The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-17-18 Protest - Hook, McKenzie, Mickolio, Bergevin - Rainbow Creek Annexation and Zone Map Amendment August 17, 2018 - _ a - Bozeman City Clerk 121 N. Rouse Ave PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 RE: Rainbow Creek Annexation and Zoning TO: Bozeman Zoning Commission Bozeman City Commission Please accept this letter of protest regarding the Rainbow Creek Zoning Map Annexation request to zone the property located at 4555 Baxter Lane, Bozeman, MT to R-5. We have no problem with annexation of this property into the City. In fact,we are supportive of annexation. We do question the need to zone at R-5. The Baxter Meadows community has been building out for over a decade using a planned and measured approach. It is one of, if not the first, Planned United Developments (PUD) in Bozeman. When one looks at the Baxter Meadows planned community, one finds density increasing as one moves east (see attached map). Within the PUD there is R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-S and B-2 zoning. South and east of the applicant property,the new Flanders Mill development is zoned R-4. Developments further east are zoned R-3. To the south of the Sports complex,there is R-0 zoning, as well as R-3 and R-4. It is my opinion that the Baxter Meadows community and surrounding developments have already adopted, in spirit and in deed,the tenets of the Bozeman Community Plan. These tenets are stated in the Community Plan, Chapter 2, Introduction,Section 2.1 Guiding Principles: "Strives to achieve a fair and proper balance among conflicting interests,to protect the rights of citizens,and to affirm community values as they have been expressed by citizen's and throughout the planning process." And, "Affirms Bozeman's commitment to responsible stewardship of the natural environment,excellences of environmental design and conservation of heritage of the built environment." Additionally, stated in Section 2.3, Why Do We Need a Plan?: Promote the interest of the community at large,while respecting and protecting the interests of individuals or special interest groups within the community." It is our opinion that these guiding principles of the Community Plan are already being met and "spot" zoning R- 5 in the middle of the R-1 section of a planned community moves away from the spirit and principles outlined in the plan. Chapter 3, Land Use,Section 3.2, Major Themes and Related Chapters, under Land Use Principles- Neighborhoods states: 1 ^ � "rhere is strong ` public support for the preservation of existing neighborhoods and new development being part of a larger whole, rather than just anonymous subdivisions." it is our opinion that the proposed Rainbow Creek is more an anonymou I s subdivision than part of the larger whole. Further in Section Si2, Land Use Principles—Centevs,thefoUovvngisdiscussed: "Centers are further supported through careful location of high density housing imamanner that provides support for commercial operations while providing amenities bmreskdentm" A list of benefits potentially derived from this type of use area is included in the section. They include: • Increased business synergy w Greater convenience for people with shorter travel distance to a wide range of businesses • The opportunity to accomplish several tasks with a single trip. • Facilitates the use of transportation alternatives to single occupant motor vehicles with a corresponding reduction in traffic and road congestion and air quality impacts • Enables greater access to employment,services, and recreation with reduced dependence on the automobile. • Greater efficiencies in delivery of public services • Corresponding cost savings in both personal and commercial applications |n reviewing the above benefits,xvedn not see how they can be achieved considering the relative isolation/anonymity of the applicant property. |n the same section, under Land Use Principles—Sustainob0itv one finds: ' "Development should be integrated into neighborhoods and the larger community rather than a series mf unconnected stand-alone projeots." VVe feel this development represents an unconnected stand-alone project Lhatisnot|ntegratedintothe neighborhood or larger community. Section 3.3, Land Use Goals and Objectives, Objective L0-1.4states: "Provide for and support infil|development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds\t." VVe support in0||on the applicant property. VVe ask for respect of the larger community plan and the context of the existing development. R'S zoning does not respect either. In the same section, Objective LU'2.2 states— "Locate high density community scale service centers ouaone-mile radius and neighborhood service centers ona half mile radius,to facilitate efficient use of transportation and public services in providing employment, residential,and other essential uses." Given the fact that there is existing B-2 zoning within one half mile of the applicant property we fail to see how this R'5 "spot" zoning advances the cause. 2 In the Criteria narrative provided by the applicant,they state that the requested R-5 zoning is aligned with the growth policy because the current zoning is residential, and the requested zoning is residential. R-1 does not equal R-5. In fact, the DRC notes state: "Use of this zone(R-5)is appropriate for areas adjacent to mixed use districts and/or served by transit." The above sentence is a truncated version of the following one found in the Bozeman UDC Update, Part 2, Zoning District Intent& Purpose Statement, Section 38.300.100, F: "Use of this zone is appropriate for areas adjacent to mixed use districts and/or served by transit to accommodate a higher density of residents in close proximity to jobs and services." The subject property is neither adjacent to mixed use nor served by transit.Additionally,we fail to see how increasing the density on such a small parcel places a significant number of people in close proximity to jobs and services. Also, in Section 38.300.100, F.,the partial sentence cited by the applicant in their Criteria Narrative is found.The applicant notes: "...walkable area to serve the varying needs of the community's residents." The full sentence reads: "The intent of the R-5 residential mixed-use high density district is to provide for high density residential development through a variety of compatible housing types and residentially supportive commercial uses in a geographically compact,walkable area to serve the varying needs of the community's residents." We do not think the requested "spot" zoning realizes this intent. In Section 3.4, Land Use Category Descriptions-Residential one finds the sentence cited by the applicant: "Large areas of single type housing are discouraged." Further in that section it states: "All residential housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development....and in a fashion that compliments the overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy." We do not think the request is compatible nor complementary to the furtherance of the Community Plan (Growth Policy).These tenets are echoed in the Residential Emphasis Mixed Use section,which states: "All uses should complement existing and planned residential uses." It should be noted that the creation of the R-5 zoning district(2016)was preceded by the Bozeman Community Plan(2009)so alignment of the two has not yet been fully realized in our opinion. The Bozeman Community Plan addresses growth on a large scale. The zoning change request is small scale and does not align with nor further the goals and principles of the Bozeman Community Plan. In our opinion the zoning request benefits the applicant far more than it benefits the neighbors,the Baxter Meadows community and the Bozeman community at large. We request the application for R-5 zoning be denied. R-1 zoning is more in alignment with the tenets of the Bozeman Community Plan and community goals. 3 Sincerely, Edward L. Hoo Jr. Barclay G.Oo 4634 Danube Lane Bozeman, MT.59718 Baxter Meadows Sub Ph 3a,S34,T01 S, R05 E, Block 15, Lot 5 rn Kevin P McKenzie ennifer fCc enzie 4651 Danube Ln Bozeman, MT 59718-8095 Baxter Meadows Sub Ph 3a,S34,T01 S, R05 E, Block 15, Lot 3 A j Gene A. Mickoli 4579 Danube Ln Bozeman, MT 59715 Baxter Meadows Sub Ph 3a,S34,T01 S, R05 E, Block 13, Lot 12 Michael D Bergevin Kathy R Bergevin 4559 Danube Ln Bozeman, MT 59715 Baxter Meadows Sub Ph 3a,S34,T01 S, R05 E, Block 13, Lot 13 Chilton Robert Q 4627 Danube Ln Bozeman, Mt 59772-3851 Baxter Meadows Sub Ph 3a,S34,T01 S, R05 E, Block 13, Lot 9 4 ^� # � � . \ . . . \ \ 00 / / CO 2 / . 2 » . / A �fmd •w,w! rea«mw,,&u, . � / ? / I . \ 2 \ . ? � 3 X a)»._ E\ \& ` 2 \ \ ¥ f I a \ \ _ & LD\ \ / . - L \ - » \ / / \ z \ % /. \ � , I CL E f ® ƒ0 ` J / . 2 . > % 2 Z 2 y \ \ / \ \ y \ \ .» co ® ~ ® ^ \ \ / J t cmj - f L \` \ \ \ » \ \ ` . e ¥ \ 9 e m g 2 _ » \ } Cc \ / 2 2 0 \ m « g ® - < - \ f . \ e % \ s > \ ® e % » D J J J J z s $ K J \ > m 5 z E " \ , g \ | NOW - 0 � . E � . E ( \_ 0CL /