HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPAB UDC Suggestions 073117
Something in the introduction from Vickie regarding-HPAC would prefer to avoid
diminishing the integrity of historic neighborhood in areas such as setbacks, street view,
accessory structures and alley traffic, and Zone edge transition.
Sec. 38.340 Overlay District Standards (page 222)
C. Please leave in the crossed-out section that reads, “The neighboring community shall be
provided notice and opportunity to comment upon the proposed property improvements in
accordance with division 38.220 of this chapter. In addition, aggrieved persons shall have the
right to appeal any design review decision made under the provisions of this article, in
accordance with division 38.250 of this chapter.”
E. It’s important to have the addition, “The district boundary can be revised as additional
cultural resource survey work is completed.” Please make sure this section is included and not
removed during editing.
Sec. 38.340.040 Certificate of appropriateness (page 224)
A. Please leave in the sentence, “by the historic preservation staff.” It is important that a
professional oversee this process. The consistency and validity of these forms must be
maintained.
Sec. 38.340.050 Standards for certificates of appropriateness (page 225)
E. Please keep the addition here, “Where there is a conflict between the neighborhood
conservation overlay district design guidelines and other development standards in this chapter,
the neighborhood conservation overlay district design guidelines take precedent, as determined
by the reviewing authority.” This is important and should be included in the final draft.
Sec. 38.340.090 Demolition or movement of a historic structure or site (page
227)
C.1. Can “and the neighborhoods historic significance” be added to this statement? The historic
structure is not a stand-alone entity; the surrounding structures and neighborhood should also be
considered.
D.4.b. Can the type of documentation be outlined and detailed in this section and can it be stated
that the documentation should come from a professional with the appropriate credentials?
Sec. 38.250.060 Departures (page 133)
Similar to section I, noting what professional source can submit evidence and whether or not
multiple contractors are needed would improve section m. Does the cost of repair for unsafe
locations come into consideration when demolition is considered?
Sec. 38.300.100 Residential Zoning Districts Intent and Purpose (page 168)
The residential districts are also intended to allow complementary non-residential uses. The
purpose in having more than one residential district is to provide opportunities for a variety of
housing types and arrangements within the community while providing a basic level of
predictability.
This could be enhanced with examples of what a complementary non-residential use is and how
they fit in with a neighborhood. If examples can’t be provided would it be possible to reference a
section that defines this term. Do we need to identify what different “uses” are allowed based
on different zoning districts?
Sec. 38.300.110 Commercial and Mixed-Use Zoning Districts Intent and
Purpose (page 171)
Why remove the section- “Room should be provided in appropriate areas for logical expansion
of district?” Could this be kept as a measure to address increased development in the area? I
would think this would give the city the ability to ensure a congruent look from established zones
to new, future portions. The concern here is the newer commercial development on the outer
edges of the city could greatly contrast more central areas.
Sec. 38.09.010. Residential emphasis mixed-use zoning district (REMU) (page
173)
It would serve the section well to add a few sentences on emphasizing the historical significance
of the area. Other aspects of a district are addressed in “sense of place” (5), “natural Amenities”
(6) and “development of centers” (7).
Sec. 38.340.010 Intent and purpose. (38.16.010) Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District & Historic Preservation (page 222)
Removing this part seems to take away from the value of public opinion in maintaining the
historical, cultural and architectural significance of NCODs. Having the public’s support and
input could lead to more preservation as people want to improve the area in which they live.
Sec. 38.230.040 Review Authority (page 82)
Do not change this section to reduce Design Review Board Authority. In fact, add the following
criteria to the above:
All mixed-use, multifamily residential, industrial and commercial new developments and
substantial renovation projects located within the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District.
Sec. 38.230.100(A)(7)(a) Plan review criteria: Conformance with the project
design provision of Article 5 (page 89):
The City of Bozeman should not remove the word “and height” from this paragraph. When the
plan review authority is considering compatibility with and sensitivity to, the immediate
environment of the site and adjacent neighborhoods, proposed building height is an important
element that needs to be considered.
Sec. 38.320.060 Zone edge transitions (new) (page 213):
This section doesn't minimize our concerns for historic properties. We recommend the
commission and planning staff consider transition requirements that are more stringent adjacent
to a historic district.
Minimum side and rear setbacks for development within BP, M-1, M-2, B-3 and UMU districts
within 100 feet of a historic district will be a distance of half (X/2) of the initial vertical wall
height (X) from the property line. Initial vertical wall height cannot exceed 150% of average
neighboring wall height. Vertical wall height may increase 25% every 25 feet.
Sec. 38.340.010 (F) (part I) (page 222):
Historically significant" was added. Remove this addition. This could narrow the intent of the
section. This is the NCOD chapter. The purpose of the NCOD should be to preserve a
neighborhood's character defining features, not just the historically significant ones. Further, the
overlay protection should be for older neighborhoods that may not be able to qualify for historic
designation.
Sec. 38.340.040 Certificate of appropriateness (page 224):
Who will update the MT Historical Architectural Inventory Form if not the historic preservation
staff? The planning department and city commission should consider leaving the text in its
current form.
Sec. 38.360.040 Accessory dwelling units (page 247):
Section D.2.a allows detached ADUS on a lot with alley access. Many alleys are too narrow to
accommodate a dwelling unit. Change to "alleys at least 30 feet wide". The city should also add
language about amenities in the alley like lighting, snow removal, etc. and the need for all
residents to have access to the same amenities.
Sec. 38.340.080 Review of demolition or movement of historic structures or
sites section C.2. (page 226):
The policy process for determining whether there is “no viable economic life remaining” needs
to be more clear. HPAC recommends the planning department and city commission make
certain this policy is effective enough to meet the policy goals of the planning department for
demolition