HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-05-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A1. Adopt the Storm Water Fund CIP for 2020-2024
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Kristin Donald, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt the Storm Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for
Fiscal Years 2020-2024.
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
MEETING DATE: November 5, 2018
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Storm Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
for Fiscal Years 2020-2024.
BACKGROUND: Each year, the City Manager is required to prepare a 5 Year Capital
Improvements Plan and submit it to the Commission by December 15th.
As we grow as a City, so will our projects and infrastructure. To move towards a plan that only
includes true capital items which, we need to plan for based on risk and strategic initiatives, we
will move to a higher threshold. Currently, threshold for inclusion in the plan is $10,000 this
causes many maintenance and other operational budget items to be included in the capital plan.
For the FY21 to FY25 Capital Improvement Plan we will use a $25,000 threshold. This will
align us with best practices and be able to make better capital decisions by focusing on true
capital items and less maintenance and operational expenses.
The Public Works Director, City Manager, and other city staff met in October and November to
develop the attached Capital Plan for the equipment and capital needs of the Storm Water Fund.
234
Strategic Plan Efforts- This year we worked towards 7.1 b Create a Culture of Innovation by
changing our Capital planning system, from an Access database for project tracking and plan
development to using our ERP system’s project module making it easier to merge them into the
budget, setup efficiency for projects when started and giving increased project reporting.
UNRESOLVED ISSUES: None.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the City Commission. If the Commission does not
wish to adopt this schedule tonight, it can be scheduled for approval on a later agenda.
FISCAL EFFECTS: This step in the process has no fiscal effect. Once adopted, the
Capital Improvements Plan becomes the basis of the City Manager’s Recommended Budget for
FY20.
Report compiled on: October 25, 2018
Attached: Storm Water Fund CIP Section
235
STORM WATER FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY Financial Summary Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24UnscheduledProjected Beginning Reserve Balance Dedicated to CIP 420,777$ 376,933$ 351,273$ 344,344$ 356,707$ 388,941$ Plus: Storm Water Utility Fees Dedicated to Capital 606,156$ 624,341$ 643,071$ 662,363$ 682,234$ 702,701$ Less: FY18 Carryover Capital ‐$ Less: Scheduled CIP Project Costs (650,000)$ (650,000)$ (650,000)$ (650,000)$ (650,000)$ (650,000)$ (125,000)$ Projected Year‐End Cash Dedicated to CIP 376,933$ 351,273$ 344,344$ 356,707$ 388,941$ 441,641$ Assumptions Made for Revenue Estimates Current YearFY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24Estimated Annual Storm Water Utility Revenue 1,347,013$ 1,347,013$ 1,387,423$ 1,429,046$ 1,471,917$ 1,516,075$ Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Attributed to Growth 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Estimated Annual Increase ‐ Rate Increase 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Total Estimated Revenues 1,347,013$ 1,387,423$ 1,429,046$ 1,471,917$ 1,516,075$ 1,561,557$ Current Revenues Dedicated to CIP % 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Plus: Increase Dedicated to Capital 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total % Dedicated to CIP 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0%Total Estimated Revenues Dedicated to CIP 606,156$ 624,341$ 643,071$ 662,363$ 682,234$ 702,701$ ProjectedProjected$(650,000)$(650,000)$(650,000)$(650,000)$(650,000)$(650,000)$(125,000)FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 UNSCHEDULEDSTORM WATER PROJECTS 236
STORM WATER FUND PROJECT SUMMARY Project # Project Name FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024STDM01DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHAB 400,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM02MANLEY DITCH REHAB 100,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM03DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE PH2 ‐ 350,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STDM04HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ ‐ STDM05ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REH ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ STDM06N 9TH DITCH REHAB ‐ ‐ ‐ 150,000 ‐ STDM07HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ ‐ ‐ 475,000 ‐ STDM08UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 ‐ STDM09MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHAB ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 300,000 STDM10HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 275,000 STDM11UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 75,000 STOS01SEDIMENT DISP FAC RD RPR ‐ ‐ 50,000 ‐ ‐ STRH01DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH3 ‐ 300,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ STRH02DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH4 ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ ‐ STRH03REGIONAL STORM COLL FACIL ‐ ‐ 200,000 ‐ ‐ STUO01STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN 150,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fiscal Year totals 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 237
STORM WATER FUND DETAIL BACKGROUND The City’s Storm Water Fund is an enterprise fund that is funded primarily through Stormwater utility charges. These monthly charges are based on the impervious area of a lot. Fiscal year 2017 revenues represent the first fiscal year where our rate‐model is fully implement for all 12 months. The changes in revenues over the past 5 years have been driven by our implementation of the full rate model. We are basing our FY20‐24 revenue estimates on annual customer growth of 3% per year. This is similar to our most recent Wastewater rate model. Actual revenues should grow depending on the mix of impervious areas/existing infrastructure use as property is annexed and developed. CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY This year the Stormwater Division updated its plan by changing the project numbers to align with defined areas to better track their progress. The spending is still aligned with its original conception of $650,000 a year. $268,531 $453,483 $943,621 $1,293,941 $1,324,463 $856,808 $‐ $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,0002014 2015 2016 First year fullrate 20172018 Average FY14‐FY18Storm Water Revenue238
!
!
!
!!
!
!Stormwater Fund FY21
!Stormwater Fund FY22
Stormwater Fund FY20
Stormwater Fund FY21
Stormwater Fund FY22
Stormwater Fund FY23
Stormwater Fund FY24
STDM01
Main
Durston
Oak
College
Bridger19th
FergusonS11thRouseChurchHighlandI90
Babcock
Oak
19thGriffin
Peach
This map was created by the City of Bozeman GIS Department on 10/24/18 and is intended for planning purposes only.
¯0 10.5 Miles
FY20-24 Stormwater
Baxter
I90Davis7thSTDM02
STRH02
STOS01
STRH01STRH01STRH03
STDM03
STDM04
STDM06
STDM07
STDM09
STDM10
STDM10
239
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 400,000 DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION (PHASE I) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REHABILITATING ‐ 2,000 FEET OF STORM SEWER PIPE BENEATH THE ALLEY ‐ LOCATED BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND MENDENHALL STREET ‐ AND BENEATH NORTH ROUSE FROM MAIN STREET TO EAST ‐ VILLARD STREET. THE CURRENT PIPE CONSISTS OF ‐ HISTORICAL MATERIALS THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH, ‐ INCLUDING BRICK, VITRIFIED CLAY, AND CONCRETE. THE ‐ PIPE IS OVER 100 YEARS OLD, IS IN POOR ‐ STRUCTURAL CONDITION (CONTAINS 42 IDENTIFIED ‐ DEFICIENCIES), AND CONVEYS SIGNIFICANT STORMWATER ‐ FLOWS GENERATED FROM A 330‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE ‐ BASIN, MAKING IT A HIGH PRIORITY FOR ‐ REHABILITATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE PIPE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE. FURTHER, ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED SPOT REPAIRS ‐ WHICH PROLONG ‐ A PIPE'S LIFE ‐ ARE UNFEASIBLE DUE TO THE PIPE'S ‐ LOCATION, DEPTH, CONDITION, AND SIZE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL ENSURE THE PIPE CONVEYS STORM‐ ‐ WATER AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED AND INTENDED. THE ‐ PROJECT COLLABORATES WITH THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT ‐ OF TRANSPORTATION (MDT) RECONSTRUCTION OF NORTH ‐ ROUSE AVENUE. MDT WILL PROVIDE A COST‐SHARE ‐ COMMENSURATE WITH THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE ‐ SECTION OF PIPE WITHIN THEIR RIGHT‐OF‐WAY. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY20 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS WILL BRING ‐ THE CITY TO 21% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL ‐ DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHAB 2020400,000 STDM01240
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE PIPE ON A FIVE‐YEAR REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, ‐ INCLUDING FLUSHING, VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 100,000 MANLEY DITCH REHABILITATION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REHABILITATING ‐ 1500 FEET OF MANLEY DITCH LOCATED EAST OF MANLEY ‐ ROAD. THE DITCH CONVEYS STORMWATER GENERATED FROM ‐ A 58‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE BASIN. THE DITCH INCLUDES ‐ A VEGETATED SWALE THAT HAS EXPERIENCED SIGNIFICANT‐ DEGRADATION, RESULTING IN A NONFUNCTIONAL ‐ CONVEYANCE AND OBSTRUCTED RAILROAD‐OWNED CULVERT ‐ CROSSING. SPECIFIC ISSUES INCLUDE SEDIMENT ‐ DEPOSITION, OVERGROWN VEGETATION, AN ILLEGAL ‐ BULKHEAD, AND BANK EROSION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE DITCH IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND FURTHER ‐ HEIGHTEN ONGOING FLOODING IMPACTS. ALSO, THE ‐ DITCH'S LOCATION, LENGTH, AND TIGHT GRADES MAKE AN ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED REPAIR UNFEASIBLE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL ENSURE THE DITCH CONVEYS ‐ STORMWATER AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED AND INTENDED. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY20 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS WILL BRING ‐ THE CITY TO 21% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL ‐ SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ MANLEY DITCH REHAB 2020100,000 STDM02241
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 350,000 DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION (PHASE 2) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGN AND REHABILITATING ‐ 1419 FEET OF STORM SEWER PIPE BENEATH THE ALLEY ‐ LOCATED BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND MENDENHALL STREET, ‐ AND IS THE SECOND AND FINAL PHASE OF THE ‐ DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION PROJECT.THE ‐ CURRENT PIPE CONSISTS OF HISTORICAL MATERIALS ‐ THROUGHOUT ITS LENGTH, INCLUDING BRICK, VITRIFIED ‐ CLAY, AND CONCRETE. THE PIPE IS OVER 100 YEARS ‐ OLD, IS IN POOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION (CONTAINS ‐ 27 IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES), AND CONVEYS ‐ SIGNIFICANT STORMWATER FLOWS GENERATED FROM A ‐ 273‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE BASIN, MAKING IT A HIGH ‐ PRIORITY FOR REHABILITATION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE PIPE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE. FURTHER, ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED SPOT REPAIRS ‐ WHICH PROLONG ‐ A PIPE'S LIFE ‐ ARE UNFEASIBLE DUE TO THE PIPE'S ‐ LOCATION, DEPTH, CONDITION, AND SIZE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT WILL ENSURE THE DITCH CONVEYS ‐ STORMWATER AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED AND INTENDED. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY21 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS BRINGS THE ‐ CITY TO 27% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL SET ‐ BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE PIPE ON A FIVE‐YEAR REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, ‐ DOWNTOWN TRUNK LINE PH2 2021350,000 STDM03242
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 100,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REPLACING 583 ‐ FEET OF STORM SEWER PIPE BENEATH SOUTH BLACK AVE ‐ FROM EAST BABCOCK STREET TO EAST MAIN STREET. THE ‐ CURRENT PIPE CONSISTS OF VITRIFIED CLAY, WHICH ‐ IS HISTORICAL MATERIAL. THE PIPE IS OVER 100‐YEARS ‐ OLD, IS IN POOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION (CONTAINS 31 ‐ IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES), AND CONVEYS STORMWATER ‐ FLOWS GENERATED FROM A 28‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE ‐ BASIN, MAKING IT A HIGH PRIORITY FOR REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE PIPE IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE. FURTHER, ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED SPOT REPAIRS ‐ WHICH PROLONG ‐ A PIPE'S LIFE ‐ ARE UNFEASIBLE DUE TO THE PIPE'S ‐ LOCATION, DEPTH, CONDITION, AND SIZE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE PIPE WILL EFFECTIVELY ‐ CONVEY STORMWATER UNDER DESIGN CONDITIONS. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY22 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS BRINGS THE ‐ CITY TO 28% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL SET ‐ BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE PIPE ON A FIVE‐YEAR REOCCURING SCHEDULE, ‐ INCLUDING FLUSHING, VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2022100,000 STDM04243
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 50,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION & DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS PIPE ‐ REHABILITATION, DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS ‐ THAT IMPROVE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND ‐ CONVEYANCE CAPACITY OF THE CITY'S STORM SEWER ‐ SYSTEM. UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO RESPOND TO ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS THAT ARISE FROM REOCCURRING ‐ SYSTEM INSPECTION AND PARTNER WITH OTHER PUBLIC ‐ WORKS' PROJECTS, SUCH AS LOCAL SID STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTIONS IF APPROVED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF ASSESSED THE POTENTIAL OF COMPLETING ALL ‐ PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS ‐ INTERNALLY; HOWEVER, DETERMINED THIS APPROACH ‐ WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE RESOURCES APPLIED ‐ TOWARD CRITICAL REOCCURRING INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ALLOCATION OF UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOWS STAFF TO ‐ BE PROACTIVE IN THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ‐ STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS OR IS LIKELY ‐ TO FAIL, INCREASING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY AND REDUCING ‐ CITY LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE OF PROJECTS AS REQUIRED. ‐ ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REH 202250,000 STDM05244
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 150,000 NORTH 9TH AVENUE DITCH REHABILITATION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REHABILITATING ‐ 900 FEET OF STORMWATER CONVEYANCE DITCH LOCATED ‐ NEAR NORTH 9TH AVENUE FROM WEST VILLARD STREET TO ‐ WEST PEACH STREET. THE DITCH CONVEYS STORMWATER ‐ GENERATED FROM A 142‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE BASIN AND ‐ INCLUDES A VEGETATED SWALE THAT HAS EXPERIENCED ‐ SIGNIFICANT DEGRADATION. SPECIFIC ISSUES INCLUDE ‐ SEDIMENT DEPOSITION, OVERGROWN VEGETATION, & BANK ‐ EROSION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE DITCH IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK FOR ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ALSO, THE ‐ DITCH'S LOCATION, LENGTH, AND TIGHT GRADES MAKE AN ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED REPAIR UNFEASIBLE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE DITCH WILL CONVEY ‐ STORMWATER AS DESIGNED FOR EFFECTIVE SYSTEM ‐ OPERATION. COMPLETION OF FY23 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS ‐ WILL BRING THE CITY TO 40% OF ITS DEFERRED ‐ MAINTENANCE GOAL SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION ‐ DURING THE STORMWATER UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ N 9TH DITCH REHAB 2023150,000 STDM06245
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 475,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (FY23) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REPLACING ‐ 2623 FEET OF STORM SEWER PIPE LOCATED THROUGHOUT ‐ THE CITY'S HISTORIC DOWNTOWN CORE. THE CURRENT ‐ PIPES CONSIST OF VITRIFIED CLAY, WHICH IS ‐ HISTORICAL MATERIAL. THE PIPES ARE OVER 100 YEARS ‐ OLD, ARE IN POOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION (CONTAIN 162 ‐ IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES), AND CONVEY STORMWATER ‐ FLOWS GENERATED FROM NUMEROUS LARGE URBAN ‐ DRAINAGE BASINS, MAKING THEM HIGH PRIORITIES ‐ FOR REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE PIPES ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE. FURTHER, ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED SPORT REPAIRS ‐ WHICH PROLONG ‐ A PIPE'S LIFE ‐ ARE UNFEASIBLE DUE TO THE PIPES' ‐ LOCATIONS, DEPTHS, CONDITIONS, AND SIZES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE PIPES WILL EFFECTIVELY ‐ CONVEY STORMWATER UNDER DESIGN CONDITIONS. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY23 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS BRINGS THE ‐ CITY TO 40% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL SET ‐ BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE PIPE ON A FIVE‐YEAR REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, ‐ INCLUDING FLUSHING, VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2023475,000 STDM07246
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 25,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION & DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS PIPE ‐ REHABILITATION, DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS ‐ THAT IMPROVE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND ‐ CONVEYANCE CAPACITY OF THE CITY'S STORM SEWER ‐ SYSTEM. UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO RESPOND TO ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS THAT ARISE FROM REOCCURRING ‐ SYSTEM INSPECTION AND PARTNER WITH OTHER PUBLIC ‐ WORKS' PROJECTS, SUCH AS LOCAL SID STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTION IF APPROVED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF ASSESSED THE POTENTIAL OF INTERNAL CREWS ‐ COMPLETING ALL PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS; HOWEVER, DETERMINED THIS APPROACH ‐ WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE RESOURCES APPLIED ‐ TOWARD CRITICAL REOCCURRING INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ALLOCATION OF UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOWS STAFF ‐ TO BE PROACTIVE IN THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ‐ STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS OR IS LIKELY ‐ TO FAIL, INCREASING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY AND REDUCING ‐ CITY LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE OF PROJECTS AS REQUIRED. ‐ UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI 202325,000 STDM08247
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 300,000 MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHABILITATION ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REHABILITATING ‐ 1500 FEET OF STORMWATER CONVEYANCE DITCH ‐ LOCATED NEAR NORTH 15TH AVENUE FROM WEST MAIN ‐ STREET TO WEST BEALL STREET. THE DITCH CONVEYS ‐ STORMWATER GENERATED FROM A 42‐ACRE URBAN DRAINAGE ‐ BASIN. THE DITCH INCLUDES A VEGETATED SWALE THAT ‐ HAS EXPERIENCED SIGNIFICANT DEGRADATION. SPECIFIC ‐ ISSUES INCLUDE SEDIMENT DEPOSITION, OVERGROWN ‐ VEGETATION, AND BANK EROSION. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE DITCH IS A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETOWRK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK FOR ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ALSO, THE ‐ DITCH'S LOCATION, LENGTH, AND TIGHT GRADES MAKE ‐ AN INTERNALLY MANAGED REPAIR UNFEASIBLE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE DITCH WILL CONVEY ‐ STORMWATER AS DESIGNED FOR EFFECTIVE SYSTEM ‐ OPERATION. COMPLETION OF FY24 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS ‐ WILL BRING THE CITY TO 51% OF ITS DEFERRED ‐ MAINTENANCE GOAL SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING ‐ THE STORMWATER UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ MIDDLE CREEK DITCH REHAB 2024300,000 STDM09248
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE PROJECT 275,000 HISTORIC PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (FY24) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND REPLACING 1400 ‐ FEET OF STORM SEWER PIPE LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE ‐ CITY'S HISTORIC DOWNTOWN CORE. THE CURRENT PIPES ‐ CONSIST OF VITRIFIED CLAY, WHICH IS HISTORICAL ‐ MATERIAL. THE PIPES ARE OVER 100 YEARS OLD, ARE ‐ IN POOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION (CONTAIN 54 ‐ IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES), AND CONVEY STORMWATER ‐ FLOWS GENERATED FROM NUMEROUS LARGE URBAN DRAINAGE ‐ BASINS, MAKING THEM HIGH PRIORITIES FOR ‐ REPLACEMENT. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. THE PIPES ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE ‐ CITY'S PUBLIC STORM SEWER NETWORK, AND FURTHER ‐ DEFERENCE WILL IMPACT PUBLIC SAFETY AND INCREASE ‐ FLOOD RISK IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE. FURTHER, ‐ INTERNALLY MANAGED SPOT REPAIRS ‐ WHICH PROLONG ‐ A PIPE'S LIFE ‐ ARE UNFEASIBLE DUE TO THE PIPES' ‐ LOCATIONS, DEPTHS, CONDITIONS, AND SIZES. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE PIPE CONVEY STORMWATER AS ‐ DESIGNED FOR EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OPERATION. ‐ COMPLETION OF FY24 CONVEYANCE PROJECTS BRINGS THE ‐ CITY TO 51% OF ITS DEFERRED MAINTENANCE GOAL SET ‐ BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE MAINTENANCE OF ‐ THE PIPE ON A FIVE‐YEAR REOCCURRING SCHEDULE, ‐ INCLUDING FLUSHING, VACUUMING, AND INSPECTION. ‐ HISTORIC PIPE REPLACE PRG 2024275,000 STDM10249
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 75,000 ANNUAL UNPLANNED PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE ‐ PROJECTS ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ AN ANNUAL PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES FUNDING FOR THE ‐ DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS PIPE ‐ REHABILITATION, DRAINAGE, AND TREATMENT PROJECTS ‐ THAT IMPROVE THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND ‐ CONVEYANCE CAPACITY OF THE CITY'S STORM SEWER ‐ SYSTEM. UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOW STAFF TO RESPOND TO ‐ INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS THAT ARISE FROM REOCCURRING ‐ SYSTEM INSPECTION AND PARTNER WITH OTHER PUBLIC ‐ WORKS' PROJECTS, SUCH AS LOCAL SID STREET ‐ RECONSTRUCTIONS IF APPROVED. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF ASSESSED THE POTENTIAL OF COMPLETING ALL ‐ PIPE REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECTS ‐ INTERNALLY; HOWEVER, DETERMINED THIS APPROACH ‐ WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE RESOURCES APPLIED ‐ TOWARDS CRITICAL REOCCURRING INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ MAINTENANCE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE ALLOCATION OF UNPLANNED FUNDS ALLOWS STAFF ‐ TO BE PROACTIVE IN THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ‐ STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT HAS OR IS LIKELY TO ‐ FAIL, INCREASING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY AND REDUCING ‐ CITY LIABILITY. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE OF PROJECTS AS REQUIRED. ‐ UNPLANNED PIPE REHAB/DRAI 202475,000 STDM11250
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #OPERATION SUPPORT PROJECT 50,000 SEDIMENT DISPOSAL FACILITY ASPHALT REPAIR ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF ‐ THE ASPHALT SURFACE LOCATED AT THE CITY'S ‐ STORMWATER WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY. THE FACILITY ‐ IS USED TO STORE, PROCESS, AND DRY WASTE GENERATED ‐ FROM REOCCURRING STORMWATER OPERATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ PROLONG ASPHALT MAINTENANCE RISKING FURTHER ‐ DEGRADATION OF DRIVABLE SURFACES AND INCREASED ‐ DEFERRED EXPENSE. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE PROJECT ENSURES THE FACILITY WILL REMAIN ‐ FUNCTIONAL, ALLOWING STAFF TO MEET THE CITY'S ‐ LEVEL OF SERVICE GOALS. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ NONE ‐ SEDIMENT DISP FAC RD RPR 202250,000 STOS01251
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #RIVER HEALTH PROJECT 300,000 DOWNTOWN MECHANICAL STORMWATER TREATMENT (PHASE 3) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND INSTALLING TWO ‐ (2) STORMWATER MECHANICAL SEPARATION UNITS NEAR ‐ THE INTERSECTIONS OF NORTH ROUSE AVENUE AND EAST ‐ PEACH STREET, AND NORTH ROUSE AVENUE AND EAST ‐ TAMARACK STREET. STAFF PROPOSES TO TARGET THESE ‐ LOCATIONS BECAUSE THE ROADS, PARKING LOTS, YARDS, ‐ DRIVEWAYS, AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CONTAINED WITHIN ‐ THEIR URBAN WATERSHED HAVE A DIRECT CONNECTION ‐ TO BOZEMAN CREEK, MEANING NO REMOVAL OF ‐ STORMWATER POLLUTANTS OCCURS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. CITY STAFF HAS NOT IDENTIFIED ANY ‐ ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER TREATMENT APPROACHES WITH ‐ COMPARABLE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, CONSTRUCTION ‐ FOOTPRINTS, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCES, ‐ ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE LARGE SIZE OF THE ‐ DRAINAGE BASINS TARGETED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UNITS WILL TREAT STORMWATER GENERAGED FROM ‐ 138‐ACRES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND COLLECT ‐ OVER 20‐TONS OF SEDIMENT, LITTER, NUTRIENTS, OIL, ‐ AND METALS ANNUALLY. POLLUTANT REMOVAL WILL ‐ IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY, HELP RESTORE BOZEMAN ‐ CREEKS' AQUATIC HABITAT, AND REDUCES STORMWATER ‐ PERMIT VIOLATION RISK. COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT ‐ WILL BRING THE CITY TO 81% OF ITS WATER QUALITY ‐ GOAL SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE ‐ STORMWATER UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE SEMI‐ANNUALLY, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL ‐ DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH3 2021300,000 STRH01252
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #OF COLLECTED DEBRIS USING EXISTING VACUUMING ‐ EQUIPMENT. STAFF WILL THEN STORE AND DRY DEBRIS ‐ AT THE CITY'S STORMWATER WASTE MANAGEMENT ‐ FACILITY BEFORE HAULING TO THE LANDFILL FOR FINAL ‐ DISPOSAL. ‐ RIVER HEALTH PROJECT 250,000 DOWNTOWN MECHANICAL STORMWATER TREATMENT (PHASE 4) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND INSTALLING TWO ‐ (2) STORMWATER MECHANICAL SEPARATION UNITS NEAR ‐ THE INTERSECTIONS OF SOUTH BLACK AVENUE AND EAST ‐ CLEVELAND STREET, AND SOUTH BOZEMAN AVENUE & EAST ‐ CLEVELAND STREET. STAFF PROPOSES TO TARGET THESE ‐ LOCATIONS BECAUSE THE ROADS, PARKING LOTS, YARDS, ‐ DRIVEWAYS, AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS CONTAINED WITHIN ‐ THEIR URBAN WATERSHED HAVE A DIRECT CONNECTION ‐ TO MATHEW BIRD CREEK (A TRIBUTARY OF BOZEMAN ‐ CREEK), MEANING NO REMOVAL OF STORMWATER ‐ POLLUTANTS OCCURS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ NONE. CITY STAFF HAS NOT IDENTIFIED ANY ‐ ALTERNATIVE STORMWATER TREATMENT APPROACHES WITH ‐ COMPARABLE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, CONSTRUCTION ‐ FOOTPRINTS, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES, ‐ ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE LARGE SIZE OF THE ‐ DRAINAGE BASINS TARGETED. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE UNITS WILL TREAT STORMWATER GENERATED FROM ‐ 193‐ACRES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND COLLECT ‐ OVER 27‐TONS OF SEDIMENT, LITTER, NUTRIENTS, OIL, ‐ AND METALS ANNUALLY. POLLUTANT REMOVAL WILL ‐ IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY, HELP RESTORE MATHEW BIRD ‐ AND BOZEMAN CREEK'S AQUATIC HABITAT, AND REDUCE ‐ STORMWATER PERMIT VIOLATION RISK. COMPLETION OF ‐ DOWNTOWN MECH STORM PH4 2022250,000 STRH02253
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #FY22 TREATMENT PROJECTS WILL BRING THE CITY TO ‐ 100% OF ITS WATER QUALITY GOAL SET BY THE CITY ‐ COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER UTILITY'S ‐ DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE SEMI‐ANNUALLY, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL ‐ OF COLLECTED DEBRIS USING EXISTING VACUUMING ‐ EQUIPMENT. STAFF WILL THEN STORE AND DRY DEBRIS ‐ AT THE CITY'S STORMWATER WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY ‐ BEFORE HAULING TO THE LANDFILL FOR FINAL DISPOSAL. ‐ RIVER HEALTH PROJECT 200,000 REGIONAL STORMWATER COLLECTION FACILITY (BEALL ‐ PARK) ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THIS PROJECT INCLUDES DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTING ‐ A REGIONAL STORMWATER COLLECTION AND INFILTRATION ‐ FACILITY NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH BLACK ‐ AVENUE AND EAST VILLARD STREET. STAFF PROPOSES ‐ TO TARGET THIS LOCATION BECAUSE THE ROADS, PARKING ‐ LOTS, YARDS, DRIVEWAYS, AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ‐ CONTAINED WITHIN ITS URBAN WATERSHED HAVE A ‐ DIRECT CONNECTION TO BOZEMAN CREEK, MEANING NO ‐ REMOVAL OF STORMWATER POLLUTANTS OCCURS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF DECENTRALIZED & SMALLER BOULEVARD ‐ INFILTRATION‐BASED FACILITIES SPREAD THROUGHOUT ‐ THE TARGETED BASIN. THIS APPROACH WOULD RESULT IN ‐ EIGHT TO NINE TIMES THE COST AS A REGIONAL ‐ FACILITY TO ACHIEVE SIMILAR STORMWATER QUALITY ‐ AND QUANTITY REDUCTION GOALS. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ THE FACILITY WILL CAPTURE, STORE, AND INFILTRATE ‐ STORMWATER GENERATED FROM 52‐ACRES OF URBAN ‐ REGIONAL STORM COLL FACIL 2022200,000 STRH03254
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #DEVELOPMENT, AND COLLECT OVER 14‐TONS OF SEDIMENT, ‐ LITTER, NUTRIENTS, OIL, AND METALS ANNUALLY. ‐ POLLUTANT REMOVAL WILL IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY, HELP ‐ RESTORE BOZEMAN CREEKS' AQUATIC HABITAT, AND ‐ REDUCE STORMWATER PERMIT VIOLATION RISK. ALSO, THE ‐ FACILITY WILL IMPROVE URBAN RESILIENCY BY ‐ CAPTURING URBAN FLOOD FLOWS THAT WOULD OTHERWISE ‐ TAKE UP VALUABLE CAPACITY IN THE DOWNSTREAM ‐ SYSTEM. COMPLETION OF FY22 TREATMENT PROJECTS WILL ‐ BRING THE CITY TO 100% OF THE WATER QUALITY GOAL ‐ SET BY THE CITY COMMISSION DURING THE STORMWATER ‐ UTILITY'S DEVELOPMENT. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COST: ‐ STORMWATER OPERATIONS PERSONNEL WILL COMPLETE ‐ MAINTENANCE SEMI‐ANNUALLY, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL ‐ OF COLLECTED DEBRIS USING EXISTING VACUUMING ‐ AND FLUSHING EQUIPMENT. STAFF WILL THEN STORE AND ‐ DRY DEBRIS AT THE CITY'S STORMWATER WASTE MGMT ‐ FACILITY BEFORE HAULING TO THE LANDFILL FOR FINAL ‐ DISPOSAL. ‐ 255
Project Name Year Description Amount Total Project #UTILITY OPERATION PROJECT: 150,000 STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN UPDATE ‐ DESCRIPTION: ‐ THE PROJECT INCLUDES HIRING A CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE ‐ THE CITY OF BOZEMAN'S STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN ‐ LAST REVISED IN 2007. THE CITY HAS MADE ‐ SIGNIFICANT PROGRAMMATIC, OPERATIONAL, AND ‐ ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS IN ‐ RESPONSE TO EVOLVING ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, ‐ GROWTH, AND AGING INFRASTRUCTURE. AN UPDATED ‐ STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN WILL ASSIST STAFF IN ‐ IDENTIFYING HIGH‐PRIORITY INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ DEFICIENCIES, FUTURE NEEDS, AND DETERMINE THE ‐ CITY'S REGULATORY STANDING WITH STORMWATER PERMIT ‐ REGULATIONS. ‐ ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: ‐ STAFF WILL CONTINUE IMPLEMENTING THE ‐ RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN THE 2007 STORMWATER ‐ FACILITY PLAN. ‐ ADVANTAGES OF APPROVAL: ‐ AN UPDATED STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN PROVIDES STAFF ‐ A FRAMEWORK, ACTION PLAN, AND THIRD PARTY ‐ PROFESSIONAL OVERSIGHT HELPING THE CITY ACHIEVE ‐ ITS PROGRAMMATIC GOALS, WHICH INCLUDE COMPLYING ‐ WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, IMPROVING WATER‐ ‐ WAY HEALTH, PROTECTING PUBLIC SAFETY, AND ‐ MANAGING INFRASTRUCTURE. ‐ ADDITIONAL OPERATING COSTS: ‐ NONE. ‐ STORMWATER FACILITY PLAN 2020STUO01150,000 256