The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-04-17 City Commission Minutes THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA MINUTES Monday, December 04,2017 AGENDA ORDER MODIFIED DURING MEETING.ITEM AND NUMBER DESIGNATIONS REMAIN AS ORIGINALLY NOTICED. Mayor-Carson Taylor: Present Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Present Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Present Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Present Staff Present at the Dais:City Manager(CM)Andrea Surratt, City Attorney(CA)Greg Sullivan, City Clerk Robin Crough A. 06:00:17 PM (00:04:29)Call to Order—6:00 PM-Commission Room, City Hall, 121 North Rouse Mayor Taylor called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. B. 06:00:28 PM (00:04:40) Pledge of Allegiance and a Moment of Silence C. 06:01:17 PM (00:05:29)Changes to the Agenda Mayor Taylor moved Item G. Mayoral Proclamation ahead of general public comment. D. 06:01:36 PM (00:05:48)Authorize Absence-Commissioner I-Ho Pomeroy 06:01:36 PM (00:05:48)Motion and Vote to authorize the absence of Commissioner I-Ho Pomeroy. The motion passed 4-0. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Deputy Mavor-Cynthia Andrus:2nd Mavor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve E. 06:01:56 PM (00:06:08)Consent Page 1 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 1. Authorize Payment of Accounts Payable Claims for Goods and Services(LaMeres) C= 2. Adopt the Library Depreciation Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019- 2023 (Donald) 7La 3. Adopt the Parking Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 (Donald) 4. Adopt the Street and Curb Reconstruction Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 (Donald) '.: .a 5. Adopt the Street Maintenance Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019- 2023 (Donald) 6. Adopt the Wastewater Fund. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 (Donald) a 7. Adopt the Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)for Fiscal Years 2019-2023(Donald) a 8. Adopt the Water Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 (Donald) a 9. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Public Access and Utility Easement with M. Cooper for the Bozeman Midtown Urban Renewal District's Lighting and Streetscape Project(Fine) 1 a 10. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Public Access and Utility Easement with Sapphire Night Sky, LLC for the Bozeman Midtown Urban Renewal District's Lighting and Streetscape Project (Fine) wa 11. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Public Access and Utility Easement with the Human Resource Development Council of District IX, Inc. (HRDC) for the Bozeman Midtown Urban Renewal District's Lighting and Streetscape Project(Fine) 11- 4�:3 12. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Memorandum of Agreement, Public Use Easement,and Certificate of Acceptance with S. Sterry and P. Wookey for Right-of-Way Purchase for the Construction of Improvements to Durston Road (Woolard) . 13. Authorize the City Manager to Sign the Sewer and Water Pipeline and Access Easement and Agreement with South Rows Investors, LLC for the South Rows Project(Kohtz) '. -.,a 14. Authorize the City Manager to Sign Task Order Number 13 with DOWL for Right-of-Way Acquisition Services at the Intersection of Fowler Avenue and West Babcock Street (Hixson) 01� Cp 15. Authorize the City Manager to Sign Amendment Number 1 to Task Order Number 9 with DOWL for Right-of-Way Acquisition Services for the Fowler Lane Extension (Hixson) 7La 16. Ratify the City Manager's Signature on a Professional Services Agreement with Camelot Construction for the Removal of Snow from Public Sidewalks(Knight) a ffler.d,.. eent i ted at 806 ne-,, ley Read, Appleeation 17230 (Sa MOVED TO ACTION ITEMS Page 2 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 06:02:03 PM (00:06:15)City Manager Overview CM Surratt provided a brief overview of Consent Items 1-17. 06:07:19 PM (00:11:31) Pull Consent Item 17 Cr. Krauss requested to pull Consent Item 17. Mayor Taylor placed this as the first Action Item. 06:07:29 PM (00:11:41) Public Comment on Consent Items 1-16. There was no public comment. 06:07:47 PM (00:11:59)Motion and Vote to approve Consent Items 1-16 as submitted. The motion passed 4-0. Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 06:08:07 PM (00:12:19) Discussion Cr. Krauss thanked the Midtown property owners who cooperated with the improvements in the district. G. 06:08:52 PM (00:13:04) Mayoral Proclamation 1. 06:09:10 PM (00:13:22)Award the Key to the City of Bozeman to Allan Lien C� Mayor Taylor bestowed the Key to the City to Allan Lien. He discussed Mr. Lien's contributions to the city. Mr. Lien accepted the key, and spoke a few words about water and annexation. He thanked the mayor for the key. F. 06:17:25 PM (00:21:37) Public Comment Mayor Taylor opened public comment. 06:18:14 PM (00:22:26)Brian Caldwell Public Comment Mr. Caldwell discussed challenges with the sale of alcohol in the City,specifically the service area radius ban. He asked that the Commission revisit the new types of licenses that have recently been created at the state. 06:20:52 PM (00:25:04)Jessym Bremer,Public Comment Ms. Bremer, representing the Downtown Group, requested the City Commission to revisit the alcohol license radius issue as well. 06:22:47 PM (00:26:59)Henry Foch,Public Comment Page 3 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Mr. Foch noted that members of the design community are here for the UDC item. He stated staff has been very open to meet with them. G. Mayor-;;I Pracl2raa MOVED BEFORE PUBLIC COMMENT H. 06:23:43 PM (00:27:55)Action Items 06:23:50 PM (00:28:02) Consent Item 17.Schedule Reconsideration of Action Regarding the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment, Located at 806 Manley Road,Application 17230(Saunders) L� 06:24:05 PM (00:28:17) Discussion Cr. Krauss stated he is voting no as he initially voted no. 06:24:27 PM (00:28:39) Public Comment Mayor Taylor opened public comment. 06:24:38 PM (00:28:50)Per Hjalmarsson,Public Comment Mr. Hjalmarsson stated there are some new issues that have come up that warrant additional public comment. He stated that everything was done correctly,over years of work prior to applying for annexation. 06:28:00 PM (00:32:12)City Attorney CA Sullivan noted the options available to the Commission on this item for reconsideration. Policy and Planning Manager Chris Saunders described the noticing period. CA Sullivan suggested that the hearing be run the same as the initial hearing,since it will be a new Commission. 06:30:46 PM (00:34:58)Motion to reconsider the prior action to not annex and zone the Bridger View [Vale]development,application 17230,and direct staff to prepare the required public notice and set a public hearing date. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd 06:31:02 PM (00:35:14) Discussion Cr. Mehl noted that the memo only notes one option, but later is better than never. He would rather hear some substance behind the discussion. He supported the original annexation. DM Andrus also supports the motion. Mayor Taylor is ready to vote, but he supports the motion if that is what the Commission desires. Page 4 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 06:33:05 PM (00:37:17) Vote on the Motion to reconsider the prior action to not annex and zone the Bridger View(Vale]development, application 17230,and direct staff to prepare the required public notice and set a public hearing date. The motion passed 3-1. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion DeputV Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 1. 06:33:17 PM (00:37:29) Wastewater Impact Fee Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2019-2023 (Donald) „a 06:33:34 PM (00:37:46)Staff Presentation Finance Director Kristin Donald discussed the Wastewater Impact Fee Fund, and specific projects and timing.She provided a summary of the projects. 06:36:26 PM (00:40:38) Questions of Staff DM Andrus asked about the difference between an interceptor and a lift station. Public Works Director Craig Woolard responded.She asked why the schedule changed for the North Frontage Road interceptor. She also asked about the change in the Davis Lane lift station scheduling,and what has changed from last year to this year.She also asked about the Hidden Valley lift station change.She asked about the Davis Lane lift station debt service change, and if there is a funding agreement in place. Finance Director Donald responded.She asked Director Woolard if there is a point when we stop building so many lift stations. Cr. Mehl asked Director Donald about the expected term for the loans. He asked about impact fees paying for this work vs. rate-payers. Cr. Krauss asked also asked about the timeline for reaching the max of lift stations,and how impact fees will continue to finance these. He asked how the city will deal with a large project uphill of wastewater treatment plants,and if impact fees can fund large individual projects. Director Woolard responded in detail about deficiencies and accommodating growth. He asked about the City directing growth. He asked if there is a section-based impact fee program, and maybe there should be reflective impact fee districts.Assistant City Manager Anna Rosenberry stated these districts do not exist yet,and provided additional detail. He asked about disproportional charges,and when does it make sense to split the city into impact fee districts. Director Woolard also responded regarding the long-term CIP and decisions and priorities made a few years ago. 07:02:46 PM (01:06:58) Public Comment Page 5 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 There was no public comment. 07:02:58 PM (01:07:10)Motion to adopt the Wastewater Impact Fee[Fund]Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)for Fiscal Years 2019-2023. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd 07:03:08 PM (01:07:20) Discussion Cr. Krauss stated that Bozeman has never specifically directed growth with the use of the associated costs. He discussed in great deal, but does support the motion. DM Andrus supports the motion.She discussed growth and how the Transportation Master Plan has helped guide. Cr. Mehl supports the motion, but wanted to be clear that the Triangle Planning Committee is already discussing this. He stated this discussion needs to happen in the long run. Mayor Taylor supports the motion. He stated there should be a discussion before more lift stations are built. Cr. Krauss noted that discussion on a regional facility has happened before, but he doesn't see that happening as an option, but he does welcome this discussion in the future. Cr. Mehl stated he was not suggesting the County would do this. 07:14:11 PM (01:18:23) Vote on the Motion to adopt the Wastewater Impact Fee[Fund]Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)for Fiscal Years 2019-2023. The motion passed 4-0. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 2. 07:14:30 PM (01:18:42) Session Continued from November 27, 2017: Public Hearing of the Bozeman City Commission Regarding Proposed Changes to the City's Zoning,Subdivision,and Other Land Use Regulations (Chapter 38, Bozeman Municipal Code) (Known as the "UDC Update") (Public Comment Closed - May Be Reopened, Commission Deliberation Only) (Rogers) 1"4D 07:14:39 PM (01:18:51) Procedure Mayor Taylor discussed the process for the UDC for the evening. CA Sullivan recommended that the Commission complete Article 4 before they move into Article 5. Mayor Taylor recommended doing cleanup after Article 5 is completed. Page 6 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 07:19:24 PM (01:23:36)Article 4 Housekeeping The Commission began to resolve tied and remaining motions carried over from the November 15, 2017 meeting. 07:19:41 PM (01:23:53) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to add to 38.360.240,2(c)to state, "individual garages facing the street are not allowed for townhouse or rowhouse dwellings in the a-3 District."The amendment passed 3-2. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy: Disapprove Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 07:20:00 PM (01:24:12) Discussion DM Andrus discussed her support of the motion and voted yes. 07:21:26 PM (01:25:38) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion as Amended to add a phrase to paragraph 3 in section 38.340.090.0 after the existing "Whether the subsequent development complies with 38.340.050"to add, ';and the neighborhood's historic significance."The amendment passed 3-2. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy: Disapprove Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 07:21:58 PM (01:26:10) Discussion DM Andrus stated her support of the motion and voted yes. 07:22:16 PM (01:26:28)City Attorney CA Sullivan stated this was a Pile B amendment and will come back to be incorporated in the document at a later date. 07:23:17 PM (01:27:29)Amendment to the Motion to add transitional emergency housing as a"C"or conditional use in all zoning districts. Page 7 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy: 2nd 07:23:42 PM (01:27:54)Amendment to the Motion withdrawn. 07:24:03 PM (01:28:15) Discussion Cr. Mehl is interested in coming back to it later. CA Sullivan asked when Cr. Mehl expected to return to this item. Community Development Director Marty Matsen asked to tackle this in the spring in the affordable housing discussion. 07:26:40 PM (01:30:52) Rollover Discussion on Drive Access-Article 4 Senior Planner Tom Rogers discussed the drive access standards discussion that still needs to be resolved. He discussed staff proposed changes on residential drive access and separation standards in Section 38.400.090: Delete: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) (numbering error,should have been (5)). Replace with: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2). Residential drive access standards apply to all residential development with drive access facing a street, except apartment buildings. i. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with a single internal parking bay meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 12 feet in width measured at the right-of-way line and 18 feet in width measured at the curb line. ii. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with two or more internal parking bays meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 20 feet in width measured at the right-of-way line and 26 feet in width measured at the curb line. iii. Individual and shared drive accesses must be physically separated by means of a landscaped area greater than or equal to ten feet in width between paved areas and extending from the front line of the building to the right-of-way line. iv. Residential complexes with 25 or more dwelling units must meet the commercial access standards in 38.400.090.C.3.b. 07:33:20 PM (01:37:31) Discussion Cr. Mehl asked Mr. Rogers to describe the nature of the changes. Cr. Krauss asked if this limits the size of the garage door or driveway. He asked if the hourglass was possible, and if there are any relaxations possible for a permeable surface. DM Andrus asked Director Matsen to describe a drawing of the driveways to further explain. Page 8 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 07:39:44 PM (01:43:56)Amendment to the Motion to approve the staff changes as suggested in the memo received dated November 29th on page 313 of the overall packet from the top of the page through roman numeral IV(revising residential drive access standards to: Delete: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4)(numbering error,should have been(5)). Replace with: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2). Residential drive access standards apply to all residential development with drive access facing a street, except apartment buildings. i. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with a single internal parking bay meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 12 feet in 23715320,Staff Report for the Unified Development Code Update and Replacement Municipal Code Text Amendment Page 15 of 52 width measured at the right-of-way line and 18 feet in width measured at the curb line. ii. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with two or more internal parking bays meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 20 feet in width measured at the right-of-way line and 26 feet in width measured at the curb line. iii. Individual and shared drive accesses must be physically separated by means of a landscaped area greater than or equal to ten feet in width between paved areas and extending from the front line of the building to the right-of-way line. iv. Residential complexes with 25 or more dwelling units must meet the commercial access standards in 38.400.090.C.3.b.]. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:2nd 07:40:10 PM (01:44:22) Discussion Cr. Mehl stated this doesn't impact existing buildings, but allows for other vehicles. Cr. Krauss stated this is clear, but he doesn't support it. Mayor Taylor stated this makes sense and moves forward the issue. Page 9 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 07:41:20 PM (01:45:32) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to approve the staff changes as suggested in the memo received dated November 29rn on page 313 of the overall packet from the top of the page through roman numeral IV(revising residential drive access standards to: Delete: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(3) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Table 38.400.090.C.3.a(4) Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(4)(numbering error,should have been(5)). Replace with: Section 38.400.090.C.3.a(2). Residential drive access standards apply to all residential development with drive access facing a street, except apartment buildings. i. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with a single internal parking bay meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 12 feet in 23715320,Staff Report for the Unified Development Code Update and Replacement Municipal Code Text Amendment Page 15 of 52 width measured at the right-of-way line and 18 feet in width measured at the curb line. ii. Individual residential drive accesses facing the street with two or more internal parking bays meeting the standard of table 38.540.020 may not exceed 20 feet in width measured at the right-of-way line and 26 feet in width measured at the curb line. iii. Individual and shared drive accesses must be physically separated by means of a landscaped area greater than or equal to ten feet in width between paved areas and extending from the front line of the building to the right-of-way line. iv. Residential complexes with 25 or more dwelling units must meet the commercial access standards in 38.400.090.C.3.b.J. The amendment passed 3-1. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner- 1-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 07:41:39 PM (01:45:51)Amendment to the Motion to revise Section 38.400.090.D.3,removing the Page 10 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 dates to just say"These standards apply to the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and intersections,and the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and other public and/or private accesses." Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd 07:42:36 PM (01:46:48) Discussion DM Andrus stated this was outdated and no longer needed. Mr. Rogers provided additional detail. 07:43:41 PM (01:47:53) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to revise Section 38.400.090.D.3, removing the dates to just say"These standards apply to the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and intersections, and the minimum distance between public and/or private accesses and other public and/or private accesses."The amendment passed 3-1. Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Manor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 07:43:54 PM (01:48:06)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked staff to explain what the intent of eliminating D.2 at the beginning of page 305. Mr. Saunders stated that 09.03 would stay intact,which is the current standard since 2002. Director Matsen provided further clarification. 07:45:15 PM (01:49:27)Amendment to the Motion to accept the staff recommendation to delete Section 38.400.090.D.2 in total(as covered on page 313 of tonight's packet). Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd 07:45:55 PM (01:50:07) Discussion Cr. Mehl stated this has been covered with discussion and previous amendments. 07:45:42 PM (01:49:54) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to accept the staff recommendation to delete Section 38.400.090.D.2 in total(as covered on page 313 of tonight's packet). The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Page 11 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 07:46:08 PM (01:50:20)Article 3 Housekeeping CA Sullivan clarified that accessory buildings is in Article 3. Director Matsen stated staff does not have a formulated response for this evening. 07:48:49 PM (01:53:01) Recess Mayor Taylor called the Commission into recess at 7:55 PM. 07:58:01 PM (02:02:13)Call to Order Mayor Taylor called the meeting back to order at 7:58 PM. 07:58:16 PM (02:02:28)Staff Presentation on Article 5—Project Design Senior Planner Tom Rogers presented on the key components and proposed changes to Article 5— Project Design. Mr. Rogers discussed block frontage in further detail, including landscape,storefront, and gateway and mixed standards. He discussed site plan and design elements. He discussed the Building Design section. 08:11:37 PM (02:15:48) Public Comment There was no public comment. 08:13:29 PM (02:17:41)Amendment to the Motion to Section 38.500.020.A.1 (page 356)eliminating the words"design"and"section"as described in the staff memo for the November 15fh City Commission meeting has follows: For sites within the city's established neighborhood conservation overlay district, the desigm provisions of division 38.340 supersede the provisions of this article. However, the review authority may apply the provisions of this article in the event of a conflict, where the review authority determines that the provisions herein help new development better meet the purpose and intent of neighborhood conservation overlay district per sec-flee 38.340.010.]. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd 08:13:47 PM (02:17:59) Discussion Cr. Mehl stated that this is staff's recommendation, and this is the final part of cleanup. Page 12 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 08:14:32 PM (02:18:44) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to Section 38.500.020.A.1(page 356) eliminating the words "design"and"section"as described in the staff memo for the November 15tn City Commission meeting[as follows: For sites within the city's established neighborhood conservation overlay district, the de4ym provisions of division 38.340 supersede the provisions of this article. However, the review authority may apply the provisions of this article in the event of a conflict, where the review authority determines that the provisions herein help new development better meet the purpose and intent of neighborhood conservation overlay district per sec-tion 38.340.010.]. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner-1-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 08:15:47 PM (02:19:59)Amendment to the Motion to add"and four-household"to Section 38.510.010.b[block frontage standards, as follows: "The provisions of this division apply to all development within Bozeman, except single, two-, three, and four-household dwellings in any configuration."]. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd 08:15:57 PM (02:20:09) Discussion Cr. Mehl asked Mr. Rogers to provide the rationale of this for the public. 08:17:11 PM (02:21:23) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to add"and four-household"to Section 38.510.010.b[block frontage standards, as follows: "The provisions of this division apply to all development within Bozeman, except single, two-, three, and four-household dwellings in any configuration."]. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- 1-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Page 13 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 08:17:26 PM (02:21:38)Amendment to the Motion to change Section 38.540.070.A.4 to read"may not be located more than 300 feet,"replacing 100 with 300. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:2nd 08:18:17 PM (02:22:29) Discussion Cr. Mehl stated this would allow for more creative parking solutions. Mayor Taylor asked what average block size is. DM Andrus asked staff's opinion on this. Staff supports the motion. Mayor Taylor asked is this would preclude a provided shuttle. Cr. Krauss asked if there is an exception for the use of structured parking. 08:22:36 PM (02:26:48)Amendment to the Motion to change Section 38.540.070.A.4 to read"may not be located more than 300 feet,"replacing 100 with 300. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 08:22:49 PM (02:27:01)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked staff about(5) on page 431, Section 38.540,050,what's the exemption's impact on mixed use? Mr. Rogers provided explanation. 08:25:42 PM (02:29:54)Amendment to the Motion to take the November 21,2017 dated document, page 1-21,and adopt wholesale[replacing Section 38.530—Building Design with the revised standards,see attached section 38.530—Building Design standards]. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd 08:27:01 PM (02:31:13) Point of Clarification Cr. Krauss expressed concern about the clarity of adopting this amendment wholesale,and which documents were being referred to. He stated at this point he needs new documents. DM Andrus asked what Cr. Krauss was looking for in a clean document. Cr. Mehl explained when the document was provided to the public. Page 14 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 08:33:10 PM (02:37:22) Discussion Cr. Mehl stated he'd like to go through the document in order and work backwards through any additional amendments. Cr. Krauss stated his second doesn't endorse or eliminate changes, even though there are discussion items within this document.This amendment is the cleanest way to do this as a whole. 08:34:55 PM (02:39:07) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to take the November 21,2017 dated document,page 1-21, and adopt wholesale[replacing Section 38.530—Building Design with the revised standards,see attached section 38.530—Building Design standards]. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 08:35:19 PM (02:39:31) Discussion Cr. Mehl asked where a motion on the figures should happen. CA Sullivan provided his recommendation. DM Andrus stated she would like to talk about the placeholder for alternative compliance, and she supports the staff, and that the design community's request is too broad. CA Sullivan recommended removing the language of placeholder by motion. 08:39:33 PM (02:43:45)Amendment to the Motion to remove the placeholder for alternative compliance evaluation path[deleting section 38.050.020.E]. Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd 08:39:41 PM (02:43:53) Discussion DM Andrus explained her rationale for removing that language, as she doesn't support the alternative at this time. Cr. Krauss will be voting no, as the design community needs a path where this can happen. Cr. Mehl stated there isn't a current workable alternative. Mayor Taylor also supports this, as the document is an attempt to balance the critique of the design community with some standards. 08:45:34 PM (02:49:46) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to remove the placeholder for Page 15 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 alternative compliance evaluation path[deleting section 38.050.020.E]. The amendment passed 3-1. Deputy MaVor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 08:46:13 PM (02:50:25)Questions of Staff DM Andrus wanted a better understanding of human/appropriately-scaled verbiage in facade articulation. Cr. Krauss asked about limiting the scale to just humans, and not allowing grander architecture. Cr. Mehl asked if departures would be possible. 08:55:00 PM (02:59:12)Amendment to the Motion to accept the places where "appropriately-scaled" was suggested by the design community, rather than human-scaled. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion 08:55:24 PM (02:59:36)Amendment dies for lack of a second. 08:55:49 PM (03:00:01)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked for clarification on page 5, 38.530.040.C.7, and whether staff did or didn't put these changes forward. Mr. Rogers responded that staff is in support. Cr. Krauss asked if the word pattern would remain. DM Andrus asked about fagade articulation,and what the difference is from the addition and omission, on page 4. Cr. Mehl asked about page 5, and the use of vertical piers/columns, and if staff suggested a replacement. Cr. Mehl asked on page 6, if D.2 and 3 conflict with an earlier staff memo. Director Matsen responded. Mayor Taylor asked on page 6,why the building width was broadened. He also asked about the figure on page 7. Mr. Rogers stated the figures need to be updated at the end. DM Andrus asked for more clarification on the changes on vertical articulation. Director Matsen demonstrated on the whiteboard. Cr. Krauss stated this isn't actually that drastic. Cr. Mehl asked for the staff response on page 7,the criteria and description of departures. Mr. Rogers and Director Matsen provided responses on departures. 09:13:45 PM (03:17:57) Discussion Cr. Krauss stated he does not like the buildings described on page 8, and does not want this to be the Page 16 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 requirement. DM Andrus asked for additional text/photographs to add more clarity. Cr. Krauss stated he would change departures on page 9 to number 4. He asked staff's opinion. Cr. Mehl asked on page 10,A, if number 2 is already covered by number 1? Mr. Rogers stated staff would be fine either way. He asked about including windows in building fagade, and why part B on page 10 was removed. On page 13, he asked in 26 about prohibited windows, and why staff dropped "continuous ribbon,"and what is that window? Director Matsen provided clarification. DM Andrus asked if recessed windows make sense with EIFS. Cr. Krauss made some comments on windows. Cr. Mehl asked on pg. 15, add to section that rooftop solar is permitted. It was clarified that D takes care of this. 09:32:27 PM (03:36:39)Amendment to the Motion to change D[Section 38.530.050.D]to read"Active Solar Collection Units(electronic and hydronic)are permitted." Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd 09:32:46 PM (03:36:58) Discussion Cr. Krauss stated this needs to actively state they are permitted. Cr. Mehl stated there isn't any indication code is slowing solar down. He asked if this would apply to houses. He asked why solar panels are considered ugly, and if it could say encouraged instead of permitted?Staff responded to questions in detail. DM Andrus stated she prefers "permitted"to"encouraged." Cr. Krauss stated that screening"carefully integrated" is not as important as actively encouraging alternate forms of energy. 09:41:40 PM (03:45:52) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to change D[Section 38.530.050.D]to read"Active Solar Collection Units(electronic and hydronic)are permitted."The amendment passed 4- 0. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 09:41:51 PM (03:46:03)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked on page 17, regarding"intent" in relation to building materials. He asked what damage from maintenance is. He asked why staff dropped section B, building materials. Mr. Rogers responded it Page 17 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 was rewritten and added below. DM Andrus asked about CMU as a secondary material, and why it was changed to a primary material. Cr. Mehl asked on page 19,why did staff increase the percentage of the total fagade area allowed using EIFS. The Commission and staff discussed EIFS in significant detail. 09:57:40 PM (04:01:52) Meeting Extended Mayor Taylor extended the meeting to 10:15 PM. 09:57:51 PM (04:02:03) Discussion/Questions Continued DM Andrus asked what percentage of a number of new buildings was EIFS, and why highly textured EIFS was prohibited. Development Review Manager Brian Krueger responded in detail. Cr. Mehl does cannot see a building with more than half EIFS. 10:03:29 PM (04:07:41)Amendment to the Motion to change the second sentence to say that on buildings of two stories or less or less than 5,000 square feet in footprint, EIFS is limited to 50%of the total facade area[changing Section 38.530.060.C.3.a]. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd 10:03:59 PM (04:08:11) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to change the second sentence to say that on buildings of two stories or less or less than 5,000 square feet in footprint, EIFS is limited to 50% of the total facade area[changing Section 38.530.060.C.3.a]. The amendment passed 3-1. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy: Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 10:05:09 PM (04:09:21) Meeting Extended Mayor Taylor continued the meeting to 10:30 PM. 10:05:15 PM (04:09:27)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked staff how they define cementitious and what is the concern. Mr. Krueger responded in detail. He also asked why the blank wall on page 21 went away. Mr. Rogers responded. Mayor Taylor asked why the blank wall feature couldn't be better dealt with as a departure. DM Andrus asked where the compromise was on this with the design community, and what prompted this to go in in the first place. Page 18 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 10:20:23 PM (04:24:35)Amendment to the Motion to leave the language as it was originally intended and make it a departure[replacing the Blank Wall provision AND ADDING a departure for blank walls]. DeputV Mayor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl:2nd 10:20:44 PM (04:24:56) Discussion DM Andrus stated this makes sense to have some restrictions on blank walls. Mayor Taylor stated he will vote for this. Cr. Mehl asked if it would be a blank wall if there was fagade articulation. He asked if the departure language was going to be specific or general. He will support this but hopes the tradeoff is successful. The Commission discussed examples in some detail. 10:29:51 PM (04:34:03) Meeting Extended Mayor Taylor extended the meeting to 11:00 PM. 10:30:02 PM (04:34:14) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to leave the language as it was originally intended and make it a departure[replacing the Blank Wall provision AND ADDING a departure for blank walls]. The amendment passed 3-1. DeputV MaVor-Cynthia Andrus: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl:2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-CVnthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Disapprove Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 10:30:15 PM (04:34:27)City Attorney CA Sullivan clarified that this was an addition of a departure to the re-inclusion of the blank wall verbiage. 10:30:40 PM (04:34:52)Staff Presentation on Article 6 and 7 Mr. Rogers explained some small changes in Articles 6 and 7. 10:31:45 PM (04:35:57)Questions of Staff Cr. Mehl asked if staff still requests the change the definition of apartment building, and why is staff asking for the change (38.700.020) (page 494). 10:34:18 PM (04:38:30)Amendment to the Motion to revise the[apartment]definition to say"a Page 19 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 building, other than a hotel or motel, containing five or more dwelling units, excluding townhouses and rowhouses. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd 10:34:55 PM (04:39:07) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion to revise the[apartment]definition to say"a building, other than a hotel or motel, containing five or more dwelling units,excluding townhouses and rowhouses. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Chris Mehl: Motion Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-CVnthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner- I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 10:35:06 PM (04:39:18)Amendments from Previous Articles Mayor Taylor opened the session to amendments from other articles. 10:35:55 PM (04:40:07)Amendment to the Motion regarding the notes under Section 38.310.030 (page 180),[deleting]footnote 6 referring to Accessory Dwelling Units in the R-S and R-1 districts,and Section 38.360.040.C.2.b(page 238), to eliminate both statements regarding 1997. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd 10:37:36 PM (04:41:48) Discussion Cr. Mehl asked for clarity on the motion. Mayor Taylor explained the purpose of the motion. DM Andrus asked if this impacts short-term rentals. 10:39:38 PM (04:43:50) Vote on the Amendment to the Motion regarding the notes under Section 38.310.030(page 180),[deleting]footnote 6 referring to Accessory Dwelling Units in the R-S and R-1 districts, and Section 38.360.040.C.2.b(page 238), to eliminate both statements regarding 1997. The amendment passed 4-0. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-CVnthia Andrus:Approve Page 20 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 10:39:54 PM (04:44:06) Discussion Mayor Taylor stated Cr. Pomeroy requested a motion to eliminate on page 234, G.1(accessory buildings may not exceed the height of the principal building unless such accessory building has been otherwise approved per this chapter). Director Matsen described a challenge this creates. Cr. Krauss asked staff to determine a way to define accessory dwelling unit that isn't related to height. Director Matsen provided further details. Mayor Taylor stated concerns of exceptionally tall ADUs. CA Sullivan discussed the effective date of changes like this and Pile B. Staff provided additional information about how this could work. Cr. Mehl confirmed he would also like to look into this in the future. 10:48:07 PM (04:52:19) Procedure Mayor Taylor described the procedure going out, cancelling the Thursday meeting. 10:49:43 PM (04:53:55) Vote on the Main Motion as Amended that having reviewed and considered the application materials,public comment, recommendation of the Zoning Commission, recommendation of the Planning Board,and all the information presented, 1 hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 15320 and move to approve the zone text amendments as shown in the July 28,2017 Unified Development Code draft and direct the city manager to return to the commission with an ordinance codifying these text amendments along with other text amendments previously approved by the commission but not yet adopted by ordinance. The motion passed 4-0. Commissioner-Jeff Krauss: Motion Commissioner-Chris Mehl: 2nd Mayor-Carson Taylor:Approve Deputy Mayor-Cynthia Andrus:Approve Commissioner-Jeff Krauss:Approve Commissioner-I-Ho Pomeroy:Absent Commissioner-Chris Mehl:Approve 10:50:05 PM (04:54:17) Procedure Director Matsen described the format of the new revised draft. CA Sullivan explained the two attachments to the codifying ordinance. I. 10:52:18 PM (04:56:30) FYI/Discussion • Cr. Krauss referenced public comment from earlier this evening, and asked the Commission to put the alcohol radius discussion on an agenda to update the ordinance. CA Sullivan stated he has been working on this.The Commission discussed in detail. Page 21 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 10:59:44 PM (05:03:56) Meeting Extended Mayor Taylor extended the meeting to 11:05 PM. 10:59:46 PM (05:03:58) Discussion Continued • Mr.Saunders stated that as of this afternoon, Planning has received 18 short-term rental applications since being open on December V. • CA Sullivan reminded the Commission of responding to the County's reply brief,filed today. 11:04:54 PM (05:09:06) Meeting Extended Mayor Taylor extended the meeting to 11:06 PM. 11:04:55 PM (05:09:07) Discussion Continued • City Clerk Crough reminded the Commission they have their December 15 meeting packet in hand. J. 11:05:22 PM (05:09:34)Adjournment Mayor Taylor adjourned the meeting at 11:05 PM. Carson Taylor Mayor ATTEST: B p2' Robin Crough . y �83 ,•S� City Clerk 9TIN Co��t0 PREPARED BY: AA 5 Robin Crough City Clerk Page 22 of 23 Bozeman City Commission Meeting Minutes,December 4,2017 Approved on: Yl(AaYLA_ _ Q� Page 23 of 23 Revised section 38.530 Building Design: November 21, 2017 Section 38.530 below replaces the July 28, 2017 draft version in its entirety. All changes to the July 28,2017 draft are identified with for deletion and underlining for addition and highlighted in=to identify the location of changes. Addition to introductory section: ■ One of the primary goals of the UDC update is to make it easier to use and understand, particularly for those who do not use it on a daily basis.Therefore,staff included photographs and illustrations(collectively referred to as"figures"in the draft)to assist in explaining the intent and standards of a particular section.The design community found the photographs unhelpful and requested that they be replaced with illustrations that more accurately represent the concept.Staff agrees;however,creating new illustrations would require additional financial support that is currently not included in the budget for this project. ■ To facilitate revising,replacing,and adding figures in the UDC in the future,and to clarify that figures are illustrative and not regulatory,staff suggests adding section 38.100.120: Sec.38.-M.120.—Figu The figures in this chapter are for illustrative purposes only and do no regulatory standards. Figures may be revised,replaced or added by administrative issued by the Director of Community Development. _ 38.530 Building Design (New) Sec.38.530.010.—Purpose. See the individual"intent"statements for each section in this division. Sec.38.530.020.—Applicability and compliance. The provisions of this division apply to all development within Bozeman,except single,two-, and three-household dwellings on individual lots unless otherwise noted. Specifically: A. For clarification on the relationship between the provisions in this division and other documents and codes,see section 38.500.020.A. B. For the application of building additions and remodels and site improvements,see section 38.500.020.B. C. For clarification on how the provisions of this division are applied,see section 38.500.030. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 1 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 256 D. The review authority may waive or relax these provisions in the industrial zones depending on the type of use,number of anticipated employees and customers,and the site's physical context.The greater number of employees and/or customers and higher visibility levels warrant a greater application of building design standards. Place holder-for Alternative Compliance Evaluation Pat kCA Commented[TR1]:Staff comment:Significant policy determination.Without specific review criteria,appeal provisions, Sec.38.530.030.—Building character. costs,staffing requirements,time requirements In place revised path would be difficult to implement,apply,and meet adequate A. Intent. due process standards.Also,we believe the Bozeman Design --_ Manual ought to be in place to support any alternative review path. . To promote To a degree,ACEP is built into the draft through departures and i9 all A is based on lhuma scaled design details, PUD alternative. durable high quality materials,sustainable design measures,and that responds uniquely to the Commented[TR2]:Staff comment:Suggested change to site's Context. "appropriately"not Included 3. To avoid generic,corporate architectural designs that lessens the character and identity of 113ozema .For example,some franchise Commented[TR3]:Staff comment:An issue of importance to convenience uses have very specific architectural features(such as a distinctive roofline design the community.Adapted language from deleted section that functions as a sign)that reinforce their identity. aa.sao.oao.c. B. Building character standards and guidelines. I. Developments within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District(NCOD)are subject to FIRM ----- - -- - Pre-ad. erhefher=-le _ _ building design standal is d, r Sec.38.530.040.—Building massing&articulation. A. Intent. -- that reduee the r------scale --o--- o �. To articulate building elements in order to achieve an appropriate perceived scale and add visual interest. 2. To create clear and welcoming building entries. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 2 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 257 human S�ialed B. Facade articulation-Storefronts and other buildings with non-residential uses on round level must inc imam of three of the following articulation_features every 60 f (maximum)to create a human led facadepattern: Z) Commented[TI Staff comment:did not alter to say J "appropriately scaled".We believe the built environment is for humans and functionally meeting our needs. I. Windowt 2. �Entrie4 Commented[TR5]:staff comment:Moved to new line and re- 3. Use of weather protection features. numbered. 4. Use of S. Change in roofline per subsection F below. 6. Change in building material or siding style. VAIF6-tiril 4 bn rA`i sm e u .a r t 8. Other design techniques that effectively reinforce a humanIScaledl pattern compatible with the Commented[TR6]:staff comment:did not alter to say building's surrounding context "appropriately scaled".We believe the built environment is for humans and functionally meeting our needs. 9. Providing vertical elements such as a trellis with plants,green wall,art element 10. Providing vertical building modulation of at least 12 inches in depth if tied to a change in roofline per subsection F below or a change in building material,siding style,or color. Exceptions: a. Only two articulation features are required on building facades in the BP district; b. Only one articulation feature is required on building facade s in the M-I district; c. Buildings in the M-2 district are exempt from these standards. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 3 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 258 F\ I � � The left image uses window patterns,weather protection elements,and roofline modulation.The photo example to the right also includes window patterns and weather protection along with brick vertical piers to articulate the facade.The lower example illustrates how a multitenant retail building can successfully be articulated(windows,weather protection,vertical building modulation,and roofline changes) i_ IFigure�38.S30.040.8 Commented[TR7]:Staff comment:see new section Facade articulation examples. 38.100.120 above.Applies to all images in this section. r8IMP VA bi-@ak up the n4"N4T=ok=h =613 �. Facade articulation-Residential buildings must include articulation features at appropt1a Intervals relative to the scale of the facade in order to reduce the perceived massing of the buil to and add visual interest.The following features must be employed at intervals relative to the individual dwelling units or at a maximum of every 30 feet.The scale of the facade at-ticulao should be compatible with the Surrounding context.�D I. Use of windows 2. IEntries�. Commented[TR8]:staff comment:separated line and lrenumbered. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 4 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 259 S. Change in roofline per subsection F below. 6. Change in building material®siding styl 1cu atlon o a sin e a ate 1 otter E mented[TR9]:Staff comment.Staff is not supportive of 8. Providingvertical building modulation if tied to a change in roofline ptlon,l[Isincludedfordlscussion.Theconceptisaddressedin g g Ilne Items and there is insufficient criteria to Implement. modulation per subsection F below or a change in building material,siding style,or color. 9. Other design techniques that effectively break up the massing at no more than 30-foot intervals. 10. vertical elements such as a trellis with plants,green wall,Mart element. 30'max. 30'max. 30'max. Below examples use a combination of vertical building modulation,window patterns,material changes,and roofline modulation. aFK BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 5 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 260 Figure 38.530.040.0 Residential facade articulation examples D. Departure criteria associated with articulation standards. Proposals must meet the intent of the standards.The following criteria will be considered in determining whether the proposed articulation treatment meets the')nten ." Commented[TRIO]:Departure criteria is not changed. I. The type and width of the proposed articulation treatment and how effective it is in meeting the Adequate objective criteria are required make objective determinations and eliminate arbitrary an d capricious decisions. intent given the building's current and desired context(per Bozeman's growth policy or applicable adopted subarea plan). 2. The applicable block frontage designation.Undesignated block frontages warrant more flexibility than block frontages designated as mixed or landscaped. 3. The size and width of the building.Smaller buildings warrant greater flexibility than larger buildings. 4. The quality of facade materials in concert with doors,windows,and other facade features and their ability to add visual interest to the street from a pedestrian scale and more distant observable scales. S This building is a good departure example.Its two clear articulation features are the window patterns and the entry/building modulation feature(3 minimum are required). However,the overall effectiveness of these articulation features combined with the high quality of materials and detailing and the relatively small width of the building help it meet the intent of the standards. Figure 38.530.040.D Facade articulation departure examples E. Maximum fa4ade width. Building facades wider than feet must include at least one of the following features to break up the massing of the building and add visual interest.Building walls facing alleys,rear or side yards BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 6 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 261 are not subject to the standards herein,except for zone edge properties,when adjacent to a lower intensity zoning district. I. Provide vertical building modulation at least=feet deep and®feet wide.For multi- story buildings,the modulation must extend through more than one-half of the building floors. 2. Use a contrasting vertical modulated design component that: �.Utilizes a change in building materials that effectively contrast from the rest of the facade; Is modulated vertically from the rest of the facade by an average of six inches. 3. Facade employs building walls with contrasting articulation that make it appear like distinct buildings.To qualify for this option,these contrasting facades must employ all of the following: a. Different building materials and/or configuration of building materials; b. Contrasting window design(sizes or configurations). Departures will be considered provided the design meets the intent of the standards. Supplemental consideration for approving alternative(designs Commented[:RIr]'Departure criteria Is not changed. Adequate objective criteria re required to make objective • Width of the facade. The larger the facade,the more substantial articulation/modulation determinations and eliminate arbitrary and capricious decisions. features need to be. • Block frontage designation. Storefront designated block frontages warrant the most scrutiny, while undesignated streets warrant more flexibility. • The type of articulation treatment and how effective it is in meeting the intent given the building's context. Less than wide:Meets standard More than wide:Does not meet �tandar4 Commented[TR12]:Illustrations need to be updated to new standard. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 7 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 262 �1a Building Incorporates a-courtyard f. along the facade to 4v- � effectively break it up into ". .� smaller components: Meets standard. l Eton ; nee Both buildings use modulated entry feature to help break up the perceived massing and add visual interest. Figure 38.530.040.E Illustrating maximum facade width standards and good and bad examples. 1. The left building on East Main(about 110'wide)uses an articulated partial third floor along with smaller articulation treatments on the main floors to effectively break up the perceived scale and add visual interest(this would be a good departure example).The building to the right would not be an acceptable example.While the articulated features on the lower floors help,the monotony of the very long upper floor and roofline would not be acceptable. Figure 38.530.040.E Illustrating maximum facade width standards and good and bad examples. F. Roofline modulation.In order to qualify as a facade articulation feature in subsections B,C,and E above,rooflines must employ one or more of the following:. I. For flat roofs BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 8 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 263 an extension of the parapet or-a break h e ara et of of measured from the adjacent roof or adjacent parapet. If no ra•et is pre j roof ed eleave extension of at least two feet 2. A pitched roofline NFIFTWI scaled appropriately to the facade e 3. A combination of the above. Departures will be considered provided the roofline modulation design effectively reduces the perceived scale of the building and adds visual lnteres. Commented[TR13]:staffcomment.No change to departure criteria Included.Intent statements are gulding principles and regulatory standards. _--OW-hel9M t AGNrcum dapN+=I' Roofline modulation examples for flat roofs. Figure 38.530.040.1 Acceptable examples of roofline modulation. I00 ��Ir �I II 'aso -11 Ei The left building illustrates a pitched roof example and the right building includes a combination of flat and gabled rooflines. Figure 38.530.040.1 Acceptable examples of roofline modulation. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 9 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 264 Sec.38.530.050.—Building details. A. Intent: NNW encoura e. lative to th 2. To integrate window design that adds depth,richness,and visual interest to the facade. AF -____ hail BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 10 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 265 - _.A,et i•- -- - .. - 1 -=- - - - `t :• DRAFT 0cs4 "@co Pfie of hHek,tile, t ken building(such I iptu 6m. -De-e-G-1-afti-ee kick plate,pilaster,base pariel,or-othe!-sim:lar 17 Is t.. � rris tttt� g _t BOZEMAN UDC-ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 12 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 267 ®. Window design standards. All at 1@ast v. rlehfiess,and �1 All windows(except storefront windows and curtain walls)must include trim or other desig treatment or alternated be recessed at least two inches from the facade.Understated or trim- jess windows without additional design treatment are permitted provided the placement and Wesign is integrated into the over Allidamoosition of the building.Z> 2. Prohibited windows: a. Mirrored glass is prohibited. :�.wo Recessed and/or trimmed windows. The window In the left image lacks any other detail that adds visual interest. I Aloe Figure 38.530.050.0 Acceptable and unacceptable window design examples ®. High visibility street corner and gateway sites. All development proposals located at designated high visibility street corners and gateway sites must locate a building or structure within 20 feet of the street corner and include®design features that accentuate the street corner. Alternatively,the building could be configured with a corner plaza.Corner design features could BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 13 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 268 include a cropped building corner with a1_entry feature,decorative use of building materials at the corner,distinctive fa4ade articulation,a sculptural architectural element,or other elements that meet the intent of the standards.Figure 38.530.050.D below illustrates acceptable examples. i 1110 11 - t RR Building 1 includes a corner tower.Building 2 features cropped building corners with decorative elements. Building 3 uses a canopy. Building 4 uses a change in building materials and faZade articulation at the corner. Building 5 incorporates a plaza at the corner. Figure 38.530.050.1) Acceptable high visibility street corner/gateway site examples. ( i6 4111 Building 6 shows a decorative landscaped area with a trellis and neighborhood gateway sign. Figure 38.530.050.13 Acceptable high visibility street corner/gateway site examples. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 14 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 269 "'�--camsciasi2rs� 1 i 2 ice- affe.-ti-ely ppo,ides an "top"to the htlildim� _ I r,<- ,ot � t_ 4 -- 1 on c a are permitted, provided the placement and design of units visible from the surrounding streetscape is carefully integrated into the overall design concept of the building. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 15 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 270 E.Articulated building entries. OVrimary building entranced Must be clearly defined scaled proportionaIN to the building.See Figure 38.530.050.F below Rnd the o-eman design___.._i for good examples. _..',Pal t 1 I. Colo Figure 38.530.050.F Acceptable building entry examples. F.Departures to built in detail standards will be considered if they are determined to meet the in the standards in section 38.530.050—Buildin Details Commented[TR141:staffoomment.Departures now apply generally to all building details standards.No change to language. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 16 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 271 Sec.38.530.060.—Building materials. A. Intent. b--_. `le=tea sense of J__.L__J rieh..`...... h T I___the highest_.:__•.,__.r._r__.n.._._ «I_...,..,,1:.. .._a J.....n:__..f___«__•_I_at.LA pl To encourage the use of durable materials to provide visual interest from vehicular anti pedestrian vantage oints with the highest priority at locations susceptible to damage from [maintenance and meathering'., Commented[TR15]:staff comment—Generally revised Intent based on design community comments."Appropriate"Is also vague,no definition or reference point.Focus on human and a Quality r..aa: _ Y_r .:..1. nppl:___._mwst user: .._u a.. a l Tr:_:_ _ d pedestrian scale to maintain community character and desires. f.-._.�...�___ r r.1�,..- e,��t# - et-L�(firs.-tv,-@ fee�only)must he tised (@x-.1 mg...indw-and de I-a-@as)foi-the first fl-.@i- Durable building materials Applicants must use durable materials Where facades are located directly adjacent to a city sidewalk impact resistant materials must be used(excluding window and Woor areas)for a minimum of the first 18"above the walking surf A C. Special conditions and limitations for the use of certain cladding materials. � t not the be olisidered via deparwre P41o*Wed the design 'Pq Pi interest,Fri-exaR 11_Concrete block(aka CMU)when used as a primary cladding material must be treated or rticulated to provide visual interest above and beyond natural uncolored untreated bloc) ith(matching)natural colored grout Examples of such treatments include using ground, polished or split face units;creating patterns/texture with different block sizes face treatments or colors;creating patterns/textures by modulating the finish plane of units;utilizing contrastin>y grout color:or utilizing sealers or painted treatments that enhance the finish of natural concrete lock Industrial zoning districts are exempt from subsection C, BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 17 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 272 lid ' ' CMU is the primary cladding for the corner element The above facade Illustrates an acceptable alternative above,but secondary to brick on the main facades. example,as CMU is used as the primary cladding The corner element uses a combination of material. Note the use of split-facade CMU's above decorative split faced CMU closer to the sidewalk each of the awnings and coupled with the use of and smooth-faced CMU that is colored to look more smooth-facade CMU's on the vertical columns(which like traditional white terra cotta tiles. employ black accent tiles for added Interest). Figure 38.530.060.C.1 Acceptable concrete block use/design 2. Metal siding _ideo.:_ __a r L......,.,,...L.,_. ." 9 atTi�.I is i Metal siding must be a minimum 24 gauge thickness.Re-purposed metal siding is exempt from minimum thickness requirements provided its material integrity is intact. Metal siding must feature appropriate molding,trim or hemming at all exposed edges and rners eta)sidin must be facto finished or alternatelX purposefullXdesigned to natural) patina. ghly reflective galvanized finished are prohibited.Re-purposed or re-claimed metal siding rmitted. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLES DRAFT Page 18 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 273 The use of metal siding in each example above is secondary to masonry.The left and right images are more contemporary in character,whereas the middle image is more rustic and industrial,with more refined windows. Figure 38.530.060.C.2 Acceptable metal siding examples 3. Standards for the use of Exterior Insulation and Finish System(EIFSI. Such material/finishes may be used as a decorative accent cladding material if it is incorporated with other permitted materials and it complies with the following: a, L111111MIMITEMM EIFS is limited to no more than 20 percent of the total facade area and is not the primary cladding material s b. C. attern d. .EIFS must not be us I&be_ground floor when directly adjacent to a sidewalk,pedestrian or vehicular pathwaX. Departures will be considered provided the material's integration and overall facade composition meets the intent of the standards. BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE S DRAFT Page 19 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 274 1 i - Note the use of brick and decorative concrete block on the ground level and EIFS on the second floor of the left Image.The window treatments visible on the second floor add depth and interest to the facade.The right image employs EIFS between the window and sidewalk—this design is prohibited. Figure 38.530.060.C.3 Acceptable and unacceptable EIFS examples. 4. Cementitious wall board paneling/siding may be used provided it meets the following kovision Commented[TR16]:Staff comment.Design communitywishes to delete this section in its entirety.Staff agrees cementitious wall a. Cement board paneling/siding may not be used on the ground floor of non-residential or board can be durable.However,there appears to be a conflation of mixed-use buildings where adjacent to a sidewalk or other pedestrian path; the terms durable and quality.Staff cannot determine based on the Information provided by the design community that removing this b. Where cement board paneling/siding is the dominant siding material,the design must section does not unduly burden the community by ignoring the integrate a mix of colors and/or textures that are articulated consistent with windows, majority ofthe goals and objectives to focus on creating guidelines balconies,and modulated building surfaces and are balanced with facade details that add visual that simply allow architectural expression. interest from the ground level and adjacent buildings. Departures will be considered provided the material's integration and overall facade composition meets the intent of the standards. --BR it a-; , BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 20 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 275 II..,,..! IMIN1PPI 11191 MMl�l1��, 11 ,[�ER �i BLANK WALL grealerthan 16' a�rsbartng .,cr+r3=x+-I+rtnr-trr-�++ r._.law..:_ible 61 I....-.II a ya g:..t..Qf♦l eatp4ept_Pgay be 1.......:.....J 4.-........4 tL...�..4....!..F 4L... Il BOZEMAN UDC—ARTICLE 5 DRAFT Page 21 November 21,2017 UDC update 7-28-2017 draft 276