Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-06-06 234 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA June 6, 1988 ************************ The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, June 6, 1988, at 2:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Stiff, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, City Manager Wysocki, I City Attorney Becker and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. Mayor Stiff asked if any of the Commissioners wished any of the Consent Items removed for discussion. Commissioner Martel requested that the request for permission to conduct the Sweet Pea Bicycle Race and Change Order No. 2 for SID No. 652 be removed for discussion. Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the min- utes of the regular meeting of May 23, 1988 be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the min- utes of the regular meeting of May 31, 1988 be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Ordinance No. 1258 - amending Section 18.66.010 of the Bozeman Municipal Code to allow for an increase in the number of members on the Board of Adjustment City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1258, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1258 I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING SECTION 18.66.010 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE ALLOWING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS ON THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. The City Manager reminded the Commission that this Ordinance, as revised to specify six members, was provisionally adopted on May 23, 1988. He then recommended that it be finally adopted at this time. Commissioner Martel noted that the Preamble refers to the State statute; however, it also refers to expanding the membership to six rather than the current five members. He noted that the State statutes provides for five to seven members, with the final determination to be made by the local governing body. He then indicated that he feels the reference in the Preamble should be changed to more accurately reflect the statutory regulations. City Attorney Becker stated he feels the wording of the Preamble is adequate, noting that it falls within the statutory regulations. Commissioner Martel indicated he cannot support final adoption of the Ordinance with the current wording of the Preamble. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the Commission finally adopt Ordinance No. 1258, increasing the number of members on the Board of Adjustment to six. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye be- ing Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No being Commissioner Martel. I Commission Resolution No. 2697 - revising cemetery burial requirements City Manager Wysocki presented Commission Resolution No. 2697 as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2697 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, REVISING CEMETERY BURIAL REQUIREMENTS. 06-06-88 235 The City Manager reminded the Commission that they had approved the Cemetery Advis- ory Board's recommendation that vaults be required, and that a payment-in-lieu be established for those not wishing to purchase a vault. He noted the City Attorney has prepared the nec- essary resolution to implement this requirement and set the payment-in-lieu fee at $200.00. He indicated the fee is established to cover the additional maintenance costs incurred when a vault is not used. The City Manager then recommended that the Commission adopt this resolution. I It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Com- mission adopt Commission Resolution No. 2697, revising cemetery burial requirements to include a vault or payment-in-lieu. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. No. 1260 - amendin Chapter 15.08 of the Bozeman Municipal Code to adopt the Uni- ing Code, 1985 Edition, with State of Montana amendments City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1260, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1260 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08 OF THE BOZEMAN MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE BY ADOPT- ING THE MONTANA AMENDMENTS TO SAID CODE AS PROMULGATED BY THE UNI- FORM PLUMBING CODE BY ADOPTING THE MONTANA AMENDMENTS TO SAID CODE AS PROMULGATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND SET FORTH IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF MONTANA AT 98.70.301 ET SEQ. ADMIN- ISTRATIVE RULES OF MONTANA. The City Manager noted that this Ordinance adopts the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1985 Edi- tion, with the State of Montana amendments. He then recommended that the Commission pro- visionally adopt this ordinance and that it be brought back in two weeks for final adoption. City Attorney Becker stated that the Commission has previously adopted the Uniform I Plumbing Code, 1985 Edition, however, it was done without the State of Montana amendments. He then indicated that this Ordinance incorporates the State amendments as well. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Com- mission provisionally adopt Ordinance No. 1260, amending Chapter 15.08 of the Bozeman Munici- pal Code by adopting the the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1985 Edition, with amendments as adopted by the State of Montana Department of Commerce, and that it be brought back in two weeks for final adoption. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Continued discussion - Sidewalk Program 1988 City Manager Wysocki noted that the sidewalk program was discussed at the May 23 meet- ing, with prospects of moving forward with this year's program. He reminded the Commission that the August 25, 1987 memo from the City Engineer indicates the current policy is to require the installation of sidewalks along both sides of the street, therefore, he further recommends that sidewalks be required along the streets surrounding Woodbrook. He noted that on August 4, 1986, the Commission ordered that the sidewalk along the west side of South 17th Avenue, in the Cedar Winds development, be installed by 1989. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the City received a petition from the Cedar Winds Homeowners' Association requesting that the sidewalk along South 17th Avenue not be required, since it is located within the planned unit development. He further reminded the I Commission that Woodbrook has been developed as a planned unit development. City Manager Wysocki indicated that the staff has begun to prepare the resolution of in- tent to establish the sidewalk district; however, all parcels to be involved must be separately identified in that document. He then asked the Commission if they wish to include the Cedar Winds and Woodbrook developments within the sidewalk district currently being developed. He reminded them of the current policy to require sidewalks along both sides of the street and asked if that policy remains in effect. 06-06-88 236 The City Manager then stated he does not feel that any decision should eliminate the pos- sibility of having public sidewalks along any street unless physically unable to do so. He then noted that with planned unit developments, internal movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic is addressed; however, movement of pedestrian traffic past the development is not. He also noted that in such developments, landscaping is an important factor. He stated the staff should probably review those plans more carefully to ensure that the landscaping within the public right-of-way could easily accommodate a sidewalk. I City Manager Wysocki then asked if the Commission wishes to consider the requirement of sidewalks on only one side of the street, possibly with properties on both sides of the street sharing in those costs of installation. He suggested that the Commission establish a policy that is flexible enough to accommodate philosophical changes without change in the policy. Commissioner Hawks noted there are some heavi Iy landscaped areas within the right-of- way, where sidewalks are typically located. He noted, however, that pedestrian safety is an im- portant issue and must be addressed. He indicated that although planned unit developments can accommodate their own problems, movement of pedestrian traffic from or by those developments is not addressed. He indicated that responsibility to the entire community dictates that some type of safe movement past the development must be provided. The Commissioner then stated he feels that flexibility must enter into the picture, possibly allowing the sidewalk to be located along the back of the curb or allowing sidewalks on only one side of the street. Commissioner Vant Hull asked if anyone has contacted the City of Billings to see how they have handled their proposal to install sidewalks along only one side of the street; and the City Manager indicated that to his knowledge no one has. The Commissioner then asked who would bear the costs of moving utilities from the right-of-way, and whether residents on both sides of the street could be asked to share the costs of installing sidewalks on one side of the street. Commissioner Vant Hull further stated she feels the safety of passersby must be consid- ered; however, protection of the existing landscaping must also be considered. She then sug- gested that flexibility in the location of sidewalks would help to address this concern. The Commissioner then asked if the Commission has any legal responsibilities when considering plan- I ned unit developments, noting that one portion of the State statutes provides that the Com- mission may require sidewalks where they deem necessary for the public safety. City Attorney Becker reminded the Commission that a planned unit development is a land use process only and does not affect the provision for ordering in sidewalks. Commissioner Martel noted that during the discussion two weeks ago, the Commissioners indicated their interest in considering a more flexible sidewalk policy, which would probably accommodate some of the problems and concerns currently under consideration. He then indicat- ed support for the proposal that sidewalks may vary in width, depending on traffic loads and the residential area. He also noted that flexibility in the location of the sidewalk could help to address the concern about the existing location of utilities. City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that the question under consideration is whether Cedar Winds and Woodbrook should be included in the resolution of intent. He a I so asked if the Commission wishes to reaffirm its existing policy or if it is to be different in some areas. Commissioner Martel noted that Woodbrook was developed in various phases over several years. He then noted that the planned unit development addresses the area within the property lines only. Commissioner Goehrung asked who would be responsible for paying the costs of installing sidewalks along parkland, such as Langohr Park; and the City Manager indicated that the City would be responsible for those costs. The Commissioner then addressed the issue of sidewalks along the west side of North 17th Avenue. He noted that the density of development may dictate I the need for sidewalks along the west side of the street for pedestrian safety. Commissioner Vant Hull stated that the property owners within Cedar Winds do not feel a second sidewalk along North 17th Avenue is necessary; and she concurs. 5 he noted that the street enters the planned unit development; but it does not pass through the development. She stated that those in the development will make sure that any sidewalks needed for pedestrian safety will be installed. Mayor Stiff stated he feels it is important to place sidewalks along both Cedar Winds and Woodbrook to keep the current policy in force. He noted it would be easy to feel that Wood- 06-06-88 237 brook shou Id be exempt from the pol icy because of its beauty; however, he does not feel that can be done. He then noted that Christie Park is located within the proposed district. He in- dicated that is presently school district property; however, they are considering sa Ie of that parcel. The Mayor then cautioned the Commissioners that they are establishing a precedent in considering the request to remove the two planned unit developments from the sidewalk program. He noted it is important to establish a precedent that can be easily followed when moving into I other residential areas of the community. Commissioner Hawks indicated it is difficult to answer the question before the Commission without first establishing a policy. He then suggested that item be addressed first, then the two subject developments could be addressed in a manner consistent with that policy. Mayor Stiff reminded the Commission that a precedent exists in Woodbrook, since the in- stallation of sidewalks was required in Phase IV. Commissioner Vant Hull noted that the sidewalks installed in Phase IV of the Woodbrook development establish a precedent, since flexibility was allowed in the design. She reminded the Commission that the discussion about sidewalks two weeks ago included flexibility and sensitivity to the problems involved. She further reminded the Commission that at last week's meeting, the provision for curvilinear sidewalks was made. Commissioner Hawks stated he feels the policy should be established. including guidel ines within which property owners may install sidewalks which will be acceptable to the City. He noted in some areas that may include aI/owing sidewalks next to the curb. Commissioner Vant Hull stated that in some residential areas, sidewalks have been instal- led next to the curb. She noted that those with small children have expressed concern about not having a boulevard to buffer the children from the vehicular traffic. The Commissioner in- dicated that along snow routes, possibly a wider sidewalk should be required if it is to be locat- ed at the back of the curb. She then indicated support for installing sidewalks on one side of the street only if research deems it legally and financially feasible. Mayor Stiff asked that the Commissioners limit their comments to the question of whether I sidewalks should be required at Cedar Winds and Woodbrook, keeping that issue separate from proposed pol icy changes. Commissioner Vant Hull stated that she feels Cedar Winds should be exempt from the re- quirement at this time since South 17th Avenue only leads into the planned unit development and there is no development along the west side of South 17th Avenue. S he then stated that she feels that sidewalks along one side of the street in the vicinity of Woodbrook would be adequate. Commissioner Hawks indicated he is not comfortable with allowing any exceptions until a specific policy has been implemented. Commissioner Martel stated he also feels a revised policy is necessary so that all requests are treated uniformly. The Commissioner then noted that the Commission does not have adequate time to develop a revised policy and then begin the sidewalk program for this year. He remind- ed the Commission that the suggestion has been made to proceed with this year's program whi Ie revising the policy at the same time. He indicated that he feels Cedar Winds and Woodbrook need to be treated differently, with more flexibility and sensitivity. Commissioner Goehrung indicated that a consistent overall policy is important. He a I so noted that the policy cannot become so flexible that no sidewalks are required or that the City does not have the ability to enforce its policy. He also noted that a high level of flexibility and innovation will increase costs; and he feels the individual responsible for those costs shou Id pay for them. Mayor Stiff noted that the Commission cannot resolve this issue on aesthetics only but must consider the safety of those within the neighborhood and the entire community as well. I Break - 3:03 to 3:10 p.m. Mayor Stiff declared a break from 3:03 p.m. to 3:10 p.m., in accordance with Commission policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983. Continued discussion (continued) - Sidewalk Program 1988 Mayor Stiff noted that representatives from both Cedar Winds and Woodbrook are present. He then asked for a spokesman to speak for each group, noting that additional comments will then be received from anyone else wishing to speak. 06-06-88 238 Mr. Dean Halse, Chairman of the Board for the Cedar Winds Homeowners' Association, noted that the petition submitted to the Commission requesting that sidewalks not be required along the west side of South 17th Avenue has the support of the entire association, although not all of the signatures were on the petition. He noted the association has 35 units, with 17 more to be added shortly. He indicated that the next phase is now under construction; and that phase is located along the west side of South 17th Avenue. Mr. Halse noted that, although South 17th Avenue is a public street, it is not a through street. He noted that there is a I sidewalk along the east side of South 17th Avenue, and it continues through the project to West Koch Street. Mr. Halse stated that the association does support the installation of sidewalks along West Koch Street and West Olive Street; however, they do not feel the sidewalk along the west side of South 17th Avenue is necessary. Mr. Greg Morgan, attorney representing Woodbrook, stated that the Woodbrook Home- owners' Association has a meeting scheduled for June 14. He indicated he has been gathering information concerning the sidewalk program for the 71 homeowners to consider at that meeting. He encouraged the Commission to establish a sidewalk policy so that anyone developing property can review it and know what is required. Mr. Morgan indicated a pol icy did not exist when most of Woodbrook was developed, not- ing that three-fourths was developed without sidewalks when one-fourth was required to put in sidewalks. He then stated that property owners within the development purchased their units relying upon the fact that it was a planned unit development that was developed under special guidelines. He noted that reviews and criteria are much more stringent for such developments, including regulations on location of streets, landscaping, height of bui Idings and density. He indicated that planned unit developments carry special connotations, noting that no change in the development or area is anticipated once the development is complete. Mr. Morgan also reminded the Commission that a majority of the residents in Woodbrook are on fixed incomes; and this is an additional expense. He also noted that installation is not the big expense; but the annual costs for snow removal must also be considered. He then asked the Commission to exercise sensitivity and to recognize that when a planned unit development is I involved, people have some right to presume that no changes will be required. Mr. Greg Morgan noted that the issue of safety has been raised. He then asked if there a re criteria for safety and whether warrants are to be considered. He stated that he served on the Pedestrian/Traffic Safety Committee when it was first formed, serving as Chairman for a time. He noted that the City had not adopted warrants at that time because of the liability and risk involved. Mr. Morgan then reminded the Commission that Westridge Subdivision is located only two blocks from Woodbrook, and it has no sidewalks. He noted the residents in that subdivision walk in the streets; and they do not feel that they incur any problems by doing so. Mr. Morgan stated he feels that Woodbrook should be treated differently because it is a planned unit development. Commissioner Hawks reminded Mr. Morgan that a planned unit development is constructed with specified physical boundaries, bordered by public property. He concurred that a PUD is unique within its boundaries; however, the public property remains avai lable for public im- provements. Mr. Morgan indicated that the public easement does exist; however, not many people are aware of it when they purchase a unit. Commissioner Vant Hull asked if the 71 homeowners include those with sidewalks; Mr. Morgan indicated it does. The Commissioner then asked if the homeowners would be willing to contribute to the costs of a sidewalk across the street. Mr. Morgan indicated that is a new concept which arose today, therefore, he is not prepared to respond. I Commissioner Martel stated that the City has had a pol icy requiring the installation of sidewalks in residential developments for many years; however, there was a period when that policy was not enforced. He noted the lapse in enforcement has resulted in the City requiring the installation of sidewalks in fully developed residential areas at this time. Mr. Morgan repeated that a planned unit development has a different connotation. He then noted that he also resides within the proposed sidewalk district, and he had not intended to install sidewalks; however, he will do so when the City establishes the district. 06-06-88 239 Commissioner Martel indicated that he does recognize planned unit developments as being somewhat different. He then noted that Westridge Subdivision was not developed as a PUD; however, it is somewhat similar. He stated that he feels the policy should address all types of development. Mr. Ken LeClair asked if clarification is needed on the Cedar Winds request. He noted that South 17th Street is a public street; however, it is a cul-de-sac surrounded by the same I planned unit development. He noted that to have installed a private street could have avoided this issue. Commissioner Hawks noted that perhaps the City should develop criteria for safety in its sidewalk policy. Commissioner Vant Hull stated she feels that sidewalks are needed through developed areas to provide a safe area for pedestrians. She noted that people do not like to walk in the street, competing with vehicular traffic. Commissioner Martel noted that the premise for sidewalks and streets is to separate ped- estrian and vehicular traffic. He then noted the City does have vehicular counts but not ped- estrian counts and asked what a safety problem is. City Manager Wysocki stated that circumstances change. He then noted the City must react to those changes to maintain the public health, safety and welfare; and that may include the requirement for installation of sidewalks. Mayor Stiff stated he feels it is important to address the traffic facilities in the com- munity, installing sidewalks to address safety concerns. He noted that the Commission has been asked to be more sensitive and flexible; however, he has not heard anyone say they want pedes- trians to be more vulnerable in their area than any other part of the community. Commissioner Vant Hull stated that human and vehicular traffic travel on a route that is safe. She noted that warrants based on numbers may not be accurate in a given area because of that tendency. City Manager Wysocki asked if the Commission would prefer to develop a revised policy I prior to addressing the original question submitted. Mayor Stiff expressed concern that to table any additional sidewalk programs until a re- vised policy is developed could result in a two or three year pause in the program. He in- dicated that he feels the proposed district could be moved forward this year while developing a revised pol icy. Commissioner Hawks indicated he would prefer to have a revised policy completed prior to continuing with the program. He stated he would anticipate the policy could be adopted and the district created yet this year, with individuals beginning the installation of sidewalks next spring. Commissioner Vant Hull noted the Commission has indicated unanimous concern for sensi- tivity and flexibility. She stated that does not mean no sidewalks; however, meandering side- walks or sidewalks on one side of the street might be acceptable. She noted that since the Commission has already indicated that flexibility and sensitivity are to be utilized, she does not feel the revised policy is necessary before moving forward with this sidewalk district. The Commissioner noted that several of the goals for this fiscal year pertain to pedestrian safety and a pedestrian-friendly community; and moving forward with the sidewalk program addresses that goal. Commissioner Martel stated he does not feel that development of the revised policy would delay the sidewalk program. Commissioner Goehrung stated the residents of Woodbrook need a clear indication of the City's intention prior to their June 14 meeting. He then indicated he feels the sidewalk program I can be continued without having the revised policy adopted. I t was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the staff be instructed to prepare a revised draft sidewalk policy for Commission consideration, and that the sidewalk program be put into abeyance until after the new policy has been adopted. The motion failed by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel and Com- missioner Hawks; those voting No being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff. The Commission then addressed the question of whether Cedar Winds and Woodbrook should be included in the 1988 sidewalk program. 06-06-88 240 Commissioner Hawks suggested that if the sidewalk program is to proceed at this time, those areas wishing to exercise flexibility be given an extended period of time to put their sidewalks in place. Commissioner Vant Hull stated that she feels a consulting engineer could help to carry out the Commission's desire to exercise flexibility and sensitivity. Commissioner Martel noted that to eliminate the two planned unit developments from the proposed district would dramatically reduce its size. He then noted that the Commission has ad- I dressed flexibility and sensitivity, and he feels the policy should be flexible enough to allow for areas not wanting to install sidewalks. He stated Woodbrook has stated its opposition to in- stalling sidewalks; and he feels they should not have to do so. Commissioner Goehrung stated he feels the City needs to continue with the sidewalk pro- gram as advertised, with flexibility to work with homeowners and homeowners' associations. He indicated that he feels the Cedar Winds and Woodbrook developments should remain in the pro- gram, as initially proposed. Mayor Stiff stated that to continue with the program will show that the Commission is serious about continuing the sidewalk program. Commissioner Hawks asked if including the two developments at this time will limit the ability to remove them later in the process if deemed appropriate. Commissioner Goehrung stated he does not feel it would. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the Com- mission authorize and direct the staff to proceed with preparing the necessary documents for the Sidewalk Program 1988, including the Woodbrook and Cedar Winds planned unit developments, and further direct the staff to prepare a revised sidewalk pol icy, addressing those concerns expressed, for Commission consideration. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. B rea k - 4: 11 to 4: 16 p. m. I Mayor Stiff declared a break from 4:11 p.m. to 4:16 p.m., in accordance with Commission policy established at their regular meeting of March 14, 1983. Discussion - maintenance contract for all State Highway streets City Manager Wysocki noted that a copy of the minutes of a meeting between Highway Department personnel and City personnel held on May 25 was included in the Commissioners' packets. He briefly reviewed three alternatives listed, including an annual maintenance agree- ment, a seasonal maintenance agreement, and a one-year trial period for winter maintenance. He noted that a list of additional items that would be needed to service a seasonal maintenance agreement, with estimated costs, is included at the end of the minutes. The City Manager then suggested that the Commission may wish to consider the one-year trial period to determine the costs involved. He noted that under that proposal, the amount of salt would be reduced to 5 or 10 percent, which keeps the sand from freezing; the State will haul snow twice at their cost, with the City being responsible for any additional hauling; the City will sweep the streets and clean the storm inlets because of the additional sand accumula- tion; and the City will locate a site for dumping snow. City Manager Wysocki then distributed to the Commission a listing of the cost figures for winter maintenance for the fiscal years 1984 through 1988 on Bozeman's streets, as prepared by the State Highway Department. He noted he feels it is important for the City to establish its own cost figures before entering into a maintenance agreement. City Manager Wysocki stated one alternative to using salt in the sand to keep it from I freezing would be to develop a storage area where the sand could be kept warm. He noted that the Highway Department hauls snow an average of twice a year; and they would be willing to continue that practice through the trial period with the City making any additional pick-ups they determine necessary. He reminded the Commission that use of additional sand in place of salt will result in larger accumulations of sand; and the streets will need to be swept more and the storm inlets cleaned more to alleviate problems. The City Manager noted that the City would be able to determine how much additional sand must be used and how much snow hauling would be required under this method of reducing the use of salt. 06-06-88 241 Commissioner Martel noted that seasonal maintenance includes pavement repair, indicating he does not feel that is beneficial during the winter. He also noted the City has a contract for maintenance of traffic control devices at the present time. Director of Public Service Holmes stated the practice is to fill potholes in the winter, even though it is recognized as a temporary measure. The Director of Public Service then con- curred that the City has a contract for all traffic signals; however, a seasonal maintenance I contract would include sign repair and replacement along all State highway streets. Commissioner Vant Hull noted that the City's maintenance costs would be much higher than those shown on the sheet prepared by the State Highway Department, indicating that she feels those figures are unrealistic. The Commissioner then indicated that other communities have higher figures in their maintenance contracts with the State. The City Manager concurred. He noted, however, that under a maintenance contract, the State would pay at the level which they have determined it costs them; and the City would then be responsible for all additional costs. Commissioner Martel noted that other communities have year-round maintenance contracts with the State; and the one under consideration at this time is a seasonal only contract. Director of Public Service Holmes stated that, due to the location of the State Highway Department building, those going out to maintain roads often drop sand and salt along the street as they leave town. He noted those costs are probably not attributed to the urban street sys- tem, but rather to the main highway to which they are traveling. Mayor Stiff asked about the liability that the City would incur in taking over the main- tenance of the State Highway streets. City Manager Wysocki indicated that the City would assume liability, due to maintenance, on those additional streets. Commissioner Hawks noted that in the Director of Public Service's report from 1985, he indicated that the City uses an average of 15 percent salt; the State uses 33 percent; and MSU uses 13 percent. He stated that someone in the salt industry conservatively estimated the cost I of salt at $310 per ton when all costs incurred are combined. He then asked if salt and sand would be applied separately or if they can be mixed and spread at the same time. He also sug- gested that windrowing the snow could eliminate some of the need for using salt and sand. The Director of Public Service stated that the City has different types of spreaders; and they all should be able to accommodate a salt and sand mixture. The City Manager indicated that during a one-year trial period, he would not anticipate any additional capital expenditure. He noted that if additional equipment or manpower were needed for hauling snow, he would suggest those services be contracted. Director of Public Service stated that sometimes a snow storm hits with a certain moisture content or at a temperature that causes the snow to stick to the pavement; and a motor patrol cannot remove it. He noted in those situations or when there is hardpack, salt is needed to remove it. Commissioner Martel suggested that the plowing be done immediately after the snowfall or during the snowfall if it is a substantial amount. He noted that hauling is not so critical and could be done later. City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that the City must continue its mainten- ance of all the regular City streets in addition to the State Highway streets. He noted the snow routes must be maintained on a regular basis. Commissioner Hawks noted that Missoula uses no salt; and they have found that a larger aggregate is effective. He then asked if that might be an option here. Director of Public Service Holmes stated that the EPA has approached the Highway De- I partment about using sand in some communities in the State. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the Highway Department is preparing its budget for the upcoming year. He then suggested that the City enter into a one-year trial per- iod. He noted this would give the City a chance to evaluate the program and determine if it wishes to continue that maintenance. The Di rector of Public Service indicated that under the proposed trial period, the State would continue its normal operations, except for the reduction in use of salt. He noted that any additional maintenance would be the City's responsibility. He further indicated that the State would not pay the City; and the City would not pay the State during the trial period. He in- 06-06-88 242 dicated that if the lowered salt concentration does not seem to be working, the State would pro- bably return to its normal procedure. Mayor Stiff expressed concern that the State maintains control while the City assumes ad- ditional liability. He also noted the City will incur additional costs as a result of this program. City Manager Wysocki asked the Commissioners if they had realized and recognized that this program would cost the City additional monies. Commissioner Vant Hull stated she has recognized that the removal of salt would result in I additional costs. She noted that is why she has disagreed with the removal of salt from the snow removal program until such time as a 2-cent gas tax is passed to offset those additional costs. She indicated other projects could also be funded through a portion of the revenues from the 2-cent gas tax. Commissioner Hawks noted that under the proposed trial period, presumably more sand and less salt will be used; however, there is no way to monitor the process. He indicated he is not certain the process is in the City's best interests. The City Manager stated that local control wi II result in costing the local people additional money. He noted the trial period will provide an opportunity to determine those additional costs. Commissioner Hawks stated he feels that the costs for the additional snow removals should be shared by the City and the State, rather than the City assuming all of the costs. He then asked if the staff is in a position to negotiate what the State has submitted. City Manager Wysocki stated that the staff asked what type of arrangement could be made for maintenance of the State Highway streets; and this is the result. He noted several different options were submitted; and the staff feels that the one-year trial period is the best option. Mayor Stiff suggested that the Commission continue this discussion after the public hear- ings have been completed. Recess - 5:15 p.m. Mayor Stiff recessed the meeting at 5:15 p.m., to reconvene at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose I of conducting the scheduled public hearings and completing the routine business items. Reconvene - 7:00 p.m. Mayor Stiff reconvened the meeting at 7: 00 p. m. for the purpose of conducting the scheduled public hearings and completing the routine business items. Public hearing - Commission Resolution No. 2695 - intent to annex Tracts 23 and 24 of the Gordon Mandeville State School Section Subdivision (north of Griffin Drive and west of the Burlington Northern Railroad) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on Commission Resolution No. 2695, as prepared by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2695 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN AND HEREIN MORE PARTICU- LARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. Mayor Stiff opened the public hearing. Planner Ron Brey presented the Staff Report. He reminded the Commission that the sub- ject property is described as Tracts 23 and 24 of the Gordon Mandeville State School Section Subdivision. The 3. 2-acre parcel is located north of Griffin Drive, south of the Meadow Lane I right-of-way, west of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and east of the lots front- ing on Lea Avenue. Planner Brey reminded the Commission that on April 4, 1988, they approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow Pacific Hide and Fur to relocate their business from East Main Street to the subject parcel, which is located at 315 West Griffin Drive. He stated one of the conditions for approval was that the applicant must seek annexation of the property, since a stated objective in the Master Plan is that all heavy industrial uses be placed on central water and sewer facilities. 06-06-88 ----------------- 243 He noted that on May 9, the Commission adopted Commission Resolution No. 2695, stating the City's intent to annex the subject parcel, and set the public hearing for this date. The Planner briefly reviewed the Staff Report, which was submitted to the Commission on May 9. He noted the parcel is zoned M-2- T, Manufacturing and Industrial with a Transitional Overlay. He briefly highlighted the staff findings in review of the City's eight goals and eleven policies for annexation. He indicated the parcel is under the five-acre minimum contained in the I goals; however, it does not create any islands or uneven projections. He then stated the only goal this proposed annexation does not meet pertains to access. He indicated that access is from Griffin Drive, which is a County road; however, it is a hard surfaced roadway. Mr. Bob Koelzer, Manager of Pacific Hide and Fur, indicated he would respond to any questions; but none were asked. No one was present to speak in opposition to the proposed annexation. Mayor Stiff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the cus- tomary one-week waiting period be waived. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. It was' moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Com- mission authorize and direct the staff to prepare the annexation agreement and accompanying documents. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Com- missioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Public hearing - Conditional Use Permit - Mark MacLeod for Anna Mae Anderson - allow an owner or caretaker residence on COs No. 178-B, located in the SEi-, sW.L Section 11, T2S, R5E, MPM (2621 West College Street) This was the time and place set for the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit re- quested by Mark Macleod for Anna Mae Anderson to allow an owner or caretaker residence on I Certificate of Survey No. 178-B, located in the southeast one-quarter of the southwest one- quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal Meridian. The sub- ject parcel is more commonly located at 2621 West College Street. Mayor Stiff opened the public hearing. Planner Tom Sheely presented the Staff Report. He stated the requested Conditional Use Permit would allow an owner's residence to be located in a B-2, Community Highway Business, District. He indicated the applicant is currently using the existing house at 2621 West College Street for his residence as well as his commercial photographic studio. The Planner briefly summarized the criteria for review of conditional uses. He noted that the overhead power lines were too low; and Montana Power has relocated them. He then stated that the Zone Code re- quires two off-street parking spaces. He indicated the applicant has leased two parking spaces from the First Citizens' Bank, which meets that requirement. He noted that an appropriate sign is to be placed on the subject property, indicating where parking is available. The Planner stated that since the applicant has already established his residence and business at the subject location, the staff has recommended that the final site plan be required within 45 days rather than the customary six months. He then reviewed the remaining condi- tions for approval, as recommended by the Planing Staff and Zoning Commission. Mr. Mark MacLeod t applicant, indicated that he has completed a majority of the conditions recommended by the Planning Staff and Zoning Commission. He noted that the final site plan is currently being prepared; the handicapped accessible ramp has been installed; the sign de- I signating the parking area and the one-way driveway sign have been completed and installed in the proper locations; the gravel driveway access has been barricaded and sodded; and he has removed the bush that was located in the sight triangle. He then indicated that the waiver of protest for the creation of special improvement districts must be executed by the property owner. Commissioner Martel asked why this application is coming before the Commission after the residence and business have already been established. Mr. Macleod stated he was not aware of the process to be followed until Building Official Glen Edsall contacted him. 06-06-88 244 Commissioner Hawks noted that he saw cars parked in the one-way driveway when he visited the site. Mr. MacLeod stated that often customers who are simply dropping off film or picking up pictures wi II park in the driveway. He noted that since they are served in the order in which they arrive, it causes no problems for leaving. He indicated that when a customer is to be in the business for an extended period of time, he advises them to park in the bank parking lot. Mayor Stiff asked if the living quarters are separate and distinct from the business area. I Mr. MacLeod stated that the business and living area are separate; however, there is no door between the two areas. Mr. Bob Abbott noted the subject property is currently under negotiation for sale. He then asked about the status of the waiver of protest for the creation of special improvement districts if the property is sold. City Manager Wysocki indicated that the present property owner must execute the waiver; and the waiver then remains with the property and transfers with ownerships. City Manager Wysocki recommended that the word "property" be inserted in front of "owner" on Condition No.7; and the Commission concurred. He further recommended that the applicant be required to provide proof of the lease agreement for parking spaces to substantiate compliance with Condition No.3. Mr. MacLeod submitted a copy of that lease agreement to the Planning Staff. Mayor Stiff closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung, that the cus- tomary one-week waiting period be waived. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the Con- ditional Use Permit requested by Mark MacLeod for Anna Mae Anderson to allow an owner or caretaker residence on Certificate of Survey No. 178-8, located in the southeast one-quarter of the southwest one-quarter of Section 11, Township 2 South, Range 5 East, Montana Principal I Meridian be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final site plan must delineate which part of the subject building will be used for commercial purposes, and which part will be used for the resi- dence. I t must also show the location, size, design, wording and materials used for all required signs on the property; 2. A handicapped accessible ramp shall be installed at the northeast entrance to the principal structure on the property; 3. A sign stating "Parking for Highlander Photographic available at First Citizens' Bank" shall be located 30 feet south of the location shown on the preliminary site plan. This sign shall be a minimum of 18 inches by 24 inches in size, made of durable, weather-proof materials (wood, metal, etc.), attached to a post, and with lettering readable at a distance of at least 25 feet. Also, a copy of the lease for that parking must be submitted to the Planning Director; 4. A sign stating "One Way, Do Not Enter" must be posted at the property line where the paved drive exits onto West College Street. This sign must meet the same specifications as outlined in Condition No.3; 5. The gravel drive access to West College Street on the property shall be eliminated and a physical barrier placed across it at the south property line; 6. The obstructions (vegetative growth) within the sight triangle at the College Street exit must be removed at least 15 feet to the east of the driveway and approved by the City Engineer; 7. A waiver of the right to protest the creation of SID's for improvements to West College Street must be obtained from the property owner; I 8. Three copies of the final site plan containing all the conditions, corrections and modifications approved by the City Commission shall be submitted for review and approved by the Planning Director within forty-five (45) days of the date of the City Commission approval. A final site plan must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit or business license for the project. One signed copy shall be retained by the Building Depart- ment, one signed copy shall be retained by the Planning Director and one signed copy shall be retained by the applicant; 9. If improvements are not installed prior to final site plan approval, the 06-06-88 ---------..----- - 245 applicant shall enter into an improvements agreement with the City. Detail- ed cost estimates, construction plans and methods of security shall be a part of that agreement; 10. Since occupancy of the structure and commencement of the use has already occurred, the improvements agreement must be secured by a method of secu- rity equal to one and one-half times the amount of the cost of the scheduled improvements; and I 11. All on-site improvements shall be completed within six (6) months of the final site plan approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period of only six (6) months following approval of the final site plan. Prior to the permanent renewal of the permit at the end of that period, the applicant must satisfy all the conditions in the granting of the permit. An on-site inspection will be made and a report made to the City Commission for their action. I f all required conditions have been satisfied, the permit will be permanently renewed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Continued public hearing - Conditional Use Permit - Michael H. Houlton for the Eckardt Family Trust - allow applicant to establish owner's residence in building proposed for commercial use - Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Rouse's First Addition (615 East Mendenhall) This was the time and place set for the continued public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit requested by Michael H. Houlton for the Eckardt Family Trust to allow the applicant to establish an owner's residence in a building proposed for commercial use on Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Rouse's First Addition to the City of Bozeman. The subject site is more commonly referred to as 615 East Mendenhall Street. Mayor Stiff opened the continued public hearing. Planner Ron Brey stated that neither the applicant nor his representative is present at this meeting. Commissioner Martel indicated he has several questions for the applicant and requested I that the public hearing be continued until such time as the applicant is present. Mayor Stiff continued the public hearing to July 5, 1988, which is the next regular date for public hearings. Discussion (continued) - maintenance contract for all State Highway streets Commissioner Hawks expressed concern about the one-sided risk involved in this pro- posal. Commissioner Vant Hull stated if the staff can negotiate so that the City incurs no additional expense, she wi II support the trial period. She noted that the figures which have been submitted by the State Highway Department don't seem accurate. Commissioner Martel indicated he is also concerned about the figures submitted. He then stated that, based on the figures submitted, he does not support proceeding with the option. Commissioner Goehrung reminded the Commissioners that this proposal addresses one of the top priority goals which the Commission established for the upcoming fiscal year. He then noted if the Commission wishes to accomplish specific items, they must be willing to fund those items. Mayor Stiff indicated he feels that to assume maintenance of State Highway streets results in additional liability. He noted the City has no way to determine what the costs might be, suggesting they may fall anywhere between $10,000 and $50,000. He also noted that sizeable capital expenditures must also be made if the City is to continue maintenance of those additional streets. I Commissioner Martel indicated he would like to see the contracts and dollar amounts for Great Falls, Butte, Billings and Missoula. He acknowledged that those are year round contracts; however, a comparison between lane miles and dollars could be made, and more reasonable fig- ures for Bozeman could then be determined. The Commissioner then stated that he feels the ad- ditional costs incurred by the City to remove salt from the streets would be worth it because of the decreased amounts of car body rust and deterioration to cement curbs, gutters and side- walks. He indicated support for a one-year trial period, noting that could provide some cost figures for the City to work with. 06-06-88 246 Commissioner Hawks indicated he would support an on-going study this year, with pos- sibly becoming involved in a one-year trial period next year. Commissioner Martel noted if the City wants better snow removal from Main Street, it must be will ing to pay those additiona I costs. Commissioner Hawks suggested that the Commission direct the staff to negotiate with the State Highway Department to have Guideline No.2, indicating that the State will haul snow twice at their expense with additional haulings to be completed and financed by the City, removed for I the one-year trial period. Mayor Stiff asked if the costs would be reduced enough with the elimination of the second guideline so that the City could accommodate those costs for the one-year trial period. Commissioner Vant Hull stated she will not support any proposal that will cost City resi- dents more money. Commissioner Martel stated he feels it is necessary to have figures from the other major cities before any decision is made. Mayor Stiff indicated he would prefer to wait a year, with monies to be budgeted speci- fically for this purpose. He then questioned where the City would get approximately $50,000 to fund this additional expenditure. Commissioner Hawks indicated he has several questions about the elimination of salt; and he feels the one-year trial period would help to answer those questions. It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commis- sion authorize and direct the staff to negotiate with the State Highway Department for a one- year trial period, including Guideline Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 as submitted in the State's proposal, with possible revisions to No. 1 if deemed appropriate, with a report to be submitted back to the Commission as soon as possible. The motion failed by the following Aye and No vote: those vot- ing Aye being Commissioner Hawks and Commissioner Martel; those voting No being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Com- mission authorize and direct the staff to obtain copies of the maintenance agreements from the I four major communities who have contracted with the State, along with an indication of the mon- ies they received through that contract, and further direct the staff to request a clarification from the State Highway Department on how the numbers they have submitted are assembled. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Request for permission to conduct Sweet Pea Bicycle Races - Saturday, August 6, 1988, 12: 30 to 4:30 p.m. - North Bozeman Avenue, East Short Street, North Black Avenue and East Beall Street City Manager Wysocki stated that Commissioner Martel had requested this item be removed from the Consent Items. Commissioner Martel reminded the Commission of the conditions imposed on approval of a street closure for the First Lutheran Church two weeks ago. He then noted this closure is for a longer period of time; however, it has received a recommendation for approval from the staff. The Commissioner stated that he feels all requests of this nature should be treated in the same manner. Mayor Stiff stated that the Sweet Pea activities are community-wide events; and they attract people from out of state as well as from all over within the State. City Manager Wysocki stated that the requirements for street closure are standard for all appl icants. He then recommended approval of this request. I It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung, that the Com- mission approve the request for permission to conduct the Sweet Pea Bicycle Races on Saturday, August 6, 1988 from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., authorizing the closure of North Bozeman Avenue, East Short Street, North Black Avenue and East Beall Street during those hours. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Com- missioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. 06-06-88 247 Authorize City Manager to sign - Change Order No. 2 for SID No. 652 - add $1,302.82 and 1 calendar day - Pioneer Ready Mix City Manager Wysocki stated that Commissioner Martel had requested this item be removed from the Consent Items. He noted that this Change Order accommodates the change in materials needed because the water main in the ground is a 14-inch line rather than the 12-inch line shown on maps. I Commissioner Martel stated he has asked Director of Public Service Holmes why the maps show a 12-inch water main while the line is actually a 14-inch line. He stated he feels that adequate research should be done to avoid such problems in the bid specifications. The Com- missioner then indicated that he has checked prices on the materials needed and found the amounts listed in the Change Order to be fair. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the Commission authorize the City Manager to sign Change Order No. 2 for Special Improvement Dis- trict No. 652, adding $1,302.82 and 1 calendar day to the contract. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote; those voting Aye being Commissioner Goehrung. Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Discussion - FY I Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. ( 1 ) The snowpack and precipitation report for Apri I 1988, as prepared by the Soi f Conservation Service. He stated the report indicates that the best runoff is anticipated in the streams around Bozeman. (2) The City Manager indicated that effluent from the water filtration plant was 6.5 million gallons on Saturday and 6.8 million gallons on Sunday, noting those were both hot days. He then stated that 24-hour plant operation will begin tomorrow. (3) A letter from Mr. D. Llewellyn Drong, 802 North 17th Avenue #33, requesting the I installation of sidewalks and bike paths along North 17th Avenue and Durston Road. Commissioner Hawks noted that the City has addressed the "squeakie wheel" in determin- ing areas for sidewalk construction in the past. He then suggested that, since a priority list has not yet been prepared, this project should possibly be moved into next year's program, or this year's if possible. City Attorney Becker indicated that is not a legal question; but suggested that the City Engineer be contacted. (4) Agenda for the Board of Adjustment meeting held this afternoon. (5) Mayor Stiff asked if the City still marks sidewal ks for replacement. The City Manager indicated he is not certain but will check on it. (6) Agenda and packet for the Planning Board meeting to be held on Thursday even- ing. (7) An invitation from the Bozeman Area Chamber of Commerce to the grand opening of the 1988 season for the North 7th Avenue Visitor Center, to be held at 2: 00 p.m. on Friday, June 10. (8) The City Manager stated he has just received a note indicating that the $10,000 BOR grant for improvement of Jarrett Park has been funded. He reminded the Commission that this Bureau of Outdoor Recreation grant is a matching grant that was approved in November 1986, depending on availability of funds. (9) The City Manager noted that a copy of the newspaper insert for the recreation programs was placed in the Commissioners' boxes. He indicated the insert was compiled by the I Bozeman Daily Chronicle and the Recreation office staff at no expense to the City. He noted this is the first year that the insert has not resulted in a substantial expense to the City. (10) Mayor Stiff noted that the East Gallatin Park opening was held on Thursday. He indicated that Commissioner Vant Hull spoke on his behalf since the project has not yet been completed. The Mayor then stated the newspaper indicated there was a lack of volunteer help in this effort. Commissioner Vant Hull indicated that during the opening ceremonies, no reference was made to lack of community participation. 06-06-88 248 ( 11 ) Commissioner Vant Hull indicated she has received several telephone calls con- cerning the City's process for requesting proposals for various services. She then asked if any of the other Commissioners have received similar calls. Mayor Stiff indicated that he has received several calls over a period of time; and he has reviewed the process with the City staff. Commissioner Vant Hull then suggested that the Commission ask the staff to review the process at next week's meeting. I Commissioner Hawks stated he has heard concern that those submitting proposals receive no formal feedback on how they ranked in the process. City Manager Wysocki indicated that HB310 specifically lists the process to be followed. City Attorney Becker stated he will submit copies of the section of the State statute in which HB310 is codified to the Commissioners for their review. He noted the criteria for review of proposals are set forth in addition to the process. The Commissioners requested that this item be placed on next week's agenda for discus- sion. (12) Commissioner Goehrung indicated that he hosted Mr. Walter Coto, a gentleman from Costa Rica under the Montana Council for International Visitors' Program, last week. He stated Mr. Coto is from a community about the size of Bozeman with an agricultural university; and he has expressed an interest in becoming a sister city to Bozeman. (13) Commissioner Hawks noted that twelve visitors have been in Bozeman the past month under the Montana Council for International Visitors' Program. He stated that his recent hosting of a Hungarian visitor was very rewarding. Consent I terns City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following Consent Items: Re uest for ermission to conduct Sweet Pea Parade - saturda , Au ust 6, 1988, 10:00 a.m. - Main Street from North 15th venue to Church Avenue Building Inspection Division report for May 1988 I It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Con- sent Items be approved as listed above, and the appropriate persons be authorized and directed to complete the necessa ry actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks t Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commis- sioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Adjournment - 9:05 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. ALFRED M. STIFF, Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN L. SULLIVAN I Clerk of the Commission 06-06-88