No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 - Traffic Impact Study - West Winds Subdivision Ph 4 - 8 OFF,,,�En!T(1F PI Ry41NG SIP ENT L i Subdivision Phase IV—VIII Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update April, 2007 Prepared For: Cascade Development, LLC Suite 223 1627 West Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Prepared By: E N G I N E E R I N G 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 04S067.125 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................8 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................................................12 ADJACENT LAND USE.....................................................................................................12 REGIONALACCESS.........................................................................................................12 AREAROADWAYS...........................................................................................................12 STUDY INTERSECTIONS.................................................................................................16 SITEACCESS...................................................................................................................17 III. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS..............................................................................................18 BACKGROUNDTRAFFIC.................................................................................................18 TRIPGENERATION..........................................................................................................21 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENTS .....................................................................23 IV. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................33 INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ..................................................33 TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM PHASE 1................................................................................37 TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM BUILDOUT.............................................................................38 WARRANT ANALYSIS......................................................................................................42 V. REVIEW OF COLLSION DATA......................................................................................43 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................45 April 2007 Page 2 of 46 kilo "G . West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Study Intersections .................................................................................................... 16 Table 2 -West Winds Community Trip Generation...................................................................21 Table 3 - Level-of-Service Criteria ............................................................................................33 Table 4 - Level-of-Service Summary for Signalized Intersections .............................................34 Table 5 - Level-of-Service Summary for Minor Street Stop-Controlled Intersections.................35 Table 6 - 2014 Phase III-Vill Site Drive Access Points..............................................................37 Table 7. Phases 1-III Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume....................................38 Table 8. Build-out Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume........................................40 Table9. Collision Rates............................................................................................................43 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 - Vicinity Map..............................................................................................................10 Figure 2 - Conceptual Site Map ................................................................................................11 Figure 3 - Existing Lane Configuration and Control...................................................................13 Figure 4- Existing Peak Hour Traffic ........................................................................................19 Figure 5 - 2007 Background Traffic...........................................................................................20 Figure 6 -Trip Distribution (Buildout) ........................................................................................26 Figure 7 -Trip Distributions (Buildout).......................................................................................27 Figure8 - Phase 1 Site Trips ....................................................................................................28 Figure 9 - 2007 Background Plus Phase 1................................................................................29 Figure 10 - 2014 Background Including Phase 1.......................................................................30 Figure 11 - Buildout Site Trips...................................................................................................31 Figure 12 - 2014 Background Plus Buildout..............................................................................32 APPENDIX April 2007 Page 3 of 46 N E N G IN E E R I NO West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY a, This traffic study serves to update the 2004 evaluation of the traffic impacts of the proposed West Winds Community subdivision located in the Northwest '/ of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, Montana. West Winds is contained between Davis Lane and North 271h Avenue, and Baxter Lane and Oak Street. The project will be developed through multiple phases, depending on market conditions, and is planned to consist of single-family homes (36.2% of the site trips), multi-family homes (25.1% of the site trips), townhouses and condos (12.7% of the site trips), apartments (8.5% of the site trips), and by the senior congregate care/assisted living (18.7% of the site trips). The development will also include a linear park, and a future neighborhood community center. Construction commenced in 2004, and the project is expected to be completed by 2014. Access to the site will be provided by 13 proposed drive access points to Baxter Lane, North 271h Avenue, Oak Street, and Davis Lane. Phases 1-III will develop 9 drive access points, including 5 on North 27th Avenue (Trade Wind Lane, Turbulence Lane, Tschache Lane, Breeze Lane and Cobblestone Place), one on Baxter Lane (Buckrake Avenue) and 3 on Oak Street (Buckrake Avenue, Hunters Way and Windward Avenue).Phases 1-III are expected to generate -�143 trips in the AM peak hour, and 176 trips in the PM peak hour. The remaining phases (project build-out) are expected to generate 232 trips in the AM peak hour, and 281 trips in the PM peak hour. One existing signalized intersection and eight existing unsignalized intersections have been identified for traffic analysis by the City of Bozeman. These study intersections are North 191h Avenue at Tschache Lane, North 27th Avenue at Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane, Oak Street and Durston Road, Oak Street at Buckrake Avenue, Hunters Way and Davis Lane, and Davis Lane at Baxter Lane. Analyses were completed for a Phase 1-III scenario and a Build-out scenario, which includes Phase 1-III site trips. Additionally, five proposed access locations were analyzed. r b� Analysis indicates that the majority of the study intersections can be expected to operate at satisfactory LOS's with site trips during all scenarios (existing through build-out), with the exception of Oak Street / North 271h Avenue and Durston Road / North 27th Avenue. The Durston Road / North 27th Avenue intersection is anticipated to be nearly at LOS D with background traffic in the build-out year. The addition of site traffic pushes it to LOS E in the AM April 2007 Page 4 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update peak hour. Recently completed improvements to the Durston Road corridor will do little to mitigate the poor LOS at this intersection in the future. Oak Street / North 27th Avenue carries a high volume of northbound to eastbound traffic in the AM and westbound to southbound traffic in the PM peak hour. This intersection degrades to LOS D in the PM hour in the design year with background traffic. The addition of West Winds site traffic for build-out drops this intersection to LOS F. All of the proposed site accesses were found to operate at LOS B or better. Warrant analyses were not conducted for this study, as each of the unsignalized study ✓1 - intersections operates at a satisfactory level of service at this time and is expected to do so for through the completion of Phases 1-III. As volumes increase over time, signal warrant analyses should be conducted to determine the appropriate time from for signal installation at these �(v intersections. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) was estimated assuming peak hour volumes represented 10% of ADT. As weather allows, existing traffic volumes will be measured and updated ADT information will be submitted in memo format on or before June 1, 2007. d 4 Accident data was requested from the Montana Department of Transportation for the original 2004 study intersections. The original study indicated the proposed project was not expected to adversely impact the safety of the subject intersections. Updated accident data has been requested from MDT and an updated analysis will be presented in memo format on or before June 1, 2007. Recommendations based on this study are as follows: • No mitigation to the existing roadway system beyond anticipated improvements to Davis Lane and Baxter Lane is necessary due to the additional traffic generated by the proposed Phase 1-III development or the project build-out, except as noted below at Oak Street/ North 27th Avenue and Durston Road / North 271h Avenue. • No significant impacts to the intersection of Durston Road at North 27th Avenue are anticipated for the Phase 1-III development. Although improvements to Durston Road are currently underway and will include the addition of a two-way left turn (TWLT) lane; these April 2007 Page 5 of 46 H E N G I N E E RW14 & West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update improvements will do little to improve capacity along the corridor, or at its intersection with North 271n Avenue. It is notable that Durston Road carries a higher volume of east- west traffic than Oak Street. Improved north-south connectivity between Durston Road and Oak Street west of Davis Lane would contribute to a more balanced distribution of traffic. Regardless, as additional east-west and north-south arterials and collectors are developed adjacent to Durston Road, demand along Durston Road can be expected to stabilize. • Although not warranted at this time, consideration should be given to funding for a potential signal at North 27th Avenue / Oak Street and/or North 27 m Avenue / Durston Road. The West Winds Developer has signed a "Waiver of Protest to SID" for the potential future signal improvements. • Improvements to adjacent streets should be constructed to City of Bozeman approved street standards. Consideration for future signalization of collector-arterial and arterial- arterial intersections should be made, including appropriate setbacks and sight visibility zones. • Site drive accesses should be developed according to local standards, should incorporate appropriate throat depths, and provide for the safe passage of pedestrians across the drive access. Pedestrian crosswalks should be installed at each site driveway. • Exclusive right-turn lanes at site drive accesses are not considered necessary or 2 warranted as right-turn demands are predicted to be below 100 vph during the peak ' traffic hours. • An exclusive left turn lane should be considered on the westbound (east) leg of the intersection of Oak Street / North 271n Avenue. Analysis of MDT warrants for an exclusive left turn lane indicate that a left turn lane should be considered on the westbound (east) leg of the intersection, due to the high percentage of left turns. • The development of the West Winds Community is not expected to increase collision rates at the study intersections. The will be verified in a supplemental memo when April 2007 Page 6 of 46 ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update updated accident data is received from MDT and analyzed. Submittal of this memo is anticipated by June 1, 2007. • Due to winter weather conditions, 24-hour traffic data was not collected. As weather improves, 24-hour traffic data will be collected and ADT shown in this report will be verified. Updated ADT's will be submitted in memo format by June 1, 2007. � 1 2 r vY April 2007 Page 7 of 46 H West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update I. INTRODUCTION This study reevaluates and updates the anticipated traffic impacts associated with the development of the West Winds Planned Community. The original traffic impact study was developed in 2004 and was based on assumed future traffic projections and planned West Winds traffic generation. At the time of the original study, it was understood that an update would be provided at some point to revisit the original assumptions regarding future area traffic projections and traffic generation characteristics of West Winds. The West Winds site consists of approximately 160 acres, occupying the entire undeveloped parcel bounded by Baxter Lane to the north, Oak Street to the south, and the future extensions of Davis Lane to the west and North 271h Avenue to the east, legally described as the Northwest '/ of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, PMM, Bozeman, Montana. A vicinity map depicting the location of the subdivision relative to the regions transportation system is presented in Figure 1. The subdivision is expected to incorporate single-family homes, townhouses, apartments, low- income multi-family housing, senior residential, assisted-care senior residential, a future neighborhood community center, and a park. The entire site is currently zoned R-3 "Residential Medium Destiny" and is wholly contained within the Bozeman city limits. Adjoined zoning is primarily residential with the exception of B-1 zoning to the northeast and northwest of the project. A full size conceptual site map depicting the proposed subdivision layout is enclosed with this report, and a reduced depiction is presented in Figure 2. In the original 2004 study, traffic impacts of the West Winds subdivision to the surrounding transportation system were analyzed based on two scenarios. The Initial scenario consisted of Phase IA and Phase IB development and was expected to include single-family homes, townhouses, and low-income multi-family housing generally located within the southeast corner of the subdivision. These two phases encompasses approximately 31 acres, and were expected to be completed by 2007. The Build-out scenario anticipated full development of the remainder of the site by 2014. A year 2007 review of West Winds finds Phases IA and IB to be approximately 16% built out with single family homes. No multi-family or townhouse lots have been built on at the time of this study. This study will investigate the impacts of the remaining build-out of Phase I plus Phase II and Phase III, which are currently under construction. Phases April 2007 Page 8 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update 1-III are expected to be completed by 2010, with the remaining phases still anticipated to be complete by 2014. April 2007 Page 9 of 46 H E NOI NE E RIN GA. West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 1 -Vicinity Map JAw, NO�TH rn 141 -,• 4i L; 1 • �. Q k Baxter:Lane z i, i �_ " �»� _ _ r, Tschactte!Lane !'•.sue � � .� W. Oak Street =_. ••�� j �I: �• I .`t f• Ls 17. N t i,'Main=Street Or7iF� .t. n--t—weer7 r� *s V. tf i Z etz t aa• aage- "• . .: ■r t ' 1 '( /nee �'� - �__• � erg 1 /!�. I I'- �- wy.I'Ll.t . Project Site �. -•- S �' i�` - �,,. ! �W fir; `� ;! I J 1 j I I 1- April 2007 Page 10 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 2-Conceptual Site Map 34I 36 •._.._•._.._ _ ..14I�T€R L�NE�M/NOR ARTER/ALL•• ..�+.._.._.._•._..�.•--,3 HEDCEROWCIDWr 1 < ` •• 1� -- - /'_ � , ''`�- •�-- —; ;vw J it 1 ,aauweue nlrsas+cEw+e----- I I ••_••_�•r••�•• �.•_•••�•; � , TJCSl4pE L4E • FO -J 1 hd IXXD` :\ •;r •.� �---- --� it OMME LAW .v ., r !� Tr' , — ? . . ---•- OAK STREET (PRINCIPAL ARTER/ALI-- -•-•••_.___ ...�... _ I II i-- April 2007 Page 11 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ADJACENT LAND USE West Winds is surrounded by a variety of land uses that can be generalized as residential mixed use. The site is generally flat, is bisected north to south by a lateral of the Farmers Ditch Canal, and is currently bounded by either planned or existing residential development. The site is bordered to the west by the 100-acre Regional Park and the planned Baxter Meadows; to the south by multi-family (Castlebar Apartments) and single-family (Harvest Creek Subdivision) development; to the east by the High Gate Project (45-50 unit senior project) and two larger vacant parcels (10 and 20 acres) for the future Fellowship Baptist Church and Rose Park; and to the north by larger rural tract (1 acre and larger) properties with the exception of the recently constructed Baxter Square Subdivision, consisting of a 104-lot townhouse project with 3000 SF lots. The mixed uses and density proposed by the West Winds Community is consistent with existing adjacent land uses. REGIONAL ACCESS Regional access to the West Winds Community site will be provided primarily by the North 19th Avenue corridor. Baxter Lane, Tschache Lane, Oak Street, Davis Lane, and North 27th Avenue will provide local access to the site, and will also provide alternative north-south routes parallel to the North 19th Avenue corridor. Existing lane configurations and control at key intersections along these routes are depicted in Figure 3. April 2007 Page 92 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 3 - Existing Lane Configuration and Control c 0 � > O C r 0 F Z •fi+ Baxter Lane �► � r 0 Tschache Lane A)j j tw T A Al �► - - --- .�� .. '�' W. Oak Street w m C C Q Q L r Z Z April 2007 Page 13 of 46 H E N.1.N E E R I N O West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update AREA ROADWAYS The West Winds community area is served by several area roadways, providing access to the area transportation network. The project is well served, with arterial roadways adjacent to the project on the west, north and south, and a collector adjacent to the development on the east. As such, excellent connectivity is provided to the Oak Street and North 19th Avenue corridors, providing easy access to the greater Bozeman area. Baxter Lane is classified as an east-west minor arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and incorporates a single lane in each direction within the vicinity of this project. The existing road is generally paved to roughly a 24-foot width with ,1,2-foot travel lanes and no discernable shoulder. West Winds Phase II widened thg�eastbound lane to include an 1loot travel lane, 5-foot bike lane and., �ing foo iith from the proposed Hunters Way to North 27th Avenue. Baxter Lane intersects North 19th Avenue at a signalized intersection and is side-street stop controlled within the vicinity of this project. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Baxter Lane has an estimated 2007 average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately60 vehicles per day(vpd) adjacent to the project site. Tschache Lane is classified as a local street within the Bozeman transportation network, and was only recently extended from the project site to North 191h Avenue. Tschache Lane is currently constructed and paved from Buckrake Avenue to North 27th Avenue. From North 27th Avenue to North 19th Avenue, Tschache Lane is currently constructed to base gravel to Home Depot, and paved from this point to North 191h Avenue. It is anticipated the gravel portion will be paved in 2007. Currently, Tschache Lane is carrying traffic from Hunter's Way to North 19th Avenue. Future improvements are expected to occur with the development of Phases III-Vlll of West Winds west of Buckrake Avenue and also with Baxter Meadows west of Davis Lane. With these improvements, Tschache Lane will extend from west of Davis Lane to North 19th Avenue. Currently, Tschache Lane intersects North 19th Avenue at a signalized intersection. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Tschache Lane has an estimated 2007 ADT volume of approximately(100--0/pd just west of North 19th Avenue. Oak Street is classified as an east-west principal arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and is improved to a full standard with a 4-lane section and a raised median adjacent April 2007 Page 14 of 46 H EN C31N EERINO � West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update to this project. Oak Street intersects North 19th Avenue at a signalized intersection, and is side- street stop controlled within the vicinity of the project. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Oak Street has an estimated 2007 ADT volume of approximately(270d'vpd adjacent to the project site. Davis Lane is classified as a north-south minor arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and is improved to a half standard with 24-foot paved surface and curb and gutter adjacent to this project. The existing Section Line Ditch will be accommodated in the center median for the future full standard roadway. Davis Lane extends north of Baxter Lane and provides access to business and retail on North 19th Avenue. South of the site, a connection to Durston Road is made via Meagher Avenue, which intersects Oak Street approximately 350 feet west of Davis Lane. Based on intersection turning movement counts, Davis Lane has an estimated 2007 ADT volume of approximately, 120 vpd adjacent to the project site. North 271h Avenue is classified as a 2-lane north-south collector within the Bozeman transportation network. During Phase 1-2 of West Winds, North 27th Avenue was constructed to a half standard from Oak Street to Baxter Lane adjacent to the project site. The alignment continues north of Baxter Lane as Thomas Drive. Thomas Drive does not currently provide access to retail and commercial services on North 19th Avenue. Based on intersection turning movement counts, North 27th Avenue has an estimated 2007 ADT volume of approximately:(900,! vpd adjacent to the project site. North 191h Avenue is classified as a north-south principal arterial within the Bozeman transportation network, and is currently the only major north-south running urban arterial within the immediate vicinity of the site. North 19th Avenue is also an MDT Urban Route (U-1201), and is administered by MDT in cooperation with the City of Bozeman. Recent improvements to North 19th Avenue have developed the street to a 4-lane standard with a center left-turning median. Although not directly adjacent to the project site, this street will serve as a major conduit for site- developed trips. Based on intersection turning movement counts, North 19th Avenue has an estimated 2007 ADT volume of approximately 2,900 �d adjacent to the project site. April 2007 Page 15 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update STUDY INTERSECTIONS The City of Bozeman identified the following existing and proposed intersections to be included in this study for traffic analysis. These study intersections are identified in Table 1. Table 1 -Study Intersections M f �)W V f JV Existing Proposed Stop Intersection Signalized Intersection Intersection Controlled f North 19" Avenue / Tschache 1 ✓ ✓ � Lane North 271h Avenue / Durston ✓ ✓ Road ✓ North 27"' Avenue / Oak ✓ Street North 27"' Avenue / Tschache ✓ ✓ Lane North 27'h Avenue / Baxter ✓ ✓ Lane ✓ Oak Street/ Buckrake Avenue ✓ — ✓ Oak Street/ Hunters Way ✓ ✓ Oak Street / Windward ./ ✓ Avenue ✓ Oak Street/ Davis Lane ✓ ✓ ✓ Davis Lane/ Breeze Lane ✓ ✓ ✓ Davis Lane/Tschache Lane ✓ ✓ Davis Lane / Baxter Lane ✓ ✓ Selected intersections include all West Winds site accesses and adjacent arterial and collector intersections, plus the off-site intersections of North 19th Avenue /Tschache Lane and North 27th Avenue/ Durston Road. Original study intersections which were not included in the 2007 update include North 191h Avenue at Durston Road, Oak Street and Baxter Lane. These intersections were dropped at the discretion of the City. The North 191h Avenue / Durston Road intersection April 2007 Page 16 of 46 ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update has been improved, with additional lanes since the original West Winds TIS was conducted. North 19th Avenue I Oak Street is currently undergoing improvements including exclusive right turn lanes on North 19th Avenue and widening the west leg to a 5-lane standard. SITE ACCESS In addition to the 7 study intersections, 12 major access points are planned for the project site. Of those access points, 3 were constructed during Phase 1 development. These 3 site drive accesses are Buckrake Avenue at Oak Street, Breeze Lane at North 271h Avenue and Tschache Lane at North 27th Avenue. The remaining 9 access points will be developed as necessary and as future demand dictates. Internal access will be provided through a series of local streets including extensions of Tschache Lane from the east and Hunters Way from the south. Site driveways will be developed to current City of Bozeman standards with stop control on the minor legs of the driveway intersections. The levels of pedestrian treatments considered appropriate at these site driveways are pedestrian cross bars and stop bars. April 2007 Page 17 of 46 H E N G IN E E R ING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update III. TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS BACKGROUND TRAFFIC HKM Engineering Inc. collected turning movement counts on Tuesday, February 13, Wednesday, February 14 and Thursday February 15, 2007. Count data was collected for the following intersections: 1. North 19th Avenue and Tschache Lane 2. North 27th Avenue and Durston Road 3. North 27th Avenue and Oak Street 4. North 271h Avenue and Tschache Lane 5. North 271h Avenue/Thomas Drive and Baxter Lane 6. Oak Street and Buckrake Avenue 7. Oak Street and Hunters Way 8. Oak Street and Davis Lane 9. Oak Street and Baxter Lane The peak hour of the study area was calculated based on the peak hour of the system, and the AM peak hour was found to occur between 7:30 and 8:30, while the PM peak hour was from 5:00 to 6:00. Peak hour count data collected from these counts are summarized in Figure 4 as "Existing Peak Hour Traffic". Based on discussions with the City of Bozeman, a growth rate of 5.0% per year was employed to determine 2010 and 2014 background volumes in an effort to estimate increases in demand due to the development of adjacent subdivisions and expected growth to the Bozeman area population. This growth rate is supported by recent growth trends in the area, but could be considered conservative if the high rate of growth seen in recent years does not continue. Regardless, this rate is utilized as the average growth rate per year for this study. The present day count data has been processed to reflect an expected 2010 equivalent volume, and is presented in Figure 5 as "2010 Background Traffic". Count data and volume tabulations are provided in Section One of the Appendices. Supplementary traffic volume data was also used from the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update. April 2007 Page 18 of 46 H E N G.I N E E R IN G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 4- Existing Peak Hour Traffic Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) NogTH [1850] = Estimated ADT Not to = Existing Road - - - = Future Road 1 2 -3 4 --97(180) n o �-99(215) G j"9(41) r } p 2(�) E 16 107(8D) - 7(28) V) 0 2(2} � uj m 60(52) r ti 51(73) o -78(132) .7 01) Baxter Lane ; , 12(42) 6(32)-! 1 [19001 a(1) ! _ ' [2600] 83(62) - aia 100(56) 668 6(7)..; d 0 0(0) o N E C _ �01 e-1(0) 7(72) o N o 0(0) a 3(5) C 1.1(0) Tschache Lane !8(52) w8 D 1(0) , [1000] 7(20)r. -" Q0 1) Y d � _ 0 O 18(20) -102(232) N 59(10D) 2 ;25(106) W.Oak Street 19(42) ' 3600j 167�eaj a [5200] a7 38(49) 3(6)-, IV v' d � Q ppO m � L N Q.0 N 4M Z r 8(42) 179(373) Durston Road 467(312)— o � 0 April 2007 Page 19 of 46 H E NO IN E E R I N GA. West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 5-2010 Background Traffic Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) [1850] = Estimated ADT --------- = Existing Road - - - Future Road NOff H 1 2 Not to Scale SLi. M(74)- 112(208) w 00( 7) - i � l-2( ) NN 1242(2) - ' 7(28)-� ) E 60(52) F c N > 0 3 1(2) M o v 7(17) iq k 1(6) N 59(85) ^o --90(153) r 6(13) Baxter Lane , 14(49) 7(37) ` " [2300] 5(1) ! } [3000] 96(72) c w 116(65) - m 7(8) 5 6 m West Winds C�Vnw r R,.1(0) a t-8(83) J c o _...0(0) o R - 3(6) w �^m + _ j 1(0) Tschache Lane , 9(80) Y + 1(9) 1 [1100] 8(23) / t ,T + Q 0(0) - 1(7) to ' 10(20) 21(23) ' m O - 118(269) 68(1181 w 29(123) W.Oak Street 3 22(49)-� 1 9(7) [6000] 42(57) [42001 182(109 - Q 3(7� `ary N L C L > > m l0 O Z Z * Z k-9(49) 207(432) DurSton Road 67(81) r 541(361) April 2007 Page 20 of 46 "No".N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update TRIP GENERATION Project trip generation is based on trip generation rates as reported in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) most recent publication Trip Generation, 7(" Edition. Trips were generated for each expected development type, according to current plats, and correspond to the morning and evening peak hours of the adjacent street network. At the time of the study, infrastructure has been constructed for Phase I and Phase II. At this time, 25 single family lots in Phase I have constructed homes, with 14 remaining vacant. Lots with constructed homes are assumed to be accounted for in background traffic, and are removed from trip generation estimates. Phase II infrastructure is complete, with no constructed homes. Phase III is planned for construction beginning in 2007. Trip generation estimates for Phases 1-III were developed separately from the site build-out, although those trips are included in the site trip distribution estimates for the build-out condition. Estimated trip generation for the project is presented in Table 2. Table 2 - West Winds Community Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Weekday I nps Trips I reps Trips (Land Use Code 1 QuantityTripEnds Rate Trips %in X Out In Out Rate Tri s V.I. %outl In I Out PHASE I-III Single Family Detached Housing 210 49 Units 469 0.75 37 250 75% 9 28 1.01 49 63% 37% 31 18 Residential Condominium/Townhouse 230 89 Units 522 0.44 39 17% 83% 7 32 052 46 67% 33% 31 15 Mufti-Family Residential 230 129 Units 756 0.44 57 17% 83% 10 47 0.52 67 67% 33% 45 22 Congregate Care Facility 253 124 Units 432 008 10 45% 55% 5 6 0.11 14 61% 39% 9 5 SUBTOTAL(PHASE I-pl) 2179 143 31 113 176 116 60 BUILDOUT(PHASE IV-VIII) Single Family Detached Housing 210 122 Units 1168 075 92 259 75% 23 69 101 123 64% 36% 79 44 Apartments 220 62 Units 417 0.51 32 20% 80% 6 26 062 38 65% 35% 25 13 (Residential Condominium/Tovmhouse 230 22 Units 129 0.44 10 17% 83% 2 8 052 11 67% 33% 7 4 Muni-Family Residential 230 69 UnHs 522 044 39 17% 03% 7 32 052 46 67% 33% 31 15 Congregate Care Facility 253 35 Units 71 0.06 2 1 59% 41% 1 1 017 6 55% 45% 3 3 Assisted Living 2 254 150 Beds 411 038 57 36% 64% 21 36 038 57 36% 64% 21 36 Neighborhood Park 3 NA 4 Sites NA 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 Neighborhood Community Center° NA 100 KSF NA 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0 0 SUBTOTAL(PHASE IV THRU VIII) 2718 232 60 172 291 166 11b TOTAL(BUILDOUT) 4697 376 21 28 2457 82 173 'Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook 7th Edition AM generation rate is assumed to match PM rate. 'Park will incorporate a natural setting including wetlands and seasonal youth soccer practice fields(not regular soccer fields). °Community Center is planned to be developed as a neighborhood meeting center and will not offer recreational activities or daily planned events. Of the estimated peak hour trips projected for generation by this development, 38.3% will be contributed by the development of Phases 1-III and the remaining site will contribute 61.7%. With April 2007 Page 21 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update respect to the overall development, 36.2% of the trips will be contributed by single-family homes, 25.1% by multi-family units, 12.7% by townhouses and condos, 8.5% by apartments, and 18.7% by the senior congregate care/assisted living. The development of low-income multi-family residential units is expected along the eastern portion of the development. Although this development type is not specifically identified within the generation tables of ITE's Trip Generation guidelines, the generator is expected to closely resemble both the "Apartment" generation (ITE Code 220) and the "Residential Condominium/Townhouse" generation (ITE Code 230). Based on expected development trends, trips for the low-income multi-family residential use have been generated based on these two ITE codes. The centerpiece of the West Winds Community is an expansive north/south linear park (West Winds Park) providing active and passive recreational opportunities as well as a proposed Neighborhood Community Center. The neighborhood park is expected to incorporate both unimproved and improved areas including level areas suitable for seasonal soccer practices. Included in the park is a planned neighborhood community center. The proposed neighborhood community center is expected to be a gathering place for residents to enjoy such activities as neighborhood barbecues or to host neighborhood meetings, and could be rented out for casual events such as wedding receptions, town meetings, etc. As both the park and the community center are anticipated to be used primarily by the West Winds subdivision, significant internal trip capture by the generators is anticipated. Moreover, large community parks are planned to the immediate east and west of the project site providing regional recreational opportunities for the immediate adjacent area. Lastly, significant bicycle and pedestrian access is anticipated from outside the subdivision. Although some trips can be expected to originate outside the development, they are generally expected to occur outside the weekday peak generation hour of the site or on weekends. As such, trip generation by the park and by the neighborhood community center is not included in the total generation for the project site. Should either the park or the community center experience a change in function, an addendum to the master traffic study may be required. April 2007 Page 22 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Due to the residential nature of the project, assignments of the generated trips have been classified as having primary destinations with pass-by and diverted trips not anticipated. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENTS Original trip distribution percentages for the project site were based on: existing Bozeman area traffic patterns as reflected in the turning movement counts taken at the study intersections; from information gathered in the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan 2001 Update; from approved traffic studies adjacent to the project site; and from expected directions of travel to nearby existing commercial and office developments. Trip distributions for the 2007 update were based on the original distributions and modified to reflect new and planned development of the area road network. The last several years have seen Oak Street extended west beyond Davis Lane. Davis Lane has been constructed to a half section from Oak Street north to Baxter Lane. From this point, existing Davis Lane has been improved to a half standard to Valley Center Drive, providing access to retail businesses on North 191h Avenue. In addition, Tschache Lane is currently being extended from North 27th Avenue to North 19th Avenue. At the time of the study, the road was improved to a gravel surface and carries a minimal amount of traffic. Tschache Lane will provide access to North 19th Avenue. The extension of these roads indicates the area grid network is substantially in place, providing alternate east-west and north-south routes for travelers who wish to avoid the congestion on North 19th Avenue. Considering only development of Phases I, II and III, with development only in the southern and eastern portions of the project site, trip distribution percentages were modified to reflect the available site drive accesses. Trips entering or exiting the site at the completion of Phase III are expected to have a variety of access points, including three site drive accesses on Oak Street, 5 accesses on North 27th Avenue, and 1 access on Baxter Lane. Although Bozeman is expanding to the west, the majority of Phase 1-III trips are expected to exit the study area to destinations east and south of West Winds via North 191h Avenue and Oak Street. Of the total trips, 15% are anticipated to travel north or northwest of the development towards northern Bozeman, Belgrade, or to the Interstate 90 corridor. This traffic will access North 19th Avenue via Baxter Lane or Tschache Lane, or travel to their destination via the alternate route provided by Davis t Pass-by trips are those trips attracted from background traffic passing the site on adjacent roadways and as such,do not add new traffic to the adjacent street system. Diverted trips are trips attracted from background traffic volumes already on non-adjacent roadways in the vicinity of the project site. April 2007 Page 23 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Lane. 20% of total traffic is anticipated to exit the study area to the west via Oak Street and Durston Road bound for employment and commercial destinations in the Huffine Lane corridor. The remaining 65% of traffic is expected to exit the study area for destinations east and south, entailing the traditional commercial and employment centers in Bozeman. Oak Street will carry most of this traffic, while Baxter Lane and Tschache Lane will carry lesser percentages. Phase 1-III trip distribution characteristics are presented in Figure 6. At build-out, site trips are expected to exit the site from one of 13 different site access points located around the project site. Approximately 40% of all the project build-out trips generated by the site are expected to exit the study area using the North 19th Avenue corridor, while an additional 22% of the project build-out trips are expected to cross North 191h Avenue at Baxter, Oak, Tschache and Durston. Of the North 19th Avenue trips, a two-thirds/one-third distribution favoring southbound North 191h Avenue is anticipated in an effort to reach employment centers in and around Bozeman and the surrounding area. Of the total trips, only 15% are anticipated to travel north or northwest of the development towards northern Bozeman, Belgrade, or to the Interstate 90 corridor. Alternative access to this area is expected to be provided via Davis Lane and North 27th Avenue/Thomas Drive. 16% of the project build-out trips are anticipated to leave the study area for destinations west and south, in the Huffine Lane corridor. Project build-out trip distribution characteristics are presented in Figure 7. Site trips for the Phases 1-III development and for the project build-out reflecting the above considerations and the trip generation estimates are depicted in Figure 8. These site trips have been added to the projected background traffic estimates to yield anticipated demands at the completion of Phases 1-III, and are depicted in Figure 9 as "2010 Background Plus Phases 1-III", including average daily traffic (ADT) estimates based on the assumption that the PM peak hour demands are equivalent to 10% of the ADT. Background traffic estimates for the project build-out were estimated based on the 5% growth rate, a 2014 expected completion date, and static Phase 1-III site trips. Tschache Lane will be extended from North 27th Avenue to Davis Lane as part of West Winds build-out. It is anticipated that Tschache Lane will be extended west of Davis Lane by the Baxter Meadows development prior to the West Winds build-out. In order to accurately forecast future background traffic at this intersection in the absence of existing traffic, anticipated site trips as determined by the Baxter April 2007 Page 24 of 46 Pi., NEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Meadows Traffic Impact Study2 have been added directly as 2014 background traffic. 2014 background traffic is depicted in Figure 10. Site trips for the build-out condition reflecting the above considerations and the trip generation estimates are depicted in Figure 11. Project site trips for the build-out condition have been added to the projected 2014 background traffic estimate to yield anticipated demands at the completion of the development, and are depicted in Figure 12 as "2014 Background Plus Build- out", including average daily traffic (ADT) estimates. z Tra tc Impact Study for Preliminary Amended Plat of Baxter Meadows Subdivision P.U.D. Phase Four Prepared by Marvin and Associates. April 2007 Page 25 of 46 H West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 6-Trip Distribution (Phases 1-III) d as a G � H Q N Ja o a 1= Z z 5% 0% Baxter Lane 0% 17% 2% West M iNk PHASE (ZOIMII�I�+ II C Tschache Lane > r 1% PHASE z PHASE III W. Oak Street 12% 7% 40% s d 3% N z 10% 3% Durston Road April 2007 Page 26 of 46 E NBIN EE RI Nc3 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 7 -Trip Distributions (Build-out) d �p O � J Q WffH ,V � rMtm Sori Z 10% 5% Baxter Lane 2% 20% 5% c 77s Wed wi11�8 chache Lane ' ° Z 0 W. Oak Street 0% C10- % 20% a 2% z S�Durston Road April 2007 Page 27 of 46 E NO IN E E R I NO West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 8 - Phase 1-III Site Trips NOgTH hbI;�ass Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) [1850] = Estimated ADT z = Existing Road - - - = Future Road H H v m `-3(2) 4(14) Baxter Lane Z 8(3) N i Trade Wind Lane West liNindB cmmull w Turbulence Lane 4(11) I(3) Tschache Lane 7(3)..- 2(1)J Q 8(3)— 1(1) - ccd N 3(2)-V r>< ' 14(7) v Breeze Lane Cobblestone Place a(4) A 1 2 l 9((36)) W,Oak street 2(9) -11 35(18)— j 7(4) ? r� = C Q a a Oy w Go N Z d Z g �+ _ '�_1(3) Durston Road 3(12)J A 1 2 v ti 3(14l d `' �-4(14) M '-d ) 7(4) 3(2) - 7(28(14) 1(4)- L(4) jj L 2(8) 2) - _j April 2007 Page 28 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 9-2010 Background Plus Phases I —III NORTH Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) [1850] = Estimated ADT s o = Existing Road ar - - - = Future Road 0 59(85) n 91(153) �- 8(13) ;18(63) Baxter Lane 7(37) ! 4 [2300) 5 0) f r [33001 96(72)— r 122(68) 7(8)- n 5(6) , `o wed wimb N O 2(3) 8(83) N' - 4(11) N 4(7) j 2(3) Tschache Lane J I ,-9(6o) > c , 6(3) ` (14001 10(24) �d 4) 6(3) c v= 2(6)Z. of Q Q r + Q 3(3) 0 1 36(43) a `w m ► � o r g 77- SS_ r 21(23)S C] k 13(32) t0 r p N N 127(304) 76(120 N 29(123) W.Oak Street 22 c49, �_ A 1 2 9(7) ,1 , [67001 7 42(66) - 144001 1 (127), W w g 0 ( y 7 C Im a > Q N N z 2075(4321 Durston Road 70(93) 541(361) A _ 1 2 N� �' 4 14 (2 1) `* 3(14) v o - 115(210) c_ R 122(277) 10(47) �, 2(23) 143(115) 1(4) �� t 2(13)-' M 139(105) 2(2) 2(2) C0 m April 2007 Page 29 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 10-2014 Background Including Phases I— III NOgTN Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) ® [1850] = Estimated ADT m = Existing Road - - - = Future Road N O C t F- N F rr 11(23) N - 94(155) o 111(192) 14(19) 1 _ i-21(73) Baxter Lane 8(45) ' [2900]1 6(11)-� ' [4000] 117(87) - ai ��/ 136(92) 12(14)'1 N fed lumb 6(17) c Q 2(3) m m 10(101) 4(11) M 5(8) s(6) m r f 2(3) Tschache Lane { 11(73) [16001 -12(29) ' •3 e 6(3) - u�i 2(9) W p 1 ♦ a 3(3)� a n 41(51) , N� o •P40] C316(36) -• 153(366) CVl35(149) w Qak Street27(59) 2 � [80001 O 53(78) 59(150) a Q C y d Q O Z Z M .N � cp W 6 252(525) Durston Road. 657(439) - A 1 2 N V N C i-4(14) 14 c� �-8(22) !,3{14) 146(262) 143(338) 154(261) r /-13(56) ) f 3(28) 114(141)�- 169( 15) 130) uv 243(177)-1 d c o 3(a)� 3(3) ; April 2007 Page 30 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 11 —Build-out Site Trips D E 7(10) NO TH 2(5) M Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) [1850] = Estimated ADT m o = Existing Road - - - = Future Road c� 1` m m � 7(10) 1 ; 1(13) i 8(22) Baxter Lane 1(3) 5(6) v 2(14) - S o wet wfIIII b ' 4(10) m C . . L o - 5(13) m 1 m ! 400) Tschache Lane 3(8) b 14(9) - 9(6) ' N > 5(3)..i W C 9(6) - a 17(12) m B ` "-8(2) 3(8) W.Oak Street a —9(6) A 1 2 ' r 9(25' 19(8) 26(17) 3(8) - 12(8)-` �N m (D 3 7 CD 0 C 61 Q Q C ` N Z: Z '.5(31) Z me _'2(1 9(6 °=N. 7C <-1(3) Durston Road L(2) 5(13) �. 0 B A 1 2 d 5(3) 5(05)) (13) .� - 9(15) - 13(27) 1 3 1 1 j 24(16)-.-, 4(4) 15(0) - o April 2007 Page 31 of 46 H ENGINEERWN & West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Figure 12 -2014 Background Plus Build-out. D E - 127(215) - 124(212) 2(7} 4(10) NORTH 148(120) - 2(5) d 2(a) , Legend: 60 (52) =AM Peak (PM Peak) [1850] = Estimated ADT o = Existing Road - - - = Future Road o d � �N N 101 065 X m 118(212) rl 7 15(32 D E ., + y-29(95) Baxter Lane 8(45) ` ' - [34001 11(14)--'� ' [46001 118(69) In 5 ii 150(91) 14(1$) Q West%%ft 6(17) r m N co � � N -6(13) v k-10(101) 9(24) N - 8(16) 6(13) Tschache Lane + f 11(73) O C F N g(3) ! [2300] 21(35) ! 1 - M j 1 Q 20(12)-- `e 11(15) ti Q y 8(8) n 58(72)•1 o 10 u � Y N 3 � O l m v + Oct m ) N -100(1,b7 , -co� - 182(391) M + r 35(149) W.Oak Street 44(67) ` A 1 11(8) -' I [86001 56(86) ..- [6000 85(167) - W 23(20) +N m g 7 C C Q Q r. Y N � Z Z wv --20) r r , 9(6) v 13(65) LI((62)) 252(525) Durston Road � 90(123)657(439) B A 1 2 v ti w (28) TajiT 1 13(35)4 5.(3) 7(24) n N {277) - 155(365) 159(286 r ) + 13(58) + j-3(26) L(13(9) 27I 45) } - '86(140) - C m,� 281(198) • i o a !j 3(3) 6(6)-1 v N April 2007 Page 32 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update IV. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Intersection capacity analyses have been conducted using the procedures outlined in Part III, Chapters 16 "Signalized Intersections" and Chapter 17 "Unsignalized Intersections" of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). Calculation forms for the analyses are contained in Section Two of the Appendices. In accordance with the HCM procedures, Level-of-Service (LOS) has been determined by estimating the average vehicular delay of the intersections and the intersection movements. The range of traffic delays associated with each LOS is presented in Table 3 for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. It should be noted that delay thresholds for a given LOS for unsignalized intersections are lower than those given for signalized intersections. This difference, as explained in Chapter 17 of the 2000 HCM, is to account for the greater variability in delay associated with unsignalized movements and the different driver expectations associated with each type of intersection control, with the understanding that signalized intersections are designed to carry higher traffic volumes and therefore will experience greater delay than an unsignalized intersection. Table 3 - Level-of-Service Criteria Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection LOS Average Delay (sec I veh) Average Delay (sec I veh) - II A < 10 ---- -� 10 B > 10to20 > 10to15 C > 20 to 35 > 15 to 25 D > 35 to 55 > 25 to 35 E > 55 to 80 > 35 to 50 F > 80 > 50 Analysis of the lone study intersection under signal control is summarized in Table 4, representing the existing signal timing, plus a best-case scenario with optimized signal cycle lengths for design year analysis. The analysis indicates that the subject intersection can be April 2007 Page 33 of 46 Pq 0 1 N E E R I N 0 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update expected to operate at a satisfactory LOS and with adequate capacity for both the Phase 1-III Build-out and total build-out of the development. Table 4- Level-of-Service Summary for Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Condition V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS 2007 Existing 0.41 24.6 C 0.62 27.2 C J 2 2010 Background 0.47 6.9 A 0.71 13.6 B N. 19th Avenue&.Tschache Lane 2010 Background+Phase 1-III 0.48 7.8 A 0.71 14.4 B 2014 Background Incl.Phase 1-III 0.58 9.0 A 0.88 16.2 B 2014 Build-out 0.60 r9.8 A 0.89 17.3 B Analyses of the unsignalized intersections and future drive accesses are summarized in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. The analyses indicate that the majority of the unsignalized intersections in the build-out condition are expected to operate at LOS C or better and with adequate capacity, with the exceptions of North 271h Avenue at its intersections with Oak Street and Durston Road. All of the proposed accesses to West Winds are expected to operate at LOS B or better. April 2007 Page 34 of 46 kN(31 NEE RI N0 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update i Table 5- Level-of-Service Summary for Minor Street Stop-Controlled Intersections Worst-Case Approach Intersection Traffic Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 2007 Existing 10.1 B 11.5 B 2010 Background 10.4 B 12.1 B Baxter Lane&Davis Lane 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 10.4 B 12.1 B 2014 Background Ind.Phase 1-111 11.3 B 16.1 C 2014 Build-out 11.6 B 18.7 C 2007 Existing 9.1 A 9.7 A 2010 Background 9.2 A 10.0 A Oak Street&Davis Lane 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 9.3 A 10.1 B 2014 Background Ind.Phase I-III 9.5 A 10.2 B 2014 Build-out 9.7 A 10.7 B 2007 Existing 8.8 A 9.0 A 2010 Background 8.9 A 9.1 A Oak Street&Hunters Way 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 10.3 B 11.8 B 2014 Background Ind.Phase 1-III 10.7 B 12.8 B 2014 Build-out 11.1 B 13.7 B 2007 Existing 9.2 A 9.4 A 2010 Background 9.3 A 11.4 B Oak Street&Buckrake Avenue 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 9.9 A 12.0 B 2014 Background Ind.Phase 1-III 10.2 B 12.7 B 2014 Build-out 10.9 B 14.1 C Table 5 is continued on the next page. April 2007 Page 35 of 46 N E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Table 5. - Level-of-Service Summary for Minor Street Stop-Controlled Intersections Continued Worst-Case Approach Intersection Traffic Condition AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 2007 Existing 10.2 B 11.1 B 2010 Background 10.6 B 11.6 B North 27th Avenue&Baxter Lane 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 11.0 B 12.2 B 2014 Background Incl.Phase 1-III 11.5 B 13.6 B 2014 Build-out 11.9 B 14.5 B 2007 Existing 9.2 A 7.3 A 2010 Background 9.3 A 8.6 A North 27th Avenue&Tschache Lane 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 9.6 A 9.8 A 2014 Background Incl.Phase 1-I11 9.6 A 10.1 A 2014 Build-out 10.1 B 10.3 B 2007 Existing 11.8 B 15.3 C 2010 Background 13.5 B 18.1 C North 27ih Avenue&Oak Street 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 14.1 B 22.2 C 2014 Background Incl.Phase 1-111 16.5 C 31.6 D 2014 Build-out 18.7 C 61.1 F 2014 Build-out with 4-Way Stop 11.4 B 20.4 C 2007 Existing 15.7 C 14.3 B 2010 Background 19.3 C 17.1 C North 27th Avenue&Durston Road 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 19.8 C 17.8 C 2014 Background Incl.Phase 1-III 32.8 D 26.7 D 2014 Build-out 35.7 E 29.5 D A/08 ,ABM /01 LO April 2007 Page 36 of 46 tNG I N E E R I N 0 � West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Table 6-2014 Phase III-Vill Site Drive Access Points v1 1 Worst-Case Approach 'V f Intersection Traffic Condition AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour � Delay LOS Delay LOS 2010 Build-out Phase 1-III 9.6 A 9.7 A Oak Street&Windward Avenue 2014 Background w/Phase 1-III 9.8 A 10.4 B 2014 Build-out 10.0 A 10.4 B 2014 Background w/Phase 1-III NA NA NA NA Baxter Lane&Hunters Way 2014 Build-out 9.5 A 9.5 A 2014 Background w/Phase 1-III NA NA NA NA Baxter Lane&Windward Avenue 2014 Build-out 9.4 A 9.6 A 2014 Background w/Phase 1-III NA NA NA NA Davis Lane&Tschache Lane 2014 Build-out 9.6 A 10.2 B 2014 Background w/Phase 1-III NA NA NA NA Davis Lane&Breeze Lane 2014 Build-out 8.7 A 9.1 A TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM PHASES 1-III Construction of infrastructure for Phases I & II of the West Winds Community is complete at the time of this study. As previously discussed, Phase I is partially built out, while Phase II is newly open to builders. Completed road improvements associated with the development of the site include expansion of Oak Street to a full arterial standard from North 27th Avenue to New Holland Drive, and construction of North 27th Avenue to a half standard from Oak Street to Baxter Lane. Davis Lane has been constructed to a half standard from Oak Street to Baxter Lane by others. Tschache Lane is under construction by others between North 19th Avenue and North 27th Avenue, and was open with a gravel surface at the time of this study. Completion is expected in early 2007. With these improvements, the road network surrounding West Winds has been improved, offering travelers several routes to and from the study area. Approximately 60% of trips generated by the development are expected to utilize the Oak Street I North 27th Avenue intersection, representing approximately 22% of this intersection's expected 2010 peak hour volume. April 2007 Page 37 of 46 M E N 0 1 N E E RING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update As demonstrated by the intersection LOS analysis, no significant impacts to the study area are anticipated by the development of Phases 1-III. Moreover, low demand at the adjacent unsignalized intersections, including the intersection of North 27th Avenue with Oak Street, does not necessitate the need for signal warrant analyses at this time. A summary of traffic impacts to each of the study intersections by build-out of Phases 1-III of the West Winds Community is provided in Table 7. Table 7. Phases 1-III Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume Intersection l Contribution, AM (PM) Baxter Lane & Davis Lane 2.7% (1.6%) Oak Street&Davis Lane 4.7% (3.9%) Oak Street& Hunters Way 13.0%(10.4%) Oak Street& Buckrake Avenue 15.2% (14.6%) North 27th Avenue & Baxter Lane 8.0% (8.6%) North 27th Avenue&Tschache Lane. 3.5% (3.5%) North 27th Avenue&Oak Street l 13.2% (12.1%) T North 27th Avenue& Durston Road 1.9% (1.8%) North 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane 1.3% (9.1%) TRAFFIC IMPACTS FROM BUILDOUT Build-out of the West Winds Community is anticipated by 2014, depending on future market trends and development demand. Additional road improvements adjacent to the project are anticipated to include expansion of Oak Street to a full 5-lane standard from Davis Lane west, expansion of North 271h Avenue to a full 3-lane standard from Oak Street to Baxter Lane, and Apr112007 Page 38 of 46 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update expansion of Davis Lane to a full 3-lane standard from Oak Street to Baxter Lane. Tschache Lane is expected to extend from Davis Lane to North 27th Avenue with the build-out of the West Winds Community. Other area developments are expected to extend Tschache Lane west of Davis Lane, and from North 27th Avenue to North 19th Avenue (this leg is currently under construction). In the build-out condition with optimal timing and phasing, the signalized intersection of North 191h Avenue and Tschache Lane reaches LOS B and will serve the volume of traffic that would be expected to use the roadway and the intersection based on anticipated growth rates. However, the intersection approaches capacity in the design year in the current configuration. This intersection currently exhibits a high volume of north-south demand. East-west demand is generated by retail businesses adjacent to the intersection, with additional volumes anticipated from residential development to the west with the extension of Tschache Lane from North 27th Avenue to North 19th Avenue. Background traffic based on existing volumes is not anticipated to travel west beyond the existing retail businesses. Recent improvements to the intersections of North 19th Avenue with Durston Road and Oak Street will improve traffic flow in the North 19th Avenue corridor. As demonstrated by the unsignalized intersection LOS analysis, no significant impacts to the study area are anticipated by the build-out of the project, with the exceptions of Oak Street / North 271h Avenue and Durston Road / North 27th Avenue. Durston Road and North 27th Avenue is anticipated to operate at LOS C at the build-out of Phases 1-III. By the design year, background traffic is expected degrade the intersection to LOS D, and the addition of West Winds Phases IV-VIII site traffic will bring the intersection to LOS E in the AM peak hour, while it continues to operate at LOS D in the PM peak hour. This poor level of service is mostly due to high through volumes on Durston Road. As volumes increase and the intersection degrades, a signal warrant study should be conducted to determine the appropriate time frame for signalization of this intersection. The intersection of Oak Street and North 27th Avenue and Oak Street is anticipated to degrade to LOS D in the PM peak hour by the design year with expected background traffic. The addition of West Winds Phases IV-VIII site traffic is expected to drop the intersection to LOS F during the PM peak hour. This intersection carries a high volume of westbound to southbound traffic in the April 2007 Page 39 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update PM, creating high delays for southbound and eastbound traffic on the north leg of the intersection. This intersection currently meets MDT warrants for a westbound left turn lane, due ` 0 VON to the high volume and percentage of left turns. As volumes increase in the future; a signal warrant study should be conducted to determine the appropriate time frame for signalization. As / an interim measure, 4-way stop control would bring the intersection to LOS C at full build-out. �/�-�� ✓ Discussions with City staff indicate a desire to restrict left-turning movements to some of the site driveways, sometimes described as right-in / right-out driveways. Based on the analysis of the potential trip generation and traffic patterns expected to occur at project build-out, the inclusion of right-in / right-out site driveways should not significantly impact the development of this subdivision, and will serve to decrease the potential for "cut-across" traffic through the subdivision. It is recommended, however, that the intersection of Hunters Way with Baxter Lane be developed as a full movement intersection. A summary of traffic impacts to each of the study intersections by the build-out of the West Winds Community is provided in Table 8. Table 8. Build-out Traffic Volumes as a Percent of the Total Volume April 2007 Page 40 of 46 H ENGINEERING � West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update Intersection i Contribution, AM (PM) Baxter Lane & Davis Lane 7.9% (6.0%) Oak Street&Davis Lane 12.5% (10.1%) Oak Street& Hunters Way 21.6% (15.9%) Oak Street& Buckrake Avenue 26.0% (15.1%) North 27th Avenue& Baxter Lane 17.3% (17.8%) North 27th Avenue&Tschache Lane. 58.0% (51.6%) North 27th Avenue&Oak Street 23.9% (22.1%) North 27th Avenue& Durston Road 3.4% (3.5%) North 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane 2.4% (1.5%) MEDIANS It has been requested that this study address the need for a center median on Baxter Lane. A center median serves several functions including separation of opposing traffic, recovery of errant vehicles, acceleration/deceleration space, and storage for left-turning vehicles. Baxter Lane is classified as a minor arterial by the Bozeman Transportation Plan. A 3-lane option with a center median is included in the recommended street standards for minor arterials. The 21-foot recommended center median provides adequate space for turn lanes and vehicle storage for either a Two Way Left Turn Lane (TWLTL) or a raised median. Selection of a raised median versus a TWLTL is dependent on the need to control or provide access to and from the roadway. West Winds is planned to provide access to Baxter Lane via intersections with 3 local streets between Davis Lane and North 27th Avenue. Currently this portion of Baxter Lane is bordered on the north by larger tract rural homes (1 acre or larger) with direct driveway access to Baxter Lane. Installation of a raised median would render these partial accesses, with only right in and right out movements permitted. As an alternative, a flush median or TWLTL could be installed to perpetuate full access at these driveways. In the event that this property April 2007 Page 41 of 46 H E N O I N 6 E R I N 0 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update redevelops, it would be subject to the Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance (BUDO) which prohibits residential lots from direct access to arterials or collectors. In the case of redevelopment, the direct accesses would be eliminated. At this time, the TWLTL could be reconstructed as a raised median. As discussed in this report, all of the study intersections on Baxter Lane are expected to operate at LOS B or better in the design year, with little or no queuing for left turns. As such, a center median would have little effect on LOS at the study intersections through the design year. WARRANT ANALYSIS Warrant analyses were not performed as each unsignalized intersection currently operates with acceptable delays and with sufficient capacity as a TWSC intersection and are expected to do so through the build-out of Phases 1-III. By the design year, the intersections of Oak Street / North 271n Avenue and Durston Road / North 27tn Avenue are expected to fail with or without traffic generated by completion of West Winds Phases IV-Vill. As volumes increase, signal warrant analyses are recommended to determine the appropriateness and time frame for signalization at these intersections. ACCESS SPACING West Winds Community is planned for a total of 13 accesses to the surrounding transportation network. These include 3 accesses on Baxter Lane (minor arterial), 3 accesses on Oak Street (principal arterial),®accesses on Davis Lane (minor arterial) and 5 accesses on North 27cn Avenue (collector). The Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance (BUDO) sets forth standards for access spacing on arterial and collector streets, requiring 660 feet of separation between full accesses on arterials and 330 feet on collectors. The BUDO includes provisions for deviations from the standards. Due to topographic conditions and locations of existing street connections, West Winds is unable to meet these standards in all locations. A report addressing access spacing for West Winds Planned Community is included in the appendix to this report. April 2007 Page 42 of 46 H EN G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update V. REVIEW OF COLLISION DATA The original study included analysis of collision data for the 3-year time period between July 2000 through June 2003 by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for the following intersections: • North 191h Avenue & Durston Road • North 19th Avenue & Oak Street • North 19th Avenue &Tschache Lane • North 19th Avenue & Baxter Lane • Davis/Fowler& Baxter Lane Accident rates per million entering vehicles (MEV) were computed for each of the intersections based on millions of entering vehicles and are listed below. Table 9. Collision Rates Intersection Collision Rate per MEV North 19th Avenue & Durston Road 0.60 North 191h Avenue & Oak Street 1.24 North 19th Avenue &Tschache Lane 0.28 North 19th Avenue & Baxter Lane 0.65 Davis/Fowler& Baxter Lane 0.41 The original analysis indicated that there were no critical collision locations near the project development. It was noted that the intersection of North 19th Avenue & Oak Street exhibited a higher collision rate than the adjacent intersections due to the predominance of "rear-end" and 11side-swipe" type accidents. The original analysis indicated that the development of the West Winds Community was not expected to increase collision rates at the study intersections. Updated accident data has been April 2007 Page 43 of 46 H E N 0 1 N E E R IN". . West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update requested from the Montana Department of Transportation for the following intersections for the period from July 2003 through June 2006. North 191h Avenue /Tschache Lane North 19th Avenue/Oak Street North 271h Avenue / Durston Road North 271h Avenue /Oak Street North 27th Avenue / Baxter Lane Oak Street/ Davis (or Fowler) Lane Oak Street/ Baxter Lane An updated analysis will be provided in memo format when this data has been received and analyzed. Anticipated submittal date for this memo is June 1, 2007. April 2007 Page 44 of 46 H ENGINEERING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The analysis presented herein indicates that the site-generated traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing and proposed roadway system for the Phase 1-III development. At project build-out, while the majority of the study intersections exhibit satisfactory levels of service of A, B, or C, the intersections of Oak Street / North 271h Avenue and Durston Road / North 271h Avenue exhibit levels of service of D or below. This degradation in LOS can be largely attributed to background traffic volumes and analysis indicates the intersections are already at LOS D in the design year without the inclusion of West Winds build-out traffic. Recommendations based on this study are as follows: • No mitigation to the existing roadway system beyond anticipated improvements to Davis Lane and Baxter Lane is necessary due to the additional traffic generated by the proposed Phase 1-III development or the project build-out, except as noted below at Oak Street/ North 271h Avenue and Durston Road / North 27th Avenue. • No significant impacts to the intersection of Durston Road at North 27th Avenue are anticipated for the Phase 1-III development. Although improvements to Durston Road are currently underway and will include the addition of a two-way left turn (TWLT) lane; these improvements will do little to improve capacity along the corridor, or at its intersection with North 27th Avenue. It is notable that Durston Road carries a higher volume of east- west traffic than Oak Street. Improved north-south connectivity between Durston Road and Oak Street west of Davis Lane would contribute to a more balanced distribution of traffic. Regardless, as additional east-west and north-south arterials and collectors are developed adjacent to Durston Road, demand along Durston Road can be expected to stabilize. • Although not warranted at this time, consideration should be given to funding for a potential signal at North 27th Avenue / Oak Street and/or North 27th Avenue / Durston Road. The West Winds Developer has signed a "Waiver of Protest to SID" for the potential future signal improvements. April 2007 Page 45 of 46 H E N G I N EERI N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study Bozeman, MT 2007 Update • Improvements to adjacent streets should be constructed to City of Bozeman approved street standards. Consideration for future signalization of collector-arterial and arterial- arterial intersections should be made, including appropriate setbacks and sight visibility zones. • Site drive accesses should be developed according to local standards, should incorporate appropriate throat depths, and provide for the safe passage of pedestrians across the drive access. Pedestrian crosswalks should be installed at each site driveway. • Exclusive right-turn lanes at site drive accesses are not considered necessary or warranted as right-turn demands are predicted to be below 100 vph during the peak 411 traffic hours. V, 4. • An exclusive left turn lane should be considered on the westbound (east) leg of the intersection of Oak Street / North 27th Avenue. Analysis of MDT warrants for an exclusive left turn lane indicate that a left turn lane should be considered on the westbound (east) leg of the intersection, due to the high percentage of left turns. • The development of the West Winds Community is not expected to increase collision rates at the study intersections. The will be verified in a supplemental memo when updated accident data is received from MDT and analyzed. Submittal of this memo is anticipated by June 1, 2007. • Due to winter weather conditions, 24-hour traffic data was not collected. As weather improves, 24-hour traffic data will be collected and ADT shown in this report will be verified. Updated ADT's will be submitted in memo format by June 1, 2007. April 2007 Page 46 of 46 E N G I N E E R I N 0 APPENDIX SECTION ONE a w X Q N N C N � 0) E 0 o a U cc m1Q G I-, .- , ' n NN N i , on00 IIV m W •- ,O M A W 1O M m V n LL LL �T m p AO) LL LLC O a , - i•� `o a s U o a sw 0 0 LL a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z `z o o a z z z z `z z z z z z z z z z z z 'o O O C 2 0 x x U aw _ ¢z za z z z z z z z zzz z z z za a ? EL� a a Y a o o o o o o 0 N y w W V) 0 v v a m 0 > c c O m m A A O N N R N N N M r m C C y O m m N Pm') N IU W m R I(7 m N m r a a a E c P ¢ O F LL U. r y a a ¢ z ¢ Q a a ¢ g g 6 4 g ¢ zz z z zz d z zz z zz z z z z z z m a a a a Q a ¢ a a g < a a g a ¢ v a a a g ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a z zz 3 z z 'z z z z z z z `z z z z a z z z zzz z zz zz z z � v e Q Q a s < a a a a Q ) r O N N O O cv zzzzzz zz z z 'zz `zzz t3 ` pODr � mm mom ' O o R a a a a a a a a a a g a ¢ g a a z a a a g a a a ¢ a a a a g g a a N ° z z z z z z z z z z z zz `z z zz z zz z zzz 'z z z z z zzz z 3 z LL a a a Q a Q a ¢ a a 4 g ¢ a a ¢ J O O O V Z Z z z Z z z z z z 2 a Z 12 z z J V ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ g ¢ a ¢ ¢ a a a ¢ a a y ¢ ¢ ¢ g ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a g ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ` a z z z z 'z z z z zz zz z 'z z z z z a z z z z z z z z z zz z,z zzz z ~ � a .O > C a a o o u> In v v v v In -It1, M M W In m a `d Q 4 ¢ Q a g a ¢ ¢ g g g gag Q a z z zzz z z z z z z z z z z z O xx a c O c pp m a N r A y� O M (� N N N M m � N a < N f� N N M N � E i O Q tL LL Z z z z Z a Z Z z N a) to �D U) m M r J 2 z z z z z z -a J E g a a aaa a a a ¢ < g g a a e a a ¢ a a g g a a ¢ a a a g g g a z z z z z z z z z z z` z z z z z a ZZ z z z z z z z z zz z z z z z z Z 0 N O N 1) a L a a Q g a g ¢ a Q a Q 4 g g ¢ CO N m m A m m 10 10 m N m m 0L z N z z z z z z z 0 ' ¢3 'z z z z ' zzz 'z J O Q) t y t� lL w o r z L F t C Z 0 z a ¢ a Q a Q ¢ s a a Q a a Q a a a w Q ° a o a ¢ a < a a a a a a g a 4 ¢ a a o > o EE z z z z z' z z z z zzz z z z z = E x z z z zzzz zz zz z zz z z z zz z w 0 Z LL Z P z co M o m In In K m oLU Q a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a H J z z zzz zz z z z z zz 3 'z z z 'z w LU L15 ovi v v v oo Y E Z r; rr o0 00 of ao v r v vv n i 0 Y ( vi ai m o O I� A r A m W W m K 4 R R Yf VI Y) N O a Ul _N O U N C 0 O U N N X Q N M C � � OI E 0 o a I.m 6 2 N N N N_W M •] :V my N O ^ LL l 7 �' JI W S W p. p N W W fp N W M N C) LLOaN M 1� M1 W 1Ml/ x S C O a M LO iO to tD N ? ui iA to W - V O d a - V # a s N o `O 75 3 `o `o r �m ' - as agaa ga ggaaaaaa LLLL aaa aagaa aaggaggg CL zz z `z z z z z zz z z `z z z zz zz `z 0 0 a z z z z 'z z z 'z 'z zzz 'z z z z 0 0 0 xx W r O a s a p mWm� S O Y m M CO N M W IO m W W Ol IO CO CO r„p a. _O O O � O N M � O O N ^ �' � M O O (U Qrf ' U Ul w C N N = y y W A N G W 0 O y N L •0-1 yl a ?� m O N O OI W n n W M M R < 0 0 O O G O O N R O M � W N N N N N o ¢a o G ¢a LL LL ✓V N N N N M O � M UO (0 W � N N r- 71 dd+ N d a a a g g a a g a a a a d a a g a aaa a a g a g a g a <z g a g g n. z zz z z z z z z z zz `z zz z~ z z z o'• z z 'z z z zz z zz z 'z zzz z z IC p 'o Q c � L O O O N N i� IO 7 � W � W Q � W � L a R �1 V W Ol n N Y n � n O W 3 c a 0 d z= z = 1 r Q m � r m N i ti W m O N O N 0 N W fW'') O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N W W N N N N M f+) E � LL E Q n W C) W m M W I- rn W W OI n W a) CI 0 0 N N O N N N M N O V v g a a a a a a g a a a a a a a a 5 aaa a_ a g a a a a a a g g a g i a z 'z z` z `z z zzz zz z zz zz z z zz z a z zz z z 'z z z zz z zz z zz z z z z _ 0 n 'r O W L O N N N N � N n OI N m O N O W V fV m � Q a a — L m N ? N N a � ln]1 W U •' {r') W O O G N O O M O R y 0 0 W m IO coW �j V (h N M(� O } E W LL LL rl fV N N n M m W 0 r0 O N M fV N ul N R W 10 m n n Q Y J W n a g s < g g a g a g a a a g g g Q i, a a a g a a g g g g g a a g g W E .� a zzzz z z `z z z z z zzz z z Z m zz z z .z z z z z zz zzz zzz z W = o C) t L N M N N G O W00 y o r r- C) t m m L L y ' 7 o p ryN (mV (RV 10 Nm NW m np M M ((OVV7 = 0 Z e N .�! N N (V N N N N N M N N Z 0 O O O N E Z E F Q E c Q o W Z 1, Cl) N M N W W M •] Z J N IN O 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 N Q Q C I!) O Nf O Y1 O O 0 O C r ''J `I O M < O �• O - �' e7 Q O r M C O ly 4 O r• M Y O ? c0 w 00 f0 C� f Q e M In N h )O 2 ti n n ci c0 00 u0 Orn t K Y Yi iti h h i0 L O IO O Y) O Vf O JI 4 Yf N h O Mf 0 10 0 1n O N O 10 O N O N O 10 Y O M Y O �- M Y O �- In Y IF M q '• C O Cn ? O '- M Y O e M ? O M V N Z ti n n A W m W m ? R R ? Yf t n ri Z n r : io W W 00 e R R N n m M a � � C v v w U N O U N C J O U U�N X-O U N 7 C N E O pp E a N N Pl ^ Y T n Olz oo M r m iP po S j m. N 1 = to m W n mN Of W Ol M = rS A •f 7 O T 7 .y. II II _ N II II N 6pp) LLLL c 6 `� M� MO^ T ^ 2 O19 7Mm1� 2 = C a TLL W N n tT N N m m O'1 N N CV N 2 2 c p 6 Ul .�- �-W 2 O _ N N n •f N a s Uo as Uo N N 3 0 0 o `o w m m u ti " a a a a a a a a aaa a a a as IL'L paaEQaQa¢ ¢ aQ ¢ aQQ2 lLl1 9 a `z Z z z zz z z z z z z z `zzzz � `= azzzZzzzz 'z 'zz 'z `zzzz oo 0 2 2 U Y Y L N N m L a.a a- .. ¢ ¢ < ¢ ¢_ ¢ ¢_ ¢_ ¢ ¢ a ¢ a 6 ¢ Z C C _ 0 0 0 O N M 0 0 N M O O O V M D Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z O O a r rd ° 6 L N d 00 O 3 O m N f� Y Cl) O N n f� m f•1 m O O) C C ?� O r7 m A m N(n II��V 01 O C C E 7 n 01 � 7 m m �� E O N N 7 ? 1? NN Nr-NNM NNN �a Q r ¢d O r a LL U. •- M i� l7 N m n m N m 7 7 N I� O m y -- O t^1 M- N�o N�N N N P1� _ J � a ¢ e aaaga aaaaaaaa � ,z ? gaaaaa aaaaaaaa n z zzzz azz zz z z z 3z3z Rzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz !C a o - 3 � a aaa as aa_ a a_ aaaaa_ aa c° oo �� �N poN �Nrvmu• L z Z; z z 2 z 2 z z z z z 2 z Z z N N T2 LL o ¢ a s a g a a ¢ g g a a a g a a ' o v 0 Z Z z z Z z Z z Z Z z Z�z z Z 2 E NN ?•nv - TNNN EMT r E iL o C LL U. ¢ ¢ 4 6 V 'z z 'z z `z z zz z z z zz z z 'z z z � aaaaad_ aa aaaaaaaa gsa4a¢aa2 aaaaaaaa a 'zz2zzzz `z zzzzzzzzzz azzzzzzzz zzzz3z3zz H a a t C C = O ° L O O f r7 ry �- ? m n M n O O 10 N m .'t. O^? n -t `1 n d'M N n ry•D G dog L G Vl L q�qOr n 0 •i 'A N 1>7 ((pp N Im n O LO N N M M [r ♦ VI m m m m � m m F- m d) aaaaaaaa a aaagaga 'oloMm`c�,��N � Z z z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 2 Z j N 1+114t: N cm Q $ a a d a 6 a Q a a a a a a a a $ ¢¢aaa ¢ S¢ aa¢Qaiaad O aZzzz2 zz zzzz `zz ' zzz H n. zz`zzzzzz zzzzzzzzz Z ' W g O 'o - WO O ) r OO N UN N N N M M V M 0 M ul n 0 0N0 Z�C p a a a Q a a a ¢ a a a aQ aaa p O � oM•a o? T+r ? TNN -r Z Z zz z `z z z z zz z zz zzzz z z z z Q E Q E Q o o z w LL` LU a` Z � m m 0 m m n •D M Ol 7 Z U O O M ltl ? N v O V tV N? •1 O M W ` � W J J > > r Q Q L •O O Yf O IA O M O 10 O 1(I O N p = N pp U)O N 4 N 0 N O N O N O N O 0 ti ., O .- M . O _ R M O C rs ..M Y O e�K O ..M 4 0 M Q O Lo Z n f. n f0 Ki eD to Q• e a Y V/ vi •f1 1!i o0 E Z n h h W W al W Of v V Vf in h h N E t N N O N p• v) O !fl O !fl O ' O 10 O Y) O •O N h O If)O O O N O N O N O N O-O N Y c 0 •-` M V O `• In d O T 7 0 n I1 < c 0 M) 7 0 M 7 O�`M T O to 7 !p Z n n n n m W W O) � a ♦ O vl .n v) h Z nnA n W m m B 7 77'PNN N N Ol a n G C J O O Z1 O U O c 7 O U .w X Q 9 U1�O C N � Or Ea 0 Y v tM�6 S a C`ri rUru bi�0 NO pCNS�r O Qpi N N--N oWn2u oe2f non Ga N ��Nryry�N as 3 m m m a a a a a a a a a a LL LL N azzzzz¢zz az zzz 'z 'z 'z 'z 'z oo a _= U Y Y Y (L as w O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N O - 0 0 -a C CD O d y N N 12 bt W W G b c c o 0 0 0 0 0Hddd+ LL ddd+ 0 0 �Tgaaaaag aa ¢ aagga azzgzzzzzz zzzzz `zzzzz m o 0 :0 tu 0 c 00000 - t V c 8 N Q F a rt>rn N Ql(O lTf c r0 ':V rn � O m m fD N N VEl � LL O 6 O O O O 0 0 O G 0 0 0 0 /+ J V a -,a <aaaaa aaaaaa¢¢ ` azzzzzzzz zzzzzzz H c' V c = O c �N w ....11 Qgaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa J azzzzzzzz 'zzz 'zzzzz'z 2 � Q J o _ C�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�]O N 2 p7xcr t G Z4N oNrnmc 'D ¢om n a Noco E Q c € o W ci z m w Q ~ ti E �' n m ai m up oo :i ui ui vi vi u 'o N rn ' orn o u�ovT oin orn oin ovToui L rr C O♦'V1 P 0 r n P O rl'h P O� 17'.f m 0 Z n N A A m m OD CO ♦P P P Vt to N N a c C C D a a w u w 0 U C 7 O U West Winds Planned Community 2007 Update -System Peak Hour INTERSECTION w w Z ° w Q z LLJ a w w Z Q cy w W -' w V7 = w O ai U > Y w Q x N a Y 2 > ,- x x a Q Q z c� Q O u PEAK o Y p = U) °0 o p F HOUR HOUR z = z o o z z Q TOTAL OF THE a °° a z z a a w a SYSTEM w 0 C Q w w = w z z w w = = z = a w w z z z w z w w w M > > Q Q > > Uj w U) vri Q x Q x a Q N p Q rn n F ~ x IO Y o N c Z a0 v Z z Z W Z 'n 7:00 194 232 151 209 1316 174 615 348 47 2891 AM 7:15 237 264 168 244 1419 211 752 390 54 3295 PEAK 7:30 249 280 174 260 1497 245 823 439 69 3528 HOUR 7:45 239 283 171 263 1491 240 811 414 64 3498 8:00 227 245 163 233 1475 221 774 378 63 3338 TOTAL 1146 1304 827 1209 7198 1091 3775 1969 297 16550 4:00 254 277 214 245 2204 234 799 465 95 4227 P M 4:15 278 304 253 267 2288 254 857 501 98 4501 PEAK 4:30 312 368 289 330 2409 279 901 563 100 4888 HOUR 4:45 338 382 280 347 2400 285 913 591 94 4945 5:00 325 380 277 344 2444 276 918 592 88 4964 TOTAL 1507 1711 1313 1533 11745 1328 4388 2712 475 23525 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2010 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5.00%.AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 1. BAXTER LANE AND DAVIS LANE From North(Southbouna) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min DAVIS LN. BAXTER RD. DAVIS LN. BAXTER RD. Count Interval Left 'Through Right Ped Left Throuqh Right I Ped Left Throughl Right Ped Left Through Roll Ped w/o Peds 7:30-7,45 1 6 4 N/A 3 14 1 N/A 0 5 4 N/A 2 21 2 N/A 63 7:45-8:00 1 11 6 N/A 2 12 0 N/A 0 10 2 N/A 0 27 1 N/A 72 8:00-8115 2 6 5 N/A 1 14 4 N/A 2 8 4 N/A 2 17 1 N/A 60 8:15-8:30 1 6 2 N/A 1 11 1 N/A 2 2 0 N/A 2 16 2 N/A 48 Peak Hour Vol 5 29 17 0 7 51 6 0 4 25 10 0 6 83 6 0 249 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 5 29 17 0 7 51 6 1 0 4 25 10 0 6 83 6 0 249 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 2010 Background 6 34 20 0 8 59 7 0 5 29 12 0 7 96 7 0 290 Site Trips 3 0 3 2 8 Pass-bv Adi.n Backgroud+site 9 34 20 0 6 59 10 0 5 29 14 0 7 96 71 0 298 PHF= 86.5% 5:00-5:15 1 17 4 N/A 4 25 1 N/A 1 11 0 N/A 6 13 1 N/A 64 5:15-5:30 2 12 7 N/A 2 23 5 N/A 1 12 3 N/A 14 20 0 N/A 101 5:30-5:45 0 8 5 N/A 4 19 7 N/A 1 10 1 N/A 6 18 2 N/A 81 5:45-6:00 0 11 4 N/A 1 6 2 N/A 6 7 1 N/A 6 11 4 N/A 59 Peak Hour Vol 3 48 20 0 11 73 15 0 9 40 5 0 32 62 7 0 325 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1-0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad') 3 48 20 0 11 73 15 0 9 40 5 0 32 62 7 0 325 Growth Rate 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 15 .1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 76 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 3 56 23 0 13 85 17 0 10 46 6 0 37 72 6 0 376 Site Trips 1 2 2 1 6 Pass-b Adj. Background+Site 4 59 23 0 13 85 19 0 10 46 7 0 37 72 8 0 382 PHF= 100 3% 2.OAK STREET AND BUCKRAKE AVENUE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min BUCKRAKE OAK ST. BUCKRAKE OAK ST. Count Interval Lett Through Throughl Right Ped Left ThrouqM1 Right Ped Left Through Throughl Right I PedrLeltThrough R" ht Ped wlo Peds 7:30-7:45 0 0 0 N/A 0 22 1 N/A 1 0 3 N/A 37 0 N/A 64 7:45-8:00 1 0 1 N/A 1 28 0 N/A 1 0 5 N/A 52 0 N/A 69 8:00-8:15 0 0 2 N/A 1 27 1 N/A 1 0 1 N/A 33 1 N/A 68 6:15-8:30 0 0 2 N/A 0 22 1 N/A 0 0 5 N/A 28 1 N/A 59 Peak Hour Vol 1 0 5 0 2 99 3 0 3 0 14 0 150 2 0 280 Adjustments 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak HourIAd') 1 U 5 0 2 99 3 0 3 0 14 0 1 150 2 0 280 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.15761 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.15761 1.15761 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1,1576 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 1 0 1 6 0 2 115 3 0 3 1 16 7�0 1 174 2 0 324 Site Trips 14 3 1 7 •1 1 29 58 Pass-byAd'. Background+Site 15 0 9 1 2 122 7 0 3 1 16 2 2 0 382 PHF= 109.4% 5:00-5:15 0 0 1 N/A 6 45 3 N/A 2 0 3 N/A 2 28 1 N/A `51 515-5:30 1 0 0 N/A 4 73 1 N/A 1 0 3 N/A 0 33 1 N/A 117 5:30-5:45 3 1 0 N/A 2 55 1 N/A 0 0 4 N/A 5 26 0 N/A 97 5:45-6:00 0 0 1 N/A 8 42 1 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 1 22 0 N/A 75 Peak Hour Vol 4 1 2 0 20 215 6 0 3 0 10 0 8 109 2 0 380 Adjustments 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad► 4 1 2 0 20 215 6 0 3 0 10 0 8 109 2 0 380 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1,1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1 1576 1 1.1576 1 1.1576 1 1 1576 1 1,1576 2010 Background 5 1 2 0 23 249 7 0 3 1 12 0 9 126 2 1 0 1 440 Site Trips 8 2 1 28 14 4 19 Pass-b Adj. Background+Site 13 4 4 1 23 277 21 1) 3 1 12 0 13 145 2 0 515 PHF= 979% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xls(2010 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2010 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5.00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 3.OAK STREET AND DAVIS LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min DAVIS LN. OAK ST. DAVIS LN. OAK ST. Count Interval Left NNA Right Ped Left Throu h Rrghl Ped Lett Throu h Right Ped Lett Through Right Ped w/o Peds 7:30•7:45 4 8 N/A N/A 13 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 11 N/A N/A 48 7:45•8:00 3 8 N/A N/A 16 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 11 N/A N/A 51 8:00-6:15 4 5 N/A N/A 17 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4 7 N/A N/A 41 8:15•8:30 3 7 N/A N/A 13 4 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 7 N/A N/A 34 Peak Hour Vol 14 28 0 0 59 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 36 0 0 174 Adjustments 1.0000 10000 1,0000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1-0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 ri0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad') 14 0 28 0 0 59 18 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 36 0 0 174 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1 15761 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 16 0 32 0 0 68 21 0 0 0 0 0 22 42 0 0 201 Site Trips 8 2 10 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 16 0 1 32 0 1 0 76 21 0 0 0 0 0 22 144 0 0 1 211 PHF= 85.3% 5:00.5:15 5 N/A 20 N/A N/A 24 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 21 N/A N/A 86 5:15.5:30 4 N/A 8 N/A N/A 32 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 13 N/A N/A 74 5:30-5:45 9 N/A 12 N/A N/A 27 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 7 N/A N/A 67 5:45.6:00 0 N/A 8 N/A N/A 17 6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 8 N/A N/A 50 Peak Hour Vol 18 0 48 0 0 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 42 49 0 0 277 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad') 18 0 1 48 0 1 0 100 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 42 49 0 0 277 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1,1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1 776 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 21 0 56 0 0 116 23 0 0 0 0 0 49 57 0 0 322 Site Trios 4 9 13 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 21 0 56 0 0 120 23 0 0 0 0 1 0 49 1 66 0 0 335 PHF= 1034% 4.OAK STREET AND HUNTERS WAY From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min HUNTERS WAY OAK ST. HUNTERS WAY OAK ST. Count Interval Left Thro-ughl Right Ped Left Ttvou h Ri ht Ped Left Through Throughl Right Ped LTft_T_T,1_rnug7h R' ht Ped w/0 Peds 7:30-7:45 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 22 N/A N/A 0 N/A 8 N/A N/A 29 1 N/A 60 7:45.8:00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 27 N/A N/A 0 N/A 10 N/A N/A 38 0 N/A 77 6:00-8:15 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 26 N/A N/A 0 N/A 12 N/A N/A 25 1 N/A 69 8:15.8:30 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 22 N/A N/A 0 N/A 15 N/A N/A 15 0 N/A 54 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 9 97 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 107 2 0 260 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.00o0 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad') 0 0 0 0 9 97 0 0 0 1 0 45 1 0 0 107 2 0 260 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 11576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1,1576 1.1576 11576 2010 Background 0 0 0 0 10 112 0 0 1 0 52 0 0 124 2 0 301 Site Trips 14 3 4 3 4 1 1 15 45 1--Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 1 14 3 4 0 10 115 4 0 1 1 52 0 1 139 1 2 0 346 PHF= 1083% 5:00-5:15 N/A N/A I N/A N/A 5 43 N/A N/A 1 N/A 8 N/AKNIA 22 0 N/A 79 5:15-5:30 N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 59 N/A N/A 1 N/A 10 N/A 23 0 N/A 109 5:30-5:45 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 42 N/A N/A 2 N/A 12 N/A 18 1 N/A 88 5:45-6:00 N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 36 N/A N/A 1 N/A 6 N/A 17 1 NIA 68 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 41 180 0 0 5 0 36 0 80 2 0 3" Adjustments 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1-0000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 0 0 0 0 1 41 180 0 0 5 0 36 0 0 80 2 0 344 Growth Rate 11576 1 1.1576 1 1.1576 11576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1,1576 11576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1.1576 1 1.1576 1.1576 1 1.1576 1 11576 1 L1576 2010 Background 0 0 0 0 47 208 0 0 6 0 42 0 0 93 2 0 398 Site Trips 7 2 2 2 14 3 4 12 46 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 7 2 2 0 47 210 14 0 6 3 42 0 1]4 105 1 2 0 444 PHF= 977% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined As(2010 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2010 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5,00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 5. N. 19TH AVENE AND TSCHACHE LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 19TH TSCHACHE 19TH TSCHACHE Count Interval Left 1hroughl Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Left IThrough Right I Peds w/o Peds 7:30-7:45 3 250 4 N/A 3 0 2 N/A 3 103 0 N/A 2 0 8 N/A 378 7:45-8:00 2 222 3 N/A 2 2 2 N/A 6 126 2 N/A 2 1 1 3 N/A 373 8:00-8115 6 228 1 N/A 1 0 2 N/A 3 102 2 N/A 3 0 6 N/A 354 8:15-8:30 6 259 1 N/A 2 1 1 N/A 3 114 3 N/A 0 0 2 N/A 392 Peak Hour Vol 17 959 9 0 8 3 7 0 15 445 7 0 7 1 19 0 1497 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 1-0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad') 17 959 9 0 8 3 7 0 15 445 7 0 7 1 19 0 1497 Growth Rate 1 1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 20 1110 10 0 9 3 8 0 17 515 8 0 8 1 1 22 0 1731 Site Trips 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 14 23 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 20 1110 11 0 9 4 8 0 21 515 8 0 10 2 38 0 1754 PHF= 955% 5:00-5:15 10 207 2 N/A 18 4 10 N/A 9 306 10 N/A 6 3 11 N/A 596 5:15-5:30 16 233 0 N/A 18 0 26 N/A 7 339 11 N/A 5 1 6 N/A 662 5:30-5:45 10 215 1 N/A 10 1 20 N/A 6 310 6 N/A 2 1 9 N/A 591 5:45-6:00 13 229 0 N/A 6 0 16 N/A 8 300 10 N/A 7 1 5 N/A 595 Peak Hour Vol 49 884 3 0 52 5 72 0 30 1255 37 0 20 6 31 0 2444 Adjustments 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 49 884 3 0 1 52 5 1 72 0 30 1255 37 0 20 6 31 0 2444 Growth Rate 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.15761 1.15761 1 15761 1.1576 1 1.15761 1.15761 1.1576 1 1 15761 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 2010 Background 57 1023 3 1 0 60 6 83 1 0 35 1 1453 43 0 23 7 36 0 2829 Site Trips 2 1 14 1 1 7 26 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 57 1023 5 0 60 7 83 0 49 1453 43 0 24 8 43 0 2855 PHF= 92.3 6. N.27TH AVENUE AND BAXTER LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min THOMAS DR. BAXTER RD. 27TH BAXTER RD. Count Interval Left Through Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Left Through PZ ht Peds w/o Peds 7:30-7:45 2 0 0 N/A 3 16 0 N/A 1 0 12 N/A 1 19 1 N/A 55 7:45-8:00 1 0 0 N/A 2 18 0 N/A 2 0 6 N/A 1 34 1 N/A 65 6:00-8:15 1 0 0 N/A 2 20 0 N/A 2 0 9 N/A 2 20 0 N/A 56 8:15-8:30 2 0 1 N/A 5 24 1 N/A 0 0 7 N/A 0 27 2 N/A 69 Peak Hour Vol 6 0 1 0 12 78 1 0 5 0 34 0 4 100 4 0 245 Adjustments 1-0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1,0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 6 0 1 0 12 78 1 0 5 0 34 0 4 100 4 0 245 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1,1576 2010 Background 7 1 1 0 14 90 1 0 6 1 39 0 5 116 5 0 286 Site Trips 4 1 14 6 25 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 7 1 1 0 18 91 1 0 6 1 53 0 5 122 1 5 0 311 PHF= 94.2% 5:00-5:15 4 1 0 N/A 11 37 1 N/A 1 0 6 N/A 0 16 1 N/A 78 5:15-5:30 0 2 1 N/A 17 43 0 N/A 1 1 5 N/A 0 13 0 N/A 83 5:30-5:45 0 1 0 N/A 10 33 0 N/A 0 1 2 N/A 1 13 1 N/A 62 5:45.8:00 1 1 0 N/A 4 19 3 N/A 1 0 7 N/A 0 14 3 N/A 53 Peak Hour Vol 5 5 1 0 42 132 4 0 3 2 20 0 1 56 5 0 276 Adjustments 10000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 5 5 1 0 42 132 1 4 0 1 3 2 20 0 1 1 56 5 0 276 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1-1576 1.1576 2010 Background 6 6 1 0 49 153 5 0 3 2 23 0 1 65 6 0 320 Site Tri s 14 6 7 3 30 Pass-byAdj. Background+Site 6 6 1 0 63 159 5 0 3 2 30 0 1 68 6 0 350 PHF= 83.1 Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xls(2010 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2010 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5.00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 7. N. 27TH AVENUE AND DURSTON ROAD From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 27TH DURSTON N/A DURSTON Count Interval Lett Throu n Right Peds Left Through Right Peds tN/A Through Right Peds Lett Throu h Right Peds w/o Peds 7:30-7:45 18 N/A 9 N/A N/A 36 2 N/A N/A NIA N/A 17 97 NIA N/A 179 7:45-8:00 13 N/A 14 N/A N/A 42 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 114 N/A N/A 197 8:00-8:15 17 N/A 10 N/A N/A 45 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 141 N/A N/A 226 6:15-8:30 11 N/A 19 N/A N/A 56 4 N/A N/A NIA N/A 16 115 N/A N/A 221 Peak Hour Vol 59 0 52 0 0 179 8 0 0 0 0 0 58 467 0 0 823 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 59 0 1 52 0 0 179 8 0 0 0 0 0 56 1 467 0 0 823 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 11576 1.1576 1.1576 11576 2010 Background 68 0 60 0 0 207 9 0 0 0 0 0 67 541 0 0 952 Site Trips 3 11 1 3 18 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 71 0 71 0 0 207 10 0 0 0 0 0 70 541 1 0 1 0 970 PHF= 1149% 5:00-5:15 6 N/A 26 N/A N/A 95 15 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 83 N/A N/A 246 5:15-5:30 5 N/A 29 N/A N/A 105 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 17 76 N/A N/A 239 5:30-5:45 9 N/A 22 N/A N/A 87 12 N/A N/A N/A N/A NIA 16 74 N/A N/A 220 5:45-6:00 4 N/A 20 N/A N/A 86 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 79 N/A N/A 213 Peak Hour Vol 24 0 97 0 ! 0 373 42 0 0 0 0 0 70 312 0 0 918 Adjustments 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 24 0 1 97 0 0 373 42 0 0 0 0 0 70 312 0 0 918 Growth Rate 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1,1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 15761 1 1576 1,1576 2010 Background 28 0 112 0 0 432 49 0 0 0 0 1 0 81 361 0 0 1063 Site Trios 2 2 3 12 19 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 1 30 0 114 1 0 1 0 432 52 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 93 361 0 0 1082 PHF= 960% 8. N.27TH AVENUE AND OAK STREET From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 27TH OAK ST. 27TH OAK ST. Count Interval Left Through Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Lett Through Right Peds w/o Peds 7:30-7:45 3 4 1 N/A 2 23 0 N/A 0 10 27 N/A 2 41 0 N/A 113 7:45.8:00 6 0 2 N/A 4 33 1 N/A 1 4 14 N/A 3 48 1 N/A 117 8:00-8:15 1 a 0 N/A 8 26 4 N/A 2 5 B NIA 1 36 1 N/A 96 8:15-8:30 4 8 2 N/A 11 20 4 NIA 2 5 22 N/A 2 32 1 N/A 113 Peak Hour Vol 14 16 5 0 25 102 9 0 5 24 71 0 8 157 3 0 439 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1-0000 10000 1-0000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 14 16 1 5 0 25 102 9 0 5 1 24 71 1 0 6 157 3 0 439 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1676 1 1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 2010 background 16 19 5 0 29 118 10 u 6 28 82 0 9 182 3 0 503 Site Trips 11 8 9 3 2 2 35 7 77 Pass-b Ad'. Background+Site 27 27 6 0 29 127 13 0 8 30 82 0 9 217 10 0 585 PI IF= 97.1 5:00-5:15 a 3 N/A 30 51 2 N/A 1 5 15 NIA 2 25 2 NIA 1" 5:15-5:30 4 11 9 N/A 31 67 7 N/A 1 1 12 N/A 3 24 3 N/A 173 5:30-5:45 0 4 7 N/A 25 70 2 N/A 0 3 16 NIA 1 20 0 N/A 148 5:45-6:00 3 7 0 N/A 20 41 6 N/A 0 6 15 N/A 0 25 1 N/A 127 Peak Hour Vol 11 26 19 0 106 232 17 0 2 15 58 0 6 94 6 0 592 Adjustments 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 11 26 19 0 106 232 17 0 2 15 58 0 6 94 6 0 592 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 11576 1.1576 1 1 1576 1.1576 1.1b76 1 1576 1.1576 1 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1.15761 1.1578 2010 Background 13 1 30 1 22 0 123 269 26 0 2 17 67 0 7 109 7 I 0 686 Site Trips 6 4 35 12 7 8 18 4 94 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 19 34 22 0 123 304 32 0 9 25 67 0 1 7 1 127 11 0 1 780 PFIF= 85 5' Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xls(2010 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2010 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5 00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 9. N. 27TH AVENUE AND TSCHACHE LANE From North(Soul hboundI From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min TSCHACHE 27TH TSCHACHE 27TH Count Interval Left Through Right Peds Left I mou h Right Peds Left Through Right Peds Leh Tnrou h RM:iht Peds wlo Peds 7:30-7:45 0 5 0 N/A 1 0 0 N/A 0 12 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 18 7:45-8:00 0 8 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 8 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A It; 0:00-8:15 0 3 0 N/A 0 0 1 N/A 1 8 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 13 8:15-8:30 0 11 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 9 1 N/A 1 0 0 N/A 22 Peak Hour Vol 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 37 1 0 1 0 0 0 69 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1_0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 19000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad') 0 27 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 37 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 69 Growth Rate 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1678 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1516 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 1.1576 2010 Background 0 31 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 43 1 0 1 0 0 U 79 Site Trips 3 4 2 1 4 1 3 4 4 7 6 3 A:: Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 1 3 3:i 2 0 2 4 2 0 4 47 5 0 8 6 3 0 121 PHF= 95.8% 5:00-5:15 0 14 0 N/A 0 0 0 _NIA 0 8 0 N/A 0 0 0 WA 22 5:15-5:30 0 20 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 6 0 N/A 0 0 0 NIA 28 5:30-5:45 0 10 0 WA 0 0 0 N/A 0 6 0 N/A 0 0 1 N/A 17 5:A5-6:00 0 e 1 NIA 0 0 0 N/A 0 12 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 21 Peak Hour Vol 0 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 53 Adjustments 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad 0 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 88 Growth Rate 1.1576 1 1576 1,1576 1.1576 1.1576 1 1576 1 1576 1.1676 1.1576 1 1.1578 1 1.1576 1 1.1516 1 1,1576 1.1576 1 1.1576 1 1.1576 1 1.1579 2010 Background 0 50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 1 U '101 Site Trips 2 4 6 3 11 3 10 7 1 3 3 2 55 Pass-by Adj. Background+Sitc 2 64 7 0 3 11 3 0 10 46 1 0 1 3 3 1 3 0 1 156 PHF= 78.6% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xis(2010 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic(Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2014 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5 00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 1. BAXTER LANE AND DAVIS LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min DAMS I.N. BAXTER RD. DAVIS I.N. BAXTER RD. Count Interval Leh Thrr.hulh Rigw Pod :Alt Throuqh Rq ht Pod LEtft Thm,ah RI ht Pad Left Throu h Rttlhl Port wlo Pads 7:30-7:45 1 6 4 N/A 3 14 1 N/A 0 5 4 N/A 2 21 2 N/A 63 7AS•8:00 1 11 6 N/A 2 12 0 N/A 0 10 2 N/A 0 27 1 N/A 71 8t00.8:15 2 6 5 N/A 1 14 4 N/A 2 8 4 N/A 2 17 1 WA 6f 8:15-8:30 1 6 2 N/A 1 11 1 N/A 2 2 0 N/A 2 18 2 N/A 48 Peak Hour Vol 5 29 17 0 7 51 6 0 4 2S 10 0 6 83 6 0 249 Adjustments 1 0000 1 onnn 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 10000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 NA Peak Hour(Ad') 5 29 17 0 7 51 6 0 4 25 10 0 6 83 6 0 244 Growth Rate 14071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 1 1 4071 2014 Background 7 41 24 0 10 72 8 0 6 35 14 0 8 117 8 0 350 Phase 1.3 Site Trips 3 0 3 2 8 2014 BG+Ph 13 10 41 24 0 10 72 11 0 6 35 1 16 0 8 117 8 0 358 Phase 441 Site TrI s 6 1 7 3 17 1 35 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 10 47 24 0 11 79 11 0 9 52 16 0 8 117 9 0 393 PHF= 86 5 5:00-8:15 1 17 4 WA 4 25 1 WA 1 11 0 N/A 6 13 1 WA 84 5:15-5:30 2 12 7 WA 2 23 5 N/A 1 12 3 WA 14 20 0 N/A 101 5:30-5:45 0 8 5 N/A 4 19 7 N/A 1 10 1 N/A 6 18 2 N/A 8t 5:46-6:00 0 11 4 N/A 1 6 2 N/A 6 7 1 N/A 6 11 4 NIA 59 Peak Hour Vol 3 48 20 0 11 73 15 0 9 40 5 0 32 62 7 0 325 Adjustments 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 10000 1.0000 1-0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad) 3 48 20 0 11 73 15 0 9 40 5 0 32 62 7 0 325 Growth Rate 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 1 4071 1 1 4071 1 1 4071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 14071 1,4071 2014 Background 4 68 28 0 15 103 21 0 13 1 56 7 1 0 45 87 10 0 457 Phase 13 Site Trips 1 2 2 1 6 2014 BG+Ph 13 5 70 28 0 15 103 23 0 13 56 8 0 45 j 97 10 0 463 Phase 441 Sit*Trips 17 13 10 2 12 3 57 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 5 87 28 0 28 113 23 0 15 6B 9 0 45 87 17 0 520 PHF= 1003% 2.OAK STREET AND BUCKRAKE AVENUE From North(Southbound) From Fast(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min BUCKRAKE OAK ST. BUCKRAKE OAK ST. Count Interval Left Through Right Ped Left Through Right Ped Leh IThrough flight Ped Left TKrourth Rtrint I Pod w/o Pads 7:30-7:45 0 0 0 WA 0 22 1 N/A 1 0 3 N/A 0 37 0 N/A 04 7:45•8:00 1 0 1 N/A 1 28 0 N/A 1 0 5 N/A 0 52 0 N/A 69 8:00-8:15 0 0 2 N/A 1 27 1 N/A 1 0 1 N/A 1 33 1 N/A Bit 8:15-8:30 0 0 2 N/A 0 22 1 N/A 0 0 5 N/A 0 28 1 NIA 59 Peak Hour Vol 1 0 5 0 2 99 3 0 3 0 14 0 1 150 2 0 280 Adjustments 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 10000 1.0000 1 0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1 0000 10000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad 1 0 5 0 2 99 3 0 3 0 14 0 1 150 2 0 28G Growth Rate 14071 14071 14071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 1 4071 1 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1.10;1 2014 Background 1 0 7 0 3 139 4 0 4 0 20 0 1 211 3 0 393 Phase 13 Site Trips 14 3 7 4 1 1 29 '+'1 2014 BG+Ph 13 15 0 10 0 3 146 8 0 4 0 20 1 0 2 240 3 0 451 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 14 13 5 24 =f Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 29 0 10 0 3 159 13 0 4 0 I 20 0 2 264 3 0 507 PHF= 1094% 5!00-5:16 0 0 1 N/A 6 45 3 WA 2 0 3 WA 2 28 1 N/A 91 5:16-5:30 1 0 0 N/A 4 73 1 N/A 1 0 3 N/A 0 33 1 N/A 117 5:30-5:45 3 1 0 N/A 2 55 1 N/A 0 0 4 N/A 5 26 0 N/A 97 5:45•6:00 0 0 1 N/A 8 42 1 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 1 22 0 N/A 75 Peak Hour Vol 4 1 2 0 20 215 6 0 3 0 10 1 0 8 109 2 0 380 Adjustments 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1 0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 NW4 Peak Hour Ad' 4 1 2 0 20 215 6 0 3 0 10 0 8 109 2 0 '000 Growth Rate 14071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 1 4071 14071 1.4071 1 4071 14071 14071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1 71 1 4071 1,4071 2014 Background 6 1 3 0 28 303 8 0 4 0 14 0 11 153 I 3 40 0 1 534 Phase 1.3 Site Trips 8 2 28 14 4 19 75 - 2014 SG+Ph 1-3 14 1 5 0 28 331 22 0 4 0 14 0 15 172 3 0 609 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 9 27 13 16 05 Pass-by Ad'. .Background+Site 23 1 5 0 26 358 35 0 4 0 14 0 15 18B 3 0 1283 PHF= 979% Peak Counts-West Winds Update Combined.xls(2014 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2014 year buildoul,Mainline AGR=5.00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 3.OAK STREET AND DAVIS LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min DAVIS LN. OAK ST. DAVIS LN. OAK ST. Count Interval LPtt 'Through Right Ped Left Through Right Pod Lett Through Right I Ped Left Throu h Right Ped w/o Peds 7:30.7 45 4 N/A 8 N/A N/A 13 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A WA 7 11 WA N/A 48 7:45.8:00 3 N/A 8 N/A N/A 16 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 _ 11 NIA N/A 51 8:00-8:15 4 N/A 5 N/A N/A 17 4 N/A WA WA N/A N/A 4 7 NIA N/A 41 8:15-8:30 3 N/A 7 WA N/A 13 4 WA N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 7 N/A NIA _ Peak Hour Vol 14 0 28 0 0 59 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 36 0 0 174 Adjustments 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 14 0 28 0 0 59 18 n 0 0 0 0 19 36 0 0 174 Growth Rate 1 4071 1 4071 1 1 4071 14071 14071 1 4071 14071 14071 1 4071 1 1 4071 1,4071 1.4071 1 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 1 a07' 2014 Background 20 0 39 0 0 83 25 0 0 0 0 0 27 51 0 0 245 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 8 2 1" 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 20 0 39 0 0 91 25 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 63 0 0 255 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 4 12 9 8 19 73 _Pass-by Adj.Background+Slte 24 0 51 0 0 100 33 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 310 PHF= 853% 5:00-5:15 5 NIA 20 N/A N/A 24 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 13 21 N/A N/A 66 5:15.5:30 4 N/A 8 N/A N/A 32 6 WA WA N/A N/A N/A 11 13 N/A N/A 74 5:30-5:45 9 N/A 12 N/A WA 27 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7 7 N/A N/A 67 5:45-6:00 0 WA 8 N/A WA 17 6 WA N/A N/A N/A WA 11 8 N/A N/A Peak Hour Vol 18 0 48 0 0 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 42 49 0 0 277 Adjustments 1.0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 0000 1,0000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 00001 10000 1 0000 1 0000 1.0000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 18 0 48 0 0 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 42 49 0 0 Growth Rate N38 1.4071 1.4071 14071 14071 14071 1.4071 14071 14071 14071 14071 14071 14071 1.4071 14071 14071 tao7s� 2014 Background 0 68 0 0 141 29 0 0 0 0 0 59 69 0 0 390 Phase 11-3 Site Trips 4 9 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 0 68 0 0 145 28 0 0 0 0 0 59 78 0 0 403 Phase 4A Slte Tri s 13 6 2 8 8 50 Pass-byAdj.. Background+Site 0 81 0 0 151 30 0 0 0 0 0 67 88 0 0 453 PHF= 103 4% 4.OAK STREET AND HUNTERS WAY From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 45-min HUNTERS WAY OAK ST. HUNTERS WAY OAK ST. Count Interval Lett Through Right Ped Left Through Right Ped Left Through Ritirit I Ped Left IThroughl Ri ht Ped w/o Peds 7.30-7:45 WA WA WA N/A 0 22 N/A N/A 0 N/A 8 1 N/A N/A 29 1 WA 60 7:45.0:00 N/A N/A WA WA 2 27 N/A N/A 0 N/A to N/A N/A 38 0 N/A 77 8:00-8:16 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 26 N/A N/A 0 WA 12 WA N/A 25 1 N/A 59 6:15.8:30 N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 22 N/A WA 0 N/A 15 N/A N/A 15 0 N/A 54 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 9 97 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 107 2 0 260 Adjustments 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 1.00o0 1.0000 1.O000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 0 0 0 0 9 97 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 107 2 1 0 200 Growth Rate 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 14071 1,4071 1 4071 1 1.4071 1 4071 14071 1.4071 1.4071 14071 14071 2014 Background 0 0 0 0 13 136 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 151 3 0 366 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 14 3 4 3 4 1 1 15 45 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 14 3 4 0 13 139 4 0 0 1 63 0 1 166 3 0 411 Phaco 4-8 Site Trips 15 3 3 9 4 1 1 15 51 Pass-by Adj. Background+Site 1 29 1 6 7 0 13 143 5 0 0 2 63 0 2 181 3 0 1 462 PHF= 108 3% 5:00-SAS N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 43 WA N/A 1 N/A 8 N/A N/A 22 0 N/A 79 5:15-5:30 N/A N/A WA N/A 16 59 WA N/A 1 N/A 10 N/A N/A 23 0 N/A 109 5:30-5:45 N/A N/A N/A WA 13 42 WA N/A 2 N/A 12 N/A NIA 18 1 N/A 68 5:45.6:00 WA N/A N/A N/A 7 36 WA WA 1 N/A 6 WA N/A 17 1 N/A 68 Peak Hour Vol 0 0 0 0 41 180 0 0 5 0 36 0 0 80 2 0 344 Adjustments 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 0 0 0 0 41 180 0 0 5 0 36 0 0 80 2 0 344 Growth Rate 1.4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 2014 Background 0 0 0 0 58 253 0 0 7 0 51 0 o 113 3 0 485 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 7 2 2 2 14 3 4 12 46 2014 BG+Ph 1.3 7 2 2 0 58 255 14 0 7 3 51 0 4 125 3 0 531 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 10 2 2 15 12 3 3 10 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 17 4 1 4 1 0 58 270 26 0 1 7 6 51 r 0 7 135 3 0 588 PHF= 97 7% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xls(2014 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic (Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2014 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5.00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 5.N. 19TH AVENE AND TSCHACHE LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 19TH TSCHACHE 19TH TSCHACHE Count Interval Lott Through Rrcht Ped5 Left Twou h Rioht Peas Left Through Right I Pen, Lett Thrcnr h Right I Pods w/o Peas 7:30-7:45 3 250 4 WA 3 0 2 N/A 3 103 0 N/A 2 0 8 N/A 378 7:45-8:00 2 222 3 N/A 2 2 2 WA 6 126 2 N/A 2 1 3 N/A 373 8:00.OAS 6 228 1 N/A 1 0 2 N/A 3 102 2 N/A 3 0 6 N/A 354 8:15.8:30 6 259 1 N/A 1 2 1 1 N/A 3 114 3 N/A 0 0 2 N/A M Peak Hour Vol 17 969 9 0 a 3 7 0 15 445 7 0 7 1 19 0 1497 Adjustments 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1-0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 17 959 9 0 8 3 7 0 15 445 7 0 7 1 '19 0 1d97 Growth Rate 14071 14071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1A071 2014 Background 24 1349 13 0 11 4 10 0 21 626 10 0 10 1 27 0 2106 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 1 1 4 2 1 14 23 2014 BG+Ph 1.3 24 1349 14 1 0 11 5 10 0 25 626 10 0 12 2 41 0 2129 Phase 4.8 Site Trips 3 9 9 17 _ 6 3 a� Passb Ad'. Back round+Sfte 24 1349 17 0 20 14 27 0 31 628 10 0 12 5 41 0 2176 PHF= 955% 6:00.6:15 10 207 2 N/A 18 4 10 N/A 9 306 10 N/A 6 3 11 WA 596 5:15•5:30 16 233 0 N/A 18 0 26 N/A 7 339 11 NIA 5 1 6 N/A 662 6:30-5:45 10 215 1 N/A 10 1 20 N/A 6 310 6 N/A 2 1 9 N/A 591 5:45-6:00 13 229 0 N/A 6 0 16 N/A B 300 10 N/A 7 1 5 N/A 595 Peak Hour Vol 49 884 3 0 52 5 72 0 30 4255 37 0 20 6 31 0 _2444_ Adjustments 1.00o0 1A0o0 Lo000 1An00 1.00o0 10o00 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1,0000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad 49 884 3 0 52 5 72 0 30 1255 37 0 20 6 31 0 "A.1.1 Growth Rate 1.4071 14071 1.4071 1 4071 1 1 4071 14071 14071 14071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 2014 Background 69 1244 4 0 73 7 101 0 42 1766 52 0 28 8 44 0 1 3438 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 2 1 14 1 1 7 :n 2014 BG+Ph 1.3 69 12" 6 0 73 a 101 0 56 1766 52 0 29 9 61 0 3464 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 8 6 6 12 17 e 1,7 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 69 1244 14 0 79 14 113 0 73 1766 52 0 29 17 51 0 3521 PHF= 923% 6.N.27TH AVENUE AND BAXTER LANE From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-mfn THOMAS DR_ BAXTER RD. 27TH BAXTER RD. Count Interval Left Through Right Fads Left Through Pught Peas Left Through Right Pods Left Through Right Pods win Peas 7:30-7:46 2 0 0 N/A 3 16 0 N/A 1 0 12 N/A 1 19 1 N/A 55 7:45-8:00 1 0 0 N/A 2 1 B 0 N/A 2 0 6 N/A 1 34 1 WA 65 8:00-6:15 1 0 0 N/A 2 20 0 WA 2 0 9 N/A 2 20 0 N/A % 8:16.8.30 2_ 0 1 N/A 5 24 1 N/A 0 0 7 N/A 0 27 2 N/A 69 Peak Hour Vol 6 0 1 0 12 78 1 0 5 0 34 0 4 100 4 0 245 Adjustments 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour(Adj) 6 0 1 0 12 78 1 0 5 0 34 0 4 100 4 0 245 Growth Rate 14071 14071 1.4071 1.4071 1.4071 14071 14071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1,4071 2014 Background 6 0 1 0 17 110 1 0 7 0 48 0 6 141 8 0 345 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 4 1 14 6 25 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 6 0 1 0 21 111 1 0 7 0 62 0 6 147 6 0 370 Please 4.8 Site Trips 1 2 8 7 5 2 8 7 40 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 1 8 1 1 3 1 0 1 29 118 1 0 1 12 2 1 62 0 14 154 6 1 0 410 PHF= 942% 5:00-6:16 4 1 0 N/A 11 37 1 N/A 1 0 6 N/A 0 16 1 N/A 78 5:15.5:30 0 2 1 WA 17 43 0 N/A 1 1 5 N/A 0 13 0 N/A 83 5:30-5:45 0 1 0 N/A 10 33 0 N/A 0 1 2 N/A 1 13 1 N/A 62 5:46-6:00 1 1 0 N/A 4 19 3 WA 1 0 7 N/A 0 14 3 WA 5.9 Peak Hour Vol 5 5 1 0 42 132 4 0 3 2 20 0 1 56 5 0 276 Adjustments 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 1,0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 5 5 1 0 42 132 4 0 3 2 20 0 1 56 5 0 Y7c Growth Rate 1,4071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 14071 14071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1.4071 14071 1.4071 1.4071 2014 Background 7 7 1 0 59 186 8 1 0 4 3 28 0 1 79 7 0 1 388 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 14 6 7 3 30 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 7 7 1 0 73 192 6 0 4 3 35 0 1 62 7 0 418 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 3 5 22 20 6 14 22 20 1 t2 Pass-by Adj. _ Background+Site 7 10 8 0 95 272 6 0 10 17 35 0 23 102 7 0 530 PHF= 83.1 Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined As(2014 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic(Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2014 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5 00%.AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 7.N.27TH AVENUE AND DURSTON ROAD From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 27TH DURSTON WA DURSTON Count Interval Left Through Rion: I Peas Leff Throo r. R 7hl Pods Loft JTOrGvgls Rl ht Peds Loft ihro, h Rr ht Pow, w/o Pods 7:30-7:45 1B NIA 9 N/A N/A 36 2 WA N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 97 N/A N/A 17fi 7:45-8:00 13 N/A 14 N/A N/A 42 1 N/A WA N/A N/A N/A 13 114 NIA N/A 197 8:00-8:16 17 N/A 10 N/A N/A 45 1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12 141 N/A NIA 220 8:15•8:30 11 N/A 19 N/A N/A 56 4 NIA N/A WA N/A N/A 16 115 N/A N/A 221 Peak Hour Vol 59 0 52 0 0 179 a 0 0 0 0 0 58 467 0 0 823 Adjustments 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 59 0 52 0 0 179 8 0 0 0 0 0 58 467 0 0 823 Growth Rate 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 14071 1,4071 2014 Background 83 0 7] 0 0 252 11 0 0 0 0 0 82 657 0 0 1158 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 3 11 1 3 tt` 2014 BG+Ph 13 86 0 84 0 0 252 12 0 0 0 0 0 85 667 0 0 1176 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 3 14 1 5 L3 _ Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 89 0 9a 0 0 252 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 90 657 0 0 199 PHF= 1149% 5:00-5:15 6 WA 1 26 WA N/A 95 15 1 N/A NIA N/A N/A WA 21 83 NIA N/A 246 5:15-5:30 5 WAr29 NIA N/A 105 7 N/A N/A WA N/A N/A 17 76 N/A NIA 239 5:30.5,45 9 NIA N/A N/A 87 12 N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A 16 74 N/A N/A 2'20 5:45-6:00 4 N/A WA N/A 86 8 N/A N/A N/AN/A WA 16 79 N/A N/A 213 Peak Hour Vol 24 0 0 0 373 42 0 0 0 0 0 70 312 0 0 918 Adjustments 1,0000 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad' 24 0 97 0 0 373 42 0 0 0 0 0 70 312 0 0 918 Growth Rate 1 4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 14071 14071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 lAl,'71 2014 Background 34 0 136 0 0 525 59 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 96 439 0 0 1291 Phase 13 Site Trips 2 2 3 12 19 2014 BG+Ph 13 36 0 138 0 0 525 62 0 0 0 0 0 110 439 0 0 1310 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 2 9 3 13 27 Pass-by Ad]. Background+Site 1 38 0 147 0 0 525 65 0 0 0 0 0 123 439 0 0 1337 PHF= 96.0% 8.N.27TH AVENUE AND OAK STREET From North(Southbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From West(Eastbound) Int 15-min 27TH OAK ST. 27TH OAK ST. Count Interval Left Thruu h R; hl Pods Left 7wou h Fir hl Paris Lott Thrr Qri RI ht Peds Leh Twoucitil fZ hl I Pods w/o Pods 7:30-7:45 3 4 1 N/A 2 23 0 NIA 0 10 27 WA 2 41 1 0 1 N/A 113 7:45-8:00 6 0 2 WA 4 33 1 N/A 1 4 14 WA 3 48 1 NIA 117 8:00-6:15 1 4 0 NIA 8 26 4 N/A 2 5 8 NIA 1 36 1 NIA 96 8:15-8:30 4 8 2 NIA it 20 4 N/A 2 5 22 N/A 2 32 1 NIA 113 Peak Hour Vol 14 16 5 0 26 102 9 0 5 24 71 0 1 6 157 3 0 439 Adjustments 10000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1.0000 10000 1.0000 1 00001 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad 14 16 5 0 25 102 9 0 5 24 71 0 1 8 157 3 0 439 Growth Rate 1 4071 14071 1 4f.'71 14071 1 4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1.4071 14071 1 4071 1 411071 1AU71 1.4071 1.4071 1 4071 11 4071 2014 Background 20 23 7 0 35 144 13 0 7 44 100 0 11 221 4 0 619 Phase 1.3 Site Trips 11 8 9 3 2 2 35 7 77 2014 BG+Ph 13 31 31 7 0 35 153 16 0 9 36 100 0 11 256 11 0 696 Phase 4.8 Site Trips 9 5 9 3 4 2 26 12 70 Pass-by Adj. I Background+Site 40 36 7 0 ]5 162 19 0 13 38 too 0 11 282 23 0 766 PHF= 971% 5:00-5:15 4 4 3 NIA 30 51 2 NIA 1 5 15 NIA 1 2 25 2 N/A 6:15-5:30 4 11 9 WA 31 67 7 WA 1 1 12 WA 3 24 3 WA 5:30-5:45 0 4 7 NIA 25 70 2 N/A 0 3 16 WA 1 20 0 WA 5:45-6:00 3 7 0 N/A 20 44 6 WA 0 6 15 WA 0 25 1 WA Peak Hour Vol 11 26 19 0 106 232 17 0 2 15 58 ' 0 6 94 6 0 5e2 Adjustments 1,0000 1.0000 1.0000 1,0000 1 0000 1 0000 1,0000 1 0000 1 0000 1,(Y= 1 0000 1.0000 1.0000 1 0000 1 OOOWO 1.OW0 Peak Hour Ad' 11 26 19 0 106 232 17 0 2 15 58 0 6 94 6 0 Growth Rate F2? 14071 14071 14071 14071 14071 1,4071 1A0'71 14071 1.4071 14071 14071 1.4071 14071 14071 1.4071 2014 Background 37 Z7 j 0 149 326 24 0 3 T1 92 0 a 132 a 0 532 Phase 1-3 Slte Trips 4 35 12 7 B 18 4 94 2014 BG+Ph 13 41 27 0 149 361 38 0 10 29 82 0 a 150 12 0 926 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 3 25 8 12 4 17 8 83 Pass-by Ad'. Background+Site 44 27 0 149 386 44 0 22 33 82 0 a 167 20 0 1009 711'IF= 85.5% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.As(2014 Background and Site) January 2006 Background Traffic(Adjusted; Peak Hour of the System) (Assumes 2014 year buildout,Mainline AGR=5.00%,AM Peak=7:30,and PM Peak=5:00) 9.N.27TH AVENUE AND TSCHACHE LANE From North(Souhbound) From East(Westbound) From South(Northbound) From west(Eastbound) Int 15-min TSCHACHE 27TH TSCHACHE 27TH Count interval Left Through Riaht Pods Leh Tnr n Ri nt Peds Left Through Right Pads Lett Throe h Ri Ihl Ped, w/o Pads 7.30-7t45 0 5 0 N/A 1 0 0 N/A 0 12 0 N/A 0 0 0 NIA 10 _ 7:45-8:00 0 6 0 WA 0 0 0 N/A 0 6 0 NIA 0 0 0 N/A 16 8:00-8:15 0 3 0 WA 0 0 1 N/A 1 8 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 13 &I S-8:30 0 11 0 N/A 0 0 0 NIA 0 9 1 N/A 1 0 0 NIA 22 Peak Hour Vol 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 0 / 37 / 0 1 0 0 0 69 Atl'ustmants 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 1.0000 1A000 10000 NA Peak Hour(Ad)) 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 37 1 0 1 u 0 0 69 Growth Rate 1.4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4t'71 1.4071 1,4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 1 4071 14071 2014 Background 0 30 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 62 1 0 1 0 0 0 95 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 3 4 2 1 4 1 3 4 4 7 6 3 42 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 3 42 2 0 2 4 2 O 4 56 5 0 8 6 3 0 137 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 10 4 5 4 2 3 10 14 5 67 Pass-b Ad'. Back round+Sito 13 42 2 0 1 6 9 6 0 6 59 15 0 8 20 8 0 194 PHF= 95 8% 5100.SAS 0 14 0 N/A 0 0 0 WA U 8 U WA 0 0 0 WA 22 5:15-5:30 0 20 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 8 0 WA 0 0 0 WA 28 5:30•5:45 0 10 0 N/A 0 0 0 WA 0 6 0 N/A 0 0 1 N/A 17 6:45.6:00 0 6 1 WA 0 0 0 WA 0 12 0 NIA 0 0 0 N/A 21 Peak Hour Vol 0 52 1 0 0 0 D 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 88 Adjustments 1.0000 1.Oo00 1.0000 LOWO I.DOW 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 10000 10000 10000 1.0000 10000 10000 NA Peak Hour Ad 0 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 BB Growth Rate 1 4071 1.4071 1.4071 1.4071 14071 14071 14071 1-4071 1 4071 14071 1 4071 14071 1,.1071 1 4071 14071 1.4071 1.4071 2014 Background 0 73 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 1 0 123 Phase 1-3 Site Trips 2 4 6 3 11 3 10 7 1 3 3 2 55 2014 BG+Ph 1-3 2 77 7 0 3 11 3 0 10 55 1 0 3 3 3 0 178 Phase 4-8 Site Trips 7 10 1 10 5 7 7 9 3 59 Pass-by Ad'. Back round+Site 9 77 7 0 13 12 13 0 15 62 8 0 3 12 6 0 237 PHF= 76.6% Peak Counts--West Winds Update Combined.xls(2014 Background and Site) January 2006 APPENDIX SECTION TWO Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period AM Existing Analysis Year 2007 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 1 0 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 7 1 19 8 3 7 15 445 7 17 959 9 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N ,V Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 30.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 1 G = 15.0 1 G = 45.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7CFAmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing Y= 4 Iy= 0 Iy= 0 IY= 0 IY= 3 Y= 7 Iy= 0 Iy= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 - --A-Cycle Length C = 104.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7CF.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 7 1 19 8 3 7 15 445 7 17 959 9 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Flow Rate 7 1 15 8 3 5 16 464 6 18 999 8 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 23 8 8 16 464 6 18 999 8 Proportion of LT or RT 0.304 -- 0.652 1.000 -- 0.625 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 10.980 0.980 fs 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 10.900 10.900 0.900 fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.960 10.742 1.000 0 -- .950 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- Secondary fLT __ 0.153 0.153 -- 0.399 0.399 -_ f RT 0.912 -- 10.906 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 fLpb ---- -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 10-950 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- f RPb 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 __ 1.000 1.000 -- Adjusted Satflow 1468 1244 1519 1622 3208 11432 1606 3176 1512 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7CF.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 I Secondary Adjusted I I I I262 1492 -- 675 9269 ISatflow file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7CF.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 23 8 8 16 464 6 18 999 8 Satflow Rate 1468 1244 1519 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.43 0.43 0.64 0.43 0.43 Lane Group Capacity 423 359 438 365 1388 620 570 1374 654 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.33 0.01 0.03 0.73 0.01 Flow Ratio 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.31 0.01 Critical Lane Group y N N N N N y y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.34 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.41 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 23 8 8 16 464 6 18 999 8 Lane Group Capacity 423 359 438 365 1388 620 570 1374 654 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.33 0.01 0.03 10.73 0.01 Green Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.43 0.43 0.64 0.43 0.43 Uniform Delay d1 26.7 26.5 26.5 9.6 19.6 16.8 7.1 24.4 16.8 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 26.8 26.5 26.5 9.6 20.2 16.8 7.1 27.2 16.9 Lane Group LOS C C C A C 8 A C 8 Approach Delay 26.8 26.5 1 19.8 26.7 Approach L-O C 8 C Intersection Delay 24.6 Intersection LOS C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:21 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7CF.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Pagel of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agencyor_Co. _HKM_Engineering Area Type CBD-or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period PM Existing Analysis Year 2007 Intersection Geomet Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 I 0 0 i 1 0 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Volume(vph) 20 6 31 52 5 72 30 1255 37 49 884 3 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 20.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 20.0 G = 50.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Iy= 0 Y= 0 IY= 0 IY= 4 Y= 7 IY= 0 IY= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 1 1 Cycle Length C = 105.0 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 20 6 31 52 5 72 30 1255 37 49 884 3 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adjusted Flow Rate 22 7 33 57 5 77 33 1364 40 53 961 3 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 62 57 82 33 1364 40 53 961 3 Proportion of LT or RT 0.355 -- 0.532 1.000 -- 0.939 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 19.995 0.995 10.995 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0 -- .898 0.740 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- Secondary fLT __ 0.186 0.186 -- 0.072 0.072 f RT 0.928 -- -- -- [0.859 1.000 [0.850 1.000 0.850 f Lpb -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- f Rpb 1.000 -- 1.000 -- -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 -- Adjusted Satflow 1398 1240 1440 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 SecondISatflow ary Adjusted I I I __ I I I I318 I598 I I�22 I 230 1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SIB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 62 57 82 33 1364 40 53 961 3 Satflow Rate 1398 1240 1440 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 11512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.73 0.48 0.48 0.73 0.48 0.48 Lane Group Capacity 266 236 274 482 1528 682 375 1512 720 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.30 0.07 0.89 0.06 0.14 0.64 0.00 Flow Ratio 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.43 0tN O3 0.03 EN ]0.00 Critical Lane Group N N Y N Y Y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.52 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.62 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 62 57 82 33 1364 40 53 961 3 Lane Group Capacity 266 236 274 482 1528 682 375 1512 720 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.30 10.07 0.89 0.06 0.14 0.64 0.00 Green Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.73 0.48 0.48 0.73 0.48 0.48 Uniform Delay d1 36.0 36.1 36.5 6.1 25.1 14.8 11.3 20.7 14.4 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.0 5.7 0.1 0.1 1 1.8 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 36.5 36.6 37.1 6.2 30.8 14.9 11.5 22.4 14.4 Lane Group LOS D D I D A C B 13 C 8 Approach Delay 36.5 36.9 29.7 21.8 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Delay 27.2 Intersection LOS C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:24 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k7F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period AM Background Analysis Year 2010 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 1 0 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 8 1 22 9 3 8 17 515 8 20 1110 10 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 10.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 10.96 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 EW P�t file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k804.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 10.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 6.0 G = 90.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 3 Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs =0.25 ICycIeLengthC = 120.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k804.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 8 1 22 9 3 8 17 515 8 20 1110 10 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Flow Rate 8 1 18 9 3 5 18 536 6 21 1156 8 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 27 9 8 18 536 6 21 1156 8 Proportion of LT or RT 0.296 -- 0.667 1.000 -- 0.625 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 10.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 10.980 10.980 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 9 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f 0.900 0.900 10.900 0.900 19.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 a fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.929 0.744 1.000 10.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Secondary fLT _ 0.207 10.207 -- 0.427 0.427 -- fRT 0.910 0.906 1.000 10.850 1.000 0.850 -- -- -- -- fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 10.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- -- Adjusted Satflow 1417 1247 11519 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k804.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Iattflo Secondary Adjusted I I I I354 665 -- 1722 11356 I I file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k804.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 27 9 8 18 536 6 21 1156 8 Satflow Rate 1417 1247 1519 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 j 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.86 0.75 0.75 0.86 0.75 0.75 Lane Group Capacity 118 104 127 367 2406 1074 664 2382 1134 v/c Ratio 0.23 10.09 0.06 0.05 0.22 0.01 10.03 0.49 0.01 Flow Ratio 10.02 10.01 0.01 0.01 110.17 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.01 Critical Lane Group Y N N N N N Y Y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.40 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.47 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 27 9 8 18 536 6 21 1156 8 Lane Group Capacity 118 104 127 367 2406 1074 664 2382 1134 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.09 0.06 10.05 0.22 0.01 0.03 0.49 0.01 Green Ratio 0.08 0.08 10.08 0.86 10.75 0.75 10.86 10.75 0.75 Uniform Delay d1 •51.4 50.8 50.7 2.2 4.5 3.8 1.4 5.9 3.8 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 10.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 52.4 51.1 50.9 2.3 4.7 3.8 1.4 6.4 3.8 Lane Group LOS D D D A A A A A A Approach Dela 52.4 51.0 4.6 6.3 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Delay 6.9 Intersection LOS A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:25 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k804.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM-Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period PM Background Analysis Year 2010 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 1 0 � 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume(vph) 23 7 36 160 6 83 35 1453 43 57 1023 3 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 2 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 112.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 1 F- EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 1 I I I file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tema\s2k815.tmn 4/21/gom Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 16.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 6.0 G = 74.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 IY= 0 Y= 0 IY= 0 IY= 3 Y= 7 IY= 0 ly= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 lCvc[eLengthC = 110.0 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k815.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 23 7 36 60 6 83 35 1453 43 57 1023 3 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adjusted Flow Rate 25 8 34 65 7 85 38 1579 41 62 1112 1 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 67 65 192 1 38 1579 41 62 1112 1 Proportion of LT or RT 0.373 -- 10-507 1.000 -- 0.924 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0,980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fs 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.799 0.712 1.000 0.950 1.000 __ 0.950 1.000 -- -- _ Secondary fLT __ 0.202 0,202 -- 0,100 0.100 -- f RT 0.931 0.861 -- 1 1.000 10.850 .000 0.850 -` fLpb -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 fRpb -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 __ Adjusted Satflow 1248 1193 1444 1622 3208 1432 1606 13176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k815.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 ISaeflondary Adjusted I I I I I I - I 345 I 648 I - 1168 I316 I -- l file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k815.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 67 65 92 38 1579 41 62 1112 1 Satflow Rate 1248 1193 11444 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 12.0 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.79 0.67 0.67 0.79 0.67 0.67 Lane Group Capacity 182 174 210 342 2158 963 212 2137 1017 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.44 0.11 0.73 0.04 0.29 0.52 0.00 Flow Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.49 0.03 0.04 0.35 0.00 Critical Lane Group N N Y I N Y N Y N N Sum Flow Ratios 0.59 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.71 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 67 65 92 38 1579 41 62 1112 1 Lane Group Capacity 182 174 210 342 2158 963 212 2137 1017 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.44 0.11 0.73 0.04 0.29 0.52 0.00 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.79 0.67 0.67 0.79 0.67 0.67 Uniform Delay d1 42.4 42.5 42.9 4.0 11.6 6.1 8.1 9.1 5.9 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 1.3 1.4 1 1.5 0.1 1.1 0.0 1 0.6 0.7 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Control Delay 43.7 43.8 144.4 4.0 12.7 6.1 8.7 9.8 5.9 Lane Group LOS D D D A B A A A A Approach Delay 43.7 44.1 12.3 9.7 Approach LOS D D B A Intersection Delay 13.6 Intersection LOS B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:25 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k815.tmn 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period AM Background+Ph 1-3 Analysis Year 2010 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 1 0 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 10 2 36 9 4 8 21 515 8 20 1110 11 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 110.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P I P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 1 0 4 0 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 .i,; Y . �i% nI N N �! N N N N Par'King( vi 1�� iv Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeftLocal Settings\Temp\s2k826.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 10.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 7.0 G = 89.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 3 Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 ICycIeLengthC = 120.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k826.trnn 4i?Ii')nn7 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 10 2 36 9 4 8 21 515 8 20 1110 11 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Flow Rate 10 2 32 9 4 4 22 536 4 21 1156 6 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 44 9 8 22 536 4 21 1156 6 Proportion of LT or RT 0.227 -- 0.727 1.000 -- 0.500 11.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 w fHv 0.980 0.980 1 10.980 0.980 10.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 9 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P f nn 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 a fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 10.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.941 0.781 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Secondary fLT 0.205 10.205 __ 0.426 0.426 fRT 0.902 -- -- -- 0.925 1.000 0.850 1.000 10.850 fLPb ---- 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 - -- -- fRPb -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 -- -- -- Adjusted Satflow 1423 1309 1551 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k826.tYnp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Secondary Adjusted I I �� 11353 Satflow � _� �- 351 659 720 l file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k826.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 44 9 8 22 536 4 21 1156 6 Satflow Rate 1423 1309 1551 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.86 0.74 0.74 0.86 0.74 0.74 Lane Group Capacity 119 109 129 376 2379 1062 670 2356 1121 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.23 0.00 0.03 0.49 0.01 Flow Ratio 0.03 1 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.00 Critical Lane Group Y N N Y N N N Y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.41 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.48 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 44 9 8 22 536 4 21 1156 6 Lane Group Capacity 119 109 129 376 2379 1062 670 2356 1121 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.23 0.00 0.03 0.49 0.01 Green Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.86 0.74 0.74 0.86 0.74 0.74 Uniform Delay d� 52.0 50.8 50.7 2.3 4.8 j 4.0 1.4 6.3 4.0 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 1.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 54.0 51.1 50.9 2.4 5.0 4.0 1.4 6.9 4.0 Lane Group LOS D D D A A A A A A Approach Delay 54.0 51.0 4.9 6.8 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Delay 7.8 Intersection LOS A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:26 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k826.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT ffAgency rmation Site Information L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache o. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD-or Similar Date Performed 4%10/2007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period PM Background+Ph 1-3 Analysis Year 2010 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 7 0 � 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 24 8 43 60 7 83 49 1453 143 57 1023 5 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 1 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k88C.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 16.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 7.0 G = 73.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 3 Y= 7 IY= 0 IY= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 110.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k88C.trnp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 Nna DJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET n st Winds TIS 2007 Update t EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 24 8 43 60 7 83 49 1453 43 57 1023 5 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92. 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 Adjusted Flow Rate 26 9 41 65 8 85 53 1579 41 62 11112 2 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 76 65 93 53 1579 41 62 1112 2 Proportion of LT or RT 0.342 -- 0.539 1.000 -- 0.914 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1-1-067 1.000 11.0671 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 ::fl.-005 980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f9 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.005 11-005 10.995 0.995 0.995 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 fLu 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.793 0.683 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Secondary fLT __ 0.200 0.200 0.097 0.097 fRT 0.927 _- 0.863 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 f Lpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Adjusted Satflow 1232 1145 1447 1622 13208 11432 1606 13176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k88C.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Secondary Adjusted Satflow I I I I I I I341 I641 - I164]A308 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k88C.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 76 65 93 53 1579 41 62 1112 2 [Green t'ow REe1232 1145 11447 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 st Time2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Rat0.15 0.15 0.15 0.79 0.66 0.66 0.79 0.6 00.66 Lane Group Capacity 179 167 210 351 2129 950 221 2108 1003 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.39 0.44 0.15 0.74 0.04 0.28 0.53 0.00 Flow Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.49 0.03 0.04 0.35 0.00 Critical Lane Group N N Y N Y N Y N N Sum Flow Ratios 0.60 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.71 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB Lane Group LTR1167 L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 7665 93 53 1579 41 62 1112 2 Lane Group Capacity 179 210 351 2129 950 221 2108 1003 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.39 0.44 0.15 0.74 0.04 0.28 10.53 0.00 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 10.15 0.79 0.66 0.66 0.79 0.6 00.66 Uniform Delay di 42.8 42.6 42.9 4.1 12.3 6.4 8.4 9.6 6.2 Delay Factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 1.6 1.5 1.5 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.6 0.8 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Control Delay 44.4 44.1 44.4 4.2 13.7 6.5 9.0 10.4 6.2 Lane Group LOS D D D A 8 A A 8 A Approach Delay 44.4 44.3 13.2 10.3 Approach LOS D D 8 8 Intersection Delay 14.4 Intersection LOS g Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:28 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k88C.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period AM Background with Ph 1-3 Analysis Year 2014 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 1 0 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume(vph) 12 3 41 11 5 10 25 626 10 24 1349 14 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 110.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P I A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 1 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 1 5 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k848.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing4of G = 1�OG = 0.�O �G� = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 6.0 G = 88.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4Y= 0 = 0 Y= 0 Y= 3 Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 0 Durational sis hrs Cycle Length C = 120.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k848.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 12 3 41 11 5 10 25 626 10 24 1349 14 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Flow Rate 13 3 38 11 5 6 26 652 6 25 1405 9 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 54 11 11 26 652 6 25 1405 9 Proportion of LT or RT 10.241 -- 0.704 1.000 -- 0.545 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 9 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f 10.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 a feu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.938 0.723 1.000 10.950 1.000 10.950 1.000 Secondary fLT __ __ 10.147 0.147 -- 0.373 0.373 -- f RT -- -- -- 0.905 0.918 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 -- fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 fRPb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 -- -- -- Adjusted Satflow 1424 1212 1539 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k848.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Secondary Adjusted I I 250 471 630 11183 Satflow -- 1 1 -- file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k848.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 54 11 11 26 652 6 25 1405 9 Satflow Rate 1424 1212 1539 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.10 0.10 10.10 110.84 0.73 10.73 0.84 0.73 10.73 Lane Group Capacity 142 121 154 279 2353 1050 579 2329 1109 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.09 10.07 10.09 0.28 0.01 10.04 10.60 10.01 Flow Ratio 0.04 0.01 ,0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 10.02 10.44 10.01 Critical Lane Group Y N N Y N N N Y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.50 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.58 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 54 11 11 26 652 6 25 1405 9 Lane Group Capacity 142 121 154 279 2353 1050 579 2329 1109 v/c Ratio 10.38 10.09 10.07 0.09 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.60 10.01 Green Ratio 10.10 0.10 10.10 0.84 0.73 10.73 10.84 10.73 10.73 Uniform Delay d1 50.5 49.0 48.9 3.8 5.4 4.3 1.8 7.7 4.3 Delay Factor k 10.11 0.11 110.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 10.50 10.50 Incremental Delay d2 1.7 0.3 1 0.2 0.1 0.3 1 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 52.2 49.4 49.1 1 3.9 5.6 4.3 1.8 8.6 4.3 Lane Group LOS D D D A A A A A A Approach Delay 52.2 49.3 5.6 8.4 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Delay 9.0 Intersection LOS A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:26 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k848.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Pagel of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM_Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period PM Background with Ph 1-3 Analysis Year 2014 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 0 � 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 7 Volume and Timbiq in of EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 29 9 51 73 8 101 56 1766 52 69 1244 6 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated (P/A) A I A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 4 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0::j 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 1 03 04 1 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k859.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 16.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 6.0 G = 74.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 IY= 0 Y= 0 IY= 0 IY= 3 Y= 7 IY= 0 IY= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 1 ICycIeLengthC = 110.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k859.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 29 9 51 73 8 101 56 1766 52 69 1244 6 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 Adjusted Flow Rate 32 10 50 79 9 104 61 1920 51 75 1352 2 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 92 79 113 61 1920 51 75 1352 2 Proportion of LT or RT 10.348 -- 10-543 1.000 -- tO.920 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 f Lu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.655 0.639 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- Secondary fLT __ 0.144 0.144 0.049 0.049 -- fRT -- -- 0.927 0.862 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 -- '- fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- f Rpb 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- -- Adjusted Satflow 1017 1072 1445 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k859.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 IS a on Adjusted I I I I I I I245 1dary460 I - 183 1157 -- file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k859.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SIB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 92 79 113 61 1920 51 75 1352 2 Sattlow Rate 1017 11072 1445 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.79 0.67 0.67 0.79 0.67 0.67 Lane Group Capacity 148 156 210 268 2158 963 153 2137 1017 v/c Ratio 10.62 0.51 0.54 0.23 10.89 0.05 0.49 0.63 0.00 Flow Ratio 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.60 10.04 0.05 0.43 110.00 Critical Lane Group Y N N I N Y N Y N N Sum Flow Ratios 0.74 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.88 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 92 79 113 61 1920 51 75 1352 2 Lane Group Capacity 148 156 210 268 2158 963 153 2137 1017 v/c Ratio 0.62 10.51 0.54 0.23 0.89 0.05 0.49 0.63 0.00 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 110.79 0.67 10.67 0.79 0.67 0.67 Uniform Delay d1 44.2 43.4 1,43.6 5.5 14.7 6.1 18.2 10.3 5.9 Delay Factor k 0.20 0.11 0.14 0.11 10.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 7.8 2.7 1 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.6 0.9 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 52.0 46.0 46.3 5.6 15.4 6.1 19.9 11.2 5.9 Lane Group LOS D D D A 8 A I A Approach Delay 52.0 46.2 14.9 11.6 Approach LOS D D g g Intersection Delay 16.2 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:26 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k859.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Pagel of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM Engineering Area Type CBD or Similar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period AM Buildout Analysis Year 2014 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 1 Grade= 0 0 0 1 � 1 0 1 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume(vph) 15 4 55 11 6 10 30 626 10 24 1349 17 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 10.96 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 5 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking (Y pr K11 N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 1 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86A.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 12.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 1 G = 0.0 1 G = 7.0 G = 87.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 3 Y= 7 IY= 0 IY= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Len th C = 120.0 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86A.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 15 4 55 11 6 10 30 626 10 24 1349 17 PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 10.96 0.96 0.96 Adjusted Flow Rate 16 4 52 11 6 5 31 652 6 25 1405 13 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 72 11 11 31 652 6 25 1405 13 Proportion of LT or RT 0.222 -- 10.722 1.000 -- 0.455 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 w fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 10.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 10.995 0.995 0.995 9 f 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 a fLu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 10.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.939 0.631 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Secondary fLT 0.145 0.145 _- 0.371 10.371 -- fRT 0.902 0.932 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 fRpb 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- Adjusted Satflow 1421 1058 1562 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86A.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Secondary Adjusted I I I I ( I 247 464 - 627 1179 Satflow 1 1 1 - 1 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86A.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 72 11 11 31 652 6 25 1405 13 Satflow Rate 1421 1058 1562 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 10.10 0.10 10.10 10.84 0.73 10.73 0.84 0.73 0.73 Lane Group Capacity 142 106 156 288 2326 1038 585 2303 1096 v/c Ratio 10.51 0.10 110.07 0.11 0.28 10.01 0.04 10.61 0.01 Flow Ratio 10.05 0.01 i 10.01 10.02 0.20 0.00 0.02 10.44 0.01 Critical Lane Group Y N N Y N7 N N Y N Sum Flow Ratios 0.51 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.60 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 72 11 11 31 652 6 25 1405 13 Lane Group Capacity 142 106 156 288 2326 1038 585 2303 11096 v/c Ratio 0.51 10.10 0.07 10.11 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.61 110.01 Green Ratio 10.10 10.10 0.10 10.84 0.73 10.73 0.84 0.73 10.73 Uniform Delay d1 51.2 49.1 48.9 4.0 5.7 4.6 1.8 8.1 4.6 Delay Factor k 10.12 10.11 0.11 110.11 0.50 10.50 0.11 0.50 10.50 Incremental Delay d2 3.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control Delay 54.2 49.5 49.1 4.1 6.0 4.6 1.8 9.0 -T 4.6 Lane Group LOS I D D I D A I A A A A A -A-pproae#De 54.2 49.3 5.9 1 8.8 Approach LOS D D A A Intersection Delay 9.8 Intersection LOS A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:27 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k86A.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 1 of 5 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N19th/Tschache Agency or Co. HKM-Engineering Ne�:l Type CBD-orSimilar Date Performed 411012007 Jurisdiction City of Bozeman/MDT Time Period PM Buildout Analysis Year 2014 Intersection Geometry Grade= 1 1 2 Grade= 0 0 0 0 Grade= 0 Grade= -1 1 2 1 Volunie and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume(vph) 31 10 60 73 10 101 69 1766 52 69 1244 7 % Heavy Veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Startup Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 4 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parking/Hour Bus Stops/Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian Timing 25.7 30.0 16.5 17.5 EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k87l3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 2 of 5 Timing G = 17.0 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 6.0 G = 73.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 4 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 IY= 3 Y= 7 IY= 0 IY= 0 Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 1 I, -,^'- IengthC = 110.0 file://CADocuments and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k87B.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 3 of 5 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 31 10 60 73 10 101 69 1766 52 69 1244 7 PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adjusted Flow Rate 34 11 60 79 11 104 75 1920 51 75 1352 3 Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 105 79 115 75 1920 51 75 1352 3 Proportion of LT or RT 0.324 -- 0.571 1.000 -- 0.904 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base Satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 fw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.000 1.067 1.000 1.067 fHv 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 f9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.005 1.005 1.005 0.995 0.995 0.995 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 f Lu 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 1.000 0.952 1.000 fLT 0.678 0.610 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- Secondary fLT __ 0.141 0.141 -- 0.050 0.050 - f RT 0.923 0.864 -- 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 -- fLpb -- 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 -- -- -- I I f Rpb 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- Adjusted Satflow 1050 1022 1449 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 P12 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k87l3.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 4 of 5 Isa eflondary Adjusted I I I __ I I I I 241 I 453 I - 185 1159 -- file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k87B.tmp 4/23/2007 Full Report Page 5 of 5 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane Group L TR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 105 79 115 75 1920 51 75 1352 3 Satflow Rate 1050 1022 1449 1622 3208 1432 1606 3176 1512 Lost Time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.78 0.66 0.66 0.78 0.66 0.66 Lane Group Capacity 162 158 224 263 2129 950 153 2108 1003 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.50 0.51 0.29 0.90 0.05 0.49 0.64 0.00 Flow Ratio 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.60 0.04 0.05 0.43 0.00 Critical Lane Group Y N N N Y N Y N N Sum Flow Ratios 0.75 Lost Time/Cycle 18.00 Critical v/c Ratio 0.89 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB Lane Group LTR L TR L T R L T R Adjusted Flow Rate 105 79 115 75 1920 51 75 1352 3 Lane Group Capacity 162 158 224 263 2129 950 153 2108 1003 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.50 0.51 0.29 0.90 0.05 0.49 0.64 0.00 Green Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.78 0.66 0.66 0.78 0.66 0.66 Uniform Delay d1 43.7 42.6 42.7 6.1 15.5 6.5 18.6 10.8 6.2 Delay Factor k 0.23 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 Incremental Delay d2 8.7 2.5 2.0 0.1 1.4 0.0 2.0 1 1.2 0.0 PF Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Control Delay 52.4 45.1 44.7 6.2 16.9 6.5 20.6 12.1 6.2 Lane Group LOS D D D A B A C B A Approach Delay 52.4 44.9 16.2 12.5 Approach LOS D D B B Intersection Delay 17.3 Intersection LOS B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:27 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\s2k87B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period M Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h) 6 83 6 7 51 6 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 95 6 8 58 6 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 25 10 5 29 17 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 28 11 5 33 19 (Veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDelay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 6 8 43 57 C(m) (veh/h) 1538 1504 754 782 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.02 0.18 0.24 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.4 10.1 10.0 LOS A A B A .Approach Delay (s/veh) - -- 10.1 10.0 Approach LOS -- -- B A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:29 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k681.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis c enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 nal sis Time Period PM Exi-1:. Pro*ect Description West Winds T/S 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientatton: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 32 62 7 11 73 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 084 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 38 73 8 13 86 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 40 5 3 48 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, !iF-R veh/h 10 47 5 3 57 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 38 13 62 83 C (m) (veh/h) 1489 1529 620 680 v/c 0.03 0.01 0.10 0.12 95% queue length 0.08 0.03 0.33 0.41 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.4 11.5 11.0 LOS A A B B Ispproach Delay /veh "" -- 11.5 11.0 Approach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:30 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k684.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Back round Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EastNVest Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 7 96 7 8 59 7 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 110 8 9 67 8 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 - -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 29 12 6 34 20 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 33 13 6 39 22 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 9 51 67 C(m)(veh/h) 1524 1483 723 752 vlc 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 95% queue length 0.02 0.02 0.23 0.29 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 10.4 10.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.4 10.3 Approach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:31 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k687.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Baxtet/Davis A,genc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year 2010 naI sis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds T/S 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 _ L T R L T R Volume veh/h 37 72 8 13 85 17 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.`?,' 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 1 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 44 85 9 15 101 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 46 6 3 56 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 I-Huui ly Flow Rate, HFR 11 54 7 veh/h) 3 66 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 44 15 72 96 C (m) (veh/h) 1467 1513 581 643 v/c 0.03 0.01 0.12 0.15 95% queue length 0.09 0.03 0.42 0.52 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.4 12.1, 11.6 LOS A A B B Approach Delay s/veh - - 12.1 11.6 pproach LOS -- - B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:31 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k68A.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. I-IKM Engineerl_ng Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 4/1012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane (Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 7 96 7 8 59 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 110 8 9 67 11 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- - 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 1 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 29 14 9 34 20 (Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 33 16 10 39 22 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Cc I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 9 54 71 C (m) (veh/h) 1520 1483 731 745 vlc 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.10 95%queue length 0.02 0.02 0.24 0.31 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 10.3 10.3 LOS A A B B ,Approach Delay (s/veh -" -- 10.3 10.3 Approach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:31 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k68D.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. BaethM Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. I-lKM En ineJurisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 4110/2007nal sis Year 2010 nal sisTime Period PM Buildout Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasVWest Street: Baxter Lane- North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 37 72 8 13 85 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 44 85 9 15 101 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h) 10 46 7 4 58 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 54 8 4 69 27 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Lengthh and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 44 15 73 100 C(m)(veh/h) 1464 1513 583 639 v/c 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.16 95%queue length 0.09 0.03 0.43 0.55 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.4 12.1 11.7 ILOS A A B B Approach Delay s/veh 12.1 11.7 "" -- Approach LOS -- — B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:31 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tem1D\u2k690.trnn 4/?I/?nn7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane I14orth/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 14 94 11 8 117 8 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 108 12 9 134 9 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 1 41 21 10 45 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 47 24 11 51 27 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 IFlared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay. Queue Len th, and Level of Service .Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 16 9 72 89 C(m) (veh/h) 1440 1480 681 662 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.13 rok ­­_ ro �,rh n n� n n� n vti 4�✓v iu 4uv length v.vv v.vc v.vv Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.4 10.9 11.3 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.9 11.3 (s/veh Approach LOS — _ -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+7M Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:32 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k693.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Enqineenng urisdiction City of Bozetnan Date Performed 411212007 nal sis Year 2014 .Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 i 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 45 87 14 19 155 23 Peak-I-lour Factor, P F 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 53 103 16 22 184 27 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 33 77 28 5 74 28 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 084 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 39 91 33 5 88 33 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR belay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 53 22 163 126 C (m) (veh/h) 1360 1482 485 523 v/c 0.04 0.01 0.34 0.24 95% queue length 0.12 0.05 1.47 0.93 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.5 16.1 14.1 LOS A A C B Approach Delay s/veh -- 16.1 14.1 pproach LOS -- C B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:32 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k696.tmn 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 8 118 14 15 101 11 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 135 16 17 116 12 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 'Upstream Signal 1 0 1 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 4 58 21 10 53 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 66 24 11 60 27 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 9 17 94 98 C (m)(veh/h) 1458 1442 641 642 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.15 95% queue length 0.02 0.04 0.51 0.54 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.5 11.6 11.6 LOS A A B B Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 11.6 11.6 Approach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:32 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k699.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxtei/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds T!S 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane- North/South-Street: Davis Lane - Intersection Orientation: East-West - IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 45 89 15 32 165 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 1 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 53 105 17 38 196 27 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 (Median Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 35 89 28 5 91 28 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 41 105 33 5 108 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 53 38 179 146 C(m)(veh/h) 1346 1478 439 480 vlc 0.04 0.03 0.41 0.30 95%queue length 0.12 0.08 1.95 1.27 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.5 18.7 15.7 I_OS A A C C Approach Delay s/veh) 18.7 15.7 -- -- Approach LOS -- -- C C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:32 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k69C.trnj) 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection DaWDaviS Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cil of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 19 36 59 18 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 42 0 0 69 21 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 14 28 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 16 0 32 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration t LR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 22 48 C (m) (veh/h) 1505 922 vlc 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.04 0.16 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 9.1 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.1 s/veh Approach LOS -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5 21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:34 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temb\u2k69F.tm1n 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection oak vis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Project Description West Winds T1S 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak StreetNorlh/South Street: Davis Lane Vntersection Orientation: East-West - IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 42 49 100 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 50 58 0 0 119 23 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 (Median Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 18 48 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 21 0 57 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Delay, Queue Len tit, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 50 78 C(m)(veh/h) 1441 844 vlc 0.03 0.09 95%queue length 0.11 0.30 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 9.7 LOS A A Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 9.7 Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:34 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settinizs\Temn\u2k6A2_tmn 4/21/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection OaWDavis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 22 42 68 21 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 49 0 0 79 24 (veh/h (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- IMedian Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 16 32 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 18 0 37 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 25 55 C(m)(veh/h) 1489 904 v/c 0.02 0.06 y 0.19 c7O queue lel gtll V.Vi5 9.2 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.2 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.2 (s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:34 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6A5.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information [Analyst 5HKM aeth Intersection Oak/Davis Agency/Co,/Co. En ineerin urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Anal sis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Back round Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis-Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period lirs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 49 57 116 23 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 58 67 0 0 138 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L Volume (veh/h T R ) 21 R Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Kate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 25 0 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LP Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 58 91 CC(m)(veh/h) 1413 808 v/c 0.04 0.11 95%queue length 0.13 0.38 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.0 LOS A 0. Approach Delay 's/veh -' 10.0 Approach LOS -_ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:34 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6A8.tm1) 419,11?00'7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak1DaviS Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street (North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 22 44 76 21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 25 51 0 0 89 24 (veh/h Percent Heavv_ Vehicles 2 - -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 16 32 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 18 0 37 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Della , Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR V(veh/h) 25 55 C (m)(veh/h) 1476 882 vlc 0.02 0.06 95% queue length 0.05 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9•3 ILOS A L A Approach Delay 9.3 s/veh) Approach LOS -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:35 PM file-//C..ADncnme.nts and Settings\lhaeth\Local Settings\Tem1n\u2k6AB.trnn 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Davis Agency/Co. HKM EngineeringJurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West Istudy Period Iirs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 1- T R L T R Volume veh/h 49 66 120 23 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 1 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 58 78 0 0 142 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR U §t ream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 21 56 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.R4 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 25 0 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 58 91 C (m) (veh/h) 1409 800 v/c 0.04 0.11 95% queue length 0.13 0.38 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 10.1 pproach LOS - __ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6AE.tmn 4/9.30..007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection OaklDavis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period lirs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 27 53 91 32 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 62 0 0 107 37 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 "- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 23 42 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 27 0 49 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 31 76 C(m)(veh/h) 1436 883 v/c 0.02 0.09 95% queue length 0.07 0.28 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 9•5 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.5 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tea Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6Bl.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection OaWbavis enc /Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 nal sis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 iid Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis-Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West — IStUdy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound I Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veld/h) 59 78 145 34 Peak-Ho!it Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 70 92 0 0 172 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ _ 0 _- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 30 72 Peak-Hour Factor, PHI= 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 veh/h) 0 35 0 85 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 70 120 C (m)(veh/h) 1356 818 v/c 0.05 0.15 95% queue length 0.16 0.51 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 10.2 LOS q r roach Delay B eh 10.2 roach LC __ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2 007 3:35 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6B4.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection f,2014 k/Davis Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 44 56 100 40 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 65 0 0 117 47 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 - -- IMedian Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Sign 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 27 54 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 31 0 63 {veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 51 94 C(m)(veh/h) 1412 860 vlc 0.04 0.11 95%queue length 0.11 0.37 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 9.7 LOS A A ,Approach Delay 9.7 (s/veh) Approach LOS -- — A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:36 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6B7.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Davis enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 67 86 157 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 79 102 0 veh/h 0 186 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L'Volume veh/h T R 43 R (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 veh/h 0 51 0 101 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 'Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 79 152 C(m)(veh/h) 1337 784 v/c 0.06 0.19 95%queue length 0.19 C 0.72ontrol Delay(s/veh) 7.9 0.72 10.7 LOS A 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) 10.7 4pproach LOS __ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:36 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6BA.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurlsdlctlon City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way (Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 107 2 9 97 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 125 2 10 114 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T 'Upstream Signal 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 0 45 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 52 0 0 0 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service .Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 10 52 C (m)(veh/h) 1472 994 v/c 0.01 0.05 95% queue length 0.02 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 8.8 ILOS A A Approach Delay 8.8 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6BD.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection [20007 rs Agency/Co. HKM En ineerin urisdiction eman Date Performed 311712007 nal sis Year Analysis Time Period PM Existin Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I- T R L T R Voluine veh/h 80 2 41 180 1 d Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 U.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 99 2 veh/h 51 224 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volurne veh/h 5 36 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 _ 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HI-K veh/h 6 0 44 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 51 50 C (m) (veh/h) 1504 955 /c 0.03 0.05 95% queue length 0.11 0.17 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.0 LOS A A Approach Delay s/veh - -- 9.0 pproach LOS -- __ A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6C0.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction CRY of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 124 2 10 112 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 145 2 11 131 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T 'Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 1 52 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 61 0 0 0 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 11 62 C (m) (veh/h) 1447 974 V/c 0.01 0.06 95%queue length 0.02 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 8.9 LOS A A Approach Delay ji(s/veh _ 8'9 Approach LOS I -- I -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6C3.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Enqineerin urisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EastiWest Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 93 2 47 208 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 116 2 58 259 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration T TR LT T U stream Signal 0 0 _ Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volurne veh/h 6 42 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 52 0 0 0 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 58 59 C(m)(veh/h) 1483 937 v/c 0.04 0.06 95%queue length 0.12 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.1 ILOS A A Approach Delay s/veh) -- -- 9.1 Approach LOS -- __ A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:38 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6C6.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EastiWest Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 1 139 2 10 115 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 163 2 11 135 4 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 1 1 52 14 3 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1 61 16 3 4 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 11 63 23 C (m)(veh/h) 1442 1426 953 706 Vlc 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.03 95% queue length 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 7.5 9.0 10.3 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.0 10.3 (s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:39 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6C9.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters gene /Co. HKM En ineerin urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411 122007 nal sis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West Istudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R iL T R Volume veh/h 4 105 2 47 210 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 U.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 131 2 veh/h 58 262 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 _ 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 3 42 7 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 11 0.80 Huurly Flow Rate, HFR 7 3 veh/h 52 8 2 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v (veh/h) 4 58 62 12 C (m) (veh/h) 1281 1464 879 539 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.12 0.23 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.6 9.4 11.8 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh -- _ 9.4 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:39 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6CC.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 1 169 3 13 146 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 198 3 15 171 4 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 1 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 0 1 63 14 3 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 74 16 3 4 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 15 75 23 C (m)(veh/h) 1399 1383 935 656 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 0.26 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.6 9.2 10.7 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh -- -- 9.2 10.7 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:39 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6CF.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction — City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 .Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 130 3 58 262 14 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 162 3 72 327 17 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 — __ 0 (Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 7 3 51 7 2 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 3 63 8 2 2 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 4 72 74 12 C(m)(veh/h) 1212 1426 849 472 vlc 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.16 0.29 0.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 7.7 9.6 12.8 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh -' -- 9.6 12.8 Approach LOS -- __ A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HC3+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:39 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6D2.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period M Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West [Study Period hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 185 3 13 155 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 217 3 15 182 9 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 -- -- IMedian Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 2 63 29 6 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR i;veh/h 0 2 74 34 7 8 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 2 15 76 49 C (m) (veh/h) 1380 1361 913 636 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.08 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 0.27 0.25 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.7 9.3 11.1 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.3 11.1 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:39 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6D5.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information [Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Hunters enc Co'/ HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2 007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L _ T R L T R Volume veh/h 7 140 3 58 277 26 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 8 174 3 72 346 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 IC edian Type Raised curb T Channelized 0 0 anes 0 2 0 0 2 0 onfigurationn LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 7 6 51 17 4 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 (veh/h 7 63 21 4 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len tl and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 72 78 29 C(m)(veh/h) 1177 1411 792 443 v/C 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.07 95% queue length 0.02 0.16 0.33 0.21 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 7.7 10.0 13.7 ILOS A A B 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.0 13.7 .Approach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:40 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6D8.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection OaWBuckrake Agency/Co. I iKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update IEast/West Street: Oak Street INorth/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 E1550 3 4 5 6 L R L T R Volume(veh/h) 1 2 2 99 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 187 2 2 123 3 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- IMedian Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 1 14 1 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 3 1 17 1 0 6 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 2 21 7 C(m)(veh/h) 1458 1397 882 944 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.02 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 9.2 8.8 ILOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.2 8.8 (s/veh) 4pproach LOS -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:41 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6DB.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Buckrake enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 109 2 20 215 6 LHourly k-Hour Factor PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Flow Rate, HFR 9 132 2 24 262 7 h/hcent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- _ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 0 14 1 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 3 0 17 1 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len ti, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 9 24 20 7 C (m)(veh/h) 1292 1463 913 829 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 '95%queue length 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.03 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.5 9.0 9.4 LOS A A A A Approach Delay s/veh -" -- 9.0 9.4 4pproach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:41 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6DE.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection OaWBuckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period M Background (Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update IEast/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue (Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 174 2 2 115 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 1 217 2 2 143 3 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 3 1 16 1 0 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 1 19 1 0 7 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 2 23 8 C (m)(veh/h) 1434 1362 863 933 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0,00 0.00 0.08 0.03 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 9.3 8.9 ILOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.3 8.9 Approach LOS - -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6El.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection OaklBuckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cil.y of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 126 2 23 249 7 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 1 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 11 157 2 28 311 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 1 12 5 1 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 3 1 14 6 1 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 11 28 18 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1238 1433 838 568 V/c 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 7.6 9.4 11.4 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh - 9•4 11.4 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/20 77 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6E4.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Buckrake Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments IMa'or Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 2 203 2 2 122 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 253 2 2 152 8 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 3 1 16 15 0 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 1 19 18 0 11 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR [Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service proach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 2 2 23 29 C(m)(veh/h) 1417 1322 835 758 vlc 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 95%queue length 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.12 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.7 9.4 9.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 9.4 9.9 Approach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6E7.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection OaldBuckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction CitV of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R I.. T R Volume veh/h 13 145 2 23 277 21 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h) 15 176 2 28 337 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 1 12 13 1 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 I lourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 1 14 15 1 4 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 5—elay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v (veh/h) 15 28 18 20 C (m) (veh/h) 1193 1410 816 535 v/C 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 95% queue length 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.12 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 7.6 9.5 12.0 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 9.5 12.0 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6EA.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Buckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Proiect Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street (North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 2 243 3 3 143 8 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 303 3 3 178 9 i(veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 4 0 20 15 0 10 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 24 18 0 12 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 71 IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR V(veh/h) 2 3 28 30 C(m)(veh/h) 1385 1266 814 728 V/c 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.04 95% queue lengthv.vvv.^vi 0.11 0.13 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.9 9.6 10.2 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.6 10.2 s/veh ,Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 41931 007 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6ED.trnp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Buckrake_ enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 15 177 3 28 338 22 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 1 0.82 0.82 0.82 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 215 3 34 412 26 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 0 14 14 0 5 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 17 17 0 6 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 18 34 21 23 C(m)(veh/h) 1118 1364 804 488 v/c 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 95%queue length 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.15 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.3 7.7 9.6 12.7 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.6 12.7 I's/veh -- -- Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:42 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tema\u2k6F0.tmn 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Buckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit-y of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out- Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 3 281 6 3 156 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 351 7 3 194 16 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR 'Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 4 0 20 29 0 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 24 36 0 12 (veh/h (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v(veh/h) 3 3 28 48 C(m)(veh/h) 1358 1212 777 657 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 95% queue length 0.0', 0.01 0.11 0.24 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 8.0 9.8 10.9 LOS A A A B Approach Delay _ 9.8 10.9 (s/veh) Approach LOS — -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:43 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k6F3.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Btuckrake Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 i.Anal sis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Buckrake Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 30 196 6 28 365 35 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.62 o.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR vel-1/11 36 239 7 34 445 42 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 0 14 23 0 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF_ 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 4 0 17 28 0 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 0 0 t 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR v (veh/h) 36 34 21 34 C (m)(veh/h) 1072 1332 769 429 v/c 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.08 95% queue length 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.26 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 7.8 9.8 14.1 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh -" -- 9.8 14.1 pproach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:43 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tema\u2k6F6.trnn 4/230.00 7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction MY of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStUdy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments IMa'or Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 4 100 4 12 78 1 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 112 4 13 87 1 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 5 0 34 6 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 38 6 0 1 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 4 13 43 7 C(m) (veh/h) 1508 1485 910 700 v/c 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.01 Zy.ri o tAucuc 101IVLIi v.vi v.v3 v.I- nn.3 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 9.2 10.2 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.2 10.2 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:48 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k717.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth InA.-ction N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM En ioeerin u Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 near 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasUWest Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West — IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R .Volume veh/h 1 56 5 42 132 4 Peek-Hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 65 5 vch/h 48 153 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 3 2 20 5 5 1 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 3 2 23 5 5 1 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 48 28 11 C (m) (veh/h) 1423 1544 893 603 vlc 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.4 9.2 11.1 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay 's/veh -- -- 9.2 11.1 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:49 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k71B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 116 5 14 90 1 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 133 5 16 103 1 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- - Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 1 39 7 1 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 44 8 1 1 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 5 16 51 10 C(m) (veh/h) 1488 1458 871 636 vlc 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.02 9597'0 queue length 0.01 0.03 0.19 G.v3 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.5 9.4 10.8 LOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.4 10.8 I,'s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:45 PM file://C:\Documents and Settinizs\lbaeth\Local Settines\Tema\u2k6FF.tmD 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit,y of Bozeman Date Performed 411012-007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 65 6 49 1 153 5 Peak-Hour Factur, PHF 0.86 1 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 veh/h 75 6 56 177 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 2 23 6 6 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 2 26 6 6 1 i veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 56 31 13 C (m)(veh/h) 1393 1529 876 555 vlc 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.02 95%queue length 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.4 9.3 11.6 LOS A A A B Approach Delay is/veh -- -- 9•3 11.6 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/ 0007 3:45 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settines\Temn\u2k702_tvnn ai?'A/'?nn7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update N East/West Street: Baxter Lane orth/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 122 5 18 91 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 137 5 20 102 1 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 6 1 53 7 1 1 (Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 1 59 7 1 1 (veh/h (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 5 20 66 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1489 1453 874 614 vlc 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.01 ✓v/V Mucus iclevu1 v.v1 0.04 ?.24 0'04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.5 9.5 11.0 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay 9.5 11.0 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:45 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k705.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Anal sis Year 2010 nal sis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period Iirs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 68 6 63 159 5 IP ercent Hea eak-Hour Factor, rHF 0.86 v^.uG 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 ourly Flow Rate, HFR eh/h 1 79 6 73 184 5 vy y Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 2 30 6 6 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 2 34 6 6 1 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 73 39 13 C (m) (veh/h) 1385 1524 879 513 lc 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.03 95% queue length 0.00 0.15 0.14 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 7.5 9.3 12.2 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh '" - 9.3 12.2 pproach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:45 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k708.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27thBaxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments (Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 6 136 6 21 111 1 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 152 6 23 124 1 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 7 0 62 8 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 0 69 8 0 1 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 6 23 76 9 C(m) (veh/h) 1462 1434 859 562 A 0.00 0.02 0.09 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.05 0.29 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 9.6 11.5 LOS A A A B Approach Delay _ 9.6 11.5 s/veh Approach LOS — - A 8 Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:45 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k70B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information [Analyst L. Baeth lintersection N27th/Baxter Agency/Co. HKM Engineenbg Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West ISt"Civ Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R plume veh/h 1 92 17 73 192 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 106 19 84 223 6 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 4 3 35 7 7 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 veh/h 3 40 8 8 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 1 84 47 17 C (m) (veh/h) 1339 1474 805 437 v/c 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.18 0.19 0.12 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.7 7.6 9.7 13.6 LOS A A A B Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 9.7 13.6 Approach LOS -- -- A B copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:46 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k70E.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter enc /Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 11 150 6 29 118 1 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 168 6 32 132 1 veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 0 -- -- IMedian Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 7 3 84 8 1 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 3 94 8 1 3 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 12 32 104 12 C (m)(veh/h) 1452 1415 829 532 v/c 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.07 0.43 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 10.0 11.9 ILOS A A A B Approach Delay 's/veh -- -- 10.0 11.9 Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:46 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k711.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information naI st L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Baxter n enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 11 6 L T R L T r Volume veh/h 14 91 17 95 212 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 16 105 19 110 246 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 5 50 7 10 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 _0_.8_6 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rdtu, HFR 4 5 L veh/h 58 8 11 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I TR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 16 110 67 1 25 C (m)(veh/h) 1313 1475 777 404 V/c 0.01 0.07 0.09 0.06 95% queue length 0.04 0.24 0.28 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 7.6 10.1 14.5 LOS A A B B Approach Delay s/veh -- - 10.1 14.5 pproach LOS -- B 8 Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:46 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k714.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing (Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update IEast/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue (Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments (Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 37 1 0 27 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 47 1 0 34 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 1 0 0 1 0 1 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 0 1 0 1 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 0 2 1 C (m)(veh/h) 1591 1572 936 854 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 8.9 9.2 LOS A A A- 1 A Approach Delay 8.9 9.2 I(s/veh) Approach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:50 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k71F.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Beeth Intersection IN27thlTschache Agency/Co. HKM En ineerin Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existin Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: N. 271h Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 0 34 0 0 52 1 Peak-Hoi it Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 38 0 0 veh/h 58 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 __ __ 0 _- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 0 1 0 0 0 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 1 0 veh/h 0 0 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 0 0 0 1 C (m)(veh/h) 1558 1585 1014 ✓lc 0.00 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 C 0.00 ontrol Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 .0 ILOS A A A Approach Delay s/veh "" -- 8.6 pproach LOS -_ __ A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:50 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k722.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound IMovement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 1 43 1 0 31 0 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 55 1 0 39 0 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 - -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 0 0 1 0 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 0 0 1 0 1 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 1 0 2 1 C (m)(veh/h) 1584 1562 924 843 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q5c�/� nr rpup lennth 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 8.9 9.3 LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 8.9 9.3 Approach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:50 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k725.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection g h/Tschache gency/co. HKM En ineerin urisdiction of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 nal sis Year Analysis Time Period PM Back round Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: lschache Lane North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R VOlume veh/h 0 39 0 0 60 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 43 0 0 67 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 __ 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 0 0 1 0 0 0 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 veh/h 1 0 0 0 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR 7e4y,Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 0 0 0 1 C (m)(veh/h) 1546 1579 1001 vlc 0.00 0.00 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.00 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 8.6 ILOS A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) 8.6 Approach LOS -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:50 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k728.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildouit PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments IMajor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 47 5 3 35 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 60 6 3 44 2 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 6 3 2 4 2 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 7 3 2 5 2 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 5 3 9 20 C(m) (veh/h) 1575 1549 798 805 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 9.6 9.6 ILOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.6 9.6 (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS — -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:51 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k72B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth lintersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering JUrisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasVWest Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStUdy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 46 1 2 64 7 Peak-Hni it Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 v.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 11 51 1 2 71 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- _ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 3 3 3 11 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89_ 0.89 0.89 I iuudy Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 3 3 3 3 12 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 11 2 18 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1533 1567 762 813 We 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.03 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.3 9.8 9.5 LOS A A A A Approach Delay s/veh -- - 9.8 9.5 pproach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:51 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k72E.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st [41121200 . Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. IKM En ineerin Jurisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 7 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period M BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 56 5 3 42 2 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 71 6 3 53 2 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 6 3 2 4 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 7 3 2 5 2 'veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service ,Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 5 3 9 20 C(m) (veh/h) 1563 1535 805 810 vlc 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.3 9.5 9.6 LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.5 9.6 Approach LOS -- - A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:51 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k731.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 'veh/h 10 55 1 2 77 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 12 70 1 2 98 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 3 3 3 11 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 3 3 3 14 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 12 2 20 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1498 1542 732 777 V/c 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.00 0.08 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.3 10.1 9.7 LOS A A B A Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 10.1 9.7 pproach LOS -- -- B A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:51 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k734.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 59 15 13 42 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 75 19 16 53 2 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 t -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 20 8 6 9 6 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 25 10 7 11 7 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 7 16 25 45 C (m) (veh/h) 1563 1513 766 751 vlc 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.06 95% queue length 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.19 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.3 7.4 9.9 10.1 LOS A A A B Approach Delay _ 9.9 10.1 s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:51 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k737.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Tschache Agency/co, HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 15 62 8 9 97 7 rc!ak-I-luur Factor, Flit- 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 16 69 8 10 108 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- _ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 12 6 13 24 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 3 13 6 14 26 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 16 10 54 22 C (m) (veh/h) 1487 1535 733 721 v/c 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.03 95% queue length 0.03 0.02 0.24 0.09 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 10.3 10.2 LOS A A B B Approach Delay s/veh -- -- 10.3 10.2 Approach LOS -- __ B 8 Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:52 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tema\u2k73A.tmn 4./);/9nn7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period AM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street (North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStUdy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 157 3 25 102 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 167 3 26 108 9 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 24 71 14 16 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 25 75 14 17 5 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 26 105 36 C(m)(veh/h) 1471 1420 758 563 Vlc 0.01 0.02 0.14 0.06 95%queue length 0.02 0.06 0.40 0.20 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.6 10.5 11.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 10.5 11.8 (s/veh Approach LOS -- — B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:53 PM file:HCADocuments and Settines\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k73D.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst f_. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStUdy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 94 6 106 232 17 Peak-I-luur Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR'veh/h 6 109 6 123 269 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 2 15 58 11 26 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 2 17 67 12 30 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 6 123 86 64 C (m) (veh/h) 1274 1487 681 414 vlc 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.15 95% queue length 0.01 0.27 0.43 0.54 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 7.6 11.0 15.3 LOS A A 8 C Approach Delay s/veh "" -- 11.0 15.3 pproach LOS -- -- B C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:53 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Set ings\Temn\u2k740_tmn 4/)'A/')nn7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM E-wineering Jurisdiction Cit.y of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Background Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update N East/West Street: Oak Street orth/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume (veh/h) 9 182 3 29 118 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 216 3 34 140 11 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 L - Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 6 28 82 16 19 6 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 33 97 19 22 7 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration —_—T LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service .Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 10 34 137 48 C (m)(veh/h) 1430 1362 685 471 vlc 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.10 95% queue length 0.02 0.08 0.74 0.34 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.7 11.6 13.5 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.6 13.5 s/veh Approach LOS - _ -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:54 PM file://C:\Documents and Settines\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temn\u2k743.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West -]Study Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 7 109 7 123 269 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 126 8 143 312 23 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 (Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 2 17 67 13 30 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 19 77 15 34 25 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 143 98 74 C (m) (veh/h) 1224 1463 627 348 vlc 0.01 0.10 0.16 0.21 95% queue length 0.02 0.32 0.55 0.79 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.0 7.7 11.8 18.1 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 11.8 18.1 (s/veh) -- - Approach LOS -- -- B C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:54 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settinus\lhaeth\i.ncat trnn A/')z/I)nn'7 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection IN27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 9 217 10 29 127 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 230 10 30 135 13 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 1 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 30 82 27 27 6 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 31 87 28 28 6 ('veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR V(veh/h) 9 30 126 62 C.(m)(veh/h) 1434 1339 668 458 Vlc 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.14 9v o t4utl v ieiiyuI v.v2 v^.v^7 v.69 0.47 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.8 11.6 14.1 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 11.6 14.1 (s/veh Approach LOS _ - B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:57 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k761.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EastlWest Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 7 127 11 123 304 32 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 147 12 143 353 37 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 9 25 67 19 34 22 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 1 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 'veh/h 10 29 77 22 39 25 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 8 143 116 86 C(m) (veh/h) 1169 1433 476 294 'plc 0.01 0.10 0.24 0.29 95%queue length 0.02 0.33 0.95 1.19 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 7.8 15.0 22.2 LOS A A B C Approach Delay s/veh - -- 15.0 22.2 Approach LOS -- -- B C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:54 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k74C.tmn 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27117/0ak Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments (Major Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 11 259 11 35 153 16 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 275 11 37 162 17 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 9 36 100 31 31 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 9 38 106 32 32 7 i(veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade (%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v(veh/h) 11 37 153 71 C (m) (veh/h) 1397 1288 611 385 vlc 0.01 0.03 0.25 0.18 95%queue length 0.02 v.v9 0.99 0.67 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 7.9 12.8 16.5 LOS A A 8 C Approach Delay 12.8 16.5 Fs/veh Approach LOS -- -- B C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:54 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k74F.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection N27th/0ak Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 U date East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 150 12 149 366 36 Peak-l-luur Factor, PI IF 0.86 1 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/li 9 174 13 173 425 41 Percent Fleavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 29 82 21 41 27 Peak-Hour Factor, PI-IF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 11 33 95 24 47 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h) 9 173 139 102 C (m) (veh/h) 1095 1399 411 235 v/c 0.01 0.12 0.34 0.43 95% queue length 0.02 0.42 1.47 2.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.3 7.9 18.2 31.6 LOS A A C D Approach Delay s/veh "" "- 18.2 31.6 pproach LOS -- -- C D Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2 007 3:54 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k752.tmn 4/23/7007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Oak Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cit-y of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 11 285 23 35 162 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 303 24 37 172 20 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 13 38 100 40 36 7 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 40 106 42 38 7 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v(veh/h) 11 37 159 87 C (m) (veh/h) 1381 1244 566 349 v/c 0.01 0.03 0.28 0.25 95% queue length 0.02 0.09 1.i5 0•Q7 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 8.0 13.8 18.7 LOS A A B C Approach Delay 13.8 18.7 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- B C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:55 PM file)/C:\Documents and Settinizs\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k755.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st j411212007 h Intersection N27tl?10ak Agency/Co. n ineerin urisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed nal sis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period ld-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West — IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I_ T R L T R Volume veh/h 8 167 20 149 391 44 Peak-Hour Factor, PHi- 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 9 194 23 173 454 51 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 1 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 22 83 82 27 44 27 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 25 96 95 31 51 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR V (veh/h) 9 173 216 113 C (m) (veh/h) 1060 1365 268 169 v/c 0.01 0.13 0.81 0.67 95% queue length 0.03 0.43 6.32 3.89 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.4 8.0 57.1 61.1 LOS A A F F Approach Delay (s/veh) 57.1 61.1 ,Approach LOS -- -- F F Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:55 PM file:HC:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Tema\u2k758.tmn 401/90m All-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst IL. Baoth Intersection 10ak/North2.71h Agency/Co. 11/KM Engineering EngMeering Jurisdiction lCity of Bozeman Date Performed 1411912007 Analysis Year 12014 nal sis Time Period 16M Buildout Project ID West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 27th Avenue 'Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 11 285 23 35 162 19 °/.Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 13 38 100 40 36 7 '/.Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L7 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Flow Rate(veh/h) 11 327 37 192 159 87 A Heavy Vehicles 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 No.Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration,T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Drop.Left-Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 Prop.Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1 Prop.Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj,computed 0.5 -0.0 0.5 -0.0 -0.3 0.1 Departure Headway and Service Time lid,initial value(s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 K3. 3.20 3.20 K,initial 0.01 0.29 0.03 0.14 0.08 hd,final value(s) 6.03 5.47 6.15 5.18 5.74 K,final value 0.02 0.50 0.06 0.23 0.14 Move-up time,m(s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 'Service Time,is(s) 3.7 3.2 3.8 3.3 3.2 3.7 'Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity(veh/h) 261 577 287 442 409 337 Delay(s/veh) 8.84 13.45 9.26 10.60 9.71 9.66 LOS A B A B leiA A Approach:Delay(s/veh) 13.30 10.39 9.71 9.66 LOS g B A A Intersection Delay(s/veh) 11.39 Intersection LOS B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:55 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k75B.tmp 4/23/2007 All-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL ANALYSIS General Information Site Information Analyst IL-Baelh Intersection 10ak/North 27th Agency/Co. lHKM Engineering urisdiction CR of Bozeman Dale Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 12014 Analysis Time Period JPM Buildout Pro ect ID West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: North 271h Avenue Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement L T R L T R olume(veh/h) 8 167 20 149 391 44 %Thrus Left Lane Approach Northbound Southbound Movement L 1 L I R Volume(veh/h) 22 83 82 27 44 27 ro i hrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Plat- 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Flow Rate(veh/h) 9 217 173 505 216 113 %Heavy Vehicles 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 No.Lanes 2 2 1 1 Geometry Group 5 5 2 2 Duration,T 0.25 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Prop Left-Turns 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 Prop.Right-Turns 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 Prep Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 hLT-adj 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.7 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 EhHV-adj 1.7 1.7 1.71.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 puted 0.5 -0.0 0.5 -0.0 -0.2 -0.1 Departure Headwayand Service Time lid,initial value(s) 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x,initial 0.01 0.19 0.15 0.45 0.19 0.10 hd,final value(s) 7.16 6.57 6.53 5.95 6.20 6.61 final value 0.02 0.40 0.31 0.83 0.37 0.21 Move-up time,m(s) 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.0 Service Time,1.(s) 4.9 4.3 4.2 3.6 4.2 4.6 Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Capacity(veh/h) 259 467 423 600 466 363 Delay(s/veh) 9.99 13.52 12.18 31.55 12.82 11.34 LOS A B B D B B Approach:Delay(s/veh) 13.38 26.60 12.82 11.34 LOS g D B B Intersection Delay(s/veh) 20.37 Intersection LOS C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:58 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temn\u2k765_tmn 4/9100m Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co./Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 nal sis Time Period M Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 58 467 179 8 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 63 513 0 0 196 8 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 (Median Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 59 52 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 64 0 57 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service .Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 63 121 C (m)(veh/h) 1368 456 v/c 0.05 0.27 95% queue length 0.14 1.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.8 15.7 LOS A C .Approach Delay F s/veh -- -- 15.7 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:59 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k769.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM En ineerinJurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2007 Analysis Time Period PM Existing Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: N-27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West — IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 70 312 373 42 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 75 335 0 0 401 45 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR iJ stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 24 97 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 25 0 104 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 75 129 C (m)(veh/h) 1114 514 vlc 0.07 0.25 95% queue length 0.22 0.99 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.5 14.3 LOS A B ,Approach Delay s/veh) -- - 14.3 Approach LOS -- -_ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 3:59 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k76C.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. 14KM Engineering urisdiction Cit.y of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period M Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West --- IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 67 541 207 9 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 73 594 0 0 227 9 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 68 60 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 74 0 65 veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 73 139 C (m) (veh/h) 1331 389 vlc 0.05 0.36 95% queue length 0.17 1.59— Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 19.3 LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh) - -- 19.3 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k76F.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst IL. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Background Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: N. 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West _]Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 81 361 432 49 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 87 388 0 0 464 52 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 28 112 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 30 0 120 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 87 150 C (m)(veh/h) 1050 447 v/C 0.08 0.34 95% queue length 0.27 1.46 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.7 17.1 ILOS A C Approach Delay 17.1 (s/veh -- %pproach LOS -- __ C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k772.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasVVVest Street: Durston Road North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments (Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 70 541 207 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 76 594 0 0 227 10 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR 'Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 71 71 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 78 0 78 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 76 156 C (m)(veh/h) 1330 398 vlc 0.06 0.39 95% queue length 0.18 1.82 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 19.8 LOS A C Approach Delay 19.8 (s/veh) -- Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k775.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information KDate st L. Baeth tIntersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM Engineering diction Cit of Bozeman Performed 411012007 sis Year 2010 sis Time Period PM Buildout PH 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 11 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 93 361 432 52 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 99 388 0 0 464 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ __ 0 4 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 30 114 R Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 veh/h) 32 0 122 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 99 154 C (m)(veh/h) 1047 434 v/c 0.09 0.35 95% queue length 0.31 1.58 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.8 17.8 LOS A C Approach Delay s/veh " -- 17.8 Approach LOS C Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k778.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston enc /Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 id Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update IEast/West Street: Durston Road (North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 85 657 252 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 93 721 0 0 276 13 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 86 84 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 94 0 92 (veh/h) (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 93 186 C (m) (veh/h) 1273 309 V/c 0.07 0.60 95% queue length 0.24 3.66 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 32.8 ILOS A D Approach Delay 32.8 is/veh Approach LOS -- — D Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k77B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM En ineerin Jurisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 4110 22007 Analysis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasUWest Street: Durston Road North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 I- T R L T R Volume veh/h 110 439 525 62 Peak-Ha-ir Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 1 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 118 472 0 0 564 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 36 138 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 1 iuuily Flow Rate, HFIl veh/h 0 0 0 38 0 148 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 118 186 C (m) (veh/h) 952 347 v/c 0.12 0.54 95% queue length 0.42 3.01 Control Delay(s/veh) 9.3 26.7 LOS A D Approach Delay s/veh - -- 26.7 pproach LOS -- __ D Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:00 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k77E.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction Cit of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road (North/South Street: North 27th Avenue 'Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 90 657 252 13 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 98 721 T0 0 276 14 (veh/h (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Undivided IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound (Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 89 98 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 97 0 107 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Della , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 98 204 C (m)(veh/h) 1272 313 vlc 0.08 0.65 95%queue length 0.25 4.27 Control Delay(s/veh) 8.1 35.7 LOS A E Approach Delay 35.7 s/veh Approach LOS -- -- E Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:01 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k781.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection N27th/Durston Agency/Co. NKM Enqincenng urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Durston Road North/South Street: North 27th Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (firs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L_ T R Volume veh/h 123 439 525 65 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 132 472 0 (veh/h 0 564 69 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 38 147 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rite, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 40 0 158 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Fe-lay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 132 198 C (m) (veh/h) 950 339 v/c 0.14 0.58 95% queue length 0.48 3.51 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 29.5 LOS A D Approach Delay s/veh -- _ 29.5 Approach LOS - __ D Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:01 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k784.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Windward Agency/Co. HKM Engineering .Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Analysis Year 2010 Analysis Time Period AM Buildout Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds T!S 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments IMa'or Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 1 143 117 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 155 0 0 127 3 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 14 4 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 15 0 4 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR IDela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 1 19 C (m)(veh/h) 1453 805 vlc 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.07 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.6 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.6 (s/veh Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k787.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth tnalysis rsection Oak/Windward Agency/Co. HKM En ineerin sdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed 411012007 Year 2010 Analysis Time Period PM Buildout Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update EasUWest Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 117 143 1 Peak-Hnur Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 3 127 0 0 155 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 14 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 I lourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 0 0 15 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len tlt and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 3 19 C (m)(veh/h) 1422 787 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.7 LOS A A Approach Delay s/veh -- - 9.7 pproach LOS -- __ A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k78A.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Windward Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM BG with Phase 1-3 Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments IMa"or Street Eastbound Westbound (Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 1 174 154 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 189 0 0 167 3 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 ILanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 14 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 15 0 4 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Len th, and Level of Service ,Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 (Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 1 19 C (m)(veh/h) 1405 764 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.08 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 9.8 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.8 (s/veh) _ Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:03 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k78D.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Windward Agency/Co. HKM Enqineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411212007 nal sis Year 2014 k sis Time Period PM BG with Phase 1-3 ct Descri tion West Winds TIS 2007 U date West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: WindwardAvenue section Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L f__ A_ R Volurne(vehih) 4 141 261 14 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.9_2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR(veh/h 4 153 0 0 283 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume veh/h 7 2 (Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 7 0 2 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I ILR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 4 9 C (m) (veh/h) 1260 680 v/c 0.00 0.01 95%queue length 0.01 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 10.4 LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -" - 10.4 Approach LOS - -- B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:04 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k790.tinp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st [411912007 . Baeth Intersection Oak/Windward Agency/Co. KM Engineering Jurisdiction Cityof Bozeman Date Performed Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period M Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update IEast/West Street: Oak Street Worth/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs . 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 3 178 159 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 193 0 0 172 7 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 - -- Median Type Raised curb IRT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 20 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 21 0 5 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 IRT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 3 26 C (m) (veh/h) 1394 751 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.6 10.0 ILOS A A Approach Delay 10.0 (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:05 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k793.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Oak/Windward A enc /Co. HKM Enqineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 U date East/West Street: Oak Street North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 t. T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 145 266 24 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 9 157 0 0 289 26 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT T T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 15 9 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Fin,irly Flow Rate, HFRI veh/h 0 0 0 16 0 9 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I ILR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 9 25 C (m) (veh/h) 1242 694 v/c 0.01 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.11 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9 10.4 LOS A 8 Approach Delay s/veh - -- 10.4 pproach LOS -- __ B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:06 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k796.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM En ineerin Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 12014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West :5tudv Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume (veh/h) 148 2 4 124 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 160 2 4 134 0 (veh/h (Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- (Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 5 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 0 10 0 0 0 (veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v(veh/h) 4 15 C (m) (veh/h) 1429 811 vlc 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.5 ILOS A A Approach Delay 9.5 (s/veh) - Approach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:10 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k799.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Hunters Agency/Co. HKM Et),gineering urisdiction Cit.y of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Hunters Way Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement _ 1 2 3 4 5 6 Volume veh/h 120 5 10 212 Peak-Hour Factor PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 0 130 5 10 230 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 1 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 3 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 sourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 7 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Fe-lay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 10 10 C (m) (veh/h) 1462 805 V/c 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 0.04 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 9.5 LOS A A Ispproach Delay /veh -- -- 9.5 pproach LOS -- -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:10 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k79C.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Baxter/Windward Agency/Co. HKM En ineering Jurisdiction Citv of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds T/S 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 148 2 2 127 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 160 2 2 138 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 3 7 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 7 0 0 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 2 10 C (m)(veh/h) 1429 819 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.04 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.5 9.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 9.4 s/veh pproach LOS -- A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:11 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k79F.tYnp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection e Baxter/Windward nc /Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 nal sis Year 2014 nal sis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TlS 2007 Update East/West Street: Baxter Lane North/South Street: Windward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement Westbound 1 2 3 4 5 fi L T R L - T R Volume veh/h 120 5 7 Peak-Hour Factor, O,g2 215 tor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 I-lourly 1�1uw Rate, i-iFi1 veh/h 0 130 5 7 233 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 __ 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 Configuration 0 1 0TR LT Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement Southbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 5 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, I-IFR veh/h 5 0 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared A 0 pproach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len cat and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound (Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 7 15 C (m) (veh/h) 1462 v/c 796 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 96 LCIS A A Approach Delay s/veh -- 9.6 pproach LOS __ -' A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:11 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k7A2.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Davis/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Engineering Jurisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: North-South [Study Period (hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 14 71 3 4 66 12 Leak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 77 3 4 71 13 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 (Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 7 1 6 9 2 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 1 6 9 2 5 i veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 (Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 15 4 16 14 C (m) (veh/h) 1526 1531 802 830 v/C 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.02 95%queue length 0.03 0.01 0.06_. ._ 0.05 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.4 7.4 9.6 9.4 LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 9.6 9.4 Approach LOS -- -- A A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:12 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k7A5.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal yst L. Baeth Intersection Davis/Tschache Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozernan Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period PM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/west Street: Tschache Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 'Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 14 142 8 10 116 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 15 154 8 10 126 13 (Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 'Volume(veh/h) 7 2 6 6 1 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 (Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 2 6 6 1 3 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 (Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service )Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v(veh/h) 15 10 10 15 C (m) (veh/h) 1457 1429 698 725 '✓lc 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.06 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.5 7.5 10.2 10.1 LOS A A B 8 Approach Delay (s/veh __ __ 10.2 10.1 4pproach LOS -- -- B B Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:12 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k7A8.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst L. Baeth Intersection Davis/Breeze Agency/Co. HKM Engineering urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 411912007 Analysis Year 2014 Analysis Time Period AM Build-Out Project Description West Winds TIS 2007 Update East/West Street: Breeze Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: North-South - IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 83 1 81 Peak-Hour Factor. PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 90 1 0 88 0 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR T Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 5 veh/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 5 C (m) (veh/h) 973 v/C 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.7 LOS A Approach Delay 8.7 s/veh Approach LOS -- - I A Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:12 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k7A1B.tmp 4/23/2007 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nal st L. Baeth Intersection Davis/Breeze enc /Co. HKM En ineerin urisdiction City of Bozeman Date Performed 4119/2007 Anal sis Year nal sis Time Period PM Build-Out 2014 Pro'ect Description West Winds T/S 2007 U date East/West Street: Breeze Lane North/South Street: Davis Lane Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Ad'ustments Major Street Northbound Movement Southbound 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T IN " I'll, T R Volume (veh/h 161 - Peak-Hour Factor, Pl IF 128 0.92 0.92 0.92 H 0.92 0.92 ourly Flow Rate 0.92 , Hf"� --- veh/h 0 174 2 0 139 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type 0 -- -- Raised curb RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 0 C 1 0 onfiguration 0 0TR U stream Si nal T 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Movement Westbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T Volume veh/li R L T R Peak-Hour Factor, PHF p,92 3 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR VI I1/11 0 0 0 0 0 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 0 0 0 Flared Approach N Storage N 0 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 0 C 0 �onfig nation 0 0 0 1 Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service R pproach Northbound Southbound Westbound Movement Eastbound 1 4 7 $ 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) C (m)(veh/h) 3 v/C 874 0.00 95% queue length 0.01 Control Delay(s/veh) 9'1 LOS Approach Delay A (s/veh) 9.1 Approach LOS __ Copyright©2005 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved TM HCS+ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/23/2007 4:12 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\lbaeth\Local Settings\Temp\u2k7AE.tmp 4/23/2007 APPENDIX SECTION THREE s Subdivision Phase IV-Vill Access Separation Report— Baxter Lane April 2007 Prepared For: Cascade Development, Inc. 3825 Valley Commons Dr., Ste. 4 Bozeman, MT 59718 Prepared By: E N G I N E E R I N G 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 04S067.125 West Winds Community Access Separation Bozeman, MT Baxter Lane Introduction This Access Separation Report is prepared for Phases IV-Vill of the West Winds Planned Community. Per the requirements of Section 18.44.090(H.) of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Ordinance, West Winds is requesting a relaxation of access spacing standards on Baxter Lane. A similar relaxation was granted for Oak Street as part of the Revised Conditions of Approval for a Conditional Use Permit for West Winds Planned Unit Development, on file with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder. The discussion below is based on the West Winds Planned Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update, prepared by HKM Engineering. Project Overview The West Winds Planned Community is a 960-unit mixed use residential development located in the northwest'/, Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, bordered by Oak Street on the south, North 271h Avenue on the east, Baxter Lane on the north, and Davis Lane on the west. Traffic Volumes Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Baxter Lane between Davis Lane and North 27th Avenue is currently 1900 vehicles per day(vpd), estimated with the assumption that peak hour volumes represent 10% of ADT. Applying this method to build-out turning volumes results in an estimated ADT at build-out of 3400 vpd,'representing approximately an 8% growth rate. As noted in the West Winds Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update, ADT will be field verified and reported to the City on or before June 1, 2007. Turning Movements As detailed in the West Winds Planned Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update, all of the West Winds intermediate local street access intersections on Baxter Lane are expected to operate at LOS A in the design year, while the major intersections at Baxter Lane/ Davis Lane and Baxter Lane/ North 271h Avenue are expected to operate at LOS C or better. Traffic Controls All of the subject intersections on Baxter Lane, both existing and proposed, are expected to be two-way stop control intersections, with Baxter Lane being the major road at all intersections. Signalization of these intersections is not anticipated through project build-out. Site Design West Winds has been designed to provide adequate transportation access as part of a well designed community. As such, access locations and development layout is sensitive to the existing terrain. The natural water course and subsequent open space park were driving forces in the layout of the on site road network and access locations. Access locations on Oak Street were driven by connections to the existing street network at Hunters Way and Buckrake Avenue, as well as the presence of a large wetland and riparian corridor. The existing street connections were located in the eastern half of the West Winds frontage on Oak Street. An additional access was needed for the western half of the Subdivision. This resulted in three accesses on Oak Street within one-half mile, with an average access spacing of 591 feet. Windward Avenue, Hunters Way and Buckrake Avenue are planned to extend to Baxter Lane, in order to provide north-south continuity through West Winds. This results in a similar average April, 2007 Page 1 of 2 "G11 E E R I N� West Winds Community Access Separation Bozeman, MT Baxter Lane lies with average access spacing Lane. Davis Lane complies access spacing of 591 feet on Baxter p for arterials (660 feet), with an average access spacing of 808 feet. Please note that Winter Park Street will not extend to Davis Lane. North 211h Avenue also complies with BUDO standards for access spacing on collectors (330 feet), with an average access spacing of 374 feet. Sight Distance Adequate sight distance is an important characteristic of intersection design. Baxter Lane is classified by the Greater Bozeman Area Transportation Plan, 2001 Update as a minor arterial, and thus has a design speed of 45 mph. Table IV-2 of the COB Design Standards and Specifications refers to AASHTO guidelines for stopping sight distance (SSD) on arterial streets. Exhibit 7-1 of the 2004 edition of the AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets recommends a minimum SSD of 360 feet for a 45 mph design speed. From a horizontal alignment perspective, Baxter Lane adjacent to West Winds is a tangent section of undivided 2- lane highway. Sight distance for vehicles entering Baxter Lane is free of obstructions for at least a % mile (1300 feet) in each direction. From a vertical alignment perspective, AASHTO Exhibit 3-72 also recommends 360 feet SSD for a crest vertical curve, correlating to a K value of 61. Crest vertical curves on Baxter Lane as designed for Phase II and known existing curves indicate K values of 70 or greater. As such, adequate vertical stopping sight distance is provided. Per section 18.44.100.A of the UDO, a sight triangle extending 50' along each of the intersecting curbs is required. West Winds provides this sight triangle via an open space and utility easement parallel to Oak Street. Conclusion This report establishes that the proposed West Winds accesses to Baxter Lane are aligned to connect with the existing street network on Oak Street and extend north to Baxter Lane. As currently planned, the proposed accesses are expected to operate a satisfactory level of service and adequate sight distance will be provided. April, 2007 Page 2 of 2 ■J E N GG IN E E R ING APPENDIX SECTION FOUR December2004 INTERSECTION AT-GRADE 13.3(5 WE6I I1t�45 715 200} tAP0ATIC Zoo7 G 2 w E ¥ 2 o ■ z3 § § LL 2 § § 0z U. § ¥ uj W w eu z 0: R z 52 � zw & 1PrRS k ° � § 4 ® § nz E -je A biz � § B0 S § � K N B@ � 2 ■ gym [ - ) w � >w zLL E wA � � � « Gza � 2 J4^LOB 3 � � w2 o m /0- � ww c o $ § # w � E LL Z E z T § ] ■ s RB 2R3M oo2w z » G � ow6 a _ LLzM W ; d # Ems § o Q § � Rw W >- www 20 § IL \ } 0 � � 2 wow w w § / / � / � � � $ [ § � j k e - = xM :w e � 2 E - � 0 - 1 ( � 0gm § h / � § §- 83 § § CO) Co w g 2 w ■ 0 _ - § 7 z�� � � § m $ � -- - ' $ / N O / 2 O W U) Cok O K § 2 W � � U W « m . § 2 w §k / � \ ` Go / § § \ CO § NnOH NmSM ONmna(dA)]Wn]0A OmSOddO OA OAK ;5-T9.EE-I 1A;OATH 2-ttd AVE' i %. OU PEN G I N E E R I N G June 21, 2007 JUN 2 2. 2007 McChesney Professional Building 601 Nikles Drive Suite 2 Bozeman, MT 59715 Ms. Sue Stadola Phone: 406.586.8834 City of Bozeman—Engineering Department Fax: 406.586.1730 20 East Olive www.hkminc.com Bozeman, MT 59715 Re: West Winds Phases 4, 5 &6—Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update Addendum—Average Daily Traffic Update & Collision Review Dear Sue: �� B Enclosed please find an Addendum to the West Winds Phases 14, S &�6_6) Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update. This addendum addresses Average Daily Traffic, wTucli was reevaluated based on 24-hour volume data, and Review of Collision Data, which was updated upon receipt of accident data from the Montana Department of Transportation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, HKM Engineering Inc. Lewis Baeth, P.E. cc: file enclosure BILLINGS,MONTANA BUTTE,MONTANA BUTTE LABORATORY MILES CITY,MONTANA SHERIDAN,WYOMING LANDER,WYOMING 406.656.6399 406.723.8213 406.494.1502 406.234.6666 307.672.9006 307.332.3285 f. t 7: �j lid 2 2 2007 ►l . vL� � ------------------------ _I Subdivision Phase IV—Vill Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update I —Addendum — 1 — Average Daily Traffic Update - - Review of Collision Data— 1 June, 2007 Prepared For: Cascade Development, LLC Suite 223 1627 West Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 IPrepared By: J *imp E N G I N E E R I N G - 601 Nikles Dr., Ste. 2 Bozeman, MT__59715 i 04S067.125 J West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................3 II. AVERAE DAILY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS.........................................................................3 III. REVIEW OF COLLISION DATA.......................................................................................8 IV, CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................10 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing and Projected Background Average Daily Traffic.............................................5 Table2. —ADT Comparison........................................................................................................7 Table3. Collision Rates..............................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 —Traffic Data Collection Locations................................................................................4 APPENDIX Average Daily Traffic Volume Reports June 2007 Page 2 of 9 N ENGINEER�NQ West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data I. INTRODUCTION This document is presented as an addendum to the West Winds Subdivision Phase IV-VI11 Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update, submitted April, 2007 for the purpose of reevaluating and updating the anticipated Average Daily Traffic (ADT) associated with the development of the West Winds Planned Community. The data contained herein was developed separately from the April 2007 Update due to winter weather conditions which precluded the collection of 24- hour volume data until warmer weather. In the absence of actual volumes, the 2007 Update based ADT on the assumption that peak hour volumes represented an estimated 10% of total average daily traffic, with the understanding that field data would be collected when weather conditions allowed and more accurate ADT projections could be developed. Similarly, an updated Review of Collision Data was not included in the 2007 update, with the understanding that this review would be completed upon receipt of accident data from the Montana Department of Transportation. As such, this addendum also contains the updated Review of Collision Data. II. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS Existing traffic volumes were collected using 24-hour tube counters, placed at locations selected to correspond with ADT values shown in the 2007 TIS update. Traffic data was collected over a 6-week period from May 7th to June 151h, 2007. Traffic data was not collected from May 28th through June 8th due to the Memorial Day holiday and inclement weather. Existing traffic data was collected at nine locations on the following streets, at the locations shown in Figure 1. 1. Baxter Lane 2. Davis Lane 3. North 19`'Avenue 4. North 27th Avenue 5. Oak Street 6. Tschache Lane June 2007 Page 3 of 9 H E N G.I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data Figure 1 —Traffic Data Collection Locations Legend: = Existing Road "ogTF' - - - = Future Road Data Collection Point W O > C G T T Baxter Lane 1 N 1 c West Winds Common" o 1 Tschache Lane � , c cl--—0 1 Q � Q � Y l4 C 1 , m 1 ' W.Oak Street � c c m a' a N z z c = Durston Road June 2007 Page 4 of 9 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data Based on discussions with the City of Bozeman, a growth rate of 5.0% per year was employed to determine 2010 and 2014 background volumes in an effort to estimate increases in demand due to the development of adjacent subdivisions and expected growth to the Bozeman area population. This growth rate is supported by recent growth trends in the area, but could be considered conservative if the high rate of growth seen in recent years does not continue. Regardless, this rate was utilized as the average growth rate per year for the 2007 update as well as in determining future background ADT. The collected traffic volumes have been processed to reflect expected 2010 and 2014 equivalent volumes. Existing and projected ADT is presented in Table 1. Table 1. Existing and Projected Background Average Daily Traffic Background ADT Location % in Peak 2007 2010 2014 Hour —ft Baxter Lane-East of N 27th 3,955 6.7% 4,578 5,565 Avenue Baxter Lane-West of N 27th 2,647 7.3% 3,064 3,725 �J Avenue t S Davis Lane 1,728 6.7% 2,000 2,431 North 19th Avenue 27,367 8.4% 31,681 38,508 North 27th Avenue-North of 1,828 5.1% 2,116 2,572 Oak Street North 27th Avenue-South of 2,607 8.2% 3,018 3,668 Oak Street Oak Street-East of North 27th 5,612 9.2% 6,497 7,897 Avenue Oak Street-West of North 27th 4,441 8.1% 5,141 6,249 Avenue Tschache Lane-West of North 257 37.0% 298 362 19th Avenue June 2007 Page 5 of 9 H ENO INC E R ING West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data The percentage of ADT occurring in the peak hour was calculated from peak hour data collected in February, 2007 and 24-hour volume data collected in May and June, 2007. As such, the estimated percentages could be slightly lower than would be calculated from same day peak hour and 24-hour data. It should be noted that calculating ADT from a lower percentage value yields a conservative ADT value. Comparison of the updated ADT volumes with the peak hour volumes in the 2007 Update indicates that peak hour volumes ranged between 5% and 9% of ADT as shown in Table 1, rather than the assumed value of 10%. To illustrate this, Table 2 presents a comparison of estimated Background ADT with the measured and projected volumes from Table 1. This comparison indicates that projected ADT volumes in the 2007 update4id not 4,a, reflect existing volumes on the area road network. Table 3 presents Adjusted Background and Build-out ADT. Projected ADT at build-out for Phase 1-III (2010) and Phase IV-Vill (2014) were based on peak hour volumes using the percentages shown in Table 1. In the case of Tschache Lane, 100% of the volumes measured in the peak hour counts did not continue west beyond Home Depot. As such, a percentage of ADT in the peak hour could not be calculated. An adjusted value of 7% was used, based on the range of percentages estimated in Table 1. Similarly, the 5.1% value calculated for North 27`h Avenue north of Oak Street is expected to increase over time. As build-out of West Winds occurs, a higher percentage of peak hour traffic is expected to generate from adjacent residential neighborhoods. An adjusted value of 6% was used, based on this expectation. June 2007 Page 6 of 9 H E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study-2007 Update-Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data Table 2.-Average Daily Traffic Comparison Background ADT Location 2007 2010 2014 Estimated Actualz Estimated3 Projected° Estimated5 Projected° Baxter Lane-East of N 27th 2,600 3,955 ` 3,000 4,578 4,000 6,442 Avenue Baxter Lane-West of N 27th 1,900 2,647 , 2,300 3,064 2,900 4,312 Avenue Davis Lane 1,300 1,728' 1,500 2,000 1,800 2,815 North 19th Avenue 22,900 27,367 ' 26,500 31,681 32,400 44,578 North 27th Avenue-North of 900 1,828 1,100 2,116 / 1,600 2,978 Oak Street North 27th Avenue-South of 2,300 2,607 ° 2,700 3,018 3,500 4,247 3/ Oak Street 9 Oak Street-East of North 27th 5,200 5,612 6,000 6,497 ! 8,000 9,141 Avenue Oak Street-West of North 27th 3,600 4,441 4,200 5,141 f 5,400 7,234 2�'� Avenue Tschache Lane-West of North 1,000 4,441_? 4,200 2` 5,141 5,400 7,234 19th Avenue June 2007 Page 7 of 9 West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study- 2007 Update-Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data Table 3.-Adjusted Average Daily Traffic Location 2007 2010 2010 2014 2014 Existing %,In Peak Background Build-Out Background Build-Out Hour Phase 1-III' Phase IV-VIII' Baxter Lane-East of N 27th 3,955 6.7% / 4,578 ' 4,850 5,565 ' 6,880 Avenue Baxter Lane-West of N 27th 2,647 7.3% i 3,064 3,180 3,725 4,710 Avenue (Davis Lane 1,728 i 6.7% 2.000 2,170 2,431 i 3,450 North 19th Avenue 27,367 8.4% 31,681 31.800 38,508 39,050 North 27th Avenue-North of 1,828 6.0% -4� (� 2,116 2,320 2,572 3,880 Oak Street North 27th Avenue-South of 2,607 8.2% ' 3,018 3,280 3,668 ' 4,880 Oak Street Oak Street-East of North 27th 5,612 i 9.2% 6,497 ' 7,300 7,897 9,350 Avenue Oak Street-West of North 27th 4,441 8.1% 5,141, 5,930 6,249 7,840 Avenue r� Tschache Lane-West of North 257 7.0% 31 l0 298 i 330 362 1,130 19th Avenue June 2007 Page 8 of 9 PiN E E West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data III. REVIEW OF COLLISION DATA Collision data was provided by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) for the 3-year time period between July 2003 through December 2006 for the intersections listed below. Accident rates per million entering vehicles (MEV) were computed for each of the intersections based on millions of entering vehicles and are presented in Table 3. Collision rates from the original 2004 traffic study are included, when applicable. Table 4. Collision Rates Intersection Collision Rate per MEV 2000-2003 2003-2006 North 19th Avenue&Durston Road 0.60 N/A' North 19th Avenue&Oak Street 1.24 N/Al North 19th Avenue&Tschache Lane 0.28 0.41 North 19th Avenue &Baxter Lane 0.65 N/Al North 27th Avenue&Oak Street 0.41 0.11 North 27th Avenue &Durston Road N/A2 0.20 North 27th Avenue&Baxter Lane N/A2 0.22 a Baxter Lane &Davis Lane 0.41 l N/A' a Intersection not included in 2007 TIS Update 2Intersection not included in original 2004 TIS. No critical collision locations were identified near the project development. While the collision rate at the intersection or North 191' Avenue and Tschache Lane is rising, the majority of accidents at this intersection involve north bound/southbound traffic with a high percentage of June 2007 Page 9 of 9 E N G I N E E R I N G West Winds Community Traffic Impact Study— 2007 Update—Addendum Bozeman, MT Average Daily Traffic Update Review of Collision Data "rear-end" and "left-turn" accidents. While four of the accidents involved injuries, no fatalities r + occurred. I It was noted in the original study that the intersection of North 19th Avenue & Oak Street exhibited a higher collision rate than the adjacent intersections due to the predominance of "rear-end" and "side-swipe" type accidents. This intersection was not included in the 2007 update, and as such a current collision rate was not calculated. Review of accident data indicates this intersection still exhibits a large number or "rear-end" and "left-turn" accidents. This intersection was reconstructed with additional capacity in 2007, after the 2007 Update was submitted. Improvements are also planned for the intersection of North 19th Avenue and Durston Road. The development of the West Winds Community is not expected to cause an increase to collision rates at the study intersections. IV. CONCLUSION ADT volumes for the West Winds Community Phase IV-VIII Traffic Impact Study 2007 Update were estimated assuming peak hour volumes represented 10% of total ADT. Subsequent collection of field data reveals that peak hour ADT is more accurately represented using the peak hour percentages of ADT calculated from field data. As such, link volumes presented in this document supersede the values the 2007 Update. Estimated peak hour volumes and Level of Service presented in the 2007 Update are not affected by this change. The development of the West Winds Community and traffic generated by it's residents is not expected to result in an increase in accident rates at the intersection evaluated in the 2007 TIS Update. June 2007 Page 10 of 9 H E N Q I N E E R I N 6 APPENDIX SECTION ONE West Winds Community Baxter Lane-East of N 27th Avenue Traffic Engineering.Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Date Start: 11-Jun-07' Weather:Variable HKM Engineering Date End: 15-Jun-07 Serial Number: 11371 Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Installed By: Tony Becken-Gaddo Average Sat Sun Week Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1•seraue 7,rne II-Jun 07 12:00 * « AM 6 7 8 8 7 7 . 01:00 10 10 11 7 10 " 10 02:00 3 4 2 4 3 * * 31 03:00 7 9 7 9 8 " 8 04:00 29 29 29 27 28 " 28■ 108 05:00 103 111 111 108 108 " 253 06:00 272 259 250 232 253 * * 253- 07:00 292 274 172 290 257 " " 257 08:00 223 260 128 258 217 * * 237 09:00 252 294 137 266 237 " 237 30 10:00 226 280 124 288 230 * " 2 11:00 355 298 183 328 291 2911 12:00 * 282 PM * 324 303 202 298 282 280 01:00 274 280 269 299 280 282- 02:00 267 304 276 * 282 03:00 360 332 359 320 * 343 343 04:00 390 401 388 359 384 * " 384 05:00 224 208 224 230 222 * 222 06:00 154 166 195 206 * 180 * 180 07:00 142 135 144 150 143 • 143 08:00 80 108 106 139 108 * * 108 09:00 42 54 71 62 57 • 57 ■ 10:00 20 38 34 34 32 * 32■ _ 11:00 _ 20 18 18 29 21 _ ' * 21 1 Total 1432 4103 4261 3438 2422 3983 0 0 3983 %Avg. 36.0% 103.0% 107.0% 86.3% 60.8% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 36.0% 103.0% 107.0% 86.3% 60.8% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% We�c 11:00 AM Peak 11:00 11:00 06:00 11:00 11:00 291 Vol. 355 298 250 328 291 - - - PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 13:00 16:00 16:00 3 Val. 390 401 388 359 299 384 84 Total 1432 4103 4261 3438 2422 3983 0 0 3983 ADT ADT 3,955 AADT 3,955 Page 1 West Winds Community Baxter Lane-West of N 27th Avenue Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable Date Start: 14-May-07 Serial Number: 11371 HKM Engineering Date End: 18-May-07 Installed By: Tony Becken-Gaddo Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Other Notes: Start Mon Too Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 14May-07 _ — - Day A —_ � 12:00 2 AM 1 0 5 3 2 01:00 2 6 5 3 4 ' 4 02:00 * 3 5 5 5 4 * 41 03:00 * 6 6 6 9 7 7 20 F 04:00 * 14 21 18 26 20 05:00 * 54 70 90 49 66 66 —, 70 06:00 " 174 190 162 156 170 1 07:00 222 218 272 204 229 * 2299 69 08:00 * 158 166 183 168 169 * " 143 1 09:00 * 130 125 152 165 143 178 1668 10:00 * 196 156 170 192 178 * 11:00 212 230 200 29 168 8 12:00 200 PM 206 194 200 200 " *01:00 195 166 210 190 190 * " 190 -� 02:00 221 201 207 194 * 206 224 206 03:00 232 220 190 254 " 224 ' " 04:00 240 254 266 262 255 * * 255 05:00 141 149 134 136 140 140 06:00 102 105 103 112 106 * * 106 07:00 84 102 98 92 94 " 94 08:00 64 55 64 64 62 * 62 09:00 30 28 40 40 34 * * 34 ■ 10:00 6 14 11 22 13 " 131 _ 11100 4 3 ' 10 5 S Total 1124 2704 2668 2864 1009 2689 0 0 2689 %Avg. 41.8% 100.6% 99.2% 106.5% 37.5% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 41.8% 100.6% 99.2% 106.5% 37.5% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 07:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 222 230 272 _204_ 229 229 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol 240 254 2S5_ 262 255 255 Total 1124 2704 2668 2864 1009 2689 0 0 2689 ADT ADT 2,647 AADT 2,647 I Page 1 West Winds Community Davis Lane Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable HKM Engineering `Date Start: 07-May-07 Serial Number: 11371 g g Date End: 11-May-07 Installed By: Tony Becken-Gaddo Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Other Notes:_ Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week _Time 07•May07 Rey — p 12:00 AM 6 5 43 42 24 * 24 _ 01:00 0 159 100 86 86 " 86 02:00 2 98 96 97 73 73 0100 5 94 88 66 63 63 04:00 7 104 110 74 74 * 741� 05:00 46 86 112 94 84 " 84 06:00 102 123 104 126 114 114 07:00 122 82 100 124 107 * 107 08:00 * 86 105 112 19 80 " 80 09:00 102 107 112 " 107 107 10:00 * 112 162 150 * 141 * * 141 -� 11:00 112 156 153 140 * 140 12:00 PM * 120 98 130 116 116 - 01:00 80 88 90 * 86 86 02:00 118 136 74 54 * 96 * 96 03:00 170 138 31 54 * 98 98 04:00 192 174 30 23 * 105 * * 105 05:00 116 126 10 19 ` 68 68 06:00 89 72 5 7 * 43 * * 43 07:00 52 66 2 4 * 31 * 31 08:00 37 48 2 1 * 22 22 09:00 16 36 4 4 15 " 15 1 10:00 7 14 4 1 6 * * 61 11:00 6 1 4 8 ` 5 5 Total 803 1713 1633 1675 728 1784 0 0 1784 %Avg. 45.0% 96.0% 91.5% 93.9% 40.8% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 45.0% 96.0% 91.5% 93.9% 40.8% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 07:00 10:00 11:00 06:00 10:00 10:00 Vol 12 162 153 126 141 141 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Vol. 192 174 98 130 116 116 Total 803 1713 1633 1675 728 1784 0 0 1784 ADT ADT 1,728 AADT 1,728 Page 1 West Winds Community North 19th Avenue Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable HKM Engineering ineering Date Start: 11-Jun-07 Serial Number: 11372(NB); 12620(SB) Date End: 15-Jun-07 Installed By: Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 To_n-Becker-gg4do Start MIN Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 11-Jun-07 Dw Average 12:00 p AM * 39 62 52 73 56 * 561 01:00 * 30 39 42 45 39 * * 39 02:00 * 57 43 41 49 48 * * 48 9 03:00 86 93 112 84 94 * 94 I 04:00 * 253 264 231 257 251 • ' 251 ■ 05:00 ` 736 715 675 646 693 • 693 06:00 1449 1359 1351 1298 1364 • 1364 07:00 1396 1434 1364 1359 1388 " 1388 08:00 1399 1471 1510 1535 1479 " 1479^—T� 09:00 1649 1745 1678 1854 1732 1732 10:00 1919 1967 2019 2123 2007 2007 11:00 2144 2193 2216 2176 2182 2182 7, 12:00 PM * 2137 2128 2160 2005 2108 * 2108 01:00 2008 1928 2030 1386 1838 " 1838 02:00 2081 1991 1992 2090 * 2038 * * 2038 03:00 2142 2064 2084 2107 ' 2099 2099 04:00 2149 2281 2205 2196 * 2208 " * 2208 05:00 1748 1726 1800 1834 ' 1777 " " 1777 06:00 1414 1335 1494 1407 1412 * 1412 07:00 1093 1051 1186 1186 " 1129 1129 08:00 777 837 838 846 * 824 * * 824 09:00 488 512 499 528 " 507 " 507 10:00 247 230 244 256 244 244 11:00 138 117 119 131 126 ' ` 126 Total 12277 27446 27902 28062 14890 27643 0 0 27643 %Avg. 44.4% 99.3% 100.9% 101.5% 53.9% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 44.4% 99.3% 100.9% 101.5% 53.9% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 2144 2193 2216 2176 2182 2182 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 12:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 2149 2281 2205 2196 2005 2208 22QB Total 12277 27446 27902 28062 14890 27643 0 0 27643 ADT ADT 27,367 AADT 27,367 Page 1 O NN rO V 00 r f0 r' O)OD V M OOo000� 1- O O M a 000 MNMCC)NN V N0 N 00CN M Nf0 O mm M o000 M�O M O M O m � fn C C C �MCO CL)I�000 � � 00� �d)f� �MN� M 6m c d N m 7 7N O � �N N QS E Tao ?Z rt V C O Qn0 co p 1-r 0 CD N m to 0000 O N Or-CO V MN (O cocOMO—N O N O V 7 Off••' "O 0.0 N--MMf0 Or V 00 w OOrO e-CO0 M1-OM L'r— O LO O N Q CO c6 C a) N M a0 00 1�CO 0 0 CA O)6) O) 0 00 co V N.- M O (p w �LLJ C p d � N 0 ❑ k0' . . . # « . . . . . . . . . . . . O O p Z O W _ _ O O cl I Q .ak V O CO 0�a V V V O)(O k + % + k f k # k r 0 CD 0 V N M� C)M •Y` t. Cl)CO�f)1-00 C%l1l U') N C5 O CD N Z Q°p' 0) 1 LL p� OfOMV Nf� V LOCO ODON hNk r k + k K x # k Y C') O O 1� V .0 N M cl)M CO I-000M Of 1- M`"' O O O h M 1-1-11-0)0 0 1'-(0 r p El - - - G �cn MNr-N V M I�0MOM 000Ln CO Co co Nao NOLO O M C) CO /1 V/ C ,Op NNN0O�NM M 0 M M OuO0M �c-ON0MNr- CD O N V t MLoCO 0O CO CD cmO-(DMN D r o N r N •` W N L Z CD G Gv m � c � Co VC OO VOI-NOrVO0 co LO COd OD O) OVN O O co NN-LO L)N V 00 �r-00t- O 0O M M 0O 1� 0 MWCOS V N 0) i GGr N Cr O � O •A •� U) 0 (O0 C7)O)V OLON V OOQ NNCO 00 N(O 00NLOLL)OC CD O O O N W J NNN�M U)M V a)N V h C 000 00)O M m 0 O h 0)O O M C:)CD V O L Mfp 1� 0 0 CArC0 V Nr' OV (p r V 0 N o�Z N (A � O (OMV VOLOVNO OM 00000 C0MVC0 M VMNN C) ,O M��MM00 N(O Cf)MN H(O�� VNOLMN Iz �M00001�0000 OOOO 0OD(D� V N� 00 f a- �2 r �2 ~ 7 OCO Cl Co�COMN O) CO 0)(0 V N P. 0O BOO O)I-O O O 1� N C,4 "L, Cl)00 V COM V O I�ODV a0 COO OCOM O O V Cl) LOCO fD 00 O)CD 0O)0 C�V O)(O LO V N � M CCCr (p N2 f� O N V ❑ H CA V MOONO(0 VV 000O0pp ODNI�N VN MN V OCO� O Qp O 00 NN V O(D In V 1- 0 U)N V ,n MN �6)M 0)�i0 N O u°Qi O Cn'� N r V 0O O0 t- M 0 0(A Q) 0 00 to V V N W O N O M e r e- O `- (D M rx • k # N r k + x + k K . (0 OD w V O O LO W V 00 r O N _ O W V N M I-r M—CO �O1�CO 0ON� (0 O Cl) (O n m Cl) N 1 ~ r ~ r 7 N ❑ 7K • x + x Y k # x + x + k Y LC) Co V V M N O M 0v 0 O •Ci' N Q fll Cl) 'O� CDON OON C)0M7� .D� 00000(O 0n V N� Lo W) (0 LQ1 O M ,p A. �. > E co _ m O<0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a.0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O C m< m Oa-m o 5 ~ (DZ omC N Q a mOQ a�>a a�> E o ❑ �N NM V LO0r-OOM0 N NM V CO(DrOD CnO J a d OH Q fD(11 M �.s�.� 000000000— 000000000 V can) =91 West Winds Community North 27th Avenue-North of Oak St Traffic Engineering Study - 2007,ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable ' Date Start: 14-May-07 Serial Number: 11372 HKM Engineering Date End: 18-May-07 Installed By: Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Tony Becken-Gaddo - Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 14-Mav-07 Dey Avm-vp-_ 12:00 5864 AM 6 1 124 102 58 01:00 4 5 140 100 62 02:00 4 274 98 76 113 * 11133 03:00 4 77 90 86 64 64 04:00 " 6 96 90 70 66 * * 66 05:00 34 114 86 78 " " 78 06:00 113 122 99 * 111 * * 111 07:00 138 120 93 117 117 08:00 * 62 139 124 * 108 108 09:00 78 208 142 * 143 143 10:00 * 112 194 154 * 153 * * 163 MF 11:00 126 155 108 130 " 130 12:00 PM * 112 119 88 106 * 10 I 01:00 " 87 92 68 " 82 " " 822 E 02:00 120 138 54 70 * 96 * * 96 _ 03:00 177 128 42 40 " 97 97 04:00 179 171 20 28 * 100 * * 100 05:00 110 110 10 9 " 60 " 60 06:00 67 76 10 13 * 42 * 42 07:00 58 82 8 4 " 38 38 08:00 48 56 8 6 " 30 * 30 09:00 21 26 8 6 15 15 1 10:00 16 19 16 11 16 * * 16■ 11:00 12 9 56 43 30 30 Total 808 1701 1948 1734 434 1915 0 0 1915 %Avg. 42.2% 88.8% 101.7% 90.5% 22.7% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 42.2% 88.8% 101.7% 90.5% 22.7% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 07:00 02:00 10:00 00:00 10:00 1 153 1 Vol. 138 274 154 102 153 :00 10 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Vol. 179 171 119 88 106 1066 Total 808 1701 1948 1734 434 1915 0 0 1915 ADT ADT 1,828 AADT 1,828 Page 1 West Winds Community North 27th Avenue-South of Oak St. Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Weather: Variable HKM En Date Start:21-May-07 Engineering Serial Number: 11371 g g Date End: 25-May-07 Installed By: Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Tony.Becken-Caddo Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 21-May-07 ppy Average 12:00 AM 5 3 11 15 8 81 01:00 1 4 10 10 6 6 02:00 * 4 5 2 2 3 31 03:00 3 4 4 5 4 4 04:00 * 17 23 24 14 20 20■ 05:00 * 52 68 76 54 62 62 06:00 168 162 144 131 151 151 07:00 184 174 190 180 182 182 08:00 * 134 112 130 142 130 * 130 09:00 " 108 136 123 140 127 127 10:00 * 140 150 142 66 124 * 124�11 11:00 142 178 186 169 169 - 12:00 PM 150 174 134 153 * * 153 01:00 181 164 164 172 " 170 * 170 02:00 200 186 221 196 201 * * 201 03:00 218 210 241 256 * 231 " 231 04:00 286 230 285 276 269 * 269 05:00 202 168 212 206 197 197 06:00 132 133 174 124 141 * 141 07:00 117 112 121 99 112 " 112 08:00 58 62 94 78 73 * * 73 09:00 51 44 54 57 52 52 M 10:00 33 31 39 28 33 * * 33■ 11:00 16 11 9 24 15 _ *_ _ " 15 Total 1494 2459 2807 2692 759 2633 0 0 2633 %Avg. 56.7% 93.4% 106.6% 102.2% 28.8% 100.0% WkDay %Avg, 56.7% 93.4% 106.6% 102.2% 28.8% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 07:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 184 178 190 180 182 182 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 286 230 285 276 269 269 Total 1494 2459 2807 2692 759 2633 0 0 2633 ADT ADT 2,607 AADT 2,607 Page 1 West Winds Community Oak Street- East of N 27th Avenue Traffic Engineering Study - 2007,ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable HKM Engineering Date Start:21-May-07 n Serial Number: 11372 g g Date End:25-May-07 Installed By: Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Tony Becken-Gaddo Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 21-May-07 Day Average 12:00 AM 15 14 24 22 19 " * 19 01:00 5 8 13 18 11 " 11 02:00 8 4 1 8 5 " 51 03:00 6 7 13 8 8 8 04:00 38 28 46 30 36 36■ 05:00 146 124 160 138 142 142 06:00 371 260 347 296 318 * 318 07:00 386 326 384 360 364 " 364 Effi� 08:00 327 236 317 296 294 294 09:00 296 302 308 326 308 308 INC= 10:00 387 353 364 224 332 332 MEN= 11:00 390 440 472 " 434 434 12:00 PM * 354 412 326 364 " * 364 01:00 399 333 348 343 356 " 356 02:00 432 360 410 435 409 " 409 03:00 494 420 485 492 473 473 04:00 646 518 616 530 578 " 578 05:00 390 356 451 435 408 408 06:00 279 224 316 320 285 * 285 07:00 242 200 240 217 225 225 08:00 131 120 167 152 142 * 142 09:00 77 97 116 132 106 106 M 10:00 59 41 63 55 54 54■ _ 11:00 25 11 24 34 24 _ 24 1 Total 3174 5409 5750 5920 1726 5695 0 0 5695 %Avg. 55.7% 95.0% 101.0% 104.0% 30.3% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 55.7% 95.0% 101.0% 104.0% 30.3% 100.0% o 0 Week 0.0/0 0.0/o AM Peak 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 390 440 472 360 434 434 PM Peak 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 646 518 616 530 578 578 Total 3174 5409 5750 5920 1726 5695 0 0 5695 ADT ADT 5,612 AADT 5,612 Page 1 West Winds Community Oak Street-West of N 27th Avenue Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT Bozeman, MT Weather:Variable HKM Engineering Date Start: 07-May-07 n Serial Number: 11372 g. g Date End: 11-May-07 Installed By: Bozeman, MT Date Printed: 18-Jun-07 Tony Becken-Gaddo Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 074ay-07 Day Average 12:00 AM * 9 12 17 16 14 • 14 01:00 " 3 8 8 12 8 8 02:00 * 2 4 3 9 4 " 41 03:00 10 4 5 3 6 6 04:00 25 27 32 14 24 * 24 05:00 ' 114 130 100 36 95 ' 95 06:00 334 324 330 151 285 * 285 07:00 324 394 361 196 319 319 08:00 * 288 312 238 ' 279 279 09:00 340 322 206 * 289 289 10:00 364 328 184 * 292 292 11:00 404 412 210 342 342 12:00 PM 383 386 249 339 339 01:00 ' 336 398 209 " 314 314 02:00 392 448 226 355 355 _ 03:00 452 430 487 240 402 402 04:00 466 407 476 276 406 " 406 05:00 298 300 289 206 273 273 EE --A 06:00 199 204 274 164 * 210 * 210 07:00 182 166 197 136 170 " 170 08:00 96 125 126 100 * 112 ' 112 09:00 70 81 100 43 74 740 10:00 28 38 54 29 * 37 * 37■ 11:00 15 18 25 18 " 19 '_ _ _ 19 1 Total 1806 5097 5537 3590 437 4668 0 0 4668 %Avg. 38.7% 109.2% 118.6% 76.9% 9.4% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 38.7% 109.2% 118.6% 76.9% 9.4% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 11:00 11:00 07:00 07:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 404 412 361 196 342 342 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 15:00 16:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 466 430 487 276 406 406 Total 1806 5097 5537 3590 437 4668 0 0 4668 ADT ADT 4,441 AADT 4,441 Page 1 West Winds Community Tschache Lane Traffic Engineering Study - 2007 ADT West of North 19thAvenue Weather: HKM i Engneering Date Start: 11-Jun-07 Serial Number:126O1 Date End: 15-Jun-07 Installed By:Tony Becken-Gaddo Bozeman, MT Date Printed:20-Jun-07 VOther Notes: Start Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Sat Sun Week Time 11-Jun-07 Day. Average 12:00 AM " 0 0 0 2 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 03:00 1 1 1 1 1 " 11 04:00 0 2 4 4 2 2 1 05:00 6 4 1 6 4 4 ■ 06:00 13 15 12 12 13 * 13 07:00 14 9 6 11 10 10 08:00 26 17 17 18 20 * 20 09:00 16 8 8 12 11 11 10:00 25 22 16 26 22 " 22- 11:00 36 22 27 36 30 " 30 12:00 PM * 23 17 24 28 23 " 23 01:00 18 13 13 15 15 15 02:00 * 28 13 20 " 20 20- 03:00 15 10 28 21 18 18 - 04:00 21 24 15 19 * 20 * * 20- 05:00 18 15 20 15 17 * 17 06:00 11 10 13 11 * 11 * * 11 07:00 7 12 7 9 " 9 * 9 08:00 6 10 10 5 8 " 8 M 09:00 1 1 7 1 2 2 10:00 4 0 0 1 " 1 " 11 11:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 Total 84 288 243 232 171 257 0 0 257 %Avg. 32.7% 112.1% 94.6% 90.3% 66.5% 100.0% WkDay %Avg. 32.7% 112.1% 94.6% 90.3% 66.5% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Week AM Peak 11:00 10:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 36 22 27 36 30 30 PM Peak 16:00 14:00 15:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Vol_. 21 28 28 24 28 23 23 Total 84 288 243 232 171 257 0 0 257 ADT ADT 257 AADT 257 Page 1