HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-23-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A2. Law and Justice Center Refined Options and PricingPage 1 of 15
Commission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Chuck Winn, Assistant City Manager
Andrea Surratt, City Manager SUBJECT: Presentation of Refined Options and Pricing; Joint Project with Gallatin County for Law Enforcement Building and a Bozeman Public Safety
Facility (BPSF) on City-Owned Property on Rouse Avenue.
MEETING DATE: April 23, 2018 AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
RECOMMENDATION: Listen to presentation by staff, ask questions, and provide direction
to the City Manager.
POSSIBLE MOTION: After listening to the presentations and taking public comment, I move to
direct the City Manager to finalize plans for a Bozeman Public Safety Facility on city-owned
property on Rouse Avenue and return to the Commission with draft mill levy and bond information
for a future election.
OR
POSSIBLE MOTION: After listening to the presentations and taking public comment, I move to
direct the City Manager to work with Gallatin County to finalize a joint law enforcement project on the Law and Justice Center site and bring back to the City Commission draft mill levy ballot funding language for a November 2018 election.
OR Other motion as determined by the Commission
INTRODUCTION: On January 22, 2018, the City Commission considered two options to address
facility deficiencies for Bozeman’s public safety and criminal justice functions. One option was to partner with Gallatin County on a phased approach to a joint project previously defeated by voters in November 2016. The second option was to construct a city public safety facility on city-owned
land that included the Police Department, Fire Department, Bozeman Municipal Courts and
support functions, and Bozeman prosecution functions on city-owned property on North Rouse.
After deliberation, the City Commission directed staff to further explore the city public safety facility option and return to the Commission in April for further consideration.
167
Page 2 of 15
APPROACH: To efficiently develop concept plans and accurate estimates for a city public safety
facility, we engaged the services of the architect and general contractor/construction manager who
had developed plans and estimates for both the previous joint project with Gallatin County and the
Rouse Justice Center (RJC). The basis for the new facility was the RJC modified to include Bozeman Fire Station 1. This approach allowed us to take advantage of design and cost estimating work already completed and apply it to this project without significant redesign and redundant
effort. It also provided an opportunity to reevaluate the facility and service assumptions made in
2014 and update as needed in 2018.
Policy Considerations:
For the purposes of this discussion it is important to note that these are two very different projects
that address two very different problems. As you will see, the two different scenarios have different costs, timelines, benefits and risks. In addition, to evaluate them on costs alone would miss a
critical policy question about how the entirety of City services are provided to residents and visitors
of the City of Bozeman.
Bozeman is a rapidly growing municipality. With this growth comes increased demands for city services including those provided by the Bozeman Police and Fire Departments and the Municipal
Courts. In the past, the City has been most effective providing public safety services when it has
been able to engage city voters and make decisions directly. Working with the County on joint
public safety facilities adds a level of complexity and uncertainty to any project as the City
Commission and City voters do not have direct authority to make decisions that impact these critical services.
It can be argued that Bozeman is of a sufficient size (nearing 50,000) and complexity that the needs
of the growing municipal population are best served by focusing city resources on city services.
There are functions where partnerships make sense by reducing redundancy and improving efficiency (i.e. City/County Health Department, 911 Dispatch, etc.), but the Bozeman Police
Department, Municipal Courts, City Attorney’s Office, and Bozeman Fire Department are funded
entirely by City taxpayers and provide direct services within the corporate city limits. Gallatin
County taxpayers outside the City limits do not provide funding for these services. Does it make
sense for City voters, taxpayers, and policy makers to be able to focus their efforts and resources on making decisions that are in the best interests of the City without having to get permission from
Gallatin County?
OVERVIEW
The initial phase of the joint project at the Law & Justice Center provides space for the Bozeman Police Department but does not address any of the facility needs of the Municipal Courts, the City
Prosecution staff or important judicial support services such as victim services, court clerk staff,
and citizen jury facilities. Facilities for those services are planned to be provided in the future
through a voted mill levy determined by the County Commission. It also does not address the
needs of the City’s Fire Department.
Main components of each option:
County Option – Phased Approach: Law Enforcement-Only Building Includes:
168
Page 3 of 15
• Bozeman Police
• County Sheriff
• Shared Evidence Processing and Storage
• Shared Law Enforcement Records
• Future Phase: Courts Building
City Option – Bozeman Public Safety Facility Includes:
• Bozeman Police
• City Evidence Processing and Storage
• City Law Enforcement Records
• Municipal Courts and Court Services (Clerks and Victim Services)
• Prosecution
• Bozeman Fire Station 1
The Bozeman Public Safety Facility (BPSF) Project Description:
The City has three major public safety facility challenges to meet the demands of the growing
community; a Bozeman Police Station, Municipal Courts and Court Services, and the relocation of Fire Stations 1 and 2. The Fire Department Master Plan as recently accepted by the City
Commission finds that the construction and staffing of a fourth fire station can be delayed, and
current services improved, through the relocation of both Fire Station 1 (built in 1963) and Fire
Station 2 (built in 1974). The Fire Master Plan identifies the city-owned property on Rouse as an
ideal location for Station 1. The City will immediately solve three of its most important public safety facility challenges with the construction of a joint public safety building on Rouse Avenue.
As a starting point for the BPSF project, we used the design previously completed for the Police
and Municipal Courts project presented to the voters in 2014 and added fire station programming
required for the relocation of Fire Station 1. This new effort allowed us to take advantage of
building systems and site considerations to provide an efficient design and layout. The cost estimates in this memo are provided using current material and labor pricing.
There are significant benefits to collocating City public safety functions together on the Rouse site.
Shared Spaces. The Police and Fire Departments are both emergency public safety services
and can share important resources within the building. These include, but are not limited to,
staff meeting and training areas, public meeting facilities, command and emergency operation spaces and equipment.
Police and Fire Department staff work closely together on the street, as they respond to public
safety emergencies throughout town. Many incidents have both Police and Fire first
responders present. Being located in the same facility will have the benefit of improving
working relationships between department members.
Common Spaces. Common elements in the buildings including lobbies, mechanical and other
facilities support rooms, hallways, public meeting and restrooms, and stairwells would be
shared by the courts, attorneys, police and fire. This sharing resulted in reduced square footage
by eliminating redundant spaces.
169
Page 4 of 15
Emergency Services. Facilities for both Police and Fire require construction to the essential
services provisions of the building code. It is critical Bozeman public safety agencies are able
to provide life-safety services to the community during times of extreme emergency. The BPSF
is designed to withstand seismic events and utility interruptions of up to 72 hours to provide a base of operations for Bozeman’s primary emergency response agencies.
Land and Financing Issues:
1. Land Ownership. The land on which the BPSF would be built is approximately 8 acres
and is owned by the City. The property is currently being used to store public works equipment previously stored at the City Shops.
2. Ownership Structure. The City would own the entire project and have control over
operations and maintenance.
3. Project Debt
• City Bond Election. Construction of the BPSF would be funded through the sale of municipal bonds authorized by voters and paid back over 20 years. The City’s
bond rating has recently been improved and is the same as the County (Moody’s
Aa2). The site that is currently Fire Station 1 could be sold in order to decrease
the amount of debt that must be borrowed for the project.
• Mill Levy Question(s). Operating and maintenance costs could be funded through
a voted increase to the City’s mill levy or funded through the levying of additional
mills authorized within the existing cap but not currently levied.
Ongoing Operations and Maintenance:
The City would need to increase budget authorization for operations and maintenance of the new facility. These new costs could be offset with funds currently paid to Gallatin County as described
below.
Additionally, the City entered into a 40-year lease to the County in 1994 and prepaid $765,000.
The provisions in that agreement allow the City to vacate the building, and under certain conditions, require the County to refund unused lease funds. The amount of the refund would be determined by the date the City moved out but would be approximately $267,000 if the project
was approved by the voters in 2018 and the lease was terminated by mutual agreement in year 26
of the contract.
170
Page 5 of 15
Bozeman Public Safety Facility – Project Costs
Construction: The Bozeman Public Safety Facility building project is estimated to cost $40.1
million. Sale of the current Fire Station #1 property and cash from the Fire and Equipment Capital
fund could reduce the bond costs by $3,150,000. The bond for construction would total $36.9
million. The table below details the Cost of the Construction of the Project:
Operational Costs: The City would seek to be released from our current long-term lease and no
longer have annual maintenance costs at the current Law and Justice Center. There would be an
increase to the City’s budget that would need to be levied for operations. We estimated the utilities
and maintenance based on the City’s buildings expenses per square foot. To estimate these costs,
we used the average cost per square foot of four City’s buildings (City Hall, Stiff Professional
Building, Fire Station 1 and the Library).
With the move of operations to this new building, there will be a need to increase staffing. The
records division (currently run by Gallatin County and funded through the 911 Levy) would
require an additional 2.5 FTE and a .5 FTE evidence technician would be added. Court security
will need staffing of 2.0 FTE for security services while court is in session. NOTE: this building
security function is new for this project and is not currently provided by the County at the
L&J Center even after being identified as a major safety concern for several years.
Maintenance, utilities and staffing could be funded by asking voters for an operating levy or use
of a portion of the 15.97 mill still under the current cap (9.00 mills related to 911-Records, and
6.97 below for general fund cuts/carryover). The net effect would be an estimated 5.18 mill
increase for City residents. Below is the summary table of expenses:
Building Construction Cost 40,115,362.00$
Minus: Sale of Current Fire Station One (pending true appraisal)(2,500,000.00)$
Minus: Fire & Equip fund contribution (650,000.00)$
Total Bonded amount 36,965,362.00$
Total Bozeman Public Safety Building Construction Cost debt funded 36,965,362.00$
Bozeman Public Safety Building Construction Costs
Savings from Current L&J Operating Agreement (145,000.00)$
Utilities 181,611.50$
Building & Grounds Maintenance 185,398.68$
FTE- Evidence, Records and Security 302,302.41$
Court Operations Costs: 524,312.60$
Operational Costs (Operational Levy Needed or use portion remainder of levy cap 15.97)
171
Page 6 of 15
Impact on Median Home
The median home taxable value in the City of Bozeman is $292,000. Based on this value we
estimate the annual cost of the levy for building construction would be $101.78 in the first year
and the operating levy (if current available mills is not used) in the first year would be $19.67.
This totals $121.45 per year in the first year.
The City’s taxable value has grown at an average rate of 3.6% per year over the past 10 years.
Using that as an indicator of future tax-base growth, the amount that tax payers would be required
to pay each year of the 20-year bond would decline. For instance, by year 2028 we estimate that
the median home would pay $86.25 per year for the bond.
Bond Levy
Estimated Annual Payment 2,713,373.34$
Current Annual Mill Value 101,195.00$
Estimated # of Mills 26.81
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 101.78$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 8.48$
Operational Levy
Estimated Annual Amount 524,312.60$
Estimated Annual Mill Value 101,195.00$
Current Annual Mill Value 5.18
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 19.67$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 1.64$
Total Impact
Estimated Annual Payment & Operations 3,237,685.94$
Current Annual Mill Value 101,195.00$
Estimated # of Mills 31.99
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 121.45$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 10.12$
Bozeman Public Safety Complex Impact on Median Home
172
Page 7 of 15
Other Considerations County Sheriff & Courts Building: If the City decides to build its own Bozeman Public Safety
Facility, Gallatin County has discussed also asking voters to construct a building for County
Sheriff and Courts functions at an estimated $40 Million cost, paid for by all county property
owners. We admittedly do not have many details about this plan. However, if approved, we
estimate that this project will add an additional $39.07 in property taxes for City tax payers.
County Sheriff & Courts Building Impact on City Bozeman Median Home
Bond Levy $ 40,000,000
Estimated Annual Payment $ 2,953,704
Current Annual Mill Value $ 286,963
Estimated # of Mills 10.29
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home $ 39.07
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home $ 3.26
Combined city tax payer impact of both the BPSF and the County Sheriff & Courts buildings will
equal $160.52 per year in first year.
Total Impact on Median Home with BPSF and County Project - 2018
Estimated Annual Payment & Operations $ 6,191,389.94
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home $ 160.52
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home $ 13.38
173
Page 8 of 15
The costs of these projects in 2021 (for comparison purposes with the Joint Project described later)
are estimated to be:
Total Impact on Median Home with City and County Projects - 2021
Estimated Annual Payment & Operations $ 6,191,389.94
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home $ 146.14
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home $ 12.18
Fire Station 2 Relocation: The City of Bozeman will also need to look at funding the relocation
of Fire Station 2. Relocating both Station 1 and Station 2 will postpone the need to build Fire
Station 4 for approximately 10 years, saving the City around $1.2 million in salaries and benefits
each year.
Joint Law Enforcement Building on the L&J Site – Project Description:
As originally designed, the project consisted of two separate buildings constructed on the L&J
campus; a Courts building and a law enforcement building. The total estimated square footage for both buildings was 181,658. With this new phased approach, the law enforcement building would be constructed first. This fall, the County began construction of a records and vehicle storage
building that had been planned before the joint project but put on hold as the storage could easily
be included in the joint project. Approximately 4,900 sq. ft. has been removed from the law
enforcement building. The new estimated cost allocations are outlined below.
The cost of construction of the law enforcement building would be allocated to the City and the County in proportion to the relative square footages of each party’s condominium units except as
otherwise noted here.
Shared Spaces. The cost of construction of certain project elements, designed on the architect’s
plans as “shared” spaces, would be shared equally. Examples of these shared elements are certain reception areas, shared conference rooms, restrooms, and break rooms. The City and County anticipate that their respective use of these shared areas will be more or less equivalent,
$-
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
201820192020202120222023202420252026202720282029203020312032203320342035203620372038City and County Projects Impact on City
Median Home $292k
Tax Per Median Home- City Project Tax Per Median Home- County Project
174
Page 9 of 15
and that an equal allocation of the costs of these spaces is fair based on the anticipated levels
of use.
Common Spaces. The remaining common elements in the buildings, including lobbies,
mechanical and other facilities support rooms, hallways, and stairwells would be shared on a pro-rata basis based on the relative size of the City’s and County’s condominium units.
The City and County have reviewed the layout and function of the law enforcement building and
have agreed on the allocations.
Land and Financing Issues:
1. Land Ownership. The land on which the law enforcement building would be constructed is approximately 4.95 acres and is currently owned by the County. The City’s payment to
the County for its undivided interest in the project’s real property is being discussed and
would be different than the formula agreed to in the 2016 project. For the purposes of
discussing project costs in this memo, we have assumed 50% ownership of 2.5 acres,
totaling $375,000.
2. Ownership Structure. If both the bond and operating levy questions are approved by
voters, the City and County would jointly own the law enforcement building as
condominiums. This is the same form of property ownership chosen by the County and
City for the joint 911 Center/Fire Station 3 property. Under this form, each party would
own their condominium unit (the areas of the buildings exclusively occupied by that party), plus an undivided property interest in the common elements, expressed as a percentage. It
is anticipated the City and County would each have a 50% voting interest in the
condominium’s common elements. The condominium declaration will include a dispute
resolution mechanism to resolve any deadlocks.
3. Project Debt
a. County Bond Election. As in the 2016 project, the County would issue the bonds
for construction. The City would annually pay the County for its share of the project
costs. All voters in the county would be asked to approve the full $26M bond.
b. Mill Levy
• City residents would be asked to approve a debt service mill levy to reimburse the County for the City’s proportional share of the Project costs financed
through the bond. The City’s share equates to $13.4M – see fiscal effects.
• Operating and maintenance costs could be funded through a voted increase to the City’s mill levy or funded through the levying of additional mills authorized
within the existing cap but not currently levied.
Ongoing Operations and Maintenance:
The City and County have been discussing opportunities to share resources and expertise as it relates to operation, maintenance, and support of the building and the services contained within. Both entities recommend the County assume responsibility for facilities operation and
maintenance and the City assume the information and technology services for the new building.
175
Page 10 of 15
1. Facility Services. The shared expenses for ongoing operations, maintenance, insurance,
and other common expenses would be allocated based on the 50/50 space allocations
for the project.
2. Information and Technology Services. The City would assume primary responsibility for providing information technology services for the new law enforcement building.
The scope of services to be provided by the City and the parties’ respective obligations
would be detailed in a separate agreement.
The costs for each service have not yet been determined. Written agreements for those services
will be finalized should the project receive voter approval.
Further details related to operations, maintenance, and governance of the condominium association will be included in the condominium declaration and bylaws.
Joint Law Enforcement Building on L&J Site – Financing
Construction: The Joint Law Enforcement building project is $28.4 million, of which both the
County and the City have already funded $2.3 million. The bonded amount for the project will be
$26 million total. The City obligation for the building construction is 50% of the costs, or $13.4
million.
As described above, the County has requested that the City provide $375,000 for its condominium
interest in the 4.95-acre site. That cost has been included in the project cost below.
Between construction and land costs, the total obligation for the City portion of the building will
be $13.4 million. The annual debt payment would be $984,908. With the value of a current mill
at $101,195, this is equivalent to 9.73 mills at today’s mill value.
Annual Operations: The City will be providing full information technology support to both the
Police Department and the Sheriff’s Office located in the building, while the County will be
providing facility maintenance. Under a yet-to-be-written operating agreement, the City will make
payment to the County for facility maintenance, and the County will pay the City for information
technology support. At this time, we believe those amounts will roughly offset each other. The
main operation budget increase would be the City’s portion of utilities. To estimate utility costs,
we used the average cost per square foot of four of the City’s larger buildings (City Hall, Stiff
Professional Building, Fire Station 1 and the Library). The estimated annual budget increase
needed would be about $61,000 and adjusted each year for inflation.
Building Construction Cost 28,425,953.00$
Minus: Planning Costs already spent by both County and City (2,351,730.00)$
Total project costs to be bonded 26,074,223.00$
City Share of Construction Costs:13,037,111.50$
City Land Payment to County*375,000.00$
Total City Amount to be bonded: 13,412,111.50$
*County will likely decrease their bond amount for City Land Payment
Joint Law Enforcement Building Construction Costs
176
Page 11 of 15
We will be continuing our lease with the County for at least the Courts space in the current Law
& Justice Center, so lease payments and operational costs for the current Law and Justice Center
will need to remain in the budget for a number of years until the courts are constructed ($174,000
a year.) Also, because we will not be vacating the Courts space, we will not receive a residual
payment from our capital investment under the capital lease (an element of our previous project.)
Impact on Median Home
The median home taxable value in the City of Bozeman is $292,000. Based on this value and our
current mill value, we estimate the annual property tax increase from the bond for the median
homeowner within the City of Bozeman would be $51.52 for the first year as described in the table
below.
The City’s taxable value has grown at an average rate of 3.6% per year over the past 10 years.
Using that as an indicator of future tax-base growth, the amount that tax payers would be required
to pay each year of the 20-year bond would decline. For instance, by year 2028 we estimate that
the median home would pay $36.67 per year for the bond.
City Only Portion
Estimated Annual Payment 984,908.19$
Estimated Annual Mill Value 101,195.00$
Estimated # of Mills 9.73
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 36.95$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 3.08$
County Only Portion
Estimated Annual Payment 929,021.44$
Estimated Annual Mill Value 286,963.00$
Estimated # of Mills 3.24
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 12.29$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 1.02$
Operation Costs Levy (City Only)
Estimated Annual Payment 61,000.00$
Estimated Annual Mill Value 101,195.00$
Estimated # of Mills 0.60$
Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 2.29$
Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 0.19$
City of Bozeman Resident (City and County)
Estimated Total Annual Payment 1,974,929.63$
Estimated Total Annual Cost of Levy to Median Home 51.52$
Estimated Total Monthly Dollar Cost of Levy to Median home 4.29$
Joint Law Enforcement Building Impact on Median Home
177
Page 12 of 15
Bozeman property owners will pay for all of the project that is directly attributable to the City’s
Police Department and pay for a portion of the project attributable to the Gallatin County Sheriff’s
Department. Currently, the City pays 34.7% of every county-wide mill that is levied. As a result,
City property owners will pay 67% of this project’s total cost ($19.1 Million) and County property
owners outside the City will pay 33% of the project’s total cost ($9.3 Million).
Paid by City
Property Tax
Payers,
$19,145,000
67%
Paid by County
Property Tax
Payers Outside the
City of Bozeman,
$9,281,000
33%
Joint Law Enforcement Building
178
Page 13 of 15
Other Considerations
Joint Courts Building: Two years following the Law Enforcement building the County
Commission has expressed interest in proceeding with a voted bond levy to construct the second
phase of the original project; the Joint Courts Building estimated at $53.1 million.
Fire Station 1: According to our adopted capital plan, the City will look to fund the relocation of
Fire Station #1 in FY20.
City voters will need to approve these projects, and their property taxes will increase as a result,
in the years the projects are built. Keeping the current median home value of $292,000, and
assuming average tax-base growth of 3.6%, the following table illustrates that all three projects
(Law Enforcement Building, Fire Station #1 Relocation, and Courts building) would cumulatively
impact the median home by a total of $129.58 in 2021.
Other Considerations of Note
FY 20 Fire Station One Relocation (inflation included) $ 5,530,400.00
Additional cost to estimated Median home in FY20 $ 14.27
FY21 Joint Courts Building Project total (inflation included) $ 53,146,280.00
FY21 Joint Courts Building (CITY SHARE) $ 21,258,512.00
Additional cost to estimated Median home in FY21) CITY & COUNTY $ 69.22
FY 20 Total estimated additional project impact on median home $ 62.47
FY 21 Total estimated additional project impact on median home $ 129.58
179
Page 14 of 15
Estimated Cost Comparison of the two options: There is a desire to understand the total impact on property tax payers for each of these separate paths:
• Bozeman Public Safety Facility (also assuming County Sheriff & Courts Building), or
• Joint Law Enforcement Building (also assuming Fire Station #1 and Joint Courts Building)
To make that comparison, we are required to make many assumptions:
1. Assuming all ballot measures are approved by voters the first time we present them. 2. Assuming that the County Sheriff & Courts Building has a total project cost of $40 Million. 3. Assuming that construction costs escalate at 6%/year.
4. Assuming that taxable values grow as they have on average for the past 10 years.
5. Assuming that no other elements are added to these projects that increase scope/project
costs. Given those assumptions, by the time both scenarios would be fully funded:
• Bozeman Public Safety Facility & County Sheriff & Courts Building would cost city
taxpayers $146.14 in 2021.
• Joint Law Enforcement Building & Fire Station #1 and Joint Courts Building would cost
city taxpayers $129.52 in 2021.
Courts
Building
Fire
Station
180
Page 15 of 15
The Bozeman Public Safety Facility option, along with Gallatin County having its own project
with the costs assumed in this memo, would cost the median city taxpayer $16.62 per year more
than the Joint Law Enforcement Building option.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by Commission
Attachments: Exhibit A: L&J Site Plan for Phased Construction Exhibit B:BPSF site plan
Report compiled on: April 18, 2018
$146.14 129.58
$-
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
20182019202020212022202320242025202620272028202920302031203220332034203520362037203820392040Comparison of Separate and Joint Projects with Fire
Station
City Project and County Project Joint Law, Fire Station 1, and Court Building
181
UP
UP
UP
115 SF
RECORDS MGR.
111
87 SF
MONITOR
124
1,084 SF
COMMUNITY MTG
102
83 SF
INT.
130
205 SF
INT. WAITING RM
125
153 SF
MAIL
108
327 SF
FILES
110
319 SF
STAIR #1
132
1,690 SF
RECORDS
107
172 SF
VEST
164
4,467 SF
GARAGE
199
300 SF
VEST
100
96 SF
COPY
109
82 SF
INT
129 82 SF
INT
128
117 SF
INT.
127
70 SF
TOILET
113
91 SF
STOR.
112
255 SF
CORRIDOR
126
189 SF
COFFEE
115
273 SF
CHIEF
134A
156 SF
DEPUTY CHIEF
134B
300 SF
WAITING/COPY
134
164 SF
DEPUTY CHIEF
134C
162 SF
CAPTAIN
135
162 SF
CAPTAIN
136
162 SF
CAPTAIN
137
318 SF
PATROL LT.
138
459 SF
INVESTIGATION
PROJECT ROOM
139 349 SF
EXEC CONF
140
430 SF
BRIEFING
141
157 SF
CPT
143
160 SF
CPT
144
117 SF
CHAPLAIN
142
124 SF
ADMIN MGR.
145
160 SF
CPT
146C
296 SF
WAITING/COPY
146
160 SF
U.S.
146B
274 SF
SHERIFF
146A
224 SF
STAIR #2
147
72 SF
INT.
167
155 SF
LT.
168
67 SF
INT
170
76 SF
TOILET
171
252 SF
DTF STORAGE
172
872 SF
DTF
169
152 SF
GEN. STORAGE
173
428 SF
QUARTER
MASTER
179B
134 SF
P.D. ARMORY
177
423 SF
BLDG STOR/
FACILITIES
179C
83 SF
RECEIVING
180
303 SF
G.C. ARMORY
182
93 SF
WEAPONS
MAINTENANCE
181
318 SF
CORONER
INTAKE
185
758 SF
VEH. EXAM
188112 SF
COOLER 1
187A
205 SF
COOLER 2
187B
516 SF
SRT STORAGE
179A
129 SF
OFFICE
186
153 SF
EVID. OFFICE
189B 364 SF
EVIDENCE TECH
189A
143 SF
SRT ARM.
178
97 SF
LAB VEST.
189C
53 SF
STOR
189D
409 SF
ID LAB
190
840 SF
EVIDENCE
INTAKE
192
80 SF
LARGE EVID.
LOCKER
192A
132 SF
DISCOVERY
194
102 SF
PUBLIC RETURN
193
36 SF
KENNEL
196B
34 SF
KENNEL
196C 96 SF
K-9
196A 35 SF
DRY
197A
35 SF
DRY
197B
125 SF
NARC STOR
195A
209 SF
BIKES
199A
341 SF
MOTORS
199B
1,252 SF
EVIDENCE STOR
195
1,091 SF
LOBBY
101
269 SF
FUTURE OFFICE
133
52 SF
ELEV
117
50 SF
JAN.
118
186 SF
MEN
119
191 SF
WOMEN
120
148 SF
TELECOMM.
121
148 SF
ELECT.
122
1,132 SF
PD
INVESTIGATIONS
148
1,143 SF
PATROL
SUPPORT SVCS
149
1,107 SF
PD. PATROL SGT.
150 302 SF
ICAC
155
282 SF
PD PATROL EQ.
STOR PATROL
GEN STOR
156
282 SF
GC PATROL EQ.
STOR PATROL
GEN STOR
157
620 SF
SERVER ROOM
158
296 SF
PATROL FILES/
COPY
160
214 SF
HOUSEKEEPING
183
65 SF
JUV. TOILET
152
79 SF
JUV. LOUNGE
151
118 SF
MEN
103
122 SF
WOMEN
104
191 SF
ELECTRICAL
159
79 SF
WATER ENTRY
174
1,107 SF
GC PATROL SGT.
153
1,132 SF
GC
INVESTIGATIONS
154
507 SFCORRIDOR1162,024 SF
CORRIDOR
131
214 SF
WORK ROOM
158A2,497 SF
REPORTS
161
2,939 SF
CORRIDOR
162 RedundantRoomCORRIDOR165117 SFVESTIBULE166847 SF
BAG TAG
191
154 SF
MEN
175
164 SF
WOMEN
176
75 SF
REPORT TAKING
105
76 SF
REPORT TAKING
106
118 SF
STOR.
102A
141 SF
COUNSELING
123
88 SF
JAN.
159A
CITY: 7,536 SF
COUNTY: 12,453 SF
SHARED (50/50): 14,742 SF
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 1 GROSS SF: 49,068 SF
COMMON (PRO-RATA): 14,337 SF
121 SF
IT
198
TOTAL CITY: 8,858 SF
TOTAL COUNTY: 13,196 SF
TOTAL SHARED (50/50): 19,455 SF
LAW ENFORCEMENT TOTAL
TOTAL GROSS SF: 59,718 SF
TOTAL COMMON (PRO-RATA): 18,209 SF
COP YRIGHT 2016P R E L I M I N A R YD R A W I N G SN O T F O RC O N S T R U C T I O N
Architect:
ThinkOne
101 East Main St.
Studio 1
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-586-7020
Associate Architect:
AndersonMasonDale
Architects
3198 Speer Blvd.
Denver, CO 80211
303-294-9448
Associate Architect:
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie,
Inc.
Architects
8705 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85020
602-331-4141
Engineer:
Morrison-Maierle, Inc.
2880 Technology Blvd.
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-587-0721
6/16/2016 12:17:32 PMO-001
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
2016-06-17
1514GALLATIN COUNTY AND CITY OF BOZEMANLAW & JUSTICE CAMPUS - LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER615 SOUTH 16TH AVENUE, BOZEMAN, MONTANA, 59715OWNERSHIP DIAGRAM - FIRST FLOOR 1/16" = 1'-0"O-001
1FIRST FLOOR PLAN
4,767 sf
Garage Storage Bays:Gross = 4,767 SFNet = 4467 SF
CITY: 7,536 SF
COUNTY: 12,453 SF
SHARED (50/50): 14,742 SF
LEVEL 1
LEVEL 1 GROSS SF: 49,068 SF
COMMON (PRO-RATA): 14,337 SF
TOTAL CITY: 8,858 SF
TOTAL COUNTY: 13,196 SF
TOTAL SHARED (50/50): 19,455 SF
LAW ENFORCEMENT TOTAL
TOTAL GROSS SF: 59,718 SF
TOTAL COMMON (PRO-RATA): 18,209 SF
Initial SF percentages:(utilizes outside face of structure for gross square footage calculation)
Revised SF percentages (Jan. 3, 2018):(updates gross square footage calculation to outside face of exterior finish)
(same)
Revisions
(deduct vehicle garage bays)
(same)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish & deductsvehicle garage bays)
7,536 SF
7,986 SF
14,742 SF
45,233 SF
14,969 SF
50,000 SF (calc. to outsideface of ext. finish)
61,400 SF (calc. to outsideface of ext. finish)
Revisions
8,858 SF
8,729 SF
19,455 SF
56,633 SF
19,591 SF
(same)
(deduct vehicle garage bays)
(same)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish & deductsvehicle garage bays)
2018-01-02
Total Occupied SF %
Bozeman Police – 15.64%
Gallatin Co. Sheriff - 15.41%
Total Shared - 34.36%
Total Common - 34.59%
Ownership & Usage ~ 50/50
182
DN
DN
DN
DW REF.REF.
52 SF
ELEV #1
210
620 SF
FITNESS
208
799 SF
LUNCH RM
204227 SF
STAIRS #1
202
218 SF
STAIRS #2
209
1,135 SF
DEFENSIVE
TACTICS &
TRAINING RM
207
236 SF
D.T. STOR
206
2,125 SF
LOCKERS
203
236 SF
TASK CHAIR
STOR
205
95 SF
1st AID/
SLEEP
213
115 SF
T/SHWR
219
90 SF
ELECT
220
77 SF
T/LAV
218
90 SF
T/LAV
217
82 SF
T/LAV
216
85 SF
T/LAV
215
108 SF
T/SHWR
214
90 SF
1st AID/
SLEEP
212
758 SF
STORAGE
201
497 SF
MECH/SUPPORT
223
2,092 SF
BREAKOUT
221
OPEN TO BELOW
107 SF
JAN.
222
161 SF
ROOF ACCESS
225
254 SF
STORAGE
224
OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW
CITY: 1,322 SF
COUNTY: 743 SF
SHARED (50/50): 4,713 SF
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2 GROSS SF: 10,650 SF
COMMON (PRO-RATA): 3,872 SF
COP YRIGHT 2016P R E L I M I N A R YD R A W I N G SN O T F O RC O N S T R U C T I O N
Architect:
ThinkOne
101 East Main St.
Studio 1
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-586-7020
Associate Architect:
AndersonMasonDale
Architects
3198 Speer Blvd.
Denver, CO 80211
303-294-9448
Associate Architect:
McClaren, Wilson & Lawrie,
Inc.
Architects
8705 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85020
602-331-4141
Engineer:
Morrison-Maierle, Inc.
2880 Technology Blvd.
Bozeman, MT 59715
406-587-0721
6/16/2016 12:17:35 PMO-002
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
2016-06-17
1514GALLATIN COUNTY AND CITY OF BOZEMANLAW & JUSTICE CAMPUS - LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER615 SOUTH 16TH AVENUE, BOZEMAN, MONTANA, 59715OWNERSHIP DIAGRAM - SECOND FLOOR 1/16" = 1'-0"O-002
1SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OWNERSHIP
Initial SF percentages:(utilizes outside face of structure for gross square footage calculation)
Revised SF percentages (Jan. 3, 2018):(updates gross square footage calculation to outside face of exterior finish)
11, 400 SF (calc. to outsideface of ext. finish)
CITY: 1,322 SF
COUNTY: 743 SF
SHARED (50/50): 4,713 SF
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2 GROSS SF: 10,650 SF
COMMON (PRO-RATA): 3,872 SF
(same)
Revisions
(same)
(same)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish)
(sf inclusive of ext. finish)
1,322 SF
743 SF
4,713 SF
11,400 SF
4,622 SF
2018-01-02
183
DWF.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.UPUP UPUP5 4 3 2 1COMMON BUILDINGVICTIM'S SERVICESCITY OF BOZEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENTBZN PD/FD TRAINING ROOMBZN PD/FD EXERCISE ROOMBZN PD/FD DECON BAYCITY OF BOZEMAN FIRE STATION #1COPYRIGHT 2014PRELIMINARY
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTIONThinkOne 101 East Main St.Studio 1Bozeman . MT 59715406.586.7020Anderson Mason Dale 3198 Speer Blvd.Denver . CO 80211303.294.9448Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd.Bozeman . MT 59715406.587.0721KEY PLAN3/30/2018 11:20:12 AMBPS1.0PRE DESIGN INVESTIGATION03.30.2018CITY OF BOZEMAN
PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
N. ROUSE AVE. & E. OAK ST., BOZEMAN MT
OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"BPS1.01OVERALL FIRST LEVEL PLAN - PRESENTATION184
REF.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.EJDNOPEN TO BELOWEXITENTER F.E.C. F.E.C.COMMON BUILDINGMUNICIPAL COURTSCLERK SUITECITY ATTORNEY
COMMON BUILDING(MECHANICAL)MECHANICAL MEZZANINE EST. 1,900 SFMECHANICAL PENTHOUSE EST. 1,300 SFCOPYRIGHT 2014PRELIMINARY
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTIONThinkOne 101 East Main St.Studio 1Bozeman . MT 59715406.586.7020Anderson Mason Dale 3198 Speer Blvd.Denver . CO 80211303.294.9448Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd.Bozeman . MT 59715406.587.0721KEY PLAN3/30/2018 11:20:17 AMBPS1.1PRE DESIGN INVESTIGATION03.30.2018CITY OF BOZEMAN
PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
N. ROUSE AVE. & E. OAK ST., BOZEMAN MT
OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0"BPS1.11OVERALL SECOND LEVEL - PRESENTATION185
DWF.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C.TRAINING ROOM1-186WATER ENTRY1-173ELECT.1-179ARMORY1-168SRT ARMORY1-213BIKE PATROL1-211PATROL1-137OP SERGEANT1-151COMMANDER1-150TEAM MTG /CONFERENCE1-161INVESTIGATIONS1-135POLICE INFO SPEC1-146DET SERGEANT1-145COMMANDER1-144COMMANDER1-143CHIEF1-141RECEPTION1-140INTERVIEW1-129RECORDS1-126WAITING1-109OFFICE1-111OFFICE1-110RECEPTION1-108WOMENS RR1-115INTERVIEW1-118MENS RR1-120COMMUNITYROOM1-104PUBLIC LOBBY1-102ELEV. MR1-103GEAR BAGS
1-139REPORT WRITING1-138SUPPORT SERVICES1-134SECURE CORRIDOR1-196STAIR 3
S-3 IT1-155ASST. CHIEF1-142IT1-165LARGE INTERVIEWROOM1-157REPORT WRITING1-152REPORT WRITING1-153POLICE INFO SPEC1-148FUTURE OFFICE1-149SECURE VESTIBULE1-187SECURE CORRIDOR1-124SHARED WORK
AREA
1-136SECURECIRCULATION1-131STAIR 2S-2SPECIAL PROJECTS1-158BRIEFING1-162RR1-159JAN1-172BUNK ROOM1-177BUNK ROOM1-171ELEV MR1-133CONFERENCEROOM1-132ELEVATOR 2E-2MAIL / WORK
ROOM
1-147
ELEV. MR1-167STORAGE1-156GEAR BAGSCLR.5' - 0" 16' - 6"CLR.5' - 0" 2' - 2"
GEAR BAGS
7' - 0"ELECT.1-160SECURECIRCULATION1-174STORAGE1-185BRUSH TRUCK EQUIPMENT ISSUEEXERCISE ROOMDECON /EXTRACTORDECONBATHROOMSHOWER ROOMSHOWER ROOMSCBA,MAINTENANCE &STORAGEBUNKER STORAGERESTROOMSHOWER ROOMSECURERESTROOMCHANGINGROOMCHANGINGROOMLOCKER ROOMBOOT WASH, HOSE
REELS, HOTSY, ETC.WAITINGVIEWINGLARGE INTERVIEWSM. INTERVIEW
SM. INTERVIEW SRT STORAGE ELECTRICAL DELIVERYSRT WEAPONSMAINTENANCEEVIDENCE OFFICELABVESTIBULEVEHICLE EXAMBAYEVIDENCE TECHSTORAGELARGE EVIDENCENARCOTICSDRY ROOMDRY ROOMBAG TAGEVIDENCEPROCESSINGPUBLIC EVIDENCEVIEWINGDISCOVERYROOMEVIDENCESTORAGEVAULTEVIDENCE LABSALLY PORTSHOWER ROOMSCBA COMPRESSOR INTERVIEW1-130TABLE & CHAIRSTORAGEFREE WEIGHTSMEDICINE BALLSSTORAGERRRRJAN.QUARTER MASTEROFFICE1-112RR1-117WORKROOM1-121KITCHENETTE
1-116
FILE STORAGE1-12772 LARGE LOCKERS18 SMALL LOCKERSCOPYRIGHT 2014PRELIMINARY
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTIONThinkOne 101 East Main St.Studio 1Bozeman . MT 59715406.586.7020Anderson Mason Dale 3198 Speer Blvd.Denver . CO 80211303.294.9448Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd.Bozeman . MT 59715406.587.0721KEY PLAN3/30/2018 11:20:23 AMBPS1.2PRE DESIGN INVESTIGATION03.30.2018CITY OF BOZEMAN
PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
N. ROUSE AVE. & E. OAK ST., BOZEMAN MT
AREA A FLOOR PLAN 1" = 10'-0"BPS1.21FIRST LEVEL PLAN - AREA A - WITH FIRE STATION186
DW F.E.C.F.E.C.UPTRAINING ROOM1-186WATER ENTRY1-173ELECT.1-179ARMORY1-168SRT ARMORY1-213BIKE PATROL1-211PATROL1-137OP SERGEANT1-151COMMANDER1-150GEAR BAGS
1-139REPORT WRITING1-138SECURE CORRIDOR1-196STAIR 3
S-3 IT1-165REPORT WRITING1-152REPORT WRITING1-153POLICE INFO SPEC1-148FUTURE OFFICE1-149SECURE VESTIBULE1-187BRIEFING1-162RR1-164STORAGE1-163JAN1-172BUNK ROOM1-177BUNK ROOM1-171ELEV. MR1-16724' - 6" 8' - 0" 16' - 0"11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0"
GEAR BAGSCLR.5' - 0" 16' - 6"CLR.5' - 0" 2' - 2"
GEAR BAGS
7' - 0"SECURECIRCULATION1-174STORAGE1-1855 4 3 2 1SLEEPING ROOMSLEEPING ROOMSLEEPING ROOMSLEEPING ROOMSLEEPING ROOMLAUNDRY/JANITORTOILET|SHOWER24' - 0" 10' - 3" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 10' - 3" 12' - 3" 18' - 3" 2' - 6"FIRE MARSHALOPS CHIEFEMSSUPERVISORTRAININGOFFICEREMERGENCYMANAGERBATTALION CHIEFINTERPRETIVELOBBYDININGKITCHENDAY ROOMCONFERENCEROOMENTRY VESTIBULEEXTERIOR PATIOFIRE ENGINE
LADDER TRUCK
HAZ-MAT | RESCUE TRAILER
AMBULANCE
HAZ-MAT TRUCK
CHEVY 1500 EXT. CAB
FORD EXPLORER
INTERCEPTOR
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO SLEEPING ROOMSSCREEN WALL TO CREATE A PRIVATE SPACE FOR BBQ'S, EXTERIOR DINING, ETC.PUBLIC ENTRYCAPTAINS OFFICEEMSOFFICESECURE ACCESSSLEEPING ROOMCHIEF'S OFFICE14' - 0" 20' - 0"30' - 0" 8' - 0"TOILET|SHOWERTOILET|SHOWERFIRE FIGHTER'SWORK AREADISPLAYDECON PARKING BAY
(SHARED)
BRUSH TRUCK5' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0"
DISPLAY
7' - 0"16' - 0"7' - 0"IT ROOMOFFICE ADMINWAITING ROOMRESTROOMSILSBYEQUIPMENT ISSUEEXERCISE ROOMDECON /EXTRACTORDECONBATHROOMSHOWER ROOMSHOWER ROOMSCBA,MAINTENANCE &STORAGEBUNKER STORAGERESTROOMSHOWER ROOMSECURERESTROOMCHANGINGROOMCHANGINGROOMLOCKER ROOMBOOT WASH, HOSE
REELS, HOTSY, ETC.WAITINGVIEWINGLARGE INTERVIEWSM. INTERVIEW
SM. INTERVIEW
5' - 0"SRT STORAGE ELECTRICAL DELIVERYSRT WEAPONSMAINTENANCEEVIDENCE OFFICELABVESTIBULEVEHICLE EXAMBAYEVIDENCE TECHSTORAGELARGE EVIDENCENARCOTICSDRY ROOMDRY ROOMBAG TAGEVIDENCEPROCESSINGPUBLIC EVIDENCEVIEWINGDISCOVERYROOMEVIDENCESTORAGEVAULTEVIDENCE LABSALLY PORT72 LARGE LOCKERS18 SMALL LOCKERSSHOWER ROOMSCBA COMPRESSOR WORKROOMSTORAGEFREE WEIGHTSMEDICINE BALLSPUBLICRESTROOM70' - 0"SLEEPING ROOM8' - 6" 12' - 6" 10' - 0" 8' - 0"
72' - 0"
4' - 1"
FIRE INSPECTOR
OPEN OFFICE
108' - 8"
20' - 0" 10' - 6" 10' - 6" 19' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 8" 12' - 0"COPYRIGHT 2014PRELIMINARY
DRAWINGS
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTIONThinkOne 101 East Main St.Studio 1Bozeman . MT 59715406.586.7020Anderson Mason Dale 3198 Speer Blvd.Denver . CO 80211303.294.9448Morrison-Maierle, Inc. 2880 Technology Blvd.Bozeman . MT 59715406.587.0721KEY PLAN3/30/2018 11:20:28 AMBPS1.3PRE DESIGN INVESTIGATION03.30.2018CITY OF BOZEMAN
PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
N. ROUSE AVE. & E. OAK ST., BOZEMAN MT
AREA B FLOOR PLAN 1" = 10'-0"BPS1.31FIRST LEVEL PLAN - AREA B - WITH FIRE STATION187