Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-19-16 CC Mtg - A2. Ordinance 1967, Billion Auto Plaza ZMA16404 Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 1 of 21 Application 16404, City Commission Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Public Hearing Dates: Zoning Commission public hearing was on December 6, 2016 City Commission public hearing is on December 19, 2016 Project Description: Zoning Map Amendment to rezone eight (8) existing lots including two (2) common area lots totaling approximately 21.11 acres from BP Business Park district to B‐2 Community Commercial district as allowed by Article 38.37 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. Project Location: The subject properties are generally located at 270 Auto Plaza Drive, on the northwest corner of Huffine Lane and Cottonwood Avenue. The area also incorporates rezoning of Competition Drive and Auto Plaza Drive and portions of adjacent rights‐of‐way to the center line. The properties are legally described as: Lot 1A of Block 3, Amended JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J‐180‐C; Lot 1A of Block 2, Amended JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J‐180‐A; and Lot 4 of Block 2, Lot 3 of Block 3 and Lots 1,2, 3, and 4 of Block 1, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J‐180; located in the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of S09, T02 S, R05 E of P.M.M., City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, 59718. Recommendation: Approval of the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Application 16404, as recommended by the Zoning Commission, and provisional adoption of Ordinance 1967. City Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the text of the ordinance, staff report, application materials, public comment, the deliberations and recommendation of the Zoning Commission at the public hearing of December 6, 2016, and all information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for Application 16404 and move to provisionally adopt Ordinance 1967, the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment. Report Date: December 13, 2016 Staff Contact: Rebecca Owens, Associate Planner Shawn Kohtz, Development Review Engineer Agenda Item Type: Action ‐ Legislative 367 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 21 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues No unresolved issues have been identified at this time. Project Summary The subject proposal is a Zone Map Amendment (ZMA) application to rezone eight existing lots including two common area lots totaling approximately 21.11 acres, and portions of adjacent rights‐of‐way, from BP Business Park district to B‐2 Community Commercial district. The subject properties are generally located to the northwest of the intersection of Huffine Lane (Highway 191) and South Cottonwood Road, and cover tracts of land with planned unit development (PUD) designation for subdivision development. Public streets that are subject to the PUD and wholly within the area proposed for rezoning include Auto Plaza Drive and Competition Drive. Zoning for surrounding and nearby properties is varied but includes a significant portion of B‐2. Rezoning the subject parcels will bring the tract into closer alignment to the City’s growth policy by changing zoning from BP to B‐2, which is an implementing zoning district of the Community Commercial Mixed Use land use designation. The change will potentially allow for increased utilization of lot coverage in future development on several currently vacant lots as well as infill on already developed parcels. Current uses on the developed lots are auto‐oriented, per the PUD entitlement, and include auto sales, repair, detailing services, parts retail, and wash operations. The Development Review Committee considered the application at its October 26, 2016 meeting and did not identify any regulatory or infrastructure constraints that would impede the amendment of the City of Bozeman Zoning Map to B‐2 for these lots. The Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered the application at its December 6, 2016 meeting. As noted in the attached minutes, the Zoning Commission unanimously, 4‐0, to pass a motion recommending this ZMA for approval by the City Commission with the findings presented in the staff report. No public comment has been received on this application as of the writing of this report. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended contingencies; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended contingencies; 3. Deny the application based on the Zoning Commission’s findings of non‐compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. 368 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 2  Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................. 2  Project Summary ............................................................................................................... 2  Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 2  SECTION 1 ‐ MAP SERIES ........................................................................................................ 4  SECTION 2 ‐ RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT ................ 9  SECTION 3 ‐ RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS ................................................. 9  SECTION 4 ‐ ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ........................ 9  Section 76‐2‐304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria ........................................................................ 9  PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS ................................................................ 14  APPENDIX A ‐ DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND ......................... 15  APPENDIX B ‐ NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ............................................................ 17  APPENDIX C ‐ PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING .............................. 17  APPENDIX D ‐ OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF .................................... 21  FISCAL EFFECTS .................................................................................................................... 21  ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 21  369 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 21 SECTION 1 ‐ MAP SERIES Figure 1 – Current zoning 370 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 21 Figure 2 – Future Land Use 371 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 6 of 21 Figure 3 – Aerial photograph 372 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 7 of 21 Figure 4 – Proposed zoning boundaries Eco-Joe’s Splash N Go (Car Wash) Billion Auto Group (Auto Body Repair) Open space Executive Automotive Detail vacant vacant Billion Auto Group (Sales and Services) Open space 373 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 8 of 21 Figure 5 – Subject property, looking north from Huffine Lane Figure 6 – Subject property, looking west from South Cottonwood Road Figure 7 – Subject property, looking southwest from South Cottonwood Road 374 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 9 of 21 SECTION 2 ‐ RECOMMENDED CONTINGENCIES OF ZONE MAP AMENDMENT Please note that these contingencies are necessary for the City to complete the process of the proposed amendment. Recommended Contingencies of Approval: 1. None. The applicant provided all materials necessary for the processing of this Zone Map Amendment. SECTION 3 ‐ RECOMMENDATION AND FUTURE ACTIONS Project Name: Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Application: 16404 Having considered the criteria established for a Zone Map Amendment, Staff recommends approval of the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment as submitted. The Development Review Committee considered the amendment on October 19, 2016. The Development Review Committee did not identify any infrastructure or regulatory constraints that would impede the approval of the application. The Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this Zone Map Amendment on December 6, 2016 and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Commission. The City Commission will hold a public meeting on the Zone Map Amendment on December 19, 2016. The meeting will be held at 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman. The meeting will begin at 5 p.m. The City Commission will make the final decision on the application. SECTION 4 ‐ ZONE MAP AMENDMENT STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS In considering applications for plan approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission must consider the following criteria (letters A‐K). As an amendment is a legislative action, the Commission has broad latitude to determine a policy direction. The burden of proof that the application should be approved lies with the applicant. In considering the criteria the analysis must show that the amendment accomplishes criteria A‐D. Criteria E‐K must be considered and may be found to be affirmative, neutral, or negative. A favorable decision on the proposed application must find that the application meets all of criteria A‐D and that the positive outcomes of the amendment outweigh negative outcomes for criteria E‐K. Section 76‐2‐304, MCA (Zoning) Criteria A. Be in accordance with a growth policy. 375 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 10 of 21 Yes. The proposed zoning is in accordance with a growth policy. The proposed zoning change from BP to B‐2 brings the zoning into closer alignment with the growth policy by changing the zoning from industrial to commercial and eliminates a current conflict between the Future Land Use Designation and the current zoning. Table C‐16 of the Bozeman Community Plan (page C‐17) indicates B‐2 as an implementing district of the underlying Community Commercial Mixed Use land use designation, which does not support BP. Rezoning the properties to B‐2 implements several specific goals and objectives of the Bozeman Community Plan as well, including: Chapter 3 ‐ Land Use Objective LU‐1.4: Provide for and support infill development and redevelopment which provides additional density of use while respecting the context of the existing development which surrounds it. Respect for context does not automatically prohibit difference in scale or design. The proposed B‐2 zoning will support infill development by allowing greater lot coverage on the subject parcels. In B‐2, the entire lot, exclusive of required yards and parking, may be occupied by the principal and accessory buildings and the setbacks include: 7 foot front yard, 10 foot rear yard, and 5 foot side yard for buildings, in addition to 25 foot front yard, ten foot rear yard, and eight foot side yard for parking and loading areas. BP setbacks are significantly larger and this can hinder use of an area; BP requires a 25 foot front yard, 20 rear yard, and 15 foot side yard. In addition, BP zoning requires a minimum lot area of 43,560 square feet for new lots but there is no such minimum for B‐2, so rezoning the lots to B‐2 may facilitate subdivision of the parcels for denser development. B‐2 also has a smaller lot width minimum, requiring 100 feet for new lots as compared to the 150 feet required for BP. The intent of the B‐2 zoning district is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers. Yes. The proposed zoning will secure safety from fire and other dangers. Emergency services are currently available to serve the property. Five fire hydrants are located throughout the subject area on Competition Drive and Auto Plaza Drive, and three more are located directly across South Cottonwood. Regulatory provisions established for all City of Bozeman zoning districts including the proposed B‐2 zoning ensure an adequate transportation network, fire services and public utility lines. Future development of the properties is subject to the review by the City of Bozeman and development standards will be applied to address the criteria at such time. 376 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 11 of 21 C. Promote public health, public safety, and general welfare. Yes. The proposed zoning will promote public health, public safety and general welfare. Any change in use, redevelopment or further intensification in development of the subject properties requires review by the City of Bozeman and the property is subject to all state and local regulations to ensure public health, safety and general welfare. The intent of the Bozeman Unified Development Code is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare; to recognize and balance the various rights and responsibilities relating to land ownership, use, and development identified in the United States and State of Montana constitutions, and statutory and common law; to implement the city's adopted growth policy; and to meet the requirements of state law. D. Facilitate the provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements. Yes. Existing transportation networks and public utilities adequately serve the site and will not be directly impacted by this amendment. This is a commercial property and impact on educational facilities and parks are not anticipated. The subject properties are bounded by two existing principal arterial streets, South Cottonwood and Huffine Lane (U.S. Hwy 191), and two local streets, Competition Drive and Auto Plaza Drive. Fallon Street abuts the properties to the north. The revised zoning for the properties will not impact transportation. If additional site plan development occurs within the PUD, additional connectivity to the north may be required in the future, which would facilitate the provision of transportation. Water service was installed for each lot at the time of subdivision as the JC Billion Auto Plaza water project and is located along all of the adjacent streets, and sewer is a gravity main that follows all of Competition Drive and part of Fallon directly north of the subject area, as well as three‐quarters of Auto Plaza Drive. Adequate capacity for future intensification of development is anticipated but will be confirmed at the time of application for further development review. Montana Code Annotated and the Bozeman Municipal Code set regulations for subdivision and development that will be applied to any land use application associated with this property in the future. Based on the proposed B‐2 zoning and allowed uses, public infrastructure improvements will likely be required to develop the property and will be reviewed at the time application is made. The proposed B‐2 zoning allows for a range of commercial uses and some residential. If residential uses are proposed, parkland and on‐site residential open space may be required. E. Reasonable provision of adequate light and air. Yes. The proposed zoning will ensure a reasonable provision of adequate light and air. The adopted standards in the Unified Development Code for the requested B‐2 zoning 377 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 12 of 21 district provide the necessary provisions including required yards, setbacks, lot coverage and building heights. Maximum building height in the B‐2 district is 44 feet, which is the same as the maximum height of 44 feet in the BP district, however B‐2 allows for greater height and intensity with conditional use permit approval. The subject property also falls within a Class I Entryway Corridor and any development is subject to additional provisions set forth in Chapter 38.17 of the Unified Development Code. F. The effect on motorized and non‐motorized transportation systems. Neutral. The proposed zoning will not have a negative effect on motorized and non‐ motorized transportation systems. B‐2 zoning allows for a broad range of commercial uses but is not significantly different from BP zoning. The subdivision was platted for commercial development and the transportation network was analyzed and determined adequate to serve the future development. Adjacent local streets and sidewalks were fully constructed to City standards at the time of subdivision. South Cottonwood, an existing principal arterial serves the properties from the east and was recently upgraded for improved capacity. This street moves traffic from the subject properties directly to another arterial, Huffine Lane, as well as to local streets and is anticipated to effectively continue this function construction if the subject area develops further. An existing drive access from Auto Plaza Drive through Lot 1A, Block 2 to South Cottonwood Road is intended as an eventual extension of Valley Commons Drive to improve public road connectivity. Any impacts to the transportation system will be evaluated upon requests for development review. G. Promotion of compatible urban growth. Yes. The proposed zoning will promote compatible urban growth. The existing fabric of the surrounding area is primarily composed of commercial uses along the arterial streets with residential development of varying density in pockets of the commercial corridors. The proposed zoning will promote compatible urban growth and continue the commercial fabric found in the corridor. The Bozeman Community Plan calls for Community Commercial Mixed Use to apply to the subject properties, and rezoning them to B‐2 will facilitate the intensification of existing buildings and development of vacant lots within the subdivision. New construction will be designed to current B‐2 standards, which include requirements for development to achieve compatibility with the community. B‐2 will facilitate more urban growth in a manner consistent with current and projected growth patterns in this gateway area of the City. Recent development in the vicinity demonstrates the subject properties’ compatibility with the surrounding context and includes a new automobile dealership just north of the site across Fallon, which is already zoned B‐2. 378 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 13 of 21 H. Character of the district. Neutral. The proposed zoning is in the character of the district. The subject subdivision was platted for commercial use and has been developed as a retail and services center. Properties that are contiguous to the subject area to be rezoned and in the general vicinity include the following, several of which have been rezoned over time:  the Huffine Lane (Highway 191) right‐of‐way to the south of the subject area, which is property of the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) and currently zoned as BP;  several R‐3, R‐4, R‐O and B‐2 lots in the Loyal Garden Subdivision that are partially under residential use, and a B‐2 zoned Town Pump gas station and convenience store, located across Huffine Lane to the south;  a large tract of undeveloped property zoned BP and R‐O that is owned by the Floweree Family, LLC, and which adjoins the entire western boundary of the subject area;  several B‐2 zoned properties that are occupied by First Security Bank, Alpine Orthopedics, and Cottonwood Veterinary Hospital, and located across South Cottonwood Road to the east; and  the B‐2 zoned J.C. Billion new vehicle dealership, located across Fallon Street to the north. Adjoining properties are primarily designated for nonresidential/commercial uses or are already developed with compatible activities, ensuring that the proposed zoning will not impact local character. The change from BP to B‐2 zoning would allow a greater maximum signage area, changing from 250 square feet per lot to 400 square feet per lot. This would bring the subject properties into alignment with the signage allowed on other B‐2 zoned properties in the area. It is not anticipated that the subject properties with existing development will significantly change the character of their existing signage under the new zoning. All new signage must undergo development review for permit approval to ensure that design standards are met, which include character compatibility. I. Peculiar suitability for particular uses. Yes. The property has been determined appropriate for B‐2 uses based on the underlying land use designation. The subject properties were deemed by the City as suitable for the particular use of auto‐oriented activities through the original PUD approval and more recent development as well. For example, a new automobile dealership has been established due north of the subject properties, and the local context of Huffine Lane and South Cottonwood Avenue is auto‐oriented, as both are 379 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 14 of 21 major arterial roadways that provide the area with a high level of access for auto‐ related uses. The existing PUD created an allowance for a more intensive zone than B‐2 in some sense because conditional use permits would be required for some of the current auto‐ related uses under B‐2. The subject properties and uses are thus generally conforming to the intent of B‐2 and are legally conforming under the PUD entitlement. Leaving the zoning as BP however would not promote efficiency in use on the land as outlined as a goal in the adopted growth policy. Any change in use, further intensification or redevelopment of the property will be subject to development review by the City of Bozeman at such time application is made. J. Conserving the value of buildings. Yes. The proposed zoning will conserve the value of buildings. The majority of the subdivision has been completed with a range of commercial structure types and the completion of this block with any additional development that may ensue from rezoning, as along the currently undeveloped Competition Drive area will eliminate vacant land to allow maximum efficiency in use of the land. Neighboring building values will not likely be negatively impacted with the change in zoning on the subject properties. Future development of the subject property may increase property values. Site development is subject to the Entryway Corridor Overlay District review criteria to ensure compatibility and additional standards for design quality are met. K. Encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area. Yes. The staff analysis and findings for the above criteria demonstrate the proposed rezoning from BP to B‐2 encourages the most appropriate uses on the subject property in relation to neighboring uses and zoning districts in the vicinity. Prior R‐O residential‐ office districting for the subject area stems from when the lots were within the Gallatin Country jurisdiction, prior to annexation in 1997, when the City and County zoning authorities were split, at which time the properties were assigned with BP industrial zoning. As the western areas of the City of Bozeman continue to growth, residential neighborhoods need local commercial services and employment and if facilitated through rezoning, the infill of existing developments like the subject area can help to reduce strip development and pressure to expand on greenfields. PROTEST NOTICE FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS IN THE CASE OF WRITTEN PROTEST AGAINST SUCH CHANGES SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF 25% OR MORE OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE AMENDMENT AREA OR THOSE LOTS OR UNITS WITHIN 150 FEET FROM A LOT INCLUDED IN A 380 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 15 of 21 PROPOSED CHANGE, THE AMENDMENT WILL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE EXCEPT BY THE FAVORABLE VOTE OF TWO‐THIRDS OF THE PRESENT AND VOTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION. APPENDIX A ‐ DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This is a Zone Map Amendment application to rezone eight existing lots including two common area lots totaling approximately 21.11 acres, and portions of adjacent right‐of‐ way, from BP Business Park district to B‐2 Community Commercial district. The subject properties are generally located to the northwest of the intersection of Huffine Lane (Highway 191) and South Cottonwood Road, and cover a tract of land with planned unit development (PUD) designation for subdivision development. Public streets that are subject to the PUD and wholly within the area proposed for rezoning include Auto Plaza Drive and Competition Drive. Zoning for nearby properties is varied but includes a significant portion of B‐2. The applicant submitted the formal Zone Map Amendment application on September 20, 2016 and proposes rezoning the property to B‐2 to increase consistency with the Future Land Use Designation for Community Commercial Mixed Use. The existing PUD was approved in 1992 under Application Z‐91131. At the time, the properties were zoned R‐O residential office and included one existing development, the anchor tenant of JC Billion Auto dealership. The PUD was established through a conditional use permit prior to annexation of the properties to the City, which explains how the auto‐related uses were approved. The approval was for an “auto‐related commercial PUD” and key conditions included: provision of water and sewer infrastructure for the entire PUD; protective covenants for the maintenance of right‐of‐ way features such as sidewalks, exterior lighting, pavement, curbs, water, and sewer infrastructure; the provision of open space beyond BP yard requirements, which is provided via the current 2.612‐acre Lot 4, Block 1 and 0.125 acre Lot 4, Block 2; stringent site lighting standards to limit glare; prohibition of external speaker systems; uses limited to low‐traffic generation factor; development allowed on the premise of outstanding project design quality to serve as models for the City’s entryway corridor area; architectural guidelines, such as for massing and palette; common infrastructure for stormwater; and exemplary landscaping in and around sites for buffering. The subdivision was rezoned to BP circa 1997, when the joint City and County planning jurisdiction was dissolved and the subject properties were assimilated into the new City zoning districts. The PUD is still active and the entitlement enables three current structures and associated operations on different lots to operate as legally non‐ conforming conditions because the BP standards and PUD pre‐date current zoning. The PUD was intended to support subdivision of the subject land. The PUD has allowed 381 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 16 of 21 intensive uses to exist analogous to those that are supported in B‐2, resulting in more concentrated development than would have been allowed under BP alone. However, activity has been static and little new development has occurred since creation of the PUD. The last project approved and constructed in the PUD was in 2008 for the Joe’s Eco‐Splash N Go carwash site plan, Application Z‐08060. Rezoning of the subject properties in the PUD from BP to B‐2 allows a higher utilization of land in the subdivision for infill expansion on existing developed lots and potential future development of currently vacant lots. Existing conditions and uses in the subject area include (also refer to Figure 4, page 7):  common open space on Lot 4, Block 1;  common open space on Lot 4, Block 2;  Joe’s Eco‐Splash N Go carwash on Lot 3, Block 3;  Executive Automotive Detail, which bridges Lot 3, Block 3 and Lot 1A, Block 3;  vacant parcel, Lot 3, Block 1;  vacant parcel, Lot 2, Block 1;  Billion Auto Group auto body repair on Lot 1A, Block 2;  Billion Auto Group sales and service on Lot 1, Block 1;  Auto Plaza Drive, a street with two entrances off of South Cottonwood;  Competition Drive, a currently dead‐end street with one entrance off of Auto Plaza Drive; and  additional features in the PUD covering various easements including for a telecommunications tower located immediately west of Lot 1, Block 1. The Bozeman Community Plan’s future land use designation for the subject parcels and neighboring properties to the north and east is Community Commercial Mixed Use, and the subject area’s base BP zoning does not conform with current growth policy per Table C‐16 (page C‐17) “Zoning Correlation with Land Use Categories”. As a result, the ZMA will bring the zoning of the subject parcels into closer alignment with growth policy and allow future development of the parcels to better serve other, surrounding plan designations that include significant residential allocations. The ZMA will also allow adjacent right‐of‐ways to be rezoned to meet existing zoning boundaries where gaps may exist, either to the property line or center of the right‐of‐way, thus improving the cohesiveness and clarity of the City’s districts. The applicant has expressed the property owner’s desire to build on currently vacant parcels and to infill existing parcels. Approval of the proposed Zone Map Amendment to rezone the properties to B‐2 will allow maximization of efficiency of the land and existing water and sewer services through denser development. Lot realignments may be pursued where multiple existing parcels currently serve a single structure or to redistribute land between the lots. Any subsequent infill or new lot development would 382 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 17 of 21 require full plan review to current code, which will enable assurance of design and function that appropriately complements the character of the neighborhood and community. The Development Review Committee considered the application on October 26, 2016 and did not identify any regulatory or infrastructure constraints that would impede the rezoning and recommended approval. The Zoning Commission considered the application at its December 6, 2016 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend the City Commission approve the ZMA. The City Commission will hold a public hearing on the application on December 19, 2016. APPENDIX B ‐ NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Noticing was provided for this project at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the City Commission public hearing. Notice for both public hearings was posted on‐site and mailed via First Class US Mail to all property owners of record within 200 feet of the property on October 25, 2016. The project was posted in the legal ads section of the Bozeman Daily Chronicle on October 30, 2016. No public comment has been received on this proposed Zone Map Amendment as of the writing of this staff report. If any public comment is received prior to the public hearing, it will be forwarded to the City Commission. APPENDIX C ‐ PROJECT GROWTH POLICY AND PROPOSED ZONING Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The property is designated as Community Commercial Mixed Use in the Bozeman Community Plan. “Activities within this land use category are the basic employment and services necessary for a vibrant community. Establishments located within these categories draw from the community as a whole for their employee and customer base and are sized accordingly. A broad range of functions including retail, education, professional and personal services, offices, residences, and general service activities typify this designation. “Activities within this land use category are the basic employment and services necessary for a vibrant community. Establishments located within these categories draw from the community as a whole for their employee and customer base and are sized accordingly. A broad range of functions including retail, education, professional and personal services, offices, residences, and general service activities typify this designation.” 383 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 18 of 21 Community Commercial Mixed Use has a wide variety of options with which this project currently complies and would become more in alignment with through rezoning. For example:  This land use must typically be located on one or two quadrants of intersections of arterials and/or collectors.  Mixed use areas must be developed in an integrated, pedestrian friendly manner and must not be overly dominated by any single land use.  A Floor Area Ratio in excess of .5 is desired.  Large Community Commercial Mixed Use is intended to service the larger community as well as adjacent neighborhoods within an approximately 1‐mile radius and is typically over 15 acres in size.  Higher intensity employment and residential uses are encouraged in the core of the area or adjacent to significant streets and intersections.  As needed, building height transitions should be provided to be compatible with adjacent development. 384 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 19 of 21 The following table from the Bozeman Community Plan shows the B‐2 zoning correlation with the underlying Community Commercial Mixed Use growth policy designation. Proposed Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The applicant has requested zoning of B‐2, community business district with this application. The intent of the B‐2 District is to provide for a broad range of mutually supportive retail and service functions located in clustered areas bordered on one or more sides by limited access arterial streets. Table 38.10.020 385 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 20 of 21 Table of Commercial Uses B‐1 B‐2 B‐3 Ambulance service — P P Apartments and apartment buildings6, as defined in this chapter P P1/C P 3 Arts and entertainment center, as defined in this chapter P P P Automobile fuel sales or repair, as defined in this chapter C C C Automobile parking lot or garage (public or private) P P P Automobile washing establishment C P C Banks and other financial institutions P P P Business, technical or vocational school — C P 3 Bus terminals — C C Community centers P P P 3 Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents P P1/C P 3 Community residential facilities serving nine or more residents — C — Convenience uses C P C Convenience use restaurant P P P Day care centers P P P Essential services Type I A A A Essential services Type II P P P Essential services Type III C 9 P C 9 Extended‐stay lodgings — P P Food processing facilities — C — Frozen food storage and locker rental — P — Health and exercise establishments P 1/C P P Hospitals — P C Hotel or motel — P P Laboratories, research and diagnostic — P P 3 Laundry, dry cleaning — C C Light goods repair, as defined in this chapter — C A Lodginghouses — C C3 Manufacturing, artisan P P P 8 Manufacturing, light — C C 3 Manufacturing, light and completely indoors — C — Mortuary — C C Museum — C C Medical and dental clinics P 1/C P P Meeting hall — P P Offices, as defined in this chapter P 1/C P P 3 Other buildings and structures typically accessory to permitted uses A A A Parking facilities P P P 3 Personal and convenience services, as defined in this chapter P P P Pet grooming shop P P P Printing offices and publishing establishments — — C Private club, fraternity, sorority or lodge — P P Public buildings P P P Refuse and recycling containers A A A 386 16404, Staff Report for the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 21 of 21 Table of Commercial Uses B‐1 B‐2 B‐3 Research laboratories — P P Restaurants P 5 P P Retail uses, as defined in this chapter P 2 P2 P2 Retail, large scale — P — Sales of alcohol for on‐premises consumption7 C C C Sign paint shops (not including neon sign fabrication) — P C Upholstery shops (excluding on site upholstery service for cars, boats, trailers, trucks and other motorized vehicles requiring overnight storage) — P P 3 Veterinary clinic — C — Wholesale distributors with on‐premises retail outlets, providing warehousing is limited to commodities which are sold on the premises — C — Wholesale establishments that use samples, but do not stock on premises — P P Any use, except adult businesses and casinos approved as part of a planned unit development subject to the provisions of article 20 of this chapter C C C APPENDIX D ‐ OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Property Owner(s): J&D Family Limited Partnership, c/o Joe Billion, 270 Automotive Ave., Bozeman, MT 59718 Applicant & Representative: Chris Wasia, 204 North 11th Avenue, Bozeman, MT 59715 Report By: Rebecca Owens, Associate Planner FISCAL EFFECTS No unusual fiscal effects have been identified. No presently budgeted funds will be changed by this Zone Map Amendment. ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Ordinance 1967 Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Exhibit Application Materials Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes from December 6, 2016 387 ORDINANCE NO. 1967 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONE MAP FROM BP, BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT TO B-2, COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR 21.11 ACRES DESCRIBED AS THE BILLION AUTO PLAZA SUBDIVISION GENERALLY LOCATED AT 270 AUTO PLAZA DRIVE INCLUDING: LOT 1A OF BLOCK 3 (PLAT J-180-C); LOT 1A OF BLOCK 2 (PLAT J-180-A); AND LOT 4 OF BLOCK 2, LOT 3 OF BLOCK 3 AND LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF BLOCK 1 (PLAT- J-180) LOCATED IN THE EAST ½ OF THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP TWO SOUTH, RANGE FIVE EAST, P.M.M. CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, WITH B-2 ZONING EXTENDED TO THE CENTER LINE OF ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman has adopted zoning regulations and a zoning map pursuant to Sections 76-2-301 and 76-2-302, Mont. Code Ann.; and WHEREAS, Section 76-2-305, M.C.A. allows local governments to amend zoning maps if a public hearing is held and official notice is provided; and WHEREAS, Section 76-2-307, Mont. Code Ann.; states that the Zoning Commission must conduct a public hearing and submit a report to the City Commission for all zoning map amendment requests; and WHEREAS, the City of Bozeman Zoning Commission has been created by Section 2.05.2700, BMC as provided for in Section 76-2-307, Mont. Code Ann.; and 388 Ordinance No. 1967, Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, Chapter 38, Article 37 of the Bozeman Unified Development Code sets forth the procedures and review criteria for zoning map amendments; and WHEREAS, the proposed Zone Map Amendment to amend the City of Bozeman Zone Map from BP, Business Park District to B-2, Community Business District for 21.11 acres, has been properly submitted, reviewed and advertised; and WHEREAS, the Bozeman Zoning Commission held a public hearing on December 6, 2016 to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a Zone Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, upon a vote of 4-0, the Bozeman Zoning Commission recommended to the Bozeman City Commission that the zone map amendment be approved; and WHEREAS, after proper notice, the City Commission held its public hearing on December 19, 2016, to receive and review all written and oral testimony on the request for a Zone Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed and considered the twelve zone change criteria established in Section 76-2-304, M.C.A., and found the proposed zone map amendment to be in compliance with the twelve criteria; and WHEREAS, at its meeting held on December 19, 2016, the City Commission found that the proposed Zone Map Amendment would be in compliance with Bozeman’s adopted growth policy and would be in the public interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1 389 Ordinance No. 1967, Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 3 of 5 The zoning district designation of the following-described property is hereby designated as "B-2", Community Business District: Zoning Boundary Perimeter: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 9; THENCE N01°51'14"E A DISTANCE 1333.9'; THENCE N 89°34'10"W A DISTANCE OF 663.3'; THENCE S02°00'11"W A DISTANCE OF 1381.7; THENCE S 89°22'23"E A DISTANCE OF 666.8' ; THENCE N01°54'21"E A DISTANCE 50.0' TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 21.11 ACRES MORE OR LESS, SUBJECT TO EXISTING EASEMENTS. Property Bounds: LOTS 1, 2,3, & 4, BLOCK 1, LOT 4, BLOCK 2, & LOT 3, BLOCK 3, J.C. BILLION AUTO PLAZA SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-180, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, LOCATED IN THE EAST ½ OF THE SE ¼ OF THE SE ¼ OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF P.M.M., AND INCLUDING THE ENTIRETY OF HUFFINE LANE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTH, AND INCLUDING THE COTTONWOOD ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO ITS CENTERLINE TO THE EAST, AND INCLUDING THE ENTIRETY OF COMPETITION DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY. LOT 1A, BLOCK 2, AMENDED PLAT OF J.C. BILLION AUTO PLAZA SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-180-A, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, LOCATED IN THE EAST ½ OF THE SE ¼ OF THE SE ¼ OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF P.M.M., AND INCLUDING THE COTTONWOOD ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO ITS CENTERLINE TO THE EAST, AND THE ENTIRETY OF AUTO PLAZA DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY. LOT 1A, BLOCK 3, AMENDED PLAT OF J.C. BILLION AUTO PLAZA SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-180-C, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA, LOCATED IN THE EAST ½ OF THE SE ¼ OF THE SE ¼ OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF P.M.M.. SUBJECT to all easements of record or apparent from visual inspection of the property. Section 2 Repealer. 390 Ordinance No. 1967, Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 4 of 5 All provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other provisions of the ordinances of the City of Bozeman not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3 Savings Provision. This ordinance does not affect the rights and duties that matured, penalties that were incurred or proceedings that were begun before the effective date of this ordinance. All other provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code not amended by this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4 Severability. Should any sentence, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole, or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so decided to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Bozeman Municipal Code as a whole. Section 5 Codification. This Ordinance shall not be codified but shall be kept by the City Clerk and entered into a disposition list in numerical order with all other ordinances of the City and shall be organized in a category entitled “Zone Map Amendments.” Effective Date. The effective date is thirty (30) days after final adoption of this ordinance on second reading. 391 Ordinance No. 1967, Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment Page 5 of 5 PROVISIONALLY ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on first reading, at a regular session thereof held on the 19th day of December, 2016. CARSON TAYLOR Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN CROUGH City Clerk FINALLY PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the City Commission of the City of Bozeman, Montana, on second reading, at a regular session thereof held on the _____ day of __________________________ 2017. The effective date of this ordinance is _________________, _______, 2017. CARSON TAYLOR Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN CROUGH City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: GREG SULLIVAN City Attorney 392 393 394 ENGINEERING    CONSULTING      PLANNING    DESIGN  204 N. 11th Ave.  BOZEMAN, MT  59715  406‐581‐3319  www.g‐e‐i.net 204 N. 11th Ave., Bozeman, MT 59715 Cell: (406) 581-3319 www.g-e-i.net Page 1 of 1   September 16, 2016    Chris Saunders  Community Development Planning Interim Director  City of Bozeman Community Development  PO Box 1230  Bozeman, MT 59771‐1230    Re: Billion Auto Plaza – Zoning Map Amendment Application       Dear Chris,    As we discussed earlier this summer, the Billion group would like to change the zoning of the  original Billion Auto Plaza (property on corner of Huffine and Cottonwood).  The purpose of the  zoning change would be to align the zoning with the direction of the Billion Auto Plaza and to match  the zoning with the current Growth Policy.  The zoning would match existing zoning to the north  and east of the subject property.  Please find attached one hardcopy of the Zone Map Amendment  form and narrative, as well as 3 copies of the exhibits, and two CDs with full digital copies of the  submittal.  Also included in the submittal is a check for $2,894 to cover the review fee of $1,785 +  ($57 x 19.45 acres).      Thank you for meeting with me regarding this project.  Let us know if you need anything else as  part of this submittal.      Sincerely,             __________________________                                             Chris Wasia, P.E.                                                       Genesis Engineering, Inc.                                        www.g‐e‐i.net        cc:   H:\1134\001\DOCS\Zoning Amendment\ZMA ‐ cover letter.doc  395 A1 Development Review Application A1 Page 1 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION 1. PROJECT Development Name: Description: 2. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 3. APPLICANT Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 4. REPRESENTATIVE Name: Full Address: Phone: Email: 5. PROPERTY Full Street Address: Full Legal Description: Current Zoning: Current Use: Community Plan Designation: Billion Autoplaza Zone Map Amendment J&D Family Limited Partnership - c/o Joe Billion, see attached for additional 270 Automotive Ave, Bozeman MT 59718 406-556-9076 J&D Family Limited Partnership - c/o Joe Billion 270 Automotive Ave, Bozeman MT 59718 406-556-9076 Genesis Engineering Inc. - Chris Wasia 204 North 11th Ave, Bozeman, MT 59715 406-581-3319 cwasia@g-e-i.net See Attached for multiple addresses See Attached for multiple legal descriptions BP Existing Dealership, Car Wash, Auto Body Community Commercial Mixed Use 396 Development Review Application A1 Page 2 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications Overlay District: Neighborhood Conservation Entryway Corridor None Urban Renewal District: Downtown North 7th Avenue Northeast None 6. STATISTICS (ONLY APPLICATION TYPES 2-12, 17, 24 AND 26) Gross Area: Acres: Square Feet: Net Area: Acres: Square Feet: Dwelling Units: Nonresidential Gross Building Square Feet: 7. APPLICATION TYPES Check all that apply, use noted forms. Form Form 1. Pre-application Consultation None 17. Informal Review INF 2. Master Site Plan MSP 18. Zoning Deviation None 3. Site Plan SP 19. Zoning or Subdivision Variance Z/SVAR 4. Subdivision pre-application PA 20. Conditional Use Permit CUP 5. Subdivision preliminary plat PP 21. Special Temporary Use Permit STUP 6. Subdivision final plat FP 22. Comprehensive Sign Plan CSP 7. Subdivision exemption SE 23. Regulated Activities in Wetlands RW 8. Condominium Review CR 24. Zone Map Amendment (non Annexation) ZMA 9. PUD concept plan PUDC 25. UDC Text Amendment ZTA 10. PUD preliminary plan PUDP 26. Growth Policy Amendment GPA 11. PUD final plan PUDFP 27. Modification/Plan Amendment MOD 12. Annexation and Initial Zoning ANNX 28. Extension of Approved Plan EXT 13. Administrative Interpretation Appeal AIA 29. Reasonable Accommodation RA 14. Administrative Project Decision Appeal APA 30. Other: 15. Commercial Nonresidential COA CCOA 1 6. Historic Neighborhood Conservation Overlay COA NCOA 8. APPLICATION FEES AND MATERIALS A. Fees are to be provided based upon the adopted fee schedule FS. Contact our office for an estimate. approximately 46,000 square feet 19.45 acres 12.6 397 Development Review Application A1 Page 3 of 3 Revision Date 01-04-16 Required Forms: Varies by project type Recommended Forms: Presentation of submitted plans and specifications B. Application materials shall be submitted for each application as shown in the specific guidance and checklists that is provided for each application type. A common development review application form and common notice materials may be provided for an application that includes more than one application type. All other application materials shall be submitted for each individual application type per the project guidance and checklists. 9. CERTIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES This application must be signed by both the applicant(s) and the property owner(s) (if different) for all application types before the submittal will be accepted. The only exception to this is an informal review application that may be signed by the applicant(s) only. As indicated by the signature(s) below, the applicant(s) and property owner(s) submit this application for review under the terms and provisions of the Bozeman Municipal Code. It is further indicated that any work undertaken to complete a development approved by the City of Bozeman shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and any special conditions established by the approval authority. I acknowledge that the City has an Impact Fee Program and impact fees may be assessed for my project. Further, I agree to grant City personnel and other review agency representative’s access to the subject site during the course of the review process (Section 38.34.050, BMC). I (We) hereby certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Certification of Completion and Compliance – I understand that conditions of approval may be applied to the application and that I will comply with any conditions of approval or make necessary corrections to the application materials in order to comply with municipal code provisions. Statement of Intent to Construct According to the Final Plan – I acknowledge that construction not in compliance with the approved final plan may result in delays of occupancy or costs to correct noncompliance. Applicant Signature: Printed Name: Owner Signature: Printed Name: Owner Signature Printed Name: If signing as a corporation, please provide the title and position of the individual signing on behalf of the corporation. Attach separate sheets for additional owner signatures. CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net J&D Family Limited Partnership - Joe Billion J&D Family Limited Partnership - Joe Billion Billion Family Limited Partnership - Joe Billion 398 ENGINEERING CONSULTING PLANNING DESIGN 204 N. 11th Ave.  BOZEMAN, MT 59715  406-581-3319  www.g-e-i.net Development Review Application Additional Street Addresses and Legal Descriptions Legal: Lot 1A, Block 3, Amended JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180-C Street Address: 171 Competition Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 3, Block 3, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180 Street Address: 100 Competition Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 1A, Block 2, Amended JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180-A Street Address: Auto Plaza Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 3, Block 1, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180 Street Address: Competition Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 2, Block 1, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180 Street Address: Auto Plaza Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 1, Block 1, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180 Street Address: 1 Auto Plaza Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718 Legal: Lot 4, Block 1, JC Billion Auto Plaza Sub, Plat J-180 Street Address: Common Area H:\1134\001\DOCS\Zoning Amendment\addresses and legals.doc 204 N. 11th Ave., Bozeman, MT 59715 Cell: (406) 581-3319 www.g-e-i.net Page 1 of 1 399 ZMA Zone Map Amendment Required Materials ZMA Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: ZONE MAP AMENDMENT REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8½ x 11 or 8½ x 14 sets. This application is only for a proposed zone map amendment to in association with annexation. If an annexation is associated with the map amendment, see form ANNX. Complete and signed development review application form A1. Plan sets that include all items required in the zone map amendment checklist below. Standard application sets required plan sizes: 2 sets that include full size 24 x 36 inch plans 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans 2 digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROM’s or USB drive. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. Notes: All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8½ x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3-ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1 and materials. APPLICATION FEE Base fee: $1, 785 Plus: $57 per acre ZONE MAP AMENDMENT CRITERIA 1. A thorough project narrative including a detailed response to the following: a. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy? How? b. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How? c. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How? d. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements? How? e. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How? f. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorize and non-motorized transportation systems? How? g. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How? h. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How? i. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How? j. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How? k. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area? 2. If map amendment, provide an exhibit of the property to be modified. Provide existing zoning designation and the proposed land use designation. The exhibit should include the legal limits of the property and size in square feet and acreage. If adjacent to a right of way the zoning should extend to the centerline of the right of way. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 400 Zone Map Amendment Required Materials ZMA Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: CERTFICATION AND SIGNATURES I (We), the undersigned, hereby certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Property Owner’s Signature(s) Date State of County of On this day of , 20 , before me, a Notary Public ofr the State of , personally appeared , known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is(are)) subscribed to the above instrument and acknowledge to me that he/she/they executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Notarial Seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public for State of Residing at My Commission Expires CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net 401 ENGINEERING    CONSULTING      PLANNING    DESIGN  204 N. 11th Ave.  BOZEMAN, MT  59715  406‐581‐3319  www.g‐e‐i.net 204 N. 11th Ave., Bozeman, MT 59715 Cell: (406) 581-3319 www.g-e-i.net Page 1 of 2   September 16, 2016    Zone Map Amendment Narrative  Lot 3 of Minor Subdivision 340 & J.C. Billion Auto Plaza Subdivision         1. A thorough narrative including a detailed response to the following:  a. Is the new zoning designed in accordance with the growth policy?  The growth policy lists the subject property as “Community Commercial Mixed Use”.  The proposed  zoning change from BP to B‐2 actually brings the zoning closer to the growth policy by changing the  zoning from industrial to commercial.    b. Will the new zoning secure safety from fire and other dangers? How?  The proposed B‐2 zoning has standards for building height, setback, and list of authorized uses within  the current U.D.O. which will help secure safety from fire in future development in this area.  The  surrounding north, south, and east lands are already zoned B‐2 and secure safety from fire is currently  being met.  Emergency vehicle access standards as well as the applicable building codes will also aid in  the fire safety.    c. Will the new zoning promote public health, public safety and general welfare? How?  The proposed B‐2 zoning has standards which promote public health, safety and welfare within the  current U.D.O.  The zoning changes does not affect the public health standards established by the City  and State for roads and public utilities.  All City and Federal public safety requirements will still be  required in the proposed B‐2 zoning.    d. Will the new zoning facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks,  and other public requirements? How?  The proposed B‐2 zoning has standards to provide for adequate transportation, water, sewerage,  schools, and parks within the current U.D.O. The zoning change does not affect the public health  standards established by the City and State for roads and public utilities.      e. Will the new zoning provide reasonable provision of adequate light and air? How?  The building height and landscaping requirements are the same for BP and B‐2 zoning.  Therefore, the  zoning change will not affect the provision of adequate light or air.  Separate national and local building  requirements will also likely provide for a reasonable provision of adequate light and air.    f. Will the new zoning have an effect on motorized and non‐motorized transportation systems? How?  No, the effect on motorized and non‐motorized transportation systems will remain the same.    g. Does the new zoning promote compatible urban growth? How?  The new zoning promotes compatible urban growth since the proposed zoning matches existing zoning  to the south, east, and north.  The proposed zoning is also more aligned with the current growth policy.    h. Does the new zoning promote the character of the district? How?  Yes, the new zoning will better promote the character of the district since the existing buildings and  uses will now be principle authorized uses within the proposed zoning district.       402 204 N. 11th Ave., Bozeman, MT 59715 Cell: (406) 581-3319 www.g-e-i.net Page 2 of 2 i. Does the new zoning address the affected area’s peculiar suitability for particular uses? How?  The new zoning does will not significantly affect the areas suitability for particular uses. The primary use  of the existing buildings is currently a non‐conforming use within the existing zoning and a principle use  within the proposed zoning.  The new zoning will also match surrounding zoning to the south, east and  north, while still leaving a buffer to low density residential zoning.    j. Was the new zoning adopted with a view to conserving the values of buildings? How?  The proposed zoning will surely not depreciate the value of the existing buildings.  The value of the  buildings will most likely be constrained as the result of the proposed zoning change and principle uses.    k. Does the new zoning encourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the jurisdictional area?  Yes. Since most of the area is already existing buildings and the existing buildings are principle  authorized uses within the proposed zoning, the new zoning does encourage the most appropriate use  of land.  The proposed re‐zoning to B‐2 is also congruent with zoning adjacent main corridors  throughout the City of Bozeman zoning area.                             H:\1134\001\DOCS\Zoning Amendment\re‐zoning narrative.doc  403 N1 Noticing Materials Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: NOTICING MATERIALS Notice is required for certain projects in order for citizens to participate in decision making which affects their interests and provides opportunity to receive information pertinent to an application that would not otherwise be available to the decision maker. SITE PLAN, MASTER SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, DEVIATION, FIRST MINOR SUBDIVISON AND SIMILAR REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site, attached to this checklist. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. MAJOR AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site and not physically contiguous (touching a boundary) to the subdivision, attached to this checklist. Clearly label list ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners physically contiguous (touching a boundary) including recorded purchasers under contract for deed to be sent certified mail attached to this checklist. Clearly label list CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed. Two sets additional mailing labels with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed attached. NOTICE Current property owners of record can be found at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office in the Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman, Montana. CERTIFICATION I, _____________________________________________, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all condominium owners, within 200 feet of the property located at ________________________________________________________, is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. _______________________________________ Signature CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net JEREMY MAY J.C. BILLION AUTO PLAZA SUBDIVISION & AMENDMENTS(J-180, J-180-A, J-180-C) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 404 Proposal _________________________________ $GMRLQLQJ3URSHUW\2ZQHUVAdjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within _______ feet of proposal site./HJDO'HVFULSWLRQRI3URSHUW\3URSHUW\2ZQHU¶V1DPH0DLOLQJ$GGUHVVRI3URSHUW\2ZQHUIURP&RXQW\7D[5HFRUGV12345678910* If road is a state highway, also include Montana Department of Transportation in property owner list. Page _____ of ______ (If additional pages of this form are needed, download the file entitled "Adjoiner List".)Adjoiner List-051306/13CONTIGUOUS TO PROJECT✔200W1/2,SE1/4,SE1/4, SEC 9, T02S, R05E FLOWEREE FAMILY, LLC C/O MUCKEL ANDERSONPO BOX 1869, RENO, NV 89505-1869HUFFINE LANE (HIGHWAY 191) Montana Department of TransportationPO BOX 1110, BOZEMAN, MT 5977111405 Proposal _________________________________ $GMRLQLQJ3URSHUW\2ZQHUVAdjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within _______ feet of proposal site./HJDO'HVFULSWLRQRI3URSHUW\3URSHUW\2ZQHU¶V1DPH0DLOLQJ$GGUHVVRI3URSHUW\2ZQHUIURP&RXQW\7D[5HFRUGV12345678910* If road is a state highway, also include Montana Department of Transportation in property owner list. Page _____ of ______ (If additional pages of this form are needed, download the file entitled "Adjoiner List".)Adjoiner List-051306/13ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS✔✔200LOT 11, BLOCK 1, LOYAL GARDEN SUB, PHASE 1A GOLDEN GATE PROPERTIES, LLC 2149 WEST DURSTON ROAD, SUITE 31, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-2740LOT 1, BLOCK 1, LOYAL GARDEN SUB, PHASE 1A TMT&T, 2009 TRUST, C/O AMY KNOWLESPO BOX 990861, REDDING, CA 96099-0861LOT 2, BLOCK 1, LOYAL GARDEN SUB, PHASE 1A BOZEMAN HEALTH 915 HIGHLAND BLVD, BOZEMAN, MT 59715-6902LOT 1, MINOR SUB 454B PARK STREET HOLDINGS, LLC600 SOUTH MAIN STREET, BUTTE, MT 59701-2534LOT 5A, MINOR SUB 340A FIRST SECURITY BANK PO BOX 910, BOZEMAN, MT 59771-0910LOT 4, MINOR SUB 340 AO GROUP, LLC 536 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, SUITE 100, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9529LOT 3, MINOR SUB 340 THEAH, LLC - C/O COTTONWOOD VET450 COTTONWOOD ROAD, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9207UNIT 101, 102 & 302, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340HRDC OF DISTRICT IX, INC 32 SOUTH TRACY AVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59715-4659UNIT 103, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340KIMBERLEY HEITMAN 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 103, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-923913406 Proposal _________________________________ $GMRLQLQJ3URSHUW\2ZQHUVAdjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within _______ feet of proposal site./HJDO'HVFULSWLRQRI3URSHUW\3URSHUW\2ZQHU¶V1DPH0DLOLQJ$GGUHVVRI3URSHUW\2ZQHUIURP&RXQW\7D[5HFRUGV12345678910* If road is a state highway, also include Montana Department of Transportation in property owner list. Page _____ of ______ (If additional pages of this form are needed, download the file entitled "Adjoiner List".)Adjoiner List-051306/13ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS✔✔200UNIT 104, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340GTG COTTONWOOD LLC 210 CIRQUE DRIVE, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9315UNIT 105, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340JASON & RICHARD SCHNEIDER337 SHOSHONE STREET, SHERIDAN, WY, 82801-5527, UNIT 106, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340LAURA E. ORSER 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 106, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 107, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340ANDREA FEIGE 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 107, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 108, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340JACK R. TOLEDO, JR 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 108, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 201, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340SANDRA M. TANSY 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 201, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 202, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340ROGER W. RENNER 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 202, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 203, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340NIEDENS BROADWATER, LLC214 SILVER CLOUD CIRCLE, BOZEMAN, MT 59715-0631UNIT 204, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340TRACY MARSH 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 204, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 205, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340CLINTON G. BISHOP, JR. 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 205, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-923923407 Proposal _________________________________ $GMRLQLQJ3URSHUW\2ZQHUVAdjacent to proposal site and across watercourses, roads*, etc. Within _______ feet of proposal site./HJDO'HVFULSWLRQRI3URSHUW\3URSHUW\2ZQHU¶V1DPH0DLOLQJ$GGUHVVRI3URSHUW\2ZQHUIURP&RXQW\7D[5HFRUGV12345678910* If road is a state highway, also include Montana Department of Transportation in property owner list. Page _____ of ______ (If additional pages of this form are needed, download the file entitled "Adjoiner List".)Adjoiner List-051306/13ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS✔✔200UNIT 206, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340DAVID M. SWIFT 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 206, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 207, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340DONNA MILLER 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 207, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239 UNIT 208, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340MAYON SARGEANT 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 208, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 301, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340JENNY McCUNE 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 301, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 303, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340LARRY M. ZAPF 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 303, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 304, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340CAROL MATLAND 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 304, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 305, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340DAVID & SARAH KENNEY 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 305, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 306, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340KYLE HELM 244 SOUTH COTTONWOOD RD, UNIT 306, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-9239UNIT 308, TBP CONDO, LOT 2 CONDO MASTER, MINOR SUB 340STEPHANIE STRATTON 210 TALON WAY, BOZEMAN, MT 59718-975933408 409 410     City Zoning Commission Tuesday, December 6, 2016 6:00 PM  City Commission Chamber – 121 N. Rouse Avenue  A. Call meeting to order   Present were:  Chris Mehl, Commissioner Liaison  Erik Garberg  Julien Morice  Jordan Zignego  George Thompson  B. Changes to the Agenda.  There were no changes to the agenda.  C.  06:02:20 PM (00:00:53)  Approve Meeting Minutes from Joint Zoning Commission/  Planning Board Meetings – 9/6/16, and 10/4/2016.  It was moved and seconded that the minutes of the meetings of September 6, 2016 and October 4,  2016, be approved.  The motion carried unanimously.    D.  06:02:28 PM (00:01:01)  Public Comment – Please state your name and address in an  audible tone of voice for the record.  This is the time for individuals to comment on matters falling  within the purview of the Committee.  There will also be an opportunity in conjunction with each  action item for comments pertaining to that item.  Please limit your comments to three minutes.  No comment was received under this agenda item.  E. Action Items  1. 06:02:45 PM (00:01:18)   16404 Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment (Zoning  Commission only)   Zone Map Amendment to rezone eight existing lots totaling approximately 21 acres  and adjacent rights‐of‐way from BP Business Park to B‐2 Community Commercial  district as allowed by Article 38.37 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. (Owens)  411     06:02:58 PM (00:01:31)  Rebecca Owens entered her staff report and findings into the record.  She  noted this proposal is to rezone eight existing lots totaling 21 acres, located within a commercial PUD,  lying along the west side of Cottonwood Road from BP to B‐2.  The future land use designation is  community commercial mixed use.  The B‐2 zone is an implementing zone for the land use designation  while the BP zone is not.  The PUD was established in 1992 and there are two lots and two open space  lots remaining undeveloped at this time.  Current uses on the site are automobile oriented; and future  development within the PUD would be subject to the provisions of B‐2 zoning and the corridor overlay  district.  She noted that access to the undeveloped lots will probably be from an extension of  Competition Drive to Fallon Street; the Montana Department of Transportation has prohibited access to  this subdivision from Huffine Lane.  Rebecca Owens stated no public comment has been received as of this time.  She noted the  Development Review Committee has reviewed this application and recommended approval.    06:10:09 PM (00:08:42)   Erik Garberg asked if changing the zoning will create any issues with the  existing uses.  06:10:21 PM (00:08:54)  Rebecca Owens responded that the auto related uses on the site are not  permitted in BP but will be more conforming since they are permitted or conditional uses in the B‐2  zone.  06:11:14 PM (00:09:47)  Responding to questions from Erik Garberg, Rebecca Owens stated the  applicant will probably need to either amend the PUD or seek conditional use approval for continued  auto related operations if other planning processes are triggered in the subdivision.   06:11:51 PM (00:10:24)  Julien Morice asked about the proposed motion language; Rebecca Owens  responded that the contingencies on Page 9 reference standard zone map contingencies.  06:12:31 PM (00:11:04)  Chris Wasia, Genesis Engineering, indicated concurrence with the staff report  and a willingness to respond to questions.  06:12:55 PM (00:11:28)  Erik Garberg asked if the applicant is aware that there may be additional  conditional use permitting processes required after this.  06:13:00 PM (00:11:33)  Chris Wasia responded the applicant is aware there may be.  He stated they are  not removing the PUD at this time, but changing the underlying zoning to be more consistent with what  is in the area.  06:13:44 PM (00:12:17)  Chris Mehl asked if the applicant has seen the memo from staff, noting it will be  entered into the record.  Chris Wasia responded he has and has no issues with it.  06:14:10 PM (00:12:43)  George Thompson asked about the alignment of the access roads.  06:14:31 PM (00:13:04)  Chris Wasia responded the plat was done in the early 1990s and the roads for  this development were platted at that time.  He recognized that other roadways in the area may or may  412     not connect to the existing roads in the future.  He stated he feels Competition Drive needs to be  completed at some time, noting he is not aware of why it has not been to date.  06:15:23 PM (00:13:56)  George Thompson noted he is baffled by roads that don’t align with those in  adjacent developments.    06:16:00 PM (00:14:33)  Erik Garberg opened the public hearing; not public comment was received.  06:16:24 PM (00:14:57)   It was moved by Julien Morice that, having reviewed and considered  the staff report, application materials public comment and information presented, I hereby  adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 16404 and move to  recommend approval of the Billion Auto Plaza Zone Map Amendment with contingencies  required to complete the application process.    06:16:45 PM (00:15:18)  Seconded by Jordan Zignego.  06:16:47 PM (00:15:20)  Julien Morice stated the property is surrounded by B‐2, and the rezoning makes  sense.  06:17:18 PM (00:15:51)  The motion carried unanimously.    F. 06:17:27 PM (00:16:00)  FYI/Discussion.  Chris Mehl asked if this board will be meeting on  December 20, noting it would be good to let people know as soon as possible if there is no  meeting.    G. 06:18:05 PM (00:16:38)  Adjournment.  Erik Garberg adjourned the meeting.   413