Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-11-03 City Commission Packet Materials - 19. Baxter Square PUD and Preliminary Plat og BOZO, CITY OF BOZEMAN V 9x DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT * _ Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406)582-2263 tt'r, 1 oo Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM To: City Commissioners From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner , Date: August 6, 2003 f Subject: Baxter Square PUD #P-03020 and#Z-03132 On July 8, 2003 the Development Review Committee voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Major Subdivision PUD and the Zoning PUD applications with the conditions and code provisions outlined by staff. The Design Review Board also met on July 8, 2003 to review the Zoning PUD but was unable to forward a formal recommendation due to the lack of a quorum. On August 5, 2003 the Planning Board voted 6-0 in favor of the proposed subdivision of 18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two multi-household lots and one existing single household lot. No public comment was received in regards to the proposed subdivision and development of the property. The property owners are requesting concurrent construction of buildings and infrastructure and the relaxation of subdivision and zoning standards, which have been identified in the staff reports. The applicant is working to revise the building footprints prior to City Commission in order to address staff s initial concerns with some of the relaxations. The following are outstanding issues that will need to be resolved: Subdivision: • Based on staff estimations the subdivision is approximately 1 acre short in parkland dedication. The landowners would like to consider cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication. The Recreation & Parks Advisory Board does not support cash-in-lieu with this subdivision due to the density. • Although no written comments have been received some of the neighbors to the east have voiced their concern with the density of the development directly adjacent to their properties. Zoning: • Staff does not support the relaxation of the setbacks that result in insufficient stall length behind the garages. • Staff does not support the reduction is drive aisle width for the apartment buildings. This may be resolved with a reduction in parking that can be permitted if the units are certified affordable for 30 years. planning ® zoning ® subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation housing grant administration • neighborhood coordination Baxter Square Major Subdivision PUD #P-03020 RESOLUTION#P-03020 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TO SUBDIVIDE 18 ACRES INTO 101 TOWNHOUSE LOTS, TWO 8-PLEX LOTS AND ONE SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL LOT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED R-3 (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT) AND IS LOCATED NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE THOMAS DRIVE AND BAXTER LANE INTERSECTION, AND IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE E%2 W%2 SEl/4 SWl/4, SECTION 35, T1S, R5E, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. WHEREAS, t he C ity o f B ozeman h as a dopted a Growth Policy pursuant to 76-1-601, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Planning Board has been created by Resolution of the Bozeman City Commission as provided for in Title 76-1-101, M.C.A.; and WHEREAS, Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741, Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 and Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 represented by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 and JJKG & Associates, 284 Frontier Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718, submitted a Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Application to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot on land legally described as E%2 W%2 SEV4 SWl/a, Section 35, TIS, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana; and WHEREAS, the proposed Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Application has been properly submitted, reviewed, and advertised in accordance with the procedures of Section 16.10 of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Planning Board held a public meeting on Tuesday, August 5, 2003, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for said Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Application; and WHEREAS, several of the Planning Board members had concerns with condition#2 and requested Staff rewrite the condition to give an alternative if a well is not permitted by DNRC; and WHEREAS, several of the Planning Board members had concerns with the proposed private street width, which doesn't allow for boulevards between the curb and sidewalk; and WHEREAS, the applicant's representative was in agreement with the recommended conditions of approval forwarded by the Development Review Committee, except Condition #2, for which she offered a compromise to remove two lots to provide a greater percentage of the parkland dedication, with the remainder being met with cash-in-lieu; and 1 Baxter Square IvW4 Subdiv sion PUD #P-03.02Q WHEREAS, one members of the Planning Board expressed dissatisfaction with the parkland compromise, stating her view that a grater amount of parkland could be dedicated on site; and; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Planning Board reviewed the application against the requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, and found that the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Application would comply with those requirements with the recommended conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, a motion was made to modify Condition #41 to accept the compromise regarding parkland dedication as offered by the applicant with the motion passing by a vote of 5 in favor and 1 opposed; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Bozeman Planning Board, on a vote of 6 to 0, recommends to the Bozeman City Commission that the application to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot on property zoned R-3 (Residential Medium Density District) which is located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection and is legally described as being Amended Plat of Lots 42-1 through 42-8 of the Amended Plat of E%2 WY2 SE'/a SWI/a, Section 35, TIS,RSE, Gallatin County, Montana,be approved with direction to staff to reword condition 2 as discussed {reflected below}, and with the following conditions: Conditions for Approval: 1. All mature vegetation that currently exists within any of the designated park, open space and required setbacks shall be preserved. The Planning Office shall be contacted prior to any mature vegetation being removed. 2. Unless precluded by DNRC, the subdivider shall be responsible for locating and installing an irrigation well strictly for the purposes of irrigating residential yard spaces, boulevard, open space and parkland. If a well is not permitted, irrigation shall be provided by the subdivider using City water, and a new landscape plan, which includes mostly drought-resistant species, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department 3. If the subdivision improvements are to be phased then the open space and parkland improvements shall be completed with the platting of Phase 1. 4. Cash in lieu of water rights for Baxter Square Subdivision, as determined by the Director of Public Service, must be paid at the time the final plat is submitted. 2 Baxter Square Major Subdivision PUD #P-03020 5. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 6. The dedicated parkland shall be identified as "Public Park" on the final plat. 7. The developer shall submit a formal development plan signed by a certified landscape architect for the design of all dedicated parklands within said subdivision for review and approval by the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands, and the City of Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. Per Section 16.08.080 "Final Park Plan", a final park plan shall be submitted to the City of Bozeman for review and approval prior to the installation of any park improvements. The park plan shall address all of the items listed in Section 16.08.050.P for the dedicated parkland, open space areas and trail amenities. 8. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands of a park land implementation plan outlining installation of landscape improvements, trail/bike path improvements, and maintenance and upkeep of the park lands and trails, and that said implementation plan be noted accordingly in the protective covenants and restrictions of the property owner's association documents, for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval. 9. Section 16.14.100 "Park Requirements" allows public parkland to be used for storm water detention or retention ponds but the area shall not count towards the parkland dedication requirement. The parkland estimates shall be recalculated excluding the storm water detention/retention ponds. 10. The public parkland boundaries bordering all private lots shall be delineated at the common private/public corner pins, with flat, flexible fiberglass posts, as prescribed in Section 16.14.100.17.3 of the subdivision regulations prior to filing of the any phase of the major subdivision that contains dedicated public parkland. 11. If the remainder of the parkland is to be provided in the form of cash-in-lieu of parkland donation then the plat shall conform to Section 18.14.100.G "Cash in Lieu of Park Land Donation". U. Section 16.14.110.A "City of Bozeman Rights-of-Way", states that the subdivider shall be responsible for installing sod, boulevard trees and an irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external subdivision streets and adjacent to subdivision parks or other open space areas. 13. Section 16.14.120.13.1 "Transportation Pathways", requires corridors for Class 1 trails to be dedicated to the City. The dedicated trail corridor shall be at least 25 feet in width to ensure adequate room for the construction, maintenance and use of the trail. Transportation trail corridors cannot be used to satisfy parkland dedication requirements. 3 Baxter Square Major Subdivision PUD,, #P=030- Trail specifications shall be submitted to the Planning Department, for review and approval,prior to construction of the trail. 14. The subdivider shall provide irrigation system as-builts, for all irrigation installed in public rights-of-way and/or land used to meet parkland dedication requirements. The as- builts shall include the exact locations and type of lines, including accurate depth, water source, heads, electric valves, quick couplers, drains and control box as outlined in Section 16.08.090 "Irrigation System As-builts". 15. Streetlights shall be provided at all intersections of public and/or private streets and at the intersection of pathways and streets within the proposed subdivision as outlined in Section 16.14.230.D "Subdivision Light Fixture Location and Placement". 16. Per Section 16.14.230.G"Lighting Specifications",the standard height for light standards shall not exceed 24 feet. 17. As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. 18. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. 19. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The final plat application shall include two (2) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double- sided,high density 3%-inch floppy disk or compact disk; and five (5)paper prints. 20. Conditional approval of the preliminary plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by state statute. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. 21. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. 4 Baxter Squarelvlajor Subdivision PUD #P-0302O 22. A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park, or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision (e.g., general lot runoff, public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. The pond in the northwest corner of the subdivision appears to violate this and shall be on open space if it is collecting runoff from subdivisions streets. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot, the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. 23. Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street, prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre- construction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction by the City Commission. If approved for concurrent construction, all parts of section 16.22.030 of the subdivision regulations must be complied with. 24. All infrastructure improvements including 1) water and sewer main extensions, and 2) public streets, curb/gutter, sidewalks fronting parks, open space, rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to o ccupancy o f any s tructure o n the p roperty. U pon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. 5 Baxter Square Major;SubdivsionPTlD" #P-03Q20 25. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as proposed. 26. The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, SCS, Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. 27. Easements f or the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 28. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure. 29. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 30. All street names must be approved by the County Road and Bridge Department and the City Engineering Division to eliminate duplication of names countywide. 31. A one-foot no access strip shall be shown on the final plat along the entire Baxter Lane frontage. The driveway for the existing dwelling shall be relocated to the new street, and the existing driveway obliterated. 32. The existing dwelling must be connected to city sewer and water once the mains have been installed and accepted by the City. 3 3. The 12" water main in B axter Lane s hall b e e xtended t o t he w estern b oundary o f t he subdivision to conform to the City's Water Master Plan. 34. Baxter Lane shall be improved to one half of a minor arterial standard as shown in the Transportation Plan along the frontage of this subdivision. 35.North 27`h/Thomas shall be improved to one half of a collector standard as shown in the Transportation Plan from the east/west street midway through the subdivision to Baxter Lane. 36. The three way stop suggested in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) at the intersection in the center of the subdivision w ill n of b e allowed. T his intersection w ill b e one w ay stop controlled (south leg) until such time as warrants are met for three way stop. If crosswalks are installed at this intersection as suggested in the TIS they must be thermoplastic or preformed plastic, and all required signing must be installed. 6 Baxter Square Major Subdivision PUD #P-03020 37. No Parking signs shall be installed and the curb painted yellow on one side of all of the private streets. The minimum allowed width of these private streets shall be 29' back of curb to back of curb. 38. All of the sidewalks that are substandard (less than 5') in width shall meet ADA requirements for turnouts for passing and width at intersections. 39. All lots shall be served by a sewer main extended from the north near Cattail Drive. No direct connection to the Baxter sewer will be allowed. 40. The c enter e ast/west public street shall be improved to a full city standard local street from the eastern boundary of this subdivision to North 27th/Thomas. 41. An additional 0.8 acres of parkland dedication is required. Lots 54 and 55 shall be removed and added to the land adjacent to the park and the remaining required acreage shall be received as cash-in-lieu as written in Condition#11. 42. The overhead power line across the park shall be relocated or buried to avoid interference with park use and public safety. 43. The north end of the trail, near the stream/ditch, shall be located so as to continue along the stream/ditch when the property to the west is developed. FYI: The covenants must be modified as directed in the D.R.C. comments from July 7, 2003, and the comments by the Planning Board in regard to the lighting standards from August 5, 2003. DATED THIS 5"DAY OF AUGUST 2003 Resolution#P-03020 Andrew C. Epple, Planning Director Ed Musser, President Dept. of Planning & Community Development City of Bozeman Planning Board 7 B. Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Application#P- 03020 (Baxter Square Village). A Major Subdivision PUD Preliminary Plat application, requested by Evert Wierda, Buffalo Land Management, LLC, and Baxter Square Partners, LLC, to subdivide 18 acres into 101 residential townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots, and one single household residential lot. The property is described as E%2 Wl/2 SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana. The property is located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. (Morris/Epple) Planning and Community Development Director Andrew Epple presented the Staff Report, located the proposed and future connecting streets, and noted that Staff supports the project overall. He noted the remaining issue between the applicant and Staff is the shortfall in parkland dedication. He noted the Parks and Recreation Board had recommended that two lots be eliminated and extra land be added to the park to meet the area requirements. He noted the rationale for a PUD is the interior streets are proposed to be less than City standards. Mr. Gallik noted condition#2 has the first reference he's seen on requiring a well for irrigation. Director Epple noted it may be; however, it may become the standard as the use of treated water for irrigation is very expensive and wasteful. President Musser noted that Zoot Enterprises is having problems getting a permit from DNRC for the well. Director Epple noted the applicant would be required to have that permit in hand prior to using any ground water. Mr. Close asked if the property lies near the plume. Director Epple noted the property is generally west of the plume; however, there should be an additional wording to condition#2, such as "Unless precluded by DNRC due to Bozeman solvent site issues" and to Bozeman". Ms. Guggenheim asked if there might be a point where a new landscape plan would be required. The Board concurred that the condition would be rewritten. Mr. Gallik asked how the irrigation lines would be run in relation to the public water supply. Director Epple noted the public supply water lines would connect to City services and both sets of lines would be laid in the ground. Mr. Close asked if conditions#15 and#16 pertaining to lighting are accurate or are they a moving target. Director Epple noted those kinds of issues will be finalized by the time the applicant prepares the final plat. Ms. Pomnichowski asked if Baxter Lane to the centerline has been annexed. Mr. Per Hjalmarsson noted the east half of Baxter Lane on the south end of the property has been annexed, and the west half will be annexed prior to final platting. Ms. Pomnichowski asked when the improvements to Baxter Lane and Thomas Lane would be done. Director Epple noted building permits wouldn't be issued until those improvements are completed. Voss Bowman, applicant,noted the requirement by the Parks and Recreation Board for dedicated parkland rather than cash-in-lieu was a surprise to them as they had met with the Board in January 2003 and negotiated with the Board for the indicated dedicated parkland and the rest as cash-in-lieu. She noted they would like to offer a compromise - give up the two lots on the southwest loop as parkland next to the dedicated trail system. She noted they would then be short only .6 acres with the remainder as cash-in-lieu, which they request the Planning Board to support. She noted the concern about the installation of a well may be moot as there is an City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes—August 5,2003 2 FA h P existing well on the property. She noted a Homeowner's Association would be responsible for maintenance of the common open space. She noted the landscaping plan does contain drought resistant plantings. Mr. Frost asked if the sidewalk would be on the curb. Mr. John Sinrud noted they would be along the private streets with no boulevards on either side of the private streets. He noted the public streets have traditional boulevards and sidewalks, Mr. Frost stated he was concerned that the elderly will be shoveling snow and kids playing right next to the private streets. Mr. Sinrud noted the parks are planned to have full playground facilities. Mr. Frost asked how the children would get to the playground. Ms. Guggenheim asked about the spring at the north end of the property, which is mentioned in the DNRC report. Mr. Bjalmarsson indicated the location of the wetlands and stated they have hired a wetlands expert to prepare a report to be included with the Final Plat. He noted the old railroad bed has depressions on both sides, which have collected water, creating an artificial wetland. Ms. Pomnichowski asked if the 1 00-year floodplain had been delineated along this property. Director Epple noted that this watercourse does not have a FEMA delineated floodplain,but the 50-foot watercourse setback should be adequate to handle any flooding of this stream. President Musser asked if there were plans for a fire station in the northwest area of the City. Director Epple noted,though there have been discussions with some of the property owners/developers in that area,none was planned at this time. President Musser OPENED THE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, and hearing none, CLOSEDTHE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING. Ms. Pomnichowski concurred with Mr. Frost that streets being constructed to less than City Standards were not acceptable. Mr. Frost stated a full width boulevard would not be necessary,just some space between the sidewalk and the streets for the safety of the children. Director Epple described City standard streets, and noted private streets were proposed and would be maintained by the Homeowners Association. Ms. Pomnichowski noted the narrow streets don't allow for parking on both sides, adequate snow removal, or safety of pedestrians. Ms. Guggenheim noted there was no snow storage area between the streets and sidewalk without a boulevard. Mr. Close asked what would be a practical distance between the curb and sidewalk. Director Epple noted three feet is quite narrow for sprinklering five feet is more typical, Mr. Bjalmarsson noted if the street were widened, the cars parked in front of the garages would hang over the sidewalks. Mr. Sinrud indicated the location of the public streets and private streets on a display board. Ms. Guggenheim stated she appreciated the compromise offered to remove two lots to meet a portion of the parkland dedication. She asked if they would consider having the property City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes—August 5,2003 3 line softened along the line to the west of the single household lot and north of the two lots to be converted into parkland. She noted, if that line were curved, more square feet could be added to the two lots for parkland. Ms. Bowman noted, until they received the Staff Report, they didn't know the Parks and Recreation Board had decided not to accept cash-in-lieu for the rest of the parkland requirements. She explained the agreement the owner has with a potential buyer of the single household lot. She asked the Board to recommend approval of the applicant's compromise for the removal of the two lots and the remainder cash-in-lieu. President Musser commended the applicant for creating usable parkland. He noted this project appears to be one that could be allowed to meet the remaining parkland dedication with cash-in-lieu. Ms. Bowman noted that Rose Park and the regional park were both within half a mile of this project. Ms. Guggenheim noted she would be more supportive of the compromise if the shortfall were less than half an acre; however, the shortfall is almost 3/4 of an acre. She noted, because of the proposed density, she would like to see more dedicated parkland. Ms. Bowman noted a Class 1 trail system goes through the property and doesn't count towards the parkland. Mr. Gallik stated he was in favor of the compromise. MOTION: Mr. Close moved, Mr. Gallik seconded, to recommend the modification of #40 to allow the compromise offered by the applicant on the parkland dedication. The motion carried 5-1, with Ms. Guggenheim voting against it. MOTION: Mr. Close moved, Mr. Frost seconded, to recommend approval of application with modification by staff of condition#2, Staff to review the covenants to reflect the lighting standards, and the modifications made to condition#40. The motion carried 6-0 City of Bozeman Planning Board Minutes—August 5,2003 4 PLANKING BOARD STAFF REPORT BAXTER SQUARE MaSUB P.U.D. FILE NO. P-03020 ITEM: MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #P-03020. A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION TO DIVIDE 18 ACRES INTO 101 TOWNHOUSE LOTS, TWO 8-PLEX LOTS AND ONE SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL LOT.THE PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED AS THE EY2 WY, SE'/a SWl/a, SECTION 35, T1S, R5E, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. APPLICANTS: C&H ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. 205 EDELWEISS DRIVE BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59718 JKG & ASSOCIATES 285 FRONTIER DRIVE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 OWNERS, BUFFALO LAND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 12720 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 EVERT WIERDA 13707 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS,L.L.C. 317 SANDERS AVENUE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: BEFORE THE CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2003 AT 7:00 P.M. AND BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMSSION ON MONDAY, AUGUST 11, 2003 AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN,MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS, ASSISTANT PLANNER CITY OF BOZEMAN PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Baxter Square MaSUB P.UD. Staff Report 1 Project Location: The subject property is legally described as the El/2 W%2 SE'/4 SW'/a, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County,Montana, located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. The east half of the property is zoned"R-3"(Residential Medium Density District) and the west half is preliminarily approved for"R-3" zoning. Please refer to the vicinity map provided. B-2 13P R.-1 N R-3 Recommended Conditions of Approval: Based on the following analysis, Planning Staff and the Development Review Committee (DRC) find that the application,with conditions,is in general compliance with the adopted Growth Policy, the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act and the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. The Board mayprovide advice and comments on the following conditions of approval as recommended: Conditions for Approval: Planning: 1. All mature vegetation that currently exists within any of the designated park,open space and required setbacks shall be preserved. The Planning Office shall be contacted prior to any mature vegetation being removed. 2. The subdivider shall be responsible for locating and installing an irrigation well strictly for the purposes of irrigating residential yard spaces,boulevard, open space and parkland. 3. If the subdivision improvements are to be phased then the open space and parkland improvements shall be completed with the platting of Phase 1. Baxter'Square`MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 2 4. Cash in lieu of water rights for Baxter Square Subdivision, as determined by the Director of Public Service, must be paid at the time the final plat is submitted. 5. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 6. The dedicated parkland shall be identified as "Public Park" on the final plat. 7. The developer shall submit a formal development plan signed by a certified landscape architect for the design of all dedicated parklands within said subdivision for review and approval by the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands, and the City of Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. Per Section 16.08.080"Final Park Plan",a final park plan shall be submitted to the City of Bozeman for review and approval prior to the installation of any park improvements. The park plan shall address all of the items listed in Section 16.08.050.P for the dedicated parkland, open space areas and trail amenities. 8. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands of a park land implementation plan outlining installation of landscape improvements, trail/bike path improvements, and maintenance and upkeep of the park lands and trails, and that said implementation plan be noted accordingly in the protective covenants and restrictions of the property owner's association documents, for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval. 9. Section 16.14.100 "Park Requirements" allows public parkland to be used for storm water detention or retention ponds but the area shall not count towards the parkland dedication requirement. The parkland estimates shall be recalculated excluding the storm water detention/retention ponds. 10. The public parkland boundaries bordering all private lots shall be delineated at the common private/public corner pins, with flat, flexible fiberglass posts, as prescribed in Section 16.14.100.17.3 of the subdivision regulations prior to filing of the any phase of the major subdivision that contains dedicated public parkland. 11. If the remainder of the parkland is to be provided in the form of cash-in-lieu of parkland donation then the plat shall conform to Section 18.14.100.G "Cash in Lieu of Park Land Donation". 12. Section 16.14.110.A"City of Bozeman Rights-of-Way", states that the subdivider shall be responsible for installing sod,boulevard trees and an irrigation system in the public right-of- way boulevard strips along all external subdivision streets and adjacent to subdivision parks or other open space areas. Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report- 13. Section 16.14.120.B.1 "Transportation Pathways",requires corridors for Class 1 trails to be dedicated to the City. The dedicated trail corridor shall be at least 25 feet in width to ensure adequate room for the construction, maintenance and use of the trail. Transportation trail corridors cannot be used to satisfy parkland dedication requirements. Trail specifications shall be submitted to the Planning Department,for review and approval,prior to construction of the trail. 14. The subdivider shall provide irrigation system as-builts, for all irrigation installed in public rights-of-way and/or land used to meet parkland dedication requirements. The as-builts shall include the exact locations and type of lines,including accurate depth,water source,heads, electric valves, quick couplers, drains and control box as outlined in Section 16.08.090 "Irrigation System As-builts". 15. Streetlights shall be provided at all intersections of public and/or private streets and at the intersection of pathways and streets within the proposed subdivision as outlined in Section 16.14.230.D "Subdivision Light Fixture Location and Placement". 16.Per Section 16.14.230.G"Lighting Specifications", the standard height for light standards shall not exceed 24 feet. 17. As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office(SHPO),a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. 18. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. 19. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received,a platting certificate,and all required and corrected certificates. The final plat application shall include two (2) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film(or equivalent);two(2)digital copies on a double-sided,high density 31/a-inch floppy disk or compact disk; and five (5)paper prints. 20. Conditional approval of the preliminary plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by state statute. Prior to that expiration date,the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 4 21. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of all improvements in accordance with the preliminary plat submittal information and conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. Engineering: 22. A Stormwater Master Plan for the subdivision for a system designed to remove solids, silt, oils, grease and other pollutants from the runoff from the private and public streets and all lots must be provided to and approved by the City Engineer. The master plan must depict the maximum sized retention basin location, show location of and provide easements for adequate drainage ways within the subdivision to transport runoff to the stormwater receiving channel. The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information(particularly for the basin site, drainage ways and finished lot grades), typical stormwater detention/retention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations and a stormwater maintenance plan. Any stormwater ponds located within a park or open space shall be designed and constructed to be conducive to the normal use and maintenance of the open space. Stormwater ponds for runoff generated by the subdivision(e.g.,general lot runoff,public or private streets, common open space, parks, etc.) shall not be located on easements within privately owned lots. The pond in the northwest corner of the subdivision appears to violate this and shall be on open space if it is collecting runoff from subdivisions streets. While the runoff from the individual lots will be dependent on the intensity of use on each lot,the maximum sizing of the storm retention facilities for each lot will be established based on maximum site development. Final facility sizing may be reviewed and reduced during design review of the FSP for each lot. 23.Plans and specifications and a detailed design report for water and sewer main extensions, storm sewer and the public street,prepared by a Professional Engineer,shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. The Applicant shall also provide Professional Engineering services for construction inspection, post-construction certification, and preparation of mylar record drawings. Construction shall not be initiated on the public infrastructure improvements until the plans and specifications have been approved and a pre-construction conference has been conducted. No building permits shall be issued prior to substantial completion and City acceptance of the required infrastructure improvements unless approved for concurrent construction by the City Commission. If approved for concurrent construction, all parts of section 16.22.030 of the subdivision regulations must be complied with. 24.All infrastructure improvements including 1)water and sewer main extensions,and 2)public streets,curb/gutter,sidewalks fronting parks,open space,rear yard frontages or other non-lot frontages, and related storm drainage infrastructure improvements shall be financially guaranteed or constructed prior to Final Plat approval. City standard residential sidewalks Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 5 shall be constructed on all public street frontages of a property prior to occupancy of any structure on the property. Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall,without further notice, construct within 30 days said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. This condition shall be included on the plat and in the covenants for the subdivision. 25. The location of existing water and sewer mains shall be properly depicted. Proposed main extensions shall be noted as proposed. 25. The Montana Fish,Wildlife and Parks,SCS,Montana Department of Environmental Quality and Army Corps of Engineer's shall be contacted regarding the proposed project and any required permits (i.e., 310, 404, Turbidity exemption, etc.) shall be obtained prior to FSP approval. 26. Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 27. Project phasing shall be clearly defined including installation of infrastructure. 28. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 29. All street names must be approved by the County Road and Bridge Department and the City Engineering Division to eliminate duplication of names countywide. 30. A one-foot no access strip shall be shown on the final plat along the entire Baxter Lane frontage. The driveway for the existing dwelling shall be relocated to the new street,and the existing driveway obliterated. 31. The existing dwelling must be connected to city sewer and water once the mains have been installed and accepted by the City. 32. The 12" water main in Baxter Lane s hall b e e xtended t o t he w estern b oundary o f t he subdivision to conform to the City's Water Master Plan. 33, Baxter Lane shall be improved to one half of a minor arterial standard as shown in the Transportation Plan along the frontage of this subdivision. 34.North 27th/Thomas shall be improved to one half of a collector standard as shown in the Transportation Plan from the east/west street midway through the subdivision to Baxter Lane. 35. The three way stop suggested in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) at the intersection in the Baxter Square MaSUR P.U.D. Staff Report 6 center of the subdivision w ill n of b e allowed. T his i ntersection w ill b e o ne w ay s top controlled(south leg)until such time as warrants are met for three way stop. If crosswalks are installed at this intersection as suggested in the TIS they must be thermoplastic or preformed plastic, and all required signing must be installed. 36.No Parking signs shall be installed and the curb painted yellow on one side of all of the private streets. The minimum allowed width of these private streets shall be 29'back of curb to back of curb. 37. All of the sidewalks that are substandard (less than 5') in width shall meet ADA requirements for turnouts for passing and width at intersections. 38. All lots shall be served by a sewer main extended from the north near Cattail Drive. No direct connection to the Baxter sewer will be allowed. 39. The center east/west public street shall be improved to a full city standard local street from the eastern boundary of this subdivision to North 27th/Thomas. Recreation&Parks Advisory Board. 40.An additional 0.8 acres of parkland dedication is required. Lots 54 and 55 shall be removed and added to the land adjacent to the park and the remaining acreage shall be carved out of Lot 31 with adjacency to the private street rather than Baxter Lane. 41. The overhead power line across the park shall be relocated or buried to avoid interference with park use and public safety. 42. The north end of the trail,near the stream/ditch, shall be located so as to continue along the stream/ditch when the property to the west is developed. FYI: The covenants must be modified as directed in the D.R.C. comments from July 7, 2003 ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING The subj ect property is zoned "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District). NORTH: "R-S" —Unincorporated Single Household Residences SOUTH: "R-3" —Vacant EAST: "R-S"—Single Household Residence with a janitorial service as a home occupation WEST: "R-S" —Single Household Residence on unincorporated land. PROPOSAL/BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval to allow the subdivision of 18 acres of land into 104 residential lots concurrent with an application for a Zoning Planned Unit. The development proposal is for the creation of 101 townhouse lots,two multi-household residential lots for affordable housing and one single household residential lot for the existing residence. The two existing tracts are separately owned but the owners have chosen to submit a unified development plan for both lots. Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 7 The east tract, originally called the Syme-Darvis Annexation, was formally annexed at the end of 2002. The west tract was preliminarily approved for annexation as the D.A.K.Annexation in 2002 but the City Commission has not yet formally adopted the annexation agreement. The applicant requests the relaxation o f S ection 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow construction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and for a sidewalk system to be constructed without a boulevard. The minimum local street standard requires 60 feet of right of way with a minimum of 31 feet from back of curb to back of curb. The minimum standard,with parking,supportable by City Staff is 29 feet from back of curb to back of curb. This allows for two lanes of traffic and parking on one side of the street as well as the necessary width for emergency vehicles. Primary access to the subdivision will be provided from Baxter Lane with secondary access provided from Thomas Drive through a street easement obtained across adjacent parcels to the east. Baxter Lane will be required to be improved to half a minor arterial street standard and Thomas Drive, which will become North 27th Avenue, will be required to be improved to half a collector street standard. A majority of the streets are identified as private streets on the plat. The public street easement will overlay the lots adjacent to the private streets. Adequate lot depth was provided to ensure the necessary setbacks are still maintained from the edge of the public street easement. Dedicated right of way, noted as 60 feet for a local street standard, will be provided through the center of the subdivision running north to south(with a slight offset to the west)and one running east to west from Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue and dead ending at the stream. The Transportation Plan also identifies the need for a trail corridor along Cattail Creek. The trail currently ends at Oak Street in Harvest Creek Subdivision. The trail will eventually connect to Valley Center Road with future development. Since the watercourse runs along the southwest corner of the property the applicants have depicted the trail corridor running along the east side of the stream and ending adjacent from the public park. Most of the parkland dedication has been provided in the center of the subdivision as identified in the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. Additional parkland has also been depicted adjacent to the stream/trail corridor. The detention ponds noted in the park cannot be calculated towards meeting the parkland dedication requirements. Approximately 0.8 acres of additional parkland is required to meet the requirement of 0.03 acres per dwelling unit. The Recreation&Parks Advisory Board has recommended conditions of approval for the elimination of two lots and the reduction in size of the lot reserved for the existing residence in order to fulfill the parkland requirements. The Recreation&Parks Advisory Board does not support the use of cash-in-lieu of parkland for this development given the density of the proposal. BOZEMAN ZONING & GROWTH POLICY DESIGNATIONS The property is designated as Residential in the adopted Growth Policy and is zoned "R-3" Residential Medium Density District. The Residential land use designation denotes areas where the "primary activity is urban density living quarters"(Bozeman 2020 Community Plan). The intent of the R-3 district is to provide for the development of one to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city(City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance). Baxter Square'MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 8 BOZEMAN PLANNING BOARD REVIEW Pursuant to Section 16.10.050.D of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, the Planning Board shall review the preliminary plat and supplementary information to determine if the proposed plat is in compliance or noncompliance with the adopted Growth Policy. The Plaiming Board shall act to recommend approval,conditional approval or denial of the preliminary plat application. The Board shall then provide advice and comments to the Bozeman City Commission for its consideration at its Monday, August 11, 2003, hearing which begins at 7:00 p.m. The Planning Board Resolution#P-03020 and minutes from the Planning Board's August 5,2003,meeting will be forwarded to the City Commission and made a part of the Commission's record. STAFF FINDINGS Pre-application Review: The pre-application for Baxter Square was submitted and reviewed in November2002. At that time City Staff determined: a)the lots must be designated outside of the stream setback; b) the stream setback could not be calculated towards the parkland dedication but could be calculated towards the open space requirement; c)Baxter Lane must be constructed to one half a minor arterial standard; and d) Thomas Drive/North 27t"Avenue must be constructed to one half a collector street standard. Subdivision Review: A preliminary plat application was submitted to the Planning& Community Development Office on May 21,2003. The proposal was forwarded to various review agencies and scheduled before the Development Review Committee(DRC)for a three-week review beginning on June 24, 2003. During the review, the DRC discussed the need for an irrigation well, additional parkland, cash-in-lieu of water rights, stormwater master plan, one foot no access strip on Baxter Lane,constructing the east/west local street to Thomas Drive,Baxter Lane to be constructed to half a minor arterial street standard and Thomas Drive to be constructed to half a collector street standard. On July 8,2003,the DRC made a recommendation for conditional approval of the preliminary plat application pursuant to the conditions listed at the beginning of this report. Certificates: All certificates must conform to Chapter 16.32 of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations for subdivisions within the city limits. If the applicant wishes to utilize an Improvements Agreement for infrastructure improvements, the Certificate of Completion of Improvements will need to be modified accordingly. As with all Final Plat submittals, a Platting Certificate,issued no later than 30 days prior to a final plat application submittal,must be included with the Final Plat. Subdivision Supplemental Materials: An evaluation of the surface water,floodplains,groundwater, geology, vegetation, wildlife, historic features, agriculture, agricultural water users, water supply, sewage disposal, storm water management, streets and roads, utilities, educational facilities, land use,housing and parks and recreation facilities was submitted with the preliminary plat application. Cattail Creek runs across the southwest corner of the property. The subdivision does not propose any alteration to the creek. A 50-foot setback from the watercourse will be maintained. There appears to be wetlands in the northwest corner of the property. A determination will need to be made prior to final plat submittal whether the wetlands are jurisdictional wetlands. If a determination is made that the wetland area is not artificial then the stream setback may need to be altered to comply with the Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 9 subdivision and zoning requirements. Based on the current regulations the stream setback must be measured from edge of any jurisdictional wetlands. No lot can be created within the stream course setback. REVIEW CRITERIA The basis for the Governing Body's decision to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove a subdivision is whether the preliminary plat, planning board recommendation, public hearing, or additional information demonstrates that development of the subdivision meets the requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act. The Act establishes six primary review criteria,which the governing body must also consider when evaluating subdivisions. Planning staff,the DRC and other reviewing agencies have made comments in relation to those and other criteria as described below, and have recommended conditions. A)PRIlVIARY REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Effects on Agriculture. The property has been master planned for Residential development. The urban density development will replace the existing agricultural uses. 2. Effects on Agricultural Water User Facilities. No effects on agricultural water user facilities were identified. 3. Effects on Local Services. Water/Sewer: One of the recommended conditions of approval would require the subdivider to install an irrigation well for the watering of residential yards,parks and open space areas. An irrigation well will eliminate the use of treated water for irrigation purposes and is also a cost saving measure for the residents of the development. The 12" water main in Baxter Lane shall be extended to the western boundary of the subdivision to conform to the City's Water Master Plan. The developer further proposes to extend the 8"sewer main located in the south end of Cattail Creek subdivision to the subdivision along Thomas Drive/North 27t' Avenue. Police/Fire: During D.R.C. review the Fire Department expressed some concern over the growth of the city to the west and the inevitable increase in response times from the existing fire stations. Streets: A ccess t o t he p roperty w ill b e p rovided p rimarily from Baxter Lane, which is identified as a minor arterial street. A local street will be constructed through the subdivision to Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue, a collector street,in order to provide secondary access. The developers have obtained a public street easement to allow the construction of the local street across adjacent parcels. Aside from the primary north/south street and the east/west street to be constructed within a 60-foot right of way,the remaining streets will be designated as private streets and constructed within a 32-foot public street easement. Utilities:The appropriate utility easements must be noted on the final plat.Easements for the water and sewer main extensions shall be a minimum of 30 feet in width, with the utility Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 10 located in the center of the easement. In no case shall the utility be less than 10 feet from the edge of easement. 4. Effects on the Natural Environment. Surface run off will be directed into storm water detention facilities that will be maintained by the property owner's association. The watercourse will be designated as common open space and a public trail corridor will be constructed adjacent to the watercourse as outlined in pathway and zone planting requirements in the Subdivision Regulations. 5. Effects on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat. There should be minimal impact on Cattail Creel, given the distance of the developed area from the watercourse. The 50-foot stream setback will provide a buffer to the watercourse and will support the usual small mammals found in riparian areas. The applicant is aware of any and all permitting required with Fish, Wildlife & Parks and will obtain all permits necessary. 6. Effects on Public Health and Safety. The threat of groundwater degradation from onsite sewage disposal should be eliminated since municipal sewer will service the development. In addition to city review of the Plans and Specifications, the subdivider will be required to obtain any permits required by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality,Fish,Wildlife&Parks,Department of Natural Resource Conservation and the Montana Department of Transportation. B) COMPLIANCE WITH SURVEY REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED FOR IN PART 4 OF THE MONTANA SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING ACT. The subdivision currently complies and will remain in compliance with survey requirements of the Act. C) COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOZEMAN SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. The final plat will comply with the Subdivision Regulations with the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the beginning of the staff report. D) COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCESS. The Planning Board and City Commission hearings have been properly noticed, as required in the Subdivision Regulations. E) PROVISION OF EASEMENTS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANNED UTILITIES. All utilities and necessary utility easements will be provided and depicted on the final plat. F) PROVISION OF LEGAL AND PHYSICAL ACCESS TO EACH PARCEL. Primary access will be provided from Baxter Lane and secondary access will be provided from Thomas Drive/North 27t"Avenue. All ots within the subdivision will have direct access either to the dedicated public streets or to adjacent private streets with public street easements. Baxter Square MaSUB P.UD. Staff Report i i PUBLIC COMMENT No public comment has been received as of this date. Attachments: Exhibit A—Preliminary Plat Submittal Exhibit B-Letter from the Recreation &Parks Advisory Board cc: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan,MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 JKG&Associates, 285 Frontier Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Baxter Square MaSUB P.U.D. Staff Report 12 EXISTING SURROUNDING BAXTER SQUARE N FUTURE DE DMAN'S GULCH Lu DEDICATED 0' RIGHT"OF WAY zz OR FU uj Scale: l "=300' p L 0 r r BAXTER LANE Lu 0 1 z J z > Q d !, U? 1= Q N LLI LU rr LL. M u— OAK STREET G NEERIN A D S VEYING, __—_- •Civil Engineering•Struc rat Engineering •Lan Su g � 205 Edelweiss Drive Bozeman, Montana 59 18 (4os)587-1115•Fai:(406)6 7-9768•infoMengineers.c m Sheet 1 of 1 ��•� #di2 3 9 5(D j ESIGN� RE .=i W BOARD STAFF REPORT RAXTEIZYSQUARE�'CUPMUD ZONING FILE NO. Z-03132 ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #Z-03132. THROUGH THE ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 101 TOWNHOUSE UNITS, TWO 8-PLEX APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND ONE EXISTING SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE WITH REQUESTED RELAXATIONS FROM THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BAXTER LANE WEST OF THE BAXTER LANE AND THOMAS DRIVE INTERSECTION AND ZONED "R-3" (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT). REPRESENTED: C&H ENGINEERING& SURVEYING, INC. 205 EDELWEISS DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 JKG & ASSOCIATES 285 FRONTIER DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 OWNERS: BUFFALO LAND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 12720 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 EVERT WIERDA 13707 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN,MT 59741 BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 317 SANDERS AVENUE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2003, AT 3:30 P.M., IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ALFRED M. STIFF PROFESSIONAL BUILDING, 20 EAST OLIVE STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMEND: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Baxter Square CUP/PUD 1 1. Project Description: The subject property is described as E%2 W% SE'/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. Please refer to the vicinity map provided. U - Bp X R-S R-1 N R-3 The Zoning Planned Unit Development application proposes to construct 101 townhouse units and two apartment buildings with requested relaxations and proposed improvements. The property is being concurrently reviewed for the subdivision of the property. The development is required to provide 0.03 acres of dedicated parkland per dwelling unit and 30% open space. The open space requirement includes parkland and stream setbacks. The parkland required equates to approximately 3.5 acres and the open space would be 3.1 acres. The site plan indicates a soccer field in the middle of the subdivision and additional parkland being provided adjacent to the 50- foot stream setback. If additional area cannot be provided to meet the total parkland dedication then cash-in-lieu of parkland must be paid. A Class I trail, as noted in the Transportation Plan, is required adjacent to Cattail Creek. The applicant has also depicted benches and associated landscaping for the stream setback and park facilities. The subdivision will be developed primarily with townhouse clusters ranging from two to four units per cluster. However, one of the proposed relaxations is for the allowance for two apartment-style condominium buildings. The "R-3" zoning district permits up to a fourplex or up to a five-unit townhouse cluster. The apartment buildings would provide eight dwelling units per building. The developer is attempting to get the dwelling units certified as affordable housing units. If the units are certified as affordable then the parking requirement for the apartment buildings will be reduced by one space per unit. The subdivision is required to have 218 off-street parking spaces with 117 additional on-street parking spaces permitted. The wider public streets will have parking on both sides and the narrower private streets will provide parking on one side of the street. The development will also have parking adjacent to the public park in the center of the subdivision. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 2 Staff does not support all of the requested relaxations from the zoning ordinance. Planning does not support the reduction in drive aisle width and any of the deviations that would reduce the parking stall length. Although the applicant has requested a relaxation to the drive aisle width for the 8-plex buildings it may not be required if half of the off-street parking can be eliminated due to the exception in the code for parking related to affordable housing complexes. If this is the case then the drive aisle reduction will not be necessary. Staff cannot support the relaxation of the stall length for a couple of driveways within the corner side yard setback and front yard setback because of the potential for vehicles to overhang the sidewalk and hinder pedestrian movements. Only compact vehicles would be able to park in the shortened driveways. Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" requires a recommendation from the Design Review Board either for approval, conditional approval or denial of the preliminary plan to the City Commission. 2. List of Deviations: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R- 3"zoning district. b) b)S ection 18.20.030 "Lot A rea a nd W idth" t o allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet. c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback. e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback. f) Section 18.50.110.13 "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. 3. Architectural Review: The D esign R eview B oard r eviewed t he C oncept P Ian a t i is F ebruary 2 5, 2 003 public meeting and made the following comments: a) Aggregation of the driveways would create wider yard spaces and allow for more on- street parking. b) Landscaped boulevards (sod and street trees) should be provided along all sidewalks. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 3 c) The two spur trails on the east half of the property could be eliminated. d) So many driveways are not aesthetically pleasing. Alleys would be preferable. e) Longer driveways should be considered to minimize the stacking of vehicles into the right-of-way and blocking pedestrian use of the sidewalks. f) May need to look at widening the streets and narrowing the lots to allow for more on- street parking. g) The trail system should be located to provide a future link to the regional park. 4. Administrative Design Review Comments: The comments received have been identified as recommended conditions of approval. 5. Public Comment: No written comment has been received to date. 6. Staff Conclusion: The intent of Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development" is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in t he d evelopment o f t and a nd t he d esign o f d evelopment p roj ects within the city. The applicant is proposing deviations from the city's standards through the Planned Unit Development process and therefore must demonstrate a plan that will produce an environment, landscape quality and character superior to that produced under the existing standards. Setbacks- The "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) lots have a twenty-foot front and r ear yard s etback and a five-foot side yard setback requirement. Corner lots with driveways within the corner side yard have a twenty-foot corner side yard setback and a fifteen-foot corner side yard setback if no driveway is present. The property has an additional fifty-foot stream setback adjacent to Cattail Creek. The trail amenities are permitted within the setback as depicted. The applicant has requested reductions in the setbacks for a few of the lots. Generally, when reviewing a subdivision PUD we do not restrict the relaxations to just those lots encroaching into the setbacks. Therefore, the relaxations have been advertised and if approved would be permitted for all of the lots within the PUD. Parkin2- Three parking spaces per two or three bedroom dwelling unit is required. All of the units have been depicted as either two or three bedroom. Out of the three spaces, required per unit, two of the spaces must be provided off the street. Based on these figures 218 off Baxter Square CUP/PUD 4 street parking spaces must be provided and 117 parking spaces must be provided within the subdivision. All of the townhouse units have single car garages. Therefore, they are permitted stacking of parking spaces with one space counted inside the garage and one space counted in the driveway. The plans depict numerous parking spaces on the street. The private streets have parking on one side of the road and the pubic streets depict parking on both sides of the right of way. A parallel space on the street must be twenty-four feet in length and outside of the street vision triangle in order to fulfill the parking requirement. Parking for affordable housing units can be reduced to two spaces per unit, with half of the spaces being provided off-street, based on a new provision in the zoning ordinance. This may alleviate the need for a relaxation of the drive aisle if the applicant is able to eliminate the extra row of parking depicted on the 8-plex site plan. Open Space- Section 18.54.100.E.1.12 "Open Space" requires a minimum of 30% open space e xclusive o f y and s etbacks a nd r equired p arking 1 of 1 andscaping b e p rovided for residential projects. Three and a half acres of parkland must be provided and three acres of open space must be set-aside for the benefit of the residences. Detention and retentions ponds are permitted within dedicated parkland but they do not count towards the parkland dedication and they must be incorporated as a design feature. Staff recommends that the ponds be constructed in a more organic shape and incorporate landscaping. The subdivision meets the 3-acre open space requirement with the stream setback, adjacent parkland and the soccer field. Building Height & Footprint- Maximum Allowable Depicted Building Height 38 feet 28 feet Building Footprint 120 ft. length 65-120 ft. length The applicant is requesting a reduction of the lot area requirement in the "R-3" district. The minimum average lot area for a townhouse cluster is 3,000 square feet. The relaxation would be for ten of the thirty-three townhouse clusters with the smallest at 2,630 square feet. Landscape & Buffering- The applicant proposes to preserve a large majority of the existing mature vegetation especially adjacent to Cattail Creek. The landscape plan must also include Zone 1 watercourse plantings within fifteen to thirty feet of the high water mark. A mix of new and existing trees spaced 25-35 feet apart and shrubs planted throughout 5-15 feet apart. Baxter Square CUP/PUD 5 Based onn the above summary review, the Planning Office and Administrative Design Review staff recommend to the Design Review Board conditional approval of the Planned Unit Development application with the following conditions: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. NOTE: The Design Review Board and Development Review Committee will forward a formal recommendation to the City Commission on this matter who will in turn consider an action on this application on Monday,August 11,2003. Attachments: Submittal for Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development Mailed To: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road,Manhattan, MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman,MT 59718 XG &Associates, 285 Frontier Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Baxter Square CUP/PUD 6 Mr. Muhlenfeld added that, architecturally, the buildings were of historical type and in keeping with the downtown area. He stated the accesses were from the boulevards and from private alleys. He stated this is the first of three proposed phases. He stated Mr. Hanson was concerned with the length of the fagade at the informal review, and the applicant had provided an elevation of the fagade depicting different heights of entrances and numbers of stairs leading up to them to lessen the impact of the length of it. Mr. Carpenter asked if there was on-street parking on both sides of the streets. Mr. Muhlenfeld stated there was parking access from the front and the rear. Chairperson Smith asked for clarification of what would be developed in the first phase. Mr. Delaney explained the phases of development,noting that the third phase of development was unknown as of yet. Mr. Carpenter stated he appreciated the in-fill in that location, the facades were better than those presented in the Informal review, and the retention ponds were better located in this proposal. Chairperson Smith stated she liked the project and was in favor of recommending approval of the application including Staff conditions and the requested deviations. B. Baxter Square MaSub PUD Prel. Plat#P-03020 (Morris) 5371 Baxter Lane * A Preliminary Plat Application to subdivide 18.12 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two eight-plex lots, and one single family lot with proposed relaxations from the subdivision regulations. Voss Bowman, Evert Wierda, Randy Visser, John Sinrud, Amy Grant, and Per Hjalmarsson joined the DRB. Assistant Planner Jami Morris presented the staff report, noting there was a possibility of the proposal being comprised partially of affordable housing units. She stated Staff s main concern was the request for relaxation for the driveways to be less than twenty feet long, which would cause vehicles parked on the pad in front of the garage to hang over the sidewalks. She noted the original comments made by the DRB during the conceptual plan review of the project had been addressed with the Preliminary Plat proposal. She stated Staff requested a materials board and color pallet be provided before final approval. Mr. Sinrud stated the west portion of the property had some single and some dual car garages and the east side proposed single car garages,back to back,with 2 spaces of on-street parking. He stated the units would be reduced in size to accommodate the required length of the driveways to eliminate the request to reduce the required driveway length. He stated the applicant had tried to make parking arrangements and accesses more user friendly per DRB comments from the Concept Plan review. He stated the plans were to include a functioning park. Chairperson Smith asked if the affordable housing designation would reduce the number of required parking spaces. Mr. Sinrud stated code does require fewer parking spaces for affordable City of Bozeman Design Review Board Notes—July 8,2003 2 housing. He stated the reduction in the number of parking spaces would allow more landscaping as a buffer zone between the condos and the eight-plexes. Planner Morris stated Staff s major concern was the drive aisle width. Mr. Carpenter stated he appreciated the effort the applicant made to address the DRB comments from the initial review and he wished them success in the affordable housing designation. He stated the code should be changed so that parking would not be reduced with affordable housing. He asked the width of the drive aisle. Planner Morris responded that the drive aisle was 26 feet wide. Chairperson Smith stated she had serious concerns regarding the amount of proposed parking. She stated the number of vehicles would not decrease with a designation of affordable housing. She stated she was concerned with vehicular circulation throughout the project and the density may be too much for the area; thus, causing the parking difficulties. She stated she was concerned that vehicles stacked on the driveway would overhang the sidewalks. Mr. Carpenter asked if time limits could be placed on some of the parking spots. Planner Morris stated it could be instituted in the covenants. Mr. Howe stated enforcement of a time limit would be difficult as the subdivision would have to enforce the parking restrictions. He added that many projects reviewed by the DRB did not address parking well. C. Stoneridge Business Park Ph. II B MaSP/COA#Z-03146 (Honatke) Southwest corner of the intersection of North 19th Avenue and North 22"d Avenue * A Major Site Plan Application with a Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the construction of two, single-stony, multi-tenant, 4,700 sq. ft. office buildings; one single-stony,multi-tenant, 4,553 sq. ft. office building; and one two-story, 9,618 sq. ft. retail/office building with related site improvements. This proj ect was done second per an arrangement between Urban Designer/Planner Honatke and Planner Morris. Jesse Sobrepena and Dave MacDonald joined the DRB. Urban Designer/Planner Candace Honatke presented the staff report, noting that lots 15 and 16 have met all parking and landscaping requirements, however; lot 14 is deficient in achieving the necessary 23 landscape points. She stated Staff was requiring a color pallet and elevations, and DRC voted to conditionally approve the project earlier in the day. Mr. MacDonald stated he wanted the project to be a known element in the community. He stated choosing the color was difficult and he made the decision to use the same colors as those on the existing buildings on lot 13. Mr. Howe stated the project looked good. Mr. Carpenter stated he supported the project with Staff conditions. City of Bozeman Design Review Board Notes—July 8,2003 3 CITY OF BOZEMAN ,dog BOZO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT q� Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406) 582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 8 <r o� Mailing address: P.O. Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net co. Bozeman, Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner Date: July 7, 2003 Subject: Baxter Square MaSub Preliminary Plat#P-03020 Staff has reviewed the above referenced major subdivision preliminary plat application to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot, against the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations, the City of Bozeman adopted Growth Policy and Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has requested the relaxation of Section 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow constriction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and the for a sidewalk system to be constricted without a boulevard. Staff will only support the relaxation if the private street is constricted to a width of 28 feet from curb face to curb face rather than the 26 feet depicted. Otherwise, the subdivision, with the following conditions and regulation requirements addressed, appears to comply with review criteria and should not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The recommended conditions from Planning Staff are listed below. Conditions for Approval: 1. All mature vegetation that currently exists within any of the designated park, open space and required setbacks shall be preserved. The Planning Office shall be contacted prior to any mature vegetation being removed. 2. The subdivider shall be responsible for locating and installing an irrigation well strictly for the purposes of irrigating residential yard spaces, boulevard, open space and parkland. 3. If the subdivision improvements are to be phased then the open space and parkland improvements shall be completed with the platting of Phase 1. 4. Cash in lieu of water rights for Baxter Square Subdivision, as determined by the Director of Public Service, must be paid at the time the final plat is submitted. 5. The declaration of covenants for the subdivision must be included and recorded with the Final Plat. The City of Bozeman shall be party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 6. The dedicated parkland shall be identified as "Public Park" on the final plat. planning • zoning subdivision review anne-ration historic preservation housing • grant administration neighborhood coordination 7. The developer shall submit a formal development plan signed by a certified landscape architect for the design of all dedicated parklands within said subdivision for review and approval by the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands, and the City of Bozeman Recreation and Parks Advisory Board. Per Section 16.08.080 "Final Park Plan", a final park plan shall be submitted to the City of Bozeman for review and approval prior to the installation of any park improvements. The park plan shall address all of the items listed in Section 16.08.050.P for the dedicated parkland, open space areas and trail amenities. 8. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the Superintendent of Facilities and Public Lands of a park land implementation plan outlining installation of landscape improvements, trail/bike path improvements, and maintenance and upkeep of the park lands and trails, and that said implementation plan be noted accordingly in the protective covenants and restrictions of the property owner's association documents, for review and approval prior to Final Plat approval. 9. Section 16.14.100 "Park Requirements" allows public parkland to be used for storm water detention or retention ponds but the area shall not count towards the parkland dedication requirement. The parkland estimates shall be recalculated excluding the storm water detention/retention ponds. 10. The public parkland boundaries bordering all private lots shall be delineated at the common private/public corner pins, with flat, flexible fiberglass posts, as prescribed in Section 16.14.100.17.3 of the subdivision regulations prior to filing of the any phase of the major subdivision that contains dedicated public parkland. 11. If the remainder of the parkland is to be provided in the form of cash-in-lieu of parkland donation then the plat shall conform to Section 18.14.100.G"Cash in Lieu of Park Land Donation". 12. Section 16.14.110.A "City of Bozeman Rights-of-Way", states that the subdivider shall be responsible for installing sod, boulevard trees and an irrigation system in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external subdivision streets and adjacent to subdivision parks or other open space areas. 13. Section 16.14.120.13.1 "Transportation Pathways", requires corridors for Class 1 trails to be dedicated to the City. The dedicated trail corridor shall be at least 25 feet in width to ensure adequate room for the construction, maintenance and use of the trail. Transportation trail corridors cannot be used to satisfy parkland dedication requirements. Trail specifications shall be submitted to the Planning Department, for review and approval,prior to construction of the trail. 14. The subdivider shall provide irrigation system as-builts, for all irrigation installed in public rights-of- way and/or land used to meet parkland dedication requirements. The as-builts shall include the exact locations and type of lines, including accurate depth, water source, heads, electric valves, quick couplers, drains and control box as outlined in Section 16.08.090 "Irrigation System As-builts". 15. Streetlights shall be provided at all intersections of public and/or private streets and at the intersection of pathways and streets within the proposed subdivision as outlined in Section 16.14.230.D "Subdivision Light Fixture Location and Placement". Page 2 16. Per Section 16.14.230.G "Lighting Specifications", the standard height for light standards shall not exceed 24 feet. 17. As recommended by the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO), a professional cultural resource inventory of the site shall be conducted by a qualified archeologist. The results of said survey must be provided to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of any infrastructure plans and specifications. 18. Prior to final plat approval, a Memorandum of Understanding shall be entered into by the Weed Control District and the subdivider for the control of county declared noxious weeds and a copy provided to the Planning Department. 19. The final plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the Uniform Standards for Final Subdivision Plats and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The final plat application shall include two (2) signed reproducible copies on a stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies on a double-sided, high density 3%-inch floppy disk or compact disk; and five (5) paper prints. 20. Conditional approval of the preliminary plat shall be in force for not more than three calendar years, as provided by state statute. Prior to that expiration date, the developer may submit a letter of request for the extension of the period to the Planning Director for the City Commission's consideration. 21. If it is the developer's intent to file the plat prior to the completion of all required improvements, an Improvements Agreement shall be entered into with the City of Bozeman guaranteeing the completion of a 11 i mprovements i n a ccordance w ith t he p reliminary p lat s ubmittal i nfonnation a nd conditions of approval. If the final plat is filed prior to the installation of all improvements, the developer shall supply the City of Bozeman with an acceptable method of security equal to 150% of the cost of the remaining improvements. Please be advised that staff mayprovide additional comments and conditions duringpreparation of the final staff report. Page 3 Covenants shall include a reference to the following sections of the Subdivision Regulations: • Section 16.14.100 "Park Requirements" requires the subdivider to be responsible for leveling the park area, amending soil, seeding with drought tolerant grass seed and installing an underground irrigation system. • Per Section 16.14.1001 "Irrigation. • Section 16.14.1201 "Pathway Maintenance". Page 2 • Sidewalks,boulevard, and parks/open space maintenance is the responsibility of the HOA. • Question the drainfield reference. • Wells for irrigation only. • Outbuildings are totally restricted? • Add language to domestic pets that City does not enforce this regulation. Page 5 • 3E add City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations. Page 6 • 3H check typos and need clarification on the style of lighting permitted. Details needed. • 3J must comply with the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and the approved Planned Unit Development guidelines. Page 9 • Fill in the blanks with approved details. • Check zoning for building height. • Fill in setback information once approved. Page 10 • Fill in the blanks. • 4F What hilltops? • 4G"Fences"needs more detail. Include height, location, finished side out and applicable setbacks. Page 11 • Do you need 4L, 4M and 4N? • Need to add information pertaining to irrigation wells. • 40 check typo. • 5A needs to include information on open space, sidewalks, private street, park and detention/retention maintenance. Page 12 • 5B needs to refer to City not County. Page 13 • Need to include light details. Page 4 CITY CO MISSION STAFF REPORT FILE NO..Z:03132 BARTER SQUARE CUP/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION #Z-03132. A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR A ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 101 TOWNHOUSE UNITS, TWO 8-PLEX APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND ONE EXISTING SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE WITH REQUESTED RELAXATIONS FROM THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONING ORDINANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE O F B AXTER L ANE W EST OF THE BAXTER LANE AND THOMAS DRIVE INTERSECTION AND ZONED "R-3" (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT). REPRESENTED: C&H ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 205 EDELWEISS DRIVE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 JKG & ASSOCIATES 285 FRONTIER DRIVE BOZEMAN,MT 59718 OWNERS: BUFFALO LAND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. 12720 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN, MT 59741 EVERT WIERDA 13707 CAMP CREEK ROAD MANHATTAN,MT 59741 BAXTER SQUARE PARTNERS,L.L.C. 317 SANDERS AVENUE BOZEMAN, MT 59718 DATE/TIME: BEFORE THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMSSION ON MONDAY, AUGUST 11,2003,AT 7:00 P.M.,IN THE COMMISSION MEETING ROOM, CITY HALL, 411 EAST MAIN STREET, BOZEMAN, MONTANA REPORT BY: JAMI MORRIS,ASSISTANT PLANNER RECOMMENDATION: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report ' 1 Project Location: The subject property is described as E%2 W%2 SEI/4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. Please refer to the vicinity map provided. I B-2 BP MR- �� R-1 IY R-3 Recommeuded Conditions of Approval: The Bozeman Development Review Committee (D.R.C.) and the Design Review Board (D.R.B.) have reviewed the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development against the criteria set forth in Section 18.52, 18.53 and Section 18.54 of the Zoning Ordinance. Some of the issues have been identified in the subdivision staff report and are not duplicated in this staff report. Based on the evaluation of said criteria and findings by the Planning Staff, staff recommends the following conditions of approval and code provisions to the City Commission: Conditions for Approval: 1. A materials sample board and color palette shall be provided with the Final Site Plan for review and approval by the Administrative Design Review Staff. 2. Street trees shall be provided within the front yard setback on the streets without boulevards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 2 4. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land,his successors or assigns,shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 5. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 6. The applicant must submit seven(7)copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 7. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work,and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan,including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 8. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements,the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months;however,the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine(9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 9. The final site plan,building permits and occupancy of all structures shall be in compliance with the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.030.D.3 for concurrent construction. 10. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience,or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 11. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 3 12. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. 13. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". 14. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 15. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces",parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed"Van Accessible". 16. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04,if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 17. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d"Open Space Maintenance Plan,"requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city,the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 18. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines,including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers,with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2"Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements".The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 19.A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. Baxter Square CUP/P-UD Staff Report 4 Proposal: The Zoning Planned Unit Development application proposes to construct 101 townhouse units and two 8-unit apartment buildings with requested relaxations and proposed improvements. The property is being concurrently reviewed for the subdivision of the property. The development is required to provide 0.03 acres of dedicated parkland per dwelling unit and 30% open space. The open space requirement includes parkland and stream setbacks. The parkland required equates to approximately 3.5 acres and the open space would be 3.1 acres. The site plan indicates a soccer field in the middle of the subdivision and additional parkland being provided adjacent to the 50-foot stream setback. If additional area cannot be provided to meet the total parkland dedication then cash-in-lieu of parkland must be paid. A Class I trail,as noted in the Transportation Plan,is required adjacent to Cattail Creek. The applicant has also depicted benches and associated landscaping for the stream setback and park facilities. The subdivision will be developed primarily with townhouse clusters ranging from two to four units per cluster. However, one of the proposed relaxations is for the allowance for two apartment-style condominium buildings. The"R-3"zoning district permits up to a four-plex or up to a five-unit townhouse cluster. The apartment buildings would provide eight dwelling units per building. The developer is attempting to get the dwelling units certified as affordable housing units. If the units are certified as affordable then the parking requirement for the apartment buildings will be reduced by one space per unit. The subdivision is required to have 218 off-street parking spaces with 117 additional on-street parking spaces permitted. The wider public streets will have parking on both sides and the narrower private streets will provide parking on one side of the street. The development will also have parking adjacent to the public park in the center of the subdivision. Staff does not support all of the requested relaxations from the zoning ordinance. Planning does not support the reduction in drive aisle width and any of the deviations that would reduce the parking stall length. Although the applicant has requested a relaxation to the drive aisle width for the 8-plex buildings it may not be required if half of the off-street parking can be eliminated due to the exception in the code for parking related to affordable housing complexes. If this is the case then the drive aisle reduction will not be necessary. Staff cannot support the relaxation of the stall length for a couple of driveways within the corner side yard setback and front yard setback because of the potential for vehicles to overhang the sidewalk and hinder pedestrian movements. Only compact vehicles would be able to park in the shortened driveways. The Planned Unit Development has been advertised with the following requested relaxations from the Zoning Ordinance in exchange for a unified development and landscape plan. The developers have indicated they may be able to redesign some of the units to address Staff s concerns, which may no longer necessitate the requirement for all of the originally requested relaxations. a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the"R-3" zoning district. b) b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet. c) Section 18.20.050"Yards"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 5 d) Section 18.50.060.A"Permitted Encroachments Into Yards"to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback. e) Section 18.50.060.C"Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback. f) Section 18.50.110.B "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K"No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards"to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. Adiacent Land Uses and Zoning: The adjacent land uses and zoning designations in the immediate area of the proposed development are as follows: NORTH: "R-S"—Single Household Residence on unincorporated land. SOUTH: "R-3" —Vacant EAST: "R-S"—Single Household Residence with a janitorial service as a home occupation WEST: "R-S"—Single Household Residence on unincorporated land. 71 r : Staff Findings: The City of Bozeman Planning Office has reviewed the Planned Unit Development application against Sections 18.52, 18.53 and 18.54 of the Zoning Ordinance, and offers the following review comments. The findings outlined in this report include comments and recommended conditions provided by the Development Review Committee (D.R.C.). Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 6 Section 18.52 "Site Plan Review Criteria" Site plan review criteria from section 18.52.030.F that are not discussed elsewhere follows: A. CONFORMANCE WITHT THE CITY'S ADOPTED GROWTH POLICY. • The property is designated Residential. The Residential land use designation denotes areas where the primary activity is urban density living quarters. • One of the implementing zoning districts in areas designated Residential is"R-3"Residential Medium Density District. The intent of the R-3 district is to provide for the development of one to five-household residential structures near service facilities within the city. • Townhouse clusters up to five units per cluster is a permitted principal use in the "R-3" district. Apartment buildings over four dwelling units require approval as a planned unit development. B. CONFORMANCE TO THIS TITLE,I NCLUDING T HE C ESSATION 0 F A NY CURRENT VIOLATIONS. • Certain code/policy requirements and recommended conditions will ensure compliance with the code.Elements that do not meet code have been noted as conditions of approval and code provisions. C. CONFORMANCE WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS,ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS. • The intent of Section 18.54"Planned Unit Development"is to promote maximum flexibility and innovation in the development of land and the design of development projects within the city. Per Section 18.54.030.A "a planned unit development may be applied to any development having one or more principle uses or structures on a single parcel of real property or contiguous parcels of real property",as long as the use is consistent with the Bozeman Growth Policy. • The site plan has been reviewed against Sections 18.50, 18.52, 18.53 and 18.54 and staff has found the application in general compliance with the requirements set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Any areas not addressed in the applicant's proposal have been identified as code provisions that shall be addressed on the Final Site Plan. D. RELATIONSHIP OF SITE PLAN ELEMENTS TO CONDITIONS BOTH ON AND OFF THE PROPERTY. • The property is currently developed with a single household residence on the southwest corner of the property. The proposal requests the addition of 101 townhouse units and two, 8-plex condominiums. Baxter Square CUPIPUD Staff Report • The adjacent properties to the north and northeast have not been incorporated into the city limits. The area is primarily single household residences on parcels ranging from one acre to ten acres in size. Access to the property will be provided primarily from Baxter Lane,which is identified as a minor arterial street. A local street will be constructed through the subdivision to Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue, a collector street, in order to provide secondary access. • All lots are required to be platted outside the 50-foot watercourse setback. Landscaping within the setback must follow the guidelines outlined in Section 18.50.060.D.2.g"Setback Planting". E. THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL ON THE EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONDITIONS. • According to the Traffic Impact Study each single household unit will generate approximately 9.57 average weekday trip ends and the apartment buildings will generate approximately 5.86 average weekday trip ends per unit. This equates to a total of 1,070 weekday trip ends. • The traffic study estimates that the Baxter Meadows development at full buildout will create as many as 23,000 new trips per day. The study concludes that the expected impacts of Baxter Square, at full build out of both Baxter Square and Baxter Meadows, will only account for 12% of the traffic on Baxter Lane. • According to the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update,Baxter Lane is designated as a minor arterial that is expected to support 5,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day and 27th Avenue is designated as a collector street, which will eventually be designed to support 2,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day. • Three parking spaces per two or three bedroom dwelling unit is required. Based on these figures 218 off street parking spaces must be provided and 117 parking spaces must be provided within the subdivision. The private streets have parking on one side of the road and the pubic streets depict parking on both sides of the right of way. • Parking for affordable housing units can be reduced to two spaces per unit,with half of the spaces being provided off-street, based on a new provision in the zoning ordinance. This may alleviate the need for a relaxation of the drive aisle if the applicant is able to eliminate the extra row of parking depicted on the 8-plex site plan. Baxter Square CUP/PIJD Staff Report 8 F. THE °CONS`ISTENCY OF THE PROPOSAL WITH RESPECT TO LAND USE REQUIREMENTS. • 6.6.1 Objective 6. Support infill development which respects the context of the existing development which surrounds it. 6.6.2 Objective 3.Support and encourage compatible infill development to avoid sprawl and unnecessary public expense. 4.9.1 Objective 6. Develop infill within the existing are of the City rather than developing land requiring expansion of the City's area. The east tract, originally called the Syme-Darvis Annexation, was formally annexed at the end of 2002. The west tract was preliminarily approved for annexation as the D.A.K. Annexation in 2002 but the City Commission has not yet formally adopted the annexation agreement. The proposal for the construction of 117 new dwelling units on the combined parcels will offer high-density urban infill development within the city limits. T he existing single household residences located to the north and northeast of the subject property,outside of the city limits, are mostly on one-acre tracts. The average density of the new subdivision is 11 units per net acre compared to the average one dwelling unit per acre of the neighboring properties. The Bozeman Growth Policy recommends an average of 12 units per acre for medium density zoning districts. The proposed development is higher in density than the neighboring properties but consistent with the densities contemplated for Cattail Creek to the north and future developments to the south. Ultimately,the development will be in harmony with the expected densities for "R-3" zoned properties that encourage urban density infill development. The city limits and city infrastructure extend further west to Baxter Meadows. Additional infrastructure will be required to be constructed in conjunction with the development proposal. G. PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS. • Full access will be permitted from Baxter Lane and North 27th Avenue. • The developers have obtained an easement to allow the construction of the local street across the adjacent county parcels. Aside from the primary north/south street and the east/west street to be constructed within a 60-foot right of way,the remaining streets will be designated as private streets and constructed within a 32-foot public street easement. • Boulevards will not be installed along the private streets. • A pedestrian/bike trail will be constructed along the east side of Cattail Creek as required in the Transportation Plan. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 9 H. BUIL,DING LOCATION AND HEIGHT. Maximum Allowable Depicted Building Height 38 feet 28 feet Building Length 120 feet 65-120 feet I. LANDSCAPING. • The landscape plan meets the required Landscape Performance Standards. • Additional landscaping is required in the form of zone plantings within the watercourse setback and the apartment building parking lots must be landscaped to meet the mandatory landscaping requirements. J. LIGHTING. • The streetlight indicated in the site plan submittal conforms to our zoning standards as long as it is equipped with a cut off lens. K. PROVISIONS FOR UTILITIES. • One of the recommended conditions of approval associated with the subdivision would require the subdivider to install an irrigation well for the watering of residential yards,parks and open space areas. An irrigation well will eliminate the use of treated water for irrigation purposes and is also a cost saving measure for the residents of the development. • The 12" water main in Baxter Lane s hall b e e xtended t o t he w estern b oundary o f t he subdivision to conform to the City's Water Master Plan. The developer further proposes to extend the 8" sewer main located in the south end of Cattail Creek subdivision to the subdivision along Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue. L. SITE SURFACE DRAINAGE. • Storm water detention ponds are noted for the subdivision to the north of Lot 91,on the west side of the park and along the west side of the trail. • The ponds located within the park cannot be calculated towards meeting the dedicated parkland requirements associated with the subdivision improvements. M. OPEN SPACE. • The Planned Unit Development review criteria require a minimum of 30%open space and under the subdivision review a total of 3%2 acres of dedicated parkland is required. to Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 3 0% o pen s pace h as b een p rovided e xclusive o f t he y and setbacks and the parking lot landscaping but inclusive of the watercourse setback. As discussed in the subdivision staff report the parkland dedication has not been fulfilled. Approximately one acre of parkland must still be accounted for but additional open space is not required. • An open space maintenance plan must be submitted with the final site plan. • The site plan indicates the installation of benches along the trail. N. LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS. • Not applicable. O. GRADING. • The property will be graded with the subdivision infrastructure to provide adequate drainage to storm water runoff ponds located on the north and west sides of the property. P. SIGNAGE. • A detail for the subdivision sign has been included with the site plan submittal materials. One subdivision identification sign per entrance is permitted under Section 18.65. Each sign cannot exceed sixteen square feet in area or five feet in height. Q. SCREENING. • Staff did not feel that adding screening between the existing and future development would encourage integration of the two neighborhoods. R. SETBACKS. • The"R-3"(Residential Medium Density District)lots have a twenty-foot front and rear yard setback and a five-foot side yard setback requirement. Corner lots with driveways within the corner side yard have a twenty-foot corner side yard setback and a fifteen-foot corner side yard setback if no driveway is present. The property has an additional fifty-foot stream setback adjacent to Cattail Creek. The trail amenities are permitted within the setback as depicted. • The applicant has requested reductions in the setbacks for a few of the lots. Generally,when reviewing a subdivision PUD we do not restrict the relaxations to just those lots encroaching into the setbacks. Therefore,the relaxations have been advertised and if approved would be permitted for all of the lots within the PUD. Planning Staff does not support the relaxation of the corner side yard setback. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 11 S. eOVERLAY DISTRICT PROVISIONS. Not applicable. T. OTHER RELATED MATTERS,INCLUDING EXPRESSED PUBLIC OPINION. • No public comment has been received. Section 18.53 "Cib; Commission. Consideration and Findin ss In approving a Conditional Use Permit application,the City Commission shall consider the criteria set forth in Section 18.53.030 of the Zoning Ordinance and find as follows: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and topography to accommodate such use,and all yards,spaces,walls,and fences,parking,loading and landscaping are adequate to properly relate such use with the land and uses in the vicinity. The site is adequate in size to support the proposed uses. The applicant has requested a reduction in yard setbacks but the reduction is not necessary for all of the townhouse clusters. Sufficient parking is depicted on the site plan. The two affordable housing buildings will qualify for a reduction in parking if they can meet the criteria outlined in Section 18.50.110 "Parking Requirements". Staff is concerned with the possible reduction of any of the front yard or corner side yard setbacks in relation to the inadequate stall length that would be provided if approved. If permitted as proposed the bumpers of vehicles will overhang the sidewalk and interfere with pedestrian movements. 2. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. City staff including the fire department believes the streets will be adequate in width if constructed to a minimum width of 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb. This will leave adequate space for two lanes of traffic and space for parking on one side of the street. The Fire Department requires a minimum of 20 feet in width for fire trucks and our local street design allows for on street parking being as narrow as 7 feet. However, the Engineering Department could not support less than 8 feet for on street parking due to the presence of a curbwalk and the lack of a boulevard. The conditions of approval will require improvements to Baxter Lane and Thomas Drive/North 27th Avenue to bring them up to the standards outlined in the Transportation Plan. 3. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect upon the abutting property. There is no question that the proposal is dissimilar to the existing character of the neighborhood. However, the conditions of approval should ensure that the project has minimal impact on adjacent properties. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff 12 Report 4. That the proposed use shall be in conformance with the adopted Growth Policy. The proposal is in conformance with the adopted Growth Policy as discussed in the objectives outlined earlier in the staff report 5. That the conditional use has complied with all conditions stipulated in Chapter 18.50. Section 18.50 establishes general development standards that are intended and designed to assure compatibility of uses;to prevent urban blight,deterioration and decay;and to enhance the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the residents living within the zoning jurisdiction of the City of Bozeman. The proposal satisfies most of the requirements of Section 18.50,"General Building and Development Standards"of the Zoning Ordinance,the Code Provisions listed with the Conditions of Approval will need to be addressed prior to Final Site Plan approval. 6. That any additional conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health,safety and general welfare. Such conditions may include,but are not limited to: a)Regulation of use;b)Special yards,spaces and buffers; c)Special fences, solid fences,and walls;d)Surfacing of parking areas; e)Requiring street,service road or alley dedications and improvements or appropriate bonds;f)Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress; g)Regulation of signs; h) Requiring maintenance of the grounds; i) Regulation of noise, vibrations, odors; j) Regulation of hours for certain activities;k)Time period within which the proposed use shall be developed;1)Duration of use; m) Requiring the dedication of access rights; n) Other such conditions as will make possible the development of the City in an orderly and efficient manner. On July 8, 2003, the DRC voted 5 to 0 to forward a favorable recommendation based on compliance with the conditions and code provisions outlined by Staff that identified any of the potential concerns outlined in the Conditional Use Permit criteria. On July 8,2003 the DRB met to discuss the development proposal. Without a quorum they were unable to forward conditions of approval or a formal recommendation. The board did voice concerns over the possible lack of sufficient parking and the density of the project. The City Commission may conclude that there are other conditions necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 18.54 "Planned Unit Development Criteria" In approving a Planned Unit Development,the City Commission is charged with finding that criteria outlined in Section 18.54.100 are adequately addressed and may consider any conditions deemed necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. Planning staff has evaluated the application against the applicable Planned Unit Development review criteria and offers the following summary review comments below. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 13 All Development 1. Is the development compatible with,and sensitive to,the immediate environment of the site and the adjacent neighborhoods relative to architectural design,building bulk and height, neighborhood identity, landscaping, historical character, orientation of buildings on the site and visual integrity? The proposal is for mixed housing types at higher urban densities as expected in the"R-3" zoning designation. Not only does the proposal meet the objectives of the zoning designation it also meets the goals and objectives of the adopted Growth Policy by providing mixed housing types (2-5 unit townhouse clusters and two apartment buildings) and affordable housing units. The only buildings not consistent with the zoning are the 8-plex condominiums,which the property owners are attempting to get certified as affordable units through HRDC. The design of the townhouse buildings also helps provide more character and break up the facade by incorporating different colors and materials for each unit to avoid the doldrums of the typical multi-unit townhouse structure. The Commission may want to consider moving the two apartment style buildings into the interior of the subdivision and reducing the overall number of dwelling units adjacent to the existing single household residences. 2. Does the development comply with all city design standards, requirements and specifications for the following services:water supply,sanitary supply,fire protection, flood hazard areas, telephone, cable television, trails/walks/bike ways, irrigation companies, electricity, natural gas, storm drainage, streets? The developers have requested concurrent construction of the buildings and the infrastructure. The proposal will have to comply with the requirements outlined for concurrent construction. Conditions of approval have been recommended to address the infrastructure, irrigation, storm drainage and the trail corridor. 3. Does the project preserve or replace existing natural vegetation? The application proposes to preserve the existing vegetation adjacent to the creek. Otherwise the only existing mature vegetation is in association with the existing single household residence. 4. Have special precautions been taken to preserve existing wildlife habitats, natural wildlife food services, or existing places, or are these areas being preserved? Cattail Creek will not be altered and existing mature vegetation will be preserved within the stream setback. Therefore, wildlife habitat will be maintained especially for birds, small mammals and aquatic life. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 14 5. If the proposed project is located within a locally designated historical district or includes a.locally designated landmark structure,is the project in conformance with the city's Historic Preservation Ordinance? Not applicable. 6. Is the exterior lighting, except for warning, emergency or traffic signals, installed in such a manner that the light source is obscured to prevent excessive glare on public streets and walkways or into any residential area? The proposed streetlight that will be installed at road intersections and trail/road intersections complies with the zoning requirements as long as the lens is flush with the fixture. The covenants will ensure general compliance with the zoning ordinance and the desire to maintain a dark sky policy even in a residential subdivision. 7. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) arranged on the site so that activities are integrated with the organizational scheme of the community and neighborhood? The site plan has arranged the site plan elements in a manner that provides an integrated development proposal to meet the needs of the neighborhood. The plan gives consideration to producing an interesting streetscape and addressing the new requirements for a center in the subdivision. 8. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g., buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to produce an efficient, functionally organized, and cohesive planned unit development? The site plan has been designed with consideration given to the watercourse and functional open space. The dedicated road running north to south jogs slightly to the west where it aligns with one of the private streets. Although conceptually this seems odd it will serve to slow traffic on the wider streets with the T-intersection at the park. 9. Is the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g.,buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) in harmony with the existing natural topography; natural water bodies and watercourses; existing vegetation? The site plan is in harmony with the natural elements of the property. Each lot will maintain a 50-foot watercourse setback. Based on the Recreation&Parks Advisory comments for the subdivision, the only two lots adjacent to the open space area associated with the stream should be removed. Then the park could be expanded to meet the parkland minimums and would avoid the drawbacks associated with homes being constructed directly adjacent to open space amenities. There is also the possibility of the presence of wetlands on the northwest comer of the property. Fish, Wildlife & Parks has indicated that the head of a spring 1 ies w ithin t his area and that the vegetation associated with the spring provides significant habitat for birds and wildlife. As a condition of approval the applicant is required Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 15 to determine if the area is characterized by wetlands. If wetlands are present then the 50-foot watercourse setback applies and all lots must be created outside of the setback. 10. Does the design and arrangement of elements of the site plan (e.g. building construction, orientation, and placement: t ransportation n etworks, selection and placement of landscape materials; and/or use of renewable energy sources, etc.) contribute to the overall reduction of energy use by the project? The continuing extension of the north/south trail identified in the transportation plan should encourage walking and bike riding. Upon completion of the trail it will extend from the Bozeman Ponds to as far north as the intersection of Hulbert Road and Fowler Lane. 11. Are the elements of the site plan (e.g. buildings, circulation, open space and landscaping, etc.) designed and arranged to maximize the privacy by the residents of the project? The site plan has been arranged with all but two buildings to be across the street from the park and open space areas. This should maximize the privacy of the residents. Although elimination of the two lots adjacent to the open space area would be further beneficial and allow the expansion of the park. Expansion of the parkland could be designed in a fashion that would still maintain an adequate buffer between the existing residence and the public park. 12. Open space. Sufficient open space has been provided through the park amenities associated with the subdivision and the extra buffer to the linear park. 13. Is the active recreational area suitably located and accessible to the residential units it is intended to serve and is adequate screening provided to ensure privacy and quiet for neighboring residential uses? The trail runs from Baxter Lane to the intersection with the park that will provide an area for walking and bike riding. The master plan for the park,if approved by the City Commission, is to construct a small playground and a soccer field. 14. Is the pedestrian circulation system designed to assure that pedestrians can move safely and easily both within the site and between properties and activities within the neighborhood area? Sidewalks will be constructed adjacent to all of the roads. The private streets will not be constructed with boulevards but will provide 5-foot wide curbwalks. The block lengths do not exceed the recommended lengths in the subdivision regulations so additional connections in the middle of the blocks were not recommended with the subdivision improvements. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 16 15. Is the development being;properly integrated into development and circulation patterns of adjacent and nearby neighborhoods so that this development will not become an isolated "pad" to adjoining development? The street layout does take into consideration the existing and future circulation patterns. The supplemental sheet provided by C&H Engineering identifies the major street network of adjacent developments. 16. Does the pedestrian circulation system incorporate design features to enhance convenience, safety and amenity across parking lots and streets, including, but not limited to,paving patterns, grade differences, landscaping and lighting? The applicant has discussed the option for a stop sign and pedestrian crosswalk adjacent to the park. The Engineering Department will have to evaluate whether stop signs are required. 17. Does the pedestrian and bicycle trail system adequately connect to the systems in adjacent developments? As previously stated the trail system will eventually connect as far south as the Bozeman Ponds and as far north as Hulbert Road. 18. Does the landscape plan enhance the appearance of vehicular use, open space and pedestrian areas which contribute to their usage and visual appearance? The landscape plan for the trail corridor and the park will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood. However, the landscape plan for the streets only depicts street trees being constructed within the boulevards. The private streets that lack boulevards note that the lot owners will provide landscaping within the front yards to enhance the streetscape. Planning Staff has suggested that street trees be installed within the front yards if boulevards are not present. 19. Does the landscaping plan enhance the building(s)? The covenants and design guidelines recorded for the PUD will require landscaped yards. Additional landscaping will also be required for the apartment buildings in order to meet the mandatory landscaping requirements. 20. If the development is adjacent to an existing or approved public park or public open space area,have provisions been made in the site plan to avoid interfering with public access to that area? No parkland currently exists adjacent to the proposed development. The regional will be located to the west in Baxter Meadows and Rose Park lies to the southeast on Oak Street. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 17 Residential 1. On a net acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project(calculated for residential portion of the site only), consistent with the development densities set forth in the land use guidelines of the Bozeman Growth Policy? The adopted Growth Policy recommends an average of 12 units per acre for Medium Density zoned properties. The proposal is for an average of 11 units per acre. 2. Does the project provide for private outdoor areas (e.g., private yards,patios and balconies, etc.) for use by the residents and employees of the project which are sufficient in size and have adequate light sun,ventilation, privacy and convenient access to the household or commercial units they are intended to serve? Adequate yard spaces will exist for the benefit of the residents. All of the units will maintain a 20-foot rear yard setback. Only a few of the townhouses actually depict the patio area encroaching more than the 5 feet permitted within the rear yard setback. In addition, the condominiums have been designed in a horseshoe configuration in order to provide a courtyard area for the residents to use for active recreation. 3. Does the project provide for outdoor areas for use by persons living and working in the development for active or passive recreational activities? The development will have a 2.2 acre park in the center of the subdivision, a linear park and trail on the northwest portion of the property and individual outdoor spaces tied to each privately owned yard. 4. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus, does it include a variety of housing types and styles designed to address community wide issues of affordability and diversity of housing stock? The project does not request a density bonus but does provide a mixture of housing types and affordable housing units. 5. Is the project within two thousand feet of an existing or approved neighborhood service center, public school, day care center, major employment center, or public neighborhood or community park? The project is within two thousand feet of Gallatin Center, which is identified in the adopted Growth Policy as a regional center. The property is within 2,500 feet of Bridger Peaks Town Center and 2,700 feet of the regional park. Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 18 6. Is the overall project designed to enhance the natural environment, conserve energy and to>provide efficient public services and facilities? The proposal will enhance the natural environment by maintaining the existing stream corridor and providing outdoor amenities for the residents and the public. The bike trail will help conserve energy by encouraging people to utilize the future trails and bike lanes. 7. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets. Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 8. If limited commercial development as defined above is proposed within the project, is less than twenty percent of the gross area of the PUD designated to be used for offices or neighborhood service activities not ordinarily allowed in the particular residential zoning district? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 9. If neighborhood service activities are proposed within the project, is a market analysis provided demonstrating that less than fifty percent of the market required to support proposed neighborhood service activities is located outside the immediate area of the PUD and are the neighborhood services of a nature that does not require drive-in facilities or justification for through traffic? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 10. If the project contains limited commercial developments as defined above, is the project located at the intersection of arterial streets, or arterial and collector streets. Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 11. If the project contains limited commercial development as defined above, has the project been sited and designed such that the activities present will not detrimentally affect the adjacent residential neighborhood and have the commercial activities been developed at a scale compatible with residential development? Not applicable. The project does not propose any commercial development. 12. Does the overall PUD recognize and,to the maximum extent possible, preserve and promote the unique character of neighborhoods in the surrounding area? The existing neighborhood can be characterized primarily by ranch style single household residences on at least one acre with some homes on lots as large as ten acres. The City of Bozeman has very few examples of residential developments that would mimic the existing densities especially on a property that was approved by the Commission for"R-3" zoning. 19 Bauer Square CUP/PUD Staff Report Developments such as Sundance Springs on the south end of town do not necessarily promote the objectives of the adopted Growth Policy which touts the need for mixed housing types, affordable housing and smaller lots that discourage sprawl. Con clusion/Recommendation: The Bozeman Development Review Committee(D.R.C.)and Design Review Board(D.R.B.) have reviewed the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, and recommend to the City Commission conditional approval of said application with conditions and code provisions outlined at the beginning of the staff report. The Planning Staff has identified various code provisions that are not currently met by this application. Some or all of these items are listed in the findings of this staff report. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that umnet code provisions,or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not,in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. BECAUSE THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT, THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION SHALL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THIS APPLICATION. THE DECISION OF THE CITY COMMISSION MAY BE APPEALED BY AN AGGRIEVED PERSON AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 18.58 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. Attachments: Applicant's Submittal for a Planned Unit Development Attachment A-Existing &Proposed Major Street Network Attachment B-Design Review Board Staff Report Attachment C-Design Review Board Minutes Mailed To: Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creek Road,Manhattan, MT 59741 Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan,MT 59741 Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C., 317 Sanders Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59718 C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 JIG &Associates, 284 Frontier Drive,Bozeman,MT 59718 Baxter Square CUP/PUD Staff Report 20 og Bozo CITY OF BOZEMAN V 'Y� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building Phone: (406)582-2260 20 East Olive Street Fax: (406) 582-2263 tare c80.�'� Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Bozeman,Montana 59771-1240 World wide web: www.bozeman.net MEMORANDUM To: Development Review Committee From: Jami Morris, Assistant Planner Date: July 8, 2003 -Final Week Review Subject: Baxter Square CUP/PUD #Z-03132, Baxter Lane Staff has found the Conditional Use Permit application for the establishment of a unified development plan for 101 townhouse units, two 8-plex apartment buildings and one existing single household residence, with conditions and code provisions, aside from the requested relaxations, complies with the requirements of the Bozeman Zoning Ordinance and should not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicant has requested the following relaxations of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex-apartment buildings in the "R-3"zoning district. b) b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet. c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty-foot front yard setback. d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty-foot rear yard setback. e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks"to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen-foot corner side yard setback. f) Section 18.50.110.13 "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet. g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. Planning Staff is unable to forward a favorable recommendation regarding the relaxation of the front yard setback, corner side yard setback and the drive aisle width. Reductions of the setbacks will likely lead to parked vehicles overhanging the sidewalk and the reduction of the drive aisle width has too much potential for generating vehicular conflicts within the parking lot. Standard Conditions of Approval: 1. The right to a conditional use permit shall be contingent upon the fulfillment of all general and special conditions imposed by the Conditional Use Permit procedure. planning • zoning • subdivision review • annexation • historic preservation • housing 0 grant administration • neighborhood coordination 2. All special conditions and code provisions shall constitute restrictions running with the land, shall be binding upon the owner of the land, his successors or assigns, shall be consented to in writing by the applicant prior to commencement of the use and shall be recorded as such with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office by the property owner prior to the final site plan approval or commencement of the use. 3. All of the conditions and code provisions specifically stated under any conditional use listed in this title shall apply and be adhered to by the owner of the land, successor or assigns. 4. The applicant must submit seven (7) copies a Final Site Plan within 6 months of preliminary approval containing all of the conditions, corrections and modifications to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office. 5. A Building Permit must be obtained prior to the work, and must be obtained within one year of Final Site Plan approval. Building Permits will not be issued until the Final Site Plan is approved. Minor site surface preparation and normal maintenance shall be allowed prior to submittal and approval of the Final Site Plan, including excavation and footing preparation, but NO CONCRETE MAY BE POURED UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT IS OBTAINED. 6. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City to guarantee the installation of required on-site improvements at the time of Final Site Plan submittal. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to the installation of all required on-site improvements, the Improvements Agreement must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half tunes the amount of the estimated cost of the scheduled improvements not yet installed. Said method of security shall be valid for a period of not less than twelve (12)months; however, the applicant shall complete all on-site improvements within nine (9) months of occupancy to avoid default on the method of security. Code Provisions: 7. Per Section 18.49.040.C.3 "Preparation of a Landscape Plan", landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a registered Montana Landscape Architect, an individual with a degree in landscape design and two years of professional design experience, or an individual with a degree in a related field and at least five years of professional design experience. The final landscape plan shall indicate both existing vegetation to be preserved and proposed vegetation. 8. The 8-plex parking lots shall conform to Section 18.49.060.0 "Parking Lot Landscaping," which states that internal parking lot landscaping provided shall be proportionately dispersed so as to define aisles and limit unbroken rows of parking to a maximum of one hundred feet, with landscaped areas provided in an appropriate scale to the size of the parking lot. The minimum width and/or length of any parking lot landscaped area shall be eight feet. 9. All lighting shall be arranged so as to deflect light down and/or away from any adjoining properties and shall not detract from driver visibility on adjacent streets. Luminaries and lenses shall not protrude below the edge of the light fixture per Section 18.50.035.A. Page 2 10. A watercourse setback planting plan shall be prepared by a qualified landscape professional and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the commencement of development or site preparation. The plan shall include a schedule for planting and landscaping as outlined for Zone 1 and Zone 2 of Section 18.50.060.D.2.g "Setback Planting". II. Per Section 18.50.110.B.13 "Pedestrian Facilities in Parking Lots," concrete sidewalks a minimum of three feet in width shall be provided between any existing or proposed building and adjacent parking lot. Where sidewalk curbs serve as wheel stops, an additional two feet of sidewalk width is required. 12. Per Section 18.50.110.F.3 "Disabled Accessible Parking Spaces", parking spaces and access aisles shall be level with slopes not exceeding 1:50 in all directions. Raised signs shall be located at a distance no greater than five feet from the front of each accessible space and shall state "Permit Required $100 Fine". One of the disabled accessible spaces shall also be signed "Van Accessible". 13. Section 18.50.110.F.l.b.i "Affordable Housing", when calculating the amount of required parking for.affordable housing, as defined in Chapter 18.04, if the project is guaranteed for use as affordable housing for a minimum period of 30 years and the use as affordable housing is subject to long term monitoring to ensure compliance and continued use as affordable housing, all parking shall be calculated as if on-street parking were available for each affordable dwelling unit provided, and shall not exceed that required for a 2 bedroom dwelling. 14. Section 18.54.060.C.4.d "Open Space Maintenance Plan," requires that the developer submit a legal instrument setting forth a plan providing for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreational areas, communally owned facilities, and parking lots. Once the document has been approved by the city, the property owner shall file the document with the County Clerk and Recorder's Office. A copy of the recording receipt and the signed and notarized document shall be provided with the final site plan submittal. 15. The applicant shall provide a bound copy of the Architectural Guidelines, including a table of contents that identifies each chapter and page numbers, with the final site plan as described in Section 18.54.080.D.2 "Developmental Guidelines Submittal Requirements". The City of Bozeman shall be third party to any changes or modifications made to the restrictive Covenants and Architectural Guidelines as they relate to any zoning and/or planning bylaws. 16. A Sign Permit Application shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Office prior to the construction and installation of any signage on-site in accordance with Section 18.65 of the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The applicant must comply with all provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code, which are applicable to this project prior to receiving Final Site Plan approval. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. Page 3 ZoninL, PUD Recommended Condition#20: Adequate snow storage area must be designated on the final site plan identifying areas to store snow off of the sheets and sidewalks and outside the street vision triangles. Subdivision PUD Recommended Condition# 44 The covenants shall include a section precluding snow storage on the streets and sidewalks. A copy of an approved snow storage plan shall also be included in the recorded covenants. wog so CITY CITY OF BOZEMAN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ` Street address: Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street Phone: (406)582-2260 Mailing address: P.O.Box 1230 Fax: (406)582-2263 CO' Bozeman,Montana 59771-1230 E-mail: planning@bozeman.net Worldwide web: www.bozeman.net NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A MAJOR SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of a public hearing before the BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION on Monday, August 11, 2003, to consider both the Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development application and the Major Subdivision Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat application for Baxter Square Planned Unit Development to be held at 7:00 p.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, City Hall, 411 East Main Street, Bozeman, Montana tn The applications would allow the property owners Evert Wierda, 13707 Camp Creek Road, Manhattan, MT 59741, Buffalo Land Management, L.L.C., 12720 Camp Creels Road, Manhattan, MT 59741 and Baxter Square Partners, L.L.C.,317 Sanders Avenue,Bozeman, MT 59718 represented by C&H Engineering and Surveying, Inc., 205 Edelweiss Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 and JJKG & Associates, 284 Frontier Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718, to subdivide18 acres into 101 townhouse lots, two 8-plex lots and one single household residential lot and to establish a unified development plan with requested relaxations from the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The property owners are also requesting concurrent construction of buildings and the subdivision infrastructure as outlined for Planned Unit Developments in Section 16.22.030 "Completion of Improvements" of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations and Section 18.50.030.1) "Water and Sanitary Sewer System Requirements" in the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance. The subject property is legally described as the E'/Z W%2 SEV4 SW'/4, Section 35, T1S, R5E, Gallatin County, Montana, and generally located on the north side of Baxter Lane west of the Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane intersection. The property is preliminarily approved for "R-3" (Residential Medium Density District) zoning. The Subdivision Planned Unit Development application further requests a relaxation of the City of Bozeman Subdivision Regulations Section 16.16.080 "Paving Requirements" to allow construction of the private streets to less than the adopted city standards for the driving/parking lane and sidewalk widths and for a sidewalk system to be constructed without a boulevard. The Conditional Use Permit for a Zoning Planned Unit Development requests the following relaxations from the City of Bozeman Zoning Ordinance: a) Section 18.20.020 "Permitted Uses" to allow two 8-plex apartment buildings in the "R-3" zoning district; b) Section 18.20.030 "Lot Area and Width" to allow the townhouse clusters to be constructed on an average lot area less than 3,000 square feet; c) Section 18.20.050 "Yards" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to one and a half feet into the twenty foot front yard setback; d) Section 18.50.060.A "Permitted Encroachments Into Yards" to allow the townhouse patios to encroach up to ten feet into the twenty foot rear yard setback; e) Section 18.50.060.0 "Special Yard Setbacks" to allow the townhouses to encroach up to two feet into the fifteen foot corner side yard setback; f) 18.50.110.13 "Stall, Aisle and Driveway Design" to allow up to an eight foot reduction to the standard drive aisle width of twenty-six feet for the 8-plex parking lots and to allow the townhouse driveway stall length be reduced from twenty feet to eighteen feet; and g) Section 18.50.110.K "No Parking Permitted in Required Front or Side Yards" to allow the parking lots for the 8-plexes to encroach up to seven feet into the front yard setback and completely into the five foot side yard setback. Public testimony will be taken at the public hearing. Written comments may be submitted to the City of Bozeman Department of Planning and Community Development, P.O. Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. Data pertaining to the application may be reviewed in the City of Bozeman Department of Plaiuiing and Community Development, 20 East Olive Street, 582-2260. For those who require accommodations for disabilities, please contact Ron Brey, City of Bozeman ADA Coordinator, 582-2306 (voice), 582-2301 (TDD). 9Z-03132 Baxter Square Zoning Preliminary Plan PUD 4P-03020 Baxter Square MaSub Preliminary Plat PUD SUBMITTED 07/10/03 FOR SUNDAY, 07/13/03 DISPLAY AD PUBLICATION. PLEASE PRINT WITH NORTH ARROW UP, BOLD WHERE INDICATED, AND SEND AFFIDAVIT TO CITY PLANNING OFFICE. 1 1 M }..._....................__.__..._...._................................_............_......._..............__ B-2 I � Si 2rt�,S BP r I u , R-1 R-3