HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-12-22
U2/
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION
BOZEMAN, MONT ANA
December 22, 1986
************************
The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room,
Municipal Building, December 22, 1986, at 2:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Mathre, Comm issioner
I Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull (after 2:45 p.m.),
City Manager Wysocki, City Attorney Becker and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence.
Mi nutes
Commissioner Stiff requested that action on the minutes of the regular meeting of
December 15. 1986, be tabled for one week. Mayor Mathre requested that action on the minutes
of the regular Commission meeting of December 15, 1986, be placed on next week's agenda.
Presentation from DNRC re renovation of Hyalite Dam (Glen McDonald)
City Manager Wysocki stated that Mr. Glen McDonald had requested an opportunity to
submit an update to the Commission concerning renovation of the Hyalite Dam.
Mr. Glen McDonald, Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, reminded the
Commission that, as a result of his meeting with the Commission two years ago, they submitted
a letter expressing the City's intent to purchase additional water from expansion of the dam.
He noted that the letter contained two conditions to the intent, one being that if the costs
changed, he would come back before the Commission to discuss the matter, and the second being
that the DNRC would keep the City informed of all matters relating to the enlarged project.
Mr. McDonald noted that two years ago, the figures of $32.00 per acre foot and an over-
all cost of $4. 1 mi !lion were discussed. He then stated that the December 1986 costs have
changed quite substantially, with the overall cost now being estimated at $5 million. He
I requested that the City submit another letter expressing its continued intent in purchasing the
additional storage water so the DNRC can proceed with financing for the rehabilitation project.
Mr. McDonald gave the Commission a brief review of the meeting held two years ago,
along with a synopsis of the changes which have taken place since that time. He noted that
the Middle Creek Dam has an insufficient spi IIway capacity, which must be corrected. He noted
that HKM Associates has completed a study listing several alternatives for renovation; and the
DN RC has selected a preferred alternative to bring the dam into compliance with present day
standards. He noted that alternative would include raising the dam ten feet, using reinforced
earth in the center with conventional earthfill along the ends, with an emergency spi IIway to be
installed along the left abutment. He noted that raising of the dam will increase the water
surface by 8.2 feet, providing an additional 2340 acre feet of storage capacity.
Mr. McDonald distributed to the Commissioners a cost summary showing the estimates in
1984 and 1986, briefly reviewing the sheet. He then reviewed the proposed method for financing
the project, which will be through a BOR (Bureau of Reclamation) Small Projects Loan. He noted
that under this program, all qualifying agricultural water users will repay the principal only,
while those holding municipal and industrial use water will pay the interest on the entire loan.
He noted that the cost summary sheet has projected the interest rate for the loan at 10 3/4
percent, which is the current rate. He then noted the Department has proposed that the
approximately 10,000 acre feet of water which would be available after expansion of the dam be
divided with 7,000 acre feet to agricultural use and 3,000 to municipal use, with the shares
I being extrapolated on a linear basis from agricultural use to municipal use over a forty-year
period, so that the split becomes SO/50. He noted this process will increase the amount of
water available to the City while keeping the interest costs as low as possible.
In response to a question from Commissioner Martel, Mr. McDonald indicated that agri-
cultural use will be charged $5.00 per acre foot, while municipal use will be charged at $42.00
per acre foot.
Commissioner Jordan noted under the proposal, the City would gain just under 100 acre
feet of water the first year, and approximately 50 acre feet each year thereafter until the
stored water capacity is split SO/50; and Mr. McDonald indicated concurrence.
12-22-86
--- .--....-
028
Mr. McDonald stated that the cost estimates have changed during the past two years due
to inflation as well as additional comments submitted by the Forest Service. He noted that the
need to install a concrete emergency spillway rather than the proposed earthen spillway will
increase costs. Also, the road across the dam will be paved in the near future; therefore when
the dam is renovated, the road wi II need to be paved once again. He also noted that additional
camping sites and an additional boat ramp will be provided, as well as relocation of existing
sites, which will also raise the cost. Mr. McDonald then indicated that an application for a I
federal grant for recreation in the amount of $556,000 will be submitted in March 1987, for
relocation of the camping sites and boat ramps, since those facilities are for recreational use.
City Manager Wysocki noted that the City has been told that the dam must be repaired
because it is considered unsafe by more than one public entity. He then noted that the cost of
repair would be essentially the same as raising the dam.
Mr. McDonald concurred, noting that renovation would cost approximately $600,000 less
than the proposed raising of the dam.
(Commissioner Vant Hull arrived.)
Mr. Bob Clark, DNRC, stated that $3,477 ,900 would be the total amount borrowed for
this project, according to the cost summary, rather than the total amount of the project. He
noted that some of the costs have already been incurred by the State.
City Manager Wysocki noted that the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks had discussed
the possible requirement for a minimum pool of 1150 acre feet, which would effectively reduce
the City's net gain by half. He then asked if that requirement is a real possibility.
Mr. Glen McDonald stated that the requirement for a minimum pool would be dependent
upon someone purchasing the rights for that purpose. He then indicated that DN RC has not
agreed to a minimum pool; however, such provisions also allow for a negotiation process if the
snow pack is low.
The City Manager reminded the Commission that only once in the past eighteen years has
the reservoir dropped below 750 acre feet for the minimum pool; and Mr. McDonald noted that
was due to release of water to find a drowning victim, not natural causes. I
Commissioner Jordan asked how much time it will take to process the loan application for
this project.
Mr. Clark stated that the process usually takes about six months. He indicated that
construction on this project is currently scheduled to begin in the Spring of 1989, being
completed by Fall 1991.
The Commission requested copies of the engineering study prior to making a decision on
this item. Mr. Clark also indicated he would leave a copy of the Environmental Assessment for
Commission review.
City Manager Wysocki indicated he will place this item on the agenda as soon as possible
for additional discussion and possible action.
B rea k - 3: 02 to 3: 1 3 p. m .
Mayor Mathre declared a break from 3:02 p.m. to 3:13 p.m.. in accordance with Commission
policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983.
Preliminary Kunz - 25.8 acres
of the intersection of
Gooch
This was the time and place set to review the preliminary plat for Blue Grass Meadow
Subdivision, Phase I, requested by Larry Kunz for 25.8 acres located in the northwest one-quarter
of Section 20, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian. This site is more
commonly known as being located one-half mile southwest of the intersection of Gooch Hill Road I
and Stucky Road.
Assistant Planner Dave Skelton submitted to the Commission a petition of opposition
containing 57 signatures, representing 35 homes located in an area of one square mile from the
proposed subdivision. He noted there are currently 40 homes located in that area; and 39 of
those homes are currently occupied. He further stated the petition indicates that 2 people
declined to sign the petition; and 4 were unavailable. He also submitted to the Commission a
12-22-86
U29
letter of opposition from Lee and Martin Faulkner, 6651 Gooch Hill Road, who had also signed
the petition.
Assistant Planner Skelton then presented the Staff Report. He noted this is basically
the same application that was submitted in June 1986, which was denied by the City Commission
on August 25, 1986, based on the failure to show a need for the subdivision. The Assistant
Planner stated that the applicant has attempted to address that issue in this resubmittal.
I Assistant Planner Dave Skelton stated that the applicant has requested that the interior
road not be paved; and the Planning Staff recommends that favorable consideration be given to
that request. He then noted that two water courses are located within the subdivision, one
located in Phases II and III, and one located in Phase I. He noted that the water course
located in Phase I was so designated in 1959; however, following review of the site, represen-
tatives of the Soil Conservation Service, the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, and the
Planning Staff have determined that designation was incorrect. He stated that a third desig-
nated water course is actually a ditch which runs along the south boundary of this subdivision,
installed in 1980.
The Assistant Planner stated that the staff considered the eight criteria during review of
this application. He noted that the Master Plan has designated a minimum of 112 points for a
rural development node; and the staff has given this application 99 points. He then indicated
that the applicant has done an inventory of available residential lots, using five criteria to
review the twelve subdivisions which are similar to the subject application. He noted that 416
lots were identified, with 362 having been built on or being sold to someone. Of the 54 lots
remaining, 45 are not available, 4 of the remaining lots have been sold; and only 5 are actually
available for sale. The Assistant Planner stated that the staff has tried to determine the
validity of this inventory, but they feel it is fairly subjective.
Assistant Planner Skelton stated that the City-County Planning Board conducted a public
hearing on this application at its meeting on December 11, 1986 and concurred in the staff
recommendation for approval, subject to ten conditions. He then submitted a memo suggesting
I that the Commission add one more condition to protect the water rights of individuals who
utilize the irrigation ditch running through Phase I.
The Assistant Planner noted that the Board recognizes that this application is not in
compliance with the Master Plan because it does not meet the Agricultural-Vacant land use
designation; but it is in general compl iance with the subdivision regulations. He stated they
further recognize that the application is in general compliance with the zoning designation of
RS-2--Residential-Suburban Country Estates, 2-acre tracts, which takes precedence over the
land use designation.
Mr. Jack Schunke, Morrison-Maierle, Inc., indicated that he is representing Mr. Larry
Kunz, the developer. He stated that the developer has reviewed the staff report as well as the
conditions, and he agrees to meet all of those conditions. Mr. Schunke then reviewed some of
the conditions, as follows. He noted that his firm has dri lied eight or nine monitoring wells to
determine the water table; and they anticipate drilling another eight to ten wells to be assured
they are getting proper data. He indicated they also plan to install a covered drainage ditch
along the east side of the subdivision to divert drainage.
Mr. Schunke stated that this resubmittal is the same as the original application, noting
that development in three phases will minimize any impacts on the area. He also noted that
access to the subdivision is good; and entrance onto Gooch Hill Road provides good sight dis-
tance, with the nearest major intersection being over 1,000 feet away. He then indicated that
the subject site is used strictly for grazing cattle; and development as a subdivision would
provide a better use of the property.
I Mr. Schunke then stated concern about the scoring which the Planning Staff has placed
on this application. He noted that he has also scored the application, and it has scored 105
points. which is just under the 112-point minimum established in the Master Plan.
Mr. Robert Lee, working with Morrison-Maierle, Inc., reviewed the needs assessment for
the proposed subdivision, including the criteria upon which the inventory was conducted. He
noted that only bonafide subdivisions located within ten minutes or six miles of the city, based
on the intersection of North 7th Avenue and Main Street, were considered. He then stated there
were few two-acre lots available, so the criteria were expanded to include one- to three-acre
12-22-86
---.....--.--- .-
03U
lots. He also noted that only subdivisions created since 1973 were used, because most of the
older subdivisions have been filled. Also, those created since 1973 are under the same zoning
and subdivision regulations as this appl ication. Mr. Lee stated that only those subdivisions
with similar settings and physical characteristics were considered in the inventory. He then
indicated that the inventory revealed that there is a need for two-acre tracts close to the city.
Mr. Schunke stated that the developer is willing to enter into an agreement with a con-
I tract sprayer to control the weeds in this subdivision until the lots have been sold. He then
I
addressed the concerns about the water table on the proposed site, noting that the drainage
ditch along the southern boundary provides a barrier for the subject parcel. He indicated that
Mr. White had installed that ditch because irrigation of his property had flooded Aspen Basin
Subdivision, which resulted in a lawsuit.
Commissioner Vant Hull asked how much slope there is from north to south on the property.
Mr. Schunke indicated there is about a 1 percent grade across the property, which would be
about 25 feet in the one-half mile length.
Commissioner Jordan asked if the 112 points listed in the Master Plan is a minimum, not-
ing the purpose of that minimum was to establish growth nodes which would not stop growth of
the community. The Assistant Planner stated that the intent of the system was to allow the
type of development that could be annexed in the future. He also noted that the City-County
Planning Board had indicated the same concern. He then cautioned the Commission that a major
portion of the recommendation for approval was based on the conclusion that the zoning designa-
tion takes precedence over the land use designation, as well as the point system.
Commissioner Jordan noted that the lots within this subdivision would not increase the
number of two-acre lots available for sale, because the developer had indicated his intent to
build on those lots prior to sale. The Commissioner then asked the City Attorney if the zoning
designation does take precedence over the land use designation and the point system; and the
City Attorney indicated he would review that question.
Commissioner Vant Hull asked if the extension of Joe's Way through Aspen Basin Sub-
division would create any problems. I
The Assistant Planner stated that Joe's Way is a dedicated public right-of-way. The
City Manager suggested that the Commission may wish to change the language in Condition No.
9 from "the north boundary of the subdivision" to "Comfort Lane" to assure that there is no
break in the secondary access roadway.
Commissioner Vant Hull asked why a portion of the parkland requirement is being dedi-
cated, while the remainder will be a cash-in-lieu payment, rather than dedication of the entire
amount required.
Mr. Bob Lee noted that the proposed parkland site is along the western boundary of the
subdivision, where it could possibly be expanded in the future. He further noted that the
parkland must be dedicated with each phase; and Phase I is located along the eastern portion of
the property.
Mrs. Molly Dreiseszen, 2950 Texas Way, stated she has four points of concern, those
being roads, water, need and effects on the natural environment. She noted that Joe's Way is
a private road maintained by the homeowners' association in Aspen Basin Subdivision; and use
of that road as a secondary access for the proposed project could create an additional financial
burden on them. She then expressed concern that the proposed subdivision, which would include
relocation of the irrigation ditch, might affect their water rights. She also questioned whether
the addition of 34 septic systems would have any effect on the existing wells. Mrs. Dreiseszen
stated she feels that need for the subdivision has not been established, particularly since the
project does not meet the minimum of 112 points. She also indicated that she feels the project
would have a definite effect on the wildlife currently free to use that land. I
Mrs. Dreiseszen then stated that Mrs. Peg McKnight, 6424 Gooch Hill Road, was unable
to attend this meeting; however, she wished to have the Commission consider five points. Those
points include the fact that two-acre tracts are an awkward size, especially when the covenants
do not allow animals; the subdivision is not compatible with existing development in the area,
which is mostly ten-acre tracts; the water level, particularly with the number of septic tanks in
the area. She stated that Mrs. McKnight also noted that the land could still be sprinkle
12-22-86
.
1.131
irrigated rather than flood irrigated. The final point is that the City should observe the
Master Plan land use designation and the rural area. .
Ms. Anita Anderson, 6742 Gooch Hill Road, stated she lives across the road from the
proposed subdivision; and all of those lots are a minimum of ten acres in size. She indicated
that when she moved to that location in 1981, she was assured that the minimum lot size would
be five acres, with most of the lots being at least ten acres. Ms. Anderson then stated that
I the ditch which Ray White installed is an eyesore; and she does not wish to see any more
ditches installed in that manner, particularly along the eastern edge of the property.
Ms. Anderson noted that the traffic on Gooch Hill Road is heavy; and its intersection
with Huffine Lane is becoming increasingly dangerous.
Mr. Jack Schunke stated that the ditch along the eastern boundary of the property will
be covered. He further noted that there is a seven-foot-high embankment along the ditch to
the south; and that will be leveled off, probably during construction of the roadways.
Commissioner Vant Hull noted that Ray White is the owner of record for the subject tract
of land.
Mr. Bob Lee stated that Larry Kunz is actually the owner of the property, purchasing it
on a Contract for Deed from Mr. White.
Mrs. Lee Faulkner, 6651 Gooch Hill Road, reviewed the letter which had been submitted
to the Commission by the Assistant Planner at the beginning of this agenda item. She noted
that the petition of opposition was signed by approximately 85 percent of the residents within
one square mi Ie. She also reminded the Commission that Aspen Basin Subdivision currently has
fourteen homes, with a maximum of nineteen homes possible; and the proposed subdivision is
substantially larger than that. She then noted her letter lists four points of concern: (1 )
needs assessment; (2) land use evaluation points; (3) zoning issues; and (4) water table issues.
She noted that 45 homes have been built on two-acre lots in the last thirteen years, yet this
developer proposes to build five to six homes per year. She also stated that homes constructed
outside the city limits have a negative impact on the City and its services, including police,
I streets, libraries and recreation facilities. Mrs. Faulkner then stated she would like to see the
Master Plan fol lowed. She noted the proposed development is not desired by the majority of the
residents in the area; and it is not compatible with development in the area.
Mrs. Faulkner noted that the high water table is a part of the environment in that area;
and it is a positive aspect to some, while a negative impact on those trying to develop the area.
She then requested that the Commission not approve the requested subdivision.
Commissioner Jordan asked if anyone protested the Zone Map Change for the subject property.
Mrs. Faulkner stated that at least as many as have protested this subdivision also pro-
tested the zone change.
Mayor Mathre requested that the decision on this item be placed on next week's agenda.
Break - 5:08 to 5:15 p.m.
Mayor Mathre declared a break from 5:08 p.m. to 5:15 p.m., in accordance with Commission
policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983.
Applications for renewal of Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for Calendar Year 1987 _ various
establishments
This was the time set for renewal of the Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for the Calendar
Year 1987. A total of 46 applications have been received, along with the required fees. City
Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following list of establishments which have
made application and paid the required fee:
I APPLICATIONS FOR BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSES
CALENDAR YEAR 1987
APPLI CANT BEER WINE LIQUOR TOTAL
-
Albertsons, Inc. (dba Albertson's
Food Center #237) $200.00 $200.00 $ $ 400.00
American Legion Club 500.00 500.00
Baldy Mountain Ski Supply 200.00 200.00 400.00
12-22-86
032
Bozenlan Restaurant and Lounge, Inc.
(dba Holiday Inn) 500.00 500.00
Bridger View Conoco 200.00 200.00
Cat's Paw 500.00 500.00
Cowboy Cafe 200.00 200.00 400.00
Empire, Inc. (dba Black Angus) 500.00 500.00 I
Fraternal Order of Eagles
Aerie No. 326 500.00 500.00
Giovanni's, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
Haufbrau 500.00 500.00
Heeb's Food Center 200.00 200.00 400.00
Hilltop Chevron 200.00 200.00
Hinky-Dinky 200.00 200.00 400.00
I nterstate Chevron 200.00 200.00
J W's Hide-A-Way Lounge 500.00 500.00
Joe's Parkway 200.00 200.00 400.00
K Mart No. 7027 200.00 200.00 400.00
King Gallatin Corporation (dba
Rocky Mountain Pasta Co., Bacchus
Pub, and The Robin Lounge 500.00 500.00
Kwik Way #31 200.00 200.00 400.00
Kwik Way #32 200.00 200.00 400.00
Kwik Way #33 200.00 200.00 400.00
Livery Stable, Inc. 500.00 500.00 I
Me and Jan's Mini Mart 200.00 200.00 400.00
Me and Jan's II 200.00 200.00 400.00
Molly Brown 500.00 500.00
Montana Pizza (dba Godfather's
Pi z za ) 200.00 200.00 400.00
Osco Drug, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
Price Rite Drug Center 200.00 200.00 400.00
Restaurant Management Company
(dba Pizza Hut of Bozeman) 200.00 200.00 400.00
Safeway Stores, Inc. (dba
Safeway Store #289) 200.00 200.00 400.00
Scoop Bar 500.00 500.00
Skaggs Alpha Beta, Inc.; (dba
Buttrey Food Drug #3834) 200.00 200.00 400.00
Stromboli's, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
Tee Pee Gas 200.00 200.00 400.00
The Bowl 500.00 500.00 I
The Cannery Lounge 500.00 500.00
The Crystal Bar, Inc. 500.00 500.00
The Filling Station, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
The Sundance 500.00 500.00
The Topper Restaurant & Lounge 500.00 500.00
12-22-86
-
U33
Town and Country Warehouse Grocers 200.00 200.00 400.00
Town Pump, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
Van's IGA 200.00 200.00 400.00
Village I nn Pizza Parlor 200.00 200.00 400.00
Williams' Pump & Pak, Inc. 200.00 200.00 400.00
I Total - 46 applications $19,400.00
The City Manager recommended that the Commission approve the applications for renewal
of Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses as listed.
It was moved by Commissioner Jordan, seconded by Commissioner Stiff, that the Commission
approve the renewal of Beer, Wine and Liquor Licenses for Calendar Year 1987 for the various
establishments as listed above. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those
voting Aye being Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner
Vant Hull and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none.
Blocks 46 and 49 of the Northern Pacific
y treet between c dow
City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1227, as prepared by the City Attorney,
entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 1227
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN,
MONTANA, VACATING AND ABANDONING A PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOCATED
IN BLOCKS 46 AND 49 OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC ADDITION TO THE CITY OF
BOZEMAN, MONTANA.
The City Manager reminded the Commission this Ordinance was provisionally adopted on
December 8, 1986. He then recommended that the Commission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1227
I at this time.
It was moved by Commissioner Stiff, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commission
finally adopt Ordinance No. 1227, vacating the alley located in Blocks 46 and 49 of the Northern
Pacific Addition. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being
Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Jordan and Mayor Mathre; those voting
No being Commissioner Vant Hull.
Discussion - review of letter drafted by Mayor Mathre to legislators re 1-105
City Manager Wysocki submitted to the Commission the letter to legislators expressing
concern about the impacts of Initiative 105, as drafted by Mayor Mathre.
The Mayor indicated that she has also sent a copy of this draft letter to Alec Hansen,
League of Cities and Towns, for his review. She then suggested that if the Commissioners agree,
she will revise the letter as needed and send it to the local legislators as soon as possible.
Commissioner Jordan noted that the City must also address this issue through the League,
monitoring all proposals to be sure they are equitable.
The Commission concurred that Mayor Mathre should revise the letter and send it to all
local legislators as soon as possible.
Discussion - enforcement of Ordinance No. 1171 (sidewalk snow removal ordinance
City Manager Wysocki submitted to the Commission a memo, along with a map, proposing
a revised method of enforcement for the sidewalk snow removal ordinance. He noted that under
I this system, the community would be divided into basically three sections, with specified
City-maintained properties serving as reference points on how clean the sidewalks must be. He
noted those segments would include (1) north of Main Street, using Centennial Park, at the
intersection of North Tracy Avenue and East Cottonwood Street, as a reference; (2) Main Street
to College Street, using Cooper Park, at the intersection of South 8th Avenue and West Story
Street, as a reference; and (3) south of College Street, using Kagy Boulevard, from South
12-22-86
-
03 Ie
Willson Avenue to Sourdough Road, as a reference. He then indicated that the downtown
businesses would use the sidewalks around City Hall as a reference point.
The City Manager stated that this proposed method of enforcement does not meet the
ordinance requirements and asked the Commission to indicate its concurrence if it wishes to see
this method implemented. He noted that this proposal recognizes that when mechanical equipment
is used, the sidewalks may not be as clean as they are when shoveled.
Commissioner Martel requested that the staff submit a report on this method of enforce- I
ment in about two months; and the City Manager indicated he would do so.
It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the
Commission authorize and direct the staff to follow the proposed method for enforcement of the
sidewalk snow removal ordinance, using specified City-maintained properties as reference points,
as submitted in the City Manager's proposal. The motion carried by the following Aye and No
vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan,
Commissioner Stiff and Mayor Mathre; those voting No, none.
Discussion - code of ethics for public officials
City Manager Wysocki suggested that the Commission defer this item for a period of one
week, due to the length of this meeting; and the Commission concurred.
Discussion - FYI Items
City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information"
items.
(1) The agenda and packet for the Zoning Commission meeting to be held on Tuesday,
December 23, 1986.
(2) A copy of an article from the December 15, , 986, issue of the High Country
Independent Press regarding the rural libraries' desire for more County funding, as submitted
by Commissioner Vant Hull.
Commissioner Vant Hull suggested that, while Bozeman's Library Board may wish to work I
with the other libraries in an attempt to Increase funding from the County, perhaps the City
Commission should also work with other Councils to obtain better funding from the County for
common problems.
(3) Commissioner Jordan suggested that if the Commission wishes to discuss some of his
observations from interning at the City of Great Falls, they should do so in the near future.
The Commission indicated its interest and requested that this item be placed on the
agenda as soon as possible.
(4 ) Commissioner Jordan noted it is time for the City Manager's six-month review; and
the Commission should discuss the format for that review.
The Commission concurred that the process should begin as soon as possible.
(5) Commissioner Martel stated he has not yet completed his report on the Congress of
Cities held in San Antonio; and he will submit it when completed.
Adjournment - 5:45 p.m.
There being no further business to come before the Commission that this time, it was
moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Jordan, that the meeting be adjourned.
The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner
Vant Hull, Commissioner Jordan, Commissioner Stiff, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Mathre; those
voting No, none.
JUDITH A. MATHRE, Mayor - I
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Commission
12-22-86