HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-18-17 Zoning Commission Minutes
Zoning Commission
Tuesday, July 18th, 2017 7:00 PM
City Commission Chamber – 121 N. Rouse Avenue
A. 07:17:34 PM (00:06:50) Call meeting to order
Present Were:
Chair Erik Garberg
Julien Morice
Jordan Zignego
Commissioner Chris Mehl
George Thompson
B. Changes to the Agenda
C. Approve Meeting Minutes (None)
D. 07:18:06 PM (00:07:22) Public Comment – Please state your name and address in an
audible tone of voice for the record. This is the time for individuals to comment on
matters falling within the purview of the Committee. There will also be an opportunity in
conjunction with each action item for comments pertaining to that item. Please limit
your comments to three minutes.
E. 07:18:13 PM (00:07:29) Action Items
1. 17‐304 Ordinance 1976: B‐2M Parking Requirements (Fine)
An ordinance of the city commission of the city of Bozeman, Montana
amending chapter 38, unified development code, section 38.25.040 to set
minimum off‐street parking requirements for the B‐2M district.
Staff Report
Application
Ordinance No. 1976 (Draft)
B2‐M Zoning District & Midtown Urban Renewal Dist. Boundary Map
City Commission Minutes 5/1/2017
07:18:42 PM (00:07:58) Economic Development Specialist, David Fine provided some
background on the Bozeman Midtown B‐2M zoning district, which is a commercial mixed use
district created in the spring of 2016 with the midtown area in mind.
Parking is being reviewed due to feedback from the Midtown Urban Renewal Board, Planning
Board and Zoning Commission that the standard parking standards were a barrier to
development in a compact urban form.
07:20:06 PM (00:09:22) Fine stated that over the past year they’ve done research and looked at
urban parking studies, sampling some midtown area locations and adjacent areas to see what
changes to the parking requirements would do. The goal is to ensure that parking requirements
are consistent with the urban form they are trying to create in Midtown.
07:21:00 PM (00:10:16) Fine reviewed some peak time parking utilization using office use as an
example. After reviewing similar cities, they realized that some had eliminated parking
requirements altogether. These cities shared the goal in revitalizing the community. Fine
clarified that they are turning over the responsibility to the professionals leveraged for the
development process rather than having a minimum requirement.
07:23:20 PM (00:12:36) The proposed Ordinance 1976 combines two approaches they
discovered during the study including: 1) Creating new parking “blended rate” requirements for
the B‐2M Zoning District and 2) Suspending those new regulations in the Midtown Urban
Renewal District.
07:24:21 PM (00:13:37) Fine reviewed the proposed parking requirements for B‐2M. They have
encouraged businesses to centralize parking so that rather than each business having a small
parking lot, there is a larger, shared parking lot.
07:27:04 PM (00:16:20) Fine reviewed the Criteria of Evaluation, included in the staff report.
07:27:42 PM (00:16:58) Chair Garberg asked about the base minimum requirements for parking
in B‐2M. Garberg wanted to confirm that the old minimums are now the new maximum parking
requirements. Fine confirmed.
07:31:15 PM (00:20:31) Board member Morice asked for clarification on B‐2M vs. Midtown.
Fine explained that the Midtown Urban Renewal District is an area that is identified via map.
Morice also stated that he would like to see B‐3 zoning follow suit with the Midtown parking
requirements.
07:34:49 PM (00:24:05) Fine offered some examples of decreased parking requirements
including Bellingham, WA, Missoula, MT and Billings, MT. He explained that Bellingham utilized
a ‘blended rate’ of one space per unit and two spaces per 1000 square feet for most commercial
uses. Billings, MT had eliminated minimum parking requirements in their downtown and an
industrial / residential area on their east side. Missoula has also attempted removing minimum
parking requirements, replacing with paid parking downtown.
07:38:00 PM (00:27:16) Lauren Waterton, from the Sanderson Stewart consultant team stood
up and explained how they made some recommendations regarding bike parking, etc.
07:40:15 PM (00:29:31) Public Comment
07:40:26 PM (00:29:42) Kenny Strauss (201 S. 8th Ave) commented that he and his business
partners are starting a pizza business and asked for the board to support the proposed parking
ordinance. He explained that under the current code, they would be required to have nearly 40
spaces for 2000 sq. ft. of space. In a location with such high foot traffic and with many Bozeman
residents using alternate transportation, he and his partners do not feel that these parking
requirements reflect the reality of their potential customers’ transportation choices. He also
stated that high parking requirements will be a non‐starter for them to invest in opening in that
location. Other businesses have done well in the area with less parking.
07:42:30 PM (00:31:46) Alan Kirk (227 E. Olive St.) asked if the parking requirements under the
car parking (referring to a table in the presentation) are maximums. Fine stated that those were
the minimums.
07:44:33 PM (00:33:49) Fine responded to Kirk’s comment by bringing the slide showing actual
peak utilization ratio. He explained that parking can be determined many ways, by looking at
maximum or minimum utilization.
07:46:38 PM (00:35:54) Discussion: Commissioner Mehl commented that the area in discussion
has very little development, so they expect the first few projects to be the most challenging. He
clarified that the Commission is committed to reviewing the changes to see if they’re successful.
Mehl stated that parking is an opportunity to restart development in that area.
07:47:52 PM (00:37:08) MOTION: Having reviewed and considered the application materials,
public comment and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the
staff report for application 17304 and move for approval of the text amendment: Julien Morice
MOTION SECONDED: Jordan Zignego
07:48:07 PM (00:37:23) Morice commented that he supports the text amendment and disclosed
that he could have a project coming up in that area, though there is no application currently. He
stated that he would still provide the minimum parking, depending on what the use is, but that
it is a good idea to allow entrepreneurs to decide how much parking they need for their
customers. He also stated that he felt the biggest hold up in that area was the strict parking
requirements. He also commented that he looks forward to the study in B3 and if this is
something they could repeat in that area.
07:50:12 PM (00:39:28) Board member Zignego supported the motion, stating that he like
putting it to the business owners to determine their parking needs. He also supported using N.
7th as an experimental ground since it needs improvement.
07:50:50 PM (00:40:06) Board member Thompson supported the motion and is interested in the
bike parking aspect, noting that he’s uncomfortable having to lock his bike to various signage
along the street.
07:51:07 PM (00:40:23) Chair Garberg stated that his only concern was the maximum parking
requirements. He said that there may be businesses that need more parking and he is
concerned about them not being able to have extra parking.
07:52:09 PM (00:41:25) VOTE: All in Favor – Motion Passes Unanimously
F. FYI/Discussion
G. 07:52:28 PM (00:41:44) Adjournment
For more information please contact Tom Rogers at TRogers@bozeman.net
This board generally meets the first and third Tuesday of the month at 6:00pm
Zoning Commission meetings are open to all members of the public. If you have a disability and
require assistance, please contact our ADA coordinator, Mike Gray at 582‐3232 (TDD 582‐
2301).