Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17422 Noyes Application Materials ANNEXATION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS 3 THROUGH 9 3. If the property is currently in agricultural use please identify current crops / conditions. a. The property is not currently in agricultural use. 4. Number of residential units existing on the property? a. 1 5. Number and type of commercial structures on the property? a. 0 6. Estimate of existing population of the property? a. 2 7. Assessed value of the property? a. $355,300.00 8. Existing on site facilities and utilities (gas, power, telephone, cable, septic systems, wells, etc.) a. There is a failed septic system and well no longer in use. b. The property is served with power and telephone utilities. 9. Any additional information that will be helpful in the City’s review of the application. a. The current homeowner residences, David and Lynn Noyes, are living in and plan to continue living in the existing house. They have been living without bathroom or water facilities for almost 2 months and with to remedy their situation by hooking on to City water and sewer services as soon as possible. ZONE MAP AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Project Narrative a. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy? How? i. Growth Policy documents identify the area adjacent to the subject tract as a R-1, R-2, R-S, and R-4. The intent of the growth policy in the area of proposed annexation is to provide a mixture of single family and higher density multi-family housing. With the planned Bridger View affordable housing project being zoned B-4 just to the west of the subject tract and R-2 around Story Mill just to the south, the subject tract will provide a good transition from R-4 to the R-S development to the east (Headlands Subdivision). ii. The intent of the R-2 residential two-household medium density district is to provide for one- and two-household residential development at urban densities within the city in areas that present few or no development constraints, and for community facilities to serve such development while respecting the residential quality and nature of the area. b. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? i. The current landowners have no immediate plans to use the property for anything other than what it is currently being used for. If annexation is approved, the property will be served by City services. ii. There is an existing fire hydrant at the northeast corner of the subject property, increasing fire protecting safety. c. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? i. Yes, by abandoning the existing septic and drain field system and hooking into City services. d. Will the new zoning facilitate adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? i. Use of the proposed parcel to be zoned will not change. The purpose of the proposed annexation is to facilitate adequate sewer and water provisions by getting served by City facilities. Currently, the occupants of the residence are not served with adequate water and sewer as the on-site facilities have failed. e. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? i. Considering no change in use, this requirement is considered not applicable. There are no known light and air concerns currently. f. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems? How? i. No effect on motorized and non-motorized transportation systems will be felt. The property is currently served by access directly off Bridger Drive and residents plan to continue using this access. No additional motorized or non-motorized transportation facilities will be required. g. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? i. Yes, please see Part a. of this narrative. h. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? i. Yes, please see Part a. of this narrative. i. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? i. There is no current use change proposed for the subject parcel. Currently serving as a single-family residence, the purpose of annexation is to be served by City water and sewer services. ii. Yes, the proposed R-2 zoning designation is suitable for adjacent areas; please see Part a. of this narrative. j. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? i. Yes, the applicant’s intent is to continue living in the house on site. Annexation will ensure their ability to do so and conserve the existing structure. k. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? i. Yes, please see Part a. of this narrative.