Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLakes at Valley WestPage 1 of 28 16320, Planning Board Staff Report for the Lakes at Valley West Phase 3 Subdivision Date: Planning Board, October 4, 2016 at 6:00 pm in the City Commission Room 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana City Commission, October 10, 2016 at 6:00 pm in the City Commission Room 121 N. Rouse Avenue, Bozeman, Montana Project Description: A Preliminary Major Subdivision application for the 3rd phase of a multi- phase residential development located on 65 acres south of Durston Road, east and west of an extension of Laurel Parkway. In association with a planned unit development. One phase with 56 lots and additional unplatted phases for future development. Eighteen relaxations are requested with the PUD associated with this application. Project Location: Lot R2 of Phase 2 of the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision, located in the NW ¼ of Section 9 Township 2S, Range 5E PMM City of Bozeman, Montana. Located at 5600 Durston Road Recommendation: Approval with conditions Advisory Board Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 16320 and move to recommend approval of the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Commission Recommended Motion: Having reviewed and considered the application materials, public comment, and all the information presented, I hereby adopt the findings presented in the staff report for application 16320 and move to approve the subdivision with conditions and subject to all applicable code provisions. Report Date: September 15, 2016 Staff Contact: Chris Saunders, Community Development Shawn Kohtz, Development Review Engineer Agenda Item Type: Action (Quasi-judicial) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Unresolved Issues If the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and associated relaxations are not approved, then the conditions and findings of this report will need to be modified. The analysis summarized in this report assumed approval of the requested relaxations. Staff has recommended approval of the PUD and associated relaxations. 4 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 2 of 28 Project Summary This subdivision and associated PUD proposes a unique combination of uses and configuration. The applicant asserts that the overall outcome of the proposal is superior to what would be obtained from the application of the default R-1 district. The outcome will be a diverse small scale neighborhood with unique access and development standards. Homes are expected to be smaller than what is commonly constructed in Bozeman. Substantial open space will be provided in both public and private ownerships. This combination is not presently available in the community. Park dedication exceeds the minimum required and is proposed to be banked for future phases as needed. Two existing lakes are incorporated into the design of the subdivision. Major streets are constructed per the City’s standards. An alternative street standard (woonerf) is used in portions of the pocket neighborhoods to create a unique design character. Approval for the non-standard street and a total of 18 relaxations from City of Bozeman standards have been requested through the associated PUD. Fifteen of the relaxations were previously approved with prior phases of the PUD and are continued on with this application. No action regarding the relaxations will be taken through the subdivision review. Alternatives 1. Approve the application with the recommended conditions; 2. Approve the application with modifications to the recommended conditions; 3. Deny the application based on the Commission’s findings of non-compliance with the applicable criteria contained within the staff report; or 4. Open and continue the public hearing on the application, with specific direction to staff or the applicant to supply additional information or to address specific items. This alternative is requested if the Commission wishes to amend or add conditions of approval. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 Unresolved Issues ............................................................................................................... 1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES .......................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES OR DEVIATIONS .................................................. 7 SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ............................................ 8 SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS ...................... 13 SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS .......................................... 16 5 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 3 of 28 SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS and findings .......................................................................... 17 Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.03.040, BMC................................. 17 Primary Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 76-3-608 ................................................. 19 Preliminary Plat Supplements ........................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY...................................... 26 APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.................... 26 APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT ......................................................... 27 APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF.................................. 27 FISCAL EFFECTS ....................................................................................................................... 27 ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 28 6 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 4 of 28 SECTION 1 - MAP SERIES Growth Policy Vicinity Map 7 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 5 of 28 Zoning Vicinity Map 8 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 6 of 28 Proposed Layout for Phase 3 9 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 7 of 28 Overall project layout showing possible future phases. SECTION 2 – REQUESTED VARIANCES There are no variances requested with this subdivision application. The associated PUD has requested 18 relaxations. Analysis of the requested relaxations is provided under the PUD staff report. To enable understanding of why the proposed plat does not comply with typical standards the relaxations are listed here. Several of the standards affect lot size and dimensions which are reflected on the plat. The summary of each relaxation, the customized zoning district incorporating those relaxations, and the overall reasoning behind the relaxations is in Section 9 of the subdivision submittal. The altered standards are depicted by lot and described in text in Appendix C of the Design Manual included in Section 10 of the subdivision submittal. Explanatory notes are attached to each section of the municipal code proposed to be altered. No action will be taken on these requested relaxations as part of the subdivision review. This review assumes that the requested relaxations have been approved. If that is not correct, then additional analysis will be required. Condition 31 requires a notice to purchasers to inform them of the unusual development standards in this development. This will avoid confusion, purchase under misapprehensions, and future conflicts between owners and the City. As the plat requires approval of the PUD in order to conform to all 10 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 8 of 28 regulations, Condition 7 establishes the sequence of approvals needed to enable approval of a final plat. Summary List of PUD Relaxations Code Section Summary of Section 1) 38.08.010.A.2 Intent of R-1 District 2) 38.08.020 Expand Authorized Uses in R-1 3) 38.08.030.A.2 Increase Allowed Lot Coverage and Floor Area 4) 38.08.040.A Reduce Minimum Lot Area 5) 38.08.040.B Reduce Minimum Lot Width 6) 38.08.050.A Reduce Yards 7) 38.08.060 Replace Building Height in R-1 to be the same as R-4 8) 38.22.030 Allow R-1 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) without a Conditional Use Permit for defined lots 9) 38.23.040.B Allow Increased Block Length 10) 38.23.040.C Allow Smaller Block Width 11) 38.23.040.D.3 Allow Alternate Pedestrian Walk Surface 12) 38.23.040.E Not Require Block Numbering 13) 38.24.060.A Design Standards (length of tangent at intersection) 14) 38.24.060.B Alternate Alley Section to Allow Woonerf 15) 38.23.100.A.2 Reduction to minimum wetland setback 16) 38.23.080.F Increase percentage of front yard allowed for storm water facility 17) 38.25.010.A.5 Allow parking in designated side yards for common parking areas 18) 38.21.060.A.4 Increase the allowed encroachment for a covered deck in front yard SECTION 3 - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Please note that these conditions are in addition to any required code provisions identified in this report. These conditions are specific to the planned unit development. Additional conditions may apply to the subdivision of the property being processed concurrently with this planned unit development. Recommended Conditions of Approval: Planning 1. The plat shall conform to all requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code and the Uniform Standards for Subdivision Plats (Uniform Standards for Certificates of Survey and Subdivision Plats (24.183.1104 ARM) and shall be accompanied by all required documents, including certification from the City Engineer that as-built drawings for 11 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 9 of 28 public improvements were received, a platting certificate, and all required and corrected certificates. The Final Plat application shall include three (3) signed reproducible copies on a 3 mil or heavier stable base polyester film (or equivalent); two (2) digital copies; one (1) PDF copy; and five (5) paper prints. The Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder’s office has elected to continue the existing medium requirements of 2 mylars with a 1½” binding margin on one side for both plats and COS’s. The Clerk and Recorder will file the new Conditions of Approval sheet as the last same sized mylar sheet in the plat set. 2. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. 3. The final plat and all associated improvements must be completed consistent with the application as submitted except where required to be changed by the City of Bozeman. 4. The applicant shall submit with the application for Final Plat review and approval, a written narrative stating how each of the conditions of preliminary plat approval and noted code provisions have been satisfactorily addressed, and shall include a digital copy (pdf) of the entire Final Plat submittal. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. 5. Simultaneously with filing of the final plat, in conjunction with required or offered dedications, the subdivider (or owner of the property being subdivided if the owner is not the subdivider) shall transfer ownership to the property owner’s association of all any open space proposed to be conveyed to the property owner’s association and all its right, title, and interest in any improvements made to such parkland or open space. For the transfer of real property, the subdivider or owner of the property shall submit with the application for final plat a warranty deed or other instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring fee simple ownership to the property owner’s association and associated realty transfer certificate. The subdivider or owner of the property must record the deed or instrument at the time of recording of the final plat. For personal property installed upon open space owned by the property owner’s association, the subdivider shall provide an instrument acceptable to the City Attorney transferring all its rights, title and interest in such improvements including all applicable warranties to such improvements. 6. Lot R2A shall be platted as undevelopable lots in accordance with Section 38.39.080.B.6 BMC. No public improvements shall be required for the undevelopable lot until it is subdivided as a lot which is not subject to this restriction. The following language shall be placed on the conditions of approval sheet of the plat: “NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all potential purchasers of Lot R2A, of the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, that the final plat of the subdivision was approved by the Bozeman City Commission without completion of on and off site improvements required under the Bozeman Municipal Code, as is allowed in Chapter 38.39 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. As such, this Restriction is filed with the final plat that stipulates that any use of this lot is subject to further subdivision, and no development of this lot shall occur until all on and off site 12 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 10 of 28 improvements are completed as required under the Bozeman Municipal Code. THEREFORE, BE ADVISED, that Building Permits will not be issued for Lot R2A, of the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana until all required on and off site improvements are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. No building structure requiring water or sewer facilities shall be utilized on this lot until this restriction is lifted. This restriction runs with the land and is revocable only by further subdivision or the written consent of the City of Bozeman.” 7. The Planned Unit Development Final Plan shall be completed and approved by the City of Bozeman before the approval of the final plat. 8. Documentation of compliance with the parkland dedication requirements of Section 38.27.020, BMC shall be provided with the final plat. A table showing the parkland requirements for the subdivision and the method of meeting the parkland dedication shall be included on the final plat conditions of approval sheet. The table shall explicitly state how much parkland credit was allocated for each lot within the phase. This table shall include but not be limited to listing all dedicated parkland requirements, parkland or parkland credits and areas not credited towards parkland (i.e., detention/retention areas, watercourse setbacks, wetlands, common open space, parking facilities) and the total area of each. Any cost sharing agreements for maintenance shall be included with the final plat. 9. The final plat shall provide all necessary utility easements and shall be described, dimensioned and shown on each subdivision block of the final plat in their true and correct location. Any rear or side yard utility easements not provided will require written confirmation from ALL utility companies providing service indicating that rear or side yard easements are not needed. 10. Lot 11 shall be resized to comply with the required minimum lot size of 2,400 sq. ft. 11. All Irrigation wells located within the exterior boundaries of the development shall include Montana DNRC certificates which shall be provided to the City with the final plat submittal. Ownership of any well and associated water right within common open space owned by the property owner’s association shall be transferred to the property owner’s association in conjunction with the final plat. All wells shall include a meter or other device to determine consumption. 12. Drainage plans shall be required for each lot as part of the building permit application. 13. The public access easement referenced in the application materials for the common open spaces must be provided as a separate document describing the scope of the grant of easement and naming a custodian of the public’s interest in the easement. 14. The final maintenance plan must explicitly include all trails, paved or unpaved, within the common open spaces of phase 3. 15. The final plat shall contain the following notation on the conditions of approval sheet: “Ownership of all common open space areas and trails, and responsibility of maintenance thereof and for city assessments levied on the common open space lands shall be that of the property owners’ association. Maintenance responsibility shall include, in addition to the common open space and trails, all vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees and 13 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 11 of 28 irrigation systems in the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external perimeter development streets and as adjacent to public parks or other common open space areas. All areas within the subdivision that are designated herein as common open space including trails are for the use and enjoyment by residents of the development and the general public. The property owners’ association shall be responsible for levying annual assessments to provide for the maintenance, repair, and upkeep of all common open space areas and trails. At the same time of recording the final plat for each phase of the subdivision the subdivider shall transfer ownership of all common open space areas within each phase to the property owners’ association created by the subdivider to maintain all common open space areas within the Lakes at Valley West Phase 3.” 16. The certificate of dedication on the final plat shall include the specific names of the streets dedicated to the public for which the City accepts responsibility. 17. The 1 foot wide no access strip along the private lot frontage of Durston Road and Laurel Parkway shall be included on the final plat. 18. Prior to acceptance of publically owned infrastructure, the contractor shall provide a Maintenance Bond with the developer/owner equal to 20% of the actual cost of the improvements to correct any deficiencies in workmanship and/or materials which are found during the two-year warranty period. The City of Bozeman shall be named as dual oblige on the bond. 19. Any public street lighting installed by this development shall be LED. 20. Any alleys that contain public utilities (water and/or sewer) shall have a minimum of 30’ wide right of way, and shall not contain any other utilities i.e. gas, electric, etc. 21. Subdivision lighting SILD information shall be submitted to the Clerk of Commission after Preliminary Plat approval in hard copy and digital form. The final plat application will not be deemed complete until the resolution to create the SILD has been approved by the City Commission. The initial adoption of the special improvement lighting district shall include the entire area of the preliminary plat for the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision. As each final plat within the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision is approved the area and number of lots approved for development and associated lighting improvements shall be added to basis of the installed improvements and the fee payers of the district. Areas within the district which are platted as R lots shall not be assessed a fee or if it is determined that a fee must be charged to R Lots the lot shall be assessed as a single lot. 22. The property owners shall be responsible for a sewer surcharge for financing the costs of operation and maintenance of the sewage lift station. 23. All proposed private utilities to serve the subdivision shall be shown on the public infrastructure plans and specifications. 24. All clear distances between the City utilities and right of way lines, gutters, trees, and other utilities shall be maintained as specified in the City Design Standards and Specification Policy. 25. The proposed development falls within a known area of high groundwater. No crawl spaces or basements may be constructed such that sump pumps are required to pump water from these spaces. Sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary 14 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 12 of 28 sewer system. Sump pumps are also not allowed to be connected to the drainage system unless capacity is designed into the drainage system to accept the pumped water. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged onto streets, such as into the curb and gutters where they may create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles. 26. The developer shall make arrangements with the City Engineer's office to provide addresses for all individual lots in the subdivision prior to filing of the final plat. 27. The applicant must add a note to the Conditions of Approval sheet of the plat to the effect that maintenance of Arnhem Way is the responsibility of the property owner's association. 28. Adjust the title of the “Director of Public Service” to the “Director of Public Works” on the plat documents. 29. The applicant must add a note to the Conditions of Approval sheet of the plat to the effect that maintenance of stormwater infrastructure is the responsibility of the property owner’s association. 30. The applicant must indicate the proposed snow storage areas for Arnhem Way on the Conditions sheet of the plat. The applicant must also add a note to the Conditions sheet of the plat to the effect that snow removed from Arnhem Way must either be placed in the snow storage areas or hauled offsite to an approved location. Snow may not be deposited on public right of way. 31. A notice prepared by the City shall be filed concurrently with the final plat so that it will appear on title reports. It shall read substantially as follows: Lots within the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks from property lines, and restrictions on use. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 and are in place of the general development standards of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process. Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. 32. The Conditions and Notes sheet of the final plat shall contain the following language that is readily visible with lettering, at a minimum size of 12 point type, placing future landowners of individual lots on notice of the presence of high groundwater in the area of the subdivision: 15 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 13 of 28 “Due to the potential of high ground water tables in the areas of the subdivision, it is not recommended that residential dwellings or other structures with full or partial basements be constructed without first consulting a professional engineer licensed in the State of Montana and qualified in the certification of residential and commercial construction.” 33. The final plat for each phase shall include a transfer of private improvements certificate to read substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP & COMPLETION OF NON- PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The following are hereby granted and donated to the property owners association noted below for their use and enjoyment: Common Open Space parcels designated with letters A, B, C, D, etc. Unless specifically listed in the Certificate of Dedication, the city accepts no responsibility for maintaining the same. I, (Subdivider), hereby further certify that the following non-public improvements, required to meet the requirements of Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code, or as a condition(s) of approval of the subdivision plotted herewith, have been installed in conformance with any approved plans and specifications prepared in accordance with the standards of Chapter 38 or other City design standards, or have been financially guaranteed and are covered by the subdivision improvements agreement accompanying and recorded with this plat. Installed Improvements: (LIST ITEMS OR STATE NONE). Financially Guaranteed Improvements: (LIST ITEMS OR STATE NONE). The subdivider hereby grants ownership of all non-public infrastructure improvements to the property owners association created by Document Number ______________________ (To be filled in when recorded) By: (Subdivider) Date: _____________________________ SECTION 4 - CODE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRING PLAT CORRECTIONS The following are procedural requirements not yet demonstrated by the plat. A. BMC Section 38.23.030.A states: The developer shall install complete drainage facilities in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and shall conform to any applicable facilities plan and the terms of any approved site specific stormwater control plan. The city's requirements are contained in the design standards and specifications policy and the city modifications to state public works standard specifications, and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations. 16 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 14 of 28 No detention or retention facilities are proposed for drainage areas D1.1A and D1.1C. Detention or retention must be provided to limit offsite runoff to the predevelopment condition per Design Standards and Specifications Policy (DSSP) Section II. Upon further discussion, the applicant indicated, “Direct runoff from drainage basins D1.1A and D1.1C is included in the calculations for total combined runoff to Aajker Creek and its tributary. The tributary is ¼ mile long and runs from the double arch culvert under Durston Road to the main stream channel. Total 10-year post-development peak runoff to Aajker Creek, including direct runoff from these basins, will be limited to the pre-development peak rate. Basins D1.1A and D1.1C consist of mostly pervious backyards that will provide biofiltration prior to discharge.” This is an acceptable approach, and the stormwater calculation for this proposal will be reviewed upon future submittal of the infrastructure plans, specifications, and design reports. The applicant must comply with DSSP Section II.A.4. Upon further discussion, the applicant indicated, “The two StormTech systems will be constructed on alluvial (gravel) material that provides very good infiltration. These systems also provide infiltration storage (capture). Further discussion and calculations will be provided with the final design.” This is an acceptable approach, and the calculations will be reviewed upon submittal of the infrastructure plans, specifications, and design reports. The proposed StormTech system sizing may require adjustment pending calculation of the 0.5-inch requirement. The applicant must provide an analysis of the post-development C factors used in the Rational Method stormwater calculations. The C factors used in the analysis seem low, but a detailed description of development of the C factors was not provided. Upon further discussion, the applicant indicated, “Calculations for C factors were provided in earlier drainage reports and addenda for the project. The previous C factors were carried forward and modified to fit the final Phase 3 layout; calculations for these modifications will be provided with the final design.” This is an acceptable approach, and the calculations will be reviewed upon submittal of the infrastructure plans, specifications, and design reports. B. BMC Section 38.41.060.11.b states: The plan shall include sufficient site grading and elevation information (particularly for the basin sites, drainageways and lot finished grades), typical stormwater retention/detention basin and discharge structure details, basin sizing calculations, and a stormwater maintenance plan. 17 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 15 of 28 The applicant must provide a stormwater maintenance plan for review. The maintenance plan will be included with the property owner’s association (POA) documents to instruct the POA on maintenance of the stormwater system. The stormwater maintenance plan must be reviewed and approved prior to final plat approval. C. BMC Section 38.23.180 states: the transfer of water rights or the payment of cash-in-lieu (CIL) of water rights shall be provided. The applicant must contact the City Engineering Department (Brian Heaston) for an analysis of CIL of water rights and pay any CIL of water rights due prior to final plat approval. D. BMC Section 38.23.070.A.1 states: The developer shall install complete municipal water and sanitary sewer system facilities, or a system allowed by 38.21.030.D, and may be required by the city to install municipal storm sewer system facilities. These systems shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the state department of environmental quality and the city, and shall conform with any applicable facilities plan. The city's requirements are contained in the Design Standards and Specifications Policy and the City of Bozeman Modifications to Montana Public Works Standard Specifications, and by this reference these standards are incorporated into and made a part of these regulations. Further, DSSP Section V.A.5 states: all main extensions shall be looped, where possible. The applicant must loop the eastern leg of the water main in Arnhem Way to the main in Durston. This will be reviewed upon future submittal of the infrastructure plans. E. BMC Section 38.23.060.C.1 states: A public utility easement shall be granted for all public utility mains not located within public street right-of-way. The applicant must provide a 30-foot easement for the water mains not located in the public right-of-way. The executed easement must be delivered to the City Engineering Department (Shawn Kohtz) prior to final plat approval. The easement must be executed on the City’s standard easement form for water and sewer mains. A copy of the standard easement form may be obtained from the City Engineering Department. 18 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 16 of 28 F. BMC Section 38.23.060.A states: Where determined to be necessary, public and/or private easements shall be provided for private and public utilities, drainage, vehicular or pedestrian access, etc. The applicant must provide all necessary executed and filed easements prior to final plat approval. G. If not already filed, the applicant must provide and file with the County Clerk and Recorder's office executed Waivers of Right to Protest Creation of Special Improvement Districts (SID’s) for the following: a. Street improvements to Durston Road including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage b. Street improvements to Laurel Parkway including paving, curb/gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage c. Intersection improvements to Durston Road and Laurel Parkway The document filed must specify that in the event an SID is not utilized for the completion of these improvements, the developer agrees to participate in an alternate financing method for the completion of said improvements on a fair share, proportionate basis as determined by square footage of property, taxable valuation of the property, traffic contribution from the development, or a combination thereof. The applicant must provide this waiver prior to final plat approval. H. Record Drawings have not been provided to the City for Phase 1 and 2 infrastructure improvements. The applicant must provide Record Drawings for those improvements prior to final plat approval. SECTION 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE ACTIONS The Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the application on August 17th and September 7, 2016. On September 7, 2016, the DRC found the application sufficient for review. The DRC recommended favorably on both the planned unit development and subdivision with conditions. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board subdivision review committee considered the application on August 11, 2016. They recommended favorably on the application as presented. The Planning Board will conduct a public hearing on the related subdivision and make a recommendation to the City Commission. Public hearing date for the Planning Board is October 4, 2016. The hearing will be held in the City Commission chamber, 121 N Rouse Avenue at 6 pm. 19 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 17 of 28 Public hearing date for the City Commission is October 10, 2016. The hearing will be held in the City Commission chamber, 121 N Rouse Avenue at 6 pm. SECTION 6 - STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Analysis and resulting recommendations are based on the entirety of the application materials, municipal codes, standards, and plans, public comment, and all other materials available during the review period. Collectively this information is the record of the review. The analysis is a summary of the completed review. Applicable Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 38.03.040, BMC. In considering applications for subdivision approval under this title, the advisory boards and City Commission shall consider the following: 1) Compliance with the survey requirements of Part 4 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The preliminary plat has been prepared in accordance with the survey requirements of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Montana. As noted in recommended Condition No. 1, the final plat must comply with State statute, Administrative Rules of Montana, and the Bozeman Municipal Code. 2) Compliance with the local subdivision regulations provided for in Part 5 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The final plat shall comply with the standards identified and referenced in the Unified Development Code (UDC). The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as a condition of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or State law. Additional compliance and data necessary to verify compliance with Chapter 38 will be required with Conditions 2-6. Section 4 of this report identifies specific corrections necessary to comply with the municipal code. 3) Compliance with the local subdivision review procedures provided for in Part 6 of the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act The application was received on July 26, 2016. The application was reviewed and found inadequate for further review on August 17, 2016. Additional materials were provided in response to the request for additional information on August 31, 2016. The application was found adequate for review on September 7, 2016. The hearings before the Planning Board and City Commission have been properly noticed as required by the Bozeman UDC. Based on the recommendation of the DRC, RPAB, and other applicable review agencies, as well as any public testimony received on the matter, the Planning 20 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 18 of 28 Board shall forward a recommendation in a report to the City Commission who will make the final decision on the applicant’s request. The final decision for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat with more than 50 lots must be made within 80 working days of the date it was deemed adequate. Pursuant to Section 38.03.040.A.5.a(4), BMC the city commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the subdivision application by December 21, 2016, unless there is a written extension from the developer, not to exceed one year. Public notice for this application was given as described in Appendix C. On September 27, 2016 this major subdivision staff report was completed and forwarded with a recommendation of conditional approval for consideration by the Planning Board. The subdivision relies upon the associated planned unit development to meet the required zoning standards. The final plan for the planned unit development must be finished and receive final approval before the final plat is approved. Therefore, Condition 7 ensures that the final timing of the two applications will be properly coordinated. 4) Compliance with Chapter 38, BMC and other relevant regulations Based on review of the DRC and the Department of Community Development all applicable regulations appear to be met. Pertinent code provisions and site specific requirements are included in this report for City Commission consideration. Condition 6 addresses the two lots which will result from the subdivision which are not prepared for development. The required notice will restrict them from development. Tracts which are less than 160 acres in size must be included within the bounds of the final plat. Section 4, item A-H address corrections required to comply with chapter 38, BMC. Conditions 8-10, and 16 ensure that identified regulations are met. 5) The provision of easements to and within the subdivision for the location and installation of any necessary utilities As noted under Staff Finding No. 2 above and required Section 38.23.060.A, all easements, existing and proposed, shall be accurately depicted and addressed on the final plat and in the final plat application. Therefore, all utilities and necessary utility easements will be provided and depicted accordingly on the final plat. All public utilities will be located within dedicated street right of way. Conditions 9 and 13 requires performance of this obligation. 6) The provision of legal and physical access to each parcel within the subdivision and the notation of that access on the applicable plat and any instrument transferring the parcel All of the proposed lots have frontage to public streets constructed to City standards or an approved alternative with lot frontage as shown on the preliminary plat. In addition, pursuant to Section 38.24.090.A, BMC, plats shall contain a statement requiring lot accesses to be built to the standard contained in this section, the city design standards and specifications policy, and the city modifications to state public works standard specifications. 21 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 19 of 28 The applicant has proposed use of an alternative “woonerfs” standard to provide legal and physical access to some of the lots. A woonerf is a narrower street with a greater degree of sharing of use of the same space by multiple types of users. Approval for the woonerf section has been requested through the associated PUD which is the correct method. If the request is not approved, then this criterion has not been met. Access easements across common open spaces have been proposed to connect some individual driveways to the dedicated right of way. Condition 17 restricts access to Durston Road by individual lots to preserve the function of the arterial street and reduce turning movement conflicts. Primary Subdivision Review Criteria, Section 76-3-608 1) The effect on agriculture The subject property is designated as a residential area according to the City of Bozeman Community Plan. The area is zoned for residential development and has been used for residential purposes. The property has previously been used as a gravel mine and has been heavily disturbed. All agricultural use of the property stopped over ten years ago. Property to the north, east, and south has also been or is in the process of being developed for non-agricultural uses. The property to the west is separated from this area by Aajker Creek and no street crossings or other development is proposed west of Aajker Creek. Therefore, this subdivision will not have adverse effects on agriculture. 2) The effect on Agricultural water user facilities No agricultural water user facilities were discovered during review. Currently the subject property is designated as a residential area according to the City of Bozeman Community Plan; the area is zoned for residential development, and has begun to develop. Over flow from the lake discharges to Aajker Creek and was previously permitted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. As a natural stream and water of the US no irrigation water user easement is necessary to protect access. No impediment to stream flow is proposed with this subdivision. Therefore, the proposed subdivision will have minimal impacts on agricultural water user facilities. 3) The effect on Local services Water/Sewer – Municipal water and sewer can be provided to this site. Internal water and sewer mains will be installed prior to final plat approval. Water service is currently in the Durston Road corridor and will be looped in accordance with engineering standards. Water for irrigation of open spaces will be required. If the applicant chooses to use a well or other non-municipal water supply to do so they must provide transfer of ownership to the HOA so that the HOA can legally have the water resources necessary to maintain the open space. A sewer main installed by prior phases serves the property in the Laurel Parkway right of way. The area will be served by an existing sewer lift station. Use of lift stations creates additional costs above that required by gravity sewers. Condition 22 requires that the future lot owners participate in offsetting these 22 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 20 of 28 costs what are attributable to the property. Condition 20 ensures that adequate width utility easements are provided to enable safe installation of water and sewer mains. Condition 18 requires that an adequate warranty is provided and secured to ensure that installed infrastructure is serviceable. Inoperable infrastructure is a hazard and inhibits development of the site. Conditions 23 and 24 coordinate between private and public utility locations and avoid conflicts between utilities and other objects. Streets – The initial phases of the Lakes at Valley west installed the remaining portions of Durston Road, a minor arterial, along the north side of the property from the western edge to the intersection of Cottonwood Road. This includes frontage along Bronken Park. The City participated with impact fee funding to oversize the street and install a traffic signal at Durston and Cottonwood intersection. Adequate street capacity is available for this project. Street lighting is a component of the required street improvements. The applicant has proposed a lighting plan to meet the requirement. A special improvement lighting district is proposed to maintain these facilities. Conditions 19 and 21 ensures that the SILD will be formed and effective before final plat and that the lighting will be LED which will reduce long term costs and improve reliability for the residents.. The City will be responsible to maintain Durston Road, Westgate Avenue and Westmorland Drive. The Home Owner’s Association (HOA) will be responsible to maintain the woonerfs. Maintenance and use of public streets is subject to the terms of the municipal code. It is important to have clear responsibilities for access and use by the public. Conditions 27 and 30 establish the responsible parties. Police/Fire – The area of the subdivision is within the service area of both these departments. No concerns on service availability have been identified. Condition 26 requires that the necessary addresses are provided to enable 911 response to individual homes. Stormwater - The subdivision will construct storm water control facilities to conform to municipal code. Inspection of installed facilities prior to final plat will verify that standards have been met. Maintenance of the storm water facilities is an obligation of the home owners association. This responsibility is addressed in the covenants proposed with the subdivision which were previously recorded and are applied to this development. Condition 12 ensures that the stormwater system will be integrated with the individual developed lots to prevent flooding and stagnant water. Parklands - The previous phases of the Lakes at Valley West dedicated excess park land which was banked for future phases. This phases draws on that excess dedication. Adequate park land was provided. No new park land is proposed with this phase. This will be documented with the final plat per Condition 8. Substantial areas of private open space are also proposed in conjunction with the PUD. These areas will be in the ownership of the HOA and will be maintained by the HOA per Condition 15. 23 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 21 of 28 A public access easement has been proposed by the applicant to enable public access to the open space. This is acceptable. A network of natural fines trails six feet in width are proposed within the development. The new trails will connect to existing trails to the east and the internal and external sidewalks and will provide a substantial network throughout the development. Maintenance of the park and private open space facilities is an obligation of the home owners association. This responsibility is addressed in the covenants proposed with the subdivision. Condition 15 requires that this responsibility be referenced on the plat so that owners have an affirmative awareness of this responsibility. The applicant has proposed a paved trail along the Aajker Creek alignment. With additional extensions to the south the trail will connect with a trail being constructed by the Norton development. Due to observed maintenance requirements on paved trails, the applicant is encouraged to construct the trail along Aajker Creek with a more durable surface such as permeable pavers. The maintenance of these facilities is heavily dependent on clear ownership and associated responsibilities. Conditions 14, 15, and 33 requires provisions for open space maintenance, notice to owners of obligations for maintenance, and a plat certificate to transfer ownership of common spaces and associated facilities to the property owner’s association. This does not require any additional facilities but simply addresses the transfer of ownership. 4) The effect on the Natural environment As described, the site has considerable wetlands and surface waters. There has been no material injury to the natural environment identified with this development. The applicant has proposed the use of drought tolerant grasses in common area. This is consistent with the City’s Integrated Water Resources Plan and Climate Action Plan which encourage conservation of resources. Some areas are already vegetated as a result of the wetland enhancement project permitted under a prior 404 process. There will be some disturbance of established vegetative areas as a result of the necessary street and trail construction. The City encourages use of wells or surface water rights to irrigate parks rather than municipal water supply. There is a lesser energy and infrastructure cost to this approach. However, in order for the City to rely on these sources to meet the code requirement there must be the rights to the water. Condition 11 requires that necessary ownership and rights are transferred to the HOA. The site is in an area of high groundwater which may negatively impact future homes. Adequate drainage plans are necessary to prevent the inappropriate transfer of stormwater runoff onto adjacent private property. Conditions 12 and 28 require notification of owners of potential hazard of groundwater and put a procedure in place to avoid in appropriate grade changes. During the period of development for the Valley West PUD which initiated the wetlands project which was approved through the completed 404 permit, the City revised its water course and wetlands standards. The applicant has performed fully on the 404 permit. The proposed development has some stream crossings for trails and has some park and lot area close to the 24 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 22 of 28 required setback boundary. A PUD relaxation was advertised to allow such encroachments into the revised setbacks as may be required to be consistent with the original 404 permit. It has not been documented that encroachments do occur but this was considered by staff to be the correct manner to address this issue in a manner open to public review but still protect the owner’s ability to rely upon the previously issued permitting. The project site has high ground water which can flood crawl spaces. Water removed from crawl spaces must go somewhere. Illicit discharges to the sanitary sewer consumes pipe capacity and can over burden the system. Discharge to streets can over burden the surface drainage system. Therefore, Condition 25 restricts placement of discharges from sump pumps. Condition 32 requires notice of the high ground water condition be given to purchasers through a note on the plat. 5) The effect on Wildlife and wildlife habitat The site has been substantially impacted already which has reduced wildlife habitat. The approved and constructed 404 permit created additional wetlands which provide small animal and bird habitat. Large animal habitat is displaced. FWP offered comment on prior phases and did not identify any barriers to this development. The lakes have been established for several years and future stocking of fish is proposed which will create some additional opportunity for water fowl. 6) The effect on Public health and safety The intent of the regulations in Chapter 38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code is to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The subdivision has been reviewed by the DRC which has determined that it is in general compliance with the title. Any other conditions deemed necessary to ensure compliance have been noted throughout this staff report. In addition, all subdivisions must be reviewed against the criteria listed in 76-3-608.3.b-d, Mont Code Ann. and as a result, the Department of Community Development has reviewed this application against the listed criteria and further provides the following summary for submittal materials and requirements. Preliminary Plat Supplements A subdivision pre-application plan review was completed by the DRC on May 18, 2016. With the pre-application plan review application, waivers were requested from the materials required in Section 38.41.060 “Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements.” The waiver requests from transportation, water, sewer, wetlands, and stormwater were not granted. Staff offers the following summary comments on the supplemental information required with Article 38.41, BMC. Some material is repeated from the original Lakes at Valley West preliminary plat application. 25 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 23 of 28 38.41.060.A.1 Surface Water Supplemental information was provided showing location of surface waters. The two lakes are the primary distinguishing features of the site. Baxter Creek crosses the site on the eastern side. Most surface waters will be contained within a publicly dedicated park or a protected common open space. The water features and protective regulations do not interfere with any proposed lot location. The lakes are groundwater fed and have an outlet to Aajker Creek on the NW of the western pond. The lakes can be controlled in height in a depth range of approximately 3 feet. 38.41.060.A.2 Floodplains The mapped floodplains for Baxter Creek and Aajker Creek are located in common open spaces or parks. No floodplain encroachments are proposed except for allowed trail crossings. 38.41.060.A.3 Groundwater The groundwater level varies significantly across the site. The highest level is on the east adjacent to Baxter Creek and is at approximately 2 feet in depth. The lowest level is towards the NW portion of the site with a depth of 8 feet. Due to the comparatively high level of ground water Condition 38 requires that a note be placed on the plat advising future lot purchasers of the high groundwater. 38.41.060.A.4 Geology, Soils and Slopes Material waived 38.41.060.A.5 Vegetation The site is mostly covered with grasses reestablished after the site was used as a gravel pit. A wetlands restoration project was permitted and completed to establish or expand wetlands on the perimeter of the lakes and in the Baxter Creek Natural Area. The US Army Corp of Engineers has given final approval for the wetland project. A variety of woody plants were placed around the lakes which are now ranging from 4 to 6 feet in height. The applicant proposes a mix of low water use grasses for most of the open space and park areas. It will be necessary to have initial irrigation in place to establish new planted areas. Such irrigation systems may be temporary in nature and may be removed after establishment of the vegetation. Condition 12 addresses this issue. 38.41.060.A.6 Wildlife Material waived. 38.41.060.A.7 Historical Features Material waived. There are no identified historical features on the site. 38.41.060.A.8 Agriculture The site was removed from agricultural uses in the early 2000’s when the original Valley West PUD was developed. The adjacent properties to the north and south are already developed as residential uses or are in process of development. The site has been greatly disturbed in the past by gravel mining operation. Surface soils are no longer suitable for agricultural uses. 26 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 24 of 28 38.41.060.A.9 Agricultural Water User Facilities No agricultural water user facilities cross Phase 3. 38.41.060.A.10 Water and Sewer The site will be served with municipal services as discussed under Criteria 3 of the Primary Review Criteria. A lift station is needed to direct sewage flow. Adequate information was provided with the application to facilitate review. Additional design details will be provided during the plan and specification review conducted by the Engineering division prior to construction. 38.41.060.A.11 Stormwater Management The application proposes to manage stormwater onsite. Review of the proposed methods of treatment appears to comply with adopted standards. Further analysis will occur during the plans and specifications review by the Engineering Division. 38.41.060.A.12 Streets, Roads and Alleys A traffic study was provided. Adequate capacity was demonstrated to accommodate this project. 38.41.060.A.13 Utilities All private utilities servicing the subdivision will be installed underground. The DRC and local review agencies did not identify any potential impacts and/or concerns with providing private utilities to the subdivision. The final plat shall provide public utility easements along all front, side and rear lot lines as required by Section 38.23.050, BMC. However, in the event front and/or rear yard utility easements are used, side yard easements must still be provided on the plat unless written confirmation is submitted to the Planning Office from all utility companies and Director of Public Works indicating that front and rear yard 10-foot wide easements are adequate to service said subdivision lots. 38.41.060.A.14 Educational Facilities Material waived. 38.41.060.A.15 Land Use The associated planned unit development is the vehicle to modify lot dimensional standards and uses. If the PUD is approved then the subdivision will be in conformance with required land use regulations. The use proposed is exclusively residential which conforms to the future land use designation and zoning purposes. 38.41.060.A.16 Parks and Recreation Facilities A park master plan was submitted which approved by the City Commission with Phase 1. The park plan provided adequate area of park. 27 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 25 of 28 38.41.060.A.17 Neighborhood Center Plan Material waived. 38.41.060.A.18 Lighting Plan Subdivision or street lighting is required pursuant to Section 38.23.150.B, BMC. A lighting plan and installation of lights has been proposed. The plan shall include a pole light detail with spacing based on high pedestrian conflict, a local street pole light at one per local street intersection, and a bollard light detail for placement at pathway/street intersections. All street lights installed shall use LED light heads lights, including bollard light, and shall conform to the City’s requirement for cut-off shields. 38.41.060.A.19 Miscellaneous Supplemental information waived by the DRC. The subdivision will not impact access to any public lands and there are no identified hazards in proximity to the subject property. 38.41.060.A.20 Affordable Housing Supplemental information waived by the DRC. The Workforce Housing Ordinance, Article 38.43, BMC, is not compulsory at this time. 28 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 26 of 28 APPENDIX A –PROJECT SITE ZONING AND GROWTH POLICY Zoning Designation and Land Uses: The subject property is zoned “R-1” (Residential Single Household Low Density District). The intent of the R-1 residential single-household low density district is to provide for primarily single-household residential development and related uses within the city at urban densities, and to provide for such community facilities and services as will serve the area's residents while respecting the residential character and quality of the area. Adopted Growth Policy Designation: The Future Land Use Map of the Bozeman Community Plan designates the subject property to develop as “Residential.” The “Residential” classification designates places where the primary activity is urban density dwellings. Other uses which complement residences are also acceptable such as parks, low intensity home based occupations, fire stations, churches, and schools. High density residential areas should be established in close proximity to commercial centers to facilitate the provision of services and employment opportunities to persons without requiring the use of an automobile. Implementation of this category by residential zoning should provide for and coordinate intensive residential uses in proximity to commercial centers. The residential designation indicates that it is expected that development will occur within municipal boundaries, which may require annexation prior to development. The dwelling unit density expected within this classification varies between 6 and 32 dwellings per net acre. A higher density may be considered in some locations and circumstances. A variety of housing types can be blended to achieve the desired density. Large areas of single type housing are discouraged. In limited instances the strong presence of constraints and natural features, such as floodplains, may cause an area to be designated for development at a lower density than normally expected within this category. All residential housing should be arranged with consideration of compatibility with adjacent development, natural constraints, such as watercourses or steep slopes, and in a fashion which advances the overall goals of the Bozeman growth policy. The residential designation is intended to provide the primary locations for additional housing within the planning area. APPENDIX B – DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision phase 3 has been submitted in conjunction with a Planned Unit Development. The project subdivides an area included with the original Valley West development begun in the late 1990’s. The developed portion of that project exists east of Cottonwood Road. The original Valley West development included Bronken Park and the Baxter Creek Natural Area. This property which is the subject of the current application has been physically altered over time to accommodate two lakes and adjacent wetlands that were required as wetland mitigation area for the phases of Valley West east of Cottonwood Road. This area has always been a planned phase of Valley West, but the approved PUD design had changed over time. This PUD proposal approved with phase 1 and continued with this 29 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 27 of 28 application requests a modified design that eliminates a small commercial element and proposes a small lot pocket neighborhood design with alternative access via a modified alley design. The new layout reduces the amount of parkland area with street frontage and provides, in lieu, a combination of parkland and public access open space with less street frontage. The development has the potential for additional phases of residential development. The subdivision of the property is proposed with 56 residential and open space and future development lots. As part of the overall design the applicant is proposing developing an unusual cross section for several “woonerfs” which are multi-user streets with a narrow character. APPENDIX C – NOTICING AND PUBLIC COMMENT Notice was provided at least 15 and not more than 45 days prior to the Planning Board and City Commission public hearings. Per Article 38.40, Notice was provided by posting the site, mailing by certified mail to adjacent property owners and by first class mail to all other owners within 200 feet, and by legal advertisement publication in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Additionally, notice of the project was published on the City of Bozeman website. Content of the notice contained all elements required by Article 38.40, BMC. No public comments have been received as of the writing of this report. APPENDIX D - OWNER INFORMATION AND REVIEWING STAFF Owner: The Lakes at Valley West Bozeman, LLC, 4515 North 56th Street, Phoenix AZ 85018- 3119 Applicant: The Lakes at Valley West Bozeman, LLC, 2880 Technology Blvd W, Bozeman MT 59718 Representative: Morrison Maierle, Inc. PO box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771 Report By: Chris Saunders, Policy and Planning Manager FISCAL EFFECTS The development will generate the typical costs and revenues of residential development. A special surcharge will be required to offset the expenses associated with service by the sewer lift station. Other than these items no unique fiscal effects or impact on budgeted items have been determined. 30 16320, Planning Board Staff Report - Lakes at Valley West Ph. 3 Subdivision Page 28 of 28 ATTACHMENTS The full application and file of record can be viewed at the Community Development Department at 20 E. Olive Street, Bozeman, MT 59715. Application materials – Available through the Laserfiche archive linked agenda materials. 31 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Table of Contents Title Section Architectural Green Plan of Overall PUD (11x17) Green Plan Introduction, Document Organization and Applicant Team 1 Development Review Application / Preliminary Plat Checklist 2 Responses to City of Bozeman Pre-application Review Comments 3 Legal Description 4 Certificate of Adjoining Property Owners List / Neighborhood 5 Recognition Ordinance Compliance Certificate Montana Department of Environmental Quality Exemption 6 PUD Relaxations 7 Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions & Design Guidelines 8 Maintenance Provision for Non-Public Improvements 9 Noxious Weed Management and Re-vegetation Plan 10 Preliminary Platting Certificate 11 Preliminary Plat Drawings – 11”x17” and 24” x 36” 12 31 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Additional Preliminary Plat Supplements Surface Water 13 Floodplains 14 Water and Sewer 15 Water System Redundancy 16 Stormwater Management 17 Streets, Roads and Alleys 18 Traffic Impact Study 19 Utilities 20 Educational Facilities 21 Land Use 22 Lighting Plan 23 Agency Letters (and responses received to date) 24 32 33 34 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Introduction Since its original approval in 2002, the overall design of the award-winning Valley West Planned Unit Development (PUD) has continued to mature and adjust to ongoing parks and wetlands design, changing land use regulations and policies and developing adjoining properties as well as overall market conditions. Note that several significant land use changes have recently occurred – most notably, a school and church have been constructed on the property west of Ferguson Avenue in place of what was originally contemplated as a residential neighborhood. This application includes a subdivision Preliminary Plat for Phase 3 (50 lots). The master plan (see Green Plan) shows likely development patterns for approximately 300 dwelling units on the entire 65 acres for reference only. The property owners require flexibility as future phases are submitted to adjust to continuing changes to the Bozeman market. A Preliminary PUD Modification application has also been submitted in parallel to the Preliminary Plat. The PUD proposes to begin to complete this quality neighborhood by creating progressive residential pocket neighborhoods that are all connected by open spaces, trails, streets and enhanced alleys inspired by the European planning concept of a woonerf. Woonerfs are described in the Unified Development Code as: “streets where pedestrians and cyclists have priority over motorists… Woonerfs may be permitted on public local streets or alleys through the… PUD process” (38.09.030). There are several important known factors that influence and dimensionally challenge the overall site and design including the existing lakes, Baxter Creek Natural Area to the east, the location of Laurel Parkway, the north and south connections for Westgate Avenue, required access separation on Durston Road, the watercourse setback on Baxter Creek and a section of the watercourse setback along Aajker Creek (note that both creeks run through adjacent properties and only a portion of the setback affects the subject site). 35 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Document Organization This submittal has been prepared to address all requirements as noted in 38.41.040, BMC. The included content has been organized in a logical way to help ease navigation, and generally follows the order of the requirements in the Development Review Application (DRA) and Preliminary Plat Checklist. The PUD, as mentioned above, parallels this submittal and both these submittals are designed to provide guidance and baseline information for all subsequent “Lakes” submittals. Future subdivision submittals can therefore be simplified by reducing the amount of duplicate material. 36 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application APPLICANTS and DESIGN TEAM OWNER: The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC Greg Stratton 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 406-599-5603 APPLICANT: Kilday and Stratton, Inc. Greg Stratton 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 406-599-5603 ARCHITECTURE & LAND PLANNING: Intrinsik Architecture, Inc. Rob Pertzborn 111 N Tracy Ave. Bozeman, MT 59715 406-582-8988 CIVIL ENGINEER: Morrison - Maierle Inc. James Nickelson 2880 Technology Blvd. W. Bozeman, MT 59718 406-587-0721 WETLANDS: Vaughn Environmental Services Barbara Vaughn 8353 Saddle Mountain Rd. Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-6909 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: Peaks to Plains Design Jolene Rieck 404 N 31st St., STE 405 Billings, MT 59101 406-294.9499 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: Castlerock Geotechnical Andy Pilskalns 1114 E Babcock St. Bozeman, MT 59715 406-586-9533 37 38 39 40 PP Preliminary Plat Required Materials PP Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, PP1, N1, SVAR (if variance) Recommended Forms: Required Forms: SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUIRED MATERIALS APPLICATION SETS 3 total sets are required that include 1 copy of every item below bound or folded into 8½ x 11 or 8½ x 14 sets Complete and signed development review application form A1. Plan sets that include all required items listed on the subdivision preliminary plat checklist form PP1. Standard application sets required plan sizes: 2 sets that include full size 24 x 36 inch plans 1 set that include 11 x 17 inch plans 2-digital versions of all materials (JPEG or PDF) on separate CD-ROMs or USB drives. Individual files must be provided at 5MB or less in size. Files shall be named according to naming protocol. Notes: All plans must be drawn to scale on paper not smaller than 8½ x 11 inches or larger than 24 x 36 inches. The name of the project must be shown on the cover sheet of the plans. If 3 -ring binders will be used, they must include a table of contents and tabbed dividers between sections. Plans that are rolled or not bound into sets will not be accepted. NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1 and materials. STATISTICS 1. Subdivision Type: First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record First Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record with variance Second or Subsequent Minor Subdivision from a Tract of Record First Major Subdivision 2. Total Number or Lots: 3. Lots by Proposed Uses: Residential, single household City Park Residential, multi household Manufactured Home Space Planned Unit Development Recreational Vehicle Space Condominium Unit Commercial Townhouse Industrial Common Open Space Restricted Development Other: 41 Preliminary Plat Required Materials PP Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, PP1, N1, SVAR (if variance) Recommended Forms: Required Forms: APPLICATION FEE Base fee $1,785 Minor or $ 2,840 Major Plus $72 per lot Plus $6.50 noticing fee per each physically contiguous (touching) property owner CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net 42 PP1 Preliminary Plat Checklist PP1 Page 1 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, N1, PP, SVAR (if variance) Recommended Forms: Required Forms: SUBDIVISON PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST GENERAL INFORMATION The preliminary plat submittal must include the following information. Please refer to Section 38.41.040, BMC for the specific requirements for each item. 1. All information required with the pre-application plan, as outlined in Section 38.41.030 (Subdivision Pre-application Plan), BMC. See checklist PA1. 2. Name and location of the subdivision, scale, scale bar, north arrow, date of preparation, lots and blocks (designated by number), the dimensions and area of each lot, and the use of each lot, if other than for single household. 3. All streets, roads, alleys, avenues, highways, and easements; the width of the right -of-way, grades, and curvature of each; existing and proposed road and street names; and proposed location of intersections for any subdivision requiring access to arterial or collector highways. 4. The names of adjoining platted subdivisions and numbers of adjoining certificates of survey. 5. An approximate survey of the exterior boundaries of the platted tract with bearings, distances, and curve data indicated outside of the boundary lines. When the plat is bounded by an irregular shoreline or a body of water, the bearings and distances of a closing meander traverse shall be given. 6. The approximate location of all section corners or legal subdivision corners of sections pertinent to the subdivision boundary. 7. If the improvements required are to be completed in phases after the final plat is filed, the approximate area of each phase shall be shown on the plat. 8. Ground contours at 2-foot intervals if slope is under 10 percent; 5-foot intervals if slope is between 10 and 15 percent; and 10-foot intervals if slope is 15 percent or greater. 9. List of waivers granted from the requirements of Section 38.41.060 (Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements), BMC during the pre-application process. 10. Request for exemption from Montana Department of Environmental Quality Review as described in Section 38.41.040.11 (Request for Exemption from MDEQ Review), BMC. 11. All appropriate certificates (refer to Chapter 38.06, BMC). 12. All preliminary plat supplements required for all subdivisions: Preliminary Plat Supplements Required for All Subdivisions A. A map showing all adjacent sections of land, subdivision, certificates of survey, streets and roads B. Map of entire subdivision on either an 8½-inch x 11-inch, 8½-inch x 14-inch, or 11-inch x 17-inch sheet C. A written statement describing any requested subdivision variance(s) and the facts of hardship upon which the request is based. Refer to Chapter 38.35 (Variance, Deviation and Appeal Procedures), BMC. See checklist SVAR D. Covenants, Restrictions and Articles of Incorporation for the Property Owners’ Association E. Encroachment permits or a letter indicating intention to issue a permit where new streets, easements, rights-of way or driveways intersect State, County, or City highways, streets or roads F. A letter of approval or preliminary approval from the City of Bozeman where a zoning change is necessary 43 Preliminary Plat Checklist PP1 Page 2 of 2 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: A1, N1, PP, SVAR (if variance) Recommended Forms: Required Forms: G. A draft of such other appropriate certificates H. Provision for maintenance of all streets (including emergency access), parks, and other required improvements if not dedicated to the public, or if private I. Profile sheets for street grades greater than 5 percent J. If an authorized representative signs on behalf of an owner of record, a copy of the authorization shall be provided K. A Noxious Weed Management and Revegetation Plan approved by the Weed Control District for control of noxious weeds L. A preliminary platting certificate prepared by a Montana title company 13. All preliminary plat supplements not waived at pre-application review by the Development Review Committee. Please refer to Section 38.41.060, BMC for the specific requirements for each item. Additional Subdivision Preliminary Plat Supplements Waived A. Surface water B. Floodplains C. Groundwater D. Geology, soils and slope E. Vegetation F. Wildlife G. Historical features H. Agriculture I. Agriculture water user facilities J. Water and sewer K. Stormwater management L. Streets, roads and alleys M. Utilities N. Educational facilities O. Land use P Parks and recreation facilities Q. Neighborhood center plan R. Lighting plan S. Affordable Housing T. Miscellaneous CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net 44 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application Response to Pre-Application and Concept PUD Review Comments The responses to the City Staff review comments and discussion items from the Pre-Application and the Concept PUD are included in this section. The Staff comments are provided in standard font, responses to their comments are in italics: Department of Community Development: 1. The applicant is advised that unmet code provisions, or code provisions that are not specifically listed as conditions of approval, does not, in any way, create a waiver or other relaxation of the lawful requirements of the Bozeman Municipal Code or state law. No response needed. 2. The applicant shall submit with the application for Preliminary Plan review and approval, a written narrative stating how they have responded to each of these comments. This narrative shall be in sufficient detail to direct the reviewer to the appropriate plat, plan, sheet, note, covenant, etc. in the submittal. This is the narrative. 3. The preliminary plan submittal shall identify the uses to be allowed on each proposed lot in the design guidelines and associated development standards as was done with Phases 1 and 2. The permitted uses are limited to residential, see Article IX, 9.3 of the covenants. The lots on which more than one dwelling unit is permitted are identified on the Lot Exhibits which are part of the Design Guidelines and shown on the Preliminary Plat park allocation table. 4. Please note that the PUD standards limit the additional allowed density through the PUD review to a maximum of 30%. Please provide the calculations to demonstrate compliance with this standard. “(6) Residential density bonus. If the project is proposing a residential density bonus (30 percent maximum) above the residential density of the zoning district within which the project is located and which is set forth in article 8 of this chapter, does the proposed project exceed the established regulatory design standards (such as for setbacks, off-street parking, open space, etc.) and ensure compatibility with 45 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application adjacent neighborhood development? The number of dwelling units obtained by the density bonus shall be determined by dividing the lot area required for the dwelling unit type by one plus the percentage of density bonus sought. The minimum lot area per dwelling obtained by this calculation shall be provided within the project. Those dwellings subject to chapter 38, article 43, shall be excluded in the base density upon which the density bonus is calculated.” A density bonus of up to 30% is allowed. A density bonus of 24% is proposed for Phase 3. Based on the net residential lot area of 4.85 acres, 42 lots would be permitted by right (4.85 acres x 43,560 sf/ acre /5,000 square foot per lot = 42.25 lots). In addition to the 50 single family lots, four accessory dwelling units would be allowed, for a total of 54 dwelling units, this represents a density bonus of 24% (54/42 = 1.24). Note: 50 of the total number of lots are residential, the others are open space (6 lots) or Restricted Lots (one lot). 5. Please clearly identify what, if any, elements of the adopted covenants will apply to Phase 3. Unless a specific reason is given to exclude this phase the City will expect that the City’s participation in covenants for this phase will mirror those for Phases 1 and 2. Phase 3 will be annexed into and governed by the existing Phase 1 and 2 covenants. A draft amendment to the covenants annexing Phase 3 is provided along with the new covenants applicable to Phase 3. 6. The proposed covenants shall include a section which clearly indicates those portions of the covenants which were relied upon for the approval of the PUD. This section shall restrict those portions from alteration without written approval of the City of Bozeman. See the draft covenants, Article XXI which lists the portions of the covenants that were relied upon for approval of the Lake Phase 3 PUD. 7. Planning staff recommends removing any minimum home size standard from covenants other than as required by the International Residential Code. There are no minimum home sizes stated in the covenants. 8. No property may be removed from the covenants once established without written approval of the City of Bozeman. See Article 12. 9 of the covenants. This prohibits removal of property from jurisdiction of the covenants without City approval. 9. The PUD Final Plan shall be completed before the approval of the final plat. Timing is noted. 46 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application 10. A notice prepared by the City shall be filed concurrently with the final plat so that it will appear on title reports. It shall read substantially as follows: Lots within the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 are subject to specific design standards, unique building setbacks from property lines, and restrictions on use. These standards may be found in [insert correct reference to design standard location]. Lot owners are advised that these are specific to the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 and are in place of the general development standards of the City of Bozeman Zoning. If a development standard is not specifically established in the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision Phase 3 approval documents the general standards of the City apply. Modification of the special standards would require an amendment to the Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development. Modifications are strongly discouraged. It is the obligation of the lot owner to be fully informed as to these standards before beginning any home or site design process. Approval by the design review entity established in the covenants of the development does not bind the City of Bozeman to approve a construction plan. Comment noted. 11. The City of Bozeman will rely upon the overall design standards required as part of the planned unit development application. The design standards may not be altered without consent of the City. Comment noted. 12. The final open space plans shall address how required temporary irrigation necessary to establish the proposed grass mixes will be delivered. In areas without permanent irrigation, Peaks to Plains Design, PC has proposed grass mix and an establishment method that does not require temporary irrigation. 13. Accessory dwelling units are only permitted on those lots specifically identified in Phases one and two to have accessory dwelling units. The covenants shall explicitly state which lots may have an accessory dwelling unit and which lots may not have them. This covenant may not be changed without City written consent. The covenants note that ADU’s will be allowed only on Lots 31, 48, 49 and 50. See Section 12.11 of the Phase 3 Covenants. This covenant cannot be changed without City approval. 14. The final landscape plan shall be coordinated with Northwestern Energy so that the species of trees identified for planting along Durston Road and adjacent open spaces shall not conflict with the existing overhead power lines. The landscape plan includes trees recommended by the City of Bozeman for this particular application and will confirm with Northwestern Energy that they are suitable for this use. 47 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application 15. Coordinate with Northwestern Energy to ensure that adequate dry utility easement size and placement has been included with the preliminary plat. Northwestern Energy has been sent a copy of the preliminary plat lot layout along with a proposed layout for their utilities. At this time we have not received comments back but will plan on working with Northwestern as part of the DRC review to assure the easements are adequate. 16. Lots shall have their boundary with an adjacent common open space clearly delineated. If the subdivider does not choose to construct the specified fence style along the perimeter an alternative ground marking which is readily visible and durable shall be placed. The type of delineation shall be identified with the final PUD plan and shall be installed prior to final plat approval. A specific fence type is not proposed at this time. Consistent with the Development Guidelines Section 6.1.b, four foot tall, 4” X 4” treated delineator posts will be set 2-feet from the property line where lots abut open space or parks adjacent to the Lake. 17. Fences located in the front, side or rear yard setback of properties adjacent to any park or publicly accessible open space shall not exceed a maximum height of four (4) feet, and shall be of an open construction designed in a manner to be consistent along all park land and open space areas. Proposed fencing shall conform to Section 38.23.130 “Fences, Walls and Hedges.” This requirement with appropriate exhibits of fence types shall be addressed and illustrated in the property owner’s association documents. The documents shall include a single fence style acceptable to the City for locations fronting any public park. Permitted fence types are specified in Section 6.1.b of the Development Guidelines and are limited to a maximum height of 4-feet where adjacent to parks or open space. 18. The area of the driveway easements required to access private lots shall be deducted from the calculation of open space performance points. The area of the driveway easements have been excluded from the calculations. The drive access for lots 4 and 38 amounts to 1,750 square feet, or 0.04-acres. This reduces the open space to a net of 3.084-acres. The three parking areas proposed along Arnhem Way remove another 1,356 square feet from the open space, or 0.031- acres, which further reduces the net open space acreage to 3.053-acres. This divided by the Phase 3 gross acreage of 10.547 gives an open space percentage of 28.9%. All of the net open space is publically accessible therefore Phase 3 provides adequate open space to easily meet the required 20 PUD points (28.9 points x 1.25 bonus for public access = 36.1 points). 19. Street west of Westgate is shown as a woonerf. There is a question of whether that has adequate capacity. Applicant is advised that additional east-west connections may be required with future phases. 48 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application The applicant is currently working on detailed layouts in the future phase areas and has taken note of this comment. 20. Lot between woonerf and Westgate is not numbered or shown as size. Appears to be two lots, fix numbering and add dimensions. This has been fixed. 21. Relaxation 1 description notes purpose is affordable housing but later compliance with 38.43 is disclaimed. Please either conform to 38.43 or use a different descriptor as it causes confusion. The language in Relaxation 1 has been modified to read exactly as that approved for Lakes Phases 1 and 2. 22. Relaxation 4. The very small lot sizes proposed with this phase cause concern about ability to build. Please provide example sketch plans to demonstrate viability of these parcels in compliance with the requested relaxations. A sketch plan has been provided and is included in the PUD application. 23. Relaxation 8 shall be note to only those lots specifically identified as approved for an ADU. The language in Relaxation #8 has been modified to identify the specific lots on which accessory dwelling units will be permitted (Lots 31, 48, 49 and 50). 24. An additional relaxation is required to allow a storm water facility to occupy more than 1/3 the frontage of Durston Road. This relaxation has been added. 25. The requested relaxations are generally found to be acceptable as proposed in the application materials if adjusted as noted in these comments. Comment noted. 26. Please provide a landscaping plan per 38.26 for the PUD open spaces. The landscape plan is included in the PUD submittal. 27. The floodplain boundary and wetlands boundaries shall be depicted on the preliminary plat submittal materials. There are no flood plain boundaries on Phase 3, from either Aajker Creek to the west or Baxter Creek to the east. Refer to the floodplain information in the preliminary plat application in Section 14. 28. The requested waivers for submittal requirements for transportation, water, sewer, wetlands, and stormwater are not granted. Where data reflective of current conditions is available it may be included in response to the required submittal 49 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application material. If no current data is available please submit a full response to these elements. The remaining waivers for subdivision data submittal are approved. In instances where waivers were not granted, the information has been provided in the application. 29. Additional comments regarding the PUD will be provided after the DRB meeting on May 25th. Comment noted. 30. Formal applications for preliminary plat and preliminary plan must be submitted within one calendar year of the date of the comment letter. Comment noted. 31. The preliminary plat and preliminary PUD will be subject to review for compliance with the Montana Subdivision and Platting Act, Bozeman Municipal Code, Bozeman Community Plan, and associated implementing standards and policies. Comment noted. Future Impact Fees - Please note that future building permit applications will require payment of the required transportation, water, sewer and fire impact fees according to the City of Bozeman adopted impact fee schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance. If you desire an estimate of the required impact fees according to current rates please contact the Department of Community Development and/or visit www.bozeman.net. Comment noted. The Recreation and Parks Advisory Board review committee suggests that the path along Aajker Creek be coordinated with the Norton development to provide a continuous paved shared use path from Durston to Huffine Lane. Please coordinate with the Parks Department regarding construction details and specifications. The RPAB and Parks Department has approved the use of a Class 1B, 10-foot wide paved shared use trail on the west side of the project. This is what is being proposed for Phase 3. A copy of the correspondence approving the proposal is included with agency letter responses. Engineering Department The following comments pertain to review of the submitted materials for the above referenced project: 50 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application 1. The applicant requested a pre-application waiver for the water and sewer. However, supplemental information is needed regarding the water and sewer systems at this site. Specifically: a. How will sanitary sewer service be provided for the proposed project, and does the lift station that will serve the project have adequate capacity? The preliminary plat application for Phases 1 and 2 of the project included a report that addressed the full 65 acre development. This report has been updated and is included in this application. b. The project is located at the end of a dead-end water main with significant loading on the water system on the dead-end main and only one feed from Durston Road. This issue was discussed with the applicant. The applicant has agreed to work with the City to construct a second water main feed to serve the project, and subsequently serve the larger impacted service area, on the condition of identifying a funding mechanism or alternate method to complete water system looping. The Applicant is still in agreement with this. Refer to Section 16 of the preliminary plat application. 2. A waiver was requested for stormwater management. However, the applicant shall provide a summary of stormwater infrastructure for the proposed project in the context of the larger development. The overall 65 acre development stormwater management plan has been included in the application which has been updated to reflect information specific to Phase 3. 3. The applicant shall submit a copy of the latest traffic impact study. The traffic impact study completed with Phases 1 and 2 is included in the application. The study looked at impacts of the full 65 acre development. It is our opinion that the study and its recommendations are still valid and that the improvements completed in concert with the City for Phases 1 and 2 allow for the development to proceed with Phase 3 with no further off-site improvements. 4. The proposed, local street section indicates 2, 8-foot parking lanes instead of drive lanes. It is assumed that this is an error and will be corrected on future applications. This has been corrected. 51 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application 5. The future Vaughn Drive must be a local street extended to the eastern and western property boundaries to allow future extension of the street per Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.24.010.A.1. This comment applies to future phases. The Applicant is currently working on the next phases of the development which will include the extension of Vaughn Drive to the west. However, the street cannot be extended to the east as the area to the east is a park and not suitable for use other than its current use. 6. The proposed Woonerf street section will not be maintained by the City. It will be the responsibility of the homeowner’s association to maintain this street. The applicant concurs and the HOA documents recognize this maintenance responsibility. HOA maintenance is require by the covenants in Article 12.4. 7. Adequate snow storage areas must be designated outside the sight triangles, but on the subject property (unless a snow storage easement is obtained for a location off the property and filed with the County Clerk and Recorder's office). This is particularly challenging on the Woonerf street section. The applicant shall describe snow storage for the Woonerf section. An exhibit has been prepared showing the snow storage areas in the Woonerf area. 8. The 100-year floodplain associated with Aajker Creek must be indicated on the site drawings per Bozeman Municipal Code (BMC) 38.31.090. As part of the Phase 1 and 2 approval process, a flood study was completed on Aajker Creek. The flood plain for Aajker Creek does not extend into Phase 3. A copy of the study is included with the application materials. 9. The Zone 1 and Zone 2 watercourse setbacks from Aajker Creek shall be indicated on the site drawings per BMC 38.23.100.A.2. The proposed path must be located within the Zone 2 setback. The zones 1 and 2 setbacks are shown on the preliminary plat. The proposed trail is located outside of Zone 1. 52 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Application 10. A current wetlands delineation must be indicated on the site drawings per BMC 38.30. There are no wetland impacts in Phase 3. Refer to information from the Phases 1 and 2 application which is included in Section 13. 11. The proposed development falls within a known area of high groundwater. No crawl spaces or basements may be constructed such that sump pumps are required to pump water from these spaces. Sump pumps are not allowed to be connected to the sanitary sewer system. Sump pumps are also not allowed to be connected to the drainage system unless capacity is designed into the drainage system to accept the pumped water. Water from sump pumps may not be discharged onto streets, such as into the curb and gutters where they may create a safety hazard for pedestrians and vehicles. The applicant agrees. 12. The transfer of water rights or the payment of cash-in-lieu of water rights shall be provided in accordance to BMC section 38.23.180. Comment noted. 13. Lot 26 and Lot 27 do not have adequate access fronting a local street or a woonerf street. Adequate access must be provided per BMC 38.24.090.B. The lot configuration in this area has been modified from the pre-application layout. All lots have adequate access via a street, woonerf or easement. 53 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Legal Description Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West, being Lot R2 of The Lakes at Valley West – Phase 1 & Phase 2, Plat J-572; situated in the NE¼NW¼ of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572, Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 1337.30 feet to the West One-sixteenth Corner between Section 4 and Section 9; thence S.00° 59' 02"W. for 50.06 feet along the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9 to a point on the south right-of-way of Durston Road, the Point of Beginning; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 873.66 feet along the south right-of-way of Durston Road to the northwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.1°54’25”E., 25.00 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.19°42’50”W., 388.15 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.13°17’40”E., 223.76 feet to the southwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence N.88°04’19”E., 487.01 feet to a point on the west right-of-way of North Laurel Parkway; thence S.0°58’16”W., 694.85 feet to a on the north boundary of the SE¼NW¼ of Section 9; thence S.88°28’17”W., 1292.11 feet to the Northwest One-sixteenth Corner of Section 9; thence N.00° 59' 02"E. for 1291.80 feet along the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9, to the Point of Beginning. The Area of the above described tracts of land is 1,376,730 square feet, or 31.605 acres, more or less. 54 N1 Noticing Materials Page 1 of 1 Revision Date 1-05-16 Required Forms: N1 Recommended Forms: Required Forms: NOTICING MATERIALS Notice is required for certain projects in order for citizens to participate in decision making which affects their interests and provides opportunity to receive information pertinent to an application that would not otherwise be available to the decision maker. SITE PLAN, MASTER SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, VARIANCE, DEVIATION, FIRST MINOR SUBDIVISON AND SIMILAR REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site, attached to this checklist. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. MAJOR AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUIRED NOTICING MATERIALS Completed and signed property adjoiners certificate form N1. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners within 200 feet of the project site and not physically contiguous (touching a boundary) to the subdivision, attached to this checklist. Clearly label list ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the adjoining property owners. Legible list of full names and addresses of all property owners physically contiguous (touching a boundary) including recorded purchasers under contract for deed to be sent certified mail attached to this checklist. Clearly label list CONTIGUOUS. Stamped, unsealed, plain (no return address) #10 envelopes preaddressed with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed. Two sets additional mailing labels with the names and addresses of the physically contiguous property owners including recorded purchasers under contract for deed attached. NOTICE Current property owners of record can be found at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office in the Gallatin County Courthouse 311 West Main Street Bozeman, Montana. CERTIFICATION I, _____________________________________________, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the attached name and address list of all adjoining property owners (including all condominium owners, within 200 feet of the property located at ________________________________________________________, is a true and accurate list from the last declared Gallatin County tax records. I further understand that an inaccurate list may delay review of the project. _______________________________________ Signature CONTACT US Alfred M. Stiff Professional Building 20 East Olive Street 59715 (FED EX and UPS Only) PO Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771 phone 406-582-2260 fax 406-582-2263 planning@bozeman.net www.bozeman.net 55 Proposal The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Property Owners –CONTIGUOUS (Within 200 Feet of Project Site) N:\5352\007\Design Docs\Platting\Adjoiners List\Adjoiner CONTIGUOUS Phase 3 06_09_16.docx Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 1 S09, T02 S, R05 E, C.O.S. 1581, Parcel 1, Acres 20.519 S09, T02 S, R05 E, C.O.S. 1581, Parcel 2, Acres 20.526 Alan D. Fulton 958 Rialto Way Butte, MT 59701-7113 2 S09, T02 S, R05 E, Acres 0.77, A 25’ Strip off North End of SW4NW4 Norton East Ranch Sub Ph 3A, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot R1, Acres 79.3085, Plat J-564 Norton Properties, LLC 63026 Lower Meadow Dr., Suite 200 Bend, OR 97701-6984 3 S09, T02 S, R05 E, Acres 39.25, SW4NW4 Less 25’ Rd on NS Aajker Creek Properties, LLC 4700 Gooch Hill Rd Bozeman, MT 59718-9027 4 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Open Spaces D, E, & F Plat J-572 Valley West Homeowners Association. Peak Property Management 716 S 20th Bozeman, MT 59718 56 Proposal The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Property Owners – ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS (Within 200 Feet of Project Site) N:\5352\007\Design Docs\Platting\Adjoiners List\Adjoiner NOT CONTIGUOUS Phase 3 06_09_16.docx Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 1 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 11, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 13, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 18, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 19, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 20, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 21, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 22, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 31, Plat J-572 The Lakes at Valley West Bozeman, LLC 2 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 25, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 26, Plat J-572 Roset & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 10234 Bozeman, MT 59719-0234 3 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 23, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 24, Plat J-572 First Time Homebuyers, LLC 5205 Eclipse Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715-7743 57 Proposal The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Property Owners – ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS (Within 200 Feet of Project Site) N:\5352\007\Design Docs\Platting\Adjoiners List\Adjoiner NOT CONTIGUOUS Phase 3 06_09_16.docx Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 4 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 12, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 14, Plat J-572 ROI, LLC 6101 Blackwood Rd. Bozeman, MT 59718-7761 5 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 27, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 28, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 29, Plat J-572 Lakes at Valley West Ph 2, S09, T02 S, R05 E, Lot 30, Plat J-572 Shane Collins Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 11090 Bozeman, MT 59719-1090 6 S04, T02 S, R05 E, Acres 40, SW4SW4 Bonita L. Nollmeyer PO Box 1503 Belgrade, MT 59714-1503 7 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 11, Lot 5, Acres 0.28, Plat J-374 Melissa L. Morelli Kevin Foster 3300 Vickers Dr. Glendale, CA 91208-1606 8 Goldenhills Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 11 Plat J-374 Condo Master Goldenhills Condo Master General Delivery Bozeman, MT 59718-9999 8a Goldenhills Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 11 Plat J-374 Unit A Amy S. Wycoff Travis A. Royer 623 Westgate Ave., Apt A Bozeman, MT 59718-6591 8b Goldenhills Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 11 Plat J-374 Unit B Haley Vicchio 4820 Vine St. Bozeman, MT 59718-9284 8c Goldenhills Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 11 Plat J-374 Unit C Brian Farve 623 Westgate Ave., Apt. C Bozeman, MT 59718-6591 8d Goldenhills Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 11 Plat J-374 Unit D Big Iron Properties, LLC 103 Newton Ave. Glasgow, MT 59230-2886 58 Proposal The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Property Owners – ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS (Within 200 Feet of Project Site) N:\5352\007\Design Docs\Platting\Adjoiners List\Adjoiner NOT CONTIGUOUS Phase 3 06_09_16.docx Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 9 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 1, Acres 0.358, Plat J-374 Jason Schwartz 68 N. Fawn Pl., Unit C Belgrade, MT 59714-9304 10 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Acres 0.43, Public Park 3, Plat J-374 Laurel Glen Subdivision Ph 1 Park Area General Delivery Bozeman, MT 59718-9999 11 Shadow Glen Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 2 Blk 4 Plat J-374 Condo Master Shadow Glen Condo Master General Delivery Bozeman, MT 59718-9999 11a Shadow Glen Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 2 Blk 4 Plat J-374 Unit A James M. Warfield 4716 Shadowglen Dr., Apt A Bozeman, MT 59718-6594 11b Shadow Glen Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 2 Blk 4 Plat J-374 Unit B Jerry Shae 5458 134th Ave. Nw Williston, ND 58801-8998 11c Shadow Glen Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 2 Blk 4 Plat J-374 Unit C Wilson Gonzalez Lindsay Dyer 4716 Shadowglen Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718 12 Shamrock Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 3 Blk 14 Plat J-374 Condo Master Shamrock Condo Master General Delivery Bozeman, MT 59718-9999 12a Shamrock Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 3 Blk 14 Plat J-374 Unit A Jeffrey M. & Kamie R. Garner 5353 Highpointe Ter. Bloomington, MN 55437-1972 12b Shamrock Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 3 Blk 14 Plat J-374 Unit B Douglas C. Moriarty 1028 Summer Ridge Rd. Bozeman, MT 59715-7759 12c Shamrock Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 3 Blk 14 Plat J-374 Unit C John Kelly & Dickie Fox Kelly 4521 NE 201st Pl. Lk Forest Pk, WA 98155-1704 12d Shamrock Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 3 Blk 14 Plat J-374 Unit D Makos Family Trust 1794 Spyglass Cir. Vista, CA 92081-8950 13 Celtic Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 14 Plat J374 Condo Master Celtic Condo Master General Delivery Bozeman, MT 59718-9999 13a Celtic Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 14 Plat J374 Unit A Paul & Lynne Elder Trust Dtd 1/17/97 Paul W & Lynne B Elder Trustees 115 Nez Perce Dr. Bozeman, MT 59715-8304 59 Proposal The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Property Owners – ADJOINER NOT CONTIGUOUS (Within 200 Feet of Project Site) N:\5352\007\Design Docs\Platting\Adjoiners List\Adjoiner NOT CONTIGUOUS Phase 3 06_09_16.docx Legal Description of Property Property Owner’s Name Mailing Address of Property Owner from County Tax Records 13b Celtic Condo, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1 Lot 4 Blk 14 Plat J374 Unit B Patrick T. Haggerty Christina M. Haggerty 4662 Shadowglen Dr. Apt. B Bozeman, MT 59718 14 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 5, Acres 0.213, Plat J-374 Jeffrey D. Sadik 160 Blazer Trl. Bozeman, MT 59718-9379 15 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 6, Acres 0.225, Plat J-374 Robert J. & Vonnie K. Roller 82 W Shore Dr. Belgrade, MT 59714-9537 16 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 7, Acres 0.235, Plat J-374 Angela M. Mackay 4608 Shadowglen Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-6554 17 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 8, Acres 0.234, Plat J-374 Jim L. & Sandy D. Lundquist 912 34th Ave. NE Great Falls, MT 59404-1265 18 Laurel Glen Sub Ph 1, S04, T02 S, R05 E, Block 14, Lot 9, Acres 0.226, Plat J-374 Tony Kaber 4568 Shadowglen Dr. Bozeman, MT 59718-6555 60 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application MDEQ Exemption The applicant will request a Municipal Facilities Exclusion from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), per Section 38.41.040.11, BMC. The project schedule calls for water, sewer and stormwater infrastructure to be completed during 2016. After the project obtains preliminary plat approval, the Municipal Facilities Exclusion Checklist will be provided to the Director of Public Works for his approval and signature and forwarded to MDEQ for final approval. 61 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application PUD Relaxations A list of all PUD relaxation requests is included on the following pages. This section is identical to the requests that have been provided with the Preliminary Plan application. 62 List of Proposed Preliminary Plan Relaxations  The same relaxations to strict adherence to the underlying R-1 zoning and UDC Development Standards that were approved for the 65-acre Lakes at Valley West PUD, and specifically Phases 1 and 2, are being requested to be applied to Phase 3. In addition to the 15 relaxations approved before, 3 more, for a total of eighteen, are being requested for Phase 3. In addition to the additional relaxations, a modification to one of the previously approved modifications is being requested for Phase 3. The previously approved minimum lot size is 2,500 square feet and is requested to be reduced to 2,400 square feet for this Phase. The intention is that the lot size reduction (from 2,500 square feet to 2,400 square feet) would be applicable to Lots 5 through 12 of Lakes Phase 3 (but not retroactive to Phases 1 and 2). If it is applied again in future phases it will be requested for specific lots per phase. The detail associated with the justification for the first 15 relaxations was provided for in the Phases 1 and 2 application and are applicable to Phase 3 and future phases of The Lakes (all of the application forms referenced the entire 65-acre PUD), and the covenants specifically allow for annexation of subsequent phases into the authority of the covenants and Design Manual, the relaxation justification language presented here will be minimized. The relaxation justification focus will be on the three new relaxations. The relaxations and modified development standards would be administered for Phase 3 in the same fashion as for Phases 1 and 2: through the authority of the Lakes Design Manual and as required by the covenants. As will be seen, the existing Design Manual and covenants will be amended to incorporate Phase 3 (See Section D.17 of this application). In a related note, it would appear that the relaxed standards as stipulated in the Design Manual (see Section D. 17) are working well for Lakes Phases 1 and 2. After one year’s construction experience the reduced size lots and modified accesses via the woonerfs are both working well. On the following page a summary of the relaxations requested for Phase 3 is presented. Following that is a discussion regarding the lot size modification to relaxation #4 and the three new relaxations. The previously approved relaxation language will not be provided at this time. 63 Summary List of Relaxations*   Relaxation # Code Section Summary of Section  #1 38.08.010.A.2 Intent of R‐1 District  #2 38.08.020 Authorized Uses in R‐1  #3 38.08.030.A.2 Lot Coverage and Floor Area  #4 38.08.040.A Minimum Lot Area  #5 38.08.040.B Minimum Lot Width  #6 38.08.050.A Yards  #7 38.08.060 Building Height  #8 38.22.030 R‐1 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)  #9 38.23.040.B Block Length  #10 38.23.040.C Block Width  #11 38.23.040.D.3 Pedestrian Walk Surface  #12 38.23.040.E Block Numbering  #13 38.24.060.A Design Standards (length of tangent at intersection)  #14 38.24.060.B Alternate Alley Section to Allow Woonerf  #15 38.23.100.A.2 Reduction to minimum wetland setback  #16 38.23.080.F % of front yard occupied by storm water facilities  #17 38.25.010.5 Parking in Side Yards  #18 38.21.060.4 Increase covered deck front yard encroachment      *Table Notes: A relaxation is not necessary from Section 38.23.030.D.1 because it has built in flexibility with an “approved development plan.” The Design Manual includes information regarding lot orientation. As a point of clarification, since woonerfs are alleys, not streets, any residential garage in the Lakes PUD facing a woonerf will not have to comply with the design criteria in 38.080.070. This is noted in Article-PUD1 Section 7, Residential Garages.         64     Justification for New and Modified Relaxations Modification to #4. Relaxation to 38.08.040. A., Modification to single family lot area. As noted above, the previously approved single family lot size would be reduced from 2,500 square feet to 2,400 square feet. This is to accommodate lots 5 through 12 (inclusive) adjacent to Duston Road. The depth and size of these lots has been dictated by physical circumstances, but the lots are still suitable for zero lot-line homes that account for the shallow lot depths. The following set of building footprint and perspective view plans (Exhibits D.2.1 through D.2.5) show that the lots provide suitable building areas. This request is specific to these 7 lots in this Phase; however, a similar request may be made for specific lots in future phases with subsequent applications. (All other lot sizes as shown in the Design Manual would remain greater than 2,500 square feet.) New Relaxation #16. Relaxation to 38.23.080.F, Storm water facilities shall not generally occupy more than 1/3 of the front yard setback. A relaxation to this standard is requested for the front yard along Durston Road. The entire front yard setback between Westgate Avenue and the Phase 2 boundary will be utilized for underground storm water facilities. The surface will be landscaped and maintained by the Owners Association. New Relaxation #17. Relaxation to 38.25.010.5, Parking in side yards. A relaxation to this standard is requested for the parking stalls shown in the open space areas along Arnhem Way between lots 6 and 7, lots 8 and 9 and lots 19 and 20. The parking layout will include asphalt paving with ribbon concrete curbing. Perpendicular parking stalls are proposed in lieu of parallel parking stalls as shown on the preliminary plat and open space plan. The additional parking is requested to augment existing parking options in the area without significantly reducing the open spaces and would be no more than one parking stall in depth. New Relaxation #18. Relaxation to 38.21.060.4, Covered deck encroachments into open space setbacks. The relaxation would allow covered decks that are more than 1/3 the building all length to encroach 5-feet into the front yard/open space along Durston Road. The encroachment is into the setback, not the actual front yard/open space and is a relaxation that had been previously approved for the Valley West PUD but not incorporated into the Lakes Phase 1 and 2 relaxations. The relaxation allows for increased building design flexibility and enhances the front yard streetscape, along Durston Road in this instance. Perspective views of how this could look are provided in Exhibits D.2.1 through D.2.5, noted above. This relaxation is specific to Lots 5 through 12 at this time. It is possible that a similar relaxation will be requested for specific lots in future phases in subsequent applications. 65 LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE A R N H E M A V E D U R S T O N R O A D OPEN SPACE 1" = 30'-0"1 SITE PLAN Exhibit D.2.1 66 Exhibit D.2.267 Exhibit D.2.368 Exhibit D.2.469 Exhibit D.2.570 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions & Design Guidelines Attached are the following documents: 1. Recorded “Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West.” 2. Recorded “Affidavit of Omission Concerning the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West.” 3. Draft “Supplemental Declaration to the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West” 4. Draft updated “Design Manual for The Lakes at Valley West.” The base manual is the manual that is approved for The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 and 2 with proposed updates for Phase 3 shown using track changes in the document. 71 J-572 AfterRecording,ReturnTo: OgburnLawFirm,PLLC P.O.Box7020 Bozeman,MT 59771 2527605 Page:1 of 23 10/14/201501:19.39PM Fee:$161.00 CharlotteMills-GallatinCounty,MT MISC DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS,CONDITIONS,AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST THIS DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST ismade this_day ,2015,by The Lakes atValley West,Bozeman,LLC,hereinafterreferredto as "Declarant;" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,theDeclarantisthe owner of thefollowingdescribedrealpropertysituated in GallatinCounty,Montana: The Lakes atValley West Phase 1 and 2 Subdivision,includingspecificallyLots 1 through 25 of Phase 1,Lots 1 through 36 of Phase 2 and RestrictedLots R1 and R2, and by thisreferencemade a parthereof and hereinafterreferredto asthe"The Lakes Subdivision;"and WHEREAS,The Lakes Subdivisioniscurrentlysubjectto the Fourth Amended & RestatedDeclarationof ProtectiveCovenants &RestrictionsforValley West ("ValleyWest Covenants"),recorded on April 28,2014 as Document No.2479575,intheGallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder's Office,the FirstAmendment to Fourth Amended and RestatedDeclaration of ProtectiveCovenants and RestrictionsforValley West ("FirstAmendment to Valley West Covenants"),recorded on May 14,2015 as Document No.2511338,inthe GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder'sOffice,the Second Amendment toFourth Amended and RestatedDeclarationof ProtectiveCovenants and RestrictionsforValley West ("Second Amendment toValley West Covenants"),recorded on 10-14-201.5 as Document No.2527604 ,inthe Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office,and allRules and RegulationsfortheValley West Homeowners'Associationon fileand of record attheGallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder's Office; WHEREAS,the Declarantdesiresto impose additionalcovenants,conditions,and restrictionson thepropertyinThe Lakes Subdivision; 72 NOW THEREFORE,the Declaranthereby declaresthatallofthePropertyin The Lakes Subdivisionshallbe held,sold,and conveyed subjecttothe followingeasements,covenants, conditions,and restrictions,which areforthe purpose of maintaininga stablevalue,character, use,and development of The Lakes Subdivision;and which shallrun with the landand be binding on allpersons having any right,title,or interestin any propertyin The Lakes Subdivision or any partthereof,theirheirs,successorsand assigns,and shallinureto the benefitof each owner thereof. ARTICLE I Definitions 1.1."Affirmative Vote"means the affirmative vote of the majority of the membership interestwho are eligibleto vote and who are present at a meeting in person or by proxy. 1.2."Annexed Property"means property adjoining the Property which isannexed to the Property pursuant to Article XIV. 1.3."Association"means the Lakes Homeowner's Association for The Lakes Subdivision. 1.4."Board of Directors"means the Board of Directors for the Association. 1.5."Bylaws"means the Bylaws,ifany,for the Association,as may be amended from time to time.The Board of Directors isnot required to adopt Bylaws unless the Association isincorporated. 1.6."Common Areas"mean any propertyor partof any propertywithinThe Lakes Subdivisionthatisdedicatedor reservedfortheuse of allthe Owners,theirguestsand invitees. 1.7."Design Manual"means The Lakes atValley West Design Manual,as may be amended from time to time. 1.8."Director"means a person on the Board of Directors. 1.9."Declarant"means The Lakes atValley West,Bozeman,LLC,or any successoror assign who obtainsan Assignment of Declarant'sRights and Responsibilities.Both successorsand assignsshallalways be deemed to be includedwithinthe term "Declarant"whenever,however, and wherever such terms are used inthe Declaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,orDesign Manual. 1.10."Declaration"means thisDeclaration of Protective Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West,and as may be amended from time to time. 1.11."Design Review Panel"means The Lakes atValley West Design Review Panel, as furtherdefined in Article VI. DECLARATION 2 73 1.12."Lot"means any plot of land shown upon any recorded The Lakes atValley West subdivision map,excluding the Common Areas. 1.13."Member"means each Owner.By purchasing a Int in The Lakes Subdivision,each Member agreestoabide by and be bound by the Declaration,the Bylaws,allRules and Regulations,and the Design Manual. 1.14."Open Space"means any propertydesignatedas open space on any recordedThe Lakes at Valley West Phase 1 and 2 subdivision plat. 1.15."Owner"means the record owner,whether one or more persons or entities,of a fee simple titleto any Lot which isa partof The Lakes Subdivision,but excludingthosehaving such interestmerely as securityforthe performance of an obligation. 1.16."Parks"means any propertydesignatedas a park on any recordedThe Lakes at Valley West Phase 1 and 2 subdivision plat. 1.17."Park Facility"means and refersto the park facilitiesas shown on The Lakes Subdivision Parks Plans approved by the City of Bozeman. 1.18."Property"means and refersto allof the propertydescribedin The Lakes atValley West Phase 1 and 2 Subdivisionand such additionstheretoas may hereafterbe annexed and brought withinthejurisdictionoftheAssociation. 1.19."Storm Water Facility"means and refersto storm water facilitiesas shown on the City of Bozeman approved infrastructureplans. 1.20."The Lakes Subdivision"or "The Lakes at Valley West"means and referstoallof thepropertydescribedinthe FinalPlatof The Lakes atValley West Phase 1 and 2 Subdivision and such additionstheretoas may hereafterbe annexed and brought withinthejurisdictionofthe Association. 1.21."Transfer Date"means the date on which allof the Lots and Property owned by the Declarant-both atthe time thisDeclaration isrecorded or as may be annexed by the Declarant pursuant to Article XIV -have been sold,transferred,or the construction of a residence on the Lot completed.On the Transfer Date,allrights,responsibilities,duties, or benefits of the Declarant,solely in itsposition as the Declarant,which ariseout of this Declaration,shallautomatically transferto the Association.The sale or transfermust have been to someone other than the Declarant's successors or assigns.The Board of Directorsor itsdesignated representativeshallnotifythe Owners of the Transfer Date within a reasonable time afterthe Transfer Date occurs.For purposes of thisSection,notice includesposting notice of the Transfer Date to the Association'swebsite. DECLARATION 3 74 1.22."Rules and Regulations"means such rules and regulations adopted by the Board of Directors. 1.23."Utilities"means utilitylinesforpower,sewer,gas,telephoneand otherutilitylinesand servicelinesfortelevision,computer services,gas or otherservicelines,whether presently availableor not. 1.24."Valley West Covenants"means theFourth Amended &RestatedDeclarationof ProtectiveCovenants &RestrictionsforValley West,recordedon April 28,2014 as Document No.2479575,inthe GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder'sOffice,the FirstAmendment to Fourth Amended and RestatedDeclarationof ProtectiveCovenants and RestrictionsforValley West ("FirstAmendment to Valley West Covenants"),recorded on May 14,2015 as Document No.2511338,intheGallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder'sOffice,and any additional amendments tothose documents on fileand of recordwith the GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder'sOffice. 1.25."Valley West Homeowners'Association"means the association referred to in the Valley West Covenants.Until such time as the Property in The Lakes Subdivision isno longer subject to the jurisdictionof the Valley West Association,Owners are also members of the Valley West Homeowners'Association and subject to the Valley West Covenants and allRules and Regulationsforthe Valley West Homeowners'Associationon file and of recordatthe GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder'sOffice. ARTICLE II Location 2.1 The principalofficeof the Associationshallbe locatedin theresidenceof the duly elected Secretaryof the Association;or ifthereisno Secretary,inthe residenceof the duly elected Presidentof the Association. ARTICLE III Membership 3.1 Every Lot Owner shallbe a Member of the Association.Membership shallbe appurtenant to and may not be separate from the ownership of any Lot,so thateach Lot owner willautomaticallybecome a Member of the Association with the purchase of any Lot, and willbe a permanent Member untilthe Lot issold or transferredto a differentowner. Accordingly,no Member shallbe expelled,nor shallany Member be permitted to withdraw or resignwhile possessing a membership interest. 3.2 Itshallbe the duty of each Owner to advise the Association of the Owner's acquisition of any Lot,the Owner's mailing address and email address,and of any change in ownership or mailing or email address.For purpose of providing any noticerequired by the Declaration,the Owner's address shallbe the lastknown address on filewith the Association. DECLARATION 4 75 3.3 The votingrightsof each Owner aresubjectto: A.Ownership of an interestby fee or by contractin a Lot in The Lakes Subdivision; B.The fullpayment of assessments,fees,fines,penalties,interest,attorneys'fees, other costs,and liensimposed by the Association;and C.Compliance with the Declaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,and Design Manual. 3.4 The voting rightsof any Owner are automaticallysuspended during any period when such Owner shallhave failedtotimely pay any monies then owed to theAssociationand during any period of non-compliance with the Declaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,and Design Manual.Upon payment of such monies and upon complete compliance,the Member's voting rightsshallbe automaticallyrestored. 3.5 Each Lot shallhave one membership or voting interest.Ifownership isvested in more than one person,only one vote may be castcollectivelyby such Owners.Such owners must,priorto ameeting where voting may be allowed,among and between them,determine who isentitledtovote the membership interest,and inwhat manner itshallbe voted.If more than one person seeks to exercise the vote,the vote shallbe suspended and the Owners will be deemed to not be eligibleto vote on that matter. ARTICLE IV Meetings 4.1 There shallbe an annual meeting of the membership of the Association.The annual meeting shallbe held ata place specifiedin the notice of the meeting and at a date and hour selectedby the Board of Directors.The notice of the annual meeting may statethose matters thatwill come before the Association for approval. 4.2 Special meeting may be calledat any time upon the initiativeof the President,a majority vote of the Board of Directors,or by a qualifiedPetition(a Petitionsigned by 5%of the membership interesteligibleto vote atthe time the Petitionispresented to any Director, and which specifiesthepurpose(s)forwhich the specialmeeting isbeing requested).Upon receiptof a qualifiedPetition,the notice forsuch specialmeeting shallbe providedby the Board of Directorsor itsdesignated representativewithin 30 days afterreceivinga qualified Petition.Notice of any specialmeeting shallstatethe hour,date and place of the meeting and shallstatethe reason(s)of such meeting,and saidspecial meeting shallbe strictlyconfined to the matters setforthinthe notice. 4.3 Written noticeof allannual and specialmeeting shallbe mailed,emailed,or personallydeliveredby theBoard of Directorsor itsdesignatedrepresentativeto every Member of record no laterthan ten (10)days and not more than fifty(50)days before the date of the meetmg. DECLARATION 5 76 4.3.1 The record date shallbe the date on which the notice of the meeting isfirst sentto any Member. 4.3.2 The notice of the annual meeting shallinclude a copy of the budget forthe priorcalendar year,with actualincome and expenses included,and a copy of the budget for the next calendar year. 4.4 At the beginning of eitheran annual or specialmeeting of the Association,the presence in person or by proxy of 10%of the membership interesteligibleto vote shall constitutea quorum.Ifa quorum shallnot be presentatany meeting,such meeting shallbe adjourned and may be immediately re-convened,atwhich time thepresence inperson or by proxy of 5%of themembership interesteligibleto vote shallconstitutea quorum. 4.5.Once a quorum is established,unless anothervote isexpresslyrequired,the Association may actby AffirmativeVote. 4.5.1 Notwithstanding anything statedin thisDeclaration,before the TransferDate any vote taken by the Members is an advisory vote.No advisory vote taken by the Members shallbe construedtorequiretheDeclarantor Board of Directorsto actor not act;the Board ofDirectorsshallhave the discretionto determinewhether to act or not actbased on the advisoryvote. 4.5.2 AftertheTransferDate,ifany actionapproved by the Members compels theBoard of Directors to take positive action,the Board of Directors retainsthe final discretionas tothe scope,extent,and specificcharacterofthe actionitisrequired totake. 4.6 All annual and special meetings shallbe presided over by the President,or the Vice -Presidentifthe Presidentisnot present,or by any person electedby Affirmative Vote if neitherthe Presidentnor the Vice-President ispresent. 4.7 Any actionto be taken by the Members may be taken without a meeting ifthe Association deliversa ballot,via mail or email,to every Member eligibleto vote on the matter.The ballotmust setforththe proposed action,provide an opportunityto vote for or againstthe proposed action,indicatethe number of responses needed to meet the quorum requirement,statethe percentage of approvals necessary to approve each matter,and specify the time by which a ballotmust be received in order forthe vote to be counted.Approval by ballotunder thisSection isvalidifthe number of votes castby ballotequals or exceeds the quorum required to be present a meeting,and the number of approvals equals or exceeds the number of votes thatwould be required to approve the matter ata meeting. DECLARATION 6 77 ARTICLE V Board of Directors 5.1 The Association shallbe governed by the Board of Directors. 5.2 The Board of Directorsshallhave the authorityto acton behalfof the Associationin ordertocarryout the purposes of the Declarationand the Associationand to enforcethe Declaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulation,and Design Manual,unlessitisaftertheTransfer Date and an action isexpressly reserved forthe Members of the Association, 5.3 The Board of Directorsshallbe made up of threeDirectors. 5.4 The initialBoard of Directorsshallbe appointedby the Declarantforterms ofone,two and threeyears;thatis,one directorfora one year term,one fora two year term and one fora threeyear term.Thereafter,as a term expires,the next term shallbe a threeyear term,thus staggeringtheterms of the Directors.Directorsmay be appointed or elected for successive terms. 5.5 Appointment or Election of Directors. 5.5.1 After recording the Declaration,the Declarant shallappoint threeDirectors. The Declarant shallhave the rightto appoint the Directorsuntilthe Transfer Date.During thistime,the Directorsneed not be Owners or Members of the Association. 5.5.2 At the next annual meeting of the Association afterthe Transfer Date,the Members shallnominate and electcandidates from among the Members to fill the Directorpositionwhose term expiresatthe annual meeting,and so forth each year thereafter. (1)At any meeting atwhich an electionisheld,any Member presentin person atthemeeting may nominate himselfor anotherMember to be on the Board of Directors. (2)The Member receivingthehighestnumber of votes shallbe thenamed as a Director. 5.6 The Board of Directors shallelectthe following officers: 5.6.1 President-The Presidentshallbe electedfrom among the Directors.The President'sterm isone year.The Presidentshalloversee allmeetings of the Association and the Board of Directors.The President shallbe authorizedto sign on behalf of the Association allcontracts,records,documents,and instruments required or necessary to the administrationof the Association or incidentalto the powers of the Board of Directors.The Presidentshallhave all otherpowers expressly or impliedly authorized by the Declaration,the DECLARATION 7 78 Bylaws,or the Board of Directors. 5.6.2 Vice-President-The Vice-President shallbe electedfrom among the Directors. The Vice-President'sterm isone year.The Vice-President shallexercisethe powers of the President inthe absence of the President.The Vice-President shallhave allotherpowers expressly or impliedly authorized by the Declaration,the Bylaws,or the Board of Directors. 5.6.3 Secretary-The Secretarymay,but isnot required to be,a Director.The Secretaryshallremain in the officeof the Secretaryuntilhe or she resignsor untilthe Board of Directors appoints a differentperson to be Secretary, whichever happens first.At the least,the Secretary shall: (1)Maintain a record of allOwners/Members inthe Association and their membership interests,addresses,and emails; (2)Send,eitherpersonally or through a designated representative,notices of allmeetings of the Association and the Board of Directors; (3)Prepare and maintain minutes of the Association and Board of Director meetmgs; (4)Maintain other records requiredby the Declaration,Bylaws,or the Board of Directors; (5)Sign on behalf of the Association allrecords,documents,and instruments when such are authorized to be signed by the Board of Directors;and (6)Upon request,authenticaterecords of the Association. 5.6.4 Treasurer-The Treasurer may,but isnot requiredto be,a Director.The Treasurer shallremain inthe officeof the Treasurer untilhe or she resignsor untilthe Board of Directors appoints a differentperson to be Treasurer, whichever happens first.At the least,the Treasurer shall: (1)Prepare a proposed budget for each year for review,comment,and approval by the Board of Directors; (2)Keep and maintain adequate and correctaccounts of the accounts, liabilities,receipts,disbursements,gains,and lossesof the Association; and (3)Keep and maintain a record of allassessments,fees,fines,and interest owed by any person to the Association. DECLARATION 8 79 5.6.5 An officermay hold more than one office. 5.7 Removal of Directors. 5.7.1 Before the Transfer Date,the Declarant has the power to remove any Director forany reason and atany time. 5.7.2 After the Transfer Date,at any meeting of the Association,the Members may remove a Director upon the approval of 75%or more of the membership interestpresent inperson or by proxy.The Members may electthe replacement as setforthin Article5.5.2. 5.8 Vacancy on Board. 5.8.1 Before the Transfer Date,the Declarant has the power to fillany vacancy on the Board of Directors. 5.8.2 After the Transfer Date,any vacancy on the Board of Directors shallbe filledby the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining Directors,even though lessthan a quorum of the Board of Directors,and any such appointed Director shallhold officefor the unexpired term of his or her predecessor in office. 5.9 Without limitingany power vested in the Board of Director by law or by this Declaration,the Board of Directors shallhave the power to: A.To sue and be sued,complain,and defend inthe Association'sname; B.To purchase,receive,lease,orotherwiseacquireand own,hold,improve,use,maintain, and otherwisedeal with realor personalpropertyor any legalor equitableinterestin property; C.To lease,exchange,and otherwise dispose of allor any part of the Association's property; D.To make contractsand guaranties; E.To incurliabilitiesand pay the expenses of the Association; F.To prepare and approve a budget; G.To establisha reservefund; H.To impose assessments,penalties,fines,fees,interest,attorneys'fees,and costsupon itsMembers and upon the Lots within The Lakes Subdivision as authorizedby the Declaration,the Bylaws,the Rules and Regulations,theDesign Manual,or the law; DECLARATION 9 80 I.To collectassessments,penalties,fines,fees,interest,attorneys'fees,and costs authorizedby the Declaration,the Bylaws,the Rules and Regulations,the Design Manual,or the law; J.To fileand forecloseliens; K.To care for,manage,control,protect,and maintain the Common Areas,Parks,Park Facilities,Open Spaces,Storm Water Facility,boundary fences,and easements; L.To enforcetheseDeclaration,the Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,and Design Manual; M.To setand callmeeting of the Association,both annual and special,andto preside over such meetings and to give appropriatenoticeof such meeting as requiredby the Declaration or the Bylaws; N.To establishRules and Regulationsto carryout the purposes oftheDeclarationso long as such Rules and Regulations do not conflictwith the Declarationand the Members are provided with 30 days writtennotice (via mail,email,or on the Association's website)of any Rule and Regulation beforeitbecomes enforceable; O.The form committees to assistthe Board of Directorsin carryingout itspowers and authority;and P.To pay forsuch insuranceas may be necessary and in the bestinterestof Association and theBoard of Directors,and to provide for the use and dispositionof the insuranceproceeds inthe event of lossor damage.The extentand specificnature of coverage shallbe determined by the Board of Directors,except thattheBoard of Directorsshallprocure and maintain liabilityinsuranceforthe Association; Q.To pay taxes; R.To dealwith agencies,officers,boards,commissions,departments,and bureaus or other governmental bodies ina federal,state,county,or localbasison behalf of the Association; S.To do allthingsauthorizedby the Declaration,the Bylaws,Rules and Regulations, or theDesign Manual;and T.To do all things necessary or convenient which may serve the interestsof the Association or The Lakes Subdivision or to carry into effectthe Declaration,the Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,the Design Manual or the purposes of theAssociation. 5.10 A meeting of the Board of Directorsmay be calledatany time upon the initiativeof the Presidentor a majority of the Board of Directors. DECLARATION 10 81 5.11 Notice of any Board of Directors'meeting may be by telephone,mail,email,or personaldeliverytoeach Directoratleast2 days beforethemeeting.The noticeneed not state the purpose(s)of the meeting.A Director may waive the requirednotice by a writing,signed by the Director,and filedin the corporaterecords;or by attendingor participatingin a meeting unless the Director,upon arrivingatthe meeting or before the vote on any matter, objectsto the lack of notice and does not vote for or assentto thataction. 5.12 At the beginning of a Board ofDirectors'meeting,the presence inperson or by proxy of a majority of the Board ofDirectorsshallconstitutea quorum.Any Directormay participate ina meeting through the use of any means of communication by which allDirectorsparticipating may simultaneouslyhear each otherduring themeeting.A Directorparticipatingina meeting by thismeans isconsideredpresentin person atthemeeting. 5.13 Once a quorum isestablished,the Board ofDirectorsmay actupon the affinnativevote of a majorityof Directorspresent. 5.14 Any actionrequired or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directorsmay be taken without a meeting ifthe actionistaken by allDirectors.The actionmust be evidenced by one or more writtenconsents describing the actiontaken,be signed (by regularor electronic signature)by each Director,and filedin the corporate records,or ratifiedby the Board of Directorsat itsnext annual or specialmeeting. 5.15 The Directorsshallnot receiveany monetary compensation,except thatthey shallbe reimbursed for any out-of-pocketexpenses incurredwhile actingintheirofIicialcapacityfor theirservicesas members of the Board of Directors. 5.16 Any Director who actsin good faithon behalf of theAssociation: A.Shallnot be liableto the owners as a resultof theiractivitiesas such for any mistake ofjudgment,negligence or otherwise,except for theirown willful misconduct or bad faith; B.Shallhave no personal liabilityincontractto an Owner or any other person or entityunder any agreement,instrumentor transactionentered intoby them on behalf ofthe Association intheircapacityas such; C.Shall have no personal liabilityintortto any Owner or any person or entity, except for theirown willfulmisconduct or bad faith; D.Shall have no personal liabilityarisingout of the use,misuse or condition of the property which might inany way be assessed againstor imputed tothem as a resultof or by virtueof theircapacity as such. 5.17 Any person made a partyto any proceeding because theperson isor was a Directoror member of the Design Review Panel shallbe defended and indemnified as setforthinSection 35-2-446 through Section35-2-454,MCA,as those statutesmay be amended from time totime. DECLARATION 11 82 ARTICLE VI Design Manual and Design Review Panel 6.1 Pursuant tothe Second Amendment to the Fourth Amended and RestatedDeclarationof ProtectiveCovenants and RestrictionsforValley West,on fileand ofrecordinthe Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office asDocument No.,Members and Owners are not requiredto comply with ArticleIV (ArchitecturalRegulations),ArticleV (SiteDesign), ArticleVI (Landscape Design),ArticleVII (Design Review Process),and ArticleVIII (Valley West ArchitecturalReview Committee)of theValley West Covenants.Instead,allMembers and Owners shallbe bound by and adhere to theDesign Manual (asamended from time totime)and shallbe subjecttothe authorityof The Lakes atValley West Design Review Panel. In additionto any enforcement powers given toBoard and/orthe Design Review Panel,while the Valley West Subdivisionisunder thejurisdictionof the Valley West Homeowners'Association, allMembers and Owners shallcontinuetobe subjectto ArticleX,Section2,of theValley West Covenants forany violationof theValley West Covenants or the Design Manual. 6.2 All construction,installation,and alterationof allimprovements on thePropertyor any Lot withinThe Lakes Subdivisionshallbe subjecttheDesign Manual and tothe review and approval of The Lakes atValley West Design Review Panel. 6.2.1 Before the TransferDate,except forany provisionthatcannot be changed without theCity of Bozeman's approval,theDeclarantmay adopt,amend,modify,add,or deleteany provisionof the Design Manual; 6.2.2 AftertheTransferDate,except forany provisionthatcannot be changed without theCity of Bozeman's approval,theBoard of Directorsmay adopt,amend, modify,add,or deleteany provisionof theDesign Manual by unanimous vote. 6.2.3 Any amendment,modification,addition,or deletiontotheDesign Manual shall not be effectiveuntil30 days afterthe Members are given noticeof the amendment,modification,addition,or deletion.For purposes ofthisprovision, noticeoftheamendment,modification,addition,or deletionmay be given by mail,email,or by postingthe amendment,modification,additionordeletionon theAssociation'swebsite. DECLARATION 12 83 ARTICLE VII Assessments 7.1 The Declaranthereby covenants,and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed therefor,whether or not itshallbe so expressed insuch deed,isdeemed to covenant and agree to pay to theAssociation: (1)Annual Assessments;and (2)SpecialAssessments. 7.2 Assessments may be used topromote the recreation,health,safety,convenience,and welfareof the Associationor the Members;fornoxious weed mitigationand removal;forthe improvement,repair,operation,and maintenance of the Common Area,Open Space,Parks,Park Facility,Storm Water Facility,easements,sidewalks,woonerfs and alleys,or any otherareafor which the Associationisor may be responsiblefornow or inthefuture;to defray,inwhole or in part,the costof any construction,reconstruction,gravel,paying,repairor replacement of a capitalimprovement upon the Common Area,Open Space,Parks,sidewalks,trails,woonerfs and alleys,easements,or any otherareaforwhich the Associationisor may be responsiblefornow or inthefuture,includingfixturesand personalpropertyrelatedthereto;to establishreservesfor any reason;formaking and collectingassessments;forpaying taxesand insurance;forenforcing the Declaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,or Design Manual;to assistthe Board of Directorsor Design Review Panel incarryingout theirpowers and authorities;forany other purposes,expressor implied,inthisDeclaration,the Bylaws,the Rules or Regulations,or the Design Manual;and forany otherpurpose deemed reasonableand necessaryby theBoard of Directors. 7.3 The Board of Directorsshallhave the power to levy Annual and Special Assessments on itsMembers. 7.3.1 Annual Assessments shallbe fixedby the Directorsata uniform rateforeach Lot, exceptthe Directorsmay fixa differentuniform rateforimproved and unimproved Lots. 7.3.2 SpecialAssessments shallbe fixed at the same ratefor each Lot affectedby the SpecialAssessment. 7.4 The Annual and SpecialAssessments shallbe due on thedatedetermined by the Board of Directors,exceptthatthe Board of Directorsor itsdesignatedrepresentativeshallprovide notice of the amount and due date of the Annual and SpecialAssessments to the Owner of each Lot at least30 days beforethe due date of each Annual Assessment,and atleast90 days beforethe due dateforeach SpecialAssessment. 7.5 No Owner may waive or otherwiseescape liabilityfortheAssessments provided forherein by non-use of thePropertyor by abandonment of hisor her Lot. DECLARATION 13 84 7.6 Untilsuch time as The Lakes Subdivisionisremoved from thejurisdictionofthe Valley West Homeowners'Association,any Owner assessedhereunder shallbe subjectto an additional assessmentby the Valley West Homeowners'Association,which isassessedand collected pursuantto theValley West Covenants.Payment of such assessmentsdoes not alleviateor offset theassessmentsrequiredby thisDeclaration. 7.7 Notwithstanding anything containedinthisDeclaration,the Declarantshallnot be requiredtopay any assessmentson any Lot or Propertyowned by theDeclarantunlessthe Declarantor itsagents,representatives,members,or employees resideon the Lot. ARTICLE VIII Fees 8.1 The Board ofDirectorsshallhave the power to establishand charge fees forany service provided to any Owner (such servicesmay but are not requiredto include,lawn maintenance, weed maintenance,snow removal,design review,etc.),or for any other reason permitted by the Declaration,the Bylaws,the Rules and Regulations,or the Design Manual. 8.2 The fees may be used in any manner that the Board of Directors,in itsdiscretion, believesbenefitsthe Association. 8.3 Fees are due in an amount and on the due date establishedby the Board ofDirectorsor as otherwise setforthintheDeclaration,Bylaws,Rules and Regulations,or Design Manual. ARTICLE IX Property Use 9.1 Municipal Regulations.All land use regulationsand allotherlaws,rules,and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdictionthe land liesare consideredto be partof thisDeclaration and enforceablehereunder;and allof the Owners of saidlandsshallbe bound by such land use regulationsand other laws,rules,and regulations.In the event thereis a conflict between the Declaration and the applicableland use regulationsand other laws,rules,and regulations,the most restrictiveshallcontrol. 9.2 Re-Subdivision.There shallbe no furtherdivisionof the Lots withoutthe consentof the Board of Directors. 9.3 ResidentialUse.The Lots shallbe restrictedto residentialuses only.There shallbe no commercial businessconducted on any Lot,except that"cottageindustries"may be conducted in the dwelling or within an appurtenantbuildingby an Owner residinginthe dwellingor any of the Owner's immediate family residingin thedwelling.A "cottageindustry "means a business where the publicdoes notpurchase merchandise on a retailbasison the Lot,and such commercial use isclearlyincidentaland secondary to the use of the Lot as a residence. 9.4 Wildlife.No hunting of,shootingator harassingof birds,animals or any wildlifewillbe permitted.Skunks,gophers and rodentsmay be trapped;however,poison may not be used. DECLARATION 14 85 9.5 Animals.No animals,except dogs,cats,chickens,or small in-housepets,arepermittedon the Lots.Owners may comply with allstate,city,and localrulesregardinganimals kept on any Lot.Owners shallpick up aftertheiranimals and shallnot allow theiranimals toroam freeon any otherLot. 9.6 Lot Maintenance.Each Owner isrequiredto maintain his or her Lot,whether developed or undeveloped,in a neat and orderlyfashion.This includesbut isnot limitedto maintainingthe landscape,mowing,trimming,weeding,mitigatingand removing noxious weeds,and othersimilar maintenance and upkeep. 9.7 BuildingMaintenance.Each Owner isrequiredtomaintain any structure(buildings,fences, walls,etc.)on theOwner's Lot ina neatand orderlyfashion.This includesbut isnot limitedtore- painting,re-staining,re-roofing,and othersimilarmaintenance and upkeep. 9.8 Woonerfs and Alleys.Each Owner shallmaintain the alleyright-of-wayadjacentto the Owner's Lot.This includesbut isnot limitedto pickingup and appropriatelydisposingof garbage, trash,debris,and otherwaste and mowing and trimming the alleyright-of-way. 9.9 Refuse. 9.9.1 No junk,garbage,trash,debris,materials,equipment,or otherwaste shallbe allowed to accumulate on any Lot or originatefrom any Lot;exceptthatduring theperiodof constructionapproved by theDesign Review Panel,temporary accumulationsmay be allowed but they shallatalltimes be kept in an orderly, clean,and sanitaryconditionand screened from view,and shallbe disposed of regularly. 9.9.2 There shallbe no incinerationorburning ofjunk,garbage,trash,debris,materials, equipment,or otherwaste on any Lot. 9.9.3 All garbage and trashrequirementsof the City of Bozeman shallbe observed. 9.9.4 All garbage and trashthatisstoredoutsideshallbe kept in a City-approved container.Except on garbage pick-upday,garbage containersshallbe kept inthe garage or otherenclosuredirectlyadjacentto a structureor fence. 9.9.5 Inadditionto any otherremedy allowed under thisDeclaration,theRules and Regulations,the Design Manual,or atlaw or inequity,ifan Owner violatesany partof thisSection,the Board of Directors,aftertwenty-fourhours'notice,may cause thejunk,garbage,trash,debris,materials,equipment,or otherwaste to be controlled,collected,and/or removed,assessthe Owner of the Lot forall attorney'sfeesand costsrelatedthereto,and charge a fine. 9.10 Junk Vehicles.No junk vehiclesor unusable machinery or equipment shallbe parked outsideon any Lot or placed on any road.A "junk vehicle"means one which has not been DECLARATION 15 86 licensedforseveralmonths or isinan inoperablecondition."Unusable machinery or equipment" means thatwhich isnot in operablecondition. 9.11 Signs.Only the followingsignsmay be erectedon the exteriorof any Lot: (1)Signs which identifythe Owner of theLot; (2)"For Sale"signson a Lot being sold; (3)Politicalsigns,forup to 30 days beforean electionand 2 days afterthe election;and (4)Signs placed by the Declarant and/or Association at any entrance(s)to The Lakes Subdivisionto identifythe subdivisionand/orneighborhood. 9.12 Automobiles and Vehicles. 9.12.1 "Automobile"means a two,three,or four door passenger vehicle,sportsutility vehicle,or pick-up truckwith or without a canopy cover or topper,or a moped or motorcycle,which isprimarilyused fortransportinga small number ofpeople over publichighways. 9.12.2"Vehicle"means any boat,trailer,snowmobile,motor home,mobile home, recreationalvehicle,off-highway vehicle,or othersimilarequipment. 9.12.3 Only one Vehicle per Lot isallowed to be stored/parkedoutsideof a garage on that Lot,and any such Vehicle parked/stored outside of a garage shall only be parked/storedon a designatedconcrete or gravelpad.The designatedconcreteor gravelpad shallonly be adjacenttothe alley.No Vehicle shallbe parked/storedin a driveway or infronta house. 9.12.4 No Automobile or Vehicle shallobstructpedestriantraffic. 9.12.5 All Automobiles and Vehicles shallalsocomply with alllocaland statelaws. 9.12.6 In additionto any other remedy allowed under the Declarationor the Rules and Regulations,owners of Automobiles or Vehicles parked in violationof this Declaration may be asked in writing or by placing a written notice on the Automobile or Vehicle to comply with this Declaration and/or to immediately remove the Automobile or Vehicle.Ifthe Automobile or Vehicle isnot removed within 24 hours of notification,the Board of Directors or its authorized representativemay cause theAutomobile or Vehicle tobe towed and impounded at the expense of the owner,assessthe Owner of the Lot for allattorney'sfees and costsrelatedthereto,and charge a fine. 9.12.7 Notwithstanding anythingtothecontrary,theBoard or itsauthorizedrepresentative may cause an Automobile or Vehicle tobe towed immediately withoutnotification DEcLARATIoN 16 87 if the Board or itsauthorizedrepresentativedetermines thatthe Automobile or Vehicle impedes emergency vehiclesorrepresentsa threattohealthand safety.The Board of Directorsmay have the Vehicle towed and impounded atthe expense of the owner,assess the Owner of the Lot for allattorney'sfees and costsrelated thereto,and charge a fine. 9.13 Conduct.Each Owner,whether present or not,shallbe responsiblefor his or her own conduct and forthe conduct of hisor her finnily,occupants,guests,invitees,licensees,and tenants while on the Owner's Lot or within The Lakes Subdivision.Each Owner and his or her family, occupants,guests,invitees,licensees,and tenantsshallconduct themselves in a manner so as not to disturbthe peacefulpossessionof another Owner's Lot or the use of othersof the Common Areas,Open Spaces,or Parks.Itisa violationof thisDeclarationto allow noiseto emit beyond the Owner's Lot boundary ata levelthatdisturbsone or more persons. 9.14 Tenants.Each Owner is responsible for the Owner's tenants,and is responsiblefor providing a copy of the Declaration,Rules and Regulations,and Design Manual to the tenants. Upon the Board of Director'srequest,the Owner shallprovide the Board of Directorswith each Tenant'sname,address,and telephone number. 9.15 Nuisance.No nuisance of any type or nature shallbe permitted to existupon any Lot, Common Area,Open Space,or Park.A "nuisance"includes,but isnot limitedto,any actionor conduct or thing which,in the Board of Director'ssolediscretion,disturbsor interfereswith the peacefuluse,occupancy,or enjoyment of any Owner,occupant,guest,invitee,licensee,or tenant inThe Lakes Subdivision.Every Owner isresponsiblefortheactionand conduct oftheOwner and the Owner's family,occupants,guests,invitees,licensees,and tenants. 9.16 Sidewalks.Notwithstanding anything contained in this Declaration,every Owner is responsibleformaintainingtheOwner's sidewalklocatedon,adjacentto,and between theOwner's Lot and the nearestright-of-way."Maintain"includes,but isnot limitedto,snow removal. ARTICLE X Agricultural Uses 10.1 Lot Owners and residentsof The Lakes Subdivision are informed thatadjacent uses may be agricultural.Lot Owners accept and are aware thatstandard agriculturaland farming practicescan resultin dust,animal odors and noise,smoke,flies,and machinery noise. Standard agriculturalpracticesfeaturethe use of heavy equipment,chemical sprays,and the use of machinery earlyinthe morning and sometimes lateintothe evening. 10.2 All fences bordering agriculturallands shallbe maintained by the landowners in accordance with statelaw. DECLARATION 17 88 ARTICLE XI Common Areas,Parks,Open Spaces,Easements, and Designated Sidewalks I1.1 The Declarantshallinstallor cause to be installedor constructedthefollowing improvements:The mainlinesfortelephone,power and gas shallbe connected up to themain utilitylinesinthe area and Declarantshallinstallsuch utilitylinesnear each Lot withinthe utility orroad easements or Common Areas shown on the siteplans.The streetsshown on the siteplan shallbe installedin accordance with thepresentCity of Bozeman requirementsforsuch a subdivision.Storm Water Facilitiesand Park Facilitiesas requiredunder theCity of Bozeman approved infrastructureand park facilityplans,includingany such Storm Water Facilitiesand Park Facilitiesrequiredinthe R Lots shown on theFinalPlatforPhases I and 2 of theLakes at Valley West.Such otheramenitiesas theDeclarantdeems appropriateor as requiredby Gallatin County. 11.2 The Declarantreservesand retainsthroughout The Lakes Subdivisionthereasonableand necessaryeasements and encroachment rightstoinstall,move,maintain,repair,and remove the utilitiesservicelines,includingsewer and water lines,improvements and amenitiesmentioned in Section 11.1,and forotherservicelinesand utilityand cableservices,whether presently availableornot,inthe Common Areas,Parks,Park Facilities,Storm Water Facilities,and Open Spaces along theeasements reservedor delineatedon therecorded subdivisionmap.The Declarantor the Board of Directorsmay grantsuch easements to thirdpartiesas necessaryfor installation,moving,maintenance,repair,or removal of any servicelinesor improvements inthe Common Areas,Parks,Park Facilities,Storm Water Facilities,and Open Spaces.. 11.3 Afterthe TransferDate,only the Valley West Associationand the Association,acting through theirrespectiveBoards,shallhave the rightsand reservationssetforthinSection11.1 and Section 11.2. I1.4 City sewer and water lines,power,naturalgas,cabletelevision,and telephoneservice linesareprovided to each Lot.The Owners shallbe responsibleand have the obligation,atits cost,to installand hook up the utilityand servicelinesfrom the main linesto thebuildingsand improvements on theLot.All utilitylinesshallbe underground.Privateutilitiesarethe responsibilityof the Owner.The Owners shallpay forallserviceand use charges billedby the utilityand servicecompanies fortheuse and consumption oftheutilities. 11.5 After the initialinstallationof the improvements in the Common Areas,Parks,and Open Spaces by the Declarant,the Association,iftheValley West Associationdoes not or isno longer obligatedto,shallbe responsibleforand have theobligationtomaintain theCommon Areas,Parks and Open Spaces in good conditionand repairand as setforthon the Final Platof The Lakes Subdivision.This includestheresponsibilityto controlnoxious weeds and to maintainsidewalks in the Common Areas,Parks,and Open Spaces,including snow removal.The cost of such maintenance shallbe a partof the annual budget forthe Associationtobe assessedtothe Owners. 11.6 Common Area Easement.The Declarant,the Owners and theirguestsand invitees,and the publichave a perpetualnonexclusive easement of ingressand egressthrough the Common Area, DECLARATION 18 89 Parks,and Open Space.This covenant shallnot be changed without the writtenapproval of the City of Bozeman. 11.7 Other Easement.The Association,by and through the Board of Directorsor itsdesignated representative,shallhave the right,but not the obligation,to enterupon any Lot foremergency, security,or safetyreasons,or toperform maintenance incompliance with the Declaration,Bylaws, Rules and Resolutions,or Design Manual,which rightmay be exercisedby any member of the Board of Directorsor theirdesignated representative,and allpoliceman,firemen,ambulance personnel,and similaremergency personnelintheperformance of theirduties. ARTICLE XII Additional Covenants Required by the City 12.1 Every Owner shallcause to be constructedcitystandard sidewalks (includinga concrete sidewalk section through all private drive approaches)on all public and private street frontagespriortothe occupancy of any structureon individualLots.Upon the thirdanniversary of the finalplatrecordationof a Lot Owner's phase of The Lakes Subdivision,any Lot Owner within thatphase who has not constructedthe required sidewalk shall,without furthernotice, construct within 30 days the sidewalk for his or her Lot(s),regardlessof whether other improvements have been made upon the Lot. 12.2 The Open Space within The Lakes Subdivision,as designatedon a finalplator approved PUD siteplan,shallbe preserved inperpetuity. 12.3 After the installationof the Storm Water Facilityand the Parks Facilityby the Declarant, the Association,ifthe Valley West Associationdoes not or isno longer obligatedto,shallbe responsibleforand have the obligationto maintainthe Storm Water Facilityand Park Facilitiesas shown on the City of Bozeman approved infrastructureand park plans,includingthe R Lots as shown on the Final Plat for Phases I and 2 of The Lakes at Valley West.The cost of such maintenance shallbe a partof the annual budget forthe Associationtobe assessedtothe Owners. 12.3 The Board of Directorsshallincludeintheassessmentsan amount necessaryto pay forthe taxes,insurance,maintenance,upkeep,and repairof allParks,Open Space,sidewalksinParks and Open Spaces,Woonerfs and alleys,thatarerequiredtobe maintained by the Association. 12.4 Ifthe Associationfailsto maintain the Parks and Open Spaces in reasonableorder and condition in accordance with the City of Bozeman's approved plan,the City may enforce the covenant pursuantBozeman Ordinance Section38.38.030(8). 12.5 Drainage plans shallbe requiredforeach Lot as partof a Lot Owner's applicationfora buildingpermit from the City of Bozeman. DECLARATION 19 90 ARTICLE XIII Enforcement 13.1 For any violationor threatened violationof the Declaration,Bylaws,Rules or Regulations,or Design Manual,the Board of Directors (on behalf of the Association)or any Owner may bring a legalproceeding formonetary,injunctive,and/or other reliefand damages.The prevailingparty shallbe entitledto an award of allattorney fees (including fees for fees and fees on appeal)and allcosts and expenses relatedto or arisingfrom the issuesraisedinthe proceeding. 13.1.1.Beforethe Board of Directorsmay being a legalaction,the Board of Directors shallprovide notice of the violationor threatenedviolationto the Owner. 13.1.2.The notice shallspecify the violationand the time period in which the violationmust be cured. 13.1.3.The notice shallbe served upon the Owner via mail,email,or personal delivery.The notice isdeemed served on the date itispersonally deliveredor emailed,or 3 days afteritismailed,whichever date comes first. 13.1.4.The Lot owner has 10 days afterserviceof the noticeto submit a writtenletter to the Board of Directors settingforthallof the reasons why the Owner believesa violationhas not occurred.The Owner shallattachto the letterall documentary evidence and,ifapplicable,a listof witnesses in support of the Owner's position. 13.1.5.Ifthe Owner submits a timely writtenresponse,the Board of Directorsshall review the Owner's response and determine whether a violationhas occurred. Ifthe Owner failstotimely submit a writtenletterto the Board of Directors, then the violationwillbe deemed to have occurred. 13.1.6.Ifa violationisdeemed to have occurred,any actionor proceeding authorized by the Declaration,these Bylaws,the Rules and Regulations,the Design Manual,or by law or equity may be taken againstthe Owner and/orthe Lot. Such actionmay include,but isnot limitedto any or allof the following: suspending voting rights,assessing fines,charging interest,filinga lien,filing a lawsuit,and assessingpayment for allattorneyfees and allcostsand expenses. 13.1.7.Even ifa violationisdetermined or deemed to have occurred,the Board of Directorsmay make a businessjudgment decisionto not take actionor initiate a proceeding againstthe Lot owner. 13.2 The Board of Directors (on behalf of the Association),may also record alien any Lot owned by the Lot Owner for allunpaid assessments,fees,fines,attorneyfees,othercosts and expenses,and intereston alloutstanding amounts owed at the rateof 12%per annum. DECLARATION 20 91 Said lienshallbe a charge on any Lot owned by the Owner and shallbe a continuinglienuntil allamounts owed arefullypaid. 13.2.1 Such lienshallbe superiorto allother liensand encumbrances,except for tax and specialassessment liensplaced by a statutoryauthority,otherstatutory 1.lens. 13.2.2 Such lienshallattachfrom the datethenoticeof the assessment,fee,or fineis firstserved,the date itfirstbecomes due,orthe date the lienisfiled,whichever happens first. 13.2.3 The Board of Directorsmay foreclosethe lienagainsttheLot inthemanner set forthunder Montana law forthe foreclosureof liensagainstrealproperty,and may alsobring an action againstthe Owner personally obligatedtopay all such amounts. 13.3 Any money due on a Lot or owed by an Owner that remains unpaid at the time the Owner's Lot ispurchased by or transferred to a successive owner,shallalso be the personal obligation of any successive owner,regardless of the factthat the amount first became due while the Lot was owned by a prior owner.Every successiveowner has a duty to contact the Association'sBoard of Directors before taking titleto a Lot to learn if there are any unpaid amounts due on the Lot or against the prior owner. 13.4 In additiontothe remedies outlinedinthisArticle,the Board of Directors(on behalfof theAssociation)reservesthe rightto assertand/orpursue any otherremedy inwhich itmay be entitledto under the Declaration,theseBylaws,the Rules and Regulation,theDesign Manual,or atlaw or inequity. 13.5 Failureto Enforce Covenants.The failureby to enforceany provisioncontainedinthis Declarationshallnotbe deemed a waiver or inany way prejudicetherightsto laterenforcethat same provisionorany otherprovision. ARTICLE XIV Annexation 14.1 At any time beforethe TransferDate,the Declarant shallhave theright,from time totime and initssolediscretion,toannex tothe Propertyand to includewithinthisDeclarationallor partof any propertythatiscontiguousto any partoftheProperty.Right-of-ways,such as streets and alleys,do not prevent propertyfrom being consideredcontiguous. 14.2 Notwithstanding anything statedinthisDeclaration,any annexationauthorizedin Section 14.1,above,may be made by the recordingof one or more supplemental declarationssignedby the Declarant.At theleast,a supplemental declarationshallcontain:(1)thelegaldescriptionof the propertyto be annexed;(2)a statementthatthe annexed propertyisdeemed a partof the Propertyand subjecttotheDeclaration;(3)and a statementthatallowners of any lotinthe annexed propertyshallautomaticallybe a member of the Association. DECLARATION 21 92 14.3 The annexation shallbecome effectiveupon being recorded with the GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder. 14.4 In any propertyisannexed to the Propertypursuant tothe provisionsofthisArticle,then such propertyshallbe consideredwithin.thedefinitionof Propertyforallpurposes of this Declarationand each owner shallbe deemed a member of the Associationsubjecttoallrightand responsibilitiessetforthinthisDeclaration. ARTICLE XV Notice 15.1 Whenever noticeisrequiredunder thisDeclaration,unlessotherwisestatednoticeshall be deemed servedifnoticeisgiven by mail to the owner's lastknown address,email to the Owner's lastknown email address,or personal delivery.The noticeisdeemed served on the date itispersonally deliveredor emailed,or 3 days afteritismailed,whichever date comes first.The ARTICLE XVI Miscellaneous Covenants 16.1 Term of Declaration.The term of thisDeclarationshallbe perpetual,exceptthatany time aftertheTransferDate,95%of the membership interestmay signa document toterminatethe Declaration.Said terminationshallnot take effectuntilthe document and allof therequired signaturesarerecorded inthe GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder's Office. 16.2 Amendment. 16.2.1Before theTransferDate,except forthosecovenants requiredby theCity of Bozeman under ArticleXII,theDeclarantmay amend,modify,add,or deleteany provisionof thisDeclaration,inwhole or inpart.The amendment,modification, addition,or deletionshallnot takeeffectuntilitisrecorded with theGallatin County Clerk and Recorder and noticeprovided to allMembers.For purposes of thisprovision,noticeincludespostingthe amendment,modification,addition,or deletionon theAssociation'swebsite. 16.2.2Afterthe TransferDate,except forthose covenants requiredby the City of Bozeman under ArticleXII,the Associationmay amend,modify,add,or delete any provisionof thisDeclarationupon the approvalof 75%ofthemembership interestpresentata meeting inperson or by proxy.The amendment,modification, addition,or deletionshallnot take effectuntilitissigned by thePresident, recorded inwith GallatinCounty Clerk and Recorder,and noticeprovided to all Members.For purposes of thisprovision,noticeincludespostingtheamendment, modification,addition,or deletionon theAssociation'swebsite. DECLARATION 22 93 16.3 Invalidation.Invalidationof any one of provisionor partof any provisionofthis Declarationby judgment or by Court order shallinno way affectany oftheotherprovisionsor portionsof any provision,allof which shallremain infullforceand effect. 16.4 The Board of Directorsshallhave the power to interpretallof the provisions of this Declaration,and such interpretationshallbe binding on allpersons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,theDeclaranthas hereunto setitshand as ofthis day of to r ,2015. The Lakes atValley West,LLC By: J es M.Kilday Its:uthorizedRepres ve STATE OF MONTANA ) :ss. County of Gallatin ) On this 13 day of Chiobs r ,intheyear 20 ,beforeme,aNotary Publicforthe StateofMontana,personallyappearedJames M.Kilday,known tome tobe theperson whose name(s) is/aresubscribedto the within instrument,and acknowl to me thathe/she/theyexecuted the IN WITNESS WHEREOF,Ihave hereuntosetmy hand and affixedmy officialsealtheday and yearhereinabovefirstwritten. adesprae .ne'cr-es race (printname) Notary Publicforthe Stateof Montana Residingat "$tivrak ,Montana (NOTARIAL SEAL)My Commission expires:Mart,L .4 .co@ efff',,CHRISTIELEESTANDIFORD '-,NotaryPublic SOTAftySk fortheStateofMontana -oE Residingat:*'SEAL *f selgrade,Montana'---My CommissionExpires: of March26,2019 DECLARATION 23 94 2548465 95 (Document No.2527605 referencedabove). 7.That the attachedExhibitA isto be treatedas ifitwas originallyrecorded with the Declarationof ProtectiveCovenants,Conditions,and RestrictionsfortheLakes atValley West. DATED THIS ay of June,2016. * Margot burn This instrumentwas executedbeforeme this day ofJune,2016,by Margot B.Ogburn, attorneyfortheLakes Homeowner's Association. ,CORRIE LARSON .'o o :NotaryPublic (bre Ath (printname)OT^R fortheStateofMontana Notary Publicforthe Stateof MontanaResidingat:.SEAl Bozeman,Montana Residing at W11-the ,ont na (N(AL "'"My Commission expires:it*V7 96 EXHIBIT A ARTICLE XII TO THE DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS,CONDITIONS,AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST Additional Covenants Required by the City 12.1 Every Owner shallcausetobe constructedcitystandardsidewalks(includinga concretesidewalk sectionthroughallprivatedriveapproaches)on allpublicandprivatestreetfrontagespriortotheoccupancy ofany structureon individualLots.Upon thethirdanniversaryofthefinalplatrecordationofa LotOwner's phase of The Lakes Subdivision,any Lot Owner withinthatphase who has notconstructedtherequired sidewalkshall,withoutfurthernotice,constructwithin30 daysthesidewalkforhisorherLot(s),regardless ofwhetherotherimprovementshave been made upon theLot. 12.2 The Open Space withinThe Lakes Subdivision,asdesignatedon a finalplatorapprovedPUD site plan,shallbe preservedinperpetuityand aresubjecttotheperpetualcommon areaeasementdescribedin 11.6,above. 12.3 Afterthe installationof the Storm Water Facilityand theParks Facilityby the Declarant,the Association,iftheValleyWest Associationdoes notor isno longerobligatedto,shallbe responsiblefor and have theobligationto maintaintheStorm Water Facilityand Park Facilitiesas shown on theCityof Bozeman approvedinfrastructureandparkplans,includingtheR Lotsas shown on theFinalPlatforPhases I and 2 ofThe Lakes atValleyWest.The costofsuch maintenanceshallbe a partoftheannualbudgetfor theAssociationtobe assessedtotheOwners. 12.4 The Board of Directorsshallincludeintheassessmentsan amount necessarytopay forthetaxes, insurance,maintenance,upkeep,and repairofallParks,Open Space,sidewalksinParksand Open Spaces, Woonerfs and alleys,thatarerequiredtobe maintainedby theAssociation. 12.5 IftheAssociationfailstomaintaintheParksand Open Spacesinreasonableorderand conditionin accordancewith the City of Bozeman's approved plan,the City may enforcethe covenantpursuant Bozeman OrdinanceSection38.38.030(8). 12.6 Drainageplansshallbe requiredforeach Lot as partofa Lot Owner's applicationfora building permitfrom theCityof Bozeman. 12.7 The approveddesignstandardsprovidedin Chapter6 oftheLakes DesignManual arean integral partof theLakes PUD and shallnotbe changed withoutconsentoftheCity. 12.8 AlllandownersarerequiredtomaintainmutualfencesasstipulatedinSection70-16-205,Montana Codes Annotated. 12.9 No portionof thePropertysubjecttothisDeclarationshallbe removed from theauthorityof the DeclarationwithoutthewrittenconsentoftheCityofBozeman. 12.10 IncompliancewithArticle16.1,none oftherequiredcovenantsstatedinArticle12 can be revised or terminatedwithouttheconsentoftheCityofBozeman. 97 Supplemental Declaration WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Margot B. Ogburn Ogburn Law Firm, PLLC P.O. Box 7020 Bozeman, MT 59771 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION TO THE DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST 98 Supplemental Declaration THIS SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION TO THE DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST (“Supplemental Declaration”) is made effective the _____ day of __________, 20__, by The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC, a Montana limited liability company (“Declarant”). WHEREAS, the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West (“Declaration”) was recorded on October 14, 2015, as Document No. 2527605, in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana, as supplemented by the Affidavit of Omission Concerning the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for The Lakes at Valley West, recorded on June 20,2016, as Document No. 2548465, in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana; WHEREAS, the Declaration, Article XIV, authorizes the Declarant to supplement the Declaration to annex additional property to The Lakes Subdivision, which Supplemental Declaration shall be effective upon the recording of the Supplemental Declaration with the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana; WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to annex additional property to The Lakes Subdivision and to make such additional property subject to the provisions in the Declaration, the Bylaws, all Rules and Regulations, and The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual (“Design Manual”); NOW THEREFORE, THE DECLARANT HEREIN SUPPLEMENTS THE DECLARATION AS FOLLOWS: 1. The property to be annexed to the Lakes Subdivision is commonly referred to as “The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3” in Gallatin County, Montana, and is legally described in Exhibit A, incorporated herein. 2. Upon the recording of this Supplemental Declaration, the annexed property in The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, is to be deemed a part of the Property and The Lakes Subdivision and is subject to the Declaration, the Bylaws, all Rules and Regulations, and the Design Manual. 3. Upon purchasing a Lot within The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, each Owner shall automatically become a Member of The Lakes Homeowner’s Association for The Lakes Subdivision (“Association”) and subject to the Declaration, the Bylaws, all Rules and Regulations, and the Design Manual. 4. The term “Open Space,” as defined in the Declaration, shall also include designated open space on any recorded The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, subdivision plat. /// /// 99 Supplemental Declaration 5. As a condition of receiving final plat approval from the City of Bozeman for The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, the City of Bozeman requires the following additions to the Declaration (the portion in italics shall be added to the Declaration and the portion with a strikethrough shall be deleted): ADDITION NO. 1 Under Article XII Additional Covenants Required by the City . . . 12.11. Only four (4) Lots in The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, are authorized to have accessory dwelling units (“ADUs”). The Lots that are permitted to have ADUs are Lots 31, 48, 49, and 50. No other Lot in The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, is permitted or allowed to have ADUs without the express written authorization of the City of Bozeman. 12.12 The City of Bozeman has authorized certain relaxations to the Bozeman Municipal Code for The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3. These relaxations are contained in the Design Manual. These relaxations are incorporated herein by reference and, like other covenants contained in Article XII, may not be varied, amended, modified, or deleted without the express written authorization of the City of Bozeman. SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW 100 Supplemental Declaration IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has heretofore set its hand as of this _____ day of _______________, 2016. DECLARANT: The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC By: _______________________________________ James Kilday Its: Authorized Representative STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss. County of Gallatin ) This instrument was willingly acknowledged before me on the _____ day of ____________________, 2016, by James Kilday, the authorized representative of The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year hereinabove first written. __________________________________________ ________________________________(print name) Notary Public for the State of Montana Residing at _____________, Montana (NOTARIAL SEAL) My Commission expires: _____________ 101 Supplemental Declaration EXHIBIT A Legal Description for The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West, being a portion of Lot R2 of The Lakes at Valley West – Phase 1 & Phase 2, Plat J-572; situated in the NE¼NW¼ of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572, Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 1337.30 feet to the West One-sixteenth Corner between Section 4 and Section 9; thence S.00° 59' 02"W. for 50.06 feet along the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9 to a point on the south right-of-way of Durston Road, the Point of Beginning; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 873.66 feet along the south right-of-way of Durston Road to the northwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.1°54’25”E., 25.00 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.19°42’50”W., 388.15 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.13°17’40”E., 223.76 feet to the southwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.88°04’19”W., 296.79 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left, having a radius of 280.00 feet, a central angle of 24°45’39”, an arc length of 121.00 feet to a point, the chord being N.24°09’14”W., 120.06 feet; thence N.36°32’03”W., 62.13 feet to a point; thence S.50°56’59”W., 90.09 feet to a point; thence S.53°42’03”W., 60.00 feet to a point; thence S.56°35’13”W., 64.64 feet to a point; thence S.63°07’43”W., 86.94 feet to a point; thence S.75°16’23”W., 33.24 feet to a point thence S.84°04’23”W., 52.71 feet to a point; thence N.89°04’37”W., 87.84 feet to a point on the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9; thence N.0°59’02”E., 609.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The Area of the above described tracts of land is 459,420 Square Feet, or 10.547 Acres, more or less. 102 _______________ date The Lakes at Valley West DESIGN MANUAL 103 1 Prepared For: The Lakes at Valley West, LLC Prepared By: 111 North Tracy Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 104 2 DESIGN MANUAL Table of Contents Name Page Chapter 1: Purpose 4 Chapter 2: Properties and Projects Subject to Design Manual 5 Chapter 3: Relationship to other Documents 5 3.1 Local Land Use Regulations & Building Codes 5 3.2 The Declaration of Protective Covenants & Bylaws for The Lakes at Valley West 6 Chapter 4: The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel 7 4.1 Function 7 4.2 Membership 7 4.3 Enforcement Powers 7 4.4 Limitation of Responsibilities 7 Chapter 5: Design Review Process 8 5.1 In General 8 5.2 Informal Advice 9 5.3 Form A: Sketch Design Review 9 5.4 Form B: Construction Design Review 10 5.5 Form C: Changes & Modifications 12 5.6 Building Permits & Site Plan Review 12 5.7 Timing of Construction 12 5.8 Form D: Inspections 13 5.9 Liability 13 Chapter 6: Neighborhood Design Patterns 14 6.1 Site 14 (a) Intent, Uses, Lot Coverage, Lot Area, Lot Width, Setbacks, Height, Garages, Parking and Minimum Density 14 (b) Fences & Screens 14 (c) Sidewalks 17 6.2 Building 17 (a) Recommended Energy Star Program 17 (b) Base Element & Foundation 17 (c) Walls & Façades 19 (d) Porches 20 (e) Outdoor Rooms 21 (f) Decks & Patios 22 105 3 (g) Windows & Solar Gain 23 (h) Doors 24 (i) Roofs 26 (j) Skylights 27 (k) Roof-Mounted Solar Panels 27 (l) Dormers 27 (m) Eaves 27 (n) Chimneys/Roof Vents 29 (o) Lighting 29 (p) Signage 30 6.3 Landscape 30 (a) Boulevard Plantings 30 (b) Yard Plantings 31 (c) Vegetation & Solar Gain 33 (d) Hardscapes 33 (e) Soil Preparation & Drainage 33 (f) Irrigation & Water Use 34 (g) Fertilizing 34 (h) Weed Control 33 (i) Vegetation Removal 34 6.4 Variations from Neighborhood Patterns 35 Chapter 7: Amendments 35 Chapter 8: Definitions 35 Exhibit 1: Phases 1 & 2 Legal Description 36 Exhibit 2: Phase 3 Legal Description 37 Appendix A1: Phases 1 & 2, The Lakes at Valley West PUD Zoning District 38 Appendix A2: Phase 3, The Lakes at Valley West PUD Zoning District 43 Appendix B: Forms (A, B, C, D) 49 Appendix C1: Phases 1 & 2 Required Building Envelope Exhibits 58 Appendix C2: Phase 3 Required Building Envelope Exhibits 59 Appendix D: Woonerf Diagram 60 106 4 Pursuant to the Declaration of Protective Covenants for The Lakes at Valley West (“Declaration”), on file with the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office, the Declarant The Lakes at Valley West, LLC (“Declarant”), herein adopts the following The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual (“Design Manual”): Chapter 1: Purpose This Design Manual is intended to promote sustainable patterns of development that will encourage people to connect and interact as part of The Lakes at Valley West neighborhood and adjacent neighborhoods. The standards within this document provide a framework for design and construction that will allow each project to contribute to the neighborhood and to the long term goal of complimenting and enhancing the overall Bozeman community. The architectural and landscape elements of site design are considered to be integral to the overall desired neighborhood patterns. Rather than dictate specific design styles, the standards are provided to ensure well-built, compatible energy-efficient homes with clear order and comprehensive composition. Photographs are included for education, inspiration and reference only and do not imply specific solutions or guarantee regulatory approval. The goal is to strike a balance between neighborhood harmony and creativity. This document encourages design diversity and contemporary design while at the same time providing certain guidance to ensure quality design and longevity in property values. Each project should not simply be an exact copy of another building. The fact that a particular style or feature of building already exists does not guarantee that it will necessarily be approved for construction again. Exceptions to this Design Manual may be granted only on the basis of architectural merit as determined by The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel (“DRP”) and outlined in Section 6.4. The DRP is not authorized to grant any exceptions to local land use regulations unless explicitly authorized by the appropriate review agency or agencies. It is the responsibility of the Owner to ensure that all proposed construction shall comply with all laws, rules, and regulations including, but not limited to local Land Use Regulations and the International Building Code as well as other applicable plumbing, electric, or building codes in effect in the City of Bozeman. The Declaration and Bylaws, if any, also apply to all Lots within The Lakes Subdivision. Chapter 2: Properties and Projects Subject to Design Manual The Design Manual shall inure to and pass with each and every parcel, tract, lot or division in the Lakes Subdivision. Unless specifically excluded, this Design Manual shall apply to the entire The Lakes Subdivision (as described in Exhibit 1 & 2), any property annexed to The Lakes Subdivision, and all improvements. 107 5 No improvements shall be made, erected, altered or permitted to remain upon any Lot until (1) the proper Form is/are submitted, (2) any other information required or requested by the DRP is submitted, (3) all fees are fully paid, (4) all required Forms are approved in writing by the DRP, and (5) any applicable City of Bozeman review or permitting and/or fee payment(s) has been completed. All plans submitted to the City of Bozeman must have The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel Form B stamp of approval. “Improvement” shall be construed broadly and includes, but is not limited to, a residence, fence, wall, garage, outbuilding, other structure, or landscaping. Chapter 3: Relationship to other Documents 3.1 Local Land Use Regulations & Building Codes All improvements must comply with applicable building codes, land use regulations, and all other laws, rules and regulations of any government or agency under whose jurisdiction the land lies. Local land use regulations can be found online at www.bozeman.net. Some provisions of this Design Manual may be more or less restrictive than local land use regulations as part of the overall The Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development (“PUD"). 3.1.1 The following relaxations from the Bozeman Municipal Code apply to The Lakes at Valley West Phase 1 and 2 Subdivision: Relaxation # Code Section Summary of Section #1 38.08.010.A.2 Intent of R-1 District #2 38.08.020 Authorized Uses in R-1 #3 38.08.030.A.2 Lot Coverage and Floor Area #4 38.08.040.A Minimum Lot Area #5 38.08.040.B Minimum Lot Width #6 38.08.050.A Yards #7 38.08.060 Building Height #8 38.22.030 R-1 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) #9 38.23.040.B Block Length #10 38.23.040.C Block Width #11 38.23.040.D.3 Pedestrian Walk Surface #12 38.23.040.E Block Numbering #13 38.24.060.A Design Standards (length of tangent at intersection) #14 38.24.060.B Alternate Alley Section to Allow Woonerf Relaxations #1-8 are addressed in Appendix A1: The Lakes at Valley West PUD Zoning District and are intended to replace Article 8 in the Unified Development Code. Relaxations #9-14 are more related to overall subdivision design. 108 6 3.1.2 The following relaxations from the Bozeman Municipal Code apply to The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3: Relaxation No. Code Section Summary of Section #1 38.08.010.A.2 Intent of R-1 District #2 38.08.020 Authorized Uses in R-1 #3 38.08.030.A.2 Lot Coverage and Floor Area #4 38.08.040.A Minimum Lot Area #5 38.08.040.B Minimum Lot Width #6 38.08.050.A Yards #7 38.08.060 Building Height #8 38.22.030 R-1 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) #9 38.23.040.B Block Length #10 38.23.040.C Block Width #11 38.23.040.D.3 Pedestrian Walk Surface #12 38.23.040.E Block Numbering #13 38.24.060.A Design Standards (length of tangent at intersection) #14 38.24.060.B Alternate Alley Section to Allow Woonerf #15 38.23.100.A.2 Reduction to minimum wetland setback #16 38.23.080.F % of front yard occupied by storm water facilities #17 38.25.010.5 Parking in Side Yards at specific open space locations #18 38.21.060.A.4 To allow covered decks exceeding 1/3 the length of the building to encroach 5-feet into the open space setback. To allow porches to encroach 5-feet into any yard facing a street or facing a Woonerf. Relaxations #1-8, 17-18 are addressed in Appendix A2: The Lakes at Valley West PUD Zoning District and are intended to replace Article 8 in the Unified Development Code. Relaxations #9-16 are more related to overall subdivision design. 3.1.3 Notwithstanding anything contained in this Design Manual to the contrary, the relaxations set forth in 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 may not be varied, amended, modified or deleted without the express written authorization of the City of Bozeman. 3.2 The Declaration of Protective Covenants and Bylaws for The Lakes at Valley West All Lots in The Lakes Subdivision are also subject to The Declaration of Protective Covenants for The Lakes at Valley West (“Declaration”), which are on file at the Gallatin County Clerk & Recorder’s Office, and Bylaws, if any. These documents are available for reference online at www.thelakesatvalleywest.com. 109 7 Chapter 4: The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel A Panel is hereby established known as The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel (“DRP”). 4.1 Function The function and purpose of the DRP is to review applications, plans, specifications, materials, samples, and location in order to determine if the proposed construction conforms to the Declaration and the Design Manual. 4.2 Membership 4.2.1 Before the Transfer Date, the Declarant may appoint a Design Review Panel composed of up to three persons. The persons are not required to be Owners or Members of the Association. The persons may serve on the Design Review Panel until he or she resigns or is replaced by the Declarant, whichever occurs first. If no persons are on the Design Review Panel, then the Board of Directors shall act as the Design Review Panel. 4.2.2 After the Transfer Date, the Board of Directors may appoint a Design Review Panel composed of up to three persons. The persons are not required to be Owners or Members of the Association. The persons may serve on the Design Review Panel until he or she resigns or is replaced by the Board of Directors, whichever occurs first. If no persons are on the Design Review Panel, then the Board of Directors shall act as the Design Review Panel. 4.2.3 The Board of Directors may also engage engineers or other advisors or consultants in the design review process as necessary. 4.3 Enforcement Powers Should any Owner violate or threaten to violate any part of this Design Manual, the DRP may attempt to work with the Owner to have the Owner cure the violation in a timely manner, and/or refer the violation or threatened violation to the Board of Directors. Among any other remedy set forth in the Declaration, the Board of Directors has the right to injunctive relief, which requires the Owner to stop, remove, and/or alter any improvements in a manner that complies with the standards established by the DRP. 4.4 Limitation of Responsibilities The primary goal of the DRP is to review the Review Applications and the plans, specifications, materials, samples, and location in order to determine if the proposed construction conforms to the Declaration and the Design Manual. The DRP does not assume responsibility for the following:  The structural adequacy, capacity, or safety features of the proposed construction or improvement.  Soil erosion, ground water levels, non-compatible or unstable soil conditions.  Compliance with any or all building codes, safety requirements, and governmental laws, regulation or ordinances. 110 8 Chapter 5: Design Review Process 5.1 In General 5.1.1 Approval Required to Commence Construction. No improvements shall be made, erected, altered or permitted to remain upon on any Lot until the Owner submits the proper Form to the DRP and the Form is approved in writing by the DRP. 5.1.2 DRP Discretion. The DRP has complete discretion as to whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Form. At the least, the construction, installation, or alteration shall comply with the Declaration and Design Manual; be in harmony with the external design, location, and topography of the surrounding Lots and The Lakes Subdivision; and not be placed on or under any part of said Lot within the common areas and easements reserved as indicated on Exhibit “A,” or the common areas and easements reserved and created in Declaration, except as approved by the DRP. 5.1.3 Information Required. No Form will be deemed submitted until all of the information required by the Design Manual and requested by the DRP, and all fees are provided. Incomplete applications may be returned and are subject to a re-submittal fee. 5.1.4 Submitting Forms. Submit (hand delivery or mail) 2 copies of the required Form and related materials for each design review to the following: The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel c/o Intrinsik Architecture, Inc. 111 North Tracy Avenue Bozeman, Montana 59715 Submittals must be labeled with “The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel” and specific project title and address. Form A, Form B, Form C, and Form D, as may be amended from time to time, may be requested from the DRP or may be downloaded from the website at www.lakesatvalleywest.com. 5.1.5 After the Review. Following DRP review, the Owner will be notified as to whether the construction has been approved, conditionally approved or denied. 5.1.6 Withdrawing Application. An Owner may withdraw an application without prejudice, provided the request for withdrawal is made in writing to the DRP. 5.1.7 Variances. Any request for any variance must be made in writing to the DRP. Any variance granted shall be considered unique and will not set any precedent for future decisions. Variance requests are subject to Section 6.4. 5.1.8 Request for Hearing. If an application is conditionally approved or denied, the Owner may request a hearing before the DRP to justify the Owner’s position. The 111 9 DRP will consider the arguments and facts presented by the Owner and notify the Owner of its decision. 5.1.9 If the DRP does not to take action on a Form within forty-five days after receiving the Form, the Form shall be deemed denied. 5.2 Informal Advice Prior to beginning the design process, it is recommended that Owners and their designated representatives (such as architects, contractors, etc.) contact the DRP to verify their interpretation of this Design Manual. Owners or their designated representatives may, at their option, request a meeting with the DRP to discuss the preliminary plans prior to a full Form A (Sketch Design Review) submittal. Fee* Required Documents Required Submittal Materials (2 paper copies + 1 digital PDF copy) Schematic Drawing Checklist None (except as noted below) None Conceptual plans appropriate for informal discussion N/A *Note: Additional meetings and/or reviews requested by the Owner and as determined by the DRP to be above and beyond the standard review process are subject to hourly fees in addition to the Design Review fee and must be paid prior to issuance of approval. 5.3 FORM A (Required) Sketch Design Review The Sketch Design Review checks designs for general interpretations of the overall Declaration and Design Manual. Form A includes a statement of Acknowledgement. The Lot Owner and/or its designated representative shall take all necessary steps to ensure that they and their employees, subcontractors, agents, suppliers, and others involved in the development of the Lot are familiar with and agree to abide by the Declaration, Design Manual, and approved plans. Note that Form A review must be completed before Form B review can begin. If a Form B application is not submitted within 9 months of Form A review (based on the date of the letter from the DRP approving or conditionally approving the plans) or if the design changes considerably (as determined by the DRP in the DRP’s sole discretion), a new full Form A submittal will be required. 112 10 Fee* Required Documents (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Required Submittal Materials (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Half size/scale plots acceptable. Schematic Drawing Checklist $600 Form A (must be signed) Site Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) North Arrow Property/Setback Lines Easements Sidewalks; Building Footprints; Porches, Stairs, etc; Overhangs (as dashed lines) Landscape Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) Schematic Site & Boulevard Landscaping Floor Plans (1/8” scale or larger) Room Use Windows & Doors Overhangs Dimensions Gross SF Elevations (1/8” scale or larger) Porches, balconies Doors, windows Materials specified Overall Height (from average grade) Roof Pitches *Notes: 1) Fee covers Form A & B; if project does not progress past Form A, a $400 refund will be provided upon request of the owner. 2) Additional meetings and/or reviews requested by the Owner and as determined by the DRP to be above and beyond the standard review process are subject to hourly fees in addition to the Design Review fee and must be paid prior to issuance of approval. 3) Incomplete applications may be returned and are subject to a $100 penalty. 5.4 Form B (Required) Construction Design Review: The Construction Design Review checks the construction documents for general compliance with the Declaration and Design Manual and verifies that the previous DRP recommendations have been addressed. Conformity to applicable local regulations and building codes, as well as obtaining appropriate permits is the responsibility of the Owner and/or the Owner’s architect and/or builder. If a Form B application is not submitted within 9 months of Form A review (based on the date of the letter from the DRP) or if the design changes considerably (as determined by the DRP in its sole discretion), a new full Form A submittal will be required. 113 11 Fee* Required Documents (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Required Submittal Materials (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Half size/scale plot acceptable. Drawing Checklist $0 Form B (must be signed) & Green Building Checklist Site Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) All dimensions must be noted. North Arrow; Property Lines; Setback Lines; Easements; Sidewalk & Street Location; Location, Dimensions, Materials for walks & drives; Building Footprints; Porches, Stairs, etc.; Overhangs (as dashed lines); Fence location & details; Grading Plan; Location and screening of equipment and meters; Limits of construction activity Landscape Plan (1/16” or 1/8” scale) Site landscaping Boulevard Landscaping Floor Plans (1/8” scale or larger) All dimensions must be noted. Room Use Windows & Doors Overhangs Gross square footage for unit and garage Elevations (1/4” scale or larger) All dimensions must be noted. Porches, balconies Doors, windows Materials specified Overall Height (from average grade) Roof Pitches Lights and light fixture details Color Rendering Color rendering of the front elevation and color chips Material Samples As requested by DRP Foundation Letter from Engineer Each project is required to submit a letter from a civil engineer identifying existing ground water elevations, and recommendations for foundation design, footing and first floor elevations. *Notes: 1) Fees paid with Form A cover both Form A & Form B. 2) Form A & Form B may be submitted concurrently. 3) Additional meetings and/or reviews requested by the Owner and as determined by the DRP to be above and beyond the standard review process are subject to hourly fees in addition to the Design Review fee and must be paid prior to issuance of approval. 4) Incomplete applications may be returned and are subject to a $100 penalty. 114 12 5.5 Form C Changes & Modifications: Owners may wish to make improvements or modifications to their improvements or property during the initial construction or at a future date. A change may only be executed after DRP approval of Form C. Note that any changes or modifications that are made before Form C is submitted, reviewed, and approved will be subject to an increased fee, to be decided by the Board of Directors or the DRP. Fee* Required Documents (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Required Submittal Materials (1 paper copy + 1 digital PDF copy) Drawing Checklist $150 (for proposed modifications) $500 (for “after the fact” modifications) Form C Any relevant drawings related to proposed change(s) Any details related to the proposed changes. *Notes: 1) Additional meetings and/or reviews requested by the Owner and as determined by the DRP to be above and beyond the standard review process are subject to hourly fees in addition to the Design Review fee and must be paid prior to issuance of approval. 2) Incomplete applications may be returned and are subject to a $100 penalty. 5.6 Site Plan Review & Building Permits All construction projects require a building permit and some projects may require additional review from the City of Bozeman. Any plans submitted to the City of Bozeman must include The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel stamp and/or letter of approval. This is a requirement of The Lakes at Valley West Homeowner’s Association and not the City of Bozeman. Approval by the DRP does not guarantee approval by the City of Bozeman. Construction may not commence without obtaining necessary approvals/permits from the City of Bozeman and the Valley West Home Owner’s Association. The Valley West Homeowners’ Association will assess significant fines for beginning construction prior to obtaining all required approvals. 5.7 Timing of Construction An Owner has 1 year from the date of Form B approval to start construction. If construction of a structure is not started within 1 year of Form B approval, new approval must be obtained. An Owner has 1 year from the date construction commences to complete construction, unless an extension is granted by the DRP. If construction is commenced and is not completed in 1 year or is not completed in strict compliance with what was approved, then in addition to any other remedy allowed in the Declaration or this Design Manual, or at law or in equity, the Board of Directors, may, in its sole discretion, take any action that in its judgment is necessary to improve the appearance of the construction or to bring it into 115 13 compliance with the Declaration, the Design Manual, or the approved plans, including completing the exterior, or removing the uncompleted structure, or any other action. Consideration will be given to remaining landscaping based on seasonal constraints; however, such landscaping must be completed during the beginning of the next planting season. The amount of any expenditure incurred in so doing shall be the Owner’s obligation. In addition, a lien on the Lot may be recorded and enforced by an action at law. The Association may also take such action as is available in the Declaration and by law or in equity, including an injunction and/or action for damages. 5.8 Inspections: The DRP reserves the right to inspect the Lot during any stage of construction. If the DRP determines, in its sole discretion, that discrepancies exist between the construction and approved plans, the Declaration, or the Design Manual, the Owner shall immediately correct the discrepancies or submit a Form C (after the fact changes) for review and approval. A Final Inspection is required. Owners are responsible for scheduling an inspection. The inspection shall determine general compliance with the Declaration, Design Manual, and approved plans. If the DRP finds the improvements were not completed in strict compliance with the Declaration, Design Manual, and approved plans, the DRP shall notify the Owner of the noncompliance, and shall require remedy of the same. The Owner shall have 7 days from the notification to remedy the noncompliance or to submit a work plan delineating the time frame when the noncompliance will be remedied, although in no instance shall the timeframe exceed 45 days. The DRP may allow up to 45 days for the noncompliance to be remedied if the Form C and corresponding work plan provides adequate justification for the requested time. If the noncompliance is not remedied, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, remedy the noncompliance. The amount of any expenditure incurred in so doing shall be the Owner’s obligation. In addition, a lien on the Lot may be recorded and enforced by an action at law. The Association may also take such action as is available in the Declaration and by law or in equity, including an injunction and/or action for damages. No occupancy of the project shall take place prior to the completion of all required inspections or as otherwise specified by the DRP. 5.9 Liability Neither The Lakes at Valley West Homeowner’s Association, the Declarant, the Board of Directors, the DRP, nor the individual members thereof, may be held liable to any person for any damages for any action taken pursuant to this Design Manual, including but not limited to, damages which may result from review, correction, amendment, changes or rejection of plans and specifications, observations or inspections, the issuance of approvals, or any delays associated with such action on the part of the Design Review Panel or Board of Directors. 116 14 Chapter 6: Neighborhood Design Patterns All development must adhere to the neighborhood patterns described in the following sections (Site, Building, and Landscape). Photos are included reference only. Note that some provisions of this Design Manual may be more or less restrictive than local land use regulations as part of the overall Planned Unit Development (PUD). See Section 6.4 for allowable variations from these neighborhood patterns. Please also refer to Exhibit C1 & C2 for specific lot by lot requirements for uses, setbacks, coverage, areas, widths, etc. 6.1 Site The following site design guidelines are intended to provide a framework for site layouts within The Lakes at Valley West. (a) Regulations regarding Intent, Uses, Lot Coverage, Lot Area, Lot Width, Setbacks, Height, Garages, Parking and Minimum Density are all addressed in Appendix A1 & A2: The Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development Zoning District. (b) Fences & Screens  No fencing is allowed in street-facing yards or in required street vision triangles.  Two fences types are permitted. See specifications below.  A 4 foot tall fence, only as specified below, is allowed along the woonerf property lines, along common private property lines, and along an imaginary line setback two feet inside any property line that borders park or open space. This 2 foot buffer between the fence and the property line bordering park or open space must be planted with a hedge that is well maintained at 4 feet or less in height.  Hedges species may be Lilac, Cranberry Highbush, or as approved by the DRP. Minimum planting size is 24” tall and maximum spacing is 36” O.C. 4’H Option A 117 15 4’H Option B 4’H Option C 118 16  A 6 foot tall screen fence, only as specified below, is allowed on side property lines setback 20 feet from the street and woonerf property lines. 6’H Option A 6’H Option B 119 17  Screen walls, used for patios or hot tubs, are required to meet all setbacks and must be aesthetically connected to and appear as an extension of a primary residence wall. Outdoor rooms may be designed to include, but shall not be substantially obscured by, screen walls.  All fence assemblies are required to be maintained for appearance and kept in working order.  Dog kennels or runs must be attached to a primary or accessory structure, be screened from public streets and adjacent properties, and receive DRP approval for materials and configuration. Chain-link is not permitted. Underground electric fences are encouraged for dogs. (c) Sidewalks  Any existing sidewalks in the right-of-way or open spaces that are damaged during construction must be repaired or replaced at the lot owner’s expense.  Sidewalks on homes facing local streets are required to cross the boulevard in line with the sidewalk leading to the front porch.  Upon the third anniversary of the plat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed said sidewalk shall, without further notice, construct within 30 days, said sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have been made upon the lot. Failure to comply may result in the HOA constructing sidewalks and assessing full coordinating and installation costs and apply fines when deemed necessary. 6.2 Building The following building design guidelines are intended to promote both building diversity and neighborhood compatibility within a developing neighborhood framework. (a) Recommended Energy Star Program  Because of its ease and low cost, homes are encouraged to meet or exceed the standards of the “Energy Star” Program. Energy Star homes typically include additional energy-saving features that make them 20–30% more efficient than standard code compliant homes.  Energy Star Qualified New Homes include: Effective Insulation R.H. Carter Architects, Inc. 120 18 High-Performance Windows Tight Construction and Ducts Efficient Heating and Cooling Equipment Efficient Products Third-Party Verification  The specific standards can be found at: http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=new_homes.hm_index. (b) Base Element & Foundation  A base element is required and must be detailed in such a way to visually and structurally connect the building with the ground. It may appear as a platform or terrace upon which the house stands or as a built extension of the ground integrated with the house above. This element may be masonry, concrete, wood or materials matching trim package. Buildings without a base element may be considered based on design merit.  Foundation walls shall be exposed a maximum of 12-inches above the ground. Exposed foundation walls shall be built of brick, cast concrete, trimmed with horizontal members, or as otherwise approved by DRP. Concrete foundations exposed more than 18-inches above grade must have an architectural finish (texture, pattern and/or color).  Due to the potential of high ground water tables in the areas of the subdivision, it is not recommended that residential dwellings or other structures with full or partial basements be constructed without first consulting a professional engineer licensed in the State of Montana and qualified in the certification of residential and commercial construction. 121 19 (c) Walls & Facades  All facades of the main building and accessory structures shall be made of similar materials and be similarly detailed.  Primary materials on a façade may change only at a horizontal band or an inside corner. Consideration will be given to changing materials at a visual block such as a fence.  Varied building massing is encouraged. No exterior wall plane, unless approved otherwise for design merit, shall exceed 35 feet in length without incorporating a minimum 24-inch offset or recess in a significant proportion to the overall plane.  Building walls shall be clad in smooth cut wood shingles, wood clapboard, barn or reclaimed wood, wood drop siding, traditional wood board and batten, fiber cement siding, architectural metal cladding, brick, or stone. Siding shall be painted or stained; pre-finished siding will be considered based on design merit. Alternative materials, including the use of steel, will be considered based on design merit. Stucco, log, vinyl or aluminum siding is not allowed.  The color palette of the body of the house shall be as approved by the DRP based on merit. Color schemes must be varied from the two adjacent properties, in each direction and from the properties across the street. Attached dwelling units are exempted from each other. Garish colors are not allowed.  Exposed exterior wood shall be painted or stained (wood front doors excluded).  Lap siding shall run horizontally. Maximum lap siding exposure is 5-inch. Combinations of lap exposure will be considered on a case-by-case basis. 122 20  Trim materials should be of high quality and of appropriate visual size. Exterior trim of at least 4-inches is required around windows and doors. Corner caps are acceptable. Variations on trim width and/or exclusion of trim will be considered based on design merit.  Brick surfaces shall be set predominantly in a horizontal running bond pattern.  Stonework shall be natural or approved synthetic stone materials. Dry stack, un-coursed settings with minimal exposed mortar are preferred. Stonework shall not be applied to individual wall surfaces in order to avoid a veneer-like appearance. It shall continue around corners to an inside corner. (d) Porches  For yards facing a public street, the front porch of a residential structure must be built within 5 feet of the setback line (“build-to” line). The width of the porch on the build-to line must occupy a minimum of 30% of the width of the front façade measured along the build-to line. As an alternative to the typical front porch and to provide additional design diversity, narrower but deeper porches that have the same square footage may also be considered. A minimum 6 feet of depth is required.  Buildings on lots that address two or more streets must address both streets with fronting characteristics as part of the comprehensive composition. Design considerations should include but not be limited to: wrapping front porches, outdoor rooms, variation in wall planes and massing, additional openings and enhanced landscaping.  Porches are also required along woonerfs; however, these porches only have a minimum length or width requirement of 6 feet. The percentage requirement does not apply to porches facing a woonerf. Verde Builders Group BCprojects.ca Taylor’d DISTINCTION 123 21  Front porches generally must be elevated between 2 and 4 feet above fronting top of curb. Other heights may be considered based on site conditions and foundation design.  Porch railings may be opened or closed. If closed, they must be constructed of the same material as the adjacent wall planes.  Front stoops shall be made of concrete, wood, stone, or brick and must be detailed and integrated into the porch/railing design. Required stair railings must be compatible with the overall stair and porch design.  Porch supports shall be built of stone, masonry, concrete, or wood. Column base piers shall be no less than 16 x 16-inch square and wood columns shall be no less than 8-inches square. Column groupings must have an outer minimum dimension of 10-inches. Tapered columns may not be smaller than 7 x 7-inches at the top. Columns shall match or be similar in design on all elevations of a structure.  The balustrade and the space below porches shall be closed and integrated into a closed band and/or landscaped, interrupted as necessary for drainage.  No exposed stair or deck framing is allowed. (e) Outdoor Rooms (required on buildings adjacent to open spaces)  To complement the neighborhood open spaces and courtyards, all lots adjacent to an open space are required to have an “Outdoor Room” facing the open space. This concept is intended to provide a transition from the public green spaces to private indoor spaces. Buildings on lots that address two or more open spaces will only be required to address one open space with an outdoor room. The building, however, will need to address all open spaces. Design considerations should include but not be limited to: wrapping front porches, outdoor rooms, variation in wall planes and massing, additional openings, and enhanced landscaping. 124 22  The minimum size requirement for an outdoor room is 80 square feet with a minimum dimension of 8 feet on both sides.  Outdoor Rooms typically include covered porches, screened porches, covered patios, or covered decks with integrated landscaping. Partially covered or uncovered patios or decks that are integrated into the overall design and comprehensive composition of the home and landscaping will be considered on design merit.  Other interpretations of outdoor rooms will be considered based on design merit by the DRP. (f) Decks & Patios  Decks and patios must face only side yards and/or open spaces. Decks and patios may not extend more than 40 percent feet into any required side setback. Setback Deck/Patio Encroachment 5’ 2’ 7’ 2’-9” 10’ 4’ 12’ 4’-9”  Within The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, Lots 5-12, first and second floor porches fronting Durston Road may encroach up to 5 feet into a 10’ open space setback only if the covered deck exceeds 1/3 in length of the building. Arcanum Architecture 125 23  The space below first floor elevated decks visible from nearby streets or public spaces shall be architecturally detailed and/or landscaped to provide screening.  Decks, balconies, and terraces shall be designed to enhance the overall architecture of the building by creating variety, layering, and detail on exterior elevations. Covered decks, projecting balconies, and bay windows shall be integrated and composed with the overall building form, rather than placed randomly throughout the building. Terraces shall be used to integrate the building and landscape by creating a transition between the built and natural character of the site. (g) Windows & Solar Gain  Windows are encouraged meet or exceed Energy Star standards as previously stated.  Openings (including windows and doors) shall not be less than 15% of the wall area, measured on each elevation. Elevation calculations shall include exterior window or door trim.  Windows shall be wood, wood-clad, fiberglass or vinyl.  Round, hexagonal and octagonal windows are not permitted.  Mirrored glass shall not be used.  Buildings shall have all openings trimmed in wood bands of minimum 4-inches nominal width unless approved based on design merit.  Bay window projections shall be proportionate to the overall composition and are encouraged to extend to the ground or be trimmed appropriately. Cantilevered bays must be visually carried by structural brackets or a water table trim band. Only cantilevered bays may encroach into a setback. 126 24  False shutters are not permitted.  Canvas awnings are permitted and shall be square cut without side panels. (h) Doors  Exterior doors are encouraged to meet or exceed Energy Star standards as previously stated.  Front doors shall be solid wood or have a wood appearance. Complimenting wood storm/screen doors are encouraged. High quality synthetic alternatives, such as fiberglass Masonite, may be considered based on detailing and proportions.  Traditional sliding glass doors may only be used in yards facing open spaces and side yards.  Garage doors shall be built of wood, steel, or fiberglass. 127 25  Garage doors shall be de-emphasized in the elevation of the building. If possible, they should be oriented away from the street. If a lot does not have access to a woonerf and garage doors must face a street, the doors shall be made of a complementary and quality material and have significant detailing contributing to the elevation composition.  To encourage varied massing, garage door wall planes fronting woonnerfs must vary a minimum of 24” from adjacent attached wall planes.  Detached garages and garage doors may front a woonerf if composed with overall site plan and have significant detailing contributing to the street elevation.  Other more contemporary and creative approaches to garage doors will be considered based on design merit. 128 26 (i) Roofs  Asphalt composition shingles are permitted, but must be at least 30-year architectural grade.  Treated wood shingles are permitted.  Metal roof materials are a permitted but must be designed to protect people and property from significant sliding of snow and ice (not applicable to dormers or similar roof forms that do not drip directly to grade). Metal roofs may be corrugated or standing seam only. Unpainted, galvanized, rusted, brown, grey or rust-red-baked-on finish are all appropriate finishes. Garish colors or shiny materials are not appropriate.  Natural or synthetic slate roof materials are permitted.  Green roofs are encouraged.  Flat roofs are permitted on all buildings if integrated with the design. Flat roofs used as balconies on street facades may be enclosed with solid railings.  Roof plane continuous length dimensions shall not exceed 40’ for single family and duplex structures and 100’ for multifamily structures without a significant break. Minimum break shall be no less than 20% of the length roof plane and extend up the roof plane no less than 30% of the height of the roof. 129 27 (j) Skylights  Skylights shall be flat in profile (no bubbles or domes). (k) Roof Mounted Solar Panels  Solar panels area encouraged for all projects. (l) Dormers  Dormer width shall be proportionate to the overall composition.  Shed dormers shall have a pitch of at least 3:12. Hip and gable dormers shall have the same pitch as the main roof volume. (m) Eaves  Overhanging roof eave and gable end depth shall be no less than 24-inches unless approved otherwise based on design merit for a more contemporary style or flat roof. Roof overhang depth on accessory structures must match the main building structure. 130 28  Fascia detail must have a minimum dimension of 8-inches nominal unless otherwise approved for design merit. Two-piece fascia detailing is required. Wood (including Miratec and similar products as determined by the Design Review Committe) is the only acceptable material. Vinyl or metal fascia material is not permitted. As an alternative, exposed rafter tails and entry accents are encouraged if appropriate for the architectural style.  Soffits shall be wood (including Hardiboard products). Metal or vinyl soffits are not permitted.  Boxed soffits are allowed when integrated into a suitable architectural style and overall detailing.  Enclosed soffits are acceptable on more contemporary styles. 131 29  Gutters shall be built of metal of a color and finish that blends with the finish color scheme. Gutters shall be half-round or rectangular and downspouts shall be circular or rectangular. (n) Chimneys / Roof Vents  Chimneys shall be clad in stone, masonry, siding, steel or some other compatible or complementary material.  Chimneys shall be at least 30 x 30-inches.  Prefabricated metal flues shall be concealed within a chimney unless approved otherwise. Chimney caps may extend above the chimney top per building code requirements.  Roof protrusions, other than chimneys, shall be arranged to minimize street exposure.  All roof-mounted equipment shall be integrated into overall design and screened. (o) Lighting  All exterior residential lighting must be dark—sky compliant. All exterior lighting of all lots shall be limited to 800 lumens (12- watt LED bulbs/60-watt incandescent bulbs) and must be full cut-off and shielded bulb of such focus and intensity so as to not cause disturbance of adjacent lots.  Recessed or can lighting is encouraged for porches and main entrances for softer lighting conditions. 132 30  The following lighting is prohibited: obtrusive flood lighting, mercury vapor or high-pressure sodium lights, metal halide lights, and clear glass or exposed bulb (non-cutoff) fixtures.  Pathway lighting is permitted. These types of lights may be attached to the home, along walkways near the ground level, or incorporated into fences. Solar powered lighting is strongly encouraged.  Woonerfs will be lighted with the LED Cree Edge Series Pedestrian Pathway lighting or equivalent. Streets will be lighted with the LED KIM Archetype light fixtures or equivalent. (p) Signage  No signs shall be erected on residential properties except to identify the owner and address of the property.  Typical "For Sale" signs shall be allowed during the sale of a lot.  Signage integrated with landscaping may be placed at the main entrances and parks to identify the neighborhood. 6.3 Landscape The proper use of plant materials adds to a sense of permanence and consistency for a neighborhood while also connecting the built and natural environments. Landscape plans submitted with Form B should outline hardscape elements, fencing, and planting areas with species and quantities listed. Each Owner will be required to meet minimum landscape specifications related to two general categories: boulevard plantings and yard plantings. (a) Street / Woonerf Boulevard Plantings 133 31  Individual Lot Owners shall be responsible for the landscaping the boulevard area directly adjacent to their property at the time of occupancy and for the maintenance of the boulevard area thereafter.  To enhance a public street boulevard where present, 1 tree (minimum 2½-inch diameter caliper) shall be planted per 50 feet in the boulevard area. Grass or an approved xeriscape plan must also be installed in the boulevard area directly adjacent to the subject property.  To enhance a woonerf boulevard where present, 1 tree (minimum 2 ½-inch diameter caliper) shall be planted where utility conflicts do not exist as well as provide a composed planting bed that includes a minimum of 3 shrubs, perennial plantings and a minimum of 2 boulders. See Appendix D: Woonerf Diagram.  Maximum height of landscaping in required vehicle vision triangles is 30-inches.  It is the responsibility of the Owner to contact the appropriate utility companies before digging. (b) Yard Plantings  All properties are required to landscape yards. Yards facing a street must be sod (fescue blend sod is strongly encouraged). Yards facing open space or side yards may be seeded.  Native, drought tolerant grasses and regional plant materials are encouraged. Lawns should be well maintained, so they thrive and therefore, use fewer resources. Regular fertilizing (see below), aeration, and weekly cutting with a sharp blade are all critical to lawn success. Lawns should be maintained at about 4-inches as keeping lawns slightly long ensures the soil remains shaded, thereby using less water. 134 32  Mulching, composting, efficient irrigation, harvesting water from roofs, sidewalks, driveways and other impervious surfaces are all encouraged.  “Xeriscaping” or water-conserving, drought-tolerant landscaping is encouraged. A proposal for a Xeriscape landscape plan must be prepared by a landscape professional. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has guidelines available at at: http://www.epa.gov/.  Yards facing a street: At least 1 tree (minimum 2½-inch caliper) and 2 appropriately sized planting beds are required for yards facing a public street. Corner lots are considered to have 2 separate yards and therefore require a total of 2 trees (minimum 2½-inch caliper) and 2 appropriately sized planting beds  Yards Facing a Woonerf: At least 1 tree and 1 appropriately sized planting bed are required for yards facing a woonerf.  Yards Facing Open Spaces: At least 1 tree (minimum 2½-inch diameter caliper) and 2 appropriately sized planting beds are required for any yard facing an open space.  Planting beds must be composed with the site and the building elevations and shall have a top layer of mulch or earth tone stone (non-white). 135 33  Maximum height of landscaping in required vehicle vision triangles is 30-inches.  It is the responsibility of the Owner to contact the appropriate utility companies before digging. (c) Vegetation & Solar Gain  Special consideration should be given to areas of sun exposure and shade for the planting of trees and large shrubs. Landscaping should allow southern exposures necessary for a home’s solar gain in the winter, or that of the neighbors. (d) Hardscapes  Selection of hardscape materials should favor natural materials such as untreated wood, stone, or stamped concrete, while balancing the desire for durability. Pressure treated lumber and railroad ties, although re-used, should be avoided for their toxicity. (e) Soil Preparation & Drainage  Investment at the soil level provides huge payoff in reduced water and fertilizer use, and plant vigor. Soils should be of the best quality available and improved with imported compost as feasible, especially in lawn areas. In areas where poor soils are unavoidable, homeowner’s should focus plant selection on species that thrive in such conditions. Runoff from roofs, and hardscapes, and melting snow, should be considered, and should be harvested for landscape use whenever possible. (f) Irrigation Systems & Water Use  Underground irrigation systems can use water efficiently but they must be designed, installed and operated correctly. They also require regular maintenance.  Plants with similar water usage, sun and shade requirements and zones with spray heads, rotors or drip systems should be grouped together.  Plants should be sufficient in number and density to reduce weed growth. A weed mat also inhibits weed growth. Mulch conserves water and shades soil. 136 34  Landscapes do not require as much water during shoulder seasons (May, June, September and October) as in July and August. Watering should be reduced in September and October to prepare vegetation for dormancy. Early morning is the best time (4am-9am) to water because watering at night can encourage fungus and disease to grow. Avoid watering between 9am – 7pm.  Water only when your turf requires it. If you leave distinct footprints when you step on it or the grass does not spring back, it is time to water. Applying one inch of water (including rainfall) each time you water once per week is enough to keep your lawn green throughout the summer.  Turf grass should be watered using longer run times (15-20 minutes) but less often. This causes the grass roots to grow deeper thereby needing less water and becoming more drought and weed resistant. Frequent watering of turf grass causes the root base to remain shallow causing the grass to brown easily and it will be more susceptible to drought and weeds.  When watering trees and shrubs it is not necessary to water the leaves or the trunk. Instead, place a sufficient number of emitters evenly around the tree or shrub halfway between the trunk and the outer canopy. (g) Fertilizing / Pesticides  In careful consideration of the lakes and streams, homeowner’s that border open spaces or parks with surface water (lakes, streams, wetlands) will only be permitted to use non-chemical fertilizers / pesticides in required yard setbacks. Organic fertilizers for lawns are readily available, as are corn based weed suppression substitutes. Non-lawn native and drought tolerant plantings typically require no extra fertilizing at all. (h) Weed control  As further specified in the covenants, noxious weeds pose a serious threat to the environment, and property owners should familiarize themselves with, and control them, on their property. Chemical solutions should be balanced with the threat level of the individual species and the possibility for non-chemical alternative treatments. Under no circumstance should noxious weeds be allowed to flourish, or go past the flowering stage and into the seed stage. Weed control is required on both developed and vacant lots and will be enforced in accordance with the Covenants. (i) Vegetation Removal  No landscaping in the right-of-way, parks, open spaces and common areas may be removed without prior permission from the DRP. 6.4 Variances from Neighborhood Patterns The DRP encourages unique and creative design that respects thee spirit and intent of the Declaration and Design Manual. Except as otherwise set forth in Chapter 3, the DRP may, upon application, grant a variance from the Design Manual, based on design merit. 137 35 The Board of Directors shall have the power to make the final decision on whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a variance, without any liability being incurred or damages being assessed due to any decision of the Board of Directors. Chapter 7: Amendments Amendments to Design Manual may only be made as set forth in the Declaration. Any amendments to the Design Manual will be posted on The Lakes at Valley West website. A submittal shall be processed consistent with the Design Manual in effect 30 days prior to DRP receipt of a complete Form A submittal. No improvements that were constructed and approved in accordance with the Design Manual shall be required to be changed because such standards are thereafter amended. Chapter 8: Definitions The words and terms used in this document shall have their customary dictionary definitions unless otherwise specifically defined within the Declaration or this Design Manual. 138 36 Exhibit 1 The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 & 2 Subdivision Legal Description Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 1005B, and Tract 2A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C, hereinafter known as “The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 1 and Phase 2”, situated in the NE ¼ NW ¼ and NW ¼ NE ¼ of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572, Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office; thence N.89° 32' 48"E. for 1337.30 feet to the West One-sixteenth Corner between Section 4 and Section 9, being the northwest corner of Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 1005B, the Point of Beginning; thence continuing N.89° 32' 48"E. for 1337.30 feet to the One-quarter Corner between Section 4 and Section 9, being the north corner common to Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 1005B and Tract 2A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C; thence S.88° 44' 32"E. for 826.90 feet to the north corner common to Tract 2A and Tract 3A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C, from which the Corner to Sections 3, 4, 9, and 10, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1577, Document No. 380643, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office, bears S.88° 44' 32"E., 1816.88 feet distant; thence S.02° 30' 35"W. for 659.22 feet to an angle point between Tract 2A and Tract 3A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C; thence S.26° 04' 23"W. for 437.25 feet to an angle point between Tract 2A and Tract 3A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C; thence S.02° 30' 35"W. for 289.84 feet to the south corner common to Tract 2A and Tract 3A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C, being a point on the north line of SW ¼ NE ¼ of said Section 9; thence N.89° 11' 53"W. for 650.69 feet to the Center-North One-sixteenth Corner of said Section 9, being the south corner common to Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 1005B and Tract 2A of Certificate of Survey No. 1005C; thence S.89° 56' 46"W. for 1337.16 feet to the Northwest One-sixteenth Corner of said Section 9, being the south corner common to Tract 1 of Certificate of Survey No. 1005B and Tract 2 of Certificate of Survey No. 1581; thence N.02° 27' 30"E. for 1341.86 feet to the West One-sixteenth Corner between Section 4 and Section 9, the Point of Beginning. The Area of the above described tracts of land is 64.89 Acres, more or less. 139 37 Exhibit 2 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Subdivision Legal Description Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West, being a portion of Lot R2 of The Lakes at Valley West – Phase 1 & Phase 2, Plat J-572; situated in the NE¼NW¼ of Section 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572, Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 1337.30 feet to the West One-sixteenth Corner between Section 4 and Section 9; thence S.00° 59' 02"W. for 50.06 feet along the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9 to a point on the south right-of-way of Durston Road, the Point of Beginning; thence N.88° 04' 19"E. for 873.66 feet along the south right-of-way of Durston Road to the northwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.1°54’25”E., 25.00 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.19°42’50”W., 388.15 feet to an angle point on the west boundary of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.13°17’40”E., 223.76 feet to the southwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence S.88°04’19”W., 296.79 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left, having a radius of 280.00 feet, a central angle of 24°45’39”, an arc length of 121.00 feet to a point, the chord being N.24°09’14”W., 120.06 feet; thence N.36°32’03”W., 62.13 feet to a point; thence S.50°56’59”W., 90.09 feet to a point; thence S.53°42’03”W., 60.00 feet to a point; thence S.56°35’13”W., 64.64 feet to a point; thence S.63°07’43”W., 86.94 feet to a point; thence S.75°16’23”W., 33.24 feet to a point thence S.84°04’23”W., 52.71 feet to a point; thence N.89°04’37”W., 87.84 feet to a point on the east boundary of the NW¼NW¼ of Section 9; thence N.0°59’02”E., 609.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The Area of the above described tracts of land is 459,420 Square Feet, or 10.547 Acres, more or less. 140 38 Appendix A1 ARTICLE 8 - PUD1 – THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT Phases 1 & 2 Sec. 1 - Intent and purpose. A. The intent and purpose of the Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Residential Zoning District is to set forth certain standards for development within the PUD that vary from the Unified Development Code (UDC) typical residential zoning districts. Other relaxations from the UDC are detailed in the PUD application and are related to subdivision design. This District applies to all lots within The Lakes at Valley West. Future changes to the R-1 zone in UDC do not impact the subject properties. 1. The intent of the Lakes at Valley West residential density district is to provide for a variety of small lots for lower intensity single, two and three household residential development and related uses (including accessory dwelling units) within the city at urban densities in a master planned area and to provide for such community facilities and services as will serve the area's residents while respecting the residential character and quality of the area. It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character. 2. In exchange for relaxations, strict design standards have been established in The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual which is administered by The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel. Many of these standards are more stringent than the requirements of the UDC. Sec. 2 - Authorized uses. A. Uses are depicted in the table below. Appendix C in the Design Manual designates which lots are allowed which uses. Principal uses are indicated with a "P," conditional uses are indicated with a "C," accessory uses are indicated with an "A" and uses which are not permitted with the district are indicated by a "-." “C” uses require a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman but must receive approval from The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel prior to submitting any applications to the City. B. Note that additional uses for telecommunication uses are contained in the UDC. C. The uses listed are deliberately broad and some are given special definitions in the UDC. The intent of this method is to provide general guidance for uses while allowing the unique needs and circumstances of each proposal to be specifically addressed through the review process. Some uses are the subject of special regulations contained in the UDC. 141 39 Table of Residential Uses for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Type of Use Accessory dwelling units1 P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Community centers C Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents P Cooperative housing C Day care centers C Essential services Type I A Essential services Type II P Essential services Type III C Family day care home P Fences A Greenhouses A Group day care home C Group living2 P Guesthouses A Home-based businesses3 A/C Other buildings and structures typically accessory to authorized uses A Private garages A Private or jointly owned recreational facilities A Private stormwater control facilities A Public and private parks and park improvements P Manufactured homes on permanent foundations4 P Single-household dwelling P Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work A Temporary sales and office buildings A Three-household dwelling P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Two-household dwelling P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) “Limited Two Household/Duplex”5 P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Townhouses (two or three attached townhomes) P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies A Uses approved as part of the Lakes at Valley West PUD P Notes: 1 Only one ADU per designed lot in Appendix C; one separated off-street parking space required for the second unit; occupancy may not exceed two persons or one bedroom; living area limited to 600 SF. 2 Group living is subject to the requirements of the UDC. 3 Home-based businesses are subject to the terms and thresholds of the UDC. 4 Manufactured homes are subject to the standards of the UDC and must adhere to the architectural standards established by The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual. 5 “Limited Two Household/Duplexes” (similar to attached ADUs) are allowed on designated lots in Appendix C; one separated off-street parking space is required for the second unit; occupancy may not exceed three persons or two bedrooms; living area is limited to one-third of the total square footage of the main residence. 142 40 Sec. 3 - Lot coverage and floor area. A. Maximum lot coverage by principal and accessory buildings shall be: 1. Not more than 50 percent of the lot area B. Minimum floor area requirements for each dwelling in all districts shall be that area required by the city's adopted International Building Code. Sec. 4 - Lot area and width. A. All lots shall have a minimum area as set forth in the table below and are cumulative. These minimums assume a lack of development constraints. Table of Minimum Lot Areas for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Minimum Lot Area (SF) Single-household dwelling 2,500 Two-household dwelling (including “limited two-household/duplex”) 3,000 Three-household dwelling 4,000 Lot area per townhouse (including duplex townhomes and triplex townhomes) 2,500 (2,000 for interior unit) Additional area required for a detached accessory dwelling unit none All other uses 5,000 B. All lots shall have a minimum width as set forth in the table below. These minimums assume a lack of development constraints. Table of Minimum Lot Widths for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Minimum Lot Width Single-household dwelling 25 Two-household dwelling 25 Accessory dwelling unit none Dwellings in three-household dwelling configurations 25 Townhouses 25 All other uses 50 143 41 Sec. 5 - Yards. A. Minimum yards required are: 1. Any yard facing a street: 15 feet; 20 feet for garage doors 2. Any yard facing a Woonerf: 15 feet; See Appendix C1 for garage door setbacks. 3. Any yard facing open space: 10-20 feet (see Lot Exhibits in Appendix C1) 3. Any side yard: 5-12 feet; or zero feet for interior walls of townhouses (see Lot Exhibits in Appendix C1) B. Yard Encroachments: 1. Decks and patios must face only side yards and/or open spaces. Decks and patios may not extend more than 40 percent feet into any required side setback. Side Setback Deck/Patio Encroachment 5’ 2’ 7’ 2’-9” 12’ 4’-9” Sec. 6 - Building height. Maximum building height for each residential district shall be as follows: Table of Heights for The Lakes at Valley West Height (in feet) Less than 3:12 34 3:12 or greater but less than 6:12 38 6:12 or greater but less than 9:12 42 Equal to or greater than 9:12 44 Sec. 7 - Residential garages. A. Attached residential garages facing a street shall not obscure the entrance to the dwelling. Attached garages are required to be clearly subordinate to the dwelling. A subordinate garage has two or more of the following characteristics: 1. The principal facade of the dwelling has been emphasized through the use of architectural features such as, but not limited to, porches, fenestration treatment, architectural details, height, orientation or gables, so that the non-garage portion of the residence is visually dominant; 2. The facade with the garage vehicle entrance is recessed at least four feet behind the facade of the dwelling containing the main entry; and/or 144 42 3. The area of the garage vehicle door comprises 30 percent or less of the total square footage, exclusive of any exposed roof areas, of the principal facade of the dwelling. Principal facade shall include all wall areas parallel to the garage door. B. Residential garages facing a woonerf are not required to meet the above criteria. Sec. 8 – Parking A. Parking requirements in terms of the number and size of spaces are the same as the most current version of the UDC. B. Where a woonerf serves lots, access to garages and off-street parking shall be off of the woonerf. In cases where a woonerf is not adjacent to a lot, accesses to garages are permitted to be off of the street. C. Driveways are encouraged to be shared wherever possible to minimize street cuts and maximize on-street parking options. D. All “required” parking spaces must meet the minimum dimensions established in the UDC. E. Parking spaces shall not block sidewalks, woonerfs, driveways, accesses, pedestrian facilities or snow removal/plowing. F. The developer will provide parallel parking spaces along the woonerf in several designated locations. Driveways must be located outside of these parking areas. Sec. 9 - Minimum density. A. New residential development shall provide a minimum net density of five dwellings per net acre. A minimum is required to support efficiency in use of land and provision of municipal services, and to advance the purposes and goals of this chapter and the City’s adopted growth policy. Density may be achieved by averaging lot sizes over the entire Lakes at Valley West PUD area. For example, one phase or area may be less than five units per net acre while another may be greater than five units per net acre as long as the average is at least five units per net acre. Sec. 10 – Architectural, Additional Site and Landscape Requirements A. The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual includes additional site, architectural and landscape requirements that are all subject to review and approval by The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel. Appendix C1 of the Design Manual contains detailed lot exhibits that provide specific information per lot regarding uses, setbacks, etc. 145 43 Appendix A2 ARTICLE 8 - PUD1 –THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT PHASE 3 Sec. 1 - Intent and purpose. A. The intent and purpose of the Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development (PUD) Residential Zoning District is to set forth certain standards for development within the PUD that vary from the Unified Development Code (UDC) typical residential zoning districts. Other relaxations from the UDC are detailed in the PUD application and are related to subdivision design. This District applies to all lots within The Lakes at Valley West. Future changes to the R-1 zone in UDC do not impact the subject properties. 1. The intent of the Lakes at Valley West residential density district is to provide for a variety of small lots for lower intensity single, two and three household residential development and related uses (including accessory dwelling units) within the city at urban densities in a master planned area and to provide for such community facilities and services as will serve the area's residents while respecting the residential character and quality of the area. It should provide for a variety of housing types to serve the varied needs of households of different size, age and character. 2. In exchange for relaxations, strict design standards have been established in The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual which is administered by The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel. Many of these standards are more stringent than the requirements of the UDC. Sec. 2 - Authorized uses. A. Uses are depicted in the table below. Appendix C in the Design Manual designates which lots are allowed which uses. Principal uses are indicated with a "P," conditional uses are indicated with a "C," accessory uses are indicated with an "A" and uses which are not permitted with the district are indicated by a "-." “C” uses require a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Bozeman but must receive approval from The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel prior to submitting any applications to the City. B. Note that additional uses for telecommunication uses are contained in the UDC. C. The uses listed are deliberately broad and some are given special definitions in the UDC. The intent of this method is to provide general guidance for uses while allowing the unique needs and circumstances of each proposal to be specifically addressed through the review process. Some uses are the subject of special regulations contained in the UDC. 146 44 Table of Residential Uses for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Type of Use Accessory dwelling units1 P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Community centers C Community residential facilities with eight or fewer residents P Cooperative housing C Day care centers C Essential services Type I A Essential services Type II P Essential services Type III C Family day care home P Fences A Greenhouses A Group day care home C Group living2 P Guesthouses A Home-based businesses3 A/C Other buildings and structures typically accessory to authorized uses A Private garages A Private or jointly owned recreational facilities A Private stormwater control facilities A Public and private parks and park improvements P Manufactured homes on permanent foundations4 P Single-household dwelling P Temporary buildings and yards incidental to construction work A Temporary sales and office buildings A Three-household dwelling P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Two-household dwelling P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) “Limited Two Household/Duplex”5 P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Townhouses (two or three attached townhomes) P (only on specifically designated lots in Appendix C) Tool sheds for storage of domestic supplies A Uses approved as part of the Lakes at Valley West PUD P Notes: 1 Only one ADU per designed lot in Appendix C; one separated off-street parking space required for the second unit; occupancy may not exceed two persons or one bedroom; living area limited to 600 SF. 2 Group living is subject to the requirements of the UDC. 3 Home-based businesses are subject to the terms and thresholds of the UDC. 4 Manufactured homes are subject to the standards of the UDC and must adhere to the architectural standards established by The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual. 5 “Limited Two Household/Duplexes” (similar to attached ADUs) are allowed on designated lots in Appendix C; one separated off-street parking space is required for the second unit; occupancy may not exceed three persons or two bedrooms; living area is limited to one-third of the total square footage of the main residence. 147 45 Sec. 3 - Lot coverage and floor area. A. Maximum lot coverage by principal and accessory buildings shall be: 1. Not more than 50 percent of the lot area B. Minimum floor area requirements for each dwelling in all districts shall be that area required by the city's adopted International Building Code. Sec. 4 - Lot area and width. A. All lots shall have a minimum area as set forth in the table below and are cumulative. These minimums assume a lack of development constraints. Table of Minimum Lot Areas for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Minimum Lot Area (SF) Single-household dwelling 2,500 Two-household dwelling (including “limited two-household/duplex”) 3,000 Three-household dwelling 4,000 Lot area per townhouse (including duplex townhomes and triplex townhomes) 2,400 (2,000 for interior unit) Additional area required for a detached accessory dwelling unit none All other uses 5,000 B. All lots shall have a minimum width as set forth in the table below. These minimums assume a lack of development constraints. Table of Minimum Lot Widths for The Lakes at Valley West PUD Minimum Lot Width Single-household dwelling 25 Two-household dwelling 25 Accessory dwelling unit none Dwellings in three-household dwelling configurations 25 Townhouses 25 All other uses 50 Sec. 5 - Yards. A. Minimum yards required are: 1. Any yard facing a street: 15 feet; 20 feet for garage doors 2. Any yard facing a Woonerf: 15 feet; See Appendix C2 for garage door setbacks. 148 46 3. Any yard facing open space: 5-20 feet (see Lot Exhibits in Appendix C2) 3. Any side yard: 5-12 feet; or zero feet for interior walls of townhouses (see Lot Exhibits in Appendix C2) B. Yard Encroachments: 1. Side yards and/or Open Space yards. a. Decks and patios must face only side yards and/or open spaces. Decks and patios may not extend more than 40 percent feet into any required side setback. b. For Lots 5-12 only, first and second floor porches fronting Durston Road may encroach up to 5 feet into a 10’ open space setback only if the covered deck exceeds 1/3 in length of the building. 2. Porches may encroach up to 5 feet into a 15’ yard setback facing a street or 15’ a yard facing a Woonerf only if all four of the following conditions are met: i. The encroaching porch must have a length equal to or greater than on one-half the length of the building façade or 12 feet, whichever is greater. The remaining portion may be occupied by an integrated façade as defined in this Design Manual: ii. The encroaching porch must have a minimum depth of six (6) feet; iii. Second or subsequent stories are not allowed to encroach into the 15-foot street or Woonerf facing yard; and iv. No stairs are permitted beyond the 10-foot setback. Sec. 6 - Building height. Maximum building height for each residential district shall be as follows: Table of Heights for The Lakes at Valley West Height (in feet) Less than 3:12 34 3:12 or greater but less than 6:12 38 6:12 or greater but less than 9:12 42 Equal to or greater than 9:12 44 Setback Deck/Patio Encroachment 5’ 2’ 7’ 2’-9” 10’ 4’ 12’ 4’-9” 149 47 Sec. 7 - Residential garages. A. Attached residential garages facing a street shall not obscure the entrance to the dwelling. Attached garages are required to be clearly subordinate to the dwelling. A subordinate garage has two or more of the following characteristics: 1. The principal facade of the dwelling has been emphasized through the use of architectural features such as, but not limited to, porches, fenestration treatment, architectural details, height, orientation or gables, so that the non-garage portion of the residence is visually dominant; 2. The facade with the garage vehicle entrance is recessed at least four feet behind the facade of the dwelling containing the main entry; and/or 3. The area of the garage vehicle door comprises 30 percent or less of the total square footage, exclusive of any exposed roof areas, of the principal facade of the dwelling. Principal facade shall include all wall areas parallel to the garage door. B. Residential garages facing a woonerf are not required to meet the above criteria. Sec. 8 – Parking G. Parking requirements in terms of the number and size of spaces are the same as the most current version of the UDC. H. Where a woonerf serves lots, access to garages and off-street parking shall be off of the woonerf. In cases where a woonerf is not adjacent to a lot, accesses to garages are permitted to be off of the street. I. Driveways are encouraged to be shared wherever possible to minimize street cuts and maximize on-street parking options. J. All “required” parking spaces must meet the minimum dimensions established in the UDC. K. Parking spaces shall not block sidewalks, woonerfs, driveways, accesses, pedestrian facilities or snow removal/plowing. L. The developer will provide parking spaces along the woonerf in several designated locations. Driveways must be located outside of these parking areas. Sec. 9 - Minimum density. A. New residential development shall provide a minimum net density of five dwellings per net acre. A minimum is required to support efficiency in use of land and provision of municipal services, and to advance the purposes and goals of this chapter and the City’s adopted growth policy. Density may be achieved by averaging lot sizes over the entire Lakes at Valley West PUD area. For example, one phase or area may be less than five units per net acre while another may be greater than five units per net acre as long as the average is at least five units per net acre. 150 48 Sec. 10 – Architectural, Additional Site and Landscape Requirements B. The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual includes additional site, architectural and landscape requirements that are all subject to review and approval by The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel. Appendix C2 of the Design Manual contains detailed lot exhibits that provide specific information per lot regarding uses, setbacks, etc. 151 49 Sketch Design Review Application FORM A Property Information: Street Address: ___________________________________________________ Lot __________ Block _________ Phase _________ Owner Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Architect Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Builder Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Landscape Designer Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Appendix B: Applications 152 50 Information: 1. Are any variances from The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual being requested under this application?  Yes  No If yes, please describe the variance: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Items submitted (please check):  Review Fee  Site Plan  Floor Plans  Roof Plan  Elevations  Landscape Plan  Digital copy (PDF) of all of the above 153 51 Acknowledgement Statement: The Lot Owner acknowledges that he/she has received, read and will abide by the Design Manual for The Lakes at Valley West. As stated in the both the Covenants and Design Manual, violations will be remedied by The Lakes at Valley West Homeowner’s Association whereupon the Lot Owner will be responsible for the cost of the remedy. I (We) ______________________________________________ am/are the owner(s) of record of Lot ____, Block _____, Phase __________ of The Lakes at Valley West. I/We have read these requirements and understand their implications. Furthermore, I (we) have been given sufficient opportunity to discuss any questions we may have regarding these requirements with a member of The Lakes at Valley West Design Review Panel. My (Our) signature(s) below is/are evidence of my/our intent to comply with these requirements. Owner Signature: __________________________________ Date: _________ Printed Name:___________________________________________________ Applicant Signature: ________________________________ Date: _________ Printed Name: ___________________________________________________ 154 52 Construction Design Review Application FORM B Property Information: Street Address: ___________________________________________________ Lot __________ Block _________ Phase _________ Owner Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Architect Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Builder Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Landscape Designer Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ 155 53 Information: 1. Are any variances from the The Lakes at Valley West Design Manual being requested under this application?  Yes  No If yes, please describe the variance: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Items submitted (please check):  Site/Grading Plan  Floor Plans  Roof Plan  Elevations & Sections  Samples & Cut Sheets  Rendered Elevation  Landscape Plan  Digital copy (PDF) of all of the above Signature: _______________________________________ Date: _________ Printed Name: __________________________________________________ 156 54 Changes Application FORM C Property Information: Street Address: ___________________________________________________ Lot __________ Block _________ Phase _________ Owner Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Architect Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Builder Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Landscape Designer Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ 157 55 Information: 1. Has the requested change or modification already been constructed?  Yes  No If yes, please explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. Change Description and reason for change: (Attach specific drawings of proposed change) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Items submitted (please check):  Review Fee  Plans/Elevation  Details/ Samples  Digital copy (PDF) of all of the above Signature: _________________________________ Date: _________ Printed Name: ____________________________________________ 158 56 Inspection Application FORM D Property Information: Street Address: ___________________________________________________ Lot __________ Block _________ Phase _________ Owner Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Architect Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Builder Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ FAX:______________________ Email: ________________________________ Landscape Designer Information: Name: __________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: __________________________________________________ Telephone: __________________________ FAX:________________________ Email: ________________________________ 159 57 Certification: I do hereby certify that the contracted structure on said lot conforms to the codes and the construction documents as approved by the DRP. All site work, landscaping, cleaning, removal of temporary utilities, and repair of damage to rights-of-way and/or common areas have been implemented. Signature: _________________________________ Date: _________ Printed Name: ____________________________________________ For DRP use only: Date of inspection: _____________  Approved as noted in letter  Denied as noted in letter DRP Signature: _______________________________ If denied, subsequent inspection date: _____________  Approved as noted in letter  Denied as noted in letter DRP Signature: _______________________________ 160 58 Appendix C1: The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 & 2 Building Envelopes The following lot exhibits describe allowable land uses, lot coverage, lot areas and widths, setbacks and driveway requirements. 161 S89° 46' 59"W105.0055.00'N89° 46' 59"E105.0055.00'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"N0°13'01"W 181.72N0°13'01"W 181.7255.00'N89°46'59"E 121.0041.00'50.00'50.00'LOT 15775 sq.ft.LOT 25250 sq.ft.LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 1BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THELOT 1 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AND SET BACK15FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.15FTSTREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:12385FT SIDE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVEWOONERFDRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 1FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.24.0026.0010FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKOPEN SPACE162 S89° 46' 59"W105.0055.00'55.00'S89° 46' 59"W105.0051.72'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'0 0 "R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"N0°13'01"W 181.72N0°13'01"W 181.7255.00'LOT 35775 sq.ft.41.00'N0°13'01"W 306.9750.00'55.00'50.00'LOT 15775 sq.ft.LOT 25250 sq.ft.LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 2BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVEDRIVEWAY EASEMENT FOR LOT 1PARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALK163 S89° 46' 59"W105.0051.72'S89° 46' 59"W104.9750.00'L=51.04'Δ=18°16'34"69.85'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'0 0 "R=20.00L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"LOT 155634 sq.ft.L=3.28'N0°13'01"W 181.72N0°13'01"W 181.72LOT 45090 sq.ft.LOT 35775 sq.ft.215.89'41.00'N0°13'01"W 306.9750.00'55.00'50.00'LOT 25250 sq.ft.LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 3BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/20155FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVE7FT SIDE SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.PARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENT164 51.72'S89° 46' 59"W104.9750.00'L=51.04'Δ=18°16'34"S89° 46' 59"W95.87N89° 46' 59"E64.95S0° 13' 01"E69.85'S89° 46' 59"W63.65LOT 155634 sq.ft.L=3.28'25.00'"LOT 45090 sq.ft.LOT 35775 sq.ft.215.89'N0°13'01"W 183.06N0°13'01"W 306.9755.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 4BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVEPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALK165 ΔS89° 46' 59"W95.87L=140.87'96.97'N89° 46' 59"E64.9588.20'L=23.08'S0° 13' 01"ES89° 46' 59"W63.65LOT 56049 sq.ft.LOT 65824 sq.ft.25.00'20.00'L=345.58'Δ=90°00'00"R=190.00'L=298.45'Δ=90°00'00"R=160.00'L=251.33'Δ=90°00'00"L=16.32'L=16.75'215.89'N0°13'01"W 183.06LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 5BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.7FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVEPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALK166 50.00'96.97'N89° 46' 59"E64.9588.20'L=23.08'41.94'N0° 13' 01"W80.00S0° 13' 01"E9.86S89° 46' 59"W63.65LOT 65824 sq.ft.LOT 75072 sq.ft.25.00'L=16.32'N0°13'01"W 30.78215.89'N0°13'01"W 183.0663.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 6BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKSIDEWALKOPEN SPACE5FT CONCRETE BORDER10FTUTILITY EASEMENTPARKING167 N89° 46' 59"E64.9541.94'N0° 13' 01"W80.00S0° 13' 01"E9.86N0° 13' 01"W80.00S89° 46' 59"W63.65LOT 65824 sq.ft.LOT 85072 sq.ft.LOT 75072 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 297.91N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.1963.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 7BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET OF THE LOT AND SET BACK 20FTFROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.7FT SIDE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALK168 N0° 13' 01"W80.00N0° 13' 01"W80.0063.40'LOT 85072 sq.ft.LOT 75072 sq.ft.LOT 95072 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 297.91N89°46'59"E 435.57N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.1963.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 8BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVE7FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALK169 N0° 13' 01"W80.00N0° 13' 01"W80.00N89° 01' 44"W63.90N0° 13' 01"W9.8765.77'N89° 01' 44"W64.6863.40'LOT 85072 sq.ft.LOT 95072 sq.ft.LOT 105870 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 297.91N89°46'59"E 435.57N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.1963.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 9BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET LOT AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVE7FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALK170 N0° 13' 01"W80.0091.21'N89° 01' 44"W63.90N0° 13' 01"W9.8765.77'N89° 01' 44"W64.6863.40'60.82'LOT 95072 sq.ft.LOT 105870 sq.ft.220.77'N0°58'16"E 185.1750.00'63.40'63.40'25.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 10BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)WESTMORLAND DRIVEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALK5FT CONCRETE BORDER10FTUTILITY EASEMENTPARKING171 N89° 01' 44"W63.90N0° 13' 01"W9.87N89° 01' 44"W64.6868.95'R=20.00'L=31.00'Δ=88°48'44"43.23'S0° 13' 01"E80.00S0° 13' 01"E9.8763.40'63.42'R=20.00'L=31.83'Δ=91°11'16"50.00'LOT 115605 sq.ft.LOT 125072 sq.ft.220.77'39.72'N0°58'16"E 185.17N0°58'16"E 316.7950.00'50.00'50.00'63.40'25.00'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 11BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)PARKINGPARKING AREAPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT5FT CONCRETE CORDERSIDEWALKOPEN SPACEDELFT WAY(WOONERF)172 N89° 01' 44"W63.90N89° 01' 44"W64.6843.23'S0° 13' 01"E80.00S0° 13' 01"E9.87S0° 13' 01"E80.0063.40'63.42'LOT 135072 sq.ft.LOT 115605 sq.ft.LOT 125072 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.19N89°46'59"E 277.09N89°46'59"E 275.5975.00'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 12BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)7FT SIDE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.SIDEWALK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACE5FT CONCRETE BORDER173 S0° 13' 01"E80.0063.40'S0° 13' 01"E80.00LOT 145072 sq.ft.LOT 135072 sq.ft.LOT 125072 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.19N89°46'59"E 277.09N89°46'59"E 275.5975.00'75.00'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 13BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT(MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)SIDEWALK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACE5FT CONCRETE BORDER174 N89° 46' 59"E64.95S0° 13' 01"E9.86S0° 13' 01"E80.00S0° 13' 01"E80.00S89° 46' 59"W63.65S0° 13' 01"E9.8643.65'62.17'LOT 155634 sq.ft.LOT 145072 sq.ft.LOT 135072 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 190.20N89°46'59"E 190.19N89°46'59"E 277.09N89°46'59"E 275.5975.00'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 14BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACKPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)SIDEWALK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACE5FT CONCRETE BORDER175 50.00'N89° 46' 59"E64.95S0° 13' 01"E9.86S0° 13' 01"E80.0069.85'S89° 46' 59"W63.65S0° 13' 01"E9.8643.65'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"62.17'LOT 155634 sq.ft.LOT 145072 sq.ft.25.00'215.89'41.00'N0°13'01"W 183.06N0°13'01"W 306.9750.00'55.00'63.40'63.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 15BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015DELFT WAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKPARKING AREAMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)SIDEWALK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACE5FT CONCRETE BORDER176 55.00'S0° 13' 01"E43.65'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"N0° 13' 01"W80.0082.17'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"62.17'LOT 166489 sq.ft.55.00'41.00'N0°13'01"W 306.9750.00'55.00'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 16BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKDELFT WAY(WOONERF)DELFT WAY(WOONERF)DRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 112FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKOPEN SPACEOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALKPARKING12.00'12.00'PARKING10FTUTILITY EASEMENT177 LOT 186000 sq.ft.N0° 13' 01"W80.0062.17'N0° 13' 01"W80.00LOT 176000 sq.ft.N89°46'59"E 345.84N89°46'59"E 277.09N89°46'59"E 275.5975.00'75.00'N89°46'59"E 314.3563.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 17BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015DELFT WAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK12FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKOPEN SPACESIDEWALKPARKING AREA12.00'12.00'PARKING AREA178 LOT 186000 sq.ft.S0° 13' 01"E80.00S0° 13' 01"E80.0080.00N0° 13' 01"W80.00N0° 13' 01"W80.0063.42'LOT 13N89°46'59"E 345.84N89°46'59"E 277.09N89°46'59"E 275.5975.00'75.00'N89°46'59"E 314.3563.40'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 18BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015DELFT WAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK12FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKOPEN SPACESIDEWALKPARKING AREA179 R=20.00'L=31.00'Δ=88°48'44"43.23'N0° 13' 01"W80.0063.42'R=20.00'L=31.83'Δ=91°11'16"82.18'55.96'50.00'LOT 196551 sq.ft.56.63'39.72'50.00'63.40'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 19BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK12FT SIDE SETBACKWOONERFMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENTDRIVEWAYEASEMENT FORLOT 20UTILITY EASEMENTOPEN SPACESIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALKPARKINGPARKING180 R =20.00'L =31.83'Δ =91°11'16N89° 01' 44"W105.0053.79'N89° 46' 59"E105.0255.96'50.00'LOT 205763 sq.ft.LOT 215250 sq.ft.56.63'N89°46'59"E 121.0239.72'50.00'25.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 20BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEDRIVEWAY EASEMENT FOR LOT 20 AND SETBACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTYLINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.20FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK7FT SIDE SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKWOONERFLAUREL PARKWAYMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTDRIVEWAYEASEMENT FORLOT 20UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKOPEN SPACESIDEWLAKSIDEWLAKOPEN SPACE181 R=20.00'L=31.00'Δ=88°48'44"R =20.00'L=31.83'Δ =91°11'16"N89° 01' 44"W105.0053.79'55.96'N89° 01' 44"W105.0050.00'LOT 225250 sq.ft.LOT 205763 sq.ft.LOT 215250 sq.ft.56.63'39.72'50.00'50.00'50.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 21BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MAX) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACKLAUREL PARKWAYWOONERFMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENT12.00'12.00'PARKINGSIDEWALKDRIVEWAYEASEMENT FORLOT 20UTILITY EASEMENT182 64.6868.95'R=20.00'L=31.00'Δ=88°48'44"20.00'=31.83'Δ =91°11'16"N89° 01' 44"W105.0050.00'N89° 01' 44"W105.00LOT 115605 sq.ft.LOT 235250 sq.ft.LOT 225250 sq.ft.LOT 215250 sq.ft.N0°58'16"E 371.8039.72'N0°58'16"E 316.7950.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 22BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAYDELFT WAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,ADU,DUPLEX LIMITED.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'PARKING10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALK183 N89° 01' 44"W68.95'R=2L=31.0Δ=88°48'44N89° 01' 44"W105.00N89° 01' 44"W105.0050.00'LOT 245250 sq.ft.LOT 235250 sq.ft.LOT 225250 sq.ft.N0°58'16"E 371.80220.77'N0°58'16"E 185.17N0°58'16"E 316.7950.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'25.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 23BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAYDELFT WAY(WOONERF)5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MAX) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTPARKINGSIDEWALK184 91.21'68.95'N89° 01' 44"W105.00N89° 01' 44"W105.0050.00'60.82'LOT 256500 sq.ft.LOT 245250 sq.ft.LOT 235250 sq.ft.N0°58'16"E 371.80220.77'N0°58'16"E 185.17N0°58'16"E 316.7950.00'50.00'50.00'25.00'63.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 24BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAY5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)12.00'12.00'10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTPARKING AREASIDEWALK185 91.21'N89° 01' 44"W105.0050.00'60.82'LOT 256500 sq.ft.LOT 245250 sq.ft.105.02'30.01'N0°58'16"E 185.1750.00'63.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 1PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 1.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 25BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACKLAUREL PARKWAYSIDEWALKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.DELFT WAY(WOONERF)10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10FTUTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKWESTMORLAND DRIVE186 LOT 14320 sq.ft.LOT 23780 sq.ft.N89° 01' 44"W108.00S89° 01' 44"E108.00N89° 01' 44"W108.0035.00'35.00'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"61.37'30.50'40.00'40.00'47.99'35.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 1-2BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE DRIVEWAY EASEMENT FOR LOT 1AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINE5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKLAUREL PARKWAY20FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKZERO LOT LINE15FT WOONERF SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACEUTILITY EASEMENT26.00'24.00'SIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKSIDEWALKDRIVEWAYEASEMENTFOR LOT 1(WOONERF)VERMEER LANE187 LOT 23780 sq.ft.LOT 34050 sq.ft.LOT 44050 sq.ft.N89° 01' 44"W108.00N89° 01' 44"W108.0035.00'35.00'N89° 01' 44"W108.0037.50'N89° 01' 44"W108.0037.50'37.50'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00 "R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"61.37'S0°58'16"W 370.40N0°58'16"E 312.1337.50'47.99'35.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 3-4BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKZERO LOT LINEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.VERMEER LANEPARKING AREA10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.DRIVEWAYEASEMENTFOR LOT 112'12'188 LOT 44050 sq.ft.LOT 54050 sq.ft.LOT 64050 sq.ft.N89° 01' 44"W108.00N89° 01' 44"W108.0037.50'37.50'N89° 01' 44"W108.00N89° 01' 44"W108.0037.50'37.50'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00 "N0°58'16"E 291.4755.00'39.98'S0°58'16"W 370.40N0°58'16"E 312.13N0°58'16"E 177.8137.50'37.50'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 5-6BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAY•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15F (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238(WOONERF)VERMEER LANEPARKING AREAFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENT•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.12'12'189 N89° 01' 44"W108.00S89° 46' 59"W18.60LOT 74050 sq.ft.LOT 85240 sq.ft.N89° 01' 44"W108.0047.39'49.63'N0°58'16"E 30.0039.98'82.83'108.02'16.00'16.00'N0°58'16"E 177.8137.50'37.50'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 7-8BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015LAUREL PARKWAYWESTMORLAND DRIVE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK20FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238(WOONERF)VERMEER LANEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKSIDEWALK•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.PARKING AREA12'12'190 37.50'55.45'S89° 46' 59"W18.60N12° 14' 35"E87.5544.64'47.01'49.63'N0°58'16"E 291.47LOT 103872 sq.ft.LOT 95463 sq.ft.45.10'L=53.85'39.98'82.83'16.00'16.00'N0°58'16"E 177.81S89°01'44"E 191.29S84°23'06"E 200.0237.50'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 9BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/20155FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, AND TOWNHOME DUPLEX. (MUSTUTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 10)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES: SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•LOT TO BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.SIDEWALKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE(WOONERF)VERMEER LANE10' UTILITY EASEMENT191 55.45'S89° 46' 59"W18.60N12° 14' 35"E87.55N12° 40' 48"E85.1744.64'45.01'LOT 113951 sq.ft.LOT 103872 sq.ft.LOT 95463 sq.ft.1.75'L=45.10'L=53.85'R=R=490.00'Δ=19°55'51"39.98'82.83'16.00'N0°58'16"E 177.81S84°23'06"E 200.02LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 10BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/20155FT SIDE SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, AND TOWNHOME DUPLEX. (MUSTUTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 9 OR 11)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES: SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•LOT TO BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREET.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED FOR LOTS10 AND 1115FT STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE10' UTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINESIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALK192 N12° 40' 48"E85.1744.64'45.01'N17° 49' 16"E78.4254.90'L=21.91'L=4LOT 123939 sq.ft.LOT 113951 sq.ft.LOT 103872 sq.ft.L=19.75'L=51.75'L=45.10'R=490.00'Δ=19°55'51"36.09'65.40'25.12'S84°23'06"E 200.02N19°42'50"E 155.38LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 11BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/20155FT SIDE SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, AND TOWNHOME DUPLEX. (MUSTUTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 10 OR 12)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES: SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•LOT TO BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREET.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED FOR LOTS10 AND 1115FT STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE10' UTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINESIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALK193 N12° 40' 48"E85.1745.01'N17° 49' 16"E78.423829 sq.ft.40.00'50.00'54.90'40.00'S0° 58' 16"W64.27'40.00'18.09'L=21.91'LOT 123939 sq.ft.LOT 113951 sq.ft.L=19.75'L=51.75'R=4Δ=1936.09'S70°17'10"E 173.0965.40'64.87'25.12'S84°23'06"E 200.02S19°42'50"W 155.38N19°42'50"E 155.3840.00'16.00'16.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 12BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015WESTMORLAND DRIVE(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, AND TOWNHOME DUPLEX. (MUSTUTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 11)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES: SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•LOT TO BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.OPEN SPACEVERMEER LANE5FT CONCRETE BORDERSIDEWALKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENT15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKSIDEWALKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.194 44.64'45.01'S0° 58' 16"W75.00LOT 143000 sq.ft.LOT 133829 sq.ft.L=19.83'L=12.96'40.00'N35° 09' 25"WL=19.83'L=12.05'25.38'40.00'54.90'40.00'40.00'S0° 58' 16"W75.0064.27'R=20.00'L=24.87'Δ=71°15'26"R=52.00'Δ=71°15'26"N89°01'44"W 167.5165.40'64.87'25.12'S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 191.29S84°23'06"E 200.02S19°42'50"W 155.38N19°42'50"E 155.3824.50'24.50'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2ˆPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Nov/19/20155352.002LOT 13-14BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ11/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 14).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.(WOONERF)ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE15FT WOONERF SETBACK5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACKOPEN SPACESIDEWALK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT CONCRETE BORDER10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:123810' UTILITY EASEMENTPARKINGPARKINGVERMEER LANEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 13OR 15).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED SRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICALSIDEWALKSIDEWALK195 LOT 153000 sq.ft.LOT 163440 sq.ft.55.45'N12° 14' 35"E87.55N12° 40' 48"E44.64'45.01'S0° 58' 16"W75.00S0° 58' 16"W75.0040.00'39.99'47.01'27.01'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'027.01'40.00'LOT 143000 sq.ft.40.00'40.00'40.00'S0° 58' 16"W75.00LOT 11N89°01'44"W 167.5155.00'39.98'N0°58'16"E 177.81S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 191.29S84°23'06"E 200.02LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 15-16BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXTOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITHLOT 14 OR 16)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDNECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.(WOONERF)10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.MAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238SIDEWALKOPEN SPACEVERMEER LANEPARKING AREAPARKING AREA10' UTILITY EASEMENT•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX TOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE 0LOT LINE WITH LOT 15)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND NECESSARYBUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE10' UTILITY EASEMENT196 LOT 16LOT 173684 sq.ft.LOT 183119 sq.ft.S0° 58' 16"WS0° 58' 16"W39.99'27.01'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"N0° 58' 16"E78.9947.07'R=20.00'L=31.42'Δ=90°00'00"27.01'N0° 58' 16"E76.9640.05'40.00'40.05'LOT 193038 sq.ft.40.00'40.00'N89°01'44"W 167.5161.37'N88°04'19"E 167.22N88°04'19"E 418.59N0°58'16"E 312.13S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 131.5147.99'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 17-18BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/201510FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK(WOONERF)15FT WOONERF SETBACKWOONERF•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLEFAMILY, DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEXTOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE 0 LOTLINE WITH LOT 18).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND NECESSARYBUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSEDFROM THE WOONERF AND SETBACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYSENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 17OR 19).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.DRIVEWAYEASEMENTFOR LOT 1FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10' UTILITY EASEMENT10' UTILITY EASEMENTPARKING AREA12'12'SIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALKOPEN SPACEVERMEER LANE197 LOT 153000 sq.ft.LOT 183119 sq.ft.S0° 58' 16"W75.0039.99'N0° 58' 16"E76.9640.05'40.00'40.05'LOT 193038 sq.ft.LOT 202868 sq.ft.LOT 213513 sq.ft.LOT 143000 sq.ft.LOT 133829 sq.ft.L=19.83'L=12.96'40.00'S0° 58' 16"W74.94S1° 05' 17"E74.5640.05'N84° 47' 30"E40.00'S0° 58' 16"W75.00R=20.00'L=24.87'Δ=71°15'26"R=52.00'Δ=71°15'26"N89°01'44"W 167.5164.87'N88°04'19"E 167.22N88°04'19"E 418.59S89°01'44"E 131.51S89°01'44"E 131.5124.50'24.50'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 19-20BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 18OR 20).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK(WOONERF)10' UTILITY EASEMENTPARKING AREA12'12'VERMEER LANE•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 19OR 21).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.MAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238SIDEWALKOPEN SPACEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE198 LOT 202868 sq.ft.LOT 213513 sq.ft.L=19.83'L=12.96'S0° 58' 16"W74.94S1° 05' 17"E74.5640.05'N84° 47' 30"E70.54N35° 09' 25"W93.25N26° 44' 50"E67.03L=19.83'S66° 27' 46"E76.56L=12.05'25.38'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S0° 58' 16"W75.00R=20.00'L=24.87'Δ=71°15'26"LOT 223452 sq.ft.LOT 233000 sq.ft.LOT 243000 sq.ft.R=52.00'Δ=71°15'26"24.50'24.50'39.71'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2ˆPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Nov/19/20155352.002LOT 21BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ11/2015(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXLIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 20 OR 22).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE15FT WOONERFSETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINESIDEWALKSIDEWALKOPEN SPACEVERMEER LANEMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.10' UTILITY EASEMENT199 LOT 213513 sq.ft.LOT 133829 sq.ft.L=19.83'S1° 05' 17"E74.56N84° 47' 30"E70.54N35° 09' 25"W93.25N26° 44' 50"E67.03L=19.83'S66° 27' 46"E76.5642.43'L=12.05'25.38'40.00'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.0040.00'R=20.00'L=24.87'Δ=71°15'26LOT 223452 sq.ft.LOT 233000 sq.ft.LOT 243000 sq.ft.R=52.00'Δ=71°15'26"64.87'N19°42'50"E 172.43S19°42'50"W 155.3839.71'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2ˆPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Nov/19/20155352.002LOT 22BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ11/2015(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 21OR 23).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERFSETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE10' UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKVERMEER LANESIDEWALKOPEN SPACEMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.PARKING AREA200 LOT 213513 sq.ft.L=19.83'N35° 09' 25"W93.25N26° 44' 50"E67.03L=19.83'S66° 27' 46"E76.5642.43'L=12.05'25.38'40.00'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.0040.00'40.00'54.90'R=LOT 223452 sq.ft.LOT 233000 sq.ft.LOT 243000 sq.ft.LOT 253000 sq.ft.R=52.00'Δ=71°15'26"64.87'25.12'N19°42'50"E 172.43S19°42'50"W 155.38N19°42'50"E 155.3840.00'228.15'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 23BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX TOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE 0LOT LINE WITH LOT 22 OR 24).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FTFROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE(WOONERF)ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEOPEN SPACESIDEWALKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.VERMEER LANE10' UTILITY EASEMENTSIDEWALKMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238PARKING AREA12'12'201 L=19.83'S66° 27' 46"E76.5642.43'L=12.05'25.38'40.00'50.00'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.0040.00'40.00'50.00'3452 sq.ft.LOT 233000 sq.ft.LOT 243000 sq.ft.LOT 253000 sq.ft.LOT 263750 sq.ft.LOT 123939 sq.ft.75.00'65.40'25.12'N19°42'50"E 172.43N70°17'10"W 121.00S19°42'50"W 155.38N19°42'50"E 155.3840.00'N19°42'50"E 388.15'228.15'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 24BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015(WOONERF)ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10' UTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238OPEN SPACESIDEWALKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.PARKING AREA12'12'PARKING AREA12'12'•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEXTOWNHOME (MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 24 OR 26).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDNECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEREAR OF THE LOT AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.VERMEER LANE202 25.38'40.00'50.00'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.0040.00'40.00'50.00'LOT 243000 sq.ft.LOT 253000 sq.ft.LOT 263750 sq.ft.75.00'36.09'30.00'S70°17'10"E 173.0965.40'N19°42'50"E 172.43N70°17'10"W 121.00S19°42'50"W 155.3840.00'16.00'16.00'N19°42'50"E 388.15'228.15'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 25BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 24 OR 26).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND NECESSARYBUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF LOTAND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.WESTMORLAND DRIVEPARKING AREA12'12'(WOONERF)VERMEER LANEMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238SIDEWALKOPENSPACE10' UTILITY EASEMENTFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.203 40.00'50.00'S70° 17' 10"E75.00S70° 17' 10"E75.0040.00'40.00'50.00'LOT 243000 sq.ft.LOT 253000 sq.ft.45.00'LOT 263750 sq.ft.75.00'30.00'S70°17'10"E 173.09N19°42'50"E 172.43S70°17'10"E 173.09N70°17'10"W 121.00S19°42'50"W 155.3840.00'40.00'16.00'16.00'N19°42'50"E 388.15'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 26BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,DUPLEX LIMITED, DUPLEX TOWNHOME(MUST UTILIZE 0 LOT LINE WITH LOT 25).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND NECESSARY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.WESTMORLAND DRIVE15 FT STREET SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238PARKING AREA12'12'SIDEWALKSIDEWALKOPENSPACEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.204 LOT 294000 sq.ft.LOT 284000 sq.ft.LOT 274500 sq.ft.18.09'40.00'45.00'S19° 42' 50"W100.0045.00'40.00'S19° 42' 50"W100.00S19° 42' 50"W100.00S70°17'10"E 173.09S70°17'10"E 173.09N70°17'10"W 121.00S70°17'10"E 143.0940.00'40.00'16.00'100.00'30.00'30.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 27-28BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOMEDUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVE15FT STREET SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACESETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOMEDUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACEOPEN SPACESIDEWALKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.SIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238205 LOT 304201 sq.ft.LOT 294000 sq.ft.LOT 284000 sq.ft.L=47.23'L=25.93'18.09'40.00'45.00'40.00'18.09'L=21.91'S17° 24' 33"W100.00S19° 42' 50"W100.00S19° 42' 50"W100.00S19° 42' 50"W100.0036.09'S70°17'10"E 173.09S70°17'10"E 173.09S70°17'10"E 143.0940.00'40.00'LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 29-30BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015WESTMORLAND DRIVE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOMEDUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSEDFROM THE STREET AND SET BACK20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTYLINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYSENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5 FT SIDE SETBACK•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOMEDUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSEDFROM THE STREET AND SET BACK20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTYLINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYSENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEOPEN SPACESIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.206 LOT 324364 sq.ft.LOT 304201 sq.ft.L=47.26'L=47.27'L=47.23'=25.93'18.09'L=21.91'L=40.00'L=40.00'L=40.0S9° 05' 52"W100.00S13° 15' 53"W100.00S17° 24' 33"W100.00LOT 334363 sq.ft.R=550.00'Δ=19°55'51"R=650.00'Δ=20°04'57"LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 31-32BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015WESTMORLAND DRIVE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.15FT STREET SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACESIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238207 LOT 344364 sq.ft.LOT 324364 sq.ft.S0° 45' 51"W100.00L=9.42'L=40.00'S4° 56' 16"W100.00L=47.28'L=47.26'L=47.27'L=40.00'L=40.00'S9° 05' 52"W100.00S13° 15' 53"WLOT 334363 sq.ft.R=550.00'Δ=19°55'51"R=650.00'Δ=20°04'57"LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 33-34BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015WESTMORLAND DRIVE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.15FT STREET SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACESIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:1238208 LOT 364500 sq.ft.LOT 344364 sq.ft.S0° 13' 01"E100.0045.00'45.00'30.58'LOT 354086 sq.ft.L=11.13'S0° 13' 01"E100.00S0° 45' 51"W100.0030.58'L=9.42'L=40.00'S4° 56' 16"W100.00L=47.28'N89°46'59"E 158.00N89°46'59"E 73.86N89°46'59"E 157.38LOT EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 2PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERDRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 20152880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\002\ACAD\Exhibits\Phase 1 and 2 Lot Exhibits\PHASE 2.dwg Plotted by cody farley on Aug/19/20155352.002LOT 35-36BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJKDJ07/2015WESTMORLAND DRIVE•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.15FT STREET SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK20FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 5O%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACESIDEWALK10' UTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUMBUILDING HEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTLESS THAN3:12323:12 TO 6:12346:12 TO 9:1236GREATERTHAN 9:123810FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK209 59 Appendix C2: The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Building Envelopes The following lot exhibits describe allowable land uses, lot coverage, lot areas and widths, setbacks and driveway requirements. 210 PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 1-50THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT LAYOUT OVERVIEWBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702W E S T M O R L A N D D R I V EFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.WESTGATE AVENUE ARNHEM WAYWOONERF DURSTON ROAD EXISTI N G P H A S E 2 F U TUR E PH ASE 4 OPENSPACEOPENSPACE211 LOT 13651 sq.ft.LOT 23355 sq.ft.LOT 213895 sq.ft.N70°17'10"W74.13'N70°17'10"WL=51.33'31.89'L=42.28'S3°53'09"W83.06'L=52.64'60.00' 50.00' 45.00' L=46.70'L=50.03'L=18.01'18.80'27.00'L=42.28'S70°17'10"E6.38' 6.38'00'21'11"PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 1THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 2).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTPHAS E 2 O P E N S P A C E 5FT SET BACK15 FT WO O N E R F S E T B A C K 10FT O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K ARNHEM W A Y (WOONER F )15FT STREET SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVE10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.212 LOT 13651 sq.ft.LOT 23355 sq.ft.LOT 33369 sq.ft.LOT 213895 sq.ft.45.00'N70°17'10"W74.13'N70°17'10"W74.74'L=51.33'L=31.89'L=37.32'07'L=42.28'S3°53'09"W83.06' 50.00' 45.00' 45.00' L=46.70'L=50.03'L=18.01'18.80'27.00'L=42.28'S70°17'10"E6.38' 6.38'R=20.00'Δ=91°21'11"R=13Δ=89° 1 2'1 N19°2 3 ' 0 0 " EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 2THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTPHASE 2 O P E N S P A C E 15 FT W O O N E R F S E T B A C K 10FT O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K ARNH E M W A Y (WOO N E R F )5 FT SIDE SETBACKWESTMORLAND DRIVE10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)5 FT SIDE SETBACKFOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST USE ZERO LOTLINE WITH LOT 1)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.24FTPARKI N G A R E A 213 LOT 23355 sq.ft.LOT 33369 sq.ft.LOT 53705 sq.ft.2510 sq.ft.LOT 21LOT 43375 sq.ft.45.00'32.00'N70°17'10"W74.74'N70°17'10"W75.00'2'L=24.54'L=20 .2 4' N1°55'41"W66.42'L=31.89'=37.32'45.00' 45.00' 45.00' 43.15'N70°17'10"W75.00'45.00' 45.49' 45.00' L=18.01' S19°23 ' 0 0 " W 25.62' 27.00'R=20.00'Δ=91°21'11"R=13 . 0 0 'Δ=89° 1 2'1 6 "N19°23' 0 0 " EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 3THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST USE ZERO LOTLINE WITH LOT 4)•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTPHASE 2 O P E N S P A C E 5FT SET BACK15 FT W O O N E R F S E T B A C K 10FT O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K ARNH E M W A Y (WOO N E R F )10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SET BACKDRIVEWAY EASEMENT FOR LOT 4FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.24FTPARKI N G A R E A 214 OPEN SPACE A0.63 acs. LOT 23355 sq.ft. LOT 33369 sq.ft. LOT 53705 sq.ft. LOT 43375 sq.ft.45.00'32.00' N70°1 7 ' 1 0 " W 74.13' N70°1 7 ' 1 0 " W 74.74' N70°17 ' 1 0 " W 75.00' 4.54' L =2 0 .24'65.94'3'L = 3 1.89'45.00'45.00'45.00'43.15'N70°17 ' 1 0 " W 75.00'45.00'45.49'45.00'L=18.01'S19°23'00"W25.62'27.00'R = 2 0 . 0 0' Δ = 9 1 ° 2 1'11" R =1 3 .00'Δ =8 9 °1 2 '16"N19°23'00"E PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 4 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. OPEN SPACE ZERO L O T L I N E15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT OP E N S P A C E S E T B A C K DURSTON SIDEWALK ARNHEM W A Y (WOONER F ) DRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 4 •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, TOWNHOMEDUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 3).. •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERFAND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL. ZERO L O T L I N E 5FT SI D E S E T B A C K PHASE 2 OPEN SPACE10FTUTILITY E A S E M E N T24FTPARKING AREA215 LOT 33369 sq.ft.LOT 53705 sq.ft.LOT 62510 sq.ft.LOT 72400 sq.ft.45.00'32.00'N70°17'10"WL=40.52'L=24.54'L=20 . 2 4' N1°55'41"W 66.42'65.94'40.00'L=37.32'L=20.07'21.77'35.45'45.00' 45.49'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.35'40.00'N1°55'41"W60.00' 45.00' S19°23 ' 0 0 " W 25.62'17.72'L=12.28'R=13. 0 0 'Δ=89° 1 2'16" N19°23 ' 0 0 " EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 5,6THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 55%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.•FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PORCHES FRONTING DURSTON MAYENCROACH 5FT INTO THE 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTOPEN SPACEZERO LOT LINE ZERO LOT LINE 5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK15FT W O O N E R F S E T B A C K 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKDURSTON SIDEWALKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)ARNHE M W A Y (WOON E R F )DRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 410ftUTILITY EASEMENTPARKING STALLS9'8'9'216 LOT 62510 sq.ft.LOT 72400 sq.ft.LOT 82400 sq.ft.LOT 92400 sq.ft.L=40.52'N1°55'41"W 60.00'40.00'40.00'N1°55'41"W60.00'L=37.32'L=20.07'21.77'35.45'43.20'44.08'S88°04'19"W 675.56'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.35'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.00'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.00'17.72'L=12.28'S88°04'19"WS88°04'19"WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 7,8THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTOPEN SPACEZERO LOT LINE ZERO LOT LINE 5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKDURSTON SIDEWALKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK OPEN SPACEPARKING STALLS9'8'9'PARKING STALLS9'8'9'•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 55%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.•FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PORCHES FRONTING DURSTON MAYENCROACH 5FT INTO THE 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK.217 LOT 82400 sq.ft.LOT 92400 sq.ft.LOT 102400 sq.ft.LOT 112386 sq.ft.N1°55'41"W 60.00'40.00'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.00' S1°55'41"E 60.00'39.77'39.77'30.08'40.00'43.20'44.08'44.74'23.08'S88°04'19"W 675.56'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00'N1°55'41"W 60.00' S1°55'41"E60.00'S88°04'19"WS88°04'19"WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 9,10THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTOPEN SPACEZERO LOT LINE ZERO LOT LINE 5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKDURSTON SIDEWALKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK OPEN SPACEPARKING STALLS9'8'9'•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 55%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.•FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PORCHES FRONTING DURSTON MAYENCROACH 5FT INTO THE 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK.24FTPARKING AREA24FTPARKING AREA218 LOT 102400 sq.ft.LOT 112386 sq.ft.LOT 122604 sq.ft.N1°55'41"W 40.00'3.59'L=32.43'S1°55'41"E 60.00' S1°55'41"E 60.00'39.77'43.48'25.49'39.77'30.08'40.00'35.45'23.08'30.00'37.50'26.91'=30.4 0' 15.76'45.00'29.24'15.76' S1°55'41"E 60.00'43.48'35.45'32.00'R=20.00' 87°05'1 8 "R=20.00'Δ=92°54'42"PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 11,12THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTZERO LOT LINE ZERO LOT LINE 15FT WOONERF SETBACK 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKDURSTON SIDEWALKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK OPEN SPACE15FT WOONERF SETBACKDRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 38•AUTHORIZED USES: TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 55%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.•FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PORCHES FRONTING DURSTON MAYENCROACH 5FT INTO THE 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK.24FTPARKING AREA24FTPARKING AREA219 LOT 134516 sq.ft. LOT 143563 sq.ft. LOT 154797 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.43'25.49'39.77'30.08'S1°55'41"E95.00'S1°55'41"E95.00'25 .27 '9.24'30.00'37.50'L=79.5 7'L =3 0 .0 2 '25 .27 ' 26.91'L=30.40'S1°55'41"E97.41'19 .25 'S0°59'02"W73.65'L=2.46'L=59.72'45.00'45.00'43.57'L=31.59'L=31.59'R=20.00'Δ=87°05'18"0 .00' 2°54'42"S0°59'02"WS88°04'19"W 50.72'S88°04'19"W 37.50'  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 13 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.ZERO LOT LINE15FT WOONERF SETBACK ARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 14) •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL. 15FT SETBACK 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 15FT WOONERF SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKARNHEM WAY (WOONERF)ZERO LOT LINE24FT PARKING AREA 24FTPARKING AREA24FTPARKING AREA220 LOT 134516 sq.ft. LOT 143563 sq.ft. LOT 154797 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.2.43'25.49'39.77'30.08'S1°55'41"E95.00'S1°55'41"E95.00'25.27 '9.24'30.00'37.50' L =79 .57 'L =3 0 .0 2 '25.27 ' 26.91'L=30.40'S1°55'41"E97.41'19.2 5 'S0°59'02"W73.65'L=2.46'L=59.72'45.00'45.00'43.57'L=31.59'L=31.59'R=20.00'Δ=87°05'18"= 2 0 .00' = 9 2°5 4'42"S0°59'02"WS88°04'19"W 50.72'S88°04'19"W 37.50'  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 14 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION.ZERO LOT LINE5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT WOONERF SETBACK ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZEZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 13). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.ZERO LOT LINE10FTUTILITY EASEMENT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 15FT SETBACKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)5FT SIDE SETBACK24FT PARKING AREA 221 LOT 134516 sq.ft. LOT 143563 sq.ft. LOT 154797 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.S1°55'41"E95.00'S1°55'41"E95.00'25.2 7 '9.24'L=79 .5 7'L =3 0 .0 2 '25.2 7 'S1°55'41"E97.41'S0°59'02"W73.65'L=2.46'L=59.72' 2 1 . 6 8 'L=13.92'L=37.42 '43.57'L=31.59'L=31.59' L = 1 7.8 5' 2 3 . 7 0 '72.00'N50°56'59"ES88°04'19"W 50.72'S88°04'19"W 37.50'  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/6/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 15 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 06/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 1 0 F T O PEN S PACESETB ACK 1 5 F T W O O N E R F S E T B A C K WEST M O RLA N D D RI VE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL. 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 5FT SIDE SETBACKARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)15FT ST R E ET S ET B A C K 222 LOT 143563 sq.ft.LOT 164072 sq.ft. LOT 173910 sq.ft. LOT 183544 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.39.77'30.08'40.00'S1°55'41"E95.00'25 .27 '9.24'44.08'44.74'23.08'30.00'37.50'9.57'L =3 0 .0 2 '25 .27 'S1°55'41"E97.41'19.25 ' L =4 5 .6 3 'L =3 6 .4 4 ' L =3 6 .S17°46'34"E103.63'S13°40'40"E92.78'= 40.00'30.00' R =4 5 S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W 37.50'  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 16 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTMO R L A N D D RI V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 17). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT ST R E E T S E T B A C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT5FT S IDE SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKZERO LOT L INEZERO LOT L INE 24FT PARKING AREA 24FT PARKING AREA 223 LOT 143563 sq.ft.LOT 164072 sq.ft. LOT 173910 sq.ft. LOT 183544 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.39.77'30.08'40.00'S1°55'41"E95.00'2 5 . 2 7 '9.24'44.08'44.74'23.08'30.00'37.50'79 .57'L =3 0 .0 2 '2 5 . 2 7 'S1°55'41"E97.41'19.25 ' L =4 5 .6 3 'L =3 6 .4 4 'L =3 6 .S17°46'34"E103.63'S13°40'40"E92.78'L 40.00'30.00' R =4 5 S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W 37.50'  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 17 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTMO R L A N D D RI V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 16). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT STR E E T S E T B A C K 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 5FT S IDE SETBACKZERO LOT L INEZERO LOT L INE 5FT S IDE SETBACK 24FT PARKING AREA 24FT PARKING AREA 224 LOT 164072 sq.ft. LOT 173910 sq.ft. LOT 183544 sq.ft. LOT 193310 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.40.00' 35.45'43.20'44.08'44.74' L =4 5 .6 3 'L =3 6 .4 4 ' L =3 6 .3 0 'S17°46'34"E103.63'S13°40'40"E92.78'L =36.3 0 'S9°03'21"E85.55'L=30.01'S4°26'01"E81.92'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00' 5 '5 1" R =4 5 0 .0 0 'L =3 71.8 8 'Δ =4 7 °2 0 '57 " S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 18 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTMORLA N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 19). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT STREET S E T B A C K 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT5FT S IDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT L INE5FT SIDE SETBACK PARKING STALLS 9'8'9' 225 LOT 173910 sq.ft. LOT 183544 sq.ft. LOT 193310 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.35.45'43.20'44.08'44.74' L =3 6 .4 4 'L =3 6 .3 0 'S13°40'40"E92.78'L =3 6 .30 'S9°03'21"E85.55'L=30.01'S4°26'01"E81.92'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00'S0°36'47"E81.55'17.72' R =4 5 0 .0 0 'L =3 7 1.8 8 'Δ =4 7°20 '5 7" S88°04'19"W S88°04'19"W  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 19 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTMORLA N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 18). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT STREET SETBA C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT 5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT L INE 5FT SIDE SETBACKPARKING STALLS 9'8'9' PARKING STALLS 9'9'9' 226 LOT 193310 sq.ft. LOT 213895 sq.ft. LOT 203178 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.L=40.52' L=24.54'N1°55'41"WL=51.33'L = 3 1.89' L=37.32' L=20.07'21.77'35.45'43.20' L =3 6.3 0'L=3 0.01'L=35.34'L=42.28'S4°26'01"E81.92'S3°53'09"W83.06'N1°55'41"W40.00'40.00'S0°36'47"E81.55'17.72'L=12.28' L=42.28' 47°20'5 7 "6.38'R = 2 0 . 0 0' Δ = 9 1 ° 2 1'11"  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 20 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTMORLAND DRIVE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 21). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL. ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT STREET SETBACK10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACKPARKING STALLS 9'8'9' PARKING STALLS 9'9'9' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 227 LOT 213895 sq.ft. LOT 203178 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.32.00' L=40.52' L=24.54' L=2 0 .24'L=51.33'L = 3 1. 8 9' L=37.32' L=20.07'21.77'35.45' L=3 0.01'L=35.34'L=42.28'S3°53'09"W83.06'L=46.70'40.00' L=50.03'S0°36'47"E81.55'L=18.01'S19°23'00"W25.62'17.72'L=12.28'27.00'L=42.28'6.38'6.38'R = 2 0 .00' Δ = 9 1° 2 1'11"R =1 3 .00'Δ=8 9 °1 2'16"N19°23'00"E PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 21 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 15FT WOONE R F S E T B A C K WESTMORLAND DRIVE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 20). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 15FT STREET SETBACK 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEPARKING STALLS 9' PARKING STALLS 9'8'9'ARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)15FT WOONERF SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 228 LOT 224964 sq.ft. LOT 234613 sq.ft. LOT 244617 sq.ft. S87°11'18"E 39.07' S79°28'29"E 39.09' S71°56' 3 3 " E 44.91'S14°32'57"W100.12'S6°48'55"W100.23'L=52.64' L=52.64' L=35.16' 18.80'100.00'60.00'L=50.03' 18.80' S70°17 ' 1 0 " E S70°17 ' 1 0 " E6.38' PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 22 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTMORLA N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 23). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.ARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)15FT S T R E E T S E T B A C K 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K PHASE 2 OPEN SPACETRAILOPEN SPACE TRAIL 229 LOT 224964 sq.ft. LOT 234613 sq.ft. LOT 244617 sq.ft. S87°11'18"E 39.07' S79°28'29"E 39.09' S71°56' 3 3 " E 44.91'S14°32'57"W100.12'S6°48'55"W100.23'L=52.64'S0°55'04"E100.32'L=52.64' L=35.16' 18.80'100.00'L=50.03' S70°17 ' 1 0 " E S70°17 ' 1 0 " E  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 23 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTMORLA N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 22). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.ARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)15FT STREE T S E T B A C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT 5FT SIDE SETBACKZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT OPEN S P A C E S E T B A C K PHASE 2 OPEN SPACETRAILOPEN SPACE5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAIL 230 LOT 234613 sq.ft. LOT 244617 sq.ft.LOT 254622 sq.ft.LOT 264624 sq.ft. N71°46'04 " E N77°20'43"E 39.05'N85°05'54"E 39.07'S87°11'18"E 39.07' S79°28'29"E 39.09'S6°48'55"W100.23'L =5 2 .6 4 ' L =5 2.65'L=52.64'S0°55'04"E100.32'S8°39'10"E100.40'LR=3 9 0 .0 0 'L =4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =5 8 °4 5 '51" =4 5 0 .0 0 'L  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 24 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTMORLAND DRIVE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 25). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. 15FT STREET SETBACK10FT UTILITY EASEMENT ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK OPEN SPACE 5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAIL 231 LOT 234613 sq.ft. LOT 244617 sq.ft.LOT 254622 sq.ft.LOT 264624 sq.ft. N71°46'04 " E N77°20'43"E 39.05'N85°05'54"E 39.07'S87°11'18"E 39.07' S79°28'29"E 39.09'S6°48'55"W100.23'L =5 2 .6 4 ' L =5 2.65'L=52.64'S0°55'04"E100.32'S8°39'10"E100.40'LR=3 9 0 .0 0 'L =4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =5 8 °4 5 '51" =4 5 0 .0 0 'L  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 1 thru 25.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 25 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTMORLAND DRIVE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 24). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. 15FT STREET SETBAC K 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINE5FT SIDE SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBAC K OPEN SPACE5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAIL 232 LOT 254622 sq.ft.LOT 264624 sq.ft. LOT 27 4169 sq.ft. L N71°46'04 " E 24.21' N77°20'43"E 39.05' N85°05'54"E 39.07' L =5 2 .0 4 'L =5 2 .6 4 ' L =5 2.65'S8°39'10"E100.40'S16°23'11"E100.49'N24°01 '53 "W 4 6 .86 ' N 3 9 ° 0 3 ' 0 1 "W 5 5 . 6 7 ' N58°1 5' 3 6" E 45.37' N 3 9 ° 0 3 ' 0 1 "W 6 0 . 0 9 ' R =3 9 0 .0 0 'L =4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =5 8 °4 5 '51"  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 26 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTMOR L A N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 27). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. 15FT STREET S E T B A C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT OPEN S P A C E S E T B A C K OPEN SPACE5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAIL5FT SIDE SETBACK233 LOT 264624 sq.ft. LOT 274169 sq.ft. LOT 284394 sq.ft. L =3 0 .0 2 '1 9 . 2 5 ' L =4 5 .6 3 'N71°46'04 " E 24.21' N77°20'43"E 39.05' L =5 0 .8 8 'L =5 2 .0 4 'L =5 2 .6 4 'S8°39'10"E100.40'S16°23'11"E100.49'N24°01 '53 "W 46 .86 ' N 3 9 ° 0 3 ' 0 1 "W 5 5 . 6 7 ' N58°15'3 6" E45.37' S 3 9 ° 0 3 ' 0 1 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' N4 9 ° 2 0 ' 0 7 " W 43. 2 5 ' N 3 9 ° 0 3 ' 0 1 "W 6 0 . 0 9 ' R =3 9 0 .0 0 'L =4 0 0 .0 0 'Δ =5 8 °4  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 27 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. WESTM O R L A N D D RI V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 26). •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. 15FT ST R E E T S E T B A C K 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT ZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 10FT OP E N S P A C E SETBAC K OPEN SPACE 5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK TRAIL5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAI L 234 LOT 274169 sq.ft.LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 284394 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.N71°46 '04"E24.21 ' 45.00'3 1 . 0 8 ' L = 1 3.9 2' L = 3 7 . 4 2' L = 5 0 . 8 8 ' S16°23'11" E 100.49'N24°01'53"W46.86'N39°03'01"W55.67'4 5 . 0 0 ' N 5 8 ° 1 5 ' 3 6 " E 4 5 . 3 7 'S39°03'01"E100.02'S39°03'01"E100.00'N49°20'07"W43.25'N39°03'01"W60.09'S39°03'01"E100.00'N50°56'59"E N 5 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 9 " EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 28THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702WE S TMO R L A N D D R I V E•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 29).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.1 5 F T S TR E E T S E T B A C K10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT1 0 F T OP EN S P A C E S E T B A C K OPEN SPACE5FT SIDE SETBACKTRAIL5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACKARNHEM WAY235 LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 284394 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.L=55.55'17.38' 45 . 0 0 ' 3 1 . 0 8 ' L = 13.9 2' L = 3 7.4 2'N24°01'53"W46.86'1 1 . 5 0 ' 1 1 . 5 0 ' 4 5 . 0 0 'N5 8 ° 1 5 ' 3 6 "E 4 5 . 3 7 'S39°03'01"E100.02'S39°03'01"E100.00'N49°20'07"W43.25'N39°03'01"W60.09'S39°03'01"E100.00'72.00'N5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " E N50°56'59"E N 5 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 9 " E R=36.38'Δ=87°29'02"PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 29THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702WE S TM O R L A N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 28).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.1 5 F T S T R E E T S E T B A C K10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT1 0 F T O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K OPEN SPACE5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKARNHEM WAY236 LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 315183 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.S36°32'03"E65.28'L=55.55' 1 7 . 3 8 ' 4 5 . 0 0 ' 1 1 . 5 0 ' 1 1 . 5 0 ' 4 5 . 0 0 'S39°03'01"E100.02'S39°03'01"E100.00'S39°03'01"E100.00'56 . 5 9 ' 33 . 5 0 'L=45.63'57.01'N 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " E N 5 1 ° 1 4 ' 2 9 " E37.60'°52'52"R=36.38'Δ=87°29'02"R=27.18'Δ=96°11'30"S36°32'03"E 62.13'S 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 30THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702WE S TM O R L A N D D R I V E•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 31).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THESTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.1 5 F T S T R E E T S E T B A C K10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT1 0 F T O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K O P E N S P A C E 5FT SIDE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKWESTGATE AVENUEF U T U R E O P E N S P A C E237 LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 315183 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.S36°32'03"E65.28'L=55.55' 17 . 3 8 ' 4 5 . 0 0 ' 1 1 . 5 0 ' 1 1 . 5 0 'S39°03'01"E100.02'S39°03'01"E100.00'5 6 . 5 9 ' 33 . 5 0 'L=57.01'N 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " ES36°32'16"E64.55'R=37.60'Δ=86°52'52"R=36.38'Δ =87°29'02" S 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 31THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702W E S T M O R L A N D D R I V E 1 5 F T S T R E E T S E T B A C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINEZERO LOT LINEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT1 0 F T O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K 15FT S STREET SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACKWESTGATE AVENUE•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX, TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZERO LOT LINEWITH LOT 30).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROMTHE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.F U T U R E O P E N S P A C E238 LOT 334264 sq.ft.LOT 325259 sq.ft.21.68'4 5 . 0 0 'L=31.59'L=7.48'L =5 3 .7 5 'L=17.35'19.85'L=17.85'23.70'L=25.20'21.19'L=45.63'7 2 . 0 0 ' N 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " E N 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " ER=27.18'Δ=96°11'30"R =1 2 0 .0 0 'L =7 8 .5 8 'Δ =3 7 °31'16"N77°39'02"E96.86'N6 5 ° 0 3 '55 "E 101 .79 'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 32THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702W E S T M O R L A N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZEZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 33).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSEDFROM THE STREET OR WOONERFAND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.1 5 F T S T R E E T S E T B A C K 10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT L INE 5 FT S IDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERFSETBACKWESTGATE AVENUEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)ZERO LOT L INE 239 LOT 343912 sq.ft.LOT 334264 sq.ft.LOT 325259 sq.ft.L=59.72'L =3 1.5 9'L=31.59'46.05'L=7.48'L =5 3 .7 5 'L=17.35'19.85'L=17.85'23.70'37.91'L=22.15'L =5 0 .16 'L=20.35'L=25.20'54.77'L=45.63'7 2 . 0 0 ' N 5 0 ° 5 6 ' 5 9 " ER=27.18'Δ=96R =1 8 0 .0 0 'L =1 1 7 .8 7 'Δ =3 7 °3 1 '0 5 " R =1 2 0 .0 0 'L =7 8 .5 8 'Δ =3 7 °3 1'16 "N77°39'02"E96.86 'N65°03 ' 5 5 "E101.79 'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 33THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702W E S T M O R L A N D D R I V E •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH 32 OR 34).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT S IDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT L INEZERO LOT L INE 5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK15FT WOONERFSETBACKWESTGATE AVENUEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTARNHE WAY(WOONERF)ZERO LOT L INE240 LOT 354050 sq.ft.LOT 343912 sq.ft.LOT 334264 sq.ft.S0°59'02"W 73.65'L=2.46' 43.57'L=1.43'L =3 1.5 9'L=31.59'45.00'46.05'L=7.48'L =5 3 .7 5 'L=17.85'23.70'60.00'37.91'L=22.15'16 '5 " 0 0 'L =7 8 .5 8 'Δ =3 7 °3 1'16 "S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.01'N77°39'02"E96.86'N6 5 ° 0 3 '55 "E 1 01 .79 'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 34THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZE ZEROLOT LINE WITH LOT 33 OR 35).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINE5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTZERO LOT LINEARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 24FTPARKING AREA241 LOT 364050 sq.ft.LOT 354050 sq.ft.LOT 343912 sq.ft.L=30.4 0' S0°59'02"W 73.65'L=2.46'L=59.72'45.00'43.57'L=1.43'L =31.5 9 'L=3145.00'45.00'46.05'L=7.48'60.00'60.00'37.91'S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"W R=20.00' Δ=87°05 '1 8 " S0°59'02"W S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.01'N77°39'02"E96.86 'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 35THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY,TOWNHOME DUPLEX (MUST UTILIZEZERO LOT LINE WITH LOT 34).•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT(MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTZERO LOT LINE5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF)MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT24FTPARKING AREA242 LOT 374050 sq.ft.LOT 364050 sq.ft.LOT 354050 sq.ft.L=32.43'L=30.4 0' S0°59'02"W 73.65'2.46' 45.00'45.00'43.57'L=1.43'45.00'45.00'45.00' 60.00'60.00'S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"W R=20.00' Δ=87°05 '1 8 "R=20.00'Δ=92°54'42"S0°59'02"W N89°00'58"W90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.01'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 36THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 24FTPARKING AREA243 LOT 122604 sq.ft.LOT 134516 sq.ft.LOT 384050 sq.ft.LOT 374050 sq.ft.LOT 364050 sq.ft.3.59'L=32.43'35.45'L=30.4 0 ' S0°59'02"W 15.76'45.00'45.00'29.24'15.76' 45.00'45.00'45.00' 60.00'60.00' 35.45'32.00'S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"W R=20.00' Δ=87°05'1 8 "R=20.00'Δ=92°54'42"S0°59'02"W N89°00'58"W90.00'N89°00'58"W90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 37THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THEWOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENTMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHT5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 24FT PARKING AREA244 LOT 122604 sq.ft.LOT 384050 sq.ft.LOT 374050 sq.ft.3.59'L=32.43'35.45' .4 0' 15.76'45.00'29.24'15.76' 25.03'45.00'45.00' 30.12'60.00'60.08'35.45'32.00'20.00'05'1 8 "R=20.00'Δ=92°54'42"N89°00'58"W90.00'N89°00'58"W90.00'S89°00'58"E90.00'PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 38THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE WOONERF AND SET BACK 15FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT5 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK 15FT WOONERF SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE ARNHEM WAY(WOONERF)MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTDURSTON SIDEWALKOPEN SPACEDRIVEWAY EASEMENTFOR LOT 38245 LOT 396000 sq.ft.LOT 406000 sq.ft.25.03'45.00'45.00'138.02'S89°01'04"E100.00'60.00' 30.12'60.00'60.00'S89°00'58"E100.00'60.00'60.08'138.02'S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 39THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.10FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT5 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTDURSTON SIDEWALKOPEN SPACETRAILOPEN SPACE246 LOT 396000 sq.ft.LOT 406000 sq.ft.LOT 416000 sq.ft.45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00' 60.00' 60.00'60.00'60.00'S89°00'58"E100.00'S89°00'58"E100.00'60.00'N0°59'02"E60.00' S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 40THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.10FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT5 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTTRAILOPEN SPACE247 LOT 406000 sq.ft.LOT 416000 sq.ft.LOT 426010 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE B0.52 acs. 45.00'45.00'46.05' 449.00' 60.00'60.00'37.91'S89°00'58"E100.00'S89°00'58"E100.00'60.00'N0°59'02"E60.00'60.00' S0°59'02"W S0°59'02"WPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 41THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET SETBACK WESTGATE AVENUE MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTTRAIL OPEN SPACE248 LOT 436391 sq.ft.LOT 416000 sq.ft.LOT 426010 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE B0.52 acs. 45.00'46.05' L =5 3 .7 5 '449.00'S89°00'58"E101.36'60.00'37.91'L=22.15' L =5 0 .16 'S89°00'58"E100.00'N0°59'02"E60.00'60.00'70.00' 1 1 7 .8 7 'Δ =3 7 °3 1 '0 5 " R =1 2 0 .0 0 'L =7 8 .5 8 'Δ =3 7 °3 1'16 "PROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 42THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT10 FT SIDE SETBACK15FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET SETBACK WESTGATE ROAD MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTTRAIL OPEN SPACE249 LOT 436391 sq.ft.LOT 426010 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE B0.52 acs.'N80°13'54"E116.37'S89°00'58"E101.36'L=22.15' L =5 0 .1 6 'L=20.35'L=25.20'21.19'38.00'34.00 '54.77 ' 60.00'70.00' R =1 8 0 .0 0 'L =1 1 7 .8 7 'Δ =3 7 °3 1 '0 5 " L =7 8 .5 8 'Δ =3 7 °31'16 "N77°36'18"EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 43THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLEAND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROMTHE STREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN)FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGEDWHEN PRACTICAL.5FT SIDE SETBACK10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET S E T B A C K WESTGATE AVENUE MAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTTRAIL OPEN SPACE SIDEWALK 250 LOT 454407 sq.ft.LOT 444417 sq.ft.LOT 465041 sq.ft.L=17.35'19.85'N80°13'54"E116.37'L=20.35'L=25.20'21.19'L=42.46' 9. 3 1 'L=46.55'38.00'34.00'54.77 'S29°52'43"E93.71'S16°52'48"E100.99'L=45.63''15" S 5 6 ° 3 5 ' 0 4 "W 3 1 . 5 8 'R=27.18'Δ=96°11'30"R=26.13'Δ=93°07'08" R =1 8 0 .0 0 'L =1 1 7 .8 7N77°36'18"EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 44THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM EITHER STREETAND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK1 5 F T S TR E E T S E T BA C K WESTGATE AVENUEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTWE S TM O R L A N D D R I V E OPEN SPACE SIDEWALK 15FT STREET SETBACK251 LOT 454407 sq.ft.LOT 444417 sq.ft.LOT 465041 sq.ft.N80°13'54"E S0°59'02"W90.03'37.84'35'L=25.20'21.19'L=42.46' 9. 3 1 'L=46.55'L=25.50'42.64'38.00 '34.00 '54.77 'S29°52'43"E93.71'S16°52'48 " E 100.99' 2 3 . 5 9 'N89°00'58"WR=120.04'L=72.04'Δ=34°23'15" S 5 6 ° 3 5 ' 0 4 "W 3 1 . 5 8 ' S 5 6 ° 3 5 ' 0 4 "W R=26.13'Δ=93°07'08"N77°36'18"EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 45THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREETAND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACKWESTGATE AVENUEMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTWE S TM O R L A N D D R I V E OPEN SPACE SIDEWALK 5FT SIDE S E T B A C K TRAIL OPEN SPACE 252 LOT 454407 sq.ft.LOT 444417 sq.ft.LOT 465041 sq.ft.S0°59'02"W 90.03'37.84'L=25.20'21.19'9 . 3 1 'L=46.55'L=25.50'42.64'38.00 '34.00'54.77'S29°52'43"E93.71'S16°52'48 " E 100.99' S0°59'02"W 60.00'N89°00'58"WR=120.04'L=72.04'Δ=34°23'15" S 5 6 ° 3 5 ' 0 4 "W 3 1 . 5 8 'N77°36'18"EPROJECT NO.FIGURE NUMBERCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/25/2016DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007LOT 46THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3LOT EXHIBITBOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN07/20162880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702•AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY.•MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%.•GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREETAND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.•SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.10FTUTILITY EASEMENT15 FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK 15FT STREET SETBACKMAXIMUM BUILDINGHEIGHTROOF PITCHMAXIMUMBUILDINGHEIGHTWESTMORLAND DRIVEOPEN SPACE S IDEWALK 5FT SIDE S E T B A C K TRAIL OPEN SPACE 253 LOT 474500 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE C0.09 acs.LOT 485610 sq.ft. 37.84'45.00'N84°34'24"E 57.69'N0°59'02"E65.61'15.84 ' L =4 8 .45 '45.00'N0°58'49"E100.00'N0°58'49"E100.00'100.00'S0°59'02"W 60.00'37.83'R=56.00'Δ=21°16'10"N89°00'59"W R=180.8 9 ' Δ =15 °2 0 '45 " S89°00'54"E  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 47 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY ONLY. •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE STREETAND SET BACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL. 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT 10FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK5FT OPEN SPACE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WESTMORLAND DRIVE TRAIL5FT SIDE SETBACKFUTURE PHASE 4 OPEN SPACE 254 LOT 474500 sq.ft.LOT 485610 sq.ft. 45.00'N84°34'24"E 57.69'N75°16'23"E 33.24' L =2 5 .2 3'15.84 'S0°59'02"W56.61'N0°59'02"E65.61'15.84 ' L=4 8 .4 5 '45.00'N0°58'49"E100.00'N0°58'49"E100.00'R=88.00'Δ=21°16'10"R=56.00'Δ=21°16'10"N89°00'59"W R R =18 0.8 9 ' Δ =15 °2 0 '45 " R =1 80 .00 'Δ =8 °0 1 '49 "S89°00'54"E  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 48 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. 10FTUTILITY EASEMENT 10FT OPEN SPACE SE T B A C K5FT SIDE SETBACK15FT STREET SETBACK MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WESTMORLAND DRIVE WOONERF15FT WOONERF SETBACKFUTURE PHASE 4 OPEN SPACE •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLEFAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY WITH ADU,LIMITED DUPLEX. •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BYPRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORYBUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSEDFROM THE WOONERF AND SETBACK 15FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYSENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL.OPEN SPACE255 LOT 505925 sq.ft. LOT 495662 sq.ft. 5610 sq.ft. N75°16'23"E 33.24' N63°07' 4 3" E 86.94' N56°35'13" E64.64' 9.31' L =4 6 .5 5 'L=57.01'23.59' 12.56' L =2 5 .2 3 '15.84 'S0°59'02"W56.61'S 3 3 ° 2 4 ' 5 6 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 'N0°59'02"E65.61'15.84 'R=88.00'Δ=21°16'10"R=56.00'Δ=21°16'10"=3 4 °2 3 '1 5 "S56°3 5' 04" W R =1 8 0 .0 0 'Δ =8 °0 1 '4 9"S56°3 5' 04" W R=37.60'Δ =86°52'52"  PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 49 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLE FAMILYWITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX. •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE ANDACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM THE WOONERFAND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHEN PRACTICAL. 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 10FT O P E N S P A C E S E T B A C K 5 F T S ID E S E T B A C K15FT ST R E E T S E T B A C K MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WEST M O RL A N D D RI V E WOONERF15FT WOONERF SETBACKFUTUR E P H A S E 4 OPEN S P A C E 256 LOT 505925 sq.ft. LOT 495662 sq.ft. S 3 6 ° 3 2 ' 0 3 " EL=55.55'N63°07' 4 3" E 86.94' N56°3 5' 13" E 64.64' N53°42'03" E60.00'L=57.01'23.59'12.56' L =25 .23 'S0°59'02"W56.61'S 3 3 ° 2 4 ' 5 6 " E 1 0 0 . 0 0 ' S 3 6 ° 3 2 ' 1 6 " E 6 4 . 5 5 'R=88.00'Δ=21°16'10"S56°35'04" W 31.58' =18 0 .0 0 'Δ =8 °0 1'4 9"S56°35'04" W R=37.60'Δ=86°52'52"R=36.38'Δ=87°29'02"Δ PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Lot Exhibits\Ph 3 Lot Exhibits- 26 THRU 50.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/14/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 LOT 50 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 LOT EXHIBIT BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE FINAL PLAT FOR SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION. •AUTHORIZED USES: SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLEFAMILY WITH ADU, LIMITED DUPLEX. •MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE BY PRINCIPLE AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS- 50%. •GARAGES SHALL BE ACCESSED FROM EITHERSTREET AND SET BACK 20FT (MIN) FROM THEPROPERTY LINE. •SHARED DRIVEWAYS ENCOURAGED WHENPRACTICAL. 10FT UTILITY EASEMENT 10FT OPEN S P A CE S ET B A C K 5 F T S I D E S E TB ACK 15FT S T R E E T S E T B A C K MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ROOF PITCH MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WEST M O R L A N D D RI V E FUTUR E P H A S E 4 OPEN S P A C E 1 5 F T S T R E E T S E T B A C K WE S T G A T E A V E N U E 257 60 Appendix D: Woonerf Diagram The following diagram explains Section 6.3 Landscape: (a) Street / Woonerf Boulevard Plantings. 258 Perennials < 24-inches • Bloody Cranesbill • Max Frei Geranium • Bellflower varieties • Maiden Pink Dianthus • Bleeding Heart Dianthus • White Bleeding Heart Dianthus • Showy Daisy • Blanketflower varieties • Daylily varieties Boulders • 2-foot diameter max. Woonerf Boulevard Planting Diagram Shrubs < 4-feet • Bailadeline Dogwood • Littleleaf Mockorange • Snowflake Mockorange • Dart’s Gold Ninebark • Abbotswood Potentilla • Goldfinger Potentilla • Spirea varieties • St. Mary’s Broom Blue Spruce • Jakobsen Mugo Pine • White Bud Pine Shade Tree • Littleleaf Linden • American Linden • Norway Maple varieties • Bur Oak • Skyline Honey Locust Ornamental Trees: • Spring Snow Crabapple • Flame Amur Maple • Amur maackia • Mountain Frost Pear • Prairie Gem Pear Approved Driveway Length Varies 24-feet 12-feet 12-feetLength Varies Woonerf Walkway R.O.W. R.O.W. R.O.W.©Peaks to Plains Design2-foot concrete ribbon At-grade planting bed with edging, weed fabric & mulch12-inches from the property line to parking edge 9-feet 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 35 4 15-feet 259 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Maintenance Provision The Homeowners Association will maintain all non-public improvements including, but not limited to, parks, open spaces, private improvements and other improvements as noted below. Parks NOTE: While Phase 3 does not have a park, the homeowners will be responsible for their share of the park maintenance of the park provided with the overall PUD. The park system within the The Lakes at Valley West is diverse and requires different subsets of maintenance considerations within this area. Because over 9 acres of this area is dedicated for parkland, the master plan allows for certain areas to remain native, natural state versus a manicured park for ease of maintenance and to maintain species diversity. Depending on the seasonal moisture, native grass will be mowed 2 to 3 times per year. Generally the first time in mid-July, and the final time occurring in mid-October. The mow height will be a minimum of 6 inches, with 12 inches being the preferable. A noxious weed control program has been established with a local contractor. A yearly property check with two applications a year till turf is fully established once in June and the other in August. Once the turf is fully established then spaying will be cut down to one application per year in the month of June. This event is coordinated with the County Weed Supervisor, the NRCS agent and the City of Bozeman. This program can also be used to control the weeds in gravel walkways with spot application of a weed control agent as required. The City of Bozeman shall be notified of any and all applications of pesticides and/or herbicides on public lands. Signs shall be posted prior to application in appropriate and noticeable locations identifying the product applied. Signs will remain in place for a minimum of two (2) days after treatment. Records shall be maintained in accordance with the State of Montana Pesticide Act, Administration Rule 4.10.207 and copies submitted to the City of Bozeman Parks Division. Active use grass areas will have a mow height of no less than 3 inches and be allowed to grow to 4 or 4-1/2 inches before being mowed again. One can expect around 26 mows a year. Fescue blend lawn areas require roughly 9 inches of water between June 1st and September 1st. At peak demand this means roughly 0.75 inch of precipitation per week in lawn areas. For mature lawn areas, this water will be spread evenly through the week and in less frequent, deeper soakings. 260 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Fertilizing of grass and lawn areas is to be done as necessary, but not be overdone to minimize water needs and mowing and to protect sensitive areas. Lawns which have irrigation at head to head coverage will have two applications of fertilizer: The first will be a blend of 17-17-17 in May and then will have an application of 27-8-8 in mid-summer. As the lawns are establishing, the rate of fertilization will be approximately 40 lbs per 10,000 square feet. An established lawn will be fertilized at a rate of 60 lbs. per 10,000 square feet. Certain park areas have ground cover which requires full or partial irrigation. In areas where a full turf-type lawn is desired, an irrigation system will be placed with head to head coverage. The borders next to areas desired to be left in native grass state, a single row of heads is placed to allow for minimal watering to allow that transition. The irrigation system will need to be monitored to watch for breaks, vandalism and overall needs of the site. Areas which are "partially irrigated" or have only a single row of heads may be fertilized in a similar way. Bi-annual soil test will be taken to assess soil nutrient contents and adjust fertilizer rates accordingly. Any seed mix that has no irrigation or areas within 50 feet of a stream or wetland will not be fertilized and has no plan for regular application of fertilizer. This will minimize excess nutrient run-off that will adversely affect the water ecosystem. Trees and shrubs located within this corridor will be monitored and if deemed that they need fertilization, the use of capsule fertilizer will be utilized. In areas outside the corridor, the shade trees will be fertilized in April with 16-10-9 plus iron and zinc. Once trees and shrubs are established, they will be fertilized with tree food spikes. Do not fertilize trees and shrubs past mid to late July. Pruning of evergreens will occur in June. Shade trees will pruned in April, except maples and birch. Maple and Birch species will be pruned in mid to late July. During the fall once the leaves have fallen, they will be collected and removed. General monitoring for pests and diseases will be done throughout the year. Trees and shrubs will be deep watered right before the ground freezes. All trees on public property are subject to the City of Bozeman permits and ordinances as outlined in City Ordinance 12.30.040. The irrigation system will be charged in April, after the frost has left the ground and plant material begins to grow. All of the manual drain valves will be turned to the closed position. The power for the pump will be switched to the "on" position. Program or adjust the controller for the current month's watering needs. Check all heads to ensure that there is no breakage and that proper coverage is attained. Each month the heads and controller will be checked and adjusted for the weather. When repairing the sprinkler heads using different brands or nozzles are not recommended. This ensures that the coverage is efficient for the working pressure and disperses at an equal 261 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application precipitation rate. Ensure that the heads seated at a level which it is not damaged from mowing or maintenance equipment. Be sure to periodically check the drip emitters around the trees to ensure they are functioning properly. Winterization of the irrigation system typically occurs during the last week of October. At this time, the power to the well pump will be turned off. All manual drain valves will be opened. Use a high powered air pump to connect to many of the quick coupler valves around the system. Run air through the system, opening and closing each valve zone, until all of the water is completely out of the system. Turn off the controller and leave the water off until spring. If winter watering is necessary, this must be done manually from a tank to avoid damage to the system. Areas with higher use such as picnic structures and tables will need weekly garbage service. All residential garbage is the responsibility of the individual lot. The park system is currently maintained through the Homeowner's Association and these types of services will be included in that overall maintenance. Sidewalks, Streets, Woonerfs, and Alleys Concrete sidewalks located in the open space will have the snow removed within 24 hours of the end of any snowfall event as per Bozeman Ordinance 1529. Gravel trails will not have a regular snow removal schedule. The maintenance as well as the snow removal for the concrete sidewalks located in the open spaces will be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association. City standard streets will be maintained by the City of Bozeman which includes snow removal and overall street maintenance. The snow removal for the Woonerf's and Alley's will be completed for any snow event that is 2 inches or greater. The snow will be stored on-site. The snow removal and maintenance for the Woonerf's and Alley's will be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association. A rate study will be performed to establish Homeowner's Association fees based on maintenance requirements as well as long term replacement costs for the concrete sidewalks, Woonerf's, and Alley's. Implementation All park and open space areas will comply with the City of Bozeman requirements for implementation. Each preliminary plat subdivision phase will provide detailed landscape and irrigation plans in accordance with the overall master plan for any park land in that particular phase. Site grading, seeding, well development and irrigation infrastructure will be installed as required for subdivision regulations. All soils to be used on pubic park land shall be inspected 262 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application by and meet the approval of the City of Bozeman Parks Division Staff prior to installation and shall meet the minimum depth requirement of 10 inches. Additional amenities not required of the developer, but will be included in park improvements, include playground equipment, surfacing and drainage; benches, and picnic tables. The quality of the installed improvements will far exceed the minimum requirements necessary for the development. 263 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Noxious Weed Management and Re-vegetation Plan The applicant has entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding the full 65 acre development and has implemented the associated weed plan. Copies of the weed plan and the memorandum of understanding is included in this section. 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Preliminary Plat 277 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+23 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+006+990+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+23 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+006+99ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists41GALLATIN5352.0071"=500'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NWBASIS OF BEARINGTHE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE MODIFIED RECORDZ/E'^͘d,ZKZZ/E'͕E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϱ͕͘͟>KE'THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OFSECTION 9, WAS RECOMPUTED BASED ON THERE-ESTABLISHMENT OF OBLITERATED CORNERS BETWEENTHE ONE-QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 9 ANDSECTION 10, AND THE CORNER TO SECTIONS 3, 4, 9, ANDϭϬ͘d,Z^h>d/E'Z/E'/^E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϬ͘͟LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATOWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOTI, Daniel J. Boers, Montana Professional Land Surveyor License No. 14732LS, hereby certify that the Final Plat ofThe Lakes at Valley West Phase 3 was surveyed under my supervision between January 2016 and July 2016, andplatted the same as shown on the accompanying plat and as described in accordance with the provisions of the0RQWDQD6XEGLYLVLRQDQG3ODWWLQJ$FW†WKURXJK†0&$DQGWKH%R]HPDQ8QLILHGDevelopment Ordinance. I further certify that monuments which have not been set by the filing date of thisinstrument will be set by March 2017, due to public improvements construction pursuant to 24.183.1101(1)(d) A.R.M.Dated this___________day of_________________, 2016.________________________________________________________Daniel J. Boers, PLS, CFedSMT Reg. #14732LSMorrison-Maierle, Inc.THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC.______________________________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday, Authorized Representative DatedState of ____________________________________County of ___________________________________On this ________________ day of ___________________________, 2016, before me, the undersignedNotary Public for the State of _____________________ personally appeared _______________________,known to me to be the Authorized Representative of The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC. andacknowledged to me that said LLC executed the same.Notary Public in and for the State of ___________________Printed Name _____________________________________Residing at _______________________________________My commission expires _____________________________CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTSI, James M. Kilday and I, James R. Nickelson, a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in theState of Montana, hereby certify that the following improvements, required to meet the requirements of Chapter38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or as Conditions of Approval of the Final Plat of The Lakes at Valley WestPhase 3, have been installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, or financiallyguaranteed and covered by the improvements agreement accompanying this plat.Installed Improvements:Financially Guaranteed Improvements:The subdivider hereby warrants against defects in these improvements for a period of two years from the date ofacceptance by the City of Bozeman.The subdivider grants possession of all public infrastructure improvements to the City of Bozeman and the Cityhereby accepts possession of all public infrastructure improvements, subject to the above indicated warranty.___________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday Authorized RepresentativeDatedThe Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC.___________________________________________________________________James R. Nickelson, No. 9063PEDatedMorrison Maierle, Inc.___________________________________________________________________Craig WoolardDatedDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaI, Craig Woolard, Director of Public Service, City of Bozeman, Montana, do hereby certify that theaccompanying plat has been duly examined and has found the same to conform to the law, approve it, andhereby accept the dedication to the City of Bozeman for the public use of any and all lands shown on the platas being dedicated to such use.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Craig WoolardDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaI, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat hasbeen duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the landto being divided have been paid.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Kimberly BuchananTreasurerGallatin County, Montana_________________________________________Tax ID No.CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURERI, Charlotte Mills, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrumentwas filed in my office at _______ o'clock, __________(a.m., or p.m.), this _________ day of ______________,2016, and recorded in Book ______ of Plats on page __________, and Document # ____________________,Records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Charlotte MillsClerk and RecorderGallatin County, MontanaCERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDERThe Lakes at Valley West-Phase 3, Gallatin County, Montana, is within the City of Bozeman, Montana, a first classmunicipality, and with the planning area of the Bozeman growth policy which was adopted pursuant to Section 76-1-601et seq., MCA, and can be provided with adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal facilities. Thereforeunder the provisions of Section 76-4-125(2)(d), MCA, this survey is excluded from the requirement for MontanaDepartment of Environmental Quality review.Dated this ________________________ day of _______________________________, 2016.________________________________Craig WoolardDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaCERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEWCERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICECERTIFICATE OF SURVEYORWe, the undersigned property owners, do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, subdivided andplatted into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and other divisions and dedications, as shown by the plat hereuntoincluded the following described tract of land to wit:Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West, being Lot R2 of The Lakes at Valley West - Phase 1 & Phase 2, Plat-VLWXDWHGLQWKH1(ó1:óRI6HFWLRQ7RZQVKLS6RXWK5DQJH(DVWPrincipal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows:Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East,Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572,Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; thence1ƒ (IRUIHHWWRWKH:HVW2QHVL[WHHQWK&RUQHUEHWZHHQ6HFWLRQDQG6HFWLRQWKHQFH6ƒ :IRUIHHWDORQJWKHHDVWERXQGDU\RIWKH1:ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWRDSRLQWRQWKHVRXWKright-of-way of Durston Road, the Point of BeginningWKHQFH1ƒ (IRUIHHWDORQJWKHVRXWKright-of-way of Durston Road to the northwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence6ƒ ´(IHHWWRDQDQJOHSRLQWRQWKHZHVWERXQGDU\RI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRDQDQJOHSRLQWRQWKHZHVWERXQGDU\RI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH6ƒ ´(IHHWWRWKHVRXWKZHVWFRUQHURI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH1ƒ ´(IHHWWRDSRLQWRQWKHZHVWULJKWRIZD\RI1RUWK/DXUHO3DUNZD\WKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRDSRLQWRQWKHQRUWKERXQGDU\RIWKH6(ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRWKH1RUWKZHVW2QHVL[WHHQWK&RUQHURI6HFWLRQWKHQFH1ƒ (IRUIHHWDORQJWKHHDVWERXQGDU\RIWKH1:ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWRthe Point of Beginning.The Area of the above described tracts of land is 1,376,730 square feet, or 31.605 acres, more or less.7KHDERYHGHVFULEHGWUDFWRIODQGLVWREHNQRZQDQGGHVLJQDWHGDV³The Lakes at Valley West - Phase 3´&LW\of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or publiclands shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use andenjoyment. Unless specifically listed herein, the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or publiclands dedicated to the public are accepted for public use, but the City of Bozeman accepts no responsibility formaintaining the same. The owner agrees that the City of Bozeman has no obligation to maintain the landsincluded in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or public lands, hereby dedicated to public use. The landsincluded in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or public lands dedicated to the public for which the City ofBozeman accepts responsibility for maintenance include Westmorland Drive and Westgate Avenue.The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person firm or corporation, whether public or private,providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas, internet, cable television or other similar utility orservice, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of theirlines and other facilities in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement" tohave and to hold forever.CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATIONCOTTONWOOD ROADVICINITY MAPBABCOCK ST.DURSTON RD.PROJECT AREAVICINITY MAPAll streets, alleys, and rights-of-way, shown hereon as "DEDICATED", are not easements.The intent of the dedication is to convey all the streets, alleys, and rights-of-way to the public,upon acceptance by the governing authority.DEDICATION AND EASEMENT NOTELAUREL PARKWAY2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702PHASE 1PHASE 2LAUREL GLENSUBDIVISIONWEST BROOKESUBDIVISIONPHASE 1VALLEY WESTSUBDIVISIONNORTON EAST RANCHSUBDIVISIONBRONKENPARKC.O.S.1851C.O.S.1851278 NW 1/16C-N 1/161337.16'670.28'6ƒ : 6ƒ : 6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 609.00'1ƒ (12.50'6ƒ :50.06'1ƒ ( 1ƒ :82.84'6ƒ :57.69'6ƒ :33.24'6ƒ :86.94'6ƒ :64.64'6ƒ :60.00'6ƒ :90.09'6ƒ (         6ƒ (25.00'6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( R =280 .00' L=121.0 0' ǻ =2 4 ƒ4 5'39 " C B =N2 4 ƒ09 '14"W CH =12 0.06'1ƒ    : 62.13'FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED0255,6210$,(5/(,1&$7$32,176ƒ (FEET FROM THE POINT SHOWN ON C.O.S. 1005B, & N.ƒ ()((7)5207+(32,17)257+(SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF C.O.S. 1581W 1/16ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists42GALLATIN5352.0071"=10007/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NWBASIS OF BEARINGTHE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE MODIFIED RECORDZ/E'^͘d,ZKZZ/E'͕E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϱ͕͘͟>KE'THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OFSECTION 9, WAS RECOMPUTED BASED ON THERE-ESTABLISHMENT OF OBLITERATED CORNERS BETWEENTHE ONE-QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 9 ANDSECTION 10, AND THE CORNER TO SECTIONS 3, 4, 9, ANDϭϬ͘d,Z^h>d/E'Z/E'/^E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϬ͘͟LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATOWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOTLOT 6LOT 7LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12LOT 13LOT 14LOT 15LOT 16LOT 17LOT 18LOT 19LOT 20LOT 21LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 8LOT 7LOT 6LOT 5LOT 4LOT 3LOT 2LOT 1LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 19 LOT 20 LOT 12LOT 11LOT 10LOT 9LOT 36LOT 35LOT 34LOT 33LOT 32LOT 31LOT 30LOT 29LOT 28LOT 16LOT 15LOT 14LOT 13LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26 LOT 27 LOT 2 8 LOT 2 9 LOT 30 LOT 3 1 LOT 5 0 LOT 4 9 LOT 48 LOT 47LOT 46 LOT 45 LOT 4 4 LOT 43LOT 42LOT 41LOT 40LOT 39LOT 38LOT 37LOT 36LOT 35LOT 34LOT 33LOT 32LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 15LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 19 LOT 20 LOT 21 LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4WESTGATE AVENUELAUREL PARKWAYWESTMORLAND DRIVEDURSTON ROADWESTGATEAVENUELAUREL PARKWAYLEGENDRIGHT-OF-WAYPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTFOUND REBAR WITH A PLASTIC CAPFOUND REBAR WITH AN ALUMINUM CAPSET REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAPMARKED "MORRISON-MAIERLE INC. 14732LS"FOUND REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP,2 IN. DIAM. MARKED "MORRISON-MAIERLE INC.14732LS"FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTEDFOUND ONE-QUARTER CORNERR-3R-2UNZONEDUNZONEDR-1POINT OF BEGINNINGR-2R-3R-4OPEN SPACE BOPEN SPACE AOPENSPACE DOPENSPACE FOPENSPACE CLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5AREA SUMMARY- PHASE 3LOT AREA:PUBLIC R-O-W AREA:OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC):PHASE 3 TOTAL AREA:LOT R2A AREAGRAND TOTAL AREA 4.85 acres (211,112) Sq. Ft. 2.58 acres (112,385) Sq. Ft. 3.12 acres (135,907) Sq. Ft.10.546 acres (459,404) Sq. Ft.21.059 acres (917,326 Sq. Ft.)31.605 acres (1,376,730 Sq. Ft.)CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 5' MAJOR AND 1' MINOROPENSPACE ELOT 27*LOT 26*LOT 25*LOT 24*LOT 23*LOT 22 LOT 2 1 OPEN SPACE DOPEN SPACE F2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702LAKELAKEPHASE 1PHASE 2CITY PARK 1OPENSPACE AAAJKER CREEKAAJKER CREEKBOUNDARYZONEING279 LOT 474500 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE A0.63 acs.OPEN SPACE F1.74 acs.OPEN SPACE C0.09 acs.LOT 13651 sq.ft.LOT 23355 sq.ft.LOT 33369 sq.ft.LOT 53705 sq.ft.LOT 62510 sq.ft.LOT 72400 sq.ft.LOT 82400 sq.ft.LOT 92400 sq.ft.LOT 102400 sq.ft.LOT 112386 sq.ft.LOT 122604 sq.ft.LOT 134516 sq.ft.LOT 143563 sq.ft.LOT 154797 sq.ft.LOT 164072 sq.ft.LOT 173910 sq.ft.LOT 183544 sq.ft.LOT 193310 sq.ft.LOT 213895 sq.ft.LOT 203178 sq.ft.LOT 224964 sq.ft.LOT 234613 sq.ft.LOT 244617 sq.ft.LOT 254622 sq.ft.LOT 264624 sq.ft.LOT 274169 sq.ft.LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 284394 sq.ft.LOT 315183 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.LOT 384050 sq.ft.LOT 374050 sq.ft.LOT 364050 sq.ft.LOT 354050 sq.ft.LOT 343912 sq.ft.LOT 334264 sq.ft.LOT 325259 sq.ft.LOT 436391 sq.ft.LOT 396000 sq.ft.LOT 406000 sq.ft.LOT 416000 sq.ft.LOT 426010 sq.ft.LOT 454407 sq.ft.LOT 444417 sq.ft.LOT 465041 sq.ft.LOT 505925 sq.ft.LOT 495662 sq.ft.LOT 485610 sq.ft.LOT 43375 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.OPEN SPACE B0.52 acs.45.00'32.00'1ƒ :74.13'1ƒ :74.74'1ƒ :75.00'L=40.52'L=24.54'L=20.24'1ƒ :66.42'65.94'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'3.59'L=3 2.43'6ƒ (60.00'6ƒ (60.00'39.77'43.48'25.49'39.77'30.08'40.00'35.45'6ƒ (95.00'L=51.33'L=3 1.89'L=37.32'6ƒ (95.00'L=20.07'21.77'25.27'9.24'35.45'43.20'44.08'44.74'23.08'30.00'37.50'L=79.57'L=30.02'25.27'26.91'L=30.40'6ƒ (97.41'19.25'L=45.63'L=36.44'L=36.30'6ƒ (103.63'6ƒ :73.65'6ƒ (92.78'L=36.30'L=2.46'L=59.72'21.68'6ƒ (85.55'L=30.01'L=35.34'L=42.28'6ƒ (81.92'6ƒ :83.06'1ƒ (24.21'1ƒ (39.05'1ƒ (39.07'6ƒ (39.07'6ƒ (39.09'6ƒ (44.91'37.84'45.00'1ƒ (57.69'1ƒ (33.24'6ƒ    ( 65.28'L=55.55'17.38'45.00'31.08'L=13.92'6ƒ :100.12'6ƒ :100.23'L=37.42'L=50.88'L=52.04'L=52.64'L=52.65'L=52.64'6ƒ (100.32'6ƒ (100.40'6ƒ (100.49'1ƒ    : 46.86' 1ƒ     : 55.67'11.50'11.50'45.00'1ƒ (45.37'1ƒ (86.94'1ƒ (64.64'1ƒ (60.00'6ƒ     (100.02'L=52.64'L=35.16'18.80'6ƒ    ( 100.00' 1ƒ    :43.25' 1ƒ    : 60.09' 6ƒ    ( 100.0 0'15.76'45.00'45.00'43.57'L=1.43'L=31.59'L=31.5 9'29.24'15.76'25.03'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'46.05'L=7.48'L=53.75'L=17 .3 5 '19.85' L =17 .8 5 '23.70'1ƒ (116.37'6ƒ :90.03'37.84'449.00'138.02'6ƒ (100.00'60.00'6ƒ (101.36'30.12'60.00'60.00'60.00'37.91'L=22.15'L=50.16'L=20.3 5 'L=25.20 '21.19'L=42.46'9.31'L=46.55'6ƒ (100.00'6ƒ (100.00'6ƒ (100.00'56.59'33.50'60.00'L=25.50'42.64'38.00'34.00'54.77'6ƒ    ( 93.71'6ƒ (100.99'100.00'60.00'50.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'43.15'1ƒ :25.00'6ƒ : 1ƒ (60.00'L=45.63'72.00'1ƒ :75.00'45.00'L=46.70'45.49'40.00'1ƒ :60.35'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'L=50.03'6ƒ (81.55'L=57.01'23.59'12.56'L=25.23'15.84'6ƒ :56.61'6ƒ     ( 100.00'60.08'45.00'L=18.01'6ƒ :25.62'17.72'6ƒ (60.00'43.48'35.45'60.00'70.00'18.80'138.02'L=12.28'27.00'1ƒ (65.61'15.84'L=48.45'45.00'L=42.28'1ƒ (100.00'1ƒ (100.00'100.00'6ƒ : 37.83'32.00'1ƒ : R=150.00'L=90.06'ǻ=34ƒ23'57"6ƒ : 1ƒ ( R=420.00'L=430.76'ǻ=58ƒ45'51"6ƒ (18.80'1ƒ (1ƒ (R=390.00'L=400.00'ǻ=58ƒ45'51"R=450.00'L=371.88'ǻ=47ƒ20'57"6ƒ (6ƒ (6ƒ     ( 64.55'R=88.00'ǻ=21ƒ16'10"R=56.00'ǻ=21ƒ16'10"1ƒ :1ƒ :R=120.04'L=72.04'ǻ=34ƒ23'15"R=180.89'ǻ=15ƒ20'45"1ƒ    :      6ƒ : R=150.00'L=98.22'ǻ=37ƒ31'05"6ƒ :31.58'R=180.00'ǻ=8ƒ01'49"6ƒ :R=37.60'ǻ=86ƒ52'52"R=36.38'ǻ=87ƒ29'02"R=27.18'ǻ=96ƒ11'30"R=26.13'ǻ=93ƒ07'08"R=180.00'L=117.87'ǻ=37ƒ31'05"R=120.00'L=78.58'ǻ=37ƒ31'16"6ƒ :6ƒ :R=105.16'L=71.4 3 'ǻ =38ƒ5 4 '56 "6ƒ (21.61'6ƒ : 6ƒ : R=200.00'L=62.38'ǻ=17ƒ52'17"6ƒ (37.82'6ƒ :6ƒ :R=20.00'ǻ=87ƒ05'18"R =2 0.00'ǻ=9 2 ƒ5 4'42"6ƒ :1ƒ (R=475.00'L=66.96'ǻ=8ƒ04'37"6.38'6.38'R =2 0 .00'ǻ=91 ƒ21'11"R=13.00'ǻ=89ƒ12'16"1ƒ (1ƒ (1ƒ :90.00'1ƒ :90.00'6ƒ (90.00'6ƒ (90.00'6ƒ (90.01'1ƒ (96.86'1ƒ (101.79'6ƒ :50.72'6ƒ :37.50'1ƒ (1ƒ ( 6ƒ ( 6ƒ     (       R =2 8 0 .0 0 'L=12 1.00 'ǻ =24 ƒ45 '39"6ƒ (6ƒ :1ƒ (6.38'6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S 8SWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W WWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SW W 8S 8 S 8 S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SSDSDSDW 1/16RESIDENTIAL LOTSPHASE BOUNDARY/PROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDOVERHEAD POWER LINESPUBLIC OPEN SPACEPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYWATER INFRASTRUCTURESTORM WATER EASEMENT AREASEWER INFRASTRUCTUREWROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURELOT ACCESS AND PARKINGEASEMENT AREA10' UTILITY EASEMENT LINEWALKING TRAILSIDE WALKSTORM WATER INFRASTRUCTUREˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists43THE LAKESGALLATIN5352.0071"=40'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NW2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702R-3R-2UNZONEDUNZONEDTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST PHASE 2STORM WATER EASEMENT AREAWESTMORLAND DRIVEDURSTON ROADWESTGATE AVENUEAAJKER CREEKAAJKER CREEK50' CREEKSETBACKPOND WATERLINEEXISTINGSTORM WATERPIPE INVERTSPOND WATEROUTLET PIPEEXISTINGPOND WATEROUTLET PIPEDURSTON ROAD10'10'10'10'10'10'ARNHEM WAYOPEN SPACE PHASE 2OPEN SPACE PHASE 210'10'10'10'10'10'LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3OWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOT10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEKCONTOUR INTERVAL IS 5' MAJOR AND 1' MINOR10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEK10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEK50' CREEKSETBACK10.00'1' NO ACCESS 1' NO ACCESS 45' PUBLICSTREET EASEMENT50' DURSTON ROADRIGHT-OF-WAYDEDICATED WITH THELAKES PHASE 1 & 245' PUBLICSTREET EASEMENT50' DURSTON ROADRIGHT-OF-WAYDEDICATED WITH THELAKES PHASE 1 & 232.00'32.00'32.00'32.00'AREA SUMMARY- PHASE 3LOT AREA:PUBLIC R-O-W AREA:OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC):PHASE 3 TOTAL AREA:LOT R2A AREAGRAND TOTAL AREA 4.85 acres (211,112) Sq. Ft. 2.58 acres (112,385) Sq. Ft. 3.12 acres (135,907) Sq. Ft.10.546 acres (459,404) Sq. Ft.21.059 acres (917,326 Sq. Ft.)31.605 acres (1,376,730 Sq. Ft.)280 ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists44THE LAKESGALLATIN5352.0071"=40'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NW2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 50 LOTSConditions:Buyers of property should ensure that they have obtained and reviewed all sheets of the plat and all documents recorded andfiled in conjunction with the plat and buyers of property are strongly encouraged to contact the local planning department andbecome informed of any limitations on the use of the property prior to closing.The undersigned property owner acknowledges that there are federal, state, and local plans, policies, regulations, and/orconditions of subdivision approval that may limit the use of the property, including the location, size, and use.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SHEET1.Notice is hereby given to all potential purchasers of Lot R2A of the plat of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision Phase 3, Cityof Bozeman, Gallatin county, Montana that the final plat of the subdivision was approved by the city commission withoutcompletion of on and off-site improvements required under the Bozeman municipal code, as is allowed in ARTICLE 38.39 ofthe Bozeman Municipal Code. As such, this restriction is filed with the final plat that stipulates that any use of this lot issubject to further subdivision and no development shall occur until all on and off-site improvements are completed asrequired under the Bozeman municipal code. Therefore, be advised, that building permits will not be issued for Lot R2A of theplat of The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Gallatin county, Montana until all required on and off-siteimprovements are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. No building or structure requiring water or sewerfacilities shall be utilized on this lot until this restriction is lifted. This restriction runs with the land is is revocable only byfurther subdivision or the written consent of the City of Bozeman.2.Due to the potential of high ground water tables in the areas of the subdivision, it is not recommended that residentialdwellings or other structures with full or partial basements be constructed without first consulting a professional engineerlicensed in the State of Montana and qualified in the certification of residential and commercial construction.3.City standard sidewalks (including a concrete sidewalk section through all private drive approaches) shall be constructed onall public and private street frontages prior to occupancy of any structure on individual lots. Upon the third anniversary of theplat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed the required sidewalk shall, withoutfurther notice, construct within 30 days, the sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have beenmade upon the lot.4.Lots along Durston Road have a 1' wide vehicular no-access easement unless otherwise noted. Direct access to DurstonRoad will not be allowed for single family lots.5.All portions of this subdivision are zoned R-1. Land uses shall be established in accordance with The Lakes at Valley WestPlanned Unit Development and its development guidelines first recorded in Document No. 2479575 and subsequentamendments.6.Front setback encroachments are allowed as provided in the protective covenants and restrictions for The Lakes at ValleyWest Planned Unit Development, Phase 3.7.All public park and open space parcels are hereby encumbered by a public access easement as recorded in Document No. _____________________.8.Ownership of all common open space areas and trails, and responsibility of maintenance thereof and for city assessmentslevied on the common open space lands shall be that of the property owners' association. Maintenance responsibility shallinclude, in addition to the common open space and trails, all vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees and irrigation systemsin the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external perimeter development streets, parks, and areas adjacent topublic parks or other common open space areas. All areas within the subdivision that are designated herein as common openspace including trails are for the use and enjoyment by residents of the development and the general public. The propertyowners' association shall be responsible for levying annual assessments to provide for the maintenance, repair, and upkeepof all parks, common open space areas, and trails. At the same time of recording the final plat for each phase of thesubdivision the subdivider shall transfer ownership of all common open space areas within each phase to the propertyowners' association created by the subdivider to maintain all common open space areas within The Lakes at Valley WestPhase 3.Special Improvement District Waivers:%X\HUVDUHKHUHE\QRWLILHGWKDWWKHSURSHUW\LVVXEMHFWWRWZRVSHFLDOLPSURYHPHQWOLJKWLQJGLVWULFWV DQGBBBBB DQGVXEMHFWWRVSHFLDOimprovement district waivers as identified in the annexation agreement, film 180 page 22 through 98 and special improvement districts listedin document #2048041.The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC.By: ______________________________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday, Authorized RepresentativeDatedCertificate of transfer of ownership & completion of non-public improvements:The following are hereby granted and donated to the property owners association noted below for their use and enjoyment: common openspace parcels designated with letter A, B, C, D, E & F. Unless specifically listed in the certificate of dedication, the city accepts noresponsibility for maintaining the same. The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC hereby further certify that the following non-publicimprovements, required to meet the requirements of chapter 38 of the Bozeman municipal code, or as a condition(s) of approval of thesubdivision plotted herewith, including, but not limited to trails, trees, lawns, irrigation systems, shrubs, and landscape features and furniture,have been installed in conformance with any approved plans and specifications prepared in accordance with the standards of chapter 38 orother city design standards, or have been financially guaranteed and are covered by the subdivision improvements agreement accompanyingand recorded with this plat.Installed improvements: NoneFinancially guaranteed improvements: open space improvementsThe subdivider hereby grants ownership of all non-public infrastructure improvements to the property owners association created bydocument number _____________________________________.THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 332'LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PARK AREA TABLE:REQUIRED PARKLAND:LOTS 31, 48, 49, AND 50REMAINING 46 LOTSTOTAL:SURPLUS PARKLAND FROMPHASE 1 AND 2:SURPLUS PARK LAND PHASES 1, 2 AND 3TO BE APPLIED TO FUTURE PHASES: 0.06 acres/lot0.24 acres0.03 acres/lot 1.38 acres1.62 acres2.94 acres1.32 acresThe 54 dwelling units consist of 1 unit oneach lot in Phase 3 and one accessorydwelling unit on Lots 31, 48, 49, and 50 inPhase 3.State of ____________________________________County of ___________________________________On this ________________ day of ___________________________, 2016, before me, the undersignedNotary Public for the State of _____________________ personally appeared James M. Kilday, known to me tobe the Authorized Representative of The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC. and acknowledged to me thatsaid LLC executed the same.Notary Public in and for the State of ___________________Printed Name _____________________________________Residing at _______________________________________My commission expires _____________________________10'35'9.5'35.5'32'19.7'28'1'1'32.2'19' 19'28'13.3' 13'1'33.5'1'1'28'1'28'13' 13'281 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+23 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+006+990+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+23 0+001+002+003+004+005+006+006+99ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists41GALLATIN5352.0071"=500'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NWBASIS OF BEARINGTHE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE MODIFIED RECORDZ/E'^͘d,ZKZZ/E'͕E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϱ͕͘͟>KE'THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OFSECTION 9, WAS RECOMPUTED BASED ON THERE-ESTABLISHMENT OF OBLITERATED CORNERS BETWEENTHE ONE-QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 9 ANDSECTION 10, AND THE CORNER TO SECTIONS 3, 4, 9, ANDϭϬ͘d,Z^h>d/E'Z/E'/^E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϬ͘͟LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATOWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOTI, Daniel J. Boers, Montana Professional Land Surveyor License No. 14732LS, hereby certify that the Final Plat ofThe Lakes at Valley West Phase 3 was surveyed under my supervision between January 2016 and July 2016, andplatted the same as shown on the accompanying plat and as described in accordance with the provisions of the0RQWDQD6XEGLYLVLRQDQG3ODWWLQJ$FW†WKURXJK†0&$DQGWKH%R]HPDQ8QLILHGDevelopment Ordinance. I further certify that monuments which have not been set by the filing date of thisinstrument will be set by March 2017, due to public improvements construction pursuant to 24.183.1101(1)(d) A.R.M.Dated this___________day of_________________, 2016.________________________________________________________Daniel J. Boers, PLS, CFedSMT Reg. #14732LSMorrison-Maierle, Inc.THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC.______________________________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday, Authorized Representative DatedState of ____________________________________County of ___________________________________On this ________________ day of ___________________________, 2016, before me, the undersignedNotary Public for the State of _____________________ personally appeared _______________________,known to me to be the Authorized Representative of The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC. andacknowledged to me that said LLC executed the same.Notary Public in and for the State of ___________________Printed Name _____________________________________Residing at _______________________________________My commission expires _____________________________CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTSI, James M. Kilday and I, James R. Nickelson, a Registered Professional Engineer licensed to practice in theState of Montana, hereby certify that the following improvements, required to meet the requirements of Chapter38 of the Bozeman Municipal Code or as Conditions of Approval of the Final Plat of The Lakes at Valley WestPhase 3, have been installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, or financiallyguaranteed and covered by the improvements agreement accompanying this plat.Installed Improvements:Financially Guaranteed Improvements:The subdivider hereby warrants against defects in these improvements for a period of two years from the date ofacceptance by the City of Bozeman.The subdivider grants possession of all public infrastructure improvements to the City of Bozeman and the Cityhereby accepts possession of all public infrastructure improvements, subject to the above indicated warranty.___________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday Authorized RepresentativeDatedThe Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC.___________________________________________________________________James R. Nickelson, No. 9063PEDatedMorrison Maierle, Inc.___________________________________________________________________Craig WoolardDatedDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaI, Craig Woolard, Director of Public Service, City of Bozeman, Montana, do hereby certify that theaccompanying plat has been duly examined and has found the same to conform to the law, approve it, andhereby accept the dedication to the City of Bozeman for the public use of any and all lands shown on the platas being dedicated to such use.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Craig WoolardDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaI, Kimberly Buchanan, Treasurer of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the accompanying plat hasbeen duly examined and that all real property taxes and special assessments assessed and levied on the landto being divided have been paid.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Kimberly BuchananTreasurerGallatin County, Montana_________________________________________Tax ID No.CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY TREASURERI, Charlotte Mills, Clerk and Recorder of Gallatin County, Montana, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrumentwas filed in my office at _______ o'clock, __________(a.m., or p.m.), this _________ day of ______________,2016, and recorded in Book ______ of Plats on page __________, and Document # ____________________,Records of the Clerk and Recorder, Gallatin County, Montana.Dated this __________ day of ____________________, 2016.________________________________________Charlotte MillsClerk and RecorderGallatin County, MontanaCERTIFICATE OF CLERK AND RECORDERThe Lakes at Valley West-Phase 3, Gallatin County, Montana, is within the City of Bozeman, Montana, a first classmunicipality, and with the planning area of the Bozeman growth policy which was adopted pursuant to Section 76-1-601et seq., MCA, and can be provided with adequate storm water drainage and adequate municipal facilities. Thereforeunder the provisions of Section 76-4-125(2)(d), MCA, this survey is excluded from the requirement for MontanaDepartment of Environmental Quality review.Dated this ________________________ day of _______________________________, 2016.________________________________Craig WoolardDirector of Public ServiceCity of Bozeman, MontanaCERTIFICATE OF EXCLUSION FROM MONTANADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEWCERTIFICATE OF DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICECERTIFICATE OF SURVEYORWe, the undersigned property owners, do hereby certify that we have caused to be surveyed, subdivided andplatted into lots, blocks, streets, and alleys, and other divisions and dedications, as shown by the plat hereuntoincluded the following described tract of land to wit:Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West, being Lot R2 of The Lakes at Valley West - Phase 1 & Phase 2, Plat-VLWXDWHGLQWKH1(ó1:óRI6HFWLRQ7RZQVKLS6RXWK5DQJH(DVWPrincipal Meridian, City of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana, more particularly described as follows:Commencing at the Corner to Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 2 South, Range 5 East,Principal Meridian, as described on Certified Corner Recordation, Book 2, Page 1572,Document No. 380638, filed at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office; thence1ƒ (IRUIHHWWRWKH:HVW2QHVL[WHHQWK&RUQHUEHWZHHQ6HFWLRQDQG6HFWLRQWKHQFH6ƒ :IRUIHHWDORQJWKHHDVWERXQGDU\RIWKH1:ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWRDSRLQWRQWKHVRXWKright-of-way of Durston Road, the Point of BeginningWKHQFH1ƒ (IRUIHHWDORQJWKHVRXWKright-of-way of Durston Road to the northwest corner of Phase 2 of The Lakes at Valley West; thence6ƒ ´(IHHWWRDQDQJOHSRLQWRQWKHZHVWERXQGDU\RI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRDQDQJOHSRLQWRQWKHZHVWERXQGDU\RI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH6ƒ ´(IHHWWRWKHVRXWKZHVWFRUQHURI3KDVHRI7KH/DNHVDW9DOOH\:HVWWKHQFH1ƒ ´(IHHWWRDSRLQWRQWKHZHVWULJKWRIZD\RI1RUWK/DXUHO3DUNZD\WKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRDSRLQWRQWKHQRUWKERXQGDU\RIWKH6(ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWKHQFH6ƒ ´:IHHWWRWKH1RUWKZHVW2QHVL[WHHQWK&RUQHURI6HFWLRQWKHQFH1ƒ (IRUIHHWDORQJWKHHDVWERXQGDU\RIWKH1:ó1:óRI6HFWLRQWRthe Point of Beginning.The Area of the above described tracts of land is 1,376,730 square feet, or 31.605 acres, more or less.7KHDERYHGHVFULEHGWUDFWRIODQGLVWREHNQRZQDQGGHVLJQDWHGDV³The Lakes at Valley West - Phase 3´&LW\of Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana; and the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or publiclands shown on said plat are hereby granted and donated to the City of Bozeman for the public use andenjoyment. Unless specifically listed herein, the lands included in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or publiclands dedicated to the public are accepted for public use, but the City of Bozeman accepts no responsibility formaintaining the same. The owner agrees that the City of Bozeman has no obligation to maintain the landsincluded in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or public lands, hereby dedicated to public use. The landsincluded in all streets, avenues, alleys, and parks or public lands dedicated to the public for which the City ofBozeman accepts responsibility for maintenance include Westmorland Drive and Westgate Avenue.The undersigned hereby grants unto each and every person firm or corporation, whether public or private,providing or offering to provide telephone, electric power, gas, internet, cable television or other similar utility orservice, the right to the joint use of an easement for the construction, maintenance, repair and removal of theirlines and other facilities in, over, under and across each area designated on this plat as "Utility Easement" tohave and to hold forever.CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATIONCOTTONWOOD ROADVICINITY MAPBABCOCK ST.DURSTON RD.PROJECT AREAVICINITY MAPAll streets, alleys, and rights-of-way, shown hereon as "DEDICATED", are not easements.The intent of the dedication is to convey all the streets, alleys, and rights-of-way to the public,upon acceptance by the governing authority.DEDICATION AND EASEMENT NOTELAUREL PARKWAY2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702PHASE 1PHASE 2LAUREL GLENSUBDIVISIONWEST BROOKESUBDIVISIONPHASE 1VALLEY WESTSUBDIVISIONNORTON EAST RANCHSUBDIVISIONBRONKENPARKC.O.S.1851C.O.S.1851282 NW 1/16C-N 1/161337.16'670.28'6ƒ : 6ƒ : 6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 609.00'1ƒ (12.50'6ƒ :50.06'1ƒ ( 1ƒ :82.84'6ƒ :57.69'6ƒ :33.24'6ƒ :86.94'6ƒ :64.64'6ƒ :60.00'6ƒ :90.09'6ƒ   (         6ƒ (25.00'6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( R =2 8 0 .0 0 'L =1 2 1.0 0 ' ǻ =2 4 ƒ4 5 '3 9 " C B =N 2 4 ƒ0 9 '1 4 "W C H =1 2 0 .0 6 '1ƒ     : 62.1 3'FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED0255,6210$,(5/(,1&$7$32,176ƒ (FEET FROM THE POINT SHOWN ON C.O.S. 1005B, & N.ƒ ()((7)5207+(32,17)257+(SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF C.O.S. 1581W 1/16ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists42GALLATIN5352.0071"=10007/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NWBASIS OF BEARINGTHE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE MODIFIED RECORDZ/E'^͘d,ZKZZ/E'͕E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϱ͕͘͟>KE'THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OFSECTION 9, WAS RECOMPUTED BASED ON THERE-ESTABLISHMENT OF OBLITERATED CORNERS BETWEENTHE ONE-QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 9 ANDSECTION 10, AND THE CORNER TO SECTIONS 3, 4, 9, ANDϭϬ͘d,Z^h>d/E'Z/E'/^E͘ϬϭΣϬϲΖϬϬ͘͟LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATOWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOTLOT 6LOT 7LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12LOT 13LOT 14LOT 15LOT 16LOT 17LOT 18LOT 19LOT 20LOT 21LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 8LOT 7LOT 6LOT 5LOT 4LOT 3LOT 2LOT 1LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 19 LOT 20 LOT 12LOT 11LOT 10LOT 9LOT 36LOT 35LOT 34LOT 33LOT 32LOT 31LOT 30LOT 29LOT 28LOT 16LOT 15LOT 14LOT 13LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26 LOT 27 LOT 2 8 LOT 29 LOT 3 0 LOT 31 LOT 5 0 LOT 4 9 LOT 48 LOT 47LOT 46 LOT 45 LOT 4 4 LOT 43LOT 42LOT 41LOT 40LOT 39LOT 38LOT 37LOT 36LOT 35LOT 34LOT 33LOT 32LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 15LOT 16 LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 19 LOT 20 LOT 21 LOT 12 LOT 11 LOT 10 LOT 9 LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4WESTGATE AVENUELAUREL PARKWAYWESTMORLAND DRIVEDURSTON ROADWESTGATEAVENUELAUREL PARKWAYLEGENDRIGHT-OF-WAYPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTFOUND REBAR WITH A PLASTIC CAPFOUND REBAR WITH AN ALUMINUM CAPSET REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAPMARKED "MORRISON-MAIERLE INC. 14732LS"FOUND REBAR, 5/8 IN. DIAM. WITH AN ALUMINUM CAP,2 IN. DIAM. MARKED "MORRISON-MAIERLE INC.14732LS"FOUND SECTION CORNER AS NOTEDFOUND ONE-QUARTER CORNERR-3R-2UNZONEDUNZONEDR-1POINT OF BEGINNINGR-2R-3R-4OPEN SPACE BOPEN SPACE AOPENSPACE DOPENSPACE FOPENSPACE CLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5AREA SUMMARY- PHASE 3LOT AREA:PUBLIC R-O-W AREA:OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC):PHASE 3 TOTAL AREA:LOT R2A AREAGRAND TOTAL AREA 4.85 acres (211,112) Sq. Ft. 2.58 acres (112,385) Sq. Ft. 3.12 acres (135,907) Sq. Ft.10.546 acres (459,404) Sq. Ft.21.059 acres (917,326 Sq. Ft.)31.605 acres (1,376,730 Sq. Ft.)CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 5' MAJOR AND 1' MINOROPENSPACE ELOT 27*LOT 26*LOT 25*LOT 24*LOT 23*LOT 22 LOT 2 1 OPEN SPACE DOPEN SPACE F2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702LAKELAKEPHASE 1PHASE 2CITY PARK 1OPENSPACE AAAJKER CREEKAAJKER CREEKBOUNDARYZONEING283 LOT 474500 sq.ft.OPEN SPACE A0.63 acs.OPEN SPACE F1.74 acs.OPEN SPACE C0.09 acs.LOT 13651 sq.ft.LOT 23355 sq.ft.LOT 33369 sq.ft.LOT 53705 sq.ft.LOT 62510 sq.ft.LOT 72400 sq.ft.LOT 82400 sq.ft.LOT 92400 sq.ft.LOT 102400 sq.ft.LOT 112386 sq.ft.LOT 122604 sq.ft.LOT 134516 sq.ft.LOT 143563 sq.ft.LOT 154797 sq.ft.LOT 164072 sq.ft.LOT 173910 sq.ft.LOT 183544 sq.ft.LOT 193310 sq.ft.LOT 213895 sq.ft.LOT 203178 sq.ft.LOT 224964 sq.ft.LOT 234613 sq.ft.LOT 244617 sq.ft.LOT 254622 sq.ft.LOT 264624 sq.ft.LOT 274169 sq.ft.LOT 294505 sq.ft.LOT 284394 sq.ft.LOT 315183 sq.ft.LOT 304500 sq.ft.LOT 384050 sq.ft.LOT 374050 sq.ft.LOT 364050 sq.ft.LOT 354050 sq.ft.LOT 343912 sq.ft.LOT 334264 sq.ft.LOT 325259 sq.ft.LOT 436391 sq.ft.LOT 396000 sq.ft.LOT 406000 sq.ft.LOT 416000 sq.ft.LOT 426010 sq.ft.LOT 454407 sq.ft.LOT 444417 sq.ft.LOT 465041 sq.ft.LOT 505925 sq.ft.LOT 495662 sq.ft.LOT 485610 sq.ft.LOT 43375 sq.ft. OPEN SPACE E0.06 acs.OPEN SPACE D0.08 acs.OPEN SPACE B0.52 acs.45.00'32.00'1ƒ :74.13'1ƒ :74.74'1ƒ :75.00'L=40.52'L=24.54'L=20.24'1ƒ :66.42'65.94'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'3.59'L =3 2 .43'6ƒ (60.00'6ƒ (60.00'39.77'43.48'25.49'39.77'30.08'40.00'35.45'6ƒ (95.00'L=51.33'L=3 1 .8 9 'L=37.32'6ƒ (95.00'L=20.07'21.77'25.27'9.24'35.45'43.20'44.08'44.74'23.08'30.00'37.50'L=79.57'L=30.02'25.27'26.91'L=30.40'6ƒ (97.41'19.25'L=45.63'L=36.44'L=36.30'6ƒ (103.63'6ƒ :73.65'6ƒ (92.78'L=36.30'L=2.46'L=59.72'21.6 8'6ƒ (85.55'L=30.01'L=35.34'L=42.28'6ƒ (81.92'6ƒ :83.06'1ƒ (24.21'1ƒ (39.05'1ƒ (39.07'6ƒ (39.07'6ƒ (39.09'6ƒ (44.91'37.84'45.00'1ƒ (57.69'1ƒ (33.24'6ƒ     ( 65.2 8'L=55.55'17.38'45.00'31.08'L=13.92'6ƒ :100.12'6ƒ :100.23'L=37.42'L=50.88'L=52.04'L=52.64'L=52.65'L=52.64'6ƒ (100.32'6ƒ (100.40'6ƒ (100.49'1ƒ    : 46.86' 1ƒ     : 55.6 7'11.50'11.50'45.00'1ƒ (45.37'1ƒ (86.94'1ƒ (64.64'1ƒ (60.00'6ƒ    ( 100. 02'L=52.64'L=35.16'18.80'6ƒ     ( 100.0 0'1ƒ :43.25'1ƒ     : 60.09' 6ƒ    ( 100. 00'15.76'45.00'45.00'43.57'L=1.43'L=31.59'L =3 1.5 9 '29.24'15.76'25.03'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'46.05'L=7.48'L=53.75'L =1 7 .3 5 '19.85' L =1 7 .8 5 '23.7 0'1ƒ (116.37'6ƒ :90.03'37.84'449.00'138.02'6ƒ (100.00'60.00'6ƒ (101.36'30.12'60.00'60.00'60.00'37.91'L=22.15'L=50.16'L =2 0 .3 5 'L =2 5 .2 0 '21.1 9'L=42.46'9.31'L=46.55'6ƒ (100.00'6ƒ (100.00'6ƒ (100.00'56.59'33.50'60.00'L=25.50'42.64'38.00'34.00'54.77'6ƒ     ( 93.71'6ƒ (100.99'100.00'60.00'50.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'43.15'1ƒ :25.00'6ƒ : 1ƒ (60.00'L=45.63'72.00'1ƒ :75.00'45.00'L=46.70'45.49'40.00'1ƒ :60.35'40.00'30.00'40.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'40.00'1ƒ :60.00'L=50.03'6ƒ (81.55'L=57.01'23.59'12.56'L=25.23'15.84'6ƒ :56.61'6ƒ     ( 100. 0 0'60.08'45.00'L=18.01'6ƒ :25.62'17.72'6ƒ (60.00'43.48'35.45'60.00'70.00'18.80'138.02'L=12.28'27.00'1ƒ (65.61'15.84'L=48.45'45.00'L=42.28'1ƒ (100.00'1ƒ (100.00'100.00'6ƒ : 37.83'32.00'1ƒ : R=150.00'L=90.06'ǻ=34ƒ23'57"6ƒ : 1ƒ ( R=420.00'L=430.76'ǻ=58ƒ45'51"6ƒ (18.80'1ƒ (1ƒ (R=390.00'L=400.00'ǻ=58ƒ45'51"R=450.00'L=371.88'ǻ=47ƒ20'57"6ƒ (6ƒ (6ƒ     ( 64.5 5'R=88.00'ǻ=21ƒ16'10"R=56.00'ǻ=21ƒ16'10"1ƒ :1ƒ :R=120.04'L=72.04'ǻ=34ƒ23'15"R=180.89'ǻ=15ƒ20'45"1ƒ     :      6ƒ : R=150.00'L=98.22'ǻ=37ƒ31'05"6ƒ :31.58'R=180.00'ǻ=8ƒ01'49"6ƒ :R=37.60'ǻ=86ƒ52'52"R=36.38'ǻ=87ƒ29'02"R=27.18'ǻ=96ƒ11'30"R=26.13'ǻ=93ƒ07'08"R=180.00'L=117.87'ǻ=37ƒ31'05"R=120.00'L=78.58'ǻ=37ƒ31'16"6ƒ :6ƒ :R=10 5.16 'L =7 1.4 3 'ǻ =3 8 ƒ5 4 '5 6 "6ƒ (21.61'6ƒ : 6ƒ : R=200.00'L=62.38'ǻ=17ƒ52'17"6ƒ (37.82'6ƒ :6ƒ :R=20.00'ǻ=87ƒ05'18"R =2 0.00'ǻ =9 2 ƒ54'42"6ƒ :1ƒ (R=475.00'L=66.96'ǻ=8ƒ04'37"6.38'6.38'R=2 0 .0 0 'ǻ=91 ƒ2 1'11"R=13.00'ǻ=89ƒ12'16"1ƒ (1ƒ (1ƒ :90.00'1ƒ :90.00'6ƒ (90.00'6ƒ (90.00'6ƒ (90.01'1ƒ (96.86'1ƒ (101.79'6ƒ :50.72'6ƒ :37.50'1ƒ (1ƒ ( 6ƒ ( 6ƒ     (     R =2 8 0 .0 0 'L =1 2 1 .0 0 'ǻ =2 4 ƒ4 5 '3 9 "6ƒ (6ƒ :1ƒ (6.38'6ƒ : 1ƒ ( 1ƒ ( 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SW W 8 S 8S 8 S 8 S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SSDSDSDW 1/16RESIDENTIAL LOTSPHASE BOUNDARY/PROPERTY BOUNDARYLEGENDOVERHEAD POWER LINESPUBLIC OPEN SPACEPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYWATER INFRASTRUCTURESTORM WATER EASEMENT AREASEWER INFRASTRUCTUREWROADWAY INFRASTRUCTURELOT ACCESS AND PARKINGEASEMENT AREA10' UTILITY EASEMENT LINEWALKING TRAILSIDE WALKSTORM WATER INFRASTRUCTUREˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists43THE LAKESGALLATIN5352.0071"=40'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NW2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702R-3R-2UNZONEDUNZONEDTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST PHASE 2STORM WATER EASEMENT AREAWESTMORLAND DRIVEDURSTON ROADWESTGATE AVENUEAAJKER CREEKAAJKER CREEK50' CREEKSETBACKPOND WATERLINEEXISTINGSTORM WATERPIPE INVERTSPOND WATEROUTLET PIPEEXISTINGPOND WATEROUTLET PIPEDURSTON ROAD10'10'10'10'10'10'ARNHEM WAYOPEN SPACE PHASE 2OPEN SPACE PHASE 210'10'10'10'10'10'LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PRELIMINARY PLATTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 3OWNERTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST, BOZEMAN, LLC4515 N56TH STPHOENIX, AZ 85018-3119ZONINGCITY OF BOZEMANR-1PURPOSETO CREATE 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS,6 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND1 RESTRICTED LOT10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEKCONTOUR INTERVAL IS 5' MAJOR AND 1' MINOR10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEK10' ASPHALT TRAIL30' MINIMUM SETBACKFROM AAJKER CREEK50' CREEKSETBACK10.00'1' NO ACCESS 1' NO ACCESS 45' PUBLICSTREET EASEMENT50' DURSTON ROADRIGHT-OF-WAYDEDICATED WITH THELAKES PHASE 1 & 245' PUBLICSTREET EASEMENT50' DURSTON ROADRIGHT-OF-WAYDEDICATED WITH THELAKES PHASE 1 & 232.00'32.00'32.00'32.00'AREA SUMMARY- PHASE 3LOT AREA:PUBLIC R-O-W AREA:OPEN SPACE (PUBLIC):PHASE 3 TOTAL AREA:LOT R2A AREAGRAND TOTAL AREA 4.85 acres (211,112) Sq. Ft. 2.58 acres (112,385) Sq. Ft. 3.12 acres (135,907) Sq. Ft.10.546 acres (459,404) Sq. Ft.21.059 acres (917,326 Sq. Ft.)31.605 acres (1,376,730 Sq. Ft.)284 ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016PLOTTED DATE: Jul/21/2016 PLOTTED BY: colenorsworthyDRAWING NAME: N:\5352\007\ACAD\Survey\PPLAT\5352007--PHASE3-PREPLAT-PLOT.dwg1/4 SEC.SECTIONTOWNSHIPRANGEPROJ. #:SHEET OFPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MONTANACOUNTY, MONTANADATE:SCALE:CLIENT:FIELD WORK:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:engineers surveyors planners scientists44THE LAKESGALLATIN5352.0071"=40'07/21/2016DJBCHNMMI 5E 2S 9NW2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 50 LOTSConditions:Buyers of property should ensure that they have obtained and reviewed all sheets of the plat and all documents recorded andfiled in conjunction with the plat and buyers of property are strongly encouraged to contact the local planning department andbecome informed of any limitations on the use of the property prior to closing.The undersigned property owner acknowledges that there are federal, state, and local plans, policies, regulations, and/orconditions of subdivision approval that may limit the use of the property, including the location, size, and use.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SHEET1.Notice is hereby given to all potential purchasers of Lot R2A of the plat of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision Phase 3, Cityof Bozeman, Gallatin county, Montana that the final plat of the subdivision was approved by the city commission withoutcompletion of on and off-site improvements required under the Bozeman municipal code, as is allowed in ARTICLE 38.39 ofthe Bozeman Municipal Code. As such, this restriction is filed with the final plat that stipulates that any use of this lot issubject to further subdivision and no development shall occur until all on and off-site improvements are completed asrequired under the Bozeman municipal code. Therefore, be advised, that building permits will not be issued for Lot R2A of theplat of The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision, City of Bozeman, Gallatin county, Montana until all required on and off-siteimprovements are completed and accepted by the City of Bozeman. No building or structure requiring water or sewerfacilities shall be utilized on this lot until this restriction is lifted. This restriction runs with the land is is revocable only byfurther subdivision or the written consent of the City of Bozeman.2.Due to the potential of high ground water tables in the areas of the subdivision, it is not recommended that residentialdwellings or other structures with full or partial basements be constructed without first consulting a professional engineerlicensed in the State of Montana and qualified in the certification of residential and commercial construction.3.City standard sidewalks (including a concrete sidewalk section through all private drive approaches) shall be constructed onall public and private street frontages prior to occupancy of any structure on individual lots. Upon the third anniversary of theplat recordation of any phase of the subdivision, any lot owner who has not constructed the required sidewalk shall, withoutfurther notice, construct within 30 days, the sidewalk for their lot(s), regardless of whether other improvements have beenmade upon the lot.4.Lots along Durston Road have a 1' wide vehicular no-access easement unless otherwise noted. Direct access to DurstonRoad will not be allowed for single family lots.5.All portions of this subdivision are zoned R-1. Land uses shall be established in accordance with The Lakes at Valley WestPlanned Unit Development and its development guidelines first recorded in Document No. 2479575 and subsequentamendments.6.Front setback encroachments are allowed as provided in the protective covenants and restrictions for The Lakes at ValleyWest Planned Unit Development, Phase 3.7.All public park and open space parcels are hereby encumbered by a public access easement as recorded in Document No. _____________________.8.Ownership of all common open space areas and trails, and responsibility of maintenance thereof and for city assessmentslevied on the common open space lands shall be that of the property owners' association. Maintenance responsibility shallinclude, in addition to the common open space and trails, all vegetative ground cover, boulevard trees and irrigation systemsin the public right-of-way boulevard strips along all external perimeter development streets, parks, and areas adjacent topublic parks or other common open space areas. All areas within the subdivision that are designated herein as common openspace including trails are for the use and enjoyment by residents of the development and the general public. The propertyowners' association shall be responsible for levying annual assessments to provide for the maintenance, repair, and upkeepof all parks, common open space areas, and trails. At the same time of recording the final plat for each phase of thesubdivision the subdivider shall transfer ownership of all common open space areas within each phase to the propertyowners' association created by the subdivider to maintain all common open space areas within The Lakes at Valley WestPhase 3.Special Improvement District Waivers:%X\HUVDUHKHUHE\QRWLILHGWKDWWKHSURSHUW\LVVXEMHFWWRWZRVSHFLDOLPSURYHPHQWOLJKWLQJGLVWULFWV DQGBBBBB DQGVXEMHFWWRVSHFLDOimprovement district waivers as identified in the annexation agreement, film 180 page 22 through 98 and special improvement districts listedin document #2048041.The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC.By: ______________________________________________________________________________________James M. Kilday, Authorized RepresentativeDatedCertificate of transfer of ownership & completion of non-public improvements:The following are hereby granted and donated to the property owners association noted below for their use and enjoyment: common openspace parcels designated with letter A, B, C, D, E & F. Unless specifically listed in the certificate of dedication, the city accepts noresponsibility for maintaining the same. The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC hereby further certify that the following non-publicimprovements, required to meet the requirements of chapter 38 of the Bozeman municipal code, or as a condition(s) of approval of thesubdivision plotted herewith, including, but not limited to trails, trees, lawns, irrigation systems, shrubs, and landscape features and furniture,have been installed in conformance with any approved plans and specifications prepared in accordance with the standards of chapter 38 orother city design standards, or have been financially guaranteed and are covered by the subdivision improvements agreement accompanyingand recorded with this plat.Installed improvements: NoneFinancially guaranteed improvements: open space improvementsThe subdivider hereby grants ownership of all non-public infrastructure improvements to the property owners association created bydocument number _____________________________________.THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST - PHASE 332'LOT R2 OF PHASE 2 OF THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION, PLAT J-572, SITUATED IN THE NE1/4 NW1/4, OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST,PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF BOZEMAN, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA.PARK AREA TABLE:REQUIRED PARKLAND:LOTS 31, 48, 49, AND 50REMAINING 46 LOTSTOTAL:SURPLUS PARKLAND FROMPHASE 1 AND 2:SURPLUS PARK LAND PHASES 1, 2 AND 3TO BE APPLIED TO FUTURE PHASES: 0.06 acres/lot0.24 acres0.03 acres/lot 1.38 acres1.62 acres2.94 acres1.32 acresThe 54 dwelling units consist of 1 unit oneach lot in Phase 3 and one accessorydwelling unit on Lots 31, 48, 49, and 50 inPhase 3.State of ____________________________________County of ___________________________________On this ________________ day of ___________________________, 2016, before me, the undersignedNotary Public for the State of _____________________ personally appeared James M. Kilday, known to me tobe the Authorized Representative of The Lakes at Valley West, Bozeman, LLC. and acknowledged to me thatsaid LLC executed the same.Notary Public in and for the State of ___________________Printed Name _____________________________________Residing at _______________________________________My commission expires _____________________________10'35'9.5'35.5'32'19.7'28'1'1'32.2'19' 19'28'13.3' 13'1'33.5'1'1'28'1'28'13' 13'285 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Surface Water This narrative is from the Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat Application and is provided with this application to address the pre-application review comment regarding wetlands. Exhibit A is a delineation of the boundaries of surface waters and wetlands (Waters of the US) that currently exist within the Lakes at Valley West parcel. The surface water and wetland resources are described below according to the Cowardin system of classification (Cowardin et al 1979). • The historic Baxter Creek channel and riverine fringe encompasses approximately 1.69 acres of a perennial stream and adjacent saturated to seasonally flooded wetland fringe. • The West and East Lakes total approximately 8.29 acres of constructed mitigation lacustrine wetland that are permanently flooded. • The constructed lacustrine fringe surrounding the lakes totals approximately 2.56 acres that exhibit seasonally flooded to saturated soil conditions. • The constructed palustrine, emergent wetland southeast of the east lobe encompasses approximately 4.06 acres of wetland exhibiting saturated to permanently flooded soil conditions. Exhibit A shows the historic Baxter Creek corridor and post-construction mitigation wetlands on the property. The Baxter Creek riverine fringe shown on Exhibit A reflects the surveyed boundaries drawn on the original delineation map that were detailed in the 1998 Wetland Delineation Report. There have been no impacts or changes to the channel or riverine fringe on this reach of Baxter Creek since the original delineation as verified by Vaughn Environmental Services every year from 2008 to 2015. The post-construction mitigation wetlands are considered waters of the US as approved by the US Army Corps. Two linear wetlands that historically existed on this parcel were impacted to develop a gravel pit and later create the twin lakes. The boundaries of the open water of the twin lakes, the lacustrine fringe around the lakes, and the large palustrine wetland were established on the ground based on the design and an intricate grid drawn, surveyed and constructed in 2008. Aajker Creek is located outside the west property boundary, although the 50-foot watercourse setback extends across the west boundary into the Lakes parcel. Baxter Creek and Aajker Creek and the adjacent wetland fringes will be protected from development by 50-foot watercourse 286 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application setbacks in accordance with Section 38.23.100 Watercourse setback (A) of the City of Bozeman Unified Development Code (UDC). The mitigation wetlands and the Baxter Creek corridor are protected in perpetuity from development according to the conditions of the USACE 404 permit. The parcel was laid out to provide 50-foot watercourse setbacks on Baxter Creek and 35-to 50-foot upland buffers around the lakes and palustrine wetland. The surface water resources will be protected within park and/or open space. The East Lobe, palustrine wetland, and Baxter Creek corridor will be dedicated to the City as park land. There will be no impacts to the mitigation wetlands or Baxter Creek as a result of the development except for a pedestrian bridge crossing on Baxter Creek. The bridge impacts were included in the original 404 permit. The permit expired before the bridge was constructed. The surface water resources will be protected during road construction with construction fencing and erosion control measures. The resource conditions associated with Baxter Creek, the Lakes, and the wetland complex are detailed in the following sections Baxter Creek The Gallatin County Conservation District (GCD) classifies Baxter Creek as a perennial stream. The creek channel within the property is approximately 7 to 10 feet wide and 1,373 feet long, flowing from south to north between the Baxter Natural Area city park and the Lakes at Valley West. Baxter Creek is diverted from the Farmer’s Canal approximately 1.2 miles south of the Lakes property. The boundaries of the open water channel and adjacent riverine fringe were originally delineated in 1994 in anticipation of the original Valley West Subdivision plat submittal. Fifty-foot watercourse setbacks were established from the edge of the riverine wetland fringe in the October 2003 Preliminary Plat Application (Figure A). The watercourse setbacks have been maintained to the present in accordance with Section 38.23.100 Watercourse setback (A) of the City of Bozeman UDC. Base flows fed by high groundwater and irrigation water originating in the Farmer’s Canal in summer provide the main sources of hydrology for Baxter Creek. High flow events are typically related to stormwater runoff events and melting valley snowpack. The reach of Baxter Creek within the project boundaries had been negatively impacted by livestock grazing and agricultural practices resulting in an overly wide stream channel, bank erosion, lack of pool habitat, and lack of woody riparian vegetation. Restoration of a segment of Baxter Creek extending 1,800 feet south of Durston Road was completed in 2006. The work included narrowing the channel, stabilizing eroding banks, and enhancing fish habitat by constructing pools throughout the stream reach located on the Lakes property. The restored banks were revegetated with salvaged sod mats and custom seed mixes. The east side of Baxter Creek was planted with trees and shrubs as part of the Baxter Natural Area construction in 2007. Approximately 692 containerized woody plant materials were installed within the riparian corridor of Baxter Creek and the Baxter Creek Natural area. The west side of the corridor was planted with trees and shrubs in fall 2008 287 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application coincident with construction of The Lakes. Planting details are included in the Vegetation Section. The Baxter Creek corridor, adjacent riverine wetland fringe, and 50-foot watercourse setback will be protected from development. A gravel fines trail was constructed in 2008 at the outer edge of the watercourse setback in accordance Wetlands: The Lakes and Palustrine Wetland Complex The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) authorized an Individual 404 permit (Permit No.1998-90014) for the 360 Ranch Corporation to implement Phase I of the Valley West Subdivision project on May 4, 1998, and Phase II on July 23, 1998. Bozeman Lakes, LLC, the subsequent owners of Valley West Subdivision, applied for an amendment to the original 404 permit in May 2001. Primary design changes included a reduction in the number of impacted wetland acres and a change in the location of the constructed wetland complex from an upland area west of Baxter Creek to an upland area east of Baxter Creek. The permit amendment was approved by the USACE in a letter dated November 21, 2002. The USACE 404 amended permit required the construction of 49.5 acres of mitigation wetlands across the entire Valley West site. Mitigation wetlands located within the current Lakes at Valley West property boundaries include approximately 8.0 acres of open water in the West and East Lakes and an additional 6.5 acres of lacustrine fringe and palustrine, emergent wetlands constructed adjacent to the lakes and Baxter Creek (Figure A). The lakes were constructed with west and east lobes separated by the future Laurel Glen Parkway. The shoreline was contoured to maximize safety and the extent of the lacustrine fringe. The lake depth was excavated to a minimum of 25 feet to ensure adequate turnover, maximize oxygen levels, and to provide a refuge for fish. The lake will be stocked under management of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks once the area is open to the public. Anticipated uses of the public space are recreational including fishing, bird watching, and hiking. The lacustrine fringe of the east and west lobes of Wing Lake was planted with wetland sod mats salvaged from an onsite, non-jurisdictional wetland. The mats were placed on approximately half of the perimeter of both lakes and around the fishing access points in June 2008. Over five thousand wetland tubelings were planted within the lacustrine fringe of both lobes on August 27, 2008. The water levels were raised with the control structure after planting to ensure sufficient inundation levels. Approximately 458 containerized trees and shrubs and customized seed mixes were planted around The Lakes and the west side of the Baxter Creek riparian corridor in September and October 2008. The clusters of trees and shrubs were staked and caged to prevent browsing. The woody plants were manually watered during the first growing season following installation. The USACE wrote a letter on August 12, 2013, closing the Valley West 404 permit file based on the successful completion of the mitigation wetlands constructed site wide including the Lakes at Valley West and the adjacent lacustrine and palustrine wetlands. Success of the mitigation 288 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application wetlands was based the establishment of an optimal percent cover of wetland and upland vegetation, the survival of a majority (96 percent in 2012) of the woody species, and meeting the mitigation acreage requirement. The results of the vegetation monitoring were documented in annual reports submitted to the US Army Corps from 2008 through 2012. The August 2013 closure letter from the USACE was included with the City Pre-application submittal. Copies of the original and amended permit approval letters were also included with the City Pre- Application submittal. Aajker Creek The GCD classifies Aajker Creek as a perennial stream, diverted from the Farmer’s Canal approximately 1.48 miles south of the project boundaries. The creek channel north of Farmer’s Canal has been straightened historically for agricultural purposes. The creek flows south to north outside the Lakes property boundary. The 50-foot watercourse setback for the east side of Aajker Creek extends across the west boundary of the Lakes parcel (Figure A). The watercourse setback will be maintained within the strip of open space located at the west subdivision boundary. A piped outlet from the bottom of the West Lake conveys overflow to the borrow ditch located on the south side of Durston Road east of Westgate Avenue. Surface water in the borrow ditch and the pipe outflow are diverted north through a culvert across Durston Road to a restored tributary of Aajker Creek within the Laurel Glen Subdivision. The tributary to Aajker Creek and Aajker Creek converge approximately 1,400 feet north of Durston Road. 289 315 N. 25th Street, Suite 102Billings, MT 59101Phone: (406) 656-6000Fax: (406) 237-1201010010020050HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETREVISIONSSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\002\ACAD\EXHIBITS\WATERCOURSE-WETLAND EXHIBIT.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Feb/25/2015ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2015APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. 5352.002EX.ABOZEMANMTKDJKDJKDJ02/2015WATERS OF THE U.S. EXHIBITTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST -WATERS OF THE U.S. EXHIBITAAJKER CREEK CENTERLINEBAXTER CREEKCENTERLINEPROPERTY LINEBAXTER CREEK 50'WATERCOURSE SETBACKAAJKER CREEK ANDRIVERINE FRINGE WETLAND(WEST AND EAST SIDES)0.46 ACAAJKER CREEK 50'WATERCOURSE SETBACKDURSTON ROADWESTGATE AVENUELOCAL ROADLAUREL PARKWAYWESTMORLAND DRIVEBAXTER CREEK ANDRIVERINE FRINGE WETLAND(ONLY WEST SIDE SHOWN)1.69 ACLACUSTRINEFRINGE WETLAND1.00 ACLACUSTRINEFRINGE WETLAND1.56 ACPALUSTRINEWETLAND4.06 ACLACUSTRINE WETLAND4.16 ACLACUSTRINE WETLAND4.13 AC290 291 292 293 294 295 296 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Floodplains The pre-application comments for Phase 3 included a request for information regarding the Aajker Creek flood plain. This information is contained in the information below and the associated reports that were developed as part of the Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat. Baxter Creek: During the initial stages of the Valley West Planned Unit Development, a detailed drainage plan was completed that addressed/analyzed the major drainage courses running through the Valley West property. One of those drainages, Baxter Creek, flows through a portion of the “Lakes” subdivision currently under review as part of this Preliminary Plat submittal. This portion flows through the far eastern edge of the proposed subdivision in an area that is planned to be dedicated parkland. The 100-year high water limits were analyzed in the original PUD report and were shown on the original Final Plat for Valley West Subdivision. Copies of the applicable portions of the report are included within this Preliminary Plat submittal. The 100-year high water limits of Baxter Creek are also shown on the attached Exhibit A for your reference. The Durston Road culvert was also analyzed in the PUD report, providing an estimated capacity of 150 cfs through the 54” CMP culvert existing at that time. That culvert has since been replaced with a 54”x88” reinforced concrete arch pipe. The capacity of the new culvert, based on surveyed inverts, is approximately 300 cfs before overtopping of the roadway. The culvert itself can accommodate approximately 210 cfs without any headwater over the culvert (see attached culvert calculations). The estimated 100-year flow at the Durston Road culvert is 114 cfs. Based on the findings of the PUD report and existing trail elevations along the west bank of Baxter Creek, the “Lakes” subdivision will not be impacted by the flooding of Baxter Creek during the 100-year storm event. Please refer to the Baxter Creek Flood Analysis immediately following Exhibit A. Aajker Creek: Aajker Creek was not part of the original Valley West PUD submittal, so a flood hazard evaluation of this stream is attached herein, in support of “The Lakes at Valley West” subdivision. The majority of runoff in Aajker Creek comes from areas south of Huffine Lane; 297 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application the 100-year flow was conservatively estimated to match the capacity of the two culverts under Huffine, a total of 191 cfs. USGS topography and project-specific (i.e., surveyed) topography between Huffine Lane and Durston Road both indicate drainage generally flows to the north-northwest. This would direct any streambank overflow to the west side of the stream, and away from the project site. Surveyed cross-sections and existing, surveyed culvert overflow points also indicate overflow would occur to the west (offsite) rather than to the east, and would not re-enter Aajker Creek downstream of the point(s) of overflow. The attached report and calculations estimate the 100-year peak flow within the Aajker Creek stream channel along the project’s west boundary to be 37.91 cfs. The 100-year high water limits of Aajker Creek are shown on the attached Exhibit A for your reference. Based on the findings of this analysis, the “Lakes” subdivision will not be impacted by the flooding of Aajker Creek during the 100-year storm event. Please refer to the Aajker Creek Flood Analysis immediately following the Baxter Creek Flood Analysis. 298 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Baxter Creek Floodplain Analysis 299 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Aajker Creek Floodplain Analysis 300 WBO WBO WBOWBO2880 Technology Blvd- WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702010010020050HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETREVISIONSSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\002\ACAD\EXHIBITS\FLOOD ANALYSIS.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Feb/25/2015ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2015APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. 5352.002EX.ABOZEMANMTKDJKDJKDJ01/2015FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS FOR AAJKER AND BAXTER CREEKSTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTESTIMATED 100-YEAR HIGH WATER LIMITS FOR AAJKER CREEK AND BAXTER CREEKBAXTER CREEKCENTERLINEPROPERTY LINEOPEN WATEROPEN WATERDURSTON ROADWESTGATE AVENUE LOCAL STREETLAUREL PARKWAY WESTMORLAND DRIVEAAJKER CREEK ESTIMATED100-YEAR HIGH WATER LIMITS(BASED ON AAJKER CREEK FLOODANALYSIS COMPLETED IN 2015)BAXTER CREEKESTIMATED 100-YEARHIGH WATER LIMITS(BASED ON VALLEY WESTDRAINAGE STUDYCOMPLETED IN 2001)SOUTH CUTOFF DITCHEXIST. 36" CMP301 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat Application Baxter Creek Floodplain Analysis 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Monday, Jan 5 2015 Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 4739.82 Pipe Length (ft) = 63.60 Slope (%)= 1.31 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 4740.65 Rise (in)= 54.0 Shape = Arch Span (in)= 108.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Arch Corrugated Metal Culvert Entrance = Mitered to slope (A) Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.03, 1, 0.0463, 0.75, 0.7 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 4748.40 Top Width (ft)= 30.00 Crest Width (ft) = 50.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs)= 0.00 Qmax (cfs)= 500.00 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs)= 210.00 Qpipe (cfs)= 210.00 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 7.46 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 9.61 HGL Dn (ft)= 4743.36 HGL Up (ft)= 4743.23 Hw Elev (ft)= 4745.12 Hw/D (ft)= 0.99 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 364 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Monday, Jan 5 2015 Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 4739.82 Pipe Length (ft) = 63.60 Slope (%)= 1.31 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 4740.65 Rise (in)= 54.0 Shape = Arch Span (in)= 108.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Arch Corrugated Metal Culvert Entrance = Mitered to slope (A) Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.03, 1, 0.0463, 0.75, 0.7 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 4748.40 Top Width (ft)= 30.00 Crest Width (ft) = 50.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs)= 0.00 Qmax (cfs)= 500.00 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs)= 300.00 Qpipe (cfs)= 300.00 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 10.07 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 11.44 HGL Dn (ft)= 4743.68 HGL Up (ft)= 4743.86 Hw Elev (ft)= 4748.19 Hw/D (ft)= 1.67 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 365 Hydraflow Express - Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! - 01/5/15 1 Q Veloc Depth HGL Total Pipe Over Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Hw Hw/D (cfs)(cfs)(cfs)(ft/s)(ft/s)(in)(in)(ft)(ft)(ft) 30.00 30.00 0.00 1.36 1.92 31.30 21.35 4742.43 4742.43 4742.53 0.42 60.00 60.00 0.00 2.54 5.94 33.81 13.62 4742.64 4741.79 4742.49 0.41 90.00 90.00 0.00 3.63 6.89 35.88 17.75 4742.81 4742.13 4743.09 0.54 120.00 120.00 0.00 4.65 7.64 37.76 21.53 4742.97 4742.44 4743.63 0.66 150.00 150.00 0.00 5.63 8.40 39.35 24.70 4743.10 4742.71 4744.15 0.78 180.00 180.00 0.00 6.55 8.99 41.00 28.00 4743.24 4742.98 4744.64 0.89 210.00 210.00 0.00 7.46 9.61 42.47 30.94 4743.36 4743.23 4745.12 0.99 240.00 240.00 0.00 8.35 10.25 43.77 33.53 4743.47 4743.44 4745.60 1.10 270.00 270.00 0.00 9.21 10.82 45.11 36.21 4743.58 4743.67 4747.40 1.50 300.00 300.00 0.00 10.07 11.44 46.28 38.55 4743.68 4743.86 4748.19 1.67 330.00 315.24 14.76 10.51 11.76 46.83 39.67 4743.72 4743.96 4748.61 1.77 360.00 321.36 38.64 10.69 11.91 47.02 40.03 4743.74 4743.99 4748.79 1.81 390.00 326.93 63.07 10.85 12.04 47.20 40.39 4743.75 4744.02 4748.96 1.85 420.00 331.46 88.54 10.98 12.12 47.37 40.75 4743.77 4744.05 4749.09 1.88 450.00 335.72 114.28 11.09 12.20 47.55 41.10 4743.78 4744.08 4749.22 1.91 480.00 339.43 140.57 11.21 12.30 47.64 41.27 4743.79 4744.09 4749.34 1.93 366 367 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat Application Aajker Creek Floodplain Analysis 368 Page 1 of 2 The Lakes at Valley West Flood Analysis for Aajker Creek January 27, 2015 (revised March 26, 2015) Part 1 Introduction This report provides hydrologic and hydraulic calculations to delineate the Aajker Creek floodplain, in support of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision. The site is a 65-acre residential development located south of Durston Road, between Gooch Hill Road and Cottonwood Road. Aajker Creek exists along and just west of the project boundary, flowing due north under Durston Road. The majority of runoff in Aajker Creek comes from areas south of Huffine Lane; the 100-year flow was conservatively estimated to match the capacity of the two culverts under Huffine. Refer to the attached Figure 1. In addition, approximately 163 acres south of the site historically drained across the site to Durston Road, then west to Aajker Creek. The western 110 acres of this “run-on” water will be intercepted at the south property line and directed west to Aajker Creek in a new ditch, called the “South Cutoff Ditch” in the attached calculations. The remaining 53 acres of run-on water will be intercepted at the south property line and directed east to the onsite constructed wetlands, through the East Lake and then the West Lake, and then north under Durston Road through an existing 24” RCP culvert east of Aajker Creek (refer to Section 27 of this Preliminary Plat submittal). Runoff from this 53-acre offsite area will not enter Aajker Creek until several hundred feet north of Durston Road. Part 2 Major Drainage (Flood) Routing USGS topography and project-specific (i.e., surveyed) topography between Huffine Lane and Durston Road both indicate drainage generally flows to the north-northwest. This would direct any streambank overflow to the west side of the stream, and away from the project site. Surveyed cross-sections and existing, surveyed culvert overflow points also indicate overflow would occur to the west (offsite) rather than to the east, and would not re-enter Aajker Creek downstream of the point(s) of overflow. This means that when the stream is at flood stage, much of the runoff spills out the west side of the stream and flows overland to Durston Road, without re-entering Aajker Creek. The 100-year peak runoff in Aajker Creek at the project site was conservatively estimated to match the capacity of the two existing culverts under Huffine Lane. Because of the length of the basin, the direct runoff from the much smaller area north of Huffine Lane will have passed under Durston Road before much runoff from the upper basin reaches the site. The existing culvert capacities are: 1. Primary: in-stream 48” CMP, 400 feet east of Gooch Hill Road, Q = 134.44 cfs 2. Secondary: contributing 36” CMP, 1,200 feet east of Gooch Hill Road, Q = 56.44 cfs The total of the above two runoff sources is approximately 191 cfs, which represents the 100-year peak runoff in Aajker Creek between Huffine Road and Durston Road. Hydraulic calculations are attached. 369 Page 2 of 2 Part 3 100-Year Floodplain Delineation The flow in Aajker Creek along the project’s west boundary is made up of two components: 1. Existing 36” CMP Stream Culvert: This culvert is under a small dirt road near the project’s southwest corner. Just upstream of the culvert, the stream channel’s capacity is 45.66 cfs. However, the culvert’s capacity at the surveyed overtopping elevation (4759.0) is only 20.45 cfs; the excess, up to 25.21 cfs, overtops and runs downslope to the northwest, away from Aajker Creek. Hydraulic calculations are attached. 2. Direct Runoff: Direct runoff entering Aajker Creek between the above-described 36” CMP stream culvert and Durston Road is primarily “run-on” water from offsite areas to the south. A 100-year peak runoff value of 17.46 cfs was calculated in the onsite drainage report summary table, in Section 27 of this Preliminary Plat submittal, as sub-basin D1.1(A+B). The proposed South Cutoff Ditch will intercept 110 acres of offsite runoff and discharge into Aajker Creek just downstream of the existing 36” CMP stream culvert. The total of the above two runoff sources (20.45+17.46) is 37.91 cfs, which represents the 100-year peak runoff in the stream channel adjacent to the project site. This flow was routed through 10 representative cross-sections using FlowMaster software, and the resulting water surface elevations were transferred to a plan view using surveyed spot elevations and elevation contours. The 100-year peak runoff will not overtop either streambank of Aajker Creek adjacent to the proposed project. Hydraulic calculations for open channel flow through the stream channel are attached. The 100-year flood limits are shown on the attached Figure 2, and also on Figure A preceding the Baxter Creek calculations in this Section. N:\5352\002\Design Docs\Reports\Storm\Aajker floodplain\Aajker 100-yr flood report, revised 3-26-15.doc 370 371 (this page left blank intentionally) 372 373 MAJOR DRAINAGE (FLOOD) ROUTING HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 374 (this page left blank intentionally) 375 Culvert Calculator Report 48" CMP (Huffine) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:14:19 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 10.74 ft Headwater Depth/Height 2.25 Computed Headwater Elevation 10.74 ft Discharge 134.44 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev.8.81 ft Tailwater Elevation 2.55 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 10.74 ft Control Type Outlet Control Grades Upstream Invert 1.74 ft Downstream Invert 0.00 ft Length 145.00 ft Constructed Slope 1.20 % Hydraulic Profile Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth, Downstream 3.46 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 3.46 ft Velocity Downstream 11.64 ft/s Critical Slope 2.75 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 4.00 ft Section Size 48 inch Rise 4.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 10.74 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.78 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.89 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev.8.81 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 12.6 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 376 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 1.10 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 134.44 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 2.55 ft Flow Area 24.62 ft² Wetted Perimeter 18.13 ft Hydraulic Radius 1.36 ft Top Width 17.31 ft Critical Depth 2.32 ft Critical Slope 1.74 % Velocity 5.46 ft/s Velocity Head 0.46 ft Specific Energy 3.01 ft Froude Number 0.81 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.55 ft Critical Depth 2.32 ft Channel Slope 1.10 % 48" TW calc (Huffine) 1/22/2015 9:15:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 377 Culvert Calculator Report 36" CMP (Huffine) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:16:31 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 112.40 ft Headwater Depth/Height 3.12 Computed Headwater Elevation 112.40 ft Discharge 56.44 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev. 107.51 ft Tailwater Elevation 101.77 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 112.40 ft Control Type Outlet Control Grades Upstream Invert 103.04 ft Downstream Invert 99.93 ft Length 339.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.92 % Hydraulic Profile Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth, Downstream 2.44 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 2.44 ft Velocity Downstream 9.18 ft/s Critical Slope 2.48 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 3.00 ft Section Size 36 inch Rise 3.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 112.40 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.99 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.50 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev. 107.51 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 7.1 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 378 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.90 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 56.44 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.84 ft Flow Area 13.87 ft² Wetted Perimeter 13.65 ft Hydraulic Radius 1.02 ft Top Width 13.05 ft Critical Depth 1.56 ft Critical Slope 1.95 % Velocity 4.07 ft/s Velocity Head 0.26 ft Specific Energy 2.10 ft Froude Number 0.70 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.84 ft Critical Depth 1.56 ft Channel Slope 0.90 % 36" TW calc (Huffine) 1/22/2015 9:15:55 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 379 100-YEAR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS 380 (this page left blank intentionally) 381 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Normal Depth 2.37 ft Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.95 0+45.7 59.94 0+49.0 58.69 0+49.7 57.63 0+54.5 57.77 0+57.3 57.82 0+58.5 59.08 0+61.6 59.87 0+65.2 60.20 1+01.7 60.02 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.95)(1+01.7, 60.02)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge 54.31 ft³/s Elevation Range 57.63 to 60.20 ft Flow Area 26.86 ft² sta. 14+59 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:18:16 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 382 Results Wetted Perimeter 64.51 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.42 ft Top Width 63.02 ft Normal Depth 2.37 ft Critical Depth 1.23 ft Critical Slope 2.05 % Velocity 2.02 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 2.43 ft Froude Number 0.55 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.37 ft Critical Depth 1.23 ft Channel Slope 0.73 % Critical Slope 2.05 % sta. 14+59 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:18:16 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 383 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Normal Depth 2.34 ft Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.21 0+43.7 59.17 0+48.0 58.23 0+49.1 56.86 0+52.5 56.94 0+55.7 56.99 0+57.0 58.70 0+64.4 59.20 0+66.8 59.33 1+02.6 59.10 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.21)(1+02.6, 59.10)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge 45.66 ft³/s Elevation Range 56.86 to 59.33 ft Flow Area 23.82 ft² stream sta. 13+86 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:17:40 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 384 Results Wetted Perimeter 70.77 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.34 ft Top Width 69.04 ft Normal Depth 2.34 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Critical Slope 2.11 % Velocity 1.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 2.40 ft Froude Number 0.58 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.34 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Channel Slope 0.87 % Critical Slope 2.11 % stream sta. 13+86 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:17:40 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 385 Culvert Calculator Report 36" CMP (Sta. 13+40) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:20:13 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 59.00 ft Headwater Depth/Height 0.77 Computed Headwater Elevation 59.00 ft Discharge 20.45 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev.58.76 ft Tailwater Elevation 57.20 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 59.00 ft Control Type Entrance Control Grades Upstream Invert 56.70 ft Downstream Invert 56.28 ft Length 25.00 ft Constructed Slope 1.68 % Hydraulic Profile Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 1.39 ft Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.39 ft Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 1.45 ft Velocity Downstream 6.40 ft/s Critical Slope 1.43 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 3.00 ft Section Size 36 inch Rise 3.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 59.00 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.57 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.28 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev.58.76 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 7.1 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 386 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 3.33 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 20.45 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.87 ft Flow Area 4.01 ft² Wetted Perimeter 7.50 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.53 ft Top Width 7.22 ft Critical Depth 0.96 ft Critical Slope 2.23 % Velocity 5.10 ft/s Velocity Head 0.40 ft Specific Energy 1.27 ft Froude Number 1.21 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.87 ft Critical Depth 0.96 ft Channel Slope 3.33 % 36" TW calc (Sta. 13+40) 1/22/2015 9:19:02 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 387 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.30 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 17.46 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.70 ft Flow Area 8.67 ft² Wetted Perimeter 10.75 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.81 ft Top Width 10.20 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Critical Slope 2.30 % Velocity 2.01 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 1.76 ft Froude Number 0.39 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.70 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Channel Slope 0.30 % Critical Slope 2.30 % South Cutoff Ditch (100-yr), revised 3-26-15 3/26/2015 4:14:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 388 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.30 % Normal Depth 1.70 ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 17.46 ft³/s Cross Section Image 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION CROSS-SECTION CALCULATIONS 390 (this page left blank intentionally) 391 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.16 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 43.27 0+09.2 42.91 0+13.4 42.68 0+20.4 41.33 0+22.8 42.86 0+30.1 43.74 0+58.7 43.39 0+63.7 45.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 43.27)(0+63.7, 45.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.77 ft Elevation Range 41.33 to 45.00 ft Flow Area 12.02 ft² Wetted Perimeter 20.98 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.57 ft stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:04:44 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 392 Results Top Width 20.38 ft Normal Depth 1.77 ft Critical Depth 1.55 ft Critical Slope 2.20 % Velocity 3.15 ft/s Velocity Head 0.15 ft Specific Energy 1.92 ft Froude Number 0.72 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.77 ft Critical Depth 1.55 ft Channel Slope 1.16 % Critical Slope 2.20 % stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:04:44 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 393 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.16 % Normal Depth 1.77 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:05:30 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 394 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.91 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 43.79 0+15.0 42.81 0+18.0 42.21 0+20.5 43.22 0+24.6 44.08 0+44.7 44.02 0+54.0 46.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 43.79)(0+54.0, 46.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.52 ft Elevation Range 42.21 to 46.00 ft Flow Area 13.25 ft² Wetted Perimeter 22.31 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.59 ft Top Width 21.97 ft stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:00 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 395 Results Normal Depth 1.52 ft Critical Depth 1.32 ft Critical Slope 2.28 % Velocity 2.86 ft/s Velocity Head 0.13 ft Specific Energy 1.65 ft Froude Number 0.65 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.52 ft Critical Depth 1.32 ft Channel Slope 0.91 % Critical Slope 2.28 % stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:00 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 396 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.91 % Normal Depth 1.52 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:28 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 397 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.58 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 45.97 0+05.3 44.84 0+08.3 43.92 0+14.9 44.69 0+35.8 45.92 0+42.7 46.06 0+50.8 48.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 45.97)(0+50.8, 48.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Elevation Range 43.92 to 48.00 ft Flow Area 15.89 ft² Wetted Perimeter 25.07 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.63 ft Top Width 24.81 ft stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:06:56 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 398 Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.20 ft Critical Slope 2.27 % Velocity 2.39 ft/s Velocity Head 0.09 ft Specific Energy 1.59 ft Froude Number 0.53 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.20 ft Channel Slope 0.58 % Critical Slope 2.27 % stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:06:56 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 399 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.58 % Normal Depth 1.50 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:07:27 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 400 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.60 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 48.58 0+07.2 47.16 0+10.0 45.84 0+15.2 47.01 0+20.0 48.76 0+40.1 48.45 0+50.0 48.34 0+57.5 50.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 48.58)(0+57.5, 50.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.61 ft Elevation Range 45.84 to 50.00 ft Flow Area 8.50 ft² Wetted Perimeter 11.23 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.76 ft stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:07:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 401 Results Top Width 10.70 ft Normal Depth 1.61 ft Critical Depth 1.53 ft Critical Slope 2.09 % Velocity 4.46 ft/s Velocity Head 0.31 ft Specific Energy 1.92 ft Froude Number 0.88 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.61 ft Critical Depth 1.53 ft Channel Slope 1.60 % Critical Slope 2.09 % stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:07:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 402 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.60 % Normal Depth 1.61 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:11:21 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 403 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.37 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 49.40 0+07.0 47.14 0+11.6 46.79 0+14.2 47.91 0+35.6 49.57 0+43.1 49.45 0+58.1 49.24 0+73.1 49.20 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 49.40)(0+73.1, 49.20)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.38 ft Elevation Range 46.79 to 49.57 ft Flow Area 9.78 ft² Wetted Perimeter 14.19 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.69 ft stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:11:53 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 404 Results Top Width 13.77 ft Normal Depth 1.38 ft Critical Depth 1.24 ft Critical Slope 2.11 % Velocity 3.88 ft/s Velocity Head 0.23 ft Specific Energy 1.62 ft Froude Number 0.81 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.38 ft Critical Depth 1.24 ft Channel Slope 1.37 % Critical Slope 2.11 % stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:11:53 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 405 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.37 % Normal Depth 1.38 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:12:23 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 406 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.27 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 52.85 0+03.3 50.68 0+09.0 49.92 0+13.4 51.30 0+17.5 52.55 0+36.2 52.86 0+44.2 52.84 0+59.6 52.76 0+75.0 52.72 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 52.85)(0+75.0, 52.72)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.40 ft Elevation Range 49.92 to 52.86 ft Flow Area 9.22 ft² Wetted Perimeter 11.58 ft stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:12:52 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 407 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.80 ft Top Width 11.13 ft Normal Depth 1.40 ft Critical Depth 1.26 ft Critical Slope 2.07 % Velocity 4.11 ft/s Velocity Head 0.26 ft Specific Energy 1.66 ft Froude Number 0.80 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.40 ft Critical Depth 1.26 ft Channel Slope 1.27 % Critical Slope 2.07 % stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:12:52 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 408 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.27 % Normal Depth 1.40 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:13:17 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 409 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.26 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 56.73 0+12.5 54.10 0+15.0 53.41 0+17.3 54.95 0+21.2 55.93 0+41.0 55.95 0+53.0 55.74 0+68.6 55.74 0+84.6 55.72 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 56.73)(0+84.6, 55.72)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.83 ft Elevation Range 53.41 to 56.73 ft Flow Area 9.40 ft² Wetted Perimeter 12.09 ft stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:02:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 410 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.78 ft Top Width 11.37 ft Normal Depth 1.83 ft Critical Depth 1.66 ft Critical Slope 2.13 % Velocity 4.03 ft/s Velocity Head 0.25 ft Specific Energy 2.08 ft Froude Number 0.78 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.83 ft Critical Depth 1.66 ft Channel Slope 1.26 % Critical Slope 2.13 % stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:02:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 411 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.26 % Normal Depth 1.83 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:03:58 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 412 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 2.43 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 58.28 0+32.5 57.89 0+44.4 56.52 0+47.1 55.76 0+49.7 56.86 0+69.7 58.44 0+88.1 58.58 0+93.5 58.55 1+08.0 58.56 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 58.28)(1+08.0, 58.56)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Elevation Range 55.76 to 58.58 ft Flow Area 8.89 ft² Wetted Perimeter 17.18 ft stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:07 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 413 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.52 ft Top Width 16.80 ft Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.52 ft Critical Slope 2.27 % Velocity 4.26 ft/s Velocity Head 0.28 ft Specific Energy 1.78 ft Froude Number 1.03 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.52 ft Channel Slope 2.43 % Critical Slope 2.27 % stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:07 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 414 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 2.43 % Normal Depth 1.50 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:46 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 415 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.21 0+43.7 59.17 0+48.0 58.23 0+49.1 56.86 0+52.5 56.94 0+55.7 56.99 0+57.0 58.70 0+64.4 59.20 0+66.8 59.33 1+02.6 59.10 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.21)(1+02.6, 59.10)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.34 ft Elevation Range 56.86 to 59.33 ft Flow Area 9.68 ft² stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 416 Results Wetted Perimeter 9.85 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.98 ft Top Width 8.60 ft Normal Depth 1.34 ft Critical Depth 1.04 ft Critical Slope 2.16 % Velocity 3.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.24 ft Specific Energy 1.58 ft Froude Number 0.65 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.34 ft Critical Depth 1.04 ft Channel Slope 0.87 % Critical Slope 2.16 % stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 417 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Normal Depth 1.34 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:47 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 418 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.95 0+45.7 59.94 0+49.0 58.69 0+49.7 57.63 0+54.5 57.77 0+57.3 57.82 0+58.5 59.08 0+61.6 59.87 0+65.2 60.20 1+01.7 60.02 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.95)(1+01.7, 60.02)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.35 ft Elevation Range 57.63 to 60.20 ft Flow Area 10.78 ft² stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 419 Results Wetted Perimeter 11.29 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.95 ft Top Width 10.17 ft Normal Depth 1.35 ft Critical Depth 0.99 ft Critical Slope 2.16 % Velocity 3.52 ft/s Velocity Head 0.19 ft Specific Energy 1.54 ft Froude Number 0.60 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.35 ft Critical Depth 0.99 ft Channel Slope 0.73 % Critical Slope 2.16 % stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 420 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Normal Depth 1.35 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:51 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 421 WBO WBO WBOWBO2880 Technology Blvd- WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702010010020050HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETREVISIONSSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\002\ACAD\EXHIBITS\FLOOD ANALYSIS.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Feb/25/2015ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC., 2015APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. 5352.002EX.ABOZEMANMTKDJKDJKDJ01/2015FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS FOR AAJKER AND BAXTER CREEKSTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTESTIMATED 100-YEAR HIGH WATER LIMITS FOR AAJKER CREEK AND BAXTER CREEKBAXTER CREEKCENTERLINEPROPERTY LINEOPEN WATEROPEN WATERDURSTON ROADWESTGATE AVENUE LOCAL STREETLAUREL PARKWAY WESTMORLAND DRIVEAAJKER CREEK ESTIMATED100-YEAR HIGH WATER LIMITS(BASED ON AAJKER CREEK FLOODANALYSIS COMPLETED IN 2015)BAXTER CREEKESTIMATED 100-YEARHIGH WATER LIMITS(BASED ON VALLEY WESTDRAINAGE STUDYCOMPLETED IN 2001)SOUTH CUTOFF DITCHEXIST. 36" CMP422 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat Application Baxter Creek Floodplain Analysis 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Monday, Jan 5 2015 Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 4739.82 Pipe Length (ft) = 63.60 Slope (%)= 1.31 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 4740.65 Rise (in)= 54.0 Shape = Arch Span (in)= 108.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Arch Corrugated Metal Culvert Entrance = Mitered to slope (A) Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.03, 1, 0.0463, 0.75, 0.7 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 4748.40 Top Width (ft)= 30.00 Crest Width (ft) = 50.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs)= 0.00 Qmax (cfs)= 500.00 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs)= 210.00 Qpipe (cfs)= 210.00 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 7.46 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 9.61 HGL Dn (ft)= 4743.36 HGL Up (ft)= 4743.23 Hw Elev (ft)= 4745.12 Hw/D (ft)= 0.99 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 485 Culvert Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Monday, Jan 5 2015 Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! Invert Elev Dn (ft) = 4739.82 Pipe Length (ft) = 63.60 Slope (%)= 1.31 Invert Elev Up (ft) = 4740.65 Rise (in)= 54.0 Shape = Arch Span (in)= 108.0 No. Barrels = 1 n-Value = 0.013 Culvert Type = Arch Corrugated Metal Culvert Entrance = Mitered to slope (A) Coeff. K,M,c,Y,k = 0.03, 1, 0.0463, 0.75, 0.7 Embankment Top Elevation (ft) = 4748.40 Top Width (ft)= 30.00 Crest Width (ft) = 50.00 Calculations Qmin (cfs)= 0.00 Qmax (cfs)= 500.00 Tailwater Elev (ft) = (dc+D)/2 Highlighted Qtotal (cfs)= 300.00 Qpipe (cfs)= 300.00 Qovertop (cfs) = 0.00 Veloc Dn (ft/s) = 10.07 Veloc Up (ft/s) = 11.44 HGL Dn (ft)= 4743.68 HGL Up (ft)= 4743.86 Hw Elev (ft)= 4748.19 Hw/D (ft)= 1.67 Flow Regime = Inlet Control 486 Hydraflow Express - Baxter Creek Culvert Capacity (@ Durston Road) Note: Culv type RCP! - 01/5/15 1 Q Veloc Depth HGL Total Pipe Over Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Hw Hw/D (cfs)(cfs)(cfs)(ft/s)(ft/s)(in)(in)(ft)(ft)(ft) 30.00 30.00 0.00 1.36 1.92 31.30 21.35 4742.43 4742.43 4742.53 0.42 60.00 60.00 0.00 2.54 5.94 33.81 13.62 4742.64 4741.79 4742.49 0.41 90.00 90.00 0.00 3.63 6.89 35.88 17.75 4742.81 4742.13 4743.09 0.54 120.00 120.00 0.00 4.65 7.64 37.76 21.53 4742.97 4742.44 4743.63 0.66 150.00 150.00 0.00 5.63 8.40 39.35 24.70 4743.10 4742.71 4744.15 0.78 180.00 180.00 0.00 6.55 8.99 41.00 28.00 4743.24 4742.98 4744.64 0.89 210.00 210.00 0.00 7.46 9.61 42.47 30.94 4743.36 4743.23 4745.12 0.99 240.00 240.00 0.00 8.35 10.25 43.77 33.53 4743.47 4743.44 4745.60 1.10 270.00 270.00 0.00 9.21 10.82 45.11 36.21 4743.58 4743.67 4747.40 1.50 300.00 300.00 0.00 10.07 11.44 46.28 38.55 4743.68 4743.86 4748.19 1.67 330.00 315.24 14.76 10.51 11.76 46.83 39.67 4743.72 4743.96 4748.61 1.77 360.00 321.36 38.64 10.69 11.91 47.02 40.03 4743.74 4743.99 4748.79 1.81 390.00 326.93 63.07 10.85 12.04 47.20 40.39 4743.75 4744.02 4748.96 1.85 420.00 331.46 88.54 10.98 12.12 47.37 40.75 4743.77 4744.05 4749.09 1.88 450.00 335.72 114.28 11.09 12.20 47.55 41.10 4743.78 4744.08 4749.22 1.91 480.00 339.43 140.57 11.21 12.30 47.64 41.27 4743.79 4744.09 4749.34 1.93 487 488 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phases 1 and 2 Preliminary Plat Application Aajker Creek Floodplain Analysis 489 Page 1 of 2 The Lakes at Valley West Flood Analysis for Aajker Creek January 27, 2015 (revised March 26, 2015) Part 1 Introduction This report provides hydrologic and hydraulic calculations to delineate the Aajker Creek floodplain, in support of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision. The site is a 65-acre residential development located south of Durston Road, between Gooch Hill Road and Cottonwood Road. Aajker Creek exists along and just west of the project boundary, flowing due north under Durston Road. The majority of runoff in Aajker Creek comes from areas south of Huffine Lane; the 100-year flow was conservatively estimated to match the capacity of the two culverts under Huffine. Refer to the attached Figure 1. In addition, approximately 163 acres south of the site historically drained across the site to Durston Road, then west to Aajker Creek. The western 110 acres of this “run-on” water will be intercepted at the south property line and directed west to Aajker Creek in a new ditch, called the “South Cutoff Ditch” in the attached calculations. The remaining 53 acres of run-on water will be intercepted at the south property line and directed east to the onsite constructed wetlands, through the East Lake and then the West Lake, and then north under Durston Road through an existing 24” RCP culvert east of Aajker Creek (refer to Section 27 of this Preliminary Plat submittal). Runoff from this 53-acre offsite area will not enter Aajker Creek until several hundred feet north of Durston Road. Part 2 Major Drainage (Flood) Routing USGS topography and project-specific (i.e., surveyed) topography between Huffine Lane and Durston Road both indicate drainage generally flows to the north-northwest. This would direct any streambank overflow to the west side of the stream, and away from the project site. Surveyed cross-sections and existing, surveyed culvert overflow points also indicate overflow would occur to the west (offsite) rather than to the east, and would not re-enter Aajker Creek downstream of the point(s) of overflow. This means that when the stream is at flood stage, much of the runoff spills out the west side of the stream and flows overland to Durston Road, without re-entering Aajker Creek. The 100-year peak runoff in Aajker Creek at the project site was conservatively estimated to match the capacity of the two existing culverts under Huffine Lane. Because of the length of the basin, the direct runoff from the much smaller area north of Huffine Lane will have passed under Durston Road before much runoff from the upper basin reaches the site. The existing culvert capacities are: 1. Primary: in-stream 48” CMP, 400 feet east of Gooch Hill Road, Q = 134.44 cfs 2. Secondary: contributing 36” CMP, 1,200 feet east of Gooch Hill Road, Q = 56.44 cfs The total of the above two runoff sources is approximately 191 cfs, which represents the 100-year peak runoff in Aajker Creek between Huffine Road and Durston Road. Hydraulic calculations are attached. 490 Page 2 of 2 Part 3 100-Year Floodplain Delineation The flow in Aajker Creek along the project’s west boundary is made up of two components: 1. Existing 36” CMP Stream Culvert: This culvert is under a small dirt road near the project’s southwest corner. Just upstream of the culvert, the stream channel’s capacity is 45.66 cfs. However, the culvert’s capacity at the surveyed overtopping elevation (4759.0) is only 20.45 cfs; the excess, up to 25.21 cfs, overtops and runs downslope to the northwest, away from Aajker Creek. Hydraulic calculations are attached. 2. Direct Runoff: Direct runoff entering Aajker Creek between the above-described 36” CMP stream culvert and Durston Road is primarily “run-on” water from offsite areas to the south. A 100-year peak runoff value of 17.46 cfs was calculated in the onsite drainage report summary table, in Section 27 of this Preliminary Plat submittal, as sub-basin D1.1(A+B). The proposed South Cutoff Ditch will intercept 110 acres of offsite runoff and discharge into Aajker Creek just downstream of the existing 36” CMP stream culvert. The total of the above two runoff sources (20.45+17.46) is 37.91 cfs, which represents the 100-year peak runoff in the stream channel adjacent to the project site. This flow was routed through 10 representative cross-sections using FlowMaster software, and the resulting water surface elevations were transferred to a plan view using surveyed spot elevations and elevation contours. The 100-year peak runoff will not overtop either streambank of Aajker Creek adjacent to the proposed project. Hydraulic calculations for open channel flow through the stream channel are attached. The 100-year flood limits are shown on the attached Figure 2, and also on Figure A preceding the Baxter Creek calculations in this Section. N:\5352\002\Design Docs\Reports\Storm\Aajker floodplain\Aajker 100-yr flood report, revised 3-26-15.doc 491 492 (this page left blank intentionally) 493 494 MAJOR DRAINAGE (FLOOD) ROUTING HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 495 (this page left blank intentionally) 496 Culvert Calculator Report 48" CMP (Huffine) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:14:19 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 10.74 ft Headwater Depth/Height 2.25 Computed Headwater Elevation 10.74 ft Discharge 134.44 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev.8.81 ft Tailwater Elevation 2.55 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 10.74 ft Control Type Outlet Control Grades Upstream Invert 1.74 ft Downstream Invert 0.00 ft Length 145.00 ft Constructed Slope 1.20 % Hydraulic Profile Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth, Downstream 3.46 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 3.46 ft Velocity Downstream 11.64 ft/s Critical Slope 2.75 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 4.00 ft Section Size 48 inch Rise 4.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 10.74 ft Upstream Velocity Head 1.78 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.89 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev.8.81 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 12.6 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 497 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 1.10 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 134.44 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 2.55 ft Flow Area 24.62 ft² Wetted Perimeter 18.13 ft Hydraulic Radius 1.36 ft Top Width 17.31 ft Critical Depth 2.32 ft Critical Slope 1.74 % Velocity 5.46 ft/s Velocity Head 0.46 ft Specific Energy 3.01 ft Froude Number 0.81 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.55 ft Critical Depth 2.32 ft Channel Slope 1.10 % 48" TW calc (Huffine) 1/22/2015 9:15:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 498 Culvert Calculator Report 36" CMP (Huffine) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:16:31 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 112.40 ft Headwater Depth/Height 3.12 Computed Headwater Elevation 112.40 ft Discharge 56.44 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev. 107.51 ft Tailwater Elevation 101.77 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 112.40 ft Control Type Outlet Control Grades Upstream Invert 103.04 ft Downstream Invert 99.93 ft Length 339.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.92 % Hydraulic Profile Profile CompositeM2PressureProfile Depth, Downstream 2.44 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth N/A ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 2.44 ft Velocity Downstream 9.18 ft/s Critical Slope 2.48 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 3.00 ft Section Size 36 inch Rise 3.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 112.40 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.99 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.50 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev. 107.51 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 7.1 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 499 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.90 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 56.44 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.84 ft Flow Area 13.87 ft² Wetted Perimeter 13.65 ft Hydraulic Radius 1.02 ft Top Width 13.05 ft Critical Depth 1.56 ft Critical Slope 1.95 % Velocity 4.07 ft/s Velocity Head 0.26 ft Specific Energy 2.10 ft Froude Number 0.70 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.84 ft Critical Depth 1.56 ft Channel Slope 0.90 % 36" TW calc (Huffine) 1/22/2015 9:15:55 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 500 100-YEAR RUNOFF CALCULATIONS 501 (this page left blank intentionally) 502 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Normal Depth 2.37 ft Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.95 0+45.7 59.94 0+49.0 58.69 0+49.7 57.63 0+54.5 57.77 0+57.3 57.82 0+58.5 59.08 0+61.6 59.87 0+65.2 60.20 1+01.7 60.02 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.95)(1+01.7, 60.02)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge 54.31 ft³/s Elevation Range 57.63 to 60.20 ft Flow Area 26.86 ft² sta. 14+59 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:18:16 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 503 Results Wetted Perimeter 64.51 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.42 ft Top Width 63.02 ft Normal Depth 2.37 ft Critical Depth 1.23 ft Critical Slope 2.05 % Velocity 2.02 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 2.43 ft Froude Number 0.55 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.37 ft Critical Depth 1.23 ft Channel Slope 0.73 % Critical Slope 2.05 % sta. 14+59 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:18:16 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 504 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Discharge Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Normal Depth 2.34 ft Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.21 0+43.7 59.17 0+48.0 58.23 0+49.1 56.86 0+52.5 56.94 0+55.7 56.99 0+57.0 58.70 0+64.4 59.20 0+66.8 59.33 1+02.6 59.10 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.21)(1+02.6, 59.10)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Discharge 45.66 ft³/s Elevation Range 56.86 to 59.33 ft Flow Area 23.82 ft² stream sta. 13+86 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:17:40 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 505 Results Wetted Perimeter 70.77 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.34 ft Top Width 69.04 ft Normal Depth 2.34 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Critical Slope 2.11 % Velocity 1.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 2.40 ft Froude Number 0.58 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 2.34 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Channel Slope 0.87 % Critical Slope 2.11 % stream sta. 13+86 (to overflow) 1/22/2015 9:17:40 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 506 Culvert Calculator Report 36" CMP (Sta. 13+40) Title: The Lakes at Valley West - Aajker flood limits n:\...\storm\aajker floodplain\culverts.cvm 01/22/15 09:20:13 PM Morrison Maierle Inc © Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Project Engineer: mhickman CulvertMaster v3.3 [03.03.00.04] Page 1 of 1 Solve For: Discharge Culvert Summary Allowable HW Elevation 59.00 ft Headwater Depth/Height 0.77 Computed Headwater Elevation 59.00 ft Discharge 20.45 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev.58.76 ft Tailwater Elevation 57.20 ft Outlet Control HW Elev. 59.00 ft Control Type Entrance Control Grades Upstream Invert 56.70 ft Downstream Invert 56.28 ft Length 25.00 ft Constructed Slope 1.68 % Hydraulic Profile Profile S2 Depth, Downstream 1.39 ft Slope Type Steep Normal Depth 1.39 ft Flow Regime Supercritical Critical Depth 1.45 ft Velocity Downstream 6.40 ft/s Critical Slope 1.43 % Section Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.024 Section Material CMP Span 3.00 ft Section Size 36 inch Rise 3.00 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties Outlet Control HW Elev. 59.00 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.57 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.28 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev.58.76 ft Flow Control N/A Inlet Type Headwall Area Full 7.1 ft² K 0.00780 HDS 5 Chart 2 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03790 Equation Form 1 Y 0.69000 507 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 3.33 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 20.45 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.87 ft Flow Area 4.01 ft² Wetted Perimeter 7.50 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.53 ft Top Width 7.22 ft Critical Depth 0.96 ft Critical Slope 2.23 % Velocity 5.10 ft/s Velocity Head 0.40 ft Specific Energy 1.27 ft Froude Number 1.21 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.87 ft Critical Depth 0.96 ft Channel Slope 3.33 % 36" TW calc (Sta. 13+40) 1/22/2015 9:19:02 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 508 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.30 % Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 17.46 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.70 ft Flow Area 8.67 ft² Wetted Perimeter 10.75 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.81 ft Top Width 10.20 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Critical Slope 2.30 % Velocity 2.01 ft/s Velocity Head 0.06 ft Specific Energy 1.76 ft Froude Number 0.39 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.70 ft Critical Depth 1.16 ft Channel Slope 0.30 % Critical Slope 2.30 % South Cutoff Ditch (100-yr), revised 3-26-15 3/26/2015 4:14:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 509 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 Channel Slope 0.30 % Normal Depth 1.70 ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 17.46 ft³/s Cross Section Image 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION CROSS-SECTION CALCULATIONS 511 (this page left blank intentionally) 512 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.16 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 43.27 0+09.2 42.91 0+13.4 42.68 0+20.4 41.33 0+22.8 42.86 0+30.1 43.74 0+58.7 43.39 0+63.7 45.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 43.27)(0+63.7, 45.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.77 ft Elevation Range 41.33 to 45.00 ft Flow Area 12.02 ft² Wetted Perimeter 20.98 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.57 ft stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:04:44 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 513 Results Top Width 20.38 ft Normal Depth 1.77 ft Critical Depth 1.55 ft Critical Slope 2.20 % Velocity 3.15 ft/s Velocity Head 0.15 ft Specific Energy 1.92 ft Froude Number 0.72 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.77 ft Critical Depth 1.55 ft Channel Slope 1.16 % Critical Slope 2.20 % stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:04:44 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 514 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.16 % Normal Depth 1.77 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 0+29 1/22/2015 4:05:30 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 515 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.91 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 43.79 0+15.0 42.81 0+18.0 42.21 0+20.5 43.22 0+24.6 44.08 0+44.7 44.02 0+54.0 46.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 43.79)(0+54.0, 46.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.52 ft Elevation Range 42.21 to 46.00 ft Flow Area 13.25 ft² Wetted Perimeter 22.31 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.59 ft Top Width 21.97 ft stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:00 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 516 Results Normal Depth 1.52 ft Critical Depth 1.32 ft Critical Slope 2.28 % Velocity 2.86 ft/s Velocity Head 0.13 ft Specific Energy 1.65 ft Froude Number 0.65 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.52 ft Critical Depth 1.32 ft Channel Slope 0.91 % Critical Slope 2.28 % stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:00 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 517 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.91 % Normal Depth 1.52 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 1+38 1/22/2015 4:06:28 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 518 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.58 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 45.97 0+05.3 44.84 0+08.3 43.92 0+14.9 44.69 0+35.8 45.92 0+42.7 46.06 0+50.8 48.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 45.97)(0+50.8, 48.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Elevation Range 43.92 to 48.00 ft Flow Area 15.89 ft² Wetted Perimeter 25.07 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.63 ft Top Width 24.81 ft stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:06:56 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 519 Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.20 ft Critical Slope 2.27 % Velocity 2.39 ft/s Velocity Head 0.09 ft Specific Energy 1.59 ft Froude Number 0.53 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.20 ft Channel Slope 0.58 % Critical Slope 2.27 % stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:06:56 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 520 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.58 % Normal Depth 1.50 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 3+15 1/22/2015 4:07:27 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 521 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.60 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 48.58 0+07.2 47.16 0+10.0 45.84 0+15.2 47.01 0+20.0 48.76 0+40.1 48.45 0+50.0 48.34 0+57.5 50.00 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 48.58)(0+57.5, 50.00)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.61 ft Elevation Range 45.84 to 50.00 ft Flow Area 8.50 ft² Wetted Perimeter 11.23 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.76 ft stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:07:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 522 Results Top Width 10.70 ft Normal Depth 1.61 ft Critical Depth 1.53 ft Critical Slope 2.09 % Velocity 4.46 ft/s Velocity Head 0.31 ft Specific Energy 1.92 ft Froude Number 0.88 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.61 ft Critical Depth 1.53 ft Channel Slope 1.60 % Critical Slope 2.09 % stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:07:59 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 523 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.60 % Normal Depth 1.61 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 5+36 1/22/2015 4:11:21 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 524 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.37 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 49.40 0+07.0 47.14 0+11.6 46.79 0+14.2 47.91 0+35.6 49.57 0+43.1 49.45 0+58.1 49.24 0+73.1 49.20 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 49.40)(0+73.1, 49.20)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.38 ft Elevation Range 46.79 to 49.57 ft Flow Area 9.78 ft² Wetted Perimeter 14.19 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.69 ft stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:11:53 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 525 Results Top Width 13.77 ft Normal Depth 1.38 ft Critical Depth 1.24 ft Critical Slope 2.11 % Velocity 3.88 ft/s Velocity Head 0.23 ft Specific Energy 1.62 ft Froude Number 0.81 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.38 ft Critical Depth 1.24 ft Channel Slope 1.37 % Critical Slope 2.11 % stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:11:53 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 526 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.37 % Normal Depth 1.38 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 6+09 1/22/2015 4:12:23 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 527 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.27 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 52.85 0+03.3 50.68 0+09.0 49.92 0+13.4 51.30 0+17.5 52.55 0+36.2 52.86 0+44.2 52.84 0+59.6 52.76 0+75.0 52.72 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 52.85)(0+75.0, 52.72)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.40 ft Elevation Range 49.92 to 52.86 ft Flow Area 9.22 ft² Wetted Perimeter 11.58 ft stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:12:52 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 528 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.80 ft Top Width 11.13 ft Normal Depth 1.40 ft Critical Depth 1.26 ft Critical Slope 2.07 % Velocity 4.11 ft/s Velocity Head 0.26 ft Specific Energy 1.66 ft Froude Number 0.80 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.40 ft Critical Depth 1.26 ft Channel Slope 1.27 % Critical Slope 2.07 % stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:12:52 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 529 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.27 % Normal Depth 1.40 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 8+49 1/22/2015 4:13:17 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 530 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.26 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 56.73 0+12.5 54.10 0+15.0 53.41 0+17.3 54.95 0+21.2 55.93 0+41.0 55.95 0+53.0 55.74 0+68.6 55.74 0+84.6 55.72 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 56.73)(0+84.6, 55.72)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.83 ft Elevation Range 53.41 to 56.73 ft Flow Area 9.40 ft² Wetted Perimeter 12.09 ft stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:02:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 531 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.78 ft Top Width 11.37 ft Normal Depth 1.83 ft Critical Depth 1.66 ft Critical Slope 2.13 % Velocity 4.03 ft/s Velocity Head 0.25 ft Specific Energy 2.08 ft Froude Number 0.78 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.83 ft Critical Depth 1.66 ft Channel Slope 1.26 % Critical Slope 2.13 % stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:02:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 532 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.26 % Normal Depth 1.83 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 11+26 1/22/2015 4:03:58 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 533 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 2.43 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 58.28 0+32.5 57.89 0+44.4 56.52 0+47.1 55.76 0+49.7 56.86 0+69.7 58.44 0+88.1 58.58 0+93.5 58.55 1+08.0 58.56 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 58.28)(1+08.0, 58.56)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.50 ft Elevation Range 55.76 to 58.58 ft Flow Area 8.89 ft² Wetted Perimeter 17.18 ft stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:07 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 534 Results Hydraulic Radius 0.52 ft Top Width 16.80 ft Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.52 ft Critical Slope 2.27 % Velocity 4.26 ft/s Velocity Head 0.28 ft Specific Energy 1.78 ft Froude Number 1.03 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.50 ft Critical Depth 1.52 ft Channel Slope 2.43 % Critical Slope 2.27 % stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:07 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 535 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 2.43 % Normal Depth 1.50 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 13+11 1/22/2015 4:14:46 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 536 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.21 0+43.7 59.17 0+48.0 58.23 0+49.1 56.86 0+52.5 56.94 0+55.7 56.99 0+57.0 58.70 0+64.4 59.20 0+66.8 59.33 1+02.6 59.10 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.21)(1+02.6, 59.10)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.34 ft Elevation Range 56.86 to 59.33 ft Flow Area 9.68 ft² stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 537 Results Wetted Perimeter 9.85 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.98 ft Top Width 8.60 ft Normal Depth 1.34 ft Critical Depth 1.04 ft Critical Slope 2.16 % Velocity 3.92 ft/s Velocity Head 0.24 ft Specific Energy 1.58 ft Froude Number 0.65 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.34 ft Critical Depth 1.04 ft Channel Slope 0.87 % Critical Slope 2.16 % stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 538 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.87 % Normal Depth 1.34 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 13+86 1/22/2015 4:15:47 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 539 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.0 59.95 0+45.7 59.94 0+49.0 58.69 0+49.7 57.63 0+54.5 57.77 0+57.3 57.82 0+58.5 59.08 0+61.6 59.87 0+65.2 60.20 1+01.7 60.02 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.0, 59.95)(1+01.7, 60.02)0.035 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 1.35 ft Elevation Range 57.63 to 60.20 ft Flow Area 10.78 ft² stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page 540 Results Wetted Perimeter 11.29 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.95 ft Top Width 10.17 ft Normal Depth 1.35 ft Critical Depth 0.99 ft Critical Slope 2.16 % Velocity 3.52 ft/s Velocity Head 0.19 ft Specific Energy 1.54 ft Froude Number 0.60 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.35 ft Critical Depth 0.99 ft Channel Slope 0.73 % Critical Slope 2.16 % stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:25 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 541 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 0.73 % Normal Depth 1.35 ft Discharge 37.91 ft³/s Cross Section Image stream sta. 14+59 1/22/2015 4:16:51 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page 542 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Water and Sewer A water design report and a wastewater design report have been prepared for the water distribution and sewage collection in The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision. The design reports cover the entire “Lakes” Planned Unit Development, which encompass approximately 65 acres. Both reports are included within this section. 543 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Water Design Report 544 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Wastewater Design Report 545 memo Page 1 TO: Shawn Kohtz, P.E. City of Bozeman FROM: James A. Ullman DATE: June 23, 2016 JOB NO.: 5352.007 RE: The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Supplemental to the Design Report for the Water Distribution System CC: Greg Stratton Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply For Your Use This memorandum is to provide a supplemental WaterCAD analyses to the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision PUD Design Report for the Water Distribution System, dated November 24, 2014. This analysis was developed to confirm the proposed water distribution system is adequate to provide water for Phase 3 including the following scenarios; Average Day, Max Day with Fire Flows and Peak Hour. This supplemental data includes the proposed water distribution system to be installed with Phase 3. The same version of WaterCAD along with the same methodology as described in the original Lakes at Valley West Subdivision PUD Design Report for the Water Distribution System was used. The water distribution system proposed for Phase 3 will be adequate to meet the requirements of City of Bozeman Design Standards. An additional 8-inch connection to the existing 12-inch main located in Durston Road is proposed to provide water system looping. This connection is an extension of the main line located in Westgate Avenue which is west of the Laurel Parkway and Durston Road intersection. Temporary blow-offs will be provided at all water main dead ends until such time the main is extended to serve future phases. Please review and contact me with questions and/or comments. 546 AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND 547 False 12:00:00 AM Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Average Day Physical Demand Initial Settings Operational VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Scenario Summary Hydraulic Summary ID Label Notes Active Topology Age Constituent Trace Fire Flow Energy Cost Transient Pressure Dependent Demand Failure History SCADA User Data Extensions Calculation Options Label Calculation Options Label Time Analysis Type Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen-Williams 0.001 40 Base Fire Flow 1 Average Day Base Active Topology Base Physical Base Demand Base Transient Base Pressure Dependent Demand Base Failure History Base SCADA Base User Data Extensions Base Initial Settings Base Operational Base Age Base Constituent Base Trace 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Use simple controls during steady state? Is EPS Snapshot? Page 1 of 1 True Hydraulics Only THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 Start Time Calculation Type Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Base Calculation Options Base Calculation Options Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Base Energy Cost 548 ID Label Demand (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) 597 J-267 0.00 4,960.87 98 599 J-268 0.00 4,960.87 98 601 J-269 0.00 4,960.87 98 603 J-270 0.00 4,960.87 97 605 J-271 0.00 4,960.87 97 607 J-272 0.00 4,960.87 96 609 J-273 0.00 4,960.87 94 611 J-274 0.00 4,960.87 94 613 J-275 0.00 4,960.87 94 614 J-276 0.00 4,960.87 94 616 J-277 0.00 4,960.87 94 618 J-278 0.00 4,960.87 94 620 J-279 0.00 4,960.87 94 623 J-280 0.00 4,960.87 94 625 J-281 0.00 4,960.87 94 627 J-282 0.00 4,960.87 94 629 J-283 0.00 4,960.87 94 632 J-284 0.00 4,960.87 94 634 J-285 0.00 4,960.87 95 636 J-286 0.00 4,960.87 95 638 J-287 0.00 4,960.87 95 640 J-288 0.00 4,960.87 95 642 J-289 0.00 4,960.87 95 644 J-290 0.00 4,960.87 95 646 J-291 0.00 4,960.87 94 648 J-292 0.00 4,960.87 94 650 J-293 0.00 4,960.87 94 652 J-294 0.00 4,960.87 94 654 J-295 0.00 4,960.87 94 657 J-296 0.00 4,960.87 93 659 J-297 0.00 4,960.87 95 661 J-298 0.00 4,960.87 95 663 J-299 0.00 4,960.87 95 665 J-300 0.00 4,960.87 96 667 J-301 0.00 4,960.87 96 669 J-302 0.00 4,960.87 96 671 J-303 0.00 4,960.87 97 673 J-304 0.00 4,960.87 97 675 J-305 0.00 4,960.87 97 677 J-306 0.00 4,960.87 96 679 J-307 0.00 4,960.87 96 681 J-308 0.00 4,960.87 96 683 J-309 0.00 4,960.87 96 685 J-310 0.00 4,960.87 96 687 J-311 0.00 4,960.87 96 689 J-312 0.00 4,960.87 96 691 J-313 0.00 4,960.87 95 693 J-314 0.00 4,960.87 95 695 J-315 0.00 4,960.87 95 697 J-316 0.00 4,960.87 95 699 J-317 0.00 4,960.87 95 701 J-318 0.00 4,960.87 95 703 J-319 0.00 4,960.87 96 705 J-320 0.00 4,960.87 96 707 J-321 0.00 4,960.87 92 4,733.80 4,733.70 AVERAGE DAY FLOW: Junction Table Elevation (ft) 4,734.30 4,736.00 4,737.80 4,740.00 4,743.00 4,744.00 4,744.00 4,743.80 4,743.80 4,743.50 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.10 4,742.50 4,742.20 4,742.00 4,741.90 4,741.20 4,741.50 4,742.00 4,742.60 4,743.00 4,743.40 4,743.40 4,743.90 4,744.80 4,741.20 4,740.80 4,740.80 4,739.60 4,739.00 4,738.00 4,737.40 4,736.60 4,737.80 4,738.20 4,738.80 4,739.00 4,739.00 4,739.20 4,739.50 4,740.00 4,740.50 4,740.70 4,741.10 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,740.00 4,738.70 4,749.00 Zone VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 549 709 J-322 0.00 4,960.87 95 711 J-323 0.00 4,960.87 95 714 J-324 0.00 4,960.87 92 716 J-325 0.00 4,960.87 91 718 J-326 0.25 4,960.86 83 720 J-327 0.25 4,960.86 84 722 J-328 0.25 4,960.86 84 724 J-329 0.25 4,960.86 84 726 J-330 0.25 4,960.86 84 728 J-331 0.25 4,960.86 85 730 J-332 0.25 4,960.86 84 732 J-333 0.25 4,960.86 84 734 J-334 0.25 4,960.86 84 736 J-335 0.25 4,960.86 84 738 J-336 0.25 4,960.86 83 740 J-337 0.25 4,960.86 83 742 J-338 0.25 4,960.86 83 744 J-339 0.25 4,960.86 83 746 J-340 0.25 4,960.86 84 748 J-341 0.25 4,960.86 84 750 J-342 0.25 4,960.86 84 752 J-343 0.25 4,960.86 85 754 J-344 0.25 4,960.86 86 756 J-345 0.25 4,960.86 87 758 J-346 0.25 4,960.86 87 760 J-347 0.25 4,960.86 88 762 J-348 0.25 4,960.86 85 764 J-349 0.25 4,960.86 85 766 J-350 0.25 4,960.86 86 768 J-351 0.25 4,960.86 86 770 J-352 0.25 4,960.86 86 772 J-353 0.25 4,960.86 87 774 J-354 0.25 4,960.86 87 776 J-355 0.25 4,960.86 86 779 J-356 0.25 4,960.86 87 782 J-357 0.25 4,960.86 86 784 J-358 0.25 4,960.86 87 786 J-359 0.25 4,960.86 85 788 J-360 0.25 4,960.86 86 790 J-361 0.25 4,960.86 85 792 J-362 0.25 4,960.86 86 794 J-363 0.25 4,960.86 85 796 J-364 0.25 4,960.86 85 798 J-365 0.25 4,960.86 86 800 J-366 0.25 4,960.86 85 802 J-367 0.25 4,960.86 86 804 J-368 0.25 4,960.86 84 806 J-369 0.25 4,960.86 85 808 J-370 0.25 4,960.86 85 810 J-371 0.25 4,960.86 84 812 J-372 0.25 4,960.86 85 814 J-373 0.25 4,960.86 85 816 J-374 0.25 4,960.86 85 818 J-375 0.25 4,960.86 85 820 J-376 0.25 4,960.86 84 822 J-377 0.25 4,960.86 85 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 4,741.00 4,742.00 4,749.20 4,751.30 4,767.90 4,767.40 4,767.00 4,766.60 4,766.00 4,765.50 4,766.90 4,767.00 4,767.20 4,767.50 4,768.10 4,768.30 4,768.50 4,768.80 4,766.80 4,766.30 4,766.10 4,764.00 4,761.80 4,760.00 4,758.70 4,760.00 4,757.70 4,765.20 4,764.00 4,762.80 4,762.00 4,761.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,765.00 4,760.00 4,759.70 4,762.00 4,760.00 4,762.50 4,766.00 4,764.00 4,764.00 4,764.50 4,765.00 4,763.00 4,765.50 4,763.00 4,766.00 4,764.80 4,766.00 4,763.70 4,764.10 4,764.10 VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes 550 ID Label Start Node Diameter (in) Material Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) 598 P-280 J-9 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.78 0.03 600 P-281 J-267 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.78 0.03 602 P-282 J-268 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.03 0.03 604 P-283 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron 5.28 0.03 606 P-284 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.53 0.04 608 P-285 J-271 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.78 0.04 610 P-286 J-272 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.03 0.04 612 P-287 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 615 P-288 J-275 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 617 P-289 J-276 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.25 0.00 619 P-290 J-277 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.50 0.00 621 P-291 J-278 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.75 0.00 624 P-293 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.75 0.00 626 P-294 J-280 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.00 0.01 628 P-295 J-281 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.00 0.01 630 P-296 J-282 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.25 0.01 631 P-297 J-283 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.75 0.01 633 P-298 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.79 0.05 635 P-299 J-284 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.04 0.05 637 P-300 J-285 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.29 0.05 639 P-301 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.28 0.05 641 P-302 J-287 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.53 0.05 643 P-303 J-288 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.53 0.05 645 P-304 J-289 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.78 0.05 647 P-305 J-290 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.03 0.05 649 P-306 J-291 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.28 0.05 651 P-307 J-292 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.53 0.05 653 P-308 J-293 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.78 0.06 655 P-309 J-294 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.54 0.11 656 P-310 J-295 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.79 0.11 658 P-311 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 660 P-312 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.25 0.01 662 P-313 J-297 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.50 0.01 664 P-314 J-298 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.75 0.01 666 P-315 J-299 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.00 0.01 668 P-316 J-300 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.25 0.01 670 P-317 J-301 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.50 0.02 672 P-318 J-302 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.75 0.02 674 P-319 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.25 0.00 676 P-320 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.25 0.02 678 P-321 J-305 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.75 0.02 680 P-322 J-306 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.25 0.03 682 P-323 J-307 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.50 0.03 684 P-324 J-308 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.75 0.03 686 P-325 J-309 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.00 0.03 688 P-326 J-310 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.25 0.03 690 P-327 J-311 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.50 0.04 692 P-328 J-312 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.00 0.04 694 P-329 J-313 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.50 0.04 696 P-330 J-314 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.00 0.04 698 P-331 J-315 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.25 0.05 700 P-332 J-316 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.75 0.05 702 P-333 J-317 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.76 0.05 704 P-334 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.50 0.00 706 P-335 J-319 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.25 0.00 Length (Scaled) (ft)74 51 64 AVERAGE DAY FLOW: Pipe Table 56 60 47 137 135 60 11 32 27 15 8 8 47 53 61 55 33 48 69 33 68 52 52 52 8 62 25 157 44 18 14 34 33 44 47 43 43 42 59 13 21 19 25 44 40 37 33 32 9 22 29 45 Stop Node J-267 J-268 J-269 J-269 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-276 J-277 J-278 J-279 J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-273 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-289 J-290 J-291 J-292 J-293 J-294 J-295 J-39 J-296 J-297 J-298 J-299 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 J-315 J-316 J-317 J-318 J-319 J-320 Hazen- Williams C 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 551 708 P-336 J-317 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 710 P-337 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.26 0.05 712 P-338 J-322 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.51 0.05 713 P-339 J-323 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.76 0.06 715 P-340 J-288 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 717 P-341 J-281 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 719 P-342 J-295 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 721 P-343 J-293 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 723 P-344 J-292 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 725 P-345 J-291 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 727 P-346 J-290 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 729 P-347 J-289 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 731 P-348 J-287 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 733 P-349 J-286 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 735 P-350 J-285 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 737 P-351 J-284 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 739 P-352 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 741 P-353 J-282 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 743 P-354 J-278 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 745 P-355 J-276 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 747 P-356 J-277 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 749 P-357 J-280 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 751 P-358 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 753 P-359 J-272 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 755 P-360 J-271 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 757 P-361 J-270 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 759 P-362 J-269 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 761 P-363 J-268 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 763 P-364 J-297 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 765 P-365 J-299 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 767 P-366 J-300 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 769 P-367 J-301 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 771 P-368 J-302 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 773 P-369 J-303 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 775 P-370 J-304 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 777 P-371 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 780 P-373 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 783 P-375 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 785 P-376 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 787 P-377 J-307 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 789 P-378 J-308 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 791 P-379 J-309 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 793 P-380 J-310 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 795 P-381 J-311 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 797 P-382 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 799 P-383 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 801 P-384 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 803 P-385 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 805 P-386 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 807 P-387 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 809 P-388 J-315 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 811 P-389 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 813 P-390 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 815 P-391 J-320 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 817 P-392 J-319 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 819 P-393 J-322 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 821 P-394 J-323 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 823 P-395 J-298 1.00 Copper 0.25 0.10 6/23/2016 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 10 17 49 50 10 26 87 89 80 80 85 82 87 88 83 85 85 81 90 89 64 72 63 79 68 68 69 72 56 57 56 53 53 54 55 66 38 66 39 75 39 67 40 62 61 42 58 51 59 57 58 61 42 57 61 42 60 42 J-321 J-322 J-323 J-294 J-324 J-325 J-326 J-327 J-328 J-329 J-330 J-331 J-332 J-333 J-334 J-335 J-336 J-337 J-338 J-339 J-340 J-341 J-342 J-343 J-344 J-345 J-346 J-347 J-348 J-349 J-350 J-351 J-352 J-353 J-354 J-355 J-356 J-357 J-358 J-359 J-360 J-361 J-362 J-363 J-364 J-365 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755- J-372 J-373 J-374 J-375 J-376 J-377 J-366 J-367 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center J-368 J-369 J-370 J-371 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 552 ID Label Elevation (ft) Status (Initial) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 512 PMP-1 4,741.86 On 4,748.86 148.28 212.10Durston Rd #1721 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 4,960.96 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 AVERAGE DAY FLOW: Pump Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Pump Definition 553 ID Elevation (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 511 4,748.86 148.28 4,748.86 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 AVERAGE DAY FLOW: Reservoir Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Label R-1 Zone VW-Lakes 554 MAX DAILY DEMAND INCLUDING FIRE FLOW 555 False 12:00:00 AM Fire Flow THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 Start Time Calculation Type Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 Max Day <I> Base Calculation Options Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 TrueUse simple controls during steady state? Is EPS Snapshot? <I> Base Energy Cost <I> Base Transient <I> Base Pressure Dependent Demand <I> Base Failure History <I> Base SCADA <I> Base User Data Extensions <I> Base Initial Settings <I> Base Operational <I> Base Age <I> Base Constituent <I> Base Trace Fire Flow Max Day 525 Max Day (Average*2.3) <I> Base Active Topology <I> Base Physical Max Day Time Analysis Type Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen-Williams 0.001 40 Pressure Dependent Demand Failure History SCADA User Data Extensions Calculation Options Label Calculation Options Label Age Constituent Trace Fire Flow Energy Cost Transient VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Scenario Summary Hydraulic Summary ID Label Notes Active Topology Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Max Day (Average*2.3) Physical Demand Initial Settings Operational 556 ID Label Zone Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) 597 J-267 VW-Lakes 4,958.96 97 599 J-268 VW-Lakes 4,958.96 97 601 J-269 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 97 603 J-270 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 605 J-271 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 607 J-272 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 609 J-273 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 611 J-274 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 613 J-275 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 614 J-276 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 616 J-277 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 618 J-278 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 620 J-279 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 623 J-280 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 625 J-281 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 627 J-282 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 629 J-283 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 632 J-284 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 634 J-285 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 636 J-286 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 638 J-287 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 640 J-288 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 642 J-289 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 644 J-290 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 646 J-291 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 648 J-292 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 650 J-293 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 652 J-294 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 654 J-295 VW-Lakes 4,958.98 93 657 J-296 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 93 659 J-297 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 661 J-298 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 663 J-299 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 665 J-300 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 667 J-301 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 669 J-302 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 671 J-303 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 673 J-304 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 675 J-305 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 677 J-306 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 96 679 J-307 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 681 J-308 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 683 J-309 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 685 J-310 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 687 J-311 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 689 J-312 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 691 J-313 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 693 J-314 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 695 J-315 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 697 J-316 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 699 J-317 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 701 J-318 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 703 J-319 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 705 J-320 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 95 707 J-321 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 91 4,733.80 4,733.70 MAX DAY FLOW: Junction Table Elevation (ft) 4,734.30 4,736.00 4,737.80 4,740.00 4,743.00 4,744.00 4,744.00 4,743.80 4,743.80 4,743.50 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.10 4,742.50 4,742.20 4,742.00 4,741.90 4,741.20 4,741.50 4,742.00 4,742.60 4,743.00 4,743.40 4,743.40 4,743.90 4,744.80 4,741.20 4,740.80 4,740.80 4,739.60 4,739.00 4,738.00 4,737.40 4,736.60 4,737.80 4,738.20 4,738.80 4,739.00 4,739.00 4,739.20 4,739.50 4,740.00 4,740.50 4,740.70 4,741.10 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,740.00 4,738.70 4,749.00 Demand (gpm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 557 709 J-322 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 711 J-323 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 94 714 J-324 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 91 716 J-325 VW-Lakes 4,958.97 90 718 J-326 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 720 J-327 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 722 J-328 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 724 J-329 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 726 J-330 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 728 J-331 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 730 J-332 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 732 J-333 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 734 J-334 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 736 J-335 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 738 J-336 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 83 740 J-337 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 82 742 J-338 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 82 744 J-339 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 82 746 J-340 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 748 J-341 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 750 J-342 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 752 J-343 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 84 754 J-344 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 85 756 J-345 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 86 758 J-346 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 87 760 J-347 VW-Lakes 4,958.93 87 762 J-348 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 764 J-349 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 766 J-350 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 85 768 J-351 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 85 770 J-352 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 86 772 J-353 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 86 774 J-354 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 86 776 J-355 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 85 779 J-356 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 86 782 J-357 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 85 784 J-358 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 86 786 J-359 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 788 J-360 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 85 790 J-361 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 792 J-362 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 85 794 J-363 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 796 J-364 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 798 J-365 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 85 800 J-366 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 802 J-367 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 85 804 J-368 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 83 806 J-369 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 808 J-370 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 810 J-371 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 83 812 J-372 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 814 J-373 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 816 J-374 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 818 J-375 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 84 820 J-376 VW-Lakes 4,958.95 83 822 J-377 VW-Lakes 4,958.94 84 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 4,741.00 4,742.00 4,749.20 4,751.30 4,767.90 4,767.40 4,767.00 4,766.60 4,766.00 4,765.50 4,766.90 4,767.00 4,767.20 4,767.50 4,768.10 4,768.30 4,768.50 4,768.80 4,766.80 4,766.30 4,766.10 4,764.00 4,761.80 4,760.00 4,758.70 4,760.00 4,757.70 4,765.20 4,764.00 4,762.80 4,762.00 4,761.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,765.00 4,760.00 4,759.70 4,762.00 4,760.00 4,762.50 4,766.00 4,764.00 4,764.00 4,764.50 4,765.00 4,763.00 4,765.50 4,763.00 4,766.00 4,764.80 4,766.00 4,763.70 4,764.10 4,764.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 558 ID Label Start Node Diameter (in) Material Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) 598 P-280 J-9 8.00 Ductile Iron -10.87 0.07 600 P-281 J-267 8.00 Ductile Iron -10.87 0.07 602 P-282 J-268 8.00 Ductile Iron -11.45 0.07 604 P-283 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron 12.03 0.08 606 P-284 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron -12.61 0.08 608 P-285 J-271 8.00 Ductile Iron -13.19 0.08 610 P-286 J-272 8.00 Ductile Iron -13.77 0.09 612 P-287 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 615 P-288 J-275 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 617 P-289 J-276 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.58 0.00 619 P-290 J-277 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.16 0.01 621 P-291 J-278 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.74 0.01 624 P-293 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.75 0.01 626 P-294 J-280 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.33 0.01 628 P-295 J-281 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.33 0.01 630 P-296 J-282 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.91 0.02 631 P-297 J-283 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.07 0.03 633 P-298 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.85 0.11 635 P-299 J-284 8.00 Ductile Iron -18.43 0.12 637 P-300 J-285 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.01 0.12 639 P-301 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -16.77 0.11 641 P-302 J-287 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.35 0.11 643 P-303 J-288 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.35 0.11 645 P-304 J-289 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.93 0.11 647 P-305 J-290 8.00 Ductile Iron -18.51 0.12 649 P-306 J-291 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.09 0.12 651 P-307 J-292 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.67 0.13 653 P-308 J-293 8.00 Ductile Iron -20.25 0.13 655 P-309 J-294 8.00 Ductile Iron -40.47 0.26 656 P-310 J-295 8.00 Ductile Iron -41.05 0.26 658 P-311 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 660 P-312 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.82 0.02 662 P-313 J-297 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.40 0.02 664 P-314 J-298 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.98 0.03 666 P-315 J-299 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.56 0.03 668 P-316 J-300 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.14 0.03 670 P-317 J-301 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.72 0.04 672 P-318 J-302 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.30 0.04 674 P-319 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.58 0.00 676 P-320 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.46 0.05 678 P-321 J-305 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.62 0.06 680 P-322 J-306 8.00 Ductile Iron -9.78 0.06 682 P-323 J-307 8.00 Ductile Iron -10.36 0.07 684 P-324 J-308 8.00 Ductile Iron -10.94 0.07 686 P-325 J-309 8.00 Ductile Iron -11.52 0.07 688 P-326 J-310 8.00 Ductile Iron -12.10 0.08 690 P-327 J-311 8.00 Ductile Iron -12.68 0.08 692 P-328 J-312 8.00 Ductile Iron -13.84 0.09 694 P-329 J-313 8.00 Ductile Iron -15.00 0.10 696 P-330 J-314 8.00 Ductile Iron -16.16 0.10 698 P-331 J-315 8.00 Ductile Iron -16.74 0.11 700 P-332 J-316 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.90 0.11 702 P-333 J-317 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.90 0.11 704 P-334 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron 1.16 0.01 706 P-335 J-319 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.58 0.00 Length (Scaled) (ft)74 51 64 MAX DAY FLOW: Pipe Table 56 60 47 137 135 60 11 32 27 15 8 8 47 53 61 55 33 48 69 33 68 52 52 52 8 62 25 157 44 18 14 34 33 44 47 43 43 42 59 13 21 19 25 44 40 37 33 32 9 22 29 45 Stop Node J-267 J-268 J-269 J-269 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-276 J-277 J-278 J-279 J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-273 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-289 J-290 J-291 J-292 J-293 J-294 J-295 J-39 J-296 J-297 J-298 J-299 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 J-315 J-316 J-317 J-318 J-319 J-320 Hazen- Williams C 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 559 708 P-336 J-317 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 710 P-337 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.06 0.12 712 P-338 J-322 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.64 0.13 713 P-339 J-323 8.00 Ductile Iron -20.22 0.13 715 P-340 J-288 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 717 P-341 J-281 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 719 P-342 J-295 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 721 P-343 J-293 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 723 P-344 J-292 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 725 P-345 J-291 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 727 P-346 J-290 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 729 P-347 J-289 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 731 P-348 J-287 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 733 P-349 J-286 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 735 P-350 J-285 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 737 P-351 J-284 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 739 P-352 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 741 P-353 J-282 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 743 P-354 J-278 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 745 P-355 J-276 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 747 P-356 J-277 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 749 P-357 J-280 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 751 P-358 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 753 P-359 J-272 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 755 P-360 J-271 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 757 P-361 J-270 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 759 P-362 J-269 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 761 P-363 J-268 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 763 P-364 J-297 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 765 P-365 J-299 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 767 P-366 J-300 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 769 P-367 J-301 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 771 P-368 J-302 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 773 P-369 J-303 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 775 P-370 J-304 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 777 P-371 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 780 P-373 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 783 P-375 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 785 P-376 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 787 P-377 J-307 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 789 P-378 J-308 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 791 P-379 J-309 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 793 P-380 J-310 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 795 P-381 J-311 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 797 P-382 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 799 P-383 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 801 P-384 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 803 P-385 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 805 P-386 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 807 P-387 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 809 P-388 J-315 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 811 P-389 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 813 P-390 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 815 P-391 J-320 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 817 P-392 J-319 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 819 P-393 J-322 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 821 P-394 J-323 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 823 P-395 J-298 1.00 Copper 0.58 0.24 6/23/2016 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 10 17 49 50 10 26 87 89 80 80 85 82 87 88 83 85 85 81 90 89 64 72 63 79 68 68 69 72 56 57 56 53 53 54 55 66 38 66 39 75 39 67 40 62 61 42 58 51 59 57 58 61 42 57 61 42 60 42 J-321 J-322 J-323 J-294 J-324 J-325 J-326 J-327 J-328 J-329 J-330 J-331 J-332 J-333 J-334 J-335 J-336 J-337 J-338 J-339 J-340 J-341 J-342 J-343 J-344 J-345 J-346 J-347 J-348 J-349 J-350 J-351 J-352 J-353 J-354 J-355 J-356 J-357 J-358 J-359 J-360 J-361 J-362 J-363 J-364 J-365 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 J-372 J-373 J-374 J-375 J-376 J-377 J-366 J-367 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center J-368 J-369 J-370 J-371 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 560 ID Label Elevation (ft) Status (Initial) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 512 PMP-1 4,741.86 On 4,748.85 341.64 210.54Durston Rd #1721 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 4,959.39 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 MAX DAY FLOW: Pump Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Pump Definition 561 ID Elevation (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 511 4,748.86 341.64 4,748.86 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 MAX DAY FLOW: Reservoir Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Label R-1 Zone VW-Lakes 562 Label Satisfies Fire Flow Constraints? Pressure (Calculated Zone Lower Limit) (psi) J-129 True 1,500.00 J-130 True 1,500.00 J-131 True 1,500.00 J-132 True 1,500.00 J-139 True 1,500.00 J-140 True 1,500.00 J-141 True 1,500.00 J-142 True 1,500.00 J-143 True 1,500.00 J-144 True 1,500.00 J-321 True 1,500.00 J-323 True 1,500.00 J-324 True 1,500.00 J-325 True 1,500.00 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Zone VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes MAX DAY FLOW: Fire Flow Report Fire Flow (Needed) (gpm) VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes VW-Lakes 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 20 Flow (Total Needed) (gpm) Pressure (Residual Lower Limit) (psi) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 57 59 20 25 54 52 56 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 25 53 25 23 20 20 20 20 20 Pressure (Calculated Residual) (psi) 56 56 57 Pressure (Zone Lower Limit) (psi) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 46 44 45 45 46 21 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASES 1, 2 and 3 43 20 20 20 46 47 49 20 563 PEAK HOURLY DEMAND 564 False 12:00:00 AM Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Peak Hour <I> Base Calculation Options Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center <I> Base Energy Cost Hydraulics Only THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 Start Time Calculation Type 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Use simple controls during steady state? Is EPS Snapshot? Page 1 of 1 True <I> Base Transient <I> Base Pressure Dependent Demand <I> Base Failure History <I> Base SCADA <I> Base User Data Extensions <I> Base Initial Settings <I> Base Operational <I> Base Age <I> Base Constituent <I> Base Trace <I> Base Fire Flow 526 Peak Hour (Average*3) <I> Base Active Topology <I> Base Physical Peak Hour Time Analysis Type Friction Method Accuracy Trials Steady State Hazen-Williams 0.001 40 Pressure Dependent Demand Failure History SCADA User Data Extensions Calculation Options Label Calculation Options Label Age Constituent Trace Fire Flow Energy Cost Transient VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Scenario Summary Hydraulic Summary ID Label Notes Active Topology Scenario Summary Report Scenario: Peak Hour (Average*3) Physical Demand Initial Settings Operational 565 ID Label Zone Hydraulic Grade (ft) Pressure (psi) 597 J-267 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 97 599 J-268 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 97 601 J-269 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 97 603 J-270 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 96 605 J-271 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 95 607 J-272 VW-Lakes 4,957.44 94 609 J-273 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 611 J-274 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 92 613 J-275 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 92 614 J-276 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 92 616 J-277 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 92 618 J-278 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 620 J-279 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 623 J-280 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 625 J-281 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 627 J-282 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 629 J-283 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 632 J-284 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 634 J-285 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 636 J-286 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 638 J-287 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 640 J-288 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 642 J-289 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 644 J-290 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 646 J-291 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 648 J-292 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 650 J-293 VW-Lakes 4,957.46 93 652 J-294 VW-Lakes 4,957.46 93 654 J-295 VW-Lakes 4,957.46 92 657 J-296 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 92 659 J-297 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 661 J-298 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 663 J-299 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 665 J-300 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 667 J-301 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 669 J-302 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 671 J-303 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 673 J-304 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 96 675 J-305 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 677 J-306 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 679 J-307 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 681 J-308 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 683 J-309 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 685 J-310 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 687 J-311 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 689 J-312 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 691 J-313 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 693 J-314 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 695 J-315 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 697 J-316 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 699 J-317 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 701 J-318 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 703 J-319 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 705 J-320 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 95 707 J-321 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 90 709 J-322 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 94 4,733.80 4,733.70 PEAK HOUR FLOW: Junction Table Elevation (ft) 4,734.30 4,736.00 4,737.80 4,740.00 4,743.00 4,744.00 4,744.00 4,743.80 4,743.80 4,743.50 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.30 4,743.10 4,742.50 4,742.20 4,742.00 4,741.90 4,741.20 4,741.50 4,742.00 4,742.60 4,743.00 4,743.40 4,743.40 4,743.90 4,744.80 4,741.20 4,740.80 4,740.80 4,739.60 4,739.00 4,738.00 4,737.40 4,736.60 4,737.80 4,738.20 4,738.80 4,739.00 4,739.00 4,739.20 4,739.50 4,740.00 4,740.50 4,740.70 4,741.10 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,741.00 4,740.00 4,738.70 4,749.00 4,741.00 Demand (gpm) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 566 711 J-323 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 93 714 J-324 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 90 716 J-325 VW-Lakes 4,957.45 89 718 J-326 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 82 720 J-327 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 722 J-328 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 82 724 J-329 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 83 726 J-330 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 83 728 J-331 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 83 730 J-332 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 732 J-333 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 734 J-334 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 736 J-335 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 738 J-336 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 740 J-337 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 82 742 J-338 VW-Lakes 4,957.38 82 744 J-339 VW-Lakes 4,957.38 82 746 J-340 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 82 748 J-341 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 83 750 J-342 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 83 752 J-343 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 84 754 J-344 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 85 756 J-345 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 85 758 J-346 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 86 760 J-347 VW-Lakes 4,957.39 86 762 J-348 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 764 J-349 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 84 766 J-350 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 84 768 J-351 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 85 770 J-352 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 85 772 J-353 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 85 774 J-354 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 86 776 J-355 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 85 779 J-356 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 85 782 J-357 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 84 784 J-358 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 85 786 J-359 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 84 788 J-360 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 85 790 J-361 VW-Lakes 4,957.40 83 792 J-362 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 85 794 J-363 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 796 J-364 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 798 J-365 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 84 800 J-366 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 802 J-367 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 84 804 J-368 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 806 J-369 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 84 808 J-370 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 84 810 J-371 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 812 J-372 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 84 814 J-373 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 84 816 J-374 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 818 J-375 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 820 J-376 VW-Lakes 4,957.42 83 822 J-377 VW-Lakes 4,957.41 83 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 4,742.00 4,749.20 4,751.30 4,767.90 4,767.40 4,767.00 4,766.60 4,766.00 4,765.50 4,766.90 4,767.00 4,767.20 4,767.50 4,768.10 4,768.30 4,768.50 4,768.80 4,766.80 4,766.30 4,766.10 4,764.00 4,761.80 4,760.00 4,758.70 4,760.00 4,757.70 4,765.20 4,764.00 4,762.80 4,762.00 4,761.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,762.00 4,765.00 4,765.00 4,760.00 4,759.70 4,762.00 4,760.00 4,762.50 4,766.00 4,764.00 4,764.00 4,764.50 4,765.00 4,763.00 4,765.50 4,763.00 4,766.00 4,764.80 4,766.00 4,763.70 4,764.10 4,764.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 567 ID Label Start Node Diameter (in) Material Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) 598 P-280 J-9 8.00 Ductile Iron -14.36 0.09 600 P-281 J-267 8.00 Ductile Iron -14.36 0.09 602 P-282 J-268 8.00 Ductile Iron -15.11 0.10 604 P-283 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron 15.86 0.10 606 P-284 J-270 8.00 Ductile Iron -16.61 0.11 608 P-285 J-271 8.00 Ductile Iron -17.36 0.11 610 P-286 J-272 8.00 Ductile Iron -18.11 0.12 612 P-287 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 615 P-288 J-275 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 617 P-289 J-276 8.00 Ductile Iron -0.75 0.00 619 P-290 J-277 8.00 Ductile Iron -1.50 0.01 621 P-291 J-278 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.25 0.01 624 P-293 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron -2.26 0.01 626 P-294 J-280 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.01 0.02 628 P-295 J-281 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.01 0.02 630 P-296 J-282 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.76 0.02 631 P-297 J-283 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.26 0.03 633 P-298 J-273 8.00 Ductile Iron -23.38 0.15 635 P-299 J-284 8.00 Ductile Iron -24.13 0.15 637 P-300 J-285 8.00 Ductile Iron -24.88 0.16 639 P-301 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -21.86 0.14 641 P-302 J-287 8.00 Ductile Iron -22.61 0.14 643 P-303 J-288 8.00 Ductile Iron -22.61 0.14 645 P-304 J-289 8.00 Ductile Iron -23.36 0.15 647 P-305 J-290 8.00 Ductile Iron -24.11 0.15 649 P-306 J-291 8.00 Ductile Iron -24.86 0.16 651 P-307 J-292 8.00 Ductile Iron -25.61 0.16 653 P-308 J-293 8.00 Ductile Iron -26.36 0.17 655 P-309 J-294 8.00 Ductile Iron -52.63 0.34 656 P-310 J-295 8.00 Ductile Iron -53.38 0.34 658 P-311 J-279 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 660 P-312 J-286 8.00 Ductile Iron -3.77 0.02 662 P-313 J-297 8.00 Ductile Iron -4.52 0.03 664 P-314 J-298 8.00 Ductile Iron -5.27 0.03 666 P-315 J-299 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.02 0.04 668 P-316 J-300 8.00 Ductile Iron -6.77 0.04 670 P-317 J-301 8.00 Ductile Iron -7.52 0.05 672 P-318 J-302 8.00 Ductile Iron -8.27 0.05 674 P-319 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.75 0.00 676 P-320 J-303 8.00 Ductile Iron -9.77 0.06 678 P-321 J-305 8.00 Ductile Iron -11.27 0.07 680 P-322 J-306 8.00 Ductile Iron -12.77 0.08 682 P-323 J-307 8.00 Ductile Iron -13.52 0.09 684 P-324 J-308 8.00 Ductile Iron -14.27 0.09 686 P-325 J-309 8.00 Ductile Iron -15.02 0.10 688 P-326 J-310 8.00 Ductile Iron -15.77 0.10 690 P-327 J-311 8.00 Ductile Iron -16.52 0.11 692 P-328 J-312 8.00 Ductile Iron -18.02 0.12 694 P-329 J-313 8.00 Ductile Iron -19.52 0.12 696 P-330 J-314 8.00 Ductile Iron -21.02 0.13 698 P-331 J-315 8.00 Ductile Iron -21.77 0.14 700 P-332 J-316 8.00 Ductile Iron -23.27 0.15 702 P-333 J-317 8.00 Ductile Iron -23.27 0.15 704 P-334 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron 1.50 0.01 706 P-335 J-319 8.00 Ductile Iron 0.75 0.00 Length (Scaled) (ft)74 51 64 PEAK HOUR FLOW: Pipe Table 56 60 47 137 135 60 11 32 27 15 8 8 47 53 61 55 33 48 69 33 68 52 52 52 8 62 25 157 44 18 14 34 33 44 47 43 43 42 59 13 21 19 25 44 40 37 33 32 9 22 29 45 Stop Node J-267 J-268 J-269 J-269 J-271 J-272 J-273 J-274 J-276 J-277 J-278 J-279 J-280 J-281 J-282 J-283 J-273 J-284 J-285 J-286 J-287 J-288 J-289 J-290 J-291 J-292 J-293 J-294 J-295 J-39 J-296 J-297 J-298 J-299 J-300 J-301 J-302 J-303 J-304 J-305 J-306 J-307 J-308 J-309 J-310 J-311 J-312 J-313 J-314 J-315 J-316 J-317 J-318 J-319 J-320 Hazen- Williams C 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 568 708 P-336 J-317 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 710 P-337 J-318 8.00 Ductile Iron -24.77 0.16 712 P-338 J-322 8.00 Ductile Iron -25.52 0.16 713 P-339 J-323 8.00 Ductile Iron -26.27 0.17 715 P-340 J-288 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 717 P-341 J-281 6.00 Ductile Iron 0.00 0.00 719 P-342 J-295 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 721 P-343 J-293 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 723 P-344 J-292 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 725 P-345 J-291 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 727 P-346 J-290 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 729 P-347 J-289 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 731 P-348 J-287 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 733 P-349 J-286 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 735 P-350 J-285 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 737 P-351 J-284 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 739 P-352 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 741 P-353 J-282 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 743 P-354 J-278 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 745 P-355 J-276 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 747 P-356 J-277 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 749 P-357 J-280 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 751 P-358 J-283 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 753 P-359 J-272 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 755 P-360 J-271 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 757 P-361 J-270 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 759 P-362 J-269 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 761 P-363 J-268 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 763 P-364 J-297 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 765 P-365 J-299 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 767 P-366 J-300 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 769 P-367 J-301 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 771 P-368 J-302 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 773 P-369 J-303 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 775 P-370 J-304 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 777 P-371 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 780 P-373 J-305 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 783 P-375 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 785 P-376 J-306 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 787 P-377 J-307 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 789 P-378 J-308 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 791 P-379 J-309 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 793 P-380 J-310 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 795 P-381 J-311 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 797 P-382 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 799 P-383 J-312 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 801 P-384 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 803 P-385 J-313 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 805 P-386 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 807 P-387 J-314 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 809 P-388 J-315 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 811 P-389 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 813 P-390 J-316 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 815 P-391 J-320 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 817 P-392 J-319 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 819 P-393 J-322 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 821 P-394 J-323 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 823 P-395 J-298 1.00 Copper 0.75 0.31 6/23/2016 VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 10 17 49 50 10 26 87 89 80 80 85 82 87 88 83 85 85 81 90 89 64 72 63 79 68 68 69 72 56 57 56 53 53 54 55 66 38 66 39 75 39 67 40 62 61 42 58 51 59 57 58 61 42 57 61 42 60 42 J-321 J-322 J-323 J-294 J-324 J-325 J-326 J-327 J-328 J-329 J-330 J-331 J-332 J-333 J-334 J-335 J-336 J-337 J-338 J-339 J-340 J-341 J-342 J-343 J-344 J-345 J-346 J-347 J-348 J-349 J-350 J-351 J-352 J-353 J-354 J-355 J-356 J-357 J-358 J-359 J-360 J-361 J-362 J-363 J-364 J-365 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 J-372 J-373 J-374 J-375 J-376 J-377 J-366 J-367 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center J-368 J-369 J-370 J-371 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 569 ID Elevation (ft) Flow (Out net) (gpm) Hydraulic Grade (ft) 511 4,748.86 444.84 4,748.86 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 PEAK HOUR FLOW: Reservoir Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Label R-1 Zone VW-Lakes 570 ID Label Elevation (ft) Status (Initial) Hydraulic Grade (Suction) (ft) Flow (Total) (gpm) Pump Head (ft) 512 PMP-1 4,741.86 On 4,748.85 444.84 209.29Durston Rd #1721 Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Hydraulic Grade (Discharge) (ft) 4,958.14 Bentley WaterCAD V8i (SELECTseries 5) [08.11.05.61] Page 1 of 1 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISION PHASE 3 PEAK HOUR FLOW: Pump Table VW-LAKES-WaterCAD-PH3.wtg 6/23/2016 Pump Definition 571 WATERCAD MODEL 572 J-1J-2P-1J-3P-2J-4P-3J-5J-6P-5J-7J-8P-7J-9P-8J-10P-9J-11P-10J-12J-13P-12J-14P-13J-15P-14J-16P-15J-17P-16J-18P-17J-19P-18J-20P-19J-21P-20J-22P-21J-23P-22J-24P-23J-25P-24J-26P-25J-27P-26J-28J-29P-28J-30P-29J-31P-30J-32P-31J-33P-32J-34P-33J-35P-34J-36P-35J-37P-36J-38P-37J-39P-38J-51P-50 J-52P-51 J-53P-52 J-54P-53 J-55P-54J-56P-55J-57P-56J-58P-57J-59P-58J-60P-59J-61P-60J-62P-61J-63P-62P-63J-66P-65 J-67P-66 J-68P-67 J-69P-68 J-70P-69 J-71P-70 J-72P-71P-72 J-73J-74P-74 J-75P-75 J-76P-76 J-77J-78P-78 J-79P-79J-81P-81J-82P-82J-83P-83J-84P-84J-85P- 8 5J-86P-8 6J-87P-87J-88P-88 P-89 J-102P-104J-103P-105P-106J-104P-107J-105P-108 J-125P-130J-128P-134J-129P-135J-130P-136J-131P-137J-132P-138 J-139P-146J-140P-147J-141P-148J-142P-149J-143P-150 J-144P-151J-145P-152J-146P-153J-147P-154J-148P-155J-149P-156J-150P-157J-151P-158J-152P-159 J-153P-160 J-154P-161 J-155P-162 J-156P-163J-157P-164J-158P-165J-159P-166J-160P-167J-161P-168J-162P-169J-163P-170J-164P-171J-165P-172J-166P-173J-167P-174J-168P-175J-169P-176J-170P-177J-171P-178J-172P-179 J-173P-180J-174P-181 J-175P-182J-176P-183J-177P-184 J-178P-185J-179P-186 J-180P-187J-181P-188J-182P-189 J-183P-190J-184P-191 J-185P-192J-186P-193J-187P-194J-188P-195J-189P-196J-190P-197J-191P-198 J-192P-199J-193P-200 J-194P-201 J-195P-202 J-196P-203J-197P-204J-198P-205P-206 J-199P-207J-200P-208J-201P-209J-202P-210P-245R-1PMP-1P-247P-250P-257P-258P-259J-253J-65J-64J-254P-260P-261J-255P-262J-256P-263 J-257P-264P-265P-266WWWWWWWWWWWJ-258P-267 J-259P-270 J-260P-271 P-272 J-261P-273J-262P-274P-275J-263P-276 J-264J-265J-266P-277 P-278P-279J-267P-280J-268P-281J-269P-282J-270P-283J-271P-284J-272P-285J-273P-286J-274P-287J-275J-276P-288J-277P-289J-278P-290J-279P-291J-280P-293J-281P-294J-282P-295J-283P-296P-297 J-284P-298 J-285P-299 J-286P-300 J-287P-301 J-288P-302J-289P-303J-290P-304J-291P-305J-292P-306J-293P-307J-294P-308J-295P-309P-310J-296P-311 J-297P-312J-298P-313J-299P-314J-300P-315J-301P-316 J-302P-317 J-303P-318 J-304P-319J-305P-320J-306P-321J-307P-322J-308P-323J-309P-324J-310P-325J-311P-326J-312P-327J-313P-328J-314P-329J-315P-330J-316P-331J-317P-332J-318P-333J-319P-334 J-320P-335J-321P-336 J-322P-337J-323P-338P-339J-324P-340J-325P-341J-326P-342J-327P-343J-328P-344J-329P-345J-330P-346J-331P-347J-332P-348J-333P-349J-334P-350J-335P-351J-336P-352J-337P-353J-338P-354J-339P-355 J-340P-356J-341P-357J-342P-358J-343P-359J-344P-360J-345P-361J-346P-362J-347P-363J-348P-364 J-349P-365J-350P-366J-351P-367J-352P-368J-353P-369J-354P-370J-355P-371J-356P-373J-357P-375J-358P-376J-359P-377J-360P-378J-361P-379J-362P-380J-363P-381J-364P-382J-365P-383J-366P-384J-367P-385J-368P-386 J-369P-387J-370P-388J-371P-389 J-372P-390 J-373P-391J-374P-392J-375P-393J-376P-394J-377P-395Color Coding LegendPipe: Diameter (in)<= 0.75<= 1.00<= 6.00<= 8.00<= 12.00 Other0505010025HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETREVISIONSWATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMANALYSISTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST SUBDIVISIONPHASE 32880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-67022880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\007\ACAD\DESIGN\WATERCAD\VW-LAKES-WATERCAD-PH3.DWG PLOTTED BY:JAMES (JIM) A. ULLMAN ON Jun/23/2016COPYRIGHT ‹MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. REVISIONSengineers surveyors planners scientists5352.0071FIG. 1BOZEMANMONTANAJAUJAUJRN06/2016573       THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST  PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT  WASTEWATER DESIGN REPORT  NOVEMBER 17, 2014  REVISED JUNE 7, 2016    574 1    Table of Contents     Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2  Wastewater Flows ........................................................................................................................................ 2  Infrastructure within the Boundaries of the Planned Unit Development .................................................... 2  Offsite Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................... 2  Phases 1 and 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 3  Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 4  Appendix A  Appendix B  575 2    Introduction The Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development is projected to have approximately 300 dwelling units and will be completed in multiple phases. Wastewater service will be provided by the City of Bozeman through a combination of existing infrastructure and newly constructed infrastructure primarily located within the boundary of the Planned Unit Development. The purpose of this report is to identify the capacity of the existing system, conceptual improvements for the Planned Unit Development and specific improvements required for Phases 1 and 2 of the PUD. Wastewater Flows The full build out of the PUD will have up to 300 dwelling units. Based on the City of Bozeman Design Standards the total average daily wastewater flow will be 56,337 gallons per day. (89 gpdpc x 2.11 people per unit x 300 units) In addition, based on the Design Standards, the PUD will contribute 9,750 gpd of infiltration. (65 acres x 150 gpd/acre) The total average daily flow is computed to be 66,087 gpd and the peak flow from the PUD is computed to be 230,591 gpd based on a peaking factor of 3.92. (56,337 gpd x 3.92 + 9,750 gpd) Phase 1 and 2 consisted of 59 dwelling units and 19.8 acres of property. Average daily wastewater flow is computed to be 11,080 gpd. Infiltration is computed to be 2,970 gpd. Peak flow is computed to be 49,728 gpd based on a peaking factor of 4.22. Phase 3 adds 50 dwelling units, 4 accessory dwelling units, and 10.5 acres of property. Infrastructure within the Boundaries of the Planned Unit Development The existing wastewater infrastructure within the boundary of the PUD consists of an 8” main stub located at the intersection of Westgate Avenue and Durston Road and a forcemain that provides service to the Norton Lift Station located south of the PUD. All wastewater from the PUD will gravity flow to the existing sewer main stub located at the intersection of Westgate Avenue and Durston Road. The new infrastructure located within the boundary of the PUD will include sewer mains and sewer services. The sewer mains will all be 8” in diameter and services will primarily be 4” in diameter. The actual sewer service sizes will be determined during each phase based on the detailed layout developed during that phase of the project. The proposed 8” sewer mains will have a peak flow of 230,591 gpd (160.1 gpm). The capacity of an 8” main at minimum slope (0.004 ft/ft) and flowing at 75% depth utilizing an n factor of 0.013 is 313 gpm. Thus the proposed 8” mains will have adequate capacity for all phases. Offsite Infrastructure Wastewater will flow from the PUD through sewer mains, a lift station and a forcemain constructed as part of the Laurel Glen Subdivision located immediately to the north of the PUD. The Laurel Glen forcemain discharges into a sewer main constructed by the original Valley West Subdivision and flows from that point through interceptors to the City of Bozeman’s Water Reclamation Facility. 576 3    This existing offsite infrastructure has dedicated capacity of 49,088 gpd of wastewater flow on an average day basis and an additional 6,600 gpd of infiltration capacity. These values are from the design reports for the Laurel Glen Lift Station and are document in the memorandum located in Appendix A. This dedicated offsite capacity provides a total of 55,688 gpd average day flow capacity. For The Lakes at Valley West PUD this will be utilized for 65 acres of infiltration capacity (9,750 gpd) with the remainder utilized for wastewater flow. Since the infiltration allowance is not utilized with a peaking factor a review of the peak flow is required. The 49,088 gpd average day wastewater flow equates to a peak flow of 166,899 gpd utilizing the peak factor of 3.40 that has been established for the lift station. The allotted peak flow for wastewater is therefore 163,749 gpd. (166,899 gpd less additional infiltration requirement of 3,150 from the original allotment) The resulting average day flow allotted for wastewater flow is therefore 48,161 gpd. The available wastewater capacity is therefore 256 dwelling units based on 2.11 people/unit and 89 gpdpc. Future improvements will be required to serve the PUD beyond the 256 dwelling units of capacity that currently exist. A review of the available capacity of sewer mains between the PUD and the Laurel Glen Lift Station has been completed and summarized in a memorandum located in Appendix B. The memorandum documents adequate capacity to serve the PUD from the point of connection to the lift station. Improvements to the lift station will most likely be required when the PUD exceeds 256 dwelling units. Improvements downstream of the lift station maybe required at that point. It is recommended as the PUD is developed that the number of dwelling units be tracked. Depending on the actual number of dwelling units eventually contemplated offsite infrastructure improvements may or may not be required. Phases 1 and 2 The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 and 2 will be served by an 8” sewer main that begins at the Intersection of Westgate Avenue and Durston Road, extends through future phases of the Lakes at Valley West and contuse through the Phase 1 and 2 Subdivision to provide sewer service to each lot within the development. Adequate capacity is available in the existing City of Bozeman wastewater infrastructure and the proposed 8” mains will provide adequate capacity for the development. Phase 3 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 will be served by an 8” sewer main that either was constructed as part of Phases 1 and 2 or an 8” sewer main installed as part of Phase 3. The wastewater flows down a sewer main in Westgate Gate Avenue to the north. Adequate capacity is available in the existing City of Bozeman wastewater infrastructure and the proposed 8” mains will provide adequate capacity for the development. 577 4    Summary The existing City of Bozeman wastewater infrastructure in addition to the proposed 8” sewer mains with the development will provide adequate capacity to serve 245 dwelling units in The Lakes at Valley West Planned Unit Development. At this time, only 113 of the potential proposed 300 dwelling units have been fully defined. During the detailed future design of the project the total number of dwelling units will be fully developed. If at that time, the number of units begin to approach the documented 256 dwelling unit capacity, additional analysis will be required and it is probable that offsite improvements will be needed. 578 Appendix A 579 Appendix B 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 TO: Greg Stratton FROM: Jodie Binger and James Nickelson RE: Valley West – Wing Lake Property Existing Sewer Capacity Through Laurel Glen Subdivision to Lift Station DATE: March 17, 2014 The existing 8” and 10” sewer mains within the Laurel Glen Subdivision were analyzed to determine if the mains have adequate capacity to convey expected flows from the proposed Valley West Subdivision. Existing flow was determined based on currently built units and zoning classifications. Expected flow was determined based on the City of Bozeman Design Standards. Both of the existing line sizes were shown to have the capacity to include the proposed flows. Flow calculations and Figures are attached to support these findings. Based on a maximum number of units of 300 on the Valley West property the expected flow from Valley West is 0.36 CFS. After build out of the Laurel Glen Subdivision, the 8” outfall line has 0.61 cfs of capacity and the 10” outfall line has 0.71 cfs of capacity. Thus adequate capacity exists to serve Valley West through these sewer mains. Attachments: 8” Calculations with Supporting Map 10” Calculations with Supporting Map Record Drawings of Laurel Glen Sewer memo 591 Services 145.33 units People 2.11 people units Flow 89 gal person day B1 zoning 6.53 acres 1000 gal acre day Infiltration 150 gal acre day Area 33.32 acres Wastewater Flow (based on asbilts and plat) average flow:145.33 units 2.11 people 89 gal -27292 gal (units)units person day -day average flow:6.53 acres 1000 gal -6530 gal (B1)acre day -day population:145.33 units 2.11 people -307 people units - 0.31 people in thousands peak flow:(18+P^.5)18.5537565 4.07 peaking factor (4+P^.5)4.55375653 4.074385 33821.521 gal -137802 gal day -day infiltration:150 gal 33.316791 acres -4998 gal acre day -day total flow 137801.9 gal +4997.5186 gal -142799 gal day day -day 99 gal min 0.22 cfs pipe flow (assume greater than 1/2 full)pipe flow (assume less than 1/2 full) d 8 in d 8 in n 0.013 n 0.013 k 1.486 k 1.486 s 0.003 ft/ft s 0.003 ft/ft r 0.333 ft r 0.333 ft h 0.402 ft h 0.265 ft theta 3.557 rad theta 2.727 rad A 0.129 ft^2 A 0.129 ft^2 P 0.909 ft P 0.909 ft R 0.142 ft R 0.142 ft q 0.22 cfs q 0.22 cfs flow<1/2 Note: h>r therefore less than 1/2 full Existing Flow in 8" Laurel Glen Sewer Line Laurel Glen Pipe Flow Conditions 592 pipe flow d 8 in n 0.013 k 1.486 s 0.003 ft/ft r 0.333 ft h 0.167 ft theta 2.094 rad A 0.281 ft^2 P 1.396 ft R 0.201 ft q 0.60 cfs 0.38 cfs 172 gal min Services 300 services People 2.11 people service Flow 89 gal person day Infiltration 150 gal acre day Area 65 acres Wastewater Flow (based on proposed Valley West Subdivision) average flow:300 services 2.11 people 89 gal -56337 gal service person day -day population:300 services 2.11 people -633 people service - 0.63 people in thousands peak flow:(18+P^.5)18.795613 3.92 peaking factor (4+P^.5)4.79561297 3.919335 56337 gal -220804 gal day -day infiltration:150 gal 65 acres -9750 gal acre day -day total flow 220803.6 gal +9750 gal -230554 gal day day -day 160 gal min 0.36 cfs Existing Line WILL Convey Flow From Proposed Valley West Addition Allowable Future Flow (75% pipe full flow) Q (allow from Valley West) Flow Expected From Valley West Proposed 593 594 595 Services 443.67 services People 2.11 people service Flow 89 gal person day B1 zoning 6.53 acres 1000 gal acre day Infiltration 150 gal acre day Area 68.76 acres Wastewater Flow (based on asbilts and plat) average flow:443.67 services 2.11 people 89 gal -83317 gal service person day -day average flow:6.53 acres 1000 gal -6530 gal (B1)acre day -day population:443.67 services 2.11 people -936 people service - 0.94 people in thousands peak flow:(18+P^.5)18.9675452 3.82 peaking factor (4+P^.5)4.96754519 3.818293 89846.789 gal -343061 gal day -day infiltration:150 gal 68.76322 acres -10314 gal acre day -day total flow 343061.4 gal +10314.483 gal -353376 gal day day -day 245 gal min 0.55 cfs pipe flow (assume greater than 1/2 full)pipe flow (assume less than 1/2 full) d 10 in d 10 in n 0.013 n 0.013 k 1.486 k 1.486 s 0.004 ft/ft s 0.004 ft/ft r 0.417 ft r 0.417 ft h 0.467 ft h 0.366 ft theta 3.385 rad theta 2.898 rad A 0.231 ft^2 A 0.231 ft^2 P 1.208 ft P 1.208 ft R 0.191 ft R 0.191 ft q 0.55 cfs q 0.55 cfs flow<1/2 Note: h>r therefore less than 1/2 full Existing Flow in 10" Laurel Glen Sewer Line (phase 1 and 2) 596 pipe flow d 10 in n 0.013 k 1.486 s 0.004 ft/ft r 0.417 ft h 0.208 ft theta 2.094 rad A 0.439 ft^2 P 1.745 ft R 0.251 ft q 1.26 cfs 0.71 cfs 318 gal min Services 300 services People 2.11 people service Flow 89 gal person day Infiltration 150 gal acre day Area 65 acres Wastewater Flow (based on proposed Valley West Subdivision) average flow:300 services 2.11 people 89 gal -56337 gal service person day -day population:300 services 2.11 people -633 people service - 0.63 people in thousands peak flow:(18+P^.5)18.795613 3.92 peaking factor (4+P^.5)4.79561297 3.919335 56337 gal -220804 gal day -day infiltration:150 gal 65 acres -9750 gal acre day -day total flow 220803.6 gal +9750 gal -230554 gal day day -day 160 gal min 0.36 cfs Allowable Future Flow (75% pipe full flow) Q (allow from Valley West) Flow Expected From Valley West Proposed Existing Line WILL Convey Flow From Proposed Valley West Addition 597 598 599 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Water System Redundancy As part of the pre-application process, it was noted that this development and many others in the same vicinity are served by a single water main in Durston Road. While this water main provides an adequate volume and pressure of water there is concern that it does not provide any redundancy in the area during maintenance activities or emergencies. The applicant has met with the City Engineering Department and have come to an agreement to address this issue. There are two potential solutions. Both options require actions outside of the applicants control, Option A relies on City approval of funding and Option B relies on other private development. If neither option is available due to no fault of the applicant, it is expected that it will not impact the approval or timing of Phase 3 of the Lakes at Valley West. The applicant is committed to working with the City to alleviate this issue and if these two options are determined to not be viable commits to working with the City on other solutions. Option A This proposed solution is to install a water main in Laurel Parkway from its current ending point in Phases 1 and 2 of the Lakes at Valley West to Babcock Street. This is shown on the attached figure. The applicant is willing to proceed immediately with this option and can have this line operational this fall if funding becomes available through the City of Bozeman Impact Fee Program. The following steps to implement this project have been recommended by City Engineering as follows: 1. The developer will coordinate with the City Engineering Department and submit a request to the impact fee advisory committee (IFAC). The request will be to prioritize impact fee money to loop the water main in the vicinity of the project. a. Any onsite water mains will be constructed at the sole cost of the development. b. A payback district will be setup for off-site water main improvements to loop the water main to reimburse the City impact fee fund for those improvements in the future. c. The developer will construct the water main and obtain any necessary easements for the water main loop. Reimbursement for the offsite water main will be from the impact fee money as a direct payment. 2. The developer will support the request to the City Commission, which follows the IFAC recommendation, to prioritize water impact fee funds to provide off-site water main looping. The applicant is proceeding with this process and intends to develop the request for impact fee funds in the near future. 600 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Option B There is the potential that developers with land on the north side of Durston Road are proceeding with subdivisions that would provide a redundant water line into the area. If these projects proceed immediately Option A may not be needed. 601 WW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WWWW W W W W W W W WWWWW WWWWW W W W WW W W W WWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-67020757515050HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETPROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\WATER EXTENSION INTO NORTON.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jul/07/2016ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. 5352.007-EX.1BOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN06/2016QCBYQCDATEengineers surveyors planners scientistsNORTON SEWER LIFT STATIONBABCOCK STREETDURSTON ROADFUTURE LAUREL PARKWAY WATERLINEEXISTING 8" WATER LINEEXISTING 8" WATER LINE(NORTON SUBDIVISION)FUTURE NORTON DEVELOPMENTEXISTING PHASE 1EXISTING PHASE 2LAUREL PARKWAYTHE LAKESFUTURE PHASESCOOTONWOOD ROAD PROPOSED PHASE 3602 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application   Stormwater Management A grading and drainage design report has been prepared for The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision. The design report covers the entire “Lakes” Planned Unit Development, which encompasses approximately 65 acres. The report is included in this section. 603 Page 1 of 3 Storm Drainage Report The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 July 6, 2016 Part 1 Introduction This report provides hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for sizing of storm water conveyance and detention storage facilities for development of Phase 3 of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision. The site is located west of Phases 1 and 2, in the northwest corner of the site. Storm drainage design follows the path set in two previous drainage reports also prepared by Morrison-Maierle: The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 and 2: Addendum to Preliminary Plat Drainage Report (August 10, 2015) and Storm Drainage Report - Durston Road Improvements (May 28, 2015). The drainage sub-basins in these earlier reports will be modified by Phase 3; this Phase 3 report accounts for these modifications to ensure compliance with City of Bozeman design standards. Phase 3 will be constructed as described in this report and in accordance with City of Bozeman Design Standards for drainage design. As future phases are developed, the currently proposed drainage facilities will be re-evaluated, and any required modifications will be detailed in a future report. Pre-development and post-development drainage is shown on Figures 1 and 2 respectively. Part 2 Site Description and Design Basis The site drains from south to north, discharging to Aajker Creek. “Run-on” water originating south of The Lakes at Valley West subdivision is intercepted in a constructed cutoff ditch at the south property line, and directed west to Aajker Creek. Site runoff generally discharges through an existing pair of 36¼” x 22½” concrete arch culverts under Durston Road and continues down a tributary of Aajker Creek to the main branch. The Rational Method was used to calculate peak runoff and detention requirements, in accordance with City of Bozeman design standards. Runoff coefficients for Phase 3 are based on the proposed lots. Future phases are considered undeveloped in this report; additional storm drainage reports will be provided along with the development of future phases. Storm drainage infrastructure proposed for Phase 3 is identified on Figure 2. Part 3 Drainage Basins Pre-development sub-basin H1 (see Figure 1) corresponds to developed sub-basins D1.1 through D1.4 (see Figure 2). The four developed sub-basins are described below. Sub-basin D1.1: Sub-basin D1.1 consists of D1.1A (runoff from the back of several onsite residential lots within Phase 3) and D1.1B (runoff from offsite areas). The D1.1B “run-on” water drains to an existing constructed cutoff ditch along the south property line, which discharges into Aajker Creek at the southwest corner of the site. Runoff from D1.1A and D1.1C will sheet flow through the back yards and the perimeter open space into Aajker Creek. Sub-basin D1.2: Sub-basin D1.2 consists of D1.2A (runoff originating within Phase 3) and D1.2B (runoff from future phases south of Phase 3). These areas will drain north to detention facility D1.2, which will then discharge through the existing pair of 36¼” x 22½” RCP arch You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 604 Page 2 of 3 pipes (double culvert) under Durston Road. Projections were made to account for future development of sub-basin D1.2B, in order to size the D1.2 detention storage volume to meet the anticipated future detention and storm water treatment needs of future development as well as Phase 3 development. Sub-basin D1.3: This report will utilize 4.61 cfs as the 10-year peak discharge rate out of Sub-basin D1.3, a conservative value that was calculated in the drainage report for Phases 1 and 2. This runoff flows directly into the two 36¼” x 22½” RCP arch pipes under Durston Road. Sub-basin D1.4: Sub-basin D1.4 consists of D1.4A (runoff from Phases 2 and 3), D1.4B (runoff from Phases 1 and 2) and D1.4C (runoff from Laurel Parkway and future phases north of Phases 1 and 2). These areas all drain to detention facility D1.4, which will then discharge through the existing pair of 36¼” x 22½” RCP arch pipes (double culvert) under Durston Road. Part 3 Detention Basins Two underground detention storage facilities, D1.2 and D1.4, are proposed for storm water treatment and control of the 10-year peak runoff rate. Discharge from these two detention facilities will limit the total post-development 10-year peak discharge (sub-basins D1.1 through D1.4) to the pre-development peak rate (sub-basin H1). Stored runoff will discharge through control structures. Each control structure will be a manhole with a vertical tee mounted on the discharge pipe, with a 10-year “low-flow” orifice cut into an end cap on the bottom of the tee, about a foot below the discharge pipe invert. The top of the tee, extended to an elevation matching the 10-yr maximum water surface elevation (WSEL), will serve as an overflow riser. In addition to restricting outflow to the allowable 10-year release rate, the control structures, when properly maintained, will greatly reduce the amount of floating debris and larger sediment particles discharging to the underground storage and offsite surface waters. The overflow risers and outlet pipes are sized to convey the 25-year peak runoff to the existing pair of 36¼” x 22½” concrete arch culverts under Durston Road. The two permanent underground detention facilities will replace existing temporary detention basins 1.4 (constructed with Phases 1 and 2) and D1.2 (constructed with the Durston Road Improvements). Data for the proposed, permanent detention facilities is summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1 - Detention Basin Data Description Detention Basin Name DET 1.4 DET 2.1 Maximum 10-yr Release Rate (cfs) 2.30 3.73 Minimum Detention Volume (cu. ft.) 7,211 5,633 Sizes and Dimensions: vertical tee (riser) dia. 30” 30” outlet pipe dia. 24” 24” orifice (two alternates): circular orifice 63/4” dia. 85/8” dia. rectangular orifice 61/8” x 6” 77/8” x 71/2” Elevations: top of riser (=10-yr max. WSEL) 42.50 42.50 discharge pipe invert at control structure 39.00 39.00 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 605 Page 3 of 3 Part 4 Conveyance and Collection The proposed storm drain system is shown on Figure 2. Ditches and pipes have been sized to convey the 25-year peak runoff through the site. Drop inlets and curb inlets are placed as needed to collect the runoff. Provisions for overland flow of larger, less frequent storms up to the 100-year storm will be incorporated into the site grading. Future phasing (extension of the Phase 3 system) was taken into consideration in the placement and sizing of pipes and inlets. Calculations are attached. Design details for Phase 3 improvements will be provided on the construction drawings. Final drainage design for future phases will be provided at the time of development. Ditches and Drop Inlets: Drop inlets near the ends of the detention facilities will collect runoff from lots fronting Durston Road. All surface runoff will enter the underground storage facilities in an “isolator row” that is designed for sediment removal as part of regular operation and maintenance. Ditches, terminating at drop inlets, are shown by flow arrows on Figure 2. The “ditches” are likely to be grass swales built into the landscaping rather than steep-sided ditches. Gutter Flows and Curb Inlets: Curb inlets will be placed to limit the spread of water in the street, such that an unobstructed (un-flooded) travel lane will be available during a 10-year storm and in accordance with City of Bozeman design standards. Calculations for gutter spread width and inlet intercept/bypass flows are attached, for representative curb inlets and gutter flows based on locations where maximum flow depths are expected to occur. A total of five “sag” (low point) curb inlets will be required, as shown on Figure 2. Storm Drain Pipe System: The piped storm drain system is shown on Figure 2. Storm drain pipe was sized to convey the 25-year peak runoff to the discharge points. Calculations are provided for representative pipes as required to assure pipe size is adequate for all pipes. Runoff from future phases south of Phase 3 will be picked up by Phase 3 curb inlets and by a 24” pipe under Westgate Avenue. This pipe will be stubbed out past the phase line, where Westgate Avenue will be extended in a future phase of development. A temporary retention and settling basin will be constructed at this pipe end to reduce the amount of sediment entering the Phase 3 storm drain system. This retention volume is not included in the site’s detention calculations and will be removed when the pipe is extended. N:\5352\002\Design Docs\Reports\Storm\Phase 3\Drainage Report.docx You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 606 (this page left blank intentionally) 607 PEAK RUNOFF AND DETENTION CALCULATIONS You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 608 (this page left blank intentionally) You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 609 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Peak Runoff and Detention Calculations MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD i = A * (Tc/60) B Qp = C i A Qp = peak runoff, cfs Design Coefficients C = runoff coefficient Storm A B i = A(Tc/60)B (Bozeman IDF curve)2-yr 0.36 -0.60 Tc = time of concentration, minutes 5-yr 0.52 -0.64 A = Area, acres 10-yr 0.64 -0.65 25-yr 0.78 -0.64 50-yr 0.92 -0.66 100-yr 1.01 -0.67 (Bozeman Design Standards, March 2004) Sub-Basin Name Area C Tc Q2 Q5 Q10 Q25 Q50 Q100 Basin 1 H1 218.30 0.20 90.60 12.27 17.44 21.38 26.16 30.60 33.46 D1.1 (A+B+C)115.11 0.20 97.60 6.19 8.77 10.74 13.15 15.36 16.78 D1.2A 5.52 0.48 5.00 4.24 6.76 8.53 10.14 12.57 14.14 D1.2B1 6.35 0.20 5.00 2.03 3.24 4.09 4.86 6.02 6.78 D1.2 (A+B)2 11.87 0.33 16.20 3.10 4.71 5.88 7.07 8.56 9.52 D1.2 (future)3 12.61 0.48 6.30 8.42 13.32 16.76 19.98 24.65 27.67 D1.3 (West Lake outlet pipe)4 4.61 D1.4A 5.72 0.50 5.00 4.57 7.30 9.20 10.94 13.56 15.27 D1.4B 7.26 0.39 5.00 4.53 7.22 9.11 10.83 13.43 15.11 D1.4 (A+B)12.98 0.44 5.00 9.10 14.52 18.32 21.78 26.99 30.38 D1.2+D1.4 24.85 0.39 16.20 7.59 11.55 14.41 17.33 20.98 23.34 Durston Culverts5 33.45 FOOTNOTES: 1.D1.2B represents the drainage area for a temporary storm water settling basin, for pretreatment. The settling basin is not part of the Phase 3 detention requirements. 2.D1.2 (A+B) represents currently proposed conditions; fully developed Phase 3 and undeveloped subbasin D1.2B. 3.D1.2 (future) represents Phase 3 plus future development at full buildout. Future development area D1.2B is projected to be 7.09 acres (C=0.48) and is used to calculate total detention which will be constructed in Phase 3. 4.Full retention of sub-basin D1.3 was assumed to conservatively estimate the 5.14-acre lake's maximum 25-year water surface elevation (WSEL) at 131,184 cu. ft., resulting in a rise of 0.59 feet above the normal operating elevation of 44.50 to which an additional 0.5 feet was added to account for partial clogging of the 2' high fish screen. The result (WSEL=45.59) was used to calculate the 25-year peak discharge. Calculations are provided in the drainage report for Phases 1 and 2. 5.The two existing 361/4" x 221/4" ARCP culverts under Durston Road at station 9+00 will collect runoff from the West Lake outlet pipe, plus discharge and 25-year overflow from the proposed underground detention facilities for sub-basins D1.2 (A+B) and D1.4 (A+B). You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 610 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Sub-Basin D1.4 Detention (10-yr storm) MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp = C i A POST-DEVELOPMENT PRE-DEVEL. 12.98 AC Qp (Basin H1) =21.38 cfs Basins D1.1 + D1.3 =-15.35 cfs 0.44 Total, D1.2 det + D1.4 det =6.03 cfs (combined release rate) 5.0 MIN D1.4 release rate =2.30 cfs 3.22 IN/HR TIME STEP 18.32 CFS DURATION = 5.0 min. Max. Volume,Max. Volume,Required Detention Triangle Rel. (cu. ft.)Constant Rel. (cu. ft.)Volume (cu. ft.) 8664.83 5757.86 7,211 Triangle Release Constant Release DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME (MIN)(IN/HR)(CFS)(CF)(CF) 4.75 3.33 18.94 4,725 4,136 9.75 2.09 11.87 5,925 5,040 14.75 1.59 9.07 6,662 5,474 19.75 1.32 7.50 7,180 5,684 ORIFICE CALCULATIONS 24.75 1.14 6.48 7,566 5,758 MATCHING Qp =2.30 cfs 29.75 1.01 5.75 7,860 5,739 Max. Depth =3.50 ft 34.75 0.91 5.19 8,089 5,651 39.75 0.84 4.76 8,265 5,511 44.75 0.77 4.41 8,401 5,328 CIRCULAR ORIFICE: 49.75 0.72 4.11 8,503 5,111 DIAMETER =6.750 inches 54.75 0.68 3.87 8,577 4,864 Area =0.25 ft2 59.75 0.64 3.65 8,626 4,593 ORIFICE FLOW =2.24 CFS 64.75 0.61 3.47 8,655 4,300 69.75 0.58 3.30 8,665 3,988 74.75 0.55 3.16 8,659 3,659 RECTANGULAR ORIFICE: 79.75 0.53 3.03 8,638 3,315 LENGTH =6.125 inches 84.75 0.51 2.91 8,605 2,958 WIDTH =6.000 inches 89.75 0.49 2.80 8,560 2,588 Area =0.26 ft2 94.75 0.48 2.71 8,504 2,208 ORIFICE FLOW =2.30 CFS 99.75 0.46 2.62 8,439 1,817 104.75 0.45 2.54 8,364 1,417 109.75 0.43 2.46 8,281 1,009 114.75 0.42 2.39 8,191 592 119.75 0.41 2.32 8,093 168 WEIR CALCULATIONS 124.75 0.40 2.26 7,989 -262 Coefficient =3.33 inches 129.75 0.39 2.21 7,879 -700 Width =1.250 inches 134.75 0.38 2.15 7,763 -1,143 WEIR FLOW =2.27 CFS 139.75 0.37 2.10 7,641 -1,592 144.75 0.36 2.05 7,514 -2,046 149.75 0.35 2.01 7,383 -2,506 POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS: BASIN AREA POST = POST-DEV C = POST-DEV Tc = STORM INTENSITY = POST-DEV Qp = You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 611 DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME (MIN)(IN/HR)(CFS)(CF)(CF) 154.75 0.35 1.97 7,246 -2,970 159.75 0.34 1.93 7,106 -3,438 164.75 0.33 1.89 6,961 -3,911 169.75 0.33 1.85 6,813 -4,389 174.75 0.32 1.82 6,660 -4,869 179.75 0.31 1.79 6,505 -5,354 184.75 0.31 1.75 6,345 -5,842 189.75 0.30 1.72 6,183 -6,334 194.75 0.30 1.69 6,017 -6,829 199.75 0.29 1.67 5,849 -7,327 204.75 0.29 1.64 5,677 -7,828 209.75 0.28 1.61 5,503 -8,332 214.75 0.28 1.59 5,326 -8,838 219.75 0.28 1.57 5,147 -9,348 224.75 0.27 1.54 4,965 -9,859 229.75 0.27 1.52 4,781 -10,374 234.75 0.26 1.50 4,595 -10,890 239.75 0.26 1.48 4,407 -11,409 244.75 0.26 1.46 4,216 -11,930 249.75 0.25 1.44 4,023 -12,453 254.75 0.25 1.42 3,829 -12,979 259.75 0.25 1.41 3,632 -13,506 264.75 0.24 1.39 3,434 -14,035 269.75 0.24 1.37 3,234 -14,567 274.75 0.24 1.35 3,032 -15,100 279.75 0.24 1.34 2,828 -15,634 284.75 0.23 1.32 2,623 -16,171 289.75 0.23 1.31 2,416 -16,709 294.75 0.23 1.29 2,208 -17,249 299.75 0.22 1.28 1,998 -17,790 304.75 0.22 1.27 1,787 -18,333 309.75 0.22 1.25 1,574 -18,877 314.75 0.22 1.24 1,360 -19,423 319.75 0.22 1.23 1,144 -19,971 324.75 0.21 1.22 928 -20,519 329.75 0.21 1.20 710 -21,069 334.75 0.21 1.19 490 -21,620 339.75 0.21 1.18 270 -22,173 344.75 0.21 1.17 48 -22,727 349.75 0.20 1.16 -175 -23,282 354.75 0.20 1.15 -398 -23,838 359.75 0.20 1.14 -624 -24,396 364.75 0.20 1.13 -850 -24,954 369.75 0.20 1.12 -1,077 -25,514 374.75 0.19 1.11 -1,305 -26,075 379.75 0.19 1.10 -1,534 -26,636 384.75 0.19 1.09 -1,765 -27,199 389.75 0.19 1.08 -1,996 -27,763 394.75 0.19 1.07 -2,228 -28,328 399.75 0.19 1.06 -2,461 -28,894 404.75 0.19 1.05 -2,695 -29,461 409.75 0.18 1.04 -2,930 -30,029 414.75 0.18 1.04 -3,165 -30,597 419.75 0.18 1.03 -3,402 -31,167 424.75 0.18 1.02 -3,639 -31,737 429.75 0.18 1.01 -3,878 -32,309 434.75 0.18 1.01 -4,117 -32,881 439.75 0.18 1.00 -4,357 -33,454 444.75 0.17 0.99 -4,597 -34,028 449.75 0.17 0.98 -4,839 -34,603 454.75 0.17 0.98 -5,081 -35,178 459.75 0.17 0.97 -5,323 -35,754 464.75 0.17 0.96 -5,567 -36,331 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 612 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Sub-Basin D2.1 Detention (10-yr storm) MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp = C i A POST-DEVELOPMENT PRE-DEVEL. 12.61 AC Qp (Basin H1) =21.38 cfs Basins D1.1 + D1.3 +D1.4 =-17.65 cfs 0.48 D1.2 release rate =3.73 cfs 6.3 MIN D1.2 release rate =3.73 cfs 2.77 IN/HR TIME STEP 16.76 CFS DURATION = 5.0 min. Max. Volume,Max. Volume,Required Detention Triangle Rel. (cu. ft.)Constant Rel. (cu. ft.)Volume (cu. ft.) 6933.42 4332.83 5,633 Triangle Release Constant Release DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME (MIN)(IN/HR)(CFS)(CF)(CF) 5.99 2.86 17.33 4,850 3,780 12.29 1.79 10.86 5,927 4,333 18.59 1.37 8.30 6,471 4,321 24.89 1.13 6.86 6,762 4,040 ORIFICE CALCULATIONS 31.19 0.98 5.93 6,900 3,595 MATCHING Qp =3.73 cfs 37.49 0.87 5.26 6,933 3,036 Max. Depth =3.50 ft 43.79 0.79 4.75 6,890 2,395 50.09 0.72 4.36 6,787 1,689 56.39 0.67 4.03 6,637 931 62.69 0.62 3.77 6,448 130 CIRCULAR ORIFICE: 68.99 0.58 3.54 6,227 -706 DIAMETER =8.625 inches 75.29 0.55 3.34 5,977 -1,574 Area =0.41 ft2 81.59 0.52 3.17 5,703 -2,467 ORIFICE FLOW =3.65 CFS 87.89 0.50 3.02 5,409 -3,385 94.19 0.48 2.89 5,095 -4,322 100.49 0.46 2.77 4,765 -5,279 RECTANGULAR ORIFICE: 106.79 0.44 2.66 4,420 -6,252 LENGTH =7.875 inches 113.09 0.42 2.57 4,062 -7,240 WIDTH =7.500 inches 119.39 0.41 2.48 3,691 -8,242 Area =0.41 ft2 125.69 0.40 2.40 3,309 -9,256 ORIFICE FLOW =3.69 CFS 131.99 0.38 2.32 2,916 -10,282 138.29 0.37 2.25 2,514 -11,319 144.59 0.36 2.19 2,103 -12,365 150.89 0.35 2.13 1,684 -13,421 157.19 0.34 2.07 1,258 -14,486 WEIR CALCULATIONS 163.49 0.33 2.02 824 -15,558 Coefficient =3.33 inches 169.79 0.33 1.97 383 -16,638 Width =2.000 inches 176.09 0.32 1.92 -63 -17,726 WEIR FLOW =3.63 CFS 182.39 0.31 1.88 -516 -18,820 188.69 0.30 1.84 -974 -19,920 194.99 0.30 1.80 -1,438 -21,026 POST-DEV Qp = POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS: BASIN AREA POST = POST-DEV Tc = POST-DEV C = STORM INTENSITY = You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 613 DURATION INTENSITY Qp POND VOLUME POND VOLUME (MIN)(IN/HR)(CFS)(CF)(CF) 201.29 0.29 1.76 -1,906 -22,139 207.59 0.29 1.73 -2,380 -23,256 213.89 0.28 1.70 -2,858 -24,379 220.19 0.27 1.66 -3,340 -25,506 226.49 0.27 1.63 -3,826 -26,638 232.79 0.27 1.60 -4,316 -27,775 239.09 0.26 1.58 -4,810 -28,916 245.39 0.26 1.55 -5,308 -30,061 251.69 0.25 1.53 -5,808 -31,210 257.99 0.25 1.50 -6,313 -32,363 264.29 0.24 1.48 -6,820 -33,519 270.59 0.24 1.46 -7,330 -34,679 276.89 0.24 1.43 -7,843 -35,842 283.19 0.23 1.41 -8,360 -37,009 289.49 0.23 1.39 -8,878 -38,178 295.79 0.23 1.37 -9,400 -39,351 302.09 0.22 1.35 -9,924 -40,526 308.39 0.22 1.34 -10,450 -41,705 314.69 0.22 1.32 -10,979 -42,886 320.99 0.22 1.30 -11,510 -44,070 327.29 0.21 1.29 -12,043 -45,256 333.59 0.21 1.27 -12,578 -46,444 339.89 0.21 1.25 -13,115 -47,636 346.19 0.20 1.24 -13,655 -48,829 352.49 0.20 1.23 -14,196 -50,025 358.79 0.20 1.21 -14,739 -51,223 365.09 0.20 1.20 -15,284 -52,423 371.39 0.20 1.18 -15,831 -53,625 377.69 0.19 1.17 -16,379 -54,829 383.99 0.19 1.16 -16,929 -56,035 390.29 0.19 1.15 -17,481 -57,243 396.59 0.19 1.14 -18,035 -58,453 402.89 0.19 1.12 -18,590 -59,665 409.19 0.18 1.11 -19,146 -60,878 415.49 0.18 1.10 -19,704 -62,093 421.79 0.18 1.09 -20,263 -63,310 428.09 0.18 1.08 -20,824 -64,529 434.39 0.18 1.07 -21,386 -65,749 440.69 0.18 1.06 -21,950 -66,970 446.99 0.17 1.05 -22,515 -68,194 453.29 0.17 1.04 -23,081 -69,418 459.59 0.17 1.03 -23,648 -70,644 465.89 0.17 1.02 -24,216 -71,872 472.19 0.17 1.01 -24,786 -73,101 478.49 0.17 1.00 -25,357 -74,332 484.79 0.16 1.00 -25,929 -75,563 491.09 0.16 0.99 -26,502 -76,796 497.39 0.16 0.98 -27,076 -78,031 503.69 0.16 0.97 -27,652 -79,266 509.99 0.16 0.96 -28,228 -80,503 516.29 0.16 0.96 -28,805 -81,741 522.59 0.16 0.95 -29,384 -82,980 528.89 0.16 0.94 -29,963 -84,221 535.19 0.15 0.93 -30,543 -85,462 541.49 0.15 0.93 -31,124 -86,705 547.79 0.15 0.92 -31,707 -87,949 554.09 0.15 0.91 -32,290 -89,194 560.39 0.15 0.91 -32,874 -90,440 566.69 0.15 0.90 -33,459 -91,687 572.99 0.15 0.89 -34,044 -92,935 579.29 0.15 0.89 -34,631 -94,184 585.59 0.15 0.88 -35,218 -95,434 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 614 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Sub-Basin D1.4 StormTech Sizing Calculations Required Storage Volume 7,211 ft3 StormTech Modules, Model No.SC740 (30" chamber height) Depth to top of gravel 36 in. installed storage volume 74.9 ft3 per chamber (see note 1) Number of chambers required 97 96.28 before rounding excess storage volume 0.7 % Number of chambers proposed 100 excess storage volume 3.7 % equal to 268 ft3 excess storage volume Installed chamber footprint (per chamber) = 5' x 7.12' Note: add 2' min. to each row, for end caps Storage Volume Provided =7,480 ft3 Notes: 1. Storage volume assumes 6" of stone above and below chambers, and 40% stone porosity. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 615 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Sub-Basin D2.1 StormTech Sizing Calculations Required Storage Volume 5,633 ft3 StormTech Modules, Model No.SC740 (30" chamber height) Depth to top of gravel 36 in. installed storage volume 74.9 ft3 per chamber (see note 1) Number of chambers required 76 75.21 before rounding excess storage volume 1.0 % Number of chambers proposed 77 excess storage volume 2.3 % equal to 131 ft3 excess storage volume Installed chamber footprint (per chamber) = 5' x 7.12' Note: add 2' min. to each row, for end caps Storage Volume Provided =5,764 ft3 Notes: 1. Storage volume assumes 6" of stone above and below chambers, and 40% stone porosity. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 616 617 GUTTER FLOW CALCULATIONS You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 618 (this page left blank intentionally) 619 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Gutter Flow, Direct Runoff Calculations MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp = C i A Qp = 25-yr peak runoff, cfs1 C = runoff coefficient i = 0.78(Tc/60)-0.64 (Bozeman IDF curve) Tc = time of concentration, minutes A = Area, acres1 Sub-Basin Description Area1 Tc C Qp Phase 4, East-West Woonerf West end 0.71 5.00 0.48 1.30 Park inlet 0.62 5.00 0.48 1.14 Phase 4, North-South Woonerf North end 0.97 5.00 0.48 1.78 Westgate Avenue Ph 4, W. side, at E-W Woonerf 1.50 5.00 0.48 2.75 Ph 4, E. side, at E-W Woonerf 1.45 5.00 0.48 2.66 Ph 4, north end, W. side park inlet 0.86 5.00 0.48 1.58 Ph 4, north end, W. side 0.62 5.00 0.48 1.14 Ph 4, north end, E. side 0.64 5.00 0.48 1.18 Ph 3, roundabout, S. quadrant 1.41 5.00 0.48 2.59 Ph 3, at Durston, W. side 1.35 5.00 0.48 2.48 Ph 3, at Durston, E. side 1.49 5.00 0.48 2.74 Westmoreland Drive Low point at open space, S. Side 1.95 5.00 0.48 3.58 Low point at open space, N. Side 1.42 5.00 0.48 2.61 Phase 3, western North-South Woonerf North end 1.59 5.00 0.48 2.92 FOOTNOTES: 1 Areas and flow rates are for direct runoff only and do not include inlet bypass. Inlet bypass flow is accounted for on the following page. 2 "Woonerf" refers to minor alleys. Typical section is an inverted crown with 2% slope toward centerline. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 620 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Gutter Spread Width Calculations 25-yr. Peak Runoff (cfs)Gutter Sub-Basin Description Direct1 Upstream2 Total Inlet Type Bypass Spread (ft.) Phase 4, East-West Woonerf3 West end 1.30 0.00 1.30 drop inlet 0.00 12.68 Phase 4, North-South Woonerf3 North end 1.78 0.00 1.78 n/a n/a 14.23 Westgate Road Ph 4, W. side, at E-W Woonerf 2.75 0.00 2.75 on grade 1.03 7.30 Ph 4, E. side, at E-W Woonerf 2.66 0.00 2.66 on grade 0.99 7.54 Ph 4, north end, W. side park inlet 1.58 0.00 1.58 drop inlet 0.00 Ph 4, north end, W. side 1.14 1.03 2.17 on grade 0.72 6.63 Ph 4, north end, E. side 1.18 0.99 2.17 on grade 0.72 6.63 Ph 3, roundabout, S. quadrant 2.59 0.72 3.31 sag 0.00 8.56 Ph 3, at Durston, W. side 2.48 0.00 2.48 sag 0.00 7.22 Ph 3, at Durston, E. side 2.74 0.00 2.74 sag 0.00 7.67 Westmoreland Drive Low point at open space, S. Side 3.58 0.00 3.58 sag 0.00 8.95 Low point at open space, N. Side 2.61 0.00 2.61 sag 0.00 7.45 Phase 3, western North-South Woonerf3 North end 2.92 0.00 2.92 n/a n/a 14.43 FOOTNOTES: 1 Direct runoff is from "Gutter Flow" calculations on the previous page, and does not include runoff from upstream inlets. 2 Upstream runoff is the bypass flow from contributing upstream inlets. 3 For Woonerf section (minor alley with inverted crown), minor submergence is acceptable. The maximum submergence at the wheels of a car straddling the inverted crown centerline would be about 1 inch, which is considered acceptble for the short duration of peak runoff involved. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 621 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.80 % Left Side Slope 2.00 % Right Side Slope 2.00 % Discharge 1.29 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.13 ft Flow Area 0.80 ft² Wetted Perimeter 12.64 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.06 ft Top Width 12.64 ft Critical Depth 0.13 ft Critical Slope 0.00608 ft/ft Velocity 1.61 ft/s Velocity Head 0.04 ft Specific Energy 0.17 ft Froude Number 1.13 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.13 ft Critical Depth 0.13 ft Channel Slope 0.80 % Critical Slope 0.00608 ft/ft Ph 4, E-W Woonerf, W. end (25-yr) 6/22/2016 2:17:43 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 622 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.80 % Left Side Slope 50.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 50.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 1.78 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.14 ft Flow Area 1.01 ft² Wetted Perimeter 14.23 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.07 ft Top Width 14.23 ft Critical Depth 0.15 ft Critical Slope 0.00583 ft/ft Velocity 1.76 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 0.19 ft Froude Number 1.16 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.14 ft Critical Depth 0.15 ft Channel Slope 0.80 % Critical Slope 0.00583 ft/ft Ph 4, N-S Woonerf, N. end (25-yr) 7/1/2016 11:19:40 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 623 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.00 % Discharge 2.72 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.33 0.45 0+00.50 0.00 0+02.00 0.08 0+15.50 0.41 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.33, 0.45)(0+15.50, 0.41)0.013 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 0.26 ft Elevation Range 0.00 to 0.45 ft Flow Area 1.03 ft² Wetted Perimeter 9.34 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.11 ft Top Width 9.15 ft Normal Depth 0.26 ft Critical Depth 0.29 ft Critical Slope 0.00502 ft/ft Ph 4, Westgate, W. side at E-W Woonerf (25-yr) 6/22/2016 2:48:30 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 624 Results Velocity 2.63 ft/s Velocity Head 0.11 ft Specific Energy 0.37 ft Froude Number 1.38 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.26 ft Critical Depth 0.29 ft Channel Slope 1.00 % Critical Slope 0.00502 ft/ft Ph 4, Westgate, W. side at E-W Woonerf (25-yr) 6/22/2016 2:48:30 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 625 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Channel Slope 1.00 % Discharge 2.63 ft³/s Section Definitions Station (ft)Elevation (ft) 0+00.33 0.45 0+00.50 0.00 0+02.00 0.08 0+15.50 0.41 Roughness Segment Definitions Start Station Ending Station Roughness Coefficient (0+00.33, 0.45)(0+15.50, 0.41)0.013 Options Current Roughness Weighted Method Pavlovskii's Method Open Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Closed Channel Weighting Method Pavlovskii's Method Results Normal Depth 0.26 ft Elevation Range 0.00 to 0.45 ft Flow Area 1.01 ft² Wetted Perimeter 9.21 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.11 ft Top Width 9.03 ft Normal Depth 0.26 ft Critical Depth 0.29 ft Critical Slope 0.00504 ft/ft Ph 4, Westgate, E. side at E-W Woonerf (25-yr) 6/22/2016 2:51:33 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 626 Results Velocity 2.61 ft/s Velocity Head 0.11 ft Specific Energy 0.37 ft Froude Number 1.38 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.26 ft Critical Depth 0.29 ft Channel Slope 1.00 % Critical Slope 0.00504 ft/ft Ph 4, Westgate, E. side at E-W Woonerf (25-yr) 6/22/2016 2:51:33 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 627 Project Description Solve For Efficiency Input Data Discharge 2.17 ft³/s Slope 1.00000 % Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.30 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Options Calculation Option Use Both Grate Flow Option Exclude None Results Efficiency 66.91 % Intercepted Flow 1.45 ft³/s Bypass Flow 0.72 ft³/s Spread 6.63 ft Depth 0.25 ft Flow Area 0.70 ft² Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Velocity 3.11 ft/s Splash Over Velocity 5.18 ft/s Frontal Flow Factor 1.00 Side Flow Factor 0.16 Grate Flow Ratio 0.55 Equivalent Cross Slope 0.07884 ft/ft Active Grate Length 2.40 ft Length Factor 0.05 Total Interception Length 12.97 ft Ph 4, Westgate, N. end inlet, W. side (25-yr) 7/1/2016 11:41:04 AM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 628 Project Description Solve For Efficiency Input Data Discharge 2.17 ft³/s Slope 1.00000 % Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.30 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Options Calculation Option Use Both Grate Flow Option Exclude None Results Efficiency 66.91 % Intercepted Flow 1.45 ft³/s Bypass Flow 0.72 ft³/s Spread 6.63 ft Depth 0.25 ft Flow Area 0.70 ft² Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Velocity 3.11 ft/s Splash Over Velocity 5.18 ft/s Frontal Flow Factor 1.00 Side Flow Factor 0.16 Grate Flow Ratio 0.55 Equivalent Cross Slope 0.07884 ft/ft Active Grate Length 2.40 ft Length Factor 0.05 Total Interception Length 12.97 ft Ph 4, Westgate, N. end inlet, E. side (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:28:22 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 629 Project Description Solve For Spread Input Data Discharge 3.31 ft³/s Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.25 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Opening Height 5.00 in Curb Throat Type Vertical Throat Incline Angle 0.00 degrees Options Calculation Option Use Both Results Spread 8.56 ft Depth 0.31 ft Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Open Grate Area 1.22 ft² Active Grate Weir Length 5.40 ft Ph 3, Westgate, roundabout, S. quadrant (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:30:18 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 630 Project Description Solve For Spread Input Data Discharge 2.48 ft³/s Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.25 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Opening Height 5.00 in Curb Throat Type Vertical Throat Incline Angle 0.00 degrees Options Calculation Option Use Both Results Spread 7.22 ft Depth 0.27 ft Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Open Grate Area 1.22 ft² Active Grate Weir Length 5.40 ft Ph 3, Westgate, at Durston, W. inlet (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:32:06 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 631 Project Description Solve For Spread Input Data Discharge 2.74 ft³/s Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.25 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Opening Height 5.00 in Curb Throat Type Vertical Throat Incline Angle 0.00 degrees Options Calculation Option Use Both Results Spread 7.67 ft Depth 0.28 ft Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Open Grate Area 1.22 ft² Active Grate Weir Length 5.40 ft Ph 3, Westgate, at Durston, E. inlet (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:33:14 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 632 Project Description Solve For Spread Input Data Discharge 3.58 ft³/s Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.25 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Opening Height 5.00 in Curb Throat Type Vertical Throat Incline Angle 0.00 degrees Options Calculation Option Use Both Results Spread 8.95 ft Depth 0.32 ft Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Open Grate Area 1.22 ft² Active Grate Weir Length 5.40 ft Ph 3, Westmoreland, S. inlet (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:34:20 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 633 Project Description Solve For Spread Input Data Discharge 2.61 ft³/s Gutter Width 1.50 ft Gutter Cross Slope 6.25 % Road Cross Slope 3.00 % Local Depression 1.00 in Local Depression Width 1.50 ft Grate Width 1.50 ft Grate Length 3.00 ft Grate Type 30˚ Tilt Bar Clogging 20.00 % Curb Opening Length 3.00 ft Opening Height 5.00 in Curb Throat Type Vertical Throat Incline Angle 0.00 degrees Options Calculation Option Use Both Results Spread 7.45 ft Depth 0.27 ft Gutter Depression 0.05 ft Total Depression 0.13 ft Open Grate Area 1.22 ft² Active Grate Weir Length 5.40 ft Ph 3, Westmoreland, N. inlet (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:35:19 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 634 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 2.00 % Left Side Slope 50.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 50.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 2.92 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.14 ft Flow Area 1.04 ft² Wetted Perimeter 14.43 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.07 ft Top Width 14.43 ft Critical Depth 0.18 ft Critical Slope 0.00545 ft/ft Velocity 2.80 ft/s Velocity Head 0.12 ft Specific Energy 0.27 ft Froude Number 1.84 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.14 ft Critical Depth 0.18 ft Channel Slope 2.00 % Critical Slope 0.00545 ft/ft Ph 3, Western N-S Woonerf, N. end (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:37:01 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 1of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 635 PIPE FLOW CALCULATIONS You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 636 (this page left blank intentionally) You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 637 The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3 Pipe Flow Calculations MODIFIED RATIONAL METHOD Qp = C i A Qp = 25-yr peak runoff, cfs C = runoff coefficient i = 0.78(Tc/60)-0.64 (Bozeman IDF curve) Tc = time of concentration, minutes A = Area, acres Sub-Basin Description Area1 Tc C Qdirect 2 Qtotal 3 Qint 4 Qbypass Qpipe 5 Pipe Dia.6 Notes Phase 4, East-West Woonerf West end 0.71 5.00 0.48 1.30 1.30 1.30 0.00 1.30 12" Park inlet 0.62 5.00 0.48 1.14 1.14 1.14 0.00 1.14 12" Manhole 2.44 12"pipe to Westgate Ave. Westgate Avenue Ph 4, W. side, at E-W Woonerf 1.50 5.00 0.48 2.75 2.75 1.72 1.03 1.72 12" Ph 4, E. side, at E-W Woonerf 1.45 5.00 0.48 2.66 2.66 1.67 0.99 5.84 18"trunk line to Phase 3 Ph 4, north end, W. side park inlet 0.86 5.00 0.48 1.58 1.58 1.58 0.00 1.58 12" Ph 4, north end, W. side curb inlet 0.62 5.00 0.48 1.14 2.17 1.45 0.72 3.03 15" Ph 4, north end, E. side 0.64 5.00 0.48 1.18 2.17 1.45 0.72 10.31 24"trunk line to D1.2 det Ph 3, roundabout, inlet at S. quadrant 1.41 5.00 0.48 2.59 3.31 3.31 0.00 3.31 15" Ph 3, roundabout, MH. At E. quadrant 0.00 13.62 13.62 24"outfall, to D1.2 det Ph 3, at Durston, W. side 1.35 5.00 0.48 2.48 2.48 2.48 0.00 2.48 12" Ph 3, at Durston, E. side 1.49 5.00 0.48 2.74 2.74 2.74 0.00 5.22 15"outfall, to D1.2 det Westmoreland Drive Low point at open space, S. Side 1.95 5.00 0.48 3.58 3.58 3.58 0.00 3.58 15" Low point at open space, N. Side 1.42 5.00 0.48 2.61 2.61 2.61 0.00 6.19 18"outfall, to D1.4 det FOOTNOTES: 1 Contributing drainage area 2 Qdirect is direct surface runoff to the inlet, and does not include bypass flows from upstream inlets. 3 Qtotal is total peak surface runoff to the inlet (direct runoff plus bypass flows from upstream inlets). 4 Qint is surface runoff intercepted by the inlet. 5 Qpipe is total flow to outlet pipe (total pipe flow from upstream inlets plus surface runoff intercepted at the inlet). 6 Calculations are attached where "Pipe Dia." column uses bold text. Other pipe sizes are evident based on flow rates. You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 638 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.60 % Diameter 12.00 in Discharge 2.48 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.74 ft Flow Area 0.62 ft² Wetted Perimeter 2.07 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.30 ft Top Width 0.88 ft Critical Depth 0.67 ft Percent Full 74.1 % Critical Slope 0.00763 ft/ft Velocity 3.98 ft/s Velocity Head 0.25 ft Specific Energy 0.99 ft Froude Number 0.83 Maximum Discharge 2.97 ft³/s Discharge Full 2.76 ft³/s Slope Full 0.00485 ft/ft Flow Type SubCritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 % Normal Depth Over Rise 74.06 % Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s 12" pipe (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:43:21 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 639 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.60 % Diameter 15.00 in Discharge 5.22 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.08 ft Flow Area 1.13 ft² Wetted Perimeter 2.99 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.38 ft Top Width 0.85 ft Critical Depth 0.93 ft Percent Full 86.5 % Critical Slope 0.00808 ft/ft Velocity 4.63 ft/s Velocity Head 0.33 ft Specific Energy 1.41 ft Froude Number 0.71 Maximum Discharge 5.38 ft³/s Discharge Full 5.00 ft³/s Slope Full 0.00653 ft/ft Flow Type SubCritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 % Normal Depth Over Rise 86.50 % Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s 15" pipe (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:43:46 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 640 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.60 % Diameter 18.00 in Discharge 6.19 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 0.98 ft Flow Area 1.22 ft² Wetted Perimeter 2.82 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.43 ft Top Width 1.43 ft Critical Depth 0.96 ft Percent Full 65.3 % Critical Slope 0.00632 ft/ft Velocity 5.07 ft/s Velocity Head 0.40 ft Specific Energy 1.38 ft Froude Number 0.97 Maximum Discharge 8.75 ft³/s Discharge Full 8.14 ft³/s Slope Full 0.00347 ft/ft Flow Type SubCritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 % Normal Depth Over Rise 65.27 % Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s 18" pipe (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:44:11 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 641 Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.60 % Diameter 24.00 in Discharge 13.62 ft³/s Results Normal Depth 1.33 ft Flow Area 2.21 ft² Wetted Perimeter 3.80 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.58 ft Top Width 1.89 ft Critical Depth 1.33 ft Percent Full 66.3 % Critical Slope 0.00595 ft/ft Velocity 6.16 ft/s Velocity Head 0.59 ft Specific Energy 1.92 ft Froude Number 1.01 Maximum Discharge 18.85 ft³/s Discharge Full 17.52 ft³/s Slope Full 0.00363 ft/ft Flow Type SuperCritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 % Normal Depth Over Rise 66.25 % Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s 24" pipe (25-yr) 7/1/2016 2:44:41 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) 642 (this page left blank intentionally) 643 644 (this page left blank intentionally) 645 646 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Streets, Roads and Alleys Phase 3 of the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision will be served by a number of street sections; including minor arterial, local and woonerf sections. The dedicated rights-of-way for each of these sections vary based on city requirements. A Road Section Index (Figure 1) has been created that illustrates where each section is located. There are street cross section exhibits as well for each of the roadways (Figures 2 – 3). Roadway intersections within The Lakes will match the design of existing intersections within all of Valley West Subdivision. Curb bulbs will be continued in order to reduce traffic speeds and allow for safer pedestrian crossings. Curb bulbs will also be used at mid-block/trail corridor crossings. Parking will not be allowed where curb bulbs are located. Individual lots in general will not access directly to the arterial streets or collector streets. “No access” strips will be placed on lots fronting Durston Road and Laurel Parkway. Access to these fronting lots will be provided off of either a local street or woonerf. All streets will be paved to provide long-term dust control. Dust created during construction will be controlled in accordance with the Montana Public Works Standard Specifications. Surface drainage is shown on the preliminary grading and drainage plan. Surface runoff will be treated by on-site detention/retention facilities. Erosion control plans will be prepared with the construction documents. All erosion control plans will be in accordance with state and local regulations. A permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity will be required by MDEQ for all phases of the project. Construction sediment will be controlled in accordance with requirements of the permit. The applicant will pay for construction of all streets and woonerfs within the subdivision. All maintenance for public streets will be by the City of Bozeman. Maintenance in paved woonerfs will be the responsibility of the homeowner’s association for items such as snow removal, cleaning, and weed control. Major maintenance items such as asphalt repairs will need to be addressed by the homeowner’s association, as they are needed. Snow removal storage areas for the woonerf area of the subdivision are shown on Figure 4. A comparison between a woonerf section and a standard local street section is provided to illustrate the similarities in both sections. See Figure 5 [and four (4) color graphics immediately 647 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application following Figure 5]. This comparison illustrates that the woonerf has essentially the same width as a local street section. Vehicle turning movements are illustrated on Figures FIRE 1 and FIRE 2. The figures illustrate that a fire truck can negotiate the woonerf geometry as well as the proposed traffic circle. The Traffic Impact Study for the subdivision addresses traffic generation. The traffic study is included in Section 19. Offsite Roadways Modifications to Durston Road has been completed as part of Phases1 and 2 of the development. 648 ROADWAY SECTIONSROAD NAMESECTION TYPEFIGUREDURSTON ROADMINOR ARTERIAL-LOCAL STREETSLOCAL2RESIDENTIAL POCKETNEIGHBORHOODSWOONERF3PEDESTRIANSIDEWALK-PEDESTRIANTRAIL-2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702ROAD SECTION INDEXTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\ROAD SECTIONS\ROAD SECTION OVERVIEW-PH-3.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jul/07/2016ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. 5352.007XFIG.1BOZEMANMONTANACPKCPKJRN06/2016QCBYQCDATEengineers surveyors planners scientists040408020HORIZ. SCALEIN FEETDURSTON ROAD (EXISTING)WESTMOR LAND DR IVE WESTGATE AVENUE EXIS T I N G P H A S E 2 F U TU R E PH A S E 4 PROPOSED PHASE 3CURRENT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL END AT THE EASTBOUNDARY OF THE OPEN SPACE. THE REMAINING ROAD ANDPEDESTRIAN CROSSING WILL BE BUILT IN THE FUTURE.649 60.00'R.O.W.CENTER OF R.O.W.13.50'ASPHALTW/PARKING13.50'ASPHALTW/PARKING8.50'BLVD*8.50'BLVD*2.00'C&G5.00'SDWK*2.00'C&G5.00'SDWK*11.00'ASPHALT& CURB11.00'ASPHALT& CURB13.00'BLVD5.00'SDWK5.00'GRASS13.00'BLVDAT TYPICAL CURB BULB LOCATIONSLOCAL STREET SECTION3%3%7.00'PARKINGLANE8.00'DRIVELANE8.00'DRIVELANE7.00'PARKINGLANE2%2%2%2%0.50'CURB0.50'CURB* ALL SIDEWALK ALONG PARKS IS TO BE 6' WIDE, REDUCING THE BLVD TO 7.5' WIDE.2880 Technology Blvd- WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702REVISIONSSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\ROAD SECTIONS\TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONS.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jul/07/2016ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007XFIG.2BOZEMANMONTANAKDJKDJJRN06/2016TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONSLOCAL STREET SECTIONTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST650 32.00'R.O.W.CENTER OF ROAD17.00'ASPHALT2.00'WOONERF SECTION1.00'1.00'2%5.00'CONCRETEBORDER6.00'PARKING/ PLANTER BOXESCONCRETEBORDER/ PARKING2%2%2%2880 Technology Blvd- WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702REVISIONSSHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\ROAD SECTIONS\TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONS.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jun/24/2016ˆCOPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016APPR. BY:DATE:DATE:BY:DSGN. BY:Q.C. engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007XFIG.3BOZEMANMONTANAKDJKDJJRN06/2016TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONSWOONERF SECTIONTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST651 FIGURE NUMBERˆPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Snow Removal- Phase 3.dwg Plotted by dean squires on Jul/25/2016engineers surveyors planners scientists2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.67025352.007FIG. 4THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3BOZEMANMONTANASNOW REMOVAL: PHASE 3CPKCPKJRN07/2016LEGEND:SNOW REMOVAL STORAGE AREANOTE: BOULEVARDS WILL BE UTILIZED FOR SNOWSTORAGE AREAS ON LOCAL, COLLECTOR AND ARTERIALSTREETS.10' PUBLIC UTILITY ANDSTREET MAINTENANCE/ SNOWREMOVAL EASEMENT.WESTMORLAND DRIVEARNHEM WAYWESTGATE AVENUE652 60.00'R.O.W.32.00'R.O.W.22.00'DRIVING SURFACEWITH PEDESTRIAN PRECEDENCE6.00'PARKING/ PLANTER BOXES16.00'DRIVING SURFACEFord7.00'PARKING7.00'PARKING2.00'CONCRETE BORDER/ PARKINGROAD SECTION COMPARISONTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WESTFIGURE NUMBERˆPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,20162880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Road Sections\Woonerf vs Local.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jun/24/2016engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007FIG. 5BOZEMANMONTANACPKKDJJRN06/2016653 654 655 FIGURE NUMBER ˆ PROJECT NO.DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE: COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Fire Truck Turning Movements.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/7/2016 engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 FIRE 1 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 BOZEMAN MONTANA FIRE TRUCK TURNING RADII EXHIBIT WOONERF CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 WESTMORLAND DRIVE ARNHEM WAY (WOONERF) 656 ˆ PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Fire Truck Turning Movements.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/7/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 FIRE 2 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 FIRE TRUCK TURNING RADII EXHIBIT TRAFFIC CIRCLE BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 07/2016 WES T M O R L A N D D RI V EWESTGATE AVENUE657 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phases 3 Preliminary Plat Application Traffic Impact Study A traffic impact study was prepared for The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision with the Phases 1 and 2 preliminary plat application. The study covered the entire “Lakes” Planned Unit Development, which encompasses approximately 65 acres as well nearby intersections as determined by the City of Bozeman Engineering Department. The study is included in this section. It is our opinion that the study and its recommendations are still valid and that the improvements completed in concert with the City for Phases 1 and 2 allow for the development to proceed with Phase 3 with no further off-site improvements. 658 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF BOZEMAN JANUARY 2015 PREPARED BY: Bill White, Senior Transportation Planner 2880 Technology Blvd W PO Box 1113 Bozeman, MT 59771 406.587.0721 MMI PROJECT #: 5352.003 659 660 January 2015 Page i The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1  1.1 Project Description .......................................................................................................... 1  1.2 Analysis Scope and Methodology ................................................................................. 4  2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................... 7  2.1 Roadway Network ........................................................................................................... 7  2.2 Traffic Counts ................................................................................................................... 8  2.3 Traffic Operations .......................................................................................................... 11  2.4 Collision Histories .......................................................................................................... 11  3 Year 2024 Growth Rate Forecasts ...................................................................................... 13 3.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Traffic Forecasts ............................................................................................................ 13  3.3 Traffic Operations .......................................................................................................... 22  4 Year 2024 Pipeline Project Forecasts ........................................................................................ 23  4.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 23  4.2 Traffic Forecasts ............................................................................................................ 23  4.3 Traffic Operations .......................................................................................................... 31  5 Improvements and Project Mitigation .................................................................................. 33 5.1 Cottonwood Drive/Durston Road Intersection .......................................................... 33  5.2 Durston Road Three Lane ............................................................................................ 33  5.3 Developer Proposal ....................................................................................................... 35  6 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................... 37  6.1 Traffic Forecasts and Capacity .................................................................................... 37  6.2 Improvement Recommendations and Mitigation ...................................................... 37 6.3 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 38  661 January 2015 Page ii The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Criteria ......................................................................... 5 Table 2. Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Controls ............................................... 8 Table 3 Existing LOS and Delay - AM and PM Peak Hours ................................................. 11 Table 4. Project Trip Generation Projections ......................................................................... 16 Table 5. Trip Distribution and Assignment Summaries .......................................................... 17 Table 6. Year 2024 LOS Summaries (Growth Rate) - AM and PM Peak Hours .................... 22 Table 7. Project Trip Generation Projections (Re-Summarized) ............................................ 24 Table 8. Total Entering Volume Comparisons ....................................................................... 31 Table 9. Year 2024 LOS Summaries (Pipeline) - AM and PM Peak Hours ........................... 31 FIGURES Figure 1. Site Location .................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Site Plan ........................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Existing Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour ..................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Existing Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour ................................................................... 10 Figure 5. Future Without Project Traffic Volumes (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour ..................... 14 Figure 6. Future Without Project Traffic Volumes (Growth Rate) - PM Peak Hour ..................... 15 Figure 7. Project Trip Assignments – AM Peak Hour ................................................................ 18 Figure 8. Project Trip Assignments – PM Peak Hour ................................................................ 19 Figure 9. Future With Project Traffic Volumes (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour .......................... 20 Figure 10. Future With Project Traffic Volumes (Growth Rate) - PM Peak Hour ........................ 21 Figure 11. Pipeline Project Trip Assignments – AM Peak Hour .................................................. 25 Figure 12. Pipeline Project Trip Assignments – PM Peak Hour .................................................. 26 Figure 13. Future Without Project Traffic Volumes (Pipeline Trips) - AM Peak Hour ................. 27 Figure 14. Future Without Project Traffic Volumes (Pipeline Trips) - PM Peak Hour ................. 28 Figure 15. Future With Project Traffic Volumes (Pipeline Trips) - AM Peak Hour ...................... 29 Figure 16. Future With Project Traffic Volumes (Pipeline Trips) - PM Peak Hour ...................... 30 Figure 17. Proposed Durston Road Cross Section ..................................................................... 35 Technical Appendix A: Glossary of Terms Technical Appendix B: Summary Traffic Counts Technical Appendix C: LOS Summary Worksheets Technical Appendix D: Pipeline Project Trip Assignments 662 January 2015 Page 1 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 1 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) performed for the Lakes at Valley West residential development proposed in Bozeman, Montana. The analysis identifies the transportation impacts of the proposed development on nearby City arterials and roadways; recommending improvements to address forecasted traffic growth and identifying project mitigations/participation towards these improvements. The scope and work program for this study was developed in coordination with engineering staff from the City of Bozeman, and was performed in accordance with the traffic impact study guidelines outlined in Article 41 – Submittal Materials and Requirements of Chapter 38 City of Bozeman Unified Development Code. The TIS was performed to support development and building permitting processes of the City. 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Valley West is a suburban community in northwest Bozeman generally bounded by Durston Road (north), Babcock Street (south), Ferguson Avenue (east), and the approximate Westgate Avenue alignment (west). The Lakes at Valley West is the proposed western piece of this community; occupying 65 acres with the potential for up to 300 single and multifamily homes to be developed within the timeframe of the next 5 to 10 years. The project is currently anticipated to include the development of 120 single family homes and 180 townhomes. Principal access to The Lakes at Valley West is proposed through new roadways extending into the site from Durston Avenue, proposed as Westgate Avenue, Laurel Parkway, and Westmorland Drive. All three connections are proposed as stop-controlled intersections, with stop signs located on northbound approaches to Durston Avenue. These are the more immediate project accesses developed in the next 10 years, with all being reviewed by this TIS. Secondary site access would eventually be provided through Westgate Avenue (local), Laurel Parkway (collector), and an additional unnamed local street connector, to the south boundary. Similarly, provision for connectivity to the adjacent westerly subdivision will also be provided via Westmorland Drive. The timing for the development of adjacent properties is unknown, though they are not likely to be developed for several years. As such, these secondary accesses were not reviewed by this study to assure a conservative analysis of the project impacts upon Durston Road. When these are developed, some congestion relief can be anticipated for site access and along Durston Road. The project is estimated to be developed in phases with approximately 30 homes constructed and occupied every two years. The project is located within an R-1 zone of Bozeman, is located within the Valley West Planned Unit Development, and has full completion and occupancy anticipated by year 2024. Figure 1 provides a vicinity map locating the project site. Figure 2 provides a site plan. 663 664 665 666 667 668 January 2015 Page 4 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 1.2 ANALYSIS SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY The purpose of this TIS is to review the traffic and transportation impacts of the Lakes at Valley West development on arterials and recommend improvements and strategies, as needed, to mitigate these impacts in order to assure adequate transportation capacity. This section describes the primary scope and methods used to evaluate traffic conditions and determine potential improvements for the project study area. 1.2.1 Project Scope The scope for this study was established in coordination with City of Bozeman Engineering officials, and as per City Code. Per direction, this study quantifies traffic operations and capacity based on a review of intersection level-of-service (LOS). A TIS evaluates roadway capacity primarily through an examination of intersection operations/LOS as congestion and increased vehicle delays are experienced more rapidly at intersections versus road segments (between intersections). This is because the number and frequency of conflicts (i.e. turning vehicles and stopping or slowing movements) are higher and more complex at intersections versus roadway segments, and also because there are intentional stopped-delays that occur at intersections while travel is normally free-flowing between intersections on roadway segments. Per direction with staff, this study addresses LOS for the existing intersections of Westgate Avenue/Durston Road, Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, Cottonwood Road/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street and the future intersection of Westmorland Drive/Durston Road. The analysis was performed for the AM and PM peak/commute hours of the typical weekday, which are the highest hours of capacity demand within this region of Bozeman. As discussed later Section 2.2), typical count timeframes were extended to capture school activities; finding the traditional peak hours of the work commute experienced volumes that surpassed that of the peak generator hours of local schools. The project would be complete and occupied within 10 years. As such, a year 2024 analysis horizon (10 years from when traffic counts were collected) was reviewed for this study. Two forecast methodologies were used in this study to address a potential range of future traffic conditions within the City. These methodologies are summarized as follows: 1. Growth Rates. Traditionally TIS studies within Bozeman have been developed with background (non-project related) traffic growth forecasted with an annual growth rate applied to counts. Project trip assignments are then combined with baseline forecasts to generate future with project forecasts for the horizon/analysis year(s). Section 3 highlights traffic forecasts and operations/LOS results based on this traditional approach. 2. Pipeline Projects. Traffic forecasts developed using growth rates alone can sometimes miss the specific travel demands of new developments within a TIS study area. As such, it has become more common practice to build the assignments of these background developments, known as pipeline projects, into traffic forecasts. A more moderate baseline growth rate is applied to counts to reflect regional growth, and then project trip assignments are combined to generate future with project forecasts for the horizon year(s). Section 4 highlights traffic forecasts developed based upon pipeline project forecasting methodologies. As discussed later in this report, the different forecasting methodologies result in similar total entering volume (TEV) forecasts overall. The first method results in higher through forecasts 669 January 2015 Page 5 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study whereas the second method results in higher turning forecasts, resulting in conclusions and recommendations that are well vetted from varying forecasts perspectives. 1.2.2 Methodology - Intersection Operations Intersection capacity was evaluated using the level-of-service (LOS) methodologies of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010). The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is a nationally recognized and locally accepted method of measuring traffic flow and congestion for intersections. Criteria range from LOS A, indicating free-flow conditions with minimal vehicle delays, to LOS F, indicating congestion with significant vehicle delays (and operational failures). LOS for a signalized intersection is defined in terms of the average control delay experienced by all vehicles at the intersection, as measured over a specific time period, such as a peak hour. LOS for a one- or two-way stop controlled intersection or driveway is the function of average control delays experienced by vehicles in a particular approach or approach movement over a timeframe, such as a peak hour. Typically, the stopped approach or movement experiencing the worst LOS is reported. Finally, LOS at an all-way stop-controlled intersection is defined by the average control delays experienced by all vehicles at the intersection, as with signals, but the LOS thresholds are associated with delays for unsignalized versus signalized intersections. Table 1 outlines the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual. As shown, LOS thresholds, as a function of delay, vary between signalized and unsignalized intersections. This is because driver tolerances for delay have been documented to be much higher at signalized versus unsignalized intersections. Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Signalized: Control Delay (sec/veh) Unsignalized: Control Delay (sec/veh) A 10 10 B >10 – 20 10 - 15 C >20 – 35 15 - 25 D >35 – 55 25 - 35 E >55 – 80 35 - 50 F > 80 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2010) LOS was determined for this study using Synchro Version 8.0, (Trafficware, 2013). This software tool can apply the analysis methodologies of HCM 2010 and is a standard industry software application. LOS D is the typical threshold for signalized intersections. LOS E is allowed at unsignalized driveways and intersections (including all-way stops). 1.2.3 Methodology – Collision Histories Collision histories were reviewed for existing study intersections to determine whether safety issues occur as a result of operational or design issues, such as signal phase issues, sight 670 January 2015 Page 6 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study distance limitations, channelization alignment issues, etc. A location where numerous incidents are identified could indicate that a High Accident Location (HAL) may exist and would therefore require further safety analysis and ultimately improvement. An intersection may have a high number of accidents, but this is not as statistically relevant if the intersection also experiences high traffic volumes. Thus, an Intersection Collision Rate (ICR) quantifies severity based on the number of average accidents per year compared with average daily traffic (ADT), per the following equation: Intersection Collision Rate (ICR) = Average Accidents per Year * 1,000,000 (Collisions per million entering vehicles) 365 * Total Entering Intersection ADT The criteria for the evaluation of rates can vary between jurisdictions, but a typical guideline is that a corridor or intersection would require further evaluation/analysis if accident rates exceed 1.0 collisions per million entering vehicles. Typically, an HAL is not noted when rates are below this general guideline; or at the least it denotes where further review should be performed. 671 672 January 2015 Page 7 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section describes existing traffic conditions within the project study area. Described are study roadways, current traffic volumes, existing operations and capacity conditions within the study area, and collision history analyses. 2.1 ROADWAY NETWORK As indicated, the study focuses on traffic operations for the existing intersections of Westgate Avenue/Durston Road, Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, Cottonwood Road/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street. Three of these roadways are City arterials/collectors, with a description of these roadways provided is as follows:  Cottonwood Road. This principal arterial has a two lane cross section north of and four separated lanes south of W. Babcock Street. Curb and gutter are located along the majority of both sides of the roadway between W. Babcock Street and Durston Road. There is little sidewalk along the east side of the roadway with approximately 1,500 feet along the west side between W. Babcock Street and Durston Road. The posted speed limit is 40 mph north of W. Babcock Street. The arterial supports 5,600 average daily traffic (ADT) south and 550 ADT north of Durston Road (count source: Traditions Subdivisions Phases 2 & 3 Residential Development TIS, Abelin Traffic Service 2014).  Durston Road. This is a two lane minor arterial within the study area (west of Cottonwood Road). Curb, gutter, and a bike lane have been constructed as development frontage improvements along the majority of the north side of this arterial (within the study area). However, only a one-foot paved shoulder is located along undeveloped section of the south side. Separated sidewalk has been constructed as frontage improvements for approximately 1,250 feet along the north side of the roadway, between Cottonwood Road and approximately Rosa Way, and for 1,150 feet along the north side, between Laurel Parkway and Westgate Avenue. There is no sidewalk along the south side. The speed limit is 35 mph and the roadway supports 8,600 ADT within the study area (count source: Traditions Subdivisions Phases 2 & 3 Residential Development TIS, Abelin Traffic Service 2014).  W. Babcock Street. This collector arterial has a two lane cross section with curb, gutter, and bike lanes from Cottonwood Road extending to a terminus approximately 1,500 feet to the west. There are no sidewalks along the roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 mph and the roadway supports 800 ADT within the study area (count source: Norton East Range Phase III Residential Development TIS, Abelin Traffic Service 2014).  Westgate Avenue and Laurel Parkway. These local streets specifically serve developments, although Laurel Parkway is being developed to the cross section of a collector arterial, The importance of this roadway will increase in the future. Both roadways were developed with curb, gutter, and separated sidewalk section, along developed property fronts. The speed limit is posted 25 mph for both roadways. There is an ADT count of 2,800 on Laurel Parkway and no available count for Westgate Avenue (count source: Boulder Creek/Westbrook TIS, Abelin Traffic Service 2014). A summary of existing intersection turn lane locations and traffic control conditions (signal, one-way, two way, or all way stops) is provided on Table 2. Shown are different traffic movements at intersections and the whether a turn lane is provided. If no specific lane is shown, then turns 673 January 2015 Page 8 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study are performed from an adjacent, shared through-lane. Also indicated are traffic control conditions for the intersection. Controls and lanes are denoted with an “X”. Table 2. Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Controls Intersection Traffic Control Intersection Geometrics Traffic Signal One-Way Stop Two-Way Stop All-Way Stop NB Left Turn Lane NB Right Turn Lane SB Left Turn Lane SB Right Turn Lane WB Left Turn Lane WB Right Turn Lane EB Left Turn Lane EB Right Turn Lane Cottonwood Rd/Durston Rd - - X - - - - - - - - - Westgate Ave/Durston Rd - - X - - - - - - - - - Laurel Parkway/Durston Rd - - X - - - X - - - - - Cottonwood Rd/W. Babcock St - - X - X X X - X - X - 2.2 TRAFFIC COUNTS Intersection turn movement counts were collected specifically for this study on Thursday December 4, 2014 for the intersections of Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, Cottonwood Road/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street. There are only 25 homes accessing Westgate Avenue and, as such, through volumes were extrapolated from Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection and turning movements were estimated using trip generation information summarized by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition, 2012) for residential housing for the Westgate Avenue/Durston Road intersection. This is an acceptable practice on low-volume roadways. Turing movement traffic counts were performed in the morning between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and in the afternoon/evening between 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM in order to identify the AM and PM peak hours of commute/work traffic activity for each intersection. The resulting AM peak hour was noted to occur at the majority of intersections between 7:30 to 8:30 AM, with a 7:45 to 8:45 AM peak hour noted for Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street. The PM peak hour was noted between 4:45 to 5:45 PM at the majority of intersections, with a 4:30 to 5:30 PM peak hour noted for Laurel Parkway/Durston Road. Meadowlark Elementary is located in the study area north of Durston Road 650 feet east of Cottonwood Road. Primary school hours are from 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM; having peak generator hours (highest hours of school traffic) occurring between 7:45 to 8:45 AM and 3:00 to 4:00 PM. Counts were performed while school was in session. The AM peak hour of the work commute traffic and AM peak generator of the school overlapped within the study area; and therefore analyses stated later in this report address this occurrence. However, the PM peak hour of commute activity was nearly 20 percent higher in volume following the PM peak generator hour of school activities for study intersections. As such, this TIS correctly addresses the PM peak hour of commute activity as volume demands are higher versus the afternoon hours of school. Figure 3 and Figure 4 provide a summary of existing traffic volumes for study intersections during the AM and PM peak hour. Count worksheets are provided in Technical Appendix B. 674 675 676 January 2015 Page 11 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 2.3 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS The LOS and capacity analyses were performed based on a review of the traffic volumes summarized in Section 2.2 and the geometric conditions described in Section 2.1. Table 3 provides a summary of LOS for the AM and PM peak hours. Also shown are average control vehicle delays for each intersection. Note again, LOS and control delays for stop controlled intersections are the function of the worse approach or movement. Table 3. Existing LOS and Delay - AM and PM Peak Hours Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay Cottonwood Rd/Durston Rd D 30.5 sec D 25.0 sec Westgate Ave/Durston Rd B 10.6 sec B 10.8 sec Laurel Parkway/Durston Rd C 17.3 sec B 13.9 sec Cottonwood Rd/W. Babcock St B 14.1 sec B 12.7 sec LOS = Levels-of-Service Again, LOS E is the standard industry threshold for the operation of stop-controlled/unsignalized intersections. Therefore, all study intersections currently function within acceptable LOS ranges. This indicates that no capacity improvements would be warranted on the basis of existing traffic operations, as there is sufficient roadway capacity. LOS summary worksheets are provided in Section C of the Technical Appendix. 2.4 COLLISION HISTORIES Collision histories were reviewed to determine whether any unusual safety issues were noted at study intersections. Per typical industry approach, collision data was collected from the City of Bozeman for the most current three-year period available, which extends from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Collision histories were available for the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road, Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street intersections. A summary of the collision history review and analyses is as follows:  Cottonwood Road/Durston Road. Two collisions were noted for the three-year study period, which represents an average 0.67 collisions per year. From counts, we can estimate a TEV of 11,675 ADT, which calculates to a collision rate of 0.16 collisions per million entering vehicles. There was one head-on collision and one collision between eastbound and westbound left-turning vehicles. Collisions involved property damage only with no injuries.  Laurel Parkway/Durston Road. A single collision was noted during the three-year study period, which represents an average of 0.34 collisions per year. From counts, we can estimate a TEV of 10,000 ADT, which calculates to a collision rate of 0.09 collisions per million entering vehicles. This vehicle was driven into the ditch at night, with no collision with another vehicle. The accident involved property damage only with no injuries. 677 January 2015 Page 12 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study  Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street. A single collision was noted during the three-year study period, which represents an average of 0.34 collisions per year. From counts, we can estimate a TEV of 6,400 ADT, which calculates to a collision rate of 0.15 collisions per million entering vehicles. This collision involved a westbound left-turning vehicle colliding with a southbound through movement. The accident involved property damage only with no injuries. The review of collision histories suggests there are no HAL at study intersections as the ICR’s are minimal with no injuries noted at any study intersection. 678 January 2015 Page 13 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 3 YEAR 2024 GROWTH RATE FORECASTS This section summarizes year 2024 traffic forecasts, as developed using the baseline growth rate. Also described are planned future roadway improvements and forecast traffic operations and capacity conditions based on these forecasts. 3.1 ROADWAY NETWORK There are three improvement projects poised for development within the study area. All projects are currently unfunded and, as such, were not reflected in analyses for Section 3 (Year 2024 Growth Rate Forecasts) or Section 4 (Year 2024 Pipeline Forecasts) as they provide capacity that cannot be counted upon (within any predicted timeframe). However, some discussion as to the benefit of these improvements is provided in Section 5 (Improvements and Project Mitigation). It is anticipated these improvements would be developed through a combination of frontage improvements and financial support via traffic impact fees, the City of Bozeman street budget, and grants. A summary of planned improvement projects is as follows:  Durston Road. This includes the widening of Durston Road from a two-lane to a three- lane section west of Cottonwood Road to Westgate Avenue and adding a center turn lane with bike lane along the southern edge of the arterial.  Cottonwood Road/Durston Road. A traffic signal or roundabout is ultimately planned at the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection. With the signal, turn lanes could be developed to better accommodate turn movements.  Cottonwood Road. A separated, four-lane section would be developed north from W. Babcock Street to Durston Road, adding two through lanes with bike lanes. 3.2 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Baseline traffic forecasts were developed for this Section using a 3% annual growth rate provided by City of Bozeman Engineers. This growth rate was applied to year 2014 traffic volumes to generate year 2024 future without project traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. A summary of baseline growth, year 2024 future without-project traffic forecasts is shown on Figure 5 for the AM peak hour and Figure 6 for the PM peak hour. 679 680 681 January 2015 Page 16 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 3.2.1 Trip Generation Trip generation was predicted using the methods outlined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition, 2012). The Trip Generation Manual is a nationally recognized and locally accepted method for forecasting trip generation for a range of commercial, retail, and residential land uses. The forecasting methods were developed based on the survey of other existing land use developments located throughout the United States. Trip generation was determined using ITE Code 210 for single family homes and ITE Code 230 for Townhomes. The ITE describes these land uses as follows:  ITE Code 210 Single-Family Detached Housing - “includes all single-family detached homes on individual lots.”  ITE Code 230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse - “ownership units that have at least one other owned unit within the same building structure.” Trip generation was determined based on equations that estimate trips according to the number of dwelling units. Equations were used for this study for the following reasons: more than ten surveys/studies were used to develop ITE equations for these land uses; a resulting data regression analysis results in a fit in excess of 0.80 for both uses; and more conservative (higher) trip generation totals are provided. The Trip Generation Manual indicates equations should be met over rates when these criteria are met. Trips were for the weekday and AM and PM peak hours of the weekday, assuming the development and occupancy of 120 single family homes and 180 townhomes. A summary of resulting trip generation is provided on Table 4. Table 4. Project Trip Generation Projections Land Use (Units) Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Single Family Homes (120 units) 1,240 23 71 94 78 46 124 Townhomes (180 units) 1,070 14 69 83 65 32 97 Trip Totals 2,310 37 140 177 143 78 221 Source: Derived from equations provided in Trip Generation Manual (ITE, 2012) As shown, 2,310 trips would be generated during the typical weekday, with 177 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 221 trips generated during the PM peak hour. Peak hourly trips would comprise 17.2 percent of total daily trips. 3.2.2 Trip Distribution The distribution of trips was estimated to establish traffic forecasts for future LOS analyses. An imaginary cordon or screen line was assumed around the project vicinity encompassing the principal approach routes of Durston Road, Cottonwood Road, and W. Babcock Street. Individual average daily traffic (ADT) counts were compared with total ADT volumes on this cordon line (a total of 18,000 ADT was noted) to gain a sense of distribution patterns. Trip 682 January 2015 Page 17 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study distributions were proportioned to these primary approach routes in order to determine project trip assignments. A summary of this comparison is as follows:  Durston Road East. There is an ADT count of 8,600 ADT on Durston Road east of Cottonwood Road. This results in a distribution of approximately 50 percent when compared with total ADT along the cordon line.  Cottonwood Road South. There is an ADT count of 5,600 ADT on Cottonwood Road south of W. Babcock Street. This results in an approximate 30 percent distribution when compared with total ADT along the cordon line.  Durston Road West. Peak hourly to ADT ratios were developed for Durston Road East, and then used to estimate an ADT count of 3,000 ADT west of Westgate Avenue. This results in an approximate 15 percent distribution when compared with total ADT along the cordon line.  W. Babcock Street East. An approximate 800 ADT was noted for W. Babcock Street, with this road providing a viable albeit less direct route into Bozeman. A comparison results in an approximate 5 percent distribution when compared with total ADT along the cordon line. The remaining study road segments did not provide a typical approach to/from the study area and were therefore neglected in the distribution and assignment of trips. Project trips were then assigned to the study area based upon these distribution patterns. A summary of trip assignments is provided on Table 5 for the weekday, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour. Table 5. Trip Distribution and Assignment Summaries Location Distribution (Rounded) Assignments Daily Assignments AM Peak Assignments PM Peak Durston Rd W/of Westgate Ave 15.0% 345 27 33 Durston Rd E/of Cottonwood Drive 50.0% 1,155 88 111 Cottonwood Rd S/of W. Babcock St 30.0% 695 53 66 W. Babcock St E/of Cottonwood Rd 5.0% 115 9 11 Total Trip Assignments 100% 2,310 177 221 1. Distributions to/from west split between Elton Road, Upriver Drive, and Wellesley Avenue. Figure 7 provides a summary of intersection trip assignments for the AM peak hour and Figure 8 for the PM peak hour. Future without project traffic volumes and project trip assignments were combined to generate the future year 2024 traffic forecasts shown on Figure 9 and Figure 10 for the AM and PM peak hours. Again these forecasts were developed with the application of annual growth rates. 683 684 685 686 687 January 2015 Page 22 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 3.3 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS The LOS and capacity analyses were performed based on a review of the traffic forecasts summarized in Section 3.2. As indicated, this analysis was performed based on current geometric conditions. Table 6 provides a summary of future without and with project LOS and control delays for the AM and PM peak hours. Table 6. Year 2024 LOS Summaries (Growth Rate) - AM and PM Peak Hours Future Without Project Future With-Project Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay Cottonwood Rd/Durston Rd F 102.8 F 177.2 F 207.8 F >250.0 Westgate Ave/Durston Rd B 11.6 B 12.0 C 15.9 C 15.4 Laurel Parkway/Durston Rd D 30.4 C 19.3 F 164.1 F 61.4 Cottonwood Rd/W. Babcock St C 18.2 C 15.5 C 20.2 C 17.5 Westmorland Dr/Durston Rd -- -- -- -- C 15.3 C 16.9 LOS = Levels-of-Service As shown, the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection is projected to function at LOS F by year 2024 during the AM and PM peak hours, as reviewed based on forecasts developed with growth rates. Similarly, the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS F with the introduction of the fourth intersection approach during both peak hours. Note this LOS result is the function of delay experienced within the southbound approach, specifically the left-turn movement, at the intersection. All other intersections are projected to function with acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours. 688 January 2015 Page 23 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 4 YEAR 2024 PIPELINE PROJECT FORECASTS This section summarizes year 2024 traffic forecasts, as developed using pipeline project trip assignments. Reiterated are future roadway network changes and provided are forecast traffic operations and capacity conditions based on these forecasts. 4.1 ROADWAY NETWORK As indicated, the three-lane Durston Road project; the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road signal or roundabout project; and the Cottonwood Road four lane extension are improvements planned within the study area. However, as all projects are currently unfunded, they are not addressed with the analyses in this Section. Some discussion as to the benefit of these improvements is provided in Section 5 (Improvements and Project Mitigation). 4.2 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Future without project traffic forecasts were developed for this Section using a 1 percent annual growth rate combined with pipeline project trip assignments. The 1 percent growth rate addresses baseline traffic growth, meaning traffic growth not associated with specific developments within the study area. Pipeline projects again refer to vested land use projects that have been approved by local agencies, but are in the process of being developed. As such, the trips generated by these projects are not yet recorded in counts and need to be addressed in forecasts as they have rights to future capacity. A summary of pipeline projects are as follows:  Boulder Creek/Westbrook. This project includes the development of 233 single family residential units located north of Durston Road, ¼ mile west of Cottonwood Road. The traffic impact study for this development (Abelin Traffic Services, November 2013) indicates the project would generate 2,230 weekday trips with 175 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 235 trips during the PM peak hour. Of these trips, approximately 33 percent are expected off Cottonwood Road to/from the north of Durston Road, 11 percent off Cottonwood Road to/from the south of Babcock Street, 3 percent off Durston Road to/from the west of Westgate Avenue, 31 percent off Durston Road to/from the east of Cottonwood Drive, 11 percent off Laurel Parkway to/from the north of Durston Road, and 11 percent off W. Babcock Street to/from the east of Cottonwood Road.  Norton East Ranch Phase III. This project includes the development of 106 single family residential units located west of Laurel Parkway between Babcock Street and Fallon Street. The traffic impact study for this development (Abelin Traffic Services, June 2014) indicates the project would generate 1,014 weekday trips with 80 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 107 trips during the PM peak hour. Of these trips, approximately 4 percent are expected off Cottonwood Road to/from the north of Durston Road, 50 percent off Cottonwood Road to/from the south of Babcock Street, 10 percent off Durston Road to/from the west of Westgate Avenue, 24 percent off Durston Road to/from the east of Cottonwood Drive, and 13 percent off W. Babcock Street to/from the east of Cottonwood Road.  Traditions Subdivision Phases 2 & 3. This project includes the development of 98 single family residential units located north of Annie Street and west of Cottonwood 689 January 2015 Page 24 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study Road. The traffic impact study for this development (Abelin Traffic Services, September 2014) indicates the project would generate 938 weekday trips with 74 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 99 trips during the PM peak hour. Of these trips, approximately 47 percent are expected off Cottonwood Road to/from the north of Durston Road, 2 percent off Cottonwood Road to/from the south of Babcock Street, 1 percent off Durston Road to/from the west of Westgate Avenue, 26 percent off Durston Road to/from the east of Cottonwood Drive, 2 percent off Laurel Parkway to/from the north of Durston Road, and 12 percent off W. Babcock Street to/from the east of Cottonwood Road. Attached Figure 11 and Figure 12 provide a summary of pipeline project trip assignments for the AM and PM peak hours at study intersections. Pipeline trips were combined with baseline forecasts to develop the future without project traffic volumes, as shown on Figure 13 and Figure 14 for the peak hours. Specific pipeline project trip assignments are provided in Section D of the Technical Appendices. 4.2.1 Trip Generation & Distribution Again, trip generation was based on the methods of the (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition, 2012). Trip generation was determined for 120 for single family homes 180 townhomes. Total project trip generation is again summarized on Table 7. Table 7. Project Trip Generation Projections (Re-summarized) Land Use (Units) Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Trip Totals 2,310 37 140 177 143 78 221 Source: Derived from equations provided in Trip Generation Manual (ITE, 2012) As indicated, the distribution of these project trips was based on a review of study area ADT trips. A summary of these distributions are again as follows:  Durston Road East. 50 percent to/from the east of Cottonwood Road.  Cottonwood Road South. 30 percent to/from the south of W. Babcock Street.  Durston Road West. 15 percent to/from the west of Westgate Avenue.  W. Babcock Street East. 5 percent to/from the east of Cottonwood Road. Project trip assignments are again summarized on figure 7 and figure 8 for the AM and PM peak hours of the typical weekday. 4.2.2 Forecasts and Volume Comparisons Trip assignments were combined with the future without project forecasts, as developed with pipeline project trips, to generate future with project traffic forecasts. A summary of the resulting future year 2024 future with project traffic forecasts shown on Figure 15 and Figure 16 for the AM and PM peak hours. 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 January 2015 Page 31 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study A comparison of traffic forecasts was performed between the two forecast methodologies summarized in Section 3 (Year 2024 Growth Rate Forecasts) or Section 4 (Year 2024 Pipeline Forecasts). Table 8 provides a summary of total entering volume forecasts, represented as percent annual growth rates calculated between existing and future Year 2024 volumes for existing study intersections. Table 8. Total Entering Volume Annual Growth Comparisons Signalized Intersections Growth Rates Pipeline Trips AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Cottonwood Rd/Durston Rd 4.2% 4.4% 4.6% 5.3% Westgate Ave/Durston Rd 4.6% 4.9% 3.2% 3.7% Laurel Parkway/Durston Rd 4.2% 5.1% 3.7% 4.1% Cottonwood Rd/W. Babcock St 3.8% 4.1% 3.7% 4.8% Weighted Average Annual Growth Rates 4.3% 4.7% 4.0% 4.8% As shown, average annual growth rates are similar between the forecast methodologies for study intersections. Thus, although there is some difference between through and turning movement forecasts, they result in similar growth projections. 4.3 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS The LOS and capacity analyses were performed based on a review of the traffic forecasts summarized in Section 4.2. Again, this analysis was performed based on the current geometric conditions as planned improvements are currently unfunded. Table 9 provides a summary of future without project LOS and control delays for the AM and PM peak hour, as based on pipeline project traffic forecasts. Table 9. Year 2024 Traffic Forecasts (Pipeline) - AM and PM Peak Hours Future Without Project Future With-Project Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay LOS1 Delay Cottonwood Rd/Durston Rd F >250.0 F >250.0 F >250.0 F >250.0 Westgate Ave/Durston Rd B 11.7 B 11.4 C 14.5 B 14.4 Laurel Parkway/Durston Rd C 23.8 C 16.6 F 75.6 E 40.5 Cottonwood Rd/W. Babcock St C 19.6 C 18.1 C 21.8 C 20.8 Westmorland Dr/Durston Rd -- -- -- -- B 14.9 C 15.2 LOS = Levels-of-Service As before, the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection is projected to function at LOS F by year 2024 during the AM and PM peak hours, as reviewed based on forecasts developed with 697 January 2015 Page 32 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study pipeline project assignments. As before, the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection is projected to operate at LOS F with the introduction of the fourth intersection approach, except only during the AM peak hour. Again this LOS result is the function of delay experienced within the southbound approach, specifically the left-turn movement, at the intersection. All other intersections are projected to function with acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours. Note the results of the LOS analysis yield similar operations/capacity results, despite the difference in forecasting methodologies. 698 January 2015 Page 33 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 5 IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECT MITIGATION Operational deficiencies (LOS exceptions) were noted for the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road and Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersections. This section reviews and validates two improvements planned for the study area. 5.1 COTTONWOOD DRIVE/DURSTON ROAD INTERSECTION As indicated, a LOS deficiency has been noted for the Cottonwood Drive/Durston Road intersection. Traffic forecasts were reviewed incrementally between year 2014 and year 2024 during the more critical of the peak hour conditions/scenarios reviewed for this intersection, which was the AM peak hour of the pipeline forecast scenario. Thus, to accomplish the incremental analysis for this intersection:  60 units of The Lakes of Valley West development was reviewed incrementally (every two years) to an intermediate horizon year  The 1 percent annual growth rate compounded annually to this horizon year (every two years)  Plus, a 20 percent increment assignment of pipeline project trips to this incremental horizon year (every two years) Based on this incremental analysis, it was determined the intersection would function at LOS F by year 2016, indicating the need for some improvement within a two year timeframe. The installation of an all-way stop would mitigate this deficiency temporarily, delaying this deficiency approximately two years. Thus, the need for more rigorous signal or roundabout improvement would be needed by year 2018. As indicated previously, the City of Bozeman is planning to construct a traffic signal or roundabout at this intersection as funding permits in the future. Either improvement will fully address & correct LOS for this intersection; resulting in a LOS B/C operations under either forecast scenario for the AM and PM peak hours. An analysis was then performed to determine the proposed projects responsibility towards Cottonwood Drive/Durston Road intersection improvements. Per standard industry practices, a developments responsibility towards improvements is calculated on the bases of total entering volumes. Thus, the weighted average impact of project trip assignments versus forecast TEV is shown below:  (150+150+188+188) / (1,369+1,419+1,448+1,574) = 11.6% Given this calculation, the project comprises an average 11.6 percent of TEV at the intersection. As such, it is recommended the project participate in providing 32.0 percent of construction costs associated with improvement development. 5.2 DURSTON ROAD THREE LANE As indicated, the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection is projected to function within the LOS F range during the peak hours according to both forecast scenarios. Although this conflict 699 January 2015 Page 34 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study does occur as the result of project construction, with the addition of the fourth/south leg, the LOS issue is actually due to the stopped delay associated with the southbound left-turn movement at the intersection. Between 226 and 247 southbound left-turns were noted between forecast scenarios during the AM peak hour with between 142 and 155 noted between forecasts during the PM peak hour; causing significant stopped delays. Traffic forecasts were reviewed incrementally between year 2014 and year 2024 during the more critical of the peak hour conditions/scenarios reviewed for this intersection, which was the AM peak hour of the growth rate forecast scenario. Thus, to accomplish the incremental analysis for this intersection:  60 units of The Lakes of Valley West development was reviewed incrementally (every two years) to an intermediate horizon year,  The 3 percent annual growth rate compounded annually to this horizon year (every two years), Based on this incremental analysis, it was determined the intersection would function at LOS F by year 2020, indicating the need for some improvement within a six-year timeframe. Typical improvements for LOS such as this include turning restrictions, the construction of a roundabout/signal, an alternative route, and/or the construction of a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) or center turn lane; of which the TWLTL and the signal/roundabout options seem the most appropriate given the situation. TWLTL. As indicated, City Engineers have planned to construct a TWLTL along Durston Road from Cottonwood to Westgate Avenue. With the appropriate channelization, this lane can offer turning capacity for intersections and driveways along the length of Durston Road, providing for the staged movements of left-turns from intersecting streets onto the arterial. The staging of left-turns promotes a concept known as two-stage gap acceptance. This improves LOS and reduces vehicle delay, as drivers deal with traffic conflicts from only one direction of travel at a time versus two. If channelized appropriately, this improvement would mitigate traffic operations back into the LOS D/E range during the year 2024 AM and PM peak hours. However, for this to serve as a TWLTL, no eastbound or westbound left-turn lanes can be striped at the intersection; rather only the TWLTL striping can be used. This is because southbound and northbound left turning vehicles would turn into a designated turn lane, which is prohibited. Even to this end, there may be a potential for traffic conflicts between especially westbound left and southbound left-turning movements. Therefore, City Engineers may not find this a desirable mitigation for LOS issues at the intersection. Per standard industry practices, a proportionate impact of roadway improvements, in this case TWLTL widening, is determined by comparing trip assignments versus forecast traffic volumes on the roadway in question. In this case, the weighted average impact of project trip assignments versus forecast assignments on Durston Road is shown below:  (140+140+175+175) / (933+834+1,006+912) = 17.1% Given this calculation, the project comprises an average 17.1 percent of total growth projected along Durston Road between Cottonwood Road and Laurel Parkway. As such, it is 700 January 2015 Page 35 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study recommended the project participate in providing 17.1 percent of construction costs associated with improvement development. Traffic Signal. A roundabout or traffic signal would be the more ideal mitigation for the intersection, if a TWLTL is deemed by City Engineers to be the wrong improvement. A signal or roundabout would elevate operations back into the LOS B range, which is a better result; although this project would not offer capacity benefits to other intersections or driveways along Durston Road as with the TWLTL. So there is a trade-off with this improvement. As indicated previously, a comparison of TEV trip assignments versus total forecasts is the measure for impacts for intersections with the comparison summarized as follows:  (152+152+190+190) / (973+877+1,050+961) = 17.7% Given this calculation, the project comprises an average 17.7 percent of total growth projected at the intersection. As such, it is recommended the project participate in providing 17.7 percent of construction costs associated with the development of a signal or roundabout, if required over a TWLTL. 5.3 DEVELOPER PROPOSAL The project proponent and developer for the Lakes at Valley West has offered to construct the third lane and bike lane for Durston Road extending nearly one mile between Cottonwood Road and Westgate Drive for the City of Bozeman. This would include the addition of 15 feet of pavement along the southern frontage of the current arterial with an 18-foot landscape area and 6-foot sidewalks, per the cross section shown below. Figure 17. Proposed Durston Road Cross-Section The expense with developing this paved section is much more considerable than 11.6 percent proportion of the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection improvement and the 17.1 percent or 17.7 percent proportion of either Durston Road widening or Laurel Parkway/Durston Road improvements discussed above, respectively. Understanding this, City Engineers have indicated a willingness to enter into a “City of Bozeman Impact Fee Credit Agreement” with the project proponent to provide reimbursement for construction costs through traffic impact fees, the street budget, and/or through reimbursement of possible grants. 701 January 2015 Page 36 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study As such, the next step in the process (following the development of this TIS) is for a civil engineer to develop engineering and construction cost estimates for the improvements outlined in 5.1 and 5.2; the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection and for Durston Road improvements and/or for the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection. The proportionate allocations discussed in these chapters should then be compared against these costs to determine a project mitigation fee. The developer reimbursement would then be construction costs less the project mitigation fee. By way of a planning example (and by round numbers), let’s assume improvements to the Durston Road/Cottonwood Road intersection total $300,000. Let’s assume improvements to Durston Road have a construction cost of approximately $1,000,000. Thus, the proportionate mitigation fees for these projects would be ($300,000 * 11.6%) + ($1,000,000 * 17.1%) = $205,800 owed towards improvements. This would result in reimbursement of $1,000,000 - $205,800 = $794,200 back towards the developer. Again, this is an example and all construction costs should be reviewed by a civil engineer to document agreement details. 702 January 2015 Page 37 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A 300-unit residential development is proposed south of Durston Road approximately ½ mile west of Cottonwood Road. Principal access to the development is proposed through Westgate Avenue, Laurel Parkway, and Westmorland Drive; all of which will extend south into The Lakes at Valley West. The development is located within an R-1 zone of Bozeman and also within the Valley West Planned Unit development. Project completion and occupancy is anticipated by year 2024. The project is anticipated to have a mix of 120 single family homes and 180 townhomes. The project is anticipated to generate 2,310 weekday trips with 177 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 221 trips generated during the PM peak hour. Approximately 50 percent of project trips are expected to/from the east of Cottonwood Road on Durston Road; 30 percent are expected on Cottonwood Road to/from the south of W. Babcock Street; 15 percent on Durston Road to/from the west of Westgate Avenue; and 5 percent on W. Babcock Street to/from the east of Cottonwood Road. 6.1 TRAFFIC FORECASTS AND CAPACITY The project is estimated to be complete and occupied within ten years, and as such, traffic forecasts were developed for year 2024 for the AM and PM peak hours of the typical weekday. Two forecast methodologies were used in this study, to address a potential range of future traffic conditions within the City. These methodologies are summarized as follows:  Growth Rates. Project trip assignments were developed with baseline forecasts, with baseline forecasts developed using a 3 percent growth rate.  Pipeline Projects. Project trip assignments were developed with baseline forecasts developed using a 1 percent growth rate plus the trip assignments generated by approved, but yet to be developed, “pipeline” development projects. Four existing and one new intersection was reviewed with this study; including the intersections of Westgate Avenue/Durston Road, Laurel Parkway/Durston Road, Cottonwood Road/Durston Road, and Cottonwood Road/W. Babcock Street and the future intersection of Westmorland Drive/Durston Road. Of these intersections, operational deficiencies (LOS exceptions) were noted for the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road and Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersections. 6.2 IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND MITIGATION A number of improvements are planned by City of Bozeman Engineers. These improvements were vetted by this study, and confirmed for both study intersections. The following measures were proposed to address capacity/operational issues, with project participation to include:  A traffic signal or roundabout is confirmed and recommended for the Durston Road/Cottonwood Road intersection, which is projected to experience unacceptable LOS by year 2016. An interim, all/four way stop can be developed to promote LOS for two additional years. However, the signal improvement would ultimately be required by year 2018, and would fully address operational issues at the intersection (promoting LOS B/C traffic operations). The project would have an 11.6% growth impact and recommended proportionate responsibility towards intersection improvements. 703 January 2015 Page 38 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study  A two-way left-turn lane (center turn lane) is confirmed along Durston Road between Cottonwood Road and Westgate Avenue. The analysis of the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection indicates this improvement would be needed by year 2020. The TWLTL would promote a LOS D/F function for this intersection, as well as improve traffic operations for other intersections and driveways along Durston Road. The project would have an 17.1% growth impact and recommended proportionate responsibility towards Durston Road widening improvements.  Alternatively, a roundabout or signal could be constructed for Laurel Parkway/Durston Road if City Engineers determine the TWLTL is not the appropriate solution for the intersection. This focused improvement would elevate operations back into the LOS B range; however, this would not offer the benefit of the TWLTL for the remainder for Durston Road. The project would have an 17.7% growth impact and recommended proportionate responsibility towards intersection improvements, if a signal were selected over the TWLTL. As indicated in Section 5.3, the developer for The Lakes at Valley West has offered to construct the three lane section for Durston Road between Cottonwood Drive and Westgate Drive for the City of Bozeman, including a 15 foot paved section, an 18 foot landscape buffer, and a 6 foot sidewalk. The City of Bozeman indicated the willingness to enter into an agreement with the developer. The expense of this improvement will be considerably more than the proportionate impact/contribution of the improvements identified above. Thus, the developer will enter into a “City of Bozeman Impact Fee Credit Agreement” with the City to be reimbursed for construction costs, less the proportionate impacts/fees determined via the responsibilities identified above. A civil engineer should be used to finalize mitigation fees for this development, via construction cost estimates compared with the proportionate impacts above. The resulting mitigation fee is then reduced from developer expenses to determine reimbursement (see rough example in Section 5.3) 6.3 SUMMARY The project will impact traffic conditions within the study area. However, the impacts of the project can be fully mitigated with the improvements and participation described within this TIS. In addition, recommended improvements should assure the safe and effective operation of study area intersections and arterials through year 2024, as confirmed via the analysis of two forecasting methodologies. No further recommendations are provided by this TIS. 704 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study Appendix A Glossary of Terms 705 706 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study This section of the Technical Appendix provides a glossary of terms. The Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2010) and the Transportation Impact Analyses for Site Development (ITE, 2005) were used to help with the development of the following definitions:  Access point – An intersection, driveway, or opening on a roadway that provides access to a land use or facility.  All-way stop-controlled – An intersection with stop signs located on all approaches.  Arterial – (General Definition) A signalized street that primarily serves through-traffic and secondarily provides access to abutting properties.  Average daily traffic (ADT) – The average 24 hour traffic volume at a given location on a roadway.  Capacity – The number of vehicles or persons that can be accommodated on a roadway, roadway section, or at an intersection over a specified period of time. Capacity is also a term used to define limits for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities. Concept typically expressed as vehicles per hour, vehicles per day, or persons per hour or per day.  Collector street – (General Definition) A surface street providing land access and traffic circulation within residential, commercial, and industrial areas.  Cycle – A complete sequence of cycle indicators.  Cycle length – The total time for a signal to complete one cycle.  Delay – The additional travel time experienced by a driver, passenger, or pedestrian.  Demand – The number of users desiring service on a highway system or street over a specified time period. Concept typically expressed as vehicles per hour, vehicles per day, or persons per hour or per day.  Departing sight distance – The length of road required for a vehicle to turn from a stopped position at an intersection (or driveway) and accelerate to travel speed.  Downstream – The direction of traffic flow.  Functional class – A transportation facility defined by the traffic service it provides.  Growth factor – A percentage increase applied to current traffic demands or counts to estimate future demands/volumes.  High Accident Location (HAL) – A specific location along a roadway (such as an intersection or driveway) where calculated accident rates exceed industry thresholds, or those specified by a local or State agency.  High Accident Corridor (HAC) – A roadway or arterial section where calculated accident rates exceed industry thresholds, or those specified by a local or State agency.  Intersection Collision Rate (ICR) – Quantifies the number and/or severity of collisions at for use in statistical comparisons, as based on the number of average accidents (or severe accidents or fatalities) per year as compared with average daily traffic entering an intersection.  Level of Service – The standard used to evaluate traffic operating conditions of the transportation system. This is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effect of factors such as speed, volume of traffic, geometric features, traffic interruptions, delays and freedom to maneuver. Operating conditions are categorized as LOS A through LOS “F”. LOS A generally represents the most favorable driving conditions and LOS F represents the least favorable conditions. 707 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study  Mainline – The primary through roadway as distinct from ramps, auxiliary lanes, and collector-distributor roads.  Major Street – The street not controlled by stop signs at a two-way stop-controlled intersection.  Minor arterial – (General Definition) A functional category of a street allowing trips of moderate length within a relatively small geographical area.  Operational analysis – A use of capacity analysis to determine the level of service on an existing or projected facility, with known or projected traffic, roadway, and control conditions.  Peak Generator Hour – The single hour (or hours) in a day during which trip generation for a development or land use is highest.  Peak hour – Single hour (or hours) in a day during which the maximum traffic volume occurs on a given facility (roadway, intersection, etc.). Typically the peak hour is known as the “rush” hour that occurs during the AM or PM work commutes of the typical weekday. The absolute peak hour of the day can also be referred to as the design hour.  Peak Generator Hour – The peak hourly volume generated by a particular development or land use. In the context of traffic reports, the generator hour can occur in the morning and afternoon, described as AM and PM peak generator hours, respectively.  Peak hour factor – The hourly volume during the maximum-volume hour of the day divided by the peak 15-minute flow rate within the peak hour; a measure of traffic demand fluctuation within the peak hour.  Principal Arterial - (General Definition) A major surface street with relatively long trips between major points, and with through-trips entering, leaving, and passing through the urban area.  Queue – A line of vehicles, bicycles, or persons waiting to be served by the system in which the flow rate from the front of the queue determines the average speed within the queue. Slower moving vehicles or people joining the rear of the queue are usually considered a part of the queue.  Roadside obstruction – An object or barrier along a roadside or median that affects traffic flow, whether continuous (e.g., a retaining wall) or not continuous (e.g., light supports or a bridge abutment).  Road characteristic – A geometric characteristic of a street or highway, including the type of facility, number and width of lanes, shoulder widths and lateral clearances, design speed, and horizontal and vertical alignment.  Roundabout – An unsignalized intersection with a circulatory roadway around a central island with all entering vehicles yielding to the circulating traffic.  Shoulder – A portion of the roadway contiguous with the traveled way for accommodation of stopped vehicles, emergency use, and lateral support of the subbase, base, and surface courses.  Stopping sight distance – The length of road needed for a moving vehicle to come to a complete stop prior to an obstruction sighted on the road.  Total Entering Volume (TEV) – Total traffic entering and intersection during the weekday or a specified timeframe (such as a peak hour). 708 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study  Traffic conditions – A characteristic of traffic flow, including distribution of vehicle types in the traffic stream, directional distribution of traffic, lane use distribution of traffic, and type of driver population on a given facility.  Travel speed – The average speed, in miles per hour, of a traffic computed as the length of roadway segment divided by the average travel time of the vehicles traversing the segment.  Travel time – The average time spent by vehicles traversing a highway segment, including control delay, in seconds per vehicle of minutes per vehicle.  Trip Distribution and Assignment – The predicted travel patterns of vehicle trips as they approach and depart a land use. Distribution refers to the travel pattern, usually defined in percentages or fractions, and assignment refers to vehicle trip ends.  Traffic forecast – The predicted traffic volume of the analysis horizon year or time period. Most typically predicted for the weekday, AM peak hour, PM peak hour, or AM or PM peak generator hours of the typical weekday.  Traffic impact analysis – A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is an engineering and planning study that forecasts the potential traffic and transportation impacts of a proposed development on an area, neighborhood, or community. Reports can also be referred to as a traffic impact study (TIS).  Trip generation – The number of vehicle trips generated by a development or land use. Most typically predicted for the weekday, AM peak hour, PM peak hour, or AM or PM peak generator hours of the typical weekday.  Two-way left-turn lane – A lane in the median area that extends continuously along a street or highway and is marked to provide a deceleration and storage area, out of the through-traffic stream, for vehicles traveling in either direction to use in marking left turns at intersections and driveways.  Two-way stop-controlled – The type of traffic control at an intersection where drivers on the minor street or driver turning left from the major street wait for a gap in the major- street traffic to complete a maneuver. Typically the minor approaches are stop- controlled.  Unsignalized intersection – An intersection not controlled by traffic signals.  Upstream – The direction from which traffic is flowing.  Volume – The number of persons or vehicles passing a point on a lane, roadway, or other traffic-way during some time interval, often one hour, expressed in vehicles, bicycles, or persons per hour.  Volume-to-capacity ratio – The ratio of flow rate to capacity for a transportation facility.  Walkway – A facility provided for pedestrian movement and segregated from vehicle traffic by a curb, or provide for on a separate right-of-way. 709 710 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study Appendix B Summary Traffic Counts 711 712 Page 1/1 Intersection: Location: Date Count Performed: Count Time Period: Seasonal Adjustment Factor: Street/Approach Total Peak Hour %% Buses % Heavy Road Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total %%Volume PHF Trucks & RV's Vehicles L 0 8 5 6 3 3 4 1 30 47.62%2.02%17 0.71 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 3 5 5 3 2 1 1 4 24 38.10%1.62%11 0.55 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 3 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 8 12.70%0.54%3 0.38 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1.59%0.07%1 0.25 L 2 6 5 16 6 3 11 9 58 21.64%3.91%30 0.47 0.00%3.45%3.45% T 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 4 11 4.10%0.74%4 0.50 9.09%0.00%9.09% R 13 10 20 31 49 33 24 18 198 73.88%13.35%133 0.68 1.52%1.52%3.03% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.37%0.07%0 0.00 L 13 23 13 50 44 35 20 15 213 43.12%14.36%142 0.71 0.94%0.47%1.41% T 26 26 39 42 33 42 32 31 271 54.86%18.27%156 0.93 2.21%1.48%3.69% R 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 10 2.02%0.67%6 0.75 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0.46%0.20%1 0.25 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 23 52 68 77 57 57 35 32 401 60.94%27.04%259 0.84 1.00%1.50%2.49% R 17 29 43 41 38 23 33 29 253 38.45%17.06%145 0.84 1.98%0.40%2.37% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.15%0.07%0 0.00 102 161 201 268 238 201 165 147 1483 100.00%908 0.85 1.42%1.15%2.56% 732 868 908 872 751 Intersection Turning Movement Count Summary Hourly VolumeDurston RoadFrom the EastDurston RoadFrom the WestStart Time Cottonwood RoadFrom the NorthCottonwood RoadFrom the SouthIntersection Totals Weekday, AM Peak Period 1.00 Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Thursday, December 4, 2014 N:\5352\003\Traffic Data\Traffic Count Data\Cottonwood-Road_Durston-Road_AM_2014-12-04.xlsx Printed On: 12/5/2014713 Page 1/1 Intersection: Location: Date Count Performed: Count Time Period: Seasonal Adjustment Factor: Street/Approach Total Peak Hour %% Buses % Heavy Road Movement 3:00 3:15 3:30 3:45 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total %%Volume PHF Trucks & RV's Vehicles L 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 3 2 25 48.08%1.02%11 0.92 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 20 38.46%0.81%6 0.75 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 6 11.54%0.24%1 0.25 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.92%0.04%0 0.00 L 5 11 23 12 17 31 11 19 15 25 11 23 203 32.95%8.25%70 0.70 1.48%0.49%1.97% T 2 2 0 1 6 4 3 3 6 1 4 6 38 6.17%1.54%14 0.58 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 29 31 43 19 26 28 32 22 42 37 41 25 375 60.88%15.24%142 0.85 0.80%1.60%2.40% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 37 28 49 28 33 15 24 22 35 27 22 27 347 30.71%14.10%106 0.76 0.58%0.58%1.15% T 43 49 58 53 60 62 49 64 82 72 77 67 736 65.13%29.91%295 0.90 0.68%0.68%1.36% R 1 1 4 3 2 1 3 3 4 7 7 4 40 3.54%1.63%21 0.75 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.62%0.28%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0.45%0.12%2 0.50 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 39 45 28 28 30 33 40 45 58 50 42 32 470 70.89%19.10%195 0.84 0.43%0.64%1.06% R 12 18 20 14 17 9 11 20 21 15 19 13 189 28.51%7.68%75 0.89 1.06%0.53%1.59% Bike/Ped 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.15%0.04%0 0.00 170 191 238 161 197 188 179 204 269 237 228 199 2461 100.00%938 0.87 0.69%0.73%1.42% 760 787 784 725 768 840 889 938 933 Intersection Turning Movement Count Summary Hourly VolumeDurston RoadFrom the EastDurston RoadFrom the WestStart Time Cottonwood RoadFrom the NorthCottonwood RoadFrom the SouthIntersection Totals Weekday, PM Peak Period 1.00 Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Thursday, December 4, 2014 N:\5352\003\Traffic Data\Traffic Count Data\Cottonwood-Road_Durston-Road_PM_2014-12-04.xlsx Printed On: 12/5/2014714 Page 1/1 Intersection: Location: Date Count Performed: Count Time Period: Seasonal Adjustment Factor: Street/Approach Total Peak Hour %% Buses % Heavy Road Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total %%Volume PHF Trucks & RV's Vehicles L 1 1 4 3 5 4 8 3 29 5.88%3.05%20 0.63 3.45%0.00%3.45% T 27 35 67 70 60 59 67 43 428 86.82%45.01%256 0.91 0.00%0.23%0.23% R 3 3 2 7 10 5 2 3 35 7.10%3.68%24 0.60 5.71%2.86%8.57% Bike/Ped 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.20%0.11%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 7 2.36%0.74%3 0.75 0.00%14.29%14.29% T 9 16 19 51 54 48 29 28 254 85.52%26.71%182 0.84 0.79%1.57%2.36% R 2 4 6 4 2 7 3 4 32 10.77%3.36%16 0.57 3.13%0.00%3.13% U-Turn 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4 1.35%0.42%2 0.50 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 6 6 10 14 14 10 8 9 77 71.30%8.10%46 0.82 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 3 0 2 2 2 4 1 0 14 12.96%1.47%9 0.56 7.14%0.00%7.14% R 3 1 2 3 4 3 0 1 17 15.74%1.79%10 0.63 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 2 3 6 7 3 5 2 4 32 60.38%3.36%17 0.61 3.13%3.13%6.25% T 1 0 4 1 4 3 2 0 15 28.30%1.58%10 0.63 6.67%0.00%6.67% R 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 1 6 11.32%0.63%3 0.38 16.67%0.00%16.67% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 58 70 125 163 161 148 126 100 951 100.00%598 0.92 1.05%0.84%1.89% 416 519 597 598 535 Intersection Turning Movement Count Summary Hourly VolumeW Babcock StFrom the EastW Babcock StFrom the WestStart Time Cottonwood RoadFrom the NorthCottonwood RoadFrom the SouthIntersection Totals Weekday, AM Peak Period 1.00 Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Thursday, December 4, 2014 N:\5352\003\Traffic Data\Traffic Count Data\Cottonwood-Road_West-Babcock-Street_AM_2014-12-04.xlsx Printed On: 12/8/2014715 Page 1/1Intersection:Location:Date Count Performed:Count Time Period:Seasonal Adjustment Factor:Street/Approach Total Peak Hour % % Buses % HeavyRoad Movement 3:00 3:15 3:30 3:45 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total % %Volume PHF Trucks & RV'sVehiclesL 224532033102 275.03% 1.84% 7 0.58 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%T 38 40 57 56 40 44 30 34 36 40 33 21 469 87.34% 31.90% 143 0.89 0.43% 0.00% 0.43%R 122843334461 417.64% 2.79% 17 0.71 4.88% 4.88% 9.76%Bike/Ped000000000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00L 031000120010 81.11% 0.54% 3 0.38 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%T 39 49 49 35 44 48 57 45 57 63 51 52 589 81.69% 40.07% 216 0.86 0.17% 1.36% 1.53%R 121177991191410131012216.92% 8.30% 46 0.82 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%U-Turn100001000000 20.28% 0.14% 0 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Bike/Ped000000000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00L 5552576871236 7154.20% 4.83% 30 0.63 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%T 101101120210 107.63% 0.68% 5 0.63 0.00% 10.00% 10.00%R 247258125445 4937.40% 3.33% 15 0.75 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Bike/Ped000000000001 10.76% 0.07% 0 0.00L 443224237583 4758.02% 3.20% 23 0.72 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%T 011501214222 2125.93% 1.43% 9 0.56 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%R 040021102210 1316.05% 0.88% 5 0.63 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Bike/Ped000000000000 00.00% 0.00% 0 0.00105 125 137 123 114 129 115 112 139 145 123 103 1470 100.00% 519 0.89 0.34% 0.75% 1.09%490 499 503 481 470 495 511 519 510Intersection Turning Movement Count SummaryHourly VolumeW Babcock StFrom the EastW Babcock StFrom the WestStart TimeCottonwood RoadFrom the NorthCottonwood RoadFrom the SouthIntersection TotalsWeekday, PM Peak Period1.00Cottonwood Road & West Babcock StreetBozeman, Gallatin County, MontanaThursday, December 4, 2014C:\Users\bwhite\Documents\MMI Projects\5352003 - TheLakesatValleyWest\Counts\Copy of Cottonwood-Road_West-Babcock-Street_PM_2014-12-04.xlsxPrinted On: 1/28/2015716 Page 1/1 Intersection: Location: Date Count Performed: Count Time Period: Seasonal Adjustment Factor: Street/Approach Total Peak Hour %% Buses % Heavy Road Movement 7:00 7:15 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 8:45 Total %%Volume PHF Trucks & RV's Vehicles L 18 35 54 59 43 28 41 26 304 91.57%29.75%184 0.78 1.32%1.97%3.29% T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 3 4 4 3 7 1 4 2 28 8.43%2.74%15 0.54 3.57%0.00%3.57% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 100.00%0.20%2 0.25 100.00%0.00%100.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.59%0.20%0 0.00 100.00%0.00%100.00% T 29 27 34 47 34 32 41 18 262 77.29%25.64%147 0.78 4.58%1.15%5.73% R 5 4 6 11 12 11 10 15 74 21.83%7.24%40 0.83 2.70%5.41%8.11% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.29%0.10%0 0.00 L 2 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 11 3.15%1.08%6 0.50 9.09%0.00%9.09% T 18 35 45 72 56 46 30 34 336 96.28%32.88%219 0.76 2.38%0.30%2.68% R 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.57%0.20%0 0.00 100.00%0.00%100.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 77 105 144 194 157 118 128 99 1022 100.00%613 0.79 3.33%1.37%4.70% 520 600 613 597 502 Intersection Turning Movement Count Summary Hourly VolumeDurston RoadFrom the EastDurston RoadFrom the WestStart Time Laurel ParkwayFrom the NorthLaurel Parkway(Future)From the SouthIntersection Totals Weekday, AM Peak Period 1.00 Durston Road & Laurel Parkway Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Thursday, December 4, 2014 N:\5352\003\Traffic Data\Traffic Count Data\Durston-Road_Laurel-Parkway_AM_2014-12-04.xlsx Printed On: 12/4/2014717 Page 1/1 Intersection: Location: Date Count Performed: Count Time Period: Seasonal Adjustment Factor: Street/Approach Total Peak Hour %% Buses % Heavy Road Movement 3:00 3:15 3:30 3:45 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 5:00 5:15 5:30 5:45 Total %%Volume PHF Trucks & RV's Vehicles L 15 22 14 17 21 24 11 21 29 27 38 25 264 90.72%16.38%115 0.76 0.00%1.14%1.14% T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 3 1 0 1 4 1 5 1 4 2 1 2 25 8.59%1.55%8 0.50 8.00%0.00%8.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.69%0.12%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% T 43 33 44 42 49 59 34 48 50 50 43 37 532 60.45%33.00%191 0.96 2.07%0.56%2.63% R 19 22 23 21 24 40 24 25 29 48 37 35 347 39.43%21.53%139 0.72 0.86%1.15%2.02% Bike/Ped 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.11%0.06%0 0.00 L 2 2 1 2 5 3 2 0 5 5 3 6 36 8.16%2.23%13 0.65 5.56%0.00%5.56% T 42 37 33 23 24 26 23 52 49 40 33 21 403 91.38%25.00%174 0.84 1.24%0.25%1.49% R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%0.00%0 0.00 0.00%0.00%0.00% Bike/Ped 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.45%0.12%0 0.00 124 117 118 106 128 154 99 147 166 172 155 126 1612 100.00%640 0.93 1.43%0.68%2.11% 465 469 506 487 528 566 584 640 619 Intersection Turning Movement Count Summary Hourly VolumeDurston RoadFrom the EastDurston RoadFrom the WestStart Time Cottonwood RoadFrom the NorthCottonwood RoadFrom the SouthIntersection Totals Weekday, PM Peak Period 1.00 Durston Road & Laurel Parkway Bozeman, Gallatin County, Montana Thursday, December 4, 2014 N:\5352\003\Traffic Data\Traffic Count Data\Durston-Road_Laurel-Parkway_PM_2014-12-04.xlsx Printed On: 12/5/2014718 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study Appendix C LOS Summary Worksheets 719 720 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Existing - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 259 145 142 156 6 30 4 133 17 11 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 305 171 167 184 7 35 5 156 20 13 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 191 0 0 475 0 0 921 917 390 994 999 187 Stage 1 - - - - - - 392 392 - 521 521 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 529 525 - 473 478 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1383 - - 1087 - - 251 272 658 224 243 855 Stage 1 - - -- - - 633 606 - 539 532 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 533 529 - 572 556 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1383 - - 1087 - - 206 225 658 146 201 855 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 206 225 - 146 201 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 632 605 - 538 440 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 427 438 - 432 555 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.2 18.7 30.5 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)457 1383 - - 1087 - - 177 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.43 0.001 - - 0.154 - - 0.206 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.7 7.6 0 - 8.9 0 - 30.5 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 0 - - 0.5 - - 0.7 721 2: Durston Road & Westgate Avenue Existing - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 1 213 3 159 12 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 266 4 199 15 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 203 0 - 0 372 103 Stage 1 - -- - 103 - Stage 2 - -- - 269 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1369 -- - 629 952 Stage 1 - -- - 921 - Stage 2 - -- - 776 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1369 - - - 628 952 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 628 - Stage 1 - -- - 921 - Stage 2 - -- - 775 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1369 - - - 660 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 722 3: Durston Road & Laurel Parrkway Existing - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 6 219 147 40 184 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 277 186 51 233 19 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 237 0 - 0 503 211 Stage 1 - -- - 211 - Stage 2 - -- - 292 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1330 -- - 528 829 Stage 1 - -- - 824 - Stage 2 - -- - 758 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1330 - - - 524 829 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 524 - Stage 1 - -- - 824 - Stage 2 - -- - 753 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 16.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1330 - - - 524 829 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.444 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 17.3 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 2.3 0.1 723 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Existing - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 17 10 3 46 9 10 3 182 16 20 256 24 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 11 3 50 10 11 3 198 17 22 278 26 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 550 539 152 392 552 198 304 0 0 198 0 0 Stage 1 335 335 - 204 204 - - - - - - - Stage 2 215 204 - 188 348 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 432 448 868 554 441 842 1254 - - 1375 - - Stage 1 653 642 - 797 732 -- - -- - - Stage 2 787 732 - 796 633 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 413 440 868 534 433 842 1254 - - 1375 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 413 440 - 534 433 -- - -- - - Stage 1 651 632 - 795 730 -- - -- - - Stage 2 765 730 - 767 623 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.4 12.1 0.1 0.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1254 - - 413 496 534 582 1375 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.045 0.028 0.094 0.035 0.016 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - 14.1 12.5 12.4 11.4 7.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A - -BBBBA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 - - 724 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Existing - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 195 75 106 265 21 70 14 142 11 6 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 224 86 122 305 24 80 16 163 13 7 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 329 0 0 310 0 0 836 844 267 921 875 317 Stage 1 - - - - - - 272 272 - 560 560 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 564 572 - 361 315 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1231 - - 1250 - - 287 300 772 251 288 724 Stage 1 - - -- - - 734 685 - 513 511 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 510 504 - 657 656 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1231 - - 1250 - - 255 263 772 171 253 724 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 255 263 - 171 253 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 733 684 - 512 450 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 441 444 - 505 655 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 2.2 24.1 25 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)442 1231 - - 1250 - - 201 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.588 0.002 - - 0.097 - - 0.103 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.1 7.9 0 - 8.2 0 - 25 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.7 0 - - 0.3 - - 0.3 725 2: Durston Road & Westgate Avenue Existing - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 3 179 187 12 8 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 195 203 13 9 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 216 0 - 0 411 210 Stage 1 - -- - 210 - Stage 2 - -- - 201 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1354 -- - 597 830 Stage 1 - -- - 825 - Stage 2 - -- - 833 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1354 - - - 596 830 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 596 - Stage 1 - -- - 825 - Stage 2 - -- - 831 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 10.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1354 - - - 632 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.017 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 726 3: Durston Road Existing - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 13 174 191 139 115 8 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 14 187 205 149 124 9 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 355 0 - 0 495 280 Stage 1 - -- - 280 - Stage 2 - -- - 215 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1204 -- - 534 759 Stage 1 - -- - 767 - Stage 2 - -- - 821 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1204 - - - 527 759 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 527 - Stage 1 - -- - 767 - Stage 2 - -- - 810 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 13.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1204 - - - 527 759 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.235 0.011 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - - 13.9 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.9 0 727 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Existing - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 23 9 5 30 5 15 2 216 46 7 143 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 10 6 34 6 17 2 243 52 8 161 19 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 444 433 90 348 443 243 180 0 0 243 0 0 Stage 1 186 186 - 247 247 - - - - - - - Stage 2 258 247 - 101 196 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 511 515 950 594 508 795 1393 - - 1323 - - Stage 1 798 745 - 756 701 -- - -- - - Stage 2 746 701 - 895 738 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 493 511 950 578 504 795 1393 - - 1323 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 493 511 - 578 504 -- - -- - - Stage 1 797 740 - 755 700 -- - -- - - Stage 2 723 700 - 872 734 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.1 11.1 0.1 0.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1393 - - 493 612 578 695 1323 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.052 0.026 0.058 0.032 0.006 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 - - 12.7 11 11.6 10.4 7.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A - -BBBBA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 - - 728 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future Without Project (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 16.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 348 195 191 210 8 40 5 179 23 15 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 409 229 225 247 9 47 6 211 27 18 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 639 0 0 1238 1232 524 1336 1342 252 Stage 1 - - - - - - 526 526 - 701 701 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 712 706 - 635 641 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1309 - - 945 - - 152 177 553 130 152 787 Stage 1 - - -- - - 535 529 - 429 441 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 423 439 - 467 469 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1309 - - 945 - - 105 128 553 61 110 787 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 105 128 - 61 110 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 534 528 - 429 318 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 287 317 - 286 469 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.7 63.1 102.8 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)301 1309 - - 945 - - 81 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.876 0.001 - - 0.238 - - 0.61 HCM Control Delay (s) 63.1 7.8 0 - 10 0 - 102.8 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 7.9 0 - - 0.9 - - 2.8 729 2: Durston Road & Westgate Avenue Future Without Project (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 1 286 4 214 16 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 358 5 268 20 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 273 0 - 0 499 139 Stage 1 - -- - 139 - Stage 2 - -- - 360 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1290 -- - 531 909 Stage 1 - -- - 888 - Stage 2 - -- - 706 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1290 - - - 530 909 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 530 - Stage 1 - -- - 888 - Stage 2 - -- - 705 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1290 - - - 567 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.042 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 730 3: Durston Road & Laurel Parkway Future Without Project (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 8 254 198 54 247 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 322 251 68 313 25 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 319 0 - 0 627 285 Stage 1 - -- - 285 - Stage 2 - -- - 342 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1241 -- - 447 754 Stage 1 - -- - 763 - Stage 2 - -- - 719 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1241 - - - 443 754 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 443 - Stage 1 - -- - 763 - Stage 2 - -- - 712 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 28.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1241 - - - 443 754 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.706 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - - 30.4 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 5.4 0.1 731 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future Without Project (Growth Rate) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 23 13 4 62 12 13 4 245 22 27 344 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 14 4 67 13 14 4 266 24 29 374 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 739 725 204 528 742 266 409 0 0 266 0 0 Stage 1 450 450 - 275 275 - - - - - - - Stage 2 289 275 - 253 467 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 319 351 803 447 343 772 1146 - - 1298 - - Stage 1 559 571 - 730 682 -- - -- - - Stage 2 718 682 - 730 561 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 298 342 803 422 334 772 1146 - - 1298 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 298 342 - 422 334 -- - -- - - Stage 1 557 558 - 727 680 -- - -- - - Stage 2 689 680 - 692 548 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.7 14.5 0.1 0.5 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1146 - - 298 395 422 474 1298 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.084 0.047 0.16 0.057 0.023 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 - - 18.2 14.6 15.1 13.1 7.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 - - 732 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future Without Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 44.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 262 101 142 396 28 94 19 191 15 8 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 301 116 163 455 32 108 22 220 17 9 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 487 0 0 417 0 0 1169 1180 359 1285 1222 471 Stage 1 - - - - - - 366 366 - 798 798 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 803 814 - 487 424 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1076 - - 1142 - - 170 190 685 142 180 593 Stage 1 - - -- - - 653 623 - 380 398 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 377 391 - 562 587 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1076 - - 1142 - - 137 152 685 73 144 593 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 137 152 - 73 144 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 650 621 - 378 320 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 293 314 - 367 585 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 2.2 177.2 60.9 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)279 1076 - - 1142 - - 91 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.252 0.003 - - 0.143 - - 0.303 HCM Control Delay (s) 177.2 8.4 0 - 8.7 0 - 60.9 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 16.7 0 - - 0.5 - - 1.1 733 2: Durston Road & Westgate Avenue Future Without Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 4 241 251 16 11 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 262 273 17 12 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 290 0 - 0 553 282 Stage 1 - -- - 282 - Stage 2 - -- - 271 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1272 -- - 494 757 Stage 1 - -- - 766 - Stage 2 - -- - 775 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1272 - - - 492 757 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 492 - Stage 1 - -- - 766 - Stage 2 - -- - 772 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 12 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1272 - - - 532 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - - 0.029 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 12 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 734 3: Durston Road Future Without Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 17 234 257 187 155 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 18 252 276 201 167 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 477 0 - 0 665 377 Stage 1 - -- - 377 - Stage 2 - -- - 288 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1085 -- - 425 670 Stage 1 - -- - 694 - Stage 2 - -- - 761 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1085 - - - 417 670 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 417 - Stage 1 - -- - 694 - Stage 2 - -- - 747 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 18.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1085 - - - 417 670 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - - 0.4 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.4 0 - - 19.3 10.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 1.9 0.1 735 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future Without Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 31 12 7 40 7 20 4 290 62 9 192 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 13 8 45 8 22 4 326 70 10 216 26 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 599 584 121 470 597 326 242 0 0 326 0 0 Stage 1 249 249 - 335 335 - - - - - - - Stage 2 350 335 - 135 262 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 399 423 908 490 416 714 1322 - - 1234 - - Stage 1 734 700 - 678 642 -- - -- - - Stage 2 666 642 - 855 691 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 378 418 908 470 411 714 1322 - - 1234 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 378 418 - 470 411 -- - -- - - Stage 1 732 694 - 676 640 -- - -- - - Stage 2 635 640 - 824 685 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 12.6 0.1 0.3 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1322 - - 378 522 470 599 1234 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.092 0.041 0.096 0.051 0.008 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 - - 15.5 12.2 13.5 11.3 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C BBBA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0 - - 736 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 43.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 418 244 191 228 8 53 5 179 23 15 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 492 287 225 268 9 62 6 211 27 18 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 278 0 0 779 0 0 1372 1365 635 1468 1503 273 Stage 1 - - - - - - 638 638 - 722 722 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 734 727 - 746 781 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 838 - - 123 147 478 106 122 766 Stage 1 - - -- - - 465 471 - 418 431 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 412 429 - 405 405 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 838 - - 78 100 478 43 83 766 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 78 100 - 43 83 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 465 471 - 418 294 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 262 293 - 224 405 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.9 207.8 191.6 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)215 1285 - - 838 - - 58 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.297 0.001 - - 0.268 - - 0.852 HCM Control Delay (s) 207.8 7.8 0 - 10.9 0 - 191.6 HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 15 0 - - 1.1 - - 3.8 737 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 290 2 13 226 4 8 0 48 16 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 354 2 16 276 5 10 0 59 20 0 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 280 0 0 356 0 0 669 669 355 697 669 278 Stage 1 - - - - - - 357 357 - 310 310 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 312 312 - 387 359 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1283 - - 1203 - - 371 379 689 356 379 761 Stage 1 - - -- - - 661 628 - 700 659 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 699 658 - 637 627 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1283 - - 1203 - - 364 373 689 322 373 761 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 364 373 - 322 373 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 660 627 - 699 648 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 685 647 - 582 626 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 11.6 15.9 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)611 1283 - - 1203 - - 354 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 0.001 - - 0.013 - - 0.065 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 7.8 0 - 8 0 - 15.9 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - - 0.2 738 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 43 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 8 343 3 16 213 54 10 0 60 247 0 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - 50 50 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 434 4 20 270 68 13 0 76 313 0 25 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 338 0 0 438 0 0 813 834 436 800 802 304 Stage 1 - - - - - - 456 456 - 344 344 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 357 378 - 456 458 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1221 - - 1122 - - 297 304 620 ~ 303 317 736 Stage 1 - - -- - - 584 568 - 671 637 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 661 615 - 584 567 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1221 - - 1122 - - 280 294 620 ~ 259 307 736 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 280 294 - ~ 259 307 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 578 562 - 664 623 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 624 601 - 507 561 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.5 12.6 152.6 HCM LOS B F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)280 620 1221 - - 1122 - - 259 736 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 0.122 0.008 - - 0.018 - - 1.207 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.5 11.6 8 0 - 8.3 0 - 164.1 10.1 HCM Lane LOS C B A A - A A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 14.7 0.1 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 739 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future With Project (Growth) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 23 13 4 62 12 15 4 256 22 34 386 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 25 14 4 67 13 16 4 278 24 37 420 35 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 813 798 227 578 815 278 454 0 0 278 0 0 Stage 1 511 511 - 287 287 - - - - - - - Stage 2 302 287 - 291 528 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 283 318 777 413 311 760 1103 - - 1285 - - Stage 1 514 536 - 720 674 -- - -- - - Stage 2 706 674 - 693 527 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 261 308 777 387 301 760 1103 - - 1285 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 261 308 - 387 301 -- - -- - - Stage 1 512 521 - 717 672 -- - -- - - Stage 2 675 672 - 651 512 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.2 15.5 0.1 0.6 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1103 - - 261 359 387 453 1285 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.096 0.051 0.174 0.065 0.029 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 - - 20.2 15.6 16.3 13.5 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C C C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 - - 740 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 652 1 3 282 3 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- -0 - Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 724 1 4 344 4 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 726 0 1076 725 Stage 1 - -- -725 - Stage 2 - -- -351 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 877 -243 425 Stage 1 - -- -479 - Stage 2 - -- -713 - Platoon blocked, %- -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 877 -242 425 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -242 - Stage 1 - -- -479 - Stage 2 - -- -709 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 15.3 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)366 - - 877 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.047 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.3 - - 9.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - 741 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 138.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 301 128 142 468 28 144 19 191 15 8 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 346 147 163 538 32 166 22 220 17 9 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 570 0 0 493 0 0 1312 1323 420 1427 1380 554 Stage 1 - - - - - - 426 426 - 880 880 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 886 897 - 547 500 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - 1071 - - ~ 136 156 633 113 144 532 Stage 1 - - -- - - 606 586 - 342 365 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 339 358 - 521 543 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - 1071 - - ~ 105 121 633 53 111 532 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - ~ 105 121 - 53 111 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 604 584 - 341 283 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 254 278 - 326 541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 2 $ 555.6 92.1 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)193 1002 - - 1071 - - 67 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.108 0.003 - - 0.152 - - 0.412 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 555.6 8.6 0 - 9 0 - 92.1 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 31.6 0 - - 0.5 - - 1.6 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 742 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 4 253 9 49 258 16 5 0 27 11 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 281 10 54 287 18 6 0 30 12 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 304 0 0 291 0 0 701 708 286 714 704 296 Stage 1 - - - - - - 295 295 - 404 404 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 406 413 - 310 300 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1257 - - 1271 - - 353 360 753 346 361 743 Stage 1 - - -- - - 713 669 - 623 599 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 622 594 - 700 666 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1257 - - 1271 - - 337 340 753 318 341 743 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 337 340 - 318 341 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 710 666 - 621 568 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 588 564 - 669 663 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.2 11 15.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)631 1257 - - 1271 - - 362 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 0.004 - - 0.043 - - 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 7.9 0 - 8 0 - 15.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 743 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 17 263 10 61 307 187 5 0 34 155 0 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - 50 50 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 19 292 11 68 341 208 6 0 38 172 0 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 549 0 0 303 0 0 923 1020 298 917 922 445 Stage 1 - - - - - - 336 336 - 581 581 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 587 684 - 336 341 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 - - 1258 - - 250 237 741 253 270 613 Stage 1 - - -- - - 678 642 - 499 500 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 496 449 - 678 639 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 - - 1258 - - 226 213 741 222 243 613 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 226 213 - 222 243 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 663 628 - 488 460 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 447 413 - 629 625 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.5 0.9 11.5 58.1 HCM LOS B F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)226 741 1021 - - 1258 - - 222 613 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.051 0.019 - - 0.054 - - 0.776 0.02 HCM Control Delay (s) 21.3 10.1 8.6 0 - 8 0 - 61.4 11 HCM Lane LOS C B A A - A A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 5.5 0.1 744 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future With Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 31 12 7 40 7 27 4 333 62 13 216 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 13 8 45 8 30 4 374 70 15 243 26 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 687 668 134 540 681 374 269 0 0 374 0 0 Stage 1 285 285 - 383 383 - - - - - - - Stage 2 402 383 - 157 298 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 347 378 891 438 372 671 1292 - - 1184 - - Stage 1 699 675 - 639 611 -- - -- - - Stage 2 624 611 - 830 666 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 322 372 891 417 366 671 1292 - - 1184 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 322 372 - 417 366 -- - -- - - Stage 1 697 666 - 637 609 -- - -- - - Stage 2 586 609 - 796 658 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.8 13.3 0.1 0.4 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1292 - - 322 474 417 573 1184 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.108 0.045 0.108 0.067 0.012 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - 17.5 13 14.7 11.7 8.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C BBBA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 0 - - 745 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 627 3 11 554 2 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- -0 - Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 697 3 12 616 2 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 700 0 1338 698 Stage 1 - -- -698 - Stage 2 - -- -640 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 897 -169 440 Stage 1 - -- -494 - Stage 2 - -- -525 - Platoon blocked, %- -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 897 -166 440 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -166 - Stage 1 - -- -494 - Stage 2 - -- -515 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 16.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)311 - - 897 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - - 0.014 - HCM Control Delay (s) 16.9 - - 9.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - 746 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road FWO (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 103.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 322 175 161 184 29 43 28 158 85 79 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 379 206 189 216 34 51 33 186 100 93 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 251 0 0 585 0 0 1145 1113 482 1206 1199 234 Stage 1 - - - - - - 484 484 - 612 612 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 661 629 - 594 587 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1314 - - 990 - - 177 208 584 160 185 805 Stage 1 - - -- - - 564 552 - 480 484 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 452 475 - 491 497 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1314 - - 990 - - 72 161 584 ~ 77 144 805 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 72 161 - ~ 77 144 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 563 551 - 480 376 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 263 369 - 314 497 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.1 179.5 $ 529.8 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)220 1314 - - 990 - - 101 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.225 0.001 - - 0.191 - - 1.945 HCM Control Delay (s) 179.5 7.7 0 - 9.5 0 -$ 529.8 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 13.6 0 - - 0.7 - - 16.4 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 747 2: Durston Road & Westgate Avenue FWO (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 1 226 169 3 13 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 282 211 4 16 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 215 0 - 0 498 213 Stage 1 - -- - 213 - Stage 2 - -- - 285 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 -- - 532 827 Stage 1 - -- - 823 - Stage 2 - -- - 763 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1355 - - - 531 827 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 531 - Stage 1 - -- - 823 - Stage 2 - -- - 762 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1355 - - - 558 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 748 3: Durston Road FWO (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 9 245 170 52 226 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 310 215 66 286 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 281 0 - 0 581 248 Stage 1 - -- - 248 - Stage 2 - -- - 333 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1282 -- - 476 791 Stage 1 - -- - 793 - Stage 2 - -- - 726 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1282 - - - 471 791 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 471 - Stage 1 - -- - 793 - Stage 2 - -- - 719 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0 22.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1282 - - - 471 791 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - - - 0.607 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 23.8 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 4 0.1 749 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street FWO (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 19 11 3 56 10 25 3 233 20 62 329 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 12 3 61 11 27 3 253 22 67 358 29 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 786 767 193 580 782 253 387 0 0 253 0 0 Stage 1 507 507 - 260 260 - - - - - - - Stage 2 279 260 - 320 522 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 296 332 817 411 325 785 1168 - - 1312 - - Stage 1 517 538 - 744 692 -- - -- - - Stage 2 727 692 - 667 530 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 267 314 817 381 308 785 1168 - - 1312 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 267 314 - 381 308 -- - -- - - Stage 1 516 511 - 742 690 -- - -- - - Stage 2 689 690 - 616 503 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.8 14.6 0.1 1.2 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1168 - - 267 362 381 544 1312 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.077 0.042 0.16 0.07 0.051 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 - - 19.6 15.4 16.2 12.1 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C C C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 - - 750 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future Without Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 155 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 238 96 129 367 98 94 91 164 54 51 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 274 110 148 422 113 108 105 189 62 59 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 534 0 0 384 0 0 1138 1164 329 1255 1164 478 Stage 1 - - - - - - 333 333 - 775 775 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 805 831 - 480 389 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1034 - - 1174 - - 179 194 712 148 194 587 Stage 1 - - -- - - 681 644 - 391 408 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 376 384 - 567 608 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1034 - - 1174 - - 110 158 712 ~ 45 158 587 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 110 158 - ~ 45 158 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 680 643 - 390 333 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 253 314 - 348 607 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.8 $ 465 $ 483.9 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)210 1034 - - 1174 - - 70 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.91 0.002 - - 0.126 - - 1.741 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 465 8.5 0 - 8.5 0 -$ 483.9 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 29.1 0 - - 0.4 - - 10.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 751 2: Durston Road Future Without Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 3 212 216 13 9 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 230 235 14 10 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 249 0 - 0 479 242 Stage 1 - -- - 242 - Stage 2 - -- - 237 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1317 -- - 545 797 Stage 1 - -- - 798 - Stage 2 - -- - 802 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1317 - - - 543 797 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 543 - Stage 1 - -- - 798 - Stage 2 - -- - 800 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1317 - - - 576 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 11.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 752 3: Durston Road Future Without Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 20 200 216 180 142 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- - 50 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, %- 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 215 232 194 153 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 426 0 - 0 587 329 Stage 1 - -- - 329 - Stage 2 - -- - 258 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -- - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -- - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 -- - 472 712 Stage 1 - -- - 729 - Stage 2 - -- - 785 - Platoon blocked, %-- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 - - - 462 712 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- - 462 - Stage 1 - -- - 729 - Stage 2 - -- - 768 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 16.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)1133 - - - 462 712 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 - - - 0.33 0.02 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - - 16.6 10.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 1.4 0.1 753 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future Without Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 25 10 6 39 6 61 3 294 55 33 202 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 28 11 7 44 7 69 3 330 62 37 227 21 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 687 649 124 530 659 330 248 0 0 330 0 0 Stage 1 312 312 - 337 337 - - - - - - - Stage 2 375 337 - 193 322 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 347 388 904 446 383 711 1315 - - 1229 - - Stage 1 674 657 - 676 640 -- - -- - - Stage 2 645 640 - 791 650 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 302 375 904 422 371 711 1315 - - 1229 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 302 375 - 422 371 -- - -- - - Stage 1 672 637 - 674 639 -- - -- - - Stage 2 575 639 - 748 630 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16 12.4 0.1 1 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1315 - - 302 480 422 657 1229 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.093 0.037 0.104 0.115 0.03 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 - - 18.1 12.8 14.5 11.2 8 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C BBBA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 - - 754 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 240.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 392 224 161 203 29 56 28 158 85 79 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 461 264 189 239 34 66 33 186 100 93 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 273 0 0 725 0 0 1278 1247 593 1340 1362 256 Stage 1 - - - - - - 595 595 - 635 635 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 683 652 - 705 727 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1290 - - 878 - - 143 173 506 130 148 783 Stage 1 - - -- - - 491 492 - 467 472 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 439 464 - 427 429 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1290 - - 878 - - ~ 34 129 506 ~ 54 110 783 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - ~ 34 129 - ~ 54 110 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 491 492 - 467 352 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 240 346 - 252 429 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.2 $ 791.3 $ 887.2 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)111 1290 - - 878 - - 73 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.565 0.001 - - 0.216 - - 2.691 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 791.3 7.8 0 - 10.2 0 -$ 887.2 HCM Lane LOS F A A - B A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 25.8 0 - - 0.8 - - 19.3 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 755 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 244 2 13 202 3 8 0 48 13 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 298 2 16 246 4 10 0 59 16 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 250 0 0 300 0 0 582 583 299 610 582 248 Stage 1 - - - - - - 301 301 - 280 280 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 281 282 - 330 302 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1316 - - 1261 - - 424 424 741 407 425 791 Stage 1 - - -- - - 708 665 - 727 679 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 726 678 - 683 664 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1316 - - 1261 - - 418 417 741 370 418 791 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 418 417 - 370 418 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 707 664 - 726 669 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 713 668 - 628 663 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 11 14.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)667 1316 - - 1261 - - 398 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.102 0.001 - - 0.013 - - 0.046 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 7.7 0 - 7.9 0 - 14.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 756 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 20.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 9 293 3 16 186 52 10 0 60 226 0 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - 50 50 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 371 4 20 235 66 13 0 76 286 0 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 301 0 0 375 0 0 719 738 373 705 706 268 Stage 1 - - - - - - 396 396 - 309 309 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 323 342 - 396 397 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1260 - - 1183 - - 344 346 673 351 361 771 Stage 1 - - -- - - 629 604 - 701 660 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 689 638 - 629 603 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1260 - - 1183 - - 323 335 673 304 350 771 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 323 335 - 304 350 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 622 597 - 693 647 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 650 625 - 552 596 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.5 11.8 69.5 HCM LOS B F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)323 673 1260 - - 1183 - - 304 771 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 0.113 0.009 - - 0.017 - - 0.941 0.038 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.6 11 7.9 0 - 8.1 0 - 75.6 9.9 HCM Lane LOS C B A A - A A - F A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 9.3 0.1 757 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future With Project (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 19 11 3 56 10 26 3 244 20 69 371 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 21 12 3 61 11 28 3 265 22 75 403 29 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 859 840 216 630 855 265 433 0 0 265 0 0 Stage 1 568 568 - 272 272 - - - - - - - Stage 2 291 272 - 358 583 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 263 301 789 380 295 773 1123 - - 1299 - - Stage 1 476 505 - 733 684 -- - -- - - Stage 2 716 684 - 633 498 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 235 283 789 349 277 773 1123 - - 1299 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 235 283 - 349 277 -- - -- - - Stage 1 475 476 - 731 682 -- - -- - - Stage 2 677 682 - 579 469 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19.6 15.5 0.1 1.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1123 - - 235 328 349 516 1299 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.088 0.046 0.174 0.076 0.058 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 - - 21.8 16.5 17.5 12.5 7.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C C C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 - - 758 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 581 1 3 253 3 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- -0 - Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 709 1 4 309 4 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 710 0 1025 709 Stage 1 - -- -709 - Stage 2 - -- -316 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 889 -260 434 Stage 1 - -- -488 - Stage 2 - -- -739 - Platoon blocked, %- -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 889 -259 434 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -259 - Stage 1 - -- -488 - Stage 2 - -- -735 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 14.9 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)379 - - 889 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.9 - - 9.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - 759 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 365.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 277 123 129 438 98 144 91 164 54 51 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 318 141 148 503 113 166 105 189 62 59 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 616 0 0 460 0 0 1280 1307 389 1396 1320 560 Stage 1 - - - - - - 394 394 - 856 856 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 886 913 - 540 464 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 964 - - 1101 - - ~ 143 160 659 119 157 528 Stage 1 - - -- - - 631 605 - 352 374 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 339 352 - 526 564 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 964 - - 1101 - - ~ 76 126 659 ~ 22 124 528 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - ~ 76 126 - ~ 22 124 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 629 603 - 351 296 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 215 279 - 309 562 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.7 $ 1101.6 $ 1258.8 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)139 964 - - 1101 - - 37 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 3.299 0.002 - - 0.135 - - 3.293 HCM Control Delay (s) $ 1101.6 8.7 0 - 8.8 0 -$ 1258.8 HCM Lane LOS F A A - A A - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 43.9 0 - - 0.5 - - 13.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 760 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 3 225 9 49 223 13 5 0 27 9 0 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 250 10 54 248 14 6 0 30 10 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 262 0 0 260 0 0 627 633 255 641 631 255 Stage 1 - - - - - - 262 262 - 364 364 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 365 371 - 277 267 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1302 - - 1304 - - 396 397 784 388 398 784 Stage 1 - - -- - - 743 691 - 655 624 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 654 620 - 729 688 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1302 - - 1304 - - 379 376 784 358 377 784 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 379 376 - 358 377 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 741 689 - 653 593 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 620 590 - 699 686 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.4 10.7 14.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)672 1302 - - 1304 - - 397 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.003 - - 0.042 - - 0.031 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.7 7.8 0 - 7.9 0 - 14.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 761 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 20 230 10 61 266 180 5 0 34 142 0 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - -- - -- - 50 50 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 256 11 68 296 200 6 0 38 158 0 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 496 0 0 267 0 0 844 937 261 837 842 396 Stage 1 - - - - - - 306 306 - 531 531 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 538 631 - 306 311 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - -- - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1068 - - 1297 - - 283 265 778 286 301 653 Stage 1 - - -- - - 704 662 - 532 526 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 527 474 - 704 658 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1068 - - 1297 - - 256 239 778 252 272 653 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - -- - - 256 239 - 252 272 - Stage 1 - - -- - - 687 646 - 519 487 - Stage 2 - - -- - - 477 438 - 654 642 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 1 11.1 38 HCM LOS B E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)256 778 1068 - - 1297 - - 252 653 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.049 0.021 - - 0.052 - - 0.626 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.4 9.9 8.4 0 - 7.9 0 - 40.5 10.6 HCM Lane LOS C A A A - A A - E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.1 - - 0.2 - - 3.8 0.1 762 4: Cottonwood Road & West Babcock Street Future With Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 25 10 6 39 6 68 3 337 55 37 225 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 170 - - 70 - - 245 - 0 214 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 28 11 7 44 7 76 3 379 62 42 253 21 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 774 732 137 600 742 379 274 0 0 379 0 0 Stage 1 347 347 - 385 385 - - - - - - - Stage 2 427 385 - 215 357 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy 7.33 6.53 6.93 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.14 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.53 5.53 - 6.13 5.53 -- - -- - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.13 5.53 - 6.53 5.53 -- - -- - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.22 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 302 348 887 399 343 667 1286 - - 1179 - - Stage 1 643 634 - 637 610 -- - -- - - Stage 2 605 610 - 768 628 -- - -- - - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 256 335 887 375 330 667 1286 - - 1179 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 256 335 - 375 330 -- - -- - - Stage 1 642 611 - 636 609 -- - -- - - Stage 2 529 609 - 721 606 -- - -- - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18 13.2 0.1 1.1 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1286 - - 256 437 375 616 1179 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.11 0.041 0.117 0.135 0.035 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - 20.8 13.6 15.9 11.8 8.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.1 - - 763 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 549 3 11 506 2 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - -- -0 - Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 - Grade, %0 -- 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 610 3 12 562 2 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 613 0 1199 612 Stage 1 - -- -612 - Stage 2 - -- -587 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 966 -205 493 Stage 1 - -- -541 - Stage 2 - -- -556 - Platoon blocked, %- -- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 966 -201 493 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -201 - Stage 1 - -- -541 - Stage 2 - -- -546 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 15.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)362 - - 966 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - 0.013 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.2 - - 8.8 0 HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - 764 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 22.3 Intersection LOS C Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2211 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 780 502 279 50 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 796 512 284 51 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 275 70 531 565 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 341 745 540 16 Follow-Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0000 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.7 5.9 11.7 6.7 Approach LOS EABA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Left Designated Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR Assumed Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.001 0.999 0.449 0.551 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 1 795 230 282 284 51 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 858 858 1054 1054 664 642 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.980 0.978 0.981 0.982 0.973 Flow Entry, veh/h 1 779 225 277 279 50 Cap Entry, veh/h 858 841 1031 1034 652 625 V/C Ratio 0.001 0.926 0.218 0.268 0.427 0.079 Control Delay, s/veh 4.2 37.7 5.6 6.1 11.7 6.7 LOS AE AA B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 14 1 1 2 0 765 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)1 290 2 13 226 4 8 0 48 16 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly flow rate (vph)1 354 2 16 276 5 10 0 59 20 0 4 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 280 356 668 670 355 724 668 278 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 357 357 310 310 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 311 312 415 359 vCu, unblocked vol 280 356 668 670 355 724 668 278 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %100 99 98 100 92 96 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1282 1203 556 536 689 489 531 761 Direction, Lane #EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 1 356 16 280 68 23 Volume Left 1 0 16 0 10 20 Volume Right 0205594 cSH 1282 1700 1203 1700 666 518 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.21 0.01 0.16 0.10 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft)001094 Control Delay (s)7.8 0.0 8.0 0.0 11.0 12.3 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.4 11.0 12.3 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 766 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)8 343 3 16 213 54 10 0 60 247 0 20 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Hourly flow rate (vph) 10 434 4 20 270 68 13 0 76 313 0 25 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh)2 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 338 438 826 835 436 839 803 304 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 456 456 344 344 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 370 378 494 458 vCu, unblocked vol 338 438 826 835 436 839 803 304 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %99 98 97 100 88 26 100 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 1221 1122 475 472 620 420 475 736 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 448 358 89 313 25 Volume Left 10 20 13 313 0 Volume Right 4 68 76 0 25 cSH 1221 1122 724 420 736 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.02 0.12 0.74 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 10 151 3 Control Delay (s)0.3 0.6 11.8 34.6 10.1 Lane LOS A A B D B Approach Delay (s)0.3 0.6 11.8 32.8 Approach LOS B D Intersection Summary Average Delay 10.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 767 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)652 1 3 282 3 11 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0%0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly flow rate (vph) 724 1 4 344 4 13 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 726 1076 725 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 725 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 351 vCu, unblocked vol 726 1076 725 tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)5.4 tF (s)2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free %100 99 97 cM capacity (veh/h)877 434 425 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 726 4 344 17 Volume Left 0404 Volume Right 1 0 0 13 cSH 1700 877 1700 427 Volume to Capacity 0.43 0.00 0.20 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft)0003 Control Delay (s)0.0 9.1 0.0 13.8 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.1 13.8 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 768 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.7 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2211 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 496 733 408 27 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 506 748 415 27 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 192 194 373 884 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 719 594 325 58 Follow-Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0000 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 11.7 12.6 8.5 Approach LOS BBBA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Left Designated Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR Assumed Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.006 0.994 0.222 0.778 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 3 503 166 582 415 27 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 933 933 931 931 778 467 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.980 0.982 0.980 0.982 0.993 Flow Entry, veh/h 3 493 163 570 408 27 Cap Entry, veh/h 933 914 914 912 764 464 V/C Ratio 0.003 0.539 0.178 0.625 0.533 0.058 Control Delay, s/veh 3.9 11.1 5.7 13.4 12.6 8.5 LOS AB AB B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 3 1 5 3 0 769 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)4 253 9 49 258 16 5 0 27 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph)4 275 10 53 280 17 5 0 29 12 0 3 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 298 285 679 693 280 709 689 289 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 289 289 396 396 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 390 404 313 293 vCu, unblocked vol 298 285 679 693 280 709 689 289 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %100 96 99 100 96 98 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1263 1277 534 510 759 502 502 750 Direction, Lane #EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 4 285 53 298 35 15 Volume Left 4 0 53 0 5 12 Volume Right 0 10 0 17 29 3 cSH 1263 1700 1277 1700 712 540 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.17 0.04 0.18 0.05 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft)003042 Control Delay (s)7.9 0.0 7.9 0.0 10.3 11.9 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s)0.1 1.2 10.3 11.9 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 770 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)17 263 10 61 307 187 5 0 34 155 0 11 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 18 283 11 66 330 201 5 0 37 167 0 12 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh)2 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 531 294 898 987 288 905 892 431 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 325 325 562 562 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 574 662 343 330 vCu, unblocked vol 531 294 898 987 288 905 892 431 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %98 95 99 100 95 60 100 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1036 1268 412 384 751 412 422 625 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 312 597 42 167 12 Volume Left 18 66 5 167 0 Volume Right 11 201 37 0 12 cSH 1036 1268 861 412 625 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.40 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 4 4 48 1 Control Delay (s)0.7 1.4 10.5 19.5 10.9 Lane LOS A A B C B Approach Delay (s)0.7 1.4 10.5 19.0 Approach LOS B C Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 771 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Growth) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)627 3 11 554 2 6 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0%0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 682 3 12 602 2 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 685 1309 683 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 683 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 626 vCu, unblocked vol 685 1309 683 tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)5.4 tF (s)2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free %99 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h)909 390 449 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 685 12 602 9 Volume Left 0 12 0 2 Volume Right 3007 cSH 1700 909 1700 433 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.01 0.35 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft)0102 Control Delay (s)0.0 9.0 0.0 13.5 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.2 13.5 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 772 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.8 Intersection LOS D Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2211 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 726 462 285 197 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 740 472 291 201 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 390 102 573 504 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 315 762 557 70 Follow-Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0000 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 48.2 5.9 12.8 9.1 Approach LOS EABA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Left Designated Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR Assumed Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.001 0.999 0.409 0.591 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 1 739 193 279 291 201 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 765 765 1020 1020 637 683 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.981 0.979 0.979 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 1 725 189 273 285 197 Cap Entry, veh/h 765 750 999 999 625 669 V/C Ratio 0.001 0.966 0.189 0.273 0.457 0.294 Control Delay, s/veh 4.7 48.3 5.4 6.3 12.8 9.1 LOS AE AA B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 15 1 1 2 1 773 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)1 244 2 13 202 3 8 0 48 13 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly flow rate (vph)1 298 2 16 246 4 10 0 59 16 0 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 250 300 582 583 299 638 582 248 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 301 301 280 280 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 280 282 359 302 vCu, unblocked vol 250 300 582 583 299 638 582 248 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %100 99 98 100 92 97 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1316 1261 599 570 741 530 565 791 Direction, Lane #EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 1 300 16 250 68 18 Volume Left 1 0 16 0 10 16 Volume Right 0204592 cSH 1316 1700 1261 1700 716 554 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.18 0.01 0.15 0.10 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft)001083 Control Delay (s)7.7 0.0 7.9 0.0 10.6 11.7 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.5 10.6 11.7 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 774 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)9 293 3 16 186 52 10 0 60 226 0 23 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Hourly flow rate (vph) 11 371 4 20 235 66 13 0 76 286 0 29 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh)2 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 301 375 734 737 373 742 706 268 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 396 396 309 309 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 338 342 434 397 vCu, unblocked vol 301 375 734 737 373 742 706 268 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %99 98 98 100 89 38 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 1260 1184 511 505 673 461 509 770 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 386 322 89 286 29 Volume Left 11 20 13 286 0 Volume Right 4 66 76 0 29 cSH 1260 1184 785 461 770 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.02 0.11 0.62 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 1 9 103 3 Control Delay (s)0.3 0.7 11.2 24.7 9.9 Lane LOS A A B C A Approach Delay (s)0.3 0.7 11.2 23.4 Approach LOS B C Intersection Summary Average Delay 7.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 775 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - AM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)581 1 3 253 3 11 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0%0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 Hourly flow rate (vph) 646 1 4 309 4 13 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 647 962 646 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 646 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 316 vCu, unblocked vol 647 962 646 tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)5.4 tF (s)2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free %100 99 97 cM capacity (veh/h)939 473 472 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 647 4 309 17 Volume Left 0404 Volume Right 1 0 0 13 cSH 1700 939 1700 472 Volume to Capacity 0.38 0.00 0.18 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft)0003 Control Delay (s)0.0 8.9 0.0 12.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.1 12.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 776 1: Cottonwood Road & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.6 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2211 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1111 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 461 764 460 122 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 470 779 469 124 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 274 278 389 833 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 683 580 355 224 Follow-Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0000 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.0 16.3 15.1 11.2 Approach LOS B C C B Lane Left Right Left Right Left Left Designated Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR Assumed Moves L TR L TR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.004 0.996 0.194 0.806 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 2 468 151 628 469 124 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 859 859 856 856 766 491 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.980 0.980 0.981 0.981 0.982 Flow Entry, veh/h 2 459 148 616 460 122 Cap Entry, veh/h 859 842 839 839 751 483 V/C Ratio 0.002 0.545 0.176 0.734 0.612 0.252 Control Delay, s/veh 4.2 12.0 6.1 18.8 15.1 11.2 LOS A B A C C B 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 3 1 7 4 1 777 2: Westgate Avenue & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)3 225 9 49 223 13 5 0 27 9 0 2 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph)3 245 10 53 242 14 5 0 29 10 0 2 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 257 254 607 619 249 636 617 249 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 256 256 356 356 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 351 363 280 261 vCu, unblocked vol 257 254 607 619 249 636 617 249 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %100 96 99 100 96 98 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1308 1311 568 538 789 534 529 789 Direction, Lane #EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 3 254 53 257 35 12 Volume Left 3 0 53 0 5 10 Volume Right 0 10 0 14 29 2 cSH 1308 1700 1311 1700 744 568 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.05 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft)003042 Control Delay (s)7.8 0.0 7.9 0.0 10.1 11.5 Lane LOS A A B B Approach Delay (s)0.1 1.4 10.1 11.5 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 778 3: Laurel Parkway & Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)20 230 10 61 266 180 5 0 34 142 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0%0%0%0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 247 11 66 286 194 5 0 37 153 0 14 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh)2 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 480 258 824 906 253 828 815 383 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 296 296 514 514 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 528 611 314 301 vCu, unblocked vol 480 258 824 906 253 828 815 383 tC, single (s)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 tF (s)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free %98 95 99 100 95 65 100 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 1083 1307 437 406 786 440 446 665 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total 280 545 42 153 14 Volume Left 22 66 5 153 0 Volume Right 11 194 37 0 14 cSH 1083 1307 902 440 665 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.35 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 4 4 38 2 Control Delay (s)0.8 1.4 10.3 17.5 10.5 Lane LOS A A B C B Approach Delay (s)0.8 1.4 10.3 16.9 Approach LOS B C Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 779 5: Durston Road Future With Project (Pipeline) - Mitigated - PM Peak Hour The Lakes at Valley West Synchro 8 Report Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h)549 3 11 506 2 6 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0%0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 597 3 12 550 2 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh)2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 600 1172 598 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 598 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 574 vCu, unblocked vol 600 1172 598 tC, single (s)4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s)5.4 tF (s)2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free %99 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h)977 428 502 Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 600 12 550 9 Volume Left 0 12 0 2 Volume Right 3007 cSH 1700 977 1700 481 Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.01 0.32 0.02 Queue Length 95th (ft)0101 Control Delay (s)0.0 8.7 0.0 12.6 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s)0.0 0.2 12.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 780 The Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study Appendix D Individual Pipeline Projects 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Utilities Northwewstern Energy will provide natural gas and electric service to the development. These facilities will be located in public utility easements along the roadways within the subdivision. New electric and natural gas lines will be placed underground. A proposed layout for these facilities has been provided to Northwestern Energy as a starting point for their use in design of their facilities. Century Link and/or Charter Communications will provide cable, telephone and fiber service to the development. These facilities will be located in public utility easements along the roadways within the subdivision. New lines will be placed underground. These utilities will be installed in common trenches with Northwestern Energy’s facilities. Attached is a utility exhibit (Exhibit A) that illustrates the existing and proposed water, sewer, storm and dry utilities present on the site and adjacent to the site. Correspondence with Northwestern Energy is included in the Agency Letters section of the application. 861 NGNGNGNGNGNG8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8S W W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWW W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SW 8S 8 S 8S8S8S8S8S8SSDSDUTILITY LAYOUTTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3FIGURE NUMBERˆPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,20162880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Utility Layout.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jul/8/2016engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007EX.ABOZEMANMONTANACPKJRNJRN06/2016LEGENDEXISTINGWATER LINESEWER LINE8SMAJOR CONTOURFIRE HYDRANTWATER VALVEWATER LINESEWER LINE8S8SWATER VALVESTORM DRAINSDPUBLIC UTILITY EASMENTPROPOSEDSEWER VALVEELETRICAL METERPOWER POLEMAILBOXLIGHT POLESEWER MANHOLETELEPHONE BOXDECIDUOUS TREEOVERHEAD POWERLIGHT FIXTURESMINOR CONTOURWESTMORLAND DRIVEWESTGATE AVENUEUNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTIONARNHEM WAYPOWER & COMMUNICATIONSEXISTING PHASE 2FUTURE PHASE 4DURSTON ROAD8S 8 S 8S8S8S8S8S8SBURIED GASGAS VALVE862 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Educational Facilities Please see the attached letter from the Bozeman Public School District. As of this date the proposed development will be in the Meadowlark Elementary School, Chief Joseph Middle School and Bozeman High School. Also note that there are several private schools within walking distance of the development including Heritage Christian School and Petra Academy. 863 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ May 10, 2016 Robert Lee, Senior Planner Morrison Maierle 2880 Technology Blvd. W. PO Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Via email: rlee@m-m.net Subject: Preliminary Plat of The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Dear Mr. Lee Referencing your letter received May 6, 2016 concerning the evaluation of the subject development. We would expect that the proposed development, comprised of 59-single family dwelling units, could generate the following students: ♦ Pre-K-5 14 Students ♦ 6-8 7 Students ♦ 9-12 9 Students As of this date, the proposed development will be in the Meadowlark Elementary School, Chief Joseph Middle School and Bozeman High School attendance areas. Population growth and demographic shifts in the future may necessitate boundary realignments to existing schools that may modify the designated attending schools. Similarly, if a designated school attendance area’s student population exceeds the school’s capacity, attendance at an alternate school may be required. Complete and final infrastructure, such as sidewalks and crosswalks, should be constructed for the entire project irrespective of when actual housing units are developed to provide a Safe Route to School pathway for students to safely traverse the proposed and existing roadways. Our existing bus system can accommodate the estimated number of additional students. Please let us know if there are any changes to the proposed development as this could modify the above student projections. Sincerely, _________________________ Todd Swinehart, PE cc: Steve Johnson, Deputy Superintendent of Operations – Bozeman Public Schools Vance Ruff, Transportation Coordinator – Bozeman Public Schools Todd Swinehart, PE Director of Facilities (406) 522-6009 todd.swinehart@bsd7.org Bozeman Public Schools 404 West Main, PO Box 520 Bozeman, MT 59771-0520 www.bsd7.org 864 865 866 867 868 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Land Use The following chart summarizes proposed land uses for the entire 65 acres of The Lakes at Valley West. Acreage Percentage Open Space (Public Access Easement) 13.97 acres 21.5% Dedicated Parkland 12.76 acres 19.7% Residential Lots 23.84 acres 36.7% Streets, Alleys and Woonerfs 14.32 acres 22.1% TOTAL 64.89 acres 100% The following chart summarizes lot numbers and land uses for The Lakes at Valley West, Phases 1 & 2. Lots Acreage Percentage Open Space (Public Access Easement) 6 3.37 acres 14.7% Dedicated Parkland 1 4.92 acres 21.5% Residential Lots, Single Household 61 (including options for 5 ADUs ) 6.40 acres 27.9% Residential Lots, Multi Household 0 0.00 acres 0.00% Residential Lots, Townhome 0 0 acres 0% Streets, Alleys and Woonerfs NA 8.21 acres 35.9% TOTAL 61 residential lots + 7 parks/open space 22.90 acres 100% All lots are part of the overall Valley West PUD. 869 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application The following chart summarizes proposed lots and land uses for The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, not including the “Restricted Lot”, Lot R2A. Lots Acreage Percentage Open Space (Public Access Easement) 6 3.12 acres 29.6% Dedicated Parkland 0 0 acres 0% Residential Lots, Single Household 50 (including options for 4 ADUs ) 4.85 acres 46% Residential Lots, Multi Household 0 0.00 acres 0.00% Residential Lots, Townhome 0 0 acres 0% Streets, Alleys and Woonerfs NA 2.58 acres 24.4% TOTAL 50 residential lots + 6 parks/open space 10.546 acres 100% The following chart summarizes proposed lots and land uses for The Lakes at Valley West, Phase 3, including the “Restricted Lot”, Lot R2A Lots Acreage Percentage Open Space (Public Access Easement) 6 3.12 acres 9.9% Dedicated Parkland 0 0 acres 0% Residential Lots, Single Household 50 (including options for 4 ADUs ) 4.85 acres 15.3% Residential Lots, Multi Household 0 0.00 acres 0.00% Residential Lots, Townhome 0 0 acres 0% Streets, Alleys and Woonerfs NA 2.58 acres 8.2% Restricted “R” Lot 1 21.059 66.6% TOTAL 50 res. lots + “R” lot 6 parks/open space 31.605 acres 100% All lots will be part of the overall Valley West PUD. 870 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Lighting Plan A preliminary lighting plan is included in this section, along with cut sheets for the types of fixtures. The intention is to continue the lighting theme previously created with Phases 1 and 2 throughout the development. 871 COPYRIGHT ‹MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\PREAPP\PHOTOMETRICS PHASE 3.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jul/08/20162016REVISIONSDRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:Q.C. REVIEWDATE:BY:2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702engineers surveyors planners scientistsTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3BOZEMANMONTANALUMINAIRE SCHEDULE5352.007-E-1ARGARGJRN07/2016XXXMM/YYYYPOLE BASE DETAIL (TYP)REINFORCED CONC.BASE BY E.C.BUSH CONDUITSBASE COVERPROVIDE FUSE(S) IN CKT. TOBALLAST. FUSE(S) SHALL BEBUSS TYP. BBS. FUSE HOLDERSSHALL BE BUSS "TRON" HEBWATERPROOF. SIZE OF FUSESHALL BE AS REQUIRED BYLUMINAIRE MANUFACTURER.CONNECT GROUND TO POLEBASE W/ BOUNDRY #GB4CPROJECT ANCHOR BOLTS 3" MIN.ABOVE TOP OF BASE. PROVIDEDOUBLE NUTS FOR LEVELING UNIT(ONE ABOVE AND ONE BELOW BASEFLANGE). GROUT VOID BETWEENBASE FLANGE AND TOP OFCONCRETE, LEAVING DRAIN HOLE.HAND FINISH.THWN CONDUCTOR AS SHOWN ON PLANSPROVIDE 1' OF COILED SLACK ONCONDUCTOR FEED THRUHANDHOLE - 4" X 6" (NOMINAL) LUMINAIRE SCHEDULESYMBOLTYPELAMPSDESCRIPTIONSMANUFACTURERCATALOG NO. OR SERIESMOUNTING/VOLTAGEE1LEDFULL CUTOFF AREA LIGHT WITH TYPE III DISTRIBUTION. MOUNT BOTTOM OF FIXTURE AT 25' AFG.PROVIDE HORIZONTAL SLIPFITTER MOUNT FOR DAVIT ARM TO MATCH ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT.MOUNT ON CONCRETE BASE.KIM LIGHTINGSAR-3-E35-60L-4KPOLE/240E2LED8 FT PEDESTRIAN, FULL CUTOFF, POST-TOP LUMINAIRE WITH TYPE III DISTRIBUTION. MOUNT ONCONCRETE BASE.CREEPWY-EDG-3M-P8-02-D-UL-BZPOST TOP/240NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND PROVIDEBOLT COVER FROM THE POLE MANUFACTURER TOENSURE THE CLEANEST LOOK POSSIBLE.BEAKAWAY BOLT COUPLING (TYP)25' AFGFINISHED GRADETYPE E1 LUMINAIRE8' AFGFINISHED GRADETYPE E2 LUMINAIRE872 COPYRIGHT ‹MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,SHEET NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERDRAWING NUMBERVERIFY SCALE!THESE PRINTS MAY BEREDUCED. LINE BELOWMEASURES ONE INCH ONORIGINAL DRAWING. MODIFY SCALE ACCORDINGLY!DATEDESCRIPTIONNO.BYN:\5352\007\ACAD\EXHIBITS\PREAPP\PHOTOMETRICS PHASE 3.DWG PLOTTED BY:COOPER KRAUSE ON Jul/08/20162016REVISIONSDRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:Q.C. REVIEWDATE:BY:2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.6702engineers surveyors planners scientistsTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3BOZEMANMONTANAPHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS EXHIBIT5352.007-E-2ARGARGJRN07/2016XXXMM/YYYYEXE2E1PHOTOMETRIC CALCUATION NUMERIC SUMMARYLABELCALC TYPEUNITSAVGMAXMINAVG/MINMAX/MINWESTMORELAND DRILLUMINANCEFC0.581.70.0NANAWESTGATE AVEILLUMINANCEFC0.591.70.0NANAARNHEM WAYILLUMINANCEFC0.352.70.0NANAROUNDABOUTILLUMINANCEFC0.741.70.41.854.25ISOLINESFC* CALCULATION INCLUDES INCLUDES CONTRIBUTION FROMSITE LIGHTING, STREET LIGHTING AND ADJACENT PARKINGLOT LIGHTING.** CALCULATION DOES NOT INCLUDE CONTRIBUTION FROMSTREET LIGHTING OR ADJACENT PROPERTY LIGHTING0.150.20.5FUTUREPHASER-X LOTWESTMORLAND DRIVEWESTGATE AVENUEARNHEM WAYE1E1E1E1E1E1E1E2E2E2E2873 The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Preliminary Plat Application Agency Letters and Responses This section includes letters sent to agencies and responses from those that responded. 874 875 876 877 878 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ May 10, 2016 Robert Lee, Senior Planner Morrison Maierle 2880 Technology Blvd. W. PO Box 1113 Bozeman, Montana 59771 Via email: rlee@m-m.net Subject: Preliminary Plat of The Lakes at Valley West Subdivision – Phase 3 Dear Mr. Lee Referencing your letter received May 6, 2016 concerning the evaluation of the subject development. We would expect that the proposed development, comprised of 59-single family dwelling units, could generate the following students: ♦ Pre-K-5 14 Students ♦ 6-8 7 Students ♦ 9-12 9 Students As of this date, the proposed development will be in the Meadowlark Elementary School, Chief Joseph Middle School and Bozeman High School attendance areas. Population growth and demographic shifts in the future may necessitate boundary realignments to existing schools that may modify the designated attending schools. Similarly, if a designated school attendance area’s student population exceeds the school’s capacity, attendance at an alternate school may be required. Complete and final infrastructure, such as sidewalks and crosswalks, should be constructed for the entire project irrespective of when actual housing units are developed to provide a Safe Route to School pathway for students to safely traverse the proposed and existing roadways. Our existing bus system can accommodate the estimated number of additional students. Please let us know if there are any changes to the proposed development as this could modify the above student projections. Sincerely, _________________________ Todd Swinehart, PE cc: Steve Johnson, Deputy Superintendent of Operations – Bozeman Public Schools Vance Ruff, Transportation Coordinator – Bozeman Public Schools Todd Swinehart, PE Director of Facilities (406) 522-6009 todd.swinehart@bsd7.org Bozeman Public Schools 404 West Main, PO Box 520 Bozeman, MT 59771-0520 www.bsd7.org 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 From:James R. Nickelson Sent:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 11:45 AM To:Dustin Workman (dustin.workman@northwestern.com) Cc:Chaney, Erika; Cooper Krause Subject:The Lakes at Valley West ­ Phase 3 Attachments:Utility Layout­Phase 3.pdf Dustin, We are in the process of finalizing the preliminary plat and preparing the application package for this project. I have attached an exhibit showing the preliminary lot layout and a concept for your utilities as a starting point. Please review and let us know if you have any major concerns that should be addressed with the preliminary plat submittal. We will submit an application for service as well as the final lot layout and CAD files after the preliminary plat has been submitted to the city for your use in the design of your facilities and preparation of a service agreement. Thanks James James R. Nickelson, PE Senior Engineer Water/Wastewater Group Office Leader 2880 Technology Blvd W (59718) P.O. Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771 Main: 406.587.0721 | Direct: 406.922.6824 | Cell: 406.579.3108 Page 1 of 1 7/8/2016file:///N:/5352/007/Prelim%20Plat/Agency%20letters/Phase%203%20letters/The%20Lakes... 889 NGNGNGNGNGNGW W W W W W W W W W WWWWWWWWW W W WWWWWWWWWWW8S8S8S 8S 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S 8S 8SWWWWWWWW8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8S8SW 8S 8S 8S8S8S8S8S8SSDSDUTILITY LAYOUTTHE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3FIGURE NUMBERˆPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:CHK'D. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,20162880 Technology Blvd. W.Bozeman MT 59718Phone: (406) 587-0721Fax: (406) 922-6702N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Utility Layout.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Jun/15/2016engineers surveyors planners scientists5352.007EX.ABOZEMANMONTANACPKJRNJRN06/2016LEGENDEXISTINGWATER LINESEWER LINEMAJOR CONTOURFIRE HYDRANTWATER VALVEWATER LINESEWER LINESSWATER VALVESTORM DRAINPUBLIC UTILITY EASMENTPROPOSEDBURIED TELEPHONESEWER VALVEELETRICAL METERPOWER POLEMAILBOXLIGHT POLESEWER MANHOLETELEPHONE BOXDECIDUOUS TREEOVERHEAD POWERLIGHT FIXTURESMINOR CONTOURBURIED GASGAS VALVEWESTMORLAND DRIVEWESTGATE AVENUEUNDERGROUND STORMWATER DETENTIONARNHEM WAYPOWER & COMMUNICATIONSEXISTING PHASE 2FUTURE PHASE 4DURSTON ROAD890 1 James R. Nickelson From:Carolyn Poissant <CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET> Sent:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:39 PM To:Robert G. (Bob) Lee Subject:RE: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision - RPAB memo That’s fine to use our standard detail. No. 02529-16 http://www.bozeman.net/Smarty/files/30/30c3ce6a-979d-4269-b7b8-bd46f8f899f8.pdf 891 2 Carolyn Poissant, MLA, AICP Manager of Trails, Open Space and Parks Design and Development City of Bozeman - Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Office Address: 415 N. Bozeman Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Office Phone: 406.582.2908 Fax: 406.582.2292 From: Robert G. (Bob) Lee [mailto:rlee@m‐m.net]   Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:12 PM  To: Carolyn Poissant <CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET>  Subject: RE: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision ‐ RPAB memo Thank you, Carolyn. The Applicant anticipates a 10-foot trail compliant with Class 1B standards to allow for 2-way traffic. The Committee report indicate an 8-foot wide trail. Do you see this as a problem? Bob Robert G. (Bob) Lee Direct | 406.922.6745 From: Carolyn Poissant [mailto:CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET]   Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 12:21 PM  To: Robert G. (Bob) Lee <rlee@m‐m.net>  Subject: RE: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision ‐ RPAB memo Meant to attach this. Carolyn Poissant, MLA, AICP Manager of Trails, Open Space and Parks Design and Development City of Bozeman - Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Office Address: 415 N. Bozeman Street 892 3 Bozeman, MT 59715 Office Phone: 406.582.2908 Fax: 406.582.2292 From: Robert G. (Bob) Lee [mailto:rlee@m‐m.net]   Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 10:24 AM  To: Carolyn Poissant <CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET>  Subject: RE: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision: Carolyn: Many thanks for your quick reply! Bob Robert G. (Bob) Lee Direct | 406.922.6745 From: Carolyn Poissant [mailto:CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET]   Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:33 AM  To: Thom White <TWhite@BOZEMAN.NET>  Cc: Robert G. (Bob) Lee <rlee@m‐m.net>  Subject: RE: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision: The RPAB Sub. Review Committee has approved the paved trail. Carolyn Poissant, MLA, AICP Manager of Trails, Open Space and Parks Design and Development City of Bozeman - Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 1230 Bozeman, MT 59771-1230 Office Address: 415 N. Bozeman Street Bozeman, MT 59715 Office Phone: 406.582.2908 Fax: 406.582.2292 893 4 From: Thom White   Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:12 AM  To: Carolyn Poissant <CPoissant@BOZEMAN.NET>  Subject: FW: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision: I guess I am not familiar with the request‐    Thom White Park & Cemetery Superintendent (406) 582‐3224 From: Robert G. (Bob) Lee [mailto:rlee@m‐m.net]   Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:25 PM  To: Thom White <TWhite@BOZEMAN.NET>  Cc: Chris Saunders <csaunders@BOZEMAN.NET>; James R. Nickelson <jnickelson@m‐m.net>  Subject: Lake Phase 3 Subdivision: Thom: We are in the process of completing the Preliminary Plat application for the Lakes at Valley West Subdivision, Phase 3. One of the pre-application comments was that we should coordinate with the Parks Department regarding a proposed trail along the western margin of the property. The PROST plan shows a trail corridor connecting Huffine Lane with Durston Road that aligns with the west margin of Lakes, Phase 3. The Applicant wishes to build a 10-foot wide asphalt trail in the west side stream setback corridor of this project, and eventually complete it all the way along the western margin of the Lakes subdivision. The trail corridor would eventually connect the sidewalk in Durston Road, through the Norton properties and on to Huffine Lane. The Lakes project would build just the portion on the Lakes property. We propose to show a 10-foot wide asphalt trail on the Preliminary Plat and are requesting any comment that you may. Attached for your reference is a Phasing plan of the Lakes at Valley West along with a copy of the preapplication plan we have submitted for Phase 3. If you have any comments don’t hesitate to call either James Nickelson at 922-6824, or me at the number below. Many thanks, Bob Robert G. (Bob) Lee Senior Land Planner 2880 Technology Blvd W (59718) P.O. Box 1113, Bozeman, MT 59771 Main: 406.587.0721 | Direct: 406.922.6745 | 894 5 Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. This communication is the property of Morrison-Maierle, Inc. and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may  be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender  and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record  retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be  protected from disclosure under law. City of Bozeman emails are subject to the Right to Know provisions of Montana’s Constitution (Art. II, Sect. 9) and may  be considered a “public record” pursuant to Title 2, Chpt. 6, Montana Code Annotated. As such, this email, its sender  and receiver, and the contents may be available for public disclosure and will be retained pursuant to the City’s record  retention policies. Emails that contain confidential information such as information related to individual privacy may be  protected from disclosure under law. 895 896 The Lakes at Valley West – Phase 3 Response to Draft Engineering Department Comments August 24, 2016 The following list numbering system follows the draft comment list. Each number is followed by the general subject of the comment in italics and is followed up with a response. Code Requirements 1. Snow removal A meeting was held with the street department and engineering to discuss issues. A revised snow storage exhibit is provided to address the concerns. 2. Snow storage – Lot 38 A revised snow storage exhibit is provided to address the concern. 3. Drainage facilities This comment incorporated four specific subjects: Facilities for areas D1.1A and D1.1C Direct runoff from drainage basins D1.1A and D1.1C is included in the calculations for total combined runoff to Aajker Creek and its tributary. The tributary is ¼ mile long and runs from the double arch culvert under Durston Road to the main stream channel. Total 10-year post-development peak runoff to Aajker Creek, including direct runoff from these basins, will be limited to the pre-development peak rate. Basins D1.1A and D1.1C consist of mostly pervious backyards that will provide biofiltration prior to discharge. First 0.5 inch of rainfall The proposed underground system provides multiple avenues of treating the first 0.5 inch of rainfall. The underground system acts much different than an open pond in terms of water quality at the point of discharge. Additional detail will be made available as part of the final engineering design report submittal for review and approval prior to final plat approval. We respectfully request that the comment be changed to state “The applicant shall comply with Section II A. 4. of the design standards.” so it is clear that the design standard needs to be met vs. the text in the draft comment memo. C Factors This information will be provided with the final engineering design report submittal prior to final plat approval. Pre-development Calculations This information will be provided with the final engineering design report submittal prior to final plat approval. 4. Stormwater Maintenance Plan A plan will be submitted with the final engineering design report submittal prior to construction and final plat approval and be provided to the property owner’s association upon approval. 5. Cash in Lieu of Water Rights The applicant is aware of this requirement and will pay this fee prior to final plat approval. 897 6. Looped water line An exhibit is attached showing revisions to the water services and water main associated with Lots 37 and 38 eliminating the need for a dead end water line in this area. This option is not possible for Lots 3 and 4 if standard services are utilized. It is requested that the specific comment be changed to “The applicant shall comply with Section V.A.5 of the Design Standards relative to dead end water mains.” 7. Public utility easement for water line City standard easements will be provided with the final plat application. 8. 38.23.060.A Easements Easements will be provided, as required, with the final plat application. 9. Street lights This comment concerns street lights on Durston Road. With the construction of Durston Road, that was completed as part of Phases 1 and 2 of this project, the existing street lights were analyzed and found to meet the needs of the corridor. This information was provided with the design report submittal for the Durston Road improvements and has been recently provided to staff to address this concern. Site Specific Comments 1. Laurel Parkway and Durston Road – LOS C The LOS at this intersection was analyzed as part of the Phases 1 and 2 application and addressed this concern. Attached is a supplement to the original traffic study dated May 12, 2015 that was left out of this application. In addition the author of the memo and study provided the following delay values that were computed with the supplement in support of the LOS of C. Four scenarios with full project build year 2024. - “Growth Rate” AM – LOS C w/23.9 seconds average control delay - “Growth Rate” PM – LOS C w/24.0 seconds average control delay - “Pipeline” AM – LOS C w/17.5 seconds average control delay - “Pipeline” AM – LOS C w/18.0 seconds average control delay It is our understanding that this addresses the comment. 2. Title for Director of Public Works This will be corrected on the final plat. 3. Arnhem Way Maintenance A note will be added to the final plat. 4. Stormwater Maintenance A note will be added to the final plat. 5. SID Waivers Waivers will be provided with the final plat for those items not already covered by waivers. 6. Record Drawings The applicant will provide Record Drawings for Phases 1 and 2 prior to final plat approval. 898 10FTSNOW STORAGEEASEMENT IF NECESSARY32FTR.O.W.22FTDRIVING SURFACEWITH PEDESTRIAN PRECEDENCE6FTPARKING/PLANTER BOXES2FTCONCRETEBORDER/ PARKINGFIGURE NUMBERˆPROJECT NO.DRAWN BY:DSGN. BY:APPR. BY:DATE:COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Snow Removal- Phase 3.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Aug/23/2016engineers surveyors planners scientists2880 Technology Blvd WestBozeman, MT 59718Phone: 406.587.0721Fax: 406.922.67025352.007FIG. 4THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3BOZEMANMONTANASNOW REMOVAL: PHASE 3CPKCPKJRN08/2016LEGEND:PROPOSED SNOW REMOVAL STORAGE AREAFOR SINGLE AND MULTI-EVENT STORMSNOTE: BOULEVARDS WILL BE UTILIZED FOR SNOW STORAGEAREAS ON LOCAL, COLLECTOR AND ARTERIAL STREETS.10' PUBLIC UTILITY AND STREETMAINTENANCE/ SNOW REMOVAL EASEMENTWESTMORLAND DRIVEARNHEM WAYWESTGATE AVENUEADDITIONAL SNOW STORAGE AREAMULTI-EVENT STORAGE(1'$5($ )7ðSINGLE-EVENT STORAGE(1'$5($ )7ð1150450XXXXXX1840720207081092036036801440138054013805401380540414054072036018405601380540)7ñ138054013805401380540)7ñ)7ñ)7ñ)7ñPROPOSED PLOWING DIRECTIONSNOW STORAGE CALCULATIONS:(9(176725$*((1'$5($ )7ð92/80( )7ñ)7727$/6725$*(92/80( )7ñ#/)2):221(5) )7ð2)612: @ 22 FT WIDE = 6 IN OF SNOW08/7,(9(176725$*((1'$5($ )7ð92/80( )7ñ)7727$/6725$*(92/80( )7ñ#/)2):221(5) )7ð2)612: @ 22 FT WIDE = 18 IN OF SNOW$'',7,21$/6725$*( )7ð#/)2):221(5) )7ð2)612: @ 22 FT WIDE = 25 IN OF SNOWTOTAL SNOW STORAGE = 43 INCHES OF SNOWDURSTON ROADEXISTING PHASE 2 OPEN SPACE08/7,(9(176725$*($5($ )7ñ 6,1*/((9(176725$*($5($ )7ñ 899 5 + 0 0 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 LOT 11LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 LOT 15 LOT 32 LOT 33 LOT 34 LOT 35 LOT 36 LOT 37 LOT 38 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 LOT 42 LOT 43 OPEN SPACE 8S8S8S8S 8S 8S8S8SWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W WWW ESESESESESESESESˆ PROJECT NO. FIGURE NUMBER COPYRIGHT MORRISON-MAIERLE, INC.,2016 N:\5352\007\ACAD\Exhibits\Water Serive Exhibit.dwg Plotted by cooper krause on Aug/19/2016 DRAWN BY: DSGN. BY: APPR. BY: DATE:engineers surveyors planners scientists 2880 Technology Blvd West Bozeman, MT 59718 Phone: 406.587.0721 Fax: 406.922.6702 5352.007 FIG. 2 THE LAKES AT VALLEY WEST: PHASE 3 WESTGATE AVE WATER SERVICES BOZEMAN MONTANA CPK CPK JRN 08/2016 DURSTON SIDEWALK ARNHEM WAYPROPOSED SEWER SERV. ARNHEM WAY PROPOSED 8" WATER PROPOSED WATER SERV. EXISTING 8" SEWER 900 memo Page 1 TO: Bob Murray, P.E. City of Bozeman FROM: Bill White James Nickelson, P.E. DATE: May 12, 2015 JOB NO.: 5352.003 RE: The Lakes at Valley West, Supplemental TIS Analysis #2 CC: Greg Stratton Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply For Your Use This memorandum summarizes supplemental analyses #2 provided in support of the Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study (TIS) submitted to the City of Bozeman in February 2015. This analysis was developed to review the benefit potential of a basic signal system for the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection and to advance discussion and support for an intermediate or temporary four-way stop at the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection. 1. BASIC SIGNAL SYSTEM The Lakes at Valley West TIS confirms the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection currently functions at LOS D, identified as a preexisting deficiency below the LOS C operations/capacity thresholds identified in Sec. 38.24.060 of City of Bozeman “Unified Development Code”. Traffic operations were anticipated to degrade to LOS F by year 2024, as determined based upon two forecasting alternatives that: 1) stress a growth of through traffic on Durston Road via higher baseline growth rates versus 2) stress growth of turning movements through the inclusion/application of concurrent development growth (i.e. pipeline project development within the study area). The conclusion of the TIS was that a traffic signal or roundabout would be needed to address LOS issues at the intersection by year 2024. In support of this supposition, the TIS advanced an analysis that reviewed traffic operations at the intersection with assumption of an actuated signal system that includes eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes with designated signal luminaries, per current City of Bozeman Capital Improvement objectives. Such an improvement would result primarily in LOS A/B traffic operations with less than 11 seconds of control delay being noted through year 2024, as based on a review of both forecast methodologies. The City requested an analysis of an interim signal system at the intersection, as based on current geometries. This “basic” signal system would be constructed with vehicle detection promoted by video or pavement “pucks” with all through and turn movements performed through single lane intersection approaches (i.e. the intersection of two lane roadways with no turn lanes) and permissive, single approach luminaries. The analyses was performed based on AM and PM peak hour alternative traffic volumes highlighted in Figure 9 and 10 for the “growth” scenario and Figure 15 and 16 for the “pipeline” scenario of the TIS, with LOS and control delay results as follows. 901 The Lakes at Valley West, Supplemental TIS Analysis #2  Page 2 As shown, the intersection would function within the LOS A/B range by year 2024 with less than 15 seconds of control delay determined between forecast scenarios. This indicates the basic signal system would promote adequate LOS, despite the difference in forecasts between the growth scenario (with higher through volumes on Durston) versus pipeline scenario (with higher turn movements to/from Cottonwood) forecast scenarios. The City requested furthermore that the analysis be extended to year 2034 to assess the longevity of the basic signal system proposal. Forecasts were developed as described by the TIS, with the exception that baseline growth rates, 3 percent annual for the “growth” scenario and “1 percent annual for the “pipeline” scenario were extended an additional 10 years. These forecasts can be obtained upon request. LOS analyses were revised through year 2034, with the results summarized as follows. As shown, the intersection would function within the LOS B range during the peak hours, as based on pipeline project scenario. However, a LOS D is projected during both peak hours, as based on the growth scenario, which is below the City LOS C standards. This means the growth in through traffic will have a substantial impact on the ability of a basic signal system to maintain adequate traffic operations between year 2024 and year 2034. The conclusion from this analysis is that a basic signal system can be developed at the intersection and should maintain LOS for a number of years, but ultimately lane improvements would be needed to maintain long range LOS. 2. FOUR WAY STOP Supplemental analysis #1 reviewed the LOS benefits of a four way stop at the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection as an interim improvement until the extension of roadways such as Oak Street, Annie Street, and possibly Sherwood Way to Cottonwood Road can promoted; rerouting traffic from the intersection and therefore reducing southbound left-turns from the intersection (which is the critical movement most impacting LOS). The interim improvement would promote LOS C operations through year 2024 during the peak hours, as determined based on a review of the alternative traffic volumes highlighted in Figure 9 and 10 for the “growth” scenario and Figure 15 and 16 for the “pipeline” scenario of the TIS. City of Bozeman staff requested further information and support for a four way or all way stop at the intersection, even as an interim measure. Justification for an all way stop is provided by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) by the Federal Highway Administration. The current, year 2009 version of the MUTCD indicates the following information can be used in support of an all way stop. 902 The Lakes at Valley West, Supplemental TIS Analysis #2  Page 3 Section 2B.07 Multi-Way Stop Applications Support: 01 Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. 02 The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.04 also apply to multi-way stop applications. Guidance: 03 The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. 04 The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Option: 05 Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collectors (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. A review of MUTCD guidelines was performed based on available traffic data for the intersection (highlighted in 0.4 and 0.5). As data was limited and/or incomplete, the review is limited based on the available data . However, as the all way stop is proposed an interim improvement, this should be sufficient in supporting a decision for the improvement. Applicable data includes discussion on traffic volumes, bicycle and pedestrian safety, left turn conflicts, and street classification considerations. A summary of discussion is as follows for applicable guidelines/data. 0.4 A. A traffic signal is not a preferred improvement at Laurel Parkway/Durston Road; thus, this guide is not directly applicable for the intersection. However, a similarity is as the all-way stop is recommended as an interim improvement until future east-west roadway connections can be promoted within Bozeman; specifically the extension of roadways such as Oak Street, Annie Street, and possibly Sherwood Way to Cottonwood Road. These extensions will allow traffic to divert away from the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection and travel via other routes to make turn movements to/from Durston Road via the signalized Cottonwood Road intersection in the future. This will improve LOS as traffic is reduced from the critical southbound left-turn 903 The Lakes at Valley West, Supplemental TIS Analysis #2  Page 4 movement at the intersection. It is therefore envisioned the all-way stop could be reduced as these roadway extensions are complete. Thus, although this MUTCD guideline is not directly applicable, there are some similarities that would provide some rational or justification via engineering reasoning. 0.4 B. Collision histories provided by the City of Bozeman indicate that less than one collision per year has been noted for the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection. With the introduction of the fourth/south leg and as a result of increased traffic volumes projected in the future, the potential for collisions will increase. However, this is not sufficient support to suggest this particular guideline could be used in support of the all way stop. 0.4 C. There are three sets of criteria associated with this guideline. The first indicates that major street volumes entering the intersection must be 300 vehicles per hour for 8 hours of a typical weekday to meet the guide. The second indicates minor street volumes, including the combination of vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles, must be 200 per hour for 8 hours concurrently of the weekday to fulfill the guideline with a peak/one hour delay of 30 seconds. The final indicates 70 percent of volume these respective criteria can be used, 225 major street vehicles and a combination of 140 hourly vehicles, pedestrians, and bikes on the minor approach, can be used for streets with an 85th percentile speed of greater than 40 mph. Traffic count data was available for five hours of the weekday between 7:00 to 9:00 AM and between 3:00 to 6:00 PM. Traffic forecasts were developed hourly for major and minor street approaches based on the forecasting methodologies described within the TIS. A summary of forecasts for available hours is shown below for the year 2024 growth and pipeline scenarios. As shown, the major east-west approach street volumes well exceed 300 entering vehicles per hour with an average hourly volume of between 570 and 630 noted between the analysis conditions. Volumes range between 140 and 280 entering vehicles on the north-south minor street approaches with an average of between 200 and 215 noted hourly. These are vehicle volumes ONLY without forecasting north-south pedestrian and bike volumes. From the TIS, the average control delay for worst hour was about 170 second during the AM peak hour based on year 2024 growth rate analyses and 75 seconds based on year 2024 pipeline analyses. For all practical purposes, it is suggested that thresholds for the all-way stop are met as control delays well exceed thresholds and average vehicle volumes alone exceed criteria. Yes vehicle volumes are not specifically satisfied for the minor approaches for afternoon hours, but these forecasts do not reflect the pedestrian and bicycle volumes that are characteristic of a very active Bozeman community; especially given many of the water and walking features expected with the Lakes at Valley West development. Thus and again, this supplemental study stresses that from a practical perspective, given delays and that all volumes thresholds are likely to be met with pedestrian and bike activity, that an all way stop 904 The Lakes at Valley West, Supplemental TIS Analysis #2  Page 5 is a reasonable and practical interim improvement to assure vehicle and pedestrian safety for the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection. 0.4 D. The 80 percent criterion would not apply here again as collision histories are currently low for the intersection. 0.5. Beyond interim improvement and volume justifications, further support of a signal based on MUTCD guidelines would include:  “The need to control left turn conflicts.” As indicated, the southbound left-turn impact is the primary reason for LOS issues at the intersection.  “The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes.” Again as indicated, Bozeman is an active community and this intersection is situated within a growing residential neighborhood desiring access to the water features and trails of the Lakes of Valley West development. The nearest protected crossing would be ½ mile to the east at the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection; which is a spacing sufficient enough for pedestrians to risk uncontrolled crossings as to not circumvent what would be one-mile round trip back to Laurel Parkway. Thus, this criterion can be used in justification of a controlled crossing promoted via the all-way stop.  “A intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.” Laurel Parkway will evolve into a residential collector as the neighborhood develops. To that end, the City has been promoting the design of roundabouts at major intersections located along the roadway. Intersecting with the Durston Road arterial, a four way stop would “improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.” It is understood that some of the rationale in justification of the all way stop is circumstantial and less finite without current collision histories and hourly volume, pedestrian, and bike data being used for support. However, given the combination of poor traffic operations, the advent of consistently high hourly forecast traffic volumes, and given this intersection will become a focal point of pedestrian and bicycle activity, it is in the best interests of the neighborhood that this all-way stop be developed to preserve traffic operations and safety. Again, a future analysis and justification can be provided to remove the all-way stop as east-west roadway connections are promoted in the future. 3. SUMMARY Supplemental analyses #2 of the Lakes at Valley West Traffic Impact Study (TIS) confirms that a basic signal system will preserve traffic operations and safety at the Cottonwood Road/Durston Road intersection through year 2024. Turn lane and signal improvements would likely be warranted following this forecast horizon. Furthermore, this study reinforces the conclusion for the development of a four-way stop at the Laurel Parkway/Durston Road intersection in order to preserve traffic operations and pedestrian/bicycle safety as based on a review of MUTCD guidelines. It is anticipated the removal of this four way stop could occur following the construction of future east-west arterials to Cottonwood Road, as traffic volumes will likely decrease at the intersection. Thus, this should be considered a temporary or interim improvement measure for the intersection. 905