Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-01-26 OGe MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONT ANA January 26, 1987 ************************ The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, January 26, 1987, at 2:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Mathre, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, City Manager Wysocki, I City Attorney Becker and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed from the agenda for discussion. Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission approve the minutes of their regular meeting of January 19, 1987, as amended. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commis- sioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Request for permission to address Commission re parkinq - John N. Thompson, 1213 South Fifth Avenue City Manager Wysocki stated that Mr, John Thompson, 1213 South Fifth Avenue, has re- quested permission to address the Commission regarding parking in his residential area. Mr. John Thompson stated several parking violations occur in this neighborhood that go unticketed; however, he received a ticket for parking over 48 hours on January 16, even though other cars on the same street didn't receive tickets for the same violation. He noted that one of the other cars was not moved until January 23; and it did not receive any parking tickets. I Mr. Thompson then requested that the City consider implementing a system that would allow residents to park one vehicle on the street in front of their homes, with no time limits. He noted that stickers could be issued to individuals; and those vehicles not bearing the stickers would then be ticketed. City Manager Wysocki distributed to the Commission a memo from the Police Division indicating that eleven other citations were issued for a variety of parking violations in the general area at the same time Mr. Thompson's citation was issued. He noted that the parking ordinances are enforced on a spot check basis, which is typical of this type of law enforcement. The City Manager then asked Mr. Thompson if he has called the Police Division when violations to the parking regulations have occurred. Mr. Thompson indicated that he has not; and the City Manager suggested that to report the parking violations may help alleviate the problem. Mr. Thompson then noted that many of the fraternities and sororities are located in that immediate area; and there is not adequate off-street parking for those houses. Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre encouraged Mr. Thompson to help the Police Division patrol the area by calling to report violators. Commissioner Vant Hull noted that each year, a new group of students attends Montana State University; and they must be educated on the parking regulations in the community. Commissioner Jordan noted that the problem is not only lack of off-street parking in the area, but the duration of parking as well. He suggested that implementation of a sticker system or possibly additional enforcement may encourage students to park their vehicles on I campus rather than on the street. Mr. Steve Kovatch, 1221 South Fifth Avenue, stated that when he calls the Police Division about parking violations, they are quick to respond. He noted that the real problem is that the residents in the area have too many cars and must park one of the vehicles on the street, noting that he has three vehicles as does Mr. Thompson. He reminded the Commission that years ago, the area was single-family homes; and now most of the homes have apartments in the basements as well as having fraternity and sorority houses built in the area. Mr. Kovatch 01-26-87 JSI then stated he is opposed to having to move his vehicle every two days, when he uses it only every two weeks. Commissioner Vant Hull asked if residents in the area would be willing to pay a fee for parking on the street, particularly if a parking district were created, noting that such action should reduce the demand for on-street parking. Mr. Kovatch indicated that residents might consider it. I Mayor Mathre reminded the Commission that the 48-hour parking rule has been in effect for many years. She then suggested that the staff review the possibility of establishing a resident sticker system to address the issue. City Manager Wysocki indicated that the staff will review the matter and submit a report back to the Commission as soon as possible. Commission Resolution No. 2646 - annexation of the Perkins, Saccoccia and Tschache parcel ( 140. 1915 acres bounded by Baxter Lane on the north, North 11 th A venue extended on the east, West Oak Street extended on the south, and North 22nd Avenue extended on the west) City Manager Wysocki presented Commission Resolution No. 2646, as reviewed by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2646 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, EXTENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY AND REFERRED TO AS THE PERKINS, SACCOCCIA AND TSCHACHE ANNEXATION, HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. The City Manager reminded the Commission that this item was listed on the January 12, 1987 agenda; however, the Resolution had not been finalized at that time. He then noted that this is the final step in the annexation procedure, and recommended that the Commission adopt Commission Resolution No. 2646. It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commission I adopt Commission Resolution No. 2646, extending the boundaries of the City of Bozeman to include the Perkins, Saccoccia and Tschache parcels. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Discussion - proposed revisions to the City's SID policy City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commissioners that they had recently completed questionnaires on their philosophies on Special Improvement Districts. He noted that the staff has tabulated those results and submitted a summary along with a listing of issues to be considered and addressed in preparing a revised policy. He noted that the Southwest Montana Homebuilders Association has also submitted a completed questionnaire; and a copy has also been included in the Commissioners' packets. Mayor Mathre suggested that the Commission discuss the summary of responses, addressing whether they feel 51 D's are appropriate for redevelopment or reconstruction projects, and whether they are appropriate for new or raw land development. The Commission concurred that they would be willing to support special improvement districts used for redevelopment of facilities in existing developed areas. The Commission then considered the use of SI D's for raw land development, briefly reviewing the summary of Commission responses. The City Manager noted that the final summary comment at the bottom of the sheet indicates the underlying tone of the responses, which is II. .. continued development in the community at a substantially reduced risk to the taxpayer. II I Commissioner Stiff reinforced the summary statement by indicating that the Commission does not want to take risks where the developer foresees nothing but gain and the City fore- sees nothing but loss. He noted the City must have protection and must see financial state- ments which are accurate reflections of the developer's status. The Commission discussed some of the issues for discussion, which were attached to the summary of responses. Commissioner Stiff asked if a spread of ownership would be as effective or possibly more effective than a percentage of development when considering the creation of a special improvement 01-26-87 06S district. He also expressed concern that revisions to the policy might eliminate the small developer, leaving only the large developers to improve raw land in the community. Commissioner Martel noted one of the suggested options for a basically undeveloped area would be for the City to back only a portion of the SID costs and asked what legal problems that might create. City Attorney Becker stated that he feels the biggest problem would be incurred in selling the bonds, noting that a purchaser may not want to buy bonds which are not 100 percent I backed by the City. He further indicated it might create problems with the City putting liens on the property. Commissioner Martel stated he feels that the developer's equity in the property in relation to the liability via the special improvement district is an important factor. He suggested that the Commission may wish to consider a dollar-for-dollar exchange between the free and clear value of the property and the amount of the special improvement district costs. City Manager Wysocki noted that concept may promote small developers while eliminating large developers because they leverage their projects. Mr. Jerry Perkins stated concern about Commissioner Martel's suggestion, noting that although he may leverage the financing of a project, he does not plan to walk away from any investment he may have. He noted that to build upon a piece of property which he may own free and clear, he would probably borrow against that land value and then would be unable to use SID's for installation of improvements if that type of policy were adopted. He further noted that the water, sewer and streets must be installed before any structures may be built under the City's current policies. Mr. Perkins then expressed concern that the Commission is considering revision of the policy based on a reaction to the Valley Unit situation rather than careful review of the overall process and experience. City Manager Wysocki asked about the ratio of land costs to the improvements costs, suggesting that the figures be based on land costs of $5,000 per acre. Mr. Paul Kinshella, Sanderson/Stewart/Gaston Engineering, noted that after dedications I for parkland and streets, approximately 75 percent of an acre would be developable. He stated that the average cost of improvements is 80lt to $1.00 per square foot, creating about a four- to-one ratio of cost between the cost of improvements and the cost of the land (assuming $5,000/acre cost). Mr. Kinshella noted that if a developer installs a portion of the improvements on property which he owns free and clear, he probably had to borrow against that property to cover the costs. He then reminded the Commission that subdivisions, such as Graf's Second Subdivision, were platted many years ago before the installation of improvements was required before filing the final plat. He noted the City now requires that water, sewer and streets, or a financial guarantee for such improvements, be in place before the final plat is filed; and further stated that the current City policy is why special improvement districts have been used for improvements to raw land. Mr. Kinshella then indicated that Improvements to a one-acre lot in the county run approximately $2,000, while the costs to a 7, OOO-square-foot lot in the city run about $6,500. Break - 3:40 to 3:50 p.m. Mayor Mathre declared a break from 3:40 p.m. to 3:50 p.m., in accordance with Commission policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983. Discussion (continued) - proposed revisions to the City's SID policy Mayor Mathre suggested that the Commission may wish to conduct further discussion on I this item in a workshop-type setting rather than continuing it during a regular Commission meeti ng . The City Manager noted that the rough costs for improvements are as follows: $100 per linear foot for paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk; $40 to $50 per linear foot for water lines; and $40 to $50 per linear foot for sewer lines. He indicated that the percentages of total improvement costs would probably be 50 percent for paving, 20 percent each for water and sewer, and the remaining 10 percent for administration and engineering costs. He then suggested that 01-26-87 LJ69 the staff review the issues raised during this discussion in an attempt to prepare a draft policy for Commission consideration. Mayor Mathre requested that this item be placed on the agenda for further discussion in three weeks, suggesting that the evening session might be more appropriate. Discussion - feasibility of management audit for the City I City Manager Wysocki stated the Commission had requested this item be placed on the agenda. Commissioner Vant Hull stated she would prefer to postpone this discussion because she has not had time to review the North Platte study, which was completed by Cresap, McCormick and Paget. Commissioner Stiff stated that he talked with Brian Dunn, Assistant Superintendent of Schools, about the management audit process. He indicated that the school district had completed an audit of the bus routes at a cost of $20.000; and the annual savings from implementation of those recommendations is in excess of $100,000. He stated that Mr. Dunn suggested that the City request a specific number of the most recent studies completed by the firm for careful review prior to contracting with them. The Commissioner then indicated that the school district is currently proceeding with a management audit in another specific area. Mayor Mathre noted that management audits are done for two reasons: (1) review of a specific area because problems are known to exist, and (2) review of the entire operation al- though no specific problems are known. She noted that the City of Bozeman would fall into the second category. Commissioner Stiff stated he doesn't know how many companies can adequately perform management audits. He also noted that the City has been quoted figures for doing the audit and the anticipated savings; and he feels that if the City could gain one-tenth of the projected figure each year, it would be worth proceeding. Mayor Mathre reminded the Commissioners that the City recently had an opportunity to I implement cost savings through 'an automated garbage collection system, and did not do so. Mr. Jerry Perkins, Chairman of the Governmental Affairs Committee for the Chamber of Commerce, stated they discussed this item during their meeting held this morning. He noted that the City currently has a reputable national firm to audit its financial books; and it might be possible to have them conduct a management audit in conjunction with the financial audit if the Commission so desires. He noted that the committee expressed concern about the cost of the management audit. Mr. Perkins then stated the committee also registered concern that the firm engaged has a good track record, noting that sometimes a company may have good references but not perform a good job in a community, He also encouraged the Commission to consider using an in-state firm for the management audit, rather than having the dollars go out of state. He noted there are many qualified consultants in the state, and possibly in the community, who could perform the audit. Jerry Perkins stated the committee also registered concern about what would be accomplished by a management audit, questioning whether it would generate increased revenues or decreased expenses. He also questioned whether the City has a problem. He then encouraged the Commission to be sure that its decision is made for the right reasons. Mr. Perkins then addressed the management audit which was completed by the school district, noting that it addressed the manner in which the bus routes were established. He stated that the routes reviewed were in place when he purchased Karst Stage five years ago. He then indicated that his firm, or possibly a committee of local people, could probably have I reviewed the routes and accomplished the same result, noting that his company provided all of the information to those conducting the audit. Commissioner Stiff questioned whether the firm that conducts the financial audit could adequately conduct a management audit. He noted that he has a letter dated June 2, 1986, from the managing partner of Coopers and Lybrand concerning management audits, along with a copy of a management audit the company performed in 1979. He indicated his concern is that the 1979 audit was submitted as a recent engagement. The Commissioner then noted that Mr. Evans, Cresap, McCormick and Paget. addressed the National League of Cities Congress of Cities when 01-26-87 070 Commissioner Anderson, Commissioner Martel, and he attended in various years. He then indicated that he does not know of any other firms that perform management audit services for municipalities. Mr. Jerry Perkins noted that Mr. Evans has suggested that he could perform a management audit for $50,000, recommending changes which would result in a $500,000 savings to the City. He stated that he feels the City is currently operating pretty close to the bare bones and seems to be running efficiently. He further noted that the Commission hires a professional City I Manager, who is responsible for efficient operation of the City. He indicated that a consultant may write a good policy and procedure, but the Commission must accept that policy and the City Manager must enforce it, or the anticipated savings will not be realized. Commissioner Stiff suggested that an organization, such as the City of Bozeman, which has existed for 100 years should probably have its productivity examined. Mr. Perkins responded that whenever a new Commissioner is elected or a new City Manager is hired, the City goes through a review and new Ideas are introduced. He also noted that during the current economic situation, people have been doing soul searching to find ways to do things more efficiently and at a cost savings. He then questioned where the City will find the $50,000 to conduct the audit, especially if it does not realize the amount of savings projected. Mr. Perkins then encouraged the Commission to determine what it is trying to accompl ish through a management audit and what problem it is attacking. Commissioner Stiff noted that he and Commissioner Martel have encountered problems with management audits; and they recognize that the monies spent on it may not be prudently spent. He noted that Mr. Evans spent only a portion of one day here, but he feels there is an opportunity for increased productivity and efficiency in the system. Commissioner Jordan stated he is more uncomfortable with this concept since Mr. Evans was here. He noted that the pattern established in the management audits is a focus on cutting personnel. The Commissioner suggested that the Commission could direct the City Manager to review cost saving alternatives. He then suggested the City could also hire an intern for two quarters to do a cost/benefit analysis on each of the City services, which could be accomplished I at much less cost than the management audit. Commissioner Jordan stated if the Commission wants to spend $50,000, it would be better spent on purchasing items that would generate more efficiency, such as computer software. Commissioner Martel stated it is not a case of having serious problems that need to be solved, but rather a" matter of going through an examination process to determine if there are problems. Commissioner Jordan reminded the Commission that the General Fund budget is less than $4 million, with no real cost savings to be realized from the operations and maintenance portion. He then noted that the personnel costs are approximately $2.5 million; and he does not believe that $.5 million could be cut from those costs, while maintaining the current level of service. Commissioner Stiff noted that the City employees did not receive any wage increases last year, although they were already underpaid. He then noted that the State is currently advocating a two-year wage freeze for its employees; and if the City follows that trend, the employees will not receive any increases for three years. The Commissioner suggested that the City may find ways to increase productivity and efficiency while reducing expenses. He noted that the savings could possibly then be used to improve the wage scale for the employees. The Commissioner further stated he is not anti-management, and he does not want to create a rift between management and the policy makers; however, he does feel that a management audit could benefit everyone. He feels it would be better to do such an audit now, rather than waiting until it is mandated. Mayor Mathre noted that the Commission may not accept and put into place all of the recommendations for cost savings. She then reminded the Commissioners that Mr. Evans indicated I he does not usually perform management audits in this small of a community. She then reviewed the report which he had completed for North Platte, Nebraska, which is a community of 24,500. She indicated that she had called the Director of Finance in that community to see how well implementation of the recommendations had worked. She noted that the City has a budget of $16 million, with $8 million in the utility portion and $8 million in the general fund. She stated the number of employees in the utility portion was reduced by ten, resulting in $157,000 of the projected $200,000 in savings. She then noted that $357,000 of the projected $580,000 in savings 01-26-87 871 was recognized in the general fund portion; and the reduction in personnel resulted in a de- crease in services. She further indicated that the amount of anticipated long-range savings also has not been realized. The Mayor then stated she is skeptical that the City of Bozeman would realize the amount of savings which would be projected through a management audit. Mayor Mathre then compared the number of employees in North Platte and Bozeman, noting there are 55 employees, including 40 sworn officers, in their Police Department, versus 33 I employees, including 26 sworn officers, in our Police Department. In the Fire Department, North Platte has 28 firefighters plus 3 support personnel; while Bozeman has 24 firefighters plus civilian part-paid personnel. The Mayor then noted that a reduction in firefighters could result in closure of Fire Station No. 2 once again; however, the City would not realize any savings because the University currently pays the City for three firefighters to keep that station open. Mayor Mathre stated that North Platte does not have a City Manager, but is administered by an elected Mayor. She then suggested that the City staff submit suggestions for Commission review and possible implementation. Commissioner Stiff noted that Cresap, McCormick and Paget is probably not the only firm that does management audits, but that is the firm he is aware of. He then indicated an interest in knowing if any other firms do this type of work. Commissioner Jordan stated that he heard Mr. Evans speak at the National League of Cities Congress of Cities, but he did not feel it was necessary to pursue a management audit after that session. City Manager Wysocki suggested that if the Commission decides to proceed with a manage- ment audit, requests for proposals should be sought, as for any other professional service. He noted that the ranking of those proposals can be done in an manner similar to those for finan- cial audits, with a weighted scale. He stated that the scope of work to be performed must be established before proposals are solicited. The Commission directed the Clerk of the Commission to contact the National League of I Cities to obtain a list of firms that do management audits. The Mayor then requested that this item be placed on the agenda for further discussion after that information has been received. Discussion - draft agreement with the City of Belgrade re police dispatch services for Fiscal Year 1986-87 City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission a draft agreement between the City of Belgrade and the City of Bozeman providing for police dispatch services for Fiscal Year 1986-87, as prepared by the City Attorney. He noted this agreement enumerates the services which will be provided by the City of Bozeman's Police Department as well as the actions to be performed by the City of Belgrade's Police Department. The City Manager stated this agreement is on a trial basis for a period of one year, with the City of Belgrade to pay the City of Bozeman $100 per week for the police dispatch and computer services provided. He noted that the $100 per week should cover any additional costs incurred by the City of Bozeman; and the dispatching staff has not submitted any complaints about the workload. The City Manager then recommended that the Commission authorize the appropriate persons to execute the agreement after it has been finalized. It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Commission authorize and direct the appropriate persons to execute the agreement between the City of Bozeman and the City of Belgrade for police dispatch services for Fiscal Year 1986-87. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting I No, none. Discussion - draft ordinances re peeping toms and urinating in public City Manager Wysocki stated that City Attorney Becker has drafted two ordinances for Commission consideration, City Attorney Bruce Becker stated the first draft ordinance addresses the offense of window peeping. He noted at the present time, this offense is covered under disorderly conduct, which creates some problems with enforcement since the definition includes "... creating 01-26-87 072 a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act that serves no legitimate purpose." The Commissioners questioned why the draft ordinance is limited to private residences only, suggesting that it be expanded to include hotels and motels, as well as areas such as dressing rooms in stores. The City Attorney indicated he will incorporate those areas into an ordinance if the Commission is interested in proceeding with it. City Attorney Becker then reviewed the second draft ordinance, which addresses urinating in public. He noted there is no State Statute to address this issue; and any citations would I probably be written under disorderly conduct. The City Attorney then stated that this problem seems to arise behind the bars along Main Street; and the Police Division has suggested that an ordinance be adopted to address the matter. Commissioner Martel raised concern that large parties in residential areas may result in people spilling over into other yards, urinating in them; and this ordinance would not cover that situation. The City Attorney indicated that matter could be handled in another manner; however, he suggested that areas in buildings which are commonly open to the public could be included. The Commission concurred that they are interested in seeing both draft ordinances being brought back in final form for action. Appointment to City-County Planning Board City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commissioners that Mr. Don McLaughlin has submitted his letter of resignation. He then noted that six people have completed applications for appointment to the board. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that Nell E. Wetsch be appointed to replace Don J. McLaughlin on the City-County Planning Board, with a term to expire on June 30, 1988. The motion failed by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull and Commissioner Stiff; those voting No being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Mathre. It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commis- I sion appoint Thomas Hildner to replace Don J. McLaughlin on the City-County Planning Board, with a term to expire on June 30, 1988. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Stiff, Commis- sioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Discussion - FY I items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. (1) A letter of resignation from the Historic Preservation Advisory Commission, as submitted by Don J. McLaughlin. (2) A memo from Historic Preservation Officer Elkins, providing an update on the program and requesting Commission support for a bill which would revise specified sections of the State Statutes. (3) A letter from the Montana Winter Fair listing various items and inviting the Commissioners to participate in various events. (4) A letter from the Montana Winter Fair inviting Commissioners to participate in the garden tractor driving contest. (5) A memo from the Gallatin Development Corporation inviting the Commissioners to attend a luncheon meeting on Wednesday, January 28. The City Manager encouraged all interested Commissioners to attend the luncheon. (6) A copy of the Legislative Update for the week of January 12, 1987, as distributed I by the Chamber of Commerce. (7) A copy of the Legislative Bulletin dated January 22, 1987, as prepared by the Montana League of Cities and Towns. The City Manager reminded the Commission that Friday, January 30, is Local Government Day and encouraged the Commissioners to attend if possible. (8) A copy of the draft jnterlocal agreement between the City and the County for the City-County Health Board. 01-26-87 J73 (9) The agenda and packet for the Zoning Commission meeting, to be held on January 27, 1987. (10) Commissioner Vant Hull suggested that it might be appropriate for the Commission to write to all of the legislators, asking them to remember local governments in their deliberations. She noted one of the items that should be addressed is the proposed loss of the block grant for the motor vehicle reimbursement program. I Mayor Mathre requested that Commissioner Vant Hull draft a letter for review at next week's Commission meeting. Consent Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "Consent Items." Authorize use of annual leave - City Manager Wysocki - January 29 through February 6, 1987; confirm appointment of Director of Finance Gamradt as Actint City Manager Authorize use of annual leave - lerk of the Commission Sullivan - various dates between now and March 31, 1987; appoint Kathleen Norman as Acting Clerk of the Commission Claims It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Commission approve the Consent Items as listed above, and the appropriate persons be authorized and directed to complete the necessary actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commis- sioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. Executive session - litigation At 5:30 p.m., it was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Jordan, that an executive session of the Commission be called for the purpose of discussing the strategy for a litigation matter, and that all persons except the Commissioners, City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Becker, and the Clerk be requested to leave the room. The motion carried by I the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, None. At 5:55 p.m., it was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the executive session of the Commission be closed and that the open meeting be reconvened. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none, Adjournment - 5:55 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none. JUDITH A. MATHRE, Mayor ATTEST: I Clerk of the Commission 01-26-87