Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-05-18 City Commission Packet Materials - A3. Bridger Vale ZMA and Annexation ReconsiderationPage 1 of 26 17-230, Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Reconsideration Public Hearing: City Commission public hearing to reconsider the annexation and ZMA is on Monday, February 5, 2018. Zoning Commission public hearing to consider the ZMA was on Tuesday, October 3, 2017. City Commission public hearing to consider the annexation and ZMA was on Monday, October 23, 2017. Project Description: Annexation 17-230 requesting annexation of 6.49 acres and amendment 17-230 of the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of REMU “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” and PLI “Parks, Open Space and Recreational Land”. Project Location: 806 Manley Road, Bozeman, MT. The property is legally described as Remaining Tract GLR-1 of COS 157, Section 31, Township 1S, Range 6E, Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with terms of annexation and contingencies. Recommended Annexation Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17- 230 and move to approve the Bridger Vale Annexation with recommended terms of annexation, and direct staff to prepare an annexation agreement for signature by the parties. Recommended Zoning Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17- 230 and move to approve the REMU/PLI Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Report Date: January 23, 2017 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders; Community Development Manager Agenda Item Type: Action - Legislative 100 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues The applicant has requested additional time before completion of the annexation agreement to allow review of the associated subdivision and PUD. The City’s annexation policy calls for a 60 day response period. Staff does not object to a longer response period in this case but does not support a period longer than nine months. Project Summary The applicant, Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., seeks to annex 6.49 acres into the City limits and establish initial zoning of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” on a portion of the property (4.67 acres), and PLI, “Public, Open Space and Recreational Lands” on the remaining portion of the property (1.83 acres). The application also includes a PUD preliminary plan and a subdivision preliminary plat (not addressed within this staff report but dependent on completion of the annexation process). See Appendix A for a detailed project description and background. Because of the unique nature of this proposal, a combination of policies and issues were addressed when evaluating the appropriateness of the request: 1. Annexation Goals and Criteria, 2. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria, 3. public interests in access to and protection of the East Gallatin Recreation Area, and 4. environmental, health, safety, and welfare issues regarding the former landfill located to the east of the subject property. The site is currently vacant and being used for cattle grazing with the primary access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA) running through the property in an easement. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from the subject property and contains administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision is located to the south and is a 5-lot residential subdivision. Recommendation in favor of the application reflects the finding that the REMU/PLI zoning designation is in accordance with the overall intent of the growth policy and that development that would be allowed within that designation will fit appropriately as a transitional land use among adjacent properties and uses. The total area anticipated to be developed with private lots with the subsequent subdivision is slightly under 36% of the total site. This leaves 64% of the site in various public ownerships with park or roadway. Additionally, with the recommended conditions of approval, public access to the EGRA will be maintained and the provision of additional park lands will be a benefit to the community and area as a whole. Zoning Commission The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the zone map amendment application at the October 3, 2017 meeting. No public comments were received. The Zoning Commission passed a motion recommending the zone map amendment be approved the City 101 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 26 Commission with a 2-1 vote. The recording of the meeting is available at https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and-streaming-audio. City Commission The City Commission held a public hearing and considered the zone map amendment application at the October 23, 2017 meeting. At the City Commission meeting a motion approving the annexation preliminarily approved failed on a 2-3 vote. No subsequent motion was made that evening. The recording of the meeting is available at https://media.avcaptureall.com/session.html?sessionid=d7ae9288-3b38-4986-b7c5- cb4348996c24&prefilter=654,3835. At the City Commission meeting held on December 4, 2017, the Commission voted to reconsider the application at a future public hearing, with a 3-1 vote. The recording of the meeting is available at https://media.avcaptureall.com/session.html?sessionid=ec2012e4-22e2-44ab-add5- ede6fdadedaa&prefilter=654,3835. The City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposal on Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:00 PM in the City Commission Room located at 121 North Rouse Ave. Bozeman, MT. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended contingencies; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended contingencies; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable Annexation and/or Zone Map Amendment criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 2 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 2 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Zoning Commission ............................................................................................................ 2 City Commission ................................................................................................................ 3 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION ............................................ 8 102 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 26 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT... 10 SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ...................................... 11 Annexation ........................................................................................................................ 11 Zone Map Amendment ..................................................................................................... 11 SECTION 5 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ................................ 12 SECTION 6 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ........... 17 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 22 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND .............. 23 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT .................................................... 24 APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING ................... 24 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF............................ 25 FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 25 ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 25 103 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 26 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES 104 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 26 105 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 26 106 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 26 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION The following terms of annexation are recommended to enable the application to comply with the City’s Annexation Policy and the requirements of state law for the provision of services. Recommended terms of annexation: 1. An Annexation Map, titled “Bridger Vale Annexation Map” with a legal description of the property and any adjoining unannexed rights-of-way and/or street access easements must be submitted by the applicant for use with the Annexation Agreement. The map must be supplied on a mylar for City records (18" by 24"), a reduced 8 ½" by 11" or 8 ½” by 14" exhibit for filing with the Annexation Agreement with the Office of the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder, and a digital copy for the City Engineer’s Office. This map must be acceptable to the Director of Public Works and the City Engineer’s Office, and must be submitted with the signed Annexation Agreement. 2. The applicant must execute all contingencies and terms of said Annexation Agreement with the City of Bozeman within 60 days of the distribution of the annexation agreement from the City to the applicant or annexation approval shall be null and void. 3. The documents and exhibits to formally annex the subject property must be identified as the “Bridger Vale Annexation.” 4. Institutional controls in place to provide notice regarding the adjacent landfill and preventing potentially hazardous activities, including: a. A note in the annexation agreement identifying the presence of the adjacent landfill and the need for ongoing monitoring. b. A note in the annexation agreement requiring the institutional controls to be in place prior to constructing buildings. c. Grant of access by Owner to the City of Bozeman for sampling in the short and long term. d. Restrictions on on-site wells for domestic or irrigation uses. e. Easements for streets, public access, and utilities. 5. The applicant has provided reporting of environmental contamination detected by groundwater and soil sampling on the subject site. The applicant must enter into an agreement with the City that governs requirements related to contamination, ground water, and vapor intrusion controls prior to annexation. 6. Any future residential or commercial development shall construct a sub-slab vapor mitigation system designed and certified by a professional engineer and certified to installation per design to eliminate any environmental concerns as a result of VOC studies related to the nearby former landfill. 107 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 26 7. The land owners and their successors shall pay all fire, street, water and sewer impact fees at the time of connection; and for future development as required by Chapter 3.24, Bozeman Municipal Code, or as amended at the time of application for any permit listed therein. 8. The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of special improvements districts (SIDs) for the following: a. Street improvements to Manley Road including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. b. Street improvements to East and West Griffin Drive including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. c. Intersection improvements to the intersection of Manley Road and East Griffin Drive. d. Intersection improvements to the intersection of West Griffin Drive and N. 7th Avenue. e. Intersection improvements to the intersection of East Griffin Drive and Bridger Drive. f. Railroad crossing improvements on East Griffin Drive. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must use the City standard template form as the basis for the SID waivers, which may be obtained from the City Engineering Division. The applicant must provide a copy of the SID waivers filed with the County Clerk and Recorder prior to annexation. 9. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.24.050.A.1 states: All streets and roads providing access to, and within, the proposed development shall meet the following standards: Right- of-way width and construction standards contained in this chapter, the most recently adopted long range transportation plan, the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy, and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. Specific dedications required include: a. The applicant must dedicate a public street and utilities easement for Manley Road 45-feet from the centerline of Manley Road where adjacent to the property boundary. The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. b. The applicant must dedicate a (minimum 60’ wide) public street and utilities easement for the access road from Manley Road to the adjacent park (East Gallatin 108 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 26 Recreation Area). The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. 10. The applicant must execute at the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder's Office in conjunction with the annexation, a waiver of right-to-protest creation of S.I.D.'s for a City- wide Park Maintenance District, which would provide a mechanism for the fair and equitable assessment of maintenance costs for City parks as part of the Annexation Agreement. 11. BMC Section 38.23.180 states: the transfer of water rights or the payment of cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights shall be provided. The applicant must contact the City Engineering Division (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of CIL of water rights for the parcel and pay any CIL of water rights due as a condition of annexation unless the CIL payment is allowed to be deferred per Mr. Heaston’s analysis. 12. The annexation agreement shall include notice that prior to the development of the property, the developer will be responsible for installing and facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property in accordance with the City’s Infrastructure Master Plan, adopted Community Plan, and all city policies and guidelines that may be in effect at the time of development. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the proposed amendment. These contingencies only apply in the event that the related annexation request has previously been approved. Recommended Contingencies of Approval: 1. That all documents and exhibits necessary to establish an initial municipal zoning designation shall be identified as the “Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment.” All required documents must be returned to the City within 60 days of the City Commission action to annex the property or the preliminary approval shall be null and void. 2. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be finalized until the Annexation Agreement is signed by the applicant and formally approved by the City Commission. If the annexation agreement is not approved, the Zone Map Amendment application shall be null and void. 3. That the applicant must submit a zone amendment map, titled “Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, an 8 ½” by 11” or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of 109 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 26 Bozeman Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject property including adjacent right-of-ways, and total acreage of the property. 4. The Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant provides an editable metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor. SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Annexation Having considered the criteria established for an annexation on September 13, 2017, the Development Review Committee (DRC) recommends approval of the requested annexation. The City Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposal on Monday, October 23, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the City Commission Room located at 121 North Rouse Ave. Bozeman, MT. A motion to approve the application failed on a 2-3 vote. At the City Commission meeting held on December 4, 2017, the Commission voted to reconsider the application at a future public hearing, with a 3-1 vote. The City Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposal on Monday, February 5, 2018 at 6:00 PM in the City Commission Room located at 121 North Rouse Ave. Bozeman, MT. Zone Map Amendment Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff recommends approval as submitted. The Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) is in conjunction with an annexation request. Staff’s recommendation and staff responses are predicated on approval of the annexation, application #17-230. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the zone map amendment on September 13, 2017. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application. The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this ZMA on October 3, 2017 and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Commission with a vote of 2-1. The City Commission held a public hearing on the proposal on Monday, October 23, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the City Commission Room located at 121 North Rouse Ave. Bozeman, MT. The a motion on approval of the annexation having failed on a 2-3 vote, no action was taken on the zone map amendment. At the City Commission meeting held on December 4, 2017, the Commission voted to reconsider the application at a future public hearing, with a 3-1 vote. The City Commission 110 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 26 will conduct a public hearing on the proposal on Monday, January 22, 2018 at 6:00 PM in the City Commission Room located at 121 North Rouse Ave. Bozeman, MT SECTION 5 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for approval of the requested annexation, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: Commission Resolution No. 4400 Criteria Commission Resolution No. 4400 Goals Goal 1: It shall be the goal of the City of Bozeman to encourage annexations of land contiguous to the City. The property in question is contiguous to the City limits on the east, west, and south sides. Goal 2: The City shall seek to annex all areas that are totally surrounded by the City, without regard to parcel size. The subject property is not totally surrounded by the City on all sides, but is contiguous on three out of four sides. Goal 3: The City shall seek to annex all property currently contracting with the City for services such as water, sanitary sewer and/or fire protection. The subject property is not currently contracting with the City for water, sewer, or fire protection. Connection to municipal infrastructure for the property will be the responsibility of the owner at the time of development of the property. Currently there are sanitary sewer services located in Gallatin Park Drive and water services on Manley Road that can serve residential construction on the subject property. Goal 4: It shall be the goal of the City of Bozeman to require annexation of all land proposed for development lying within the service boundary of the existing sewer system as depicted in the Bozeman Growth Policy, and to encourage annexations within the urban growth area identified in the Bozeman Growth Policy. The subject property is located within the service boundary of the existing sewer system, with a mainline located along Gallatin Park Drive to the east which can be used for potential future residential development. The site is also located within the urban growth area (identified as “Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands”) of the Bozeman Growth Policy. Resolution No. 4400 Policies Policy 1: Annexations shall include dedication of all easements, rights-of-way for collector and arterial streets, water rights, and waivers of right-to-protest against the 111 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 26 creation of improvement districts necessary to provide the essential services for future development of the City. The Recommended Terms of Annexation include requirements to dedicate all easements, rights-of-way for streets, water rights, and waivers of right-to-protest against the creation of improvement districts necessary to provide the essential services for future development of the City. Recommended terms of annexation require that the applicant must dedicate a public street and utilities easement for Manley Road to the adjacent park (East Gallatin Recreation Area). The easement is the primary access through the property, and will provide the primary location for water and sewer extensions to serve future development of the property. There is an existing easement indicated on some survey documents but it is preferable to have a new City standard easement until a dedication may occur through the subdivision process. The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. Policy 2: Issues pertaining to master planning and zoning shall be addressed in conjunction with the application for annexation. a. The initial application for annexation shall be in conformance with the current Bozeman Growth Policy. If a Growth Policy Amendment is necessary to accommodate anticipated uses, said amendment process may be initiated by the applicant and conducted concurrently with the processing for annexation. The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property as “Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands.” The Community Plan indicates that “all publicly owned recreational lands, including parks, are included within this category, as well as certain private lands. These areas are generally open in character and may or may not be developed for active recreational purposes. This category includes conservation easements which may not be open for public use.” Table C-16 of the Bozeman Community Plan shows both REMU and PLI as implementing districts. While the proposed REMU zoning is not in obvious accordance with the Future Land Use Map designation, the proposed PLI zoning does conform. The dedication of the additional park land and improved right-of-way with dedicated easements allowing public access to the EGRA anticipated with the associated subdivision are a public benefit. Additionally, the proposed REMU zoning is an appropriate transitional zone between adjacent residential and mixed-use land uses and is seen to meet the overall intent of the growth policy. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation of Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands does not allow any public use of the property. The proposed mix of uses with the associated subdivision is 64% public with streets, alleys, and parks, and 36% private. The majority of the site is therefore public which use does correspond with the future land use map. The proposed mix of REMU and PLI zoning designations would allow 112 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 26 development that would provide an increased opportunity for recreation and dedicated public access to the EGRA, and thus result in substantial compliance with the intent of the growth policy. b. Initial zoning classifications of the property to be annexed shall be determined by the City Commission, in compliance with the Bozeman Growth Policy and upon a recommendation of the City Zoning Commission, prior to final annexation approval. The applicant has applied for a Zone Map Amendment, as the subject property is currently under the zoning jurisdiction of Gallatin County (Zoned M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial). As a result, an application for a Zone Map Amendment is being processed concurrently with the annexation request to establish a new zoning designation under the City of Bozeman. The applicant has requested a mix of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use” and PLI, “Public Lands Institutional” zoning designation on the subject property. c. The applicant may indicate his or her preferred zoning classification as part of the annexation application. The applicant/owner has indicated that they prefer a zoning designation of “REMU” and “PLI”, as noted on the Annexation and Initial Zoning Map. Policy 3: Fees for Annexation procedures shall be established by the City Commission. No fee will be charged for any City-initiated annexation. The appropriate application processing and review fees accompanied the application. Policy 4: It shall be the general policy of the City that annexations will not be approved where unpaved county roads will be the most commonly used route to gain access to the property. The current access to the property is from Manley Road, which is paved to the edge of the subject property. Note: The annexation and the placement of a zoning district designation on the property by the City does not guarantee available services. Section 38.07.010.C of the Unified Development Code states: “Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is not a guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all of the applicable requirements and development standards of this chapter and other applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to bear the cost of extending services.” 113 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 26 Policy 5: Prior to annexation of property, it shall be the policy of the City of Bozeman to acquire adequate and usable water rights, or an appropriate fee in lieu thereof, in accordance with Section 38.23.180 of the municipal code. As stated in the Recommended Terms of Annexation (#10), the applicant must contact the City Engineering Division (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of CIL of water rights for the parcel and pay any CIL of water rights due as a condition of annexation. Staff supports deferral of water rights until development of the site. Policy 6: Infrastructure and emergency services for an area proposed for annexation will be reviewed for the health, safety and welfare of the public. If it is found that adequate services cannot be provided to ensure public health, safety and welfare, it shall be the general policy of the City to require the applicant to provide a written plan for accommodations of these services, or not approve the annexation. Additionally, annexation proposals that would use up infrastructure capacity already reserved for properties lying either within undeveloped portions of the City limits or lying outside the City limits but within the identified sewer or water service area boundaries, shall generally not be approved. City infrastructure and emergency services are available to the subject property. The site is located adjacent to developments that are currently served by Bozeman Fire. Recommended Term of Annexation #11 includes the provision that the developer will be responsible for installing facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property in accordance with the City’s Infrastructure Master Plan, adopted Community Plan, and all city policies and guidelines that may be in effect at the time of development. The intersection of Griffin Drive and Manley Road has been functioning at less than acceptable levels. The Public Works Director can waive this requirement from limiting development. The required conditions for the waiver exist and the Director indicates he will waive the intersection level of service requirement for future development. Policy 7: It shall be the general policy of the City of Bozeman to require annexation of any contiguous property for which City services are requested or for which City services are currently being contracted. City services are not currently being provided to this property. The applicant intends to seek municipal sewer and water connections for new construction upon annexation approval. Policy 8: The annexation application shall be accompanied by mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works. Mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works must be provided with the Annexation Agreement. Typically, this includes an 18-inch by 24-inch mylar map, a reduced 8½-inch by 11 or 14-inch annexation map exhibit, and a digital copy containing the metes 114 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 26 and bounds legal description of said property. Mapping requirements are addressed in Recommended Term of Annexation # 1. Policy 9: It shall be the policy of the City of Bozeman to assess a system development/impact fee in accordance with Chpt. 2, Art. 6, Div. 9 Bozeman Municipal Code (Impact Fees), and in accordance with the Bozeman Growth Policy and other policies as they are developed. The applicant will be required to pay all fire, street, water, and sewer impact fees at the time of connection for any future development as noted in Recommended Term of Annexation #7. Standard language addressing this policy has been developed by the City Attorney that is included with all annexation agreements. There are no current uses on the site for which impact fees must be addressed at time of annexation. Policy 10: Public notice requirements shall be in compliance with Montana Code Annotated. In addition, notice shall be posted in at least one conspicuous location on the site in question, and mailed to all owners of real property of record within 200 feet of the site in question using the last declared county real estate tax records, not more than 45 days nor less than 15 days prior to the scheduled action to approve or deny the annexation by the City Commission, specifying the date, time and place the annexation will be considered by the City Commission. The notice shall contain the materials specified by Section 38.40.020.A&B.1, BMC. Notices of the public hearing have been sent and posted on the site as set forth under this policy. Policy 11: Annexation agreements shall be executed and returned to the City within 60 days of distribution of the annexation agreement, unless another time period is specifically identified by the City Commission. This policy item is specified in Recommended Term of Annexation #2. The applicant desires additional time to allow the review for the associated subdivision and PUD to be completed. They wish to not complete the annexation agreement until a final decision is reached on the preliminary plat and PUD which have been submitted. Staff has no objection to the Commission granting additional time. The delay will work to the benefit of the City to enable completion of analysis of environmental conditions at and adjacent to the site and identification of all required institutional controls and necessary mitigation. If the Commission agrees with the delay, Staff will wait to prepare the annexation agreement so that final action on the agreement meets this policy. Policy 12: When possible, the use of Part 46 annexations is preferred. This annexation is being processed under Part 46 provisions. 115 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 17 of 26 SECTION 6 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. In considering the criteria the analysis must show that the amendment accomplishes criteria A-D. Criteria E-K must be considered and may be found to be affirmative, neutral, or negative. A favorable decision on the proposed application must find that the application meets all of criteria A-D and that the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. Yes. Table C-16 of the Bozeman Community Plan shows both REMU and PLI as implementing districts. Although not in obvious accordance with the growth policy map, the property, if zoned REMU and PLI, would be in accordance with the overall intent of the growth policy. The current land use designation of the site on the growth policy map is Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation does not create any public right of use to the property. The applicant intends to set aside a large portion of the property as park land under PLI zoning, and substantially enhance the EGRA access drive by paving, realigning, and providing a landscaped median and pedestrian sidewalks. If the annexation and zoning is approved, development that fits within the REMU/PLI zoning requirements would be allowed instead of being allowed to be developed within the current county zoning of M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial. The proposed mix of uses with the associated subdivision is 64% public with streets, alleys, and parks, and 36% private. The majority of the site is therefore public which use does correspond with the future land use map. If deemed necessary by the Commission, all publicly accessible spaces could be zoned as PLI. Although the City does not rely on specific development proposals in determining appropriateness of a zone map amendment, it does indicate the possible correlation of future development to the planned use of the property. The current adjacent zoning of M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to the west, R-1 (Residential Low Density) to the south, and PLI (Public Lands/Institutions) to the south/southeast includes a complex mix of allowed uses. By allowing the subject property to be zoned a mix of REMU and PLI, it would provide a suitable transition between the adjacent uses and maintain the character of the district. Furthermore, the growth policy maps specifies the future land use of adjacent areas to be Rural to the north, Parks, Open Space and Recreational to the 116 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 18 of 26 south/southeast, Residential to the south, and Industrial to the west. The proposed zoning of REMU/PLI would maintain the overall intent of the growth policy within this area by providing an appropriate transition between intended future land uses and by enhancing public parks and access to the EGRA. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Yes. The subject property is located adjacent to developments that are currently served by Bozeman Fire. To the east of the site, there is a former landfill that is a low-level Montana Comprehensive Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) site and is no longer in operation. The landfill is owned by the City. Cleanup of the site is managed by the Montana DEQ. The DEQ has indicated that the site is a low priority. Two letters from DEQ have been received, see attachments. These letters identify two requirements, first, evaluation of groundwater contamination, and second, installation of vapor intrusion mitigation with future buildings. There has been a history of monitoring of the site. See the attachment to the September 20, 2017 DEQ letter. Monitoring has occurred both within the old landfill and on adjacent properties on eight occasions between 1983 and today. In a recent study conducted in 2015, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the property at low levels with one indication of vinyl-chloride which exceeded the human health standard. Technology continues to improve allowing detection of more diffuse concentrations of materials. The City has selected a contractor to assist the City in evaluation and monitoring of the condition of the old landfill. Scoping of that contract is now underway and the recent letters from DEQ and environmental reports provided with the annexation application will assist the City in establishing the scope. The City will address the obligations it has as the owner of the old landfill. The developer is responsible for their property. A variety of institutional controls that address notice, remediation, and prevention have been identified. The October 3, 2017 letter from DEQ suggests use of appropriate vapor intrusion. As noted, there are effective techniques for mitigating vapor intrusion. The DEQ website suggests several different alternatives. A Recommended Term of Annexation (#6) is proposed to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs. Additionally, a portion of the property on the south side is located within the 500-year flood plain and there are wetlands located along the west side near the existing ditch. A wetland delineation study and report have been prepared for the site. The proposed residential and commercial properties are proposed outside of these areas which will protect property from potential flooding damage. Slab foundations are also proposed on the residential lots which will prevent potential groundwater damage that might otherwise occur on structures with a full basement. 117 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 19 of 26 C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Yes. The proposed PLI zoning provides increased opportunity for recreation which promotes public health for users of the parks. Access to the existing portion of the EGRA will also be improved through provision of upgraded vehicular access as well as construction of new pedestrian facilities. Wider paved lanes will improve safety for cyclists, and the new sidewalks will encourage non-motorized access to the site which promotes public health and safety. General welfare will be promoted through new residential townhomes which will provide a variety of housing options for area residents. Provision of additional park land adjacent to the EGRA also promote general welfare by providing an expansion of recreational opportunities. The residential development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in bio swales and retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. See also discussion under Criterion B. D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Yes. The property is located to the east of Manley Road, which contains an existing 10” water main, and there is a sewer main in Gallatin Park Drive. The applicant intends to connect to both of these lines for future development on the site. The subject property is in the Emily Dickenson Elementary School and the Chief Joseph Middle School service areas. The property is near the EGRA and trail systems, and the proposed 1.83 acres of PLI zoned land would provide additional access to park lands beyond the existing EGRA. Additionally, transportation improvements to the EGRA access road will provide and improve pedestrian and vehicular access. E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Yes. The proposed zoning will allow development at a similar density to the adjacent residential and commercial developments. This will ensure adequate light and air for the current residents. Additionally, the placement of PLI zoned land allows a generous separation between residential units on Turtle Way and any future development on the subject property. These measures will promote an open feeling and maintain the open air and ample sunshine to the properties. The proposed PLI zoning will be open parkland and therefore will provide light and free flow of air through the site. F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Yes. Motorized and non-motorized transportation will increase as a result of the new zoning which allows residential and commercial uses on the property. With the addition of transportation facilities, non-motorized traffic is also promoted by this project. The 118 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 20 of 26 improvements to the EGRA access road are seen as a benefit to the public users of the recreation area. A traffic report has been provided with this submittal which summarizes the traffic impacts expected with this development. The intersection of Griffin Drive and Manley Road is presently not providing an adequate level of service. Plans are underway to make improvements to the intersection to correct that problem. Griffin Drive is an arterial street and Manley Road is a collector street and they serve large traffic sheds out into the county. Development of this site will create a minor increase in use. Level of service analysis will occur during development review and mitigation measures will be identified and applied at that time. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. Yes. The subject property is located at the edge of the current Bozeman City limits line and within the urban growth area as defined in the Community Plan. The proposed REMU and PLI zoning designations would allow a mix of residential, commercial, and park land in an area surrounded by similar uses. Specifically, the REMU/PLI land would provide an appropriate transition between residential and park land uses located to the south and east, with manufacturing and industrial uses located to the west and north. H. Character of the district. Yes. The new zoning aligns with existing zoning in the area. The site is bordered to the south by a residential neighborhood zoned R-1. The property adjacent to the west is zoned M-1 (Industrial), while the property to the east is zoned PLI (Public Lands and Institutions). By zoning this parcel a combination of REMU and PLI, it serves as an appropriate transition between the various zoning designations in this area and the character of this district is maintained. I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Yes. The proposed zoning layout coincides with connections to the existing EGRA lands to the east. The proposed zoning establishment will create an addition of park land in a suitable area due to the adjacency of existing park facilities. Additionally, the subject property is currently being used for the drive entrance to the existing EGRA. Proposed development will improve and widen the drive entrance by providing new paving, stormwater improvements, and sidewalks, all which will will positively affect this area’s suitability for use as an approach to the park. J. Conserving the value of buildings. Neutral. There are no current buildings on the site that will be affected by the proposed zone establishment. There are wide buffers created by the addition of PLI zoned land which limits impacts on adjacent parcels. Development with the standards of the City’s PLI and REMU districts will be more responsive to adjacent property that would occur through development under the County’s existing industrial zoning designation. REMU will provide greater 119 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 21 of 26 setbacks, lesser heights, greater parking requirements, dedication of parks, and other design elements that reduce its impacts. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Neutral. The proposed REMU/PLI zoning designation would encourage residential and mixed-use opportunities which meets the overall intent of the growth policy by providing an appropriate transition between incompatible adjacent land uses, and setting aside a large portion of the property to be used as open space. However, due to the adjacency of the EGRA, the subject property would also be appropriately used as an extension of the recreational amenities on the site as a whole. While the property is privately owned and currently county zoned M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial, the proposed REMU/PLI zoning is seen as an appropriate use of the land when weighting the alternatives and recognizing that the property unlikely to be used in its entirety as a public park without transferring ownership. Additional Evaluation Criteria: Because of the unique nature of this proposal, a combination of policies and issues were addressed when evaluating the appropriateness of the request: 1. Annexation Goals and Criteria (see Section 5) 2. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria (see Section 6) 3. public interests in access to and protection of the East Gallatin Recreation Area, and 4. environmental, health, safety, and welfare issues regarding the former landfill located to the east of the subject property. East Gallatin Recreation Area: There are two additional primary public interests in considering the changing a portion of the property from Parks, Open Space and Recreation to Residential Emphasis Mixed Use in addition to the specific review criteria addressed in Sections 5 and 6 of the report. 1. Maintaining the existing legal and physical vehicle and pedestrian access to the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA). 2. Maintaining additional open space to expand the present East Gallatin Recreation Area. As described in Sections 5 and 6 of this report, existing vehicle and pedestrian access is proposed to be maintained and improved as a result of the annexation and zone map amendment. Additionally, the provision of additional land zoned PLI on the subject property will allow the expansion of recreational opportunities for the EGRA and improve connections to additional recreation facilities to the east and west. 120 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 22 of 26 Former Landfill Safety Issues: Recommended Terms of Annexation include provisions to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs and require the applicant to enter into an agreement that governs requirements related to contamination prior to annexation. See the discussion under the annexation and zoning amendment criteria above. On December 18, 2017, the City Commission approved a professional services agreement (PSA) with Water and Environmental Technologies (WET) for environmental consulting services related to the East Gallatin Landfill. A copy of the agenda item and terms of the PSA with WET may be found at http://weblink.bozeman.net/WebLink8/ElectronicFile.aspx?docid=142547&dbid=0. They have begun work on well inventory and survey work and other data collection and reporting related to the East Gallatin landfill. PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address and legal description of the property), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. 121 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant, Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., seeks to annex 6.49 acres into the City limits and establish initial zoning of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” on a portion of the property (4.67 acres), and PLI, “Public, Open Space and Recreational Lands” on the remaining portion of the property (1.83 acres). The application also includes a PUD preliminary plan and a subdivision preliminary plat, which was not included within this staff report. The applicant previously proposed an application for a Growth Policy Map Amendment for the same property to change the future land use from Parks, Recreation and Open Space to Residential for the entire tract. The City Commission denied the request following a public hearing on May 11, 2015. The applicant is proposing to establish two zoning designations on the property, REMU on approximately 71.8% of the tract, and PLI on the remaining 28.2% of the property. Despite this zoning percentage the proposed future use of the site contains 36% private uses and 64% public uses. The intent and purpose of the residential emphasis mixed-use “REMU” district is to establish areas within Bozeman that are mixed-use in character and to provide options for a variety of housing, employment, retail and neighborhood service opportunities within a new or existing neighborhood, while providing predictability to landowners and residents in uses and standards. The intent of the public lands and institutions “PLI” district is to provide for major public and quasi-public uses outside of other districts. As noted in the Bozeman Community Plan, it is desired that all lands shown on the future land use map that are not categorized as Present Rural should be annexed prior to development. The subject property is currently categorized as Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands in the Community Plan. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation does not create any public right of use to the property. If the ZMA is approved, any development would be required to conform to Article 9, Residential Emphasis Mixed Use of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant intends to designate the land zoned PLI as a public park and open space and deed to the Bozeman Sunrise Rotary Club with the project’s final plat. The remaining REMU zoned land will be developed with 20 townhomes and 1 commercial lot which would conform with the district requirements. The site is currently vacant and being used for cattle grazing with the primary access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA) running through the property. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from the subject property and contains administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision is located to the south and is a 5-lot residential subdivision. 122 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was sent via US 1st Class mail on Friday, September 15, 2017 to all property owners within 200 feet of the subject property. The project site was posted on Friday, September 15, 2017. Notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on September 17, 2017 and October 1, 2017. New notices were published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on January 14 and 28, 2018; posted on site on January 12, 2018, and mailed to property owners on January 12, 2018. Additional notice was required due to the Commission’s decision to reconsider motion which failed on December 4, 2017. No public comments have been received on the proposed reconsideration. APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as “Parks, Open Space and Recreational Lands” in the Bozeman Community Plan. Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands. All publicly owned recreational lands, including parks, are included within this category, as well as certain private lands. These areas are generally open in character and may or may not be developed for active recreational purposes. This category includes conservation easements which may not be open for public use. Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The applicant has requested zoning of “REMU” Residential Emphasis Mixed Use and “PLI” Public Lands and Institutions in association with the annexation of the property. The intent of the REMU District is to promote neighborhoods with supporting services that are substantially dominated by housing. A diversity of residential housing types should be built on the majority of any area within this category. Housing choice for a variety of households is desired and can include attached and small detached single-household dwellings, apartments, and live-work units. Residences should be included on the upper floors of buildings with ground floor commercial uses. Variation in building massing, height, and other design characteristics should contribute to a complete and interesting streetscape and may be larger than in the Residential category. Secondary supporting uses, such as retail, offices, and civic uses, are permitted at the ground floor. All uses should complement existing and planned residential uses. Non-residential uses are expected to be pedestrian oriented and emphasize the human scale with modulation as needed in larger structures. Stand alone, large, non-residential uses are discouraged. Non-residential spaces should provide an interesting pedestrian experience with quality urban design for buildings, sites, and open spaces. This category is implemented at different scales. The details of 123 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 25 of 26 implementing standards will vary with the scale. The category is appropriate near commercial centers and larger areas should have access on collector and arterial streets. Multi-household higher density urban development is expected. Any development within this category should have a well integrated transportation and open space network which encourages pedestrian activity and provides ready access within and to adjacent development. The intent of the PLI district is to provide for major public and quasi-public uses outside of other districts. Not all public and quasi-public uses need to be classified PLI. Some may fit within another district, however larger areas will be designated PLI. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Ebbighausen Homes, Inc. Applicant: Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., PO Box 930, Manhattan, MT 59741-0930 Representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying Inc., 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Annexation or Zone Map Amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Annexation Narrative Development Review Application Annexation and Initial Zone Map Amendment Required Materials Noticing Materials Annexation and Initial Zoning Map Hydrometrics Report (VOCs) 124 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 26 of 26 Resource Technologies Report (Environmental Sampling) Vaughn Environmental Services (Wetlands) Geoseal Brochure Tetra Tech Report (Soil Sampling) Traffic Impact Study DEQ letters Institutional Controls 125 126 127 128 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING PART 1 - PROJECT NARRATIVE A. Is the new zoning designation in accordance with the growth policy? How? Yes. According to the Bozeman Community Plan (June 1, 2009) on Figure 3-1- Future Land Use Map, the subject property is designated “Parks, Open Space, & Recreational Lands”. A Growth Policy Amendment has been previously submitted to change the Future Land Use to residential for the entire tract and it was denied during a City commission hearing held on May 11, 2015. We have included a chain of emails as well as the original GMA staff report with this submittal for reference. The emails outline the discussion that took place between Chris Saunders, Doug Chandler and C&H Engineering. The discussion indicates that the GMA may not be required for the PUD to be approved and the Zone Map Amendment and Annexation may be approved without the GMA. The proposed REMU zoning is not in accordance with the Parks, Open Space, & Recreational Lands designation, however, the proposed PLI zoning is in accordance with the current land use designation and the dedication and enhancement of the public right- of-way is in accordance with the growth policy as it’s intended use is for access to the EGRA. The PUD project as a whole is therefore in conformance to the growth policy by reserving a large portion of the site for PLI and constructing the wider public right-of- way for use by the EGRA and the PUD. The REMU designation seems appropriate for the proposed residential and commercial lots considering adjacent land uses and the proposed PUD project as a whole. B. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? Yes. The subject property is 2.5 miles (7-minute drive) from the fire station. It is located on the existing City limits line between Minor Subdivision 385 and Gallatin Park Subdivision, both currently served by Bozeman Fire. There is an old landfill that is a low-level Montana Comprehensive Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) site and was operated between 1962 and 1970 located to the east of the site. Cleanup of the site is managed by the Montana DEQ. VOCs that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the property in a recent study conducted by Resource Technologies in 2015 at low levels with one indication of vinyl-chloride which exceeded the human health standard. It has been noted that the identified VOCs will continue to degrade over time. A condition of approval for the Bridger Vale Subdivision has been proposed to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs. The proposed condition states: “All lots shall construct a sub-slab vapor mitigation system to eliminate any environmental concerns.” Tetra Tech has been contracted by Andy Ebbighausen and has 129 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 provided a report based on soil sampling conducted on October 10, 2016. A Geo-seal vapor intrusion barrier has been indicated as one possible solution to mitigate sub-slab vapor concerns as a follow up to this investigation. All reports pertaining to the risk analysis and environmental testing have been included with this report. The following reports are included: Hydrometrics, Inc (April 30, 2015); Resource Technologies, Inc. (January 13, 2015); CPF Associates, Inc. (Vapor Intrusion Human Health Assessment - Match 4, 2015) A portion of the property on the south side is located within the 500-year flood plain and there are wetlands located along the west side near the existing ditch. A wetland delineation study and report have been prepared by Vaughn Environmental Services for the site (included with this submittal). The proposed residential and commercial properties are proposed outside of these areas which will protect property from potential flooding damage. Slab foundations are also proposed on the residential lots which will prevent potential groundwater damage that might otherwise occur on structures with a full basement. C. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? Yes. The REMU and PLI zoning designations will allow for development that enhances the existing surrounding land uses. The PLI zoning provides increased opportunity for recreation which promotes public health for users of the parks. Access to the existing portion of public park and Glen Lake will also be improved through provision of upgraded vehicular access as well as construction of new pedestrian facilities. Wider paved lanes will improve safety for cyclists. The sidewalks along Bridger Vale Drive and the new paved surfaces will encourage non-motorized access to the site which promotes public health and safety. It is safer for pedestrians to use the sidewalk and crosswalks rather than walk alongside the roadway. General welfare will be promoted through provision of new residential townhomes which are modern spacious and efficiently built structures. These homes provide healthy environments for residents. Provision of additional parks to the EGRA also promote general welfare by providing trail space and recreational opportunities. The residential development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in bio swales and retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. D. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? Yes. The property is located to the East of Manley Road, which contains an existing 10” water main. The sewer main located in Gallatin Park Drive will be used for this project. The subject property is in the Emily Dickenson Elementary School District and the Chief 130 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 Joseph Middle School District. The property lies within a quarter mile of Glen Lake Park. 1.8289 acres of PLI zoning is proposed with this project which will provide additional access to park lands beyond the existing EGRA. Transportation improvements to the EGRA access road will provide and improve pedestrian and vehicular access. E. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? The proposed zoning will allow development at a similar density to the adjacent parcels. This will ensure adequate light and air for the current residents. Wide boulevards and a landscaped median are being proposed along with houses that are set back in the front of the lots. These measures will promote an open feeling and maintain the open air and ample sunshine to the properties. The proposed PLI zoning will be wide open parkland and therefore will provide light and free flow of air through the site. F. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems? How? Yes. Motorized and non-motorized transportation will increase as a result of the new zoning due to the addition of residential units on the property. With the addition of pedestrian transportation facilities non-motorized traffic is promoted by this project. Divided lanes are provided with the street section median design and this will help to buffer traffic dividing the flow of traffic into two median separated lanes. A traffic report has been provided with this submittal which summarizes the traffic impacts expected with this development. G. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? Yes. The subject property is currently vacant and is on the edge of the Bozeman City limits line. The REMU and PLI zoning designations have been spatially laid out to conform to the PUD site plan and the lands that will be designated as public parks and open spaces. The open space lot in the south of the Tract will be quit claim deeded to the Bozeman Sunrise Rotary Club with this project’s final plat. The assignment of 20 residential townhouse REMU lots and 1 small commercial REMU lot conform well to this neighborhood. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from Bridger Vale and it contains mixed-use, administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-use as existing land uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision 385 to the south is a 5-lot minor subdivision and will blend with the proposed townhouse units but in a compatible manner with a centrally located open space. This project will enhance and infill this area that would otherwise remain as a vacant lot or be developed within the county zoning of M-1 light manufacturing. The proposed project promotes compatible urban growth on an appropriate scale and in a sustainable manner. 131 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 H. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? Yes. The new zoning aligns with existing zoning in the area. The site is bordered to the south by a residential neighborhood zoned R-1. The property adjacent to the west is zoned M-1 (Industrial), while the property to the east is zoned PLI (Public Lands & institutions). By zoning this parcel a combination of REMU and PLI, it serves as an effective transition between the various zoning designations in this area and the character of this district is maintained. I. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? Yes. The proposed zoning layout interfaces with the existing EGRA lands to the east. The ability to enhance this recreational park by the addition of the open space and parks PLI zones proposed with this project are unique to this project’s location. This project will positively affect the area’s suitability for parks and recreation by addition to existing park lands. The project is currently being used for the drive entrance to the existing EGRA. The project will improve and widen the drive entrance. The addition of paving, stormwater improvements and sidewalks will positively affect this area’s suitability for use as an approach to the park. J. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? Yes, there are no conflicts with the values of existing buildings with this project as all of the proposed townhouse structures are set back from any existing structures. Wide buffers will be in place between existing residential and mixed-use buildings across Manley Road. The proposed structures’ future values will be protected through measures being taken to protect the dwellings from potential soil contamination by installing an appropriate vapor barrier and by designing slab on grade foundations. The residential units are oriented in a manner to preserve existing view sheds of the Bridger Mountains including views of the “M”, Mount Baldy and Sacajawea Peak among other natural features along the ridgeline of the mountains. The orientation to maintain these view sheds will conserve the values of the future townhouses. Orientation of the buildings in close proximity to a mixed-use center and also recreational parks will further help to conserve the values of the future structures and will also enhance the values of some of the existing adjacent structures. 132 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 K. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? Yes. The new zoning designations encourages the most appropriate use of land in this vicinity by addition of residential and mixed-use opportunities while preserving the overall growth policy of parks and open space by setting aside a large portion of the property for PLI zoning and substantially enhancing the EGRA access drive. The REMU lots are appropriate considering the current adjacent land uses of the Gallatin Park Subdivision and Sunfish Park. The adjacent County tract to the north of the site is also being used as a residence. 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 Resource Technologies, Inc. 1050 E a s t Main S t r e e t Suite 4 , B o z eman, Montana 59715 Voice: ( 406) 585-8005 • F a x : ( 406) 585-0069 • e -mail: r t i @montana.n e t January 13, 2015 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen P.O. Box 930 Manhattan, MT 59741 Subject: Environmental Sampling Report; Manley Drive Property; Bozeman, Montana Dear Mr. Ebbighausen: Resource Technologies, Inc. (RTI) has completed environmental sampling at the property located east of Manley Road and north of the Bozeman Ponds Recreation Area in Bozeman, Montana. Environmental sampling was completed to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the former Bozeman City Landfill that was situated southeast of the subject property. Sampling activities were not designed nor intended to identify potential on-site sources of contamination. Work tasks included installing two groundwater monitoring wells and two soil vapor probes at the property and collection of soil, groundwater, and soil vapor samples. One monitoring well and soil vapor probe were placed along the southern boundary of the site and one monitoring well and soil vapor probe were placed along the eastern margin of the site (Figure 1). Sampling locations were selected to establish environmental conditions at the up-hydraulic gradient boundaries of the subject property. Groundwater at these locations is expected to be flowing onto the subject property from the south and/or east. As such, contaminants identified at these locations (particularly in groundwater and soil vapor) would presumably be attributable to an off-site source. Sampling methods and results are discussed below. Monitoring Well Installation On December 16, 2014, RTI installed two monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-2) at the locations shown in Figure 1 using direct push methods. Stantec of Butte, Montana provided soil-boring services. Soil samples were collected continuously by driving a four-foot core barrel with an acetate liner into undisturbed soil. Samples collected above the water table were field screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID) and heated headspace methods. One soil sample from each borehole collected above the soil/groundwater interface was retained and submitted to Energy Laboratories in Billings for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) screen and VOCs (Method 8260 Extended List) analyses. The analyte list for soil samples is included as Table 1A. Soil laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix A. 185 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 2 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. Soil boreholes were advanced to depths of 12 feet and were completed as groundwater monitoring wells with 1-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well casing and eight foot lengths of 0.010 inch slotted well screen positioned from 4 to 12 feet below ground surface. A washed sand filter pack was emplaced around the well screen and the remaining annular space was backfilled with granular bentonite. Since the monitoring wells are expected to be temporary installations, no protective cover was installed over the wellheads. Soil borehole logs are included as Appendix B. Monitoring wells were developed by surging and pumping until the wells yielded visibly non-turbid water. Soil Vapor Probe Installation On December 16, 2014, RTI installed two soil vapor probes (VW-1 and VW-2) at the location shown in Figure 1 using direct push methods. A six-inch stainless steel Geotech TM soil vapor probe was installed at a depth of 3 to 3.5 feet at each location. Teflon tubing was attached to the probe and the tubing extended to several feet above ground surface to facilitate soil vapor sampling. Washed sand was emplaced around the probe and the remaining annular space was backfilled with granular bentonite. Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were collected from the two monitoring wells on December 22, 2014 using disposable polyethylene bailers and nylon string. Prior to sample collection, a minimum of three casing volumes of water were purged from the well. During purging, stabilization parameters including temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential were monitored. When readings of these parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected. Samples were transferred to laboratory provided containers and were submitted to Energy Laboratories for EPH screen and VOCs analyses. The analyte list for groundwater samples is included as Table 1A. Groundwater analytical results for detected compounds only are included in Table 1B and laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix C. Soil Vapor Sampling Soil vapor samples were collected from the two soil vapor probes on December 22, 2014. Six-liter SUMMA canisters with flow controllers calibrated to collect a sample over an interval of one hour were connected to the vapor-probe tubing. Sampling was initiated by opening the SUMMA canister valve at the start of sampling and monitoring the flow controller vacuum. When the vacuum reading on the flow controller decreased to no less than (5) inches mercury, sampling was terminated by closing the SUMMA canister valve. Following sampling, a protective cap was then tightened onto the SUMMA canister intake fitting. The SUMMA canisters were submitted to ALS Laboratories of Salt Lake City, Utah for VOCs analysis by Method TO-15. The analytical laboratory supplied the certified SUMMA canister, flow controller, and vacuum gauge. The SUMMA canisters were returned to the laboratory along with the flow controllers in the same packaging in which they arrived. The analyte list for soil 186 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 3 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. vapor samples is included as Table 2A. Analytical results for detected compounds only are summarized in Table 2B and laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix D. Results Soil Analytes detected in soil samples were limited to total extractable hydrocarbons (TEH) detected via EPH analysis in sample MW-1 3-4 at a concentration of 59 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). TEH represents the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon compounds that comprise diesel fuel and waste oil; however, the laboratory indicated that the analytical profile of TEH detected in sample MW-1 3-4 was typical of naturally occurring hydrocarbons in soil. Groundwater Analytes detected in groundwater samples included the VOCs toluene, chloroethane, and vinyl chloride. VOCs detected in sample MW-1 were limited to toluene at an estimated concentration of 0.14 micrograms per liter (g/l). The result was “J” qualified by the laboratory since the compound was detected at a concentration below the laboratory reporting limit. VOCs detected in sample MW-2 included chloroethane reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.11 g/l, toluene reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.19 g/l, and vinyl chloride reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.52 g/l. TEH was not detected in either groundwater sample. Soil Vapor Analytical results for soil-vapor sample VW-1 indicated a total VOCs concentration of 220 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m 3 ). The majority of the VOCs detected in this sample were unidentified compounds that are not VOCs on the TO-15 analyte list. Identified compounds included freon 11 reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.87 g/m 3 and tetrachloroethene (PCE) reported at a concentration of 51 g/m 3 . Analytical results for soil-vapor sample VW-2 indicated a total VOCs concentration of 410 micrograms per cubic meter g/m 3 . Just under 50% of the VOCs detected in this sample were unidentified compounds that are not VOCs on the TO-15 analyte list. Identified compounds included freon 11 reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.87 g/m 3 , acetone reported at 100 g/m 3 , 2-butanone reported at g/m 3 , chloroform reported at g/m 3 , tetrahydrofuran reported at 10 g/m 3 , toluene reported at 6.5 g/m 3 , PCE reported at 1.1 g/m 3 , ethylbenzene reported at 3.4 g/m 3 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 4 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. appear to be more substantial along the eastern site boundary. With the exception of TEH, no target analytes were detected in either soil sample collected at the site. The reported TEH concentration was well below the most conservative soil RBSLs and the laboratory report indicated that detected TEH may have been naturally occurring. VOCs detected in groundwater included toluene and vinyl chloride at concentrations below the laboratory reporting limit. The laboratory reporting limit is the level at which the concentration of a compound can be quantified with statistical confidence. These compounds were positively identified; however, the concentrations were too low to be quantified with statistical confidence, thus the reported values are estimates. The estimated concentrations of toluene are well below human health standards for groundwater. The estimated vinyl chloride concentration (0.52 g/l) exceeds the human health standard for groundwater of 0.2 g/l. Vinyl chloride is the final breakdown product of PCE. Numerous VOCs were detected in soil vapor samples (Table 2B). There are no established regulatory screening levels for VOCs in soil vapor. Conclusions VOCs that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the subject property. Sampling points were chosen to assess potential environmental impacts originating off site. Sample points MW-1 and VW-1 were positioned to detect contaminants potentially entering the site from the south and sample points MW-2 and VW-2 were positioned to detect contaminants potentially entering the site from the east. It is unknown if any of the sampling data represents worst case conditions. Only one applicable regulatory screening level was exceeded by detected compounds. The groundwater human health standard for vinyl chloride was exceeded in sample MW-2, although the reported concentration was “J” qualified for being below the laboratory reporting limit. Limitations Sampling conducted at the subject property was intended to assess the potential for impacts by contaminants associated with the former Bozeman City Landfill. The data indicate that groundwater and soil vapor at the presumed upgradient margins of the subject property are impacted by VOCs; however, the data are not definitive as to the contaminant source or to the extent and magnitude of impacts on site. In addition, sampling was not intended to assess environmental conditions across the entire property, only at the specific locations chosen for sampling. 188 189 Figures 190 Resource Technologies Inc. MW-1 MW-2 VW-2 VW-1 MW-1 VP-1 Existing 1-inch groundwater monitoring well Existing soil vapor probe Figure 1. Site Photo and Sample Locations Manley road Property Bozeman, Montana Proposed 1-inch groundwater monitoring well 191 Tables 192 Table 1A. Soil and Groundwater Sampling Target Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen; Bozeman, Montana EPH Screen Target Analytes 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Chlorobenzene Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (TEH) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Chlorodibromomethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Chloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Chloroform 1,1-Dichloroethane Chloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Dibromomethane 1,2-Dibromoethane Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Ethyl benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane m,p-Xylene 1,2-Dichloropropane Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Methyl t-butyl ether 1,3 Dichloropropane Methylene chloride 1,4-Dichlorobenzene o-Xylene 2-Chlorotoluene Styrene 2,2 Dichloropropane Tetrachloroethene Benzene Toluene Bromobenzene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Bromochloromethane trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromodichloromethane Trichloroethene Bromoform Trichlorofluormethane Bromomethane Vinyl chloride Carbon tetrachloride Method 8260 (VOCs) Target Analytes 193 Table 1B. Groundwater Sampling Results; Detected Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen, Bozeman, Montana VOCs by 8260 DEQ Human Health Standard for Groundwater Chloroethane ND 0.11 J NA Toluene 0.14 J 0.19 J 1,000 Vinyl chloride ND 0.52 J 0.2 Notes: Q = Qualifier ND = Not detected. NA = Not applicable. µg/l Q Analyte J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the Reporting Limit (RL). It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass µg/l = micrograms per liter MW-1 MW-2 µg/l Q µg/l Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 1B Groundwater Sample Results 12.2014 1 of 1 194 Tentatively Identified Compounds* 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Chloromethane Ethanol 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Decane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4-methyl-Decane 1,1-Dichloroethane Cyclohexane 1,1-Dichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Ethyl acetate 1,2-Dibromoethane Ethyl benzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Freon 11 1,2-Dichloroethane Freon 113 1,2-Dichloropropane Freon 114 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Heptane 1,3-Butadiene Hexane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene m,p-Xylene 2-Hexanone Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 4-Ethyl Toluene Methyl t-butyl ether 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Methylene chloride Acetone o-Xylene Benzene Styrene Benzyl chloride Tetrachloroethene Bromodichloromethane Tetrahydrofuran Bromoform Toluene Bromomethane Total Volatile Organics Carbon disulfide trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Carbon tetrachloride trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Chlorobenzene Trichloroethene Chloroethane Vinyl acetate Chloroform Vinyl chloride Table 2A. Soil Vapor Sampling Target Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen; Bozeman, Montana TO-15 Analytes Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 2B Air Sample Results 12.2014 195 1 of 1 Table 2B. Soil Vapor Sampling Results; Detected Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen, Bozeman, Montana VOCs by TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND U <0.74 U 4.0 20 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND U <0.74 U 1.5 7.2 4-Ethyl Toluene ND U <0.74 U 0.73 3.6 Acetone ND U <0.71 U 43 E 100 E Chloroform ND U <0.73 U 0.41 J 2.0 J Ethyl benzene ND U <0.65 U 0.79 3.4 Freon 11 0.16 J 0.87 J 0.15 J 0.87 J m,p-Xylene ND U <0.65 U 4.0 18 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) ND U <0.44 U 3.5 10 o-Xylene ND U <0.65 U 1.2 5.1 Tetrachloroethene 7.5 51 0.16 J 1.1 J Tetrahydrofuran ND U <0.44 U 3.5 10 Toluene ND U <0.57 U 1.7 6.5 Total Volatile Organics 53 J 220 J 100 410 Tentatively Identified Compounds* Decane 5.8 J Ethanol 21 J 4-methyl-Decane 2.7 J Notes: Q = Qualifier * Compounds not on the TO-15 analyte list Sample ID VW-1 Q Q b - EPA commercial air screening level (EPA, 2014) VW-2 a - EPA residential air screening level (EPA, 2014) ppb v/v ND = Not detected. NA = Not applicable. µg/m3 Q U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the Method Detection Limit (MDL). E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range. ppb v/v Analyte J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the Reporting Limit (RL). It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed. µg/m3 µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter ppb v/v = parts per billion volume Q Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 2B Air Sample Results 12.2014 1 of 1 196 APPENDIX A Laboratory Analytical Reports - Soil 197 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B14121551-001 MW-1 3-4 12/16/14 10:00 12/17/14 Soil EPH-Ultrasonic Extraction Hydrocarbons, Extractable Petroleum-Scrn Moisture Moisture Prep Percent Moisture Volatile Organics, Methanol Extraction 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Extended List B14121551-002 MW-2 5-6 12/16/14 10:15 12/17/14 Soil Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name: Ebbighausen Work Order: B14121551 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 December 30, 2014 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 2 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 12/17/2014 for analysis. 198 Page 1 of 19 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121551-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 3-4 Collection Date: 12/16/14 10:00 Matrix: Soil Report Date: 12/24/14 DateReceived: 12/17/14 Revised Date: 12/30/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Moisture 17 wt% 0.amn2 SW3550A 12/19/14 08:24 / VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Acetone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Acetonitrile ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Acrolein ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Acrylonitrile ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Benzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Bromobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Bromochloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Bromodichloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Bromoform ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Bromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj n-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj sec-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj tert-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Carbon disulfide ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Carbon tetrachloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Chlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Chlorodibromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Chloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Chloroform ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Chloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 2-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 4-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.24 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2-Dibromoethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Dibromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Dichlorodifluoromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,3-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 2,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Ethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Report LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121551-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 3-4 Collection Date: 12/16/14 10:00 Matrix: Soil Report Date: 12/24/14 DateReceived: 12/17/14 Revised Date: 12/30/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Hexachlorobutadiene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 2-Hexanone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Iodomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Isopropylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj p-Isopropyltoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Methyl ethyl ketone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Methyl isobutyl ketone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Methylene chloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Naphthalene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj n-Propylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Styrene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Tetrachloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Toluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Trichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Trichlorofluoromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Vinyl acetate ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Vinyl chloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj m+p-Xylenes ND mg/kg-dry 0.24 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj o-Xylene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Xylenes, Total ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90.0 %REC 60-136 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 90.0 %REC 70-132 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 98.0 %REC 78-160 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj Surr: Toluene-d8 96.0 %REC 75-138 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (SGT) 13 mg/12amnkg-dry 200SW8015M 12/29/14 14:18 / Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 59 mg/12amnkg-dry 200SW8015M 12/19/14 23:22 / Surr: o-Terphenyl (SGT) 76.0 %REC 40-amn140 SW8015M 12/29/14 14:18 / Surr: o-Terphenyl 79.0 %REC 40-amn140 SW8015M 12/19/14 23:22 / - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. - Results for both the Silca Gel Treatment (SGT) and the untreated solvent extract are reported. Silica gel treatment removes polar non-petroleum hydrcarbons. The hydrocarbon profile was typical of natural occuring hydrocarbons in soil. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121551-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 5-6 Collection Date: 12/16/14 10:15 Matrix: Soil Report Date: 12/24/14 DateReceived: 12/17/14 Revised Date: 12/30/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Moisture 20 wt% 0.amn2 SW3550A 12/19/14 08:27 / VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Acetone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Acetonitrile ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Acrolein ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Acrylonitrile ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Benzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Bromobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Bromochloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Bromodichloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Bromoform ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Bromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj n-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj sec-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj tert-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Carbon disulfide ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Carbon tetrachloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Chlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Chlorodibromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Chloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Chloroform ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Chloromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 2-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 4-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.25 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2-Dibromoethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Dibromomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Dichlorodifluoromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,3-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 2,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Ethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Report LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121551-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 5-6 Collection Date: 12/16/14 10:15 Matrix: Soil Report Date: 12/24/14 DateReceived: 12/17/14 Revised Date: 12/30/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Hexachlorobutadiene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 2-Hexanone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Iodomethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Isopropylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj p-Isopropyltoluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Methyl ethyl ketone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Methyl isobutyl ketone ND mg/kg-dry 4.0 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Methylene chloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Naphthalene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj n-Propylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Styrene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Tetrachloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Toluene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Trichloroethene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Trichlorofluoromethane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Vinyl acetate ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Vinyl chloride ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj m+p-Xylenes ND mg/kg-dry 0.25 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj o-Xylene ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Xylenes, Total ND mg/kg-dry 0.20 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 82.0 %REC 60-136 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 83.0 %REC 70-132 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 89.0 %REC 78-160 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj Surr: Toluene-d8 86.0 %REC 75-138 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN Total Extractable Hydrocarbons ND mg/13amnkg-dry 200SW8015M 12/19/14 22:30 / Surr: o-Terphenyl 87.0 %REC 40-amn140 SW8015M 12/19/14 22:30 / - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 202 Page 5 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: lcs-85641 Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 11:45 Acetone 10.7 mg/kg 4.0 107 49 145 Acetonitrile 8.24 mg/kg 4.0 82 60 130 Acrolein 8.48 mg/kg 4.0 85 20 197 Acrylonitrile 8.56 mg/kg 4.0 86 45 146 Benzene 0.992 mg/kg 0.20 99 70 127 Bromobenzene 1.01 mg/kg 0.20 101 70 135 Bromochloromethane 1.10 mg/kg 0.20 110 60 130 Bromodichloromethane 1.00 mg/kg 0.20 100 56 136 Bromoform 0.848 mg/kg 0.20 85 59 132 Bromomethane 0.362 mg/kg 0.20 36 18 134 n-Butylbenzene 1.08 mg/kg 0.20 108 71 134 sec-Butylbenzene 1.03 mg/kg 0.20 103 67 132 tert-Butylbenzene 1.02 mg/kg 0.20 102 68 134 Carbon disulfide 0.896 mg/kg 0.20 90 32 141 Carbon tetrachloride 1.09 mg/kg 0.20 109 60 140 Chlorobenzene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 75 132 Chlorodibromomethane 0.856 mg/kg 0.20 86 62 133 Chloroethane 0.270 mg/kg 0.20 27 45 139 S Chloroform 1.04 mg/kg 0.20 104 62 132 Chloromethane 0.952 mg/kg 0.20 95 41 138 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 1.00 mg/kg 0.20 100 41 149 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.888 mg/kg 0.20 89 57 123 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.952 mg/kg 0.20 95 60 135 2-Chlorotoluene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 74 135 Dibromomethane 1.10 mg/kg 0.20 110 60 135 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 70 130 4-Chlorotoluene 1.02 mg/kg 0.20 102 75 136 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 71 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.08 mg/kg 0.20 108 71 131 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.848 mg/kg 0.20 85 31 123 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.04 mg/kg 0.20 104 66 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.968 mg/kg 0.20 97 51 140 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.06 mg/kg 0.20 106 64 133 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.960 mg/kg 0.20 96 63 131 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.00 mg/kg 0.20 100 66 133 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.960 mg/kg 0.20 96 60 130 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.952 mg/kg 0.20 95 59 135 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.07 mg/kg 0.20 107 39 157 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.03 mg/kg 0.20 103 65 132 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.928 mg/kg 0.20 93 55 134 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.952 mg/kg 0.20 95 58 146 Ethylbenzene 1.03 mg/kg 0.20 103 74 136 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.952 mg/kg 0.20 95 52 133 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. 203 Page 6 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: lcs-85641 Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 11:45 2-Hexanone 10.0 mg/kg 4.0 100 54 129 Iodomethane 1.11 mg/kg 0.20 111 53 128 Isopropylbenzene 0.992 mg/kg 0.20 99 70 133 p-Isopropyltoluene 1.14 mg/kg 0.20 114 70 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.864 mg/kg 0.20 86 43 152 Methyl ethyl ketone 9.60 mg/kg 4.0 96 43 148 Methyl isobutyl ketone 9.12 mg/kg 4.0 91 54 127 Methylene chloride 0.904 mg/kg 0.20 90 51 134 Naphthalene 0.808 mg/kg 0.20 81 15 171 n-Propylbenzene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 72 134 Styrene 1.02 mg/kg 0.20 102 70 135 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.992 mg/kg 0.20 99 35 156 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.960 mg/kg 0.20 96 59 135 Tetrachloroethene 1.12 mg/kg 0.20 112 64 139 Toluene 0.992 mg/kg 0.20 99 73 137 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.840 mg/kg 0.20 84 24 153 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.840 mg/kg 0.20 84 34 150 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.07 mg/kg 0.20 107 63 134 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.904 mg/kg 0.20 90 56 136 Trichloroethene 0.976 mg/kg 0.20 98 65 134 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.920 mg/kg 0.20 92 48 140 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.928 mg/kg 0.20 93 56 142 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.984 mg/kg 0.20 98 67 125 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.01 mg/kg 0.20 101 71 131 Vinyl acetate 0.880 mg/kg 0.20 88 28 123 Vinyl chloride 0.968 mg/kg 0.20 97 32 136 m+p-Xylenes 1.98 mg/kg 0.20 99 75 136 o-Xylene 0.960 mg/kg 0.20 96 72 134 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 0.20 86 60 136 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.20 85 70 132 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 0.20 95 78 160 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.20 92 75 138 Lab ID: mb-85641 Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 13:14 Acetone ND mg/kg 4.0 Acetonitrile ND mg/kg 4.0 Acrolein ND mg/kg 4.0 Acrylonitrile ND mg/kg 4.0 Benzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Bromobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Bromochloromethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Bromodichloromethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Bromoform ND mg/kg 0.20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 204 Page 7 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: mb-85641 Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 13:14 Bromomethane ND mg/kg 0.20 n-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 sec-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 tert-Butylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Carbon disulfide ND mg/kg 0.20 Carbon tetrachloride ND mg/kg 0.20 Chlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Chlorodibromomethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Chloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Chloroform ND mg/kg 0.20 Chloromethane ND mg/kg 0.20 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2-Dibromoethane ND mg/kg 0.20 2-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 Dibromomethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 4-Chlorotoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2-Dichloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg 0.20 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg 0.20 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,3-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg 0.20 2,2-Dichloropropane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg 0.20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg 0.20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND mg/kg 0.20 Ethylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Hexachlorobutadiene ND mg/kg 0.20 2-Hexanone ND mg/kg 4.0 Iodomethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Isopropylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 p-Isopropyltoluene ND mg/kg 0.20 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND mg/kg 0.20 Methyl ethyl ketone ND mg/kg 4.0 Methyl isobutyl ketone ND mg/kg 4.0 Methylene chloride ND mg/kg 0.20 Naphthalene ND mg/kg 0.20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 205 Page 8 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: mb-85641 Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 13:14 n-Propylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Styrene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Tetrachloroethene ND mg/kg 0.20 Toluene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND mg/kg 0.20 Trichloroethene ND mg/kg 0.20 Trichlorofluoromethane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND mg/kg 0.20 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND mg/kg 0.20 Vinyl acetate ND mg/kg 0.20 Vinyl chloride ND mg/kg 0.20 m+p-Xylenes ND mg/kg 0.20 o-Xylene ND mg/kg 0.20 Xylenes, Total ND mg/kg 0.20 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 0.20 92 60 136 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.20 94 70 132 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 0.20 107 78 160 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.20 99 75 138 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:12 Acetone 12.9 mg/kg-dry 4.0 107 49 145 Acetonitrile 10.3 mg/kg-dry 4.0 86 60 130 Acrolein 11.2 mg/kg-dry 4.0 94 19 197 Acrylonitrile 11.1 mg/kg-dry 4.0 92 45 146 Benzene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 70 127 Bromobenzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 70 135 Bromochloromethane 1.32 mg/kg-dry 0.20 110 60 130 Bromodichloromethane 1.16 mg/kg-dry 0.20 97 56 136 Bromoform 1.000 mg/kg-dry 0.20 83 59 132 Bromomethane 0.373 mg/kg-dry 0.20 31 18 134 n-Butylbenzene 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 71 134 sec-Butylbenzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 67 132 tert-Butylbenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 68 134 Carbon disulfide 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 32 141 Carbon tetrachloride 1.25 mg/kg-dry 0.20 104 60 140 Chlorobenzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 75 132 Chlorodibromomethane 1.03 mg/kg-dry 0.20 86 62 133 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 206 Page 9 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:12 Chloroethane 0.360 mg/kg-dry 0.20 30 45 139 S Chloroform 1.22 mg/kg-dry 0.20 102 62 132 Chloromethane 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 41 138 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 1.35 mg/kg-dry 0.20 112 41 149 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.924 mg/kg-dry 0.24 77 57 123 1,2-Dibromoethane 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 60 135 2-Chlorotoluene 1.02 mg/kg-dry 0.20 85 74 135 Dibromomethane 1.30 mg/kg-dry 0.20 108 60 135 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.09 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 70 130 4-Chlorotoluene 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 75 136 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.06 mg/kg-dry 0.20 88 71 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.17 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 71 131 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.800 mg/kg-dry 0.20 67 31 123 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.25 mg/kg-dry 0.20 104 66 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 51 140 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 64 133 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 63 131 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.17 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 66 133 1,2-Dichloropropane 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 60 130 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 59 135 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.23 mg/kg-dry 0.20 102 39 157 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.19 mg/kg-dry 0.20 99 65 132 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 55 134 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 58 146 Ethylbenzene 1.19 mg/kg-dry 0.20 99 74 136 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.926 mg/kg-dry 0.20 77 52 133 2-Hexanone 12.9 mg/kg-dry 4.0 107 54 129 Iodomethane 1.37 mg/kg-dry 0.20 114 53 128 Isopropylbenzene 1.09 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 70 133 p-Isopropyltoluene 1.20 mg/kg-dry 0.20 100 69 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.10 mg/kg-dry 0.20 91 43 152 Methyl ethyl ketone 12.7 mg/kg-dry 4.0 106 43 148 Methyl isobutyl ketone 12.2 mg/kg-dry 4.0 102 54 127 Methylene chloride 1.10 mg/kg-dry 0.20 91 51 134 Naphthalene 0.990 mg/kg-dry 0.20 82 15 171 n-Propylbenzene 1.03 mg/kg-dry 0.20 86 72 134 Styrene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 70 135 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 35 156 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 59 135 Tetrachloroethene 1.26 mg/kg-dry 0.20 105 64 139 Toluene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 73 137 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.911 mg/kg-dry 0.20 76 24 153 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.910 mg/kg-dry 0.20 76 34 150 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. 207 Page 10 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:12 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.27 mg/kg-dry 0.20 106 63 134 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 56 136 Trichloroethene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 65 134 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 48 140 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.09 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 56 142 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.07 mg/kg-dry 0.20 89 67 125 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 71 130 Vinyl acetate 1.19 mg/kg-dry 0.20 99 28 123 Vinyl chloride 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 32 136 m+p-Xylenes 2.32 mg/kg-dry 0.24 96 75 136 o-Xylene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 72 134 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 0.20 84 60 136 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.20 87 70 132 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 0.20 90 78 160 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.20 88 75 138 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:41 Acetone 13.6 mg/kg-dry 4.0 113 49 145 5.1 20 Acetonitrile 10.4 mg/kg-dry 4.0 86 60 130 0.9 20 Acrolein 10.4 mg/kg-dry 4.0 86 19 197 8.0 20 Acrylonitrile 10.9 mg/kg-dry 4.0 90 45 146 1.8 20 Benzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 70 127 0.8 20 Bromobenzene 1.11 mg/kg-dry 0.20 92 70 135 3.4 20 Bromochloromethane 1.31 mg/kg-dry 0.20 109 60 130 0.7 20 Bromodichloromethane 1.19 mg/kg-dry 0.20 99 56 136 2.4 20 Bromoform 1.02 mg/kg-dry 0.20 85 59 132 1.9 20 Bromomethane 0.432 mg/kg-dry 0.20 36 18 134 15 20 n-Butylbenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 71 134 0.9 20 sec-Butylbenzene 1.11 mg/kg-dry 0.20 92 67 132 3.4 20 tert-Butylbenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 68 134 0.0 20 Carbon disulfide 1.10 mg/kg-dry 0.20 91 32 141 1.7 20 Carbon tetrachloride 1.27 mg/kg-dry 0.20 106 60 140 1.5 20 Chlorobenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 75 132 1.7 20 Chlorodibromomethane 1.000 mg/kg-dry 0.20 83 62 133 2.8 20 Chloroethane 0.352 mg/kg-dry 0.20 29 45 139 2.2 20 S Chloroform 1.23 mg/kg-dry 0.20 102 62 132 0.8 20 Chloromethane 1.03 mg/kg-dry 0.20 86 41 138 11 20 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 1.32 mg/kg-dry 0.20 110 41 149 2.2 20 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.05 mg/kg-dry 0.24 87 57 123 13 20 1,2-Dibromoethane 1.17 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 60 135 2.5 20 2-Chlorotoluene 1.03 mg/kg-dry 0.20 86 74 135 0.9 20 Dibromomethane 1.28 mg/kg-dry 0.20 106 60 135 1.5 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 70 130 3.5 20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. 208 Page 11 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:41 4-Chlorotoluene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 75 136 1.7 20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.07 mg/kg-dry 0.20 89 71 132 0.9 20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.20 mg/kg-dry 0.20 100 71 131 2.4 20 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.756 mg/kg-dry 0.20 63 31 123 5.7 20 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.28 mg/kg-dry 0.20 106 66 130 2.3 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 51 140 1.7 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.21 mg/kg-dry 0.20 101 64 133 4.9 20 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.20 mg/kg-dry 0.20 100 63 131 4.9 20 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.17 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 66 133 0.0 20 1,2-Dichloropropane 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 60 130 1.7 20 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.18 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 59 135 2.5 20 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.27 mg/kg-dry 0.20 106 39 157 3.1 20 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.20 mg/kg-dry 0.20 100 65 132 0.8 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 55 134 0.8 20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.11 mg/kg-dry 0.20 92 58 146 2.6 20 Ethylbenzene 1.21 mg/kg-dry 0.20 101 74 136 1.6 20 Hexachlorobutadiene 1.000 mg/kg-dry 0.20 83 52 133 7.7 20 2-Hexanone 13.3 mg/kg-dry 4.0 110 54 129 2.9 20 Iodomethane 1.36 mg/kg-dry 0.20 113 53 128 0.7 20 Isopropylbenzene 1.08 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 70 133 0.9 20 p-Isopropyltoluene 1.20 mg/kg-dry 0.20 100 69 131 0.0 20 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.08 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 43 152 1.8 20 Methyl ethyl ketone 13.3 mg/kg-dry 4.0 110 43 148 4.4 20 Methyl isobutyl ketone 12.1 mg/kg-dry 4.0 101 54 127 0.8 20 Methylene chloride 1.12 mg/kg-dry 0.20 93 51 134 1.7 20 Naphthalene 1.17 mg/kg-dry 0.20 98 15 171 17 20 n-Propylbenzene 1.02 mg/kg-dry 0.20 85 72 134 0.9 20 Styrene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 70 135 0.0 20 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 35 156 2.6 20 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 59 135 1.7 20 Tetrachloroethene 1.25 mg/kg-dry 0.20 104 64 139 0.8 20 Toluene 1.15 mg/kg-dry 0.20 96 73 137 0.0 20 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 24 153 23 20 R 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.05 mg/kg-dry 0.20 87 34 150 14 20 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.26 mg/kg-dry 0.20 105 63 134 0.8 20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 56 136 0.9 20 Trichloroethene 1.08 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 65 134 6.9 20 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.03 mg/kg-dry 0.20 86 48 140 11 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.08 mg/kg-dry 0.20 90 56 142 0.9 20 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.06 mg/kg-dry 0.20 88 67 125 0.9 20 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.14 mg/kg-dry 0.20 95 71 130 1.7 20 Vinyl acetate 1.16 mg/kg-dry 0.20 97 28 123 2.4 20 Vinyl chloride 1.07 mg/kg-dry 0.20 89 32 136 7.8 20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. R - RPD exceeds advisory limit. 209 Page 12 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A 12/19/14 15:41 m+p-Xylenes 2.35 mg/kg-dry 0.24 98 75 136 1.2 20 o-Xylene 1.13 mg/kg-dry 0.20 94 72 134 1.7 20 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 0.20 84 60 136 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.20 84 70 132 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 0.20 86 78 160 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.20 84 75 138 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 210 Page 13 of 19 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 12/24/14 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8015M Batch: 85666 Lab ID: LCS-85666 Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C 12/19/14 15:48 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 174 mg/kg 10 84 60 140 Surr: o-Terphenyl 0.17 84 40 140 Lab ID: MB-85666 Method Blank Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C 12/19/14 16:32 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons ND mg/kg 10 Surr: o-Terphenyl 0.17 89 40 140 Lab ID: B14121514-002AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C 12/19/14 18:05 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 269 mg/kg-dry 13 86 60 140 Surr: o-Terphenyl 0.22 80 40 140 Lab ID: B14121514-002AMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C 12/19/14 18:49 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 270 mg/kg-dry 13 86 60 140 0.4 20 Surr: o-Terphenyl 0.22 78 40 140 Method: SW8015M Analytical Run: R235698 Lab ID: CCV_1218HP234r-S Continuing Calibration Verification Standard 12/19/14 14:21 n-Nonane 6.33 mg/kg 95 75 125 n-Decane 6.54 mg/kg 98 75 125 n-Dodecane 6.70 mg/kg 101 75 125 n-Tetradecane 6.92 mg/kg 104 75 125 n-Hexadecane 7.06 mg/kg 106 75 125 n-Octadecane 7.05 mg/kg 106 75 125 n-Nonadecane 7.21 mg/kg 108 75 125 n-Eicosane 7.17 mg/kg 108 75 125 n-Docosane 7.22 mg/kg 108 75 125 n-Tetracosane 7.40 mg/kg 111 75 125 n-Hexacosane 7.42 mg/kg 111 75 125 n-Octacosane 7.46 mg/kg 112 75 125 n-Triacontane 7.42 mg/kg 111 75 125 n-Hexatriacontane 6.79 mg/kg 102 75 125 Surr: o-Terphenyl 0.17 101 75 125 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 211 Page 14 of 19 MW-1 3-4 Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-001A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V46 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0046.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/19/2014 11:22:53 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\S3_SCN-WE-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WE.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 5.924 to 16.075 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 4.894 to 11.675 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.71 to 18.044 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.743 6.667 5.322 79.83 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.581 6.667 5.593 83.9 - DRO Area:3281863 DRO Amount: 8.004323 TEH Area:2.027716E+07 TEH Amount: 49.45514 C9-C18 Area:178217.9 C9-C18 Amount: 0.4370029 C19-C36 Area:1.117761E+07C19-C36 Amount: 27.11669 3.54 4.23 4.4.43 55 4.4.66 71 77 4.5.5.98 01 15 5.5.31 49 52 5.59 6.6.12 23 6.7.99 08 7.27 7.67 73 8.8.14 18 27 8.8.34 41 47 8.8.8.64 70 82 9.8.06 98 9.9.19 34 9.9.43 57 9.9.9.77 87 94 10.10.04 15 19 10.10.40 49 58 10.10.65 84 71 11.01 11.11.20 25 33 11.11.11.43 52 62 11.91 11.74 12.11.11 17 99 12.12.48 28 41 12.58 12.84 90 13.13.19 06 13.13.13.29 39 48 13.13.61 75 13.14.89 02 14.14.21 27 14.14.41 54 14.14.65 78 14.15.93 02 15.15.27 14 15.15.36 50 MW-2 5-6 Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-002A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V45 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0045.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/19/2014 10:30:33 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\SR_SCN-WE-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WE.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 5.924 to 16.075 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 4.894 to 11.675 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.71 to 18.044 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.747 6.667 5.778 86.67 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.586 6.667 6.16 92.4 - DRO Area:241938.5 DRO Amount: 0.5900777 TEH Area:367310.5 TEH Amount: 0.8958547 C9-C18 Area:145740.2 C9-C18 Amount: 0.3573654 C19-C36 Area:181022 C19-C36 Amount: 0.4391562 3.3.50 59 4.24 4.4.55 65 71 4.4.79 94 5.5.02 15 5.5.33 44 5.53 5.6.6.93 01 12 6.6.23 32 37 6.6.48 67 6.6.83 98 7.23 27 7.7.61 68 72 76 7.8.89 09 8.8.8.14 19 23 30 8.8.37 48 8.8.64 72 8.8.85 94 97 9.07 9.9.34 45 9.54 9.9.82 92 10.17 10.43 50 10.69 11.11.04 20 11.34 38 11.11.57 63 11.75 11.12.96 12 12.12.29 33 18 12.59 13.13.06 20 13.13.13.30 35 40 48 13.13.76 89 14.28 14.14.50 66 15.02 15.15.44 35 50 15.70 75 MW-1 3-4 (Silica Gel Treatment) Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-001A ;1229HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, SGT-V06 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2122914_b\1229HP2.0006.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/29/2014 2:18:11 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\SR_SCN-122906-WF-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WF.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.09 to 16.2 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.1 to 11.82 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.855 to 18.23 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.866 6.667 5.069 76.04 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.696 6.667 5.486 82.29 - DRO Area:1528382 DRO Amount: 3.727659 TEH Area:4501137 TEH Amount: 10.97808 C9-C18 Area:629612.8 C9-C18 Amount: 1.543855 C19-C36 Area:2922362 C19-C36 Amount: 7.089598 4.4.05 16 4.4.27 37 42 4.4.50 56 65 4.4.4.77 91 97 5.10 16 19 5.5.36 48 5.60 67 5.5.92 96 6.6.15 30 6.6.38 44 48 6.6.84 95 7.7.11 14 26 7.7.32 42 7.57 7.7.82 87 97 8.8.17 32 8.8.40 47 8.8.8.70 78 61 8.8.84 94 9.11 9.9.32 46 9.9.56 69 9.10.91 02 09 10.26 10.10.10.62 72 53 10.82 11.11.02 13 11.11.43 32 11.11.53 63 67 11.74 11.87 12.12.12.23 41 28 12.57 12.70 13.13.03 18 13.13.31 43 13.13.51 59 13.73 14.14.00 13 14.14.24 38 14.61 52 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No                       216 Page 19 of 19 APPENDIX B Soil Borehole Logs 217 218 219 APPENDIX C Laboratory Analytical Reports - Groundwater 220 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B14121909-001 MW-1 12/22/14 13:16 12/23/14 Aqueous EPH-Liquid-Liquid Extraction Hydrocarbons, Extractable Petroleum Screen 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Short List B14121909-002 MW-2 12/22/14 12:30 12/23/14 Aqueous Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name: Ebbighausen Work Order: B14121909 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 January 05, 2015 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 2 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 12/23/2014 for analysis. 221 Page 1 of 16 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121909-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 Collection Date: 12/22/14 13:16 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 01/05/15 DateReceived: 12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Bromoform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Bromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Chloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Styrene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Toluene 0.14 ug/L J 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121909-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 Collection Date: 12/22/14 13:16 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 01/05/15 DateReceived: 12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 106 %REC 77-126 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 101 %REC 70-130 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Surr: Toluene-d8 114 %REC 79-122 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 116 %REC 76-127 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN Total Extractable Hydrocarbons ND ug/309tmcL 1000SW8015M 01/03/15 18:49 / Surr: o-Terphenyl 50.0 %REC 40-tmc140 SW8015M 01/03/15 18:49 / - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 223 Page 3 of 16 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121909-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 Collection Date: 12/22/14 12:30 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 01/05/15 DateReceived: 12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Bromoform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Bromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Chloroethane 0.11 ug/L J 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Styrene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Toluene 0.19 ug/L J 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbighausen Lab ID: B14121909-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 Collection Date: 12/22/14 12:30 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 01/05/15 DateReceived: 12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RL Method Analysis Date / By MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Vinyl chloride 0.52 ug/L J 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 106 %REC 77-126 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 103 %REC 70-130 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Surr: Toluene-d8 113 %REC 79-122 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 117 %REC 76-127 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN Total Extractable Hydrocarbons ND ug/316tmcL 1000SW8015M 01/03/15 21:43 / Surr: o-Terphenyl 52.0 %REC 40-tmc140 SW8015M 01/03/15 21:43 / - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. 225 Page 5 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: LCS_122414 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 09:03 Benzene 4.96 ug/L 1.0 99 71 133 Bromobenzene 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 78 133 Bromochloromethane 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 68 131 Bromodichloromethane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 67 138 Bromoform 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 64 136 Bromomethane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 60 138 Carbon tetrachloride 4.24 ug/L 1.0 85 61 144 Chlorobenzene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 78 136 Chlorodibromomethane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 72 136 Chloroethane 4.68 ug/L 1.0 94 64 136 Chloroform 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 69 133 Chloromethane 4.44 ug/L 1.0 89 63 149 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 75 131 2-Chlorotoluene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 74 135 Dibromomethane 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 72 133 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 78 129 4-Chlorotoluene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 79 135 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 79 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 131 Dichlorodifluoromethane 4.08 ug/L 1.0 82 55 141 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 72 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 4.92 ug/L 1.0 98 57 146 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 66 142 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 74 133 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.84 ug/L 1.0 97 76 138 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 72 135 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.92 ug/L 1.0 98 75 134 2,2-Dichloropropane 6.00 ug/L 1.0 120 42 167 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 72 140 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 75 132 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 77 145 Ethylbenzene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 78 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 4.12 ug/L 1.0 82 58 151 Methyl ethyl ketone 52.8 ug/L 20 106 55 145 Methylene chloride 4.48 ug/L 1.0 90 73 126 Styrene 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 76 134 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 75 135 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 72 132 Tetrachloroethene 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 78 137 Toluene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 78 134 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 64 141 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.96 ug/L 1.0 99 72 133 Trichloroethene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 75 138 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 226 Page 6 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: LCS_122414 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 09:03 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.04 ug/L 1.0 81 58 139 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 4.92 ug/L 1.0 98 67 133 Vinyl chloride 4.08 ug/L 1.0 82 66 140 m+p-Xylenes 10.8 ug/L 1.0 108 78 133 o-Xylene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 79 136 Xylenes, Total 16.0 ug/L 1.0 107 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 101 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 105 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 108 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 114 79 122 Lab ID: BLK_122414 Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 10:00 Benzene ND ug/L 0.50 Bromobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 Bromoform ND ug/L 0.50 Bromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 0.50 Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 Chloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Chloroform ND ug/L 0.50 Chloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 0.50 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0.50 Dibromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0.50 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 227 Page 7 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: BLK_122414 Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 10:00 Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 0.50 Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 10 Methylene chloride ND ug/L 0.50 Styrene ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 Toluene ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Trichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 0.50 m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 0.50 o-Xylene ND ug/L 0.50 Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 0.50 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 100 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 104 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 118 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 114 79 122 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 14:43 Benzene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 71 133 Bromobenzene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 133 Bromochloromethane 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 68 131 Bromodichloromethane 5.48 ug/L 1.0 110 67 138 Bromoform 6.56 ug/L 1.0 131 64 136 Bromomethane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 60 138 Carbon tetrachloride 4.68 ug/L 1.0 94 61 144 Chlorobenzene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 78 136 Chlorodibromomethane 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 72 136 Chloroethane 4.40 ug/L 1.0 88 64 136 Chloroform 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 69 133 Chloromethane 4.72 ug/L 1.0 94 63 149 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 75 131 2-Chlorotoluene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 74 135 Dibromomethane 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 72 133 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.08 ug/L 1.0 102 78 129 4-Chlorotoluene 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 79 135 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 79 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 78 131 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 228 Page 8 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 14:43 Dichlorodifluoromethane 4.04 ug/L 1.0 81 55 141 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 72 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 57 146 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 66 142 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 74 133 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.72 ug/L 1.0 94 76 138 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.08 ug/L 1.0 102 72 135 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 75 134 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 42 167 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 72 140 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 75 132 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.92 ug/L 1.0 118 77 145 Ethylbenzene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 78 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 4.12 ug/L 1.0 82 58 151 Methyl ethyl ketone 48.8 ug/L 20 98 55 145 Methylene chloride 4.56 ug/L 1.0 91 73 126 Styrene 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 76 134 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 75 135 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 72 132 Tetrachloroethene 5.80 ug/L 1.0 116 78 137 Toluene 5.56 ug/L 1.0 108 78 134 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 64 141 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 72 133 Trichloroethene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 75 138 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.20 ug/L 1.0 84 58 139 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 67 133 Vinyl chloride 4.32 ug/L 1.0 86 66 140 m+p-Xylenes 10.6 ug/L 1.0 106 78 133 o-Xylene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 79 136 Xylenes, Total 15.9 ug/L 1.0 106 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 105 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 109 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 112 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 115 79 122 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 15:11 Benzene 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 71 133 1.6 20 Bromobenzene 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 78 133 2.9 20 Bromochloromethane 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 68 131 0.0 20 Bromodichloromethane 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 67 138 0.7 20 Bromoform 6.68 ug/L 1.0 134 64 136 1.8 20 Bromomethane 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 60 138 0.8 20 Carbon tetrachloride 4.64 ug/L 1.0 93 61 144 0.9 20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 229 Page 9 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 15:11 Chlorobenzene 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 78 136 2.4 20 Chlorodibromomethane 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 72 136 0.0 20 Chloroethane 4.52 ug/L 1.0 90 64 136 2.7 20 Chloroform 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 69 133 2.9 20 Chloromethane 4.56 ug/L 1.0 91 63 149 3.4 20 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 75 131 0.7 20 2-Chlorotoluene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 74 135 0.8 20 Dibromomethane 5.80 ug/L 1.0 116 72 133 1.4 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 78 129 4.6 20 4-Chlorotoluene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 79 135 4.6 20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 79 132 5.4 20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 131 5.4 20 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.93 ug/L 1.0 79 55 141 2.8 20 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 72 130 0.7 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 57 146 1.6 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 66 142 0.8 20 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 74 133 1.5 20 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.84 ug/L 1.0 97 76 138 2.5 20 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 72 135 2.3 20 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 75 134 1.6 20 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 42 167 0.7 20 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 72 140 0.8 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 75 132 1.5 20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 77 145 4.1 20 Ethylbenzene 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 78 131 2.2 20 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 4.20 ug/L 1.0 84 58 151 1.9 20 Methyl ethyl ketone 52.0 ug/L 20 104 55 145 6.3 20 Methylene chloride 4.60 ug/L 1.0 92 73 126 0.9 20 Styrene 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 76 134 1.5 20 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 75 135 1.5 20 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.48 ug/L 1.0 110 72 132 3.0 20 Tetrachloroethene 5.96 ug/L 1.0 119 78 137 2.7 20 Toluene 5.68 ug/L 1.0 111 78 134 2.1 20 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 64 141 0.7 20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 72 133 0.0 20 Trichloroethene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 75 138 1.5 20 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.08 ug/L 1.0 82 58 139 2.9 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 67 133 1.5 20 Vinyl chloride 4.20 ug/L 1.0 84 66 140 2.8 20 m+p-Xylenes 10.8 ug/L 1.0 108 78 133 1.5 20 o-Xylene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 79 136 0.8 20 Xylenes, Total 16.1 ug/L 1.0 107 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 106 70 130 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 230 Page 10 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A 12/24/14 15:11 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 110 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 112 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 115 79 122 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 231 Page 11 of 16 Project: Ebbighausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 01/05/15 Analyte Result Units RL %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD RPDLimit Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8015M Batch: 85897 Lab ID: LCS-85897 Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B 01/03/15 17:22 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 6560 ug/L 300 106 60 140 Surr: o-Terphenyl 96 40 140 Lab ID: MB-85897 Method Blank Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B 01/03/15 18:06 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons ND ug/L 300 Surr: o-Terphenyl 94 40 140 Lab ID: B14121909-001AMS Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B 01/03/15 19:33 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 13300 ug/L 600 107 60 140 Surr: o-Terphenyl 74 40 140 Lab ID: B14121909-001AMSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B 01/03/15 20:16 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 13600 ug/L 600 110 60 140 2.5 20 Surr: o-Terphenyl 74 40 140 Method: SW8015M Analytical Run: R236224 Lab ID: CCV_0102HP333r-W Continuing Calibration Verification Standard 01/03/15 15:55 n-Nonane 208 ug/L 104 75 125 n-Decane 208 ug/L 104 75 125 n-Dodecane 214 ug/L 107 75 125 n-Tetradecane 210 ug/L 105 75 125 n-Hexadecane 214 ug/L 107 75 125 n-Octadecane 215 ug/L 107 75 125 n-Nonadecane 215 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Eicosane 215 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Docosane 215 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Tetracosane 216 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Hexacosane 216 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Octacosane 216 ug/L 108 75 125 n-Triacontane 217 ug/L 109 75 125 n-Hexatriacontane 216 ug/L 108 75 125 Surr: o-Terphenyl 109 75 125 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 232 Page 12 of 16 MW-1 Batch ID: 85897 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121909-001A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, RR-V37 Raw File: G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0037.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 1/3/2015 6:49:40 PM Method File: g:\org\HP3\Methods\SR_SCN-LI-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP3\Cals\SC140226LI.CAL Sample Weight: 0.97 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 30979.57 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 30994.75 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 30987.16 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.313 to 16.684 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.273 to 12.239 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 12.274 to 19.076 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________12.282 206.186 104.002 50.44 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____13.12 206.186 75.556 36.64 - DRO Area:942938.4 DRO Amount: 62.74221 TEH Area:1152155 TEH Amount: 76.66328 C9-C18 Area:750547.9 C9-C18 Amount: 49.95296 C19-C36 Area:346567.7 C19-C36 Amount: 23.05463 4.36 4.64 5.5.06 15 5.5.5.29 37 47 5.5.56 68 5.5.78 89 5.6.99 10 6.6.30 39 6.6.52 60 7.20 7.7.64 45 7.70 7.8.8.92 00 09 8.8.34 15 21 28 8.41 8.46 8.8.85 93 9.9.18 31 9.9.42 53 9.9.66 83 10.9.90 95 03 10.10.10.13 24 32 10.10.59 41 10.65 11.11.10.00 08 93 11.11.19 31 34 11.11.45 52 11.11.67 76 71 12.11.02 89 12.12.10 15 21 12.28 12.12.38 51 12.12.12.89 70 77 12.99 13.12 13.13.35 44 13.13.61 77 13.13.14.88 96 03 14.14.21 34 39 14.14.14.44 55 63 14.14.15.94 83 00 15.15.22 06 MW-2 Batch ID: 85897 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121909-002A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, V41 Raw File: G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0041.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 1/3/2015 9:43:42 PM Method File: g:\org\HP3\Methods\SR_SCN-LI-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP3\Cals\SC140226LI.CAL Sample Weight: 0.95 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 30979.57 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 30994.75 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 30987.16 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.313 to 16.684 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.273 to 12.239 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 12.274 to 19.076 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________12.281 210.526 110.504 52.49 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____13.119 210.526 87.071 41.36 - DRO Area:930191.3 DRO Amount: 63.19706 TEH Area:1189115 TEH Amount: 80.78831 C9-C18 Area:676762.7 C9-C18 Amount: 45.99042 C19-C36 Area:401008 C19-C36 Amount: 27.23776 4.4.4.50 57 64 5.5.00 14 5.5.28 34 37 5.5.5.48 56 69 5.5.79 90 6.6.00 10 6.6.40 54 6.60 7.7.48 66 7.71 8.8.06 21 8.46 8.86 9.9.18 27 31 9.9.42 53 9.9.67 82 9.10.91 95 05 10.13 10.42 10.65 11.10.05 10 93 11.11.21 28 31 34 11.11.43 52 11.11.87 71 76 11.12.12.94 03 10 12.12.15 22 12.28 12.12.42 51 12.12.12.77 81 89 70 12.13.99 05 13.12 13.13.35 44 13.13.78 61 13.13.14.88 95 03 14.14.14.23 33 40 14.14.14.55 62 44 14.14.73 84 14.15.15.94 06 00 15.15.35 22 15.15.50 58 15.15.79 91 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No                       236 Page 16 of 16 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B15011740-001 MW-1 01/27/15 15:25 01/28/15 Aqueous 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Short List B15011740-002 MW-2 01/27/15 15:10 01/28/15 Aqueous Same As Above B15011740-003 Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 01/27/15 15:10 01/28/15 Trip Blank Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name: Ebbinghausen Work Order: B15011740 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 February 05, 2015 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 3 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 1/28/2015 for analysis. 237 Page 1 of 15 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:25 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Bromoform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Bromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Chloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Styrene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-001 Client Sample ID: MW-1 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:25 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 0.50 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 109 %REC 77-126 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 107 %REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Surr: Toluene-d8 100 %REC 79-122 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 100 %REC 76-127 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 239 Page 3 of 15 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:10 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Bromoform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Bromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Chloroethane 0.13 ug/L J 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Styrene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-002 Client Sample ID: MW-2 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:10 Matrix: Aqueous Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Vinyl chloride 0.58 ug/L 0.50 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 108 %REC 77-126 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 %REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Surr: Toluene-d8 100 %REC 79-122 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 104 %REC 76-127 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 241 Page 5 of 15 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:10 Matrix: Trip Blank Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Benzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Bromobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Bromoform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Bromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Chloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Chloroform ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Chloromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Dibromomethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 20 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Methylene chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Styrene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Toluene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client: Resource Technologies Inc Project: Ebbinghausen Lab ID: B15011740-003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 Collection Date: 01/27/15 15:10 Matrix: Trip Blank Report Date: 02/05/15 DateReceived: 01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units RLBy Method Analysis Date / MCL/ Qualifiers QCL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Trichloroethene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl o-Xylene ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 1.0 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 101 %REC 77-126 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 %REC 70-130 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Surr: Toluene-d8 95.0 %REC 79-122 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 103 %REC 76-127 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 243 Page 7 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: LCS_020215 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/02/15 19:10 Benzene 4.84 ug/L 1.0 97 71 133 Bromobenzene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 78 133 Bromochloromethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 68 131 Bromodichloromethane 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 67 138 Bromoform 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 64 136 Bromomethane 6.08 ug/L 1.0 122 60 138 Carbon tetrachloride 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 61 144 Chlorobenzene 5.08 ug/L 1.0 102 78 136 Chlorodibromomethane 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 72 136 Chloroethane 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 64 136 Chloroform 5.00 ug/L 1.0 100 69 133 Chloromethane 4.16 ug/L 1.0 83 63 149 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 75 131 2-Chlorotoluene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 74 135 Dibromomethane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 72 133 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 78 129 4-Chlorotoluene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 79 135 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 79 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 78 131 Dichlorodifluoromethane 4.80 ug/L 1.0 96 55 141 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 72 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 57 146 1,1-Dichloroethene 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 66 142 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 74 133 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 76 138 1,2-Dichloropropane 4.88 ug/L 1.0 98 72 135 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 75 134 2,2-Dichloropropane 4.36 ug/L 1.0 87 42 167 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.08 ug/L 1.0 102 72 140 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 75 132 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 77 145 Ethylbenzene 4.96 ug/L 1.0 99 78 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 58 151 Methyl ethyl ketone 51.6 ug/L 20 103 55 145 Methylene chloride 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 73 126 Styrene 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 76 134 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 75 135 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 72 132 Tetrachloroethene 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 78 137 Toluene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 78 134 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 64 141 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 72 133 Trichloroethene 5.08 ug/L 1.0 102 75 138 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 244 Page 8 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: LCS_020215 Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/02/15 19:10 Trichlorofluoromethane 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 58 139 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 67 133 Vinyl chloride 4.24 ug/L 1.0 85 66 140 m+p-Xylenes 9.96 ug/L 1.0 100 78 133 o-Xylene 5.04 ug/L 1.0 101 79 136 Xylenes, Total 15.0 ug/L 1.0 100 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 103 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 105 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 103 79 122 Lab ID: BLK_020215 Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/02/15 20:06 Benzene ND ug/L 0.50 Bromobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 Bromoform ND ug/L 0.50 Bromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 Carbon tetrachloride ND ug/L 0.50 Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 Chloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Chloroform ND ug/L 0.50 Chloromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ug/L 0.50 2-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0.50 Dibromomethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 4-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0.50 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0.50 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 245 Page 9 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: BLK_020215 Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/02/15 20:06 Ethylbenzene ND ug/L 0.50 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 0.50 Methyl ethyl ketone ND ug/L 10 Methylene chloride ND ug/L 0.50 Styrene ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Tetrachloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 Toluene ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0.50 Trichloroethene ND ug/L 0.50 Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 0.50 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 0.50 Vinyl chloride ND ug/L 0.50 m+p-Xylenes ND ug/L 0.50 o-Xylene ND ug/L 0.50 Xylenes, Total ND ug/L 0.50 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 102 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 103 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 99 79 122 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/03/15 01:56 Benzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 71 133 Bromobenzene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 78 133 Bromochloromethane 5.84 ug/L 1.0 117 68 131 Bromodichloromethane 6.12 ug/L 1.0 122 67 138 Bromoform 6.16 ug/L 1.0 123 64 136 Bromomethane 3.18 ug/L 1.0 64 60 138 Carbon tetrachloride 6.36 ug/L 1.0 127 61 144 Chlorobenzene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 136 Chlorodibromomethane 6.08 ug/L 1.0 122 72 136 Chloroethane 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 64 136 Chloroform 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 69 133 Chloromethane 4.08 ug/L 1.0 82 63 149 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 75 131 2-Chlorotoluene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 74 135 Dibromomethane 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 72 133 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 129 4-Chlorotoluene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 79 135 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 79 132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.20 ug/L 1.0 104 78 131 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 246 Page 10 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MS Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/03/15 01:56 Dichlorodifluoromethane 4.88 ug/L 1.0 98 55 141 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 72 130 1,2-Dichloroethane 6.24 ug/L 1.0 125 57 146 1,1-Dichloroethene 6.28 ug/L 1.0 126 66 142 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 74 133 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6.24 ug/L 1.0 125 76 138 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 72 135 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 75 134 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 42 167 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 72 140 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 75 132 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 6.08 ug/L 1.0 122 77 145 Ethylbenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 131 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 6.16 ug/L 1.0 123 58 151 Methyl ethyl ketone 57.6 ug/L 20 115 55 145 Methylene chloride 6.08 ug/L 1.0 122 73 126 Styrene 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 76 134 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.96 ug/L 1.0 119 75 135 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.52 ug/L 1.0 110 72 132 Tetrachloroethene 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 78 137 Toluene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 134 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6.04 ug/L 1.0 121 64 141 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 72 133 Trichloroethene 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 75 138 Trichlorofluoromethane 5.92 ug/L 1.0 118 58 139 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 67 133 Vinyl chloride 3.96 ug/L 1.0 79 66 140 m+p-Xylenes 10.5 ug/L 1.0 105 78 133 o-Xylene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 79 136 Xylenes, Total 15.7 ug/L 1.0 105 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 106 70 130 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 110 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 102 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 102 79 122 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/03/15 02:25 Benzene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 71 133 2.3 20 Bromobenzene 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 78 133 3.6 20 Bromochloromethane 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 68 131 2.8 20 Bromodichloromethane 6.00 ug/L 1.0 120 67 138 2.0 20 Bromoform 6.16 ug/L 1.0 123 64 136 0.0 20 Bromomethane 4.40 ug/L 1.0 88 60 138 32 20 R Carbon tetrachloride 6.00 ug/L 1.0 120 61 144 5.8 20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. R - RPD exceeds advisory limit. 247 Page 11 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/03/15 02:25 Chlorobenzene 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 78 136 0.7 20 Chlorodibromomethane 6.16 ug/L 1.0 123 72 136 1.3 20 Chloroethane 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 64 136 2.1 20 Chloroform 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 69 133 2.9 20 Chloromethane 4.28 ug/L 1.0 86 63 149 4.8 20 1,2-Dibromoethane 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 75 131 0.0 20 2-Chlorotoluene 5.16 ug/L 1.0 103 74 135 0.8 20 Dibromomethane 5.80 ug/L 1.0 116 72 133 0.7 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 129 1.5 20 4-Chlorotoluene 5.32 ug/L 1.0 106 79 135 1.5 20 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.40 ug/L 1.0 108 79 132 2.2 20 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 131 3.0 20 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.12 ug/L 1.0 102 55 141 4.8 20 1,1-Dichloroethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 72 130 2.2 20 1,2-Dichloroethane 6.20 ug/L 1.0 124 57 146 0.6 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 6.16 ug/L 1.0 123 66 142 1.9 20 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.56 ug/L 1.0 111 74 133 0.0 20 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6.04 ug/L 1.0 121 76 138 3.3 20 1,2-Dichloropropane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 72 135 1.5 20 1,3-Dichloropropane 5.24 ug/L 1.0 105 75 134 2.3 20 2,2-Dichloropropane 5.60 ug/L 1.0 112 42 167 2.8 20 1,1-Dichloropropene 5.48 ug/L 1.0 110 72 140 2.2 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.68 ug/L 1.0 114 75 132 0.0 20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 6.12 ug/L 1.0 122 77 145 0.7 20 Ethylbenzene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 131 0.0 20 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 6.00 ug/L 1.0 120 58 151 2.6 20 Methyl ethyl ketone 55.6 ug/L 20 111 55 145 3.5 20 Methylene chloride 5.76 ug/L 1.0 115 73 126 5.4 20 Styrene 5.64 ug/L 1.0 113 76 134 2.2 20 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 6.00 ug/L 1.0 120 75 135 0.7 20 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 72 132 2.9 20 Tetrachloroethene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 78 137 0.8 20 Toluene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 78 134 0.0 20 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.80 ug/L 1.0 116 64 141 4.1 20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.44 ug/L 1.0 109 72 133 2.2 20 Trichloroethene 5.36 ug/L 1.0 107 75 138 1.5 20 Trichlorofluoromethane 6.04 ug/L 1.0 121 58 139 2.0 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.72 ug/L 1.0 114 67 133 1.4 20 Vinyl chloride 4.12 ug/L 1.0 82 66 140 4.1 20 m+p-Xylenes 10.4 ug/L 1.0 104 78 133 0.8 20 o-Xylene 5.28 ug/L 1.0 106 79 136 2.3 20 Xylenes, Total 15.7 ug/L 1.0 105 78 136 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1.0 108 70 130 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 248 Page 12 of 15 Project: Ebbinghausen Client: Resource Technologies Inc Work Order: B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report Report Date: 02/05/15 Analyte Result UnitsRLRPDLimit %REC Low Limit High Limit RPD Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MSD Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A 02/03/15 02:25 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.0 111 77 126 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 1.0 100 76 127 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.0 102 79 122 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 249 Page 13 of 15 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No                       251 Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports – Soil Vapor 252 ANALYTICAL REPORT Mark Johnson Resource Technologies, Inc. 1050 E. Main, Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: E-mail: (406) 585-8005 rti@montana.net Report Date: January 02, 2015 Workorder: 34-1436033 Ebbighausen 122414 Purchase Order: Ebbighausen Project ID: Client Sample ID Lab ID Collect Date Receive Date Sampling Site VW-1 1436033001 12/22/14 12/24/14 Ebbighausen VW-2 1436033002 12/22/14 12/24/14 Ebbighausen ADDRESS 960 West LeVoy Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123 USA PHONE +1 801 266 7700 FAX +1 801 268 9992 ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Page 1 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 253 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID: 12/22/2014 Lab ID: 1436033001 12/24/2014 Collected: Received: VW-1 Ebbighausen Matrix: Sampling Parameter: Air Volume 6 L Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 18:08 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³ MDL (ppb) RL (ppb) Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND <0.74 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloromethane ND <0.31 0.15 0.50 1 U Freon 114 ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U Vinyl chloride ND <0.38 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,3-Butadiene ND <0.33 0.15 0.50 1 U Bromomethane ND <0.58 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloroethane ND <0.40 0.15 0.50 1 U Freon 11 0.16 0.87 0.15 0.50 1 J Freon 113 ND <1.1 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U Acetone ND <0.71 0.30 0.50 1 U Carbon disulfide ND <0.47 0.15 0.50 1 U Methylene chloride ND <0.52 0.15 0.50 1 U trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U Methyl t-butyl ether ND <0.54 0.15 0.50 1 U Vinyl acetate ND <0.53 0.15 0.50 1 U 2-Butanone ND <0.44 0.15 0.50 1 U cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1-Dichloroethane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U Ethyl acetate ND <0.54 0.15 1.0 1 U Hexane ND <0.53 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloroform ND <0.73 0.15 0.50 1 U Tetrahydrofuran ND <0.44 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,2-Dichloroethane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND <0.82 0.15 0.50 1 U Carbon tetrachloride ND <0.94 0.15 0.50 1 U Benzene ND <0.48 0.15 0.50 1 U Cyclohexane ND <0.52 0.15 0.50 1 U Trichloroethene ND <0.81 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,2-Dichloropropane ND <0.73 0.15 0.50 1 U Bromodichloromethane ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U Heptane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND <0.68 0.15 0.50 1 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND <0.68 0.15 0.50 1 U ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID: 12/22/2014 Lab ID: 1436033001 12/24/2014 Collected: Received: VW-1 Ebbighausen Matrix: Sampling Parameter: Air Volume 6 L Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 18:08 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³ MDL (ppb) RL (ppb) Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Toluene ND <0.57 0.15 0.50 1 U 2-Hexanone ND <1.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Tetrachloroethene 7.5 51 0.15 0.50 1 Dibromochloromethane ND <1.3 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,2-Dibromoethane ND <1.2 0.15 0.50 1 U Chlorobenzene ND <0.69 0.15 0.50 1 U Ethyl benzene ND <0.65 0.15 0.50 1 U m,p-Xylene ND <0.65 0.15 0.50 1 U o-Xylene ND <0.65 0.15 0.50 1 U Styrene ND <0.64 0.15 0.50 1 U Bromoform ND <1.6 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U 4-Ethyl toluene ND <0.74 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND <0.74 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND <0.74 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND <0.90 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND <0.90 0.15 0.50 1 U Benzyl chloride ND <1.6 0.30 1.0 1 U 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND <1.8 0.30 1.0 1 U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND <2.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Hexachlorobutadiene ND <3.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Total Volatile Organics 53 220 NA NA 1 J Sample ID: 12/22/2014 Lab ID: 1436033002 12/24/2014 Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Matrix: Sampling Parameter: Air Volume 6 L Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID: 12/22/2014 Lab ID: 1436033002 12/24/2014 Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Matrix: Sampling Parameter: Air Volume 6 L Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³ MDL (ppb) RL (ppb) Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Bromomethane ND <0.58 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloroethane ND <0.40 0.15 0.50 1 U Freon 11 0.15 0.87 0.15 0.50 1 J Freon 113 ND <1.1 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U Acetone 43 100 0.30 0.50 1 E Carbon disulfide ND <0.47 0.15 0.50 1 U Methylene chloride ND <0.52 0.15 0.50 1 U trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U Methyl t-butyl ether ND <0.54 0.15 0.50 1 U Vinyl acetate ND <0.53 0.15 0.50 1 U 2-Butanone 3.5 10 0.15 0.50 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND <0.59 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1-Dichloroethane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U Ethyl acetate ND <0.54 0.15 1.0 1 U Hexane ND <0.53 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloroform 0.41 2.0 0.15 0.50 1 J Tetrahydrofuran 3.5 10 0.15 0.50 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND <0.82 0.15 0.50 1 U Carbon tetrachloride ND <0.94 0.15 0.50 1 U Benzene ND <0.48 0.15 0.50 1 U Cyclohexane ND <0.52 0.15 0.50 1 U Trichloroethene ND <0.81 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,2-Dichloropropane ND <0.73 0.15 0.50 1 U Bromodichloromethane ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U Heptane ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND <0.68 0.15 0.50 1 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND <0.61 0.15 0.50 1 U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND <0.68 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND <0.82 0.15 0.50 1 U Toluene 1.7 6.5 0.15 0.50 1 2-Hexanone ND <1.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Tetrachloroethene 0.16 1.1 0.15 0.50 1 J Dibromochloromethane ND <1.3 0.15 0.50 1 U ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID: 12/22/2014 Lab ID: 1436033002 12/24/2014 Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Matrix: Sampling Parameter: Air Volume 6 L Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³ MDL (ppb) RL (ppb) Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Chlorobenzene ND <0.69 0.15 0.50 1 U Ethyl benzene 0.79 3.4 0.15 0.50 1 m,p-Xylene 4.0 18 0.15 0.50 1 o-Xylene 1.2 5.1 0.15 0.50 1 Styrene ND <0.64 0.15 0.50 1 U Bromoform ND <1.6 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U 4-Ethyl toluene 0.73 3.6 0.15 0.50 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.5 7.2 0.15 0.50 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.0 20 0.15 0.50 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND <0.90 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND <0.90 0.15 0.50 1 U Benzyl chloride ND <1.6 0.30 1.0 1 U 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND <1.8 0.30 1.0 1 U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND <2.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Hexachlorobutadiene ND <3.2 0.30 1.0 1 U Total Volatile Organics 100 410 NA NA 1 J Analysis: EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed: 12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Tentatively Identified Compound ppb Retention Time Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Ethanol 21 7.56 1 J Decane 5.8 18.34 1 J Decane, 4-methyl- 2.7 18.78 1 J Comments Quality Control: EPA TO-15 - (HBN: 141287) The LCSD result for 4-methyl-2-pentanone is outside of limits. ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 Laboratory Contact Information (801) 266-7700 alslt.lab@ALSGlobal.com www.alsslc.com ALS Environmental 960 W Levoy Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84123 Phone: Email: Web: The results provided in this report relate only to the items tested. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. Samples have not been blank corrected unless otherwise noted. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of ALS. General Lab Comments ALS provides professional analytical services for all samples submitted. ALS is not in a position to interpret the data and assumes no responsibility for the quality of the samples submitted. All quality control samples processed with the samples in this report yielded acceptable results unless otherwise noted. ALS is accredited for specific fields of testing (scopes) in the following testing sectors. The quality system implemented at ALS conforms to accreditation requirements and is applied to all analytical testing performed by ALS. The following table lists testing sector, accreditation body, accreditation number and website. Please contact these accrediting bodies or your ALS project manager for the current scope of accreditation that applies to your analytical testing. Testing Sector Accreditation Body Certificate Number Website Environmental ACLASS (DoD ELAP) Utah (NELAC) Nevada Oklahoma Iowa Florida (TNI) ADE-1420 DATA1 UT00009 UT00009 IA# 376 E871067 http://www.aclasscorp.com http://health.utah.gov/lab/labimp/ http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/labservice.htm http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/ http://www.iowadnr.gov/InsideDNR/RegulatoryWater.aspx http://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/bars/sas/qa/ Industrial Hygiene AIHA (ISO 17025 & AIHA 101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org IHLAP/ELLAP) Lead Testing: CPSC ACLASS (ISO 17025, CPSC) ADE-1420 http://www.aclasscorp.com Soil, Dust, Paint ,Air AIHA (ISO 17025, AIHA ELLAP and NLLAP) 101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org Dietary Supplements ACLASS (ISO 17025) ADE-1420 http://www.aclasscorp.com Texas (TNI) T104704456-11-1 http://www.tceq.texas.gov/field/qa/lab_accred_certif.html (Standard) Page 6 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 258 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager: Rand Potter Client: Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder: 34-1436033 MDL = Method Detection Limit, a statistical estimate of method/media/instrument sensitivity. RL = Reporting Limit, a verified value of method/media/instrument sensitivity. CRDL = Contract Required Detection Limit Reg. Limit = Regulatory Limit. ND = Not Detected, testing result not detected above the MDL or RL. < This testing result is less than the numerical value. ** No result could be reported, see sample comments for details. U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the MDL. J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the RL. It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed. B = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was detected in the blank. E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range. P = Qualifier indicates that the RPD between the two columns is greater than 40%. Result Symbol Definitions Qualifier Symbol Definitions Page 7 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 259 WATERS OF THE US DELINEATION REPORT BRIDGER VALE SUBDIVISION BOZEMAN, MONTANA November 1, 2016 Prepared for: Andy Ebbighausen Ebbighausen Homes Inc. Prepared by: 260 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................... 1 1.1 Site Waterways....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Climate ................................................................................................... 2 2.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS ...................................................... 6 2.1 Methods................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Technical Criteria..................................................................................... 6 3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS ....................................................... 9 3.1 NRCS Soil Survey Results........................................................................ 9 3.2 W-1 – Artificial, Riverine, Lower Perennial, Rock Bottom ......................... 9 4.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 11 5.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 1.0 - USGS 7.5’ Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map....................... 3 FIGURE 2.0 - Aerial Photograph showing the study area...................................... 4 FIGURE 3.0 - NWI map showing study area.......................................................... 5 TABLE 1.0 - Summary of Attributes for WUS delineated on Property.............. 11 APPENDIX A - Wetland Determination Data Forms APPENDIX B - Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey APPENDIX C - Photo Log APPENDIX D - Topographic Map - Sheet 1 of 1 COVER PHOTO: Looking north at W-1 and Manley Road 261 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 1 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND An investigation to identify waters of the United States (WUS) on the Bridger Vale Subdivision parcel was completed by Vaughn Environmental Services, Inc. (VES) on September 16, 2016. The tract encompasses 6.49 acres of undeveloped land owned by Andy Ebbighausen and located on Manley Road north of the East Gallatin Recreation Area. The proposed development is legally described as the remaining Tract GLR-1 of COS 157 located in the southwest quarter of Section 31, Township 1 South, Range 6 East, Gallatin County (Figure 1.0 – USGS 7.5’ Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map and Figure 2.0 – Aerial Photograph). Figure 3.0 shows the project area on the National Wetland Inventory database map. The wetland boundaries were flagged based on vegetation, soil, and hydrological data collected during the September field investigation. C&H Engineering and Surveying, LLC of Bozeman, Montana, surveyed the flagged boundaries of the wetland within the study area and drafted the Topographic Map shown on Sheet 1 of 1 in Appendix D. The field investigation was completed for the landowner to identify the location, extent, and characteristics of jurisdictional WUS within the study area boundaries for compliance with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regulations. The USACE requires a permit for the discharge of fill material into WUS in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA 1986). A Supreme Court 2001 decision in the case of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus US Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) limited the federal authority under the Clean Water act to regulate certain isolated wetlands. In light of the Court’s decision, WUS as it applies to the jurisdictional limits of the authority of the USACE include the area below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of stream channels and lakes or ponds connected to the tributary system, and wetlands adjacent to these waters. The jurisdictional status of wetlands depends on the presence or absence of a connection and/or proximity (meaning bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to waters of the US. The Waters of the US Delineation report documents the project background, methodology used to identify project WUS, and findings of the field investigation. Six Wetland Determination Data Forms recording data collected near or within W-1, which encompasses a borrow ditch and adjacent wetland fringe located on the east side of Manley Road (Appendix A). US Department of Agriculture soil mapping information for the site is included in Appendix B and photos of the site are included in Appendix C. The Topographic Map on Sheet 1 of 1 in Appendix D shows the boundaries of the study area wetland. The Wetland Delineation Report will be submitted to the USACE and the City of Bozeman as supporting documentation for the 310/404 Joint Application and City plat approval process. The study area encompassed the acreage within the parcel slated for development. The only wetland on the property was located in or near the borrow ditch for Manley Road located on the west property boundary. The land is mapped within the Threeriv- Bonebasin series (556A) found on flood plains formed in alluvium on 0 to 2 percent slopes (Appendix B - USDA/NRCS 2016). The soil map unit has been used historically as pasture and wildlife habitat. Manley Road parallels the west property boundary, agricultural land and single family residences occupy the land north and immediately south of the property, and the East Gallatin Recreation Area owned by Montana, Fish, Wildlife and Parks occupies the parcels located east and south of the subject property. 262 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 2 1.1 SITE WATERWAYS . The borrow ditch located on the east side of Manley Road contained surface water during the September 2016 investigation. An outlet and man-made channel has been excavated at the north side of the East Gallatin Pond. Water in the channel flows east, then north, then west, on the north side of five residences located at the south boundary of the subject property. Surface water from the channel accumulates in a small pond located at the southernmost end of the borrow ditch (W-1). Water in the borrow ditch flows north 0.38 miles along the east side of Manley Road until it discharges to the East Gallatin River. The discharge point is located on the southeast side of the bridge crossing. The Gallatin Conservation District does not classify the borrow ditch as a perennial stream. No 310 permit will be required for impacts to the ditch channel. 1.2 CLIMATE The Bozeman area climate generally resembles that of a middle latitude steppe, with relatively long cold winters and short cool summers (Pac 1991). The region comprises a mountain complex within the steppe region, resulting in orographic effects that produce a local, cooler and wetter climate. Peak runoff generally occurs during the spring from snowmelt and combined snowmelt/rainfall events. These events produce relatively long periods of runoff. Summer thunderstorms also contribute to peak runoff although they are generally short in duration. The annual pattern of precipitation typically results in increasing precipitation from March to a peak in June, a decline through mid summer, another increase in late August to a second, smaller peak in September, followed by a general decline to the yearly low in February (Pac et al 1993). The annual temperature regime of the study area is generally characterized by significant seasonal variations. Winters are typically long and cold with subfreezing average temperatures from November to March. Average annual precipitation ranges from 13 inches per year at the lower elevations to 50 inches per year at the higher elevations in the Bridger Range north of Bozeman (NRCS 1972). Although the average annual precipitation is low enough to classify most of the area as semi-arid, about 70 percent of the annual total precipitation normally falls during the April to September growing season. Elevations in the study area range from 4,700 to 4,698 feet above mean sea level (amsl) from south to north. The closest meteorological station to the study area is Montana State University located approximately 2.7 miles south of the project at 4,860 feet amsl. Records from 1961 to 1990 for Bozeman indicate that the average annual precipitation is 19.25 inches with an average total snowfall of 92.1 inches. The average temperature at the climate station is 44.2 degrees Fahrenheit (USDA 1990). The mean annual precipitation rate for the predominant soil series in the study area, the Threeriv-Bonebasin loam (509B), is 15 inches. 263 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 3 Figure 1.0 USGS 7.5 minute Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map showing project location. Project Location 264 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 4 Figure 2.0 Aerial Photograph showing road that bisects study area. Borrow ditch is shown on east side of Manley Road. 265 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Bridger Vale Subdivision 5 Figure 3.0 National Wetland Inventory Map showing study area and PABGx Bozeman Pond south of parcel. The East Gallatin River crosses Manley Road north of site. Bridger Vale Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine October 31, 2016 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 km 1:9,762 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. 266 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 6 2.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS 2.1 METHODS Waters of the US including jurisdictional wetlands within the study area were identified on September 16, 2016, using methodology developed by the USACE and other federal agencies for implementation of Section 404 of the CWA. Delineation procedures involved a review of existing site-specific information and completion of an onsite field investigation based on guidelines for the Routine Determination Method presented in the Field Guide for Wetland Delineation (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2010). The Routine Level-2 Onsite Determination Method employs primarily qualitative procedures. Sample plots (approximately a 15-foot radius) are established within potential wetlands based on changes in plant communities, plant diversity, topography, and soil type. Data points are generally located parallel to watercourses, perpendicular to the apparent groundwater hydraulic gradient, and/or along topographical breaks. Vegetation composition, hydrology, and soil characteristics are assessed at each data collection point. If all three parameters exhibit positive wetland indictors, the area represented by the sample plot is classified as wetland. If any one of the parameters does not display a positive indicator, the area is classified as a non-wetland or upland unless the wetland is atypical or problematic. The jurisdictional authority of the USACE over wetlands identified in the field depends on the presence or absence of a surface water connection and/or proximity to waters of the US. Six Wetland Data Collection Forms summarizing data collected from three wetland and three upland soil test pits (SP-1 through SP-6) were completed for the artificial riverine wetland W-1 located in the borrow ditch on the east side of Manley Road. 2.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA A wetland must meet three technical criteria for it to be categorized as jurisdictional. The USACE (259 Federal Register 853532) and the Environmental Protection Agency (47 FR 31810) jointly define wetlands as “areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.” The following conditions must be present for an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland. 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation: Defined as plant species normally or commonly adapted to saturation of sufficient duration to cause anaerobic conditions in the root zone. 2. Wetland Hydrology: Defined as hydrology supported by sources of water that result in saturated, flooded, or ponded soil conditions. 3. Hydric Soils: Defined as soil that forms under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (59 Fed. Reg. 35680, 7/13/94). Hydrophytic Vegetation Plants must be physiologically or morphologically adapted to saturated or anaerobic soil conditions to grow in wetlands. The USACE and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have determined the estimated probability of finding representative wetland species within specified areas under natural conditions. Accordingly, plants may be categorized as obligate (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), or upland (UPL) in decreasing order of moisture dependence or tolerance. Obligate species occur greater than 99 percent of the time in a wetland. Facultative wetland species have a 67 to 99 percent probability 267 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 7 of occurring in a wetland. Facultative species exhibit a 34 to 67 percent probability of occurring in a wetland. Facultative upland species have a 67 to 99 percent probability of occurring in a non- wetland and upland species have a greater than 99 percent probability of occurring in a non- wetland. Species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW, or FAC are considered hydrophytic. Vegetation indicator status for this investigation was derived from the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 2016 Regional Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). Taxonomic references included Dorn 1984, Hitchcock 1971, Lackschewitz 1991, and Lesica and Husby 2001. The name and indicator status of individual species within each vegetation stratum was recorded on the data form in descending order of abundance (Appendix A). Under the dominance test introduced in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2010), a sample plot is classified as having wetland vegetation if the cumulative total of the estimated percent cover for the dominant hydrophytic species exceeds 50 percent and 50 percent or greater of the dominant species have a hydrophytic indicator status. The Regional Supplement also introduced the Prevalence Index, Morphological Adaptations, and Wetland Non-Vascular plants as indicators of hydrophytic vegetation only when indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology are also present. Wetland Hydrology Technical criteria for wetland hydrology guidelines have been established as “permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for a significant period (usually 14 days or more or 12.5 percent of the growing season) during the growing season” (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The minimum duration required for soil saturation is five percent of the growing season in consecutive days. Inundation or saturation for periods less than 5 percent of the growing season is evidence of non-wetland conditions. Systems with continuous inundation or saturation between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season may or may not be jurisdictional wetlands based on other criteria. The growing season is defined for purposes of this report as the number of days where there is a 50 percent probability that the minimum daily temperature is greater than or equal to 28 Fahrenheit (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The Bozeman growing season extends from May 5 to October 1 according to the WETS Bozeman Climate data. Approximately 19 days of saturation would meet the wetland hydrology criterion for a specific wetland. Either direct observations of inundation or well data showing a free water surface at depths less than 12 inches continuously for more than 5 percent of the growing season have been used nationally to distinguish active wetland hydrology. Surface water, groundwater, direct precipitation, and/or snowmelt may contribute to wetland hydrology. Field observations were used to determine existing wetland hydrology. A positive indication of wetland hydrology requires either one primary indicator or two or more secondary indicators. The Regional Supplement for the Western Mountains area lists the primary indicators as surface water, high water table, saturation, water marks, sediment deposits, drift deposits, algal mat or crust, iron deposits, surface soil cracks, inundation visible on aerial imagery, sparsely vegetated concave surface, water stained leaves, salt crust, aquatic invertebrates, hydrogen sulfide odor, oxidized rhizospheres along living roots, presence of reduced iron, recent iron reduction in tilled soils, and stunted or stressed plants. Secondary indicators include water-stained leaves, drainage patterns, dry-season water table, saturation visible on aerial imagery, geomorphic position, shallow aquitard, FAC-neutral test, raised ant mounds, and frost-heave hummocks. Hydric Soils Soil is considered saturated when the capillary fringe occurs within a major portion of the root zone (within 12 inches of the surface). The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), 268 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 8 formerly the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS), has compiled a list of hydric soils in the United States. The list identifies soil series mapped by the NRCS that meet the hydric criteria. Upland (non-wetland) soils may have inclusions of hydric soils that may not be demarcated on NRCS maps. Field examination of site-specific soil characteristics is necessary to confirm the presence of hydric soils. The profile description presented on the data form reflects site soil conditions as determined from soil pits, not the NRCS designation. The NRCS soil survey information reviewed for the project area is included in Appendix B. Hydric soils exhibit certain physical characteristics that can be observed visually. These characteristics, or indicators, include high organic matter content (histic epipedons), accumulation of sulfidic material, gley formation (greenish or bluish gray color), redoximorphic features (mottling), and low soil chromas (dark soil colors – soil chroma). Organic matter content is estimated visually and texturally; redoximorphic features are identified visually; sulfidic material is identified by the odor of sulfide gases; and soil colors are determined using a Munsell soil color chart (Munsell 1988). The colorimetric determination is to be made immediately below the “A” horizon or 10 inches whichever is less. The Regional Supplement for Western Mountains introduced new classifications for hydric soil indicators based on the soil type (organic, muck or mineral), soil matrix, and type of redoximorphic features such as concentrations, depletions, reduced matrix, or covered or coated sand grains. The full description of each category is included in Chapter Three of the Regional Supplement for the Western Mountains area. Wetland soils can be assumed to be present in any plant community where all the dominant species have an indicator status of OBL or FACW, and the wetland boundary is abrupt (Environmental Laboratory 1987). 269 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 9 3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS A site investigation to determine the presence and extent of waters of the US within the study area was completed by VES on September 16, 2016. C&H Engineering and Surveying surveyed the demarcated boundaries using a global positioning system (GPS). Wetland boundaries were flagged by VES based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and primary hydrologic indicators. Wetland types were based on similarities in physiographic, hydrologic, and plant community characteristics. Site-specific wetland parameters are described on the Wetland Determination Data Forms included in Appendix A. C&H Engineers drafted the Topographic Map that shows the boundaries of W-1 identified within the study area (Sheet 1 of 1, Appendix D). Wetland 1 (W-1) is a man-made, lower perennial, riverine wetland based on the hydrogeomorphic classification system (Smith et al. 1995). The primary source of water is surface water overflow from an outlet on the north end of the East Gallatin pond located south of the subject property. The wetland is classified as rock bottom with emergent vegetation according to the Cowardin classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979). The moisture regime is permanently flooded (PF). Surface water in the man-made channel discharges to the East Gallatin River approximately 0.38 miles north of the parcel. Section 3.1 discusses the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey results for the project site. The characteristics of the project WUS are described in Section 3.2. The Wetland Determination Data forms are included in Appendix A and the NRCS soil map and soil descriptions are included in Appendix B. Photographs of the site wetland are included in Appendix C. Appendix D presents the Topographic Map showing the wetland boundaries on Sheet 1 of 1. 3.1 NRCS SOIL SURVEY RESULTS The web soil survey for Gallatin County (USDA/NRCS 2016) maps the man-made channel W-1 within the Threeriv-Bonebasin loam (556A) map unit found on 0 to 2 percent slopes (Appendix B). The Threeriv series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils taxonomically classified as a fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, calcareous, frigid Typic Fluvaquents. It is classified as hydric by virtue of the aquic order. The Bonebasin series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils, taxonomically classified as a superactive, frigid, Fluvaquentic Endoaquolls. The series is classified as hydric. 3.2 W-1 – ARTIFICIAL, LOWER PERENNIAL, RIVERINE, ROCK BOTTOM AND EMERGENT The Topographic Map (Sheet 1 - Appendix D) demarcates the boundaries of W-1. Six soil test pits were excavated to determine the boundary between wetland and upland. Test pits SP- 1 and SP-2 were located in wetland and upland, respectively, on the north half of W-1. Test pits SP-3 and SP-4 were excavated within the wetland boundary on the south half of W-1. Test pits SP-5 and SP-6 were excavated in upland at the edge of the W-1 boundary on the south half of W- 1. A rock layer between 9 and 12 inches on the south half of W-1 restricted the depth of the test pits in some locations. The soil test pit locations are shown on the map in Appendix D. None of the wetland test pits exhibited saturation or inundation. However, there was water flowing in the borrow ditch channel and ponded surface water noted in several areas within the wetland fringe that extends from the ditch. Vegetation – North Half of W-1 Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea – FACW), smooth brome (Bromus inermis – UPL) and spreading bent grass (Agrostis stolonifera – FAC) dominated the vegetation cover at SP-1. Additional species included Northwest Territory sedge (Carex utriculata – OBL) and 270 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 10 common tansy (Taraxacum vulgare – FACU). The species met the dominance test for vegetation. The same species dominated the cover at SP-2 albeit in different cover percentages. The dominance test was equal to 50 percent. The dominant species met the prevalence test for hydrophytic vegetation. Vegetation – South Half of W-1 Test pit SP-3 was located at the edge of the common cattail (Typha latifolia – OBL) dominated, inundated wetland fringe in the south half of W-1. The cover was dominated by common cattail and spreading bent grass meeting the dominance test for wetland vegetation. Test pit SP-4 was located in wetland east of SP-3. Spreading bent grass, common cattail, orchard grass, and common timothy (Phleum pratense – FAC) dominated the cover meeting the dominance test. Test pit SP-5 was located in upland at the edge of W-1. The plant cover of orchard grass, spreading bent grass, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis – FAC), and common cattail met the dominance test. Pit SP-6 was located in upland further east of SP-5 and higher in elevation. The same plants observed at SP-5 dominated the cover at SP-6. Soil – North half of W-1 Pit SP-1 revealed a black silt loam (10 YR 2/1) from 11 to 15 inches below the ground surface with 2 percent dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4) redox concentrations in the matrix. The redox dark surface was a positive indicator of a hydric soil. The soil profile in SP-2 exhibited a very dark brown (10 YR 2/2) dry, friable silt loam without redoximorphic features. The soil did not meet the wetland criteria. Soil – South half of W-1 Test pit SP-3 revealed a sticky black (10 YR 2/1) silt loam with dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4) redox concentrations in the matrix meeting the hydric soil criteria for a redox dark surface. Pit SP-4 exhibited a black silt loam (10 YR 2/1) from 0 to 12 inches bgs with grayish brown (10 YR 5/2) depletions in the matrix near 12 inches bgs. The depleted dark surface met the hydric soil criteria. Pockets of gray sand were noted within the profile. Pit SP-5 revealed a very dark brown (10 YR 2/2) silt clay loam with 2 percent grayish brown (10 YR 5/2) depletions to 9 inches bgs. A rock layer precluded a deeper excavation. The soil characteristics did not meet the hydric soil criteria. Test pit SP-6 was excavated to 13 inches bgs. The characteristics were the same as SP-5. Neither test pit met the wetland criteria for depleted dark surface based on the higher chroma and low percentage of depletions present. Hydrology – North half of W-1 The data collection point at SP-1 provided two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology, saturation visible on aerial imagery and geomorphic position. Data collection point SP-2 was located up the bank slope from SP-1. There were no indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-2. Hydrology – South half of W-1 Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-3 included a sparsely vegetated concave surface, saturation visible on aerial imagery, and geomorphic position. Test pit SP-4 was located east of SP-3 near the wetland-upland boundary. Saturation visible on aerial imagery and geomorphic position were secondary indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-4. Test pits SP-5 and SP-6 did not exhibit any indicators of wetland hydrology. 271 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 11 4.0 SUMMARY Wetland W-1 is a man-made, lower perennial, rock bottom, riverine wetland that discharges to the East Gallatin River approximately 0.38 miles north of the subject property. The source of water is overflow from an outlet channel located at the north end of the East Gallatin Recreation Area Pond. The man-made channel is diverted to the borrow ditch on the east side of Manley Road. The wetland was assumed to be jurisdictional based on the downgradient connection to the East Gallatin River. Table 1.0 Summary of Attributes for Wetland W-1 delineated on UPS Property. Wetland Designation Hydrogeomorphic/Cowardin Class Jurisdictional Status Areal Extent (Acres) W-1 Man-made, lower perennial, rock bottom, riverine (PF*) Jurisdictional 0.302 *Permanently flooded. 272 Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 12 5.0 REFERENCES Clean Water Act, Section 404. 1986. Federal Register - Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers. Cowardin, Lewis M., Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet, and Edward T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Services, USDI, Washington, DC. Dorn, R.D. 1984. Vascular Plants of Montana. Mountain West Publishing, Wyoming. Environmental Laboratory 1987. “Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,” Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksbrug, Miss. Hitchcock, A.S. 1971. Manual of the Grasses of the United States, Volume One and Two. Dover Publications, New York. Lackschewitz, K. 1991. Vascular Plants of West-Central Montana – Identification Guidebook. General Technical Report –277. Intermountain Research Station. USDA, Forest Service. Missoula, MT. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 2016 Regional Wetland Plant List. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X. Lesica, P., P. Husby. 2001. Field Guide to Montana’s Wetland Vascular Plants. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bozeman, MT Munsell. 1988. Soil Color Charts. New Windsor, New York. Smith, R.D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service 1990, WETS Climate Summary Data US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 1987. Hydric Soils of the US. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Washington DC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to theCorps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: WesternMountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S.Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-3.Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and DevelopmentCenter. WEBSITES: USDA/NRCS Web Soil Survey, Gallatin County, accessed September 2016:http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ 273 APPENDIX A WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 APPENDIX B NRCS SOIL SURVEY Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 287 Soil Map—Gallatin County Area, Montana (Ebigghausen - Manley Road) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/3/2016 Page 1 of 3 5061000 5061100 5061200 5061300 5061400 5061500 5061600 5061700 5061800 5061000 5061100 5061200 5061300 5061400 5061500 5061600 5061700 5061800 496700 496800 496900 497000 497100 497200 496700 496800 496900 497000 497100 497200 45° 42' 35'' N 111° 2' 35'' W 45° 42' 35'' N 111° 2' 6'' W 45° 42' 8'' N 111° 2' 35'' W 45° 42' 8'' N 111° 2' 6'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTMZone12NWGS84 0 150 300 600 900 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Meters Map Scale: 1:4,060 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at thisscale. 288 LOCATION THREERIV MT Established Series Rev. GAR-JJU-RJS 06/2011 THREERIV SERIES The Threeriv series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium. These soils are on flood plains. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 15 inches, and the mean annual air temperature is about 40 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, calcareous, frigid Typic Fluvaquents TYPICAL PEDON: Threeriv loam, in pastureland (colors are for moist soil unless otherwise noted). Oe--0 to 4 inches; partially decomposed sedges, rushes and grasses; slightly alkaline (pH 7.8); clear smooth boundary. (2 to 6 inches thick) Ag--4 to 9 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loam, gray (10YR 5/1) dry; few fine prominent brown (7.5YR 4/4) redox concentrations; weak medium subangular blocky structure; hard, friable, moderately sticky and moderately plastic; few very fine and fine, and common medium roots; 10 percent gravel; strongly effervescent; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0). (2 to 9 inches thick) Cg--9 to 29 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) sandy clay loam consisting of strata of sandy clay loam and sandy loam, light gray (10YR 7/2) dry; common fine prominent dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/6) redox concentrations; massive; hard, friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few very fine, fine and medium roots; 10 percent gravel; violently effervescent; moderately alkaline (pH 8.4); clear smooth boundary. (15 to 31 inches thick) 2C--29 to 60 inches; variegated extremely gravelly loamy sand; single grain; loose, nonsticky and nonplastic; 60 percent gravel and 15 percent cobbles; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0). TYPE LOCATION: Gallatin County, Montana; 2,200 feet south and 200 feet west of the northeast corner of sec. 2, T. 1N, R. 1E. RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Mean annual soil temperature - 40 to 45 degrees F. Depth to lithologic discontinuity - 20 to 40 inches Depth to seasonal high water table - 0 to 12 inches Ag horizon Hue: 10YR, N, 5Y; dry or moist Value: 5 or 6 dry; 3 or 4 moist Texture: loam, silt loam or silty clay loam Clay content: 18 to 35 percent Rock fragments: 0 to 10 percent gravel Calcium carbonate equivalent: 2 to 15 percent Reaction: pH 7.9 to 8.4 Cg horizon Hue: 10YR, 5Y or 2.5Y; dry or moist Value: 5 to 7 dry; 4 to 6 moist Chroma: 1 or 2; dry or moist Texture: stratified sandy clay loam, sandy loam, silty clay loam or clay loam Clay content: 15 to 35 percent Rock fragments: 0 to 10 percent gravel 289 Calcium carbonate equivalent: 2 to 15 percent Reaction: pH 7.9 to 8.4 2C horizon Hue: 10YR or variegated; dry or moist Value: 5 or 6 dry; 4 or 5 moist Texture: loamy sand, loamy coarse sand, sand or coarse sand Clay content: 0 to 10 percent Rock fragments: 35 to 85 percent-- 25 to 60 percent gravel, 10 to 25 percent cobbles Reaction: pH 7.4 to 8.4 COMPETING SERIES: Beavrock (MT) - have a seasonal high water table at 12 to 24 inches GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Landform - flood plains Elevation - 4,000 to 6,500 feet Slope - 0 to 2 percent Parent material - alluvium Climate - long, cold winters; moist springs; warm summers Mean annual precipitation - 10 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature - 38 to 43 degrees F. Frost-free period - 70 to 110 days GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: None listed. DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained; moderately slow over rapid permeability. USE AND VEGETATION: Threeriv soils are used mainly for pasture and wildlife habitat. Potential native vegetation may include tall reedgrasses, tall sedges and rushes, American sloughgrass, iris, willows, waterbirch, dogwood and silver buffaloberry, as well as other forbs, grasses, sedges and shrubs. DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Threeriv soils are of small extent in Southwestern Montana. MLRA - 44B. MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE: Bozeman, Montana. SERIES ESTABLISHED: Gallatin County, Montana, 1997. REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon - from 0 to 9 inches (Oe, Ag horizons) Lithologic discontinuity - at 29 inches (2C horizon) Particle-size control section - from 14 to 44 inches (part of Cg, part of 2C horizons) Threeriv soils have a frigid temperature regime and an aquic moisture regime. ADDITIONAL DATA: Soil interpretation record - MT1640. National Cooperative Soil Survey 290 APPENDIX C PHOTO LOG Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 291 Photo 1. The view is looking northwest at SP-1 at the edge of the borrow ditch on Manley Road. 292 Photo 2. The view is of SP-2 looking northwest toward Manley Road. 293 Photo 3. The photo is looking west toward SP-3 and Manley Road. 294 Photo 4. The photo is looking at SP-4, east of SP-3. 295 Photo 5. The photo shows SP-5 located outside the east edge of the south half of the wetland looking north. 296 Photo 6.0 The view is looking west at the ponded water at the south end of the south half of the borrow ditch (W-1). 297 Photo 7.0 The view is looking south at the south half of W-1 adjacent to Manley Road. 298 Appendix D WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT Waters of the US Delineation Report – Ebbighausen – Bridger Vale Subdivision 299 300 Vapor Management Technology 301 Geo-Seal® is a sub-slab vapor intrusion barrier system designed to eliminate vapor intrusion for brownfields or any type of environmentally-impaired site. Geo-Seal is a chemically-resistant material placed between the foundation of the building and the soil pad to eliminate vapor intrusion pathways and stop contaminant vapors from permeating through the slab. By deploying Geo-Seal, developers can ensure a healthy indoor environment while reducing the cost of site remediation and expediting site construction. • Geo-Seal is a composite system that creates the ideal blend between constructability and chemical resistance by using both high density polyethylene (HDPE) and spray applied asphalt latex. • Geo-Seal has been tested and proven to be highly effective against VOCs like chlorinated solvents and petroleum contaminants, and, methane. • Geo-Seal is the 1st patented vapor intrusion barrier system in the US • Geo-Seal has gained wide approval among various regulatory agencies across the country. Introduction 302 Geo-Seal BASE The BASE layer is rolled out geotextile facing down, which allows Geo-Seal CORE to be applied directly to the high density polyethylene. The BASE layer provides the ultimate substrate and enables the spray layer to be free of shadowing and pinholes. Geo-Seal CORE The CORE is applied at 60 mils, is sprayed to the base layer, seals around penetrations and seals the seams of the BASE layer. Geo-Seal BOND A proprietary protection layer is placed over the CORE layer to enhance the curing of the membrane and increase puncture resistance. • Eliminates the need for trenching • Cost-effective compared to pipe and gravel systems • Eliminates long-term costs when configured as a passive system • Allows for rapid installation • When used with Geo-Seal provides maximumprotection against contaminated vapor Vapor-Vent 303 Geo-Seal Triple-Layer System (2 Chemical Resistant Layers + 1 Spray Applied Core Layer) Dual Chemical Resistant Layers The BASE layer (bottom) and the BOND layer (top) are composed of a high-density polyethylene material bonded to a geo-textile on the out-facing side. High density polyethylene is known for chemical resistance, high tensile strength, excellent stress-crack resistance and for highly reliable subsurface containment. The geo-textile which is physically bonded to the chemical resistant layer accomplishes two goals; it allows the BOND layer to adhere to the slab, and provides a friction course between the BASE layer and the soil. Spray Applied CORE Layer The CORE layer is composed of a unique, elastic co-polymer modified asphaltic membrane which also provides additional protection against vapor transmission. This layer creates a highly-effective seal around slab penetrations and eliminates the need for mechanical fastening at termination points. Chemical Resistance The dual chemical resistant layers combined with the spray CORE form a barrier resistant to the most concentrated chemical pollutant vapors. Enhanced Curing Geo-Seal is “construction friendly” as the reduced curing time of the Geo-Seal CORE layer and the ability to apply it in cooler temperatures ensures quick installation and minimizes the impact on construction schedules. 304 Puncture Resistance Geo-Seal forms a highly puncture resistant barrier that greatly reduces the chance of damage occurring after installation and prior to the placement of concrete. Removing Contained Vapors Vapor-Vent can be used in conjunction with Geo-Seal to alleviate the buildup of vapors beneath structures as a result of vapor barrier implementation. Vapor-Vent can be utilized as an active or passive ventilation system depending on the requirements of the design engineer. Certified Applicator Network The application of Geo-Seal and Vapor-Vent can be performed by any one of many certified applicators throughout the country. Service and Support Geo-Seal representatives are available to provide job and site specific assistance. A local representative can ensure Geo-Seal and Vapor-Vent is installed as per the specification. 305 World Class Clients Environmental consultants, engineers, and real estate professionals trust Land Science to produce results knowing our expertise and industry knowledge has been proven time and again at the job site. Our world class clients include leaders in the food, banking, government, and housing industries. Get Started Today To recieve a custom vapor intrusion solution, please call 949.481.8118 or email info@landsciencetech.com One of our Technical Solutions Managers will review your project details and provide you with a customized vapor intrusion solution designed to achieve your goals. 306 www.landsciencetech.com 1011 Calle Sombra, San Clemente CA 92673 T: 949.481.8118 EXPERTS IN VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION Land Science® develops vapor intrusion mitigation solutions that protect people and invigorate renewal of contaminated properties. We leverage our industry expertise to assist clients in developing site specific solutions that are technically sound and cost-effective. ©2016 All rights reserved. Land Science and Land Science products are registered trademarks of REGENESIS Bioremediation Products. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 307 851 Bridger Drive, Suite 6 (59715) P.O. Box 1413 (59771) Bozeman, MT Office 406.582.8780 Fax 406.582.8790 October 28, 2016 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen P O Box 930 Manhattan, MT 59741 SUBJECT: Report of Test Pit Observation and Sampling Bridger Vale Development Bozeman, Montana Tetra Tech, Inc., Project No.: 114-710331.100 Dear Mr. Ebbighausen, On October 10, 2016, Tetra Tech, Inc. personnel conducted soil sampling in six test pits excavated by you, on Bridger Vale Development property. Each test pit was located in the approximate center of each of the six building footprints proposed. Test pits were excavated to approximately five feet depth below ground surface. Soil was visually described and one soil sample was collected in each test pit. The test pit field log has descriptions of the soil encountered in the test pits and is in Table 1. Soils observed in the test pits did not exhibit evidence of staining or odor, evidence of refuse/waste, or other indications of contamination. In each test pit, one soil sample was collected at depths ranging between 3.5 and 5.2 feet below ground surface. Each soil sample was mixed in a stainless steel bowl and packed into a nine ounce glass jar with an air-tight, threaded, Teflon-lined lid. The soil sample was placed in the container in a compacted manner so to minimize any headspace or voids. The samples were placed in an ice-filled cooler. In preparation for shipment to analytical laboratory, samples were packed in bubble wrap and ice in a cooler under documented chain of custody protocol. Samples were shipped to Pace Analytical Laboratories (Pace) in Billings, Montana for analysis of volatile organic compounds in accordance with USEPA Method 8260B. Analytical results of 71 constituents, in each of the six samples, indicate no detection of these constituents above the minimum detection limit (MDL). The laboratory report is contained in Attachment A. Please contact me with any questions or comments regarding this report. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Sincerely, Mark F. Pearson Environmental Scientist mfp 308 TABLE 1 TEST PIT FIELD LOG OCTOBER 10, 2016 BRIDGER VALE DEVELOPMENT BOZEMAN, MONTANA TEST PIT CORRESPONDING DEPTH GENERAL SOIL SAMPLE SURVEY MARKER DESCRIPTION COLLECTION feet bgs feet bgs #1 #300 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2 Clayey loam - firm, moist 2 - 3.2 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 3.2 - 5.8 Clayey silt - incr. moisture 3.5 5.8 Groundwater (rising to about 5') #2 #301 0 - 2 Clayey loam - rich in organics 2 - 3.5 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 3.5 - 5 Clayey silt - less dense, incr. moisture 4.5 5 Groundwater #3 #302 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 2 - 3.7 Clayey silt - blocky, hard, w abnt carbonate 3.7 - 4.5 Sandy silt - less dense 4.4 No groundwater intercepted #4 #303 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2.2 Silty clay - dry, blocky, w carbonate 2.2 - 4.5 Clayey silt - less dense, incr. moisture 4.5 - 4.7 Sandy silt - less dense 4.6 No groundwater intercepted #5 #304 0 - 1.5 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1.5 - 4.8 Silty, sandy, clay - softer, w carbonate 4.8 - 5 Sandy silt - less dense 4.9 No groundwater intercepted #6 #305 0 - 1.5 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1.5 - 4.8 Silty, sandy, clay - softer, w carbonate 4.8 - 5.2 Sandy silt - less dense 4.9 No groundwater intercepted NOTES : bgs - below ground surface. Depths are approximate. General Soil Description - soil interval visually described in field without any in-field testing w - with incr. - increased abnt - abundant Tetra Tech, Inc. 309 ATTACHMENT A 310 #=CL# October 24, 2016 LIMS USE: FR - MARK PEARSON LIMS OBJECT ID: 10365529 10365529 Project: Pace Project No.: RE: Mark Pearson Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT 851 Bridger Dr. Suite 6 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bridger Vale Subdivision Dear Mark Pearson: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 11, 2016. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current, applicable TNI/NELAC standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Beverly Faraday beverly.faraday@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 1 of 32 311 #=CP# CERTIFICATIONS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Davis Cerification IDs 2795 Second Street Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 North Dakota Certification #: R-214 Oregon Certification #: CA300002 Washington Certification #: C926-15a California Certification #: 08263CA Minnesota Department of Health Certification #: 006-999- 465 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 2 of 32 312 #=SS# SAMPLE SUMMARY Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received 10365529001 BV-1 3.5' Solid 10/10/16 14:50 10/11/16 09:30 10365529002 BV-2 4.5' Solid 10/10/16 15:05 10/11/16 09:30 10365529003 BV-3 4.4' Solid 10/10/16 15:20 10/11/16 09:30 10365529004 BV-4 4.6' Solid 10/10/16 15:30 10/11/16 09:30 10365529005 BV-5 4.9' Solid 10/10/16 15:40 10/11/16 09:30 10365529006 BV-6 4.9' Solid 10/10/16 15:45 10/11/16 09:30 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 3 of 32 313 #=SA# SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID Method Analytes Analysts Reported Laboratory 10365529001 BV-1 3.5' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV 10365529002 BV-2 4.5' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV 10365529003 BV-3 4.4' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV 10365529004 BV-4 4.6' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV 10365529005 BV-5 4.9' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV 10365529006 BV-6 4.9' EPA 8260B JCP 74 PASI-DAV ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) SJ1 1 PASI-DAV REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 4 of 32 314 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client: Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT EPA 8260B Date: October 24, 2016 Description: 8260 MSV Low Soil General Information: 6 samples were analyzed for EPA 8260B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 5030 Low with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: 97319 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10365529002 M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • MS (Lab ID: 384863) • 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene • 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane • Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) • Tetrahydrofuran • n-Hexane • MSD (Lab ID: 384864) • 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane • Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) • Tetrahydrofuran REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 5 of 32 315 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client: Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT EPA 8260B Date: October 24, 2016 Description: 8260 MSV Low Soil QC Batch: 97319 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10365529002 M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • n-Hexane Additional Comments: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 6 of 32 316 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client: Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Date: October 24, 2016 Description: Dry Weight, Davis General Information: 6 samples were analyzed for ASTM D 2974-13 (2013). All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Duplicate Sample: All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 7 of 32 317 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-1 3.5' Lab ID: 10365529001 Collected: 10/10/16 14:50 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 107-05-1 Benzene <0.089 ug/kg 5.9 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.24 ug/kg 5.9 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.25 ug/kg 5.9 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 23.4 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.7 ug/kg 58.5 2.7 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.096 ug/kg 5.9 0.096 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.090 ug/kg 5.9 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.20 ug/kg 5.9 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 5.9 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.077 ug/kg 5.9 0.077 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 5.9 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.45 ug/kg 5.9 0.45 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.095 ug/kg 5.9 0.095 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.086 ug/kg 5.9 0.086 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 5.9 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.083 ug/kg 5.9 0.083 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.061 ug/kg 5.9 0.061 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.9 ug/kg 5.9 2.9 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.095 ug/kg 5.9 0.095 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.067 ug/kg 5.9 0.067 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.094 ug/kg 5.9 0.094 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 60-29-7 Ethylbenzene <0.062 ug/kg 5.9 0.062 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 5.9 0.27 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 110-54-3 2-Hexanone <0.59 ug/kg 58.5 0.59 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.084 ug/kg 5.9 0.084 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-1 3.5' Lab ID: 10365529001 Collected: 10/10/16 14:50 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.46 ug/kg 58.5 0.46 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.068 ug/kg 5.9 0.068 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.10 ug/kg 5.9 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 103-65-1 Styrene <0.10 ug/kg 5.9 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.9 ug/kg 5.9 2.9 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.069 ug/kg 5.9 0.069 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 117 1.6 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 109-99-9 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 5.9 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.086 ug/kg 5.9 0.086 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.18 ug/kg 5.9 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.099 ug/kg 5.9 0.099 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 540-84-1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 5.9 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <2.9 ug/kg 11.7 2.9 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <2.9 ug/kg 5.9 2.9 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.094 ug/kg 5.9 0.094 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 104 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 99 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 89 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:03 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 23.1 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 9 of 32 319 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-2 4.5' Lab ID: 10365529002 Collected: 10/10/16 15:05 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 107-05-1 Benzene <0.095 ug/kg 6.3 0.095 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.26 ug/kg 6.3 0.26 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.27 ug/kg 6.3 0.27 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.21 ug/kg 25.1 0.21 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.9 ug/kg 62.6 2.9 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.18 ug/kg 6.3 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 6.3 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.096 ug/kg 6.3 0.096 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.22 ug/kg 6.3 0.22 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 6.3 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.25 ug/kg 6.3 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.083 ug/kg 6.3 0.083 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.20 ug/kg 6.3 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.48 ug/kg 6.3 0.48 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.10 ug/kg 6.3 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.092 ug/kg 6.3 0.092 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.12 ug/kg 6.3 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.089 ug/kg 6.3 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.066 ug/kg 6.3 0.066 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.18 ug/kg 6.3 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 6.3 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.1 ug/kg 6.3 3.1 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 6.3 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 6.3 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 6.3 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.10 ug/kg 6.3 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.072 ug/kg 6.3 0.072 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.10 ug/kg 6.3 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 6.3 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.13 ug/kg 6.3 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 60-29-7 M1 Ethylbenzene <0.067 ug/kg 6.3 0.067 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.19 ug/kg 6.3 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.28 ug/kg 6.3 0.28 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 110-54-3 M1 2-Hexanone <0.63 ug/kg 62.6 0.63 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.090 ug/kg 6.3 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.13 ug/kg 6.3 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-2 4.5' Lab ID: 10365529002 Collected: 10/10/16 15:05 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.14 ug/kg 6.3 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.49 ug/kg 62.6 0.49 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.072 ug/kg 6.3 0.072 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.11 ug/kg 6.3 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 103-65-1 Styrene <0.11 ug/kg 6.3 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.1 ug/kg 6.3 3.1 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.074 ug/kg 6.3 0.074 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.7 ug/kg 125 1.7 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 109-99-9 M1 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 6.3 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.092 ug/kg 6.3 0.092 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 87-61-6 M1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 6.3 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 6.3 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.18 ug/kg 6.3 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.18 ug/kg 6.3 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/kg 6.3 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.16 ug/kg 6.3 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.17 ug/kg 6.3 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.13 ug/kg 6.3 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.11 ug/kg 6.3 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.13 ug/kg 6.3 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 540-84-1 M1 Vinyl chloride <0.19 ug/kg 6.3 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <3.1 ug/kg 12.5 3.1 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <3.1 ug/kg 6.3 3.1 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.10 ug/kg 6.3 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 101 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 98 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 87 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 11:22 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 23.1 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 11 of 32 321 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-3 4.4' Lab ID: 10365529003 Collected: 10/10/16 15:20 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 6.0 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 107-05-1 Benzene <0.092 ug/kg 6.0 0.092 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.25 ug/kg 6.0 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.26 ug/kg 6.0 0.26 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 24.2 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.8 ug/kg 60.5 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.18 ug/kg 6.0 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.099 ug/kg 6.0 0.099 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.093 ug/kg 6.0 0.093 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.21 ug/kg 6.0 0.21 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 6.0 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 6.0 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.080 ug/kg 6.0 0.080 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 6.0 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 6.0 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.46 ug/kg 6.0 0.46 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.098 ug/kg 6.0 0.098 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.089 ug/kg 6.0 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.12 ug/kg 6.0 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.086 ug/kg 6.0 0.086 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.063 ug/kg 6.0 0.063 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 6.0 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 6.0 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 6.0 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 6.0 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 6.0 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.099 ug/kg 6.0 0.099 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.069 ug/kg 6.0 0.069 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.097 ug/kg 6.0 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.13 ug/kg 6.0 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 60-29-7 Ethylbenzene <0.064 ug/kg 6.0 0.064 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.18 ug/kg 6.0 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 6.0 0.27 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 110-54-3 2-Hexanone <0.61 ug/kg 60.5 0.61 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.087 ug/kg 6.0 0.087 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 6.0 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-3 4.4' Lab ID: 10365529003 Collected: 10/10/16 15:20 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.47 ug/kg 60.5 0.47 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.070 ug/kg 6.0 0.070 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.11 ug/kg 6.0 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 103-65-1 Styrene <0.11 ug/kg 6.0 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 6.0 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.071 ug/kg 6.0 0.071 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 121 1.6 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 109-99-9 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 6.0 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.089 ug/kg 6.0 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 6.0 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 6.0 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 6.0 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.19 ug/kg 6.0 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 6.0 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.17 ug/kg 6.0 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.13 ug/kg 6.0 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 6.0 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 6.0 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 540-84-1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 6.0 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <3.0 ug/kg 12.1 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <3.0 ug/kg 6.0 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.097 ug/kg 6.0 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 103 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 99 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 88 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:23 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 21.6 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 13 of 32 323 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-4 4.6' Lab ID: 10365529004 Collected: 10/10/16 15:30 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.15 ug/kg 5.6 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 107-05-1 Benzene <0.085 ug/kg 5.6 0.085 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.23 ug/kg 5.6 0.23 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.6 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.24 ug/kg 5.6 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.19 ug/kg 22.4 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.6 ug/kg 55.9 2.6 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 5.6 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.091 ug/kg 5.6 0.091 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.086 ug/kg 5.6 0.086 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.19 ug/kg 5.6 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.11 ug/kg 5.6 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.22 ug/kg 5.6 0.22 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.074 ug/kg 5.6 0.074 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.6 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.18 ug/kg 5.6 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.43 ug/kg 5.6 0.43 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.091 ug/kg 5.6 0.091 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.082 ug/kg 5.6 0.082 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 5.6 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.080 ug/kg 5.6 0.080 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.059 ug/kg 5.6 0.059 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.16 ug/kg 5.6 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.12 ug/kg 5.6 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 5.6 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 5.6 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 5.6 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 5.6 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.6 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.091 ug/kg 5.6 0.091 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.064 ug/kg 5.6 0.064 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.089 ug/kg 5.6 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.12 ug/kg 5.6 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 60-29-7 Ethylbenzene <0.059 ug/kg 5.6 0.059 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.17 ug/kg 5.6 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.25 ug/kg 5.6 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 110-54-3 2-Hexanone <0.56 ug/kg 55.9 0.56 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.080 ug/kg 5.6 0.080 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.11 ug/kg 5.6 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-4 4.6' Lab ID: 10365529004 Collected: 10/10/16 15:30 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.44 ug/kg 55.9 0.44 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.065 ug/kg 5.6 0.065 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.098 ug/kg 5.6 0.098 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.6 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 103-65-1 Styrene <0.097 ug/kg 5.6 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 5.6 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.066 ug/kg 5.6 0.066 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.5 ug/kg 112 1.5 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 109-99-9 Toluene <0.10 ug/kg 5.6 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.082 ug/kg 5.6 0.082 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.6 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.16 ug/kg 5.6 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 5.6 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.18 ug/kg 5.6 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 5.6 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 5.6 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 5.6 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.094 ug/kg 5.6 0.094 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.11 ug/kg 5.6 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 540-84-1 Vinyl chloride <0.17 ug/kg 5.6 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <2.8 ug/kg 11.2 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <2.8 ug/kg 5.6 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.089 ug/kg 5.6 0.089 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 104 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 100 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 90 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 14:43 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 14.4 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 15 of 32 325 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-5 4.9' Lab ID: 10365529005 Collected: 10/10/16 15:40 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 107-05-1 Benzene <0.084 ug/kg 5.5 0.084 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.23 ug/kg 5.5 0.23 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.23 ug/kg 5.5 0.23 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.18 ug/kg 22.1 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.6 ug/kg 55.2 2.6 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 5.5 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.090 ug/kg 5.5 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.085 ug/kg 5.5 0.085 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.19 ug/kg 5.5 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.22 ug/kg 5.5 0.22 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.073 ug/kg 5.5 0.073 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.18 ug/kg 5.5 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.42 ug/kg 5.5 0.42 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.090 ug/kg 5.5 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.081 ug/kg 5.5 0.081 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.079 ug/kg 5.5 0.079 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.058 ug/kg 5.5 0.058 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.16 ug/kg 5.5 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.12 ug/kg 5.5 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 5.5 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 5.5 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 5.5 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.12 ug/kg 5.5 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.090 ug/kg 5.5 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.063 ug/kg 5.5 0.063 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.088 ug/kg 5.5 0.088 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 60-29-7 Ethylbenzene <0.059 ug/kg 5.5 0.059 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.16 ug/kg 5.5 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.25 ug/kg 5.5 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 110-54-3 2-Hexanone <0.56 ug/kg 55.2 0.56 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.079 ug/kg 5.5 0.079 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-5 4.9' Lab ID: 10365529005 Collected: 10/10/16 15:40 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.12 ug/kg 5.5 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.43 ug/kg 55.2 0.43 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.064 ug/kg 5.5 0.064 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.097 ug/kg 5.5 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 103-65-1 Styrene <0.096 ug/kg 5.5 0.096 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 5.5 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.065 ug/kg 5.5 0.065 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.5 ug/kg 110 1.5 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 109-99-9 Toluene <0.10 ug/kg 5.5 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.081 ug/kg 5.5 0.081 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.5 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.16 ug/kg 5.5 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 5.5 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.17 ug/kg 5.5 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 5.5 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.5 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.093 ug/kg 5.5 0.093 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.11 ug/kg 5.5 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 540-84-1 Vinyl chloride <0.17 ug/kg 5.5 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <2.8 ug/kg 11.0 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <2.8 ug/kg 5.5 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.088 ug/kg 5.5 0.088 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 103 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 99 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 89 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:03 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 18.8 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 17 of 32 327 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-6 4.9' Lab ID: 10365529006 Collected: 10/10/16 15:45 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 107-05-1 Benzene <0.090 ug/kg 5.9 0.090 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 71-43-2 Bromobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 108-86-1 Bromochloromethane <0.24 ug/kg 5.9 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 74-97-5 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-27-4 Bromoform <0.25 ug/kg 5.9 0.25 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-25-2 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 23.7 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 74-83-9 2-Butanone (MEK) <2.8 ug/kg 59.3 2.8 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 78-93-3 n-Butylbenzene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 104-51-8 sec-Butylbenzene <0.097 ug/kg 5.9 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 135-98-8 tert-Butylbenzene <0.091 ug/kg 5.9 0.091 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 98-06-6 Carbon tetrachloride <0.20 ug/kg 5.9 0.20 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 56-23-5 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 108-90-7 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 5.9 0.24 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-00-3 Chloroform <0.078 ug/kg 5.9 0.078 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 67-66-3 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 74-87-3 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 5.9 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 95-49-8 4-Chlorotoluene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 106-43-4 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.45 ug/kg 5.9 0.45 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 96-12-8 Dibromochloromethane <0.096 ug/kg 5.9 0.096 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 124-48-1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) <0.087 ug/kg 5.9 0.087 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 106-93-4 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 5.9 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 74-95-3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.084 ug/kg 5.9 0.084 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 95-50-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.062 ug/kg 5.9 0.062 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 541-73-1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 106-46-7 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-71-8 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-34-3 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 5.9 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 107-06-2 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-35-4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 156-59-2 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 156-60-5 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-43-4 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 78-87-5 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.097 ug/kg 5.9 0.097 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 142-28-9 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.068 ug/kg 5.9 0.068 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 594-20-7 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.095 ug/kg 5.9 0.095 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 563-58-6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 10061-01-5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 10061-02-6 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 60-29-7 Ethylbenzene <0.063 ug/kg 5.9 0.063 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 100-41-4 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.18 ug/kg 5.9 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 87-68-3 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 5.9 0.27 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 110-54-3 2-Hexanone <0.60 ug/kg 59.3 0.60 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 591-78-6 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) <0.085 ug/kg 5.9 0.085 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 98-82-8 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 99-87-6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample: BV-6 4.9' Lab ID: 10365529006 Collected: 10/10/16 15:45 Received: 10/11/16 09:30 Matrix: Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units PQL MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 8260 MSV Low Soil Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 5.9 0.13 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-09-2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) <0.46 ug/kg 59.3 0.46 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 108-10-1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.069 ug/kg 5.9 0.069 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 1634-04-4 Naphthalene <0.10 ug/kg 5.9 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 91-20-3 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 103-65-1 Styrene <0.10 ug/kg 5.9 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 100-42-5 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 630-20-6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 5.9 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethene <0.070 ug/kg 5.9 0.070 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 127-18-4 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 119 1.6 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 109-99-9 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 5.9 0.11 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 108-88-3 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.087 ug/kg 5.9 0.087 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 87-61-6 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 120-82-1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 5.9 0.14 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 71-55-6 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 79-00-5 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 5.9 0.17 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 79-01-6 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.19 ug/kg 5.9 0.19 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-69-4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 5.9 0.15 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 96-18-4 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 5.9 0.16 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 76-13-1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 95-63-6 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 5.9 0.10 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 108-67-8 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 5.9 0.12 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 540-84-1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 5.9 0.18 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 75-01-4 Xylene (Total) <3.0 ug/kg 11.9 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 1330-20-7 m&p-Xylene <3.0 ug/kg 5.9 3.0 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 179601-23-1 o-Xylene <0.095 ug/kg 5.9 0.095 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 95-47-6 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 103 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 17060-07-0 Toluene-d8 (S) 99 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 2037-26-5 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 87 %. 70-130 1 10/14/16 09:43 10/14/16 15:23 460-00-4 Dry Weight, Davis Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Percent Moisture 19.9 % 0.10 0.10 1 10/13/16 12:10 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 19 of 32 329 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 97319 EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 8260 MSV Low Soil Associated Lab Samples: 10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK: 384861 Associated Lab Samples: 10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Matrix: Solid MDL Analyzed 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 0.11 10/14/16 11:02 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <2.5 5.0 2.5 10/14/16 11:02 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.14 5.0 0.14 10/14/16 11:02 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg <0.14 5.0 0.14 10/14/16 11:02 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.080 5.0 0.080 10/14/16 11:02 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.073 5.0 0.073 10/14/16 11:02 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 0.10 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/kg <0.38 5.0 0.38 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/kg <0.073 5.0 0.073 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.071 5.0 0.071 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg <2.5 5.0 2.5 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 0.11 10/14/16 11:02 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.084 5.0 0.084 10/14/16 11:02 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.052 5.0 0.052 10/14/16 11:02 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.082 5.0 0.082 10/14/16 11:02 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.14 5.0 0.14 10/14/16 11:02 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg <0.10 5.0 0.10 10/14/16 11:02 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.057 5.0 0.057 10/14/16 11:02 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg <2.3 50.0 2.3 10/14/16 11:02 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.16 5.0 0.16 10/14/16 11:02 2-Hexanone ug/kg <0.50 50.0 0.50 10/14/16 11:02 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg <0.39 50.0 0.39 10/14/16 11:02 Allyl chloride ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 Benzene ug/kg <0.076 5.0 0.076 10/14/16 11:02 Bromobenzene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 Bromochloromethane ug/kg <0.20 5.0 0.20 10/14/16 11:02 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 Bromoform ug/kg <0.21 5.0 0.21 10/14/16 11:02 Bromomethane ug/kg <0.17 20.0 0.17 10/14/16 11:02 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK: 384861 Associated Lab Samples: 10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Matrix: Solid MDL Analyzed cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.11 5.0 0.11 10/14/16 11:02 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg <0.081 5.0 0.081 10/14/16 11:02 Dibromomethane ug/kg <0.096 5.0 0.096 10/14/16 11:02 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 0.11 10/14/16 11:02 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) ug/kg <0.10 5.0 0.10 10/14/16 11:02 Ethylbenzene ug/kg <0.053 5.0 0.053 10/14/16 11:02 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg <0.15 5.0 0.15 10/14/16 11:02 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ug/kg <0.072 5.0 0.072 10/14/16 11:02 m&p-Xylene ug/kg <2.5 5.0 2.5 10/14/16 11:02 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg <0.058 5.0 0.058 10/14/16 11:02 Methylene Chloride ug/kg <0.11 5.0 0.11 10/14/16 11:02 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.15 5.0 0.15 10/14/16 11:02 n-Hexane ug/kg <0.23 5.0 0.23 10/14/16 11:02 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 Naphthalene ug/kg 0.093J 5.0 0.088 10/14/16 11:02 o-Xylene ug/kg <0.080 5.0 0.080 10/14/16 11:02 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 0.10 10/14/16 11:02 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.082 5.0 0.082 10/14/16 11:02 Styrene ug/kg <0.087 5.0 0.087 10/14/16 11:02 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.077 5.0 0.077 10/14/16 11:02 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg <0.059 5.0 0.059 10/14/16 11:02 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg <1.3 100 1.3 10/14/16 11:02 Toluene ug/kg <0.091 5.0 0.091 10/14/16 11:02 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 Trichloroethene ug/kg <0.14 5.0 0.14 10/14/16 11:02 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.16 5.0 0.16 10/14/16 11:02 Vinyl chloride ug/kg <0.15 5.0 0.15 10/14/16 11:02 Xylene (Total) ug/kg <2.5 10.0 2.5 10/14/16 11:02 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) %. 99 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) %. 89 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 Toluene-d8 (S) %. 98 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 384862 Spike LCS 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 40 36.6 92 72-125 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 40 36.4 91 71-125 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 40 41.9 105 75-125 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 40 38.8 97 74-125 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 384862 Spike LCS 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg 40 38.6 97 72-125 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 40 39.2 98 69-125 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 40 41.5 104 75-125 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 40 37.8 94 66-125 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 40 38.5 96 73-125 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/kg 100 114 114 59-138 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/kg 40 37.6 94 73-125 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 40 37.9 95 72-125 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 40 39.8 99 67-125 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 40 41.4 104 68-125 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 40 37.9 95 74-125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 40 34.7 87 72-125 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg 40 41.3 103 70-125 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 40 37.6 94 69-125 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg 40 34.8 87 70-130 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 40 37.2 93 70-125 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg 200 227 113 63-134 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 40 35.5 89 74-125 2-Hexanone ug/kg 200 232 116 70-130 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 40 35.4 89 72-125 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg 200 221 110 70-130 Allyl chloride ug/kg 40 35.4 88 70-130 Benzene ug/kg 40 36.6 91 69-125 Bromobenzene ug/kg 40 35.4 88 73-125 Bromochloromethane ug/kg 40 34.0 85 73-125 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg 40 35.2 88 70-125 Bromoform ug/kg 40 39.1 98 68-125 Bromomethane ug/kg 40 41.3 103 36-138 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg 40 35.5 89 69-126 Chlorobenzene ug/kg 40 35.9 90 73-125 Chloroethane ug/kg 40 40.9 102 30-150 Chloroform ug/kg 40 36.5 91 71-125 Chloromethane ug/kg 40 33.4 83 53-125 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 40 36.3 91 72-125 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 40 42.4 106 71-125 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg 40 36.1 90 69-125 Dibromomethane ug/kg 40 36.1 90 72-125 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg 40 34.1 85 46-125 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 40 35.7 89 70-130 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) ug/kg 40 38.3 96 70-130 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 40 37.8 94 72-125 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg 40 35.9 90 67-125 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ug/kg 40 37.8 94 75-125 m&p-Xylene ug/kg 80 73.7 92 71-125 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg 40 38.6 96 71-125 Methylene Chloride ug/kg 40 35.9 90 58-125 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 384862 Spike LCS n-Hexane ug/kg 100 83.1 83 70-130 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg 40 37.9 95 72-125 Naphthalene ug/kg 40 45.5 114 64-125 o-Xylene ug/kg 40 36.3 91 73-125 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg 40 38.2 95 67-125 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg 40 38.0 95 74-125 Styrene ug/kg 40 37.5 94 71-125 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg 40 36.4 91 74-125 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 40 33.3 83 72-125 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg 400 446 111 70-130 Toluene ug/kg 40 36.6 91 70-125 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 40 35.6 89 72-125 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 40 40.2 101 68-125 Trichloroethene ug/kg 40 33.3 83 73-125 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 40 33.2 83 66-125 Vinyl chloride ug/kg 40 36.1 90 62-125 Xylene (Total) ug/kg 120 110 92 72-125 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) %. 103 70-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) %. 91 70-130 Toluene-d8 (S) %. 99 70-130 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qual MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 384863 Spike MS Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MS MSD Spike Conc. 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 30.2 33.0 62 67 33-133 9 25 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.14 49 49.7 36.1 38.4 74 77 54-126 6 25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <3.1 49 49.7 27.5 29.4 56 59 30-145 7 25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.18 49 49.7 30.6 32.9 62 66 30-134 7 25 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg <0.17 49 49.7 35.2 38.2 72 77 57-125 8 25 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 36.4 39.0 74 79 51-125 7 25 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.17 49 49.7 36.6 39.6 75 80 60-125 8 25 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.10 49 49.7 36.7 40.4 75 81 54-125 10 25 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qual MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 384863 Spike MS Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MS MSD Spike Conc. 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.10 49 49.7 32.4 34.9 66 70 32-125 7 25 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.18 49 49.7 23.0 27.1 47 55 30-125 16 25 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg <0.13 49 49.7 26.7 31.7 54 64 70-130 17 25 M1 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.072 49 49.7 37.5 40.4 76 81 52-127 7 25 2-Butanone (MEK) ug/kg <2.9 246 248 182 198 74 80 39-142 8 25 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.20 49 49.7 25.7 29.5 52 59 30-125 14 25 2-Hexanone ug/kg <0.63 246 248 146 146 59 59 30-150 0 25 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 24.6 28.6 50 58 30-125 15 25 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg <0.49 246 248 174 176 71 71 30-150 1 25 Allyl chloride ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 34.7 37.5 71 76 70-130 8 25 Benzene ug/kg <0.095 49 49.7 34.1 37.1 69 75 56-125 8 25 Bromobenzene ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 24.3 27.8 50 56 30-125 13 25 Bromochloromethane ug/kg <0.26 49 49.7 30.4 32.4 62 65 45-125 6 25 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 31.1 33.5 63 68 31-132 8 25 Bromoform ug/kg <0.27 49 49.7 26.7 28.8 54 58 30-125 8 25 Bromomethane ug/kg <0.21 49 49.7 39.9 41.5 81 84 30-139 4 25 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg <0.22 49 49.7 33.9 37.2 69 75 49-130 9 25 Chlorobenzene ug/kg <0.13 49 49.7 28.6 32.0 58 65 33-125 11 25 Chloroethane ug/kg <0.25 49 49.7 41.1 44.8 84 90 30-150 9 25 Chloroform ug/kg <0.083 49 49.7 33.7 36.2 69 73 46-125 7 25 Chloromethane ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 34.3 35.9 70 72 45-125 4 25 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 34.4 36.0 70 73 50-125 5 25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.14 49 49.7 35.5 38.1 72 77 35-126 7 25 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg <0.10 49 49.7 28.2 30.7 57 62 30-130 9 25 Dibromomethane ug/kg <0.12 49 49.7 29.2 30.6 59 62 36-127 5 25 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg <0.14 49 49.7 36.3 38.6 74 78 44-125 6 25 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 35.6 38.3 73 77 70-130 7 25 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) ug/kg <0.13 49 49.7 32.5 34.1 66 69 70-130 5 25 M1 Ethylbenzene ug/kg <0.067 49 49.7 32.2 35.9 66 72 45-125 11 25 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg <0.19 49 49.7 19.1 22.9 39 46 30-125 18 25 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ug/kg <0.090 49 49.7 30.4 34.6 62 70 35-128 13 25 m&p-Xylene ug/kg <3.1 98.2 99.2 61.8 68.2 63 69 40-125 10 25 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg <0.072 49 49.7 31.5 33.8 64 68 42-125 7 25 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Conc. % Rec Limits Qual MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 384863 Spike MS Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MS MSD Spike Conc. Toluene ug/kg <0.11 49 49.7 32.6 36.0 66 72 50-125 10 25 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.17 49 49.7 34.5 36.7 70 74 57-125 6 25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 32.2 34.4 66 69 33-125 7 25 Trichloroethene ug/kg <0.18 49 49.7 30.9 33.4 63 67 51-125 8 25 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.20 49 49.7 34.9 36.8 71 74 54-125 5 25 Vinyl chloride ug/kg <0.19 49 49.7 37.7 39.1 77 79 57-125 4 25 Xylene (Total) ug/kg <3.1 147 150 91.2 101 62 68 44-125 11 25 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) %. 102 103 70-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) %. 92 92 70-130 Toluene-d8 (S) %. 99 99 70-130 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 25 of 32 335 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 97219 ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Parameter Units Dup Result Max Result RPD RPD Qualifiers 10365529003 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 384116 Percent Moisture % 21.6 17.0 24 30 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 26 of 32 336 #=QL# QUALIFIERS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. LABORATORIES PASI-DAV Pace Analytical Services - Davis ANALYTE QUALIFIERS M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 27 of 32 337 #=CR# QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Analytical Batch 10365529001 BV-1 3.5' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529002 BV-2 4.5' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529003 BV-3 4.4' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529004 BV-4 4.6' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529005 BV-5 4.9' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529006 BV-6 4.9' EPA 5030 Low 97319 EPA 8260B 97327 10365529001 BV-1 3.5' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 10365529002 BV-2 4.5' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 10365529003 BV-3 4.4' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 10365529004 BV-4 4.6' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 10365529005 BV-5 4.9' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 10365529006 BV-6 4.9' ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 97219 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 28 of 32 338 Page 29 of 32 339 Page 30 of 32 340 Page 31 of 32 341 Page 32 of 32 342 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 1 December, 2014 East Gallatin Residential Development Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, Montana A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The East Gallatin Residential Development is a 6.5 acre residential project located east of Manley Road near the East Gallatin Recreation Area. The project would include up to 23 new residential units. As proposed, the development will not create any new roadway capacity problems along Manley Road. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to do so until the City is able to complete planned improvements at this location. No additional roadway improvements will be necessary to serve the East Gallatin Residential Development. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed residential development located east of Manley Road near Glen Lake Park in Bozeman, Montana. The document also identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The site is located north of the East Gallatin Recreation Area access road. The project would be developed to include up to 23 new residential units. C. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development property currently consists of a 6.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land located east of Manley road along the access road the Glen Lake Park. The topography in this area is flat. See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways East Gallatin Recreation Area Access Road provides beach access to Glen Lake Park, picnic areas, and trails. The road has a gravel surface and has a posted speed limit of 15 MPH. Manley Road is two-lane north/south road that provides access to the homes and businesses north of Griffin Drive. The road has a paved width of 28 feet with designated bike lanes. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive has been improved to include separated right- and left-turn lanes. Traffic counts collected by Gallatin County in 2007 indicate that the road caries 900 VPD north of the East Ga1latin Recreation Area. 343 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 2 December, 2014 Figure 1- Proposed Development Site Griffin Drive is a two-way, paved east/west minor arterial road that provides access through the northern edge of the City of Bozeman. The road has a paved width of 30 feet and has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Traffic data collected 2013 by the Montana Department of Transportation indicates that Griffin Drive currently carries 8,700 VPD east of North 7 th Avenue. The Montana Rail Link like crosses Griffin Drive 200 feet west of Manley Road. The crossing has fully actuated gates. This railroad crossing currently had 15 train crossings each day. Traffic Counts In November 2014 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected turning movement count data at the intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive. The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report. It should be noted that the East Gallatin recreation area has little use in the winter months and experienced low levels of activity during the November study period. In order to account for traffic from the recreation area a usage estimate was developed for the site and applied to the area traffic volumes. This estimate is described in Section E of this report. Proposed Development Site 344 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 3 December, 2014 Additional Developments The Map Brewery and Tap Room is currently under construction along Manley Road north of Griffin Road. This 8,800 square-foot facility will brew beer and provide a tasting room for customers. Estimated traffic volumes from this facility were included in the traffic modeling for this project. This estimate is described in Section E of this report. Planned Road Improvements The City of Bozeman is currently planning an improvement project along Griffin Drive at Manley Road as part of the City’s Capital Improvements Program. Street Impact Fee (SIF) Project #32 would include the construction of a roundabout or traffic signal at this location with additional turning lanes and improvements to the railroad crossing. The projected cost for this project is $925,000 and is awaiting funding. It is not known when it may be completed. Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) - Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 5.3. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak-hour conditions. Table 1 shows the existing 2014 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the proposed development. The data shows that the intersection is currently experiencing a poor Level of Service during the AM peak hour. The only way to effectively correct this problem is with the installation of traffic signal or modern roundabout as planned by the City of Bozeman (SIF #32). It would not be appropriate to install a three-way STOP due to the proximity of the railroad track and the functional classification of this roadway. It is likely that the proximity of the Montana Rail Link tracks to the Manley Road intersection (200 feet) causes additional congestion in this area. When a train crosses Griffin Drive, vehicles cue well past Manley Road and it is not possible for drivers to turn right onto Griffin Drive. However, turning left onto Griffin Drive can be relatively easy when a train is present. After the train passes it is difficult to turn right or left from Manley Road until all cued vehicles have cleared the intersection. 345 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 4 December, 2014 Table 1 – 2014 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Griffin Drive & Manley Road 31.1 D 14.6 B D. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development currently under consideration for this site includes 6.5 acres of land located east of Manley Road which would be developed into a residential subdivision. The site is located adjacent to the access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area and would include 23 residential units. The East Gallatin Residential Development site plan is shown in Figure 2. It is intended that this subdivision will ultimately be annexed into the City of Bozeman. E. TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed development using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Seventh Edition). These rates are the national standard and are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle “trip” is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates, at full build-out the developments would produce 17 AM peak hour trips, 23 PM peak hour trips, and 220 daily trips. See Table 2 for detailed trip generation information. Table 2 - Trip Generation Rates Land Use Units AM Peak Hour Trip Ends per Unit Total AM Peak Hour Trip Ends PM Peak Hour Trip Ends per Unit Total PM Peak Hour Trip Ends Weekday Trip Ends per Unit Total Weekday Trip Ends Single Family Residential 23 0.75 17 1.01 23 9.57 220 346 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 5 December, 2014 Figure 3 – Proposed East Gallatin Residential Development 347 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 6 December, 2014 An estimate of the probable traffic from the East Gallatin Recreation area was created to account for road use from the park. The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains data to help estimate the daily trip generation from a park. The East Gallatin Recreation area is approximately 35 acres in size. The ITE manual recommends using a rate of 1.59-2.28 trips per acre for a City or County Park on weekdays. This equates to a generation rate of 50-100 trips on an average weekday. Weekend trip generation rates vary from 12-16 trips per acre or 400-600 trips per day. This is consistent with the parks 45 existing parking spaces which have a theoretical maximum daily usage of 200-300 vehicles (400-600 daily trips). The peak-hour trip generation from the park generally will not coincide with the normal morning and evening peak-hour commuter schedule and was discounted in the peak-hour trip evaluation for this project. The Map Brewery currently under construction on Manley road 1,000 feet north of Griffin Drive is a 5,400 S.F. brewing facility with a 3,400 S.F. tasting room for customers. While the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not have a specific land use code for this type of commercial facility, it is likely that the development will produce vehicle trips at a similar rate to a generic ‘drinking place’ during the evening peak hours. According to the trip generation manual, a 3,400 S.F. drinking place will produce 39 peak-hour trips. The morning and evening trip generation to the brewery portion of the facility will be low. This information was included in the traffic modeling for this project. F. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed subdivision was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak-hour turning volumes. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure 3. G. TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the East Gallatin residential subdivision is shown in Table 4. The future traffic modeling includes the projected traffic volumes from the East Gallatin residential area and the Map Brewing Company. These calculations are included in Appendix B of this report. Table 4 indicates that the construction of the East Gallatin residential development will not cause any additional roadway capacity problems along Manley RoaD. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to have operational problems until the City of Bozeman is able to complete the planned improvements at this location. The additional vehicle delay caused by the East Gallatin residential development will be small (two seconds per vehicle). The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive will continue to function adequately in the PM peak hour with the 348 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman, Montana Abelin Traffic Services 7 December, 2014 additional traffic from the East Gallatin residential development and the Map Brewing Company. The total projected traffic along the East Gallatin Recreation Area Access Road is expected to be 300-400 VPD during the weekdays and up to 800 VPD on weekends. Figure 3 – Trip Distribution Table 4 –Future Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.) LOS Delay (Sec.) LOS Griffin Drive & Manley Road 33.5 D 15.8 C Manley Road & East Gallatin Road 9.9 A 9.4 A H. IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As proposed, the East Gallatin Residential Development will not create any new roadway capacity problems along Manley Road. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to do so until the City is able to complete planned improvements at this location. No additional roadway improvements will be necessary to serve the East Gallatin Residential Development. 55% Proposed Development Site 40% Griffin Drive <5% 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 Institutional Controls re N. Rouse Landfill/Bridger Vale project discussion 7/24/2017 City Actions 1. Monitor natural attenuation – contract in development for additional monitoring services to be administered by COB Engineering Division. 2. Install information kiosk at East Gallatin Recreation Area. Annexation 1. Note in annexation agreement of presence of landfill and need to monitor. 2. Note in annexation agreement of required institutional controls to be in place prior to constructing buildings. 3. Grant of access by owner for sampling in the short and long term. 4. Restriction on on-site wells for domestic or irrigation uses. Subdivision/PUD 1. Note on plat of presence of landfill and resulting limits on construction techniques. 2. During construction ventilation utility trenches for water and sewer. 3. During construction of utilities sample dewatering discharge. 4. Location of sampling wells determined, preferably in appropriate public space like right of way. 5. Slab on grade construction with appropriate vapor barrier or ventilation system designed by and installation certified by a professional engineer. 6. Covenants to provide notice to owners of the presence of the landfill, need to monitor, and restricted construction techniques. Subject to revision during development review process. 356 Methylene Chloride ug/kg <0.14 49 49.7 33.8 35.1 69 71 42-125 4 25 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.18 49 49.7 27.3 32.3 56 65 30-127 17 25 n-Hexane ug/kg <0.28 123 124 74.3 86.2 61 69 70-130 15 25 M1 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 29.1 33.1 59 67 30-136 13 25 Naphthalene ug/kg <0.11 49 49.7 16.5 19.4 33 39 30-127 16 25 o-Xylene ug/kg <0.10 49 49.7 29.3 33.1 60 67 44-125 12 25 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg <0.13 49 49.7 26.7 31.2 54 63 30-136 16 25 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.10 49 49.7 27.2 31.8 55 64 30-133 16 25 Styrene ug/kg <0.11 49 49.7 27.7 31.6 57 64 30-128 13 25 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.096 49 49.7 26.9 31.4 55 63 30-129 16 25 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg <0.074 49 49.7 28.7 32.0 58 64 42-125 11 25 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg <1.7 490 497 287 292 59 59 70-130 2 25 M1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 24 of 32 334 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.092 49 49.7 14.2 16.4 29 33 30-125 15 25 M1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg <0.16 49 49.7 28.4 29.3 58 59 32-125 3 25 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.15 49 49.7 14.8 17.9 30 36 30-125 19 25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.13 49 49.7 27.0 31.1 55 63 30-131 14 25 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane ug/kg <0.48 123 124 62.9 62.9 51 51 30-142 0 25 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ug/kg <0.092 49 49.7 28.7 30.3 58 61 46-125 6 25 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.089 49 49.7 21.6 25.3 44 51 30-125 16 25 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg <3.1 49 49.7 33.2 36.0 68 72 46-125 8 25 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.14 49 49.7 37.0 39.7 75 80 41-125 7 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.11 49 49.7 27.9 32.2 57 65 30-132 14 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.066 49 49.7 21.2 24.9 43 50 30-125 16 25 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 23 of 32 333 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg 40 41.2 103 67-125 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 22 of 32 332 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg 40 35.6 89 68-125 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 40 38.0 95 71-125 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 40 35.9 90 72-125 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 21 of 32 331 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg <0.17 5.0 0.17 10/14/16 11:02 Chlorobenzene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 0.10 10/14/16 11:02 Chloroethane ug/kg <0.20 5.0 0.20 10/14/16 11:02 Chloroform ug/kg <0.066 5.0 0.066 10/14/16 11:02 Chloromethane ug/kg <0.13 5.0 0.13 10/14/16 11:02 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 0.12 10/14/16 11:02 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 20 of 32 330 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 18 of 32 328 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 16 of 32 326 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 14 of 32 324 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 12 of 32 322 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 10 of 32 320 Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 8 of 32 318 The acetone result in the CCS is outside of +/-30%. The surrogate recovery for 1435360001 is outside of limits. Report Authorization Method Analyst Peer Review (/S/ is an electronic signature that complies with 21 CFR Part 11) EPA TO-15 /S/ Lisa M. Reid 01/02/2015 10:01 01/02/2015 11:01 /S/ Jorden Baum Page 5 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 257 1,2-Dibromoethane ND <1.2 0.15 0.50 1 U Page 4 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 256 Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287) Percent Solid: NA 5972-W Report Basis: Wet Preparation: Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³ MDL (ppb) RL (ppb) Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND <0.74 0.15 0.50 1 U Chloromethane ND <0.31 0.15 0.50 1 U Freon 114 ND <1.0 0.15 0.50 1 U Vinyl chloride ND <0.38 0.15 0.50 1 U 1,3-Butadiene ND <0.33 0.15 0.50 1 U Page 3 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 255 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND <0.82 0.15 0.50 1 U Page 2 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 254   Not Present Not Present Not Present    No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable   0.6°C On Ice Tamara C. Logan 1/28/2015 Hand Del jrz Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\jmueller 1/29/2015 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes  No  Not Applicable  Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B15011740 250 Page 14 of 15 242 Page 6 of 15 J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. 240 Page 4 of 15 238 Page 2 of 15   Not Present Not Present Not Present    No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable   2.7°C On Ice Randa Nees 12/23/2014 Hand Del lg Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\lcadreau 12/23/2014 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes  No  Not Applicable  Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B14121909 235 Page 15 of 16 16.07 16.16.46 29 16.60 16.17.94 10 17.17.17 24 17.17.42 59 17.17.65 78 18.17.10 96 18.42 18.68 19.18.03 92 19.52 19.90 20.23 21.58 22.05 23.24 23.93 27.00 28.34 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0041.RAW B14121909-002A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, V41 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 234 Page 14 of 16 15.15.37 50 15.59 15.15.81 85 92 16.07 16.16.16.36 46 28 16.16.60 77 16.17.94 03 17.17.18 24 17.17.42 59 17.17.65 74 18.17.10 91 96 18.18.18.33 42 53 18.68 18.19.90 03 19.53 19.89 20.25 20.76 21.68 22.05 22.26 23.25 27.00 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0037.RAW B14121909-001A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, RR-V37 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 233 Page 13 of 16 QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. 224 Page 4 of 16 QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. 222 Page 2 of 16   Not Present Not Present Not Present    No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable   2.4°C On Ice Leslie S. Cadreau 12/17/2014 Return-UPS Ground lg Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\jmueller 12/17/2014 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes  No  Not Applicable  Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B14121551 215 Page 18 of 19 14.14.76 90 15.15.26 12 15.15.37 47 15.61 15.15.95 80 16.16.06 13 16.16.28 45 16.16.60 76 16.17.91 05 17.17.17.22 31 15 17.17.44 55 17.17.83 71 17.18.93 10 18.18.22 34 18.18.56 76 19.18.08 12 93 19.19.33 47 19.19.53 60 73 19.19.20.86 91 95 99 04 20.24 20.47 21.06 21.21.55 61 75 22.09 22.22.62 69 73 23.26 24.24.00 08 24.30 24.67 25.72 26.10 26.31 36 26.97 27.27.27.19 32 39 27.27.51 67 28.30 28.28.87 99 29.08 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2122914_b\1229HP2.0006.RAW B14121551-001A ;1229HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, SGT-V06 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 214 Page 17 of 19 15.16.95 08 16.16.18 35 16.16.42 57 16.16.81 95 17.17.03 18 17.57 17.80 18.18.01 14 18.68 20.00 24.09 26.46 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0045.RAW B14121551-002A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V45 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 213 Page 16 of 19 15.71 16.16.03 08 17 16.56 16.37 16.16.16.64 72 80 16.17.94 02 17.17.34 17 17.17.47 56 64 17.17.79 89 17.18.98 12 18.18.38 54 18.86 19.16 19.19.74 86 92 20.62 21.21.01 10 21.21.28 37 42 21.62 22.22.09 14 19 24 22.22.61 66 70 23.23.14 18 28 23.23.43 55 59 23.23.62 66 71 24.03 06 24.24.57 64 73 24.24.80 84 92 96 25.25.07 10 13 20 25.25.25 34 40 25.25.52 59 65 26.26.08 24 26.26.37 49 26.26.70 75 82 26.93 27.42 47 28.11 17 28.28.36 41 48 52 28.59 66 28.29.81 86 00 29.29.13 16 28 29.61 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0046.RAW B14121551-001A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V46 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 212 Page 15 of 19 Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 201 Page 4 of 19 QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 200 Page 3 of 19 Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit. MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit. ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. 199 Page 2 of 19 , total xylenes reported at 23.1 g/m 3 , 4-ethyl toluene reported at 3.6 g/m 3 , 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene reported at 7.2 g/m 3 , and 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene reported at 20 g/m 3 . Discussion Groundwater and soil vapor along the eastern and southern boundaries of the property appear to be impacted with a variety of VOCs that are not naturally occurring. Impacts 187