HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-05-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A3. Amendment 2 to PSA with Allied Engineering for Additional FundingCommission Memorandum
REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commission
FROM: Brian Heaston, Project Engineer
Craig Woolard, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Allied Engineering
authorizing additional funding to complete the downtown area flood mapping refinement; and
also authorizing the design and permitting of streambank stabilization measures for Bozeman
Creek at the City Hall property.
MEETING DATE: March 5, 2018
AGENDA ITEM TYPE: Action
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to adopt Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services
Agreement with Allied Engineering and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment
on behalf of the City to provide $59,987 to complete the downtown area flood mapping
refinement, and to provide $8,489 for the design and permitting of streambank stabilization
measures for Bozeman Creek at the City Hall property.
BACKGROUND: The Commission approved the original Professional Services Agreement
(PSA) with Allied Engineering on May 9, 2016 which placed Allied Engineering under contract
to evaluate FEMA’s draft Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and draft floodplain maps for the
Bozeman Creek and Tributaries project. A report was delivered by Allied on July 29, 2016
finding that FEMA’s draft study and flood hazard mapping could be improved upon, particularly
in the downtown area, by utilizing a more sophisticated 2D flood modeling approach to more
accurately simulate flood risk.
The Commission approved Amendment No. 1 to the original PSA on November 28, 2016 at a
total cost of $86,674. Amendment No. 1 primarily tasked Allied with refining the downtown
floodplain mapping between Olive Street and Lamme Street by utilizing a 2D modeling method.
Amendment 1 also included secondary tasks to evaluate Mill Ditch for flood hazard mitigation
potential, as well as prepare a Letter of Map Revision for the Bond Street bridge.
As was noted by Staff at the time Amendment No. 1 was approved, utilization of 2D flood
modeling for purposes of developing flood hazard maps is a relatively new concept for FEMA.
The agency has not published formal technical guidance and specifications for 2D model
development. Notwithstanding the lack of formal agency process, FEMA staff and its
contractors agreed to work with the City and its consultant in a good faith effort to find a way to
159
appropriately utilize the 2D model to refine the downtown area flood hazard mapping.
Substantial time was expended working through a host of technical details in an effort to arrive at
a mapping approach FEMA would ultimately support. The level of effort was significantly
greater than initially anticipated when Amendment 1 was scoped; thus, additional funding is
necessary to complete the refinement project. However, and this should not be not be
understated, a critical milestone has been reached, as the agency has recently confirmed that it
will allow the mapping approach that the City has proposed, which does rely heavily on the 2D
model.
Amendment No. 2 to the PSA with Allied is attached to this memo and contains Attachments A
and Attachment B. Attachment B provides additional funding necessary to complete the flood
hazard mapping refinement. The refinement will produce flood hazard mapping for Bozeman
Creek from Olive Street all the way down to the confluence with the East Gallatin River. The
cost of the Attachment B is $59,987. Attachment A includes new scope and fee to design and
permit streambank stabilization measures for Bozeman Creek at the City Hall property to protect
the building structure and pedestrian bridge foundations. The streambank has eroded and
exposed the pedestrian bridge abutments. Further downstream, adjacent to the City Hall building
itself, bank erosion is nearing a portion of the building foundation. Bank stabilization is required
to protect these structures from being compromised structurally during annual peak flow events.
FISCAL EFFECTS: A public hearing to adopt Commission Resolution No. 4887 precedes the
Commission’s action on this PSA amendment. If the resolution is approved, $50,000 will be
added to the FY18 Downtown TIF budget to fund Attachment B to Amendment No. 2. The
Downtown Business Improvement District has pledged $10,000 from its cash reserve account
towards Attachment B. Respective letters from the downtown TIF and BID committing support
for these contributions are attached. The TIF and BID contributions total $60,000, which is
sufficient to cover the $59,987 cost.
Attachment A to Amendment No. 2 costs $8,489 and will be funded by FY18 General Fund CIP
project GF274: City Hall – Bozeman Creek Bridge Improvements. CIP funding is $25,000 and
is included in the FY18 Facilities Department budget for City Hall. There is sufficient funding
to cover the $8,489 design and permitting cost, leaving a remainder of $16,511 for construction.
ALTERNATIVES: As suggested by the Commission
ATTACHMENTS: Amendment No. 2 to Allied PSA (includes Attachment A & Attachment B)
Funding commitment letters from Downtown BID and Downtown TIF
Report compiled on: February 21, 2018
160
161
162
February 12, 2018
Brian Heaston
Project Engineer
City of Bozeman Engineering Division
bheaston@bozeman.net
RE: Bozeman Creek and Tributaries Floodplain Mapping Project – Select Review and
Evaluation – Attachment A of PSA Amendment #2 for City Hall Bank Stabilization
Dear Brian:
Attached is our proposed scope of work and budget to assist the City of Bozeman with design
and permitting for bank stabilization at the City Hall pedestrian bridge and an area of the west
bank adjacent to the building corner downstream of the bridge. The attached scope of work
outlines the tasks, budget, and schedule for the work. An itemized budget showing a breakdown
of the labor and expenses is also attached.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
Paul Sanford, PE
Principal Civil Engineer
enc: Attachment A
Scope of Work
Itemized Budget
163
Attachment A - Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 1
BOZEMAN CREEK AT CITY HALL
BANK STABILIZATION
WORK SCOPE, BUDGET, AND SCHEDULE
BACKGROUND
The City Hall pedestrian bridge is located on Bozeman Creek approximately 135 feet upstream of East
Lamme Street. The banks around the City Hall pedestrian bridge are eroding. The project is included in
the 2018–2022 Capital Improvements Program (project GF274). It appears that the erosion is currently
impacting the stability of the adjacent sidewalk as well as exposing dry utilities adjacent to the bridge.
Continued erosion could impact the stability of the abutments. Refer to attached photos 1 through 4
showing the existing condition at each corner of the bridge. There is also an area on the left (west) bank
between the pedestrian bridge and East Lamme Street where there is little bank mass separating the creek
from the building corner (refer to attached photo 5).
The preliminary 2015 floodplain study (and one-dimensional HEC-RAS computer model) developed by
Michael Baker International for the on-going Bozeman Creek & Tributaries Floodplain Study, Phase 2
will be used as the basis for floodplain permitting. The project site falls within the regulatory floodway
delineated by this study. Therefore, a “no-rise” analysis is required to show that the proposed project will
not increase the Base Flood Elevations (commonly referred to as the 100-year water surface elevations).
The objectives of the project include assisting with the design and permitting phase as follows:
1. Design treatments to stabilize the banks adjacent to the bridge and the left bank area downstream
of the bridge adjacent to the building corner;
2. Complete a Joint Permit Application for work in Montana streams; and
3. Develop permit-level plans and specifications to include with the Joint Application Permit
submittal.
The project goal is to construct the stabilization work in 2018. Construction will be undertaken by the
City of Bozeman Street Department or by a contractor.
WORK SCOPE
1 Project Management
Coordinate with Client
Provide coordination and communication with the Client.
Internal Project Management
Manage the project by providing direction and review. Manage the budget and schedule. Prepare
invoices.
164
Attachment A - Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 2
2 Data Collection
Obtain and Review Available Documents and Data
Gather and evaluate relevant and available project data including: 2013 LiDAR data, previous studies,
bridge plans, and building plans. Gather relevant data from past AESI projects in this location. This data
will include: hydraulic models, reports, and survey data (2012 cross-section and bridge survey).
Site Visit
Call in a utility locate request prior to the site visit. Project Manager and Design Engineer perform a site
visit to evaluate the existing conditions. Environmental Specialist perform a site visit to evaluate
wetlands, document vegetation, and dig test hole(s) to evaluate soil and hydrology criteria. It is assumed
that the US Army Corp of Engineers will not require a formal wetland delineation. This is consistent with
our experience on the bank stabilization on Bozeman Creek just downstream of East Babcock Street
which was completed in 2015. Document the observed field conditions with notes and ground
photographs.
Structural Engineer sub-consultant (Robert Peccia & Associates) perform a site visit to evaluate the
integrity of the bridge structure. The site visit will be a visual inspection only (i.e. does not include
destructive investigation or material testing). Follow up the site visit with a brief email summary of
observations. It is assumed that no detailed structural analysis or design will be conducted. Prior to the
site visit, review the 1980 bridge plan sheet provided by the City.
Develop Base Map
Create a base map in AutoCAD Civil 3D or ArcMap from the 2013 LiDAR data and the 2012 cross-
section data obtained by AESI. The base map will be used for concept analysis and concept design.
3 Design
Analysis
It is anticipated that the bank stabilization design geometry will match the existing or pre-erosion bank
geometry. Thus, the scope of work does not include evaluation of “no-rise” with a detailed hydraulic
model. Rather, an evaluation of geometry is anticipated for the analysis.
Design Bank Stabilization
Develop a design to stabilize the streambank in the immediate vicinity of the bridge and the area
downstream of the bridge on the left bank. One potential option for the work at the bridge includes
stacked boulders at each corner of the bridge.
4 Permitting Assistance
Complete a Joint Permit Application
Complete a Joint Application form for proposed work in Montana streams, floodplains and wetlands.
Complete a draft version for Client review then a final version for submittal to the review agencies.
Develop Supporting Plans and Details
Develop supporting plans and specifications to accompany the Joint Application. Develop the plans and
specifications to a permitting completion level (i.e. not to a construction documents level).
Client Responsibilities
1. Provide relevant building plans showing the depth and configuration of the footings in the area of
165
Attachment A - Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 3
interest adjacent to the west bank of the creek;
2. Attend permitting meetings;
3. Communicate with utility companies to resolve any potential utility conflicts; and
4. Identify property boundaries and handle any boundary related issues.
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be submitted to the Client in completion of this scope of work:
1. Brief email summary of observations from Structural Engineer site visit.
2. Draft Joint Permit Application: an electronic version in .pdf format.
3. Final Joint Permit Application: an electronic version in .pdf format and a hard copy for the Gallatin
Conservation District.
BUDGET
The fixed fee budget to undertake the work scope is $8,489. A table showing a breakdown of the labor
and expenses is attached.
Invoicing will be based on percent complete and will utilize the following task: Design & Permitting.
SCHEDULE
Assuming authorization to proceed is granted by April 13, 2018, the following schedule is anticipated:
Draft Joint Permit Application - Complete by June 2018; and
Final Joint Permit Application - Complete by July 2018.
ATTACHMENTS
Photos of Site – attached
Itemized Budget
166
Photo 1. September 7, 2017. SW corner of City Hall
Pedestrian Bridge. Photo 2. September 7, 2017. SE corner of City Hall
Pedestrian Bridge.
Photo 3. September 7, 2017. NW corner of City Hall
Pedestrian Bridge. Photo 4. September 7, 2017. NE corner of
City Hall Pedestrian Bridge.
167
Photo 5. February 1, 2018. Looking downstream from the City Hall
pedestrian bridge at bank area adjacent to the building wall.
168
Task No.
Project Manager
Design Engineer, PE
Structural Engineer, PE
Environmental Specialist
Total Hours
Total Fees
Total Cost
Travel Other
1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Coordination and Communication with Client 1 1 $135 $135
1.2 Internal Project Management 2 2 $270 $25 $295
Subtotal Hours 3000 3
Subtotal Costs $405 $0 $25 $430
2.0 DATA COLLECTION
2.1 Obtain and Review Available Documents and Data 1 3 1 5 $590 $590
2.2 Site Visit (and follow up) 2243 11 $1,344 $1,344
2.3 Develop a Basemap 4 4 $400 $400
Subtotal Hours 3953 20
Subtotal Costs $2,334 $0 $0 $2,334
3.0 DESIGN
3.1 Analysis 2 6 8 $870 $870
3.2 Design Bank Stabilization 8 8 16 $1,880 $1,880
Subtotal Hours 10 14 0 0 24
Subtotal Costs $2,750 $0 $0 $2,750
4.0 PERMITTING ASSISTANCE
4.1 Complete a Joint Permit Application 1 2 10 13 $1,185 $35 $1,220
4.2 Develop Supporting Plans and Details 2 14 1 17 $1,755 $1,755
Subtotal Hours 3 16 0 11 30
Subtotal Costs $2,940 $0 $35 $2,975
Total Hours 77
Total Costs $8,429 $0 $60 $8,489
Updated: February 12, 2018
$405
514
$0 $0
$135.00
$405 $900
$100.00
$774 $255
$154.70 $85.00
$0
BOZEMAN CREEK AT CITY HALL - BANK STABILIZATION
Hours and Fees
Description
Indirect Costs
ATTACHMENT A - ITEMIZED BUDGET
$0 $0
$1,400
19 39
$2,565 $3,900 $774 $1,190
$405 $1,600 $0
$1,350
$935
169
February 12, 2018
Brian Heaston
Project Engineer
City of Bozeman Engineering Division
bheaston@bozeman.net
RE: Bozeman Creek and Tributaries Floodplain Mapping Project – Select Review and
Evaluation – Attachment B of PSA Amendment #2 for Bozeman Creek Mapping
Refinement
Dear Brian:
Attached is our proposed scope of work and budget for Amendment #2 for work associated with
the Bozeman Creek mapping refinement. The attached scope of work outlines the tasks and
budget for the work. An itemized budget showing a breakdown of the labor and expenses is also
attached.
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
Paul Sanford, PE
Principal Civil Engineer
enc: Attachment B
Scope of Work
Itemized Budget
170
Attachment B Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 1
BOZEMAN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES FLOODPLAIN
MAPPING PROJECT – MAPPING REFINEMENT
BACKGROUND
This document outlines the work completed to date and the remaining work for Amendment No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement for Bozeman Creek and Tributaries Floodplain Mapping Project –
Select Review and Evaluation.
The Bozeman Creek and Tributaries Floodplain Mapping Project is being completed by Michael Baker
International for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and is currently undergoing
review and evaluation by the City of Bozeman prior to implementation. The Bozeman Creek and
Tributaries project aims to update floodplain mapping for the area using one-dimensional hydraulic
modeling with the Army Corps of Engineer’s HEC-RAS computer program and updated elevation data.
Large-scale floodplain mapping was last completed for the Bozeman area in 1988 with a digital
conversion of the data occurring in 2011.
The following summarizes the work completed to date for Amendment No. 1:
• Development of a schematic layout for revised hydraulic analysis (2D) and methodologies
memorandum and response to FEMA comments regarding the memorandum;
• Development of a preliminary 2D hydraulic model and memorandum summarizing the model
setup and results and the plan for moving forward with a 1D model informed by the 2D model
(mainly use of flow splits from the 2D model). Response to FEMA comments regarding the
memorandum and follow-up responses;
• Bond Street Bridge Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) submittal to FEMA and follow-up
correspondence and information submittal to FEMA; and
• Mill Ditch Diversion Flood Capacity Analysis memorandum submittal to the City of Bozeman. A
Rough Order of Magnitude cost estimate was also completed for a Mill Ditch flood mitigation
channel.
Remaining work associated with Amendment No. 1 includes:
• Respond to any additional comments that arise from FEMA review of the Bond Street Bridge
LOMR submittal;
• Refine 2D hydraulic model per review from FEMA;
• Develop a 1D hydraulic model that is informed by the 2D hydraulic model specifically with
regard to flow splits;
• Revise portions of the preliminary 2015 1D hydraulic model that are affected by flow changes
from the 2D model;
• Develop a LOMR submittal for the revised 1D hydraulic model; and
• Address any comments that arise from FEMA review of the 1D model LOMR.
The text below outlines the scope of work and budget required to complete the anticipated remaining
work.
171
Attachment B Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK
1 Project Management
Internal Project Management
Manage the project, AESI staff, and sub-consultant.
Administration
Prepare invoices. Assist with preparation of deliverables.
Communication with Stakeholders
Communicate with client, FEMA, DNRC, and other stakeholders.
Conference Calls
Project Manager and Hydraulic Engineer(s) attend up to two conference calls with stakeholders.
2 Bond Street Bridge LOMR
Address FEMA Comments
Address any additional comments received from FEMA. AESI provided a LOMR submittal to FEMA in
February 2017. FEMA requested additional information, and AESI provided the information in August
2017. This work assumes tie-in to the preliminary 2015 1D hydraulic model.
3 Floodplain Modeling (1D Model informed by 2D Model)
3.1 Refine 2D Hydraulic Model
Refine 2D Hydraulic Model Based on Input from FEMA
Work with FEMA to refine the 2D hydraulic model of the downtown area for the one-percent annual
chance peak discharge (commonly referred to as the 100-year flow). Create separate models as necessary
for other recurrent interval flows.
Gather Information from the 2D Hydraulic Model
Run the model with the other recurrent interval flows (10%, 4%, 2%, and 0.2% annual chance peak
discharges) required by FEMA. Tabulate split flows from all the modeled recurrent interval flows.
Document the split flow values in a brief memorandum. Provide the memorandum to stakeholders for
review as part of the 2D Hydraulic Model Submittal. Include past memorandums and comment/response
documents in the submittal.
3.2 Develop 1D Hydraulic Model
Develop 1D Hydraulic Model
Develop a 1D Hydraulic Model for the downtown area using flow splits from the 2D hydraulic model.
Revise the portion of the existing preliminary 2015 1D hydraulic model downstream of the downtown
area as necessary to maintain flow continuity. At this time, the 1D Hydraulic Model is anticipated to
include the following reaches:
• Bozeman Creek: from station 10582 (cross-section Y) to the East Gallatin River
• Rouse Avenue Split (new reach, i.e. not in preliminary 2015 1D model)
• Church Avenue Split
• Wallace Avenue Split
172
Attachment B Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 3
• I-90 Split downstream of station 2782 (cross-section F)
Additional new reaches may be necessary to include in the 1D model but are unknown at this time.
Develop Floodway Model
Develop floodway boundaries for Bozeman Creek and the Rouse Avenue Split. Develop floodway
boundaries for any administrative floodways using the method outlined in Michael Baker’s December
2015 Floodplain Study report.
Develop Flood Zone Boundary and Regulatory Floodway Boundary Delineations
Develop flood zone boundaries to reflect the 1D model.
Develop Report to Document 1D Hydraulic Model and Mapping
Produce a report to document the development of the 1D hydraulic model and mapping. Submit the
report to stakeholders for review.
4 Develop LOMR Submittal Package
Develop Work Map(s)
Develop Work Maps to show the floodplain boundaries and other items specified on the LOMR
application.
Develop Annotated Copies of FIRM, Flood Profiles, and FIS Report Tables
Develop annotated copies of FIRM, flood profiles, and FIS report tables to reflect the revised 1D model.
Based on the November 17, 2016 appeal guidance memorandum provided by FEMA, it is not required
for MT-2/LOMRs to prepare or submit profiles or floodway data tables. However, it is FEMA’s
preference to receive profiles and floodway data tables showing the area of the proposed revisions and
tie-in locations. FEMA format is not required for these products.
Develop LOMR Submittal Package
Develop a cover letter and materials for submittal to FEMA. The materials will include the following:
LOMR application forms, hydraulic model report, hydraulic model, certified topographic work maps,
annotated FIRM information, and miscellaneous additional information.
5 Address FEMA Review Comments
This task provides an estimated scope and budget to address FEMA Review Comments. The task will be
completed on a time and materials basis for a not-to-exceed cost of $25,554. The not-to-exceed budget
was estimated based on the assumed hours shown on the attached itemized budget. Work associated with
this task may include the following: communication with FEMA reviewers; additional minor revisions to
2D hydraulic model; revisions to 1D hydraulic model; revisions to floodplain mapping; and development
of a revised LOMR submittal package.
Assumptions
1. The format of the model, maps, and report will follow the requirements laid out by FEMA for a
LOMR submittal (MT-2 Forms 1, 2, and 3);
2. The 1D model will utilize HEC-RAS 4.1.0 to match the model used for the preliminary 2015 1D
model; and
3. Regulatory floodway revision notification as shown in Section D.3 of the LOMR application
173
Attachment B Allied Engineering Services, Inc.
February 12, 2018 Page 4
MT-2 form 2 will not be required.
4. FEMA has reviewed the 2D model methodologies and model setup and AESI has responded to
review comments. It is our understanding that their concerns/comments have been addressed
related to methodologies and model setup. Therefore, any additional comments resulting from
review of the 2D model are expected to be minor.
Client Responsibilities
1. Provide review fees if required; and
2. Facilitate communication and coordination with review agencies.
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables will be submitted to the Client/Regulatory Agency in completion of this scope
of work. Deliverables will be submitted in an electronic format except where hard copies are required by
reviewing agencies.
1. Bond Street Bridge LOMR - response to FEMA comments;
2. 2D Hydraulic Model Submittal;
3. 1D Model Hydraulic Model and Mapping Report;
4. LOMR Submittal Package for the revised 1D model; and
5. Revised LOMR Submittal Package that addresses FEMA review comments.
BUDGET
The estimated budget to undertake the scope of work is $75,335. A table showing a breakdown of the
labor and expenses is attached. The amount remaining from the Amendment #1 budget is $15,348 which
will also be utilized for the above scope of work. Therefore, the Amendment #2 budget amount is
$59,987.
Invoicing will be based on percent complete and will be billed under the following tasks:
• Amend #2: 2D Hydraulic Model
• Amend #2: Bond Street Bridge LOMR
• Amend #2: 1D Hydraulic Model and LOMR
• Amend #2: Address FEMA Review Comments (billed on a time and materials basis for a not-to-
exceed cost)
174
TASK NO.
Principal Engineer/Project Manager, PE, CFM
Project Manager/Senior Engineer - QC, PE, CFM
Senior Vice President - QC, PE, D.WRE
Hydraulic Engineer, PE, CFM
Administration
TOTAL HOURS
TOTAL COST
Travel Other
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Internal Project Management 16 16 $2,160 $2,160
Administration 3 3 $165 $165
Communication with Stakeholders 6 6 $810 $810
Conference Calls (2 assumed) 4 2 2 2 10 $1,606 $1,606
Subtotal Hours 26222335
Subtotal Costs $4,741 $0 $0 $4,741
2 BOND STREET BRIDGE LOMR
Address FEMA Comments 2 16 18 $1,870 $1,870
Subtotal Hours 20016018
Subtotal Costs $1,870 $0 $0 $1,870
3 FLOODPLAIN MODELING (1D Model informed by 2D Model)
Task 3.1 - Refine 2D Hydraulic Model
Calibrate/Check 2D Hydraulic Structures 12 10 2 16 40 $5,494 $5,494
Refine 2D Hydraulic Model Based on Input from FEMA 2 2 8 12 $1,422 $1,422
Gather Information from the 2D Hydraulic Model and Develop Split Flow Memo 8 2 32 42 $4,632 $4,632
Task 3.2 - Develop 1D Hydraulic Model
Develop 1D Hydraulic Model 8 6 40 54 $6,136 $6,136
Develop Floodway Model 12 6 40 58 $6,676 $6,676
Revise Flood Zone Boundary and Regulatory Floodway Boundary Delineations 2 24 26 $2,670 $2,670
Develop Report to Document 1D Hydraulic Model and Mapping 8 4 30 42 $4,784 $4,784
Subtotal Hours 52 30 2 190 0 274
Subtotal Costs $31,814 $0 $0 $31,814
4 DEVELOP LOMR SUBMITTAL PACKAGE
Develop Work Maps 10 4 40 54 $6,054 $6,054
Develop Annotated Copies of FIRM, Flood Profiles, and FIS Report Tables 6 24 30 $3,210 $3,210
Develop LOMR Submittal Package 4 2 12 18 $2,092 $2,092
Subtotal Hours 20 6 0 76 0 102
Subtotal Costs $11,356 $0 $0 $11,356
5 ADDRESS FEMA REVIEW COMMENTS
Address FEMA Review Comments 40 40 2 126 208 $25,554 $25,554
Subtotal Hours 40 40 2 126 0 208
Subtotal Costs $25,554 $0 $0 $25,554
TOTAL HOURS 637
TOTAL COSTS $75,335 $0 $0 $75,335
Remaining Budget from Amendment #1: $15,348
Additional Budget for Mapping Refinement: $59,987
$0
$270 $0 $0 $1,600
410
$2,700
$18,900 $13,728 $1,542 $41,000 $165
$5,400 $7,040
140 78 6
$1,056 $0 $7,600
$514 $12,600
$200
$7,020 $5,280 $514
$3,510 $514 $165
$55
TASK DESCRIPTION
February 21, 2018
City of Bozeman
Engineering Department
PO Box 1230
Bozeman MT 59771
**Delivered to Brian Heaston, City of Bozeman Engineering Department**
RE: BID Funding for the second phase of Allied Engineering’s analysis of FEMA’s
Proposed Bozeman Creek Floodplain Map
City of Bozeman:
I am writing on behalf of the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) Board to inform
you they have allocated Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the expanded scope of
floodplain work to be completed by Allied Engineering.
This allocation was made by a unanimous vote of the board at their meeting on Wednesday,
February 21, 2018.
The BID Board recognizes that the regulations stipulated by the proposed FEMA floodplain map
would significantly impact a portion of downtown including the eastern section of the Main Street
Historic District. Not only does the expanded floodplain impact current downtown property
owners, but also has serious implications for future development and therefore the very vitality
of the downtown district.
I will coordinate with the Public Works and Finance Departments to make the pledged
contributions.
Respectfully submitted,
Chris Naumann, Executive Director
176
February 20, 2018
City of Bozeman
Engineering Department
PO Box 1230
Bozeman MT 59771
**Delivered to Brian Heaston, City of Bozeman Engineering Department**
RE: URD Funding for the second phase of Allied Engineering’s analysis of FEMA’s
Proposed Bozeman Creek Floodplain Map
City of Bozeman:
I am writing on behalf of the Downtown Urban Renewal District (URD) Board to inform you they
have allocated Fifty Thousand dollars ($50,000.00) for the expanded scope of floodplain work to
be completed by Allied Engineering.
This allocation was made by a unanimous vote of the board at their meeting on Wednesday,
February 20, 2018.
The URD Board recognizes that the regulations stipulated by the proposed FEMA floodplain
map would significantly impact a portion of downtown including the eastern section of the Main
Street Historic District. Not only does the expanded floodplain impact current downtown property
owners, but also has serious implications for future development and therefore the very vitality
of the downtown district.
I will coordinate with the Public Works and Finance Departments to make the pledged
contributions.
Respectfully submitted,
Chris Naumann, Executive Director
177
INDIRECT COSTS
$352
$0
3
$0
HOURS AND FEES
$0
BOZEMAN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROJECT - MAPPING REFINEMENT
$135
$19,000
ATTACHMENT B - ITEMIZED BUDGET
February 12, 2018
$176 $257 $100
175