Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRate Policy Memo Exhibit 2 Bozeman Parking Commission Rate Policy Memo Prepared by BPC Executive Committee Revised by BPC 12-7-16 BACKGROUND The 2016 Downtown Strategic Parking Management Plan provides the following recommendations: STRATEGY 4: Establish a policy for adjusting rates    Implementation Timeline:  Immediate to Near‐Term (by December 2016)  Best practices indicate that parking rates be adjusted periodically to:     Cover normal increases in operating costs.   Reflect market demand.   Ensure efficient use of parking supply.   Provide for future growth as part of a comprehensive funding strategy (see Strategy 23).  This  includes normal capital planning and projected growth in the system.   Consider rates in comparable cities.    Bozeman should establish formal systems within the municipal code that provide a basis for rate setting  in both the on and off‐street systems. What is lacking in most jurisdictions is a routine commitment to  objectively evaluating rates at all levels (i.e., including enforcement fines and fees) based on a set  standard of performance metrics.  Overall, it is essential that rate adjustment be viewed as a standard operating procedure within the  overall parking management system; one that is data‐based designed to support the fiscal health of the  parking system, and not politicized.   It is recommended that the City, through the Parking Division:    A. Immediately adjust current rates (garage leases, lot leases, citations and residential permits) to  address existing revenue short‐falls.  Actual rate changes can be calibrated to current estimated  revenue/expense deficits spread across all user categories.      NOTE: surface lot and garage lease rates were increased as of January 1, 2017. Still need to discuss residential permit rate increases this spring to be effective in August 2017. B. Adopt performance metrics for rate review and adjustments into a formal operations policy.  Best practices indicate two levels of analysis for determining adjustments. First:    1. The true cost of ideal operations, including supplies, operating fees, maintenance, and  support, as well as the reasonable cost of financing debt.  Cost recovery would be the base  hourly rate plus annual/bi‐annual adjustments to cover the costs of inflation within  operating cost expenses.    NOTE: PD and BPC needs to determine the “true costs of ideal operations”—this would be an internal exercise and not included in policy document. Our current financial reports do not provide the level of detail nor do they categorize expenses and revenues specific to the operation of the garage versus surface lots versus residential districts vs downtown district. The spreadsheet pro-forma that RWC provided might be an appropriate to cost analysis tool to refine and use on a regular basis.   The second level that would substantiate decisions to adjust rates would include:    2. Sustained occupancies in excess of 85%.  NOTE: This threshold/metric will be informed by the expanded parking study recommended in Strategy 10 that will be conducted in 2017. 3. Consistency with comparable cities.  NOTE: As has been noted, we need to be cautious about this provision since there are no comparable cities in Montana by virtue of the fact that Billings, Missoula, Great Falls, and Helena charge for on-street parking which creates a much different fiscal reality.   C. Annually review and adjust rates for publicly owned off‐street parking in accordance with  established performance metrics, with particular emphasis on ensuring consistency with  documented variations in normal operating costs.  Rates could vary upward or downward based  on occupancy/demand differences.  D. Biannually review and adjust rates for publicly owned on‐street parking in accordance with  adopted performance metrics.  E. Develop a set of comparable cities and routinely track their rate performance over time for on‐ street, off‐street and enforcement.  F. Integrate routine assessments of occupancy performance into both annual and biannual rate  evaluations (see Strategy 10).  INITIAL POLICY PROVISIONS Definition of Rates Rates to be considered as part of this policy:  Garage lease rates (Jan 1-Dec 31)  Surface lot lease rate (Jan 1-Dec 31)  Residential permit fees (Sept 1-Aug 31)  Garage transient hourly rate  2-hour Overtime citation fee  Residential citation fee Frequency of Rate Review Annual (concurrent with budget process—March-May)  Garage lease rates o review process to begin no later than September BPC meeting with any action taken no later than November BPC meeting  Surface lot lease rate o review in conjunction with garage rate review  Residential permit fees o review process to begin no later than May BPC meeting with any action taken no later than June BPC meeting  Garage transient hourly rate o review in conjunction with garage rate review every other year  Residential citation fee (in consultation with BPD) o Review in conjunction with residential permit fee every other year  2-hour Overtime citation fee (in consultation with BPD) o Review in conjunction with residential permit fee every other year Criteria Considered Including but not limited to:  Financial viability o Comparison of expenses and revenues for a product or program o Comparison of comprehensive Parking Division/Enterprise  Industry best practices o Where applicable using rates and policies from comparable communities (both in state and out of state)  85% Occupancy Rule o When and where applicable consider the tenents of the 85% Rule to determine how rate adjustments would impact use