Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-23-17 City Commission Packet Materials - A6. Bridger Vale ZMA and Annexation
Page 1 of 24 17-230, Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Public Hearing: Zoning Commission public hearing to consider the ZMA was on Tuesday, October 3, 2017. City Commission public hearing to consider the annexation and ZMA is on Monday, October 23, 2017. Project Description: Annexation 17-230 requesting annexation of 6.49 acres and amendment 17-230 of the City Zoning Map for the establishment of a zoning designation of REMU “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” and PLI “Parks, Open Space and Recreational Land”. Project Location: 806 Manley Road, Bozeman, MT. The property is legally described as Remaining Tract GLR-1 of COS 157, Section 31, Township 1S, Range 6E, Gallatin County, Montana. Recommendation: Approval with terms of annexation and contingencies. Recommended Annexation Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17- 230 and move to approve the Bridger Vale Annexation with recommended terms of annexation, and direct staff to prepare an annexation agreement for signature by the parties. Recommended Zoning Motion: Having reviewed and considered the staff report, application materials, public comment, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 17- 230 and move to approve the REMU/PLI Zone Map Amendment, with contingencies required to complete the application processing. Report Date: October 10, 2017 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders; Community Development Manager Agenda Item Type: Action - Legislative EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues None 257 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 24 Project Summary The applicant, Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., seeks to annex 6.49 acres into the City limits and establish initial zoning of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” on a portion of the property (4.67 acres), and PLI, “Public, Open Space and Recreational Lands” on the remaining portion of the property (1.83 acres). The application also includes a PUD preliminary plan and a subdivision preliminary plat (not addressed within this staff report). See Appendix A for a detailed project description and background. Because of the unique nature of this proposal, a combination of policies and issues were addressed when evaluating the appropriateness of the request: 1. Annexation Goals and Criteria, 2. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria, 3. public interests in access to and protection of the East Gallatin Recreation Area, and 4. environmental, health, safety, and welfare issues regarding the former landfill located to the east of the subject property. The site is currently vacant and being used for cattle grazing with the primary access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA) running through the property in an easement. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from the subject property and contains administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision is located to the south and is a 5-lot residential subdivision. Recommendation in favor of the application reflects the finding that the REMU/PLI zoning designation is in accordance with the overall intent of the growth policy and that development that would be allowed within that designation will fit appropriately as a transitional land use among adjacent properties and uses. The total area anticipated to be developed with private lots with the subsequent subdivision is slightly under 36% of the total site. This leaves 64% of the site in various public ownerships with park or roadway. Additionally, with the recommended conditions of approval, public access to the EGRA will be maintained and the provision of additional park lands will be a benefit to the community and area as a whole. Zoning Commission The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the zone map amendment application at the October 3, 2017 meeting. No public comments were received. The Zoning Commission passed a motion recommending the zone map amendment be approved the City Commission with a 2-1 vote. The recording of the meeting is available at https://www.bozeman.net/services/city-tv-and-streaming-audio. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended contingencies; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended contingencies; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 258 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 24 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION ............................................ 7 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT..... 9 SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ...................................... 10 Annexation ........................................................................................................................ 10 Zone Map Amendment ..................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 5 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ................................ 10 SECTION 6 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ........... 15 PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ......................................................... 20 APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND .............. 21 APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT .................................................... 22 APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING ................... 22 APPENDIX E - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF ............................ 23 FISCAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................................. 23 ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... 23 259 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 24 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES 260 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 24 261 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 24 262 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 24 SECTION 2 - RECOMMENDED TERMS OF ANNEXATION The following terms of annexation are recommended to enable the application to comply with the City’s Annexation Policy and the requirements of state law for the provision of services. Recommended terms of annexation: 1. An Annexation Map, titled “Bridger Vale Annexation Map” with a legal description of the property and any adjoining unannexed rights-of-way and/or street access easements must be submitted by the applicant for use with the Annexation Agreement. The map must be supplied on a mylar for City records (18" by 24"), a reduced 8 ½" by 11" or 8 ½” by 14" exhibit for filing with the Annexation Agreement with the Office of the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder, and a digital copy for the City Engineer’s Office. This map must be acceptable to the Director of Public Works and the City Engineer’s Office, and must be submitted with the signed Annexation Agreement. 2. The applicant must execute all contingencies and terms of said Annexation Agreement with the City of Bozeman within 60 days of the distribution of the annexation agreement from the City to the applicant or annexation approval shall be null and void. 3. The documents and exhibits to formally annex the subject property must be identified as the “Bridger Vale Annexation.” 4. Institutional controls in place to provide notice regarding the adjacent landfill and preventing potentially hazardous activities, including: a. A note in the annexation agreement identifying the presence of the adjacent landfill and the need for ongoing monitoring. b. A note in the annexation agreement requiring the institutional controls to be in place prior to constructing buildings. c. Grant of access by Owner to the City of Bozeman for sampling in the short and long term. d. Restrictions on on-site wells for domestic or irrigation uses. e. Easements for streets, public access, and utilities. 5. The applicant has provided reporting of environmental contamination detected by groundwater and soil sampling on the subject site. The applicant must enter into an agreement with the City that governs requirements related to contamination, ground water, and vapor intrusion controls prior to annexation. 6. Any future residential or commercial development shall construct a sub-slab vapor mitigation system designed and certified by a professional engineer and certified to installation per design to eliminate any environmental concerns as a result of VOC studies related to the nearby former landfill. 263 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 24 7. The land owners and their successors shall pay all fire, street, water and sewer impact fees at the time of connection; and for future development as required by Chapter 3.24, Bozeman Municipal Code, or as amended at the time of application for any permit listed therein. 8. The applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of special improvements districts (SIDs) for the following: a. Street improvements to Manley Road including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. b. Street improvements to East and West Griffin Drive including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage. c. Intersection improvements to the intersection of Manley Road and East Griffin Drive. d. Intersection improvements to the intersection of West Griffin Drive and N. 7th Avenue. e. Intersection improvements to the intersection of East Griffin Drive and Bridger Drive. f. Railroad crossing improvements on East Griffin Drive. The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must use the City standard template form as the basis for the SID waivers, which may be obtained from the City Engineering Division. The applicant must provide a copy of the SID waivers filed with the County Clerk and Recorder prior to annexation. 9. Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.24.050.A.1 states: All streets and roads providing access to, and within, the proposed development shall meet the following standards: Right-of-way width and construction standards contained in this chapter, the most recently adopted long range transportation plan, the City of Bozeman Design Standards and Specifications Policy, and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications shall apply. Specific dedications required include: a. The applicant must dedicate a public street and utilities easement for Manley Road 45-feet from the centerline of Manley Road where adjacent to the property boundary. The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. b. The applicant must dedicate a (minimum 60’ wide) public street and utilities easement for the access road from Manley Road to the adjacent park (East Gallatin 264 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 24 Recreation Area). The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. 10. BMC Section 38.23.180 states: the transfer of water rights or the payment of cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights shall be provided. The applicant must contact the City Engineering Division (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of CIL of water rights for the parcel and pay any CIL of water rights due as a condition of annexation unless the CIL payment is allowed to be deferred per Mr. Heaston’s analysis. 11. The annexation agreement shall include notice that prior to the development of the property, the developer will be responsible for installing and facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property in accordance with the City’s Infrastructure Master Plan, adopted Community Plan, and all city policies and guidelines that may be in effect at the time of development. SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the proposed amendment. These contingencies only apply in the event that the related annexation request has previously been approved. Recommended Contingencies of Approval: 1. That all documents and exhibits necessary to establish an initial municipal zoning designation shall be identified as the “Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment.” All required documents must be returned to the City within 60 days of the City Commission action to annex the property or the preliminary approval shall be null and void. 2. That the Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be finalized until the Annexation Agreement is signed by the applicant and formally approved by the City Commission. If the annexation agreement is not approved, the Zone Map Amendment application shall be null and void. 3. That the applicant must submit a zone amendment map, titled “Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment”, on a 24” by 36” mylar, an 8 ½” by 11” or 8 ½” by 14” paper exhibit, and a digital copy of the area to be zoned, acceptable to the Director of Public Works, which will be utilized in the preparation of the Ordinance to officially amend the City of Bozeman Zoning Map. Said map shall contain a metes and bounds legal description of the perimeter of the subject property including adjacent right-of-ways, and total acreage of the property. 265 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 24 4. The Ordinance for the Zone Map Amendment shall not be drafted until the applicant provides an editable metes and bounds legal description prepared by a licensed Montana surveyor. SECTION 4 - RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Annexation Having considered the criteria established for an annexation on September 13, 2017, the Development Review Committee (DRC) recommends approval of the requested annexation. The City Commission will hold a public meeting on the annexation on October 23, 2017. The meeting will be held at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. Zone Map Amendment Having considered the criteria established for a zone map amendment, the Staff recommends approval as submitted. The Bridger Vale Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) is in conjunction with an annexation request. Staff’s recommendation and staff responses are predicated on approval of the annexation, application #17-230. The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the zone map amendment on September 13, 2017. The DRC did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application. The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this ZMA on October 3, 2017 and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Commission with a vote of 2-1. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the zone map amendment on October 23, 2017. The meeting will be held at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. SECTION 5 - ANNEXATION STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for approval of the requested annexation, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: Commission Resolution No. 4400 Criteria Commission Resolution No. 4400 Goals Goal 1: It shall be the goal of the City of Bozeman to encourage annexations of land contiguous to the City. The property in question is contiguous to the City limits on the east, west, and south sides. 266 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 24 Goal 2: The City shall seek to annex all areas that are totally surrounded by the City, without regard to parcel size. The subject property is not totally surrounded by the City on all sides, but is contiguous on three out of four sides. Goal 3: The City shall seek to annex all property currently contracting with the City for services such as water, sanitary sewer and/or fire protection. The subject property is not currently contracting with the City for water, sewer, or fire protection. Connection to municipal infrastructure for the property will be the responsibility of the owner at the time of development of the property. Currently there are sanitary sewer services located in Gallatin Park Drive and water services on Manley Road that can serve residential construction on the subject property. Goal 4: It shall be the goal of the City of Bozeman to require annexation of all land proposed for development lying within the service boundary of the existing sewer system as depicted in the Bozeman Growth Policy, and to encourage annexations within the urban growth area identified in the Bozeman Growth Policy. The subject property is located within the service boundary of the existing sewer system, with a mainline located along Gallatin Park Drive to the east which can be used for potential future residential development. The site is also located within the urban growth area (identified as “Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands”) of the Bozeman Growth Policy. Resolution No. 4400 Policies Policy 1: Annexations shall include dedication of all easements, rights-of-way for collector and arterial streets, water rights, and waivers of right-to-protest against the creation of improvement districts necessary to provide the essential services for future development of the City. The Recommended Terms of Annexation include requirements to dedicate all easements, rights-of-way for streets, water rights, and waivers of right-to-protest against the creation of improvement districts necessary to provide the essential services for future development of the City. Recommended terms of annexation require that the applicant must dedicate a public street and utilities easement for Manley Road to the adjacent park (East Gallatin Recreation Area). The easement is the primary access through the property, and will provide the primary location for water and sewer extensions to serve future development of the property. There is an existing easement indicated on some survey documents but it is preferable to have a new City standard easement until a dedication may occur through the subdivision process. The applicant must provide an original, executed easement on City standard form to the City Engineering Division prior to annexation. 267 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 24 Policy 2: Issues pertaining to master planning and zoning shall be addressed in conjunction with the application for annexation. a. The initial application for annexation shall be in conformance with the current Bozeman Growth Policy. If a Growth Policy Amendment is necessary to accommodate anticipated uses, said amendment process may be initiated by the applicant and conducted concurrently with the processing for annexation. The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property as “Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands.” The Community Plan indicates that “all publicly owned recreational lands, including parks, are included within this category, as well as certain private lands. These areas are generally open in character and may or may not be developed for active recreational purposes. This category includes conservation easements which may not be open for public use.” Table C-16 of the Bozeman Community Plan shows both REMU and PLI as implementing districts. While the proposed REMU zoning is not in obvious accordance with the Future Land Use Map designation, the proposed PLI zoning does conform. The dedication of the additional park land and improved right-of-way with dedicated easements allowing public access to the EGRA anticipated with the associated subdivision are a public benefit. Additionally, the proposed REMU zoning is an appropriate transitional zone between adjacent residential and mixed-use land uses and is seen to meet the overall intent of the growth policy. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation of Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands does not allow any public use of the property. The proposed mix of uses with the associated subdivision is 64% public with streets, alleys, and parks, and 36% private. The majority of the site is therefore public which use does correspond with the future land use map. The proposed mix of REMU and PLI zoning designations would allow development that would provide an increased opportunity for recreation and dedicated public access to the EGRA, and thus result in substantial compliance with the intent of the growth policy. b. Initial zoning classifications of the property to be annexed shall be determined by the City Commission, in compliance with the Bozeman Growth Policy and upon a recommendation of the City Zoning Commission, prior to final annexation approval. The applicant has applied for a Zone Map Amendment, as the subject property is currently under the zoning jurisdiction of Gallatin County (Zoned M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial). As a result, an application for a Zone Map Amendment is being processed concurrently with the annexation request to establish a new zoning designation under the City of Bozeman. The applicant has requested a mix of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed-Use” and PLI, “Public Lands Institutional” zoning designation on the subject property. 268 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 24 c. The applicant may indicate his or her preferred zoning classification as part of the annexation application. The applicant/owner has indicated that they prefer a zoning designation of “REMU” and “PLI”, as noted on the Annexation and Initial Zoning Map. Policy 3: Fees for Annexation procedures shall be established by the City Commission. No fee will be charged for any City-initiated annexation. The appropriate application processing and review fees accompanied the application. Policy 4: It shall be the general policy of the City that annexations will not be approved where unpaved county roads will be the most commonly used route to gain access to the property. The current access to the property is from Manley Road, which is paved to the edge of the subject property. Note: The annexation and the placement of a zoning district designation on the property by the City does not guarantee available services. Section 38.07.010.C of the Unified Development Code states: “Placement of any given zoning district on an area depicted on the zoning map indicates a judgment on the part of the city that the range of uses allowed within that district are generally acceptable in that location. It is not a guarantee of approval for any given use prior to the completion of the appropriate review procedure and compliance with all of the applicable requirements and development standards of this chapter and other applicable policies, laws and ordinances. It is also not a guarantee of immediate infrastructure availability or a commitment on the part of the city to bear the cost of extending services.” Policy 5: Prior to annexation of property, it shall be the policy of the City of Bozeman to acquire adequate and usable water rights, or an appropriate fee in lieu thereof, in accordance with Section 38.23.180 of the municipal code. As stated in the Recommended Terms of Annexation (#10), the applicant must contact the City Engineering Division (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of CIL of water rights for the parcel and pay any CIL of water rights due as a condition of annexation. Staff supports deferral of water rights until development of the site. Policy 6: Infrastructure and emergency services for an area proposed for annexation will be reviewed for the health, safety and welfare of the public. If it is found that adequate services cannot be provided to ensure public health, safety and welfare, it shall be the general policy of the City to require the applicant to provide a written plan for accommodations of these services, or not approve the annexation. Additionally, annexation proposals that would use up infrastructure capacity already reserved for properties lying either within undeveloped portions of the City limits or lying outside the 269 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 24 City limits but within the identified sewer or water service area boundaries, shall generally not be approved. City infrastructure and emergency services are available to the subject property. The site is located adjacent to developments that are currently served by Bozeman Fire. Recommended Term of Annexation #11 includes the provision that the developer will be responsible for installing facilities required to provide full municipal services to the property in accordance with the City’s Infrastructure Master Plan, adopted Community Plan, and all city policies and guidelines that may be in effect at the time of development. The intersection of Griffin Drive and Manley Road has been functioning at less than acceptable levels. The Public Works Director can waive this requirement from limiting development. The required conditions for the waiver exist and the Director indicates he will waive the intersection level of service requirement for future development. Policy 7: It shall be the general policy of the City of Bozeman to require annexation of any contiguous property for which City services are requested or for which City services are currently being contracted. City services are not currently being provided to this property. The applicant intends to seek municipal sewer and water connections for new construction upon annexation approval. Policy 8: The annexation application shall be accompanied by mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works. Mapping to meet the requirements of the Director of Public Works must be provided with the Annexation Agreement. Typically, this includes an 18-inch by 24-inch mylar map, a reduced 8½-inch by 11 or 14-inch annexation map exhibit, and a digital copy containing the metes and bounds legal description of said property. Mapping requirements are addressed in Recommended Term of Annexation # 1. Policy 9: It shall be the policy of the City of Bozeman to assess a system development/impact fee in accordance with Chpt. 2, Art. 6, Div. 9 Bozeman Municipal Code (Impact Fees), and in accordance with the Bozeman Growth Policy and other policies as they are developed. The applicant will be required to pay all fire, street, water, and sewer impact fees at the time of connection for any future development as noted in Recommended Term of Annexation #7. Standard language addressing this policy has been developed by the City Attorney that is included with all annexation agreements. There are no current uses on the site for which impact fees must be addressed at time of annexation. Policy 10: Public notice requirements shall be in compliance with Montana Code Annotated. In addition, notice shall be posted in at least one conspicuous location on the site in question, and mailed to all owners of real property of record within 200 feet of the site in question using the last declared county real estate tax records, not more than 45 270 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 24 days nor less than 15 days prior to the scheduled action to approve or deny the annexation by the City Commission, specifying the date, time and place the annexation will be considered by the City Commission. The notice shall contain the materials specified by Section 38.40.020.A&B.1, BMC. Notices of the public hearing have been sent and posted on the site as set forth under this policy. Policy 11: Annexation agreements shall be executed and returned to the City within 60 days of distribution of the annexation agreement, unless another time period is specifically identified by the City Commission. This policy item is specified in Recommended Term of Annexation #2. The applicant desires additional time to allow the review for the associated subdivision and PUD to be completed. They wish to not complete the annexation agreement until a final decision is reached on the preliminary plat and PUD which have been submitted. Staff has no objection to the Commission granting additional time. The delay will work to the benefit of the City to enable completion of analysis of environmental conditions at and adjacent to the site and identification of all required institutional controls and necessary mitigation. If the Commission agrees with the delay, Staff will wait to prepare the annexation agreement so that final action on the agreement meets this policy. Policy 12: When possible, the use of Part 46 annexations is preferred. This annexation is being processed under Part 46 provisions. SECTION 6 - ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following criteria (letters A-K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. In considering the criteria the analysis must show that the amendment accomplishes criteria A-D. Criteria E-K must be considered and may be found to be affirmative, neutral, or negative. A favorable decision on the proposed application must find that the application meets all of criteria A-D and that the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E-K. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. 271 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 24 Yes. Table C-16 of the Bozeman Community Plan shows both REMU and PLI as implementing districts. Although not in obvious accordance with the growth policy map, the property, if zoned REMU and PLI, would be in accordance with the overall intent of the growth policy. The current land use designation of the site on the growth policy map is Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation does not create any public right of use to the property. The applicant intends to set aside a large portion of the property as park land under PLI zoning, and substantially enhance the EGRA access drive by paving, realigning, and providing a landscaped median and pedestrian sidewalks. If the annexation and zoning is approved, development that fits within the REMU/PLI zoning requirements would be allowed instead of being allowed to be developed within the current county zoning of M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial. The proposed mix of uses with the associated subdivision is 64% public with streets, alleys, and parks, and 36% private. The majority of the site is therefore public which use does correspond with the future land use map. If deemed necessary by the Commission, all publicly accessible spaces could be zoned as PLI. Although the City does not rely on specific development proposals in determining appropriateness of a zone map amendment, it does indicate the possible correlation of future development to the planned use of the property. The current adjacent zoning of M-1 (Light Manufacturing) to the west, R-1 (Residential Low Density) to the south, and PLI (Public Lands/Institutions) to the south/southeast includes a complex mix of allowed uses. By allowing the subject property to be zoned a mix of REMU and PLI, it would provide a suitable transition between the adjacent uses and maintain the character of the district. Furthermore, the growth policy maps specifies the future land use of adjacent areas to be Rural to the north, Parks, Open Space and Recreational to the south/southeast, Residential to the south, and Industrial to the west. The proposed zoning of REMU/PLI would maintain the overall intent of the growth policy within this area by providing an appropriate transition between intended future land uses and by enhancing public parks and access to the EGRA. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Yes. The subject property is located adjacent to developments that are currently served by Bozeman Fire. To the east of the site, there is a former landfill that is a low-level Montana Comprehensive Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) site and is no longer in operation. The landfill is owned by the City. Cleanup of the site is managed by the Montana DEQ. The DEQ has indicated that the site is a low priority. Two letters from DEQ have been received, see attachments. These letters identify two requirements, first, evaluation of groundwater contamination, and second, installation of vapor intrusion mitigation with future buildings. 272 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 17 of 24 There has been a history of monitoring of the site. See the attachment to the September 20, 2017 DEQ letter. Monitoring has occurred both within the old landfill and on adjacent properties on eight occasions between 1983 and today. In a recent study conducted in 2015, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the property at low levels with one indication of vinyl-chloride which exceeded the human health standard. Technology continues to improve allowing detection of more diffuse concentrations of materials. The City has selected a contractor to assist the City in evaluation and monitoring of the condition of the old landfill. Scoping of that contract is now underway and the recent letters from DEQ and environmental reports provided with the annexation application will assist the City in establishing the scope. The City will address the obligations it has as the owner of the old landfill. The developer is responsible for their property. A variety of institutional controls that address notice, remediation, and prevention have been identified. The October 3, 2017 letter from DEQ suggests use of appropriate vapor intrusion. As noted, there are effective techniques for mitigating vapor intrusion. The DEQ website suggests several different alternatives. A Recommended Term of Annexation (#6) is proposed to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs. Additionally, a portion of the property on the south side is located within the 500-year flood plain and there are wetlands located along the west side near the existing ditch. A wetland delineation study and report have been prepared for the site. The proposed residential and commercial properties are proposed outside of these areas which will protect property from potential flooding damage. Slab foundations are also proposed on the residential lots which will prevent potential groundwater damage that might otherwise occur on structures with a full basement. C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Yes. The proposed PLI zoning provides increased opportunity for recreation which promotes public health for users of the parks. Access to the existing portion of the EGRA will also be improved through provision of upgraded vehicular access as well as construction of new pedestrian facilities. Wider paved lanes will improve safety for cyclists, and the new sidewalks will encourage non-motorized access to the site which promotes public health and safety. General welfare will be promoted through new residential townhomes which will provide a variety of housing options for area residents. Provision of additional park land adjacent to the EGRA also promote general welfare by providing an expansion of recreational opportunities. The residential development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in bio swales and retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. See also discussion under Criterion B. 273 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 18 of 24 D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Yes. The property is located to the east of Manley Road, which contains an existing 10” water main, and there is a sewer main in Gallatin Park Drive. The applicant intends to connect to both of these lines for future development on the site. The subject property is in the Emily Dickenson Elementary School and the Chief Joseph Middle School service areas. The property is near the EGRA and trail systems, and the proposed 1.83 acres of PLI zoned land would provide additional access to park lands beyond the existing EGRA. Additionally, transportation improvements to the EGRA access road will provide and improve pedestrian and vehicular access. E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Yes. The proposed zoning will allow development at a similar density to the adjacent residential and commercial developments. This will ensure adequate light and air for the current residents. Additionally, the placement of PLI zoned land allows a generous separation between residential units on Turtle Way and any future development on the subject property. These measures will promote an open feeling and maintain the open air and ample sunshine to the properties. The proposed PLI zoning will be open parkland and therefore will provide light and free flow of air through the site. F. The effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems. Yes. Motorized and non-motorized transportation will increase as a result of the new zoning which allows residential and commercial uses on the property. With the addition of transportation facilities, non-motorized traffic is also promoted by this project. The improvements to the EGRA access road are seen as a benefit to the public users of the recreation area. A traffic report has been provided with this submittal which summarizes the traffic impacts expected with this development. The intersection of Griffin Drive and Manley Road is presently not providing an adequate level of service. Plans are underway to make improvements to the intersection to correct that problem. Griffin Drive is an arterial street and Manley Road is a collector street and they serve large traffic sheds out into the county. Development of this site will create a minor increase in use. Level of service analysis will occur during development review and mitigation measures will be identified and applied at that time. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. Yes. The subject property is located at the edge of the current Bozeman City limits line and within the urban growth area as defined in the Community Plan. The proposed REMU and PLI zoning designations would allow a mix of residential, commercial, and park land in an area surrounded by similar uses. Specifically, the REMU/PLI land would provide an 274 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 19 of 24 appropriate transition between residential and park land uses located to the south and east, with manufacturing and industrial uses located to the west and north. H. Character of the district. Yes. The new zoning aligns with existing zoning in the area. The site is bordered to the south by a residential neighborhood zoned R-1. The property adjacent to the west is zoned M-1 (Industrial), while the property to the east is zoned PLI (Public Lands and Institutions). By zoning this parcel a combination of REMU and PLI, it serves as an appropriate transition between the various zoning designations in this area and the character of this district is maintained. I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Yes. The proposed zoning layout coincides with connections to the existing EGRA lands to the east. The proposed zoning establishment will create an addition of park land in a suitable area due to the adjacency of existing park facilities. Additionally, the subject property is currently being used for the drive entrance to the existing EGRA. Proposed development will improve and widen the drive entrance by providing new paving, stormwater improvements, and sidewalks, all which will will positively affect this area’s suitability for use as an approach to the park. J. Conserving the value of buildings. Neutral. There are no current buildings on the site that will be affected by the proposed zone establishment. There are wide buffers created by the addition of PLI zoned land which limits impacts on adjacent parcels. Development with the standards of the City’s PLI and REMU districts will be more responsive to adjacent property that would occur through development under the County’s existing industrial zoning designation. REMU will provide greater setbacks, lesser heights, greater parking requirements, dedication of parks, and other design elements that reduce its impacts. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Neutral. The proposed REMU/PLI zoning designation would encourage residential and mixed-use opportunities which meets the overall intent of the growth policy by providing an appropriate transition between incompatible adjacent land uses, and setting aside a large portion of the property to be used as open space. However, due to the adjacency of the EGRA, the subject property would also be appropriately used as an extension of the recreational amenities on the site as a whole. While the property is privately owned and currently county zoned M-I, Manufacturing and Industrial, the proposed REMU/PLI zoning is seen as an appropriate use of the land when weighting the alternatives and recognizing that the property unlikely to be used in its entirety as a public park without transferring ownership. 275 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 20 of 24 Additional Evaluation Criteria: Because of the unique nature of this proposal, a combination of policies and issues were addressed when evaluating the appropriateness of the request: 1. Annexation Goals and Criteria (see Section 5) 2. Section 76-2-304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria (see Section 6) 3. public interests in access to and protection of the East Gallatin Recreation Area, and 4. environmental, health, safety, and welfare issues regarding the former landfill located to the east of the subject property. East Gallatin Recreation Area: There are two additional primary public interests in considering the changing a portion of the property from Parks, Open Space and Recreation to Residential Emphasis Mixed Use in addition to the specific review criteria addressed in Sections 5 and 6 of the report. 1. Maintaining the existing legal and physical vehicle and pedestrian access to the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA). 2. Maintaining additional open space to expand the present East Gallatin Recreation Area. As described in Sections 5 and 6 of this report, existing vehicle and pedestrian access is proposed to be maintained and improved as a result of the annexation and zone map amendment. Additionally, the provision of additional land zoned PLI on the subject property will allow the expansion of recreational opportunities for the EGRA and improve connections to additional recreation facilities to the east and west. Former Landfill Safety Issues: Recommended Terms of Annexation include provisions to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs and require the applicant to enter into an agreement that governs requirements related to contamination prior to annexation. See the discussion under the annexation and zoning amendment criteria above. PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. 276 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 21 of 24 The City will accept written protests from property owners against the proposal described in this report until the close of the public hearing before the City Commission. Pursuant to 76-2-305, MCA, a protest may only be submitted by the owner(s) of real property within the area affected by the proposal or by owner(s) of real property that lie within 150 feet of an area affected by the proposal. The protest must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the real property. In addition, a sufficient protest must: (i) contain a description of the action protested sufficient to identify the action against which the protest is lodged; and (ii) contain a statement of the protestor's qualifications (including listing all owners of the property and the physical address and legal description of the property), to protest the action against which the protest is lodged, including ownership of property affected by the action. Signers are encouraged to print their names after their signatures. A person may in writing withdraw a previously filed protest at any time prior to final action by the City Commission. Protests must be delivered to the Bozeman City Clerk, 121 North Rouse Ave., PO Box 1230, Bozeman, MT 59771-1230. APPENDIX A - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant, Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., seeks to annex 6.49 acres into the City limits and establish initial zoning of REMU, “Residential Emphasis Mixed Use” on a portion of the property (4.67 acres), and PLI, “Public, Open Space and Recreational Lands” on the remaining portion of the property (1.83 acres). The application also includes a PUD preliminary plan and a subdivision preliminary plat, which was not included within this staff report. The applicant previously proposed an application for a Growth Policy Map Amendment for the same property to change the future land use from Parks, Recreation and Open Space to Residential for the entire tract. The City Commission denied the request following a public hearing on May 11, 2015. The applicant is proposing to establish two zoning designations on the property, REMU on approximately 71.8% of the tract, and PLI on the remaining 28.2% of the property. Despite this zoning percentage the proposed future use of the site contains 36% private uses and 64% public uses.The intent and purpose of the residential emphasis mixed-use “REMU” district is to establish areas within Bozeman that are mixed-use in character and to provide options for a variety of housing, employment, retail and neighborhood service opportunities within a new or existing neighborhood, while providing predictability to landowners and residents in uses and standards. The intent of the public lands and institutions “PLI” district is to provide for major public and quasi-public uses outside of other districts. As noted in the Bozeman Community Plan, it is desired that all lands shown on the future land use map that are not categorized as Present Rural should be annexed prior to development. The 277 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 22 of 24 subject property is currently categorized as Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands in the Community Plan. The site is privately owned, and thus its current designation does not create any public right of use to the property. If the ZMA is approved, any development would be required to conform to Article 9, Residential Emphasis Mixed Use of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The applicant intends to designate the land zoned PLI as a public park and open space and deed to the Bozeman Sunrise Rotary Club with the project’s final plat. The remaining REMU zoned land will be developed with 20 townhomes and 1 commercial lot which would conform with the district requirements. The site is currently vacant and being used for cattle grazing with the primary access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area (EGRA) running through the property. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from the subject property and contains administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision is located to the south and is a 5-lot residential subdivision. APPENDIX B - NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was sent via US 1st Class mail on Friday, September 15, 2017 to all property owners within 200 feet of the subject property. The project site was posted on Friday, September 15, 2017. Notice was published in the Legal Ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on September 17, 2017 and October 1, 2017. APPENDIX C - PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as “Parks, Open Space and Recreational Lands” in the Bozeman Community Plan. Parks, Open Space, and Recreational Lands. All publicly owned recreational lands, including parks, are included within this category, as well as certain private lands. These areas are generally open in character and may or may not be developed for active recreational purposes. This category includes conservation easements which may not be open for public use. Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The applicant has requested zoning of “REMU” Residential Emphasis Mixed Use and “PLI” Public Lands and Institutions in association with the annexation of the property. The intent of the REMU District is to promote neighborhoods with supporting services that are substantially dominated by housing. A diversity of residential housing types should be built on the majority of any area within this category. Housing choice for a variety of households is desired and can include attached and small detached single-household dwellings, 278 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 23 of 24 apartments, and live-work units. Residences should be included on the upper floors of buildings with ground floor commercial uses. Variation in building massing, height, and other design characteristics should contribute to a complete and interesting streetscape and may be larger than in the Residential category. Secondary supporting uses, such as retail, offices, and civic uses, are permitted at the ground floor. All uses should complement existing and planned residential uses. Non-residential uses are expected to be pedestrian oriented and emphasize the human scale with modulation as needed in larger structures. Stand alone, large, non-residential uses are discouraged. Non-residential spaces should provide an interesting pedestrian experience with quality urban design for buildings, sites, and open spaces. This category is implemented at different scales. The details of implementing standards will vary with the scale. The category is appropriate near commercial centers and larger areas should have access on collector and arterial streets. Multi-household higher density urban development is expected. Any development within this category should have a well integrated transportation and open space network which encourages pedestrian activity and provides ready access within and to adjacent development. The intent of the PLI district is to provide for major public and quasi-public uses outside of other districts. Not all public and quasi-public uses need to be classified PLI. Some may fit within another district, however larger areas will be designated PLI. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: Ebbighausen Homes, Inc. Applicant: Ebbighausen Homes, Inc., PO Box 930, Manhattan, MT 59741-0930 Representative: C&H Engineering and Surveying Inc., 1091 Stoneridge Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Report By: Chris Saunders, Community Development Manager FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Annexation or Zone Map Amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. 279 Staff Report for the Bridger Vale Annexation and Zone Map Amendment Page 24 of 24 Annexation Narrative Development Review Application Annexation and Initial Zone Map Amendment Required Materials Noticing Materials Annexation and Initial Zoning Map Hydrometrics Report (VOCs) Resource Technologies Report (Environmental Sampling) Vaughn Environmental Services (Wetlands) Geoseal Brochure Tetra Tech Report (Soil Sampling) Traffic Impact Study DEQ letters Institutional Controls 280 281 282 283 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D.ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING PART 1 -PROJECT NARRATIVE A.Is the new zoning designation in accordance with the growth policy? How? Yes.According to the Bozeman Community Plan (June 1, 2009) on Figure 3-1-Future Land Use Map, the subject property is designated “Parks, Open Space, & RecreationalLands”.A Growth Policy Amendment has been previously submitted to change the Future Land Use to residential for the entire tract and it was denied during a City commission hearing held on May 11, 2015. We have included a chain of emails as well as the original GMA staff report with this submittal for reference. The emails outline the discussion that took place between Chris Saunders, Doug Chandler and C&H Engineering. The discussion indicates that the GMA may not be required for the PUD to be approved and the Zone Map Amendment and Annexation may be approved without the GMA. The proposed REMU zoning is not in accordance with the Parks, Open Space, & Recreational Lands designation,however,the proposed PLI zoning is in accordance with the current land use designation and the dedication and enhancement of the public right- of-way is in accordance with the growth policy as it’s intended use is for access to the EGRA. The PUD project as a whole is therefore in conformance to the growth policy by reserving a large portion of the site for PLI and constructing the wider public right-of- way for use by the EGRA and the PUD.The REMU designation seems appropriate for the proposed residential and commercial lots considering adjacent land uses and the proposed PUD project as a whole. B.Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? Yes. The subject property is 2.5 miles (7-minute drive) from the fire station. It is located on the existing City limits line between Minor Subdivision 385 and Gallatin Park Subdivision, both currently served by Bozeman Fire. There is an old landfill that is a low-level Montana Comprehensive Cleanup and Responsibility Act (CECRA) site and was operated between 1962 and 1970 located to the east of the site. Cleanup of the site is managed by the Montana DEQ. VOCs that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the property in a recent study conducted by Resource Technologies in 2015 at low levels with one indication of vinyl-chloride which exceeded the human health standard.It has been noted that the identified VOCs will continue to degrade over time. A condition of approval for the Bridger Vale Subdivision has been proposed to protect future residents from potential exposure to the identified VOCs. The proposed condition states:“All lots shall construct a sub-slab vapor mitigation system to eliminate anyenvironmental concerns.” Tetra Tech has been contracted by Andy Ebbighausen and has 284 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D.ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 provided a report based on soil sampling conducted on October 10, 2016. A Geo-seal vapor intrusion barrier has been indicated as one possible solution to mitigate sub-slab vapor concerns as a follow up to this investigation. All reports pertaining to the risk analysis and environmental testing have been included with this report. The following reports are included: Hydrometrics, Inc (April 30, 2015); Resource Technologies, Inc. (January 13, 2015); CPF Associates, Inc. (Vapor Intrusion Human Health Assessment -Match 4, 2015) A portion of the property on the south side is located within the 500-year flood plain and there are wetlands located along the west side near the existing ditch. A wetland delineation study and report have been prepared by Vaughn Environmental Services for the site (included with this submittal). The proposed residential and commercial properties are proposed outside of these areas which will protect property from potential flooding damage. Slab foundations are also proposed on the residential lots which will prevent potential groundwater damage that might otherwise occur on structures with a full basement. C.Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? Yes.The REMU and PLI zoning designations will allow for development that enhances the existing surrounding land uses.The PLI zoning provides increased opportunity for recreation which promotes public health for users of the parks.Access to the existing portion of public park and Glen Lake will also be improved through provision of upgraded vehicular access as well as construction of new pedestrian facilities. Wider paved lanes will improve safety for cyclists. The sidewalks along Bridger Vale Drive and the new paved surfaces will encourage non-motorized access to the site which promotes public health and safety. It is safer for pedestrians to use the sidewalk and crosswalks rather than walk alongside the roadway.General welfare will be promoted through provision of new residential townhomes which are modern spacious and efficiently built structures. These homes provide healthy environments for residents. Provision of additional parks to the EGRA also promote general welfare by providing trail space and recreational opportunities.The residential development serviced by the existing municipal sanitary sewer and water systems promotes public health by protecting groundwater from degradation associated with on-site septic systems and domestic wells. Stormwater will be managed in bio swales and retention facilities to filter out sediment and treat runoff. D.Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? Yes. The property is located to the East of Manley Road, which contains an existing 10” water main. The sewer main located in Gallatin Park Drive will be used for this project. The subject property is in the Emily Dickenson Elementary School District and the Chief 285 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D.ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 Joseph Middle School District. The property lies within a quarter mile of Glen Lake Park.1.8289 acres of PLI zoning is proposed with this project which will provide additional access to park lands beyond the existing EGRA. Transportation improvements to the EGRA access road will provide and improve pedestrian and vehicular access. E.Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? The proposed zoning will allow development at a similar density to the adjacent parcels. This will ensure adequate light and air for the current residents.Wide boulevards and a landscaped median are being proposed along with houses that are set back in the front of the lots. These measures will promote an open feeling and maintain the open air and ample sunshine to the properties. The proposed PLI zoning will be wide open parkland and therefore will provide light and free flow of air through the site. F.Will the new zoning have an effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems? How? Yes. Motorized and non-motorized transportation will increase as a result of the new zoning due to the addition of residential units on the property.With the addition of pedestrian transportation facilities non-motorized traffic is promoted by this project. Divided lanes are provided with the street section median design and this will help to buffer traffic dividing the flow of traffic into two median separated lanes. A traffic report has been provided with this submittal which summarizes the traffic impacts expected with this development. G.Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? Yes. The subject property is currently vacant and is on the edge of the Bozeman City limits line. The REMU and PLI zoning designations have been spatially laid out to conform to the PUD site plan and the lands that will be designated as public parks and open spaces. The open space lot in the south of the Tract will be quit claim deeded to theBozeman Sunrise Rotary Club with this project’s final plat. The assignment of 20 residential townhouse REMU lots and 1 small commercial REMU lot conform well to this neighborhood. Gallatin Park Subdivision is located across Manley Road from Bridger Vale and it contains mixed-use, administrative, single family residential, commercial retail services and other mixed-use as existing land uses. Sunfish Park Minor Subdivision 385 to the south is a 5-lot minor subdivision and will blend with the proposed townhouse units but in a compatible manner with a centrally located open space. This project will enhance and infill this area that would otherwise remain as a vacant lot or be developed within the county zoning of M-1 light manufacturing. The proposed project promotes compatible urban growth on an appropriate scale and in a sustainable manner. 286 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D.ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 H.Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? Yes. The new zoning aligns with existing zoning in the area. The site is bordered to the south by a residential neighborhood zoned R-1. The property adjacent to the west is zoned M-1 (Industrial), while the property to the east is zoned PLI (Public Lands & institutions). By zoning this parcel a combination of REMU and PLI, it serves as an effective transition between the various zoning designations in this area and the character of this district is maintained. I.Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? Yes. The proposed zoning layout interfaces with the existing EGRA lands to the east. The ability to enhance this recreational park by the addition of the open space and parks PLI zones proposed with this project are unique to this project’s location. This project willpositively affect the area’s suitability for parks and recreation by addition to existing park lands.The project is currently being used for the drive entrance to the existing EGRA. The project will improve and widen the drive entrance. The addition of paving, stormwater improvements and sidewalks will positively affect this area’s suitability for use as an approach to the park. J.Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? Yes, there are no conflicts with the values of existing buildings with this project as all of the proposed townhouse structures are set back from any existing structures. Wide buffers will be in place between existing residential and mixed-use buildings across Manley Road. The proposed structures’future values will be protected through measures being taken to protect the dwellings from potential soil contamination by installing an appropriate vapor barrier and by designing slab on grade foundations. The residential units are oriented in a manner to preserve existing view sheds of the Bridger Mountains including views of the “M”, Mount Baldy and Sacajawea Peak among other natural features along the ridgeline of the mountains.The orientation to maintain these view sheds will conserve the values of the future townhouses. Orientation of the buildings in close proximity to a mixed-use center and also recreational parks will further help to conserve the values of the future structures and will also enhance the values of some of the existing adjacent structures. 287 BRIDGER VALE P.U.D.ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION May 5, 2017 #14486 FORM ANNX PART 1 K.Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? Yes.The new zoning designations encourages the most appropriate use of land in this vicinity by addition of residential and mixed-use opportunities while preserving the overall growth policy of parks and open space by setting aside a large portion of the property for PLI zoning and substantially enhancing the EGRA access drive. The REMU lots are appropriate considering the current adjacent land uses of the Gallatin Park Subdivision and Sunfish Park. The adjacent County tract to the north of the site is also being used as a residence. 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 Resource Technologies, Inc. 1050 East Main Street Suite 4, Bozeman, Montana 59715 Voice: (406) 585-8005 • Fax: (406) 585 -0069 • e-mail: rti @ montana.net January 13, 2015 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen P.O. Box 930 Manhattan, MT 59741 Subject: Environmental Sampling Report; Manley Drive Property; Bozeman, Montana Dear Mr. Ebbighausen: Resource Technologies, Inc. (RTI) has completed environmental sampling at the property located east of Manley Road and north of the Bozeman Ponds Recreation Area in Bozeman, Montana. Environmental sampling was completed to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the former Bozeman City Landfill that was situated southeast of the subject property. Sampling activities were not designed nor intended to identify potential on-site sources of contamination. Work tasks included installing two groundwater monitoring wells and two soil vapor probes at the property and collection of soil, groundwater, and soil vapor samples. One monitoring well and soil vapor probe were placed along the southern boundary of the site and one monitoring well and soil vapor probe were placed along the eastern margin of the site (Figure 1). Sampling locations were selected to establish environmental conditions at the up-hydraulic gradient boundaries of the subject property. Groundwater at these locations is expected to be flowing onto the subject property from the south and/or east. As such, contaminants identified at these locations (particularly in groundwater and soil vapor) would presumably be attributable to an off-site source. Sampling methods and results are discussed below. Monitoring Well Installation On December 16, 2014, RTI installed two monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-2) at the locations shown in Figure 1 using direct push methods. Stantec of Butte, Montana provided soil-boring services. Soil samples were collected continuously by driving a four-foot core barrel with an acetate liner into undisturbed soil. Samples collected above the water table were field screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID) and heated headspace methods. One soil sample from each borehole collected above the soil/groundwater interface was retained and submitted to Energy Laboratories in Billings for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) screen and VOCs (Method 8260 Extended List) analyses. The analyte list for soil samples is included as Table 1A. Soil laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix A. 340 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 2 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. Soil boreholes were advanced to depths of 12 feet and were completed as groundwater monitoring wells with 1-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well casing and eight foot lengths of 0.010 inch slotted well screen positioned from 4 to 12 feet below ground surface. A washed sand filter pack was emplaced around the well screen and the remaining annular space was backfilled with granular bentonite. Since the monitoring wells are expected to be temporary installations, no protective cover was installed over the wellheads. Soil borehole logs are included as Appendix B. Monitoring wells were developed by surging and pumping until the wells yielded visibly non-turbid water. Soil Vapor Probe Installation On December 16, 2014, RTI installed two soil vapor probes (VW-1 and VW-2) at the location shown in Figure 1 using direct push methods. A six-inch stainless steel GeotechTM soil vapor probe was installed at a depth of 3 to 3.5 feet at each location. Teflon tubing was attached to the probe and the tubing extended to several feet above ground surface to facilitate soil vapor sampling. Washed sand was emplaced around the probe and the remaining annular space was backfilled with granular bentonite. Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were collected from the two monitoring wells on December 22, 2014 using disposable polyethylene bailers and nylon string. Prior to sample collection, a minimum of three casing volumes of water were purged from the well. During purging, stabilization parameters including temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation reduction potential were monitored. When readings of these parameters stabilized, groundwater samples were collected. Samples were transferred to laboratory provided containers and were submitted to Energy Laboratories for EPH screen and VOCs analyses. The analyte list for groundwater samples is included as Table 1A. Groundwater analytical results for detected compounds only are included in Table 1B and laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix C. Soil Vapor Sampling Soil vapor samples were collected from the two soil vapor probes on December 22, 2014. Six-liter SUMMA canisters with flow controllers calibrated to collect a sample over an interval of one hour were connected to the vapor-probe tubing. Sampling was initiated by opening the SUMMA canister valve at the start of sampling and monitoring the flow controller vacuum. When the vacuum reading on the flow controller decreased to no less than (5) inches mercury, sampling was terminated by closing the SUMMA canister valve. Following sampling, a protective cap was then tightened onto the SUMMA canister intake fitting. The SUMMA canisters were submitted to ALS Laboratories of Salt Lake City, Utah for VOCs analysis by Method TO-15. The analytical laboratory supplied the certified SUMMA canister, flow controller, and vacuum gauge. The SUMMA canisters were returned to the laboratory along with the flow controllers in the same packaging in which they arrived. The analyte list for soil 341 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 3 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. vapor samples is included as Table 2A. Analytical results for detected compounds only are summarized in Table 2B and laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix D. Results Soil Analytes detected in soil samples were limited to total extractable hydrocarbons (TEH) detected via EPH analysis in sample MW-1 3-4 at a concentration of 59 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). TEH represents the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon compounds that comprise diesel fuel and waste oil; however, the laboratory indicated that the analytical profile of TEH detected in sample MW-1 3-4 was typical of naturally occurring hydrocarbons in soil. Groundwater Analytes detected in groundwater samples included the VOCs toluene, chloroethane, and vinyl chloride. VOCs detected in sample MW-1 were limited to toluene at an estimated concentration of 0.14 micrograms per liter (g/l). The result was “J” qualified by the laboratory since the compound was detected at a concentration below the laboratory reporting limit. VOCs detected in sample MW-2 included chloroethane reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.11 g/l, toluene reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.19 g/l, and vinyl chloride reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.52 g/l. TEH was not detected in either groundwater sample. Soil Vapor Analytical results for soil-vapor sample VW-1 indicated a total VOCs concentration of 220 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3). The majority of the VOCs detected in this sample were unidentified compounds that are not VOCs on the TO-15 analyte list. Identified compounds included freon 11 reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.87 g/m3 and tetrachloroethene (PCE) reported at a concentration of 51 g/m3. Analytical results for soil-vapor sample VW-2 indicated a total VOCs concentration of 410 micrograms per cubic meter g/m3. Just under 50% of the VOCs detected in this sample were unidentified compounds that are not VOCs on the TO-15 analyte list. Identified compounds included freon 11 reported at a “J” qualified concentration of 0.87 g/m3, acetone reported at 100 g/m3, 2-butanone reported at g/m3, chloroform reported at g/m3, tetrahydrofuran reported at 10 g/m3, toluene reported at 6.5 g/m3, PCE reported at 1.1 g/m3, ethylbenzene reported at 3.4 g/m3, total xylenes reported at 23.1 g/m3, 4-ethyl toluene reported at 3.6 g/m3, 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene reported at 7.2 g/m3, and 1,2,4 trimethylbenzene reported at 20 g/m3. Discussion Groundwater and soil vapor along the eastern and southern boundaries of the property appear to be impacted with a variety of VOCs that are not naturally occurring. Impacts 342 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen Page 4 January 13, 2015 Resource Technologies, Inc. appear to be more substantial along the eastern site boundary. With the exception of TEH, no target analytes were detected in either soil sample collected at the site. The reported TEH concentration was well below the most conservative soil RBSLs and the laboratory report indicated that detected TEH may have been naturally occurring. VOCs detected in groundwater included toluene and vinyl chloride at concentrations below the laboratory reporting limit. The laboratory reporting limit is the level at which the concentration of a compound can be quantified with statistical confidence. These compounds were positively identified; however, the concentrations were too low to be quantified with statistical confidence, thus the reported values are estimates. The estimated concentrations of toluene are well below human health standards for groundwater. The estimated vinyl chloride concentration (0.52 g/l) exceeds the human health standard for groundwater of 0.2 g/l. Vinyl chloride is the final breakdown product of PCE. Numerous VOCs were detected in soil vapor samples (Table 2B). There are no established regulatory screening levels for VOCs in soil vapor. Conclusions VOCs that are not naturally occurring were detected in groundwater and soil vapor along the southern and eastern margins of the subject property. Sampling points were chosen to assess potential environmental impacts originating off site. Sample points MW-1 and VW-1 were positioned to detect contaminants potentially entering the site from the south and sample points MW-2 and VW-2 were positioned to detect contaminants potentially entering the site from the east. It is unknown if any of the sampling data represents worst case conditions. Only one applicable regulatory screening level was exceeded by detected compounds. The groundwater human health standard for vinyl chloride was exceeded in sample MW-2, although the reported concentration was “J” qualified for being below the laboratory reporting limit. Limitations Sampling conducted at the subject property was intended to assess the potential for impacts by contaminants associated with the former Bozeman City Landfill. The data indicate that groundwater and soil vapor at the presumed upgradient margins of the subject property are impacted by VOCs; however, the data are not definitive as to the contaminant source or to the extent and magnitude of impacts on site. In addition, sampling was not intended to assess environmental conditions across the entire property, only at the specific locations chosen for sampling. 343 344 Figures 345 Resource Technologies Inc. MW-1 MW-2 VW-2 VW-1 MW-1 VP-1 Existing 1-inch groundwater monitoring well Existing soil vapor probe Figure 1. Site Photo and Sample Locations Manley road Property Bozeman, Montana Proposed 1-inch groundwater monitoring well 346 Tables 347 Table 1A. Soil and Groundwater Sampling Target Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen; Bozeman, Montana EPH Screen Target Analytes 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Chlorobenzene Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (TEH) 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Chlorodibromomethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Chloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Chloroform 1,1-Dichloroethane Chloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Dibromomethane 1,2-Dibromoethane Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Ethyl benzene 1,2-Dichloroethane m,p-Xylene 1,2-Dichloropropane Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Methyl t-butyl ether 1,3 Dichloropropane Methylene chloride 1,4-Dichlorobenzene o-Xylene 2-Chlorotoluene Styrene 2,2 Dichloropropane Tetrachloroethene Benzene Toluene Bromobenzene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Bromochloromethane trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromodichloromethane Trichloroethene Bromoform Trichlorofluormethane Bromomethane Vinyl chloride Carbon tetrachloride Method 8260 (VOCs) Target Analytes 348 Table 1B. Groundwater Sampling Results; Detected Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen, Bozeman, Montana VOCs by 8260 DEQ Human Health Standard for Groundwater Chloroethane ND 0.11 J NA Toluene 0.14 J 0.19 J 1,000 Vinyl chloride ND 0.52 J 0.2 Notes: Q = Qualifier ND = Not detected. NA = Not applicable. µg/l Q Analyte J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the Reporting Limit (RL). It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass µg/l = micrograms per liter MW-1 MW-2 µg/l Q µg/l Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 1B Groundwater Sample Results 12.2014 1 of 1 349 Tentatively Identified Compounds* 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Chloromethane Ethanol 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Decane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4-methyl-Decane 1,1-Dichloroethane Cyclohexane 1,1-Dichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Ethyl acetate 1,2-Dibromoethane Ethyl benzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Freon 11 1,2-Dichloroethane Freon 113 1,2-Dichloropropane Freon 114 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Heptane 1,3-Butadiene Hexane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene m,p-Xylene 2-Hexanone Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone) 4-Ethyl Toluene Methyl t-butyl ether 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Methylene chloride Acetone o-Xylene Benzene Styrene Benzyl chloride Tetrachloroethene Bromodichloromethane Tetrahydrofuran Bromoform Toluene Bromomethane Total Volatile Organics Carbon disulfide trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Carbon tetrachloride trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Chlorobenzene Trichloroethene Chloroethane Vinyl acetate Chloroform Vinyl chloride Table 2A. Soil Vapor Sampling Target Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen; Bozeman, Montana TO-15 Analytes Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 2B Air Sample Results 12.2014 1 of 1350 Table 2B. Soil Vapor Sampling Results; Detected Compounds; December 22, 2014; Ebbighausen, Bozeman, Montana VOCs by TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND U <0.74 U 4.0 20 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND U <0.74 U 1.5 7.2 4-Ethyl Toluene ND U <0.74 U 0.73 3.6 Acetone ND U <0.71 U 43 E 100 E Chloroform ND U <0.73 U 0.41 J 2.0 J Ethyl benzene ND U <0.65 U 0.79 3.4 Freon 11 0.16 J 0.87 J 0.15 J 0.87 J m,p-Xylene ND U <0.65 U 4.0 18 Methyl ethyl ketone (2-Butanone)ND U <0.44 U 3.5 10 o-Xylene ND U <0.65 U 1.2 5.1 Tetrachloroethene 7.5 51 0.16 J 1.1 J Tetrahydrofuran ND U <0.44 U 3.5 10 Toluene ND U <0.57 U 1.7 6.5 Total Volatile Organics 53 J 220 J 100 410 Tentatively Identified Compounds* Decane 5.8 J Ethanol 21 J 4-methyl-Decane 2.7 J Notes: Q = Qualifier * Compounds not on the TO-15 analyte list Sample ID VW-1 QQ b - EPA commercial air screening level (EPA, 2014) VW-2 a - EPA residential air screening level (EPA, 2014) ppb v/v ND = Not detected. NA = Not applicable. µg/m3 Q U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the Method Detection Limit (MDL). E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range. ppb v/v Analyte J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the Reporting Limit (RL). It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed. µg/m3 µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter ppb v/v = parts per billion volume Q Z:\Projects\ESAs\Ebbighausen Bozeman Ponds\Data\Table 2B Air Sample Results 12.2014 1 of 1 351 APPENDIX A Laboratory Analytical Reports - Soil 352 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B14121551-001 MW-1 3-4 12/16/14 10:00 12/17/14 Soil EPH-Ultrasonic Extraction Hydrocarbons, Extractable Petroleum-Scrn Moisture Moisture Prep Percent Moisture Volatile Organics, Methanol Extraction 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Extended List B14121551-002 MW-2 5-6 12/16/14 10:15 12/17/14 Soil Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name: Ebbighausen Work Order: B14121551 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 December 30, 2014 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 2 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 12/17/2014 for analysis. Page 1 of 19353 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121551-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 3-4 Collection Date:12/16/14 10:00 Matrix:Soil Report Date:12/24/14 DateReceived:12/17/14 Revised Date:12/30/14Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 12/19/14 08:24 / amn0.2wt%17Moisture SW3550A VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcetone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcetonitrile SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcrolein SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcrylonitrile SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromoform SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDn-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDsec-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtert-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDCarbon disulfide SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloroform SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.24mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDDibromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDEthylbenzene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 2 of 19354 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121551-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 3-4 Collection Date:12/16/14 10:00 Matrix:Soil Report Date:12/24/14 DateReceived:12/17/14 Revised Date:12/30/14Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDHexachlorobutadiene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryND2-Hexanone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDIodomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDIsopropylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDp-Isopropyltoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDMethyl isobutyl ketone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDNaphthalene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDn-Propylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDStyrene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDToluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTrichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDVinyl acetate SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDVinyl chloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.24mg/kg-dryNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDo-Xylene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj60-136%REC90.0 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj70-132%REC90.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj78-160%REC98.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:13 / jrj75-138%REC96.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN 12/29/14 14:18 / amn12mg/kg-dry13Total Extractable Hydrocarbons (SGT)SW8015M200 12/19/14 23:22 / amn12mg/kg-dry59Total Extractable Hydrocarbons SW8015M200 12/29/14 14:18 / amn40-140%REC76.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl (SGT)SW8015M 12/19/14 23:22 / amn40-140%REC79.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl SW8015M - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. - Results for both the Silca Gel Treatment (SGT) and the untreated solvent extract are reported. Silica gel treatment removes polar non-petroleum hydrcarbons. The hydrocarbon profile was typical of natural occuring hydrocarbons in soil. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 3 of 19355 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121551-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 5-6 Collection Date:12/16/14 10:15 Matrix:Soil Report Date:12/24/14 DateReceived:12/17/14 Revised Date:12/30/14Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 12/19/14 08:27 / amn0.2wt%20Moisture SW3550A VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcetone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcetonitrile SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcrolein SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDAcrylonitrile SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromoform SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDBromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDn-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDsec-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtert-Butylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDCarbon disulfide SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloroform SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDChloromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.25mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDDibromomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDEthylbenzene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 4 of 19356 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121551-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 5-6 Collection Date:12/16/14 10:15 Matrix:Soil Report Date:12/24/14 DateReceived:12/17/14 Revised Date:12/30/14Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDHexachlorobutadiene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryND2-Hexanone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDIodomethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDIsopropylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDp-Isopropyltoluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj4.0mg/kg-dryNDMethyl isobutyl ketone SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDNaphthalene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDn-Propylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDStyrene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDToluene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTrichloroethene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryND1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDVinyl acetate SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDVinyl chloride SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.25mg/kg-dryNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDo-Xylene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj0.20mg/kg-dryNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj60-136%REC82.0 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj70-132%REC83.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj78-160%REC89.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B 12/19/14 14:42 / jrj75-138%REC86.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN 12/19/14 22:30 / amn13mg/kg-dryNDTotal Extractable Hydrocarbons SW8015M200 12/19/14 22:30 / amn40-140%REC87.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl SW8015M - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 5 of 19357 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: lcs-85641 12/19/14 11:45Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5971A.I_141219A Acetone 107 49 1454.010.7 mg/kg Acetonitrile 82 60 1304.08.24 mg/kg Acrolein 85 20 1974.08.48 mg/kg Acrylonitrile 86 45 1464.08.56 mg/kg Benzene 99 70 1270.200.992 mg/kg Bromobenzene 101 70 1350.201.01 mg/kg Bromochloromethane 110 60 1300.201.10 mg/kg Bromodichloromethane 100 56 1360.201.00 mg/kg Bromoform 85 59 1320.200.848 mg/kg Bromomethane 36 18 1340.200.362 mg/kg n-Butylbenzene 108 71 1340.201.08 mg/kg sec-Butylbenzene 103 67 1320.201.03 mg/kg tert-Butylbenzene 102 68 1340.201.02 mg/kg Carbon disulfide 90 32 1410.200.896 mg/kg Carbon tetrachloride 109 60 1400.201.09 mg/kg Chlorobenzene 98 75 1320.200.976 mg/kg Chlorodibromomethane 86 62 1330.200.856 mg/kg Chloroethane 27 45 1390.200.270 mg/kg S Chloroform 104 62 1320.201.04 mg/kg Chloromethane 95 41 1380.200.952 mg/kg 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 100 41 1490.201.00 mg/kg 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 89 57 1230.200.888 mg/kg 1,2-Dibromoethane 95 60 1350.200.952 mg/kg 2-Chlorotoluene 98 74 1350.200.976 mg/kg Dibromomethane 110 60 1350.201.10 mg/kg 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 98 70 1300.200.976 mg/kg 4-Chlorotoluene 102 75 1360.201.02 mg/kg 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 98 71 1320.200.976 mg/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 108 71 1310.201.08 mg/kg Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 31 1230.200.848 mg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethane 104 66 1300.201.04 mg/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane 97 51 1400.200.968 mg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene 106 64 1330.201.06 mg/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 63 1310.200.960 mg/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 66 1330.201.00 mg/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane 96 60 1300.200.960 mg/kg 1,3-Dichloropropane 95 59 1350.200.952 mg/kg 2,2-Dichloropropane 107 39 1570.201.07 mg/kg 1,1-Dichloropropene 103 65 1320.201.03 mg/kg cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 93 55 1340.200.928 mg/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 95 58 1460.200.952 mg/kg Ethylbenzene 103 74 1360.201.03 mg/kg Hexachlorobutadiene 95 52 1330.200.952 mg/kg Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. Page 6 of 19358 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: lcs-85641 12/19/14 11:45Laboratory Control Sample Run: 5971A.I_141219A 2-Hexanone 100 54 1294.010.0 mg/kg Iodomethane 111 53 1280.201.11 mg/kg Isopropylbenzene 99 70 1330.200.992 mg/kg p-Isopropyltoluene 114 70 1310.201.14 mg/kg Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)86 43 1520.200.864 mg/kg Methyl ethyl ketone 96 43 1484.09.60 mg/kg Methyl isobutyl ketone 91 54 1274.09.12 mg/kg Methylene chloride 90 51 1340.200.904 mg/kg Naphthalene 81 15 1710.200.808 mg/kg n-Propylbenzene 98 72 1340.200.976 mg/kg Styrene 102 70 1350.201.02 mg/kg 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 99 35 1560.200.992 mg/kg 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 96 59 1350.200.960 mg/kg Tetrachloroethene 112 64 1390.201.12 mg/kg Toluene 99 73 1370.200.992 mg/kg 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 84 24 1530.200.840 mg/kg 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 84 34 1500.200.840 mg/kg 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 107 63 1340.201.07 mg/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 90 56 1360.200.904 mg/kg Trichloroethene 98 65 1340.200.976 mg/kg Trichlorofluoromethane 92 48 1400.200.920 mg/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 93 56 1420.200.928 mg/kg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 98 67 1250.200.984 mg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 101 71 1310.201.01 mg/kg Vinyl acetate 88 28 1230.200.880 mg/kg Vinyl chloride 97 32 1360.200.968 mg/kg m+p-Xylenes 99 75 1360.201.98 mg/kg o-Xylene 96 72 1340.200.960 mg/kg Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 60 1360.20 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 85 70 1320.20 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 95 78 1600.20 Surr: Toluene-d8 92 75 1380.20 Lab ID: mb-85641 12/19/14 13:14Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A Acetone 4.0ND mg/kg Acetonitrile 4.0ND mg/kg Acrolein 4.0ND mg/kg Acrylonitrile 4.0ND mg/kg Benzene 0.20ND mg/kg Bromobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Bromochloromethane 0.20ND mg/kg Bromodichloromethane 0.20ND mg/kg Bromoform 0.20ND mg/kg Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 7 of 19359 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: mb-85641 12/19/14 13:14Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A Bromomethane 0.20ND mg/kg n-Butylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg sec-Butylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg tert-Butylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Carbon disulfide 0.20ND mg/kg Carbon tetrachloride 0.20ND mg/kg Chlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Chlorodibromomethane 0.20ND mg/kg Chloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg Chloroform 0.20ND mg/kg Chloromethane 0.20ND mg/kg 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20ND mg/kg 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20ND mg/kg Dibromomethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg 4-Chlorotoluene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20ND mg/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20ND mg/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.20ND mg/kg 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.20ND mg/kg cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20ND mg/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20ND mg/kg Ethylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20ND mg/kg 2-Hexanone 4.0ND mg/kg Iodomethane 0.20ND mg/kg Isopropylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg p-Isopropyltoluene 0.20ND mg/kg Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)0.20ND mg/kg Methyl ethyl ketone 4.0ND mg/kg Methyl isobutyl ketone 4.0ND mg/kg Methylene chloride 0.20ND mg/kg Naphthalene 0.20ND mg/kg Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 8 of 19360 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: mb-85641 12/19/14 13:14Method Blank Run: 5971A.I_141219A n-Propylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Styrene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg Tetrachloroethene 0.20ND mg/kg Toluene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20ND mg/kg Trichloroethene 0.20ND mg/kg Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.20ND mg/kg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20ND mg/kg Vinyl acetate 0.20ND mg/kg Vinyl chloride 0.20ND mg/kg m+p-Xylenes 0.20ND mg/kg o-Xylene 0.20ND mg/kg Xylenes, Total 0.20ND mg/kg Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92 60 1360.20 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 94 70 1320.20 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 107 78 1600.20 Surr: Toluene-d8 99 75 1380.20 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams 12/19/14 15:12Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A Acetone 107 49 1454.012.9 mg/kg-dry Acetonitrile 86 60 1304.010.3 mg/kg-dry Acrolein 94 19 1974.011.2 mg/kg-dry Acrylonitrile 92 45 1464.011.1 mg/kg-dry Benzene 96 70 1270.201.15 mg/kg-dry Bromobenzene 95 70 1350.201.14 mg/kg-dry Bromochloromethane 110 60 1300.201.32 mg/kg-dry Bromodichloromethane 97 56 1360.201.16 mg/kg-dry Bromoform 83 59 1320.201.000 mg/kg-dry Bromomethane 31 18 1340.200.373 mg/kg-dry n-Butylbenzene 94 71 1340.201.13 mg/kg-dry sec-Butylbenzene 95 67 1320.201.14 mg/kg-dry tert-Butylbenzene 93 68 1340.201.12 mg/kg-dry Carbon disulfide 93 32 1410.201.12 mg/kg-dry Carbon tetrachloride 104 60 1400.201.25 mg/kg-dry Chlorobenzene 95 75 1320.201.14 mg/kg-dry Chlorodibromomethane 86 62 1330.201.03 mg/kg-dry Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 9 of 19361 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams 12/19/14 15:12Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A Chloroethane 30 45 1390.200.360 mg/kg-dry S Chloroform 102 62 1320.201.22 mg/kg-dry Chloromethane 95 41 1380.201.14 mg/kg-dry 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 112 41 1490.201.35 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 77 57 1230.240.924 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dibromoethane 95 60 1350.201.14 mg/kg-dry 2-Chlorotoluene 85 74 1350.201.02 mg/kg-dry Dibromomethane 108 60 1350.201.30 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 90 70 1300.201.09 mg/kg-dry 4-Chlorotoluene 94 75 1360.201.13 mg/kg-dry 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 88 71 1320.201.06 mg/kg-dry 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 98 71 1310.201.17 mg/kg-dry Dichlorodifluoromethane 67 31 1230.200.800 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloroethane 104 66 1300.201.25 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichloroethane 94 51 1400.201.12 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 64 1330.201.15 mg/kg-dry cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 95 63 1310.201.14 mg/kg-dry trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 98 66 1330.201.17 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichloropropane 94 60 1300.201.13 mg/kg-dry 1,3-Dichloropropane 96 59 1350.201.15 mg/kg-dry 2,2-Dichloropropane 102 39 1570.201.23 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloropropene 99 65 1320.201.19 mg/kg-dry cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 95 55 1340.201.14 mg/kg-dry trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 94 58 1460.201.13 mg/kg-dry Ethylbenzene 99 74 1360.201.19 mg/kg-dry Hexachlorobutadiene 77 52 1330.200.926 mg/kg-dry 2-Hexanone 107 54 1294.012.9 mg/kg-dry Iodomethane 114 53 1280.201.37 mg/kg-dry Isopropylbenzene 90 70 1330.201.09 mg/kg-dry p-Isopropyltoluene 100 69 1310.201.20 mg/kg-dry Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)91 43 1520.201.10 mg/kg-dry Methyl ethyl ketone 106 43 1484.012.7 mg/kg-dry Methyl isobutyl ketone 102 54 1274.012.2 mg/kg-dry Methylene chloride 91 51 1340.201.10 mg/kg-dry Naphthalene 82 15 1710.200.990 mg/kg-dry n-Propylbenzene 86 72 1340.201.03 mg/kg-dry Styrene 96 70 1350.201.15 mg/kg-dry 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 93 35 1560.201.12 mg/kg-dry 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 94 59 1350.201.13 mg/kg-dry Tetrachloroethene 105 64 1390.201.26 mg/kg-dry Toluene 96 73 1370.201.15 mg/kg-dry 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 76 24 1530.200.911 mg/kg-dry 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 76 34 1500.200.910 mg/kg-dry Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. Page 10 of 19362 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001ams 12/19/14 15:12Sample Matrix Spike Run: 5971A.I_141219A 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 106 63 1340.201.27 mg/kg-dry 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 94 56 1360.201.12 mg/kg-dry Trichloroethene 96 65 1340.201.15 mg/kg-dry Trichlorofluoromethane 95 48 1400.201.14 mg/kg-dry 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 90 56 1420.201.09 mg/kg-dry 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 89 67 1250.201.07 mg/kg-dry 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 94 71 1300.201.12 mg/kg-dry Vinyl acetate 99 28 1230.201.19 mg/kg-dry Vinyl chloride 96 32 1360.201.15 mg/kg-dry m+p-Xylenes 96 75 1360.242.32 mg/kg-dry o-Xylene 93 72 1340.201.12 mg/kg-dry Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 84 60 1360.20 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 87 70 1320.20 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 90 78 1600.20 Surr: Toluene-d8 88 75 1380.20 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd 12/19/14 15:41Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A Acetone 113 49 145 204.0 5.113.6 mg/kg-dry Acetonitrile 86 60 130 204.0 0.910.4 mg/kg-dry Acrolein 86 19 197 204.0 8.010.4 mg/kg-dry Acrylonitrile 90 45 146 204.0 1.810.9 mg/kg-dry Benzene 95 70 127 200.20 0.81.14 mg/kg-dry Bromobenzene 92 70 135 200.20 3.41.11 mg/kg-dry Bromochloromethane 109 60 130 200.20 0.71.31 mg/kg-dry Bromodichloromethane 99 56 136 200.20 2.41.19 mg/kg-dry Bromoform 85 59 132 200.20 1.91.02 mg/kg-dry Bromomethane 36 18 134 200.20 150.432 mg/kg-dry n-Butylbenzene 94 71 134 200.20 0.91.12 mg/kg-dry sec-Butylbenzene 92 67 132 200.20 3.41.11 mg/kg-dry tert-Butylbenzene 93 68 134 200.20 0.01.12 mg/kg-dry Carbon disulfide 91 32 141 200.20 1.71.10 mg/kg-dry Carbon tetrachloride 106 60 140 200.20 1.51.27 mg/kg-dry Chlorobenzene 94 75 132 200.20 1.71.12 mg/kg-dry Chlorodibromomethane 83 62 133 200.20 2.81.000 mg/kg-dry Chloroethane 29 45 139 200.20 2.20.352 mg/kg-dry S Chloroform 102 62 132 200.20 0.81.23 mg/kg-dry Chloromethane 86 41 138 200.20 111.03 mg/kg-dry 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 110 41 149 200.20 2.21.32 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 87 57 123 200.24 131.05 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dibromoethane 98 60 135 200.20 2.51.17 mg/kg-dry 2-Chlorotoluene 86 74 135 200.20 0.91.03 mg/kg-dry Dibromomethane 106 60 135 200.20 1.51.28 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 94 70 130 200.20 3.51.12 mg/kg-dry Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. S - Spike recovery outside of advisory limits. Page 11 of 19363 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd 12/19/14 15:41Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A 4-Chlorotoluene 96 75 136 200.20 1.71.15 mg/kg-dry 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 89 71 132 200.20 0.91.07 mg/kg-dry 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 100 71 131 200.20 2.41.20 mg/kg-dry Dichlorodifluoromethane 63 31 123 200.20 5.70.756 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloroethane 106 66 130 200.20 2.31.28 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichloroethane 95 51 140 200.20 1.71.14 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloroethene 101 64 133 200.20 4.91.21 mg/kg-dry cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 63 131 200.20 4.91.20 mg/kg-dry trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 98 66 133 200.20 0.01.17 mg/kg-dry 1,2-Dichloropropane 96 60 130 200.20 1.71.15 mg/kg-dry 1,3-Dichloropropane 98 59 135 200.20 2.51.18 mg/kg-dry 2,2-Dichloropropane 106 39 157 200.20 3.11.27 mg/kg-dry 1,1-Dichloropropene 100 65 132 200.20 0.81.20 mg/kg-dry cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 94 55 134 200.20 0.81.13 mg/kg-dry trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 92 58 146 200.20 2.61.11 mg/kg-dry Ethylbenzene 101 74 136 200.20 1.61.21 mg/kg-dry Hexachlorobutadiene 83 52 133 200.20 7.71.000 mg/kg-dry 2-Hexanone 110 54 129 204.0 2.913.3 mg/kg-dry Iodomethane 113 53 128 200.20 0.71.36 mg/kg-dry Isopropylbenzene 90 70 133 200.20 0.91.08 mg/kg-dry p-Isopropyltoluene 100 69 131 200.20 0.01.20 mg/kg-dry Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)90 43 152 200.20 1.81.08 mg/kg-dry Methyl ethyl ketone 110 43 148 204.0 4.413.3 mg/kg-dry Methyl isobutyl ketone 101 54 127 204.0 0.812.1 mg/kg-dry Methylene chloride 93 51 134 200.20 1.71.12 mg/kg-dry Naphthalene 98 15 171 200.20 171.17 mg/kg-dry n-Propylbenzene 85 72 134 200.20 0.91.02 mg/kg-dry Styrene 96 70 135 200.20 0.01.15 mg/kg-dry 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 95 35 156 200.20 2.61.14 mg/kg-dry 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 96 59 135 200.20 1.71.15 mg/kg-dry Tetrachloroethene 104 64 139 200.20 0.81.25 mg/kg-dry Toluene 96 73 137 200.20 0.01.15 mg/kg-dry 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 95 24 153 200.20 231.14 mg/kg-dry R 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 87 34 150 200.20 141.05 mg/kg-dry 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 105 63 134 200.20 0.81.26 mg/kg-dry 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 94 56 136 200.20 0.91.13 mg/kg-dry Trichloroethene 90 65 134 200.20 6.91.08 mg/kg-dry Trichlorofluoromethane 86 48 140 200.20 111.03 mg/kg-dry 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 90 56 142 200.20 0.91.08 mg/kg-dry 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 88 67 125 200.20 0.91.06 mg/kg-dry 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 95 71 130 200.20 1.71.14 mg/kg-dry Vinyl acetate 97 28 123 200.20 2.41.16 mg/kg-dry Vinyl chloride 89 32 136 200.20 7.81.07 mg/kg-dry Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. R - RPD exceeds advisory limit. Page 12 of 19364 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: 85641 Lab ID: b14121551-001amsd 12/19/14 15:41Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: 5971A.I_141219A m+p-Xylenes 98 75 136 200.24 1.22.35 mg/kg-dry o-Xylene 94 72 134 200.20 1.71.13 mg/kg-dry Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 84 60 1360.20 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 84 70 1320.20 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 86 78 1600.20 Surr: Toluene-d8 84 75 1380.20 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 13 of 19365 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121551 QA/QC Summary Report 12/24/14Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8015M Batch: 85666 Lab ID: LCS-85666 12/19/14 15:48Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 84 60 14010174 mg/kg Surr: o-Terphenyl 84 40 1400.17 Lab ID: MB-85666 12/19/14 16:32Method Blank Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 10ND mg/kg Surr: o-Terphenyl 89 40 1400.17 Lab ID: B14121514-002AMS 12/19/14 18:05Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 86 60 14013269 mg/kg-dry Surr: o-Terphenyl 80 40 1400.22 Lab ID: B14121514-002AMSD 12/19/14 18:49Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCFID-HP2-B_141218C Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 86 60 140 20130.4270 mg/kg-dry Surr: o-Terphenyl 78 40 1400.22 Method: SW8015M Analytical Run: R235698 Lab ID: CCV_1218HP234r-S 12/19/14 14:21Continuing Calibration Verification Standard n-Nonane 95 75 1256.33 mg/kg n-Decane 98 75 1256.54 mg/kg n-Dodecane 101 75 1256.70 mg/kg n-Tetradecane 104 75 1256.92 mg/kg n-Hexadecane 106 75 1257.06 mg/kg n-Octadecane 106 75 1257.05 mg/kg n-Nonadecane 108 75 1257.21 mg/kg n-Eicosane 108 75 1257.17 mg/kg n-Docosane 108 75 1257.22 mg/kg n-Tetracosane 111 75 1257.40 mg/kg n-Hexacosane 111 75 1257.42 mg/kg n-Octacosane 112 75 1257.46 mg/kg n-Triacontane 111 75 1257.42 mg/kg n-Hexatriacontane 102 75 1256.79 mg/kg Surr: o-Terphenyl 101 75 1250.17 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 14 of 19366 MW-1 3-4 Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-001A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V46 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0046.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/19/2014 11:22:53 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\S3_SCN-WE-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WE.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 5.924 to 16.075 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 4.894 to 11.675 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.71 to 18.044 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.743 6.667 5.322 79.83 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.581 6.667 5.593 83.9 - DRO Area:3281863 DRO Amount: 8.004323 TEH Area:2.027716E+07 TEH Amount: 49.45514 C9-C18 Area:178217.9 C9-C18 Amount: 0.4370029 C19-C36 Area:1.117761E+07C19-C36 Amount: 27.11669 3.54 4.23 4.43 4.55 4.66 4.71 4.77 4.98 5.01 5.15 5.31 5.49 5.52 5.59 6.12 6.23 6.99 7.08 7.27 7.67 7.73 8.14 8.18 8.27 8.34 8.41 8.47 8.64 8.70 8.82 8.98 9.06 9.19 9.34 9.43 9.57 9.77 9.87 9.94 10.04 10.15 10.19 10.40 10.49 10.58 10.65 10.71 10.84 11.01 11.20 11.25 11.33 11.43 11.52 11.62 11.74 11.91 11.99 12.11 12.17 12.28 12.41 12.48 12.58 12.84 12.90 13.06 13.19 13.29 13.39 13.48 13.61 13.75 13.89 14.02 14.21 14.27 14.41 14.54 14.65 14.78 14.93 15.02 15.14 15.27 15.36 15.50 15.71 16.03 16.08 16.17 16.37 16.56 16.64 16.72 16.80 16.94 17.02 17.17 17.34 17.47 17.56 17.64 17.79 17.89 17.98 18.12 18.38 18.54 18.86 19.16 19.74 19.86 19.92 20.62 21.01 21.10 21.28 21.37 21.42 21.62 22.09 22.14 22.19 22.24 22.61 22.66 22.70 23.14 23.18 23.28 23.43 23.55 23.59 23.62 23.66 23.71 24.03 24.06 24.57 24.64 24.73 24.80 24.84 24.92 24.96 25.07 25.10 25.13 25.20 25.25 25.34 25.40 25.52 25.59 25.65 26.08 26.24 26.37 26.49 26.70 26.75 26.82 26.93 27.42 27.47 28.11 28.17 28.36 28.41 28.48 28.52 28.59 28.66 28.81 28.86 29.00 29.13 29.16 29.28 29.61 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0046.RAW B14121551-001A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V46 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Page 15 of 19367 MW-2 5-6 Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-002A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V45 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0045.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/19/2014 10:30:33 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\SR_SCN-WE-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WE.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 5.924 to 16.075 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 4.894 to 11.675 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.71 to 18.044 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.747 6.667 5.778 86.67 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.586 6.667 6.16 92.4 - DRO Area:241938.5 DRO Amount: 0.5900777 TEH Area:367310.5 TEH Amount: 0.8958547 C9-C18 Area:145740.2 C9-C18 Amount: 0.3573654 C19-C36 Area:181022 C19-C36 Amount: 0.4391562 3.50 3.59 4.24 4.55 4.65 4.71 4.79 4.94 5.02 5.15 5.33 5.44 5.53 5.93 6.01 6.12 6.23 6.32 6.37 6.48 6.67 6.83 6.98 7.23 7.27 7.61 7.68 7.72 7.76 7.89 8.09 8.14 8.19 8.23 8.30 8.37 8.48 8.64 8.72 8.85 8.94 8.97 9.07 9.34 9.45 9.54 9.82 9.92 10.17 10.43 10.50 10.69 11.04 11.20 11.34 11.38 11.57 11.63 11.75 11.96 12.12 12.18 12.29 12.33 12.59 13.06 13.20 13.30 13.35 13.40 13.48 13.76 13.89 14.28 14.50 14.66 15.02 15.35 15.44 15.50 15.70 15.75 15.95 16.08 16.18 16.35 16.42 16.57 16.81 16.95 17.03 17.18 17.57 17.80 18.01 18.14 18.68 20.00 24.09 26.46 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2121814_b\1218HP2.0045.RAW B14121551-002A ;1218HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, V45 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Page 16 of 19368 MW-1 3-4 (Silica Gel Treatment)Batch ID: 85666 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121551-001A ;1229HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, SGT-V06 Raw File: G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2122914_b\1229HP2.0006.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 12/29/2014 2:18:11 PM Method File: g:\org\HP2\Methods\SR_SCN-122906-WF-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP2\Cals\SC110829WF.CAL Sample Weight: 30 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 27187.9 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 27480.28 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 27334.08 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.09 to 16.2 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.1 to 11.82 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 11.855 to 18.23 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________11.866 6.667 5.069 76.04 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____12.696 6.667 5.486 82.29 - DRO Area:1528382 DRO Amount: 3.727659 TEH Area:4501137 TEH Amount: 10.97808 C9-C18 Area:629612.8 C9-C18 Amount: 1.543855 C19-C36 Area:2922362 C19-C36 Amount: 7.089598 4.05 4.16 4.27 4.37 4.42 4.50 4.56 4.65 4.77 4.91 4.97 5.10 5.16 5.19 5.36 5.48 5.60 5.67 5.92 5.96 6.15 6.30 6.38 6.44 6.48 6.84 6.95 7.11 7.14 7.26 7.32 7.42 7.57 7.82 7.87 7.97 8.17 8.32 8.40 8.47 8.61 8.70 8.78 8.84 8.94 9.11 9.32 9.46 9.56 9.69 9.91 10.02 10.09 10.26 10.53 10.62 10.72 10.82 11.02 11.13 11.32 11.43 11.53 11.63 11.67 11.74 11.87 12.23 12.28 12.41 12.57 12.70 13.03 13.18 13.31 13.43 13.51 13.59 13.73 14.00 14.13 14.24 14.38 14.52 14.61 14.76 14.90 15.12 15.26 15.37 15.47 15.61 15.80 15.95 16.06 16.13 16.28 16.45 16.60 16.76 16.91 17.05 17.15 17.22 17.31 17.44 17.55 17.71 17.83 17.93 18.10 18.22 18.34 18.56 18.76 18.93 19.08 19.12 19.33 19.47 19.53 19.60 19.73 19.86 19.91 19.95 19.99 20.04 20.24 20.47 21.06 21.55 21.61 21.75 22.09 22.62 22.69 22.73 23.26 24.00 24.08 24.30 24.67 25.72 26.10 26.31 26.36 26.97 27.19 27.32 27.39 27.51 27.67 28.30 28.87 28.99 29.08 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP2\DAT\HP2122914_b\1229HP2.0006.RAW B14121551-001A ;1229HP2 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-S, SGT-V06 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Page 17 of 19369 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Not Present Not Present Not Present No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable 2.4°C On Ice 12/17/2014Leslie S. Cadreau Return-UPS Ground lg Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\jmueller 12/17/2014 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes No Not Applicable Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B14121551 Page 18 of 19370 Page 19 of 19371 APPENDIX B Soil Borehole Logs 372 373 374 APPENDIX C Laboratory Analytical Reports - Groundwater 375 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B14121909-001 MW-1 12/22/14 13:16 12/23/14 Aqueous EPH-Liquid-Liquid Extraction Hydrocarbons, Extractable Petroleum Screen 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Short List B14121909-002 MW-2 12/22/14 12:30 12/23/14 Aqueous Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name: Ebbighausen Work Order: B14121909 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 January 05, 2015 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 2 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 12/23/2014 for analysis. Page 1 of 16376 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121909-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 Collection Date:12/22/14 13:16 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:01/05/15 DateReceived:12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromoform SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromomethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroform SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDDibromomethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDEthylbenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl20ug/LNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDStyrene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B J 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/L0.14Toluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichloroethene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. Page 2 of 16377 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121909-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 Collection Date:12/22/14 13:16 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:01/05/15 DateReceived:12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDVinyl chloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDo-Xylene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl1.0ug/LNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl77-126%REC106 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl70-130%REC101 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl79-122%REC114 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:29 / nl76-127%REC116 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN 01/03/15 18:49 / tmc309ug/LNDTotal Extractable Hydrocarbons SW8015M1000 01/03/15 18:49 / tmc40-140%REC50.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl SW8015M - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 3 of 16378 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121909-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 Collection Date:12/22/14 12:30 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:01/05/15 DateReceived:12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromoform SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromomethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B J 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/L0.11Chloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroform SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDDibromomethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDEthylbenzene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl20ug/LNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDStyrene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B J 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/L0.19Toluene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichloroethene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. Page 4 of 16379 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbighausen Lab ID:B14121909-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 Collection Date:12/22/14 12:30 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:01/05/15 DateReceived:12/23/14 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B J 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/L0.52Vinyl chloride SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDo-Xylene SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl1.0ug/LNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl77-126%REC106 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl70-130%REC103 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl79-122%REC113 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B 12/24/14 10:57 / nl76-127%REC117 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS-SCREEN 01/03/15 21:43 / tmc316ug/LNDTotal Extractable Hydrocarbons SW8015M1000 01/03/15 21:43 / tmc40-140%REC52.0 Surr: o-Terphenyl SW8015M - Note: Total Extractable Hydrocarbons are defined as the total hydrocarbon responses regardless of elution time. Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. Page 5 of 16380 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: LCS_122414 12/24/14 09:03Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_141224A Benzene 99 71 1331.04.96 ug/L Bromobenzene 109 78 1331.05.44 ug/L Bromochloromethane 111 68 1311.05.56 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 104 67 1381.05.20 ug/L Bromoform 113 64 1361.05.64 ug/L Bromomethane 104 60 1381.05.20 ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 85 61 1441.04.24 ug/L Chlorobenzene 100 78 1361.05.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 104 72 1361.05.20 ug/L Chloroethane 94 64 1361.04.68 ug/L Chloroform 107 69 1331.05.36 ug/L Chloromethane 89 63 1491.04.44 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 105 75 1311.05.24 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 100 74 1351.05.00 ug/L Dibromomethane 111 72 1331.05.56 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 105 78 1291.05.24 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 105 79 1351.05.24 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 105 79 1321.05.24 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106 78 1311.05.28 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 82 55 1411.04.08 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 113 72 1301.05.64 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 98 57 1461.04.92 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 102 66 1421.05.12 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 107 74 1331.05.36 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 97 76 1381.04.84 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 102 72 1351.05.12 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 98 75 1341.04.92 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 120 42 1671.06.00 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 103 72 1401.05.16 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 105 75 1321.05.24 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 114 77 1451.05.72 ug/L Ethylbenzene 108 78 1311.05.40 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)82 58 1511.04.12 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 106 55 1452052.8 ug/L Methylene chloride 90 73 1261.04.48 ug/L Styrene 110 76 1341.05.52 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 104 75 1351.05.20 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 101 72 1321.05.04 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 115 78 1371.05.76 ug/L Toluene 108 78 1341.05.40 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 110 64 1411.05.52 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 99 72 1331.04.96 ug/L Trichloroethene 105 75 1381.05.24 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 6 of 16381 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: LCS_122414 12/24/14 09:03Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_141224A Trichlorofluoromethane 81 58 1391.04.04 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 98 67 1331.04.92 ug/L Vinyl chloride 82 66 1401.04.08 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 108 78 1331.010.8 ug/L o-Xylene 105 79 1361.05.24 ug/L Xylenes, Total 107 78 1361.016.0 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 101 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 105 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 108 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 114 79 1221.0 Lab ID: BLK_122414 12/24/14 10:00Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_141224A Benzene 0.50ND ug/L Bromobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Bromochloromethane 0.50ND ug/L Bromodichloromethane 0.50ND ug/L Bromoform 0.50ND ug/L Bromomethane 0.50ND ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 0.50ND ug/L Chlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 0.50ND ug/L Chloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Chloroform 0.50ND ug/L Chloromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.50ND ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 0.50ND ug/L Dibromomethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 0.50ND ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 7 of 16382 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: BLK_122414 12/24/14 10:00Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_141224A Ethylbenzene 0.50ND ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)0.50ND ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 10ND ug/L Methylene chloride 0.50ND ug/L Styrene 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Tetrachloroethene 0.50ND ug/L Toluene 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Trichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L Vinyl chloride 0.50ND ug/L m+p-Xylenes 0.50ND ug/L o-Xylene 0.50ND ug/L Xylenes, Total 0.50ND ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 104 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 118 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 114 79 1221.0 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MS 12/24/14 14:43Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_141224A Benzene 101 71 1331.05.04 ug/L Bromobenzene 107 78 1331.05.36 ug/L Bromochloromethane 115 68 1311.05.76 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 110 67 1381.05.48 ug/L Bromoform 131 64 1361.06.56 ug/L Bromomethane 104 60 1381.05.20 ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 94 61 1441.04.68 ug/L Chlorobenzene 100 78 1361.05.00 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 117 72 1361.05.84 ug/L Chloroethane 88 64 1361.04.40 ug/L Chloroform 107 69 1331.05.36 ug/L Chloromethane 94 63 1491.04.72 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 108 75 1311.05.40 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 100 74 1351.05.00 ug/L Dibromomethane 114 72 1331.05.72 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 102 78 1291.05.08 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 102 79 1351.05.12 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 100 79 1321.05.00 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 100 78 1311.05.00 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 8 of 16383 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MS 12/24/14 14:43Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_141224A Dichlorodifluoromethane 81 55 1411.04.04 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 114 72 1301.05.68 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 101 57 1461.05.04 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 103 66 1421.05.16 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 106 74 1331.05.32 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 94 76 1381.04.72 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 102 72 1351.05.08 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 101 75 1341.05.04 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 113 42 1671.05.64 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 103 72 1401.05.16 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 106 75 1321.05.28 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 118 77 1451.05.92 ug/L Ethylbenzene 108 78 1311.05.40 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)82 58 1511.04.12 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 98 55 1452048.8 ug/L Methylene chloride 91 73 1261.04.56 ug/L Styrene 109 76 1341.05.44 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 107 75 1351.05.36 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 106 72 1321.05.32 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 116 78 1371.05.80 ug/L Toluene 108 78 1341.05.56 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 114 64 1411.05.68 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 102 72 1331.05.12 ug/L Trichloroethene 104 75 1381.05.20 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 84 58 1391.04.20 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 105 67 1331.05.24 ug/L Vinyl chloride 86 66 1401.04.32 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 106 78 1331.010.6 ug/L o-Xylene 105 79 1361.05.24 ug/L Xylenes, Total 106 78 1361.015.9 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 109 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 112 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 115 79 1221.0 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD 12/24/14 15:11Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A Benzene 102 71 133 201.0 1.65.12 ug/L Bromobenzene 110 78 133 201.0 2.95.52 ug/L Bromochloromethane 115 68 131 201.0 0.05.76 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 110 67 138 201.0 0.75.52 ug/L Bromoform 134 64 136 201.0 1.86.68 ug/L Bromomethane 103 60 138 201.0 0.85.16 ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 93 61 144 201.0 0.94.64 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 9 of 16384 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD 12/24/14 15:11Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A Chlorobenzene 102 78 136 201.0 2.45.12 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 117 72 136 201.0 0.05.84 ug/L Chloroethane 90 64 136 201.0 2.74.52 ug/L Chloroform 110 69 133 201.0 2.95.52 ug/L Chloromethane 91 63 149 201.0 3.44.56 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 109 75 131 201.0 0.75.44 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 101 74 135 201.0 0.85.04 ug/L Dibromomethane 116 72 133 201.0 1.45.80 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 106 78 129 201.0 4.65.32 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 107 79 135 201.0 4.65.36 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 106 79 132 201.0 5.45.28 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106 78 131 201.0 5.45.28 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 79 55 141 201.0 2.83.93 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 114 72 130 201.0 0.75.72 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 102 57 146 201.0 1.65.12 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 104 66 142 201.0 0.85.20 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 108 74 133 201.0 1.55.40 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 97 76 138 201.0 2.54.84 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 104 72 135 201.0 2.35.20 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 102 75 134 201.0 1.65.12 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 112 42 167 201.0 0.75.60 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 104 72 140 201.0 0.85.20 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 104 75 132 201.0 1.55.20 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 114 77 145 201.0 4.15.68 ug/L Ethylbenzene 110 78 131 201.0 2.25.52 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)84 58 151 201.0 1.94.20 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 104 55 145 20206.352.0 ug/L Methylene chloride 92 73 126 201.0 0.94.60 ug/L Styrene 110 76 134 201.0 1.55.52 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 109 75 135 201.0 1.55.44 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 110 72 132 201.0 3.05.48 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 119 78 137 201.0 2.75.96 ug/L Toluene 111 78 134 201.0 2.15.68 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 114 64 141 201.0 0.75.72 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 102 72 133 201.0 0.05.12 ug/L Trichloroethene 106 75 138 201.0 1.55.28 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 82 58 139 201.0 2.94.08 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 106 67 133 201.0 1.55.32 ug/L Vinyl chloride 84 66 140 201.0 2.84.20 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 108 78 133 201.0 1.510.8 ug/L o-Xylene 106 79 136 201.0 0.85.28 ug/L Xylenes, Total 107 78 1361.016.1 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 106 70 1301.0 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 10 of 16385 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8260B Batch: R235880 Lab ID: B14121909-001B_MSD 12/24/14 15:11Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_141224A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 110 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 112 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 115 79 1221.0 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 11 of 16386 Project:Ebbighausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B14121909 QA/QC Summary Report 01/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method: SW8015M Batch: 85897 Lab ID: LCS-85897 01/03/15 17:22Laboratory Control Sample Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 106 60 1403006560 ug/L Surr: o-Terphenyl 96 40 140 Lab ID: MB-85897 01/03/15 18:06Method Blank Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 300ND ug/L Surr: o-Terphenyl 94 40 140 Lab ID: B14121909-001AMS 01/03/15 19:33Sample Matrix Spike Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 107 60 14060013300 ug/L Surr: o-Terphenyl 74 40 140 Lab ID: B14121909-001AMSD 01/03/15 20:16Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: GCFID-HP3-B_150102B Total Extractable Hydrocarbons 110 60 140 206002.513600 ug/L Surr: o-Terphenyl 74 40 140 Method: SW8015M Analytical Run: R236224 Lab ID: CCV_0102HP333r-W 01/03/15 15:55Continuing Calibration Verification Standard n-Nonane 104 75 125208 ug/L n-Decane 104 75 125208 ug/L n-Dodecane 107 75 125214 ug/L n-Tetradecane 105 75 125210 ug/L n-Hexadecane 107 75 125214 ug/L n-Octadecane 107 75 125215 ug/L n-Nonadecane 108 75 125215 ug/L n-Eicosane 108 75 125215 ug/L n-Docosane 108 75 125215 ug/L n-Tetracosane 108 75 125216 ug/L n-Hexacosane 108 75 125216 ug/L n-Octacosane 108 75 125216 ug/L n-Triacontane 109 75 125217 ug/L n-Hexatriacontane 108 75 125216 ug/L Surr: o-Terphenyl 109 75 125 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 12 of 16387 MW-1 Batch ID: 85897 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121909-001A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, RR-V37 Raw File: G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0037.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 1/3/2015 6:49:40 PM Method File: g:\org\HP3\Methods\SR_SCN-LI-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP3\Cals\SC140226LI.CAL Sample Weight: 0.97 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 30979.57 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 30994.75 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 30987.16 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.313 to 16.684 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.273 to 12.239 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 12.274 to 19.076 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________12.282 206.186 104.002 50.44 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____13.12 206.186 75.556 36.64 - DRO Area:942938.4 DRO Amount: 62.74221 TEH Area:1152155 TEH Amount: 76.66328 C9-C18 Area:750547.9 C9-C18 Amount: 49.95296 C19-C36 Area:346567.7 C19-C36 Amount: 23.05463 4.36 4.64 5.06 5.15 5.29 5.37 5.47 5.56 5.68 5.78 5.89 5.99 6.10 6.30 6.39 6.52 6.60 7.20 7.45 7.64 7.70 7.92 8.00 8.09 8.15 8.21 8.28 8.34 8.41 8.46 8.85 8.93 9.18 9.31 9.42 9.53 9.66 9.83 9.90 9.95 10.03 10.13 10.24 10.32 10.41 10.59 10.65 10.93 11.00 11.08 11.19 11.31 11.34 11.45 11.52 11.67 11.71 11.76 11.89 12.02 12.10 12.15 12.21 12.28 12.38 12.51 12.70 12.77 12.89 12.99 13.12 13.35 13.44 13.61 13.77 13.88 13.96 14.03 14.21 14.34 14.39 14.44 14.55 14.63 14.83 14.94 15.00 15.06 15.22 15.37 15.50 15.59 15.81 15.85 15.92 16.07 16.28 16.36 16.46 16.60 16.77 16.94 17.03 17.18 17.24 17.42 17.59 17.65 17.74 17.91 17.96 18.10 18.33 18.42 18.53 18.68 18.90 19.03 19.53 19.89 20.25 20.76 21.68 22.05 22.26 23.25 27.00 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0037.RAW B14121909-001A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, RR-V37 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Page 13 of 16388 MW-2 Batch ID: 85897 EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) SCREENING ANALYSIS CHROMATOGRAM Sample Name: B14121909-002A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, V41 Raw File: G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0041.RAW Date & Time Acquired: 1/3/2015 9:43:42 PM Method File: g:\org\HP3\Methods\SR_SCN-LI-L%.met Calibration File: G:\Org\HP3\Cals\SC140226LI.CAL Sample Weight: 0.95 Dilution: 2 S.A.: 1 Mean RF for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 30979.57 Mean RF for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 30994.75 Mean RF for Total Extractable Hydrocarbons: 30987.16 Rt range for Diesel Range Organics: 6.313 to 16.684 Rt range for C9 to C18 Hydrocarbons: 5.273 to 12.239 Rt range for C19 to C36 Hydrocarbons: 12.274 to 19.076 SURROGATE COMPOUND RT ACTUAL MEASURED %REC *o-Terphenyl_____________12.281 210.526 110.504 52.49 - *1-Chloro-octadecane_____13.119 210.526 87.071 41.36 - DRO Area:930191.3 DRO Amount: 63.19706 TEH Area:1189115 TEH Amount: 80.78831 C9-C18 Area:676762.7 C9-C18 Amount: 45.99042 C19-C36 Area:401008 C19-C36 Amount: 27.23776 4.50 4.57 4.64 5.00 5.14 5.28 5.34 5.37 5.48 5.56 5.69 5.79 5.90 6.00 6.10 6.40 6.54 6.60 7.48 7.66 7.71 8.06 8.21 8.46 8.86 9.18 9.27 9.31 9.42 9.53 9.67 9.82 9.91 9.95 10.05 10.13 10.42 10.65 10.93 11.05 11.10 11.21 11.28 11.31 11.34 11.43 11.52 11.71 11.76 11.87 11.94 12.03 12.10 12.15 12.22 12.28 12.42 12.51 12.70 12.77 12.81 12.89 12.99 13.05 13.12 13.35 13.44 13.61 13.78 13.88 13.95 14.03 14.23 14.33 14.40 14.44 14.55 14.62 14.73 14.84 14.94 15.00 15.06 15.22 15.35 15.50 15.58 15.79 15.91 16.07 16.29 16.46 16.60 16.94 17.10 17.17 17.24 17.42 17.59 17.65 17.78 17.96 18.10 18.42 18.68 18.92 19.03 19.52 19.90 20.23 21.58 22.05 23.24 23.93 27.00 28.34 n-Nonane n-Decane n-Dodecane n-Tetradecane n-Hexadecane n-Octadecane n-Nonadecane *o-Terphenyl n-Eicosane *1-Chloro-octadecane n-Docosane n-Tetracosane n-Hexacosane n-Octacosane n-Triacontane n-Hexatriacontane G:\org\HP3\DAT\HP3010215_b\0102HP3.0041.RAW B14121909-002A ;0102HP3 , $HC-EPH-SCRN-W, V41 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Page 14 of 16389 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Not Present Not Present Not Present No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable 2.7°C On Ice 12/23/2014Randa Nees Hand Del lg Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\lcadreau 12/23/2014 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes No Not Applicable Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B14121909 Page 15 of 16390 Page 16 of 16391 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORTANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT The analyses presented in this report were performed by Energy Laboratories, Inc., 1120 S 27th St., Billings, MT 59101, unless otherwise noted. Any exceptions or problems with the analyses are noted in the Laboratory Analytical Report, the QA/QC Summary Report, or the Case Narrative. The results as reported relate only to the item(s) submitted for testing. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please call. Lab ID Client Sample ID Collect Date Receive Date Matrix Test Report Approved By: B15011740-001 MW-1 01/27/15 15:25 01/28/15 Aqueous 8260-Volatile Organic Compounds- Short List B15011740-002 MW-2 01/27/15 15:10 01/28/15 Aqueous Same As Above B15011740-003 Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 01/27/15 15:10 01/28/15 Trip Blank Same As Above Resource Technologies Inc Project Name:Ebbinghausen Work Order:B15011740 1050 E Main St Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 February 05, 2015 Energy Laboratories Inc Billings MT received the following 3 samples for Resource Technologies Inc on 1/28/2015 for analysis. Page 1 of 15392 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:25 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromoform SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroform SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDDibromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDEthylbenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl20ug/LNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDStyrene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDToluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 2 of 15393 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-001 Client Sample ID:MW-1 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:25 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl0.50ug/LNDVinyl chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDo-Xylene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl1.0ug/LNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl77-126%REC109 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl70-130%REC107 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl79-122%REC100 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:39 / nl76-127%REC100 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 3 of 15394 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:10 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromoform SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B J 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/L0.13Chloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroform SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDDibromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDEthylbenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl20ug/LNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDStyrene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDToluene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. J - Estimated value. The analyte was present but less than the reporting limit. Page 4 of 15395 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-002 Client Sample ID:MW-2 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:10 Matrix:Aqueous Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl0.50ug/L0.58Vinyl chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDo-Xylene SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl1.0ug/LNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl77-126%REC108 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl70-130%REC105 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl79-122%REC100 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B 02/02/15 22:11 / nl76-127%REC104 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 5 of 15396 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-003 Client Sample ID:Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:10 Matrix:Trip Blank Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromochloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromodichloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromoform SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDBromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDCarbon tetrachloride SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDChlorodibromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloroform SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDChloromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dibromoethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND2-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND4-Chlorotoluene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDDibromomethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,4-Dichlorobenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDDichlorodifluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,3-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND2,2-Dichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDEthylbenzene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl20ug/LNDMethyl ethyl ketone SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDMethylene chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDStyrene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDTetrachloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDToluene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,1-Trichloroethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,1,2-Trichloroethane SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 6 of 15397 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Client:Resource Technologies Inc Project:Ebbinghausen Lab ID:B15011740-003 Client Sample ID:Trip Blank Lot#112514 4526 Collection Date:01/27/15 15:10 Matrix:Trip Blank Report Date:02/05/15 DateReceived:01/28/15 Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Analyses Result Units Analysis Date / ByRL Method MCL/ QCLQualifiers VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichloroethene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDTrichlorofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LND1,2,3-Trichloropropane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDVinyl chloride SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDm+p-Xylenes SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDo-Xylene SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl1.0ug/LNDXylenes, Total SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl77-126%REC101 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl70-130%REC105 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl79-122%REC95.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 SW8260B 02/02/15 21:42 / nl76-127%REC103 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene SW8260B Report Definitions: RL - Analyte reporting limit.MCL - Maximum contaminant level. QCL - Quality control limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 7 of 15398 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:LCS_020215 02/02/15 19:10Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_150202A Benzene 97 71 1331.04.84 ug/L Bromobenzene 105 78 1331.05.24 ug/L Bromochloromethane 109 68 1311.05.44 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 110 67 1381.05.52 ug/L Bromoform 117 64 1361.05.84 ug/L Bromomethane 122 60 1381.06.08 ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 106 61 1441.05.28 ug/L Chlorobenzene 102 78 1361.05.08 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 117 72 1361.05.84 ug/L Chloroethane 112 64 1361.05.60 ug/L Chloroform 100 69 1331.05.00 ug/L Chloromethane 83 63 1491.04.16 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 110 75 1311.05.52 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 101 74 1351.05.04 ug/L Dibromomethane 107 72 1331.05.36 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 103 78 1291.05.16 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 101 79 1351.05.04 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 106 79 1321.05.28 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 101 78 1311.05.04 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 96 55 1411.04.80 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 102 72 1301.05.12 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 109 57 1461.05.44 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 117 66 1421.05.84 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 104 74 1331.05.20 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 112 76 1381.05.60 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 98 72 1351.04.88 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 101 75 1341.05.04 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 87 42 1671.04.36 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 102 72 1401.05.08 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 107 75 1321.05.36 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 117 77 1451.05.84 ug/L Ethylbenzene 99 78 1311.04.96 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)114 58 1511.05.68 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 103 55 1452051.6 ug/L Methylene chloride 113 73 1261.05.64 ug/L Styrene 106 76 1341.05.32 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 113 75 1351.05.64 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 102 72 1321.05.12 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 102 78 1371.05.12 ug/L Toluene 101 78 1341.05.04 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 107 64 1411.05.36 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 103 72 1331.05.16 ug/L Trichloroethene 102 75 1381.05.08 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 8 of 15399 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:LCS_020215 02/02/15 19:10Laboratory Control Sample Run: SV5972.I_150202A Trichlorofluoromethane 114 58 1391.05.72 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 108 67 1331.05.40 ug/L Vinyl chloride 85 66 1401.04.24 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 100 78 1331.09.96 ug/L o-Xylene 101 79 1361.05.04 ug/L Xylenes, Total 100 78 1361.015.0 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 103 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 105 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 100 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 103 79 1221.0 Lab ID:BLK_020215 02/02/15 20:06Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_150202A Benzene 0.50ND ug/L Bromobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Bromochloromethane 0.50ND ug/L Bromodichloromethane 0.50ND ug/L Bromoform 0.50ND ug/L Bromomethane 0.50ND ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 0.50ND ug/L Chlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 0.50ND ug/L Chloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Chloroform 0.50ND ug/L Chloromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.50ND ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 0.50ND ug/L Dibromomethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 0.50ND ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50ND ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50ND ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 9 of 15400 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:BLK_020215 02/02/15 20:06Method Blank Run: SV5972.I_150202A Ethylbenzene 0.50ND ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)0.50ND ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 10ND ug/L Methylene chloride 0.50ND ug/L Styrene 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Tetrachloroethene 0.50ND ug/L Toluene 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.50ND ug/L Trichloroethene 0.50ND ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 0.50ND ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.50ND ug/L Vinyl chloride 0.50ND ug/L m+p-Xylenes 0.50ND ug/L o-Xylene 0.50ND ug/L Xylenes, Total 0.50ND ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 103 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 100 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 99 79 1221.0 Lab ID:B15011802-001A_MS 02/03/15 01:56Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_150202A Benzene 106 71 1331.05.28 ug/L Bromobenzene 108 78 1331.05.40 ug/L Bromochloromethane 117 68 1311.05.84 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 122 67 1381.06.12 ug/L Bromoform 123 64 1361.06.16 ug/L Bromomethane 64 60 1381.03.18 ug/L Carbon tetrachloride 127 61 1441.06.36 ug/L Chlorobenzene 107 78 1361.05.36 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 122 72 1361.06.08 ug/L Chloroethane 111 64 1361.05.56 ug/L Chloroform 112 69 1331.05.60 ug/L Chloromethane 82 63 1491.04.08 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 113 75 1311.05.64 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 104 74 1351.05.20 ug/L Dibromomethane 115 72 1331.05.76 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 106 78 1291.05.28 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 108 79 1351.05.40 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 106 79 1321.05.28 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 104 78 1311.05.20 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 10 of 15401 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:B15011802-001A_MS 02/03/15 01:56Sample Matrix Spike Run: SV5972.I_150202A Dichlorodifluoromethane 98 55 1411.04.88 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 111 72 1301.05.56 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 125 57 1461.06.24 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 126 66 1421.06.28 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 111 74 1331.05.56 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 125 76 1381.06.24 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 106 72 1351.05.28 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 107 75 1341.05.36 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 115 42 1671.05.76 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 112 72 1401.05.60 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 114 75 1321.05.68 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 122 77 1451.06.08 ug/L Ethylbenzene 106 78 1311.05.28 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)123 58 1511.06.16 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 115 55 1452057.6 ug/L Methylene chloride 122 73 1261.06.08 ug/L Styrene 110 76 1341.05.52 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 119 75 1351.05.96 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 110 72 1321.05.52 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 105 78 1371.05.24 ug/L Toluene 107 78 1341.05.36 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 121 64 1411.06.04 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 111 72 1331.05.56 ug/L Trichloroethene 109 75 1381.05.44 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 118 58 1391.05.92 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 113 67 1331.05.64 ug/L Vinyl chloride 79 66 1401.03.96 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 105 78 1331.010.5 ug/L o-Xylene 103 79 1361.05.16 ug/L Xylenes, Total 105 78 1361.015.7 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 106 70 1301.0 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 110 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 102 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 102 79 1221.0 Lab ID: B15011802-001A_MSD 02/03/15 02:25Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A Benzene 103 71 133 201.0 2.35.16 ug/L Bromobenzene 112 78 133 201.0 3.65.60 ug/L Bromochloromethane 114 68 131 201.0 2.85.68 ug/L Bromodichloromethane 120 67 138 201.0 2.06.00 ug/L Bromoform 123 64 136 201.0 0.06.16 ug/L Bromomethane 88 60 138 201.0 324.40 ug/L R Carbon tetrachloride 120 61 144 201.0 5.86.00 ug/L Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. R - RPD exceeds advisory limit. Page 11 of 15402 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:B15011802-001A_MSD 02/03/15 02:25Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A Chlorobenzene 106 78 136 201.0 0.75.32 ug/L Chlorodibromomethane 123 72 136 201.0 1.36.16 ug/L Chloroethane 114 64 136 201.0 2.15.68 ug/L Chloroform 109 69 133 201.0 2.95.44 ug/L Chloromethane 86 63 149 201.0 4.84.28 ug/L 1,2-Dibromoethane 113 75 131 201.0 0.05.64 ug/L 2-Chlorotoluene 103 74 135 201.0 0.85.16 ug/L Dibromomethane 116 72 133 201.0 0.75.80 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 107 78 129 201.0 1.55.36 ug/L 4-Chlorotoluene 106 79 135 201.0 1.55.32 ug/L 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 108 79 132 201.0 2.25.40 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 107 78 131 201.0 3.05.36 ug/L Dichlorodifluoromethane 102 55 141 201.0 4.85.12 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethane 109 72 130 201.0 2.25.44 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethane 124 57 146 201.0 0.66.20 ug/L 1,1-Dichloroethene 123 66 142 201.0 1.96.16 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 111 74 133 201.0 0.05.56 ug/L trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 121 76 138 201.0 3.36.04 ug/L 1,2-Dichloropropane 107 72 135 201.0 1.55.36 ug/L 1,3-Dichloropropane 105 75 134 201.0 2.35.24 ug/L 2,2-Dichloropropane 112 42 167 201.0 2.85.60 ug/L 1,1-Dichloropropene 110 72 140 201.0 2.25.48 ug/L cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 114 75 132 201.0 0.05.68 ug/L trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 122 77 145 201.0 0.76.12 ug/L Ethylbenzene 106 78 131 201.0 0.05.28 ug/L Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)120 58 151 201.0 2.66.00 ug/L Methyl ethyl ketone 111 55 145 20203.555.6 ug/L Methylene chloride 115 73 126 201.0 5.45.76 ug/L Styrene 113 76 134 201.0 2.25.64 ug/L 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 120 75 135 201.0 0.76.00 ug/L 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 107 72 132 201.0 2.95.36 ug/L Tetrachloroethene 106 78 137 201.0 0.85.28 ug/L Toluene 107 78 134 201.0 0.05.36 ug/L 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 116 64 141 201.0 4.15.80 ug/L 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 109 72 133 201.0 2.25.44 ug/L Trichloroethene 107 75 138 201.0 1.55.36 ug/L Trichlorofluoromethane 121 58 139 201.0 2.06.04 ug/L 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 114 67 133 201.0 1.45.72 ug/L Vinyl chloride 82 66 140 201.0 4.14.12 ug/L m+p-Xylenes 104 78 133 201.0 0.810.4 ug/L o-Xylene 106 79 136 201.0 2.35.28 ug/L Xylenes, Total 105 78 1361.015.7 ug/L Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 108 70 1301.0 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 12 of 15403 Project:Ebbinghausen Client:Resource Technologies Inc Work Order:B15011740 QA/QC Summary Report 02/05/15Report Date: Analyte Result %REC RPDLow Limit High Limit RPDLimitRLUnits Qual Prepared by Billings, MT Branch Method:SW8260B Batch: R237677 Lab ID:B15011802-001A_MSD 02/03/15 02:25Sample Matrix Spike Duplicate Run: SV5972.I_150202A Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 111 77 1261.0 Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene 100 76 1271.0 Surr: Toluene-d8 102 79 1221.0 Qualifiers: RL - Analyte reporting limit.ND - Not detected at the reporting limit. Page 13 of 15404 Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Custody seals intact on all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Custody seals intact on all sample bottles? Chain of custody present? Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Samples in proper container/bottle? Sample containers intact? Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? All samples received within holding time? (Exclude analyses that are considered field parameters such as pH, DO, Res Cl, Sulfite, Ferrous Iron, etc.) Container/Temp Blank temperature: Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No Not Present Not Present Not Present No VOA vials submitted Not Applicable 0.6°C On Ice 1/28/2015Tamara C. Logan Hand Del jrz Date Received: Received by: Login completed by: Carrier name: BL2000\jmueller 1/29/2015 Reviewed by: Reviewed Date: Contact and Corrective Action Comments: None Temp Blank received in all shipping container(s)/cooler(s)? Yes No Not Applicable Lab measurement of analytes considered field parameters that require analysis within 15 minutes of sampling such as pH, Dissolved Oxygen and Residual Chlorine, are qualified as being analyzed outside of recommended holding time. Solid/soil samples are reported on a wet weight basis (as received) unless specifically indicated. If moisture corrected, data units are typically noted as –dry. For agricultural and mining soil parameters/characteristics, all samples are dried and ground prior to sample analysis. Standard Reporting Procedures: Workorder Receipt Checklist Resource Technologies Inc B15011740 Page 14 of 15405 Page 15 of 15406 APPENDIX D Laboratory Analytical Reports – Soil Vapor 407 ANALYTICAL REPORT Mark Johnson Resource Technologies, Inc. 1050 E. Main, Ste 4 Bozeman, MT 59715 Phone: E-mail: (406) 585-8005 rti@montana.net Report Date:January 02, 2015 34-1436033Workorder: Ebbighausen 122414 EbbighausenPurchase Order: Project ID: Sampling SiteReceive DateCollect DateLab IDClient Sample ID VW-1 1436033001 12/22/14 12/24/14 Ebbighausen VW-2 1436033002 12/22/14 12/24/14 Ebbighausen ADDRESS 960 West LeVoy Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123 USA PHONE FAX+1 801 266 7700 +1 801 268 9992 ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Page 1 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 408 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID:12/22/2014 12/24/20141436033001Lab ID: Collected: Received: VW-1 Ebbighausen Sampling Parameter:Air Volume 6 LMatrix: Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 18:08 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³MDL (ppb)Qual.RL (ppb)Dilution Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 0.50<0.74ND 0.15 UDichlorodifluoromethane1 0.50<0.31ND 0.15 UChloromethane1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 UFreon 114 1 0.50<0.38ND 0.15 UVinyl chloride 1 0.50<0.33ND 0.15 U1,3-Butadiene 1 0.50<0.58ND 0.15 UBromomethane1 0.50<0.40ND 0.15 UChloroethane1 0.500.870.16 0.15 JFreon 11 1 0.50<1.1ND 0.15 UFreon 113 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 U1,1-Dichloroethene 1 0.50<0.71ND 0.30 UAcetone1 0.50<0.47ND 0.15 UCarbon disulfide 1 0.50<0.52ND 0.15 UMethylene chloride 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 0.50<0.54ND 0.15 UMethyl t-butyl ether 1 0.50<0.53ND 0.15 UVinyl acetate 1 0.50<0.44ND 0.15 U2-Butanone 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U1,1-Dichloroethane 1 1.0<0.54ND 0.15 UEthyl acetate 1 0.50<0.53ND 0.15 UHexane1 0.50<0.73ND 0.15 UChloroform1 0.50<0.44ND 0.15 UTetrahydrofuran1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U1,2-Dichloroethane 1 0.50<0.82ND 0.15 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 0.50<0.94ND 0.15 UCarbon tetrachloride 1 0.50<0.48ND 0.15 UBenzene1 0.50<0.52ND 0.15 UCyclohexane1 0.50<0.81ND 0.15 UTrichloroethene1 0.50<0.73ND 0.15 U1,2-Dichloropropane 1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 UBromodichloromethane1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 UHeptane1 0.50<0.68ND 0.15 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1 0.50<0.68ND 0.15 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 0.50<0.82ND 0.15 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 Page 2 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 409 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID:12/22/2014 12/24/20141436033001Lab ID: Collected: Received: VW-1 Ebbighausen Sampling Parameter:Air Volume 6 LMatrix: Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 18:08 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³MDL (ppb)Qual.RL (ppb)Dilution Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 0.50<0.57ND 0.15 UToluene1 1.0<1.2ND 0.30 U2-Hexanone 1 0.50517.5 0.15Tetrachloroethene 1 0.50<1.3ND 0.15 UDibromochloromethane1 0.50<1.2ND 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 1 0.50<0.69ND 0.15 UChlorobenzene1 0.50<0.65ND 0.15 UEthyl benzene 1 0.50<0.65ND 0.15 Um,p-Xylene 1 0.50<0.65ND 0.15 Uo-Xylene 1 0.50<0.64ND 0.15 UStyrene1 0.50<1.6ND 0.15 UBromoform1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 0.50<0.74ND 0.15 U4-Ethyl toluene 1 0.50<0.74ND 0.15 U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 0.50<0.74ND 0.15 U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 0.50<0.90ND 0.15 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 0.50<0.90ND 0.15 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 1.0<1.6ND 0.30 UBenzyl chloride 1 1.0<1.8ND 0.30 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 1.0<2.2ND 0.30 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 1.0<3.2ND 0.30 UHexachlorobutadiene1 NA22053 NA JTotal Volatile Organics 1 Sample ID:12/22/2014 12/24/20141436033002Lab ID: Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Sampling Parameter:Air Volume 6 LMatrix: Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³MDL (ppb)Qual.RL (ppb)Dilution Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 0.50<0.74ND 0.15 UDichlorodifluoromethane1 0.50<0.31ND 0.15 UChloromethane1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 UFreon 114 1 0.50<0.38ND 0.15 UVinyl chloride 1 0.50<0.33ND 0.15 U1,3-Butadiene 1 Page 3 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 410 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID:12/22/2014 12/24/20141436033002Lab ID: Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Sampling Parameter:Air Volume 6 LMatrix: Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³MDL (ppb)Qual.RL (ppb)Dilution Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 0.50<0.58ND 0.15 UBromomethane1 0.50<0.40ND 0.15 UChloroethane1 0.500.870.15 0.15 JFreon 11 1 0.50<1.1ND 0.15 UFreon 113 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 U1,1-Dichloroethene 1 0.50100430.30 EAcetone1 0.50<0.47ND 0.15 UCarbon disulfide 1 0.50<0.52ND 0.15 UMethylene chloride 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 0.50<0.54ND 0.15 UMethyl t-butyl ether 1 0.50<0.53ND 0.15 UVinyl acetate 1 0.50103.5 0.152-Butanone 1 0.50<0.59ND 0.15 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U1,1-Dichloroethane 1 1.0<0.54ND 0.15 UEthyl acetate 1 0.50<0.53ND 0.15 UHexane1 0.502.00.41 0.15 JChloroform1 0.50103.5 0.15Tetrahydrofuran 1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U1,2-Dichloroethane 1 0.50<0.82ND 0.15 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 0.50<0.94ND 0.15 UCarbon tetrachloride 1 0.50<0.48ND 0.15 UBenzene1 0.50<0.52ND 0.15 UCyclohexane1 0.50<0.81ND 0.15 UTrichloroethene1 0.50<0.73ND 0.15 U1,2-Dichloropropane 1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 UBromodichloromethane1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 UHeptane1 0.50<0.68ND 0.15 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 0.50<0.61ND 0.15 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1 0.50<0.68ND 0.15 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 0.50<0.82ND 0.15 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 0.506.51.7 0.15Toluene 1 1.0<1.2ND 0.30 U2-Hexanone 1 0.501.10.16 0.15 JTetrachloroethene1 0.50<1.3ND 0.15 UDibromochloromethane1 0.50<1.2ND 0.15 U1,2-Dibromoethane 1 Page 4 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 Results Continued on Next Page 411 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 Analytical Results Sample ID:12/22/2014 12/24/20141436033002Lab ID: Collected: Received: VW-2 Ebbighausen Sampling Parameter:Air Volume 6 LMatrix: Media: Air Sulfur Summa 6 Liter Sampling Site: Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Analyte ppb ug/m³MDL (ppb)Qual.RL (ppb)Dilution Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 0.50<0.69ND 0.15 UChlorobenzene1 0.503.40.79 0.15Ethyl benzene 1 0.50184.0 0.15m,p-Xylene 1 0.505.11.2 0.15o-Xylene 1 0.50<0.64ND 0.15 UStyrene1 0.50<1.6ND 0.15 UBromoform1 0.50<1.0ND 0.15 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 0.503.60.73 0.154-Ethyl toluene 1 0.507.21.5 0.151,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 0.50204.0 0.151,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 0.50<0.90ND 0.15 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 0.50<0.90ND 0.15 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 1.0<1.6ND 0.30 UBenzyl chloride 1 1.0<1.8ND 0.30 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 1.0<2.2ND 0.30 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 1.0<3.2ND 0.30 UHexachlorobutadiene1 NA410100 NA JTotal Volatile Organics 1 Analysis:EPA TO-15, Air Analyzed:12/29/2014 19:21 Batch: Instrument ID: IVOA/2784 (HBN: 141287)Percent Solid:NA 5972-W Report Basis:Wet Preparation:Not Applicable Tentatively Identified Compound ppb Retention Time Dilution Qual. Analysis Method - EPA TO-15 J7.5621 1Ethanol J18.345.8 1Decane J18.782.7 1Decane, 4-methyl- Comments Quality Control:EPA TO-15 - (HBN: 141287) The LCSD result for 4-methyl-2-pentanone is outside of limits. The acetone result in the CCS is outside of +/-30%. The surrogate recovery for 1435360001 is outside of limits. Report Authorization Analyst Peer ReviewMethod (/S/ is an electronic signature that complies with 21 CFR Part 11) EPA TO-15 /S/ Lisa M. Reid 01/02/2015 10:01 01/02/2015 11:01 /S/ Jorden Baum Page 5 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 412 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 Laboratory Contact Information (801) 266-7700 alslt.lab@ALSGlobal.com www.alsslc.com ALS Environmental 960 W Levoy Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84123 Phone: Email: Web: The results provided in this report relate only to the items tested. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. Samples have not been blank corrected unless otherwise noted. This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of ALS. General Lab Comments ALS provides professional analytical services for all samples submitted. ALS is not in a position to interpret the data and assumes no responsibility for the quality of the samples submitted. All quality control samples processed with the samples in this report yielded acceptable results unless otherwise noted. ALS is accredited for specific fields of testing (scopes) in the following testing sectors. The quality system implemented at ALS conforms to accreditation requirements and is applied to all analytical testing performed by ALS. The following table lists testing sector, accreditation body, accreditation number and website. Please contact these accrediting bodies or your ALS project manager for the current scope of accreditation that applies to your analytical testing. Testing Sector Accreditation Body Certificate Number Website Environmental ACLASS (DoD ELAP) Utah (NELAC) Nevada Oklahoma Iowa Florida (TNI) ADE-1420 DATA1 UT00009 UT00009 IA# 376 E871067 http://www.aclasscorp.com http://health.utah.gov/lab/labimp/ http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/labservice.htm http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/ http://www.iowadnr.gov/InsideDNR/RegulatoryWater.aspx http://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/bars/sas/qa/ Industrial Hygiene 101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.orgAIHA (ISO 17025 & AIHA IHLAP/ELLAP) Lead Testing: CPSC ACLASS (ISO 17025, CPSC)ADE-1420 http://www.aclasscorp.com Soil, Dust, Paint ,Air AIHA (ISO 17025, AIHA ELLAP and NLLAP) 101574 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org Dietary Supplements ACLASS (ISO 17025)ADE-1420 http://www.aclasscorp.com Texas (TNI) T104704456-11-1 http://www.tceq.texas.gov/field/qa/lab_accred_certif.html (Standard) Page 6 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 413 ANALYTICAL REPORT Project Manager:Rand Potter Client:Resource Technologies, Inc. Workorder:34-1436033 MDL = Method Detection Limit, a statistical estimate of method/media/instrument sensitivity. RL = Reporting Limit, a verified value of method/media/instrument sensitivity. CRDL = Contract Required Detection Limit Reg. Limit = Regulatory Limit. ND = Not Detected, testing result not detected above the MDL or RL. < This testing result is less than the numerical value. ** No result could be reported, see sample comments for details. U = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was not detected above the MDL. J = Qualifier Indicates that the analyte value is between the MDL and the RL. It is also used to indicate an estimated value for tentatively identified compounds in mass spectrometry where a 1:1 response is assumed. B = Qualifier indicates that the analyte was detected in the blank. E = Qualifier indicates that the analyte result exceeds calibration range. P = Qualifier indicates that the RPD between the two columns is greater than 40%. Result Symbol Definitions Qualifier Symbol Definitions Page 7 of 7 Fri, 01/02/15 12:00 PM ENVREP-V3.8 414 WATERS OF THE US DELINEATION REPORT BRIDGER VALE SUBDIVISION BOZEMAN, MONTANA November 1, 2016 Prepared for: Andy Ebbighausen Ebbighausen Homes Inc. Prepared by: 415 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................11.1 Site Waterways .......................................................................................1 1.2 Climate ...................................................................................................2 2.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS ......................................................6 2.1 Methods...................................................................................................62.2 Technical Criteria.....................................................................................6 3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS .......................................................93.1 NRCS Soil Survey Results........................................................................93.2 W-1 –Artificial,Riverine, Lower Perennial, Rock Bottom .........................9 4.0 SUMMARY...............................................................................................11 5.0 REFERENCES .........................................................................................12 FIGURE 1.0 -USGS 7.5’ Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map.......................3FIGURE 2.0 -Aerial Photograph showing the study area ......................................4FIGURE3.0 -NWI map showing study area..........................................................5 TABLE 1.0 -Summary of Attributes for WUS delineated on Property..............11 APPENDIX A -Wetland Determination Data FormsAPPENDIX B -Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil SurveyAPPENDIX C -Photo Log APPENDIX D -Topographic Map -Sheet 1 of 1 COVER PHOTO: Looking north at W-1 and Manley Road 416 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 1 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND An investigation to identify waters of the United States (WUS)on the Bridger Vale Subdivision parcel was completed by Vaughn Environmental Services, Inc.(VES)on September 16, 2016.The tract encompasses 6.49 acres of undeveloped land owned by Andy Ebbighausen and located on Manley Road north of the East Gallatin Recreation Area.The proposed development is legally described as the remaining Tract GLR-1 of COS 157 located in the southwest quarter of Section 31, Township 1 South, Range 6 East,Gallatin County (Figure 1.0 –USGS 7.5’ Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map and Figure 2.0 –Aerial Photograph).Figure 3.0 shows the project area on the National Wetland Inventory database map.The wetland boundaries were flagged based on vegetation, soil,and hydrological data collected during the September field investigation.C&H Engineering and Surveying, LLC of Bozeman, Montana, surveyed the flagged boundaries of the wetland within the study area and drafted the Topographic Map shown on Sheet 1 of 1 in Appendix D. The field investigation was completed for the landowner to identify the location, extent, and characteristics of jurisdictional WUS within the study area boundaries for compliance with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)regulations. The USACE requires a permit for the discharge of fill material into WUS in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA 1986). A Supreme Court 2001 decision in the case of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus US Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC) limited the federal authority underthe Clean Water act to regulate certain isolated wetlands. In light of the Court’s decision,WUS as it applies to the jurisdictional limits of the authority of the USACE include the area below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM)of stream channels and lakes or ponds connected to the tributary system, and wetlands adjacent to these waters. The jurisdictional status of wetlands depends on the presence or absence of a connection and/or proximity (meaning bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to waters of the US. The Waters of the US Delineation report documents the project background, methodology used to identify project WUS, and findings of the field investigation.Six Wetland Determination Data Forms recording data collected near or within W-1, which encompasses a borrow ditch and adjacent wetland fringe located on the east side of Manley Road (Appendix A).US Department of Agriculture soil mapping information for the site is included in Appendix B and photos of the site are included in Appendix C.The Topographic Map on Sheet 1 of 1 in Appendix D shows the boundaries of the study area wetland.The Wetland Delineation Report will be submitted to the USACE and the City of Bozeman as supporting documentation for the 310/404 Joint Application and City plat approval process.The study area encompassed the acreage within the parcel slated for development. The only wetland on the property was located in or near the borrow ditch for Manley Road located on the west property boundary.The land is mapped within the Threeriv- Bonebasin series (556A)found on flood plains formed in alluvium on 0 to 2 percent slopes (Appendix B -USDA/NRCS 2016).The soil map unit has been used historically as pasture and wildlife habitat. Manley Road parallels the west property boundary, agricultural land and single family residences occupy the land north and immediately south of the property,and the East Gallatin Recreation Area owned by Montana, Fish, Wildlife and Parks occupies the parcels located east and south of the subject property. 417 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 2 1.1 SITE WATERWAYS .The borrow ditch located on the east side of Manley Road contained surface water during the September 2016 investigation. An outlet and man-made channel has been excavated at the north side of the East Gallatin Pond. Water in the channel flows east, then north, then west, on the north side of five residences located at the south boundary of the subject property.Surface water from the channel accumulates in a small pond located at the southernmost end of the borrow ditch (W-1). Water in the borrow ditch flows north 0.38 miles along the east side of Manley Road until it discharges to the East Gallatin River. The discharge point is located on the southeast side of the bridge crossing. The Gallatin Conservation District does not classify the borrow ditch as a perennial stream. No 310 permit will be required for impacts to the ditch channel. 1.2 CLIMATE The Bozeman area climate generally resembles that of a middle latitude steppe, with relatively long cold winters and short cool summers (Pac 1991). The region comprises a mountain complex within the steppe region, resulting in orographic effects that produce a local, cooler and wetter climate. Peak runoff generally occurs during the spring from snowmelt and combined snowmelt/rainfall events. These events produce relatively long periods of runoff. Summer thunderstorms also contribute to peak runoff although they are generally short in duration. The annual pattern of precipitation typically results in increasing precipitation from March to a peak in June, a decline through mid summer, another increase in late August to a second, smaller peak in September, followed by a general decline to the yearly low in February (Pac et al 1993). The annual temperature regime of the study area is generally characterized by significant seasonal variations. Winters are typically long and cold with subfreezing average temperatures from November to March. Average annual precipitation ranges from 13 inches per year at the lower elevations to 50 inches per year at the higher elevations in the Bridger Range north of Bozeman (NRCS 1972). Although the average annual precipitation is low enough to classify most of the area as semi-arid, about 70 percent of the annual total precipitation normally falls during the April to September growing season. Elevations in the study area range from 4,700 to 4,698 feet above mean sea level (amsl) from south to north.The closest meteorological station to the study area is Montana State University located approximately 2.7 miles south of the project at 4,860 feet amsl.Records from 1961 to 1990 for Bozeman indicate that the average annual precipitation is 19.25 inches with an average total snowfall of 92.1 inches. The average temperature at the climate station is 44.2 degrees Fahrenheit (USDA 1990). The mean annual precipitation rate for the predominant soil series in the study area,the Threeriv-Bonebasin loam (509B), is 15 inches. 418 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 3 Figure 1.0 USGS 7.5 minute Bozeman Quadrangle Topographic Map showing project location. Project Location 419 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 4 Figure 2.0 Aerial Photograph showing road that bisects study area.Borrow ditch is shown on east side of Manley Road. 420 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Bridger Vale Subdivision 5 Figure 3.0 National Wetland Inventory Map showing study area and PABGx Bozeman Pond south of parcel.The East Gallatin River crosses Manley Road north of site. Bridger Vale Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and theGIS user community Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine October 31, 2016 0 0.15 0.30.075 mi 0 0.25 0.50.125 km 1:9,762 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and WildlifeService is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of thebase data shown on this map. All wetlands related data shouldbe used in accordance with the layer metadata found on theWetlands Mapper web site. 421 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 6 2.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHODS 2.1 METHODS Waters of the US including jurisdictional wetlands within the study area were identified on September 16, 2016,using methodology developed by the USACE and other federal agencies for implementation of Section 404 of the CWA. Delineation procedures involved a review of existing site-specific information and completion of an onsite field investigation based on guidelines for the Routine Determination Method presented in the Field Guide for Wetland Delineation (Environmental Laboratory 1987)and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2010). The Routine Level-2 Onsite Determination Method employs primarily qualitative procedures. Sample plots (approximately a 15-foot radius) are established within potential wetlands based on changes in plant communities, plant diversity, topography, and soil type. Data points are generally located parallel to watercourses, perpendicular to the apparent groundwater hydraulic gradient, and/or along topographical breaks. Vegetation composition, hydrology, and soil characteristics are assessed at each data collection point. If all three parameters exhibit positive wetland indictors, the area represented by the sample plot is classified as wetland. If any one of the parameters does not display a positive indicator, the area is classified as a non-wetland or upland unless the wetland is atypical or problematic. The jurisdictional authority of the USACE over wetlands identified in the field depends on the presence or absence of a surface water connection and/or proximity to waters of the US.Six Wetland Data Collection Forms summarizing data collected from three wetland and three upland soil test pits (SP-1 through SP-6)were completed for the artificial riverine wetland W-1 located in the borrow ditch on the east side of Manley Road. 2.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA A wetland must meet three technical criteria for it to be categorized as jurisdictional. The USACE (259 Federal Register 853532) and the Environmental Protection Agency (47 FR 31810)jointly define wetlands as “areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.” The following conditions must be present for an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland. 1.Hydrophytic Vegetation: Defined as plant species normally or commonly adapted to saturation of sufficient duration to cause anaerobic conditions in the root zone. 2.Wetland Hydrology: Defined as hydrology supported by sources of water that result in saturated, flooded, or ponded soil conditions. 3.Hydric Soils: Defined as soil that forms under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (59 Fed. Reg. 35680, 7/13/94). Hydrophytic Vegetation Plants must be physiologically or morphologically adapted to saturated or anaerobic soil conditions to grow in wetlands. The USACE and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) have determined the estimated probability of finding representative wetland species within specified areas under natural conditions. Accordingly, plants may be categorized as obligate (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACU), or upland (UPL) in decreasing order of moisture dependence or tolerance. Obligate species occur greater than 99 percent of the time in a wetland. Facultative wetland species have a 67 to 99 percent probability 422 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 7 of occurring in a wetland. Facultative species exhibit a 34 to 67 percent probability of occurring in a wetland. Facultative upland species have a 67 to 99 percent probability of occurring in a non- wetland and upland species have a greater than 99 percent probability of occurring in a non- wetland.Species with an indicator status of OBL, FACW,or FAC are considered hydrophytic. Vegetation indicator status for this investigation was derived from the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 2016 Regional Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016).Taxonomic references included Dorn 1984, Hitchcock 1971, Lackschewitz 1991, and Lesica and Husby 2001. The name and indicator status of individual species within each vegetation stratum was recorded on the data form in descending order of abundance (Appendix A). Under the dominance test introduced in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2010), a sample plot is classified as having wetland vegetation if the cumulative total of the estimated percent cover for the dominant hydrophytic species exceeds 50 percent and 50 percent or greater of the dominant species have a hydrophytic indicator status. The Regional Supplement also introduced the Prevalence Index, Morphological Adaptations, and Wetland Non-Vascular plants as indicators of hydrophytic vegetation only when indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology are also present. Wetland Hydrology Technical criteria for wetland hydrology guidelines have been established as “permanent or periodic inundation, or soil saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for a significant period (usually 14 days or more or 12.5 percent of the growing season) during the growing season” (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The minimum duration required for soil saturation is five percent of the growing season in consecutive days. Inundation or saturation for periods less than 5 percent of the growing season is evidence of non-wetland conditions. Systems with continuous inundation or saturation between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season may or may not be jurisdictional wetlands based on other criteria. The growing season is defined for purposes of this report as the number of days where there is a 50 percent probability that the minimum daily temperature is greater than or equal to 28Fahrenheit (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The Bozeman growing season extends from May 5 to October 1 according to the WETS Bozeman Climate data. Approximately 19 days of saturation would meet the wetland hydrology criterion for a specific wetland. Either direct observations of inundation or well data showing a free water surface at depths less than 12 inches continuously for more than 5 percent of the growing season have been used nationally to distinguish active wetland hydrology. Surface water, groundwater, direct precipitation, and/or snowmelt may contribute to wetland hydrology. Field observations were used to determine existing wetland hydrology.A positive indication of wetland hydrology requires either one primary indicator or two or more secondary indicators.The Regional Supplement for the Western Mountains area lists the primary indicators as surface water, high water table, saturation, water marks, sediment deposits, drift deposits, algal mat or crust, iron deposits, surface soil cracks, inundation visible on aerial imagery, sparsely vegetated concave surface, water stained leaves, salt crust, aquatic invertebrates, hydrogen sulfide odor, oxidized rhizospheres along living roots, presence of reduced iron, recent iron reduction in tilled soils, and stunted or stressed plants. Secondary indicators include water-stained leaves, drainage patterns, dry-season water table, saturation visible on aerial imagery, geomorphic position, shallow aquitard, FAC-neutral test, raised ant mounds, and frost-heave hummocks. Hydric Soils Soil is considered saturated when the capillary fringe occurs within a major portion of the root zone (within 12 inches of the surface). The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), 423 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 8 formerly the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS), has compiled a list of hydric soils in the United States. The list identifies soil series mapped by the NRCS that meet the hydric criteria. Upland (non-wetland) soils may have inclusions of hydric soils that may not be demarcated on NRCS maps. Field examination of site-specific soil characteristics is necessary to confirm the presence of hydric soils. The profile description presented on the data form reflects site soil conditions as determined from soil pits, not the NRCS designation. The NRCS soil survey information reviewed for the project area is included in Appendix B. Hydric soils exhibit certain physical characteristics that can be observed visually. These characteristics, or indicators, include high organic matter content (histic epipedons), accumulation of sulfidic material, gley formation (greenish or bluish gray color), redoximorphic features (mottling), and low soil chromas (dark soil colors –soil chroma).Organic matter content is estimated visually and texturally; redoximorphic features are identified visually; sulfidic material is identified by the odor of sulfide gases; and soil colors are determined using a Munsell soil color chart (Munsell 1988).The colorimetric determination is to be made immediately below the “A” horizon or 10 inches whichever is less.The Regional Supplement for Western Mountains introduced new classifications for hydric soil indicators based on the soil type (organic, muck or mineral), soil matrix, and type of redoximorphic features such as concentrations, depletions, reduced matrix, or covered or coated sand grains.The full description of each category is included in Chapter Three of the Regional Supplement for the Western Mountains area.Wetland soils can be assumed to be present in any plant community where all the dominant species have an indicator status of OBL or FACW, and the wetland boundary is abrupt (Environmental Laboratory 1987). 424 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 9 3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS A site investigation to determine the presence and extent of waters of the US within the study area was completed by VES on September 16, 2016.C&H Engineering and Surveying surveyed the demarcated boundaries using a global positioning system (GPS). Wetland boundaries were flagged by VES based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil,and primary hydrologic indicators.Wetland types were based on similarities in physiographic, hydrologic, and plant community characteristics. Site-specific wetland parameters are described on the Wetland Determination Data Forms included in Appendix A.C&H Engineers drafted the Topographic Map that shows the boundaries of W-1 identified within the study area (Sheet 1 of 1,Appendix D). Wetland 1 (W-1) is a man-made,lower perennial,riverine wetland based on the hydrogeomorphic classification system (Smith et al. 1995). The primary source of water is surface water overflow from an outlet on the north end of the East Gallatin pond located south of the subject property.The wetland is classified as rock bottom with emergent vegetation according to the Cowardin classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979).The moisture regime is permanently flooded (PF).Surface water in the man-made channel discharges to the East Gallatin River approximately 0.38 miles north of the parcel. Section 3.1 discusses the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey results for the project site.The characteristics of the project WUS are described in Section 3.2. The Wetland Determination Data forms are included in Appendix A and the NRCS soil map and soil descriptions are included in Appendix B. Photographs of the site wetland are included in Appendix C.Appendix D presents the Topographic Map showing the wetland boundaries on Sheet 1 of 1. 3.1 NRCS SOIL SURVEY RESULTS The web soil survey for Gallatin County (USDA/NRCS 2016)maps the man-made channel W-1 within the Threeriv-Bonebasin loam (556A) map unit found on 0 to 2 percent slopes (Appendix B).The Threeriv series consists of very deep,very poorly drained soils taxonomically classified as a fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal,mixed, superactive,calcareous,frigid Typic Fluvaquents. It is classified as hydric by virtue of the aquic order.The Bonebasin series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils, taxonomically classified as a superactive, frigid, Fluvaquentic Endoaquolls. The series is classified as hydric. 3.2 W-1 –ARTIFICIAL,LOWER PERENNIAL, RIVERINE,ROCK BOTTOM AND EMERGENT The Topographic Map (Sheet 1 -Appendix D)demarcates the boundaries of W-1.Six soil test pits were excavated to determine the boundary between wetland and upland. Test pits SP- 1 and SP-2 were located in wetland and upland, respectively,on the north half of W-1. Test pits SP-3 and SP-4 were excavated within the wetland boundary on the south half of W-1. Test pits SP-5 and SP-6 were excavated in upland at the edge of the W-1 boundary on the south half of W- 1.A rock layer between 9 and 12 inches on the south half of W-1 restricted the depth of the test pits in some locations.The soil test pit locations are shown on the map in Appendix D. None of the wetland test pits exhibited saturation or inundation.However, there was water flowing in the borrow ditch channel and ponded surface water noted in several areas within the wetland fringe that extends from the ditch. Vegetation –North Half of W-1 Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea –FACW),smooth brome (Bromus inermis – UPL) and spreading bent grass (Agrostis stolonifera –FAC) dominated the vegetation cover at SP-1. Additional species included Northwest Territory sedge (Carex utriculata –OBL)and 425 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 10 common tansy (Taraxacum vulgare –FACU). The species met the dominance test for vegetation.The same species dominated the cover at SP-2 albeit in different cover percentages. The dominance test was equal to 50 percent.The dominant species met the prevalence test for hydrophytic vegetation. Vegetation –South Half of W-1 Test pit SP-3 was located at the edge of the common cattail (Typha latifolia –OBL) dominated,inundated wetland fringe in the south half of W-1. The cover was dominated by common cattail and spreading bent grass meeting the dominance test for wetland vegetation. Test pit SP-4 was located in wetland east of SP-3.Spreading bent grass, common cattail, orchard grass, and common timothy (Phleum pratense –FAC) dominated the cover meeting the dominance test. Test pit SP-5 was located in upland at the edge of W-1. The plant cover of orchard grass, spreading bent grass, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis –FAC), and common cattail met the dominance test. Pit SP-6 was located in upland further east of SP-5 and higher in elevation.The same plants observed at SP-5 dominated the cover at SP-6. Soil –North half of W-1 Pit SP-1 revealed a black silt loam (10 YR 2/1)from 11 to 15 inches below the ground surface with 2 percent dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4) redox concentrations in the matrix.The redox dark surface was a positive indicator of a hydric soil. The soil profile in SP-2 exhibited a very dark brown (10 YR 2/2) dry, friable silt loam without redoximorphic features.The soil did not meet the wetland criteria. Soil –South half of W-1 Test pit SP-3 revealed a sticky black (10 YR 2/1) silt loam with dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/4)redox concentrations in the matrix meeting the hydric soil criteria for a redox dark surface. Pit SP-4 exhibited a black silt loam (10 YR 2/1) from 0 to 12 inches bgs with grayish brown (10 YR 5/2) depletions in the matrix near 12 inches bgs.The depleted dark surface met the hydric soil criteria.Pockets of gray sand were noted within the profile.Pit SP-5 revealed a very dark brown (10 YR 2/2) silt clay loam with 2 percent grayish brown (10 YR 5/2) depletions to 9 inches bgs. A rock layer precluded a deeper excavation. The soil characteristics did not meet the hydric soil criteria.Test pit SP-6 was excavated to 13 inches bgs.The characteristics were the same as SP-5. Neither test pit met the wetland criteria for depleted dark surface based on the higher chroma and low percentage of depletions present. Hydrology –North half of W-1 The data collection point at SP-1 provided two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology, saturation visible on aerial imagery and geomorphic position. Data collection point SP-2 was located up the bank slope from SP-1. There were no indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-2. Hydrology –South half of W-1 Primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-3 included a sparsely vegetated concave surface, saturation visible on aerial imagery, and geomorphic position. Test pit SP-4 was located east of SP-3 near the wetland-upland boundary. Saturation visible on aerial imagery and geomorphic position were secondary indicators of wetland hydrology at SP-4. Test pits SP-5 and SP-6 did not exhibit any indicators of wetland hydrology. 426 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 11 4.0 SUMMARY Wetland W-1 is a man-made,lower perennial, rock bottom, riverine wetland that discharges to the East Gallatin River approximately 0.38 miles north of the subject property.The source of water is overflow from an outlet channel located at the north end of the East Gallatin Recreation Area Pond.The man-made channel is diverted to the borrow ditch on the east side of Manley Road. The wetland was assumed to be jurisdictional based on the downgradient connection to the East Gallatin River. Table 1.0 Summary of Attributes for Wetland W-1 delineated on UPS Property. Wetland Designation Hydrogeomorphic/Cowardin Class Jurisdictional Status Areal Extent (Acres) W-1 Man-made,lower perennial, rock bottom, riverine (PF*)Jurisdictional 0.302 *Permanently flooded. 427 Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 12 5.0 REFERENCES Clean Water Act, Section 404. 1986. Federal Register -Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers. Cowardin, Lewis M., Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet, and Edward T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Services, USDI, Washington, DC. Dorn, R.D. 1984. Vascular Plants of Montana. Mountain West Publishing, Wyoming. Environmental Laboratory 1987. “Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,” Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksbrug, Miss. Hitchcock, A.S. 1971. Manual of the Grasses of the United States, Volume One and Two. Dover Publications, New York. Lackschewitz, K. 1991. Vascular Plants of West-Central Montana –Identification Guidebook. General Technical Report –277. Intermountain Research Station. USDA, Forest Service. Missoula, MT. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016.Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 2016 Regional Wetland Plant List.The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings.Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X. Lesica, P., P. Husby. 2001. Field Guide to Montana’s Wetland Vascular Plants. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bozeman, MT Munsell. 1988. Soil Color Charts. New Windsor, New York. Smith, R.D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service 1990, WETS Climate Summary Data US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 1987. Hydric Soils of the US. In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Washington DC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010.Regional Supplement to theCorps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: WesternMountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S.Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-3.Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and DevelopmentCenter. WEBSITES: USDA/NRCS Web Soil Survey, Gallatin County, accessed September 2016:http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ 428 APPENDIX A WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 APPENDIX B NRCS SOIL SURVEY Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 442 Soil Map—Gallatin County Area, Montana(Ebigghausen - Manley Road) Natural ResourcesConservation Service Web Soil SurveyNational Cooperative Soil Survey 10/3/2016Page 1 of 3506100050611005061200506130050614005061500506160050617005061800506100050611005061200506130050614005061500506160050617005061800496700496800496900497000497100497200 496700 496800 496900 497000 497100 497200 45° 42' 35'' N 111° 2' 35'' W 45° 42' 35'' N111° 2' 6'' W 45° 42' 8'' N 111° 2' 35'' W 45° 42' 8'' N 111° 2' 6'' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edgetics: UTMZone12NWGS84 0 150 300 600 900Feet0 50 100 200 300MetersMap Scale: 1:4,060 if printed on Aportrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Warning: Soil Map may not bevalid at thisscale. 443 LOCATION THREERIV MT Established SeriesRev. GAR-JJU-RJS 06/2011 THREERIV SERIES The Threeriv series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium. These soils areon flood plains. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 15 inches, and the mean annual air temperature is about 40 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS:Fine-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, calcareous, frigidTypic Fluvaquents TYPICAL PEDON:Threeriv loam, in pastureland (colors are for moist soil unless otherwise noted). Oe--0 to 4 inches; partially decomposed sedges, rushes and grasses; slightly alkaline (pH 7.8); clear smooth boundary. (2 to 6 inches thick) Ag--4 to 9 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loam, gray (10YR 5/1) dry; few fine prominent brown (7.5YR 4/4)redox concentrations; weak medium subangular blocky structure; hard, friable, moderately sticky and moderately plastic; few very fine and fine, and common medium roots; 10 percent gravel; stronglyeffervescent; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0). (2 to 9 inches thick) Cg--9 to 29 inches; light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) sandy clay loam consisting of strata of sandy clay loam and sandy loam, light gray (10YR 7/2) dry; common fine prominent dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/6) redoxconcentrations; massive; hard, friable, slightly sticky and slightly plastic; few very fine, fine and medium roots; 10 percent gravel; violently effervescent; moderately alkaline (pH 8.4); clear smooth boundary.(15 to31 inches thick) 2C--29 to 60 inches; variegated extremely gravelly loamy sand; single grain; loose, nonsticky and nonplastic; 60 percent gravel and 15 percent cobbles; moderately alkaline (pH 8.0). TYPE LOCATION:Gallatin County, Montana; 2,200 feet south and 200 feet west of the northeast cornerof sec. 2, T. 1N, R. 1E. RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS:Mean annual soil temperature -40 to 45 degrees F.Depth to lithologic discontinuity -20 to 40 inches Depth to seasonal high water table -0 to 12 inches Ag horizonHue: 10YR, N, 5Y; dry or moist Value: 5 or 6 dry; 3 or 4 moistTexture: loam, silt loam or silty clay loam Clay content: 18 to 35 percentRock fragments: 0 to 10 percent gravel Calcium carbonate equivalent: 2 to 15 percentReaction: pH 7.9 to 8.4 Cg horizon Hue: 10YR, 5Y or 2.5Y; dry or moistValue: 5 to 7 dry; 4 to 6 moist Chroma: 1 or 2; dry or moistTexture: stratified sandy clay loam, sandy loam, silty clay loam or clay loam Clay content: 15 to 35 percentRock fragments: 0 to 10 percent gravel 444 Calcium carbonate equivalent: 2 to 15 percentReaction: pH 7.9 to 8.4 2C horizon Hue: 10YR or variegated; dry or moistValue: 5 or 6 dry; 4 or 5 moist Texture: loamy sand, loamy coarse sand, sand or coarse sandClay content: 0 to 10 percent Rock fragments: 35 to 85 percent--25 to 60 percent gravel, 10 to 25 percent cobblesReaction: pH 7.4 to 8.4 COMPETING SERIES:Beavrock (MT)-have a seasonal high water table at 12 to 24 inches GEOGRAPHIC SETTING:Landform -flood plains Elevation -4,000 to 6,500 feetSlope-0 to 2 percent Parent material -alluviumClimate-long, cold winters; moist springs; warm summers Mean annual precipitation -10 to 18 inchesMean annual air temperature -38 to 43 degrees F. Frost-free period -70 to 110 days GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS:None listed. DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY:Very poorly drained; moderately slow over rapid permeability. USE AND VEGETATION:Threeriv soils are used mainly for pasture and wildlife habitat. Potential nativevegetation may include tall reedgrasses, tall sedges and rushes, American sloughgrass, iris, willows, waterbirch, dogwood and silver buffaloberry, as well as other forbs, grasses, sedges and shrubs. DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT:Threeriv soils are of small extent in Southwestern Montana. MLRA -44B. MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO) RESPONSIBLE:Bozeman, Montana. SERIES ESTABLISHED:Gallatin County, Montana, 1997. REMARKS:Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are: Ochric epipedon -from 0 to 9 inches (Oe, Ag horizons)Lithologic discontinuity -at 29 inches (2C horizon) Particle-size control section -from 14 to 44 inches (part of Cg, part of 2C horizons) Threeriv soils have a frigid temperature regime and an aquic moisture regime. ADDITIONAL DATA:Soil interpretation record -MT1640. National Cooperative Soil Survey 445 APPENDIX C PHOTO LOG Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 446 Photo 1.The view is looking northwest at SP-1 at the edge of the borrow ditch on Manley Road. 447 Photo 2.The view is of SP-2 looking northwest toward Manley Road. 448 Photo 3.The photo is looking west toward SP-3 and Manley Road. 449 Photo 4.The photo is looking at SP-4,east of SP-3. 450 Photo 5.The photo shows SP-5 located outside the east edge of the south half of the wetland looking north. 451 Photo 6.0 The view is looking west at the ponded water at the south end of the south half of the borrow ditch (W-1). 452 Photo 7.0 The view is looking south at the south half of W-1 adjacent to Manley Road. 453 Appendix D WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT Waters of the US Delineation Report –Ebbighausen –Bridger Vale Subdivision 454 455 Vapor Management Technology 456 Geo-Seal® is a sub-slab vapor intrusion barrier system designed to eliminate vapor intrusion for brownfields or any type of environmentally-impaired site. Geo-Seal is a chemically-resistant material placed between the foundation of the building and the soil pad to eliminate vapor intrusion pathways and stop contaminant vapors from permeating through the slab. By deploying Geo-Seal, developers can ensure a healthy indoor environment while reducing the cost of site remediation and expediting site construction. • Geo-Seal is a composite system that creates the ideal blend between constructability and chemical resistance by using both high density polyethylene (HDPE) and spray applied asphalt latex. • Geo-Seal has been tested and proven to be highly effective against VOCs like chlorinated solvents and petroleum contaminants, and, methane. • Geo-Seal is the 1st patented vapor intrusion barrier system in the US • Geo-Seal has gained wide approval among various regulatory agencies across the country. Introduction 457 Geo-Seal BASE The BASE layer is rolled out geotextile facing down, which allows Geo-Seal CORE to be applied directly to the high density polyethylene. The BASE layer provides the ultimate substrate and enables the spray layer to be free of shadowing and pinholes. Geo-Seal CORE The CORE is applied at 60 mils, is sprayed to the base layer, seals around penetrations and seals the seams of the BASE layer. Geo-Seal BOND A proprietary protection layer is placed over the CORE layer to enhance the curing of the membrane and increase puncture resistance. • Eliminates the need for trenching • Cost-effective compared to pipe and gravel systems • Eliminates long-term costs when configured as a passive system • Allows for rapid installation • When used with Geo-Seal provides maximumprotection against contaminated vapor Vapor-Vent 458 Geo-Seal Triple-Layer System(2 Chemical Resistant Layers + 1 Spray Applied Core Layer) Dual Chemical Resistant Layers The BASE layer (bottom) and the BOND layer (top) are composed of a high-density polyethylene material bonded to a geo-textile on the out-facing side. High density polyethylene is known for chemical resistance, high tensile strength, excellent stress-crack resistance and for highly reliable subsurface containment. The geo-textile which is physically bonded to the chemical resistant layer accomplishes two goals; it allows the BOND layer to adhere to the slab, and provides a friction course between the BASE layer and the soil. Spray Applied CORE Layer The CORE layer is composed of a unique, elastic co-polymer modified asphaltic membrane which also provides additional protection against vapor transmission. This layer creates a highly-effective seal around slab penetrations and eliminates the need for mechanical fastening at termination points. Chemical Resistance The dual chemical resistant layers combined with the spray CORE form a barrier resistant to the most concentrated chemical pollutant vapors. Enhanced Curing Geo-Seal is “construction friendly” as the reduced curing time of the Geo-Seal CORE layer and the ability to apply it in cooler temperatures ensures quick installation and minimizes the impact on construction schedules. 459 Puncture Resistance Geo-Seal forms a highly puncture resistant barrier that greatly reduces the chance of damage occurring after installation and prior to the placement of concrete. Removing Contained Vapors Vapor-Vent can be used in conjunction with Geo-Seal to alleviate the buildup of vapors beneath structures as a result of vapor barrier implementation. Vapor-Vent can be utilized as an active or passive ventilation system depending on the requirements of the design engineer. Certified Applicator Network The application of Geo-Seal and Vapor-Vent can be performed by any one of many certified applicators throughout the country. Service and Support Geo-Seal representatives are available to provide job and site specific assistance. A local representative can ensure Geo-Seal and Vapor-Vent is installed as per the specification. 460 World Class Clients Environmental consultants, engineers, and real estate professionals trust Land Science to produce results knowing our expertise and industry knowledge has been proven time and again at the job site. Our world class clients include leaders in the food, banking, government, and housing industries. Get Started Today To recieve a custom vapor intrusion solution, please call 949.481.8118 or email info@landsciencetech.com One of our Technical Solutions Managers will review your project details and provide you with a customized vapor intrusion solution designed to achieve your goals. 461 www.landsciencetech.com1011 Calle Sombra, San Clemente CA 92673 T: 949.481.8118 EXPERTS IN VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION Land Science® develops vapor intrusion mitigation solutions thatprotect people and invigorate renewal of contaminated properties. We leverage our industry expertise to assist clients in developing site specific solutions that are technically sound and cost-effective. ©2016 All rights reserved. Land Science and Land Science products are registered trademarks of REGENESIS Bioremediation Products. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 462 851 Bridger Drive, Suite 6 (59715) P.O. Box 1413 (59771) Bozeman, MT Office 406.582.8780 Fax 406.582.8790 October 28, 2016 Mr. Andy Ebbighausen P O Box 930 Manhattan, MT 59741 SUBJECT: Report of Test Pit Observation and Sampling Bridger Vale Development Bozeman, Montana Tetra Tech, Inc., Project No.: 114-710331.100 Dear Mr. Ebbighausen, On October 10, 2016, Tetra Tech, Inc. personnel conducted soil sampling in six test pits excavated by you, on Bridger Vale Development property. Each test pit was located in the approximate center of each of the six building footprints proposed. Test pits were excavated to approximately five feet depth below ground surface. Soil was visually described and one soil sample was collected in each test pit. The test pit field log has descriptions of the soil encountered in the test pits and is in Table 1. Soils observed in the test pits did not exhibit evidence of staining or odor, evidence of refuse/waste, or other indications of contamination. In each test pit, one soil sample was collected at depths ranging between 3.5 and 5.2 feet below ground surface. Each soil sample was mixed in a stainless steel bowl and packed into a nine ounce glass jar with an air-tight, threaded, Teflon-lined lid. The soil sample was placed in the container in a compacted manner so to minimize any headspace or voids. The samples were placed in an ice-filled cooler. In preparation for shipment to analytical laboratory, samples were packed in bubble wrap and ice in a cooler under documented chain of custody protocol. Samples were shipped to Pace Analytical Laboratories (Pace) in Billings, Montana for analysis of volatile organic compounds in accordance with USEPA Method 8260B. Analytical results of 71 constituents, in each of the six samples, indicate no detection of these constituents above the minimum detection limit (MDL). The laboratory report is contained in Attachment A. Please contact me with any questions or comments regarding this report. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. Sincerely, Mark F. Pearson Environmental Scientist mfp 463 TABLE 1 TEST PIT FIELD LOG OCTOBER 10, 2016 BRIDGER VALE DEVELOPMENT BOZEMAN, MONTANA TEST PIT CORRESPONDING DEPTH GENERAL SOIL SAMPLE SURVEY MARKER DESCRIPTION COLLECTION feet bgs feet bgs #1 #300 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2 Clayey loam - firm, moist 2 - 3.2 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 3.2 - 5.8 Clayey silt - incr. moisture 3.5 5.8 Groundwater (rising to about 5') #2 #301 0 - 2 Clayey loam - rich in organics 2 - 3.5 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 3.5 - 5 Clayey silt - less dense, incr. moisture 4.5 5 Groundwater #3 #302 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2 Silty clay - dense, hard digging, moist 2 - 3.7 Clayey silt - blocky, hard, w abnt carbonate 3.7 - 4.5 Sandy silt - less dense 4.4 No groundwater intercepted #4 #303 0 - 1 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1 - 2.2 Silty clay - dry, blocky, w carbonate 2.2 - 4.5 Clayey silt - less dense, incr. moisture 4.5 - 4.7 Sandy silt - less dense 4.6 No groundwater intercepted #5 #304 0 - 1.5 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1.5 - 4.8 Silty, sandy, clay - softer, w carbonate 4.8 - 5 Sandy silt - less dense 4.9 No groundwater intercepted #6 #305 0 - 1.5 Clayey loam - rich in organics 1.5 - 4.8 Silty, sandy, clay - softer, w carbonate 4.8 - 5.2 Sandy silt - less dense 4.9 No groundwater intercepted NOTES :bgs - below ground surface. Depths are approximate. General Soil Description - soil interval visually described in field without any in-field testing w - with incr. - increased abnt - abundant Tetra Tech, Inc.464 ATTACHMENT A 465 #=CL# October 24, 2016 LIMS USE: FR - MARK PEARSON LIMS OBJECT ID: 10365529 10365529 Project: Pace Project No.: RE: Mark Pearson Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT 851 Bridger Dr. Suite 6 Bozeman, MT 59715 Bridger Vale Subdivision Dear Mark Pearson: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 11, 2016. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current, applicable TNI/NELAC standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Beverly Faraday beverly.faraday@pacelabs.com Project Manager Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 1 of 32 466 #=CP# CERTIFICATIONS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Davis Cerification IDs 2795 Second Street Suite 300 Davis, CA 95618 North Dakota Certification #: R-214 Oregon Certification #: CA300002 Washington Certification #: C926-15a California Certification #: 08263CA Minnesota Department of Health Certification #: 006-999- 465 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 2 of 32 467 #=SS# SAMPLE SUMMARY Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received 10365529001 BV-1 3.5'Solid 10/10/16 14:50 10/11/16 09:30 10365529002 BV-2 4.5'Solid 10/10/16 15:05 10/11/16 09:30 10365529003 BV-3 4.4'Solid 10/10/16 15:20 10/11/16 09:30 10365529004 BV-4 4.6'Solid 10/10/16 15:30 10/11/16 09:30 10365529005 BV-5 4.9'Solid 10/10/16 15:40 10/11/16 09:30 10365529006 BV-6 4.9'Solid 10/10/16 15:45 10/11/16 09:30 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 3 of 32 468 #=SA# SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID Method Analytes Reported LaboratoryAnalysts 10365529001 BV-1 3.5'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 10365529002 BV-2 4.5'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 10365529003 BV-3 4.4'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 10365529004 BV-4 4.6'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 10365529005 BV-5 4.9'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 10365529006 BV-6 4.9'EPA 8260B 74 PASI-DAVJCP ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)1 PASI-DAVSJ1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 4 of 32 469 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client:Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT EPA 8260B Date:October 24, 2016 Description:8260 MSV Low Soil General Information: 6 samples were analyzed for EPA 8260B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Sample Preparation: The samples were prepared in accordance with EPA 5030 Low with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. QC Batch: 97319 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10365529002 M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • MS (Lab ID: 384863) • 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene • 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane • Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) • Tetrahydrofuran • n-Hexane • MSD (Lab ID: 384864) • 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane • Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether) • Tetrahydrofuran REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 5 of 32 470 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client:Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT EPA 8260B Date:October 24, 2016 Description:8260 MSV Low Soil QC Batch: 97319 A matrix spike and/or matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) were performed on the following sample(s): 10365529002 M1: Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. • n-Hexane Additional Comments: REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 6 of 32 471 #=NA# PROJECT NARRATIVE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Method: Client:Tetra Tech, Inc. - MT ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Date:October 24, 2016 Description:Dry Weight, Davis General Information: 6 samples were analyzed for ASTM D 2974-13 (2013). All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below or on the chain-of custody and/or the sample condition upon receipt form (SCUR) attached at the end of this report. Hold Time: The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below. Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable): All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Continuing Calibration: All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below. Internal Standards: All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Surrogates: All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Method Blank: All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below. Laboratory Control Spike: All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below. Matrix Spikes: All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Duplicate Sample: All duplicate sample results were within method acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below. Additional Comments: This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 7 of 32 472 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-1 3.5'Lab ID:10365529001 Collected:10/10/16 14:50 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 107-05-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Benzene <0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 71-43-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.089 1 Bromobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 108-86-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 Bromochloromethane <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 74-97-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.24 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-27-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Bromoform <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-25-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.25 1 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 74-83-910/14/16 09:4323.4 0.20 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.7 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 78-93-310/14/16 09:4358.5 2.7 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 104-51-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.096 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 135-98-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.096 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 98-06-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.090 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 56-23-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.20 1 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 108-90-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-00-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.24 1 Chloroform <0.077 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 67-66-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.077 1 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 74-87-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 95-49-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.19 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 106-43-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.45 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 96-12-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.45 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.095 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 124-48-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.095 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.086 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 106-93-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.086 1 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 74-95-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.11 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.083 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 95-50-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.083 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.061 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 541-73-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.061 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 106-46-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-71-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-34-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.9 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 107-06-210/14/16 09:435.9 2.9 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-35-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 156-59-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 156-60-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-43-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 78-87-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.095 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 142-28-910/14/16 09:435.9 0.095 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.067 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 594-20-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.067 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.094 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 563-58-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.094 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 10061-01-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 10061-02-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 60-29-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Ethylbenzene <0.062 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 100-41-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.062 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 87-68-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 110-54-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.27 1 2-Hexanone <0.59 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 591-78-610/14/16 09:4358.5 0.59 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.084 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 98-82-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.084 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 99-87-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 8 of 32 473 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-1 3.5'Lab ID:10365529001 Collected:10/10/16 14:50 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-09-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.46 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 108-10-110/14/16 09:4358.5 0.46 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.068 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 1634-04-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.068 1 Naphthalene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 91-20-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.10 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 103-65-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Styrene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 100-42-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.10 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 630-20-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.9 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 79-34-510/14/16 09:435.9 2.9 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.069 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 127-18-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.069 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 109-99-910/14/16 09:431171.6 1 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 108-88-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.11 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.086 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 87-61-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.086 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 120-82-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 71-55-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 79-00-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 79-01-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-69-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.18 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 96-18-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 76-13-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 95-63-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.099 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 108-67-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.099 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 540-84-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 75-01-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.18 1 Xylene (Total)<2.9 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4311.7 2.9 1 m&p-Xylene <2.9 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 179601-23-110/14/16 09:435.9 2.9 1 o-Xylene <0.094 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:03 95-47-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.094 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)104 %.10/14/16 14:03 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)99 %.10/14/16 14:03 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)89 %.10/14/16 14:03 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 23.1 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 9 of 32 474 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-2 4.5'Lab ID:10365529002 Collected:10/10/16 15:05 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 107-05-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 Benzene <0.095 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 71-43-210/14/16 09:436.3 0.095 1 Bromobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 108-86-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 Bromochloromethane <0.26 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 74-97-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.26 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-27-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 Bromoform <0.27 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-25-210/14/16 09:436.3 0.27 1 Bromomethane <0.21 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 74-83-910/14/16 09:4325.1 0.21 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.9 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 78-93-310/14/16 09:4362.6 2.9 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 104-51-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.18 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 135-98-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.10 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.096 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 98-06-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.096 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.22 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 56-23-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.22 1 Chlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 108-90-710/14/16 09:436.3 0.13 1 Chloroethane <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-00-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.25 1 Chloroform <0.083 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 67-66-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.083 1 Chloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 74-87-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 95-49-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.20 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 106-43-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.48 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 96-12-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.48 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 124-48-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.10 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.092 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 106-93-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.092 1 Dibromomethane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 74-95-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.12 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 95-50-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.089 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.066 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 541-73-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.066 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 106-46-710/14/16 09:436.3 0.18 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-71-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.14 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-34-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.1 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 107-06-210/14/16 09:436.3 3.1 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-35-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.17 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 156-59-210/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 156-60-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.17 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-43-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 78-87-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.14 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 142-28-910/14/16 09:436.3 0.10 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.072 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 594-20-710/14/16 09:436.3 0.072 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 563-58-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.10 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 10061-01-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.14 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 10061-02-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 60-29-7 M110/14/16 09:436.3 0.13 1 Ethylbenzene <0.067 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 100-41-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.067 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 87-68-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.19 1 n-Hexane <0.28 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 110-54-3 M110/14/16 09:436.3 0.28 1 2-Hexanone <0.63 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 591-78-610/14/16 09:4362.6 0.63 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 98-82-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.090 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 99-87-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.13 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 10 of 32 475 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-2 4.5'Lab ID:10365529002 Collected:10/10/16 15:05 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-09-210/14/16 09:436.3 0.14 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.49 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 108-10-110/14/16 09:4362.6 0.49 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.072 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 1634-04-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.072 1 Naphthalene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 91-20-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.11 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 103-65-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 Styrene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 100-42-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.11 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 630-20-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.1 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 79-34-510/14/16 09:436.3 3.1 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.074 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 127-18-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.074 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.7 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 109-99-9 M110/14/16 09:431251.7 1 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 108-88-310/14/16 09:436.3 0.11 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.092 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 87-61-6 M110/14/16 09:436.3 0.092 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 120-82-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.15 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 71-55-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.14 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 79-00-510/14/16 09:436.3 0.18 1 Trichloroethene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 79-01-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.18 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-69-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.20 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 96-18-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.16 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 76-13-110/14/16 09:436.3 0.17 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 95-63-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.13 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 108-67-810/14/16 09:436.3 0.11 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 540-84-1 M110/14/16 09:436.3 0.13 1 Vinyl chloride <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 75-01-410/14/16 09:436.3 0.19 1 Xylene (Total)<3.1 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4312.5 3.1 1 m&p-Xylene <3.1 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 179601-23-110/14/16 09:436.3 3.1 1 o-Xylene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 11:22 95-47-610/14/16 09:436.3 0.10 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)101 %.10/14/16 11:22 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)98 %.10/14/16 11:22 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)87 %.10/14/16 11:22 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 23.1 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 11 of 32 476 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-3 4.4'Lab ID:10365529003 Collected:10/10/16 15:20 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 107-05-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.16 1 Benzene <0.092 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 71-43-210/14/16 09:436.0 0.092 1 Bromobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 108-86-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 Bromochloromethane <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 74-97-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.25 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-27-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 Bromoform <0.26 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-25-210/14/16 09:436.0 0.26 1 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 74-83-910/14/16 09:4324.2 0.20 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 78-93-310/14/16 09:4360.5 2.8 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 104-51-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.18 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.099 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 135-98-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.099 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.093 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 98-06-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.093 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.21 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 56-23-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.21 1 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 108-90-710/14/16 09:436.0 0.12 1 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-00-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.24 1 Chloroform <0.080 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 67-66-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.080 1 Chloromethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 74-87-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.16 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 95-49-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.19 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 106-43-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.46 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 96-12-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.46 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.098 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 124-48-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.098 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 106-93-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.089 1 Dibromomethane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 74-95-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.12 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.086 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 95-50-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.086 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.063 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 541-73-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.063 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 106-46-710/14/16 09:436.0 0.17 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-71-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.13 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-34-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 107-06-210/14/16 09:436.0 3.0 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-35-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.16 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 156-59-210/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 156-60-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.16 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-43-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 78-87-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.099 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 142-28-910/14/16 09:436.0 0.099 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.069 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 594-20-710/14/16 09:436.0 0.069 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 563-58-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.097 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 10061-01-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 10061-02-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 60-29-710/14/16 09:436.0 0.13 1 Ethylbenzene <0.064 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 100-41-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.064 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 87-68-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.18 1 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 110-54-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.27 1 2-Hexanone <0.61 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 591-78-610/14/16 09:4360.5 0.61 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.087 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 98-82-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.087 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 99-87-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.12 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 12 of 32 477 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-3 4.4'Lab ID:10365529003 Collected:10/10/16 15:20 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-09-210/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.47 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 108-10-110/14/16 09:4360.5 0.47 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.070 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 1634-04-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.070 1 Naphthalene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 91-20-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.11 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 103-65-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 Styrene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 100-42-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.11 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 630-20-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 79-34-510/14/16 09:436.0 3.0 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.071 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 127-18-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.071 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 109-99-910/14/16 09:431211.6 1 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 108-88-310/14/16 09:436.0 0.11 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 87-61-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.089 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 120-82-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 71-55-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.14 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 79-00-510/14/16 09:436.0 0.17 1 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 79-01-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.17 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-69-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.19 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 96-18-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.15 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 76-13-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.17 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 95-63-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.13 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 108-67-810/14/16 09:436.0 0.10 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 540-84-110/14/16 09:436.0 0.12 1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 75-01-410/14/16 09:436.0 0.18 1 Xylene (Total)<3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4312.1 3.0 1 m&p-Xylene <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 179601-23-110/14/16 09:436.0 3.0 1 o-Xylene <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:23 95-47-610/14/16 09:436.0 0.097 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)103 %.10/14/16 14:23 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)99 %.10/14/16 14:23 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)88 %.10/14/16 14:23 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 21.6 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 13 of 32 478 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-4 4.6'Lab ID:10365529004 Collected:10/10/16 15:30 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 107-05-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.15 1 Benzene <0.085 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 71-43-210/14/16 09:435.6 0.085 1 Bromobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 108-86-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 Bromochloromethane <0.23 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 74-97-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.23 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-27-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.14 1 Bromoform <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-25-210/14/16 09:435.6 0.24 1 Bromomethane <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 74-83-910/14/16 09:4322.4 0.19 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.6 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 78-93-310/14/16 09:4355.9 2.6 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 104-51-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.16 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.091 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 135-98-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.091 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.086 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 98-06-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.086 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 56-23-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.19 1 Chlorobenzene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 108-90-710/14/16 09:435.6 0.11 1 Chloroethane <0.22 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-00-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.22 1 Chloroform <0.074 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 67-66-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.074 1 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 74-87-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.15 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 95-49-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.18 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 106-43-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.43 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 96-12-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.43 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.091 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 124-48-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.091 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.082 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 106-93-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.082 1 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 74-95-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.11 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.080 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 95-50-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.080 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.059 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 541-73-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.059 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 106-46-710/14/16 09:435.6 0.16 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-71-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.12 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-34-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 107-06-210/14/16 09:435.6 2.8 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-35-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.15 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 156-59-210/14/16 09:435.6 0.14 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 156-60-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.15 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-43-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.14 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 78-87-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.091 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 142-28-910/14/16 09:435.6 0.091 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.064 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 594-20-710/14/16 09:435.6 0.064 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 563-58-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.089 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 10061-01-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 10061-02-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 60-29-710/14/16 09:435.6 0.12 1 Ethylbenzene <0.059 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 100-41-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.059 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 87-68-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.17 1 n-Hexane <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 110-54-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.25 1 2-Hexanone <0.56 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 591-78-610/14/16 09:4355.9 0.56 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.080 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 98-82-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.080 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 99-87-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.11 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 14 of 32 479 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-4 4.6'Lab ID:10365529004 Collected:10/10/16 15:30 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-09-210/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.44 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 108-10-110/14/16 09:4355.9 0.44 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.065 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 1634-04-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.065 1 Naphthalene <0.098 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 91-20-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.098 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 103-65-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.14 1 Styrene <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 100-42-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.097 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 630-20-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 79-34-510/14/16 09:435.6 2.8 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.066 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 127-18-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.066 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.5 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 109-99-910/14/16 09:431121.5 1 Toluene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 108-88-310/14/16 09:435.6 0.10 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.082 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 87-61-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.082 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 120-82-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 71-55-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.13 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 79-00-510/14/16 09:435.6 0.16 1 Trichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 79-01-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.16 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-69-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.18 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 96-18-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.14 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 76-13-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.16 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 95-63-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.12 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.094 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 108-67-810/14/16 09:435.6 0.094 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 540-84-110/14/16 09:435.6 0.11 1 Vinyl chloride <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 75-01-410/14/16 09:435.6 0.17 1 Xylene (Total)<2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4311.2 2.8 1 m&p-Xylene <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 179601-23-110/14/16 09:435.6 2.8 1 o-Xylene <0.089 ug/kg 10/14/16 14:43 95-47-610/14/16 09:435.6 0.089 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)104 %.10/14/16 14:43 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)100 %.10/14/16 14:43 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)90 %.10/14/16 14:43 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 14.4 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 15 of 32 480 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-5 4.9'Lab ID:10365529005 Collected:10/10/16 15:40 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 107-05-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 Benzene <0.084 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 71-43-210/14/16 09:435.5 0.084 1 Bromobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 108-86-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 Bromochloromethane <0.23 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 74-97-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.23 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-27-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 Bromoform <0.23 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-25-210/14/16 09:435.5 0.23 1 Bromomethane <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 74-83-910/14/16 09:4322.1 0.18 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.6 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 78-93-310/14/16 09:4355.2 2.6 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 104-51-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.16 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 135-98-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.090 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.085 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 98-06-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.085 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 56-23-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.19 1 Chlorobenzene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 108-90-710/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 Chloroethane <0.22 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-00-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.22 1 Chloroform <0.073 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 67-66-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.073 1 Chloromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 74-87-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 95-49-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.18 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 106-43-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.42 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 96-12-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.42 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 124-48-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.090 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.081 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 106-93-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.081 1 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 74-95-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.079 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 95-50-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.079 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.058 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 541-73-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.058 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 106-46-710/14/16 09:435.5 0.16 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-71-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.12 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-34-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 107-06-210/14/16 09:435.5 2.8 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-35-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.15 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 156-59-210/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 156-60-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.15 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-43-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 78-87-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.12 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 142-28-910/14/16 09:435.5 0.090 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.063 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 594-20-710/14/16 09:435.5 0.063 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.088 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 563-58-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.088 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 10061-01-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 10061-02-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 60-29-710/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 Ethylbenzene <0.059 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 100-41-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.059 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 87-68-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.16 1 n-Hexane <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 110-54-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.25 1 2-Hexanone <0.56 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 591-78-610/14/16 09:4355.2 0.56 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.079 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 98-82-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.079 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 99-87-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 16 of 32 481 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-5 4.9'Lab ID:10365529005 Collected:10/10/16 15:40 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-09-210/14/16 09:435.5 0.12 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.43 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 108-10-110/14/16 09:4355.2 0.43 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.064 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 1634-04-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.064 1 Naphthalene <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 91-20-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.097 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 103-65-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 Styrene <0.096 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 100-42-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.096 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 630-20-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 79-34-510/14/16 09:435.5 2.8 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.065 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 127-18-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.065 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.5 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 109-99-910/14/16 09:431101.5 1 Toluene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 108-88-310/14/16 09:435.5 0.10 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.081 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 87-61-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.081 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 120-82-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 71-55-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.13 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 79-00-510/14/16 09:435.5 0.16 1 Trichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 79-01-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.16 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-69-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.17 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 96-18-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.14 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 76-13-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.15 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 95-63-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.093 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 108-67-810/14/16 09:435.5 0.093 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 540-84-110/14/16 09:435.5 0.11 1 Vinyl chloride <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 75-01-410/14/16 09:435.5 0.17 1 Xylene (Total)<2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4311.0 2.8 1 m&p-Xylene <2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 179601-23-110/14/16 09:435.5 2.8 1 o-Xylene <0.088 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:03 95-47-610/14/16 09:435.5 0.088 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)103 %.10/14/16 15:03 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)99 %.10/14/16 15:03 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)89 %.10/14/16 15:03 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 18.8 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 17 of 32 482 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-6 4.9'Lab ID:10365529006 Collected:10/10/16 15:45 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Allyl chloride <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 107-05-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 Benzene <0.090 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 71-43-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.090 1 Bromobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 108-86-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 Bromochloromethane <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 74-97-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.24 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-27-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Bromoform <0.25 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-25-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.25 1 Bromomethane <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 74-83-910/14/16 09:4323.7 0.20 1 2-Butanone (MEK)<2.8 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 78-93-310/14/16 09:4359.3 2.8 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 104-51-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 135-98-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.097 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.091 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 98-06-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.091 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.20 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 56-23-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.20 1 Chlorobenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 108-90-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Chloroethane <0.24 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-00-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.24 1 Chloroform <0.078 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 67-66-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.078 1 Chloromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 74-87-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 95-49-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.19 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 106-43-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <0.45 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 96-12-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.45 1 Dibromochloromethane <0.096 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 124-48-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.096 1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.087 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 106-93-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.087 1 Dibromomethane <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 74-95-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.11 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.084 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 95-50-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.084 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.062 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 541-73-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.062 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 106-46-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-71-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-34-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 107-06-210/14/16 09:435.9 3.0 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-35-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 156-59-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 156-60-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-43-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 78-87-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.097 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 142-28-910/14/16 09:435.9 0.097 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.068 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 594-20-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.068 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.095 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 563-58-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.095 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 10061-01-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 10061-02-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)<0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 60-29-710/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Ethylbenzene <0.063 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 100-41-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.063 1 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 87-68-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.18 1 n-Hexane <0.27 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 110-54-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.27 1 2-Hexanone <0.60 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 591-78-610/14/16 09:4359.3 0.60 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.085 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 98-82-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.085 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 99-87-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 18 of 32 483 #=AR# ANALYTICAL RESULTS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Sample:BV-6 4.9'Lab ID:10365529006 Collected:10/10/16 15:45 Received:10/11/16 09:30 Matrix:Solid Results reported on a "dry weight" basis and are adjusted for percent moisture, sample size and any dilutions. Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualMDLPQL Analytical Method: EPA 8260B Preparation Method: EPA 5030 Low8260 MSV Low Soil Methylene Chloride <0.13 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-09-210/14/16 09:435.9 0.13 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.46 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 108-10-110/14/16 09:4359.3 0.46 1 Methyl-tert-butyl ether <0.069 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 1634-04-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.069 1 Naphthalene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 91-20-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.10 1 n-Propylbenzene <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 103-65-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 Styrene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 100-42-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.10 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 630-20-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 79-34-510/14/16 09:435.9 3.0 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.070 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 127-18-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.070 1 Tetrahydrofuran <1.6 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 109-99-910/14/16 09:431191.6 1 Toluene <0.11 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 108-88-310/14/16 09:435.9 0.11 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.087 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 87-61-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.087 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 120-82-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.14 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 71-55-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.14 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 79-00-510/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Trichloroethene <0.17 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 79-01-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.17 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.19 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-69-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.19 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.15 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 96-18-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.15 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.16 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 76-13-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.16 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 95-63-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.10 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 108-67-810/14/16 09:435.9 0.10 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane <0.12 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 540-84-110/14/16 09:435.9 0.12 1 Vinyl chloride <0.18 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 75-01-410/14/16 09:435.9 0.18 1 Xylene (Total)<3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 1330-20-710/14/16 09:4311.9 3.0 1 m&p-Xylene <3.0 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 179601-23-110/14/16 09:435.9 3.0 1 o-Xylene <0.095 ug/kg 10/14/16 15:23 95-47-610/14/16 09:435.9 0.095 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)103 %.10/14/16 15:23 17060-07-010/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Toluene-d8 (S)99 %.10/14/16 15:23 2037-26-510/14/16 09:4370-130 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)87 %.10/14/16 15:23 460-00-410/14/16 09:4370-130 1 Analytical Method: ASTM D 2974-13 (2013)Dry Weight, Davis Percent Moisture 19.9 %10/13/16 12:100.10 0.10 1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 19 of 32 484 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 97319 EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 8260 MSV Low Soil Associated Lab Samples:10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:384861 Associated Lab Samples:10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.11 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg <2.5 5.0 10/14/16 11:022.5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg <0.14 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.14 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg <0.14 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.14 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.080 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.080 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.073 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.073 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.10 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/kg <0.38 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.38 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/kg <0.073 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.073 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.071 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.071 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg <2.5 5.0 10/14/16 11:022.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.11 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg <0.084 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.084 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.052 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.052 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.082 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.082 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg <0.14 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.14 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg <0.10 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.10 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg <0.057 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.057 2-Butanone (MEK)ug/kg <2.3 50.0 10/14/16 11:022.3 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.16 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.16 2-Hexanone ug/kg <0.50 50.0 10/14/16 11:020.50 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/kg <0.39 50.0 10/14/16 11:020.39 Allyl chloride ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 Benzene ug/kg <0.076 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.076 Bromobenzene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 Bromochloromethane ug/kg <0.20 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.20 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 Bromoform ug/kg <0.21 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.21 Bromomethane ug/kg <0.17 20.0 10/14/16 11:020.17 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg <0.17 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.17 Chlorobenzene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.10 Chloroethane ug/kg <0.20 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.20 Chloroform ug/kg <0.066 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.066 Chloromethane ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 20 of 32 485 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units Blank Result Reporting Limit Qualifiers METHOD BLANK:384861 Associated Lab Samples:10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Matrix:Solid AnalyzedMDL cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.11 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.11 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg <0.081 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.081 Dibromomethane ug/kg <0.096 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.096 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg <0.11 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.11 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)ug/kg <0.10 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.10 Ethylbenzene ug/kg <0.053 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.053 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg <0.15 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.15 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/kg <0.072 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.072 m&p-Xylene ug/kg <2.5 5.0 10/14/16 11:022.5 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg <0.058 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.058 Methylene Chloride ug/kg <0.11 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.11 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.15 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.15 n-Hexane ug/kg <0.23 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.23 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 Naphthalene ug/kg 0.093J 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.088 o-Xylene ug/kg <0.080 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.080 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg <0.10 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.10 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.082 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.082 Styrene ug/kg <0.087 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.087 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg <0.077 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.077 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg <0.059 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.059 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg <1.3 100 10/14/16 11:021.3 Toluene ug/kg <0.091 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.091 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg <0.13 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.13 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg <0.12 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.12 Trichloroethene ug/kg <0.14 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.14 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg <0.16 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.16 Vinyl chloride ug/kg <0.15 5.0 10/14/16 11:020.15 Xylene (Total)ug/kg <2.5 10.0 10/14/16 11:022.5 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%.99 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%.89 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 Toluene-d8 (S)%.98 70-130 10/14/16 11:02 Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 384862LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 36.640 92 72-125 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 36.440 91 71-125 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 41.940 105 75-125 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 38.840 97 74-125 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg 35.640 89 68-125 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 38.040 95 71-125 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 35.940 90 72-125 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 21 of 32 486 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 384862LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg 38.640 97 72-125 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 39.240 98 69-125 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 41.540 104 75-125 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 37.840 94 66-125 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 38.540 96 73-125 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/kg 114100 114 59-138 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/kg 37.640 94 73-125 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 37.940 95 72-125 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 39.840 99 67-125 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 41.440 104 68-125 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 37.940 95 74-125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 34.740 87 72-125 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg 41.340 103 70-125 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 37.640 94 69-125 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg 34.840 87 70-130 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 37.240 93 70-125 2-Butanone (MEK)ug/kg 227200 113 63-134 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 35.540 89 74-125 2-Hexanone ug/kg 232200 116 70-130 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 35.440 89 72-125 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/kg 221200 110 70-130 Allyl chloride ug/kg 35.440 88 70-130 Benzene ug/kg 36.640 91 69-125 Bromobenzene ug/kg 35.440 88 73-125 Bromochloromethane ug/kg 34.040 85 73-125 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg 35.240 88 70-125 Bromoform ug/kg 39.140 98 68-125 Bromomethane ug/kg 41.340 103 36-138 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg 35.540 89 69-126 Chlorobenzene ug/kg 35.940 90 73-125 Chloroethane ug/kg 40.940 102 30-150 Chloroform ug/kg 36.540 91 71-125 Chloromethane ug/kg 33.440 83 53-125 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 36.340 91 72-125 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 42.440 106 71-125 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg 36.140 90 69-125 Dibromomethane ug/kg 36.140 90 72-125 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg 34.140 85 46-125 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 35.740 89 70-130 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)ug/kg 38.340 96 70-130 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 37.840 94 72-125 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg 35.940 90 67-125 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/kg 37.840 94 75-125 m&p-Xylene ug/kg 73.780 92 71-125 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg 38.640 96 71-125 Methylene Chloride ug/kg 35.940 90 58-125 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg 41.240 103 67-125 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 22 of 32 487 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units LCS Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers% RecConc. 384862LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: LCSSpike n-Hexane ug/kg 83.1100 83 70-130 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg 37.940 95 72-125 Naphthalene ug/kg 45.540 114 64-125 o-Xylene ug/kg 36.340 91 73-125 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg 38.240 95 67-125 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg 38.040 95 74-125 Styrene ug/kg 37.540 94 71-125 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg 36.440 91 74-125 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 33.340 83 72-125 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg 446400 111 70-130 Toluene ug/kg 36.640 91 70-125 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 35.640 89 72-125 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 40.240 101 68-125 Trichloroethene ug/kg 33.340 83 73-125 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 33.240 83 66-125 Vinyl chloride ug/kg 36.140 90 62-125 Xylene (Total)ug/kg 110120 92 72-125 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%.103 70-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%.91 70-130 Toluene-d8 (S)%.99 70-130 Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 384863MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 49 62 33-13367 9 2549.7<0.15 30.2 33.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 49 74 54-12677 6 2549.7<0.14 36.1 38.4 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 49 56 30-14559 7 2549.7<3.1 27.5 29.4 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 49 62 30-13466 7 2549.7<0.18 30.6 32.9 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ug/kg 49 72 57-12577 8 2549.7<0.17 35.2 38.2 1,1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 49 74 51-12579 7 2549.7<0.15 36.4 39.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 49 75 60-12580 8 2549.7<0.17 36.6 39.6 1,1-Dichloropropene ug/kg 49 75 54-12581 10 2549.7<0.10 36.7 40.4 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg M1492930-12533 15 2549.7<0.092 14.2 16.4 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/kg 49 58 32-12559 3 2549.7<0.16 28.4 29.3 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 49 30 30-12536 19 2549.7<0.15 14.8 17.9 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 49 55 30-13163 14 2549.7<0.13 27.0 31.1 1,2-Dibromo-3- chloropropane ug/kg 123 51 30-14251 0 25124<0.48 62.9 62.9 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/kg 49 58 46-12561 6 2549.7<0.092 28.7 30.3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 49 44 30-12551 16 2549.7<0.089 21.6 25.3 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 49 68 46-12572 8 2549.7<3.1 33.2 36.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 49 75 41-12580 7 2549.7<0.14 37.0 39.7 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/kg 49 57 30-13265 14 2549.7<0.11 27.9 32.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 49 43 30-12550 16 2549.7<0.066 21.2 24.9 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 23 of 32 488 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 384863MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg 49 66 32-12570 7 2549.7<0.10 32.4 34.9 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 49 47 30-12555 16 2549.7<0.18 23.0 27.1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane ug/kg M1495470-13064 17 2549.7<0.13 26.7 31.7 2,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 49 76 52-12781 7 2549.7<0.072 37.5 40.4 2-Butanone (MEK)ug/kg 246 74 39-14280 8 25248<2.9 182 198 2-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 49 52 30-12559 14 2549.7<0.20 25.7 29.5 2-Hexanone ug/kg 246 59 30-15059 0 25248<0.63 146 146 4-Chlorotoluene ug/kg 49 50 30-12558 15 2549.7<0.15 24.6 28.6 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ug/kg 246 71 30-15071 1 25248<0.49 174 176 Allyl chloride ug/kg 49 71 70-13076 8 2549.7<0.16 34.7 37.5 Benzene ug/kg 49 69 56-12575 8 2549.7<0.095 34.1 37.1 Bromobenzene ug/kg 49 50 30-12556 13 2549.7<0.15 24.3 27.8 Bromochloromethane ug/kg 49 62 45-12565 6 2549.7<0.26 30.4 32.4 Bromodichloromethane ug/kg 49 63 31-13268 8 2549.7<0.16 31.1 33.5 Bromoform ug/kg 49 54 30-12558 8 2549.7<0.27 26.7 28.8 Bromomethane ug/kg 49 81 30-13984 4 2549.7<0.21 39.9 41.5 Carbon tetrachloride ug/kg 49 69 49-13075 9 2549.7<0.22 33.9 37.2 Chlorobenzene ug/kg 49 58 33-12565 11 2549.7<0.13 28.6 32.0 Chloroethane ug/kg 49 84 30-15090 9 2549.7<0.25 41.1 44.8 Chloroform ug/kg 49 69 46-12573 7 2549.7<0.083 33.7 36.2 Chloromethane ug/kg 49 70 45-12572 4 2549.7<0.16 34.3 35.9 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 49 70 50-12573 5 2549.7<0.15 34.4 36.0 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 49 72 35-12677 7 2549.7<0.14 35.5 38.1 Dibromochloromethane ug/kg 49 57 30-13062 9 2549.7<0.10 28.2 30.7 Dibromomethane ug/kg 49 59 36-12762 5 2549.7<0.12 29.2 30.6 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg 49 74 44-12578 6 2549.7<0.14 36.3 38.6 Dichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 49 73 70-13077 7 2549.7<0.16 35.6 38.3 Diethyl ether (Ethyl ether)ug/kg M1496670-13069 5 2549.7<0.13 32.5 34.1 Ethylbenzene ug/kg 49 66 45-12572 11 2549.7<0.067 32.2 35.9 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/kg 49 39 30-12546 18 2549.7<0.19 19.1 22.9 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/kg 49 62 35-12870 13 2549.7<0.090 30.4 34.6 m&p-Xylene ug/kg 98.2 63 40-12569 10 2599.2<3.1 61.8 68.2 Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/kg 49 64 42-12568 7 2549.7<0.072 31.5 33.8 Methylene Chloride ug/kg 49 69 42-12571 4 2549.7<0.14 33.8 35.1 n-Butylbenzene ug/kg 49 56 30-12765 17 2549.7<0.18 27.3 32.3 n-Hexane ug/kg M11236170-13069 15 25124<0.28 74.3 86.2 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg 49 59 30-13667 13 2549.7<0.16 29.1 33.1 Naphthalene ug/kg 49 33 30-12739 16 2549.7<0.11 16.5 19.4 o-Xylene ug/kg 49 60 44-12567 12 2549.7<0.10 29.3 33.1 p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg 49 54 30-13663 16 2549.7<0.13 26.7 31.2 sec-Butylbenzene ug/kg 49 55 30-13364 16 2549.7<0.10 27.2 31.8 Styrene ug/kg 49 57 30-12864 13 2549.7<0.11 27.7 31.6 tert-Butylbenzene ug/kg 49 55 30-12963 16 2549.7<0.096 26.9 31.4 Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 49 58 42-12564 11 2549.7<0.074 28.7 32.0 Tetrahydrofuran ug/kg M14905970-13059 2 25497<1.7 287 292 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 24 of 32 489 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. Parameter Units MS Result % Rec Limits Qual% RecConc. 384863MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: MSSpike Result 10365529002 384864 MSD Result MSD % Rec RPD RPD Max MSDMS Spike Conc. Toluene ug/kg 49 66 50-12572 10 2549.7<0.11 32.6 36.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 49 70 57-12574 6 2549.7<0.17 34.5 36.7 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 49 66 33-12569 7 2549.7<0.15 32.2 34.4 Trichloroethene ug/kg 49 63 51-12567 8 2549.7<0.18 30.9 33.4 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/kg 49 71 54-12574 5 2549.7<0.20 34.9 36.8 Vinyl chloride ug/kg 49 77 57-12579 4 2549.7<0.19 37.7 39.1 Xylene (Total)ug/kg 147 62 44-12568 11 25150<3.1 91.2 101 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%.102 70-130103 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%.92 70-13092 Toluene-d8 (S)%.99 70-13099 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 25 of 32 490 #=QC# QUALITY CONTROL DATA Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result. QC Batch: QC Batch Method: Analysis Method: Analysis Description: 97219 ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples:10365529001, 10365529002, 10365529003, 10365529004, 10365529005, 10365529006 Parameter Units Dup Result Max RPD QualifiersRPDResult 10365529003 384116SAMPLE DUPLICATE: Percent Moisture %17.0 24 3021.6 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 26 of 32 491 #=QL# QUALIFIERS Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision DEFINITIONS DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit. RL - Reporting Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is a combined concentration. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for each analyte is a combined concentration. Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. TNI - The NELAC Institute. LABORATORIES Pace Analytical Services - DavisPASI-DAV ANALYTE QUALIFIERS Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.M1 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 27 of 32 492 #=CR# QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE Pace Project No.: Project: 10365529 Bridger Vale Subdivision Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method Analytical Batch 10365529001 97319 97327BV-1 3.5'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529002 97319 97327BV-2 4.5'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529003 97319 97327BV-3 4.4'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529004 97319 97327BV-4 4.6'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529005 97319 97327BV-5 4.9'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529006 97319 97327BV-6 4.9'EPA 5030 Low EPA 8260B 10365529001 97219BV-1 3.5'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 10365529002 97219BV-2 4.5'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 10365529003 97219BV-3 4.4'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 10365529004 97219BV-4 4.6'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 10365529005 97219BV-5 4.9'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) 10365529006 97219BV-6 4.9'ASTM D 2974-13 (2013) REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.Date: 10/24/2016 06:55 PM Pace Analytical Services, LLC 150 N Ninth Street Billings, MT 59101 (406)254-7226 Page 28 of 32 493 Page 29 of 32 494 Page 30 of 32 495 Page 31 of 32 496 Page 32 of 32 497 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 1 December,2014 East Gallatin ResidentialDevelopmentTrafficImpact Study Bozeman,Montana A.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The East Gallatin Residential Development is a 6.5 acre residential project located east of Manley Road near the East Gallatin Recreation Area. The project would include up to 23 new residential units.As proposed, the development will not create any new roadway capacity problems along Manley Road. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to do so until the City is able to complete planned improvements at this location. No additional roadway improvements will be necessary to serve the East Gallatin Residential Development. B.PROJECT DESCRIPTION This document studies the possible effect on the surrounding road system from a proposed residential development located east of Manley Road near Glen Lake Park in Bozeman, Montana.The document also identifies any traffic mitigation efforts that the development may require. The site is located north of the East Gallatin Recreation Area access road.The project would be developed to include up to 23 new residential units. C.EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed development property currently consists of a 6.5-acre parcel of undeveloped land located east of Manley road along the access road the Glen Lake Park.The topography in this area is flat.See Figure 1 for a location map of the proposed development. Adjacent Roadways East Gallatin Recreation Area Access Road provides beach access to Glen Lake Park, picnic areas, and trails. The road has a gravel surface and has a posted speed limit of 15 MPH. Manley Road is two-lane north/south road that provides access to the homes and businesses north of Griffin Drive. The road has a paved width of 28 feet with designated bike lanes. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive has been improved to include separated right-and left-turn lanes. Traffic counts collected by Gallatin County in 2007 indicate that the road caries 900 VPD north of the East Ga1latin Recreation Area. 498 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 2 December,2014 Figure 1-Proposed Development Site Griffin Drive is a two-way, paved east/west minor arterial road that provides access through the northern edge of the City of Bozeman. The road has a paved width of 30 feet and has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Traffic data collected 2013 by the Montana Department of Transportation indicates that Griffin Drive currently carries 8,700 VPD east of North 7th Avenue.The Montana Rail Link like crosses Griffin Drive 200 feet west of Manley Road. The crossing has fully actuated gates.This railroad crossing currently had 15 train crossings each day. Traffic Counts In November 2014 Abelin Traffic Services (ATS) collected turning movement count data at the intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive.The raw traffic data is included in Appendix A of this report.It should be noted that the East Gallatin recreation area has little use in the winter months and experienced low levels of activity during the November study period. In order to account for traffic from the recreation area a usage estimate was developed for the site and applied to the area traffic volumes.This estimate is described in Section E of this report. ProposedDevelopment Site 499 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 3 December,2014 Additional Developments The Map Brewery and Tap Room is currently under construction along Manley Road north of Griffin Road. This 8,800 square-foot facility will brew beer and provide a tasting room for customers. Estimated traffic volumes from this facility were included in the traffic modeling for this project.This estimate is described in Section E of this report. Planned Road Improvements The City of Bozeman is currently planning an improvement project along Griffin Drive at Manley Road as part of the City’s Capital Improvements Program.Street Impact Fee (SIF) Project #32 would include the construction of a roundabout or traffic signal at this location with additional turning lanes and improvements to the railroad crossing.The projected cost for this project is $925,000 and is awaiting funding. It is not known when it may be completed. Level of Service Using the data collected for this project, ATS conducted a Level of Service (LOS) analysis at area intersections. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)-Special Report 209 and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) version 5.3. Intersections are graded from A to F representing the average delay that a vehicle entering an intersection can expect. Typically, a LOS of C or better is considered acceptable for peak-hour conditions. Table 1 shows the existing 2014 LOS for the AM and PM peak hours without the traffic from the proposed development.The data shows that the intersection is currently experiencing a poor Level of Service during the AM peak hour. The only way to effectively correct this problem is with the installation of traffic signal or modern roundabout as planned by the City of Bozeman (SIF #32).It would not be appropriate to install a three-way STOP due to the proximity of the railroad track and the functional classification of this roadway. It is likely that the proximity of the Montana Rail Link tracks to the Manley Road intersection (200 feet)causes additional congestion in this area. When a train crosses Griffin Drive,vehicles cue well past Manley Road and it is not possible for drivers to turn right onto Griffin Drive. However,turning left onto Griffin Drive can be relatively easy when a train is present. After the train passes it is difficult to turn right or left from Manley Road until all cued vehicles have cleared the intersection. 500 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 4 December,2014 Table 1 –2014 Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.)LOS Delay (Sec.)LOS Griffin Drive & ManleyRoad 31.1 D 14.6 B D.PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The development currently under consideration for this site includes 6.5 acres of land located east of Manley Road which would be developed into a residential subdivision.The site is located adjacent to the access road for the East Gallatin Recreation Area and would include 23 residential units.The East Gallatin Residential Development site plan is shown in Figure 2.It is intended that this subdivision will ultimately be annexed into the City of Bozeman. E.TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT ATS performed a trip generation analysis to determine the anticipated future traffic volumes from the proposed development using the trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Seventh Edition). These rates are the national standardand are based on the most current information available to planners. A vehicle “trip” is defined as any trip that either begins or ends at the development site. ATS determined that the critical traffic impacts on the intersections and roadways would occur during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. According to the ITE trip generation rates, at full build-out the developments would produce 17 AM peak hour trips,23 PM peak hour trips, and 220 daily trips. See Table 2 for detailed trip generation information. Table 2 -Trip Generation Rates Land Use Units AM Peak Hour TripEnds per Unit Total AM PeakHour Trip Ends PM Peak Hour TripEnds per Unit Total PM PeakHour Trip Ends Weekday Trip Ends per Unit TotalWeekday Trip Ends Single FamilyResidential 23 0.75 17 1.01 23 9.57 220 501 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 5 December,2014 Figure 3 –Proposed East Gallatin Residential Development 502 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 6 December,2014 An estimate of the probable traffic from the East Gallatin Recreation area was created to account for road use from the park. The ITE Trip Generation Manual contains data to help estimate the daily trip generation from a park. The East Gallatin Recreation area is approximately 35 acres in size. The ITE manual recommends using a rate of 1.59-2.28 trips per acre for a City or County Park on weekdays. This equates to a generation rate of 50-100 trips on an average weekday. Weekend trip generation rates vary from 12-16 trips per acre or 400-600 trips per day. This is consistent with the parks 45 existing parking spaces which have a theoretical maximum daily usage of 200-300 vehicles (400-600 daily trips). The peak-hour trip generation from the park generally will not coincide with the normal morning and evening peak-hour commuter schedule and was discounted in the peak-hour trip evaluation for this project. The Map Brewery currently under construction on Manley road 1,000 feet north of Griffin Drive is a 5,400 S.F. brewing facility with a 3,400 S.F.tasting room for customers. While the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not have a specific land use code for this type of commercial facility, it is likely that the development will produce vehicle trips at a similar rate to a generic ‘drinking place’during the evening peak hours. According to the trip generation manual, a 3,400 S.F. drinking place will produce 39 peak-hour trips.The morning and evening trip generation to the brewery portion of the facility will be low. This information was included in the traffic modeling for this project. F.TRIP DISTRIBUTION The traffic distribution and assignment for the proposed subdivision was based upon the existing ADT volumes along the adjacent roadways and the peak-hour turning volumes. Traffic is expected to distribute onto the surrounding road network as shown on Figure 3. G.TRAFFIC IMPACTS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Using the trip generation and trip distribution numbers, ATS determined the future Level of Service for the area intersections. The anticipated intersection LOS with the East Gallatin residential subdivision is shown in Table 4. The future traffic modeling includes the projected traffic volumes from the East Gallatin residential area and the Map Brewing Company.These calculations are included in Appendix B of this report. Table 4 indicates that the construction of the East Gallatin residential development will not cause any additional roadway capacity problems along Manley RoaD. The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to have operational problems until the City of Bozeman is able to complete the planned improvements at this location.The additional vehicle delay caused by the East Gallatin residential development will be small (two seconds per vehicle).The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive will continue to function adequately in the PM peak hour with the 503 East Gallatin Residential Development Bozeman,Montana Abelin Traffic Services 7 December,2014 additional traffic from the East Gallatin residential development and the Map Brewing Company. The total projected traffic along the East Gallatin Recreation Area Access Road is expected to be 300-400 VPD during the weekdays and up to 800 VPD on weekends. Figure 3 –Trip Distribution Table 4 –Future Level of Service Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay (Sec.)LOS Delay (Sec.)LOS Griffin Drive & ManleyRoad 33.5 D 15.8 C Manley Road &East Gallatin Road 9.9 A 9.4 A H.IMPACT SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS As proposed, the East Gallatin Residential Development will not create any new roadway capacity problems along Manley Road.The intersection of Manley Road and Griffin Drive is currently operating at a poor LOS during the AM peak hour and will continue to do so until the City is able to complete planned improvements at this location. No additional roadway improvements will be necessary to serve the East Gallatin Residential Development. 55% Proposed DevelopmentSite Griffin Drive40% <5% 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 Institutional Controls re N. Rouse Landfill/Bridger Vale project discussion 7/24/2017 City Actions 1. Monitor natural attenuation – contract in development for additional monitoring services to be administered by COB Engineering Division. 2. Install information kiosk at East Gallatin Recreation Area. Annexation 1. Note in annexation agreement of presence of landfill and need to monitor. 2. Note in annexation agreement of required institutional controls to be in place prior to constructing buildings. 3. Grant of access by owner for sampling in the short and long term. 4. Restriction on on-site wells for domestic or irrigation uses. Subdivision/PUD 1. Note on plat of presence of landfill and resulting limits on construction techniques. 2. During construction ventilation utility trenches for water and sewer. 3. During construction of utilities sample dewatering discharge. 4. Location of sampling wells determined, preferably in appropriate public space like right of way. 5. Slab on grade construction with appropriate vapor barrier or ventilation system designed by and installation certified by a professional engineer. 6. Covenants to provide notice to owners of the presence of the landfill, need to monitor, and restricted construction techniques. Subject to revision during development review process. 511