HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-12-18 Protest - G. Kujawa & M. Kemner - Rainbow Creek Annexation and Zone Map Amendment November 12, 2018
Bozeman City Clerk
121 North Rouse Ave
PO Box 1230
Bozeman, MT 59771-1230
RE: Rainbow Creek Annexation and Zone Map Amendment, File 18-240
TO: Bozeman Zoning Commission
Bozeman City Commission
Please accept this letter of protest regarding the proposed Rainbow Creek Annexation and Zone Map
Amendment(File 18-240).The subject property, an approximately 2.29-acre lot located at 4555 Baxter
Lane, Bozeman, MT, is proposed to be annexed into the City of Bozeman and zoned as R-4 (Residential
High Density).
We are owners of and reside at real property within 150 feet of the area affected by the proposal. Our
names are Gregory M. Kujawa and Margaret A. Kemner(spouse). Our property is located at 4532
Drafthorse Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718.The legal description is:
BAXTER MEADOWS SUB PH 3A,534,T01 S, R05 E, BLOCK 15, Lot 9,ACRES 0.286, PLAT J-448
PLUS OPEN SPACE
We are supportive of annexation of this property into the City. However,we do question the proposal to
zone this as R-4. Our main concerns are:
1. The need for additional high density, affordable housing in this corner of the City is alreadv
being met.
2. R-4 is not harmonious with the adjacent community and,therefore, is not consistent with the
Bozeman Community Plan.
The Baxter Meadows community has been building out for over a decade using a planned and measured
approach. It is one of, if not the first, Planned Unit Developments (PUD) in Bozeman. When you look at
the Baxter Meadows planned community,you can see that density increases from west to east (see
attached map).Within this PUD there is R-1, R-S, R-3, R-4, and B-2 zoning.
1. The need for additional high density,affordable housing in this corner of the City is already being
met.
Please see the attached Bozeman Zoning Map—Northwest Corner.The circled areas highlight existing R-
4 zoning and you can also see the abundance of R-3.Specifically, Northeast of the subject property, the
Sundance Apartments and West Village Apartments(Four Points Subdivision) were recently developed.
Quite a few West Village units still appear to be vacant one year after completion. South and east of the
subject property,the new Flanders Mill development is zoned R-3 and R-4. The Crossings and West
Winds developments further east are all zoned R-3.To the southwest of the new Sports complex,there
is R-O zoning, as well as R-3 and R-4.Therefore, it seems obvious the Baxter Meadows community and
surrounding developments have already adopted, in spirit and in practice,the tenets of the Bozeman
Community Plan (growth policy).
The Bozeman Community Plan, Chapter 2, Introduction, and Section 2.1 Guiding Principles contain two
principles relevant to this proposal:
• Strives to achieve a fair and proper balance among conflicting interests,to protect the rights
of citizens,and to affirm community values as they have been expressed by citizen's and
throughout the planning process.
• Affirms Bozeman's commitment to responsible stewardship of the natural environment,
excellences of environmental design and conservation of heritage of the built environment
Additionally,Section 2.3 Why Do We Need a Plan?lists benefits of the planning process, one of which is
to help:
• Promote the interest of the community at large,while respecting and protecting the interests
of individuals or special interest groups within the community.
2. R-4 is not harmonious with the adjacent community,and therefore is not consistent with the
Bozeman Community Plan.
We believe the guiding principles of the Bozeman Community Plan are already being met but that
insertion of a very small parcel ("spot"zoning)of R-4 in the midst of the R-1 section of a planned
community and established open space(Sports complex) moves us away from the spirit and principles
outlined in the Community Plan.
Chapter 3, Land Use,Section 3.2, Major Themes and Related Chapters, under Land Use Principles-
Neighborhoods states:
• There is strong public support for the preservation of existing neighborhoods and new
development being part of a larger whole,rather than just anonymous subdivisions.
In Section 3.2, under Land Use Principles—Sustainability,one finds:
• Development should be integrated into neighborhoods and the larger community rather than
a series of unconnected stand-alone projects.
In reviewing the Zoning Map, it is obvious that the subject parcel would have been zoned R-1 if it had
been included in the original Baxter Meadows development project. Now,the proposed Rainbow Creek
R-4 zoning would bean anomaly rather than part of the larger whole and,therefore,would not be
harmonious with the character of the established community for the same reasons as described above.
We feel this development represents an unconnected stand-alone project that is not integrated into the
neighborhood or larger community.
Section 3.3, Land Use Goals and Objectives, Objective LU-1.4 states:
• Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional
density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it.
We support infill on the applicant property. However,we also ask for respect of the larger community
plan and the context and character of the existing development.Zoning the subject property R-4 does
not respect either.
The Bozeman Community Plan Section 3.4, Land Use Category Descriptions-Residential states:
• Large areas of single type housing are discouraged.
• All residential housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent
development....and in a fashion that compliments the overall goals of the Bozeman growth
policy.
We believe the proposed R-4 zoning is incompatible with the adjacent development and is not
complementary to the overall goals of the Bozeman Community Plan.These principles and guidelines
are echoed in the Residential Emphasis Mixed Use section,which states:
• All uses should complement existing and planned residential uses. '...,,
If zoned R-4,the subject property is of great concern for the above reasons.Also, increased residential
and business traffic coming from the subject property will add significantly to traffic congestion on
Baxter Lane when combined with traffic associated with the new Bozeman Sports Park,which has a 140-
stall parking lot directly across Baxter Lane from the Subject Property.
The Bozeman Sports Park Master Plan shows Baxter Lane as having arguably less traffic control,allowing
eastbound or westbound traffic while exiting the park. Because of this lack of physical traffic control on
Baxter Lane, increased eastbound and westbound traffic from the subject property is expected, if zoned
R-4.
We chose to build our retirement home in Baxter Meadows West because this western end of the
Baxter Meadows community provides the right level of housing density for us.We firmly believe that
zoning the subject property anything different than R-1 or R-2 would be a mistake.We believe the
zoning request is inconsistent with the Bozeman Community Plan and UDC Update and that an R-4
designation would degrade the adjacent neighborhood, Baxter Meadows community,and the Bozeman
community at large.Therefore,we strongly urge the application for R-4 zoning be denied.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal and we appreciate your serious
consideration of our concerns in finding a mutually supportable solution.
Sincerely,
` J C`_
Gregory M. Kujawa Mar aret A. Kemne
4532 Drafthorse Drive
Bozeman, MT,59718
BAXTER MEADOWS SUB PH 3A,S34,T01 S, R05 E, BLOCK 15, Lot 9,ACRES 0.286, PLAT J-448 PLUS OPEN
SPACE
Attachment—Bozeman Zoning Map—Northwest Corner
_ R _
m
v
1 -
m
U � s
yi
W _
O
U-o
.C- _
o
a�
v +'
� O L
-� Q
1 0 0
QJ V) rl tlJ
N 41
0 0
� U
(B -C O
CL 3 _ _
V QJ N -
cn t
v