Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-01-23 96 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COMMISSION BOZEMAN, MONTANA January 23, 1989 ************************ The Commission of the City of Bozeman met in regular session in the Commission Room, Municipal Building, January 23, 1989, at 1 : 00 p.rn . Present were Mayor Stiff, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull , Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, City Manager I Wysocki and Clerk of the Commission Sullivan. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence. None of the Commissioners requested that any of the Consent Items be removed for dis- cussion. Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the min- utes of the regular meetings of January 3, January 9, and January 16, 1989 be approved as amend- ed. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commis- sioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Award bid - fire pumper truck (special voted mill levy) City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission a memo from Fire Chief Allen Shearman recommending that the bid be awarded to D and R Fire Equipment Company, Billings, Montana, in the bid amount of $138,379.00, since it meets the City's requirements. He further noted the City may wish to accept the deduction of $3,454.00 which is available if the chassis is paid upon completion. The City Manager reminded the Commission that the voters approved a special voted mill levy for $140,000 and concurred in the Fire Chief's recommendation. Mayor Stiff noted that a second deduct was avai lable in this bid. The City Manager concurred, noting that deduct is in the amount of $1,364.00 and is avail- I able if the City pays for the unit at the time it is picked up at Pierce. He noted the City may also decide it wishes to take advantage of that deduct as that time approaches. Commissioner Martel asked if the option to accept those deducts must be made at this time. City Manager Wysocki stated that the decision on accepting the optional deducts need not be made at this time, but may be made closer to the time those deducts must be exercised. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the bid for the fire pumper truck be awarded to D and R Fire Equipment Company, Billings, Montana, in the bid amount of $138,379.00, it being the lowest and best bid received. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Staff Report - request for annexation submitted by Donald K. Weaver, Jr., - Tract 3-A, COS No. 406-D (10.376 acres located east of Westridge Subdivision and south of Westridge Meadows PUD) City Manager Wysocki stated that a copy of the staff report was contained in the Commis- sioners' packets. Planner Ron Brey presented the staff report. He stated that the 10. 376-acre parcel is located east of Westridge Subdivision, west of the Valley View Golf Course, south of the existing Westridge Meadows PUD and north of Spring Meadows Subdivision. Most of the subject site is proposed to be developed as the final phase of the Westridge Meadows Planned Unit Development. I He noted that the original application was for annexation of 8.069 acres of this parcel; however, the staff requested that the remainder, which is used for pasture, be included and the applicant has agreed. Planner Brey noted that the Commission raised several concerns when this application was originally received in July 1988. He stated the staff addressed those concerns, which included the Sourdough Trail through the existing Westridge Meadows PUD and the wholly surrounded rear portions of lots in Westridge Subdivision. He noted that after review of the staff's findings on those concerns, the Commission directed the staff to proceed with the staff report for this annex- ation in November 1988. 01-23-89 97 Planner Ron Brey then reviewed the staff report as submitted. He noted that the appli- cation was reviewed in accordance with the old annexation policy, since the new Resolution was adopted after this application was submitted. He stated that after review of the proposed annex~ ation, it was determined that the back yards of those lots in Westridge Subdivision were already wholly surrounded by a narrow bridge of land adjacent to the subject property. He noted, how- ever, that annexation of this parcel will create a wholly surrounded rear yard extension measur- I ing 65 feet by 109 feet. He noted that the Commission may request this property owner to partic- ipate in this annexation, or this annexation process may continue as it is, recognizing that a wholly surrounded pa rc e I will be created. He indicated that staff has drafted a letter to the property owner, if the Commission wishes to proceed in that manner. He noted, however, that if the Commission wishes to include the parcel, the proposed resolution of intent to annex must be amended to include that legal description as well. Planner Brey stated that the applicant proposes to extend Fairway Drive through this par- cel, ending in a cul-de-sac. He stated that emergency accesses will be provided to the south, to the cul-de-sac street in Spring Meadows Subdivision, as well as to the west through Westridge Subdivision to Spring Creek Drive. He reminded the Commission that this traffic circulation pat- tern has been reviewed and approved many times during consideration of the various develop- ments in this area. The Planner stated that the subject site is zoned R-1; and single-family development has been contemplated since the initial phases of the Westridge Meadows PUD were undertaken. He then indicated that the calculation of the payment-in-lieu of water rights will be made on that basis. He noted that the area to remain in pasture land will be subtracted before the calcu- lations are made, as well as recognizing that all irrigation water is taken from another source. He indicated it is contemplated that 28 single-family residences will be constructed, with the project being 90 percent complete in six to eight years. Planner Brey stated that 8-inch water and sewer lines have been extended through the subject property, so those services are already available. I The Planner then stated that the Director of Public Service has requested that a more de- tailed annexation map be submitted prior to annexation of the parcel. Commissioner Hawks asked if the Sourdough Trail will be delineated on the detailed annex- ation map. Planner Brey indicated it could be. He noted that such issues are usually addressed dur- ing subdivision review; however, in this instance, it may be appropriate to include it on the annexation map so it can be carried forward through the various processes for development. He then indicated that the subdivision process for this parcel will require the public hearing pro- cess; however, an in-house review is also possible. Commissioner Martel noted there has been a fair amount of trouble with the location of the Sourdough Trail from Kagy Boulevard through the existing phases of Fairway Drive because of landscaping and driveways; and defining the exact location of the trail is very difficult. The Planner stated that the easement for the trail, which is located along the east side of Fairway Drive, possibly wasn't as carefully protected by City staff during development as it cou Id have been. He then noted that usage of that trai I now is on Fairway Drive, although that is not where the easement is located. City Manager Wysocki noted that, although use of the trail is on Fairway Drive, the ease- ment cannot be legally described as such because of the conflict between pedestrians and ve- hicles on that paved roadway. He further reminded the Commission that the existing develop- ment is currently operated by the Westridge Meadows Owners' Association, not Mr. Weaver; and, therefore, cannot be addressed under this item. I Planner Brey concurred in the City Manager's comment. He noted that Sourdough Trail, as it traverses the parcel under consideration, may be addressed; but not from the edge of the property north to Kagy Boulevard. Commissioner Goehrung asked about the impact the private street may have on the City, since it is an extension of an existing street. Planner Brey stated that there is no traffic circulation system which uses this street. He then noted that with the two emergency accesses, there is an adequate roadway system for the proposed development of the site. 01-23-89 98 Commissioner Vant Hull asked if it would be possible to install signs designating the Sourdough Trail, since it does not follow the easement along Fairway Drive. She noted that some people may not know where the trai I runs; and this would assure them they are in the proper place. Mr. Don Weaver, applicant, stated he has considered development of a 50-foot wide park away from Fairway Drive in which Sourdough Trail would run. He noted that since the West- ridge Meadows Owners' Association (WMOA) now controls that area which is now developed, he I cannot make any decisions which might affect that portion of the trail. He then stated that when the first phases of that development were initially constructed, property along the east side of the roadway was owned by the Valley View Golf Course, with their driving range located in that area. He noted that property was then sold to Clair Daines, who developed the site as an extension of the Westridge Meadows PUD. He stated that the development a long that side of the street did cause encroachments in the easement for the trail. He then noted that people have indicated a preference to walk on the pavement rather than in the easement since develop- ment of that project. Mr. Weaver then stated that he is willing to carry any suggestions from the City con- cerning the Sourdough Trai I to the Board of Directors of the WMOA since he is a member of that board. Commissioner Hawks stated the City has a public easement and a responsibility to ensure the safety of those who walk on it. He then suggested that an exchange of the existing ease- ment for one which runs along the fence at the eastern edge of the property could be a way to resolve the existing conflicts, particularly with the likelihood of additional traffic on the roadway because of expansion of the development. He noted that under the present situation, cross- country ski ing along the trail becomes impossible through the development. I n response to a question from City Manager Wysocki, Mr. Weaver stated at the present time there are 33 dwelling units in the Westridge Meadow PUD; and he proposes to develop an additional 28 units on the subject parcel. City Manager Wysocki stated that if people wish to walk on a private road, that is their I business. He noted, however, that the City cannot tell them that is where the trai I is located. He then cautioned the Commissioners that the Sourdough Trai I is not the subject before them at this time. Commissioner Vant Hull stated she feels that a letter should be sent to the property owner of the parcel which will be wholly surrounded to see if she wishes to participate in this annexation. She then asked how long the response time would be. Planner Ron Brey indicated that, just as with the recent annexation requested by the Fish, Wildlife and Parks, the Commission would be required to adopt a resolution addressing the two parcels. He noted that starts the time running for the public hearing. He then indicated that if a positive response is received, the process could continue; however, if no response has been received by the time of the public hearing, that parcel could be dropped. He stated that if that small parcel is not included in this annexation, it can be treated as a wholly surrounded parcel some time after this annexation is completed. Commissioner Vant Hull stated an interest in considering annexation of all wholly sur- rounded parcels within the city limits. Planning Director Andy Epple reminded the Commission that the Legislature is considering legislation which would change statutes pertaining to annexations. He suggested that the Com- mission wait to see what those changes are before considering possible annexation of wholly sur- rounded lands. City Manager Wysocki presented Commission Resolution No. 2735, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: I COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2735 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, DECLARING IT TO BE THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, THE INHABITANTS THEREOF AND THE INHABITANTS OF A TRACT OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN AND HEREIN MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED, TO EXTEND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY OF BOZEMAN SO AS TO INCLUDE SAID CONTIGUOUS TRACT WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS THEREOF. 01-23-89 99 The City Manager recommended that the Commission acknowledge receipt of the annexation report, and adopt Commission Resolution No. 2735 and set the public hearing for February 21, 1989. It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung, that the Commission acknowledge receipt of the staff report, and adopt Commission Resolution No. 2735, stating the City's intent to annex Parcel 3-A of Certificate of Survey No. 406-D, and set the I public hearing for February 21, 1 989. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that the Commission authorize and direct the Planning staff to send a letter to the one property owner whose property will become wholly surrounded with this annexation, as well as consider sending letters to those in Westridge Subdivision whose rear yards are outside city limits. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No being Commissioner Martel. Ordinance No. 1275 - Zone Map Change - from R-2-A to R-2 on Blocks 20, 21, 29 and 30, Valley Unit Subdivision No. 1 City Manager Wysocki presented Ordinance No. 1275, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 1275 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM AN lIR-2-AlI (RES I DENT IAL--S I NGLE-FAMI L Y, MED I UM-DENS I TY) DISTRICT ON BLOCKS 20, 21 , 29 and 30, VALLEY UNIT SUBDIVISION NO. 1 , LOCATED IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 5 EAST, MONTANA PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. The City Manager reminded the Commission that adoption of this ordinance is the final I step in the zone map change process. He noted that the public hearing on this item was held on January 3, 1989, and was approved at that time. He then recommended that the Commission pro- visionally adopt the ordinance at this time and that it be brought back in two weeks for final adoption. It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that the Com- mission provisionally adopt Ordinance No. 1275, amending the zoning designation from R-2-A to R-2 on Blocks 20, 21, 29 and 30 of Valley Unit Subdivision No. 1, and that it be brought back in two weeks for final adoption. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Comm i s- sioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Commission Resolution income from 1984 Communit Development Block Grant rogram City Manager Wysocki presented Commission Resolution No. 2736, as approved by the City Attorney, entitled: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2736 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA, BUDGETING THE USE OF PROGRAM INCOME FROM THE 1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. The City Manager noted that included in the packets was a memo from the Planning staff concerning this agenda item as well as the following item. I Planner Debbie Arkell briefly reviewed the resolution before the Commission. She also presented to the Commission a map outlining the existing target area as well as the area which is proposed to be included in the target area. Commissioner Hawks asked how CDBG monies have been used outside the target area. Planner Arkell stated that the City has been able to use monies outside the target area through approval from the State of Montana Department of Commerce, which administers this pro- gram. She noted that most of the residences where monies have been used house very low in- come people or a single head of household. She stated those applications are considered on a 01-23-89 100 case-by-case basis by the State. She indicated it is a very lengthy process; and a substantial amount of additional information is required. Commissioner Martel expressed concern about using CDBG monies to improve residences which are non-conforming uses through the Zone Code. He then questioned inclusion of any B-3 or M-1 zoned properties within the target area. Planner Arkell stated that apartments are allowed in the B-3 district; and there are sev- eral in the proposed target area which could qualify for this program. I Commissioner Vant Hull asked if the Commission is to establ ish the target area or if a public hearing should be held in this item before a decision is made. Planner Debbie Arkell stated support for conducting a public hearing prior to establishing the target area. Commissioner Hawks suggested that the R-4 zone immediately west of the proposed target area might benefit from being included. City Manager Wysocki asked if any of the other Commissioners share Commissioner Martel's concern about using CDBG monies to upgrade non-conforming residential uses. A majority of the Commissioners indicated a desire to have that considered in establishing the boundaries. The City Manager then recommended that the Commission adopt Commission Resolution No. 2736, budgeting the program income from the 1984 CDBG Program to housing and neighborhood revitalization. It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Commission adopt Commission Resolution No. 2736, budgeting the program income from the 1984 CDBG Program. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Discussion - revising of target area for the Community Development Block Grant Program City Manager Wysocki noted that discussion of this item was conducted under the agenda item immediately above. He then recommended that the Commission set a public hearing on the I proposed target area for February 21, 1989. It was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung, that the Com- mission set a public hearing for February 21, 1989 on the proposed target area for the Commu- nity Development Block Grant Program. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Com- missioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Selection of auctioneer for Valley Unit lot sales City Manager Wysocki submitted to the Commission a memo recommending that Mandevi lie Auction Service be selected to conduct the first auction of Valley Unit lots, at the quoted fee of 9.5 percent. He noted that the City will do the advertising under Mandeville's supervision. The City Manager stated that he and Administrative Services Director Miral Gamradt had submitted a II Request for Proposals" and received on Iy two proposals. He stated that after care- ful review of the proposals and interviewing the two firms, they felt that Mandevi lie cou Id pro- vide a better service to the City. He indicated that experience in the area of real estate auc- tions over the past three years is crucial to make this sale successful; and Mandeville has con- ducted three such auctions in the past year or eighteen months. The City Manager then emphasized that the selection of Mandeville Auction Service is for this first auction only, with selection of an auctioneer to be made for each individual auction in preparation for that sale. He then stated that Mandeville has indicated a desire to work with City officials to develop a promotional scheme for this sale and to review various options to de- I termine which will be most cost beneficial. City Manager Wysocki stated that after discussing the upcoming auction with Mandeville, it has been determined that the date of the auction should be pushed back to late February. He noted that this will allow adequate time for advertising and preparation for the sale. He a I so noted that the original date selected was a Monday morning; and they have decided to set the date on a Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday so those interested in the outcome of the sa Ie may attend if they so choose. Commissioner Hawks noted there is no limit on the advertising costs under this proposal. 01-23-89 101 City Manager Wysocki stated that City staff will be working with the auctioneer on de- termining the advertising scheme. He noted that everyone involved will be cognizant of the costs and will work toward the most effective use of the advertising dollars. Commissioner Vant Hull asked if the 9.5 percent auctioneer fee is to be taken off the top or after expenses. City Manager Wysocki indicated that the auctioneer's fee is based on gross sales. He I noted that figure does not contain the amount of the deferred special assessment payments, but only the amount being paid initially for purchase of the lot. Mayor Stiff asked if a weighted rating scale was used in the selection process. The City Manager indicated it was, noting that one of the primary items was recent ex- perience in rea I estate auctions. Commiss"ioner Hawks asked if the type of lots to be included in the sale and the floor bids are to be set in the next few weeks. City Manager Wysocki indicated those issues will be addressed shortly. He noted that adoption of Ordinance No. 1275, which was considered earl ier in this meeting, may have some impact on the lots chosen. He also noted that the ordinance will become effective very shortly after the auction if it is held in late February rather than in early February as originally planned. Commissioner Hawks asked if there will be a limit on the number of lots which can be pur- chased by a single bidder. The City Manager stated that he does not feel that is necessary. He noted that each lot will be sold individually. He also reminded the Commission that the lots are spread throughout the subdivision, not in one small cluster. He then suggested that this issue could be discussed with the auctioneer to determine if it could possibly create a problem. It was moved by Commissioner Goehrung, seconded by Commissioner Hawks, that Mandeville Auction Service be selected as auctioneer for the upcoming sale of Valley Unit lots, at the quoted fee of 9.5 percent. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting I Aye being Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hul', Commissioner Martel and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Discussion of fifth Monday discussion topics Following a brief discussion, the Commissioners set the discussion topics for next week's meeting: fund reserve pol icies for the enterprise funds, review of the rate structures for the water, sewer and garbage activities, review of the proposed policy for selection of consultants through the "Request for Proposal" process, capital improvement program for Fiscal Year 1989, and outline of the various prongs of the goal setting process. Mayor Stiff expressed concern that Commissioner Martel wi II not be present for these dis- cussions; however, he noted that no actions will be taken at next week's meeting. Appointment of subcommittee to review Pledged Securities as of December 31, 1988 City Manager Wysocki reminded the Commission that the pledged securities must be review- ed quarterly in accordance with State Statute. It was moved by Commissioner Hawks, seconded by Commissioner Vant Hull, that Commis- sioner Goehrung and Commissioner Vant Hull be appointed to review the pledged securities as of December 31, 1988. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. I Discussion - FY I Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following "For Your Information" items. (1) A copy of a letter from Louis McCarl, as submitted by Commissioner Goehrung, con- cerning the City's policy on street plowing. (2) A memo from Mr. Dennis Seibel, Historic Preservation Officer, requesting that the Commission appoint a replacement for Ken Karsmizki, who is terminating his employment and leav- ing the community. The Commission directed the Clerk of the Commission to advertise for this vacancy. 01-23~89 102 (3) A copy of the Gaming News as submitted by Commissioner Vant Hull. She stated she felt this information was of interest to the Commissioners. She noted there is a push in this year1s legislative session to expand gambling activities in the State. (4) Agenda and packet for the Zoning Commission meeting to be held on Tuesday, Jan- uary 24. (5) The City Manager stated that at 9: 00 a. m. next Monday a hearing will be held on the City's request for additional loan monies for the Lyman Creek improvements. He indicated I that some of the staff members will be present at that hearing and suggested that a letter from the Mayor could be helpful in obtaining approval for those monies as well. He reminded the Com- mission that the Commission has previously received approval of a $726,000 loan at the rate of 3 percent below the rate at which bonds are sold for the first five years. He noted this additional $380,000 loan would be 2 percent below the rate at which the bonds are sold for the first five years; and he feels that obtaining such a loan could be beneficial for the City. (6) The City Manager stated he has distributed copies of a listing of legislators to the Commissioners for their use during this legislative session. (7) The City Manager noted that he and three of the Commissioners attended Local Government Day in Helena on Friday, January 20. Commissioner Vant Hull stated the Governor and many of the legislators have indicated they intend to abolish personal property tax or greatly reduce it. She noted the Governor has proposed a one-time replacement of those monies; however, local governments need an on-going replacement. Mayor Stiff stated he was impressed with the State people who attended the meeting. He expressed concern that partisan politics seems to be evident, detracting from solving the prob- lems at hand. He noted it is imperative to set the partisan elements aside while addressing the issues. Commissioner Martel stated he did not see any new feelings in the Legislature. He noted that the political battles are shaping up, as usual. City Manager Wysocki stated he testified on H B 125, which in essence loosens the pro- I visions of SB71 adopted in the last legislative session. He also indicated that he testified in opposition to SB139, which would extend the redemption period of delinquent special assessments back to 36 months on undeveloped land, reversing action taken in the last legislative session. He noted that the County Clerks and Recorders have stated opposition to the 18-month redemp- tion period since it spl its fiscal years; and he has indicated a wi lIingness to support a 12-month redemption period, as contained in the original version of the 1987 legislation. He also noted that a 24-month redemption period would be much preferable to the proposed 36-month period. The City Manager then noted that representatives from Bozeman met with representatives from the City of Missoula to discuss various issues; and he felt that the exchange of ideas was profitable. (8) Commissioner Vant Hull distributed to the Commission a listing of bills which have been introduced in the Legislature that may be of interest to those in local government. She stated she will continue to update that list if the Commissioners wish. City Manager Wysocki stated the City has enrolled in a service to get all of the bills presented to the Legislature as well as a daily status sheet on those bills. He encouraged any- one interested to review the bi lIs and status sheets on a regular basis. (9) Commissioner Vant Hull indicated that she will be attending a volunteers conference on Wednesday, January 25. Consent Items City Manager Wysocki presented to the Commission the following Consent Items. I Authorize City Manager to sign - contract documents for Lyman Creek improvements - Nelcon, Inc. - $633,379.90J Authorize absence of Commissioner Martel from the meeting of January 30, 1989 in compliance with Section 7-3-4322(2), MCA Approval of notice for public hearing for the proposed interim zoning ordinance; direct Clerk of the Commission to publish Claims It was moved by Commissioner Vant Hull, seconded by Commissioner Martel, that the Com- mission approve the consent items as listed above, and authorize and direct the appropriate persons to complete the necessa ry actions. The motion carried by the following Aye and No 01-23-89 103 vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Vant Hull, Commissioner Ma rtel , Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. Discussion re ad hoc committee recommendations re regulatory process with County Commission and Planning staff The Commission concurred that this discussion would be more appropriately held following I adjournment of the regular meeting. Adjournment - 2:55 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Commission at this time, it was moved by Commissioner Martel, seconded by Commissioner Goehrung, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion carried by the following Aye and No vote: those voting Aye being Commissioner Martel, Commissioner Goehrung, Commissioner Hawks, Commissioner Vant Hull and Mayor Stiff; those voting No, none. ALFRED M. STIFF, Mayor ATTEST: ROBIN L. SULLIVAN Clerk of the Commission I I 01-23-89