Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-10-13 43U, MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONT ANA October 13, 1987 ************************ The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, October 13,1987, at 2:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Mathre, Commissioner I Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Becker and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the items listed under Consent Items be removed for discussion. Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the minutes of the regular meeting of October 5, 1987 be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Decision - Conditional Use Permit - David Osterman - allow expansion of an existing mini- warehouse complex on Tract 1, Mays Tracts, and Tracts 40-A and 41-A, Northeast Annexation (1915 North Rouse Avenue) This was the time and place set for the decision on the Conditional Use Permit requested by David Osterman to allow the expansion of a mini-warehouse development located on Tract 1, Mays Tracts, and Tracts 40-A and 41-A of the Northeast Annexation. This site is more common- ly known as 1915 North Rouse Avenue. Commissioner Stiff stated he feels that the condition requiring the applicant to sign a waiver of protest to the creation of special improvement districts is in line with previous Com- mission actions. He noted that when the special improvement district is created, the method of I assessment should be carefully considered, since the difference between linear footage and square footage assessments is awesome. Commissioner Vant Hull noted that Mr. Osterman has indicated opposition to providing a wider radius turn-around as required by the Fire Marshal. She then suggested the applicant may wish to change the layout of his development to allow trucks to drive through the develop- ment rather than requiring them to turn around. Mayor Mathre stated that during the public hearing before the City Commission, the ap- plicant agreed to all of the conditions except Condition No.5, which involves the waiver of pro- test. Commissioner Martel noted the use of this property, and the impacts that use has on city services should be taken into consideration when determining the method of assessment for fu- ture special improvement districts. City Manager Wysocki recommended that the Commission approve the requested Conditional Use Permit, subject to the nine conditions recommended by the Zoning Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commis- sion approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by David Osterman to allow the expansion of a mini-warehouse development located on Tract 1, Mays Tracts, and Tracts 40-A and 41-A of the Northeast Annexation, subject to the conditions recommended by the Zoning Commission as fol- lows. 1. That the Final Site Plan be drawn to scale and show utility easements, garbage enclosure, contour lines, drainage facilities and signs, the number I of individual units per each building and each building access, and that the snow removal area located in the southwest corner of the site plan shall be relocated. 2. That final site surface drainage and grading plans be reviewed and ap- proved by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan approval. 3. That the Final Site Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall to insure adequate turning radius and fire hydrant location prior to Final Site Plan approval. 4. That a typical exterior lighting detail be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and shown on the Final Site Plan. 10-13-87 431 5. That waiver-of-protest to participation in S .1. D. 's for Griffin Drive and Rouse Avenue improvements be provided by the applicant prior to Final Site Plan approval. 6. The developer enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City of Bozeman. If occupancy of the structure is to occur prior to installation of the improvements, it must be secured by a method of security equal to one and one-half times the amount of the cost of the scheduled improvements and their installation. Detai led cost estimates, construction plans, and I methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement. 7. Three copies of the Final Site Plan containing all the conditions, correc- tions, and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within six months of the date of the City Commission approval and prior to the issuance of a build- ing permit for the project. One signed copy shall be retained by the Build- ing Department, one signed copy shall be retained by the Planning Direc- tor, and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant. 8. That all on-site improvements (Le., sidewalk, landscaping, etc.) shall be completed within 18 months of City Commission approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Phase I, within 36 months for Phase II, and within 52 months for Phase III. 9. The Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period of only 18 months following approval of the use for Phase I, for 36 months for Phase II, and 52 months for Phase III. Prior to the permanent renewal of the permit at the end of that period, the applicant must satisfy all the conditions in the granting of the permit. An on-site inspection will be made and a report made to the City Commission for their action. If all required conditions have been satisfied, the permit wi II be permanently renewed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. I This was the time and place set for the decision on the Conditional Use Permit requested by Rick Blevins for Kurland-Blevins Properties to develop a minor planned unit development on portions of Lots 4, 6, and 7, Block 7, of the Babcock and Davis Addition. This site is more commonly known as 620 East Peach Street. Commissioner Vant Hull encouraged the Commissioners to add one condition, which she had spelled out in her memo to the Commissioners prior to last week's meeting. She noted the wording is taken directly from a letter from Mr. Blevins to the Planning Department and reads as follows: "All siding and exterior damage resulting from moving the houses will be repaired with matching materials. All exteriors will be painted. All disturbed soil on site will be planted with grass and maintained. All existing shrubs and trees that can be saved will be profes- sionally trimmed and pruned." She noted that this condition would alleviate some of the neigh- borhood concerns that this request wi II not adversely impact their properties. Mayor Mathre noted that the concerns stated in the Commissioner's memo were not raised at the Zoning Commission meeting or the City Commission meeting; therefore, there is no official testimony upon which to base this requirement. Commissioner Martel expressed concern about the proposed condition, especially since no public testimony was received. He also noted that to impose a requirement for residing and re- painting of the exterior could cause the applicant to invest substantially more in his property than surrounding residents have. I Mayor Mathre stated that if the applicant agrees to the condition, she has no problem with adding it. She noted, however, that the public hearing has been closed and the imposition of such a condition with no opportunity for the applicant to address it could create problems. Commissioner Stiff stated he feels the additional condition may require too much of the applicant. City Manager Wysocki recommended that the condition proposed by Commissioner Vant Hull be revised slightly to provide more flexibility. He then recommended that the Commission ap- prove the requested conditional use permit, subject to the ten conditions recommended by the Zoning Commission plus the additional condition suggested by Commissioner Vant Hull, with the suggested revisions. 10-13-87 43:::: It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Com- mission approve the Conditional Use Permit requested by Kurland-Blevins Properties to develop a minor planned unit development on portions of Lots 4, 6, and 7, Block 7, of the Babcock and Davis Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the locations of existing buildings on the west side of the site be verified and accurately identified on the Final Site Plan. 2. That a waiver-of-protest for a Special Improvement District to East Peach I Street be obtained from the applicant prior to Final Site Plan approval. 3. That all damaged sections of the sidewalk fronting the site wi II be removed and replaced to City standards, and that a permit be obtained from the City Engineer prior to construction. 4. That a common access drive easement be filed and recorded to perpetuate the access to the west parking area prior to Final Site Plan approval. 5. That the site plan comply with Section 18.62.180 of the Bozeman Area Zon- ing Code regarding walkways and concrete curbing prior to Final Site Plan approval. 6. That the garbage refuse area be relocated so that it is not located in any yard setbacks, and that it be reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff and the appropriate solid waste service agency prior to Final Site Plan ap- proval. 7. That covenants and other legal agreements which regulate areas of facilities of common or restricted ownership be reviewed and approved by the Plan- ning Office and recorded at the Gallatin County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to Final Site Plan approval. 8. That all siding and exterior damage resulting from moving the houses will be repaired with matching materials. All exteriors will be painted. All disturbed soil on site will be planted. All existing shrubs and trees that can be saved will be trimmed. 9. The developer enter into an Improvements Agreement with the City of Bozeman. If occupancy of the structures is to occur prior to installation of the improvements, it must be secured by a method of security equal to one I and one-half times the amount of the cost of the scheduled improvements and their installation. Detailed cost estimates, construction plans, and methods of security shall be made a part of that Agreement. 10. That three copies of the Final Site Plan containing all the conditions, cor- rections, and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be sub- mitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within six months of the date of the City Commission approval and prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project. One signed copy shall be retained by the Building Department, one signed copy shall be retained by the Planning Di- rector, and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant. 11. That all on-site improvements (i. e., paving, landscaping, etc.) shall be completed within 18 months of City Commission approval. The Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period of only 18 months following approval of the use . Prior to the permanent renewal of the permit at the end of that period, the applicant must satisfy all the conditions in the granting of the permit. An on-site inspection will be made and a report made to the City Commission for their action. If all required conditions have been sat- isfied, the permit will be permanently renewed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Discussion - housing procedures - Mike Money City Manager Wysocki stated that he has asked Mr. Mike Money to submit a brief update on the housing programs. Former Community Development/Zoning Administrator Mike Money outlined the different I types of loans initiated through the 1984 Community Development Block Grant Neighborhood and Revitalization Program. He indicated that he was also requested to contact other communities to see how they have handled requests for subordination of those loans. Mr. Money stated that two different types of programs have been utilized in making loans from 1985 to the beginning of this year. The first type is single-family, owner-occupied resi- dences; and the second type is the rental rehabilitation program, which is a separate pot of money. 10-13-87 L 3 ,) fl.) Under the single-family, owner-occupied program, low-interest loans were made to moderate-income families, with the loans structured to meet the applicant's needs; and deferred payment loans were made to the very low-income families. Mr. Money stated that with the de- ferred payment loans, the loan is made for an eight-year period. The entire loan is due if the applicant sells the home within the first five years. After that, the loan is forgiven at the rate of 25 percent per year, so that after an eight-year period, the loan is totally forgiven. I Mike Money stated that the deferred payment loans are made to discourage speculative turnover and to encourage continuous ownership. He noted that under this program, safe and sanitary housing is made available to low- and moderate-income families in the community. Mr. Money stated that not many subordination agreements have been requested under this program because it is not to the individual's advantage to sell the property or to exchange the no-interest or low-interest loan for a higher interest loan. Mike Money stated that in discussing the subordination of these loans with representatives of other communities, the importance of keeping in close contact with the applicants is crucial to the program. He noted that each request for subordination must be considered on its own, with open discussion being possible between representatives of the City and the applicant. He then recommended that the Commission adopt a resolution which would authorize the Loan Review Com- mittee, previously established, to review and approve or deny each subordination request. He noted that action could then come before the Commission for ratification, following the same procedure as the initial loan process. He further suggested that the Committee be directed to establish criteria for review of each subordination request to ensure that all items are addressed before action is taken. Mr. Money stated the second program was the rental rehabilitation program, under which two different loan packages were developed. He noted that $5,000 in rental rehab monies was made available for each unit; and that amount was to be matched dollar-for-dollar under the guidelines of the program. He indicated that as long as monies were available through the Com- munity Development Block Grant program, a matching loan, near or at market rates, was also I provided for the rehabilitation. He indicated that when those monies were no longer available, the individual was required to provide the matching monies, often acquired through a private lender. Mike Money stated that probably the majority of requests for subordination will be for these loans. He noted that as the interest rates drop, individuals will be interested in con- solidating their loans for acquisition and construction into one single loan at a lower interest rate. Mr. Money stated that the rental rehabilitation monies are amortized over a ten-year period; and those loans are forgiven after ten years. He indicated that those loans are repaid to the State, not to the City; and the State currently has no program for recycl ing the project income. City Manager Wysocki asked what position the City is in before subordination. Mr. Money stated that the City's position doesn't really change because of the sub- ordination. He further reminded the Commissioners that the rental rehabilitation monies are not repaid to the City; and the monies loaned through the CDBG deferred loans are forgiven after eight years. He noted that the success of the program in providing safe and sanitary housing must be considered along with the payback aspects. Commissioner Martel asked if an applicant's financial status is reviewed periodically to determine if it has changed substantially. Mike Money stated that no monitoring is done on a regular basis. He noted that if an applicant decides to sell his property or refinance his home, the City is contacted because of the I outstanding loan. Commissioner Martel asked what happens if an applicant sells his property within the first five or ten years after acquiring a loan. Mike Money stated that each situation must be considered on an individual basis. He noted that under the single-family, owner-occupied program, the City has the option of allowing that loan to transfer to another purchaser who would qualify for the program; or a p.yback could be required. Mayor Mathre asked who has been reviewing the requests for subordination to date. 10-13-87 43 it Mike Money stated that he reviewed those requests in detail while he was working for the City. He noted that since then, the City Attorney has received those requests and has worked closely with him prior to submitting the subordination agreement to the Commission for action. He stated this situation has demonstrated the need to have continuity in the program; and the Loan Review Committee would provide that, especially since they are the group which originally approved the loan. He further noted that to allow the Committee to take on this additional duty will ensure that the applicant's confidentiality is maintained. Mr. Money then indicated that the I Commission would receive copies of the Committee1s actions and would be requested to approve their actions, under the same process as the loans were initially approved. Mayor Mathre asked if monies still remain to be allocated under this program. Mike Money stated that most of the monies are allocated; and the City is in the close-out phase. He indicated that he will be back before the Commission with a recommendation for that process. Mayor Mathre asked Mr. Money to draft a resolution for Commission consideration, noting that ratification of the Loan Review Committee's actions should be placed on the Commission's consent agenda. No. 1244 - Amendin Section 18.50.150, Fences, Walls and Hed es, of the Bozeman ode City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1244, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1244 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MON- TANA, AMENDING SECTION 18.50.150, FENCES, WALLS AND HEDGES, OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the public hearing on this zone code amendment was held on May 18 and was approved on June 1, 1987. He noted this is the sub- sequent ordinance, which completes the process, and recommended final adoption. I Commissioner Martel stated that he still feels adoption of this ordinance is premature since the City does not have a designated linear park. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Jordan, that the Com- mission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1244, amending Section 18.50.150 of the Bozeman Municipal Code. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commis- sioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No being Commissioner Martel. Ordinance No. 1245 - Adopting by reference the CABO One and Two Family Dwellin Code, 1983 dltlon Wit t e 1984 amendments City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1245, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1245 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MON- TANA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CABO ONE & TWO FAMILY DWELLING CODE, 1983 EDITION WITH THE 1984 AMENDMENTS. The City Manager reminded the Commissioners that they had provisionally adopted this ordinance at their meeting of September 28, 1987 and recommended that it be finally adopted at this time. It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commis- sion finally adopt Ordinance No. 1245, adopting the CABO One and Two Family Dwelling Code, I 1983 Edition with the 1984 amendments, by reference. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1246 - Adopting by reference the Model Energy Code, 1983 Edition City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1246, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: 10-13-87 l.t35 ORDINANCE NO. 1246 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MON- TANA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE MODEL ENERGY CODE, 1983 EDITION. The City Manager reminded the Commission that they had provisionally adopted this ordi- nance at their regular meeting of September 28, 1987 and recommended that they finally adopt the ordinance at this time. I It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Com- mission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1246, adopting the Model Energy Code, 1983 Edition, by reference. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Com- missioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1247 - Adopting by reference Part II of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Stan- dards City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1247, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1247 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MON- TANA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE PART II OF THE UNIFORM FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 50-60-201(4) M.C.A. The City Manager reminded the Commission that they had provisionally adopted this ordi- nance at the September 28, 1987 meeting and recommended that it be finally adopted at this time. It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Com- mission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1247, adopting Part II of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards, by reference. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. I Request for permission to participate in the State's Short-Term I nvestment Pool (STI P) City Manager Wysocki submitted to the Commission a memo from Administrative Services Director Gamradt concerning the City's participation in the State's Short-Term I nvestment Pool (ST I P) on a trial basis. The City Manager noted that the state statute allows a local governing body to authorize investment of the City's monies in ST I P. He stated that at the present time, the rate of return on funds invested in STI P is 1.36 percent higher than what the City is cur- rently receiving. Commissioner Vant Hull asked if the monies invested in STIP would be as liquid as they are currently. Administrative Services Director Gamradt stated that the monies would be much more liq- uid. He stated, at the present time, they are invested in sixty- or ninety-day certificates of deposit locally. Under ST I P, the monies are wire transferred within twenty-four hours after the telephone request is made. Commissioner Martel asked how much the City would invest in ST I P on a trial basis. The Administrative Services Director stated that the City would invest about $500,000, which is currently invested mainly in certificates of deposit. He noted this method of investment would have no effect on the City's repurchase account during the remainder of its term. Administrative Services Director Gamradt then stated that he discussed the investment pro- gram through Merrill Lynch with Mr. Gary Buchanan, from the Billings office of that firm. He indicated that ST I P, which is operated through the Department of Commerce, is Merrill Lynch's I biggest competitor for investments. He noted that Yellowstone County has indicated it may par- ticipate in the Merrill Lynch program; and Mr. Buchanan is currently working with the City of Billings to see if they will participate. He then suggested that the City of Bozeman participate in the STI P program, keeping its eye on how Yellowstone County's investments through the Merrill Lynch program compare. Commissioner Martel asked about service charges through the ST I P program. The Administrative Services Director stated that the service charge is taken out before the investment rate is determined; therefore, the rate reported is the net investment rate re- 10-13-87 43G ceived. He then indicated that the interest rate on ST I P is adjusted daily; and he will keep a close eye on that rate to ensure the City's investment. Commissioner Stiff stated support for the proposal to use ST I P. He noted at the present time, the Merrill Lynch program nets .07 percent more than STIP; however, monitoring the City's investment in comparison to Yellowstone County's investment will help to verify which program is more beneficial. He noted that a 1.36 percent increase in the City's investment of $500,000 is substantial. I Mr. Scott Heck, resident, noted that the higher interest rate also incurs a greater degree of risk; however, the risk is not so great that the City should not participate. Commissioner Vant Hull noted that with the liquidity of the monies, they could be pulled out of the program if the interest rate begins to drop dramatically. Commissioner Stiff asked how the recent Attorney Generalis opinion affects this program. Administrative Services Director Gamradt stated that the opinion lists all of the types of investments authorized for local governments. He indicated that Mr. Buchanan contends that the Merrill Lynch program is acceptable under this opinion. He noted that if Yellowstone County does opt to participate, that will determine whether it is allowable. He stated that since STIP is specifically authorized by the state statute, the opinion does not address that method of in- vestment. Commissioner Stiff noted that the Merrill Lynch program ties to a Wall Street Trust com- puter and asked if that type of option is available through ST I P. The Administrative Services Director stated that the computer tie is not available; how- ever, a telephone call will provide the interest rate information. City Manager Wysocki recommended that the Commission authorize investment of up to $500,000 in STI P on a trial basis, with the investment program to be reviewed prior to renewal of the Repurchase Agreement in April 1988. He noted that the mid-year budget review might provide a good time for this review. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Jordan, that the Com- mission authorize the City to participate in the State's Short-Term I nvestment Pool on a trial I basis, with the staff to submit a report back to the Commission for discussion prior to renewal of the Repurchase Agreement. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those vot- ing Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Discussion - adoption of an ordinance to prohibit hunting within city limits City Manager Wysocki stated that Commissioner Jordan had requested this item be placed on the agenda. Commissioner Jordan indicated that he had requested this be placed on the agenda for dis- cussion as a result of the recent newspaper article about the bear in the tree in Lindley Park. He noted at the present time, the City does not have an ordinance to prevent someone hunting wildlife in the city limits with weapons other than firearms; and he feels the situation should be addressed. He stated the wi Idlife that wander into town should be enjoyed and protected, with- out the potential of someone killing it. Commissioner Vant Hull stated support for such an ordinance. City Attorney Bruce Becker stated that the animal control officer has expressed concern about trapping within the city limits; and that item could possibly be addressed in the same ordinance. Mayor Mathre noted that other communities around the State may have addressed this issue and suggested that they be contacted. It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the staff be I directed to review this issue and prepare a draft ordinance for Commission consideration. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Discussion - FYI Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following IlFor Your Informationll items. 10-13-87 437 (1) A letter to the postal service, dated September 30, 1987, and their response, dated October 5, 1987, concerning the retention of postal services in the downtown area. (2) A letter from Jim Banks, Chairman of the Board of Adjustment, indicating the Board's recommendation that the membership be expanded to six at the time reappointments are made. Mayor Mathre requested that this item be scheduled for discussion on an agenda when all I Commissioners are present. (3) The City Manager noted that the auditors have almost completed their fieldwork for this year's audit. He stated that after the report has been prepared, the auditors will submit it to the Audit Committee and then the City Commission. (4) Mayor Mathre reminded the Commissioners of the Interagency Breakfast, to be held at 7:00 a.m. on Wednesday morning at the GranTree Inn. (5) Commissioner Stiff noted that he has been approached by an individual concerned with violations incurred involving pedestrians crossing the street. He suggested that possibly the police could monitor the pedestrian crossings more vigorously for a few weeks in an attempt to ensure the safety of pedestrians. Consent Items 19, 1987, in - Satu rda , October 10, I It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Consent Items be approved as listed above, and the appropriate persons be authorized and directed to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Adjournment - 3:35 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. JUDITH A. MATHRE, Mayor ATTEST: I Clerk of the Commmission 10-13-87