Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-18-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Preliminary Plat Application for the Gran Cielo Major Subdivision
Page 1 of 23 17522, City Commission Staff Report for the Gran Cielo Subdivision Public Hearing Date: Planning Board, June 5, 2018 at 7:00 pm in the City Commission Room 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana City Commission, June 18, 2018 at 6:00 pm in the City Commission Room 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana Project Description: A Preliminary Plat application for a proposed 48.754-acre major subdivision to create 124 residential townhouse lots, 3 open space lots, 2 parks and the associated right-of-way. Project Location: The subject parcel is located northwest of the intersection of S. 27th Avenue and Graf Street and legally described as Tracts 3&4 of Certificate of Survey 2725, located in Section 23, Township 2 South Range 5 East. Recommendation: Approval with conditions and code requirements Planning Board Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17522 and move to recommend approval of the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17522 and move to approve the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report Date: June 6, 2018 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager Shawn Kohtz, Development Review Engineer Agenda Item Type: Action (Quasi-judicial) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues 1) This project depends on several easements for off-site installation of streets and water mains. The general format of those easements has been agreed between the applicant and the City. An agreement to complete those easements between applicant and other land owners is needed in order to find that all required standards have been met. Conditions 20-22 address this issue. See additional discussion in Section 6 of this report. 174 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 2 of 23 Project Summary The City of Bozeman Department of Community Development received a preliminary plat application on October 25, 2017, requesting a major subdivision. The project was deemed inadequate for review and review halted until revised materials were provided. Revised materials were submitted on February 2, 2018 and March 15, 2018. The application was deemed adequate on March 22, 2018 and review continued. The application was deemed to be adequate prior to the effective date of the recently revised Chapter 38, Unified Development Code. Therefore, this review is based on the regulations in effect on the date it was deemed adequate for review. This subdivision proposes to meet its affordable housing requirement through payment of money instead of construction of housing. This is an allowed alternative. The subdivision provides a mix of lot types to support a variety of housing alternatives within the subdivision. A large central park provides the required neighborhood center. Planning Board The Planning Board held its public hearing on June 5, 2018. Two members of the public offered testimony. See Appendix B. The Planning Board recommends approval of the subdivision on a vote of 7-0. A recording of the Planning Board is available at https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and-streaming-audio. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. This alternative is requested if the Commission wishes to amend or add conditions of approval. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Planning Board.................................................................................................................... 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .......................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES ................................................................................. 8 175 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 3 of 23 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ............................................ 8 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS ...................... 12 SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS .......................................... 13 SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ................................................................. 13 Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.03.040, BMC................................. 13 Primary Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 76-3-608 ................................................. 16 Preliminary Plat Supplements ........................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY...................................... 21 APPENDIX B – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ........................................................ 22 APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION ................................................................................ 23 FISCAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................................... 23 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 23 176 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 4 of 23 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES 177 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 5 of 23 178 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 6 of 23 179 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 7 of 23 180 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 8 of 23 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES There was one variance regarding block length requested with this subdivision application. In the course of review and revisions, it was determined that the variance was not required. Therefore, there is no material provided for the variance and no analysis of variance criteria. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. The plat must conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Subdivision Plats (Uniform Standards for Certificates of Survey and Subdivision Plats (24.183.1104 ARM) and must be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application must include three (3) signed reproducible copies on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies; one (1) PDF copy; and five (5) paper prints. The Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder’s office has elected to continue the existing medium requirements of 2 mylars with a 1½” binding margin on one side for both plats and COS’s. The Clerk and Recorder will file the new Conditions of Approval sheet as the last same sized mylar sheet in the plat set. 2. The applicant must submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and must include a digital copy (pdf) of the entire Final Plat submittal. This narrative must in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 3. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 4. The final plat must provide all necessary utility easements and must be described, dimensioned and shown on each subdivision block of the final plat in their true and correct location. Any rear or side yard utility easements not provide will require written confirmation from ALL utility companies providing service indicating that rear or side yard easements are not needed. 5. Should the subdivider propose subdivision perimeter fencing or fencing adjacent to the open space or public parks, a fencing plan that includes plans and specifications to fence the perimeter of the project must be provided for review and approval prior to final plat approval. Fences located in the front, side or rear yard setback of properties adjacent to any park or open space must not exceed a maximum height of 4 feet, and must be of an open construction designed in a manner to be consistent along all park land and open 181 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 9 of 23 space areas. This requirement with appropriate exhibits of fence types must be addressed and illustrated in the home owner’s association documents. 6. Trees may not be located within 10 feet of sewer and water services. Sewer and water services must be shown on the landscaping plan of the park and open space plan, and approved by the Water/Sewer Superintendent. 7. Property owner’s association documents must address the requirements for street trees, a City of Bozeman planting permit for street trees and obtaining utility locates before any excavation begins in the City of Bozeman right-of-way. The covenants must include a planting note stating that the planting hole must be at least twice the diameter of the root ball, that the root flare of the newly planted tree is visible and above ground, and there should be a mulch ring 3’- 4’ in diameter around each newly planted boulevard tree. 8. The final plat must include a transfer of private improvements certificate to read substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP & COMPLETION OF NON-PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The following are hereby granted and donated to the property owners association noted below for their use and enjoyment: Common Open Space parcels designated with letters A, B, C, and D. unless specifically listed in the Certificate of Dedication, the city accepts no responsibility for maintaining the same. I, (Subdivider), hereby further certify that the following non-public improvements, required to meet the requirements of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, or as a condition(s) of approval of the subdivision plotted herewith, have been installed in conformance with any approved plans and specifications prepared in accordance with the standards of Chapter 38 or other City design standards, or have been financially guaranteed and are covered by the subdivision improvements agreement accompanying and recorded with this plat. Installed Improvements: (LIST ITEMS). Financially Guaranteed Improvements: (LIST ITEMS OR STATE NONE). The subdivider hereby grants ownership of all non-public infrastructure improvements to the property owners association created by Document Number ______________________ (To be filled in when recorded) By: (Subdivider) Date: _____________________________ 9. Deeds and realty transfer certificates must be provided for transfer of any platted tract to the City or other entity in association with filing of the final plat. 10. The location of mailboxes must be coordinated with the City Engineering Department prior to their installation. Locations must provide for accessible access. 11. The final plat must contain the following notation on the conditions of approval sheet in the final plat: “Ownership of all common open space areas and trails, and responsibility 182 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 10 of 23 of maintenance thereof and for city assessments levied on the common open space lands must be that of the property owners’ association. Maintenance responsibility must include, in addition to the common open space and trails, all vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees and irrigation systems in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external perimeter development streets and as adjacent to public parks or other common open space areas. All areas within the subdivision that are designated herein as common open space, including trails, are for the use and enjoyment by residents of the development and the general public. The property owners’ association must be responsible for levying annual assessments to provide for the maintenance, repair, and upkeep of all common open space areas and trails. At the same time of recording the final plat for the subdivision, the subdivider must transfer ownership of all common open space to the property owners’ association created by the subdivider to maintain all common open space areas within the Pine Meadow Subdivision. 12. A conditions of approval sheet must be added to the plat. 13. The subdivider must provide the necessary declaration and recitals to facilitate the property owners’ association bylaws and/or declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions. Any cost sharing agreements for maintenance must be included with the final plat. 14. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions a) The property owners association shall be created for the entire property with the first platting so that all elements of common maintenance are included. 15. The special improvement lighting district for the entire subdivision shall be formed with the initial final plat. 16. No basements or crawl spaces may be constructed within the subdivision. An advisory note to this effect shall be added to the Conditions of Approval sheet. 17. The applicant must adjust the draft note to the plat indicating, “The Homeowner’s Association (HOA) is responsible to maintain all stormwater facilities located in the common open space.” 18. A signed waiver of right to protest a city-wide park maintenance district shall be completed for filing with the final plat. 19. Any well, including the equipment and associated permitting, used for open space or park irrigation must be transferred to the City or Home Owners Association as applicable. 20. Easements meeting City standards must be provided to the City and executed prior to commencement of infrastructure construction for Graf Street, S. 27th Avenue, Bennett Boulevard, and South 29th Avenue. 21. The full street section for S. 27th Avenue must be constructed as shown on the preliminary plat prior to final plat approval for Phase 1. As an alternative to the location shown on the preliminary plat, the subdivider may obtain and provide to the city a 45 foot-wide public 183 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 11 of 23 street and utility easement from the adjacent property owner that would allow S. 27th to be constructed 45 feet further to the east than is shown on the preliminary plat. 22. The applicant must construct a looped water system to provide redundant water connection to the proposed project as well as increase the capacity of the existing water mains to accommodate the proposed demands from the project. The proposed dead-end water system with only one connection at the intersection of S. 27th Avenue and Graf Street does not constitute a looped water system. The water main connection to Kurk Drive proposed with the revised submittal is an acceptable alignment. Alternate alignments may be accepted. An easement meeting City standards must be provided to the City and executed prior to commencement of infrastructure construction for the looped water main. 23. The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) for the following: a) Street improvements to W. Graf Street including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b) Street improvements to S. 27th Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c) Street improvements to Stucky Road including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d) Street improvements to Fowler Lane including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage e) Street improvements to S. 19th Avenue including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage f) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and 27th Avenue g) Intersection improvements to 27th Avenue and Stucky Road h) Intersection improvements to Stucky Road and S. 19th Avenue i) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and S. 19th Avenue j) Intersection improvements to Stucky Road and Fowler Lane k) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and Fowler Lane The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final plat approval. 184 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 12 of 23 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS The following are procedural requirements not yet demonstrated by the plat. 1. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.24.010.A states: All streets shall be provided in accordance with the adopted growth policy and/or transportation plan. The arrangement, type, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions, to public convenience and safety, and to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such streets. • The full street section for S. 27th Avenue must be constructed. • The applicant’s proposed half street section for S. 27th Avenue does not include curb and gutter with installation of the half street. The applicant must construct curb and gutter on both sides of the half street section of S. 27th Avenue. 2. BMC Section 38.23.060.A states: Where determined to be necessary, public and/or private easements shall be provided for private and public utilities, drainage, vehicular or pedestrian access, etc. The applicant must provide executed street and utility easements for all offsite streets prior to commencement of construction of any public infrastructure including the following: • Graf Street • S. 27th Avenue • S. 29th Avenue • Bennett Boulevard • Apex 3. BMC 38.23.070.A.1 states: The developer shall install complete municipal water and sanitary sewer system facilities, or a system allowed by 38.21.030.D, and may be required by the city to install municipal storm sewer system facilities. These systems shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and shall conform with any applicable facilities plan. The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations. The developer shall submit plans and specifications for the proposed facilities to the city and to the state department of environmental quality and shall obtain their approvals prior to commencing construction of any municipal water, sanitary sewer or storm sewer system facilities. The applicant must construct a looped water system to provide redundant water connection to the proposed project as well as increase capacity in the water system to accommodate the proposed demands from the project. 4. BMC Section 38.23.060.C.1 States: A public utility easement shall be granted for all public utility mains not located within public street right-of-way. An easement shall 185 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 13 of 23 be at least 30 feet wide for either one or two utility mains. An additional ten feet of width is required for each additional main that occupies the easement. Wider easements may be required at the discretion of the city for large utility lines. The applicant must provide any necessary, executed off-site utility easements for looping the water system prior to commencement of construction of any public infrastructure. 5. There are several minor grammatical errors in the certificate of dedication and certificate of exclusion from DEQ review. Please correct the errors. 6. BMC 38.39 requires that any financial securities for improvement agreements must be valid for longer than the period of the work. 7. BMC 38.43 requires provision of price limited affordable housing. The applicant has proposed to meet this requirement with payment of money. Compliance is proposed to occur coincident with phased final plat filings. Updated values shall be calculated at the time of each final plat. SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS The DRC determined that the applications are adequate for continued review and recommended approval with conditions on March 22, 2018. The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the related subdivision and recommends approval to the City Commission. Public hearing date for the Planning Board was June 5, 2018. The hearing was held in the City Commission chamber, 121 N Rouse Avenue at 7:00 pm. Public hearing date for the City Commission is June 18, 2018. The hearing will be held in the City Commission chamber, 121 N Rouse Avenue at 6 pm. SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, and plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.03.040, BMC. In considering applications for subdivision approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 186 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 14 of 23 1) Compliance with the survey requirements of Part 4 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The preliminary plat has been prepared in accordance with the survey requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Montana. As noted in recommended Condition of Approval No. 1, the final plat must comply with State statute, Administrative Rules of Montana, and the Bozeman Municipal Code. Condition of approval 12 requires addition of a conditions of approval sheet so that the required notations can be added as required by conditions or code. 2) Compliance with the local subdivision regulations provided for in Part 5 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Code (UDC). The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as a condition of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. Sections 3 and 4 of this report identify conditions and code corrections necessary to meet all regulatory standards. Staff recommends Conditions No. 2-4, 9, and code requirements 1-4 and 6- 7 to address necessary documentation and compliance with adopted standards. Therefore, upon satisfaction of all conditions and code corrections the subdivision will comply with the local subdivision regulations. 3) Compliance with the local subdivision review procedures provided for in Part 6 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The application was received on October 25, 2017. The application was reviewed and found inadequate for further review on November 18, 2017. Revised materials were submitted on February 2, 2018. The application was reviewed and found inadequate for further review on March 1, 2018. Revised materials were submitted on March 15, 2018. The application was found adequate for review on March 22, 2018. Public hearings were scheduled on April 4, 2018. The hearings before the Planning Board and City Commission have been properly noticed as required by the Bozeman UDC. Based on the recommendation of the DRC and other applicable review agencies, as well as any public testimony received on the matter, the Planning Board forwards a recommendation of approval to the City Commission who will make the final decision on the applicant’s request. The final decision for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat with more than 50 lots must be made within 80 working days of the date it was deemed adequate. Pursuant to Section 38.03.040.A.5.a(4), BMC the city commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the subdivision application by July 12, 2018, unless there is a written extension from the developer, not to exceed one year. Public notice for this application was given as described in Appendix B. Public comment received as of the issuance of this staff report is summarized in Appendix B. 187 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 15 of 23 On May 30, 2018, this major subdivision staff report was completed and forwarded with a recommendation of conditional approval for consideration by the Planning Board. A revised staff report was submitted to the City Commission on June 6, 2018. 4) Compliance with Chapter 38, BMC and other relevant regulations Based on review of the DRC and the Department of Community Development all applicable regulations appear to be met if all code requirements are satisfied. Pertinent code provisions and site specific requirements are included in this report for City Commission consideration in Sections 3 and 4. 5) The provision of easements to and within the subdivision for the location and installation of any necessary utilities All easements, existing and proposed, must be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Therefore, all utilities and necessary utility easements will be provided and depicted accordingly on the final plat. All public utilities will be located within dedicated street right of way. Code Requirements 1, 2, and 4 require performance of these obligations as do Conditions 20-22. There are several easements necessary to provide necessary connections to water and sewer services and to meet the transportation connections required by Article 38.24, BMC. These include easements for Graf Street extension to the west for the southern half of the street; a connection of S. 27th to Stucky Road; and the creation of the western section of Bennett Boulevard. The required easements are located outside of the bounds of the area to be subdivided; and therefore cannot be dedicated with the plat. These easements are necessary to meet the requirements to extend streets to adjacent boundaries, avoid half-streets, and provide emergency access as required in 38.24.010, BMC. These easements must be provided prior to the City’s approval of any infrastructure construction or else this application cannot be found to meet the requirements of 38.23.060 and 38.23.070 of the municipal code and the application cannot be approved. See conditions 20-22. The City has established minimum widths for streets of various classifications. The required easements and streets must be of proportions and character to complete the widths established by the long range transportation plan and municipal code as established in 38.24.050, BMC. 6) The provision of legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision and the notation of that access on the applicable plat and any instrument transferring the parcel All of the proposed lots have frontage to proposed public streets required to be constructed to City standards per 38.24 and associated design standards. Construction of these streets relies upon off- site easements for S. 27th, Graf Street, and Bennett Boulevard. If these easements are not provided, then the requirements are not met and the application cannot be approved. In addition, pursuant to Section 38.24.090.A, BMC, plats shall contain a statement requiring lot accesses to be built to the standard contained in this section, the city design standards and specifications policy, and the 188 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 16 of 23 city modifications to state public works standard specifications. Conditions 20-21 require provisions of the necessary off-site easements to meet the legal standard for legal and physical access. Primary Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 76-3-608 1) The effect on agriculture The subject property is designated as a residential area according to the City of Bozeman Community Plan. The area is zoned for residential development and has been annexed but vacant since 2007. The soils are primarily Turner Loam. 2) The effect on Agricultural water user facilities Agricultural water user facilities are along the western edge of the subdivision. The ditch serves properties to the north. The City of Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property as a residential area. The area is zoned for residential development, and has begun to develop in all directions despite the adjacent County properties immediately to the west. The applicants have contacted the beneficiaries of the ditch and the beneficiaries have no objection to the proposed development. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will have minimal impacts on agricultural water user facilities. 3) The effect on Local services Water/Sewer – Municipal water and sewer can be provided to this site. Internal water and sewer mains will be installed prior to final plat approval. Water for irrigation of open spaces is required and proposed to be provided by a well. The applicant must provide transfer of ownership to the HOA so that the HOA can legally have the water resources necessary to maintain the open space. Irrigation facilities to support the proposed parks must be transferred to the City. The application includes correspondence from DNRC in Supplement C that the property has two authorized wells existing on the property. Condition 19 requires the transfer of the well and equipment. Condition 22 and Code requirement 2 and 3 outline the required completion of easements and physical installation of water and sewer mains. The applicant must construct a looped water system to provide redundant water connection to the proposed project as well as increase capacity in the water system to accommodate the proposed demands from the project. The initial application showed a proposed dead-end water system with only one connection at the intersection of S. 27th Avenue and Graf Street does not constitute a looped water system. The revised application depicted a water main connection to Kurk Drive in an acceptable location aligned with South 30th Avenue. At the Planning Board hearing, the applicant’s representative shared that the South 30th alignment was no longer proposed as the landowner was not willing to grant the easement for the water main. An alternate route is proposed to connect to the water main in Enterprise Boulevard. The landowner of that property offered public testimony that they supported the project. An Easement meeting City standards must be provided to the City and executed prior to plan and specification approval and commencement of infrastructure 189 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 17 of 23 construction for the looped water main as the submitted materials shows the water main loop constructed at least in part outside the bounds of the proposed subdivision. Streets – The Growth Policy and subdivision standards require adequate connectivity of the street grid to ensure sufficient infrastructure to serve the needs of the public and alleviate congestion. The preliminary plat layout extends Graf Street, Cielo Way, and Bennett Boulevard to provide east to west connectivity. Several north to south streets, notably S. 27th Avenue are provided. Example easements are provided for Graff, Bennett, and S 27th to place the streets in locations serving both this development and adjacent properties. The project is well connected as proposed. Conditions 20 and 21 require provision of the necessary easements prior to approval of plans and specifications and any commencement of construction as the submitted plat shows these streets being constructed least in part outside the bounds of the proposed subdivision and secondary access to Stucky Road is proposed in the revised submittal materials. Street lighting is a component of the required street improvements. A special improvement lighting district is proposed to maintain these facilities. Condition 15 ensures that the SILD will be formed and effective before final plat. The requirement for a single SILD will simplify long term maintenance of the street lights and provide a cost that is more equitably shared. Maintenance and use of public streets is subject to the terms of the municipal code. It is important to have clear responsibilities for access and use by the public. The certificate of dedication for the final plat will list specific duties for maintenance. Police/Fire – The area of the subdivision is within the service area of both these departments. No concerns on service availability have been identified. The necessary addresses will be provided to enable 911 response to individual homes prior to recording of the final plat. Stormwater - The subdivision will construct storm water control facilities to conform to municipal code. Inspection of installed facilities prior to final plat will verify that standards have been met. Maintenance of the storm water facilities is an obligation of the home owners association. This responsibility is addressed in the covenants proposed with the subdivision. Condition 17 ensures this will be carried through the final plat. Parklands - The proposal meets the required park dedication and improvement standards. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board recommends approval of the park master plan and the location and scope of improvements with minor adjustments. A final park plan will be completed and approved with the initial final plat. The proposed park plan includes dedication of land with additional improvements to meet the total obligation. Plans and specification review by the Parks Department will occur before installation of any work. Preliminary Plat supplement P contains the park plan and demand calculations. The two park areas of 4.24 and 1.85 acres provide physical space for recreation. The additional 1.42 acres equivalent to be met with improvements in lieu of land will create more functional parks immediately to provide improved recreation functions for the residents. Additional park mitigation may be required as the multi-household parcels are developed. Should such occur, 190 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 18 of 23 there are additional items in the proposed park master plans that can further enhance the dedicated land. Section 38.27.100 authorizes the City to require waivers of right to protest creation of park maintenance districts. The new development will create two new parks with associated maintenance requirements. The residents will also be able to use other public parks throughout the City. A park maintenance district facilitates maintenance in a manner that is proportionate to demand. The state recently changed the laws regarding creation of special districts. A waiver recorded with each phased final plat will ensure that the waiver is correctly drafted to meet state law requirements. 4) The effect on the Natural environment Wetlands exist along the property boundary to the west which are related to the adjacent irrigation ditch. Such wetlands are not protected by City of Bozeman regulations. There are small areas of wetland onsite that will be impacted by street right-of-way and lot configuration. A 404 permit has been obtained for offsite mitigation in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The City encourages use of wells or surface water rights to irrigate parks rather than municipal water supply. There is a lesser energy and infrastructure cost to this approach. However, in order for the City to rely on these sources to meet the code requirement there must be the rights to the water. Condition 19 requires that necessary ownership and rights be transferred to the HOA or City as appropriate. The site is in an area of high groundwater, which may negatively impact future homes or cause illicit discharges into the sanitary sewer and over burden the surface drainage system. Condition 16 prohibits use of basements or crawl spaces and requires addition of a notation of this restriction on the condition of approvals sheet. This requirement will protect both individual home owners from future hazards of flooding and lessen burden on the public from illicit discharges. 5) The effect on Wildlife and wildlife habitat The site has been substantially impacted already, which has reduced wildlife habitat. There are no known endangered or threatened species on the property. Comment from state FWP found no immediate negative effects but noted proximity (2 miles) to elk winter range and recommending buffering from watercourses. No federal agencies comment was received with the exception of the approval for wetland impact from the Army Corps of Engineers. 6) The effect on Public health and safety The intent of the regulations in Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The subdivision has been reviewed by the DRC which has determined that it is in general compliance with the title. Conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance are noted throughout this staff report. All subdivisions must be reviewed against the criteria listed in 76-3-608.3.b-d, Mont Code Annotated. The Department of 191 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 19 of 23 Community Development has reviewed this application against the listed criteria and provides the following summary for submittal materials and requirements. Preliminary Plat Supplements A subdivision pre-application plan review was completed by the DRC on August 28, 2017. With the pre-application plan review application, waivers were requested from the materials required in Section 38.41.060 “Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements.” Some items were not waived and all required material has been addressed. Staff offers the following summary comments on the supplemental information required with Article 38.41, BMC. 38.41.060.A.1 Surface Water There are irrigation ditches and wetlands on or adjacent to the property. The necessary approval from the Army Corps of Engineers has been received to modify or remove the wetland and from the ditch beneficiaries to pipe the ditch. 38.41.060.A.2 Floodplains There are no designated floodplains on or immediately adjacent to the site. 38.41.060.A.3 Groundwater The geotechnical investigation report is included in Appendix C of the application submittal. Groundwater was encountered in all test pit excavations. Groundwater depths ranged from 3-6 feet. Adjacent development has experienced very high groundwater with negative impacts on individual homes and the City and it is reasonable and probable that similar events would happen in this development. The geotechnical report from the Meadow Creek Subdivision also included this area and concluded similar conditions existed here with depths as shallow as two feet. Condition 16 restricts basements and crawl spaces for this reason. 38.41.060.A.4 Geology, Soils and Slopes A new report was not required. The area was considered as a possible phase on an earlier development. Plat supplement D provides details. No substantial restrictions on development on site are indicated. 38.41.060.A.5 Vegetation No substantial native vegetation was identified. Some overstory is present along ditch corridor. The area has been substantially disturbed for agriculture which has displaced most original plants 38.41.060.A.6 Wildlife See comments above under Criterion 5. 38.41.060.A.7 Historical Features No notable features are on the site. 192 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 20 of 23 38.41.060.A.8 Agriculture See discussion above under primary review criteria. 38.41.060.A.9 Agricultural Water User Facilities See discussion above under primary review criteria. 38.41.060.A.10 Water and Sewer See discussion above under primary review criteria. The required design report has been provided. Formal plans and specifications will be prepared and reviewed after action on the preliminary plat. 38.41.060.A.11 Stormwater Management See discussion above under primary review criteria. Permits from the state for stormwater control will be required prior to any onsite construction. 38.41.060.A.12 Streets, Roads and Alleys See discussion above under primary review criteria. 38.41.060.A.13 Utilities All private utilities servicing the subdivision will be installed underground. See discussion above under primary review criteria regarding extension of water and sewer. All private utilities are available in the area. 38.41.060.A.14 Educational Facilities Required materials are provided. Adequate capacity appears available. 38.41.060.A.15 Land Use The use proposed is exclusively residential which conforms to the future land use designation and zoning purposes. 38.41.060.A.16 Parks and Recreation Facilities See discussion above under primary review criteria. 38.41.060.A.17 Neighborhood Center Plan Provided by creation of the central park. Additional features within the park are identified in Supplement Q. 38.41.060.A.18 Lighting Plan Subdivision or street lighting is required pursuant to Section 38.23.150.B, BMC. All street lights installed must use LED light heads and must conform to the City’s requirement for cut-off shields as required by the City’s specifications. A Special Improvement Lighting District (SILD) will be created prior to final plat application. 193 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 21 of 23 38.41.060.A.19 Miscellaneous Supplemental information waived by the DRC. The subdivision will not impact access to any public lands and there are no identified hazards in proximity to the subject property. 38.41.060.A.20 Affordable Housing The subdivision application proposes to meet the requirements for price controlled affordable housing set by 38.43, BMC by payment of money. This is an allowed alternative for compliance. The applicant proposes to make necessary payments with each phase of development. This is acceptable. The City has recently updated its affordable housing pricing alternative. The result is a substantial reduction in the cost to this project. See the attached memo form the Affordable Housing Manager for current data. As provided in the ordinance, each phase will recalculate costs at time of final plat and the then current amount will be due. The ordinance allows several alternatives to meet the required outcome. The preliminary approval of this plat does not bind the applicant to use or another alternative or combination of alternatives. The Affordable Housing Manager has considered the proposed project and provided an estimated amount needed for each phase. Compliance will be verified with each final plat. If phasing is changed then the proportion of affordable housing provided must adjust equally. Final costs of the payment per affordable dwelling will be determined at the time of each final plat. APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) and R-4 (Residential High Density District). The intent of the R-3 residential medium density district is to provide for the development of one- to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. This purpose is accomplished by: 1. Providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas. 2. Providing for a variety of housing types, including single household dwellings, two to four household dwellings, and townhouses to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character, while reducing the adverse effect of nonresidential uses. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas with good access to parks, community services and/or transit. The intent of the R-4 residential high density district is to provide for high-density residential development through a variety of housing types within the city with associated service functions. This purpose is accomplished by: 194 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 22 of 23 1. Providing for minimum lot sizes in developed areas consistent with the established development patterns while providing greater flexibility for clustering lots and mixing housing types in newly developed areas. 2. Providing for a variety of compatible housing types, including single and multi- household dwellings to serve the varying needs of the community's residents. 3. Allowing office use as a secondary use, measured by percentage of total building area. Use of this zone is appropriate for areas adjacent to mixed-use districts, commercial districts, and/or served by transit to accommodate a higher density of residents in close proximity to jobs and services. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Residential.” The “Residential” classification designates places where the primary activity is urban density dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks, low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. High density residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons without requiring the use of an automobile. Implementation of this category by residential zoning should provide for and coordinate intensive residential uses in proximity to commercial centers. The residential designation indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries, which may require annexation prior to development. The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies between 6 and 32 dwellings per net acre. A higher density may be considered in some locations and circumstances. A variety of housing types can be blended to achieve the desired density. Large areas of single type housing are discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence of constraints and natural features, such as floodplains, may cause an area to be designated for development at a lower density than normally expected within this category. All residential housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development, natural constraints, such as watercourses or steep slopes, and in a fashion which advances the overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy. The residential designation is intended to provide the primary locations for additional housing within the planning area. APPENDIX B – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the Planning Board and City Commission public hearings. Per Article 38.40, Notice was provided by posting the site, mailing by certified mail to adjacent property owners and by first class mail to all other owners within 200 feet, and by legal advertisement publication in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Content of the notice contained all elements required by Article 38.40, BMC. 195 17522, City Commission Staff Report – Gran Cielo Subdivision Page 23 of 23 Three written public comments were received before the Planning Board public hearing began. Two were from the same person (Kerwick) and addressed the participation of Gran Cielo in infrastructure funding in the area. At the public hearing, (Ullman) a representative of Kerwick indicated that they had resolved their concerns with the project and no longer requested the proposed changes to Condition 23. The other written comment was from Hill and addressed the need for additional commercial services in the southwest quadrant of the community. All written comments were provided to the Planning Board. Two oral comments were offered at the Planning Board public hearing. Ullman spoke regarding resolution of the Kerwick comment. Bennett, adjacent landowner, spoke in favor of the project. The video of the meeting is available at https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and- streaming-audio. APPENDIX C - OWNER INFORMATION Owner: Bozeman Haus LLC, c/o CP Manage LLC 8401 Wagon Boss Road Bozeman MT 59715 Applicant: Cadius Partners LLC 8401 Wagon Boss Road Bozeman MT 59715, Representative: Madison Engineering 895 Technology Boulevard Suite 203 Bozeman MT 59718. FISCAL EFFECTS The development will generate the typical costs and revenues of residential development. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Application materials – Available through the Laserfiche archive linked agenda materials. Written Public Comment: • Kerwick (2) • Hill 196 197 198 199 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 258 260 261 262 263 264 266 267 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 297 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 319 320 321 323 324 325 326 327 329 330 331 333 334 335 337 338 339 341 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT for GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION Bozeman, Montana Prepared for Madison Engineering Prepared by Marvin & Associates 1300 North Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 October 24, 2017 486 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT for GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION Bozeman, Montana Prepared for Madison Engineering Prepared by Marvin & Associates 1300 North Transtech Way Billings, MT 59102 October 24, 2017 P.T.O.E. # 259 487 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 Streets & Intersections 3 Traffic Volumes 4 Speeds 5 Capacity 6 TRIP GENERATION 7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 9 SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 9 IMPACTS 11 Traffic Volumes 11 Capacity 12 Future Access Operations 13 Future Access Capacity 16 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 17 APPENDIX A – 24 Hour Traffic Count Summaries APPENDIX B - Speed Statistics APPENDIX C – Capacity Calculations 488 ii LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 1. Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 6 Table 2. Gran Cielo Subdivision Trip Generation 7 Table 3. Existing Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 13 Table 4. Year 2032 Future Plus Site – Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary 16 LIST OF FIGURES PAGE Figure 1. Gran Cielo Site Location Map 2 Figure 2. Year 2017 Traffic Volumes 5 Figure 3. Full Development Site Traffic Assignment 10 Figure 4. Existing Plus Full Development Site Traffic 12 Figure 5. Full Development Future Site Traffic Assignment 14 Figure 6. Year 2027 Full Development Traffic at Graf Street Intersections 15 489 Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS 490 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the findings of a traffic impact study (TIS) for the Gran Cielo Subdivision development property, which is located on the south side of Bozeman, Montana. Marvin & Associates was retained by Madison Engineering to prepare the TIS in accordance with City of Bozeman subdivision development ordinances. The primary purposes of this study were to address specific traffic impacts related to the Gran Cielo Subdivision development and to provide recommendations regarding the mitigation of any identified impacts. Having reviewed the proposed land use development plan, Marvin & Associates completed an analysis of existing conditions, addressed trip generation, trip distribution and traffic assignment, and evaluated the resulting arterial and intersection capacity impacts, before making recommendations regarding mitigation of impacts. The study methodology and analysis procedures used in this study employed the most contemporary of analysis techniques, using nationally accepted standards in the areas of site development and transportation impact assessment. Recommendations made within this report are based upon those standards and the professional judgment of the author. SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The Gran Cielo Subdivision development property is bounded on its southern border by Graf Street and agricultural land on the remaining boundaries. (See Figure 1). The property consists of 39.8 acres in R-3 zoning and 8.95 acres zoned R-4. No specific plans have been developed within the overall subdivision layout, but it is estimated that approximately 743 residents would occupy the multi-family lots at full development. This TIS was prepared to evaluate the newly proposed development’s impacts on the roadway system as it currently exists and in the future. 491 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 2 Access to the Gran Cielo Subdivision property would initially be provided from an extension of Graf Street to the west and from an extension of S 27th Avenue to the north. Two new street accesses would connect to Graf Street and four accesses would connect with S 27th Street. The City of Bozeman’s transportation plan indicates that at some future date, S. 2th would be extended from Graf Street to Garfield Street, south of the site. No specific plans were set forth for a future extension of Graf Street to the west. The transportation plan also indicates that Stucky Road will be reconstructed to provide three traffic lanes west of S 19th Avenue in the future. Potential traffic impacts associated with the initial development of Gran Cielo Subdivision property would be confined to intersections of Graf Street and Stucky Road on South 19th Avenue. 492 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS Streets & Intersections Adjacent and potentially impacted public streets within a one half mile distance of the development include South 19th Avenue and the intersections of Graf Street and Stucky Road with South 19th Avenue. South 19th Avenue is a Principal Arterial north-south oriented roadway that begins at an intersection with Cottonwood Road, approximately 6 miles south of Graf Street, and continues north approximately 4.5 miles to an interchange with Interstate 90. South 19th Avenue has variable pavement widths and varying speed zones along its length. At its intersection with Graf Street, it is approximately 62’ wide and has two southbound through lanes; two northbound through lanes; and auxiliary northbound and southbound left-turn lanes. An extension of Graf Street from S 19th Avenue to S 3rd Avenue along with traffic signal modifications were recently constructed at this intersection. North of Graf Street, South 19th Avenue transitions to a two lane road section and then transitions back to a wider section at the intersection with Stucky Road, approximately 0.5 miles south of Graf Street. The intersection of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue is similar to the Graf Street intersection except that there is only one southbound through lane on the departure side of the intersection and there is no curb and gutter on South 19th Avenue. The traffic signal at Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue is fully operational and provides two signal phases for the “T” type intersection. Graf Street and Stucky Road are both classified as Collector streets within the Urban Transportation Plan. They both provide access to residential and institutional developments west of South 19th Avenue. Both of the intersections have two approach lanes at their intersections with South 19th Avenue. Graf Street is approximately 50’ wide and accommodates a single lane of traffic in each direction with bike lanes and parking on both sides of the street. Stucky Road is 493 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 4 approximately 40’ wide at its intersection with South 19th Avenue and tapers back to a width of approximately 28’ west of the intersection. Traffic Volumes Hourly electronic traffic counts were taken in August 2017 on Stucky Road and two additional counts were taken on S 19th Avenue and on Graf Street in 2015. Additional counts were also taken on S 19th Avenue in 2016. The counts provided hourly variations, which were used to determine peak hour conditions and provide base volumes for average weekday projections on intersecting roadways. Summaries of the counts can be found be Appendix A of this report. The weekday peak hour traffic volumes were found to occur between 4:30 and 5:30 pm and between 7:30 and 8:30 am. Peak AM & PM turning movement counts were taken at both the Graf Street and Stucky Road intersections with South 19th Avenue in September of 2017. Average weekday traffic (AWT) volumes were calculated on street links using proportional turning movement volumes in relation to the AWT volume electronic counts. Figure 2 presents existing am & pm peak hour turning movement volumes at the potentially impacted intersections. Street segment average weekday traffic volumes are also depicted in this figure. The existing Intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graf Street was also counted, but that intersection only involves westbound left turn movements and northbound right turn movements and serves very few vehicles. No pedestrian activity was noted during the counting periods, but bike traffic was relatively substantial at the intersection of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue. There were 12 bikes turning left onto South 19th Avenue and 6 bikes turning right onto Stucky Road from South 19th Avenue during the peak pm hour period. 494 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 5 Speeds Speed data was also collected with the electronic counters, specifically on South 19th Avenue north of Graf Street. Appendix B contains the statistical analysis of speed data for that location. It was determined from the speed statistics that the southbound traffic had an 85th percentile speed of approximately 54 miles per hour (mph) which was identical to the 85th percentile speed of 54 mph in the northbound direction. The posted speed limit of 50 mph appears to be in an acceptable range of 85th percentile speeds. 495 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 6 Capacity Peak am and pm hour existing condition capacity calculations were completed for the potentially impacted intersections using the HCS 2010 and SigCInema software packages (see Appendix C). Table 1 summarizes the results of the capacity calculations. Measures in the table include control delay (seconds/vehicle), level of service (LOS), volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio, and 95% queue length. The calculation results showed that all approaches at each of the potentially impacted intersections currently operate at or above a LOS “C”. Since there is no intersection control at the intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graf Street, it was not possible to calculate capacity. Thus, the free flow conditions would result in LOS “A”. L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.2 19.4 19.4 20.4 5.4 17.6 5.8 16.5 LOS CB BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.31 0.07 0.18 Queue Length (95%)10 02 14 22 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)21.1 20.5 20.4 21.3 5.6 18.2 6.1 19.8 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.14 0.05 0.02 0.18 0.05 0.27 0.16 0.42 Queue Length (95%)21 02 03 45 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.6 17.8 8.9 13.9 19.3 18.2 LOS CB AB BB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.05 0.08 0.48 0.34 0.24 Queue Length (95%)51 26 82 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)22.6 19.5 12.3 12.6 30.6 18.1 LOS CB BB CB V/C Ratio 0.45 0.05 0.11 0.40 0.78 0.26 Queue Length (95%)52 16 122 Table 1. Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Intersection MOE EB WB NB SB Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour Movement Group 16.8 B 0.46 OVERALL 22.2 C 0.59 Intersection OVERALL OVERALL 16.8 B 0.30 OVERALL 17.9 B 0.32 496 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 7 TRIP GENERATION Table 2 presents a summary of trip generation for Gran Cielo Subdivision development plans. Within this table, trip generation rates and resulting trip projections for the average weekday, am, and pm peak hour are illustrated. Trip generation calculations for the development were based upon the specific land use information provided by the developer. The R-3 zone would accommodate 6.5 units per acre and the R-4 zone would have 10.4 units per acre. Using a density of 2.0 units per unit resulted in approximately 784 apartment residents. Trip generation rates were taken from ITE’s Trip Generation Report, 9th Edition. Table 2 indicates that initial development of Gran Cielo Subdivision property would generate approximately 2,656 average weekday trips (AWT) with 215 trips in the am hour and 292 trips during the peak pm hour. Land use developments typically produce multi-modal trips that include pedestrian, bicycle, and transit trips, in addition to other vehicular trips. When evaluating vehicular impacts, these non-vehicular and transit-related types of trips can often be considered negligible in terms of their potential impacts on site access points. Since the Gran Cielo Subdivision development is on the fringe of Bozeman the 784 Persons Rate* No. Trips Enter Exit Average Weekday T=3.47X-64.48 2656 1328 1328 Peak AM Hour T=0.26X+1.99 215 43 172 Peak PM Hour T=0.39X+2.03 292 190 102 Table 2. Gran Cielo Subdivision Trip Generation * ITE Trip Generation Report, 9th Edition Code 220 "Apartments" 497 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 8 area bicycle and pedestrian trip modes would probably not initially account for an appreciable number of trips. As future development in the surrounding area becomes denser, use of alternative modes will increase. However, it was assumed that none of the trips would be associated with pedestrian and bike modes. Trip generation potential can be further refined by determining the number of “new” external trips that would appear, as vehicular traffic, at development access points. It is common that, for developments which contain multiple land uses and/or complementary facilities, a portion of trips that would have origins or destinations at such facilities are captured internally. These trips are part of the total trip generation number, but do not have origins or destinations external to the development site, and as such, do not have an impact of the traffic network external to the development. These types of trips are known as “Internal Capture Trips” (ICT). In the case of Gran Cielo Subdivision Development, there are no diverse land uses that could create ICTs in the future. Therefore, no internal capture trips were applied to external trip numbers. Trips can be further categorized as primary purpose, diverted link, or passerby purpose trips. Primary purpose trips are trips for which the development is a primary destination from any particular origin. Diverted link trips are trips made to a development as a secondary destination that must be diverted from a path between the origin and primary destination. Passerby trips are also trips made to a development as a secondary destination, but without a diversion from the primary trip path (i.e., a stop on the way home from work). Passerby trips do not represent “new” trips added to the adjacent street system. Thus, site generated passerby trips must be considered as new external trips (movements) at the site approach or approaches, but do not appear as new trips on the adjacent street system. The proposed development would not be conducive to attraction of passerby traffic and it was assumed that none of the trips could be classified as passerby trips. 498 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 9 TRIP DISTRIBUTION There are various methods available for determining the directional distribution of trips to and from site developments. For developments within a large urbanized area, the task is best accomplished through the creation of a computerized transportation model of the urban street system, which includes the proposed development changes. When the creation of a model is not feasible, realistic estimates can be made by determining the distribution of existing traffic volumes on the surrounding street system. The existing distribution can then be applied to newly generated trips, with adjustments made based upon the likely trip origins and destinations associated with the particular development land use or uses. For this development, an existing condition distribution was developed based upon area traffic patterns. Results of the distribution analysis indicated that 81% of the trips would be distributed to and from the north, 12% would be directed to and from the south, 7% would be to and from the east, and the remaining 5% would be to and from the west. SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The assignment of site traffic to the surrounding street system and site access points is dependent upon several factors. Two such factors are external directional distribution and localized operational site conditions (i.e., the subdivision layout of streets). The combined calculation of demand and least time accessibility are then used to estimate likely movement volumes at each individual access point. Turning movements at each access point were then calculated through the application of the distribution to full development vehicular trip generation totals. 499 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 0 For the Gran Cielo Subdivision Development, the aforementioned access points consist of accesses on S 27th Avenue and Graf Street and all of the trips would be funneled thru the Graf Street and S 19th Avenue intersection. With a future extension of S 27th Avenue to Stucky Road, traffic assignments would be substantially different (see “Future Operations” section of this report). Average weekday and peak hour site generated traffic was routed onto the street system. Resulting traffic volume assignments are illustrated in Figure 3 with volumes that are associated with full development of the study subdivision. The highest site traffic volumes would occur on Graf Street. 500 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 1 IMPACTS Traffic Volumes Traffic volume impacts for site developments can be quantified by determining the change in traffic volumes expected at various points within the surrounding network of streets. Site traffic assignments give an indication of what volume of traffic could potentially be added to the street system during the average weekday (AWT). Yet in almost all cases, it is very difficult to determine AWT on any section of street to within 10% accuracy. Thus, impact analyses on streets with relative percentage increases less than 10% are not normally considered critical. In any case, the percent change in daily traffic can only be used to identify general locations where impacts could be significant. It is the determination of volume changes during peak traffic flow periods that provides specific information on the type and location of impacts that could potentially occur. Figure 4 illustrates the relative traffic volume impacts related to development site traffic. Figure 4 also illustrates year 2017 background traffic volume plus initial site traffic at each of the potentially impacted intersections. Traffic volumes would increase on all of the potentially impacted streets, yet none of the streets east and south of the Graf Street and S 19th Avenue intersection would exceed the level of significance associated with a 10% increase. The highest percent increase attributable to initial development would be approximately 900% on a short section of Graf Street immediately east of South 27th Avenue. 501 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 2 Capacity Table 3 presents capacity analysis results for year 2017 background traffic plus site generated traffic at the potentially impacted intersections. The addition of site development traffic to background traffic would not in itself substantially impact any of the existing intersections. In comparing Table 3 with Table 1, it can be seen that some of the movements at Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue would have a decreased LOS from “B” to “C” but the LOS on all legs of the intersection would remain the same as exists. The addition of two legs to the Graf Street and S 27th Avenue intersection would result in LOS “A” on all legs except for LOS “B” on the 502 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 3 southbound approach. The calculations assumed that stop control would be on S 27th Avenue, since Graf Street would have the highest volume of traffic. Future Operations Future traffic volumes were calculated using an annual growth rate of 2% per year and applied to the year 2017 through traffic volumes on S 19th Avenue. Through traffic on Graf Street west of S 19th would be dependent upon future development west of S 27th Street, which is speculative at this time. Traffic growth on Stucky Road appears to be stagnant when looking at counts taken 5 years ago. Since the majority of traffic on Stucky Road originates on Cottonwood Road, west of S 27th L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)25.3 19.9 19.4 20.4 5.4 17.6 5.8 16.7 LOS CB BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.61 0.10 0.02 0.19 0.03 0.31 0.07 0.21 Queue Length (95%)41 02 23 23 L TR L TR L TR L TR Control Delay (s/veh)23.0 20.8 20.4 21.3 6.0 18.2 6.1 21.1 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.10 0.02 0.19 0.06 0.27 0.16 0.52 Queue Length (95%)32 02 14 45 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)20.6 17.9 9.2 16.8 20.1 18.2 LOS CB AB CB V/C Ratio 0.42 0.05 0.10 0.64 0.40 0.24 Queue Length (95%)51 39 62 LR LT TR Control Delay (s/veh)28.0 24.2 15.0 12.2 30.2 14.7 LOS CC BB CB V/C Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.17 0.44 0.83 0.21 Queue Length (95%)62 27 142 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 Queue Length (95%)0011 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.0 11.0 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.11 Queue Length (95%)0001 18.5 18.8 A B 0.37 OVERALL OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour OVERALL B 0.43 OVERALL Table 3. Existing Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection WB NB SB Intersection Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group Movement Group OVERALL MOE EB Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour A S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour 18.0 B 0.55 Movement Group OVERALL S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour 22.8 C 0.68 503 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 4 Avenue, it would appear that future street system connections to the south of Graf Street would limit overall volumes increases in the future. Traffic Growth on Graf Street east of S 19th Avenue includes a number of known developments: University Districts Apartments Phases 2 and 3, University District Lot 5 commercial/residential subdivision, and the Yellowstone Theological Institute on the north side of Graf Street. Traffic projections for those developments along with traffic reassignment calculations for the Graf Street and 11th Avenue extension projects were used to develop year 2032 traffic volumes. All of the above noted assumptions were used to determine potential traffic volumes on the impacted street system. Figure 5 presents the full subdivision development traffic assignment for the Gran Cielo Subdivision development. 504 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 5 Figure 6 presents the combined background traffic and full development traffic volumes at the potentially impacted intersections. It can be seen that Traffic on Graf Street, immediately east of S 27th Avenue, would actually be less than the volumes shown in Figure 4. This is due to the fact that approximately 67% of the site traffic would use S 27th Avenue to access Stucky Road which would have a travel time advantage for trips to and from the north. An extension of S 27th Avenue north of Stucky Road was not considered, since timing of those improvements would probably be dependent upon future development scenarios between Stucky Road and Garfield Street. . 505 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 6 Future Capacity Table 4 presents a summary of calculations for year 2027 traffic conditions. Capacity calculations for the Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue intersection were based on future lane geometry and traffic signal modifications that would be developed as a condition of extending Stucky Road east of S 19th Avenue. LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)22.3 20.1 19.7 23.2 5.5 18.6 7.3 16.8 LOS CC BC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.45 0.14 0.06 0.54 0.04 0.41 0.27 0.22 Queue Length (95%)32 23 14 34 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)22.1 21.0 20.4 22.4 6.1 18.9 6.9 21.2 LOS CC CC AB AB V/C Ratio 0.30 0.14 0.03 0.35 0.07 0.34 0.27 0.53 Queue Length (95%)31 04 14 47 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)18.2 35.4 14.7 35.6 13.3 34.6 14.7 27.9 LOS BD BD BC BC V/C Ratio 0.52 0.28 0.03 0.31 0.05 0.78 0.04 0.51 Queue Length (95%)63 12 210 19 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)24.1 35.9 19.1 36.5 15.0 23.6 12.1 12.1 35.8 LOS CD BD BC BD V/C Ratio 0.59 0.24 0.02 0.32 0.13 0.43 0.21 0.86 Queue Length (95%)72 13 26 513 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 LOS AAAB V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 Queue Length (95%)0011 LTR LTR LTR LTR Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.4 9.7 LOS AAAA V/C Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.04 Queue Length (95%)0011 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.6 10.9 LOS ABB V/C Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.13 Queue Length (95%)111 LLR Control Delay (s/veh)8.013.69.9 LOS ABA V/C Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.07 Queue Length (95%)111 OVERALL OVERALL A S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour 29.2 C Movement Group 29.7 C 0.73 OVERALL 17.8 Table 4. Year 2032 Future Plus Site - Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection MOE EB WB OVERALL B S. 19th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour Movement Group OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour A NB SB Intersection Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street AM Hour Movement Group S. 19th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group OVERALL 0.47 0.46 18.6 B 0.60 OVERALL Movement Group OVERALL S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road PM Hour B Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Graf Street PM Hour Movement Group S. 27th Avenue & Stucky Road AM Hour B 506 Gran Cielo Subdivision Traffic Impact Study MARVIN & ASSOCIATES 10/24/2017 1 7 It was also assumed that Stucky Road would have a center continuous left turn lane at its intersection with S 27th Avenue. It can be seen that some of the movements at the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection would operate at LOS “D” in the future, but all of the approach legs would operate at LOS “C”. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS Development of Gran Cielo Subdivision Development property, as detailed in this report, would add 2,656 vehicle trips to the surrounding street system on the average weekday when the subdivision is fully developed. The TIS has determined that this development will have minimal impacts to traffic operations on South 19th Avenue and at the intersections of Stucky Road and South 19th Avenue if it existed today. Analysis of future traffic growth on the surrounding street system along with planned system improvements indicate that the Stucky Road and S 19th Avenue intersection would have some movements operating below the ideal LOS. However, the impacts would not be sufficient to cause any of the intersection approaches to suffer a LOS less than “C” When design of improvements to Stucky Road are begun, dual left turn lanes on the eastbound approach to the South 19th Avenue intersection should be considered. Time saved by using dual left turns would allow all movements within the intersection to operate at LOS “C” or better. The intersection of S 27th Avenue and Graff street should be controlled using stop signs on the on the S 27th Avenue northbound and southbound intersection approaches. Stop control should also be used on each of the internal street accesses to both Graf Street and S 27th Avenue. 507 APPENDIX A Traffic Count Volumes 508 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 1202010.2% 2 2300110.2% 3 0010000.0%4 1244120.3% 5 63181081.3% 6 15 4 7 15 21 17 2.7%7 53 12 14 65 65 61 9.5% 8 51 24 16 56 60 56 8.8% 9 54 35 84 43 33 43 6.7%10 41 29 53 32 30 34 5.3% 11 60 32 71 34 53 49 7.7%12 63 37 27 45 36 48 7.5% 13 63 36 40 26 39 43 6.7% 14 46 24 29 28 31 35 5.5%15 39 26 34 40 40 6.3% 16 49 41 36 34 44 45 7.0% 17 50 57 27 30 50 52 8.1%18 48 39 25 42 32 40 6.3% 19 21 17 8 50 26 21 3.3% 20 21 10 11 8 21 17 2.7%21 22 12 7 4 7 14 2.2% 22 510344 60.9% 23 46533 40.6% 24 06210 20.3% Total 220 693 393 557 585 380 639 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - Eastbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 509 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 1232320.3% 2 0411000.0%3 1210000.0% 4 0140100.0% 5 2313220.3% 6 10 0 1 9 11 10 1.6% 7 37 7 263927345.3% 8 48 16 58 55 49 51 8.0% 9 41 17 52 26 40 36 5.6%10 33 24 34 24 25 27 4.2% 11 60 25 33 41 42 48 7.5% 12 71 36 34 32 30 44 6.9% 13 52 32 37 45 49 49 7.6%14 50 33 40 38 35 41 6.4% 15 36 25 42 37 37 5.8% 16 53 47 30 48 50 50 7.8%17 65 56 34 63 79 67 10.5% 18 55 31 19 36 54 47 7.3% 19 37 20 21 28 35 31 4.8% 20 23 29 25 16 20 24 3.7%21 24 23 17 12 14 20 3.1% 22 11 13 7 7 6 10 1.6% 23 69823 60.9%24 67433 50.8% Total 280 677 392 582 616 314 641 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - Westbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Northbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 510 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 2434330.2%2 2711110.1% 3 1220000.0%4 1384220.2% 5 8 6 2 11 12 10 0.8% 6 25 4 8 24 32 27 2.1%7 90 19 40 104 92 95 7.4% 8 99 40 74 111 109 106 8.3% 9 95 52 136 69 73 79 6.2%10 74 53 87 56 55 62 4.9% 11 120 57 104 75 95 97 7.6%12 134 73 61 77 66 92 7.2% 13 115 68 77 71 88 91 7.1% 14 96 57 69 66 66 76 6.0%15 0 75517677 766.0% 16 102 88 66 82 94 95 7.4% 17 115 113 61 93 129 119 9.3%18 103 70 44 78 86 86 6.7% 19 58 37 29 78 61 52 4.1%20 44 39 36 24 41 41 3.2% 21 46 35 24 16 21 34 2.7% 22 16 23 10 11 10 16 1.3%23 10 15 13 5 6 10 0.8% 24 613643 70.5% Total 500 1370 785 1139 1201 694 1277 100.0% Graf Street West of S 19th Ave - EB & WB Volume Distribution 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Both Directions Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 511 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 7 39 26 6 8 7 0.2% 2 9 27 11 2 7 6 0.1%3 42158040.1% 4 13 18 12 21 19 18 0.4% 5 41 20 17 59 60 53 1.2% 6 126 84 44 159 155 147 3.2% 7 366 170 102 465 482 438 9.6% 8 364 350 199 433 426 408 8.9% 9 355 411 290 260 272 296 6.5%10 291 404 322 242 239 257 5.6% 11 319 352 283 234 280 278 6.1% 12 330 367 230 262 249 280 6.1% 13 327 237 268 211 261 266 5.8%14 255 281 287 228 236 240 5.3% 15 285 271 243 303 263 273 6.0% 16 299 270 265 351 265 278 6.1%17 259 318 252 301 278 285 6.2% 18 264 254 198 229 229 249 5.5% 19 313 306 156 192 163 261 5.7% 20 291 258 155 173 143 231 5.1%21 188 139 121 56 54 127 2.8% 22 107 142 77 26 19 89 1.9% 23 38 82 40 15 18 46 1.0%24 38 44 37 8 10 31 0.7% Total 2082 4891 4325 3750 4032 2694 4568 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - Northbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Northbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 512 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 7 32 13 5 7 6 0.2% 2 11 34 9 3 2 5 0.1% 3 21283220.1%4 0282010.0% 5 12 5 11 12 7 10 0.3% 6 50 43 22 64 65 60 1.5%7 127 60 74 182 157 155 3.9% 8 153 145 93 198 200 184 4.6% 9 137 150 166 161 208 169 4.2%10 199 280 211 204 250 218 5.5% 11 284 240 275 279 249 271 6.8%12 331 262 380 194 285 270 6.8% 13 315 333 381 277 286 293 7.4% 14 356 302 364 303 282 314 7.9%15 391 359 332 323 383 378 9.5% 16 356 404 296 310 395 385 9.7% 17 472 458 264 336 514 481 12.1%18 351 316 261 265 348 338 8.5% 19 118 99 244 174 290 169 4.2% 20 19 119 169 112 161 100 2.5%21 46 129 145 82 122 99 2.5% 22 14 40 108 43 39 31 0.8% 23 31 23 51 18 31 28 0.7% 24 5 24321415 150.4% Total 1803 3955 3802 3692 4185 2000 3982 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - Southbound Volume Distribution 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 513 Hour 8/27/15 8/28/15 8/29/15 8/30/15 8/31/15 9/1/15 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Weekday Day 1 14 71 39 11 15 13 0.2%2 20 61 20 5 9 11 0.1% 3 6 331311 2 60.1%4 13 20 20 23 19 18 0.2% 5 53 25 28 71 67 64 0.7% 6 176 127 66 223 220 206 2.4%7 493 230 176 647 639 593 6.9% 8 517 495 292 631 626 591 6.9% 9 492 561 456 421 480 464 5.4%10 490 684 533 446 489 475 5.6% 11 603 592 558 513 529 548 6.4%12 661 629 610 456 534 550 6.4% 13 642 570 649 488 547 559 6.5% 14 611 583 651 531 518 553 6.5%15 676 630 575 626 646 651 7.6% 16 655 674 561 661 660 663 7.8% 17 731 776 516 637 792 766 9.0%18 615 570 459 494 577 587 6.9% 19 431 405 400 366 453 430 5.0%20 310 377 324 285 304 330 3.9% 21 234 268 266 138 176 226 2.6% 22 121 182 185 69 58 120 1.4%23 69 105 91 33 49 74 0.9% 24 43 68 69 22 25 45 0.5% Total 3885 8846 8127 7442 8217 4694 8543 100.0% S. 19th Avenue North of Graf Street - NB & SB Volume Distribution 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Both Directions Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 514 Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % of Begin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 25 23 29 8 9 7 12 0.2% 1 19171964690.1%2 891155350.1% 3 413184250.1% 4 18 15 12 17 14 16 16 0.3%5 82 44 24 85 80 81 82 1.3% 6 227 72 45 208 239 254 232 3.7%7 635 201 131 695 727 754 703 11.3% 8 530 302 177 600 605 560 574 9.2% 9 401 367 375 388 386 385 390 6.3%10 380 368 515 346 347 521 399 6.4% 11 470 325 492 411 496 450 457 7.3%12 423 316 483 382 377 390 393 6.3% 13 411 325 291 324 333 356 356 5.7% 14 368 377 331 307 335 337 5.4%15 435 431 337 283 412 424 426 6.8% 16 456 435 377 313 368 448 427 6.9%17 442 470 403 320 385 452 437 7.0% 18 350 351 262 272 280 393 344 5.5% 19 243 265 170 230 177 220 226 3.6%20 189 150 103 115 158 166 166 2.7% 21 174 181 108 75 95 97 137 2.2%22 89 71 60 35 53 65 70 1.1% 23 33 42 34 14 28 18 30 0.5% Total 2411 6397 4628 4593 5746 6244 3785 6230 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - NORTHBOUND 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 515 Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 30 41 39 14 17 19 20 0.3% 1 18263072890.1%2 8151735350.1% 3 691140330.1% 4 1012974260.1%5 38 25 17 56 31 39 41 0.7% 6 102 75 24 113 123 116 114 1.9% 7 253 113 113 260 249 264 257 4.4%8 323 244 271 298 365 425 353 6.0% 9 298 266 253 239 286 245 267 4.6% 10 296 295 397 247 286 249 270 4.6%11 338 348 296 328 277 327 318 5.4% 12 417 379 366 401 423 395 409 7.0% 13 440 387 358 352 369 385 387 6.6%14 463 371 366 403 443 436 7.5% 15 516 552 376 304 482 469 505 8.6% 16 530 581 340 318 541 515 542 9.3%17 553 534 296 406 586 637 578 9.9% 18 498 404 271 252 417 480 450 7.7% 19 344 247 195 220 296 334 305 5.2%20 273 202 209 148 217 263 239 4.1% 21 191 282 138 86 121 162 189 3.2% 22 88 111 94 51 71 125 99 1.7%23 58 64 67 33 33 43 50 0.8% Total 3051 6017 4592 4385 5496 5908 2480 5847 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - SOUTHBOUND 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) Southbound Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 516 Hour 9/29/16 9/30/16 10/1/16 10/2/16 10/3/16 10/4/16 10/5/16 Average % ofBegin Thur Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Weekday Day 0 55 64 68 22 26 26 32 0.3% 1 37 43 49 13 6 14 18 0.1% 2 16 24 28 8 10 6 10 0.1%3 10 22 12 12 4 5 8 0.1% 4 28 27 21 24 18 18 22 0.2% 5 120 69 41 141 111 120 123 1.0% 6 329 147 69 321 362 370 346 2.9% 7 888 314 244 955 976 1018 959 8.1%8 853 546 448 898 970 985 927 7.8% 9 699 633 628 627 672 630 657 5.5% 10 676 663 912 593 633 770 668 5.6% 11 808 673 788 739 773 777 774 6.5% 12 840 695 849 783 800 785 802 6.7%13 851 712 649 676 702 557 4.7% 14 831 748 697 710 778 773 6.5% 15 951 983 713 587 894 893 930 7.8% 16 986 1016 717 631 909 963 969 8.1% 17 995 1004 699 726 971 1089 1015 8.5%18 848 755 533 524 697 873 793 6.7% 19 587 512 365 450 473 554 532 4.5% 20 462 352 312 263 375 429 405 3.4% 21 365 463 246 161 216 259 326 2.7% 22 177 182 154 86 124 190 168 1.4%23 91 106 101 47 61 61 80 0.7% Total 5462 12414 9220 8978 11242 12152 5524 11892 100.0% S 19th AVENUE SOUTH OF KAGY - NB & SB 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 01234567891011121314151617181920212223Percent of Average Day VolumeHour of Day (Beginning) NB & SB Volume Distribution Hourly % of Volume 517 Page 1 Stucky Road MARVIN & ASSOCIATESPO Box 80785Billings, MT 59108 Start31-Jul-17TueWedThuFriSatSunWeek AverageTimeEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWB12:00 AM * ***2668******4701:00****2356******4402:00 * ***1243******2203:00****2332******2204:00 * ***3745******4605:00****22312432******233206:00 * ***102 11293 83******98 9807:00****213214235220******22421708:00 * ***237256261248******24925209:00****142119154146******14813210:00 * ***170 134162 127******166 13011:00****249200269178******25918912:00 PM * ***201 209184239******192 22401:00****138196157185******14819002:00 * ***165 154102 134******134 14403:00****206163********20616304:00 * *270265256288********26327605:00**209253287249********24825106:00 * *162 173159 150********160 16207:00**112125103110********10811808:00 * *99 8199 110********99 9609:00**65465871********625810:00 * *28 2928 31********28 3011:00**9121415********1214Lane00954984285928331663161600000028432797Day01938569232790005640AM Peak - - - - 11:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 - - - - - - 11:00 08:00Vol. - - - - 249 256 269 248 - - - - - - 259 252PM Peak--16:0016:0017:0016:0012:0012:00------16:0016:00Vol. - - 270 265 287 288 184 239 - - - - - - 263 276 Comb.Total0 1938 5692 3279 0 0 0 5640 ADT ADT 5,650 AADT 5,650518 Page 1 Stucky Road MARVIN & ASSOCIATESPO Box 80785Billings, MT 59108 Start31-Jul-17TueWedThuFriSatSunWeek AverageTimeWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEBWBEB12:00 AM * ***5257******5401:00****4352******4202:00 * ***2033******2203:00****3525******2504:00 * ***5342******4205:00****22192923******262106:00 * ***74 8846 95******60 9207:00****132216143237******13822608:00 * ***146295150288******14829209:00****75150104146******9014810:00 * ***107 127100 119******104 12311:00****157138119104******13812112:00 PM * ***146 134144141******145 13801:00****127107128114******12811002:00 * ***103 123102 78******102 10003:00****165138********16513804:00 * *266162263 158********264 16005:00**309154290196********30017506:00 * *156 140106 167********131 15407:00**841019774********908808:00 * *85 78112 61********98 7009:00**48396448********564410:00 * *30 1443 17********36 1611:00**10151212********1114Lane00988703226022811084136400000022472245Day01691454124480004492AM Peak - - - - 11:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - 08:00 08:00Vol. - - - - 157 295 150 288 - - - - - - 148 292PM Peak--17:0016:0017:0017:0012:0012:00------17:0017:00Vol. - - 309 162 290 196 144 141 - - - - - - 300 175 Comb.Total0 1691 4541 2448 0 0 0 4492 ADT ADT 4,501 AADT 4,501519 APPENDIX B S 19th Avenue Speeds 520 SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Northbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 35 35 4217 4217 19.61% 19.61% 36 to 40 40 1245 5462 5.79% 25.40% 41 to 45 45 2631 8093 12.23% 37.63% 46 to 50 50 5819 13912 27.06% 64.69% 51 to 55 55 5204 19116 24.20% 88.88% 56 to 60 60 1967 21083 9.15% 98.03% 61 to 65 65 271 21354 1.26% 99.29% 66 to 70 70 59 21413 0.27% 99.56% 71 to 75 75 43 21456 0.20% 99.76% 76 to 80 80 28 21484 0.13% 99.89% 81 to 85 85 16 21500 0.07% 99.97% 86 to 90 80 7 21507 0.03% 100.00% 0.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =21507 MEAN SPEED =48.34 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =54.20 mph PACE SPEED =46 mph TO 55 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =11023 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =51.3% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE 521 SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Southbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 35 35 659 659 3.56% 3.56% 36 to 40 40 2148 2807 11.61% 15.17% 41 to 45 45 5039 7846 27.23% 42.40% 46 to 50 50 5581 13427 30.16% 72.57% 51 to 55 55 3205 16632 17.32% 89.89% 56 to 60 60 1514 18146 8.18% 98.07% 61 to 65 65 259 18405 1.40% 99.47% 66 to 70 70 52 18457 0.28% 99.75% 71 to 75 75 25 18482 0.14% 99.89% 76 to 80 80 12 18494 0.06% 99.95% 81 to 85 85 7 18501 0.04% 99.99% 86 to 90 90 2 18503 0.01% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =18503 MEAN SPEED =48.95 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =53.59 mph PACE SPEED =41 mph TO 50 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =10620 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =57.4% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE 522 SPOT SPEED STUDY ANALYSIS (Counter) SITE :South 19th Avenue N of Graf DIRECTION:Southbound & Northbound DATE:8/27/15 TIME:120 Hours SPEED SPEED CUMULATIVE RELATIVE CUMULATIVE VALUE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY FREQ (%) FREQ (%) 0 to 15 15 4876 4876 12.19% 12.19% 16 to 20 20 3393 8269 8.48% 20.67% 21 to 25 25 7670 15939 19.17% 39.84% 26 to 30 30 11400 27339 28.49% 68.33% 31 to 35 35 8409 35748 21.02% 89.35% 36 to 40 40 3481 39229 8.70% 98.05% 41 to 45 45 530 39759 1.32% 99.37% 46 to 50 50 111 39870 0.28% 99.65% 51 to 55 55 68 39938 0.17% 99.82% 56 to 60 60 40 39978 0.10% 99.92% 61 to 65 65 23 40001 0.06% 99.98% 66 to 70 70 9 40010 0.02% 100.00% TOTAL VEHICLES =40010 750 MEAN SPEED =28.63 mph 85TH PERCENTILE =33.97 mph PACE SPEED =26 mph TO 35 mph Number of Vehicles in Pace =19809 % of Total Vehicles in Pace =49.5% RANGE SPEED 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00% 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLESSPEED (MILES/HOUR) SIGMOID CURVE 523 APPENDIX C-1 Existing Capacity Calculations 524 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 46 0.90 2 7 0.90 2 3 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 9 0.90 2 86 0.90 2 16 0.90 2 322 0.90 5 7 0.90 2 42 0.90 2 157 0.90 5 37 0.90 2 0 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 5 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 338 0.039 0.257 L 0.151 20.2 C 20.0 C TR 459 0.006 0.257 TR 0.024 19.4 B WB L 357 0.005 0.257 L 0.020 19.4 B 20.3 C * TR 416 0.048 0.257 TR 0.188 20.4 C NB Lper 445 0.000 0.429 17.0 B Lpro 329 0.010 0.186 L 0.023 5.4 A * TR 1175 0.107 0.343 TR 0.311 17.6 B SB Lper 347 0.000 0.429 14.5 B * Lpro 329 0.027 0.186 L 0.070 5.8 A TR 1160 0.062 0.343 TR 0.181 16.5 B Intersection: Delay = 16.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.23 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.18SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 525 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 1 / 1 7.7 0.0 TR 0 / 0 27.0 0.0 All 11.5 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 21.0 0.0 All 21.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 17.8 0.0 TR 2 / 4 13.7 0.0 All 13.8 0.0 SB L 1 / 2 12.1 0.0 TR 2 / 2 16.4 0.0 All 15.6 0.0 Intersect. 14.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 46 7 3 6 9 86 16 322 7 42 157 37 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 526 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 42 0.90 2 11 0.90 2 15 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 15 0.90 2 75 0.90 2 9 0.90 2 269 0.90 5 10 0.90 2 104 0.90 2 371 0.90 5 71 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 15 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 331 0.036 0.250 L 0.142 21.1 C 20.9 C TR 431 0.013 0.250 TR 0.053 20.5 C WB L 344 0.005 0.250 L 0.020 20.4 C 21.2 C * TR 412 0.044 0.250 TR 0.177 21.3 C NB Lper 277 0.000 0.417 17.8 B Lpro 369 0.006 0.208 L 0.015 5.6 A TR 1140 0.091 0.333 TR 0.272 18.2 B SB Lper 367 0.000 0.417 17.1 B * Lpro 369 0.066 0.208 L 0.158 6.1 A * TR 1124 0.141 0.333 TR 0.422 19.8 B Intersection: Delay = 17.9sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.32 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.25SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 527 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 1 / 2 6.9 0.0 TR 1 / 1 17.3 0.0 All 10.6 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 19.3 0.0 All 19.3 0.0 NB L 0 / 0 23.9 0.0 TR 2 / 3 13.3 0.0 All 13.4 0.0 SB L 2 / 4 12.8 0.0 TR 3 / 5 14.1 0.0 All 13.9 0.0 Intersect. 13.8 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 42 11 15 6 15 75 9 269 10 104 371 71 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 528 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: STUCKY & 19TH AM EXIST Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 223 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 41 0.90 2 413 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 209 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 27.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 30.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 80.0 Sec 11.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 597 0.140 0.338 L 0.415 20.6 C 20.3 C R 534 0.015 0.338 R 0.045 17.8 B NB Lper 408 0.000 0.450 13.4 B Lpro 177 0.026 0.100 L 0.079 8.9 A * T 950 0.254 0.525 T 0.483 13.9 B SB T 679 0.128 0.375 T 0.342 19.3 B 18.9 B R 590 0.092 0.375 R 0.244 18.2 B Intersection: Delay = 16.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.46 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.39SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 529 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: STUCKY & 19TH AM EXIST App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 4 / 5 7.2 0.0 R 0 / 1 25.6 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 NB L 1 / 3 10.2 0.0 T 4 / 6 16.8 0.0 All 16.3 0.0 SB T 4 / 8 14.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.5 0.0 All 15.6 0.0 Intersect. 14.7 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 223 27 41 413 209 225 1 26 24 2 8 04 3 30 24 3 30 24 530 HCM Analysis Summary Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 234 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 29 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 34 0.90 2 351 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 511 0.90 5 242 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 28.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 34.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 85.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 583 0.147 0.329 L 0.446 22.6 C 22.3 C R 521 0.017 0.329 R 0.052 19.5 B NB Lper 163 0.000 0.471 12.6 B * Lpro 167 0.021 0.094 L 0.115 12.3 B T 980 0.215 0.541 T 0.398 12.6 B SB * T 724 0.314 0.400 T 0.785 30.6 C 27.8 C R 629 0.104 0.400 R 0.259 18.1 B Intersection: Delay = 22.2sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.59 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.48SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 531 NETSIM Summary Results Existing ConditionsR MarvinPeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue09/16/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 5 / 5 6.7 0.0 R 1 / 2 25.2 0.0 All 10.8 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 15.5 0.0 T 4 / 6 16.3 0.0 All 16.2 0.0 SB T 9 / 12 11.9 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.4 0.0 All 12.8 0.0 Intersect. 13.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 234 29 34 351 511 242 1 27 24 2 8 04 3 34 24 3 34 24 532 APPENDIX C – 2 Existing Plus Site Capacity Calculations 533 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 185 0.90 2 18 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 12 0.90 2 86 0.90 2 21 0.90 2 322 0.90 5 7 0.90 2 42 0.90 2 157 0.90 5 72 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 25 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 15 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 337 0.157 0.257 L 0.611 25.3 C 24.3 C TR 438 0.026 0.257 TR 0.100 19.9 B WB L 347 0.005 0.257 L 0.020 19.4 B 20.3 C TR 419 0.050 0.257 TR 0.193 20.4 C NB Lper 427 0.000 0.429 16.9 B Lpro 329 0.013 0.186 L 0.030 5.4 A * TR 1175 0.107 0.343 TR 0.311 17.6 B SB Lper 347 0.000 0.429 14.9 B * Lpro 329 0.027 0.186 L 0.070 5.8 A TR 1143 0.071 0.343 TR 0.207 16.7 B Intersection: Delay = 18.5sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.37 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.29SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 534 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 3 / 4 8.5 0.0 TR 1 / 1 24.1 0.0 All 13.5 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 19.0 0.0 All 19.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 2 18.0 0.0 TR 2 / 3 13.8 0.0 All 14.0 0.0 SB L 0 / 2 20.2 0.0 TR 2 / 3 16.9 0.0 All 17.3 0.0 Intersect. 15.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 185 18 27 6 12 86 21 322 7 42 157 72 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 535 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 125 0.90 2 18 0.90 2 27 0.90 2 6 0.90 2 28 0.90 2 75 0.90 2 32 0.90 2 269 0.90 5 10 0.90 2 104 0.90 2 371 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 30 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 328 0.106 0.250 L 0.424 23.0 C 22.5 C TR 426 0.026 0.250 TR 0.103 20.8 C WB L 337 0.005 0.250 L 0.021 20.4 C 21.3 C TR 423 0.048 0.250 TR 0.191 21.3 C NB Lper 230 0.000 0.417 16.9 B Lpro 369 0.020 0.208 L 0.060 6.0 A TR 1140 0.091 0.333 TR 0.272 18.2 B SB Lper 367 0.000 0.417 18.5 B * Lpro 369 0.066 0.208 L 0.158 6.1 A * TR 1108 0.172 0.333 TR 0.517 21.1 C Intersection: Delay = 18.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.43 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.34SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 536 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 7.7 0.0 TR 1 / 2 21.4 0.0 All 12.6 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 17.0 0.0 All 17.0 0.0 NB L 1 / 1 10.5 0.0 TR 2 / 4 13.6 0.0 All 13.3 0.0 SB L 1 / 4 15.2 0.0 TR 4 / 5 14.8 0.0 All 14.8 0.0 Intersect. 14.3 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 125 18 27 6 28 75 32 269 10 104 371 225 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 537 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 223 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 29 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 50 0.90 2 543 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 242 0.90 5 225 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 27.0 3.5 1.5 8.0 4.0 0.0 30.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 80.0 Sec 11.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 597 0.140 0.338 L 0.415 20.6 C 20.3 C R 534 0.017 0.338 R 0.051 17.9 B NB Lper 376 0.000 0.450 16.1 B Lpro 177 0.032 0.100 L 0.101 9.2 A * T 950 0.333 0.525 T 0.635 16.8 B SB T 679 0.149 0.375 T 0.396 20.1 C 19.4 B R 590 0.092 0.375 R 0.244 18.2 B Intersection: Delay = 18.0sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.55 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.47SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 538 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th AM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 4 / 5 8.2 0.0 R 0 / 1 25.6 0.0 All 12.7 0.0 NB L 0 / 3 11.4 0.0 T 7 / 9 14.5 0.0 All 14.3 0.0 SB T 4 / 6 15.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.2 0.0 All 16.2 0.0 Intersect. 14.6 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 223 29 50 543 242 225 1 26 24 2 8 04 3 30 24 3 30 24 539 HCM Analysis Summary Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Plus Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 R 3 L 3 T 3 T 3 R 3 234 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 39 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 39 0.90 2 429 0.90 5 0 0.90 2 0 0.90 2 655 0.90 5 242 0.90 2 5 0 0 0 --- --- 0 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 95 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L P LT LT TP 0 28.0 3.5 1.5 6.0 4.0 0.0 46.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 95.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB * L 522 0.147 0.295 L 0.498 28.0 C 27.5 C R 467 0.024 0.295 R 0.081 24.2 C NB Lper 143 0.000 0.547 12.5 B * Lpro 112 0.024 0.063 L 0.169 15.0 B T 1067 0.264 0.589 T 0.447 12.2 B SB * T 876 0.402 0.484 T 0.831 30.2 C 27.4 C R 763 0.103 0.484 R 0.214 14.7 B Intersection: Delay = 22.8sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.68 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.57SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 540 NETSIM Summary Results Existing Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Stucky & 19th PM Exist Plus App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 5 / 6 6.1 0.0 R 1 / 2 22.3 0.0 All 10.2 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 9.8 0.0 T 6 / 7 16.2 0.0 All 15.7 0.0 SB T 11 / 14 12.3 0.0 R 1 / 2 21.2 0.0 All 13.1 0.0 Intersect. 13.1 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 234 39 39 429 655 242 1 27 24 2 6 04 3 46 24 3 46 24 541 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Existing Plus Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 69 1 5 17 26 1 1 13 103 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 6 17 123 Capacity, c (veh/h)1540 1501 929 795 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.15 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 8.9 10.4 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 0.8 8.9 10.4 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:31:10 PMS 27th Graf AM Exist Plus.xtw542 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Existing Plus Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 41 1 17 76 114 1 1 8 61 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 20 11 74 Capacity, c (veh/h)1333 1543 900 670 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.11 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)7.7 7.4 9.0 11.0 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.7 9.0 11.0 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:29:55 PMS 27th Graf PM Exist Plus.xtw543 APPENDIX C-3 Future Capacity Calculations 544 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 105 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 40 0.92 2 250 0.92 2 25 0.92 2 420 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 150 0.92 2 205 0.92 5 55 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 80 0 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 20 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 13.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 70.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 254 0.116 0.257 L 0.449 22.3 C 21.5 C TR 445 0.035 0.257 TR 0.135 20.1 C WB L 342 0.017 0.257 L 0.064 19.7 B 22.9 C * TR 421 0.139 0.257 TR 0.542 23.2 C NB Lper 412 0.000 0.429 17.9 B Lpro 329 0.015 0.186 L 0.036 5.5 A * TR 1170 0.140 0.343 TR 0.409 18.6 B SB Lper 286 0.000 0.429 13.2 B * Lpro 329 0.092 0.186 L 0.265 7.3 A TR 1164 0.077 0.343 TR 0.224 16.8 B Intersection: Delay = 17.8sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.47 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.37SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 545 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SIteR MarvinPeak AM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/14/17Case: Graf & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 8.5 0.0 TR 1 / 2 18.8 0.0 All 12.9 0.0 WB L 0 / 2 8.7 0.0 TR 2 / 3 19.8 0.0 All 19.0 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 19.2 0.0 TR 3 / 4 13.6 0.0 All 13.8 0.0 SB L 2 / 3 13.9 0.0 TR 2 / 4 15.3 0.0 All 14.9 0.0 Intersect. 15.0 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 105 30 30 20 40 250 25 420 30 150 205 55 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 13 04 2 13 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 546 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 85 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 45 0.92 2 120 0.92 2 35 0.92 2 350 0.92 5 10 0.92 2 170 0.92 2 480 0.92 5 130 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 30 0 0 0 --- --- 0 5 0 0 --- --- 60 0 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 18.0 3.5 1.5 15.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 72.0 Sec 15.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB L 309 0.074 0.250 L 0.298 22.1 C 21.7 C TR 433 0.035 0.250 TR 0.139 21.0 C WB L 333 0.008 0.250 L 0.033 20.4 C 22.2 C * TR 419 0.088 0.250 TR 0.351 22.4 C NB Lper 218 0.000 0.417 17.8 B Lpro 369 0.021 0.208 L 0.065 6.1 A TR 1141 0.114 0.333 TR 0.343 18.9 B SB Lper 320 0.000 0.417 17.8 B * Lpro 369 0.105 0.208 L 0.269 6.9 A * TR 1135 0.176 0.333 TR 0.527 21.2 C Intersection: Delay = 18.6sec/veh Int. LOS=B Xc= 0.46 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.37SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 547 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeak PM Hour Graf Street/S 19th Avenue10/21/17Case: Graf & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 2 / 3 7.3 0.0 TR 1 / 1 22.3 0.0 All 12.9 0.0 WB L 0 / 0 0.0 0.0 TR 2 / 4 17.7 0.0 All 17.7 0.0 NB L 0 / 1 21.7 0.0 TR 3 / 4 12.4 0.0 All 12.8 0.0 SB L 2 / 4 14.9 0.0 TR 4 / 7 13.3 0.0 All 13.5 0.0 Intersect. 13.6 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 85 30 30 10 45 120 35 350 10 170 480 130 1 17 24 1 17 24 2 15 04 2 15 04 3 24 24 3 24 24 548 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 305 0.92 2 35 0.92 2 30 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 25 0.92 2 50 0.92 2 20 0.92 2 715 0.92 5 30 0.92 2 10 0.92 2 275 0.92 5 250 0.92 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 70 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 22.0 4.0 0.0 12.0 3.5 1.5 10.0 4.0 0.0 27.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 90.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 203 0.000 0.189 21.0 C * Lpro 433 0.188 0.244 L 0.522 18.2 B TR 232 0.037 0.133 TR 0.280 35.4 D WB Lper 207 0.000 0.189 30.6 C Lpro 433 0.012 0.244 L 0.034 14.7 B * TR 224 0.042 0.133 TR 0.313 35.6 D NB Lper 217 0.000 0.367 34.0 C * Lpro 197 0.012 0.111 L 0.053 13.3 B * TR 1027 0.233 0.300 TR 0.778 34.6 C SB Lper 100 0.000 0.367 27.6 C Lpro 197 0.006 0.111 L 0.037 14.7 B TR 976 0.152 0.300 TR 0.507 27.9 C Intersection: Delay = 29.2sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.60 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.48SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 549 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak AM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th AM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 6 11.9 0.0 TR 1 / 3 15.2 0.0 All 12.2 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 13.9 0.0 TR 1 / 2 13.0 0.0 All 13.2 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 7.8 0.0 TR 8 / 10 9.5 0.0 All 9.5 0.0 SB L 0 / 1 9.3 0.0 TR 5 / 9 11.5 0.0 All 11.4 0.0 Intersect. 10.7 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 305 35 30 20 25 50 20 715 30 10 275 250 1 22 04 1 22 04 2 11 24 2 11 24 3 10 04 3 10 04 4 27 24 4 27 24 550 HCM Analysis Summary Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Analysis Duration: 15 mins.Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future Area Type: Non CBD Lanes Geometry: Movements Serviced by Lane and Lane Widths (feet) Approach Outbound Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 4 Lane 5 Lane 6 EB WB NB SB 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 East West North South LTRLTRLTRLTRData Movement Volume (vph) PHF % Heavy Vehicles Lane Groups Arrival Type RTOR Vol (vph) Peds/Hour % Grade Buses/Hour Parkers/Hour (Left|Right) L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 L 3 TR 3 280 0.94 2 25 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 10 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 50 0.94 2 35 0.94 2 510 0.94 5 10 0.94 2 90 0.94 2 780 0.94 5 340 0.94 2 5 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 10 5 0 0 --- --- 120 5 0 0 --- --- Signal Settings: Operational Analysis Cycle Length: Lost Time Per Cycle: Phase: EB WB NB SB Green Yellow All Red 12345678Ped Only L L LTP LTP L L LTP LTP 0 16.0 4.0 0.0 14.0 3.5 1.5 11.0 4.0 0.0 35.0 4.0 2.0 Actuated 95.0 Sec 19.0 Sec Capacity Analysis Results Approach: App Group Lane Cap(vph)v/sRatio g/CRatio LaneGroup v/cRatio Delay(sec/veh) LOS Delay(sec/veh) LOSEB Lper 210 0.000 0.200 26.0 C * Lpro 298 0.168 0.168 L 0.587 24.1 C TR 251 0.035 0.147 TR 0.235 35.9 D WB Lper 228 0.000 0.200 34.4 C Lpro 298 0.006 0.168 L 0.021 19.1 B * TR 251 0.047 0.147 TR 0.319 36.5 D NB Lper 79 0.000 0.432 23.0 C Lpro 205 0.021 0.116 L 0.130 15.0 B TR 1267 0.158 0.368 TR 0.429 23.6 C SB Lper 261 0.000 0.432 33.8 C * Lpro 205 0.054 0.116 L 0.206 12.1 B * TR 1235 0.317 0.368 TR 0.862 35.8 D Intersection: Delay = 29.7sec/veh Int. LOS=C Xc= 0.73 * Critical Lane Group (v/s)Crit= 0.59SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 1 551 NETSIM Summary Results Future Plus SiteR MarvinPeeak PM Hour Stucky Road/S 19th Avenue10/22/2017Case: Stucky & 19th PM Future App Group Lane (veh)Avg/MaxPer LaneQueues (mph)SpeedAverage Period)(% of PeakWorst LaneSpillback in EB L 6 / 7 11.0 0.0 TR 1 / 2 13.6 0.0 All 11.3 0.0 WB L 0 / 1 16.4 0.0 TR 2 / 3 9.4 0.0 All 9.6 0.0 NB L 1 / 2 7.1 0.0 TR 5 / 6 11.0 0.0 All 10.7 0.0 SB L 2 / 5 8.3 0.0 TR 9 / 13 10.3 0.0 All 10.2 0.0 Intersect. 10.4 SIG/Cinema v3.08 Marvin & Associates Page 2 280 25 35 10 35 50 35 510 10 90 780 340 1 16 04 1 16 04 2 13 24 2 13 24 3 11 04 3 11 04 4 35 24 4 35 24 552 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 65 1 5 16 5 1 10 10 20 5 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 6 25 31 Capacity, c (veh/h)1574 1507 845 802 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)7.3 7.4 9.4 9.7 Level of Service, LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 1.5 9.4 9.7 Approach LOS A A Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:34:03 PMS 27th Graf AM Future Plus.xtw553 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th & Graf St Agency/Co.Marvin Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Graf Street Analysis Year 2017 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.85 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h)1 39 1 10 71 22 1 5 5 11 10 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 2.22 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)1 12 13 26 Capacity, c (veh/h)1466 1545 811 733 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)7.5 7.3 9.5 10.1 Level of Service, LOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.8 9.5 10.1 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:36:18 PMS 27th Graf PM Future Plus.xtw554 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak AM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)295 5 25 150 10 80 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)28 11 89 Capacity, c (veh/h)1214 557 695 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.13 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 11.6 10.9 Level of Service, LOS A B B Approach Delay (s/veh)1.2 11.0 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:43:26 PMS 27th Stucky AM Future Plus.xtw555 HCS7 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst R Marvin Intersection S 27th Ave & Stucky Road Agency/Co.Marvin & Associates Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 10/22/2017 East/West Street Stucky Road Analysis Year 2032 North/South Street S 27th Avenue Time Analyzed Peak PM Future Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Gran Cielo Sub TIS Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T L R Volume, V (veh/h)200 15 95 310 10 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)2 2 2 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.12 6.42 6.22 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.22 3.52 3.32 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)103 11 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)1322 431 796 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.03 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.3 0.1 0.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.0 13.6 9.9 Level of Service, LOS A B A Approach Delay (s/veh)1.9 10.5 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2017 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS7™ TWSC Version 7.3 Generated: 10/22/2017 1:45:39 PMS 27th Stucky PM Future Plus.xtw556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 1 GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION PARKS MASTER PLAN October 23, 2017 Prepared for Bozeman Haus, LLC 8401 Wagon Boss Road Bozeman, MT 59715 406-599-0516 Prepared by Shelly Engler, Landscape Architect 565 2 GRAN CIELO SUBDIVISION PARKS MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE Overall Project Description 3 Adjacent Property Ownership & Zoning 4 Vicinity Map 4 Soils Information 5 Construction Phasing 6 Preliminary Plat / Phasing 6 PARK PLAN 7 Gran Cielo Parks 7 Parkland Trail Corridor 7 Site Furniture 7 Plant Community Table 9 Plant Palette 10 Irrigation Plan 11 Well Information 12 Maintenance Plan 14 LIST OF EXHIBITS 15 1. Gran Cielo Central Park – 16 Conceptual landscape Plan 2. Gran Cielo North Park – 17 Conceptual Landscape Plan 3, 4, 5. Gran Cielo Parks Irrigation Plans 18 6. Cost Estimate of Park Improvements 21 566 3 Overall Project Description Gran Cielo Subdivision is located in Gallatin County on the south edge of Bozeman, Montana. Located E1/2NE 1/4NW1/4 and the SE ¼ NW ¼ of Section 23, Township 2 South Range 5 East P.M.M. The owner is Bozeman Haus LLC, 8401 Wagon Boss Road, Bozeman MT 59715. The developer is Cadius Partners, LLC at 8401 Wagon Boss Road, Bozeman MT 59715, The Central Park lies in the center of Phase 1. It is 184,904 square feet. This park will contain play berms, benches, picnic tables, barbeque grills, trees & plantings and open play space. A second 64,520 square foot parcel of parkland is located in Phase 4. 567 4 Adjacent Property Ownership & Zoning The Gran Cielo property has historically been used for agriculture. The property is bordered to the north by land owned by Hyalite Village Investors, LLC (zoned County) and the Milfred Rafferty Trust (zoned R4). Land to the northwest is owned by Charles Marvin (zoned County). The Barbara Ann Harrison Family Trust owns the to the west (zoned County). South and southwest lands are owned by Diane L. Brawner L TEV RT (zoned County) to the southeast is the Meadow Creek Subdivision (Zoned R3) and land to the east is owned by Marshall and Luzann Bennett (zoned County). See Plat Map on page 6. 568 5 Vicinity Map Soils Information Soils in the Gran Cielo subdivision are primarily loams, typical of relict stream terraces. Meadowcreek loam comprises the majority of the area with minor instances of Blackmore silt loam, Turner loam, and Enbar-Nythar loam. Soils are deep, nutrient rich and slightly alkaline. Loam soils are appropriate for park development and suitable for woody plant growth, herbaceous plants, and seeded or sodded grassland. 569 6 Construction Phasing The subdivision will be developed in 4 phases. Phase I improvements will include Central Park. Phase 2 will include one trail corridor and Phase 4 will include North Park and two trail corridors. See plat map, page 6. 570 7 571 8 PARK PLAN The overall plan for the Gran Cielo parks provides a cohesive overall park, trail and open space system for the community. The Gran Cielo parks shall: 1. Provide a variety of recreational activities, both passive and active in nature, ranging from picnic areas, play mounds and informal play fields, to walking and sitting areas. 2. Create functional, attractive plantings that will provide wildlife habitat, seasonal interest, shade, use separation, wind protection, visual and audio buffers for and from surrounding uses. 3. Central Park improvements will include a community gathering area featuring picnic tables and barbeque grills. Large berms and play mounds will create spatial definition and provide free play opportunities. 4. North Park will include benches, picnic tables a barbeque grill, berms and plantings. Parkland Trail Corridor All trails will be Class II trails meeting all current City of Bozeman standards. There are a total of three corridors totaling 21,420 square feet with 780 lineal feet of trails. Where corridors border the public streets the boulevard will be established with turf grass and one street tree. Site Furniture Bench Benches will be similar in style to that shown and will meet any standards required by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. The bench shown is of recycled materials, 100% UV-stabilized polyethylene slats bolted to a galvanized- steel frame which can be powder coated in various colors. Central Park will include 2 benches, North Park will have one bench. 572 9 Picnic Table Dog Station Barbeque Grill Improvements will be installed with the appropriate phase of the development. Haus Bozeman, LLC will be responsible for park establishment, grading and seeding, planting boulevard trees and plantings, installing the irrigation system, trails and site furniture. All site furnishings, seeding and planting methods and materials shall meet all current City of Bozeman guidelines and requirements. (See Exhibits 1 through 5) Grills similar to the one shown are planned in the 2 parks. Grills will meet any standards required by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. Central Park will include 2 grills and North Park will have one grill. Picnic tables will be similar in style to that shown and will meet any standards required by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. The bench shown is of recycled materials, 100% UV-stabilized polyethylene slats bolted to a galvanized-steel frame which can be powder coated in various colors. Central Park will include 2 tables and North Park will have two tables. Dog waste stations will be similar in style to that shown and will meet any standards required by the City of Bozeman Parks Division. Central park will include two stations and North Park will include one station. 573 10 Plant Community Types The parks and open space in Canvasback are designed to accommodate a variety of recreational activities. The vegetation will vary depending on the type and intensity of use. Generally, the plant communities fall into two zones: dryland, non-irrigated grassland and irrigated turfgrass. (See Exhibits) Irrigated Lawn Community Location: Central Park, North Park and all boulevards Uses: Active and passive recreational uses Elements: Walkways, benches, trash containers, tables, barbeque grills, dog stations Maintenance: Turf areas will be irrigated and mown Drip irrigation to all plantings not in lawn areas Dryland Non-irrigated Grassland Community Location: Open space and trail corridors Uses: Passive and active recreational uses Elements: Trails Maintenance: Grass is not irrigated or mown Drip irrigation to all plantings Trees: Japanese Tree Lilac, Spring Snow Crab Evergreens: Austrian Pine Shrubs: Lilac, Potentilla, Bird’s Nest Spruce, Viburnums Ornamental Grasses, Perennial Flowers Seed and sodded lawn areas are a high quality Kentucky Bluegrass mix Trees: Brandon Elm, Norway Maple, Tatarian Maple, Green Ash Evergreens: Ponderosa Pine, Austrian Pine Shrubs: Serviceberry, Buffaloberry Seed disturbed areas to native grass. Seed mix will be a combination of Western Wheatgrass, Thickspike Wheatgrass, Slender Wheatgrass, and Sheep Fescue. 574 11 Street Trees Elm Norway Maple Large Shade Trees Clump Birch Street trees will be planted in all public owned boulevards. Species will be selected from those approved by the City of Bozeman Forestry Division as suggested in the Tree Species Guide produced by the Forestry Division and the Bozeman Tree Advisory Board. Species might include Prairie Expedition Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Lewis & Clark’ ), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides), Thornless Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos v. inermis), and Littleleaf Linden (Tilia cordata). In order to provide a varied and diverse urban forest, no species shall comprise more than 40% of the overall number of trees and at least three different species shall be used in the street tree plantings. All boulevards will be seeded or sodded to a high quality Kentucky Bluegrass mix and provided with an automatic sprinkler system. Large shade trees will be used in park areas to enhance the natural setting, provide shade, provide wind protection, delineate use areas, buffer surrounding uses, and to provide beauty. Species will include Clump Birch (Betula papyrifera), Norway Maple (Acer platanoides) Prairie Expedition Elm (Ulmus americana ‘Lewis & Clark’ ). 575 12 Evergreen Trees Austrian Pine Small Ornamental Trees Japanese Tree Lilac Irrigation Plan As reflected on the conceptual landscape plans the parks will be irrigated. These areas will utilize an automatic underground irrigation system. A well will be installed in for irrigation in each park. The turf areas in the park and in the boulevard will be irrigated Kentucky Bluegrass turf. All trees and shrubs will outside of lawn areas will be drip irrigated. Irrigation shall be installed to meet all City of Bozeman Park Division design guidelines and requirements. Irrigation plans are included in exhibits showing proposed layout, hardware specifications as well as water usage calculations. See Exhibits 3, 4 and 5. Large evergreen trees will be used to separate uses, for windbreaks, to provide wildlife habitat, and to provide year-round structure and beauty in the plantings. Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Austrian Pine (Pinus nigra) are possible species. An assortment of small ornamental trees will be incorporated into the plantings to provide seasonal interest and color, wildlife habitat, entryway identification, and spatial definition. Species include Japanese Tree Lilac (Syringa reticulate) and Spring Snow Crab (Malus ‘Spring Snow’). 576 13 Well Information A well drilled in a nearby park produced 42 gpm with the drill stem set at 40 feet for 1 hour with a 1 hour recovery time. Total depth of the well is 45 feet. Static water depth is 6 feet. Park Maintenance The project developer will be responsible for the maintenance and care of the parks, trails and open space until 75% of the lots are sold. The developer shall warrant against defects in the initial improvements for a period of two years from the date of their written acceptance by the City of Bozeman. At that time, the maintenance shall become the responsibility of the Home Owners Association having been formed under the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of the Gran Cielo Subdivision. The Home Owners shall be responsible for maintenance in perpetuity, or until such time as a park maintenance district, or some other mechanism, is created to maintain dedicated park land. The HOA Board of Directors will provide Waiver of Protest to the City of Bozeman upon its formation. At this time it is planned for the developer to contract out the park and open space maintenance functions. Maintenance duties may include; spring care, mowing, fertilizing, watering, and maintaining play equipment. Spring: Spring care will be as follows: as soon as the snow is gone and the grass is dry enough to walk on without compaction, remove leaves and winter debris with a broom- type rake. Power raking at 3-5 year intervals will be beneficial for heavily thatched lawns. Aerating will also alleviate compacted soil conditions and should be performed when necessary. Pruning of trees and shrubs shall occur in early spring before leaves emerge, except on maples and birch, which shall be pruned late July. Pruning shall be performed according to ISA standards to encourage good plant health, proper shape and branch angles, and to eliminate unwanted suckers. No topping of trees will be allowed. Mowing: Mowing will start in the spring as soon as new growth starts. Most lawns should be mowed at a 2” height in the spring, early summer and fall. During the heat of summer raise the mower to 2.5”. Frequent mowing at 4-5 day intervals is essential to discourage weeds. Native grass areas are not intended to be mown, although they should be mowed to control weeds until grasses are established. Fertilizer: Fertilizer will be applied at regular intervals a minimum of three times per year to all turfgrass lawn areas. One pound of actual nitrogen per 1,000 sq.ft. will be used at each application. The first application will be applied in the spring when mowing for the first time, then six weeks later in early June and once in the late summer. Fertilizer will be applied to a dry lawn and then watered in after applying. A high nitrogen lawn food with approximately twice as much nitrogen as phosphorus and potassium should be used. Added iron is recommended for our area. 577 14 Watering: Enough water will be applied at each watering to soak the soil down to the depth of the root system. To conserve water, the amount of water applied will vary with the amount of natural rainfall. Recommended is 1” of water per week. The turf will be allowed to dry out between watering. Native grass areas will not require watering. Weeds: Weed control will be the responsibility of the homeowners association. Weed control will consist of regular herbicide applications after final grade work has been completed and before seeding or sodding is to occur. Once turf areas are established, broadleaf weeds will be managed with a liquid application of 2,4-D. This broadleaf herbicide will be applied on a still day to a wet lawn when temperatures are above 70 degrees and the area will then not be watered for 2 days to follow. Native grass areas should be mowed to control weeds until the grasses are established. Broadleaf herbicides can also be used to aid in native grass establishment. Snow: Snow removal on paved walkways will be included in maintenance responsibilities. No snow removal will be provided on Class II trails. 578 15 LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Gran Cielo Central Park – Conceptual landscape Plan 2. Gran Cielo North Park - Conceptual Landscape Plan 3, 4, 5. Gran Cielo Parks Irrigation Plans 6. Cost Estimate of Park Improvements 579 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 599 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Diane L. Brawner, Trustee of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust, GRANTOR, in consideration of $ 1.00 and for other and valuable considerations, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, with offices at 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59715, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a perpetual street and utility easement for the use of the public, in, through, and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County, Montana, located on the following described real property: Tract A of COS 1861, a tract of land being in the NE1/4SW1/4, Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A which by this reference is made a part hereof. The GRANTOR states that he possesses the real property described above and that he has a lawful right to grant an easement thereon. The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR. The terms, covenants, and provisions of this easement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this day of , 2018. By: Diane L. Brawner Trustee of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust 656 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 2 of 2 STATE OF MONTANA ) ):ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2018, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Diane L. Brawner, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the within instrument for and on behalf of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (SEAL) Chris Budeski Residing at Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT My Commission Expires: November 26, 2019 ACCEPTED: __________________________ CITY OF BOZEMAN by ________________________ City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ________ day of ___________________, 2 , before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared ANDREA SURRATT and ROBIN CROUGH, known to me to be the City Manager and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana (Printed Name) Residing at My Commission Expires / /20 657 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 1 of 3 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Marshall B Bennett and C. Luzann Bennett, GRANTORS, in consideration of $ 1.00 and for other and valuable considerations, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, with offices at 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59715, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a perpetual street and utility easement for the use of the public, in, through, and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County, Montana, located on the following described real property: Tract 3 of COS 2532, a tract of land being the in NE1/4SW1/4, Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, and Tract 2 of COS 2725 a tract of land being the in N1/2, Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 5 East P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A which by this reference is made a part hereof. The GRANTOR states that he possesses the real property described above and that he has a lawful right to grant an easement thereon. The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR. The terms, covenants, and provisions of this easement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this day of , 2018. By: Marshall B Bennett By: C. Luzann Bennett 658 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 2 of 3 STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2018, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Marshall B Bennett, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he did execute the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (SEAL) Chris Budeski Residing at Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT My Commission Expires: November 26, 2019 STATE OF MONTANA ) ):ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of ,2018, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared C. Luzann Bennett, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that She did execute the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (SEAL) Chris Budeski Residing at Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT My Commission Expires: November 26, 2019 659 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 3 of 3 ACCEPTED: __________________________ CITY OF BOZEMAN by ________________________ City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ________ day of ___________________, 2 , before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared ANDREA SURRATT and ROBIN CROUGH, known to me to be the City Manager and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana (Printed Name) Residing at My Commission Expires / /20 660 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Hyalite Village Investments LLC, GRANTORS, in consideration of $ 1.00 and for other and valuable considerations, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants to The City of Bozeman, a municipal corporation of the State of Montana, with offices at 121 North Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana 59715, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a perpetual street and utility easement for the use of the public, in, through, and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County, Montana, located on the following described real property: An unplatted tract of land being in the W½NE¼NW¼ of Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 5 East P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The easement is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit A which by this reference is made a part hereof. The GRANTOR states that he possesses the real property described above and that he has a lawful right to grant an easement thereon. The GRANTOR further agrees that the GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR. The terms, covenants, and provisions of this easement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this day of , 2018. By: ______________________________ Printed Name 661 PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENT Page 2 of 2 STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2018, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared _____________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the within instrument for and on behalf of the Hyalite Village Investments LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (SEAL) Chris Budeski Residing at Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT My Commission Expires: November 26, 2019 ACCEPTED: __________________________ CITY OF BOZEMAN by ________________________ City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ________ day of ___________________, 2 , before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared ANDREA SURRATT and ROBIN CROUGH, known to me to be the City Manager and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana (Printed Name) Residing at My Commission Expires / /20 662 663 664 Tract A of COS 1861 Water Pipeline & Access Easement Page 1 of 3 Return to: Chris G Budeski 895 Technology Blvd Suite 203 Bozeman MT 59718 WATER PIPELINE AND ACCESS EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT Diane L. Brawner, Trustee of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust, the GRANTOR, in consideration of One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, grant(s) to the City of Bozeman, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement to lay, construct and maintain approximately 1,256 lf (water) pipelines with the usual services, valves, connections, accessories and appurtenances for the purpose of transmitting water in, through, and across a strip of land situated in Gallatin County, Montana, to be located on the following described real property: Tract A of COS 1861, a tract of land being in the NE1/4SW1/4, Section 23, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, P.M.M., Gallatin County, Montana. The easement is more particularly shown on the attached PUBLIC WATER PIPELINE AND ACCESS EASEMENT EXHIBIT A which by this reference is made a part hereof. This grant includes the right of the GRANTEE, its successors, permittees, licensees, and assigns and its and their agents and employees, to enter at all times upon the above-described land by using existing roads or trails or otherwise by a route causing the least damage and inconvenience to the GRANTOR(S) in order to survey and establish the route and location of the easement and the pipeline and to: (1) Construct, operate, patrol, repair, substitute, remove, enlarge, replace, and maintain the pipeline, services, connections, accessories and appurtenances; (2) Trim, remove, destroy, or otherwise control any trees and brush inside or outside the boundaries of the easement which may, in the opinion of the GRANTEE, interfere or threaten to interfere with or be hazardous to the construction, operation and maintenance of the pipeline; (3) Grade the land subject to this easement and extend the cuts and fills of this grading into and on the land adjacent to that which is subject to this easement to the extent GRANTEE may find reasonably necessary; and (4) Support the pipeline across ravines and water courses with structures which GRANTEE deems necessary. THE GRANTEE AGREES: (1) That, in connection with the construction, operating, patrolling, repairing, substituting, removing, enlarging, replacing, and maintaining of said Water pipeline, it will repair or replace, at its sole expense, or pay to GRANTOR(S) the reasonable value of any damages to growing crops, existing fences, ditches and other appurtenances of said land that may be disturbed by its operation. (2) That, during operations involving excavation, it will remove the topsoil from the trenched area to a depth of one foot, or to the full depth of the topsoil, whichever is less, and stockpile said top soil for replacement over the trench. It will remove from the site any 665 Tract A of COS 1861 Water Pipeline & Access Easement Page 2 of 3 large rocks or surplus excavating material or any debris that may have been exposed by the excavation and remains after backfilling is completed. And, it will leave the finished surface in substantially the same condition as existed prior to the beginning of operations except that the surface of backfilled areas may be mounded sufficiently to prevent the formation of depressions after final settlement has taken place. THE GRANTOR(S) AGREES: (1) At no time will they build, construct, erect or maintain any permanent structure within the boundaries of said easement without the prior written consent of GRANTEE. (2) At no time will they modify the finished grade of the land over the pipeline by removal of existing soil or by placement of fill material within the boundaries of said easement without the prior written consent of the GRANTEE. (3) That where the subject improvements are not located under improved public or private streets or other provided access, a 12 foot wide all-weather access road may be constructed within the easement where at the City's discretion such access is required for operation and maintenance purposes. (4) The GRANTOR(S) warrants that they are lawfully seized and possessed of the real property described above, that they have a lawful right to convey the property, or any part of it, and that they will forever defend the title to this property against the claims of all persons. (5) The GRANTEE may peaceably hold and enjoy the rights and privileges herein granted without any interruption by the GRANTOR(S). The terms, covenants and provisions of this easement and agreement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. DATED this day of , 2018. By: Diane L. Brawner Trustee of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust STATE OF MONTANA ) ):ss County of Gallatin ) On this day of , 2018, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared Diane L. Brawner, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the within instrument for and on behalf of the Diane L. Brawner Revocable Trust. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for the State of Montana (SEAL) Chris Budeski Residing at Bozeman, Gallatin County, MT My Commission Expires: November 26, 2019 666 Tract A of COS 1861 Water Pipeline & Access Easement Page 3 of 3 ACCEPTED: __________________________ CITY OF BOZEMAN by ________________________ City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MONTANA ) )ss. County of Gallatin ) On this ________ day of ___________________, 2018, before me, a Notary Public for the State of Montana, personally appeared ANDREA SURRATT and ROBIN CROUGH, known to me to be the City Manager and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Bozeman and the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the City of Bozeman. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Notary Public for the State of Montana (Printed Name) Residing at My Commission Expires / /20 667 1 Chris Saunders From:Peter Kerwick <pkerwick@peterscorp.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 5, 2018 11:28 AM To:Chris Saunders Cc:James Ullman (jullman@m-m.net); Bill Enloe Subject:FW: Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17522 - Letter - Request Amendment to the Conditions of Approval Attachments:Bozeman - Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17552 - Request to Amend Conditions to Development.pdf Mr. Saunders, With regard to our letter sent to you yesterday, on behalf Hyalite Village Investors, LLC, I would like to add that HVi is working with the Gran Cielo principals, through their representative, Chris Budeski of Madison Engineering. HVI has offered, subject to conditions, to provide the easements Gran Cielo has requested on Bennett Drive and 29th Ave, on our common boundary. One of our “conditions” is the City requiring the amending of the City’s Conditions of Approval for the Gran Cielo Subdivision, as requested in HVI’s letter to you, sent yesterday (attached). As a matter of fairness, this condition is one the will need to be met in order for HVI to agree to provide the easements Gran Cielo Subdivision has requested. We believe our request (outlined in HVI’s letter to the City) is fair and reasonable, especially given the waiver requirements placed on HVI at the time our 20 acre site was annexed into the City. We do want to be helpful to our neighbor, and are continuing to work with Gran Cielo in an effort to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement. Thank you for hearing our request. Should you have any questions, please call me, or call James Ullman (Morrison Maierle). Sincerely, Peter Kerwick Vice President Hyalite Village Investors, LLC 4056 Cerrillos Rd., Suite F-1, Santa Fe, NM 87507 505/983 7997 Office, 505/412-0296 Cell, 505/983 7421 Fax From: Peter Kerwick Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 12:41 PM To: Chris Saunders (csaunders@bozeman.net) Cc: James Ullman (jullman@m-m.net); Bill Enloe Subject: Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17522 - Letter - Request Amendment to the Conditions of Approval Dear Mr. Saunders, Please see the letter addressed to you, which is attached (and signed by me electronically). Thank you. Peter Kerwick Vice President Hyalite Village Investors, LLC 4056 Cerrillos Rd., Suite F-1, Santa Fe, NM 87507 668 2 505/983 7997 Office, 505/412-0296 Cell, 505/983 7421 Fax 669 C:\Admin\Bozeman - Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17552 - Request to Amend Conditions to Development.docx Hyalite Village Investors, LLC 4056 Cerrillos Road, Suite F-1 Santa Fe, NM 87507 505/983-7997 June 4, 2018 Mr. Chris Saunders Via Email: csaunders@bozeman.net Community Development Manager Department of Planning and Community Development City of Bozeman P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Re: Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17522 – Request for Amendment to the Conditions of Approval Attn: Mr. Chris Saunders: We are the owner of the 20 acre parcel that is located adjacent to, and north and west of, the proposed Gran Cielo Subdivision. We have been following the subdivision process and have reviewed the proposed Conditions of Approval for the subdivision and would like to propose an amendment to the Condition #26 (from the Memorandum to the Development Review Committee from Chris Saunders, dated March 1, 2018 regarding Gran Cielo Subdivision Preliminary Plat, Application 17522). That #26 is written below, and the portion in red and underlined, is the specific language we recommend be inserted to amend his section. 26. The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) for the following: a) Public Infrastructure and Street improvements to W. Graf Street including water, sanitary sewer, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b) Public Infrastructure and Street improvements to S. 27th Avenue including water, sanitary sewer, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c) Public Infrastructure and Street improvements to Stucky Road including water, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage d) Public Infrastructure and Street improvements to Fowler Lane including water, sanitary sewer, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage e) Public Infrastructure and Street improvements to S. 19th Avenue including water, sanitary sewer, paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage f) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and 27th Avenue g) Intersection improvements to 27th Avenue and Stucky Road h) Intersection improvements to Stucky Road and S. 19th Avenue i) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and S. 19th Avenue j) Intersection improvements to Stucky Road and Fowler Lane k) Intersection improvements to Graf Street and Fowler Lane 670 C:\Admin\Bozeman - Gran Cielo Subdivision Application 17552 - Request to Amend Conditions to Development.docx The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide a copy of the filed SID waiver prior to final plat approval. In order to make sure all of the public infrastructure improvements are included in any potential Special Improvements Districts, we respectfully request that the City amend Condition #26 to the revised wording indicated above. Please call me, or Mr. Ullman, our civil engineer, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Hyalite Village Investors, LLC /s/ Peter V. Kerwick Peter V. Kerwick Vice President cc: James Ullman, P.E., Morrison Maierle, Inc. Bill Enloe 671 1 Chris Saunders From:Agenda Sent:Tuesday, June 5, 2018 9:09 AM To:Chris Saunders; Tom Rogers Subject:FW: Public hearing: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 - Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Attachments:SW Bozeman Development - Public Comment.pptm Tom/Chris, Please save and distribute the attached public comment. This was not sent to the Commission since it was directed to the Planning Board. Robin From: Andrew Hill [mailto:andrew.hill.email@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 11:05 PM To: Agenda <agenda@BOZEMAN.NET> Subject: Public hearing: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 ‐ Gran Cielo Major Subdivision Dear Planning Board, Please find my public comment for the proposed Gran Cielo Major Subdivision attached (in the form of a short Powerpoint presentation). Regards, Andrew Hill 672 Public Comment on Development in South-West Bozeman So Much Potential! 2018 673 •Great opportunity to make SW Bozeman a highly desirable, walkable neighborhood •By providing amenities in newly developed local communities such as SW Bozeman, traffic and congestion in rest of Bozeman can be reduced: everyone wins! •Much easier to plan for it now rather than hope for infill development later •Lots of development happening in South-West Bozeman •But no close places for food/coffee, especially west of 19th (all Yelp food/drink locations shown on map) •If everyone gets in their cars to do everything other than sleep, you only get the cons of density without the pros SW Bozeman –so much potential! 674 •Now is the perfect time for a small, mixed use development west of 19th offering food/essentials/coffee •Many potential sites (general areas shown in red, including some in proposed Gran Cielo Major Subdivison) •Challenge: may be lower return for developer in short-run, so may need city help or incentives •But: will pay for itself through reduced traffic and congestion in rest of Bozeman in long run •SW Bozeman west of 19th zoned for many more residents and a business park, but no shopping •Several areas being developed right now; seemingly with major residential focus •Spire climbing gym and Oracle also bring many people into area One solution to the development strain downtown is making great places in other parts of the city that share some of downtown’s characteristics –SW Bozeman has the residential density to be one! SW Bozeman – so much potential! 675