HomeMy WebLinkAboutZC & PB Amendment Summary
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bozeman Planning Board and Zoning Commission
FROM: Tom Rogers, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Zoning Commission and Planning Board amendments the UDC
update; 7/11/17 and 7/18/17
DATE: July 18, 2017
Amendments and issues related to the Unified Development Code (UDC) update.
Amendment 1
Page 82, 38.230.040. DRB Authority. Expand DRB review authority to include,
“When along a zoning district boundary between R1, R2, (or otherwise zoned
property currently in residential use, i.e. one to two family homes) and B1, B2, B3,
B2M, M1, BP or UMU and including a project with more than 30 dwelling units or 30
parking spaces.”
Staff comment: Does parking applicability include surface and/or structured
parking? Determining the use of a property may be challenging to determine.
Responsibility for determining use?
PB (6:0)
ZC (1:2)
Amendment 2
Page 213. 38.320.060. Zone Edge Transition. Consider point #3 of the Downtown
Business Partnership comment letter dated July 10, 2017. Specifically, allow
adjacent residential properties a height bonus to offset possible building height in
the B-3 district.
Staff comment: Current code states NCOD prevails. Commission to determine which
zone edge transition standard will apply, in B-3 District.
PB (6:0)
ZC (2:1)
Amendment 3
Page 2447. 38.360.040 Accessory dwelling units (ADU). Relax square footage of
Accessory Dwellings Units (ADU) to 800 square feet in all residential zoning district.
And remove 38.360.040C.2(2), subordinate clause and eliminate the one-third
limitation.
Staff comment – Multiple detached dwellings are permitted in most districts by
right. Two household attached dwellings are permitted in all residential districts
except R-S and R-1. Eliminating the size restriction appears to eliminate the City’s
effort to differentiate between and ADU ad a second dwelling unit.
PB (6:0)
ZC (2:1)
Amendment 4
Page 245. 38.360.030.H.2(b). Accessory structure setback requirement. Delete
setback requirements for Accessory structures for alley loaded lots.
PB (6:0)
ZC (3:0)
Amendment 5
Page 253. 38.360.110.C. Cottage affordable housing applicability. Remove
affordable housing requirement for cottage housing projects.
PB (2:4)
ZC (2:0)
Amendment 6
Page 279. 38.360.210.C. Row house and townhouse garage standards. Eliminate
impediments to garage on units less than or equal to 30 feet in width.
Staff comment – Please clarify staff captured your intent correctly. The Boards
referenced page 275 however, the language suggested the desire to eliminate
impediments to attached residential structures from not having garage facing the
street for units less than 30 feet in width. This provision in on page 279.
PB (5:1)
ZC (2:1)
Amendment 7
Page 366. 38.500.020.B. Building additions, remodels, and site improvements.
Generally reduce impediments for property owners to make incremental
improvements to their properties. In particular within TFF districts.
Staff comment – The proposed language is considerable less stringent that today
requirement. Discussion at approximately 9:00 pm.
PB (6:0)
ZC (3:0)
Amendment 8
Page 397. 38.520.050. Internal roadway design. Eliminate drive through screening
requirement.
PB (6:0)
ZC (3:0)
Amendment 9
Page 404 and 407. 38.520.070.B.5 and 38.520.E.1. Location and design of service
areas and mechanical equipment. Add “orientate” to list and remove residential
limitation so standards applies to all zoning districts.
Staff comment – May have unintended consequences in industrial districts.
PB (6:0)
ZC (3:0)
Amendment 10
Page 409 – 428. 38.530. Building design. Industry groups to review and codify
realistic building design standards.
Staff comment – Building design concepts and standards were presented at public
workshops, brought before the Zoning Commission and Planning Board for multiple
workshops to solicit comment. The Design Review Board, made up of design
professionals and another advisory board to the City Commission, held numerous
public meetings to discuss the building design standards. The DRB found the
provisions and standards in the draft code to further the Community Plan and the
Bozeman Design Objectives Plan.
The UDC Update Advisory Committee considered each aspect of the draft
development code including the building design components. Numerous members
of the architectural design community participated in these meetings.
Additional workshops specifically for the design community took place to educate
and refine the standards.
The Bozeman Community Plan clearly states the content in the draft code is
supported by the broadly community, not just design professionals, with specific
goals and objectives. In addition to the one goal and objective referenced by the
design community please see the following 14 goals and objectives for a more
complete picture:
G-1 Growth Management
Objective G-1.3: Require development to mitigate its impacts on our community as
identified and supported by evidence during development review, including
economic, health, environmental, and social impacts.
Goal C-1: Human Scale and Compatibility
Objective C-1.1: - Expand design review programs citywide to ensure well designed
spaces throughout the community.
Objective C-1.2: - Update design objectives to include guidelines for urban spaces
and more dense development.
Objective C-1.4: Achieve an environment through urban design that maintains and
enhances the City’s visual qualities within neighborhood, community and regional
commercial areas.
Goal C-3: Neighborhood Design
Objective C-3.2: Provide for neighborhood focal points to encourage local identity
within the community and provide a place for social interaction.
Objective C-3.4: Create neighborhood Commercial Centers that will provide uses to
meet consumer demands from surrounding Residential Districts for everyday goods
and services, and will be a pedestrian oriented place that serves as a focal point for the
surrounding neighborhoods.
Goal C-4: Design guidelines
Objective C-4.1: Continue to develop the design guidelines for site planning and
buildings to emphasize creativity, diversity, and individuality. The design guidelines
shall be based on the premise that truly creative design is responsive to its context
and contributes to a comfortable, interesting community.
Objective C-4.2: All new residential buildings should be designed to emphasize the
visually interesting features of the building, as seen from the public street and
sidewalk. The visual impact of garage doors, driveways, and other off-street parking
will be minimized and mitigated.
Objective C-4.3: Ensure the development of new residential structures that are
aesthetically pleasing through urban design.
Objective C-4.4: Provide for the protection of character and the enhancement of
services in existing residential neighborhoods.
Objective C-4.5: Investigate expanding form based zoning as a design review
strategy for the City.
PB (6:0)
ZC (3:0)