Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17057 Hotel & Mixed Commercial Uses PUD MEMORANDUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW STAFF RE: EMBASSY SUITES/HAMPTON INN INFORMAL REVIEW, APPLICATION 17057 DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project Description: This informal review request is proposing a PUD phased development to include two phases. Phase one will include a 200-room hotel, banquet space and associated parking. Phase 2 will consist of a commercial space along Tschache Lane, which will include retail, restaurant and other potential tenants. Project Location: The project is framed by Baxter to the north, the continuation of Tschache Lane to the south, the continuation of N 15th Ave to the west and N 11th Ave to the east. The project is within the Class 1 Entryway Corridor. Recommendation: Informal comments only. No motion requested. Summarized from the analysis of the Bozeman Design Objectives Plan, 2005, the following design directives were identified:  Neighborhood design  Building placement  Pedestrian systems  Parking lots  Landscape design  Building character  Primary building entrance  Building mass and scale  Building materials  Interstate 90 corridor specifics Chapter 1. Neighborhood Design Guidelines Auto Connectivity This is accomplished with the parallel traffic circulation within the parking lot to N. 15th Avenue. Once a vehicle enters into to the property there is no Page 2 of 5 need to return to the street to access the other areas of the split parking lot. It is also going to be further supported with the completion of the private access and future parking to the east. Pedestrian Connectivity This project as designed does not meet the standards for connectivity. There are not sufficient sidewalks and pedestrian features around the buildings. Where the pedestrian features are lacking are within the parking lot itself and along the private access drive. Pedestrians cannot be forced to walk through parking lots without additional protected walkways. This project will need to amend the plans to show how people exit their vehicles and access the buildings in a safer manner. The interior proposed private access points will require sidewalks. Those areas where pedestrians are intended to utilize a crossing will need to be clearly identified and a line of sight depicted in order to ensure no conflict with the proposed landscaping. Public streets will be required to provide sidewalks and the proposed street extensions to be in compliance with the City of Bozeman’s standards for alignment and pedestrian crossings. Chapter 2. Site Design Guidelines This project is providing a proposed landscaping and site design that creates a great mix of gathering spaces, outdoor dining and interior courtyards. The project is proposing a conference center layout that focuses on moving people both within and around the site. The use of Tschache Lane to both slow traffic, contain street side dining areas and have a fluid transition to future development to the south, creates a greater sense of neighborhood connectivity. The area where additional enhancements will be needed is along the proposed 15th Ave. The current design and layout seems to rely on 15th Ave as the “back of house”. In order to comply with Chapter 2 of the design objectives, a plan that more fully embraces enhancing views from the public way should be considered. Drainage features At this level of design there does not appear to be drainage features clearly identified. These types of features should function as natural amenities with curvilinear layout and enhanced landscaping. If there are ways to create parking lots that provide stormwater infiltration within their boundaries, Chapter 2 encourages minimizing runoff. Building Placement While this building appears to be one large mass, the pedestrian connectivity being “inside”, for the Bozeman climate is a valuable alternative. By allowing the future connected buildings to have identified frontage on Tschache Lane this project creates a street frontage and allows for parking to be located in places convenient to the hotel. Page 3 of 5 One item to note is solar access. While the majority of the building is taking advantage of eastern facing set of gathering places, the central “hardscaped” area does appear that it will be shaded throughout most of the day. In the winter months when the angle of the sunlight is low for the majority of the day, this area will have increased maintenance needs. This project has created a variety of outdoor public spaces. These spaces will be a great amenity to the entire project. The continued comment is to ensure that a design when submitted for formal review has addressed 15th Ave. Pedestrian and Bicycles The project has been designed to allow the flow of pedestrians around the structures and through the buildings to connect the proposed hotels to the conference and entertainment spaces. In order to comply with the parking lot standards additional pedestrian connectivity will need to be provided. Bicycle parking is a requirement on the site. In addition to the base minimum standard, as allowed by Section 38.25.040.A.2.c(6) property owners have the option of requesting the reduction of up to ten percent of the required parking spaces for nonresidential uses if: i. In addition to the minimum otherwise required by this chapter, two covered bicycle parking spaces are provided for each automobile space not provided; and ii. For each ten or fraction of ten automobile parking stalls reduced a nonresidential shower, changing area, and five clothing lockers are provided on-site. Provision of covered bicycle parking spaces and locker spaces are encouraged whether or not the applicant chooses to request a reduction in park land. Parking lot screening The renderings provided, if they reflect the final product, do provide a variety of landscaped styles ranging from courtyards, streetscape and public spaces. In order to comply with the requirements of the code and the design standards, additional parking lot screening will be required. Site Lighting No specific lighting information was provided. Lighting on site should be compliant with the codes requirement for night sky while enhancing pedestrian movement. A plan ensuring the gathering places, the parking lot and the entrances are lit for pedestrians will need to be submitted with an official PUD and preliminary site plan. Utilities and Service Areas The site plan and renderings provided little detail to these features. As this project proposes hotels and food, there is a large amount of waste that is produced from both of these uses. Identifying if the majority of the waste processing will take place within the structure or if there will be additional service areas is important. To reiterate, 15th Avenue appears to be functioning as the rear of the structure, albeit Chapter 2 of the design objectives requires for service areas to be visually unobtrusive and integrated into the design so that any future conflicts with abutting uses are minimized. Page 4 of 5 Landscaping A full landscaping plan was not submitted with this informal application. The renderings of the site do appear to meet the design objectives. Chapter 3. Building Design Guidelines Character The project has not provided a specific set of building materials at this time. The renderings as presented show a building with a mix of stone, metal, and brick facades as well as the inclusion of a wide variety of windows at both the pedestrian level and to utilize the solar orientation of the structure. The hotel front entrance has a good mix of varied heights and colors to promote a building that does not have a franchise feel. A mix of roof heights, and well defined entrances decreases the overall massing and creates a project with a mixed look and feel, hotel on 15th and storefront along Tschahche Lane. The west facing elevation of the building does not provide the same level of detail as the north and east elevations. Additional architectural features are required along the west street facing elevation in order to not present a back side of building appearance to the street and the public ways. The west elevation has multiple façade planes with inadequate detailing. Detailing that more relates to the north and east elevations must be provided on the west elevation. Entrance The main entrance is easily identifiable for the hotels. The future expansion to the full project will allow multiple entrances for a more storefront and pedestrian design. Street Level Interest The hotel is not providing specific street level interest on 15th and it must be enhanced. There are a number of façade material changes and pedestrian gathering areas that allow for the structure to have less street level interest but still provide a building without large blank walls. Mass and Materials This project satisfies the Chapter 2 requirements for providing a building with a varied design features, height, materials, and outdoor areas. The structure steps up from the main entrance to the full structure giving it a human scale where the customers will interact with the structure. The bulk of the building’s interior space is tucked behind and in a U-shape to create a smaller mass. Chapter 4. Sign Design Guidelines This project did not provide signage. While the signage at this time may be premature, understanding the need for a master sign plan is important. As the buildings will have multiple uses the entire project must have a similar character and allocation for sign square footage. This will be accomplished with a master sign plan.   January 31, 2017    City of Bozeman  Department of Community Development  20 East Olive Street  Bozeman, MT 59715  Re: Embassy Suites/Hampton Inn DRB Review  KLJ would like to request an informal review from the Design Review Board (DRB) for a  proposed commercial development between N 11th Ave and N 15th Ave and north of Patrick  Street to Baxter Lane.  Attached is a preliminary architectural plan set showing an architectural  site plan, floor plans, roof plans, exterior elevations and renderings.  We have also included the  subdivision pre‐application plan set recently submitted to the City’s Department of Community  Development.  Informal Review Checklist  1. Narrative  The project will consist of a PUD phased development plan as well as minor subdivision  application to subdivide lots and dedicate rights of way. Phase 1 will consist of a 200‐ room hotel with banquet space and associated parking and site improvements. Phase 2  will consist of a restaurant and commercial building along with access to Tschache  Lane.     Construction of 15th Ave is expected to be phased with the subdivision entitlement  process and PUD plan. Tschache Lane will be extended from its current terminus west  of the property and constructed to the Private Drive access. It will be extended east to  11th Ave in Phase 2. All required infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwater, etc) for the  hotel will be installed in Phase 1.     2. Specific Questions  A. How will the allowable building height be measured?   i.  Is this height to the roof line, or does it include additional height from  parapets, elevator penthouses, etc.?    ii. Can the Conditional Use Permit process be utilized to gain additional  height allowance for such roof structures as parapets and elevator  penthouses without going through the process of major PUD  modification?          Page 2 of 3     B. Current zoning provides that parking lots are limited to one acre in size.  What  constitutes as a boundary or buffer to provide allowable separation between  parking lots?     C. How will swimming pools be regulated for this development, in terms of  planning and health department approval?    D. Can the Board offer guidance on signage code and restrictions for this  development?    E. Can the Board offer guidance on floor area ratio (FAR) requirements for this  development?       3. Location/Vicinity Map  Refer to attached maps.  4. Site Plan  Refer to attached plans.  5. Floor Plans  Refer to attached plans.  6. Building Elevations  Refer to attached plans.  7. Building Materials  Will be submitted with the Phase 1 Site Plan.  8. Landscape Plan  Will be submitted with the Phase 1 Site Plan.  9. Parking Calculations  To be submitted with the Phase 1 Site Plan to comply with current PUD.  10. Parkland Calculations  Not applicable with commercial/industrial uses.  11. Wetland Delineation  Wetland Permitting is in process.  12. Other Information  None at this time.       Page 3 of 3     If you have any questions regarding this application, please feel free to contact me at (406)  582‐6222 or timothy.strong@kljeng.com  Sincerely,  KLJ    Shane Strong, PE  Project Manager  QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYCOVER 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESG00 02/01/17 CONSULTANT TEAM ARCHITECT OF RECORD RABUN RASCHE RECTOR REECE 44 BROAD STREET NW, SUITE 300 ATLANTA GA 30303 P. 404.522.9455 F. 404.522.9454 INTERIOR DESIGNER M2 STRUCTURAL 887 WEST MARIETTA ST NW T103 ATLANTA, GA 30318 MEP ENGINEER THE SAFAIE LANDRY PARTNERSHIP 6330 AMHERST COURT NORCROSS, GA 30092 P. 770.451.5500 CIVIL ENGINEER TBD FOOD SERVICE/LAUNDRY CAMACHO 6735 PEACHTREE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., SUITE 120 ATLANTA, GA 30360 P. 770.582.1144 F. 770.582.1009 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TBD LIGHTING CONSULTANT TBD DV/AV CONSULTANT TBD ELEVATOR CONSULTANT LERCH BATES AND ASSOCIATES 900 CIRCLE PARKWAY ATLANTA, GA 30339 P. 770.416.6765 F. 770.416.9860 SPECIFICATION CONSULTANT SPIKER BALDWIN ASSOCIATES, INC. 216 CHURCH STREET DECATUR, GA 30030 P. 404.373.9075 F. 404.373.9076 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT TBD TBD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 1. THE SITE SHALL BE KEPT IN AN ORDERLY CONDITION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE AT ALL TIMES. 2. SPECIAL ATTENTION IS CALLED FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANALYSIS OF CLEARANCES FOR THE MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, SPRINKLER AND SPECIAL SYSTEMS FOR THE PUBLIC CEILING SPACES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A COMPLETE, FULLY FUNCTIONING, FULLY FINISHED CODE- COMPLYING BUILDING. (INCLUDES ALL COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT- SITE WORK, ETC.......) 4. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COMPLIMENTARY AND ARE OF EQUAL AUTHORITY AND PRIORITY. IF A FAN IS SHOWN ON THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS AND NO POWER IS SHOWN TO THE FAN ON THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE POWER TO THE FAN AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND FULLY FUNCTIONING BUILDING. IF A CONDENSATE LINE IS SHOWN ON A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT BUT THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHERE IT IS ROUTED TO, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTEND IT TO AN ACCEPTABLE, CODE-COMPLYING LOCATION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. IF THE SPECIFICATIONS INDICATE A COMPONENT IS TO BE PROVIDED "WHERE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS" AND NOTHING IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE COMPONENT ACCORDING TO GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER E.G. IF CONTROL JOINTS IN GYPSUM BOARD CEILINGS ARE CALLED FOR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, BUT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CONTROL JOINTS PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS AT LOCATIONS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTOR AND, WHEN APPROPRIATE, THE SUB-SUB-CONTRACTORS, SHALL VISIT THE SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SPACE AVAILABLE IN THE FIELD TO VERIFY THAT ALL COMPONENTS WILL FIT WITHIN THE SPACE AVAILABLE, INCLUDING REQUIRED CLEARANCES AND ACCESS. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE ARCHITECT HAS APPROVED A SUBMITTAL OR NOT, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING COMPONENTS THAT FIT WITHIN THE AVAILABLE SPACE EVEN THOUGH ALTERNATE MANUFACTURERS MAY BE ALLOWED FOR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. THERE SHALL BE NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER TO PROVIDE A PARTICULAR COMPONENT REQUIRED TO FIT IN THE SPACE AVAILABLE. 7. IF THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL PROVIDE THE MORE COMPLETE WORK, MORE FINISHED WORK, MORE EXPENSIVE QUALITY, OR GREATER QUANTITY OF WORK, OR MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 8. THE DRAWINGS IN MANY INSTANCES ARE "TYPICAL" AND DO NOT SHOW EVERY POSSIBLE CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR ENVELOPE, INCLUDING BELOW GRADE CONSTRUCTION, WHICH IS FULLY-INSULATED, AIRTIGHT AND WATERTIGHT, AND COMPLIES WITH REQUIRED FIRE-RATINGS. 9. THE ARCHITECT MAY ISSUE ADDITIONAL DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS OR RESPOND TO CONTRACTOR REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION DURING CONSTRUCTION WHICH SERVE TO CLARIFY OR COORDINATE THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR WHICH MAY ALLOW AN ALTERNATE SELECTION DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS, ETC. WORK DONE BASED ON THESE DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, RFI RESPONSES, OR OTHER SIMILAR COMMUNICATIONS, SHALL BE DONE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR HAS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED A CHANGE IN COST OR TIME IN A SEPARATE LETTER AND HAS RECEIVED APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, OR HAS RECEIVED A CONSTRUCTION CHANGE DIRECTIVE FROM THE ARCHITECT IN RESPONSE TO SUCH LETTER. 10. SPECIAL ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A COORDINATED SHOP DRAWING WITH OVERLAYS OF MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, SPRINKLER, AND SPECIAL SYSTEMS FOR THE PUBLIC CEILING SPACES, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. LEED AND SITES - THE PROJECT IS INTENDED TO ACHIEVE LEED GOLD CERTIFICATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROJECT IS INTENDED TO ACHIEVE SITES PLATINUM CERTIFICATION. REFER TO THE LEED AND SITES TRACKING SPREADSHEET IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED POINTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE IMPLEMENTATION OF LEED AND SITES REQUIREMENTS LISTED THEREIN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RECYCLED CONTENT MINIMUMS AND 10% MATERIALS MANUFACTURED WITHIN 500 MILES. CONTRACTOR TO MEASURE, VERIFY AND TRACK THESE ITEMS ON A REGULAR BASIS AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE THE LEED AND SITES APPROVAL. 12. FIRE EXTINGUISHER LABELS, TYPES, AND LOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL. SPECIFICATION SECTION 10 4400 3.4 A. HAS BEEN MODIFIED TO INCLUDE: THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS OF THE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN ACCORD WITH NFPA 10 AND THE 2003 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL. 13. MANUAL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM DEVICES LOCATIONS AND DETAILS ARE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL. GENERAL NOTES OCCUPANCY TYPE INTERIOR WALL AND A2 R1 CEILING FINISHES (TABLE 803.9)(SPRINKLERED) (SPRINKLERED) VERTICAL EXITS AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS B B EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS B C ROOMS AND ENCLOSED SPACES C C CLASS B = FLAME SPREAD 26-75 SMOKE DEVELOPED 0-450 CLASS C = FLAME SPREAD 76-200 SMOKE DEVELOPED 0-450 TEXTILE WALL COVERING OR CEILING FINISH: CLASS A (803.6.1 & 803.6.2) INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH OR FLOOR COVERING:CLASS II (804.2 & 804.5.1 - SPRINKLERED) DRAPERIES (805.1 & 805.2): NON COMBUSTIBLE OR FLAME RESISTANT PER NFPA 701. INTERIOR FINISHES GENERAL FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS BUILDING CODE SUMMARY PROJECT SUMMARY THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A FIVE STORY, 215 ROOM, DUAL BRAND HOTEL INCLUDING APPROXIMATELY 175,000SF. AMENITIES INCLUDE A 4,600SF BALLROOM, BOARDROOM, 2 RESTAURANTS, BAR/LOUNGE, FITNESS ROOM AND INDOOR POOL. ADDITIONALLY THE PROJECTS CONTAINS A SEPARATE RETAIL FOOD COURT (FUTURE PHASE). PROJECT ADDRESS BOZEMAN, MONTANA PROJECT AREA CONSTRUCTION TYPE/FIRE PROTECTION STRUCTURAL RATINGS 2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2012 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2012 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE 2012 ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE 2012 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 2009 ICC A117.1 ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION TABLE 601& 602 HOTEL (TYPE 3B) BUILDING ELEMENT REQUIRED RATING STRUCTURAL FRAME:0 HOUR (INCLUDING COLUMNS, GIRDERS, TRUSSES) STRUCTURAL FRAME:0 HOUR (SUPPORTING ROOF ONLY) EXTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS: 2 HOUR INTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS: 0 HOUR NON-BEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS: 1 HOUR< 30FT SEPARATION (EXTERIOR) NON-BEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS:0 HOUR (INTERIOR)(EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY CODE) FLOOR CONSTRUCTION:0 HOUR (INCLUDING SUPPORTING BEAMS AND JOISTS) ROOF CONSTRUCTION:0 HOUR PUBLIC FIXTURE COUNT FIRE PROTECTION FEATURES MEANS OF EGRESS UL DESIGNATION FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL SPRAY FIREPROOFING FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL, FLOOR, 9/16" FORM DECK, 3" CONCRETE, STEEL BEAMS OR JOISTS: UL G701 ROOF, 1 1/2" METAL DECK, POLYISOCYANURATE INSULATION: UL P732 COLUMNS, WIDE FLANGE:UL X854 COLUMNS, TUBE AND PIPE:UL Y710 SEE UL DESIGN LISTING PAGES G301 - G303. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR SPRAY FIREPROOFING ON STRUCTURAL STEEL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1704.11 OF IBC. REFER TO 2003 IBC TABLE 601 PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME. THE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME SHALL INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: 1. THE COLUMNS; 2. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS HAVING DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO THE COLUMNS, INCLUDING GIRDERS, BEAMS, TRUSSES AND SPANDRELS; 3. MEMBERS OF THE FLOOR CONSTRUCTION AND ROOF CONSTRUCTION HAVING DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO THE COLUMNS; AND 4. BRACING MEMBERS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL TO THE VERTICAL STABILITY OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME UNDER GRAVITY LOADING SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME WHETHER OR NOT THE BRACING MEMBER CARRIES GRAVITY LOADS. SECONDARY MEMBERS. THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SECONDARY MEMBERS AND NOT PART OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME: 1. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS NOT HAVING DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO THE COLUMNS; 2. MEMBERS OF THE FLOOR CONSTRUCTION NOT HAVING DIRECT CONNECTIONS TO THE COLUMNS; AND 3. BRACING MEMBERS OTHER THAN THOSE THAT ARE PART OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME. REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION 07 8116 CEMENTITIOUS FIREPROOFING. EMBASSY SUITES AND HAMPTON INN & SUITES FOR BENNETT HOSPITALITY MAGNETIC NORTH PROJECT NORTH BOZEMAN, MONTANA DRB SET - 02.01.2017 VICINITY MAP - NTS SITE DUAL BRAND GALLATIN COUNTY LEVEL 1 - 52,537 SQ. FT LEVEL 2 - 26,579 SQ. FT. LEVEL 3 - 32,876 SQ. FT. LEVEL 4 - 32,876 SQ. FT. LEVEL 5 - 32,876 SQ. FT. TOTAL - 177,753 SQ. FT. No Date Description HAMPTON INN SUITES EMBASSY SUITES RESTAURANTS (FUTURE PHASE) PORTE COCHERE ROOF OVER BALLROOM LOW ROOF HARDSCAPE FUTURE PARKING PARKING LOW ROOF OVER POOL LOW ROOF FIREPLACE CHIMNEY FFE 735.0 FFE 735.0 FFE 735.0 PROPOSED TSCHACHE LANEPROPOSED 15TH AVEPROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS9 9 9 7 4 10 8 10 10 10 139 PARKING SPACES 10 9 9 9 8 9 8 8 10 7 7 77 7 35 PARKING SPACES 70 PARKING SPACES ELEV. ELEV. RET. WALL OUTDOOR DINING RET WALL FIREWALL OUTDOOR DINING OUTDOOR DINING OUTDOOR DINING STAIR OUTDOOR DINING OUTDOOR DINING SCREEN WALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MECHANICAL YARDSERVICE 10 10 10 10 10 QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESG01 02/01/17 1" = 40'-0"G01 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN No Date Description A1 Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROJECT Development Name: Description: 2. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 3. APPLICANT Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 4. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 5. PROPERTY Full Street Address: Full Legal Description: Current Zoning: Current Use: Community Plan Designation: PT Land Subdivision Phase 3 Hotel and Mixed Commercial Uses within existing PT Land PUD Montana Keystone Ventures, LLC 17 Lockwood Drive, Suite 400, Charleston, SC 29401-1155 (843) 722-8169 pwright@bennetthospitality.com/tmiller@bennethospitality.com KLJ Engineering - Shane Strong 1982 Stadium Drive, Suite 3, Bozeman, MT 59715 (406) 582-6222 timothy.strong@kljeng.com Bennett Hospitality - Peter Wright/Troy Miller 17 Lockwood Drive, Suite 400, Charleston, SC 29401 (843) 722-8169 pwright@bennetthospitality.com/tmiller@bennetthospitality.com 1023 E Baxter Lane, Bozeman, MT 59718 PT Land PH 2 SUB, S01, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 6a, Acres 32.51, PLAT J-498 B-2 Vacant Regional Commercial and Services Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation Entryway Corridor None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast None 6. STATISTICS (ONLY APPLICATION TYPES 2-12, 17, 24 AND 26) Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: Dwelling Units: Nonresidential Gross Building Square Feet: 7. APPLICATION TYPES Check all that apply, use noted forms. Form Form 1. Pre-application Consultation None 17. Informal Review INF 2. Master Site Plan MSP 18. Zoning Deviation None 3. Site Plan SP 19. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR 4. Subdivision pre-application PA 20. Conditional Use Permit CUP 5. Subdivision preliminary plat PP 21. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP 6. Subdivision final plat FP 22. Comprehensive Sign Plan CSP 7. Subdivision exemption SE 23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands RW 8. Condominium Review CR 24. Zone Map Amendment (non Annexation) ZMA 9. PUD concept plan PUDC 25. UDC Text Amendment ZTA 10. PUD preliminary plan PUDP 26. Growth Policy Amendment GPA 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 27. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD 12. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX 28. Extension of Approved Plan EXT 13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA 29. Reasonable Accommodation RA 14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA 30. Other: 15. Commercial Nonresidential COA CCOA 1 6. Historic Neighborhood Conservation Overlay COA NCOA 8. APPLICATION FEES AND MATERIALS A. Fees are to be provided based upon the adopted fee schedule FS. Contact our office for an estimate. NA 177,753 32.51 acres 1,416,085 sq. ft. 29.21 acres 1,272,175 sq. ft. INF Informal Review Required Materials INF Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 04-20-16 Required Forms: A1, INF Recommended Forms: Required Forms: INFORMAL REVIEW REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8½ x 11 or 8½ x 14 sets. Additional sets may be required if more than one board review is requested. Contact our office for more information. Complete and signed development review application form A1 Plan sets that include all informal checklist items below Standard application sets required plan sizes: 2 sets that include full size 24 x 36 inch plans 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans 2-digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROMs or USB drives. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. Notes: All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8½ x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. BOARDS Development Review Committee Design Review Board Recreation and Parks Advisory Board Subdivision Committee Zoning Commission Planning Board APPLICATION FEE Base fee $27͹ per board The base fee applies for each board the applicant requests to review the application INFORMAL REVIEW CHECKLIST The outcome of the informal review process is dependent on the level and quality of information that is provided for each board’s review. In general, the greater the extent and quality of information that is provided for review the greater the response from the City. If requesting specific guidance from a technical board, the level of technical and specific information submitted with the application must be adequate so that the board can appropriately respond to the application (e.g. in addition to the base information below, a wetland delineation and report should be submitted for Wetland Review Board informal reviews; full and colored building elevations and a color and building materials palette should be submitted for Design Review Board review) 1. Project Narrative providing a thorough description of what is being proposed. 2. List of specific questions the applicant seeks answers to. 3. Location/vicinity map, including area within one-half mile of the site. 4. Site plan with north arrow showing property dimensions, location of buildings, parking, driveways, off street loading, landscaping, location of utilities, access, pedestrian facilities, and use locations. Suggested scale of 1 inch to 20 feet, but not less than 1 inch to 100 feet. 5. Floor plans showing floor layout including square footage and proposed use for each room and area within each building. Suggested scale of ¼ to one foot, if applicable and available. 6. Building Elevations, if applicable and available. 7. Building materials and color palette, if applicable and available. 8. Landscape Plan, if applicable and available. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ Informal Review Required Materials INF Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 4-20-16 Required Forms: A1, INF Recommended Forms: Required Forms: 9. Parking calculations for all uses, including detailed calculations of deductions if proposed and applicable. 10. Parkland calculations, Park plan with details of proposed improvements, if applicable. 11. Wetland delineation, determination of jurisdiction for watercourses and wetlands, if applicable. 12. Other information, as appropriate, to assist the boards in their review. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net ELEVATOR OVERRIDE ELEVATOR OVERRIDE MEMBRANE ROOFING MEMBRANE ROOFING QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYROOF PLAN - AREA A 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA61 02/01/17 No Date Description 1/8" = 1'-0"A61 1 ROOF PLAN - AREA A 18,1910.6 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. 15,1401: Feet 00 Legend 0 Notes GIS Department www.bozeman.net City of Bozeman Location 0 Embassy Suites Aerial and Applicable Districts Street Names Lighting Districts Midtown Urban Renewal District City Limits Roads STAIR ROOF ELEVATOR OVERRIDE ELEVATOR OVERRIDE MEMBRANE ROOFING QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYROOF PLAN - AREA B (ES) 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA62 02/01/17 1/8" = 1'-0"A62 1 ROOF PLAN - ES No Date Description MEMBRANE ROOFING ELEVATOR OVERRIDE QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYROOF PLAN - AREA C 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA63 02/01/17 No Date Description 1/8" = 1'-0"A63 1 ROOF PLAN - AREA C MEMBRANE ROOFINGPOOL ROOF BELOW QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYROOF PLAN - AREA D (HIS) 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA64 02/01/17 1/8" = 1'-0"A64 1 ROOF PLAN - HIS No Date Description FIBER CEMENT SIDING BRICK VENEER STONE VENEER GLULAM COLUMNS AND BEAMS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STONE VENEER METAL AWNING STEEL BRACKETS 58' - 3" TO PARAPET54' - 3" TO ROOFBRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDINGMETAL AWNING FIBER CEMENT SIDING STONE VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLULAM TRELLIS T&G WOOD SOFFIT FIBER CEMENT SIDING STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING METAL AWNING METAL PANELS ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 62' - 11" TO STAIR PENTHOUSE56' - 3" TO PARAPET54' - 3" TO ROOFQQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA71 02/01/17 3/32" = 1'-0"A71 1 DRB Presentation Elevation - East 3/32" = 1'-0"A71 2 DRB Presentation Elevation - West No Date Description FIBER CEMENT SIDING METAL AWNING GLULAM COLUMNS AND BEAMS STONE VENEER BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STONE VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK VENEER STONE VENEER STONE LINTEL STEEL BRACKETS 58' - 3" TO PARAPET54' - 3" TO ROOFMETAL AWNING GLULAM COLUMNS AND BEAMS STONE VENEER STONE VENEER PRE-FINISHED METAL LOUVERS BRICK VENEER CONNECTION TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT METAL AWNING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBER CEMENT SIDING STEEL BRACKETS 54' - 3" TO ROOFQQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA72 02/01/17 3/32" = 1'-0"A72 1 DRB Presentation Elevation - North 3/32" = 1'-0"A72 2 DRB Presentation Elevation - South No Date Description GLULAM COLUMNS AND BEAMS STONE VEENER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 36' - 6" TO CHIMNEYFIBER CEMENT SIDING BRICK VENEER STEEL BRACKETS STONE VENEER STONE LINTEL AND SILL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT RESTAURANT (INTERIOR) METAL AWNING 58' - 3" TO PARAPET54' - 3" TO ROOFFIBER CEMENT SIDING GLULAM TRELLIS BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING STONE VENEER STONE LINTEL STEEL BRACKETS METAL AWNING 58' - 3" TO PARAPET54' - 3" TO ROOFBRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING STONE VENEER STONE VENEER FIBER CEMENT SIDING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 62' - 11" TO STAIR PENTHOUSE54' - 3" TO ROOF56' - 3" TO PARAPETQQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA73 02/01/17 3/32" = 1'-0"A73 4 DRB Presentation Elevation - Porte Cochere 3/32" = 1'-0"A73 3 DRB Presentation Elevation - CY Looking East 3/32" = 1'-0"A73 1 DRB Presentation Elevation - CY Looking North 3/32" = 1'-0"A73 2 DRB Presentation Elevation - CY Looking South No Date Description QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA78 02/01/17 No Date Description QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA81 02/01/17 No Date Description QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA82 02/01/17 No Date Description QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA83 02/01/17 No Date Description 9,0950.3 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. 7,5701: Feet 00 Legend 0 Notes GIS Department www.bozeman.net City of Bozeman Location 0 Embassy Suites Zoning & Land Use Street Names Class 1 Entryway Corridor City Limits Roads Community Plan Future Land Use Residential Residential Emphasis Mixed Use Suburban Residential Regional Commercial and Services Community Core Community Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Mixed Use Industrial Public Institutions Parks, Open Space and Recreational Lands Other Public Lands Golf Course Present Rural QQ=_êç~Ç=píêÉÉí=ktI=pìáíÉ=PMM^íä~åí~I=dÉçêÖá~==PMPMPm=QMQJROOJVQRR==c=QMQJROOJVQRQoáÅÜ~êÇ=aK=bääáëçå^o`efqb`qREVISIONS DRAWING TITLE PROJECT NUMBER DATE This drawing is the property of Rabun Rasche Rector Reece Architects and is not to be reproduced or copied in whole or in part. It is to be used only for the Project and Site specifically identified herein. It is to be returned upon request. Scales as stated hereon are valid on the original drawing, the size of which is .24" x 36"BOZEMAN, MONTANAGALLATIN COUNTYEXTERIOR RENDERINGS 15119EMBASSY SUITES /HAMPTON INN & SUITESA84 02/01/17 No Date Description 18,1910.6 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. 15,1401: Feet 00 Legend 0 Notes GIS Department www.bozeman.net City of Bozeman Location 0 Embassy Suites Vicinity Map Street Names Class 1 Entryway Corridor Midtown Urban Renewal District City Limits Roads