Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-12 Minutes, City CommissionMINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA August 12; 2002 The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, on Monday, August 12, 2002, at 3:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Steve Kirchhoff, Commissioner Marcia Youngman, Commissioner Lee Hietala, Commissioner Jarvis Brown, CommissionerAndrew Cetraro, Director of Public Service Debbie Arkell, Planning Director Andy Epple, City Attorney/Acting City Manager Paul Luwe and Clerk of the Commission Robin Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Acting City Manager Luwe requested that Commission Resolution No. 3535 and authorization for the City Manager to sign the easements from Home Depot U.S.A. be removed from the agenda and that the final plat for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase I, be removed from the Consent Items for discussion. Minutes - January 18, 2000, and May 13, July 22 and August $, 2002 It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala, that the minutes of the meeting of July 22, 2002, be approved as amended and that the minutes of the meeting of August 5, 2002, be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being CommissionerYoungman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Mayor Kirchhoff deferred action on the minutes of the meetings of January 18, 2000, and May 13, 2002, to a later date. Consent Items Acting City Manager Luwe presented to the Commission the following Consent Items. Ordinance No. '1572 - Zone Map Amendment - from "BP" to "B-2" on 20.33 acres described as Certificate of Survey No. 331 (Rolfe property on west side of North 19th Avenue); provisionally adopt and brinq back in two weeks for final adoption ORDINANCE NO. 1572 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING THE CITY OF BOZEMAN ZONE MAP ZONING DESIGNATION FROM "B-P" (BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT) TO "B-2" (COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT) ON 20.33 ACRES LOCATED IN THE NORTH HALF, SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP '1 SOUTH, RANGE $ EAST, MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA. Authorize City Mana.qer to siqn - Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement for 1997 Water Replacement Projects - HKM Enqineering, Inc. Authorize City Manaqer to siqn - Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement for Collection System Improvements - Entranco, Inc. Ratify City Manager's signature - Aqreement with Lanette Windemaker for planning consultant services 08-12-2002 -2- Authorize Mayor to siqn - Findings of Fact and Order - modification of conditions for preliminary plat for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase I (P-02002A) Authorize Mayor to si,qn - Findinqs of Fact and Order - preliminary plat for R&D Holdin(i Subdivision (subdivide 19.6 acres alonq east side of Cottonwood Road between Huffine Lane and West Babcock Street into 5 lots for commercial development) (P-02007) Buildinq Inspection Division report for July 2002 Claims It was moved by Commissioner Hietala, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the Commission approve the Consent Items as listed, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, CommissionerYoungman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Commission Resolution No. 3535 - placing fire mill levy on November ballot Authorize City Manager to sign - Tschache Lane Street/Utility Easement and Temporary Cul-de-Sac Easement on Lot 2, COS No. 2089 - Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (west side of North 19th Avenue between Tschache Lane and Baxter Lane) Included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of Commission Resolution No. 3535, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3535 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION TO THE BOZEMAN CITY COMMISSION TO LEVY UP TO EIGHT (8) MILLS ANNUALLY FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) YEARS, TO FUND CAPITAL NEEDS FOR THE BOZEMAN FIRE DEPARTMENT. Also included in the Commissioners' packets were copies of the Tschache Lane Street/Utility Easement and the Temporary Cul-de-Sac Easement for the Home Depot site. Acting City Manager Luwe reminded the Commission that he had asked that the items be removed from the Consent Items, and then requested that action on these two agenda items be delayed for a period of one week due to errors in the documents. It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Cetraro, that action on these two agenda items be delayed for a period of one week. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Approval of final plat for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase I (subdivide 60.65 acres described as Lot 2A, Minor Subdivision No. 145A, into 19 multi-family lots and 19 commercial lots (west end of Catron Street) (P-02028) Included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of the final plat for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase I. Acting City Manager Luwe reminded the Commission he had requested this item be removed from the Consent Items for discussion. He noted that the Letter of Credit has not yet been submitted or the Improvements Agreement accepted for this subdivision. He requested that the Commission approve the final plat, contingent upon Director of Public Service approval of the Letter of Credit and Improvements Agreement. 08-12-2002 -3- It was moved by Commissioner Cetraro, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that the final plat for Cattail Creek Subdivision, Phase I, subdividing 60.65 acres at the west end of Catron Street into 19 multi-family lots and 19 commercial lots, be approved contingent upon Director of Public Service approval of the Letter of Credit and Improvements Agreement. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Presentation of budqet for City-County Health Department for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 - Health Officer Stephanie Nelson Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Health Officer Nelson, dated August 5, forwarding the Gallatin City-County Health Department Proposed FY2002-2003 Budget. Health Officer Stephanie Nelson noted that the budget for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 supports the strategic activities that she identified in her presentation to the Commission in May. She stated that the County Commission has delayed approval of the budgets for the County until August 21, at which time it will consider the City's action on this budget. She then indicated that the major changes in this budget relate to employee salades since the County is moving from a linear pay system to a market based system, with a performance based system anticipated in the future. Responding to questions from Commissioner Hietala, Health Officer Nelson stated that the City's contribution to the Department is through a 5.01-mill levy assessed by the County on all properties within Gallatin County, including Bozeman. She indicated that she will have County Fiscal Officer Ed Blackman prepare a memo more fully explaining the funding sources for this budget. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, Health Officer Nelson stated that the cuts made during the recent special legislative session will cause her department to look at the highest priorities for those most at risk, cautioning that those changes will probably result in more unmet needs for the mentally ill. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala, that the Commission approve the proposed budget for the City-County Health Department for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 as submitted. The motion carded by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public review - application for loan from Community Development Block Grant Economic Development Revolvinq Loan Fund - MicroLab, Inc. This was the time and place set for review of the application submitted by MicroLab, Inc., for a loan from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund. Ms. Alicia Bradshaw, Executive Director of the Gallatin Development Corporation, distributed brochures on MicroLab, after which she presented the staff report. She stated that the CDBG Economic Development Loan Review Committee has reviewed this application and forwarded a recommendation for approval, subject to conditions. She noted that the Mr. John Amend, President of MicroLab has been in the Bozeman area for many years, teaching and developing technology at MSU. He has created products over the past couple years and is now beginning to sell those products, with over 50 percent of the revenues coming from outside the area. She noted the applicant is seeking a $160,000 loan for this start-up company. The company now has three employees with an additional five positions to be filled as a result of this loan. Mr. John Amend, applicant, gave a power point presentation on the company and showed the Commissioners samples of the products. He stated the products are computer-based and electronic, and are to be used in the sciences and agriculture. Their markets will include both education and industry, and marketing strategies will include use of websites and exhibits at conferences. 08-12-2002 -4- Mr. Amend stated that neady $400,000 has been put into the company before this loan request; and he projects that $50,000 of the loan proceeds will be dedicated to engineering and manufacturing, $85,000 to salary support and $25,000 to initial marketing. He indicated that this loan will allow the company to put product on the shelf and help ensure the salaries of the employees. After completion of his presentation, Mr. Amend responded to several questions from Commissioner Hietala. He indicated that an inordinate percentage of the initial costs will be involved in research and development, and he expects that to change as the company and its products become more established. He indicated that the initial profits will be put into research and development and into salaries. He noted that, working through the University, his group developed a product in the early 1990s which the University marketed and subsequently sold to a Pennsylvania company. He stated the group has now chosen to create products and market them through its own company. He concluded by indicating that, as the result of an exhibit at a recent conference, the company is beginning to receive orders. Responding to questions from Commissioner Brown, Acting City Manager Luwe stated that the next step after Commission action is to prepare loan documents which reflect the conditions and terms set in that action. He indicated that those documents will be reviewed by the City's legal staff and finance staff prior to execution. It was moved by Commissioner Hietala, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the application submitted by MicroLab, Inc., for a $160,000 loan from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) the loan shall be at five percent for a period of five years; (2) payments of interest only for the first six months, followed by payments of principal and interest for the remaining four and one-half years; (3) the funds will be used to assist in purchasing inventory and to fund engineering and sales positions; (4) collateral on the loan will be in first position on all business assets, inventory and intangibles; (5) the primary shareholder will personally guarantee the loan; (6) payments on loans from shareholders will be subordinate to this loan. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1567 - addinq Chapter 12.22 to the Bozeman Municipal Code, allowinq sidewalk vendors and sidewalk displays on portions of Main Street in the downtown area Included in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of Ordinance No. 1567, as approved by the City Attomey, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1567 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, PROVIDING THAT THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE BE AMENDED BY ADDING CHAPTER 12.22 ALLOWING SIDEWALK VENDORS AND SIDEWALK DISPLAYS ON PORTIONS OF MAIN STREET AND REVISING SECTION 12.12.020 TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS WITH THE NEW CHAPTER. Staff Attorney Patricia Day-Moore reviewed the revisions in the ordinance as a result of last week's discussion. She then noted that she has received a couple of requests for removal of the time restrictions to allow vendors to operate at night after the bars close. She stated that is currently prohibited under the 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. time restrictions. Commissioner Brown noted that the reference to "block face" rather that "block" needs to be included, based on last week's discussion. He then asked if the measurements included in the ordinance for clear walk space and restricted area from the curb are adequate or if additional language is needed to address the problems that arose during Crazy Days. Staff Attorney Day-Moore stated she feels the measurements in the ordinance, when coupled with the width of the sidewalk, will determine the amount of space available for tables, benches and signs. 08-12-2002 -5- Responding to questions from Commissioner Cetraro, the Staff Attorney stated the limitation on the number of vendors allowed per block face does not pertain to Crazy Days, which is covered under a blanket permit issued to the Downtown Bozeman Association. She then indicated that, at the present time, vendor permits are issued on a first come, first served basis. Responding to Mayor Kirchhoff, City Attorney Luwe suggested that the hours of operation be revised, possibly to 3:00 a.m., if the Commission wishes to accommodate the request to serve to the bar crowd. Staff Attomey Day-Moore noted that specific hours of operation could be included in the permit for each vendor that may be more restrictive than the hours in the ordinance. Mr. Bob Fletcher, The Cannery, stated he owns two businesses and three buildings in the downtown area, and he holds the permit for a vending cart in his block. He noted that the one per block limitation has worked well; and he is very concerned with the proposed two carts per block face. He stated that the businesses located downtown have made a commitment to the community, and many of them have incurred significant costs to become established. He cautioned that the vending cads represent unfair competition, since they don't have those costs and can operate only during the good times. He also indicated he does not support the late night operations, noting that is a time when the streets should be tamed. He suggested that the empty building formerly occupied by Conlin's would be a good location for a food court for those wishing to sell in the downtown area, and that would put them on an equal footing with others on Main Street since they would be required to address the issues of garbage collection and parking. Ms. Marilyn Tracz, Downtown Bozeman Partnership, stated she is concerned about any possible size limitations on tables, noting she feels that requiring a 5-foot-wide unobstructed path for pedestrians is adequate. She then voiced concurrence with Mr. Fletcher's comments, stating she feels that allowing twenty vending carts along Main Street is inappropriate and results in unfair competition to the downtown restaurants and businesses. She addressed the issues of garbage and maintenance, noting that the Downtown Bozeman Partnership takes care of the sidewalks and public garbage cans. She stated that, while the City's ordinance requires sidewalk vendors to provide garbage receptacles, in reality people tend to walk down the street as they eat, dropping their wastes in the public receptacles. She noted that the vendors have no responsibility for cleaning up the sidewalks; the business owners or the Downtown Bozeman Partnership are left to deal with the issue. She concluded by indicating she does not support the request for expanded hours of operation, stating she feels that 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. is adequate. Staff Attorney Day-Moore confirmed that at the present time only one cart is allowed per block, while under this ordinance up to four vendors could be located in a single block. She stressed that these vending carts are not limited to food services, and they must receive permission from the owner of the business to set the cart at that location. Responding to questions from Commissioner Brown, the Staff Attorney indicated that those serving food must have a current inspection sheet from the City-County Health Department and must have a current business license from the City. Commissioner Youngman indicated her interest in revisions to the ordinance which would require vendors to pay for the garbage service for the public garbage cans along Main Street, since she recognizes most of their customers will use those cans rather than the cans by the cads. She noted that failure to require such a contribution results in an additional burden on the business owners, which is unfair. Mayor Kirchhoff asked the Commissioners to address the issues of the number of vending carts per block, hours of operation, and possible contribution toward garbage service. Responding to Commissioner Cetraro, the StaffAttorney stated that there are currently four vending carts in the downtown, which is fewer than allowed under the current limitation of one per block. As a result of discussion, the Commissioners agreed that the current limitation of one per block should remain in place, and that a block should be defined as extending to the alleys on either side of Main Street. They acknowledged that vending carts may be located on Main Street, Mendenhall Street or Babcock Street between Broadway Avenue and Third Avenue. 08-12-2002 -6- A majodty of the Commissioners also agreed that the hours of operation should not be extended beyond 9:00 p.m. and could, in fact, be limited further on the individual permits. In response to comments from Staff Attorney Day-Moore, they recognized that the hours may be extended under the special permit section for special events, such as the Bite of Bozeman. Regarding the issue of paying for garbage service, a majority of the Commissioners voiced support for requiring those with vending carts to contribute to the costs of garbage collection from the downtown containers, based on a percentage of a fixed fee. Mayor Kirchhoff stated he does not want to create a disincentive for vending carts on Main Street, stating he feels they create a good atmosphere in the downtown area and views them as an asset. It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Cetraro, that Ordinance No. 1567, allowing sidewalk vendors and sidewalk displays on portions of Main Street in the downtown area, be provisionally adopted with the following revisions: (1) one vending cart per block, with block being defined as extending to the alleys on either side of Main Street, (2) hours of operation shall not be extended beyond 9:00 p.m. and could, in fact, be limited further on the individual permits, except that the hours may be extended under the special permit section for special events, and (3) vendors shall contribute to the costs of garbage collection from the downtown containers, based on a percentage of a fixed fee, and that it be brought back in two weeks for final adoption. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1569 - settinq the salaries for the City Commissioners, effective July 1, 2002 Previously distributed in the Commissioners' packets was a copy of Ordinance No. 1569, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1569 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, FIXING THE SALARIES OF THE CITY COMMISSIONERS AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.04.070 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE. It was moved by Commissioner Cetraro, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that Ordinance No. 1569, setting the Commissioners' salaries effective July 1,2002, be finally adopted. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No being Commissioner Cetraro and Commissioner Hietala. Request for impact fee credits - City of Bozeman Engineering Department - WWTP Clarifier Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Associate Planner Chris Saunders, dated August 2, forwarding the request for impact fee credits for the Wastewater Treatment Plant clarifier. Associate Planner Saunders stated that if impact fees were not in litigation, they would be available for this project. Since they are not available, the City's Engineering Department is requesting that impact fee credits be awarded from one City fund to another, pending resolution of the litigation. He indicated that staff has reviewed the request and forwards a recommendation for approval, subject to three conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala, that the request for impact fee credits submitted by the City's Engineering Department for the Wastewater Treatment Plant clarifier be approved, subject to the following conditions: The credit will not be paid as cash at this time. The credit will be awarded as a sum which will be paid back through a promissory note. Payment will become due 90 days after completion of the ongoing litigation. This mechanism is authorized by 08-12-2002 -7- Section 3.24.100.G., Option 2. The final value will not be determined until final project costs are available. An initial credit value of $558,800 has been identified. If the final determination of Cause No. D¥-99-71 is that impact fees or impact fee credits cannot be charged or credited by the City of Bozeman, then no impact fee credit shall be available to the applicant under this award. The applicant shall agree in writing to the above-listed conditions of approval and the terms of the promissory note prior to the credits becoming effective. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Request for impact fee credits - City of Bozeman Enqineerinq Department - VVWTP Diqester System Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Associate Planner Chris Saunders, dated August 2, forwarding the request for impact fee credits for the Wastewater Treatment Plant digester system. Associate Planner Saunders stated this is the same type of request as the previous agenda item, and forwarded staff's recommendation for approval, subject to three conditions. It was moved by Commissioner Hietala, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the request for impact fee credits submitted by the City's Engineering Department for the Wastewater Treatment Plant digester system be approved, subject to the following conditions: The credit will not be paid as cash at this time. The credit will be awarded as a sum which will be paid back through a promissory note. Payment will become due 90 days after completion of the ongoing litigation. This mechanism is authorized by Section 3.24.100.G., Option 2. The final value will not be determined until final project costs are available. An initial credit value of $433,070 has been identified. If the final determination of Cause No. DV-99-71 is that impact fees or impact fee credits cannot be charged or credited by the City of Bozeman, then no impact fee credit shall be available to the applicant under this award. The applicant shall agree in writing to the above-listed conditions of approval and the terms of the promissory note prior to the credits becoming effective. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those Aye being Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Informal review - Montana Crane - allow installation of 2$0-foot collocation tower on property located at end of Cedar Street, within the 1-90 corridor Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Assistant Planner Caroline, dated August 7, forwarding information on the proposed tower. Assistant Planner Karin Caroline stated the subject property is located on Cedar Street, adjacent to 1-90. She noted the applicant is proposing a 250-foot lattice tower in a chain link area that could be expanded from 80 feet square to 100 feet square when necessary to accommodate the attendant buildings and ground facilities. She noted the collocation tower is to be designed to accommodate five to eight carders, with one parking space being provided for routine maintenance. The Assistant Planner stated that the Development Review Committee has reviewed this application, and their comments have been forwarded in the packet. 08-12-2002 8- Responding to Commissioner Hietala, Assistant Planner Caroline stated that staff has discussed the need for a study to identify the number of towers required to provide coverage for Bozeman, but no such study has been undertaken. Commissioner Brown stated he shares Commissioner Hietala's concerns, and feels it is important to coordinate the installation of towers. He questioned how many towers are needed and how tall they need to be, voicing concem that the Commission does not have the expertise to evaluate the issue objectively. Mr. Don Lucker, 2408 Par Court, Yellowstone Holding Company, stated he is the regional director for this market. He stated the purpose of this review is to discuss plans and layouts that would best serve Bozeman. He indicated that this tower location would provide versatility and the ability to provide service to the community. He stressed that the subject area is industrial; and with the proposed height of the tower, it can be loaded and remodeled, and can serve as an alternate location to the City's water tank. He stated the site is located outside the downtown area and is easily accessible. Mr. Lucker briefly turned his attention to the applications before the Commission during this evening's public hearings, questioning whether 180-foot monopoles are the appropriate type of facility to be constructed or if collocation towers are better. He asked who will maintain or remove a tower if it is abandoned and whether fair market value rents are being charged. Mr. Lucker stated he wants to work with the City to develop and administer a high-quality collocation tower that is strong and has room to grow. He noted that he has no vendors at this time and needs a lease before erecting a tower. He suggested that a similar requirement should be attached to those being considered during this evening's public hearings. He also noted there is still room on the City's water tank for another vendor and suggested that the Commission slow the process down and not approve tower applications until a plan for the community has been developed. He noted that the telecommunications industry has recently taken a hit and is not moving forward like it was a few short months ago. Mayor Kirchhoff voiced appreciation for the tone of caution, recognizing that several questions and issues were raised in the presentation. He suggested that master planning for towers may be the most appropriate first step, including an impact analysis. City Attorney Luwe asked about bonding and security deposits, and industry standards for dark towers. Responding to Commissioner Brown, Mr. Lucker suggested that the City could include a condition that it has first right of refusal on acquisition of a tower than has had no activity for a specific period, such as twelve or fourteen months. Associate Planner Saunders cautioned that most towers are located on leased land or easements, which could make purchasing of the tower a little more difficult. Commissioner Youngman voiced her concern about a 250-foot-tall tower next to the Interstate, although she finds that location preferable to being adjacent to homes. She then indicated she needs additional information, including how far apart the towers are to be and how many will be needed to cover the city besides those on the City's water tank. Commissioner Brown suggested the possibility of putting antennae on the water tower at the Pea Cannery rather than constructing a tower that he is not convinced is needed. Commissioner Youngman asked for alternatives to the proposed 250-foot tower, noting there are ways to disguise a tower. She also suggested that the Commission should be considering ways to mitigate the impacts of such a large tower. Mayor Kirchhoff stated his first choice is using the existing tall places, followed by addressing the impacts of a tower and possiby disguising the installation. Mr. Greg Poncelet, owner of the proposed site, stated there is an existing 170-foot-tall lattice tower on his property on Griffin Ddve. Responding to the Commissioners, he estimated that tower is located 400 08-12-2002 -9- feet east of North Rouse Avenue and 500 feet south of Griffin Drive. The subject site is approximately 200 to 300 feet from 1-90. Responding to Commissioner Brown, Mr. Poncelet stated he has no problem with allowing the lease to be assumed by someone else if the tower becomes abandoned. Mayor Kirchhoff concluded the informal review by thanking the applicant for providing a significant amount of technical information on the issue. Appointment to Desiqn Review Board It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Cetraro, that Randy Carpenter be appointed to replace Nichole Wills as a non-professional member on the Design Review Board, with an initial term to expire on June 30, 2003. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Discussion - FYI Items The following "For Your Information" items were forwarded to the Commission. (1) Memo from City Engineer Rick Hixson announcing that City staff will require all utilities to be elevated to the flood protection elevation, effective July 11. (2) E-mail from Planning Secretary Carol Schott regarding Todd Buchanan's relocation to Billings, resulting in an opening on the Zoning Commission. (3) Agenda for the County Commission meeting to be held at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 13, at Three Forks. (4) Agenda for the School Board meeting to be held at the Willson School at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 12. (5) Agenda for the Development Review Committee meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 13, at the Professional Building. (6) Agenda for the Design Review Board meeting to be held at 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 13, at the Professional Building. (7) Agenda for the County Planning Board meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 13, in the Commission Room. (8) Newsletter from Headwaters Recycling announcing that the next meeting will be held at 10:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 14, at Three Forks. (9) Minutes from the Community Affordable Housing Advisory Board meeting held on July 24. (10) Minutes from the Montana Transportation Commission meeting held on May 30 in Helena. (11 ) Commissioner Cetraro asked the Commissioners to consider the direction that the smoking ban is going in, noting that at the present time, it's a complete ban or no ban at all. He noted that a public opinion poll of city voters is to be taken by a private firm this week, and he would like to see those results before taking action to place an ordinance on the ballot. Commissioner Cetraro noted there are three existing ordinances in Montana and suggested that voters be given a choice between the complete ban currently being proposed, which is being challenged in court, and a less restrictive ban, similar to the two ordinances that have not been challenged in court. 08-12-2002 -10- In light of a letter he received this week, he encouraged the Commissioners to consider a less restrictive ordinance since a more restrictive ordinance is almost guaranteed to be subject to litigation. City Attorney Luwe cautioned that providing choices can create confusion and that to do so could result in a challenge on the validity of the vote. A majority of the Commissioners indicated they were not willing to forward two choices, but to proceed with the more restrictive ordinance. As a result of the discussion, the Commissioners chose to proceed with one ordinance, for consideration at next Monday's meeting. Recess- 5:45 p.m. Mayor Kirchhoff declared a recess at 5:45 p.m., to reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of conducting the scheduled public hearings and completing the routine business items. Reconvene - 7:00 p.m. Mayor Kirchhoff reconvened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 3526 - levyin.q and assessinq street maintenance district for Fiscal Year 2003 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on levying street maintenance district assessments for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, as established by Commission Resolution No. 3526, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3526 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 UPON ALL REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE INCURRED IN THE CITY-WIDE STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN AND TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICT TO ENCOMPASS ANNEXED PROPERTIES. Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Administrative Services Director Gamradt stated the proposed 3-percent increase in the assessment rate is to cover inflationary costs of salaries, operations and capital. He indicated that the inflationary increase allows the City to maintain the current level of services and avoids the potential of a large increase in a single year. Responding to Commissioner Hietala, the Director stated that the 3-percent inflationary figure was set several years ago and acknowledged that inflation this past year was closer to 2 percent. No one was present to speak in support of or in opposition to the assessments. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Kirchhoff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Cetraro, seconded by Commissioner Youngman, that Commission Resolution No. 3526, levying street maintenance district assessments for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, be finally adopted. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Cetraro, CommissionerYoungman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. 08-12-2002 -11 - Public hearinq - Commission Resolution No. 3527 - levvinq and assessinq tree maintenance district for Fiscal Year 2003 This was the time and place set for the public hearing on levying tree maintenance district assessments for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, as established by Commission Resolution No. 3527, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3527 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, LEVYING AND ASSESSING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 UPON ALL REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, COUNTY OF GALLATIN, STATE OF MONTANA, TO DEFRAY THE COST AND EXPENSE INCURRED IN THE CITY-WIDE TREE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF BOZEMAN AND TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICT TO ENCOMPASS ANNEXED PROPERTIES. Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Administrative Services Director Gamradt noted his previous comments apply to this item as well. In this instance, however, staff is proposing a 3-percent inflationary increase and a 2%-percent increase to fund the capital improvement program. Responding to Commissioner Hietala, the Director indicated that the city's growth rate is not adequate to cover the additional revenues needed. He stated, in fact, that the proposed 5%-percent increase will only result in approximately a 75-cent increase for an average residence. No one spoke in support of or in opposition to the proposed assessments. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Kirchhoff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala, that Commission Resolution No. 3527, levying tree maintenance district assessments for Fiscal Year 2002-2003, be finally adopted. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public hearinq - Major Site Plan - Ellerbe-Becket Construction Services for Bozeman Deaconess Health Services - allow construction of new 82,073-square-foot medical office buildinq, consisting of a two-story section and a three-story section on COS M-116 (Medical Office Buildinq IV) (Z-02142) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Major Site Plan requested by Ellerbe- Becket Construction Services for Bozeman Deaconess Health Services under Application No. Z-02142, to allow construction of a new 82,073-square-foot medical office building, consisting of a two-story section and a three-story section, on Certificate of Survey No. M-116. The proposed structure is known as Medical Office Building (MOB) IV, and results in an expansion of the existing hospital and attendant medical offices at 915 Highland Boulevard. Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Distributed to the Commissioners just prior to the meeting was an e-mail from Ellerbe-Becket Construction Services requesting that this public hearing be opened and continued to a later date. It was moved by Commissioner Hietala, seconded by Commissioner Brown, that the public hearing be continued to next week's meeting, in response to the applicant's request. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. 08-12-2002 -12- Public hearing - Major Site Plan - TriStar Communications for Barry Brown and Jerry Locati - allow development of 180-foot-tall telecommunications tower with associated support equipment on portion of Block 49, Northern Pacific Addition (Jayhawk Tower, 528 North Broadway Avenue) (Z-02144) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Major Site Plan requested by TriStar Communications for Barry Brown and Jerry Locati under Application No. Z-02144, to allow development of a 180-foot-tall telecommunications tower with associated support equipment on a portion of Block 49, Northern Pacific Addition. The subject project is known as the Jayhawk Tower, and is located at 528 North Broadway Avenue. Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Chris Saunders presented the staff report. He noted that this application and the next one are essentially the same. He stated that distributed just prior to the meeting were a memo dated August 12, in which he forwarded a recommended replacement for Condition No. 1 on each of the applications; a letter from Yellowstone Holding Company; and a letter from TriStar Communications, dated August 7, regarding ice fall for the two towers. The Associate Planner stated that the host site for this tower currently contains a large building with a variety of users. The applicant proposes a small compound on the east side of the building, within which the tower and support equipment are to be located. Industrial uses similar to those found in this building are located to the north, east and south of the subject site, with a mix of residential and industrial uses to the west. Locating the tower on the east side of the building, as proposed, will effectively screen the lower 25 or 30 feet of the tower from the street and the residences. The Associate Planner stated that staff has reviewed this application in light of the applicable criteria in the zone code, and staff's comprehensive findings are contained in the written staff report, along with a recommendation for approval subject to several conditions. He acknowledged that the scale and height of the facility are unusual in Bozeman, but the code contains a specific exclusion from the height limitations for large scale broadcast facilities. He stated no lighting is proposed, and it is anticipated the FAA will not require lighting since it is under 200 feet and is located more than three nautical miles from the airport. Associate Planner Saunders stated the major item raised during review by the Development Review Committee was the issue of functional interference with the City's emergency communications and services equipment. He cautioned that the FCC has exclusive authority in regulating radio frequency. There are roughly 27 different types of wireless services, and some of those are more closely controlled than others. In light of the limitations on what a city may address, he has prepared the revised Condition No. 1, which should address those concerns to the greatest extent possible under those restrictions. Responding to questions from Commissioner Brown, Associate Planner Saunders stated that a review of the number of licenses and providers should help to avoid building excess capacity. He then noted that the City's water tank and essentially every tall building in the community has an antenna on it. He noted this type of location is encouraged, but there are a finite number of buildings acceptable due to height and location. Under the City's zone code, an individual wishing to erect a tower must demonstrate that no technically or financially feasible alternative is available. He recognized that any telecommunication provider is constrained by the existing network and that grids change with additional or different services. He indicated there are three monopoles currently in the area and four facilities on the City's water tank. He indicated that, with the many variables involved, someone with expertise in the field would be needed to complete an analysis of the numbers and locations of facilities. He suggested that such a study should be coordinated with the County, particularly because of the 9-1-1 system and radio frequency waves extending beyond city boundaries. He indicated that locations along the interstate are preferred, since they provide services for the traveling public. Responding to Mayor Kirchhoff, the Associate Planner stated he feels Condition No. 1 as written adequately addresses mitigations that are allowed under the federal regulations and the City's zone code. Responding to Commissioner Youngman, the Associate Planner estimated that the subject site is located 125 feet from the nearest residential lot line; and the applicant's engineer has submitted a letter 08-12-2002 13- stating the collapse area of the tower would be approximately 60 feet from its base. Since the tower is to be located in an "M-I" zone and the adjacent property is also an "M-I" use, he feels the collapse area is adequate. He then indicated that under Condition No. 4, staff is proposing the tower be moved approximately 30 to 40 feet south of the location proposed. Mr. J.R. Reger, TdStar Communications, stated the tower is to be designed to carry six major carriers and an almost unlimited number of small wireless carriers or data carriers. He noted that the two towers proposed under this agenda item and the next agenda item are sufficient wireless infrastructure to cover most of Bozeman; and their heights are adequate for line-of-sight companies. He stated that, at 180 feet, lights should not be required since the site is over three miles from the airport. Mr. Reger stated that the towers are designed to withstand an unbelievable amount of stress, including that created by hurricanes, earthquakes and tornadoes. This proposed site is in an industrial area and is the best location to serve the interstate and the eastern half of Bozeman. Mr. Reger indicated that radio frequency transmissions are harmless. He then turned his attention to the issues identified by the Development Review Committee during its review, including possible interference with public safety communication. He indicated that each licensed applicant purchases a spectrum of frequencies under a license; however, there are also many unlicensed carriers that operate on different frequencies. Mr. Mark Spencer, 411 North Broadway Avenue, stated he recently spoke with the applicant about the proposed tower. He noted he does not want to see a structure of this magnitude in this area, particularly since it is immediately across the street from residences, and he feels a much better location than the one currently proposed could be found. Mr. Robert Kailey, 415 North Broadway Avenue, stated he lives immediately across the street from the subject site. He is concerned about the unknown inhabitants of the tower, and cautioned that with the rapidly changing technology, the circles of service could change dramatically. He cautioned that once a tower is erected, it is reasonably permanent but may not be usable. Mr. Kailey raised the issue of property values, voicing that no one would want to purchase a home across the street from such a tower. He concluded by voicing his concern about the impacts that a wireless tower might have on the wireless home network he has recently installed, particularly since a specific range can cause interference in a Iow frequency network. Mr. Don Lucker, 2408 Par Court, stated he feels the tower company has failed to prove compliance with FCC issues. He also questioned whether the proposed tower will be strong enough to handle the six- foot dishes that some carriers use and suggested that allowing one such carrier on the tower could drastically reduce the number of carriers that can be accommodated. He then turned has attention to frequencies, stating that the 2.4 gig frequency is an experimental one. He indicated that the information submitted does not include the foundation for the tower, an analysis of the tower or an environmental report. Mr. Lucker stated that in the event of a catastrophic event, towers are designed to sheer in the center, not fall over. As a result, the collapse area is smaller than might be expected. He next addressed the issue of lighting, noting that if an airport manager so determines, lighting may be required on towers as Iow as 80 feet. He concluded by suggesting the Commission has the authority to deny this application based on the failure to sufficiently answer questions. Associate Planner Saunders stated that, based on review of a 1996 aerial photo of the area, the distance to the corner of the nearest residential lot line is 200 feet. He then indicated that engineering calculations for structural loads are typically required as part of the building permit application, not at this stage in the process. Also, the environmental requirements can be addressed as each carrier requests approval to attach to the tower. Mr. J.R. Reger stated there are presently 18 carriers and 35 licenses in the area, and an infinite number of unlicensed wireless providers; and these two towers will provide sufficient infrastructure to serve the community. He indicated that the tower has not yet been purchased and assured the Commission it will be engineered to handle large dishes. He also recognized that all of the federal and local regulations must 08-12-2002 -14- be met. He indicated that no tower will be constructed until he has a signed lease, so there is no concern about a "dark tower" with the initial construction. Since there were no Commissioner objections, Mayor Kirchhoff closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hietala requested that the decision be delayed for one week, to give him an opportunity to study this issue further. He voiced interest in determining how to best prevent proliferation of towers and ensuring that the conditions are fair and just. Commissioner Brown requested that, prior to next week's decision, the Commission be provided answers to some of the questions raised, including impacts on property values and radio frequency interference. He then indicated it would be his preference to see the antennae added to the water tower at the Pea Cannery rather than the construction of a new tower, if possible. Also, he asked if the conditions could be written to allow for transfer of the land lease for the tower to another party that might assume ownership of the tower. Commissioner Youngman asked that the "dark tower" concept be addressed through the conditions of approval. City Attorney Luwe stated that legal staff has not had an opportunity to review the newly revised Condition No. 1 and suggested that his staff could work with Planning staff to revise that condition prior to next week's meeting if necessary. Associate Planner Saunders cautioned that the water tower at the Pea Cannery is outside city limits, so coordination between the City and the County would be necessary to place antennae on that facility. He then indicated there are at least two carriers on the tower at the present time. Mayor Kirchhoff requested that the decision on this application be placed on next week's agenda. Public hearinq - Major Site Plan with Certificate of Appropriateness - TriStar Communications for Lux Transfer and Storage - allow development of 180-foot-tall telecommunications tower with associated support equipment on Lot 2, Tract 7, Gardner-Simmental Plaza (Lux Tower, 145 Simmental Way) (Z-02143) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Major Site Plan with Certificate of Appropriateness requested by TriStar Communications for Lux Transfer and Storage under Application No. Z-02143, to allow development of a 180-foot-tall telecommunications tower with associated support equipment on Lot 2, Tract 7, Gardner-Simmental Plaza. The subject project is known as the Lux Tower, and is located at 145 Simmental Way. Mayor Kirchhoff opened the public hearing. Associate Planner Chris Saunders presented the staff report. He stated that the subject property is to be located on a larger host site that is developed. While the proposed site of the tower is not located within an entryway corridor, corners of the larger site are located in both the 1-90 corridor and the North 19th Avenue corridor, thus triggering the requirement for review under those criteria. He indicated that the subject property and surrounding area are zoned and developed as light industrial. The Associate Planner stated that the established minimum setbacks for the Gardner-Simmental Plaza Subdivision far exceed those required in the City's zone code. As a result, the proposed tower and fence will encroach into those setback requirements, and that will require approval from the review committee within the subdivision. The applicant is to provide additional landscaping around the tower for screening of the ground facilities. He then indicated that many of the issues and concerns raised during the previous agenda item apply to this one as well. Associate Planner Saunders stated that staff has reviewed this application in light of the applicable criteria, and staff's comprehensive findings are contained in the staff report. He concluded by forwarding staff's recommendation for approval, with the newly revised Condition No. 1. 08-12-2002 15- Mr. J.R. Reger, TriStar Communications, stated that this proposed tower is also designed to accommodate six carriers and will be the same type of tower as the Jayhawk Tower. He indicated that he has been contacted by two wireless internet companies and a major PCS carrier, and he projects there will be three or four tenants on the tower within a year. He noted the ground lease contains a clause that if the tower becomes obsolete, it is to be removed and the ground restored to its former condition. He indicated that this tower is to be located on the west side of the community, where most of the growth is occurring, and is designed to accommodate all of the traffic and companies that wish to collocate there. Responding to Commissioner Brown, Mr. Reger stated the ultimate service area for a tower is just under two miles. Responding to Acting City Manager Luwe, Mr. Reger stated that he must have at least one tenant before constructing a tower to ensure cash flow. He then noted that if a tower becomes obsolete, its steel value is greater than the cost of taking it down. Mr. Don Lucker, 2408 Par Court, cautioned against allowing the construction of a spec tower and suggested that towers not be allowed until there is a signed lease, not just a letter of intent. Mr. Jon Gerster, 719 North Wallace Avenue, submitted to the Commission a list of fifteen questions he feels need tO be answered for any tower located within city limits. He also submitted copies of articles on towers that he took off the internet, and asked the Commission to consider issues such as property values, what happens when a tower collapses, and the preservation of scenic areas and viewsheds. In light of the increased interest in erecting towers, he feels that more information is needed as well as a plan. He then encouraged the Commission to deny the application because of the number of questions and the potential risks, including interference with the 9-1-1 system. Mr. Robert Burt, Cutthroat Communications, stated the company is interested in several different sites and has selected none at this time. He indicated that this is a line-of-sight business, so tower height is important to them. Mr. Chds Nixon, 719 North Wallace Avenue, asked the Commission to take more time to get questions resolved before approving this tower or the Jayhawk Tower. He stated he views this as a health issue as well as an aesthetic issue. Acting City Manager Luwe noted that Associate Planner Saunders has advised that the City cannot regulate based on the environmental effects of radio frequency. He then cautioned the Commissioners that, since this is a quasi-judicial proceeding, they cannot go to the website or obtain additional information after the public hearing is closed; rather, he suggested that staff do the research and provide the information to the Commission. Commissioner Youngman requested that, if lighting is required on either this tower or the previous tower, shielding on the bottom of the light be required. She then asked if the Commission can require a tenant commitment prior to construction of a tower. Associate Planner Saunders stated that the zone code requires an applicant to demonstrate need, and suggested that the Commission could require that, prior to final site plan approval or before construction begins, the applicant must have at least one legal contract for location on the tower. Mr. J.R. Reger stated that he must have a tenant before erecting a tower so that he can service the debt. He noted that, while he has a letter of intent for each tower, he has no lease at the present time. He then indicated that, prior to next week's meeting, he will provide proof of effects on property values and the language of conditions from other communities for Commission review. Commissioner Youngman suggested that the public hearing remain open to allow for accepting additional information regarding the questions asked, and proposed that the previous public hearing be reopened as well. It was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Cetraro, that the public hearing be continued to next week's meeting to give staff an opportunity to respond to questions and provide the 08-12-2002 -16- information requested. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, CommissionerYoungman, Commissioner Hietala and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Public hearine (continued) - Major Site Plan - TriStar Communications for Barry Brown and Jerry Locati - allow development of 180-foot-tall telecommunications tower with associated support eQuir)ment on portion of Block 49, Northern Pacific Addition (Jayhawk Tower, 528 North Broadway Avenue) (Z-02144) It was moved by Commissioner Youngman, seconded by Commissioner Hietala, that the public hearing be reopened and continued to next week's meeting to give staff an opportunity to respond to questions and provide the information requested. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala, Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. Presentation from Planning staff re alternatives to address (1) height limitations in the BP zoning district and (2) current residential zoning density limits Included in the Commissioners' packets was a memo from Planning staff, dated July 30, requesting Commission direction on two possible zone code amendments. Associate Planner Chris Saunders noted that several alternatives for each of these amendments are identified in the memo. He then indicated that he is seeking authorization from a majority of the Commissioners to proceed with the amendments. On the issue of height limitations, he suggested a blending of the second and fifth alternatives; on the density limits, the Commissioners agreed to consider an amendment that brings densities into compliance with goals of the Bozeman 2020 Community Plan. Discussion (continued) - FYI Items (12) Acting City Manager Luwe submitted the following. (1) Stated that copies of Mr. Wittich's letter were distributed just prior to the evening session. (2) Noted that the change made during the special legislative session pertaining to funding for local governments applies only to counties and consolidated governments; and the City of Bozeman was successful in getting the additional $220,000 in gambling revenues. (13) Commissioner Youngman submitted the following. (1) Reminded the Commissioners of the need to fill the remaining vacancies on the Bozeman Alcohol Policy Advisory Council. (2) Asked how many Commissioners plan to participate in the Park City SummerTour activities. She also suggested that the Commissioners get a plaque for them. (3) Reminded the Commissioners that their evaluations are due to Mayor Kirchhoff by Wednesday. (4) Noted that the trip to the White House to receive the All America City award was fun and interesting, particularly since the presentation was made in the building in which her Grandmother had worked. (14) Commissioner Youngman suggested that, since the Commission has not acted on either ballot issue, they consider writing, printing and distributing a newsletter this week. She noted that articles could include pro and con for putting a strong smoking ordinance on the ballot, and another article could address the fire ballot issue. She stated that the newsletter could then be completed with a picture of Will Beardsley accepting the All America City award in Washington, D.C., and other "good news" articles. She indicated a willingness to coordinate the letter but indicated she cannot write it all. Commissioner Cetraro noted that Bozeman receives $880,000 in gaming revenues annually; and he is concerned about the reduction that could occur with the adoption of a strong smoking ordinance, particularly in light of Helena's recent experiences. Mayor Kirchhoff stated that preparing and distributing a newsletter this week is possible, but will require a substantial amount of effort. He then indicated his support for the idea if it can be accomplished. 08-12-2002 -17- Adjournment - 9:40 p.m. Thero being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Cetraro, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Brown, Commissioner Cetraro, Commissioner Youngman, Commissioner Hietala and Mayor Kirchhoff; those voting No, none. · KIROE~OFF, May6r/'~' ATTEST: ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission 08-12-2002