HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-03-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A4. Adopt the Water Fund CIP for FY 2020-2024
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal
Years 2020-2024.
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
MEETING DATE: December 3, 2018
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
Fiscal Years 2020-2024.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital
Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th. The Public Works
Department, City Manager, and other city staff met during September - October to develop the
attached Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the capital needs of the equipment and capital
needs of the Water Fund. The Water Fund CIP tracks the capital equipment replacements and
construction projects for Water Operations (distribution system) and the Water Treatment Plant.
Relationship to the Strategic Plan:
• Water Conservation has a project to create a water conservation and efficiency plan in
2020 to achieve 6.2 a Watershed Management, which is to develop and implement a
regional watershed approach.
• This year we worked towards item 7.1 b -Create a Culture of Innovation by changing
our CIP database system for project tracking and plan development. We are now using
our city-wide budgeting system’s project module for all CIP items. This will make it
199
easier to merge approved projects into the recommended budget, begin tracking projects
in their initial stages, and give us increased project cost reporting. The change has
resulted in a different report “look-and-feel,” and we are working to evolve and refine
how the CIP reports appear.
• We are also recommending that we continue to innovate the plan for next year by
increasing the CIP threshold from its current level of $10,000 to a new minimum level of
$25,000. Currently, the $10,000 threshold causes many maintenance and other
operational budget items to be included in the capital plan. For the FY21 to FY25 CIP we
recommend using a $25,000 threshold. This will align us with best practices and allow us
to make better capital decisions by focusing on true capital items and less maintenance
and operational expenses.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not
wish to adopt this schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda.
FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the
Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for
FY20.
Report compiled on: November 20, 2018
Attached: Water Fund CIP
200
WATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial SummaryCurrent YearFY19FY20FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP 3,689,821$ (309,874)$ 490,714$ 1,869,713$ 3,300,354$ 4,929,300$ ‐$ Plus: Water Revenues Dedicated to CIP2,663,191$ 2,743,087$ 2,825,380$ 2,910,141$ 2,997,445$ 3,087,369$ ‐$ Plus: Loan or Financingfor Hyalite Dam Improvements W794,000,000$ Plus: Loan or Financing for Automation Upgrades W716,710,000$ Plus: Loan for Mechanical Upgrades W721,750,000$ Plus: Loan or Financing for Lyman Tank Construction 10,000,000$ Plus: Loan for Sourgh Dough Tank inspection W84600,000$ Less: FY18 Carryover Capital(1,780,329)$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs(4,882,557)$ (2,542,500)$ (11,446,380)$ (3,229,500)$ (5,368,500)$ (8,623,500)$ (2,994,439)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP(309,874)$ 490,714$ 1,869,713$ 3,300,354$ 4,929,300$ 6,103,169$ (2,994,439)$ Assumptions Made for Revenue EstimatesCurrent YearFY19FY20FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Estimated Annual Water Revenues8,590,940$ 8,590,940$ 8,848,668$ 9,114,128$ 9,387,552$ 9,669,179$ Estimated Annual Increase3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0%Total Estimated Revenues8,590,940$ 8,848,668$ 9,114,128$ 9,387,552$ 9,669,179$ 9,959,254$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP %26.0%31.0% 31.0%31.0%31.0% 31.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to CIP5.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP31.0%31.0% 31.0%31.0%31.0% 31.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP2,663,191$ 2,743,087$ 2,825,380$ 2,910,141$ 2,997,445$ 3,087,369$ ProjectedProjectedCURRENT$(2,542,500)$(11,446,380)$(3,229,500)$(5,368,500)$(8,623,500)$(2,994,439)FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 UNSCHEDULEDWATER FUND PROJECTS & EQUIPMENT 201
WATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project NameFY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024W03 ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 W04‐20WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐21WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W04‐22WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ ‐ W04‐23WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 ‐ W04‐24WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200,000 W47 REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP‐ 27,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W49 REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP ‐ ‐ 27,000 ‐ ‐ W56 WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 W57 WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 W62 REPLACE #3446 ‐ WTP GMC SIERRA PICKUP 45,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W66 SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 W69 WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 100,000 ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ W70 REDUNDANT NORTH 5038 ZONE FEED ‐ 66,880 ‐ ‐ ‐ W71 PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,710,000 W72 PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES ‐ ‐ 1,750,000 ‐ ‐ W79 HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,000,000 ‐ W84 SOURDOUGH TANK INSPECTION & IMPROVEMENTS 600,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W88 LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION ‐ 10,000,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ W89 MEMBRANE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 W90 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER‐ ‐ ‐ 30,000 ‐ W91 TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 14,000 14,000 14,000 ‐ ‐ W92 SIDE BY SIDE ATV ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15,000 W93 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 60,000 W94 MYSTIC LAKE BEAVER DECEIVER 35,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ W96 SOURDOUGH RAW TRANSMISSION MAIN FLOW CONTROL VALVE AND METER300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WC02 METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 WC05 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SERVICES MEDIANS BOULEVARDS 50,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ WC06 WATER CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY PLAN 60,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals 2,542,500 11,446,380 3,229,500 5,368,500 8,623,500 202
WATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND This enterprise fund revenue source are rate fees charged to water users. We estimate water rates dedicated to capital will need to increase by at least 3% bringing the portion of Water Utility revenues that support capital to 31% in order to fund this capital plan. A full rate‐study and analysis is currently underway. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY Numerous items have been adjusted or added based on current condition assessments and projections; including Water Pipe Replacements projects of $1,200,000 annually. Four projects require borrowing in the 5‐year horizon totaling over $25 million (W71, W72, W79, and W88.) . The largest project planned is W88 ‐ Lyman Tank and Transmission Main (NEW CIP Item FY21). This project is to construct a new 5MG storage tank at Lyman beginning in $7,990,070 $8,398,899 $9,646,160 $9,281,821 $11,252,286 $9,313,847 $‐ $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 5 yr avg FY14‐18Water Fund Revenue203
FY21 for $10 million. This would decommission the existing Lyman storage tank, Condition Assessment‐based repairs of the existing Lyman transmission main, new supply main tie in to new storage tank, new transmission main tie in from new storage tank to existing transmission main, new chlorination/fluoridation feed facility. Decommission Pear Street Booster Station if Hydraulic Grade Line of tank raised to meet Sourdough Tank. The Lyman water supply is a critical element of the city's overall water supply portfolio accounting for roughly 20% of annual supply volume to the city currently. The Water Treatment plant has replacement vehicles added to the plan and the replacement of the membranes (W89) in FY24 for $500,000. These membranes have been in use since 2013 and half will need replacement in FY24. Water Conservation has a project to create a water conservation and efficiency plan in 2020 to achieve 6.2 a Watershed Management of the Strategic Plan, which is to develop and implement a regional watershed approach 204
!
!Water Fund FY21
Water Fund FY20
Water Fund FY21
Water Fund FY22
Water Fund FY23
Water Fund FY24
Main
Durston
Oak
Peach
College
Bridger
19thFergusonS11thRouseChurchHighlandI90
Babcock
Oak
19thGriffin
Kagy
This map was created by the City of Bozeman GIS Department on 10/17/18 and is intended for planning purposes only.
¯0 10.5 Miles
FY20-24 Water Fund
Baxter
I90
Davis7thW70
W88
W04-20
W04-21
W04-22
W04-23
W04-24
205
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #PROJECT: ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT ‐ DESIGN 22,500 DESCRIPTION:‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE: ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 22,500 THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 22,500 DESCRIPTION:‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202222,500 W03 (FY22) ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202022,500 W03 (FY20)ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202122,500 W03 (FY21)206
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESIGN 22,500 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM‐DESIGN 22,500 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS ITEM PROVIDES FOR DESIGN WORK TO BE COMPLETED ‐ EVERY YEAR, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ANNUAL WATER ‐ SYSTEM UPGRADES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE DESIGN OF NECESSARY WATER SYSTEM ‐ MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202422,500 W03 (FY24)ANNUAL WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT 202322,500 W03 (FY23)207
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2020‐ DESCRIPTION:‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS ‐ TO ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING PIPES. PRIORITY WILL‐ GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REAPIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2021‐ DESCRIPTION:‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING ‐ FUNDS WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST:‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFECYCLE OF ALL PIPES.‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20211,200,000 W04‐21 (FY21)WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20201,200,000 W04‐20 (FY20)208
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2022 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED WITH ‐ THE ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION (N 17TH FROM ‐ DURSTON TO THE END). THE REMAINING FUNDS WILL BE ‐ USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ASSESSMENTS ‐ AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THIS PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION IN 1,200,000 2023 ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES ‐ WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20231,200,000 W04‐23 (FY23)WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20221,200,000 W04‐22 (FY22)209
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION 1,200,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ THE WATER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM SETS ASIDE FUNDS TO ‐ ASSESS AND REPLACE FAILING WATER PIPES. PRIORITY ‐ WILL GO TO REPLACE THE WATER PIPE ASSOCIATED THE ‐ ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION. THE REMAINING FUNDS ‐ WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT WATER PIPE CONDITION ‐ ASSESSMENTS AND REPAIR IDENTIFIED PIPES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ PROVIDES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NECESSARY WATER ‐ SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WORK.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ THE PROJECT RESULTS IN A NET DECREASE IN OVERALL ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER THE LIFE CYCLE OF ALL PIPES‐ * PROJECT NAME IS INCORRECT ‐ CIP ITEM IS AS27,000 FOLLOWS:‐ REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP‐ DESCRIPTION:‐ THIS PROJECT IS TO REPLACE A 1998 CHEVY WITH‐ 70,779 MILES. AS OUR CREW GROWS THIS TYPE OF‐ VEHICLE IS USED DAILY IN SUPPORT OF THE DEPT'S‐ MISSION. THIS TRUCK RESPONDS TO ALL TYPES OF‐ CALLS FROM LOCATING TO WITNESSING BORES TO A‐ SUPPORT VEHICLE FOR EXCAVATION JOBS. USING AN‐ OLDER VEHICLE BECOMES MORE UNRELIABLE, BUT IF WE‐ HAD TO, WE COULD HOLD OFF A YEAR.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER VEHICLE WHICH IS BECOMING‐ UNRELIABLE & COSTLY TO MAINTAIN.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ INCREASED RELIABILITY & SAFETY FOR STAFF.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS‐ REPLACE #2647 ‐ 1998 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP202127,000 W47 WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ CONSTRUCTION20241,200,000 W04‐24 (FY24)210
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 27,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ THIS PROJECT REPLACES A 2002 CHEVY PICKUP WITH ‐ 85,816 MILES. THIS TRUCK IS USED FOR LEAK ‐ DETECTION, LOCATING, AND FIRE HYDRANT FLUSHING, ‐ WHICH ARE 3 CRITICAL PROGRAMS FOR OUR DEPARTMENT. ‐ THIS TRUCK WILL BE REPLACED WITH A MORE FUEL ‐ EFFICIENT VEHICLE.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE TO USE OLDER PIECE OF EQUIPMENT WHICH IS ‐ BECOMING UNRELIABLE AND COSTLY TO MAINTAIN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ INCREASE RELIABILITY AND SAFETY FOR STAFF. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ AS THE TRUCK AGES THERE WILL BE UNFORESEEN COSTS ‐ TO MAINTAIN THIS VEHICLE.‐ WTP FACILITY R & R40,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT‐ PROJECT.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202040,000 W56 (FY20)REPLACE #3078 ‐ 2002 1/2 TON CHEVY PICKUP 202227,000 W49 211
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R40,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT‐ PROJECTS.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202140,000 W56 (FY21)212
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME & NOT DEFER ‐ OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND, ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED, OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURE ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED AND BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202240,000 W56 (FY22)213
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND WILL ‐ PREVENT DEFERRMENT OF OTHER PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS ‐ FUND, MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A ‐ YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO BE ‐ POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT FAILURES ‐ CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ‐ PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202340,000 W56 (FY23)214
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY R & R 40,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPAIR & REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE WTP. HAVING THIS ‐ ITEM IN THE BUDGET WILL ALLOW FOR UNEXPECTED & ‐ RAPID REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE ‐ THIS WILL RESULT IN SHORTER DOWN TIME AND NOT ‐ DEFER OTHER PLANNED PROJECTS. WITHOUT THIS FUND ‐ MAINTENANCE COULD BE DEFERRED FOR UP TO A YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NOT HAVING THIS FUND WOULD DEFER OTHER NEEDED ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IF SYSTEMS FAIL, THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED ‐ IMMEDIATELY. IF THE FAILURE IS UNEXPECTED OTHER ‐ ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED FOR WILL NEED TO ‐ BE POSTPONED. NOT ALL REPAIRS OR EQUIPMENT ‐ FAILURES CAN BE PREDICTED & BUDGETED AS CAPITAL ‐ IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ WTP FACILITY REPAIR & REPLACEMENT 202440,000 W56 (FY24)215
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION. THE ‐ LONGER THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS IN OPERATION, ‐ OPERATORS BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND ‐ COME UP WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS ‐ LINE ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON ‐ THE OPERATORS IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS.‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAM‐ ‐ LINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ PLANT PERFORMANCE.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE: ‐ NONE‐ INCREASE:10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202030,000 W57 (FY20)216
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT‐ A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF ‐ THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT‐ PERFORMANCE.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE‐ INCREASE:10,000 SERVICE COST INCREASE‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202130,000 W57 (FY21) 217
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES & COME UP WITH ‐ IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM WILL ‐ ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE OPERATOR'S ‐ IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING THE PROCESS. ‐ IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS BUDGET ITEM IS TO ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE RAW WATER INTAKES TO ‐ THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. IT WILL ALLOW ‐ STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPOSED ‐ OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE THE PROCESS ‐ AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION ‐ OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS ‐ WILL BE STREAMLINED AND WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE ‐ FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ PLANT PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS ‐ STARTED WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT ‐ IS PURCHASED AND THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202230,000 W57 (FY22)218
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ITEM ‐ WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEMS IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE ‐ SURE THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY ‐ IMPROVE THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. ‐ THROUGH THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES THE PROCESS WILL BE ‐ STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT ‐ KNOWING IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202330,000 W57 (FY23) 219
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 20,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE LONGER THE WTP IS IN OPERATION, OPERATORS ‐ BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PROCESSES AND COME UP ‐ WITH IDEAS TO OPTIMIZE THE PROCESS. THIS LINE ‐ ITEM WILL ALLOW FOR ENGINEERING STUDIES ON THE ‐ OPERATOR'S IDEAS BEFORE THE EXPENSE OF CHANGING ‐ THE PROCESS. IN PARTICULAR, THE PLAN FOR THIS ‐ BUDGET ITEM IS TO IMPROVE THE PROCESS FROM THE ‐ RAW WATER INTAKES TO THE TREATED WATER RESERVOIRS. ‐ IT WILL ALLOW STUDIES TO BE CONDUCTED TO MAKE SURE ‐ THAT PROPOSED OPTIMIZATIONS WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE ‐ THE PROCESS AT A REASONABLE EXPENSE. THROUGH THE ‐ OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANT WITH ENGINEERING STUDIES ‐ THE PROCESS WILL BE STREAMLINED & WILL SAVE MONEY ‐ IN THE FUTURE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROCEED WITH OPTIMIZATION PROJECTS WITHOUT KNOWING ‐ IF THE PROJECT WILL ACTUALLY IMPROVE PLANT ‐ PERFORMANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ADVANTAGE OF HAVING FUNDS AVAILABLE TO DO ‐ ENGINEERING STUDIES BEFORE ANY PROJECT IS STARTED ‐ WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT IS ‐ PURCHASED & THAT IT WILL PERFORM PROPERLY. ‐ OPTIMIZATION STUDIES WILL PREDICT ACTUAL COST/ ‐ BENEFIT OVER TIME TO MAKE SURE THE CITY IS ‐ SPENDING ITS MONEY EFFICIENTLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ INCREASE: 10,000 SERVICE COSTS INCREASE ‐ WTP FACILITY ENGINEERING & OPTIMIZATION 202430,000 W57 (FY24) 220
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REPLACE #3446 ‐ WTP GMC SIERRA PICKUP 45,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS TRUCK REPLACES #3446, THE PLANT'S SAMPLING ‐ VEHICLE. THIS TRUCK CURRENTLY HAS OVER 100,000 ‐ MILES ON IT AND IS DRIVEN APPROXIMATELY 35,000 ‐ MILES PER YEAR. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE DRIVING #3446 AND RISK BREAK DOWNS & ‐ INCREASED MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ A NEW TRUCK WOULD BE MORE RELIABLE & RESULT IN ‐ IN LOWER REPAIR & MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL MAINTENANCE COSTS ‐ METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY'S SCADA TECHNICIAN NEEDS FUNDS TO PERFORM ‐ NECESSARY JOB FUNCTIONS. FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC ‐ DEVICES NEEDED TO PERFORM THE JOB CANNOT BE ‐ FORESEEN OR SCHEDULED. THIS FUND WOULD ALLOW FOR ‐ THE PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT. SCADA DIRECTLY ‐ IMPACTS WATER DISTRIBUTION, WRF & WTP. IMPROVED ‐ SCADA WILL RESULT IN COST SAVINGS THROUGH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION. ‐ METERS, TRANSDUCERS, & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY'S SCADA TECHNICIAN NEEDS FUNDS TO PERFORM ‐ NECESSARY JOB FUNCTIONS. FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC ‐ DEVICES NEEDED TO PERFORM THE JOB CANNOT BE ‐ FORESEEN OR SCHEDULED. THIS FUND WOULD ALLOW FOR ‐ THE PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT. SCADA DIRECTLY ‐ IMPACTS WATER DISTRIBUTION, WRF, AND WTP. IMPROVED ‐ SCADA WILL RESULT IN COST SAVINGS THROUGH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION. ‐ SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 W66 (FY21)2021REPLACE #3446 ‐ WTP GMC SIERRA PICKUP 202045,000 W62 SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS 202010,000 W66 (FY20)221
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METERS, TRANSDUCERS, & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY'S SCADA TECHNICIAN NEEDS FUNDS TO PERFORM ‐ NECESSARY JOB FUNCTIONS. FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC ‐ DEVICES NEED TO PERFORM THE JOB CANNOT BE FORESEEN ‐ OR SCHEDULED. THIS FUND WOULD ALLOW FOR THE ‐ PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT. SCADA DIRECTLY IMPACTS ‐ WATER DISTRIBUTION, WRF & WTP. IMPROVED SCADA WILL ‐ RESULT IN COST SAVINGS THROUGH WATER CONSERVATION. ‐ METERS, TRANSDUCERS, & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY'S SCADA TECHNICIAN NEEDS FUND TO PERFORM ‐ NECESSARY JOB FUNCTIONS. FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC ‐ DEVICES NEEDED TO PERFORM THE JOB CANNOT BE ‐ FORESEEN OR SCHEDULED. THIS FUND WOULD ALLOW FOR ‐ THE PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT. SCADA DIRECTLY ‐ IMPACTS WATER DISTRIBUTION, WRF & WTP. IMPROVED ‐ SCADA WILL RESULT IN COST SAVINGS THROUGH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION. ‐ METERS, TRANSDUCERS, & COMMUNICATIONS 10,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE CITY'S SCADA TECHNICIAN NEEDS FUNDS TO PERFORM ‐ NECESSARY JOB FUNCTIONS. FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC ‐ DEVICES NEEDED TO PERFORM THE JOB CANNOT BE ‐ FORESEEN OR SCHEDULED. THIS FUND WOULD ALLOW FOR ‐ THE PURCHASE OF THAT EQUIPMENT. SCADA DIRECTLY ‐ IMPACTS WATER DISTRIBUTION, WRF & WTP. IMPROVED ‐ SCADA WILL RESULT IN COST SAVINGS THROUGH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION. ‐ SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS 202310,000 W66 (FY23) SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS202410,000 W66 (FY24)SCADA METERS, TRANSDUCERS & COMMUNICATIONS 202210,000 W66 (FY22)222
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT100,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ PREPARE AND EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END USERS. WORK A ROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH ‐ HEAVY BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, ‐ THESE STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & ‐ QUANTIFIABLE BENEFITS THAT IMPROVES PRODUCT ‐ QUALITY, PROCESSES, OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY ‐ PRACTICES. DEPENDING ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES‐ COULD RESULT IN FOLLOW‐UP R & R.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NO INSPECTION‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES AND THEREBY OFFERING THE ‐ OPPORTUNITY OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE ‐ WHOLE ASSET IF NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ‐ ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN CAN IDENTIY ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ‐ ARE COMPLETED THEREBY SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY ‐ IN REPLACING ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2020100,000 W69 (FY20)223
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT100,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ PREPARE & EVALUATE CONDITION ASSESSMENT PLAN & ‐ EXECUTE WATER MAIN CONDITION ASSESSMENTS IN HIGH ‐ RISK PORTIONS OF THE CITY. THESE ARE MAJOR ASSETS ‐ WHOSE FAILURE COULD AFFECT A LARGE POPULATION OF ‐ END‐USERS. WORK‐AROUND MAY BE POSSIBLE WITH HEAVY ‐ BURDEN ON UTILITY RESOURCES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE ‐ STUDIES COULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL & QUANTIFIABLE ‐ BENEFITS THAT IMPROVE PROJECT QUALITY, PROCESSES, ‐ OR ADOPTION OF BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. DEPENDING ‐ ON THE RESULTS, THESE STUDIES COULD RESULT IN ‐ FOLLOW‐UP R & R.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NO INSPECTION‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ DOING PLANNED CONDITION ASSESSMENT CAN PROVIDE A ‐ COST EFFECTIVE MECHANISM OF IDENTIFYING LIKELY ‐ ASSET FAILURES & THEREBY OFFERING THE OPPORTUNITY ‐ OF REPAIRING THE DEFICIENCY OR THE WHOLE ASSET IF ‐ NEEDED PRIOR TO FAILURE. ADDITIONALLY, CA OFTEN ‐ CAN IDENTIFY ASSETS IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION, SO ‐ ONLY REQUIRED REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED THEREBY ‐ SAVING SIGNIFICANT MONEY IN REPLACING ASSETS IN ‐ GOOD WORKING ORDER.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST:‐ NONE.‐ WATER SYSTEM CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2022100,000 W69 (FY22)224
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #REDUNDANT NORTH 5038 ZONE FEED 66,880 DESCRIPTION: ‐ EVALUATE, AND UPGRADE AS REQUIRED, 2ND LOCATION OF ‐ REDUNDANT FEED OF 5130 ZONE WATER INTO NORTH ‐ (5038) ZONE. THIS WILL ENSURE ALTERNATIVE SOURCE ‐ OF WATER EXISTS AND IS SUFFICIENT TO FEED NORTH ‐ ZONE IN TIME WHEN LYMAN CREEK SOURCE IS ‐ UNAVAILABLE. THIS PROVIDES A SECOND PATH FOR WATER ‐ TO MOVE FROM SOUTH ZONE TO NORTH ZONE IN EVENT ‐ THAT LYMAN SOURCE IS UNAVAILABLE. THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL MEET THE CITY'S HYDRAULIC CRITERIA. IT COULD ‐ BE PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PEAR STREET ‐ BOOSTER UPGRADE TO FACILITATE TESTING & ‐ COMMISSIONING. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE WITH SINGLE CONNECTION BETWEEN PRESSURE ‐ ZONES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ USE EXISTING FACILITIES AND CONNECTIVITY TO ‐ PROVIDE REDUNDANT BACK UP SOURCE OF WATER. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ REDUNDANT NORTH 5038 ZONE FEED 202166,880 W70 225
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION 6,710,000 UPGRADES‐ DESCRIPTION:‐ UPGRADE PRESSURE INSTRUMENTATION, AUTOMATE VALVE ‐ ACTUATION, AND PROVIDE A LAN CONNECTION & SCADA ‐ PROGRAMMING FOR REALTIME MONITORING & REMOTE ‐ CONTROL OF PRV SETTINGS. WITHOUT THIS PROJECT, ‐ SYSTEM OPERATORS ARE WITHOUT VITAL DATA ON SYSTEM ‐ OPERATING CONDITIONS. LIMITED REAL TIME DATA ‐ ALLOWS OPERATORS TO ANTICIPATE, DIAGNOSE, OR ‐ CORRECT ABNORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS. ‐ STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROL OFFERS IMPROVED ‐ PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS WHICH ARE A ‐ LIKELY CAUSE OF PIPE FAILURE. IT WILL ALSO ‐ IMPROVE SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS ‐ WHERE PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMER PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST:‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE 2 ‐ AUTOMATION & INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADES20246,710,000 W71 226
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 1,750,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ UPGRADE HATCH/ENTRY, VALVING, PIPING, PRESSURE ‐ SETTINGS, SUMP PUMPS AND PROVIDE POWER, WHICH WILL ‐ PROVIDE OPERATORS WITH A SAFE WORK ENVIRONMENT, ‐ AND SETS PRVS AT OPERATING PRESSURES AT PRESSURE ‐ ZONE INTERFACES CONSISTENT WITH THE WFPU ‐ RECOMMENDATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, IT WILL PROVIDE ‐ NECESSARY UPGRADES TO EQUIPMENT, PIPING AND ‐ VALVING IN PRV VAULTS TO REDUCE LIKELIHOOD OF ‐ FAILURES. STANDARDIZED PRESSURE CONTROLS OFFERS ‐ IMPROVED PROTECTIONS FROM SURGE CONDITIONS, WHICH ‐ ARE LIKELY CAUSES OF PIPE FAILURE. IT IMPROVES ‐ SERVICE LEVELS TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS WHERE ‐ PRESSURE TRANSIENTS CAUSE LEAKS IN SPRINKLER ‐ SYSTEMS OR WITHIN CUSTOMERS' PREMISES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ IMPROVE WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS THROUGH ‐ INCREASED UNDERSTANDING OF SYSTEM OPERATING ‐ CHARACTERISTICS. IMPROVE RESPONSIVENESS TO ‐ DYNAMIC OPERATING CONDITIONS. FACILITATE IMPROVED ‐ ACCESS TO EXISTING SITES NOW REQUIRING CONFINED ‐ SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURES. STANDARDIZE AND IMPROVE ‐ SURGE CONTROL FEATURES THROUGHOUT SYSTEM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ DEBT SERVICE (IF ANY) TO CONSTRUCT, POWER COSTS, ‐ SCADA MAINTENANCE, VAULT MAINTENANCE, INSTRUMENT ‐ MAINTENANCE, PROGRAMMING LIBRARIES. ‐ PRV PHASE I ‐ MECHANICAL & STRUCTURAL UPGRADES 20221,750,000 W72 227
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 4,000,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ ARMORING OF THE CONTROL TOWER (TO ENABLE SOME ‐ YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY) AND CONTROL ‐ UPGRADES TO IMPROVE WINTER OPERATION. CURRENT ‐ VULNERABILITY OF BOZEMAN TO DROUGHT IS VERY HIGH, ‐ DUE TO THE LACK OF SOURCES THAT ARE ROBUST IN ‐ DROUGHT (LARGE RAW WATER RESERVOIRS WITH YEAR‐OVER‐ ‐YEAR STORAGE CAPACITY, LARGE RIVERS, OR ‐ GROUNDWATER). HYALITE RESERVOIR IS CAPABLE OF ‐ PROVIDING YEAR‐OVER‐YEAR STORAGE, BUT IS NOT ‐ OPERATED IN THAT MANNER DUE TO CONCERNS OF ICE ‐ DAMAGE TO THE CONTROL TOWER. THIS INCREASES THE ‐ RISK OF OF AN EXTREMELY DRY YEAR RESULTING IN ‐ THE INABILITY TO FILL THE HYALITE RESERVOIR WITH ‐ ENOUGH WATER FOR THE CITY AND IRRIGATION USES. ‐ THIS PROJECT COULD POTENTIALLY REMOVE THE 20% ‐ SURCHARGE THE CITY PAYS FOR HYALITE RELEASES. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE TO DEAL WITH CURRENT HYALITE DAM ‐ OPERATION.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ DROUGHT MITIGATION, IMPROVED WATER USE AND COST ‐ EFFICIENCIES.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ UNKNOWN‐ HYALITE DAM & RESERVOIR OPTIMIZATION IMPROVEMENTS 20234,000,000 W79 228
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #SOURDOUGH TANK INSPECTION & IMPROVEMENTS 600,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WOULD ENTAIL TAKING THE SOURDOUGH ‐ TANK OFFLINE (ONCE THE WTP'S 5.3 MG STORAGE TANK ‐ IS ONLINE), INSPECTING IT AND REPAIRING IT AS ‐ NECESSARY. THIS PROJECT MAY OR MAY NOT INCLUDE ‐ RECONFIGURATION OF THE INLET/OUTLET CONFIGURATION ‐ TO PROVIDE FLOW THROUGH HYDRAULICS. THE CONDITION ‐ OF THE OVERLOW & INLET/OUTLET PIPES IS POOR. THE ‐ LAST DIVE INSPECTION FOUND CONCRETE AGGREGATE FROM ‐ THE CEILING ON THE FLOOR OF THE TANK. THE ‐ HYDRAULICS TO AND FROM THE TANK ARE SUSPECTED TO ‐ BE SUBOPTIMAL. AN INSTALLED MIXER WILL ALSO NEED ‐ TO BE CONSIDERED. THIS PROJECT IS CRITICAL TO ‐ ENSURE THAT THE SOURDOUGH TANK IS RELIABLE & ‐ OPERATING WELL. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ WAIT FOR CRITICAL FAILURE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REHABILITATION OF CRITICAL STORAGE INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ FOR SEVERAL DECADES TO COME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SOURDOUGH TANK INSPECTION & IMPROVEMENTS 2020600,000 W84 229
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 10,000,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ CONSTRUCT A NEW 5MG STORAGE TANK AT LYMAN, ‐ DECOMMISSIONING EXISTING LYMAN STORAGE TANK, ‐ CONDITION ASSESSMENT‐BASED REPAIRS OF THE EXISTING ‐ LYMAN TRANSMISSION MAIN, NEW SUPPLY MAIN TIE IN TO ‐ NEW STORAGE TANK, NEW TRANSMISSION MAIN TIE IN ‐ FROM NEW STORAGE TANK TO EXISTING TRANSMISSION ‐ MAIN, NEW CHLORINATION/FLUORIDATION FEED FACILITY. ‐ DECOMMISSION PEAR STREET BOOSTER STATION IF ‐ HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF TANK RAISED TO MEET ‐ SOURDOUGH TANK. THE LYMAN WATER SUPPLY IS A ‐ CRITICAL ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S OVERALL WATER ‐ SUPPLY PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING FOR ROUGHLY 20% OF ‐ ANNUAL SUPPLY VOLUME TO THE CITY CURRENTLY. THE ‐ SOURCE PROVIDES SUPPLY REDUNDANCY & RESILIENCY AS ‐ IT IS GEOGRAPHICALLY REMOVED FROM THE SOURDOUGH/ ‐ HYALITE SOURCE & PROVIDES AN INDEPENDENT ‐ CONNECTION TO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THE ‐ EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY IS INCREASED ‐ SINCE THE NEW STORAGE SYSTEM WILL NOT LEAK & WILL ‐ EXPAND THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS ABLE TO BE SUPPLIED ‐ BY LYMAN WATER. LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE OF LYMAN ‐ SUPPLY SYSTEM WILL BE DRAMATICALLY REDUCED BY ‐ REPLACED STORAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STATUS QUO OPERATION OF EXISTING LYMAN SYSTEM. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REPLACES LYMAN STORAGE TANK WHICH IS AT THE END OF ‐ ITS USEFUL LIFE. INCREASES EFFECTIVE AVAILABLE ‐ SUPPLY AS EXISTING TANK LEAKS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ ANTICIPATED OPERATING COST REDUCTION RELATED TO ‐ PEAR STREET BOOSTER DECOMMISSIONING. ‐ LYMAN TANK & TRANMISSION MAIN CONSTRUCTION 202110,000,000 W88 230
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #THE TYPICAL LIFESPAN OF THE MEMBRANES IS TEN YEARS ‐ 500,000 THE MEMBRANES HAVE BEEN IN USE SINCE FALL OF 2013. ‐ WE ARE PLANNING ON REPLACING HALF OF THE MEMBRANES ‐ IN FY 2024 500,000 TOC ANALYZER 30,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ WE DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE A TOC ANALYZER IN THE LAB. ‐ IT WILL INCREASE EFFICIENCY BY ANALYZING SAMPLES ‐ ON SITE INSTEAD OF SENDING TO A LAB AND WAITING ‐ FOR RESULTS. TURN AROUND TIME WILL BE REDUCED ‐ SUBSTANTIALLY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONTINUE TO USE OUTSIDE LABS AND WAIT LONG PERIODS ‐ FOR RESULTS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED LAB COSTS AND WAIT TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 14,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING TURBIDIMETER BECAUSE THE ‐ SOFTWARE IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY THE COMPANY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ LESS MAINTENANCE COSTS, WARRANTY UPGRADE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 202014,000 W91 (FY20)MEMBRANE REPLACEMENT 2024W89 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON ANALYZER 202330,000 W90 231
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #TURBIDEMETER REPLACEMENT 14,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING TURBIDIMETER DUE TO ‐ SOFTWARE NO LONGER BEING SUPPORTED BY THE COMPANY ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ UPGRADED WARRANTY. REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 14,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING TURBIDIMETER DUE TO ‐ SOFTWARE THAT IS NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY THE ‐ COMPANY. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS AND UPGRADED WARRANTY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ SIDE BY SIDE ATV 15,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ ATV TO INCREASE ACCESS TO 6‐SECTIONS OF LAND UP ‐ SOURDOUGH DRAINAGE FOR WEED CONTROL AND ‐ INSPECTIONS. IT CAN ALSO BE USED AT LYMAN CREEK & ‐ THE SOURDOUGH TANK. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LESS ACCESS TO SOURDOUGH DRAINAGE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ INCREASED ACCESS TO DIFFICULT TERRAIN. MORE ‐ EFFICIENT WEED CONTROL AND REDUCED STAFF TIME FOR ‐ WEED CONTROL. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ MINIMAL FUEL & MAINTENANCE COSTS. ‐ TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 202214,000 W91 (FY22)SIDE BY SIDE ATV 202415,000 W92 TURBIDIMETER REPLACEMENT 202114,000 W91 (FY21)232
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 60,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ REPLACEMENT OF MAINTENANCE/SNOW PLOW VEHICLE. ‐ TRUCK GETS HEAVY USE AND IS CRITICAL TO OPERATIONS ‐ AND MAINTENANCE OF BOTH THE SOURDOUGH PLANT & ‐ LYMAN CREEK. IT IS A 2008 WITH HIGH MILEAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ RISK OF VEHICLE BREAKDOWN AND INCREASED ‐ REPAIR COSTS AS VEHICLE HAS HIGH MILEAGE & IS ‐ USED DAILY. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS AND DOWN TIME. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ MYSTIC LAKE BEAVER DECEIVER 35,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SIPHON TO PREVENT BEAVERS FROM DAMING MYSTIC LAKE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ LET THE BEAVERS DAM THE LAKE WHICH COULD RESULT ‐ IN SIGNIFICANT FLOODING. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF THE BEAVER DECEIVER WILL PREVENT ‐ MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR REMOVING THE BEAVER DAM. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ 3/4 TON FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE REPLACEMENT 202460,000 W93 MYSTIC LAKE BEAVER DECEIVER 202035,000 W94 233
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #SOURDOUGH RAW TRANSMISSION MAIN FLOW CONTROL VALVE300,000 AND METER‐ DESCRIPTION:‐ INSTALL A FLOW CONTROL VALVE & METER IN A NEW ‐ VAULT CONSTRUCTED ON THE SOURDOUGH RAW ‐ TRANSMISSION MAIN FEEDING THE SOURDOUGH WTP. THIS ‐ PROJECT PROVIDES FOR FULL REMOTE OPERATION & ‐ RECORD KEEPING FOR THE SOURDOUGH RAW WATER SOURCE ‐ FROM THE CONTROL ROOM AT THE WTP.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ CONTINUE OPERATING THE SOURDOUGH RAW SUPPLY AS IS.‐ WAIT ON COMPLETING THE FCV AND METER IMPROVEMENT ‐ AND ROLL IT INTO THE SOURDOUGH INTAKE IMPROVEMENTS‐ PROJECT, WHICH IS PRESENTLY UNSCHEDULED IN THE ‐ WATER FUND CIP.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THE FCV WILL ALLOW FOR SOURDOUGH DIVERSIONS TO BE ‐ REMOTELY OPERATED FROM THE WTP CONTROL ROOM. THE ‐ METER INSTALLATION PROVIDES FOR AUTOMATED RECORD ‐ KEEPING AND REPORTING OF DIVERTED FLOWS & VOLUMES ‐ FROM THE SOURDOUGH SOURCE. CURRENTLY, THERE IS NO ‐ METER ON THE SOURDOUGH RAW TRANSMISSION MAIN ‐ REQUIRING DIVERTED VOLUMES TO BE MATHEMATICALLY ‐ DERIVED. DIVERTED FLOWS ARE CURRENTLY MANUALLY ‐ MEASURED AT A FLUME INSTALLED AT THE SOURDOUGH ‐ INTAKE. DIVERSION RATES ARE CURRENTLY MANUALLY ‐ ADJUSTED BY OPERATING A SLIDE GATE AT THE ‐ SOURDOUGH INTAKE. THIS PROJECT PROVIDES FOR FULL ‐ REMOTE OPERATION AND RECORD KEEPING FOR THE ‐ SOURDOUGH RAW WATER SOURCE.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE. THIS PROJECT WILL REDUCE OPERATING COSTS FOR‐ THE SOURDOUGH DIVERSION FACILITY AS IT ELIMINATES ‐ OPERATOR TIME TO MAKE MANUAL DIVERSION ‐ ADJUSTMENTS AND MEASUREMENTS AT THE SOURDOUGH ‐ SOURDOUGH RAW TRANSMISSION MAIN FLOW CONTROL VALVE AND METER2020300,000 W96 234
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION36,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME.‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY AND EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202036,000 WC02 (FY20)235
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202136,000 WC02 (FY21)236
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 36,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY FOR ‐ CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST PRACTICE ‐ STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH REAL TIME ‐ INFORAMTION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202236,000 WC02 (FY22)237
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION36,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MANAGEMENT ‐ ALERTS TO CUSTOMERS & INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL TO BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION & WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS & INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME. ‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS & HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY & ‐ CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NONE‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ CATCHES LEAKS VERY EARLY & EDUCATES CUSTOMERS ‐ ABOUT INDIVIDUAL WATER USAGE TO REDUCE WATER ‐ CONSUMPTION.‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST:‐ NONE‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION36,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ SOFTWARE UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR FLOW MGMT ALERTS ‐ TO CUSTOMERS AND INDIVIDUALIZED WATER USE ‐ ASSESSMENTS. THIS PROJECT IS VITAL FOR BOTH WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND WATER & SEWER OPERATIONS. A ‐ MECHANISM MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO ALERT CUSTOMERS ‐ OF LEAKS AND INEFFICIENT WATER USAGE IN REAL TIME.‐ DELAYS IN RELAYING THIS INFORMATION ARE COSTLY ‐ FOR CUSTOMERS AND HARM RELATIONS BETWEEN UTILITY ‐ AND CUSTOMERS. THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE BEST ‐ PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR EMPOWERING CUSTOMERS WITH ‐ REAL TIME INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR WATER USAGE. ‐ METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202336,000 WC02 (FY23)METER SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 202436,000 WC02 (FY24)238
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SERVICES MEDIANS BOULEVARDS 50,000 DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO CONTRACT WITH ‐ A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITH KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERTISE ‐ TO DEVELOP WATER EFFICIENT LOW MAINTENANCE ‐ LANDSCAPE DESIGNS AND MAINTENANCE PLANS ‐ APPROPRIATE FOR HARSH ROADWAY ENVIRONMENTS TO BE ‐ UTILIZED BY THE CITY AND DEVELOPERS. WATER ‐ USE, MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION COSTS WILL BE ‐ CONSIDERED TO ENSURE LONG TERM AESTHETIC, FISCAL ‐ AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS. THE DESIGNS WILL ‐ EXEMPLIFY THE BEAUTY OF DROUGHT TOLERANT ‐ LANDSCAPES, CONTRIBUTE TO QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ‐ BOZEMAN RESIDENTS AND DEMONSTRATE THE CITY'S ‐ COMMITTMENT TO WATER STEWARDSHIP. WITH FIFTY ‐ PERCENT OF SUMMER WATER USE GOING TO LAWNS AND ‐ LANDSCAPES, IT IS ESSENTIAL TO BOZEMAN'S WATER ‐ RESILIENCY THAT OUTDOOR WATER USE IS REDUCED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ 1) NO ACTION: MANY CITY MEDIANS REMAIN ‐ UN‐LANDSCAPED AND UNSIGHTLY. ‐ 2) TRADITIONAL TURFGRASS IS PLANTED IN THE LARGE ‐ MAJORITY OF CITY MEDIANS AND BOULEVARDS AND ‐ INCLUDES INEFFICIENT OVERHEAD SPRAY IRRIGATION ‐ WHICH OFTEN RUNS OFF INTO THE STREET. ‐ 3) CONCRETE, PAVING MEDIANS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PROVIDES EXPERTISE TO ‐ DEVELOP WATER EFFICIENT LOW MAINTENANCE ‐ LANDSCAPE DESIGNS AND MAINTENANCE PLANS FOR HARSH ‐ ROADWAY ENVIRONMENTS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS IN THE FUTURE: ‐ NONE ‐ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SERVICES MEDIANS BOULEVARDS50,000 WC05 239
Project NameYear Description Amount Total Project #WATER CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY PLAN 60,000 DESCRIPTION:‐ DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI‐YEAR WATER ‐ CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY PLAN TO GUIDE THE ‐ CITY'S WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS SO AS TO ACHIEVE‐ WATER CONSERVATION GOALS OUTLINED IN THE 2012 ‐ INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES PLAN WHICH CALL FOR ‐ 10,000 ACRE FEET OF FUTURE WATER SUPPLIES ‐ TO BE GENERATED THROUGH CONSERVATION. ‐ THIS PLAN WILL ANALYZE EXISTING AND FUTURE ‐ PROGRAM EFFORTS THAT ALIGN WITH INDUSTRY BEST ‐ PRACTICES AND STANDARDS AND WILL EVALUATE CHANGES ‐ IN WATER USE, FINANCIAL COSTS AND BENEFITS, ‐ AVOIDED UTILITY COSTS, AND LONG TERM EFFECTS OF ‐ CONSERVATION PROGRAMS ON WATER SUPPLY. IT WILL ‐ ALSO ACCOUNT FOR OTHER CONFOUNDING FACTORS SUCH AS‐ CHANGES IN WEATHER, DEVELOPMENT, AND EFFICIENCY ‐ STANDARDS TO DISCOVER REAL CHANGES THAT CAN BE ‐ ATTRIBUTED TO CONSERVATION PROGRAMS. THIS ANALYSIS‐ AND PLAN WILL ENSURE THAT FUTURE PROGRAM EFFORTS ‐ ARE SUCCESSFUL, COST EFFECTIVE AND BENEFICIAL FOR ‐ WATER CUSTOMERS AND THE UTILITY.‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:‐ NO ACTION.‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL:‐ THE WATER USE AND EFFICIENCY CONSULTANT HAS THE ‐ EXPERTISE TO RUN A THOROUGH COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS ‐ OF WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS CAPTURING CHANGES ‐ IN WATER USE, AVOIDED UTILITY COSTS, AND LONG TERM‐ EFFECTS OF WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS ON WATER ‐ SUPPLY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS:‐ NONE.‐ WATER CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY PLAN 202060,000 WC06 240
Unscheduled Project NameUnscheduled Project Description Amount Project #ERP Replacement "Sungard Replacement/Upgrade"Replacing/upgrading the current system installed in 1999. This is the system that runs all the financial, community development, land records, utility and business license applications. Although it is unscheduled we are currently looking into this.333,333 GF227Wheeled ExcavatorThis would be a trackhoe excavator with wheels instead of tracks. It is a critical piece of machinery in our departments, and it is used to maintain water, sewer, and stormwater infrastructure. The excavator will be split 50/50 with the wastewater fund (WW86).151,000 W68PRV Abandonments (approximately 6 sites)Abandon (in place) existing PRV's serving Northwest 4940 Pressure Zone, at sites to be determined through detailed hydraulic modeling. Install looped mains to maintain connectivity. This project will be done in conjunction with other transmission main improvements serving Northwest zones. This will reduce system complexity, and simplifies control strategy, which is critical with additional improvements planned within service area, yet maintains sufficient connectivity between zones per Hydraulic criteria. Additionally, it will create an opportunity for PRV's feeding zone to create undesired chattering of PRV's fighting each other via control strategy. Chattering of valves can lead to undesired hydraulic transients in system.510,106 W73Sourdough Intake ImprovementsSourdough intake improvements to increase efficiency of existing diversion infrastructure. Project calls for replacement of existing surface diversion, installation of sub‐surface collection system within stream bed gravels to capture water during surface freeze‐off events, new instrumentation and controls. This will increase the resiliency of the Sourdough water supply by reducing, or potentially eliminating, periods and frequency of surface water freeze‐off.2,000,000 W83Total Water Unscheduled2,994,439 UNSCHEDULED241