Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18056 Park Place Annx-ZMA application materialsA1 Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROJECT Development Name: Description: 2. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 3. APPLICANT Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 4. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 5. PROPERTY Full Street Address: Full Legal Description: Current Zoning: Current Use: Community Plan Designation: Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation Entryway Corridor None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast None 6. STATISTICS (ONLY APPLICATION TYPES 2-12, 17, 24 AND 26) Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: Dwelling Units: Nonresidential Gross Building Square Feet: 7. APPLICATION TYPES Check all that apply, use noted forms. Form Form 1. Pre-application Consultation None 17. Informal Review INF 2. Master Site Plan MSP 18. Zoning Deviation None 3. Site Plan SP 19. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR 4. Subdivision pre-application PA 20. Conditional Use Permit CUP 5. Subdivision preliminary plat PP 21. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP 6. Subdivision final plat FP 22. Comprehensive Sign Plan CSP 7. Subdivision exemption SE 23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands RW 8. Condominium Review CR 24. Zone Map Amendment (non Annexation) ZMA 9. PUD concept plan PUDC 25. UDC Text Amendment ZTA 10. PUD preliminary plan PUDP 26. Growth Policy Amendment GPA 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 27. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD 12. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX 28. Extension of Approved Plan EXT 13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA 29. Reasonable Accommodation RA 14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA 30. Other: 15. Commercial Nonresidential COA CCOA 1 6. Historic Neighborhood Conservation Overlay COA NCOA 8. APPLICATION FEES AND MATERIALS A. Fees are to be provided based upon the adopted fee schedule FS. Contact our office for an estimate. Development Review Application A1 Page 3 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications B. Application materials shall be submitted for each application as shown in the specific guidance and checklists that is provided for each application type. A common development review application form and common notice materials may be provided for an application that includes more than one application type. All other application materials shall be submitted for each individual application type per the project guidance and checklists. 9. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different) for all application types before the submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information i s true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant Signature: Printed Name: Owner Signature: Printed Name: Owner Signature Printed Name: If signing as a corporation, please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation. Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net PLS Plans and Specifications PLS Page 1 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS INTRODUCTION In order for city staff to efficiently review your project in a timely manner, the application materials and the plan sets submitted must be clear, complete and thorough. This handout provides additional details for the application requirements outlined in the project checklists. If the requirements of this handout are met with your application it will minimize the delays that can occur when an application is unclear, incomplete or not formatted correctly. These requirements are mandatory. If the application materials do not meet these standards they will require correction, which will delay your project. GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. All plans and drawings must be accurately drawn, using a conventional scale such as 1:20 or 1:1/4, and with only one scale per sheet. Details may contain a separate scale if clearly labeled. 2. All text and annotations should be at a font size to enable it to be easily read – 10 point or more. Many plan sets require that 11” x 17” plan sizes be submitted. The text and annotations on plans that size must be readable when printed at that size. If plans are unreadable at the 11” x 17” size, they will not be accepted for review. 3. Plan sizes must meet minimum and maximum size requirements. No plans outside of the stated sizes will be accepted. 4. Plans/drawings must not contain disclaimers such as “Not to Scale” and “Do Not Scale.” (perspectives excepted) and drawings must be drawn true to the stated scale(s). 5. Plans must not contain disclaimers such as “Preliminary” and “Not for Construction.” 6. Provide all relevant measured dimensions annotated on the plans/drawings. For example label typical dimensions of parking spaces, drive accesses, drive aisles and sidewalks. 7. Consistent detailing. All existing and proposed site plan elements (e.g., sidewalks, parking spaces, fire lanes, building foot prints, etc.) must be labeled (unless a legend is provided) and dimensioned (unless a detail is provided). 8. The clearest way to present proposals is to group “existing” and “proposed” drawings side by side, using the same scale for both. 9. Each sheet and/or drawing must have a title box with the drawing name, sheet number and date clearly visible in bold. If sheets are updated or revised a new date must be applied to the sheet. For example, the civil utility plans might be labeled: C2.0 Utilities 05-01-2017. This is important as this will also be the digital file name. See naming protocol below. 10. The use of a title sheet for all general information, project team, data, calculations (parking, parkland, open spaces, and table of contents is required. The title must appear in bold letters across the top of the cover sheet. If the site plan includes a conditional use include the words “and Conditional Use.” 11. If the project is part of an existing development the name of the existing development must appear in the title. For example, “Arbys at Bozeman Gateway” or “Building K at the Cannery District.” 12. The vicinity map with zoning must be on the cover page. 13. A table of contents or plan schedule for all sheets in the plan set must be included on the title sheet with a date for each sheet. If revisions are required, the title sheet must be updated to reflect all revised sheets with a new date. 14. Fully annotated plans and drawings are more understandable, e.g. if a line is shown on the plan between two properties or other conditions such as easements, it must be annotated by adding descriptors to clarify the site condition. Plans and Specifications PLS Page 2 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None. 15. A legend for all line types and symbols must be included on plan sets. 16. The plan sheets must not be overly congested with line types. When in doubt produce an extra sheet that separates the information. For example, produce a separate utility and easement sheet for utilities to clarify that information if the overall site plan contains too many lines and line types. 17. In general, the plan sheets are where most project information must be included. Separate cut sheets, exhibits, and summary tables on 8 1/2” by 11” will not be accepted. The only exception is for project narratives, property owners’ association documents, SID documents, easements, agreements, maintenance plans, water rights information, payback district information, contracts, deeds, weed plans, and standalone technical reports such as traffic studies, wetland reports, sewer and water reports, environmental, etc. PARKLAND TRACKING REQUIREMENTS 1. Parkland tracking on plans is required in 38.27.020BMC. This only applies to projects with residential development or residential units. 2. Documentation of compliance with the parkland dedication requirements of Section 38.27.020, UDC must be provided with the final plat, preliminary plat layout (park site plan) or individual development site plan (if previously subdivided). A parkland dedication tracking table showing the parkland requirements for the overall subdivision and the method of meeting the parkland dedication shall be included on the site plan. The table shall explicitly state how much parkland acreage, cash-in-lieu, or value of improvements-in-lieu was approved and allocated, as well as what is being proposed, for each lot of the subdivision or site development. 3. If residential development, each phase, lot or individual site plan of the development must have a copy of the parkland dedication tracking table provided below included on the site plan. Contact the Parks Department if you have questions on how to fill out the table. 4. If improvements in lieu are proposed for an existing park within the subdivision, a detailed park improvement site plan, including layout and product manufacturer cut sheets with a cost estimate for all improvements must be provided for Parks Department review. The Parks Department will provide a comparison chart indicating the value of code-required basic improvements versus proposed improvements. 5. Unless previously provided, provide the appropriate waiver of protest for future park maintenance district statement on the plat or site plan. Contact the Parks Department if you are uncertain if a waiver has been granted. 6. The parkland dedication tracking table that must be included on plans is as follows. If you have questions on how to fill out this table contact the Parks Department. PUBLIC PARK LAND DEDICATION TRACKING TABLE CURRENT PREVIOUS PHASES SUBDIVISION NAME: _______________________ PROJECT NAME: ___________________________ TOTAL FOR SUBDIVISION THIS PROPOSAL PHASE / LOT ___________ PARK DED AC CIL &/OR IIL PHASE / LOT __________ PARK DED AC, CIL &/OR IIL PHASE/LOT* __________ PARK DED AC CIL &/OR IIL NUMBER OF RES. UNITS PER PHASE / LOT / SITE PLAN: ACREAGE PARK LAND AND / OR CIL REQUIRED: ** VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU PROPOSED: $___________________ VS. VALUE OF CODE-REQD. BASIC PARK IMPROVEMENTS: $___________________ (ATTACH COMPARISON CHART SPREADSHEET) ACREAGE PARK LAND PREVIOUSLY DEEDED TO COB: Plans and Specifications PLS Page 3 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None. COLOR AND MATERIAL PALETTE 1. Color and material palettes are required for all new buildings and structures. A color and material palette must include all the proposed exterior building materials for all structures and site details. 2. The exterior building materials must include all siding, trim, roofing, windows, stairways, doors, balconies, railings windows, storefront, glass/glazing, walls, mechanical screening, trash enclosures, accessory equipment enclosures (generator, etc.), awnings and other architectural elements. 3. For smaller less complex projects that are using readily known building materials, a color and material palette may be presented in color on an 11” x 17” sheet that includes a color picture of the material and the specification. Each material must be keyed to the building elevations. 4. For larger, more complex projects the palette must be presented on a physical board with samples of the proposed building materials in their proposed color. Each sample must have a specification and be keyed to the building elevations. 5. Color perspectives that depict the building accurately and with the proposed building materials are encouraged to be submitted with each application. The color perspective does not satisfy the color and materials palette requirement. APPLICATION SETS 1. Application sets are independent sets of information that include one copy of all information submitted with the application. 2. Application sets that include legal documents, letters, technical reports, narratives, studies and other documentation in addition to plan sheets must include a copy of each item in each application set. All documentation of this type must have a visible and clear date of preparation on the front sheet of the document or study. 3. Three total sets of all information are required with most applications. Two of the sets must include full size plans, one set may include 11” x 17” plans. Full size plan set sizes must not exceed 24” x 36.” 4. Application sets must be bound and two hole punched at the top of the page. Three ring binders with three hole punch are not accepted. 5. If 11” x 17” plans are included, do not trifold them. Fold them in half, then fold the right half back on itself at a 45 degree angle in order to accommodate a two hole punch at the top. Plans must be accessible to be unfolded when bound in a two hole file. 6. Application sets should be organized and collated in the following general order 1) cover sheet/routing sheet 2) applications and checklists; 3) narratives/responses/photographs; 4) legal docs: CC&R’s, easements, deeds, agreements, CIL water rights, etc.; 5) plans; 6) appendices: standalone technical reports 7. Project narratives and responses must not be overwritten or provided on the application checklists. If responding to a checklist item provide a response on a separate document. 8. Plans must be grouped by discipline: Civil, Architectural, Landscape and Electrical/Lighting. 9. All plans must be stapled together and folded to a final size of 8 ½” x 11” or 8 ½” x 14”.If the plan set is large the plans must be stapled into sets by discipline and folded independently. State law requires us to keep a full size paper copy of all plans in our files. The plan sets must be folded so that they can be filed in the project archives. ACREAGE PARK LAND YET TO BE CONVEYED: PARK MASTER PLAN APPROVAL DATE: ______________ * INDICATE ADDITIONAL PHASES AS APPLICABLE **SHOW ACTUAL CALCULATIONS Plans and Specifications PLS Page 4 of 4 Revision Date 5-1-17 Required Forms: Applies to all applications Other Forms: None. DIGITAL COPIES AND NAMING PROTOCOL The city requires digital copies of all planning applications in order to produce cost savings, eliminate paper waste and enhance the flow of information between the city, external agencies, neighborhoods and the applicant. The digital copy must include a copy of all documents and plan sheets submitted as part of the application. The following requirements apply to digital copies. 1. Two digital copies are required with most applications. The copies may be on CD or on a USB drive. 2. The digital copies must be separated into three categories: Documents, Plans and Appendices. 3. Naming protocol. Each individual document or plan sheet must have a proper name and date. The name should be easily understandable. Groups of plan sheets or document sets with multiple types of documents will not be accepted. Plan sheets must include the sheet number. For example a document might be labeled “A1 Development Review application 05-01-2017” or “City Parkland Deed 05-01-17.” Plan sheets are required to be listed individually. For example a plan sheet might be labeled “A300 Floor Plan level 1 and 2 05-01-2017” or “PM Photometric Plan 05-01-17.” Do not include other tab, section or other references in the digital file names. 4. No individual files will be accepted that are larger than 5 mb. Files that are larger must be broken down into smaller files. 5. Label all CD’s with the project name and date. Attach a small tag to all USB drive with the project name and date. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net Nelson Road – Annexation and Initial Zoning 1 Overview The subject property contains a total of 69.47 acres and is generally located at the northwest corner of Nelson Road and the I-90 Frontage Road. This application proposes to annex and zone the following property: A TOPOGRAPHIC, AS-BUILT AND RETRACEMENT SURVEY OF TRACT 1C AND TRACT 1D OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 1372B, LOCATED IN THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. And The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE¼NE¼) and the East Half of the East Half of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter (E½E½W½NE¼) of Section Twenty-seven (27), Township One (1) South, Range Five (5) East, M.P.M This application proposes to zone the above listed properties, all 69.47 acres, as M-1, Light Manufacturing. This request is in conjunction with a Grown Policy Map Amendment (the amendment will change the property from Present Rural to Industrial). Please refer to the attached exhibits. Support for the annexation and zoning of this property is based on three main principles: • The adjacent and nearby heavy transportation networks (including I-90 Frontage Road and Nelson Road – future collector) are appropriate and desirable to industrial uses. • The need for more M-1, Light Manufacturing, zoning districts within the City Limits. Changing the zoning will promote positive economic development within the City limits. • Municipal services are either near (8” city water main to the MDT facility across Nelson Road) or soon to be near (Davis Lane Lift Station – City of Bozeman CIP WWIF24 project) the property boundaries. Annexation Checklist: 3. Property is currently in agriculture – Hay / Grain crops 4. There is one existing residential unit on Tract 1D 5. No commercial structures on the property 6. One residential unit – 2.5 people / unit 7. Assessed value: Tract 1C -Tax year 2017 – Total Value $31,698 Tract 1D – Tax year 2017 – Total Value $143,514 8. Existing Site Facilities – well, dry utilities Nelson Road – Annexation and Initial Zoning 2 Responses to Zoning Provision Criteria Note: The following Applicant responses to the 11 zoning review criteria are being provided as part of the overall application for the above noted Zone Map Amendment Request. The criteria will be listed verbatim, in italics font, from the recently amended City of Bozeman’s Amendment Checklist followed by the Applicant’s response. Zoning Provision Criteria 1. Is the new zoning designated in accordance with the comprehensive plan? Response: YES. The proposed M-1 zoning designation will be consistent with the Bozeman Community Plan pending approval of the concurrent Growth Policy Map Amendment. The current Bozeman Community Plan designation for the entire property is Present Rural. The Bozeman Community Plan says (Chapter 3.4, Land Use Category Descriptions, Present Rural, page 3-14): “In order to prevent such conflicts and problems in the future, use of land in the Present Rural land use designation should follow one of three paths (only path one is shown below), which are listed in order of the City’s preference: 1) Remain as currently utilized, until annexed and municipal services are available to support a Residential or other urban land use category development as described in this plan. The change in designation will require an amendment to the growth policy” The described property is currently contiguous to City limits and municipal services are either near (8” city water main to the MDT facility across Nelson Road) or soon to be near (Davis Lane Lift Station – City of Bozeman CIP WWIF24 project) the property boundaries. The property is within the City of Bozeman Water and Sewer facility plan boundaries. 2. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? Response: YES. The subject property is contiguous to property that is within the jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman Fire and Police Departments and within the service area of American Medical Response ambulances. The proposed zoning designation modification is consistent with those adjacent to the subject property (mini storage to the north and MDT to the east) and site development in compliance with the UDC and subsequent building development in compliance with building codes will help secure safety from fire and other dangers. 3. Will the new zoning promote public health, safety and general welfare? Nelson Road – Annexation and Initial Zoning 3 Response: YES. The proposed zoning designation modification is compatible with those adjacent to the subject property including the mini storage to the north and MDT to the east. Future site development that is in compliance with the UDC and future building construction that is in compliance with the building code will help assure general health and welfare. The creation of an industrial park (M-1 zoning) will promote positive economic development within the Bozeman City limits. 4. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? Response: YES. Future site development proposals on the subject property will be required to demonstrate the adequate provision of public services that will be necessary to offset any particular impacts that may be identified throughout the review process. 5. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? Response: YES. The proposed zoning designation is compatible with those adjacent to the subject property and site development in compliance with the UDC will help assure the provision of adequate light and air. 6. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorized and non- motorized transportation systems? Response: YES. The street and trail networks that will occur with site development and/or future subdivision in the area will have a positive effect on the City’s transportation systems. The property in this particular area has an evolving land use pattern that reflects the implementation of the various long range planning documents that are intended to guide land use decisions within the City. Included in those documents is the Bozeman Area Transportation Plan (2007 Update), which classifies the adjacent roadways currently abutting the subject property as a Minor Arterial (Frontage Road) and a Collector (Nelson Road). The new zoning designation will not create any more traffic than has been anticipated and can be accommodated by these roadways and future site development that complies with the Unified Development Code (UDC). 7. Does the new zoning promote compatible Urban Growth? Response: YES. The subject property is located within the limits of the Bozeman Community Plan along a minor arterial road and a future collector road and adjacent to land zoned PLI (Public Lands and Institutions District). City water and sewer services are either existing or being planned for this area. As a result, land uses that are of an industrial nature are a sensible and compatible extension of the City’s ongoing urban growth patterns for this area. Nelson Road – Annexation and Initial Zoning 4 8. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? Response: YES. The zoning designation proposed with this request has been oriented in a manner that provides for a sensible transition of uses in an effort to better accommodate the current land use patterns. Future site development that complies with the standards required within each particular zoning district would be consistent with the surrounding development types thereby preserving the character of the adjacent and current nearby uses. 9. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? Response: YES. The property’s access to a major transportation corridor makes it desirable for Industrial lot frontage. Homes along this section of the Frontage Road and in such proximity to I-90, the railroad, and the Wastewater Treatment Plant are not ideal places to live. A well-designed industrial center can provide a buffer and transition to future homes to the north and east. The zoning designation proposed with this request is consistent with the current land use patterns in the surrounding area. 10. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? Response. YES. Although much of the surrounding area has not yet been developed, all future site development that complies with the requirements outlined in the UDC, the design standards required by the City’s engineering design code and future covenants will all help ensure consistency with the existing and planned surrounding development types which will, in turn, aid in the conservation and increase in property values. 11. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? Response: YES. The zoning designation change included as part of this request is intended to address an emerging and logical market trend that would indicate a need for the addition of an industrial park within the City. The creation of an industrial park (M-1 zoning) will promote positive economic development within the Bozeman City limits. As referenced throughout this application, the facilities necessary to accommodate the change requested are more than adequate and, especially in the case of transportation facilities, the types of uses that would be allowed within the amended district will be more appropriate. N:\2286\006\Design Docs\Agency Submittal\ZMA & Annexation\ZMA.docx ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT/////////////////////////////////////////////BT B T B T BT B T B T BT B T BT B T B T BTPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETRO////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// /// //////OHPO H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// ///BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTN G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G NG N G N G NG N G N G N G N G N G NG20'////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBT/////////////////////////////////////////////BT B T B T BT B T B T BT B T BT B T B T BTPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETROPETRO////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// /// //////OHPO H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// ///BTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTBTN G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G N G NG N G N G NG N G N G N G N G N G NG 60'60'40' 40'20'60'60'N89°52'46"W 1762.09'N89°52'46"W 255.67'S1°48'08"W 255.67'S1°48'08"W 457.16'S5 2 ° 1 8 ' 4 3 " E 1 1 3 3 . 9 7 ' S 5 2 ° 1 8 ' 4 3 " E 4 7 9 . 5 2 ' N69° 3 1 ' 5 6 " W 1 6 6 . 9 5 ' N 5 2 ° 1 8 ' 3 1 " W 98 . 4 9 'N15°43'59"W81.76'N37°41'29"E 0.70' S5 2 ° 1 8 ' 4 3 " E 5 8 1 . 2 5 'N2°00'58"E 1412.22'N1°53'26"E 836.91'N89°52'46"W 30.02' 60'N1°48'08"E 117.25'N 5 2 ° 1 8 ' 2 3 " W 2 5 1 8 . 3 1 'N1°53'26"E 117.41'N89°52'46"W 20.02' N87°57'47"W 19.53'95'95'95' . ©COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2018 PLOTTED DATE: Jan/31/2018 PLOTTED BY: cole norsworthy DRAWING NAME: N:\2286\007\ACAD\Concept\2286.006-BARNARD-Annexation Map.dwg 1/4 SEC.SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE PROJ. #:SHEET OF PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANA COUNTY, MONTANADATE: SCALE: CLIENT: FIELD WORK: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: engineers surveyors planners scientists MorrisonMaierle 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 11BARNARD GALLATIN 2286.007 1"=100' 01/22/2018 MEE CHN JW & CN 5E 1S 22SE PARK PLACE - ZONING MAP F R O N T A G E R O A D NELSON ROADWIND MILL 24" CORRUGATED METAL CULVERT 21' DIAMETER GRAIN STORAGE BIN YELLOWSTONE PIPELINE COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 113, PAGE 236 YELLOWSTONE PIPELINE COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 113, PAGE 236 MONTANA POWER COMPANY TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER BOOK 122, PAGE 192 SEE NOTE 5 AND 17 IN SCHEDULE B 40' COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT ROAD PETITION NO. 259 COUNTY ROAD MAP TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SHEET No. 4 FIELD BOOK 162, PAGE 41 60' COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT COUNTY ROAD MAP TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SHEET No. 4 AND 5 FIELD BOOK 162, PAGE 41 60' RIGHT OF WAY FOR ACCESS AND UTILITIES PER CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 1372B 60' RIGHT OF WAY FOR ACCESS AND UTILITIES PER CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY No. 1372B 40' COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT ROAD PETITION NO. 259 COUNTY ROAD MAP TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SHEET No. 4 FIELD BOOK 162, PAGE 41 MONTANA POWER COMPANY GAS PIPE LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT PER FILM 52, PAGE 2286 60' COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT COUNTY ROAD MAP TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SHEET No. 4 AND 5 FIELD BOOK 162, PAGE 41 PARC E L 1 & 2 & T R A C T C COS 2 5 8 1 TRAC T 2 COS 2 1 8 8 C TRAC T 1 A COS 1 3 7 2 A TRAC T M D T COS 4 7 3 F S1/2S W 1 / 4 S23 TRAC T 2 COS 2 2 1 7 A TRAC T C O B COS 4 7 3 F PARCEL I: TRACT 1D 1.500 ACRES PARCEL II: TRACT 1C 57.217 ACRES VALLEY CENTERSPUR ROAD100 Parcel I: Tract 1D of Certificate of Survey No. 1372 B, located in the SE ¼ of Section 22, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, Gallatin County, Montana. The area of the above described tract of land is 1.500 acres, more or less. Parcel II: Tract 1C of Certificate of Survey No. 1372 B, located in the SE ¼ of Section 22, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, Gallatin County, Montana. The area of the above described tract of land is 57.217 acres, more or less. Parcel III: A tract of land located in the NE ¼ NE ¼ of Section 27, Township 1 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Section 27, also being the Southeast Corner of Tract 1C of Certificate of Survey No. 1372 B, the Point of Beginning; thence S.1°53'26”W. along the East line of Section 27 a distance of 836.91 feet to the Northeast Right-of-Way line of the Montana Rail Link Railroad; thence N.52°18'43”W. along said Railroad Right-of-Way a distance of 581.25 feet to the Right-of-Way of the Montana Department of Transportation Bargain and Sale Deed Document No. 2170717; thence N.37°41'29”E. along said Right-of-Way a distance of 0.70 feet; thence N.15°43'59”W. a distance of 81.76 feet; thence N.52°18'31”W. a distance of 98.49 feet; thence N.69°31'56”W. a distance of 166.95 feet to the Northeast Right-of-Way line of the Montana Rail Link Railroad; thence N.52°18'43”W. along said Railroad Right-of-Way a distance of 479.52 feet to the south line of Tract 1C of Certificate of Survey No. 1372 B; thence S.89°29'40”E. along said south line a distance of 1123.19 feet to the Point of Beginning. The area of the above described tract of land is 10.546 acres, more or less. Total acreage of the annexation is 69.263 acres or 3,017,096 square feet more or less. JANUARY 30, 2018 CREEK PARCEL III: NE1/4NE1/4 S27, LESS RR ROW AND HIGHWAY ROW 10.546 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION M1 ZO N I N G BOZE M A N C O M M U N I T Y PLAN F U T U R E L A N D U S E: PRES E N T R U R A L GALL A TI N C O U N T Y BOZE M A N AREA P L A N NI N G JUSRI S DI C TI O N BOZE M A N COM M U NI T Y P L A N FUTU R E L A N D U S E: PRES E N T R U R A L BOZE M A N COM M U N I T Y P L A N FUTU R E L A N D U S E: PRES E N T R U R A L BOZE M A N COM M U N I T Y P L A N FUTU R E L A N D U S E: PUBLI C I N S T I T U T I O N S 60' COUNTY ROAD EASEMENT COUNTY ROAD MAP TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SHEET No. 4 AND 5 FIELD BOOK 162, PAGE 41 PROPOSED M-1 ZONING AREA SUMMARY PARCEL I: PARCEL II: PARCEL III: RIGHT-OF-WAY 1.500 acres (65,340) Sq. Ft. 52.217 acres (2,274,572) Sq. Ft. 10.546 acres (677,184) Sq. Ft. 6.379 acres (277,869) Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED ZONING AREA:70.642 acres (3,294,965) Sq. Ft. EXISTING ZONING: SEE EXHIBIT THIS PAGE PROPOSED ZONING: M-1 GALLATIN COUNTY/BOZEMAN AREA ZONING DISTRICT AS-AGRICUTURAL SUBURBAN GALLATIN COUNTY-BOZEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN SUBJECT ZONING BOUNDARY 400 COUNTY ZONING/ NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN EXHIBIT LEGEND FOUND PUBLIC LAND SURVEY SYSTEM SECTION MARKED, "STATE OF MT, DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, 5606S 1989". EDGE OF ASPHALT//////EDGE OF GRAVEL BOTTOM EDGE OF DITCH CENTERLINE OF ROAD OVERHEAD POWER LINE BURIED TELEPHONE LINE BURIED NATURAL GAS LINE SIGN SEPTIC SYSTEM MANHOLE LIGHT POLE GUY ANCHOR POWER POLE WATER WELL ELECTRICAL METER WIRE FENCE BURIED PETROLEUM PIPELINE CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PLI Limit of Bozeman Zoning FUTURE M-1 I-90 Frontage Road Nelson RoadM-2 AGRICULTURE SUBURBAN Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA,USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community PROJECT NO.N:\2286.007 FIG. 1NELSON ROAD PROPERTY ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION N:\2286\007\GIS\Zoning Amendment Map.mxd DRAWN BY: NPE CHK'D BY: MEE APPR. BY: MEE DATE: 01/31/2018 BOZEMAN MONTANA 2880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702 EngineersSurveyorsScientistsPlanners COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2018 ±1 inch = 600 feet Legend Project AreaBozeman Zoning DistrictsZONING M-2 PLIGallatin County Zoning Districts AGRICULTURE SUBURBAN