER  ‐                  SYSTEM BALANCE WERE NOT DUE TO BUDGET              ‐                  CONSTRAINTS.          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  IMPROVED HVAC SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND REDUCED        ‐                  UTILITY COSTS, BASED ON THE KNOWN CONDITIONS,      ‐                  MCKINSTRY ESTIMATES THAT COMMISSIONING WOULD       ‐                  SAVE AT LEAST $2,400 PER YEAR.  THE OCCUPANTS OF   ‐                  THE BUILDING SHOULD EXPERIENCE MORE EVEN           ‐                  TEMPERATURES AND IMPROVED BUILDING AIRFLOW         ‐                  AND VENTILATION. ADDITIONAL SAVINGS MAY BE         ‐                  POSSIBLE, BUT NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD UNTIL ALL THE   ‐                  RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS ARE IDENTIFIED.           ‐                  ADD OPERATNG COSTS:                               ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  INCREASE:  ADJUSTMENT DUE TO INCREASE IN          ‐                  MATERIALS AND LABOR IN THIS HIGH CONSTRUCTION      ‐                  ENVIRONMENT                                        25,000            FACILITIES MANAGEMENTENERGY PROJECTS   CITY HALL     2021100,000           GF245 269 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SITE SECURITY UPGRADE ‐ BUILDING LOCKS             15,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  CURRENTLY THE CITY HAS APPROXIMATELY 64 TRILOGY    ‐                  KEYLESS ACCESS LOCKS. OF THE 64 UNITS, 18 ARE      ‐                  WIRELESS UNITS. THE REMAINING 46 HARDWIRED UNITS   ‐                  REQUIRE PHYSICAL ACCESS WITH A CABLE & LAPTOP TO   ‐                  MAKE UPDATES FOR STAFFING ACCESS CHANGES. THIS     ‐                  PROJECT WILL UPGRADE THE HARDWIRE UNITS TO WIRELES ‐                  OVER A PERIOD OF TIME.                             ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE AS WE CURRENTLY OPERATE.                  ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MOVING TO A WIRELESS SYSTEM MEANS ALL UPDATES      ‐                  CAN BE PERFORMED USING THE CITY WIDE NETWORK.      ‐                  THE ADVANTAGES TO THIS SYSTEM IS THE BETTER        ‐                  UTILIZATION OF STAFF HOURS BY REDUCING THE         ‐                  REQUIRED MAN HOURS PER ACCESS UPDATE.              ‐                  DEPENDING ON THE ACCESS LEVEL REQUIRED FOR A       ‐                  STAFF MEMBER, IT COULD MEAN ACCESSING 50           ‐                  INDIVIDUAL LOCKS FOR A SINGLE ACCESS CHANGE.       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST, BATTERY CHANGE‐OUTS.     ‐                  INCREASE:                                         ‐                  A NUMBER OF NEW LOCKS WERE PURCHASED WITH          ‐                  FUNDS IN THIS PROJECT TO ACCOMMADATE OTHER         ‐                  ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS.  8 ADDITIONAL LOCKS   ‐                  WILL BE NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT            18,000            INCREASE:                                         ‐                  $8,500 HAS BEEN SPENT ON DESIGN AND PERMITS IN     ‐                  FY19 BUDGET SO WORK CAN TAKE PLACE TO STABILIZE    ‐                  BANK AROUND CITY HALL.  TOTAL CONSTRUCTION         ‐                  BUDGET PROJECTIONS ARE $50,000.  PROJECT BUDGET    ‐                  NEEDS TO BE INCREASED IN THE AMOUNT OF             ‐                  $33,500 TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CONSTRUCTION          ‐                  COST.   $16,500 WILL BE CARRIED OVER FROM FY19     ‐                  FUNDS AND USED WITH THESE FUNDS TO COMPLETE        ‐                  PROJECT.                                           33,500            FACILITIES MANAGEMENTCITY HALL BOZEMAN CREEK IMPROVEMENTS202033,500             GF274 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTSITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 202115,000             GF272  (FY21)FACILITIES MANAGEMENTSITE SECURITY LOCKS‐UPGRD 202218,000             GF272  (FY22)270 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #CITY HALL  EXPANSION REMODEL OF STORAGE AREAS INTO 25,000            OFFICES.                                           ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WITH THE ADDITIONAL PLANNED FTE AS THE CITY GROWS  ‐                  CITY HALL'S CURRENT STORAGE AREAS CAN BE REMODELED ‐                  INTO OFFICE SPACES. THE SPACE COULD POTENTIALLY    ‐                  PROVIDE 2‐3 OFFICES SPACES DOWNSTAIRS.             ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ANY ADDITIONAL FTE IN ANY OF THE DEPARTMENT IN     ‐                  CITY HALL DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE SPACE. THIS        ‐                  WOULD PROVIDE SPACE THAT IS PERMENANT.             ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING.                  ‐                  INCREASE:                                         ‐                  DESIGN, BID DRAWINGS AND COST PROJECTIONS HAVE     ‐                  BEEN COMPLETED FOR THE SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT.      ‐                  FUNDS REQUESTED WILL SUPPORT THE COMPLETION OF     ‐                  TURNING STORAGE SPACE INTO THREE NEW OFFICE AND    ‐                  THE ADDITION OF A REQUIRED FAMILY ROOM.            ‐                  PROJECT COST NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT NEW    ‐                  PROJECTED COST, INCREASE BUDGET BY $125,000        ‐                  FOR A TOTAL OF $150,000                           125,000         CURRENT FRONT PARKINIG LOT HAS EXCEEDED IT'S LIFE  ‐                  CYCLE AND REQUIRES RESURFACING.  POT HOLES AND     ‐                  CRACKS ARE INCREASING YEARLY THAT REQUIRE REPAIR.  ‐                  MILL EXISTING ASPHALT AND DISPOSE OFF SITE,        ‐                  INSTALL 2 INCH ASPHALT.  PAINT LINE STRIPS AND     ‐                  ACCESSABLE SPACES WITH LATEX TRAFFIC PAINT.        37,145            FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE     35,000            BY 2 STAFF MEMBERS IN THIS FISCAL YEAR.  TWO       ‐                  NEW VEHICLES WILL BE NEEDED TO SUPPORT             ‐                  OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF CITY OPERATIONS.            ‐                  REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL       ‐                  SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT DEPARTMENT           ‐                  OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING      ‐                  TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER           ‐                  CONDITIONS.  TRUCK BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE     ‐                  INCLUDED IN THIS PURCHASE.                         ‐                  FACILITIES MANAGEMENTNEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    202335,000             GF325 (FY23) FACILITIES MANAGEMENTSTIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN PARKING LOT202237,145             GF323 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTCITY HALL  EXPANSION REMODEL OF STORAGE AREAS INTO OFFICES2023150,000           GF303 271 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #FACILITIES DEPARTMENT IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE     35,000            BY 2 STAFF MEMBERS IN THIS FISCAL YEAR.  TWO       ‐                  NEW VEHICLES WILL BE NEEDED TO SUPPORT             ‐                  OPERATIONAL SUPPORT OF CITY OPERATIONS.            ‐                  REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL       ‐                  SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT DEPARTMENT           ‐                  OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING      ‐                  TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER           ‐                  CONDITIONS.  TRUCK BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE     ‐                  INCLUDED IN THIS PURCHASE.                         ‐                  ADDITIONAL ATV CAPACITY IS NEEDED TO PROVIDE       ‐                  SUPPORT FOR SNOW REMOVAL OPERATIONS AT THE         ‐                  VARIOUS FACILITY LOCATIONS AROUND THE CITY THAT    ‐                  THE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT SUPPORTS.   ADDITIONAL   ‐                  ATV SUPPORT REDUCES AMOUNT OF HAND SHOVELING       ‐                  REQUIRED.  CURRENT ATV WAS PASSED DOWN FROM        ‐                  ANOTHER DEPARTMENT, REPAIRS ARE INCREASING         ‐                  EVERY YEAR WITH AGE BECOMING A FACTOR.             15,000            3YR LEASE WILL BE EXPIRING, THESE FUNDS WILL BE    ‐                  USED TO PURCHASE THE LEASE VEHICLE FOR THE         ‐                  FACILTIES SUPERINDENDENT                           15,000            DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSET # 2756 IS 23YRS OLD       ‐                  AND IS REACHING THE END OF IT'S LIFECYCLE AND      ‐                  SHOULD BE REPLACED.  BODY CONTINUES TO GET         ‐                  ADDITIONAL RUST EACH YEAR.  REQUIREMENTS WILL BE   ‐                  A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO      ‐                  SUPPORT DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING      ‐                  MATERIALS, PULLING TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN    ‐                  ALL WEATHER CONDITIONS.  BED SHELL AND LINER WILL  ‐                  BE INCLUDED ON THIS PURCHASE.  BASE VEHICLE PRICE  ‐                  IS $31,000.  SHELL & LINER $4,000                 35,000            FACILITIES MANAGEMENTVEHICLE REPLACEMENT 202335,000             GF328 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT ATV SNOW PLOW 202115,000             GF326 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTLEASE PAYOFF OF VEHICLE 202115,000             GF327 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTNEW DEPARTMENT VEHICLE    202335,000             GF325 (FY24) 272 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ASSET # 2971 IS 23YRS OLD       ‐                  AND IS REACHING THE END OF IT'S LIFECYCLE AND      ‐                  SHOULD BE REPLACED.                                ‐                  CURRENT VEHICLE IS TOO SMALL TO SAFELY TOW         ‐                  REQUIRED DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT.                     ‐                  REQUIREMENTS WILL BE A FOUR WHEEL DRIVE FULL       ‐                  SIZE TRUCK W/SHELL TO SUPPORT DEPARTMENT           ‐                  OPERATIONS SUCH AS HAULING MATERIALS, PULLING      ‐                  TRAILERS, AND CAN PERFORM IN ALL WEATHER           ‐                  CONDITIONS.  BED SHELL AND LINER WILL BE INCLUDED  ‐                  ON THIS PURCHASE.                                  ‐                  BASE VEHICLE PRICE IS $31,000                      ‐                  SHELL & LINER $4,000                               35,000            FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL‐ CASHIER WINDOW             60,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  TO BETTER USE THE SPACE IN FINANCE AND TO INCREASE ‐                  SAFETY AND SECURITY. THE FRONT DESK WILL MOVE TO   ‐                  BE A WINDOW OPERATION KEEPING A BARRIER BETWEEN    ‐                  CUSTOMERS AND CASH. IN ADDITION, USE SPACE NOT     ‐                  UTILIZED AND ADD AN ADDITIONAL CUBE ROW.           ‐                  ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED:                           ‐                  FIND OTHER LOCATIONS FOR STAFF TO SIT.             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  BETTER USE OF SPACE AND ACCOMADATE STAFFING        ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NONE.                                              ‐                  FINANCE FINANCE OFFICE REMODEL‐ CASHIER WINDOW          202260,000             GF308 FACILITIES MANAGEMENTVEHICLE REPLACEMENT   202435,000             GF329 273 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #FIRE STATION 2‐ RELOCATION                        4,500,000      DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  FIRE STATION 2, LOCATED AT 410 S. 19TH AVE, IS A   ‐                  1‐STORY BUILDING THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1974 TO   ‐                  SERVE AS THE WEST END FIRE STATION FOR THE CITY OF ‐                  CITY OF BOZEMAN.  DUE TO GROWTH OF THE CITY, THIS  ‐                  STATION NOW PRIMARILY SERVES WHAT IS THE SOUTH     ‐                  SIDE AND CENTRAL PARTS OF THE CITY.  THE STATION   ‐                  SERVES AS THE PRIMARY RESPONSE STATION FOR ALL     ‐                  AREAS WEST OF N. 7TH AVE TO THE CITY LIMITS THAT   ‐                  ARE SOUTH OF DURSTON AVE.  THIS STATION IS THE     ‐                  PRIMARY RESPONSE STATION FOR ALL OF MSU CAMPUS AND ‐                  BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL AND IS THE SECONDARY           ‐                  RESPONSE TO AREAS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORE.  GENERAL   ‐                  MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS HAVE BEEN THE MAJORITY     ‐                  OF WORK COMPLETED ON THIS STATION SINCE IT S       ‐                  OPENING.  THE DEPARTMENT HAS CONTINUED TO DEAL     ‐                  WITH A SEWAGE PROBLEM ON A REOCCURRING BASIS       ‐                  WHERE THE SEWAGE BACKS UP INTO THE LIVING AREA OF  ‐                  THE STATION.           ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  AS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION.                  ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ADDRESSES HEALTH AND SAFETY, SPACE, AND LONG TERM  ‐                  NEEDS OF FIRE STATION 2 FOR THE NEXT 25‐30 YEARS.  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  GENERAL OPERATING COST WHICH ARE CURRENTLY         ‐                  BUDGETED IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND       ‐                  BUDGET.                                            ‐                  APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM                          30,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  SYSTEM TO ELECTRONICALLY MANAGE THE RECRUITMENT    ‐                  PROCESS   FROM APPLICATION TO HIRE.                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASED EFFICIENCY, ACCURACY, AND APPLICANT      ‐                  EXPERIENCE.                                        ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  $5,000 ESTIMATE                                    ‐                  FIRE FIRE STATION 2 RELOCATION 20234,500,000        GF305HUMAN RESOURCESAPPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM       202130,000             GF288 274 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT                 55,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF          ‐                  PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED        ‐                  JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL         ‐                  REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS  ‐                  OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR      ‐                  ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS       ‐                  ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS  ‐                  (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE           ‐                  MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND         ‐                  REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR       ‐                  NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE   ‐                  IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY     ‐                  SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  REDUCE BY 5K                                      (5,000)            PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT                 65,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF          ‐                  PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED        ‐                  JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL         ‐                  REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS  ‐                  OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR      ‐                  ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS       ‐                  ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS  ‐                  (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE           ‐                  MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND         ‐                  REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR       ‐                  NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE   ‐                  IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY     ‐                  SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT202050,000             GF062 (FY20)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT202165,000             GF062 (FY21)275 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT                 65,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF          ‐                  PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED        ‐                  JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL         ‐                  REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS  ‐                  OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR      ‐                  ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS       ‐                  ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS  ‐                  (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE           ‐                  MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND         ‐                  REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR       ‐                  NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE   ‐                  IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY     ‐                  SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NEED TO UP THIS BY 10K                            10,000            PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT                 60,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF          ‐                  PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED        ‐                  JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL         ‐                  REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS  ‐                  OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR      ‐                  ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS       ‐                  ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS  ‐                  (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE           ‐                  MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND         ‐                  REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR       ‐                  NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE   ‐                  IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY     ‐                  SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NEED TO UP THIS BY 20K                            20,000            INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT202275,000             GF062 (FY22)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT202380,000             GF062 (FY23)276 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT                 65,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS IS A GENERAL ITEM FOR REPLACEMENT OF          ‐                  PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR GENERAL FUND RELATED        ‐                  JOBS AND SERVICES. (ENTERPRISE AND SPECIAL         ‐                  REVENUE FUND SERVICES PAY FOR THEIR OWN PC S.) AS  ‐                  OF FY17, PERSONAL COMPUTERS MOVED TO A 5 YEAR      ‐                  ROTATION BEFORE REPLACEMENT. PC REPLACEMENTS       ‐                  ARE ONE OF THE PRIMARY DRIVERS OF HELP DESK CALLS  ‐                  (PM01 & WL01) ‐ AGING COMPUTERS CAN HAVE           ‐                  MORE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL CONFLICTS, AND         ‐                  REPLACED PC'S OFTEN REQUIRE USER SUPPORT FOR       ‐                  NEWER VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE, ETC.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES OF CONSIDERED:                       ‐                  NOT REPLACE COMPUTER/SERVER HARDWARE AS FREQUENTLY‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CITY TECHNOLOGY NEEDS WILL BE BETTER MET AND THE   ‐                  IT DEPARTMENT WILL BE ABLE TO MORE EFFICIENTLY     ‐                  SUPPORT EMPLOYEES AND CITIZENS.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPERSONAL COMPUTER (PC) REPLACEMENT202465,000             GF062 (FY24)277 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP     45,000            REPLACEMENT                                        ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES     ‐                  AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL,   ‐                  PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J,  ‐                  LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK,       ‐                  CEMETERY. SMALLER SITES WILL BE CONSOLIDATED IN    ‐                  ONE YEAR. FY 15 ‐ PROF‐BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINT.    ‐                  THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐                  NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S        ‐                  PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM             ‐                  "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES         ‐                  RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND         ‐                  VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06).       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐                  OR MAINTENANCE.                                    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS              ‐                  THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS   ‐                  WELL AS DATA.                                      ‐                  UP THIS BY 5K                                     5,000              ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYREMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS202050,000             GF080 (FY20)278 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP     45,000            REPLACEMENT                                        ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES     ‐                  AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL,   ‐                  PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J,  ‐                  LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK,       ‐                  CEMETERY.                                          ‐                  THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐                  NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S        ‐                  PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM             ‐                  "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES         ‐                  RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND         ‐                  VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06).       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐                  OR MAINTENANCE.                                    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS              ‐                  THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS   ‐                  WELL AS DATA.                                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  UP THIS BY 5K                                     5,000              INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYREMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS202150,000             GF080 (FY21)279 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP     55,000            REPLACEMENT                                        ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES     ‐                  AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL,   ‐                  PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J,  ‐                  LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK,       ‐                  CEMETERY. SMALLER SITES WILL BE CONSOLIDATED IN    ‐                  ONE YEAR. FY 15 ‐ PROF‐BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINT.    ‐                  THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐                  NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S        ‐                  PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM             ‐                  "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES         ‐                  RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND         ‐                  VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06).       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐                  OR MAINTENANCE.                                    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS              ‐                  THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS   ‐                  WELL AS DATA.                                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYREMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS202255,000             GF080 (FY22)280 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP     50,000            REPLACEMENT                                        ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES     ‐                  AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL,   ‐                  PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J,  ‐                  LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK,       ‐                  CEMETERY. SMALLER SITES WILL BE CONSOLIDATED IN    ‐                  ONE YEAR. FY 15 ‐ PROF‐BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINT.    ‐                  THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐                  NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S        ‐                  PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM             ‐                  "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES         ‐                  RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND         ‐                  VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06).       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐                  OR MAINTENANCE.                                    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS              ‐                  THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS   ‐                  WELL AS DATA.                                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ADD 5K                                            5,000              INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYREMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS202350,000             GF080 (FY23)281 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP     55,000            REPLACEMENT                                        ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WAN SITE END OF LIFE REPLACEMENTS FOR SWITCHES     ‐                  AND ROUTER THROUGHOUT CITY TO INCLUDE CITY HALL,   ‐                  PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, CITY SHOPS, LANDFILL, L&J,  ‐                  LIBRARY, WWTP, WTP, SWIM CENTER, BEALL PARK,       ‐                  CEMETERY.                                          ‐                  THIS EQUIPMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE CITY'S TECHNOLOG ‐                  NETWORK, SUPPORTING ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT'S        ‐                  PERFORMANCE MEASURES RELATED TO SYSTEM             ‐                  "UPTIME" (PM02‐PM06) AND WORKLOAD MEASURES         ‐                  RELATED TO NUMBER OF HOURS THE NETWORK AND         ‐                  VARIOUS SOFTWARE IS "IN SERVICE" (WL02‐W06).       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN CURRENT SWITCHES WITHOUT CRITICAL SUPPORT ‐                  OR MAINTENANCE.                                    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAINTAIN UPTIME FOR ALL WAN LOCATIONS              ‐                  THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO INCLUDE PHONE SERVICES AS   ‐                  WELL AS DATA.                                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  VEHICLE REPLACEMENTDESCRIPTION:REPLACEMENT OF IT V 26,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF IT VEHICLES. IF OUR CURRENT         ‐                  VEHICLE IS STILL RUNNING WELL AND MAINTENANCE      ‐                  COSTS ARE NOT HIGH, WE WOULD KEEP THEM BEYOND      ‐                  WHAT IS SHOWN HERE.  THE TRUCK WE WOULD REPLACE    ‐                  WOULD BE THE 1995 DODGE TRUCK WITH 68K             ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  BUY NEW OR DO NOTHING.                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROVIDE FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORTATION WITH REDUCED     ‐                  MAINTENANCE COSTS.                                 ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL                                            ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT    202226,000             GF233 (FY20) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYREMOTE CLOSET SWITCHES, ROUTER AND WIRELESS AP REPLACEMENTS202455,000             GF080 (FY24)282 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                                23,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF IT VEHICLES. IF OUR CURRENT         ‐                  VEHICLE IS STILL RUNNING WELL AND MAINTENANCE      ‐                  COSTS ARE NOT HIGH, WE WOULD KEEP THEM BEYOND      ‐                  WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. 2005 CHEVY COLORADO WITH       ‐                  38K 1999 DODGE TRUCK WITH 107K 1999 JEEP           ‐                  CHEROKEE WITH 74K 1995 DODGE TRUCK WITH 67K        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                           ‐                  BUY NEW OR DO NOTHING.                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  PROVIDE FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORTATION WITH REDUCED     ‐                  MAINTENANCE COSTS.                                 ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                               ‐                  MINIMAL                                            ‐                  PER JOHN VANDELINDER NEED TO UP THIS TO 26K        3,000              GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENTDESCRIPTION:REPLACE 20,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL  ‐                  SEVERS                                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY      ‐                  AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED         ‐                  PERFORMANCE.                                       ‐                  WANT TO MOVE THIS 20K FROM THE FY21 68K ALLOTMENT  ‐                  GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT                    68,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL  ‐                  SEVERS                                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY      ‐                  AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED         ‐                  PERFORMANCE.                                       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  WANT TO MOVE 20K OF THIS TO FY20                  (20,000)          INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER REPLACEMENT GF     202020,000             GF265 (FY20)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER REPLACEMENT GF     202148,000             GF265 (FY21)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYIT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT    202326,000             GF233 (FY23) 283 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT                    20,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL  ‐                  SEVERS                                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY      ‐                  AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED         ‐                  PERFORMANCE.                                       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  GENERAL FUND SERVER REPLACEMENT                    20,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF PHYSICAL SERVERS.                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  VIRTUALIZE IF POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF BUYING PHYSICAL  ‐                  SEVERS                                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  KEEP OUR SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE UNDER WARRANTY      ‐                  AND IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR REQUIRED         ‐                  PERFORMANCE.                                       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES                      10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  UPGRADING OUR VM FARM AND SQL CLUSTER TO THE       ‐                  NEWEST VERSIONS FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE             ‐                  COMPATIBILITY                                      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  STAY ON OUR CURRENT VERSIONS UNTIL FORCED TO       ‐                  UPGRADE.                                           ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  WILL KEEP THE CITY CURRENT WITH SUPPORTED VERSIONS ‐                  OF THE OPERATING SYSTEMS AND WILL ALLOW US TO      ‐                  SUPPORT SOFTWARE THAT REQUIRES THE NEWER           ‐                  VERSIONS.                                          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  WANT TO MOVE THE 25K FROM FY22 TO FY20            25,000            INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES      202035,000             GF289 (FY20)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER REPLACEMENT GF     202320,000             GF265 (FY23)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER REPLACEMENT GF     202420,000             GF265 (FY24)284 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES                      10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  UPGRADING OUR VM FARM AND SQL CLUSTER TO THE       ‐                  NEWEST VERSIONS FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE             ‐                  COMPATIBILITY                                      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  STAY ON OUR CURRENT VERSIONS UNTIL FORCED TO       ‐                  UPGRADE                                            ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  WILL KEEP THE CITY CURRENT WITH SUPPORTED VERSIONS ‐                  OF THE OPERATING SYSTEMS AND WILL ALLOW US TO      ‐                  SUPPORT SOFTWARE THAT REQUIRES THE NEWER           ‐                  VERSIONS.                                          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  WANT TO MOVE 25K FROM FY23 TO FY21                25,000            APC REPLACEMENTS FOR DATA CENTERS                  12,000            12,000             DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF BATTERY BACKUP UNITS IN OUR DATA    ‐                  CENTERS.  THESE DEVICES ARE WHAT KEEP THE CITY     ‐                  EQUIPMENT UP AND FUNCTIONAL IN THE EVENT OF A      ‐                  POWER OUTAGE.  THEY ALSO CONDITION THE POWER       ‐                  THAT IS SUPPLIED TO EQUIPMENT INCREASING THE       ‐                  EQUIPMENT LIFESPAN.                                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DON'T REPLACE THE UNITS AND GO INTO A STATE OF     ‐                  NO WARRANTY COVERAGE.                              ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ALL OF THE CRITICAL EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED TO      ‐                  KEEP THE CITY COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS      ‐                  UP AND FUNCTIONAL WILL BE IN PLACE AND UNDER       ‐                  WARRANTY.                                          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  $1200 PER UNIT PER YEAR FOR WARRANTY AFTER THE     ‐                  FIRST THREE YEARS. YEARS 4‐10                      ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAPC REPLACE  FOR DATA CENTERS 2020GF310 (FY20)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSERVER FARM SOFTWARE UPGRADES      202135,000             GF289 (FY21)285 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #APC REPLACEMENTS FOR DATA CENTERS                  12,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF BATTERY BACKUP UNITS IN OUR DATA    ‐                  CENTERS.  THESE DEVICES ARE WHAT KEEP THE CITY     ‐                  EQUIPMENT UP AND FUNCTIONAL IN THE EVENT OF A      ‐                  POWER OUTAGE.  THEY ALSO CONDITION THE POWER       ‐                  THAT IS SUPPLIED TO EQUIPMENT INCREASING THE       ‐                  EQUIPMENT LIFESPAN.                                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DON'T REPLACE THE UNITS AND GO INTO A STATE OF     ‐                  NO WARRANTY COVERAGE.                              ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ALL OF THE CRITICAL EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED TO      ‐                  KEEP THE CITY COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS      ‐                  UP AND FUNCTIONAL WILL BE IN PLACE AND UNDER       ‐                  WARRANTY.                                          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  $1200 PER UNIT PER YEAR FOR WARRANTY AFTER THE     ‐                  FIRST THREE YEARS. YEARS 4‐10                      ‐                  APC REPLACEMENTS FOR DATA CENTERS                  12,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF BATTERY BACKUP UNITS IN OUR DATA    ‐                  CENTERS.  THESE DEVICES ARE WHAT KEEP THE CITY     ‐                  EQUIPMENT UP AND FUNCTIONAL IN THE EVENT OF A      ‐                  POWER OUTAGE.  THEY ALSO CONDITION THE POWER       ‐                  THAT IS SUPPLIED TO EQUIPMENT INCREASING THE       ‐                  EQUIPMENT LIFESPAN.                                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                   DON'T REPLACE THE UNITS AND GO INTO A STATE OF    ‐                  NO WARRANTY COVERAGE.                              ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ALL OF THE CRITICAL EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED TO      ‐                  KEEP THE CITY COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS      ‐                  UP AND FUNCTIONAL WILL BE IN PLACE AND UNDER       ‐                  WARRANTY.                                          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  $1200 PER UNIT PER YEAR FOR WARRANTY AFTER THE     ‐                  FIRST THREE YEARS. YEARS 4‐10                      ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAPC REPLACE  FOR DATA CENTERS 202212,000             GF310 (FY22)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAPC REPLACE  FOR DATA CENTERS 202112,000             GF310 (FY21)286 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #COOLING SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL                       20,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  ADD COOLING UNIT TO CITY HALL DATA CENTER TO       ‐                  PROVIDE SOME REDUNDANCY FOR THE AGING UNIT THAT    ‐                  EXISTS NOW.  THIS UNIT WILL HELP SHOULDER THE      ‐                  BURDEN OF COOLING THE ROOM AND WILL BE THE         ‐                  BACKUP UNIT SHOULD THE MAIN UNIT DIE.              ‐                  THE CURRENT UNIT IS STARTING TO HAVE ISSUES THAT   ‐                  CREATE HEAT ISSUES AND REQUIRE A SERVICE CALLL TO  ‐                  RESOLVE                                            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  ALL OF THE CRITICAL EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO MAINTAIN   ‐                  CITY COMMUICATIONS AND BUSINESS CONTINUITY         ‐                  WILL BE PROPERLY COOLED.                           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                               ‐                  ADD ISCSI FLASH DRIVES TO CITY HALL SAN            10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS WILL ADD FLASH MEMORY TO OUR MAIN STORAGE     ‐                  AREANETWORK DEVICE THAT STORES THE VIRTUAL SERVERS ‐                  THAT ALL APPLICATIONS AT CITY HALL RUN ON.         ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DONT ADD THE ADDITIONAL MEMORY AND CONTINUE TO USE ‐                  THE DEVICE AS WE ARE NOW AT LESS THAN OPTIMUM      ‐                  PERFORMANCE.                                       ‐                  ADVANTAGE OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  WOULD ALLOW IT TO CONFIGURE THE STORAGE DEVICE TO  ‐                  BETTER MEET THE CURRENT NEED WE ARE SEEING FOR     ‐                  THIS DEVICE.  PERFORMANCE WILL IMPROVE FOR USERS   ‐                  THAT USE THE APPLICATIONS HOUSED AT CITY HALL.     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYISCI FLASH UPGRADE CITY HALL  202010,000             GF312 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYCOOLING SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL 202120,000             GF311 287 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #POLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE AND BACKUP           40,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WE ARE CURRENTLY GENERATING AROUND 1 TERABYTE      ‐                  OF DATA PER MONTH WITH THE IN CAR VIDEO SYSTEMS    ‐                  AND WILL BE OUT OF SPACE FOR STORAGE IN THE NEXT   ‐                  12‐18 MONTHS. IT IS CRITICAL INFORMATION THAT      ‐                  GROWS RAPIDLY. WE ARE TRYING TO GET AHEAD OF THE   ‐                  GROWTH BY PURCHASING A 5 YEAR SOLUTION OUT OF THE  ‐                  GATE THAT CAN BE EXPANDED AS NEEDED INTO THE       ‐                  FUTURE FOR GROWTH AND THE POSSIBILITY OF BODY      ‐                  CAMERAS. THE FY 22 AMOUNT RELATES TO THE           ‐                  INCREASED STORAGE NEEDED RELATED TO BODY           ‐                  CAMERA FILES.                                      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  WILL ALLOW US TO CONTINUE TO SAFELY STORE, ACCESS  ‐                  AND BACKUP CRUCIAL EVIDENTIARY DATA WITHOUT        ‐                  CONCERN OF RUNNING OUT OF STORAGE SPACE.           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPOLICE VIDEO EVIDENCE STORAGE AND BACKUP     202340,000             GF313 288 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANTS                           150,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTES FUNDS EVERY OTHER     ‐                  YEAR TOWARDS IMPROVING PARK INFRASTRUCTURE         ‐                  THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF PARK MASTER PLANS.       ‐                  THIS GRANT PROGRAM IS A MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM     ‐                  IN WHICH THE CITY RECEIVES A MINIMUM 1 TO 1        ‐                  MATCH FROM THE RECIPIENT. THE COMMISSION HAS       ‐                  ESTABLISHED A FORMAL GRANT POLICY BY RESOLUTION.   ‐                  BY SWITCHING TO EVERY OTHER YEAR, AND ALSO         ‐                  INCREASING THE ALLOCATION, BIGGER PROJECTS CAN BE  ‐                  ACCOMPLISHED, THOUGH THESE PROJECTS WILL TAKE      ‐                  MORE TIME TO COMPLETE.                             ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  HANDLE PARK EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT  REQUESTS ON‐                  AN ADHOC BASIS, AS VARIOUS DONORS OR SERVICE       ‐                  GROUPS BRING THEM FORWARD. ALLOCATE MORE OR        ‐                  FEWER DOLLARS TO THE PROGRAM.                      ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS MATCHING FUNDS PROGRAM PROVIDES CRITICAL      ‐                  INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE PARK SYSTEM BY UTILIZING THE ‐                  TALENTS OF OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS THROUGH           ‐                  MATCHING FUNDS, DONATIONS, LABOR IN LIEU OF AND    ‐                  NUMEROUS SPECIALIZED SERVICES. ALL OF THE ABOVE    ‐                  CAN BE USED AS A MATCH IN THIS PROGRAM.            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NEW INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES BRING ON         ‐                  INCREASED MAINTENANCE AND LABOR COSTS. THE NATURE  ‐                  OF EACH PROJECT FUNDED WILL DETERMINE THE CONTINUE ‐                  COSTS. SOME PROJECTS HAVE VERY LOW ONGOING COSTS   ‐                  OTHERS HAVE RELATIVELY HIGHER COSTS.               ‐                  PARKS PARK IMPROVEMENT GRANT 2023150,000           GF031 289 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #LARGE DECK MOWER                                   58,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                   AN ADDITION TO SUPPLEMENT FLEET                   ‐                  OF A LARGE‐DECK SPORTS TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO  ‐                  BE NEEDED FOR ADDITIONAL PARKLAND USED FOR         ‐                  ATHLETICS, SUCH AS: ENTERPRISE PARK (FORMERLY      ‐                  LERNER PARK), OAK SPRINGS PARK, ADAM BRONKEN       ‐                  BOZEMAN SPORTS COMPLEX.   THE CITY CURRENTLY       ‐                  MOWS  OVER 162 ACRES OF IRRIGATED TURFGRASS WEEKLY ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO REPAIR AS BREAK DOWNS OCCUR, REPLACE   ‐                  MOWERS AS THEY BREAKDOWN, EXPLORE A LEASE PROGRAM. ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROPER MOWING OF SPORTS FIELDS AND FORMAL PARKS    ‐                  ARE IMPERATIVE TO SAFETY. REGULAR REPLACEMENT WILL ‐                  REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DECREASE THE          ‐                  NUMBER OF BREAKDOWNS WE HAVE BEEN                  ‐                  EXPERIENCING. WELL MOWED PARKS ARE AN IMPORTANT    ‐                  REFLECTION ON OUR CITY AND HOW IT IS PERCEIVED BY  ‐                  VISITORS AND CITIZENS. NEW MOWERS WILL BE MORE     ‐                  RELIABLE, SAFER, PRODUCTIVE, AND WILL REDUCE TH    ‐                  WORKLOAD ON THE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP           ‐                  PERSONNEL. WELL MAINTAINED SPORTS FIELDS HAVE      ‐                  PROVEN TO BE A VITAL COMPONENT TO THE ECONOMIC     ‐                  GROWTH OF OUR COMMUNITY, BY ATTRACTING REGIONAL    ‐                  AND STATE TOURNAMENTS TO BOZEMAN.                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  IMPROVE SCHEDULING OF MOWING AND INCREASE CREW     ‐                  EFFICIENCY BECAUSE OF RELIABLE EQUIPMENT.          ‐                  PARKS LARGE DECK MOWER    202258,000             GF034 (FY22)290 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #LARGE DECK MOWER                                   60,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  LARGE‐DECK FORMAL TURF MOWER, ANTICIPATED TO       ‐                  REPLACE THE OLDEST MOWER IN OUR FLEET. BY FY23‐    ‐                  STORY MILL COMMUNITY PARK  AND THE SPORTS COMPLEX  ‐                  WILL BE OPERATIONAL.                               ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO REPAIR AS BREAK DOWNS OCCUR,           ‐                  REPLACE MOWERS AS THEY BREAKDOWN, EXPLORE A LEASE  ‐                  PROGRAM.                                           ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROPER MOWING OF SPORTS FIELDS AND FORMAL PARKS    ‐                  ARE IMPERATIVE TO SAFETY. REGULAR REPLACEMENT WILL ‐                  REDUCE MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DECREASE THE          ‐                  NUMBER OF BREAKDOWNS WE HAVE BEEN                  ‐                  EXPERIENCING. WELL MOWED PARKS ARE AN IMPORTANT    ‐                  REFLECTION ON OUR CITY AND HOW IT IS PERCEIVED BY  ‐                  VISITORS AND CITIZENS. NEW MOWERS WILL BE MORE     ‐                  RELIABLE, SAFER, PRODUCTIVE, AND WILL REDUCE THE   ‐                  WORKLOAD ON THE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP           ‐                  PERSONNEL. WELL MAINTAINED SPORTS FIELDS HAVE      ‐                  PROVEN TO BE A VITAL COMPONENT TO THE ECONOMIC     ‐                  GROWTH OF OUR COMMUNITY, BY ATTRACTING REGIONAL    ‐                  AND STATE TOURNAMENTS TO BOZEMAN.                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  IMPROVE SCHEDULING OF MOWING AND INCREASE CREW     ‐                  EFFICIENCY BECAUSE OF RELIABLE EQUIPMENT.          ‐                  PARKS LARGE DECK MOWER    202460,000             GF034 (FY24)291 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARKS RESTROOM UPGRADES                            34,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PROJECT IS THE GENERAL REPLACEMENT AND        ‐                  UPGRADING OF THE CITY PARK S PUBLIC RESTROOM       ‐                  FACILITIES. OTHER RESTROOMS THAT NEED TO BE        ‐                  REPLACED‐ AND/OR BUILT IS:                         ‐                  ROSE PARK $34,000  (FY21)                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE WITH PORT‐POTTIES                         ‐                  THE ROSE PARK PROJECTS WILL PROVIDE RESTROOM       ‐                  FACILITIES IN AREAS WHERE CURRENTLY NONE EXIST.    ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  EASE AND EFFICIENCY OF MAINTAINING NEW  RESTROOMS; ‐                  INCREASED CLEANLINESS OF PUBLIC FACILITIES.        ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  OPERATING AND REPAIR COSTS ARE EXPECTED TO BE      ‐                  LOWER THAN THE EXISTING FACILITIES.                ‐                  REDUCED BUDGET BY 46000 DUE TO IMPLEMENTING A      ‐                  VAULT, SELF CONTAINED UNIT IN THE PARK. UNIT       ‐                  WOULD BE SIMILIAR TO THE RESTROOM AT TUCKERMAN     ‐                  PARKS PARKS RESTROOMS UPGRADES  202234,000             GF084 292 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT                              100,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL            ‐                  EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND  ‐                  CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP     ‐                  TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND         ‐                  LIABILITY CONCERNS.                                ‐                  CHRISTIE PARK (FY20)                               ‐                  IN GENERAL, SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PLAYGROUNDS ‐                  ADDRESS: PLAYGROUND SITE ELEMENTS, SIGHT LINES,    ‐                  EQUIPMENT FEATURES AND MATERIALS, SURFACING        ‐                  MATERIALS, HARDWARE, PAINTS AND FINISHES, AND ANY  ‐                  THER HAZARDS THAT MIGHT BE PRESENT. PLAYGROUND     ‐                  REPAIRS REQUIRE SAME‐DAY RESPONSE GIVEN THEIR      ‐                  CRITICAL SAFETY IMPLICATION. CURRENTLY, THE PARKS  ‐                  DIVISION INSPECTS AND MAINTAINS 22PLAYGROUNDS      ‐                  CITY‐WIDE AND ASSISTS WITH ANOTHER 23 HOA‐         ‐                  MAINTAINED PLAYGROUNDS WITH MONTHLY                ‐                  INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.                   ‐                  ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE   ‐                  GO                                                 ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS.            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL                                            ‐                  INCREASE IN PRICE                                 5,000              PARKS PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      2022105,000           GF092  (FY22)293 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT JARRETT PARK                  95,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL            ‐                  EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND  ‐                  CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP     ‐                  TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND         ‐                  IN GENERAL, SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PLAYGROUNDS ‐                  ADDRESS: PLAYGROUND SITE ELEMENTS, SIGHT LINES,    ‐                  EQUIPMENT FEATURES AND MATERIALS, SURFACING        ‐                  MATERIALS, HARDWARE, PAINTS AND FINISHES, AND      ‐                  ANY OTHER HAZARDS THAT MIGHT BE PRESENT.           ‐                  PLAYGROUND REPAIRS REQUIRE SAME‐DAY RESPONSE       ‐                  IVEN THEIR CRITICAL SAFETY IMPLICATION.            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE   ‐                  GO.                                                ‐                  PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT LINDLEY PARK                 120,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE FOLLOWING PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WILL            ‐                  EVENTUALLY NEED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO ITS AGE AND  ‐                  CONDITION: REPLACEMENT WILL BRING EQUIPMENT UP     ‐                  TO TODAY S STANDARDS AND REDUCE SAFETY AND         ‐                  LIABILITY CONCERNS.                                ‐                  LINDLEY PARK AND KIRK PARK PLAYGROUNDS.            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP EXISTING EQUIPMENT IN PLACE, MAINTAIN AS WE   ‐                  GO.                                                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS.            ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL.                                           ‐                  PARKS PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      202395,000             GF092  (FY23)PARKS PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT      2024120,000           GF092  (FY24)294 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS                        120,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  SIDEWALKS IDENTIFIED FOR REPLACEMENT DUE TO        ‐                  DETERIORATING CEMENT, MISSING SECTIONS AND         ‐                  HEAVING FROM WEATHER AND TREE ROOTS. NEW           ‐                  SIDEWALKS MUST MEET OR EXCEED CITY CODE.           ‐                  REPLACING THE OLD SIDEWALK WILL RESULT IN A SAFER  ‐                  SIDEWALK YEAR ROUND AND ENABLE THE SIDEWALK        ‐                  PLOWS TO BETTER MEET THE SNOW REMOVAL              ‐                  MUNICIPAL CODE. COSTS OF APPROXIMATELY $11.75      ‐                  SQUARE FOOT FOR RIP AND REPLACE.                   ‐                  PROJECT 1: $120,000 ‐ SOUTHSIDE PARK ‐ REPLACE 730 ‐                  OF SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTH 5TH AVENUE AND ALONG WEST  ‐                  ALDERSON STREET WITH NEW 6' (SIX FOOT) WIDE        ‐                  CONCRETE SIDEWALK, AND THE RELATED RETAINING WALL. ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND PATCH AND REPAIR   ‐                  AS NEEDED.                                         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND         ‐                  EFFICIENCY OF OPERATION (PLOWING)                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO ESTIMATE AT THIS TIME                           ‐                  PARKS PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS         2023120,000           GF108  (FY23)295 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS                         88,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  SIDEWALKS IDENTIFIED FOR REPLACEMENT DUE TO        ‐                  DETERIORATING CEMENT, MISSING SECTIONS AND         ‐                  HEAVING FROM WEATHER AND TREE ROOTS. NEW           ‐                  SIDEWALKS MUST MEET OR EXCEED CITY CODE.           ‐                  REPLACING THE OLD SIDEWALK WILL RESULT IN A SAFER  ‐                  SIDEWALK YEAR ROUND AND ENABLE THE SIDEWALK        ‐                  PLOWS TO BETTER MEET THE SNOW REMOVAL              ‐                  MUNICIPAL CODE. COSTS OF APPROXIMATELY $11.75      ‐                  SQUARE FOOT FOR RIP AND REPLACE.                   ‐                  PROJECT 2: $88,000 ‐ COOPER PARK ‐ REPLACE THE     ‐                  SIDEWALK AROUND THE ENTIRE BLOCK APPROXIMATELY     ‐                  1875' TOTAL. THIS SIDEWALK SERVES AS A MAIN ROUTE  ‐                  TO AND FROM THE UNIVERSITY.                        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  MAINTAIN EXISTING SIDEWALKS AND PATCH AND REPAIR   ‐                  AS NEEDED.                                         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASED SAFETY FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND         ‐                  EFFICIENCY OF OPERATION (PLOWING)                  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO ESTIMATE AT THIS TIME                           ‐                  PARKS PARK SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS         202488,000             GF108 (FY24)296 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS                          30,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING,   ‐                  FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW       ‐                  PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY        ‐                  PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE  ‐                  PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES    ‐                  ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR   ‐                  QUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY IS ‐                  COMPROMISED.IN FY20 OF $30,000 IS FOR A ½ TON      ‐                  FLEET VEHICLE TO REPLACE THE 1991 DODGE WITH 5     ‐                  YEAR REPAIR COSTS OF $32124.00.                    ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO DRIVE OLDER EQUIPMENT                  ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK   ‐                  USE.                                               ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS: THESE      ‐                  ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY       ‐                  DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. 5 YEAR   ‐                  AVERAGE ON REPAIRS TO THE PARKS FLEET ‐ $3,550.00  ‐                  PER VEHICLE.                                       ‐                  PARKS PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 202130,000             GF115 (FY21)297 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS                          30,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING,   ‐                  FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW       ‐                  PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY        ‐                  PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 600ACRES THAT THE   ‐                  PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES    ‐                  ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR   ‐                  EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY   ‐                  IS COMPROMISED. FY21 REPRESENTS MORE FTE. (2)      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  UTILIZE OLD VEHICLES UNTIL THEY ARE "DEAD'         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK   ‐                  EMPLOYEES, BOTH FULL‐TIME AND SHORT TERM WORKERS   ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐                  DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. 5 YEAR   ‐                  AVERAGE ON REPAIRS TO THE PARKS FLEET ‐ $3,550.00  ‐                  PER VEHICLE.                                       ‐                  PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS                          30,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING,   ‐                  FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW       ‐                  PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY        ‐                  PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 500 ACRES THAT THE  ‐                  PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES    ‐                  ARE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR   ‐                  EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY   ‐                  IS COMPROMISED.                                    ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK U ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐                  DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. 5 YEAR   ‐                  AVERAGE ON REPAIRS TO THE PARKS FLEET ‐ $3,550.00  ‐                  PER VEHICLE.                                       ‐                  PARKS PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 202230,000             GF115 (FY22)PARKS PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 202330,000             GF115 (FY23)298 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS ADDITIONAL 1 TON         55,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE PARKS DIVISION UTILIZES VEHICLES FOR MOWING,   ‐                  FERTILIZATION, IRRIGATION, INSPECTIONS, SNOW       ‐                  PLOWING AND REPAIRS OF THE CITY PARKS. CITY        ‐                  PARKLAND NOW HAS GROWN TO OVER 600 ACRES THAT THE  ‐                  PARKS DIVISION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. ALL VEHICLES    ‐                  RE UTILIZED UNTIL SERVICE RELATED DOWN‐TIME FOR    ‐                  EQUIPMENT AND STAFF BECOME PROBLEMATIC OR SAFETY   ‐                  IS COMPROMISED.                                    ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  KEEP OLD VEHICLES UNTIL THEY DIE                   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS INSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE VEHICLES FOR PARK   ‐                  USE.                                               ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THESE ARE REPLACEMENTS; RECURRING COSTS FREQUENTLY ‐                  DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER ONES. 5 YEAR   ‐                  AVERAGE ON REPAIRS TO THE PARKS FLEET ‐ $3,550.00  ‐                  PER VEHICLE.                                       ‐                  4‐WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT                          16,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  REPLACE THE ATV (2000 YAMAHA GRIZZLY) USED FOR     ‐                  SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL AND IS THE MAIN PIECE OF     ‐                  EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED TO SPRAY APPROX 300 ACRES   ‐                  WITH HERBICIDES AND BIOSTIMULANTS FOR THE PARKS    ‐                  DIVISION.                                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO USE THE 2000 YAMAHA GRIZZLY AND REPAIR ‐                  AS NEEDED.                                         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY, MINIMIZE DOWN TIME,           ‐                  PROACTIVE REPLACEMENT OF AGING EQUIPMENT.          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ROUTINE MAINTENANCE                                ‐                  PARKS 4‐WHEELER ATV REPLACEMENT 202216,000             GF190 PARKS PARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS 202455,000             GF115 (FY24)299 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SPLASH PAD‐ STORYMILL                             300,000         300,000           DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE INSTALLATION INTERACTIVE WATER FEATURE AT THE  ‐                  STORY MILL COMMUNITY PARK.                         ‐                  THIS PLAN WILL GIVE THE COMMUNITY A LARGE SPLASH   ‐                  PAD/WATER FEATURE.                                 ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOT INSTALL SPLASH PADS.                        ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CAN HELP REDUCE CHILDREN S FEAR OF WATER. ADDS     ‐                  COMMUNITY WATER FEATURES THAT HAVE NO              ‐                  ADMITTANCE FEE ALLOWING PEOPLE OF ALL SOCIO        ‐                  ECONOMIC STATUS TO ENJOY A PUBLIC AQUATICS         ‐                  AMENITY. GEOGRAPHICALLY SEPARATES TWO              ‐                  INSTALLATIONS TO BEST SERVE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY.  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  SOME ADDITIONAL WATER COSTS AND MAINTENANCE        ‐                  WILL BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE IS        ‐                  ESTIMATED AT 0.2 FTE                               ‐                  SPLASH PADS ‐ SPORTS COMPLEX                                       240,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE INSTALLATION OF A SPLASH PAD AT THE NEW SPORTS ‐                  COMPLEX.                                           ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOT INSTALL SPLASH PADS.                        ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  CAN HELP REDUCE CHILDREN S FEAR OF WATER. ADDS     ‐                  COMMUNITY WATER FEATURES THAT HAVE NO              ‐                  ADMITTANCE FEE ALLOWING PEOPLE OF ALL SOCIO        ‐                  ECONOMIC STATUS TO ENJOY A PUBLIC AQUATICS         ‐                  AMENITY. GEOGRAPHICALLY SEPARATES TWO              ‐                  INSTALLATIONS TO BEST SERVE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY.  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  SOME ADDITIONAL WATER COSTS AND MAINTENANCE        ‐                  WILL BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE IS        ‐                  ESTIMATED AT 0.2 FTE                               ‐                  PARKS SPLASH PADS ‐ SPORTS COMPLEX         2023240,000           GF250 (FY23)PARKS SPLASH PAD‐ STORYMILL         2021GF250 (FY21) 300 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #25TH STREET FROM OAK TO TSCHACHE 333,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  EXTEND 25TH STREET FROM OAK STREET TO TSCHACHE STREET‐                  ALONG THE WESTERN BORDER OF ROSE PARK. ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐                  NONE CITY MUST PROVIDE LOCAL SHARE ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐                  COINCIDES WITH THE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  STREET MAINTENANCE ‐                  PARKS 25TH STREET FROM OAK TO TSCHACHE 2020333,000           GF254301 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SPORTS COMPLEX ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF 'PROJECT RELATED' 364,000         COTTONWOOD ROAD AREA WATER & WASTEWATER IMPRMTS‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  AS OWNER OF THE SPORTS PARK PROPERTY, THE CITY IS  ‐                  REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT A NUMBER OF STREET, WATER,   ‐                  AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. IN APPROVAL OF THE         ‐                  SPORTS PARK PURCHASE, $1,778,000 WAS APPROVED      ‐                  IN TOP BOND FUNDING FOR THESE INFRASTRUCTURE       ‐                  IMPROVEMENTS: BAXTER LANE, COTTONWOOD ROAD,        ‐                  DURSTON/COTTONWOOD INTERSECTION, FLANDERS MILL     ‐                  ROAD (INCLUDING DITCH), AND OAK STREET. WE         ‐                  ESTIMATE THAT THE BOND FUNDING WILL NOT BE         ‐                  SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE COTTONWOOD ROAD (OR OAK    ‐                  STREET) IMPROVEMENTS. WE ANTICIPATE NEEDING TO     ‐                  BUILD THE PROJECT‐RELATED PORTIONS OF THE          ‐                  COTTONWOOD ROAD STREET‐RELATED IMPROVEMENTS        ‐                  WITH ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR DISTRICT DOLLARS.    ‐                  THE RELATED WATER AND SEWER‐LINE IMPROVEMENTS      ‐                  WILL NEED TO COME FROM THE GENERAL FUND. OUR       ‐                  ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATES FROM THE SPRING OF 2014    ‐                  HAVE BEEN INCREASED BY 15% TO ESTIMATE             ‐                  CONSTRUCTION INFLATION COSTS.                      ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DELAY THE IMPROVEMENTS.                            ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT STREET, WATER, ‐                  AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, IN CONCERT WITH OUR        ‐                  DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.  BETTER ACCESS AND        ‐                  AMENITIES FOR THE SPORTS PARK.                     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THE CITY'S STREET MAINTENANCE FUNDS WILL MAINTAIN  ‐                  THE STREET SURFACE, ONCE CONSTRUCTED.  THE         ‐                  UTILITIES WILL MAINTAIN THE PIPES ONCE INSTALLED.  ‐                  PARKS SPORTS COMPLEX           2024364,000           GF260 302 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PICKLEBALL COURTS                                  90,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  INSTALL PICKLEBALL COURTS IN ONE OF OUR CITY PARKS ‐                  ONE POTENTIAL SITE WOULD BE BOGERT PARK TENNIS     ‐                  COURTS.                                            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOT INSTALL PICKLEBALL COURTS AND CONTINUE      ‐                  TO UTILIZE SOUTHSIDE TENNIS COURTS.                ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  SEPARATE THE INCREASING NUMBER OF PICKLEBALL       ‐                  PLAYERS FROM THE TENNIS PLAYERS. DEDICATED SPACE   ‐                  FOR A FAST GROWING SPORT                           ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  RESURFACING OR RE‐PAINTING IN FUTURE YEARS.        ‐                  SYTHETIC TURF GROOMER                              11,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  TOW BEHIND UNIT USED TO GROOM, LEVEL AND MAINTAIN  ‐                  IN‐FILLED SYTHETIC TURF                            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED;                          ‐                  NOT MAINTAINING THE INFLL MATERIAL IN THE TURF     ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PROPERLY MAINTAINING THE SYNTHETIC TURF IN A WAY   ‐                  THAT WILL INCREASE LONGEVITY AND INCREASE SAFETY   ‐                  OF THE PLAYERS                                     ‐                  OPERATIONAL COSTS: MINIMAL FUEL COSTS OF THE      ‐                  VEHICLE THAT TOWS IT AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE       ‐                  WATER WHEEL                                        17,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WHATER WHEEL TO IRRIAGE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELDS AT   ‐                  BOZEMAN SPORTS PARK                                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: DO NOT IRRIGATE TURF     ‐                  ADVATAGES OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  COOL DOWN, DECREASE STATIC CLING AND MOST          ‐                  IMPORTANTLY, FLUSH THE TOXINS (BLOOD, URINE        ‐                  VOMIT, ETC.....) THROUGH THE TURF PROFILE.         ‐                  OPERATIONAL COSTS: MINIMAL‐ SURFACE WATER RIGHT   ‐                  AND ROUTINE MAINTENANCE                            ‐                  PARKS SYTHETIC TURF GROOMER         202111,000             GF317 PARKS WATER WHEEL                          202217,000             GF318 PARKS PICKLEBALL COURTS          202190,000             GF291 303 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #AUTOMATED ROTARY MOWER BLADE GRINDER               17,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  AAUTOMATED MACHINE THAT PRECISELY RE‐SHARPENS      ‐                  MOWERS BLADES ON ROTARY DECKS.                     ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: CONTINUE HAND GRINDING   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  PRECISION SHARPENS BLADES KEEP THE BLADES RAZOR    ‐                  SHARP, WHICH IS BENEFICIAL TO THE GRASS AND KEEPS  ‐                  THE BLADES IN BALANCE DUE TO EQUAL WEAR, WHICH IS  ‐                  EASIER ON THE MOWER. THIS PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WILL  ‐                   PROLONG THE LIFE OF MOWER BLADES.                 ‐                  OPERATINOAL COSTS: MINIMAL ELECTRICAL YET PROLONG ‐                  BLADE LIFE.                                        ‐                  UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE                     11,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  SMALLER PARK FRIENDLY VEHICLES USED FOR PARK       ‐                  MAINTENANCE IN LARGE PARKS (SMCP AND BZN SPORTS P) ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NOT USING SMALLER UNIT   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  ON‐SITE VEHICLES THAT CAN MANUVER AND NEGOTIATE    ‐                  LARGE SITES WITHOUT THE IMPACT OF A LARGE PICKUP   ‐                  OR SIMILIAR VEHICLE. (THINK GATOR OR WORKMAN)      ‐                  OPERATIONAL COSTS: LESS THAN TRADITIONAL TRUCKS   ‐                  ADDITIONAL MULTI USE VEHICLE                       10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  GATOR OR WORKMAN TYPE VEHICLE USED TO GET AROUND   ‐                  AND MAINTAIN LARGE PARKS. ELIMINATES THE NEED      ‐                  FOR LARGER PICK‐UP TYPE VEHICLES TRAVELING THRU    ‐                  THE PARK.                                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:USE EXISTING VEHICLES     ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: SMALLER UNITS THAT DO NOT ‐                  DAMAGE ASPHALT/GRASS LIKE PICKUPS FUEL EFFICIENT   ‐                  OPERATIONAL COSTS: LESS THAN TRUCKS               ‐                  PARKS UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE       202410,000             GF320  (FY24)PARKS AUTOMATED ROTARY MOWER BLADE GRINDER  202117,000             GF319 PARKS UTILITY MULTI‐PUPRPOSE VEHICLE       202311,000             GF320 (FY23)304 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #POLICE NON‐PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS             30,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS UNMARKED VEHICLES        ‐                  USED BY COMMAND STAFF, DETECTIVES AND SOME         ‐                  SUPPORT POSITIONS.  SOME OF THESE VEHICLES ARE     ‐                  USED FOR SUPPORT OPERATIONS, SUCH AS ANIMAL        ‐                  CONTROL, COMMUNITY RESOURCE OFFICER, CODE          ‐                  COMPLIANCE, ECT. COMMAND AND DETECTIVE             ‐                  VEHICLES ARE ASSIGNED AND USED TO RESPOND TO       ‐                  EMERGENCY CALLS FOR COMMAND/CONTROL OR             ‐                  INVESTIGATIONS. GENERALLY VEHICLE REPLACEMENT OF   ‐                  THESE VEHICLES INVOLVES BUYING USED, LOWER         ‐                  MILEAGE VEHICLES WITH SOME TRADE‐IN DONE BY        ‐                  HIGHER MILEAGE VEHICLES NEARING THE END OF TIME    ‐                  TO OPERATE SAFELY. DECISIONS ON WHEN TO ROTATE     ‐                  THESE VEHICLES IS USUALLY HIGHER MILEAGE THAN A    ‐                  NORMAL POLICE CAR AND DEPENDENT LARGELY ON TRACK   ‐                  HISTORY FOR MAINTENANCE CONCERNS.                  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  EACH YEAR WE ASSESS EACH PURCHASE DECISION. AT     ‐                  TIMES WE MAY BE ABLE TO CONVERT A MARKED POLICE    ‐                  CAR TO A DETECTIVE USE, WHEN THE VEHICLE IS NO     ‐                  LONGER TRUSTWORTHY TO THE LEVELS OF IMMEDIATE      ‐                  EMERGENCY RESPONSE, BUT COULD BE USED FOR A YEAR   ‐                  OR TWO AS AN UNMARKED SUPPORT VEHICLE.             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  2 OF THESE VEHICLES ARE NEW AND ESSENTIAL.  THE    ‐                  REPLACEMENTS ARE ALSO ESSENTIAL AND CONTINUE TO    ‐                  PROVIDE SAFE AND RELIABLE TRANSPORTATION.  THESE   ‐                  UNMARKED CARS TEND TO LAST FOR AT LEAST 15 YEARS.  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  POLICE UNMARKED VEHICLE REPLCMNT 202330,000             GF052 305 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                        128,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO    ‐                  BE REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE        ‐                  NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS,   ‐                  RADIO, MOBILE DATA TERMINALS, VIDEO CAMERAS,       ‐                  ELECTRONIC REPORTING / TICKETING SYSTEMS, ETC.)    ‐                  COSTS ARE BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS IN FY18 OF $61,000 ‐                  PER VEHICLE AND ANTICIPATED INCREASES IN FY19 AND  ‐                  BEYOND. PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM IN   ‐                  THE OPERATION OF THE BOZEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT,    ‐                  BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000        ‐                  RESPONSE TO CALLS EACH YEAR. POLICE VEHICLES MUST  ‐                  BE AVAILABLE FOR POLICE PATROL AND EMERGENCY CALL  ‐                  RESPONSE 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR. THESE    ‐                  EHICLES ARE USED TO RESPOND TO BOTH EMERGENCY      ‐                  AND NON‐EMERGENCY CALLS FOR SERVICE, INVESTIGATE   ‐                  VEHICLE CRASHES, CONDUCT TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND   ‐                  FOR GENERAL PATROL DUTIES. THESE PATROL VEHICLES   ‐                  AVERAGE APPROXIMATELY 20,000 MILES ANNUALLY.       ‐                  VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT WILL HAVE A     ‐                  MINIMUM ESTIMATED 110,000 MILES PER VEHICLE,       ‐                  WHICH WITH POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TENDS TO BE   ‐                  THE ROUGH TIME WHEN POLICE VEHICLES ARE NO LONGER  ‐                  SAFE FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE.  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS HELPS US PLAN FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE EMERGENCY ‐                  RESPONSE VEHICLES FOR PATROL USE, AS WELL AS       ‐                  PROJECTED LOWER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. THIS     ‐                  PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OLDER,  ‐                  HIGHER MILEAGE PATROL CARS THAT BECOME LESS        ‐                  ELIABLE AND MORE COSTLY TO REPAIR.       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THESE ARE REPLACEMENT VEHICLES. RECURRING COSTS    ‐                  FREQUENTLY DECLINE AS NEWER CARS REPLACE OLDER     ‐                  ONES. MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE STABILIZED DUE TO     ‐                  REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE, EVEN THOUGH CALLS FOR ‐                  SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS     ‐                  HAVE BEEN HIRED.                                   ‐                  THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN LOWERED (10,000)          POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2020118,000           GF053 (FY20) 306 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                        189,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO BE ‐                  REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE           ‐                  NECESSARY VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS,   ‐                  RADIO, VIDEO CAMERAS,                              ‐                  ELECTRONIC REPORTING / TICKETING SYSTEMS, ETC.)    ‐                  COSTS ARE BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS IN FY19 OF $56,000 ‐                  PER VEHICLE AND ANTICIPATED INCREASES IN FY20 AND  ‐                  BEYOND. PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM IN   ‐                  THE OPERATION OF THE BOZEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT,    ‐                  BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000        ‐                  RESPONSE TO CALLS EACH YEAR. POLICE VEHICLES MUST  ‐                  BE AVAILABLE FOR POLICE PATROL AND EMERGENCY       ‐                  CALL RESPONSE 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR.     ‐                  THESE VEHICLES ARE USED TO RESPOND TO BOTH         ‐                  EMERGENCY AND NON‐EMERGENCY CALLS FOR SERVICE,     ‐                  INVESTIGATE VEHICLE CRASHES, CONDUCT TRAFFIC       ‐                  ENFORCEMENT AND FOR GENERAL PATROL DUTIES. THESE   ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES AVERAGE APPROXIMATELY 20,000       ‐                  MILES ANNUALLY.                                    ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS HELPS US PLAN FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE EMERGENCY ‐                  RESPONSE VEHICLES FOR PATROL USE, AS WELL AS       ‐                  PROJECTED LOWER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. THIS     ‐                  PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OLDER,  ‐                  HIGHER MILEAGE PATROL CARS THAT BECOME LESS        ‐                  RELIABLE AND MORE COSTLY TO REPAIR.  ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE STABILIZED DUE TO     ‐                  REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE, EVEN THOUGH CALLS FOR ‐                  SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS     ‐                  HAVE BEEN HIRED.                                   ‐                  FROM FY20 FORWARD, THE MOBILE DATA TERMINALS       (18,000)          ("MDT'S")WILL BE REQUESTED SEPARATELY WITHIN THE   ‐                  BUDGET.   THE USABLE LIFE OF THIS ESSENTAIL TOOL   ‐                  IS LESS THAN 7 YEARS, NECESSITATING THEIR          ‐                  REPLACEMENT EVEN IF THE VEHICLE IS NOT REPLACED.   ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2021171,000           GF053 (FY21)307 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                        195,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO BE ‐                  EPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE NECESSARY  ‐                  VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, RADIO,      ‐                  MOBILE DATA TERMINALS, VIDEO CAMERAS, ELECTRONIC   ‐                  REPORTING / TICKETING SYSTEMS, ETC.) COSTS ARE     ‐                  BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS IN FY18 OF $61,000 PER       ‐                  VEHICLE AND ANTICIPATED INCREASES IN FY19 AND      ‐                  BEYOND. PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM IN   ‐                  THE OPERATION OF THE BOZEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT,    ‐                  BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER 50,000        ‐                  RESPONSE TO CALLS EACH YEAR. POLICE VEHICLES MUST  ‐                  BE AVAILABLE FOR POLICE PATROL AND EMERGENCY       ‐                  CALL RESPONSE 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS A YEAR.     ‐                  THESE VEHICLES ARE USED TO RESPOND TO BOTH         ‐                  EMERGENCY AND NON‐EMERGENCY CALLS FOR SERVICE,     ‐                  INVESTIGATE VEHICLE CRASHES, CONDUCT TRAFFIC       ‐                  ENFORCEMENT AND FOR GENERAL PATROL DUTIES. THESE   ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES AVERAGE APPROXIMATELY 20,000       ‐                  MILES ANNUALLY. VEHICLES EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT ‐                  WILL HAVE A MINIMUM ESTIMATED 110,000 MILES PER    ‐                  VEHICLE, WHICH WITH POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEND ‐                  TO BE THE ROUGH TIME WHEN POLICE VEHICLES ARE NO   ‐                  LONGER SAFE FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE.  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS HELPS US PLAN FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE EMERGENCY ‐                  RESPONSE VEHICLES FOR PATROL USE, AS WELL AS       ‐                  PROJECTED LOWER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. THIS     ‐                  PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF OLDER,  ‐                  HIGHER MILEAGE PATROL CARS THAT BECOME LESS        ‐                  RELIABLE AND MORE COSTLY TO REPAIR.   ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  .MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE STABILIZED DUE TO     ‐                  REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE, EVEN THOUGH CALLS FOR ‐                  SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS     ‐                  HAVE BEEN HIRED.                                   ‐                  THE REQUEST FOR THIS LINE HAS BEEN REDUCED DUE TO (15,000)          MOVING THE COST OF THE MDT TO GF292.              ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2022180,000           GF053 (FY22)308 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT                        132,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PLAN ALLOWS FOR A NUMBER OF PATROL CARS TO BE ‐                  REPLACED EACH YEAR, INCLUDING ALL OF THE NECESSARY ‐                  VEHICLE EQUIPMENT (TOP LIGHTS, SIRENS, RADIO,      ‐                  VIDEO CAMERAS, ELECTRONIC                          ‐                  REPORTING / TICKETING SYSTEMS, ETC.) COSTS ARE     ‐                  BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS IN FY18 OF $61,000 PER       ‐                  VEHICLE AND ANTICIPATED INCREASES IN FY19 AND      ‐                  BEYOND. PATROL VEHICLES ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM IN   ‐                  THE OPERATION OF THE BOZEMAN POLICE                ‐                  DEPARTMENT, BEING THE PRIMARY TOOL USED FOR OVER   ‐                  50,000 RESPONSE TO CALLS EACH YEAR. POLICE         ‐                  VEHICLES MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR POLICE PATROL AND   ‐                  EMERGENCY CALL RESPONSE 24 HOURS A DAY, 365        ‐                  DAYS A YEAR. THESE VEHICLES ARE USED TO RESPOND    ‐                  TO BOTH EMERGENCY AND NON‐EMERGENCY CALLS FOR      ‐                  SERVICE, INVESTIGATE VEHICLE CRASHES, CONDUCT      ‐                  TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND FOR GENERAL PATROL         ‐                  DUTIES. THESE PATROL VEHICLES AVERAGE              ‐                  APPROXIMATELY 20,000 MILES ANNUALLY. VEHICLES      ‐                  EARMARKED FOR REPLACEMENT WILL HAVE A MINIMUM      ‐                  ESTIMATED 110,000 MILES PER VEHICLE, WHICH WITH    ‐                  POLICE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TENDS TO BE THE ROUGH    ‐                  TIME WHEN POLICE VEHICLES ARE NO LONGER SAFE FOR   ‐                  EMERGENCY RESPONSE.  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS HELPS US PLAN FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE EMERGENCY ‐                  RESPONSE VEHICLES FOR PATROL USE, AS WELL AS       ‐                  PROJECTED LOWER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS. THIS     ‐                  PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF         ‐                  OLDER, HIGHER MILEAGE PATROL CARS THAT BECOME LESS ‐                  RELIABLE AND MORE COSTLY TO REPAIR. ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                               ‐                   MAINTENANCE COSTS HAVE STABILIZED DUE TO     ‐                  REGULARLY SCHEDULED SERVICE, EVEN THOUGH CALLS FOR ‐                  SERVICE HAVE INCREASED AND ADDITIONAL OFFICERS     ‐                  HAVE BEEN HIRED.                                   ‐                  THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN REDUCED DUE TO THE TRANSFER (10,000)          OF THE COST OF THE MDT TO GF292.                  ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2023122,000           GF053 (FY23) 309 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #TWO PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS:                  124,000         THESE PATROL VEHILCES ARE THE PRIMARY RESPONSE     ‐                  VEHICLE UTILIZED BY THE PATROL DIVISION. THEY      ‐                  ARE SHARED BY TWO OR THREE OFFICERS AND GENERALLY  ‐                  USED ONS MULTIPLE SHIFT IN ALL TYPES OF WEATHER    ‐                  CONDITIONS.   THESE VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH     ‐                  LIGHTBARS, A RADIO SYSTEM, A TRANSPORT SEAT AND    ‐                  DIVIDER, A SIREN, A VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM, AND MANY  ‐                  OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR PATROL RESPONSE.         ‐                  HAVING A REPLACEMENT SYSTEM IS NECESSARY TO KEEP   ‐                  THESE ESSENTIAL VEHICLES APPROPRIATE FOR           ‐                  EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN ALL CONDITIONS.              ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR & EQUIP RPLCMT 2024124,000           GF053 (FY24)310 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PORTABLE AND MOBILE RADIO REPLACEMENTS            295,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  IN FY18 THE DEPARTMENT AND CITY HAS BEEN IN        ‐                  CONVERSATIONS AND PLANNING WITH GALLATIN COUNTY    ‐                  911 TO IMPROVE RADIO COMMUNICATION THAT HAS BECOME ‐                  AN OPERATIONAL AND SAFETY CONCERN. REGARDLESS OF   ‐                  THE FINAL IMPROVEMENTS TO INFRASTRUCTURE, ONE OF   ‐                  THE IDENTIFIED NEEDS FOR REPLACEMENT IS            ‐                  SUBSCRIBER UNITS (PORTABLE RADIOS USED BY OFFICERS ‐                  AND MOBILE RADIOS USED IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE       ‐                  VEHICLES).THE REPLACEMENT OF THESE SUBSCRIBER UNIT ‐                  (RADIOS) ARE A MAJOR STOP TO IMPROVING             ‐                  COMMUNICATIONS AND RESPONSES CAPABILITIES. THESE   ‐                  RADIOS ARE AN ESSENTIAL ITEM IN THE OPERATION OF   ‐                  THE BOZEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEING A CRITICAL    ‐                  COMMUNICATION TOOL USED FOR OVER TO 50,000         ‐                  RESPONSE TO CALLS EACH YEAR. POLICE RADIOS MUST BE ‐                  AVAILABLE FOR POLICE USE 24 HOURS A DAY, 365 DAYS  ‐                  A YEAR. THESE RADIOS ARE INDIVIDUALLY ASSIGNED,    ‐                  ALLOWING FOR GREATER LONGEVITY, AND DEPARTMENT‐    ‐                  WIDE COMMUNICATION IN THE EVENT OF A NEED FOR      ‐                  MAJOR RESPONSE.   THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED     ‐                  PURCHASING THESE UNITS, WHICH ARE CURRENTLY        ‐                  PURCHASED WITH PAYMENTS IN FY19 AND FY21.  ‐                  RADIOS WILL HAVE AT LEAST A 10 YEAR USE FOR        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NO OTHER ALTERNATIVES AT THIS TIME                 ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS ENSURES SAFE AND RELIABLE EMERGENCY           ‐                  COMMUNICATION AND RESPONSE. PROGRAM ALLOWS FOR A   ‐                  PLANNED AND PREDICTABLE NEED FOR EQUIPMENT         ‐                  REPLACEMENT. CLEAR AND DEPENDABLE COMMUNICATION    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  POLICE COUNTY LEASE‐ PORTABLE AND MOBILE RADIO2020295,000           GF166 311 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL CAR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT                     10,000            30,000             DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WITHIN A PATROL CAR IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF     ‐                  TECHNOLOGY RELATED AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT.  THIS      ‐                  INCLUDES A RADAR UNIT, ARBITRATOR VIDEO RECORDER,  ‐                  ELECTRONIC TICKETING PRINTER, MOBILE DATA          ‐                  TERMINAL, AMONGST OTHER ITEMS. MOST OF THESE ITEMS ‐                  ARE PART OF A NORMAL REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE          ‐                  AS NEW PATROL VEHICLES ARE PURCHASED AND OLD       ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES RETIRED.  THIS DIRECTION ‐                   WILL ALSO LEAD TO LESS DESKTOP COMPUTERS ‐                  BEING PURCHASED AND INCREASE OFFICER EFFICIENCY.   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES ARE TO CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING MDC   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  LESS COSTS FOR DESKTOP COMPUTERS, LESS DUPLICATION ‐                  OF MAINTENANCE, MORE EFFICIENCY FOR OFFICERS,      ‐                  MEANING OFFICERS MORE AVAILABLE FOR EMERGENCY      ‐                  CALL RESPONSE.                                     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  FROM FY20 FORWARD, REQUESTS FOR MDTS WILL BE      20,000            LISTED SEPARATELY FROM THE VEHICLES.  THIS IS DUE  ‐                  TO MDTS NEEDING TO BE REPLACED BEFORE THE VEHILCE. ‐                  IN ADDITION, WE HAVE IDENTIFIED THE NEED TO        ‐                  REPLACE FIVE THIS YEAR THAT ARE EXPERIENCING       ‐                  A VARIETY OF ISSUES.                               ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP      2020GF292 (FY20) 312 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL CAR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT                     10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WITHIN A PATROL CAR IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF     ‐                  TECHNOLOGY RELATED AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT.  THIS      ‐                  INCLUDES A RADAR UNIT, ARBITRATOR VIDEO RECORDER,  ‐                  ELECTRONIC TICKETING PRINTER, MOBILE DATA          ‐                  COMPUTER AMONGST OTHER ITEMS.  MOST OF THESE       ‐                  ITEMS ARE PART OF A NORMAL REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE    ‐                  AS NEW PATROL VEHICLES ARE PURCHASED AND OLD       ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES RETIRED.   ‐                  THIS DIRECTION WILL ALSO LEAD TO LESS DESKTOP      ‐                  COMPUTERS BEING PURCHASED AND INCREASE OFFICER     ‐                  EFFICIENCY.                                        ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES ARE TO CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING MDC   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LESS COSTS FOR DESKTOP COMPUTERS, LESS DUPLICATION ‐                  OF MAINTENANCE, MORE EFFICIENCY FOR OFFICERS,      ‐                  MEANING OFFICERS MORE AVAILABLE FOR EMERGENCY      ‐                  CALL RESPONSE.                                     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  FROM FY20 FORWARD, ALL MDTS WILL BE INCLUDED IN   20,000            THIS PROJECT CODE, RATHER THAN SOME ATTACHED TO    ‐                  THE VEHICLE PROJECT CODE.   THIS IS DUE TO THE     ‐                  NEED TO REPLACE MDTS BEFORE THE VEHILCE IS READY   ‐                  TO BE REPLACED.   DUE TO THE LIFESPAN OF AN MDT    ‐                  BEING LESS THAN 7 YEARS, THE NUMBER REQUESTED HAS  ‐                  BEEN INCREASED TO 5.                               ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP      202130,000             GF292 (FY21) 313 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL CAR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT                     10,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WITHIN A PATROL CAR IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF     ‐                  TECHNOLOGY RELATED AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT.  THIS      ‐                  INCLUDES A RADAR UNIT, ARBITRATOR VIDEO RECORDER,  ‐                  ELECTRONIC TICKETING PRINTER, MOBILE DATA          ‐                  COMPUTER AMONGST OTHER ITEMS.  MOST OF THESE       ‐                  ITEMS ARE PART OF A NORMAL REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE    ‐                  AS NEW PATROL VEHICLES ARE PURCHASED AND OLD       ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES RETIRED.  THIS DIRECTION ‐                  WILL ALSO LEAD TO LESS DESKTOP COMPUTERS ‐                  BEING PURCHASED AND INCREASE OFFICER EFFICIENCY.   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES ARE TO CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING MDC   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LESS COSTS FOR DESKTOP COMPUTERS, LESS DUPLICATION ‐                  OF MAINTENANCE, MORE EFFICIENCY FOR OFFICERS,      ‐                  MEANING OFFICERS MORE AVAILABLE FOR EMERGENCY      ‐                  CALL RESPONSE.                                     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  THIS REQUEST AMOUNT HAS BEEN INCREASED DUE TO THE 20,000            INCREASED COST OF MDTS, THE TRANSFER OF SOME       ‐                  COSTS FROM GF053, AND THE NEED TO REPLACE MDTS     ‐                  WITHIN A 7 YEAR PERIOD, SHORTER THAN THE LIFE OF   ‐                  A PATROL CAR.                                      ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP      202230,000             GF292 (FY22) 314 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL CAR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT                     15,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  WITHIN A PATROL CAR IS A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF     ‐                  TECHNOLOGY RELATED AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT.  THIS      ‐                  INCLUDES A RADAR UNIT, ARBITRATOR VIDEO RECORDER,  ‐                  ELECTRONIC TICKETING PRINTER, MOBILE DATA          ‐                  COMPUTER AMONGST OTHER ITEMS.  MOST OF THESE       ‐                  ITEMS ARE PART OF A NORMAL REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE    ‐                  AS NEW PATROL VEHICLES ARE PURCHASED AND OLD       ‐                  PATROL VEHICLES RETIRED.  THIS DIRECTION ‐                  WILL ALSO LEAD TO LESS DESKTOP COMPUTERS ‐                  BEING PURCHASED AND INCREASE OFFICER EFFICIENCY.   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES ARE TO CONTINUE TO USE EXISTING MDC   ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  LESS COSTS FOR DESKTOP COMPUTERS, LESS DUPLICATION ‐                  OF MAINTENANCE, MORE EFFICIENCY FOR OFFICERS,      ‐                  MEANING OFFICERS MORE AVAILABLE FOR EMERGENCY      ‐                  CALL RESPONSE.                                     ‐                  THIS REQUEST AMOUNT HAS BEEN INCREASED DUE TO THE 15,000            INCREASED COST OF MDTS, THE TRANFER OF SOME        ‐                  COSTS FROM GF053, AND THE NEED TO REPLACE MDTS     ‐                  WITHIN A 7 YEAR PERIOD, SHORTER THAN THE LIFE OF   ‐                  A PATROL CAR.                                      ‐                  MOBILE DATA TERMINALS:                             30,000            "MDT'S" ARE AN ESSENTIAL TOOL FOR ALL PATROL       ‐                  VEHICLES.  THEY ARE USED FOR SHARING INFORMATION,  ‐                  VIEWING CALLS, COMPLETING REPORTS, AND NUMEROUS    ‐                  OTHER TASKS.  MDTS HAVE A LIFESPAN OF LESS THAN    ‐                  7 YEARS, MEANING THEY MUST FREQUENTLY BE REPLACED  ‐                  IN VEHICLES THAT LAST LONGER THAN THAT.  THESE     ‐                  MDTS WOULD BE INSTALLED IN NEW VEHICLES AND USED   ‐                  TO REPLACE THE LEAST FUNCTIONAL MDTS IN EXISTING   ‐                  VEHICLES.                                          ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP      202330,000             GF292 (FY23)POLICE PATROL CAR AUX EQUIP      202430,000             GF292 (FY24) 315 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES                        15,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  IN FY20 AND, AGAIN, IN FY22, WE ANTICIPATE         ‐                  ADDING A DETECTIVE TO THE DETECTIVE DIVISION       ‐                  TO HANDLE INCREASED DEMANDS AND AN INCREASING      ‐                  CASELOAD.                                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES MAY INCLUDE USE OF OLDER PATROL CARS  ‐                  THAT CAN T BE USED FOR PATROL RESPONSE, OR THE     ‐                  USE OF EXISTING MARKED UNITS WHICH WILL ADD        ‐                  MILEAGE TO THOSE VEHICLES AND EFFECT THAT ROTATION ‐                  SCHEDULE.                                          ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THESE VEHICLES TEND TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN 10    ‐                  YEARS AND PROVIDE SRO ABILITY TO RESPOND TO THE    ‐                  SCHOOLS, OTHER EMERGENCY AND ON‐CALL RESPONSE      ‐                  AFTER HOURS.                                       ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  REPAIR AND & MAINTENANCE                           ‐                  WITH THE ADDITION OF A SECOND BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL  15,000            WITHIN THIS YEAR, WE ANCTICIPATE ADDING AN         ‐                  ADDITIONAL SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER,                ‐                  NECESSITATING AN ADDITIONAL VEHICLE. VEHICLE       ‐                  WILL BE USED FOR MINIMAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE,       ‐                  WITH MOST USE OCCURRING IN NON‐EMERGENCY           ‐                  SITUATIONS.  VEHICLES ACQUIRED IN THIS CATEGROY    ‐                  ARE GENERALLY A COUPLE YEARS OLD AND UTILIZED AT   ‐                  LEAST TEN YEARS BY THE DEPARTMENT.                 ‐                  POLICE NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES    202015,000             GF293 (FY20)POLICE NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES         202115,000             GF293 (FY21)316 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES                        15,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  IN FY20 AND FY22 WE ANTICIPATE ADDING TWO          ‐                  SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER POSITIONS TO COVER THE NEW ‐                  BOZEMAN HIGH SCHOOL AND INCREASED DEMAND           ‐                  FOR POLICE SERVICES AT ALL SCHOOLS.                ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  ALTERNATIVES MAY INCLUDE USE OF OLDER PATROL CARS  ‐                  THAT CAN T BE USED FOR PATROL RESPONSE, OR THE     ‐                  USE OF EXISTING MARKED UNITS WHICH WILL ADD        ‐                  MILEAGE TO THOSE VEHICLES AND EFFECT THAT          ‐                  ROTATION SCHEDULE.                                 ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THESE VEHICLES TEND TO BE USED FOR MORE THAN 10    ‐                  YEARS AND PROVIDE SRO ABILITY TO RESPOND TO THE    ‐                  SCHOOLS, OTHER EMERGENCY AND ON‐CALL RESPONSE      ‐                  AFTER HOURS.                                       ‐                  ADD OPERATIN COSTS:                               ‐                  DURING THIS YEAR, WE ANTICIPATE THE ADDITION OF   15,000            BOTH ANOTHER GENERAL DETETIVE AND ANOTHER SCHOOL   ‐                  RESOURCE OFFICER.  WITH THESE ADDITIONS COMES      ‐                  THE NEED FOR TWO ADDITIONAL UNMARKED VEHILCES.     ‐                  THESE VEHICLES ARE GENERALLY PURHCASED A COUPLE    ‐                  YEARS OLD AND UTILIZED FOR AT LEAST 10 YEARS.      ‐                  BOTH WILL BE UTILZIED FOR MINIMAL EMERGENCY        ‐                  RESPONSE, WITH THE MAJORITY OF USAGE ASSOCIATED    ‐                  WITH RESPONSE TO NON EMERGENCY CALLS AND           ‐                  INVESTIGATIONS.                                    ‐                  POLICE NON‐PATROL CAR NEW VEHICLES        202230,000             GF293 (FY22)317 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL                            64,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  A REVIEW OF MILEAGE AND ESTIMATED STAFFING         ‐                  INCREASES IN PATROL BY 2‐3 OFFICERS OVER THE NEXT  ‐                  FEW YEARS HAS ALSO LED TO THE IDENTIFIED NEED FOR  ‐                  AN ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE IN FY21.  THIS WON T  ‐                  REPLACE A VEHICLE AND BRINGS THE TOTAL PATROL      ‐                  RESPONSE VEHICLES TO 23 (1 UNMARKED / 2 K9 VEHICLE ‐                  20 FULLY MARKED)                                   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE PATROL RESPONSE WITH EXISTING PATROL CARS ‐                  RESULTING IN HIGHER MILEAGE/ANNUM FOR EACH VEHICLE ‐                  AND DIFFICULTY AT TIMES TO HAVE SUFFICIENT VEHICLE ‐                  AVAILABLE FOR # OF OFFICERS HIRED AND DEPLOYED BY  ‐                  FY21+.                                             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THIS IS AN ESSENTIAL VEHICLE FOR SAFE AND RELIABLE ‐                  EMERGENCY RESPONSE VEHICLES FOR PATROL USE, AS     ‐                  WELL AS PROJECTED LOWER ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS.  ‐                  THIS ADDITIONAL VEHICLE PROVIDES SUFFICIENT MARKED ‐                  PATROL CARS FOR 24/7 RESPONSE.                     ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  VEHICLE REQUEST LOWERED DUE TO MOVING THE COST    (5,000)            OF THE MDT TO GF292.                              ‐                  ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE:                         62,000            WE ANTICIPATE THE NEED FOR AN                      ‐                  ADDITIONAL PATROL VEHICLE DUE TO INCREASED         ‐                  STAFFING AND DEMANDS FOR SERVICE. THIS VEHICLE     ‐                  WOULD BE A PRIMARY REPONSE VEHICLE UTILIZED BY THE ‐                  THE PATROL DIVISION.  THESE VEHICLES ARE SHARED    ‐                  BY TWO OR THREE PATROL OFFICERS AND GENERALLY      ‐                  USED ON MULTIPLE SHIFTS IN ALL TYPES OF WEATHER    ‐                  CONDITIONS. THESE VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH       ‐                  LIGHTBARS, A RADIO SYSTEM, A TRANSPORT SEAT AND    ‐                  DIVIDER, A SIREN, A VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM, AND       ‐                  MANY OTHER ITEMS NECESSARY FOR PATROL RESPONSE.    ‐                  POLICE PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL   202462,000             GF294 POLICE PATROL CAR ‐ ADDITIONAL   202159,000             GF294 318 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #REPLACMENT K9 DOG:                                 17,000            K9 DOGS HAVE AN AVERAGE SPAN OF SERVICE OF 7‐8     ‐                  YEARS.  THIS REQUEST WOULD BE TO REPLACE A DOG     ‐                  BEING USED SINCE 2017. COST INCLUDES THE PURCHASE, ‐                  TRAINING OF DOG AND HANDLER, AND TRANSPORT TO      ‐                  BOZEMAN. THESE K9S ARE UTILIZED FOR DRUG           ‐                  INTERDICTION EFFORTS, FOR SEARCHING BUILDINGS, AND ‐                  FOR TRACKING SUSPECTS.                             ‐                  NEW BODY CAMERA SYSTEM:                            70,000            UTILIZING BODY CAMERA SYSTEM HAS BECOME STANDARD   ‐                  IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.  OUR DEPARTMENT ANTICIPATES    ‐                  THE NEED TO IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM IN THE NEAR        ‐                  FUTURE.  COSTS CONTINUE TO CHANGE AS THE INDUSTRY  ‐                  DEVELOPS.   ANTICIPATED COSTS WOULD INCLUDE        ‐                  HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, APPROPRIATE STORAGE CAPACITY,  ‐                  AND AN INTERFACE TO EXISTING RECORDS SYSTEM.       ‐                  DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS  100,000         DESCRIPTION:                                       ‐                  DESIGN PORTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN FY22.           ‐                  INDOOR/OUTDOOR AQUATICS CENTER. THIS ITEM WAS      ‐                  IDENTIFIED AS A  TOP TEN CAPITAL FACILITY          ‐                  RECOMMENDATION  IN THE PROST PLAN, ADOPTED         ‐                  OCTOBER 2007. THE DESIGN PHASE IN FY18 INCLUDES    ‐                  THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE FAMILY AQUATICS      ‐                  CENTER. THIS PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY   ‐                  THE VOTERS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT AN ELECTION WOULD ‐                  BE OFFERED IN THE FALL OF 2021.                    ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                           ‐                  DO NOT BUILD A COMMUNITY AQUATICS CENTER.          ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                            ‐                  COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF AN AQUATICS CENTER: SAFE AND ‐                  HEALTHY PLACE FOR FAMILIES TO PLAY, CONNECTED      ‐                  FAMILIES, STRONG VITAL INVOLVED COMMUNITY, AND     ‐                  INCREASED COMMUNITY PROGRAMS.                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                               ‐                  ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS TO          ‐                  INCLUDE ADDITIONAL AQUATIC STAFF.                  ‐                  COST UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME.                    ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION                          6,000              POLICE POLICE BODY CAMERA SYSTEM 202470,000             GF316 RECREATION DESIGN & CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 2021106,000           GF056 POLICE REPLACMENT K9 DOG            202417,000             GF309 319 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project # CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS  16,500,000    DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  BOND ISSUANCE AND CONSTRUCTION                     ‐                  INDOOR/OUTDOOR AQUATICS CENTER. THIS ITEM WAS      ‐                  IDENTIFIED AS A  TOP TEN CAPITAL FACILITY          ‐                  RECOMMENDATION  IN THE PROST PLAN, ADOPTED         ‐                  OCTOBER 2007. THE DESIGN PHASE IN FY18 INCLUDES    ‐                  THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF THE FAMILY AQUATICS      ‐                  CENTER. THIS PROJECT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY   ‐                  THE VOTERS. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT AN ELECTION WOULD ‐                  BE OFFERED IN THE FALL OF 2021.                    ‐                  ALTERNTAIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  DO NOT BUILD A COMMUNITY AQUATICS CENTER.          ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  COMMUNITY BENEFITS OF AN AQUATICS CENTER: SAFE AND ‐                  HEALTHY PLACE FOR FAMILIES TO PLAY, CONNECTED      ‐                  FAMILIES, STRONG VITAL INVOLVED COMMUNITY, AND     ‐                  INCREASED COMMUNITY PROGRAMS.                      ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS TO          ‐                  ADDITIONAL AQUATIC STAFF.                          ‐                  COST UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIME.                    ‐                  FUNDING SOURCES:                                   ‐                  BOND AND GENERAL FUND                              ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION                         990,000         RECREATION CONSTRUCT INDOOR/OUTDOOR FAMILY AQUATICS 202217,490,000      GF056 320 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS    949,300         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE SWIM CENTER REQUIRES NUMEROUS REPAIR AND       ‐                  EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENTS WHICH WOULD BE ADDED        ‐                  TO THE BOND INITIATIVE FOR THE INDOOR/OUTDOOR      ‐                  AQUATICS CENTER. THESE ITEMS INCLUDE: GUTTER       ‐                  REPLACEMENT;DECK TILE REPLACEMENT;                 ‐                  REPLACEMENT OF CEILING TILES;                      ‐                  HVAC UNIT REPLACEMENT;                             ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  THESE PROJECTS WILL HELP TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE     ‐                  ABLE TO MAINTAIN A SAFE AND FUNCTIONAL FACILITY.   ‐                  THE POOL IS EXTREMELY WELL UTILIZED AND REPAIRS    ‐                  AND REPLACEMENTS ARE NECESSARY OVER TIME IN        ‐                  ORDER TO CONTINUE TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY.          ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO ADDITIONAL ANNUAL OPERATING AND                 ‐                  MAINTENANCE COSTS                                  ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION                         38,000            RECREATION SWIM CENTER ‐ FACILITY    2022987,300           GF137 321 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #LINDLEY CENTER PARKING LOT RESURFACING             53,560            DESCRIPTION: CURB AND OVERLAY THE PARKING LOT AT  ‐                  THE LINDLEY CENTER AND INCLUDE ADA PARKING STALLS. ‐                  INSTALL PARKING LOT LIGHTS AND BASES, DUMPSTER PAD ‐                  AND DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. THIS PROJECT ALIGNS WITH   ‐                  SECTION 10.10.1 OF THE PROST PLAN‐ADOPTED IN 2007  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: KEEP PARKING LOT GRAVEL.  ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: COMPLY WITH CITY CODE,    ‐                  MORE ORGANIZED PARKING, SAFER PARKING LOT,         ‐                  ACCESSIBLITY.                                      ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: STRIPPING AND PERIODIC ‐                  SEALING AND STRIPING LOT AND NOT INSTALLING LIGHTS ‐                  OVERLAYS.                                          ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO ACTUAL COST                       21,828            COMPLY WITH CITY CODES, ALLOW FOR MORE CARS TO BE  ‐                  PARKED IN THE LOT AT A TIME, MORE ORGANIZED        ‐                  PARKING WHICH WILL MAKE THE LOT SAFER AND REDUCED  ‐                  LIABILITY, LIGHTS WILL HELP WITH PUBLIC SAFETY AND ‐                  PARKING LOT/FACILITY SECURITY, ADA SPOTS WILL BE   ‐                  DESIGNATED WHICH WILL MAKE THE LOT ACCESSIBLE,     ‐                  THE DUMPSTER WOULD BE ENCLOSED.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS TO INCLUDE  ‐                  STRIPPING AND PERIODIC OVERLAYS.                   ‐                  RECREATION LINDLEY CENTER PARKING LOT RESURFACING202475,388             GF140 322 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE: RESTROOMS,           224,277         WINDOWS, SIDING, KITCHEN, ROOF, FLOORING           ‐                  DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THIS PROJECT IS THE COMBINATION OF REQUESTS FOR    ‐                  UPGRADE OF THE RESTROOMS ($56,650), WINDOW         ‐                  REPLACEMENT ($24,926), SIDING REPLACEMENT          ‐                  REPLACEMENT ($27,192), KITCHEN UPGRADE ($56,650),  ‐                  EAST ROOF INSULATION ($27,192), FLOOR SUPPORT      ‐                  ($14,389), ROOF SUPPORT ($17,278). THIS IS A       ‐                  HEAVILY USED COMMUNITY BUILDING THAT COULD BENEFIT ‐                  FROM SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENTS.                     ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  AS SUGGESTED BY THE COMMISSION                     ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  1. BRINGS RESTROOMSUP TO CURRENT ADA REQUIREMENTS  ‐                  2. BRINGS RESTROOMS UP TO CURRENT CITY OF BOZEMAN  ‐                  BUILDING CODES 3. IMPROVES SANITATION IN THE       ‐                  RESTROOMS AND KITCHEN FACILITIES 4. REHABS AND     ‐                  SECURES THE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR YEARS TO COME.   ‐                  5. REDUCED ENERGY CONSUMPTION FROM IMPROVED        ‐                  WINDOWS AND INSULATION. 6. ADDRESSES DEFICIENCIES  ‐                  THAT WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE 2014 STRUCTURAL        ‐                  ANALYSIS AND 2012 FACILITY CONDITION INVENTORY.    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  MINIMAL.                                           ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO THE FOLLOWING:                    ‐                  MEP DESIGN, CA SERVICES                            67,023            CONTINGENCY                                        29,000            RECREATION LINDLEY CENTER FULL UPGRADE 2023320,300           GF209 323 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #BOGERT POOL RENOVATION                            483,000         DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  BOGERT POOL IS BEGINNING TO SHOW ITS WEAR FASTER   ‐                  EVERY YEAR.  THIS PROJECT WOULD REPLACE THE COPING ‐                  AROUND THE POOL THAT IS CRACKED IN SEVERAL AREAS   ‐                  AND THE POOL GUTTERS THAT ARE CRACKING, CRUMBLING, ‐                  AND/OR LIFTING FROM THE POOL EDGE. ALL OF THE      ‐                  LEAKS THAT COULD BE PATCHED WITHOUT DIGGING UP THE ‐                  BOTTOM OF THE POOL HAVE BEEN PATCHED. THERE IS     ‐                  MINIMAL LEAKING IN THE RETURN PIPES TO THE POOL    ‐                  BUT WE RECOMMEND REPAIRING THE LEAKS IN THE        ‐                  RETURNING PIPING THAT WERE IDENTIFIED IN MAY OF    ‐                  2015, BEFORE THE POOL IS BLASTED WITH SAND OR HIGH ‐                  PRESSURE WATER, PREPPED, AND RESURFACED.  THE      ‐                  RETAINING WALL IS GOING TO BE REPLACED WITH A      ‐                  WROUGHT IRON FENCE TO ALLOW MORE VISIBILITY TO     ‐                  THE FACILITY AT NIGHT AND PROVIDE MORE STRUCTURE,  ‐                  AS THE CURRENT WALL IS WEAKENING.  THE SECTIONS OF ‐                  THE DECKING IN FRONT OF THE LOCKER ROOMS HAVE      ‐                  SUNKEN OVER THE YEARS AND WILL ALSO BE REPLACED.   ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  MAKING THESE REPAIRS TO   BOGERT WOULD EXTEND ‐                  THE LIFE OF THE POOL FOR  YEARS. ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NO ADDITIONAL COSTS WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH       ‐                  THESE REPAIRS.                                     ‐                  INCREASE DUE TO INFLATION                         29,000            RECREATION BOGERT POOL RENOVATION    2022512,000           GF238 324 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #SWIM CENTER   FRONT FURNACE REPLACEMENT            36,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE FRONT FURNACE SUPPLIES AIR TO THE LOBBY,       ‐                  LOCKER ROOMS, AND LIFEGUARD ROOM.  THE UNIT IS     ‐                  DETERIORATING DUE TO THE HUMID ENVIRONMENT.        ‐                  GETTING PARTS FOR THE FURNACE IS BECOMING          ‐                  INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT DUE TO ITS AGE. THE UNIT    ‐                  WOULD BE REPLACED WITH A UNIT WHICH ARE DESIGNED   ‐                  FOR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS OR BE PLACED OUTSIDE.     ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  THE CURRENT UNIT WAS INSTALLED IN 2008.            ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  CONTINUE TO REPAIR THE UNIT.                       ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  REPLACING THE CURRENT UNIT WOULD CUT DOWN ON COSTS ‐                  TO REPAIR AND SERVICE THE UNIT.                    ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  INCREASE BASED ON QUOTES                           1,080              STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT  110,000         DESCRIPTION: REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING GYMNASIUM‐                  FLOOR WITH A WOOD FLOOR THAT IS MORE DURABLE,      ‐                  LOWER MAINTENANCE, AND CONDUCIVE TO MULTIPLE USES  ‐                  THE CURRENT FLOOR HAS LIMITED USES.  ALTERNATIVES ‐                  CONSIDERED: INSTALL VINYL FLOORING INSTEAD OF WOOD‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: DURABILITY, AESTHETICS,   ‐                  INCREASED PROGRAM OPTIONS, LOWER MAINTENANCE COSTS‐                  INCREASE IN GYM RENTAL AND PROGRAM REVENUE.        ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ANNUAL FLOOR FINISH   ‐                  APPLICATION FOR INCREASED DURABILITY.              ‐                  SAND AND REFINISH FLOOR EVERY 6‐10 YEARS.          ‐                  STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT. DESCRIPTION:         60,000            THE EXTERIOR PAINT AT THE STORY MANSION HAS        ‐                  STARTED TO FADE AND PEEL. IT WAS LAST PAINTED IN   ‐                  2007 AND HAS AN EXPECTED SERVICE LIFE OF 10 YEARS  ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:NONE. ADVANTAGES OF       ‐                  APPROVAL:DUE TO THE CURRENT PEELING AND FADING OF ‐                  THE PAINT, WE RISK COMPROMISING THE SIDING WHICH   ‐                  COULD NEED REPLACEMENT DUE TO DAMAGE AND WOULD BE ‐                  A SIGNIFICANTLY MORE EXPENSIVE PROJECT.            ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: REPAINTING EVERY 8‐10 ‐                  YEARS.                                             ‐                  RECREATION STORY MANSION EXTERIOR PAINT.  202160,000             GF301 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM FLOOR REPLACEMENT 2021110,000           GF300 RECREATION SWIM CENTER   FRONT FURNACE REPLACEMENT          202037,080             GF296 325 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #PASSENGER VAN                                      35,000            DESCRIPTION:                                      ‐                  THE PURCHASE OF A 12‐15 PASSENGER VAN FOR PARKS    ‐                  AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAMS AS WELL AS      ‐                  OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS USE AS NEEDED.              ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:                          ‐                  NONE                                               ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:                           ‐                  OUR CURRENT PASSENGER VAN CAN ACCOMMODATE 13       ‐                  CHILDREN AND 2 STAFF  WHEN USED FOR PROGRAMS. THE  ‐                  MAJORITY OF OUR PROGRAMS HAVE A MAX CAPACITY OF 20 ‐                  OR MORE, WHICH MEANS MULTIPLE TRIPS AND ADDITIONAL ‐                  STAFF SUPPORT IS REQUIRED WHEN TRANSPORTING        ‐                  PARTICIPANTS, OR A LOWER MAX NUMBER PUT ON THE     ‐                  PROGRAM. ANOTHER VAN WOULD BETTER MEET CURRENT     ‐                  NEEDS.                                             ‐                  ADD OPERATING COSTS:                              ‐                  ROUTINE MAINTENANCE                                ‐                  STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM LIGHTING UPGRADE   11,000            DESCRIPTION: RETROFIT EXISTING HIGH WATTAGE       ‐                  FIXTURES WITH LED FIXTURES. ALTERNATIVES          ‐                  CONSIDERED: NOT UPGRADING THE LIGHTS.             ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT     ‐                  LIGHTING, WITH AN ESTIMATED $1,730 IN ANNUAL       ‐                  SAVINGS.  NORTHWESTERN ENERGY REBATES WOULD ALSO   ‐                  BE AVAILABLE. ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE ‐                  MAINTENANCE                                        ‐                  STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MULTIPURPOSE ROOM      17,000            EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT.            ‐                  DESCRIPTION: THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR DOORS TO   ‐                  THE TWO MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS IN THE STORY MILL       ‐                  COMMUNITY CENTER DO NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY WHICH    ‐                  COMPROMISES THE BUILDINGS SECURITY.  DOOR          ‐                  REPLACEMENT WAS IDENTIFIED AS A NEED DURING        ‐                  THE REMODEL, HOWEVER WAS CUT DUE TO THE PROJECT    ‐                  BUDGET. THIS PROJECT WOULD INCLUDE THE REPLACEMENT ‐                  IN ONE OF THE TWO ROOMS.  THE OTHER ROOMS DOORS    ‐                  WILL BE INCLUDED IN A SEPARATE CIP PROJECT.        ‐                   ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NOT REPLACING THE DOORS.‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: INCREASE BUILDING         ‐                  SECURITY, BETTER FUNCTIONALITY, MORE EFFICIENT.    ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE   ‐                  RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM LIGHTING UPGRADE  202111,000             GF331 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MULTIPURPOSE ROOM  EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT      202117,000             GF332 RECREATION PASSENGER VAN         202135,000             GF302 326 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM 50,000            DESCRIPTION: THE STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER      ‐                  GYMNASIUM DOES NOT HAVE A VENTILATION SYTEM        ‐                  AND GETS EXTREMELY HOT DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS.   ‐                  THE GYM IS USED HEAVILY ON  YEAR ROUND BASIS FOR   ‐                  MULTIPLE SPORTS, CAMPS, AND EVENTS AND WE WILL     ‐                  CONTINUE TO SEE AN INCREASE AS THE DEMAND FOR GYM  ‐                  SPACE CONTINUES TO RISE. THE VENTILATION SYSTEM    ‐                  WAS CUT FROM THE ORIGINAL REMODEL DUE TO           ‐                  BUDGET CONSTRAINTS. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:      ‐                  NOT INSTALLING THE SYSTEM.                         ‐                  ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: OCCUPANT COMFORT AND      ‐                  SAFETY.                                            ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE   ‐                  STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOM           55,000            RENOVATION. DESCRIPTION: INTERIOR RENOVATION OF   ‐                  ONE OF THE TWO MULTIPURPOSE ROOMS ALLOWING         ‐                  IT TO BE  USED FOR LARGER CITY AND COMMUNITY       ‐                  MEETINGS.  PROJECT WOULD INCLUDE WALL FINISHES     ‐                  ACOUSTIC CEILING FINISHES, NEW INTERIOR AND        ‐                  EXTERIOR DOORS, AND ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING        ‐                  UPGRADES.ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: COMPLETE THE    ‐                  PROJECT IN PHASES. ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:        ‐                  IMPROVED FUNCTIONALITY, MORE EFFICIENT LIGHTING    ‐                  RESULTING IN AN ANNUAL ELECTRICITY SAVINGS,        ‐                  INCREASED RENTAL REVENUE, AND AN ADDITIONAL        ‐                  MEETING ROOM FOR LARGE CITY MEETINGS AND USE BY    ‐                  THE GENERAL PUBLIC.                                ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ROUTINE MAINT. AND    ‐                  PAINTING AS NEEDED                                 ‐                  RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER GYM VENTILATION SYSTEM202250,000             GF333 RECREATION STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER MEETING ROOM  RENOVATION202255,000             GF334 327 DepartmentProject NameYearDescription  AmountTotal Project #HVAC SYSTEM FOR STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICE 40,100            DESCRIPTION: THE STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER IS   ‐                  NOW HOME TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT    ‐                  MAIN OFFICE AND INCLUDES 3 FULL TIME STAFF OFFICES ‐                  A SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM, AND A RECREATION LEADER   ‐                  WORKSPACE FOR 14 PART AND SHORT TERM RECREATION    ‐                  LEADERS. THE HVAC SYSTEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE      ‐                  ORIGINAL REMODEL, BUT WAS CUT DUE TO BUDGET.       ‐                  ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: NOT INSTALLING THE HVAC  ‐                  SYSTEM. ADVANTAGES FOR APPROVAL: THE INSTALLATION ‐                  OF THE MECHANICAL HVAC SYSTEM IN THE OFFICE WING   ‐                  OF THE STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER WOULD PROVIDE   ‐                  CLIMATE CONTROL TO A CITY OFFICE SPACE.            ‐                  ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS. ROUTINE SYSTEM        ‐                  MAINTENANCE.                                       ‐                  RECREATION HVAC SYSTEM FOR STORY MILL COMMUNITY CENTER OFFICE202340,100             GF336 328 DepartmentUnscheduled Project NameUnscheduled Project Description Amount Project #CommissionPhase 2 Commission Room TechnologyAdditional technology updates for the Commission Room.60,000 GF338FacilitiesPROFESSIONAL BUILDING ELEVATOR REPLACEMENTThe elevator in the Professional Building is a three stop Otis elevator. The elevator was installed when the second floor was added in 1972. Since the City purchased the building we have remodeled several areas on both the main floor and second floor – the elevator remains original and is approaching 44 years of continued use. The elevator is to the point where many technological improvements have been made in elevator technology and a change out would yield both improved service and some reductions in energy costs. The elevator is inspected annually and is still safe although there are some inherent problems with the operation of the elevator. 66,600 GF001FacilitiesCity Hall New Parking LotConvert existing lot west of City Hall into a new parking lot.250,000 GF271FacilitiesADDITION TO CITY HALL, CONSOLIDATION OF SERVICESThis project would relocate the functions currently housed in the Stiff Building (Community Development/Engineering/IT/Building Inspection) into an expansion of City Hall on Lamme Street.5,500,000 GF219Finance ERP REPLACEMENT / UPGRADE "SUNGARD REPLACEMENT / UPGRADE"Replacing/upgrading the current system installed in 1999. This is the system that runs all the financial, community development, land records, utility and business license applications. Although it  is unscheduled we are currently looking into this .333,333 GF227ParksLARGE DECK MOWERMower replacments110,000 GF034ParksPARKS RESTROOM UPGRADESThis project is the general replacement and upgrading of the City Park’s public restroom facilities. Other restrooms that need to be replaced‐ and/or built.470,000 GF084ParksPlayground EquipmentKirk Park playgrounf equipment120,000 GF092ParksPARK VEHICLE REPLACEMENTSThe Parks Division utilizes vehicles for mowing, fertilization, irrigation, inspections, snow plowing and repairs of the city parks. City parkland now has grown to over 500 acres that the Parks Division is responsible for. All vehicles are utilized until service related down‐time for equipment and staff become problematic or safety is compromised. 182,000 GF115ParksBMX PARKING LOTInstallation of parking lot at Westlake BMX park, left as unscheduled due to this potentially could be part of the Mid‐Town Urban Renewal project‐ as Westlake/BMX reside in this area.85,000 GF148ParksUPGRADE SOFTBALL COMPLEX LIGHTINGReplace the current lights at the Softball Complex with appropriate stadium lights. Estimate provided by MUSCO, would be bid at the time of construction. Existing lights have light spillage/pollution and cannot be “retro‐fitted”.1,000,000 GF191ParksSnow Plowing VehicleThe eventual replacement of the 1992 MT articulating tractor, which does the bulk of the sidewalk snow removal for the Parks Division, encompassing over 20 miles of sidewalks and four routes to plow. The newest cost saving measure is to share the cost of a vehicle with Streets. The advantage of the co‐op is that Parks needs the vehicle in the winter for plowing and Streets in the summer for right of way mowing. The Parks and Cemetery divisions are responsible for snow removal on the majority of sidewalks, paths, accesses and trails that the City is responsible for. 75,000 GF270ParksGriffin at Story Mill Park road improvement ‐ .26 mileThis represents funding the City's 1/2 portion of the East Griffin Road construction as it abuts to Story Mill Community Park.260,000 GF278ParksStory Mill Road Improvement ‐ .17 mileThis represents funding the City's 1/2 portion of the Story Mill Road construction as it abuts to Story Mill Community Park.170,000 GF279UNSCHEDULED ‐ Plan B329 Department Unscheduled Project NameUnscheduled Project Description  Amount Project #Parks Bozeman Pond Park & Aasheim ballfields road expansion ‐ .17 mile & .09 mileThis represents funding the City's required portion of 1/2 necessary to build Fowler Road adjacent to Bozeman Pond Park Expansion and Aasheim ballfields.                            260,000 GF281Parks Irrigation System ReplacementsReplacement of irrigation systems that are past their life cycle estimates. 40 years is the average life cycle of an irrigation system.                            425,000 GF290Parks 750 air compressor       750 air compressor                                      70,000 GF322Police POLICE NON‐PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENTSThe police department has unmarked vehicles used by command staff, detectives and some support positions.  Some of these vehicles are used for support operations, such as animal control, community resource officer, code compliance, ect. Command and detective vehicles are assigned and used to respond to emergency calls for command/control or investigations. Generally vehicle replacement of these vehicles involves buying used, lower mileage vehicles with some trade‐in done by higher mileage vehicles nearing the end of time to operate safely.                             377,000 GF052Police PATROL VEHICLE REPLACEMENTThis plan allows for a number of patrol cars to be replaced each year, including all of the necessary vehicle equipment (top lights, sirens, radio, mobile data terminals, video cameras, electronic reporting / ticketing systems, etc.) These patrol vehicles average approximately 20,000 miles annually. Vehicles earmarked for replacement will have a minimum estimated 110,000 miles per vehicle, which with police emergency response tends to be the rough time when police vehicles are no longer safe for emergency response.                             680,000 GF053Police PATROL MOTORCYCLE REPLACEMENTSCurrently the Police Department has two police motorcycles and one used solely for training.  Patrol motorcycles are an essential item in the traffic enforcement division, used for a portion of the over 13,000 traffic stops, crashes, and citations each year. These motorcycles are used from March to October each year and are responsible for a portion of the response to both emergency and non‐emergency calls for service, investigate accidents, conduct traffic enforcement and general patrol duties.                                60,000 GF165Plan B Total Unscheduled 10,553,933                      330