HomeMy WebLinkAbout18217 Staff Report ZCPage 1 of 16
18217, Staff Report for the Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment
Public Hearing Date:
Zoning Commission: Tuesday, July 17, 2018
City Commission: Monday, August 20, 2018
Project Description: A Zone Map Amendment application requesting amendment of the
City Zoning Map to rezone .67 gross acres / 29,210 square feet from R-1 Residential Low
Density to R-O Residential Office as allowed by Section 38.260.100 of the Bozeman
Municipal Code.
Project Location: The property is generally located north of Durston Road and east of N. 19th
Avenue and is legally described as Lots 25 and 26, Block A of Maple Terrace Subdivision, and
the adjacent Montana Department of Transportation right-of-way & right-of-way acquisition,
said tracts being located in the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 5
East, P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana.
Recommendation: Approval
Zoning Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff
report, application materials, public comment, all information presented, I hereby adopt the
findings presented in the staff report for application 18217 and move to recommend
approval of the Maple Terrace zone map amendment, with contingencies required to
complete the application processing.
Report Date: August 16, 2018
Staff Contact: Addi Jadin, Associate Planner
Agenda Item Type: Action - Legislative
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Unresolved Issues
None identified at this time.
Project Summary
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the requested amendment to the City of Bozeman
Zoning Map proposed by the property owners, applicant and the project representative listed in
Appendix D. The applicants request rezoning of 2 lots and corresponding portions of street right-
of-way totaling approximately .67 acres (gross) from R-1 Residential Low Density District to R-
O Residential Office. The subject properties are currently vacant and are surrounded by
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 16
administrative professional and single-household residential uses. The future land use map in the
Bozeman Community Plan (growth policy) designates the properties as residential.
The criteria for analysis is in Section 4 of the staff report. In considering the criteria the
analysis must show that the proposed amendment accomplishes criteria A-D or are neutral.
Criteria E-K must be considered and may be found to be affirmative, neutral, or negative. A
favorable decision on the proposed application must find that the application meets all of
criteria A-D and that the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes
for criteria E-K.
As stated in Section 38.300.020.C. placement of any given zoning district on an area
depicted on the zoning map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of
uses allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is not a
guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of the appropriate review
procedure and compliance with all of the applicable requirements and development
standards of this chapter and other applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a
guarantee of immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to
bear the cost of extending services.
Public comment including protest of the zone map amendment application has been
submitted and is summarized in Appendix B and attached to the staff report.
The Zoning Commission recommendation and all public comment will be forwarded to the
City Commission for consideration at their meeting on Monday, September 17, 2018.
Alternatives
1. Recommend approval of the application with contingencies as presented;
2. Recommend denial of the application based on findings of non-compliance with the
applicable criteria contained within the staff report;
3. Recommend approval of a different residential district after making the necessary findings
for the action; or
4. Open and continue the public hearing, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to
supply additional information or to address specific items.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1
Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1
Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 1
Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT..... 6
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................ 6
SECTION 4 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ............. 7
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria (38.100.040.C. UDC) ...................................... 7
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 12
APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND .............. 12
APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT .................................................... 13
APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING ................... 13
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 15
FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 16
ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 16
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 16
SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES
Current Zoning Map
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 16
Community Plan Future Land Use Map
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 16
SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT
Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the
proposed amendment.
Recommended Contingencies of Approval:
1. That all documents and exhibits necessary to establish an initial municipal zoning
designation shall be identified as the “2018 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment.”
2. That the applicant must submit a Zone Amendment map, titled “NAME”. The map
must be supplied on: 1) a mylar for City records (either 18" by 24" or 24” by 36”
size); 2) a reduced 8 ½" x 11" or 8 ½” by 14" exhibit for filing with the Annexation
Agreement at the County Clerk & Recorder; 3) an editable digital copy for the City
Engineer’s Office; and 4) a PDF. This map must be acceptable to the City Engineer’s
Office, and must be submitted within 60 days of the action to approve the zone map
amendment. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the
perimeter of the subject property including adjacent right-of-ways or street
easements, and total acreage of the property to be rezoned; unless the property to be
rezoned can be entirely described by reference to existing platted properties or
certificates of survey.
3. The Ordinance for the zone map amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant
provides an editable metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed
Montana surveyor.
4. All required materials shall be provided to the Department of Community
Development within 60 days of a favorable action of the City Commission or any
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS
Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff recommends
approval as submitted. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the
amendment on June 20, 2018. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory
constraints that would impede the approval of the application.
The Zoning Commission continued this item at their meeting on July 17, 2018 and will hold
a public hearing on this zone map amendment on August 21, 2018, at 121 N. Rouse Avenue,
Bozeman, and forward a recommendation of approval to the City Commission. The meeting
will begin at 6 p.m.
The City Commission was scheduled to hold a public hearing on the zone map amendment
on August 20, 2018. However, the Commission was requested by the applicant to continue
the item until September 17, 2018 at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will
begin at 6 p.m.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 16
SECTION 4 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City
Commission shall consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a
legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The
burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant.
In considering the criteria the analysis must show that the amendment accomplishes criteria
A-D or are neutral. Criteria E-K must be considered and may be found to be affirmative,
neutral, or negative. A favorable decision on the proposed application must find that the
application meets all of criteria A-D and that the positive outcomes of the amendment
outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K.
Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria (38.100.040.C. UDC)
A. Be in accordance with a growth policy.
Yes. The future land use map in the Bozeman Community Plan (growth policy) designates
the subject properties as residential. The intent of the R-O zoning district aligns with the
description of residential in the growth policy (see Appendix C of the staff report).
Additionally, the proposed zone map amendment advances multiple objectives of the growth
policy:
Land Use Objective 1.1: “The land use map and attendant policies shall be the official
guide for the development of the City and shall be implemented through zoning
regulations, capital improvements, subdivision regulations, coordination with other
governmental entities, and other implementation strategies.”
Land Use Objective 1.4: “Provide for and support infill development and
redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context
of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not
automatically prohibit difference in scale or design.”
Land Use Objective 2.3: “Encourage redevelopment and intensification, especially
with mixed uses, of brownfields and underutilized property within the City consistent
with the City’s adopted standards. Using this approach rehabilitate corridor based
commercial uses into a pattern more supportive of the principles supported by
commercial centers.”
Community Quality Objective 1.3: “Support compatible infill within the existing area
of the City rather than developing land requiring expansion of the City’s area.”
Housing Objective 1.1 “Encourage and support the creation of a broad range of
housing types in proximity to services and transportation options.”
See also discussion under Criteria G & H. No conflicts with the Growth Policy have been
identified.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 16
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers.
Yes. The subject properties are currently within the jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman Fire
and Police Departments and within the service area of American Medical Response
ambulances. The proposed amendment of the zoning map is not likely to adversely impact
safety from fire and other dangers as any changes in use and further development would be
reviewed under the Unified Development Code (UDC). Development standards of the UDC
have been found to adequately address this criterion.
C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare.
Yes. The proposed amendment will promote general welfare by implementing the future land
use map in the Bozeman Community Plan. Future site development will be required to be in
compliance with the UDC which will help assure general health, safety, and welfare. The
proposed amendment will not put undue burden on municipal services, emergency response
capability, or similar existing requirements.
D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public requirements.
Neutral. Future site development proposals on the subject property will be required to
demonstrate the adequate provision of all public services including those that may be
necessary to offset any impacts that may be identified throughout the review process.
The review procedures and standards adopted by the City ensure this criterion is met. These
standards will apply to development of the site under any zoning district.
E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air.
Yes. With the setbacks, open space, landscaping and building design requirements of the
UDC, adequate light and air is expected to be provided in the event that future development
occurs along the zone edge boundary. No height transition was deemed necessary between
R-O and R-1 lots. See Appendices A and C for additional analysis of the R-O zoning
district.
F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems.
Yes. The Bozeman Area Transportation Master Plan (TMP) (2017) classifies the adjacent
and nearby roadways surrounding the subject property as Principal Arterial (North 19th
Avenue), Minor Arterial (Durston Road), and Local (North 17th Avenue). North 19th Ave has
an existing volume to capacity ratio of 0.78 and 0.59 (east) and 0.68 (west) for Durston Road,
Page 42, TMP Figure 2.9. Any changes in traffic with development under the R-O or R-1
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 16
zoning designation would be reviewed at the time of further development on the subject
parcels, development of the area may be limited until street improvements have been
completed. Given the area being considered for rezoning and the limited intensity allowed
under the R-O zone the amount of additional travel demand is a small possible percentage of
the total available capacity.
Improvements to Durston Road and the greater transportation system may be required
starting with the dedication of right-of-way for collector streets to allow for the expansion of
the westbound right-turn bay as described in City’s long range master plan, Page 84, TSM-
30. The TMP identifies the intersection of North 19th Ave and Durston Road are currently
operating with a level-of-service (LOS) of “C” for both AM and PM peak-hours, which is
acceptable by the City. The TMP notes that the intersection will fail during PM peak-hour
conditions in the future, with the aforementioned expansion to the west-bound right-turn bay
suggested to mitigate for the future condition. This will occur with or without the change in
zoning and will involve City acquisition of additional right-of-way for widening of Durston
Road to address increased travel demand. In addition the City’s capital improvement plan
calls for the reconstruction of North 17th Avenue, scheduled for FY22 to bring the street up to
the City’s local street standard and install upraded utility mains.
Parking is also a part of the transportation system and under the proposed R-O zoning further
development will be carefully evaluated to ensure that proposed development does not create
negative impacts on adjacent properties from spillover parking.
G. Promotion of compatible urban growth.
Yes. The Growth Policy supports infill development on underutilized properties. The
proposed change of zoning for the subject properties will enable the currently undeveloped
land to be developed in a manner compatible with surrounding development patterns. In
addition, the properties are surrounded by both commercial and residential uses; as a result,
land uses that are of a mixed-use nature are an appropriate extension of the current urban
growth patterns. When considering this criterion, the City is guided by the following adopted
definitions in 38.700.040.
Compatible development. The use of land and the construction and use of structures
which is in harmony with adjoining development, existing neighborhoods, and the goals
and objectives of the city's adopted growth policy. Elements of compatible development
include, but are not limited to, variety of architectural design; rhythm of architectural
elements; scale; intensity; materials; building siting; lot and building size; hours of
operation; and integration with existing community systems including water and sewer
services, natural elements in the area, motorized and non-motorized transportation, and
open spaces and parks. Compatible development does not require uniformity or
monotony of architectural or site design, density or use.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 16
Compatible land use. A land use which may by virtue of the characteristics of its
discernible outward effects exist in harmony with an adjoining land use of differing
character. Effects often measured to determine compatibility include, but are not limited
to, noise, odor, light and the presence of physical hazards such as combustible or
explosive materials.
The primary use of a lot within the R-O zoning district is determined by the underlying
growth policy land use designation. Where the district lies over a residential growth policy
designation, as it does on the subject parcels, the primary use shall be non-office uses where
the primary use shall be measured by percentage of building floor area. This will ensure that
the future development is compatible with the adjacent low-density residential development.
H. Character of the district.
Yes. Character of the district includes the types of uses allowed, size, scale and design of
buildings and lots, the residential density, and other factors.
As previously mentioned in item G above, the ratio of residential to commercial uses allowed
on the subject parcels is determined by the underlying growth policy land use designation.
Because the underlying designation for the subject parcels is “residential”, any development
on these lots must be more than 50% residential. Whereas on the R-O lots adjacent to the
subject parcels, the underlying growth policy designation is “business park” and those lots
are allowed to be more commercial. The proposal would potentially allow a more subtle
transition from commercial to residential than currently exists between R-O lots and R-1 lots
within the district.
Another aspect of the character is the intensity of use as measured by residential density. The
current minimum density in the R-1 zoning district is 5 dwelling units per net acre; whereas
R-O zoning requires a minimum of 6 dwellings per acre. Under its current development
pattern with 26 single-household lots, 5 administrative professional and 7 vacant lots within
10.3 net acres, the Maple Terrace Subdivision has a density of approximately 2.5 dwellings
per net acre. Including roughly the same area of land south of the proposal under R-2
zoning, the current density is still below the minimum R-1 density of 5 dwelling units per
acre at approximately 4.74 units per acre. The area is not meeting the intent as stated in the
R-1 district of providing urban density.
Typically, building size, scale and design are thought of as the character of the district. R-O
zoning does allow heights about 10 feet taller than R-1; however, when adopting zone edge
transition standards of Section 38.320.060, the transition between R-O and R-1 districts was
not included. This represents a legislative determination that the difference between the scale
and intensity of the two districts does not require extraordinary mitigation.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 16
One area where the character of the R-O lot may be different from that of the adjacent
residential properties is parking. Whereas parking requirements for residential units on R-O
lots are the same in R-1, the likelihood of a need for a parking lot is greater in R-O. Due to
zoning requirements, the parking lot is likely to be in the rear or potentially along the side of
the existing lots. This is not typical in the residential districts. It would however be
mitigated by landscaping requirements and potentially by open space and storm water
facilities if placed within the setbacks.
See additional comments in Criterion G.
I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses.
Yes. The subject properties are peculiarly suitable for the proposed R-O uses. The intent of
the R-O zoning district is to provide a transition area between residential neighborhoods and
commercial areas. The subject parcels fall between existing R-O, R-1 and R-2 uses. A
change to R-O zoning would conform to adjacent zoning, implement the Bozeman
Community Plan, and provide for further development of residential with associated office
land uses which is suitable for the area as that is the current development pattern.
The location of the properties with frontage solely along an arterial street and near an
intersection with a collector is particularly suitable for an increase in intensity.
J. Conserving the value of buildings.
Yes. All future site development that complies with the requirements outlined in the
UDC will ensure consistency with the existing and planned surrounding development types
which will, in turn, aid in the conservation of surrounding property values. Standards to be
reviewed include impacts to traffic, building height, open space, landscaping, pedestrian
connectivity, building design (including Block Frontage for commercial and 5-household
residential). As a result, the proposed amendment is not likely to negatively impact the value
of existing buildings.
K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area.
Yes. The proposed zone map amendment would allow the subject property to be developed
in a manner consistent with surrounding development patterns and provide an appropriate
transition between adjacent uses. The proposed amendment is suitable for the site and can
benefit from and add to the commercial and residential nature of the surrounding area. The
growth policy supports development on underutilized parcels and the proposed amendment
would provide for that.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 16
PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS
IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE
OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT
AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A
PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT
BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION.
The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal
described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City
Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s)
of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that
lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and
must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i)
contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the
protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including
listing all owners of the property and the physical address and legal description of the
property), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of
property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their
signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to
final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City
Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230.
APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the requested amendment to the City of Bozeman
Zoning Map proposed by the property owners and applicant listed in Appendix D.
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the requested amendment to the City of Bozeman
Zoning Map proposed by the property owners, applicant and the project representative listed in
Appendix D. The applicants request rezoning of 2 lots and corresponding portions of street right-
of-way totaling approximately .67 acres (gross) from R-1 Residential Single-Household Low
Density District to R-O Residential Office. The subject properties are currently vacant and are
surrounded by administrative professional and single-household residential uses. The future land
use map in the Bozeman Community Plan (growth policy) designates the properties as residential.
Certain development standards and authorized uses that may be applicable to the subject
parcels differ between R-1 and R-O zoning. Floor area ratio is significantly higher in R-O
zoning at 1.5:1 versus .5:1 in R-1. R-O buildings are generally allowed an additional 10 feet
of height for various roof forms. R-O uses include higher density residential buildings,
lodging houses, Type 2 short term rentals, and offices including medic al. Setbacks are the
same and density requirements per net acre only differ by 1 dwelling unit.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 16
Setbacks, open space, landscaping and building design requirements of the UDC are
intended to ensure adequate light and air; thus conserving the value of existing buildings.
The Zoning Commission recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission for
consideration at their meeting on Monday, September 17, 2018 (the item is expected to be
continued at the Commission meeting on Monday, August 20, 2018).
APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT
Notice was sent via US 1st Class mail on Friday, June 29, 2018 to all owners of property located
inside the proposed change and within 200 feet of the perimeter of the change. The project site
was posted prior to July 1, 2018. Notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman
Daily Chronicle on July 1 and July 8, 2018.
Approximately 34 people have signed a letter to the Zoning Commission titled “Concerns
Regarding Rezoning Maple Terrace Lots 25 & 26.” One additional letter was provided as noted.
Topics included in public comment include:
Conflict with Maple Terrace covenants which restrict use to single-family residential.
As stated in Section 38.100.100. of the Unified Development Code, where the provisions of any
private restriction are more restrictive or impose higher standards than the provisions of this
chapter, the city has no duty to enforce such private restrictions or advise of their existence.
See Appendix C for a list of residential uses allowed in the R-O zoning district which
include single-household residential.
Inconsistent with the City’s Growth Policy.
See Appendix C
Review criteria including Street Congestion, Compatible growth, Character, Conserving the
Value of Buildings.
See Section 4 analysis
Topography of the property
To be reviewed during Site Plan process.
APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING
Adopted Growth Policy Designation:
The property is designated as Residential in the Bozeman Community Plan future land use map.
The Bozeman Community Plan describes the character of the land use category as follows:
Residential. This category designates places where the primary activity is urban
density dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 16
as parks, low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools.
High density residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial
centers to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons
without requiring the use of an automobile. Implementation of this category by
residential zoning should provide for and coordinate intensive residential uses in
proximity to commercial centers. The residential designation indicates that it is
expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries, which may
require annexation prior to development. The dwelling unit density expected within
this classification varies between 6 and 32 dwellings per net acre. A higher density
may be considered in some locations and circumstances. A variety of housing types
can be blended to achieve the desired density. Large areas of single type housing are
discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence of constraints and natural
features such as floodplains may cause an area to be designated for development at a
lower density than normally expected within this category. All residential housing
should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development,
natural constraints such as watercourses or steep slopes, and in a fashion which
advances the overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy. The residential designation
is intended to provide the primary locations for additional housing within the
planning area. (Page 3-10)
Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses:
The applicant has requested zoning of R-O (Residential Office). The intent of the R-O District as
stated in the UDC is:
… to provide for and encourage the development of multi-household and apartment
development and compatible professional offices and businesses that would blend
well with adjacent land uses. These purposes are accomplished by:
1. Providing for a mixture of housing types, including single and multi-household
dwellings to serve the varying needs of the community's residents.
Use of this zone is appropriate for areas characterized by office or multi-household
development; and/or areas along arterial corridors or transitional areas between
residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. (38.300.110.G.)
The following table consolidates uses allowed in the R-O zoning district from Tables
38.310.030.A and B of the UDC:
Permitted general and group residential uses in residential zoning districts
Accessory dwelling units P
Apartments/apartment building P
Cottage housing P
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 16
Single-, Two-, Three- and Four-household dwelling P
Townhouses & rowhouses (five attached units or less; more than five attached units) P
Community residential facilities (with 8 or fewer residents; or 9 or more) P
Cooperative household
Family day care home
Group day care home
Group living (38.360.150)
Lodging houses
Permitted accessory and non-residential uses in residential zoning districts
Essential services Type I A
Guest House A
Home-based business A/S
Other buildings and structures typically accessory to authorized uses A
Private or jointly owned recreational facilities A
Signs A
Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work A
Temporary sales and office buildings A
Bed and breakfast P
Community centers P
Day care centers P
Essential services Type II P
Essential services Type III C
Short Term Rental (Type 1, 2) P
Offices P
Public and private parks P
Medical offices, clinics, and centers P
Uses approved as part of a PUD per division 38.380 C
APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF
Property Owners:
Bobby Smith, 1811 Durston Road, Bozeman, MT 59715
Charles and Barbara Parks, 2795 Santa Clara Circle, St. George, UT 84790
Applicant:
Cory Taylor, 1232 N. Alexandria Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90029.
Staff Report for 18217 Maple Terrace Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 16
Report By: Addi Jadin, Associate Planner
FISCAL EFFECTS
No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by
this zone map amendment.
ATTACHMENTS
The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development
Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715.
Application Materials:
Maple Terrace zone map amendment exhibit
Maple Terrace zone map amendment application, including an adjoining property owners list
and project summary.
Public Protest and Comment Materials:
Protest and comment documents