HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCC Process outline 2018 1
MEMO: PCC Process Outline Date: April 6, 2018 Submitted by: Jennifer Boyer, PCC Facilitator April 3, 2018 meeting PCC develops goals through a guided discussion
• What outcomes does the PCC want to move forward?
• What is the geographic scope?
• What are the components and steps to achieve the outcomes? May 8, 2018
PCC reviews and revises draft map for focus area
PCC reviews matrix of planning tools and approaches and identifies the approaches to develop for the target geography
PCC identifies special presentations or speakers for upcoming work sessions.
Work topics – Annexation map Bozeman-Gallatin County & Belgrade –County MOU June 12, 2018
• Presentation on H2O Tool
• Work Session – TBD (water?)
• Discussion and planning for June 26th meeting June 26, 2018 – Planning Boards & PCC
• Purpose: engage planning board members and solicit feedback on PCC direction and goals July 10, 2018
• Presentation - TBD
• Work Session - TBD **FYI July 2018 TBD - Meeting for All Gallatin County Planning Boards re: study results on development and tax implications. September 4, 2018
• Presentation - TBD
• Work Session – TBD
• Discussion, Planning, Advertising for Public Open House October 2, 2018 – Target date for Public Open House
2
*NOTE: Additional, topics and meetings may be identified along the way thus, this is a “flexible” roadmap for our process over the next few months. The October Open House may be scheduled later due to preparing documents and outreach materials. MEMO: PCC Goals and Products Date: April 6, 2018 Submitted by: Jennifer Boyer, PCC Facilitator April 3, 2018 Goal Identification Summary
Immediate Actions (April-July 2018)
• Develop a shared platform (including base map) to build recommendations on
• Create a Digital Map
o Boundary map for PCC geography (the intersection of Bozeman, Belgrade and the County) that is modeled after the Billings map for annexation and planning.
Boundaries: Jackrabbit to the West Gallatin, Huffine to Elk Grove, North to North Penwell Bridge Rd, include airport interchange and River Rock.
Growth policy and jurisdiction boundaries, service districts, school districts, county zoning districts, transportation, 911, NW Energy
Infrastructure maps that will guide future development patterns
Water and Sewer infrastructure
Develop a series of layers that can project planned infrastructure for next 20 years.
• Uniform statement or vision that is included in new growth policies that speaks to the big picture future of the Gallatin Valley
• Adopt uniform direction on coordination between governments in new growth policies
• Create a matrix that compares different planning approaches, their attributes and outcomes o Identify which approaches are best suited for PCC recommendations
• List of recommended actions we can supply the three commissions that target practical steps to support cooperation o MOUs between governments
3
o Bozeman-County Map adopted Intermediate Actions (July-October 2018)
• Create a blueprint for how the communities will grow together and include the services and infrastructure for expected growth (how will Valley Center / Cameron Bridge build out? How will the airport interchange affect development?)
o Agree on mechanisms to ensure uniform approach to our community plans i.e transportation to aid coordination and information sharing
• Utilize existing information and generate new information where there are gaps. Use the data and studies to inform recommendations and share on a clearinghouse (website?) for the PCC
• Develop the fiscal case for infrastructure planning, how the coordinated approach will save money?
Future Actions (October 2018…)
• PCC website that can serve as a clearing house for PCC products, reports and research (action: Chris Saunders will investigate Bozeman IT capacity)
• Understand how the communities identify themselves (Gallatin Gateway, Four Corners etc.) Evaluation: do our recommendations support community identity?
• Identify how to mitigate conflict at the rural-urban interface, where are the rubs?
• Evaluation: do our recommendations support the value of our community? Do they support quality of life attributes and economic values (triple bottom line) of our businesses and land?
o Public outreach and engagement opportunity (October Open House)