The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About92 - Traffic Impact Study - Walmart 1 BOZEMAN WAL-MART STORE Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, Montana October, 1992 Prepared for : Civil Land Consultants 8480 East Orchard Road, Suite 2000 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Prepared by : Krager and Associates 4090 Estes Street Wheat Ridge , Colorado 80033 2 . 24219boze I . INTRODUCTION This traffic impact study addresses the roadway capacity, geo- metric , and control requirements associated with the proposed development of a Wal -Mart Store on North 7th Avenue in Bozeman, Montana. Site Location The site is located in the northeast quadrant of the North 7th Avenue and Oak Street intersection in Bozeman, Montana. The study area to be examined in this traffic impact analysis encompasses the access points to the site and the intersections of North 7th Avenue/Oak Street , and North 7th Avenue/Baxter Lane . The potential impacts to the intersections of Tamarack Street and Durston Road with North 7th Avenue are also addressed in this report . The site location is shown in Figure 1 . Existing and Proposed Site Uses The land for this development is currently vacant . The applicant is seeking site plan approval to allow the construction of a 116 ,000 square-foot retail store, with a potential expansion of 30 ,000 square feet . Access to this site would be provided by a full -movement access point onto North 7th Avenue, directly across from Baxter Lane, and another onto Oak Street . Existing Street System North 7th Avenue is currently constructed to a five-lane cross section along the site frontage . The cross section accommodates two through travel lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane . Shoulders are available for turning vehicles . Oak Street is a paved two-lane street along the frontage of the site. Future Street System The City of Bozeman has several planned street improvements which would impact travel in the vicinitry of the site . The most important of these is a plan to extend Oak Street both east and west of the site . These street improvements are expected to be completed by the Year 2010 . 2 4 N 7P17 ,—t o SITE �� s� �' 117 ST I T"a.t/cH Pa tk 4766AT � ! ! ix ■ � � :,�IIII =� .i ; � _L,;. ' � \t�itt ! 1 r^ irTltihl.• 4776 J4 •I • 47.971 i 41I I ' I — y. r1, \ RI' h �I 111 ■r ae'0e 'BA COOK T I �Bh 14810 j I L.• �I 7 sunsa;-"At ;8 7 I I"., Figure 1 SITE LOCATION II . TRIP GENERATION AND DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES Standard traffic generation characteristics compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in their report entitled "Trip Generation' revised 1991 , were applied to the proposed land use in order to estimate daily and peak hour vehicle trips for the development . A vehicle trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from a point of origin to a point of destination. Table 1 illustrates the projected daily and PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed use . The weekday PM peak hour was identified as the critical period of operation for this site, based on existing traffic counts for North 7th Avenue . Saturday will be the peak time for trips entering and leaving the site . However, the weekday PM peak traffic on the adjacent streets will determine the critical time for purposes of analysis . Table 1 Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Land Use Units ADT in out total Discount Retail KSF 8 , 135 207 191 398 I I to 4 III . TRIP MAKING REDUCTIONS Although passer-by trips and shared trips are a source of retail customers , no trip reductions were used in the analysis of access points and nearby intersections . This assures a more conserva- tive analysis of traffic impacts in the immediate area. A reduc- tion in trip generation was assumed to analyze the intersections of Tamarack Street and Durston Road with North 7th Avenue. Due to the distance between these intersection and the actual retail site, it can be assumed that most of the site-generated traffic would already be using the roadway system even if this develop- ment were not completed. For the purposes of this report , it is assumed that 50 percent of the site-generated traffic is actually new trips at the intersections of Tamarack Street and Durston Road with North 7th Avenue. This assumption is consistent with passer-by surveys documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual . 5 4 f IV. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The overall directional distribution of the site-generated traf- fic was determined based on the existing travel patterns in the area and the expected consumer draw of the site:. The trip dis- tribution used in the analysis for this report is shown in Figure :,. 2 . t _l a I 6 0 4 Lo N T 15%/15% �—5%/5% BAXTER LANE L35%/20% �— SITE 5%/5% —� 01 0 N 0-0 Lo co W m z W a ti O z o Lo -o- .1 , Ln o 01 r O 5%/5%Lo p f—00/o/15% 40%/25% LL� 0%/15% OAK STREET L �— 0%/15% — 0 Lo N 0 O Figure 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION Existing Streets/Planned Streets V. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT Current background traffic volumes for the area were developed using recent traffic counts on North 7th Avenue. Traffic count data is provided in Appendix A of this report . Traffic projec- tions for the Year 2010 were developed from daily projections provided by Robert Peccia & Associates . The Year 2010 traffic projections assume the existing plus committed roadway network. This network includes the extension of Oak Street both east and west , and a new interchange to I 90 at North 19th Avenue. Back- ground traffic volumes are shown in Figures 3 and 4 . Traffic assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the roadway network . The site-generated trips are shown in Figure 5 . The site-generated traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total projected traffic for the study area . Total PM peak hour traffic for the development is illus- trated in Figures 6 and 7 . 8 4 N 0) CO CO BAXTER LANE 38 151 N W M z W a r 0 z 0 c °' v 45 OAK STREET 5 0 -� 0 -; a) nc\j rn Figure 3 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Year 1992 PM Peak Hour 4 LO N IT BAXTER LANE 50 185 r � W m z W a t ti cc O z Ln N f 25 --a---75 OAK STREET 25 50 150 -� 100 oo N N r O r Figure 4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Year 2010 PM Peak Hour 4 0T 1 N o co L� 29/29 1 L --10/10 67/39 BAXTER LANE SITE 10/10 —t O r ra0 r W D Z W a L r ti H at O Z O O M r O N 10/10 0�0 o �--0/29 76/48 j L 0/31 OAK STREET 0/31 —'i 92/93 r Lo as f, CD Figure 5 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC PM Peak Hour Existing Streets/Imp. Streets 4 o N T m CC) 29 J I L -.0— 10 67 BAXTER LANE SITE 38 10 —� I 151 N o cj r- w W M z W a ti 0 z O a' `n 55 co ao 0 �—0 0 OAK STREET F—87 J L 56 5 � 92 � 0 58 —� 0 co o Figure 6 TOTAL TRAFFIC PM Peak Hour Year 1992 4 LO N � ~ c 29 M co 0--10 39 BAXTER LANE SITE 50 � 1 r 10 I I 185 � L r � W n Z W Q L ti O Z `n M 35 CD coo N �-- 104 . 31 OAK STREET �—73 L ---125 50 � 93 � 181 200-i 100 T Figure 7 TOTALTRAFFIC PM Peak Hour Year 2010 VI . TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS The Unsignalized and Signalized Intersection Analysis techniques , as published in the "Highway Capacity Manual" by the Transpor- tation Research Board in 1985 , were used to analyze the access points and critical intersections for the site. These tech- niques allow the determination of the overall intersection level of service based on each traffic movement . As a matter of policy, traffic signals are not installed at an intersection unless warranted according to the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices . The intersection of Oak Street and North 7th Avenue may warrant signalization in the future, but traffic projections for the extension of Oak Street are specula- tive. The traffic generated by the retail site alone will not warrant signalization of the intersection. This report assumes the intersection will be signalized in the future based on the Year 2010 traffic projections . Traffic analyses were completed for background and total traffic for both the Years 1992 and 2010 . Table 2 illustrates the levels of service found at the access points and critical inter- section for the projected PM peak hour traffic . Definitions of levels of service are given in Appendix B . The capacity work sheets are given in Appendix C. Traffic on North 7th Avenue will increase by 57 peak hour trips in the vicinity of Tamarack Street and Dursten Road. This increase in peak hour traffic amounts to a one percent increase in traffic at the Tamarack Street/North 7th Avenue, and less than a one percent increase in peak hour traffic at the intersection of Durston Road and North 7th Avenue . This small increase in traffic should not significantly impact the level of service at these intersections . 14 Table 2 Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary PM Peak Hour Level of Service Year 1992 Background Traffic North 7th Avenue/Baxter Lane E/A/C North 7th Avenue/Oak Street E/E/C/C Total Traffic North 7th Avenue/Baxter Lane F/F/C/C North 7th Avenue/Oak Street E/F/D/C Oak Street/Access A/A/A Year 2010 Background Traffic North 7th Avenue/Baxter Lane F/A/D North 7th Avenue/Oak Street B(0 . 524) Total Traffic North 7th Avenue/Baxter Lane F/F/D/C North 7th Avenue/Oak Street B(0 . 679) Oak Street/Access B/A/A KEY : Unsignalized Intersections Three Way - left turns out/ left turns in/right turns out Four Way - left turns out/left turns out/left turns in/left turns in Signalized intersections Level of Service (volume/capacity ratio) 15 VII . RECOMMENDATIONS This study assessed the impacts of the proposed development of a discount retail store at North 7th Avenue and Oak Street in Bozeman, Montana. As a result of this analysis , all intersec- tions within the study area were found to operate at acceptable levels of service. While some delays can be expected for left turns attempting to enter North 7th Avenue, these delays are not unexpected at stop sign controlled intersections . If traffic increases as projected on Oak Street , the intersection of Oak Street and North 7th Avenue may warrant signalization at sometime in the future . The intersection does not warrant signalization based on 1992 traffic volumes . 16 Appendix A Traffic Counts =rn Mvmt . Program with Midnight and Grand Totals File 0 1 _ation 2 Identification 4017 interval 15 Minute Start Date 23 Jul 92 End Date 23 Jul 92 "tart Time. 16: 24 End Time 17: 27 ul 92 Category: —� 1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ci 0 q i) c_) ci c_i 0 (i b (:) 0 i) n i) i) 0 i) i) 1: 45 5 315 7 0 c) _ 0 0 20 14 c) 2 369 00 1 270 7 0 0 2 0 0 14 12 0 4 510 ci i� i) i) 0 q _.tal 6 588 16 ci 0 5 0 0 54 /26 ci � 82 �- V`V L ,; , : 1 5 6 385 15 (_) () 0 i; 0 12 19 0 4 441 i) () (:) (_) () (:) Wand ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== Antal 12 97= 51 0 i) 5 i; i) 46 45 0 11 1123 _� I ' I � � I I � i 1 1 Z Ilp now brauW&I6 L +�c- 1 I to. I 0 5 f 1 I 1 _ OAe sT - �-3 K s T I I � afiCOMP II by StreeterAmet `_crn Mvmt. Program with Midnight and Grand Totals File # 2 Cation 1 Identification 4017 Interval 15 Minute = ^ Jul 92 22 Jul 92_art Date ;,Mart Time 16: ?1 End Time 17: i) Jul 92 Category: 1 ? _ 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 1 _----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ): 45 e , 15c.) i) i) i) i) c.) 0 2C) -1 i) 7 216 ci ' ci ci i) i) i) ci ci ci i) c_) c i 0C.) i) C.) C) i) i) t) C1 i i) i ee 2 c i i) 0 i) C) 27 `!-7 4 e 272 C) i) C) 0 0 0 C) 0 c i c i c_) cj i) 0 c i i) i) 0 i) !:1 :Cal 18 _=e ? i) i) c:) ci i) 47 6e ) 15 4E2 15 b �) _ o i) ti i) 1 41 49 i) 15 '45 0 i) i 1 0 t:1 i� 0 C) c_) i) C) ) C1 cf ci 0 i) :i i) i) ci i) 0 i) ci ci _ . . fit_) 1•'_ ^_1 2 i) C) i) i) i) 79 =4 i) 8 —• ci c_) i) i) c) i) i) C) C) i) ci i) ci iI r1 C) ) C) i) [) i) C) i) f_) i) Q .ctal =7 799 7 i1 c_1 i) 0 1 127 151 07-3 1160 I � I i ' 3—F-WO H I Io12 QI j / 1 r i I � 1 �A r To i Note s WI C v N �vo F I 5CALE Appendix B Level of Service Definitions DEFINITION OF LEVEL OF SERVICE Signalized Intersections The indicator used to determine level of service at signalized intersections is called the load factor. It is a measure of the proportion of signal cycles that are loaded , and has values ranging from zero to one, or 0% to 100%. A loaded cycle is one that has a car ready to cross the intersection in all lanes, at all times during the green phase. Empirical studies have shown a correlation between intersection volume and load factor, and it is therefore necessary to determine only the volumes to find the level of service. The definitions are based on load fac- tors, however. Definitions of level of service are as follows: Level of Service A - There are no loaded cycles (i .e. , the load factor is 0.0) and few are even close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Level of Service B - Represents stable operation , with a load factor of not over 0. 1 ; an occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Level of Service C - Stable operation continues. Loading is still intermittent , but more frequent, with the load factor ranging from 0. 1 to 0.3. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication. Level of Serv--ice D - Encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability in the limit when the load factor reaches 0.7. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clear- ance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive back-ups. Level of Service E - Capacity occurs. It represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommo- date. Although theoretically a load factor of 1.0 would repre- sent capacity, in practice full utilization of every cycle is seldom attained, no matter how great the demand, unless the street is hichly friction-free. A load factor range of 0.7 to 1.0 is more realistic. At capacity there may be long queues of vehicles waiting up-stream of the intersection and delays may be great (up to several signal cycles) . Levy-el of Service F - Represents jammed conditions. Back-ups from locations down-stream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. No load factor can be established, because full utilization of the approach is prevented by outside conditions. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ----------- ------- Level-of-service criteria for unsignalized intersec- tions are stated in very general terms, and are related to general delay ranges. Analysis for a stop- or yield-controlled intersection results in solutions for the capacity of each lane on the minor approaches. The level-of-service criteria are then based on the reserve, or unused , capacity of the lane in question , expressed in passenger cars per hour (PCPH) . RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO (PCPH) SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC ------------------------------------------------------- >400 A Little or no delay 300:399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0- 99 E Very long traffic delays F *When demand volume exceeds the capcity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. Reference: Highway CaQagity Manual . Special Report 209. Transportation Research Board, Nation- al Research Council . Washington, D. C. 19B5. Appendix C '"' Capacity Analysis Worksheets 4 198S HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------- r� AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/29/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION : 1992 Background Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------- ----- INTERSECTION TYPE : T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION : NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND : STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------- --- EB We NB SB --- LEFT 38 -- 127 `) THRU 0 -- 448 799 RIGHT 151 -- 0 37 T NUMBER OF LANES Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- t EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 2 2 -1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ----------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS � EASTBOUND 0 00 -- --- -------- ------ ------90 30 Y WESTBOUND ----- --- --- NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------------------------------------------------ SU TRUCKS o COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES o MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND --- --- NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 i CRITICAL GAPS 1 ------------------------------------------------------ -------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP • MINOR RIGHTS EB 6 . 10 5 . 10 0 .00 5 . 10 t MAJOR LEFTS NB 5 .80 S .80 0 .00 5 .80 7 h1IhdOR LEFTS ES 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 42 66 44 44 2 E RIGHT 166 780 780 780 614 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 140 348 348 348 208 C t I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Iq IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/29/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: 1992 Background Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND : STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUME --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 SB LEFT 5 11 31 46 THRU 0 0 973 904 RIGHT 0 45 12 0 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE s ------------------------------------ --- _- ------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 3 3 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R i i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 i PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS f� ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 30 Y WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 30 Y NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS o COMBINATION f AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ----------- -------------- -------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 y NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 I SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 �I CRITICAL GAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL t ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS WB 6 .10 5 . 10 0 .00 5 . 10- EB 6 . 10 S .10 0 .00 5 . 10 i MAJOR LEFTS -� SB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 + N3 5 .80 S .80 0 .00 5 .80 MINOR THROUGHS WB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .40 EB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .40 MINOR LEFTS WB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 EB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) C ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET WB LEFT 12 45 37 > 37 37 > 25 25 >E E THROUGH 0 60 49 > 49 > 49 > E RIGHT 50 861 861 861 812 A MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 45 35 > 0 35 > 0 30 > E THROUGH 0 60 49 > 49 > 49 > E RIGHT 0 889 889 889 889 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 34 316 316 316 282 C SB LEFT 51 277 277 277 227 C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 -, PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/29/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION : 2010 Background Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL i ------------------------------------------------------__-------_-.--_--- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN a TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------- -------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 SB LEFT 50 -- 155 0 THRU 0 - - 475 865 RIGHT 185 -- 0 45 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------- -------------- ----------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 -- 2 ` 1 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 30 Y ,71 WESTBOUND ----- --- --- - NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS o COMBINATION i AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND --- --- --- NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- i TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS EB 6 . 10 5 .10 0..00 5 .10 MAJOR LEFTS NB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 i I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS ..� p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 55 53 28 28 -27 F RIGHT 204 750 750 750 546 A MAJOR STREET -# NB LEFT 171 313 313 313 142 -D 4 7 I 198S HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS pac7e-1 �'�.�T�:**%k**%kn%Y`�'�n.`•.'�*mmm*l�%�*�T'%kT�:J1c%ic��:ter.`�:'X.m%K�%!:`a-'.T:Y:i.�;.i.)k`kn:�*1"yn`�:•1:%e.�K�:a >I=h.T�:*X"-f':m IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . 45 -� PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( rnm/ud/n' ) . . . . . . 10/19/92 T IME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oM PFeak Hour w OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------ ----------------------------- INTERSECT TON TYPE 4--LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION : NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND' STOP SIGN TRAFFIC: VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT Err - 67 127 �1 I I THRU 10 10 906 809 a RIGHT 151 29 72 37 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE U:;AGE EB WE NB SB ------- -- ---- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 3 3 LANE USr IGE LT + R LT + R ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pale-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 30 Y WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV "S VEHICLES p MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP --------------- __-___ _. . ---------- _ - --------- MINOR RIGHTS EB 6 .10 5 . 10 0 .00 5 .10 WB 6 . 10 6 .10 0 .00 6 .10 MAJOR LEFTS SC 5 .30 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 NB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 MINOR THROUGHS EB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .40 WB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .40 w MINOR LEFTS EB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .50 WB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Baxter/ Lane ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 �,. ------------------_---------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE { RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ` ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- h 'IINOR STREET EB LEFT 42 48 26 > 28 26 ) -24 -15 >F F THROUGH 11 63 40 > 4.0 > 29 ) E r<, RIGHT 166 381 881 881 715 A MINOR STREET -. WG LEFT 74 48 24 > 25 24 > -60 -50 >F F THROUGH 11 63 40 > 40 > 29 > E RIGHT 32 662 662 662 630 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 34 304 304 304 270 C NB LEFT 140 367 367 367 227 C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ?' ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic WW1965.LVH.JCM= UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION r.. -------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . 10/19/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P11 Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . : . . 2010 Total Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION` NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND : STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 50 39 155 31 THRU 10 10 955 875 RIGHT 185 29 41 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 3 3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS. FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 30 Y WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS o COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS EB 6 . 10 5 . 10 0 .00 5 . 10 _ WB 6 .10 6 .10 0 .00 6.10 MAJOR LEFTS SB S .80 5 .80 0 .00 S _80' NB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 MINOR THROUGHS E^c 7 .40 / .%a0 0 .00 7 .40 WB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .4.0 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 WB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 2010 Total Traffic J J 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 J NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . North 7th Avenue NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . A 10/19/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic J INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 5 87 31 55 THRU 0 0 1045 971 RIGHT 0 55 94 0 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE y -- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 3 3 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ------Page-2 ..� -------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- { EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N I NORTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N I SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 IV VEHICLE COMPOSITION o SU TRUCKS n COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES n MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 JNORTHBOUND ' 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS ----------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -- -- -- ----- _ - - ------------- ------------- IHINOR RIGHTS EB 6 .10 6 .10 0 .00 6 .10 I WB 6 .10 6 .10 0 .00 6 .10 -� MAJOR LEFTS SB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80' NB 5 .80 5 .80 0 .00 5 .80 MINOR THROUGHS EB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .40 WB 7 .40 7 .40 0 .00 7 .W 0 MINOR LEFTS EB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 WB 7 .90 7 .90 0 .00 7 .90 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------- - -- - -- - -- - ---------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Avenue DATE AND ,TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE FATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 55 48 22 > 23 22 ) -43 -33 >F F THROUGH 11 63 33 > 33 > 22 > E RIGHT 204 857 857 857 653 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 43 4.8 18 > 20 18 > -34 -24 >F F THROUGH 11 63 33 > 33 > 22 > E RIGHT 32 661 661 661 629 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 34 296 296 296 262 C NB LEFT 171 332 332 332 161 D IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Baxter Lane NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 2010 Total Traffic L 1985ww �yJJ H..CyyJM: UNSJJIG..NALyIyyZyED y1INyyTER``SLLECTyyIWONS yy yy LL VV yy yy yy yyWW JJ''WW yV JJ yy yy Page-1 IDENTIFYINGr(� �TTT�TihT��T��TI��,T��T�T�T�T��T��TTT��TT�T�TTT.TTTT�T1`TTM�T��TT��TT�:1` b IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . 30 1 PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30000 s NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . Oak Street L NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . Access NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . 10/19/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . .,, . , PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------- ------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 92 87 -- 86 THRU 58 56 -- 971 RIGHT 0 0 -- 0 — NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 -- 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ----Page_2 ------- -- ------- -- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS. FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- %s SU TRUCKS o COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES a MOTORCYCLES ----------- ------------- ------------- EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- ---- --- SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS 5B 5 .50 5 .50 0 .00 5 .50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5 .50 5 .50 0 .00 5 .50 MINOR LEFTS SB 7 .00 7 .00 0 .00 7 .00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . Access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATIO,N . . . . 1992 Total Traffic CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c P( pcph ) c M( pcph ) c SH R SH( pcph ) c = c - v LOS --------- ------------ --------------- --- MINOR STREET SE LEFT 95 655 615 615 521 A RIGHT 0 999 999 999 999 A, MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 101 997 997 997 896 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . Access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19%92 PM Pea4, Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic t 1 1985 HCM= UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - ------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ -- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED , MAJOR STREET . . 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . . . . Access NAME OF THE ANALYST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . klk DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ( mm/dd/yy ) . . . . . . 10/19/92 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 2010 Total Traffic ' INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION : EAST/WEST ' CONTROL TYPE SOUTHSOUND : STOP SIGN 1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 93 87 -- -86 THRU 200 125 - 971 RIGHT 0 31 -- 29 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 - 2 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --Page_2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS ( ft ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- -- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0 .00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV °S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ' EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 ` ' NORTHBOUND --- --- --- ' SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST . FINAL ( Table 10-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ' --- ------------ -------- P1INOR RIGHTS Ss, 5 .50 5 .50 0 .00 5 .50 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5 .50 5 .50 0 .00 5 .50 ' MINOR LEFTS SB 7 .00 7 .00 0 .00 7 .00 1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . Access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . , . . 10/19/92 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATIO,N . . . . 2010 Total Traffic i CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ----- ----------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph) c P( pcph ) c ( PcPh ) c SH( pcph ) c R SF-I= c v LOS M MINOR STREET SB LEFT 95 478 446 446 351 B RIGHT 32 996 996 996 964 A MAJOR STREET ES LEFT 102 936 936 936 834 A IDENTIFYING -INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . Access DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 PM Peak ,(Hour OTHER- INFORMATION . . . . 2010 Total Traffic 1 1 1985 HCM= SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION . .Oak Street/North 7th Avenue AREA TYPE . . . . .OTHER ANALYST . . . . . . . k1k DATE . . . . . . . . . .10/19/92 TIME . . . . . . . . . .PM Peak Hour COMMENT . . . . . . .2010 Total Traffic ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB = EB WB N3 SB LT 50 73 100 35 LT 12 .0 LT 12 .0 L 12 .0 L 12 .0 TH 181 104 1066 1014 R 12 .0 R 12 .0 T 12 .0 T 12 .0 RT 100 35 77 50 12 .0 12 .0 T 12 .0 T 12 .0 ' RR 0 0 0 0 = 12 .0 12 .0 R 12 .0 R 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 ' 12 .0 12 .0 _ __^_12_0_ -_-_ 1--- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT . ARR . TYPE ' ( % ) ( % ) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0 .00 2 .00 N 0 0 0 .90 50 N 31 .8 3 WB 0 .00 2 .00 N 0 0 0 :90 50 N 31 .8 3 ' NB 0 .00 2 .00 N 0 0 0 .90 50 N 19 .8 3 SB 0 .00 2 .00 N 0 0 0 .90 50 N 19 .8 3 ' SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90 .0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X 1 TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 25 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 GREEN 55 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 YELLOW S .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 YELLOW 5 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP . DELAY APP . LOS EB LT 0 .613 0 .300 22 ,4 C 21 .1 C R 0 .245 0 .300 18 .1 C ' WB LT 0 .787 0 .300 32 .3 D 29 .8 D R 0 .086 0 .300 17 .2 C NB L 0 .627 0 .633 12 .4 B 7 .5 B 1 T 0 .551 0 .633 7 3 B R 0 .089 0 .633 4 .9 A SB L 0 .288 0 .633. 6 .0 B 6 .9 B T 0 .524 0 .6:33 7 .1 B ' R-------0_058 0 .633 A --------- ------------------ __ _ _ _ _ __ INTERSECTION= Delay = 10 .4 ( sec/veh ) V/C-= 0 .679 ^^LOS = B - 1 r • • i 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION -Oak Street/North 7th Street AREA TYPE . . . . .OTHER ANALYST . . . . . . . klk DATE . . . . . . . . . .7/29/92 TIME . . . . . . . .PM Peak Hour COMMENT . . . . . . .2010 Background Traffic ------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB W^o NB S8 : EB WB NB SB LT 50 25 100 25 : LT 12 .0 LT 12 .0 L 12 .0 L 12 .0 TH 150 7S 102S 975 : R 12 .0 R 12 .0 T 12 .0 T 12 .0 RT 100 'S 25 50 : 12 .0 12 .0 T 12 .0 T 12 .0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12 .0 12 .,0 R 12 .0 R 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12 .0 12-0 12 .0 12 .0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED . BUT . ARR . TYPE ' ( ; ) ( ; ) Y/N Nin Nb Y/N min T EB 0 .00 2 .00 Y 20 0 0 .90 50 N 0 .0 3 WB 0 .00 2 .00 Y 20 0 0',r90 50 N 0 .0 3 NB 0 .00 2 .00 1' 20 0 0 .90 50 N 0 .0 3 SB 0 .00 2 .00 Y 20 0 0 .90 50 N 0 .0 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90 .0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 25 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 GREEN 55 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 YELLOW 5 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 YELLOW 5 .0 0 .0 0 .0 0 .0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE 1 LANE GRP . V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP . DELAY APP . LOS EB LT 0 .451 0 .300 19 .8 C / 19 .4 C R 0 .306 0 .300 18 .6 C WB LT Q.319 0 .300 18 .7 C 18 .4 C R 0 .076 0 .300 17 .2 C NB L 0 .558 0 .633 9 .7 B 7 .3 B T 0 .530 0 .633 7 .1 8 ' R 0 .036 0 .633 4 .7 A g L 0 . 150 0 .633 5 .1 8 6 .8 8 T 0 .504 0 .633 6 .9 B R 0 .072 --0 .633 --------------- - --------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 8 .9 (sec/veh ) V/C = 0 .524 LOS = B 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c ( pcph ) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 48 34 > 34 34 > 29 29 >E E THROUGH 0 63 48 > 48 > 48 > E RIGHT 0 674 674 674. 674 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 96 48 37 37 -59 F THROUGH 0 63 48 48 43 E RIGHT 61 612 642 612 552 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 62 246 246 246 184 D NE LEFT 34 308 308 308 274 C J IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET . . . . . . Oak Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET . . . . North 7th Ave ue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS . . . . . 10/19/92 4M Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION . . . . 1992 Total Traffic r. y