HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-19 Minutes, City Commission, specialMINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE CITY COMMISSION
BOZEMAN, MONTANA
December 19, 2001
The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in special session in the Commission Room,
Municipal Building, on Wednesday, December 19, 2001, at 5:00 p.m. Present were Mayor
Youngman, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner
Kirchhoff, City Manager Johnson, City Attorney Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence.
None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for
discussion.
SiQnina of Notice of Special Meeting
Each of the Commissioners, in turn, signed the Notice of Special Meeting.
Minutes - January 18 and February 7, 2000, and January 30, November 19, December 3, December
10, December 13 and December 17, 2001
It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that the minutes of
the meetings of December 10 and December 13, 2001, be approved as submitted. The motion
carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting No being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner
Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none.
Mayor Youngman deferred action on the minutes of the meetings of January 18 and February
7, 2000, and January 30, November 19, December 3 and December 17, 2001 to a later date.
Consent Items
City Manager Johnson presented to the Commission the following Consent Items.
Authorize City Manager to sign - Trail Corridor Easement - Clifford K. Christie and Sally
Franklin Christie - 25-foot-wide easement on abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee,
St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way adiacent to Tract 22,
Northeast Annexation (1015 East Griffin Drive)
Award proposal for 2002 pickup -Ressler Motors, Bozeman, Montana, in the amount
of $38,040.00
Building Inspection Division report for November 2001
It was moved by Commissioner Frost, seconded by Commissioner Smiley, that the Commission
approve the Consent Items as listed, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the
necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being
Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown and Mayor
Youngman; those voting No, none.
12-19-2001 Special
-2-
Renewal of Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for Calendar Year 2002
This was the time set for renewal of the remainder of the Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for
the Calendar Year 2002. A total of 13 applications have been received, along with the required fees.
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a list of the establishments which have made
application and paid the required fee, as follows:
APPLICATIONS FOR BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSES
CALENDAR YEAR 2002
APPLICANT BEER WINE LIQUOR TOTAL
Catback, Inc.
dba Bennigan's
1320 North 19th Avenue
500 $ 500
Heeb's East Main Grocery
544 East Main Street
200 2OO 4OO
John Bozeman's Bistro
125 West Main Street
200 200 400
DTLP
dba Soup Garage
451 East Main Street
200 200 4OO
Althea Co.
dba Grum's Deli
2107 North 7th Avenue
200 200 4O0
Althea Co.
dba Grum's Market
2111 North 7th Avenue
200 200 4OO
LaParilla
1533 West Babcock Street
500 500
Looie's Down Under
101 East Main Street
200 20O 4OO
Montana Ale Works
611 East Main Street
500 500
O'Brien's Restaurant
312 East Main Street
200 2OO 4OO
Osco Pharmacy #5238
1525 West Main Street
200 200 4OO
Safeway #289
901 West Main Street
20O 2OO 4OO
The Wok
319 North 7th Avenue
200 2OO -- 4OO
Total - 13 Applications
2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,500 $ 5,500
12-19-2001 Special
3-
The City Manager recommended that the Commission approve the applications as submitted.
It was moved by Commissioner Smiley, seconded by Commissioner Kirchhoff, that the
Commission approve the renewal of Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for Calendar Year 2002 for the
various establishments as listed above. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those
voting Aye being Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner
Frost and Mayor Youngman; those voting No, none.
Ordinance No. 1554 - amendino the Bozeman Municipal Code by adding Chapter 2.96, providing for
a living waoe to employees of the City and to employees of businesses receiving financial assistance
from the City
Included in the Commissioners' packets was a revised copy of Ordinance No. 1554, as
prepared by the City Attorney, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 1554
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA,
PROVIDING THAT THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE BE AMENDED BY ADDING A
NEW CHAPTER TO BE NUMBERED CHAPTER 2.96 PROVIDING FOR A LIVING WAGE
TO EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN AND TO EMPLOYEES OF BUSINESSES
AND OTHER RECIPIENTS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY OF
BOZEMAN.
Responding to Mayor Youngman, City Attorney Luwe reviewed the recommended minor
changes. Those changes include, under Section 2.96.020. D. and E., insert the words "most recent"
in front of "Consumer Price Index" to clarify the document being referenced; and, under Section
2.96.050.E., change to read "~ An employee may file ..." to correct a grammatical error.
Commissioner Brown stated that, the way it is written, the ordinance would take effect in
January 2002 but the living wage would not become effective until July 1,2002. With the Consumer
Price Index (CPI) adjustment in Sections 2.96.020. D. and E., he is concerned that the result would
be increases in wages at both July 1, 2002, and January 1, 2003, which would effectively double
the raises to employees in a single year and result in twice the amount of CPI adjustment for a six-
month period. He also cautioned that, given the language of those sections, it could be that
employees of a bargaining unit, who receive raises on July 1, may expect the additional CPI
adjustment at January 1; and the fact that the City negotiates two-year contracts could further
complicate the issue. He suggested the simplest solution would be to eliminate the CPI adjustment,
noting that the Commission would still have the option of revisiting this issue and adjusting the salary
at a future date.
Mr. Bob Nichol, 1615 South Black Avenue, representing the Green Party, noted that the lowest
paid people in the country tend to be female, many of whom are single mothers raising children. The
census figures show that in Montana there are over 21,000 single parents with children, and 22
percent of those children are in poverty level situations; and the living wage will provide a minimum
level of economic security. He then suggested that the ordinance could be revised to change the
effective date of the CPI increase from January 1 to July 1 each year, stressing that the CPI
adjustment is a critical component of the living wage. He further suggested that the $8.50 wage
should apply to all types of employees, including probationary, seasonal, temporary and part-time
employees. He questioned why a company with ten or less employees should be exempted from the
requirements of this ordinance; rather, he suggested they should be simply given the option of seeking
a variance before financial assistance is granted. He concluded by characterizing the living wage as
a baby step to addressing those in poverty and establishing a new value for what people's work is
worth.
Mr. David Smith, Executive Director of the Bozeman Area Chamber of Commerce, forwarded
statistics from the Job Service for November, noting that twice as many jobs were available as clients
to fill them; the area's unemployment rate is 2.6 percent; and the average wage of the jobs filled was
12-19-2001 Special
4-
$8.80. He reminded the Commissioners that voters in Missoula defeated the living wage ordinance;
and Kalamazoo recently defeated an ordinance. He concluded by noting that many of the most recent
recipients of financial assistance from the City consistently exceed the wage listed in the ordinance,
and stating that government intervention is not necessary.
Mr. Brian Gertiser, 1010 East Olive Street, noted he is a local business owner. He cautioned
the perception is that the Commission is anti-business and questioned how much the Commission is
willing to do to increase that perception. He also expressed concern that it appears a broader
application will be sought once an ordinance is adopted. He concluded by asking how the City will
handle the situation when no one bids on its contracts.
Mr. Bobby Cove, 110 Bronco Street, noted that adoption of this ordinance is setting a standard
for Bozeman; and businessmen incurring additional labor cost will simply increase prices. He
cautioned that this will not accomplish what the City wants, and stated he is totally against it.
Ms. Kelly Pollington, 16 Lancelot Lane, stated that the Chamber of Commerce has opposed
the Montana People's Action every year in Helena when they have tried to get the minimum wage
raised. She characterized this ordinance as not being anti-business in any way; rather, it requires
fiscal responsibility and accountability for those receiving assistance from the City.
Mr. Joe Zinner, 113 South Wallace Avenue, noted there has been discussion about the ripple
effect of the increased salaries; however, there has not been similar discussion about the ripple effects
of increased rents, the increased costs of insurance, or other increased fees.
Mr. Greg Metzger, Montana Furniture, stated he would like to see the CPI adjustment
eliminated from the ordinance and the addition of a sunset provision that allows for a review of wage
levels every two years.
Responding to a question from Mr. Metzger, City Attorney Luwe stated that the language in
Section 2.96.020.J.d. complies with State law, which requires that the City go through a competitive
selection process to fill vacancies.
Mr. Metzger voiced concern about Section 2.96.050.A., which requires a recipient to show
payroll records for the period of the assistance or five years, whichever is longer, stating he feels it
is inappropriate to require a business to show its records after the assistance is ended. He also
questioned if Section 2.96.060 means the City does not have to pay a living wage because of
collective bargaining agreements. He stated that if young growing companies are being required to
meet the requirements of this ordinance, the City should be required to do so, too. He cautioned that
raising the lower wages will result in a ripple effect throughout the wage structure, since those higher
in the scale will expect the same increase as those lower on the scale. He concluded by encouraging
the Commissioners to not vote for this ordinance.
Mr. Jeff King, 339 Peace Pipe Drive, voiced concern that Section 2.96.020 requires the City
or a business to increase an employee's salary at six months, even if the probationary period is longer.
He suggested that the employer should be allowed to give the salary increase at the end of probation,
rather than at six months.
Mr. King noted that his family moved from Ireland in 1847 because there was no living wage
in Ireland. He forwarded his family rule that, if you're unhappy in a work situation, try to negotiate
change; if you can't negotiate that change, find a new situation. From 1953 to 1971, his family
moved seven times to get better wages. He stated every employment situation should be mutually
beneficial; and it is not government's role to intervene. As a result, he encouraged the Commission
to not adopt this ordnance.
Responding to questions, City Attorney Luwe stated that State law will govern whether a
recipient's financial information submitted for review is subject to protection under privacy laws. He
suggested that if there is an expectation of privacy, such as employee names, it is possible the
information would not be disclosed.
12-19-2001 Special
5-
Mr. Kent Wood, Gallatin Development Corporation, noted that an owner of an S corporation
is considered an employee of the company; and those owners typically do not pay themselves unless
monies are available. He cautioned that this ordinance would require them to pay themselves a wage,
which would create difficulties for the business as it starts up and begins its growth. He concluded
by asking about the timing of the requirement for submitting records for City review.
Ms. Alicia Bradshaw, Executive Director of the Gallatin Development Corporation, noted that
their agency administers the revolving loan fund. She cautioned that the privacy issue will create a
hurdle for the use of those funds, since the companies seeking to use them are trying to keep their
financial records as private as possible. She stated that, from her organization's standpoint, this
ordinance targets the wrong businesses because these new businesses generally become good
stewards and pay good wages once they've become established. She concluded by stressing that
this program has guidelines to follow, and it's not "a giveaway program".
Ms. Laura Dalton, 201 South 6th Avenue, encouraged adoption of the ordinance, noting it will
allow both proponents and opponents to relax and see how it works. She stated that Montana
People's Action and other groups nationwide working on living wage ordinances have found a dirth
of data on such ordinances in small towns, so MPA is seeking a grant to study how the ordinance is
working in Bozeman if it is adopted. She noted that the ordinance will affect I percent or fewer of
the employees in the community, and indications are that it will have very, very little economic effect
and no discernible ripple effect. She characterized it, rather, as a practical statement of principle and
a way to ensure that public monies are spent on things which give the best return on the investment.
Ms. Dalton noted that the data provided in the Job Service report reflects an average wage
of $8.80 for the jobs filled; however, Bozeman has no lack of unfilled minimum and Iow-wage jobs.
She suggested that the City should set the example, and suggested that in the long run the living
wage ordinance could help small businesses by putting pressure on the larger businesses to treat their
employees better.
Ms. Debra Gill, 8761 Trail Boss Road, noted that she has not changed her position, and stated
that 95 percent of the cities with living wage ordinances have populations in excess of 100,000. She
noted that there is a dirth of information on the impacts of a living ordinance on a small community,
and stated she does not want to see Bozeman turned into a research project. She questioned the
need for a living wage ordinance that affects fewer than 1 percent of the residents, and cautioned
that the result could be businesses not coming into the community. She stated that, when evaluating
impacts of the ordinance, there is a strong possibility that no one will know about those lost business
opportunities, so they cannot be factored into the results.
City Attorney Luwe provided responses to the questions raised. He noted that the extended
period for financial records was to ensure that reduced compensation or discrimination against an
employee did not occur after the financial assistance ended; however, he indicated that provision
could be revised if the Commission so desires. He indicated that, based on Monday's direction, a
small employer would not be required to provide those records for three years but larger businesses
would be required to provide the records annually or upon complaint. He cautioned that the collective
bargaining exemption cannot be eliminated for the City because of State law; however, that
requirement does not apply to private entities as the ordinance is currently written. He concluded by
reiterating that if there is an expectation of privacy for those records submitted to the City, that
privacy would normally be protected. He indicated that, in the case of a discrepancy about the
privacy of those records, there is a mechanism for submitting those records to the court for review
and a determination.
Responding to Mayor Youngman, the City Attorney stated that Section 2.96.020.E. could be
revised to not require owners of S corporations to pay themselves a living wage.
Mayor Youngman noted the Commission has received two suggestions regarding the CPI
provision and asked for Commission feedback. She cautioned that removing the CPI requirement
would allow the living wage to stay at $8.50 forever rather than increasing gently over the years.
12-19-2001 Special
-6-
Commissioner Brown noted that changing the date might solve one problem; however he is
concerned that it would not address the potential of an employee receiving both a negotiated increase
and a CPI increase in the same year. He also indicated that a specific date could inconvenience
private companies, but he recognizes the need for adjustment on a date specific. He voiced concern
that this issue has become extremely complicated.
Mayor Youngman stated that if the effective date for beginning CPI increases were January
1,2004, it would be beyond the term of newly negotiated two-year collective bargaining agreements.
In response to the concerns voiced by Commissioner Brown, City Manager Johnson noted
that, under this ordinance, employees of a bargaining unit that has negotiated a wage structure which
falls below the living wage level in the second year of the agreement could be subject to the higher
wages unless he bargains for a waiver. He cautioned that having to bargain for such a waiver can
place both him and the bargaining unit in a bad position.
Commissioner Kirchhoff suggested that if the effective date for CPI increases were changed
to January 1, 2004, it would give staff time to come back with suggested revisions that would
address those concerns.
Commissioner Brown stated there is no easy way to include the CPI in the ordinance without
the potential of "double loading" increases; and he won't vote for something that won't work.
Break - 6:30 to 6:35 p.m.
Mayor Youngman declared a
Commission policy.
break
from 6:30 p.m. to 6:35 p.m., in accordance with
Ordinance No. 1554 (continued) - amendinq the Bozeman Municipal Code by adding Chapter 2.96,
I~rovidin.q for a livinQ waqe to employees of the City and to employees of businesses receiving
financial assistance from the City
Mayor Youngman suggested that the references to Consumer Price Index in Sections
2.96.020D. and E. be deleted in light of the concerns voiced by Commissioner Brown, noting that
adjustments to the living wage can be addressed at a future date.
Responding to Commissioner Brown, City Attorney Luwe suggested that Section 2.96.020.B.,
be revised to say "Covered regular employee does not include part-time, seasonal, temporary, short-
term or probationary employees or an employee who is also an owner under a Chapter S or C
corporation."
Mayor Youngman stated her support for the ordinance, noting that the Commission has tried
to address the concerns voiced by business owners. She drew attention to the fact that the
beginning wage is the same in both Missoula and Bozeman; and this ordinance is both stronger and
weaker than the Missoula ordinance. She stated that government should be create jobs with wages
on which people can live without government assistance to make ends meet, and characterized this
as a reasonable government goal. She emphasized that the Commission has made 18 policy changes
for business and 0 policy changes for Iow-income people. She noted that, however little the direct
effect of this ordinance may be, it sets a standard and serves as an expression of commitment. She
stated that the Commission revised the revolving loan fund guidelines a few years ago, at the Gallatin
Development Corporation's request, to delete the wage standard in an effort to attract more
applicants. She noted that she regretted the deletion at that time; and it has resulted in no more
applicants. She concluded by indicating an interest in working together to identify additional options
to assist new businesses paying employees a living wage rather than having business flourish at the
expense of its employees.
Commissioner Smiley stated that, while she had fully intended to support the ordinance when
she came to the meeting, she cannot do so with the last minute revisions that have been discussed.
12-19-2001 Special
-7-
She voiced her continued interest in an ordinance that applies to the City and can serve as a seed for
others to pay living wages. She briefly highlighted some articles reflecting what has happened
recently in companies around the country, noting that those lay-offs do have an impact on Bozeman,
as evidenced by 200 applicants for a single position recently. She noted that Montana is 46th in the
nation economically. She concluded by stating she recognizes both sides of the issue and, while she
supports the concept of a living wage, she cannot support this ordinance.
Mayor Youngman noted that she would have preferred a unanimous vote on this ordinance
but, since that does not seem possible, she feels it is imperative to include the CPI, with a January
1, 2004, effective date.
City Attorney Luwe noted that, from a collective bargaining standpoint, tying the CPI to July
1, the beginning of the fiscal year, would be easier. The Commissioners agreed that the CPI increase
should be tied to the beginning of the fiscal year for each individual business affected by this
ordinance, beginning with the fiscal year starting in 2004.
City Attorney Luwe reviewed the revisions to the ordinance resulting from the above
discussion, as follows: (1) Section 2.96.020.B. - revise to say "Covered regular employee does not
include part-time, seasonal, temporary, short-term or probationary employees or an employee who is
also an owner under a Chapter S or C corporation."; (2) Section 2.96.020.D. - change the second
sentence to read "Cffo~,,vo Jar, uary I,~vv~,~^^~ o,,,, ..... v,, the first d~y u, ~o,,vo, y ir, ~o~,~, yoo, thereafter,
the The health benefits "' (3) Section 2.96.020.E.- change the second sentence to read ............
J~nu~ry' I,~,~,.~"^^~, o,,,, ,,,, the first,,o~ ................. ~, .,o,,,,o,~ ,,, e~ch year thereafter, Beginning on or after
January 1, 2004, the living wage described herein shall be increased at the beginning of the fiscal
year of the City or Recipient, or annually, each year thereafter by an amount equal to the change in
the most recent Consumer Price Index, Class "B" and "C" for the Western Region."; and (4) Section
2.96.050.E. - change first sentence to read "~ An employee may file a complaint alleging a
recipient's violation of this section."
Commissioner Frost voiced his support for this ordinance, characterizing it as a small step and
the right thing to do.
Commissioner Brown stated he has many concerns about this ordinance and, therefore, cannot
vote for it. He voiced appreciation for the Commission's willingness to review the ordinance after two
years, although he suggested that within twelve months, the Commission will know if there are any
ill effects. He proposed that the Gallatin Development Corporation review a company's financial
records rather than the City, stating he is uncomfortable with being put in a position of looking at
people's private records. He stated that he has spent a lot of time and effort on this ordinance and
had planned to support it; however, he cannot in light of the concerns he has previously voiced.
It was moved by Commissioner Kirchhoff, seconded by Commissioner Frost, that Ordinance
No. 1554, providing for a living wage to employees of the City and to employees of businesses
receiving financial assistance from the City, be finally adopted as revised to include the above listing
submitted by City Attorney Luwe. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting
Aye being Commissioner Kirchhoff, Commissioner Frost and Mayor Youngman; those voting No being
Commissioner Brown and Commissioner Smiley.
Discussion - FYI Items
City Manager Johnson presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information"
items.
(1) Letter from Alex Phillips, member of the Bozeman Area Bicycle Advisory Board, dated
December 18, encouraging the installation of bike lanes in the Baxter Meadows Subdivision.
(2) Copy of a letter from Engineering Assistant Andy Kerr to property owners in the 1900
block of South Black Avenue regarding impending parking restrictions.
12-19-2001 Special
-8-
(3) Copy of the press release regarding the garbage collection schedule during the
upcoming holiday weeks.
(4)
expansion.
Copy of a letter and information sheet from WalMart soliciting support for their store
(5) Copy of a cover letter from Jeff Rupp, Executive Director of the Human Resource
Development Council, dated December 18, forwarding a copy of the 20-year renewal contract to
maintain Greenwood Plaza as an affordable housing project.
Adjournment - 7:10 p.m.
There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved
by Commissioner Kirchhoff, seconded by Commissioner Smiley, that the meeting be adjourned. The
motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Kirchhoff,
Commissioner Smiley, Commissioner Frost, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Youngman; those voting
No, none.
ATTEST:
ROBIN L. SULLIVAN
Clerk of the Commission
12-19-2001 Special